Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 460 - LDS Temple Variance~ tu, ~ ;~ PLANNING COMMISSION RISOI.~U"LION NO. 4G0 A RESOLUTION GRAN'T'ING A VARIANCI (1Applicatlt: LDS '['emplc) (372W10BB Tax Lot 300, LDS Temple} Recitals This matter cazxre before the Planning Commission for hearing on August 3, 1999, on applicant's application for a variance. Applicant requested a variance from the fence requirements in the side yard setback area, and in the height of the fence .The Planning Commission reviewed the application and the City staff reports, and received con~zz~zents from all persons wishing to be heard in favor of and opposed to the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Criteria Ap a~licahle to Decision. The following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Cade apply to this application: A. Chapter 1'7.20, R-1-10 Residential Single-Family, and 15.20 Fence Height on Lots and Fence Variances; B. Chapter 17.80, Variances. Section 2. Findings and Cpnclusions. The Planning Commission hereby adopts by reference alI finding of fact set forth in the City staff reports, and concludes that applicant has demonstrated compliance with the requirements of CPMC Chapter 17.80, pertaining to variances. Section 3. Variance Granted. Appliance is hereby granted approval for the requested variance consisting of constructing a 6 feet fence and 7 and a half feet high pilasters, and a variance from the side-yard setbacks for the R-1-10 zone. Based ora the findings of fact contained in the record and subject to the recommended conditions of approval. Passed by the Planning Comzxzission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 3rd day of August, 1999. ~~ - ~~ Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: approved by the this ~~~ c[ay of'_ ~~_`' ~~_µ_.__..._...._._.~ 1999. Pla~lning Con~~~~ission Clair Page 2 -Planning Commission Resol€ttion No. 460 {08031999) Planning C.ommissiozl Minutes August 3, 1999 Page 2 Lee 13renn~llr, Public. ~~,~`urks 17ir~•ci,~i~, ~;u~,~,~a~l~~~l tl~~~t in the seconel option the alley w«u1d also be desi~;i7<~tcd c~17e-tivt~y, `T'he Applicant, Steve 13~~o~vn, presented his findin;.~, anal ;t<<~~.~c~titic~n~ c> t1~~, council. Mr, ~Lirown stated that file c~nl~~ u;~ti«i~ tl~w~t would ~~urr:~ i~>;• tl.cn~ wouid i,c ~~2~ti~n two. Mr. Brown also stated that t1~e rctainin~~ wail az7d drai~la~~~~ rccjuirL~~ICnts lliai 11~e city wvu!d enforce are Tine with him, as well ati making th~~ al}cy one way. The Applicant, Barbara T3rown, stated sl,e dad not want to pay far the alley and new driveway aprons, Commissioner LeGros made a motion to pass Resolution numbe-• 4~-) conditionally approving the site plan property Located at 841. F~. Pine Street for a cli°ive up window. The subject is located in the C-4 Tourist and. ()ffiee 1'-•t-t`casTonal district. The approval is subject to the following x•ecommendatians to the City CoanciL TI~e gown's must come into :i-~ agreement with the City for the two feet of public ri<~ht of way that they need to complete the project. The City Council mus# also approve a change of traffic flow on tl~e alley IocatetT -~orth of the property to one way west bound traffic, as wail as come into an a~recmc~nt with the property owne~•4 for a Local Improvement District on the Alley. The Applicants would be respoe~siiale for improving the drainage on the property, with a three inch miniimur~~ pii~c sire for the run off, as well as a retaining wall, and improvctncitts on the sicleF~ ally, building permits for the structure, and paving the drive ula wirado~v. The propcx•ty owner would be responsible for improving the front drive ~ iy apron. Commissioner Foster seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: motion passed unanimously. 1,. '~ 1'l~blic Ileaz•in~~ for the eonsidel•~it~~r~ tt>I~<~ rep ~~c5t b~~ the I:1)S f'laurch to ~ar~_1i•om _ .._ _ the t~l~ec re~~ilitenic~~its oi~ the Cc~~Cr<~l 1't~int ~-1tu~ici~~~ii C'~ul~ ~n tn~d~3~ t~- insure atiec i~ t<ztc i>>Z bite seuurit~ and tiniii~i~m t~;n~~~l~ ir~liitc:cture. I )~t: su}.~~~ct I>>•~,~l~~it~_i5 lt,t•at~~l ~?31_tl~~_ _. _ southcaa ci~r»er ~~i~T~tvlor ~~nd CiraJit IZ~~a1c1~. Ken (~c:escl~ler, Community Planner} hL~~ enic~d the Planning Department StaffF~eport, 1"he LDS c}iurch wc-uld like a variance tf•o~n two city codes. The first is the Public Works req~aire~nciit of a vision site triangle, The second would be from. the setback requirements for the sire of the fencer from the City's maximum height of six feet t~> a height of seven feet. r. Cierschler also presented that the fence is part oftl°~e o~feral.l ~~rchitecture o:l`the temple anal would increase security on the property as well as 4~d~ ac~ll~ctics to the temple. D{ul 1'~irl~ rupresentcd the 1_,l~S Church and stated he was fc~r the project and it would add to the beauty of the site and.. would cut down on tl~e vandalism. Planning Commission Minutes August 3, 1999 Page 3 Commissioner Johnson made a motion to pass resolution number 4G0, approving the fence variance application for the LDS temple located at 3J00 Grant Road, based on the findings of fact contained in the record and subject to the recommended conditions of approval. Commissioner Lunte seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Motion passed unanimously. C. Consideration of ro osed than es to the Central Point Munici al Code Section 17.60.030 regarding; accessory buildings Mr. Humphrey presented the Planning Department recommendations. The changes are due to issues that have arisen in Central Point that either apply directly to the construction of accessory buildings or have been discussed in the context of garage dimensions or temporary structures for off street covered parking. The planning staff have attempted to address all of these issues through a single code section dealing with accessory structures. Commissioner Lunte made a motion to approve the proposed language, make changes as necessary and recommend revisions to the City Council. Commissioner Riggs seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Johnson, yes; LeGros, yes; Lunte, yes; Foster, yes; Riggs, yes. Commissioner Fish abstained. VII. MISCELLANEOUS Mr. Humphrey informed the Commission on the status of last meetings approval of the Kosmatka development and that it will be presented before the City Council on August S, 1999. Mr. Humphrey also informed the commission on the status of the Naumes Development and the Hat Bikes business located on Front Street. VIII. ADJOURNMENT