Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 466 - El Albinil Site Plan~ ~% ~C) Cclp PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 466 A RESOLUTION CONDITIONALLY APPROVING A SITE PLAN APPLICATION {Applicant (s): 'l,om and John Hamlin} {372 W I I BC Tax Lot 4700} Recitals I . This matter came before the Planning Commission for bearing on November 2,1999, on applicant's site plan application fora 840 sgzzaz-e foot addition in an C-5 Thoroughfare Comzxzercial district ofthe City. The Planning Commission reviewed the application and the City staff reports, and received comments from all persons wishing to be heard in favor of and opposed to the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS p'OLLOWS: Section 1. Criteria A licable to Decision. The following chapters of the Central Point. Municipal Code apply to this application: A. Chapter 17.46, C-5 Tboroughfare Commercial District B. Chapter 17.60, General Regulations; C. Chapter 17.64, Off-Street Parking and Loading; D. Chapter 17.72, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval. Section 2. Findings and Conclusions. The Planning Commission hereby adopts by reference al l fznding of fact set forth in the City staff reports, and concludes that, except where addressed in the conditions to approval, the application and proposal comply with the requirements of the following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code: A. Chapter 17.46, relating to uses, lot size, lot coverage, setback, building height and screening in the C-5 Thoroughfare Commercial district; B. Chapter 17.60 relating to paving and landscaping requirements; C. Chapter 17.64 relating to off street parking axzd loading facilities; D. Chapter 17.72 relating to site plan requirements. Section 3. Conditional A royal. The application for site plan approval is hereby conditionally approved, subj ect to the conditions set forth in the Planning and Public Works StaffReports, 1 -PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. in Exhibits "A" and "B", which is attached hereto and by this reference incozporated herein, and the property owners will come into an agreement for the right-of way acquisition on Bush and Front Street. In the Public Works StaffReport on page 13, there is a change in the a~no~ult of right-of way fro-xz nainimam of 12 feet, to maximum of 12 feet. Also the property owners will have to sign an agreement stating that arty new redevelopment on the site will constitute a stornz drainage plan and zzpgrade. Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this ' r` day of -~r,., ,,r- , 19~. .~G~ Planning Commission Chairman ATTEST: Approved by me this ~: "''"~ day of ht~~i~M~ . I9'~G1 . _~ ~~~~~ Planning Commission Chairman 2 -PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO Attachment A RECOMMENDED PLANNING AND PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS OIL APPROVAL 1. Tl~e approval of the Site Plan snail expire in one year on September 21, 2000 unless an application for a building permit or an application for extension has been received by the City. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan depicting any changes discussed and approved at the public hearing within 30 days of Planning Commission approval. 2. The project must comply with all applicable Local, state and federal regulations . 3. The project must meet the off street parking requirements for professional offices, and the parking, access and maneuvering areas shall be paved with durable materials for all-weather use and approved by the Public Works Department. ~~ CITY Of= CENTRAL POINT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLlC WORKS STAFF REPORT for E1 Albinil Commercial Facility Expansion Site Pian PW#99060 Date: Applicant: Property Owner: Agent: Project: Location: Legal: Zoning: Acreage: Plans: Report By: Purpose Attachment B September 19, 1999 Vtus Construction, Inc., P.O. Box 7 097, Gold Hill, OR 97525 Tom and John Hamlin, P.O. Box ~43, Medford, OR 9750 none restaurant (EI Albinil) 507 S. Front Street (SW Corner of Bush and Front Streets) T37S, R2W, Section 11 BC, Tax Lot 4700 C-5 2.26 ac Site Plan wl building elevations prepared by Breeden Design, dated 6/2'1199 Lee N. Brennan Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer"} regarding Public Works standards and additional standards and requirements to be included in the design. Gather information €rom the DeveloperlEngineer regarding proposed development. Specla! Requlrernenfs Bush Sfreef lmproyemenfs: Right-of--Way: The right of way width varies from approximately ~#5 feet to 60 feet along the frontage of the subject development with Bush Street. Bush Street is being identified as a collector street to address the northbound traffic from HopkinslFourth Street traveling fo Front Street (Highway 99}. The property's proximity to the intersection will likely require development of a three lane section at the intersection that would require a minimum right-of-way width of 68 feet when developed. A major portion of the existinglprapased landscaping and parking lot along Bush Street will likely be acquired by the City when this intersection is improved. Right- of-way dedication normally would be required as part of the proposed development of the properly. Typically, the total right-af-way width is acquired from both sides of the street; splitting the total right-of-way width required in half and applying it equally to each side. However, due to the odd configuration of this intersection, if is more likely that the right-of-way needed will be acquired from the south side only rather Phan from both sides equally, to hotter align Bush Street to Fron# Street. Since the actual right-of-way width required is not known of this time, and the right-of-way centerline is not adequately defined at Phis time, the exact amount of right-of-way dedication cannot be determined at this lime. However, it is recommended thaf the approve! of the proposed development be conditioned to dedicate a minimum of 12-feet (approximately'/~ of the total additional right-of-way dedication neede~ and that only limited development (i.e parking and landscaping) be allowed in the area hick lies approximately 25 feet to the south of the existing northern property line, and that the building addition would be set back far enough to allow an adequate sight triangle when the intersection is redeveloped. ff appears that the proposed plan for the building addition could meet this proposed setback condition. 13 F:1 ,dl6~n+! P~f'D Sta~Rcf~or! Scpumb~r ! 9, ! 999 Pn~e 1 Sidewalks: ft is recommended that the Developer be required to construct new 6-foot wide curbside sidewalks and wheel chair ramps meeting City PWD standards along the Bush Street frontage. Since the development of these sidewalks should be coordinated with the redevelopment of the Bush/Front Street intersection, if is furfher recommended, that the Developer be required to defer the required improvements along Bush Street until a later date. If any or all of the improvements are to be deferred to a later date, then the Developer will be required to enter into a suitable deferred improvement agreement with the City for the required improvements (i.e. sidewalks, driveway aprons, and wheelchair ramps along the development's frontage with Bush Street. 2. South Pranf Sfreef (Highway 99Z Improvements and Right-of Way Dedication: The City is planning to install a suitable 8-foot wide sidewalk along portions of 1=ronf Street. To facilitate sidewalk installation, and to avoid existing utility poses, the City will require an additional ~0 feet of right-of-way or easement dedication along South Front Street. The City PWD is suggesting that as part of this development, that the Developer be required to dedicate a ~ 0-foot wide secfion for right-of-way along the property's frontage with South Front Street. '~ Site Drainage/Storm Drain Plan: if is recommended that fhe developer design and implement J a site drainage/storm drain plan fhaf corrects and enhances existing site drainage for the entire area noted on fhe site plan. This wit( likely require site drainage improvements to fhe entire tax lot. Sheet flow surface drainage from the properly onto fhe public rights-of-way or onto neighboring properties is unacceptable. However, it is recommended that the requirement for site drainage corrections be deferred until fhe sidewalk improvements are completed on Bush and Fronf Streets. The storm drainage infrastructure would be privately operated and maintained. A suitable system will need fo be designed far a minimum 10-year sform event, The discharge point and potential retention of storm wafer run-off shall be coordinated with aspects of fhe proposed development fo provide an aesthetically pleasing, efficient, and low maintenance facility. The sform wafer retention facilities shall be designed to mitigate erosion and sediment and hydrocarbon deposition, and to mitigate the "attractive nuisance" hazards associated with these facilities. The developer shall also secure written permission fo connectldischarge info adjoining CitylODOT sform water conveyance facilities. Catch basins, curb inlets, orifice boxes and area drains shat! be designed for sediment and petroleum hydrocarbon retention. The PWD will require a copy of fhe engineers hydrology and hydraulic computafions. 4. Driveways, Access Roads, and Parking Areas: The sife plan does not illustrate the second driveway located just north of the one driveway on Front Street. Es the Developer proposing fo eliminate this second existing driveway? It is recommended that the driveways, access roads, and parking and turning areas on the proposed development be designed and positioned in a manner that accommodate the turning movements and access of an AP,SHTO single unit truck and the Fire District's requirements. Alf driveways, access roads, and parking areas should either have asphalt or cement concrete surfaces. 5. Exisfing Infrastructure: The ©eveloper shalt provide suitable engineering certification and justification {i.e, calculations, analyses, plots, etc.,} that all connections fo existing infrastructure {i.e. street; water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems; natural drainage systems; etc.,) will not interfere with or provide far the significant degradation {in the opinion of the Public Works Director} of the existing effective feve4 of service or operation of fhe infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have either adequate capacities to accommodate Ehe 14 E:r .-r rh„: ~ r PJt'1) CtvQ~XcFwrf Sehlemhcr I9, I944 Page 3 flows andlor demands imposed on the existing infrastructure as the result of tfoe connection of the proposed development's infrastructure; or the existing facilities will be improved by and at the expense of the Developer to accommodate floe additional flows andlor demands while maintaining or improving the existing effective level of service of the affected facility. Utility Easements: A 10-foot wide public utility easement (PUE) will be regr~red along the property's frontage with Bush and Front Streets. General Development Plans: Developer shall submit #a the City's PWD for review and approval, engineered plans and specifications for all improvements proposed for construction or modifications within the City or public rights-of-way and easements, or for connections fo City infrastructure. Plans shat! show all existing utilities and City facilities, existing contours, property lines, benchmarks and other physical site information needed for review. All plans submitted for PWD review shalt be presented in a common engineering scale sized to fit an 24-inch by 36-inch, D size drawing sheets. PWD requires 3 sets of plans for review purposes. Public improvements include, but are not limited to, streets (including sidewalks, curbs and gutters and landscape buffers); alleys; storm drainage and sani#ary sewer collection and conveyance systems; water distribution system (up to the service meter and inc[udng fire protection); street lighting; and traffic control devices, street signs, and delineation. All construction of public improvements shall conform to the City's PWD Standards, the conditions approved and stipulated by the Planning Commission, and other special specifications, details, standards, andlor upgrades as may be approved by the Gity Administrator or his designee prior to the approval of the construction plans for the proposed development. During construction, changes proposed by the Developer shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's engineer #o the City PWD for approval prior to installation. 2. Approvals: Fire District No. 3 {ire hydrant placement, waterline sizing, and emergency vehicle access), Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA, for sanitary sewers), and City of Niedford Regional Water Reclamation Facility (commerciaflindustrialwostewater discharge permi#) written approval of construction plans shall be submitted to the City PWD prior to final construction plan review and approval by City PWD. 3. As-Builts: Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer's engineer ar surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. If feasible, the Developer's engineer or surveyor should provide the drawings in bath a "hard copy" form (produced on MylarJO) and in a "digital" format compatible with AutoCAD®, or other form as approved by the City PWD. As-built drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line" changes to final approved construction plans which identify the locations and or elevations (as appropriate) of actual installed items, including, but not limited to, invert, inlet, and rim ar lip elevations; spot elevations identified on drawings; water fines, valves, and fire hydrants; water and sewer lateral; modifications to street section; manhole and curb inlet; street fight locations; other below grade utility fines; etc. Provide a "red-line" hard copy (on Mylar'°), or an approved alternative format, of construction drawings, and if feasible, an acceptable AutoCAD® compatible drawing 15 ~ .~lb,n,r P~4'D SraJJ Reporl Srplcm6tr 19, 1999 Page 4 efectranic file to the City of completion of construction and prior to acceptance of public infrastructure facilities completed as part of the proposed development, ar as otherwise approved by the City Administrafor or his designee. 4. Elevations: Alf efeva#ions used on the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on the permanent benchmark shat! be tied into an established City approved benchmark and be so noted on the plans. 5. Exisfinq Infrasfrucfure: As applicable, field verify alt existing infrastructure elevations and locations {le. pipe inverts, curb elevations, street elevations, etc.}, to which the proposed development wilt connect into existing improvements, prior to final construction plan design and submittal for final approval The accurate locations of any existing underground and above ground public infrastructure, and the location of the associated easements with these facilities, steal[ be accurately portrayed {both horizontally and vertically) on the construction plans. S. FIII Placement Alf flf placed in the development shall be engineered fill that is suitably placed and compacted in accordance with City PWD and ~3uifding Department standards, except for the upper 1.5-feet of fill placed outside of public rights-af--way and that does not underlie building, strucfures, or traveled vehicular access ways or parking areas. 7. Road/Driveway/Parklrrg Areas: The Developer shall evaluate the strengfh of the native soils and determine the access road, parking, and driveway section designs to handle the expected Toads {including fire equipmenf) to be traveled on These private driveways, access roads, and parking areas. Need to provide section for review. The driveways, access roads, and truck parking and turning areas on the proposed development must be designed and positioned in a manner that will accommodate the turning movements and access of an AASHT~ Single Unit Truck without crossing into an opposing Pane or additional travel Pane of traffic. 8. Ufiiity Plans: We did not receive any utility plans for the proposed development. The utility plans shall be drawn to scale with accurate horizontal and vertical depiction of utility lines and appurtenances {transformers, valves, .etc.}. As built drawings shalt reflect ail utility locations; Located both above and below ground. 9. Area_Lighfin_g Plan: Provide and implement an adequate area lighting plan for parking and public access areas, including the driveway entrances. Plans should include the mast height, luminosity and effec#ive light spread at ground level. Lighting shall be designed so as not to interfere with vehicle traffic on city streets, or direct Eight to neighboring properties. 10. Public Ufiiify Easements: A minimum 10-foot wide public utilities easement {PUE) shall be dedicated an the proposed development for the installation of public utilities and shalt be located outside the public rights-of-way. At a minimum, the PUE should be aligned along the exterior boundaries of the property that border Bush and Front Streets, if a PUE is not currently present in this area. 11. Clear Vision Areas: The site plan indicates that fhe proposed building addition is outside the sight-vision triangle necessary for the intersection of Bush and F=ront Streets {including the consideration of Eikely redevelopment of the subject intersection}. A 55-foot minimum sight vision triangle shah be maintained at the property's corner withe the subject intersection. 16 F1.4lhrrri! P1~'17 S1a~12eporf September 19, 1999 Page S ~2. Fire Hydrants: Provide locations of existing and any new required fire hydrants. Dire I-iydrants need to be connected to 8-inch-d€ameter and larger lines. If applicable, steamer ports at hydrants located near the building shall face the buildings. Fire hydrants shall be suitably protected from potential vehicle damage and encroachment. 13. Wafer S stem Crass Cannecfion Control: Developer shall comply with Oregon Health Division (OHD) and Gity requirements for cross connection control. Building service will likely require a backflow prevention assembly to be installed directly behind the City's meter. 14. Water System: Construction drawings steal[ include the size, type, and locafion of alt water mains, hydrants, valves, service connection, meter, service laterals, and other appurtenance defails in accordance with Cify PWD Standards and as required by the City PWD. ~ ~. Sanitary Sewer industrial Discharge Permit. if applicable, obtain an updated industrial discharge permit from Cify of Medford Regional Water Reclamation Facility (Medford RWRF). Obtain Medford RWRF's written approval, Copy of the application farm can be obfained from City PWD. 16. Roof/Area Drains: A!I structures shall have roof drains, area drains, and/or crawl spaces with positive drainage away from the building. Roof drains shall not be directly connected to the public storm drain system. ~7. Grading Plans: Grading plans should have originallexisting grades and final grades plofted on the plan. Typically, existing grade contour fines are dashed and screened back, and final grade contour fines are overlaid on fop of the existing grades and are in a heavier fine width and solid. Contour lines should be labeled with elevations. 18. Storm Drain System_pesi_gn: The Developer's engineer shall provide the City PWD with a complete set of hydrology and hydraulic calculations and profile plats for sizing the site storm drain system. The engineer steal[ use the rainfalllintensity curve obtained from the City PWD for hydrology calculations, and the negotiated run-off parameters. i7 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES November 2, l 999 MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 P.M. II ROLL CALL: Chuck Piland, Candy Fish, Karolyne Johnson, John LeGros, Don Foster, Paul Lunte, and Wayne Riggs were present. Also in attendance were Tom Humphrey, Planning Director; Matt Samitore, Planning Technician; and Lee Brennan, Public Works Director. III CORRESPONDENCE There was no correspondence. IV MINUTES Commissioner Fish made a motion to approve the Planning Commission Minutes.from October, 5 1999. Commissioner Lunte seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes;.. Foster, yes; Johnson, abstained; LeGros, yes; Lunte,'yes;.and Riggs, yes. V BUSINESS A. A continuation of a ublic hearin to consider a site lan introduced b Tom and John Hamlin to add about 840 s care feet to an existin restaurant buildin at 507 Front Street. The sub'ect ro ert is located in the C-5 Thorou hfare Commercial Zonin District: Tom Humphrey, Planning Director, Presented the Planning Department Staff Report. The Applicants are requesting a Site Plan Review for a commercial addition.at the El Albinil Restaurant. The facility is located at 507 South Front Street and shares a common tax lot with the Dollar Store and other businesses. The addition would add seating_and expand the kitchen area. The PIanning Department calculated that 32 spaces are required for this project and the applicant has provided 35. Access is proposed from common shared driveways within the shopping complex from Bush and Front Streets. The City would like to come to an agreement with the owners to acquire additional right of way for the future expansion of Bush Street. City staff met with John Hamlin before the meeting to discuss the improvements. Mr. Hamlin has agreed to all terms for the staff reports except the on-site drainage. He would like relief from the on-site drainage because he is not changing the permeable surface for the site, just changing pavement to rooftop. Lee Brennan, Public Works Director, presented the Public Works Staff Report. Mr. Brennan stated that the only changes he recommends making from the original staff report would be changing the Planning Commission Minutes November 2, 1999 Page 2 words "minimum of 12 feet of right-of-way" to "mnximum". Mr. Brennan also stated that the applicants should enter into an public agreement with the city for the additional Right of Way. Mr. Brennan also recommended that the city sign an agreement with the land owner stating that any future redevelopment of the site will necessitate a storm drainage plan. Mr. Brennan also added that the heating oil tank must be removed in accordance with DEQ standards before any building permits are issued. Commissioner Riggs made a motion to pass Resolution 466 conditionally approving the site plan application for a commercial addition at the El Albinil Restaurant. The facility is located at 507 South Front Street in a C-5, Thoroughfare Comrnercial District subject to the recommended conditions of approval from the planning and public works departments, The property arvners will have to enter into an agreement for the right-of--way acquisition on Bush and Front Streets. I[n the Public Works Staff Repart on page 13; there is a change.in the amount of right-of--way from a "minimum of I2 feet;:ta a.maximum of 12.feet". The owners ~vill.also have to sign, an_agreement stating that any~futur~redevelopment.on.the site will. necessitate a storm drainage plan and Upgrade. Coanmissioner:Fish seconded,the.motion. RILL CALL:.motion passed unanirnous[y. .. .. .. B. Continuation of a public hearing to consider a site.plan introduced by Dr, Curtis: L.^Tyerman P.C. to construct a 225a_square foot dental office building at 348 Oak Street. The .subject property is located in the C-2 Commercial Professional zonin district. Dr: T erman, is also askin .for a Variance in the _ off-street parking and maneuvering requirements for xhe,zone,;. ;' ~.... . Tom Humphrey, Planning Director, presented the PIanni~ig Department Staff Report. Mr. Humphrey explained to the Commission the need for a variance. in the off-street parking and maneuvering requirements. The municipal code has two guidelines that dictate the amount ofoff-street parking that is needed. The City is suppose to use the higher of the two, this would be I I parking places, the other equation gives the applicant 9 spaces. This is the number of spaces the applicant is requesting using. The other part of the variance is for employee parking off the alley. The employees would have to drive in and back out onto the alley. Lee Brennan, Public Works Director, presented the Public Works Staff Report. Mr. Brennan recommended to the Commission that if this project is approved the City come into agreement with the Tyerman's for deferred improvement of the sidewalks, until the City has established a Side Walk Master Plan. Mr. Brennan also recommended that the alley be improved for the width of the project and a bit longer for turning movements and for drainage. The Public Works Department would also recommend that the driveway be 20 feet instead of the l 6 feet depicted on the site plan. A 10 foot PUE would be recommenced on 4`~ and Oak Streets except for the area in front of the building, which will be reduced to 5 feet.