HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 467 - Tyerman Variance~~~~ 3
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0.467
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE
{Applicant: Dr. Curtis L. Tyerman P.C.)
{372W 11 BB Tax Lot 400)
Recitals
This matter came before the Planning Commission for hearing on November 2,1999, on applicant's
application for a variance. Appl icant requested a variance from the parking and maneuvering requirements.
The Planning Commission reviewed the application and the City staff reports, and received comments from
all persons wishing to be heard in favor of and opposed to the application.
Now, therefore;
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL
POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Criteria A Iicable to Decision. The following chapters of the Central Paint
Municipal Code apply to this application:
A. Chapter 17.36, C-2, Commercial-Professional District;
B. Chapter 17.80, Variances.
Section 2. Findin sand Conclusions. The Planning Commission hereby adopts by reference
all finding of fact set forth in the City staff reports, and concludes that applicant has demonstrated
compliance with the requirements of CPMC Chapter 17.80, pertaining to variances.
Section 3. Variance Granted. Appliance is hereby granted approval for the requested variance
consisting of changing the required amount ofparking places from 11 to 9 and far employee maneuvering
in the alley.
Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 2 day
of November, 1999.
~~
Planning Commission Chair
ATTEST:
Approved by me this ~- ~ day of ~J~t~
Planni
199~.~
ssion Chair
Page 2 - PIanning Goanmission Resolution No. 467 {11021999)
Attachment A
RECOMMENDED PLANNING CONDITIONS Of APPROVAL
} . The approval aftlle Site Plans}1al1 expire in one yearon November 2, 2x00 unless an application
for a Building permit Oran application forextension has been received by the City. T}-re applicant
shall sub~rvta revised site plan depicting any changes discussed and approved atthe puBlicllear-ing
within 30 days of P}arming Commission approval.
2. The project must comp}y wide a}} app}icab}e local, state and federal regulatioms .
The project must meet the off-stxeet parking requirements for professional offices, and the parking,
access and maneuvering areas shal} Be paved with durable materials far a!}-weather use and
approved by the Public Works Department.
11CPPDPDC1City WidclPlanninb199(153~.WE'U
~~ 3i
1:171 t~l t.# rvlf~~ll r't)Ir~ll
(~f:f'f~f: J~l4f_N7 ()f= f'U(.;(.1(; lNc~l:f~;~
S~Af=f= f~IPOR~I
for
l~yerrr~ar~ t7er~tal Clinic nliraC~1i11~t1~ B
348 Oak Street
Gommerciai Facility Site Plan
PW#99053
Date:
Applicant:
Property Owner:
Agent:
Project:
Location:
Legal:
Zoning:
Plans:
Report By
P(~rpose
September 14, 1999
Curtis L. Tyerman, P.G., 57 North 2nd Street, Central Point, bR 97502
Same as Applicant
Steven G. Sherbourne, 29 South Grape Sfreet, Medford, OR 97501
Dental Clinic Building
348 Oak Sfreet (SW corner of Oak and 4'" Sfreefs)
T37S, R2W, Section 1188, Tax Lot 400
G-2
Site Plan w! building elevations submitted by Pacific Pioneer Design Group,
dated fi128/99
Pau[ W. Worth, Public Works Technician
Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred fo as "Developer"}
regarding Public Works standards and additional standards and requirements to be included in fhe
design. Gather information from the DeveloperlEngineer regarding proposed development.
Special f~equlremenfs
Oak Sfreef ancf Fourffr Sfreet Improvements:
Sidewalks: if is recommended that the Developer be required to construct new 6-foot wide
curbside sidewa]ks, wheel chair ramps and driveway aprons meeting City PWD standards
along the Oak Street fran#age. Developer should also be required to remove and replace the
existing sidewalk on the 4~' Sfreet frontage with a new 5-foot wide sidewalk, separated by fhe
existing landscape strip between the curb and sidewalk. The landscaped strip on r4~' Street
and the Right-of-Way (ROW} behind the Oak Street sidewalk shaft be planted and maintained
in compliance with City Orc#inances and PWD standards.
2. AIIey lmpravemer7fs: The alley along the southern boundary of the property is unirr-proved.
The plans indicate that there wit( be parking movements that will take access off the alley,
which wit[ result in backing and taming movements in the alley. This is prohibited in the City's
fvtunicipal Gode under Section 17.64.100 (1=} (3},
If access will be taken from the alley to the property, then it is recommended that the
Developer be required to improve the alley to current PWD standards. Typically this requires
a minimum of a 3-inch thickness of Class B asphalt over 6-inches of 314-inch-minus base rock
and 8-inches of 4-inch-minus sub-base rock. Woven geotexfile fabric is required to be placed
overtaying the subgrade. The broken concrete alley apron and sidewalk ~rril[ also require
removal and replacement to current PWD standards. Construction of the alley apron to
current standards will require that the existing catch basiralinlef be relocated to the north.
.`~ Q
... .,
r•,,~,
~tr)rrtt tiv,tter CC~llt~car~trt ;tnd Cc~rlvt'y4~rtCr: I~tcrlrtr[~s shalt a[sct bra constructed or reconstructed to
txovrdc' for storm ~vafr'r canvey~trtce front srtrface drainage of thc~ alley and ~~d<acent parkrng
<trc'a, so #hai the sc,ri<tt'r, cSrarrt~tge dogs riot shec~# flow across ttte srdcwafic/driveway at the
alley entrance
3 Site Drairr~~e/Storrrr tJrairr Plart: ft is recosttntended that the developer design and
intpfentent a site drainagetstorrn drain plan that corrects and enhances existing site drainage
for the entire area noted on the site piart. Sheet (low surface drainage from the property onto
the public rights-of-way (including the alley} or onto neighboring properties is unacceptable.
The stornt drainacde infrastructure will be privately operated and maintained. A suitable system
will need to be designed far a rrtinimunt 1Q-year storm event. The discharge paint and
potential retention of storm water run-off shall be coordinated with aspects of the proposed
development to provide an aesthetically pleasing, efficient, and low maintenance facility. The
storm water retention facilities shaft be designed to rr~itigate erosion and sediment and
hydrocarbon deposition, and to mitigate the "aftracfive nuisance' hazards associated with
these facilities. The developer shall also secure written permission to connect/discharge into
adjoining City storm water conveyance facilities. Catch basins, curb inlets, orifice boxes and
area drains shaft be designed for sediment and petroleum hydrocarbon retention. The PIND
will require a copy of the engineers hydrology and hydraulic computations.
Drrvewa~s, Access Roads, and Parkinc~Areas: It is recommended that the driveways,
access roads, and parking and Earning areas on the proposed development be designed and
positioned in a manner that accommodate the turning movements and access of an AASI-tT0
single unit truck and the Fire District's requirements. All driveways, access roads, and parking
areas should either Dave asphalt or cerrrent concrete surfaces.
The driveway entrance "throat"off of Oak Street needs to be moved a minimum of Q feet to the
west to meet the minimum setback of 30 feet from the property lines at the intersection of Oak
and Fourth Streets. Driveway throat is narrow for two way driving.
5. ~xistfnq lrtfrasfructure: The Developer shalt provide suitable engineering cert€fication and
justification {i.e. calculations, analyses, plots, etc.,) that aN connections to existing
infrastructure (i.e. street; wafer, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems; natural drainage
systems; etc.,) will not interfere with or provide for the significant degradation (in the opinion of
the Public Works Director) of the existing effective level of service ar operation of the
infrastructure faci{ifies, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have either adequate
capacities to accommodate the flows andlor derrtands imposed on the existing infrastructure
as the result of the connection of the proposed development's infrastructure; or the existing
facilities will be {reproved by and at the expense of the Developer to accommodate tf~e
addifionai flows andlor demands while maintaining or improving the existing effective level of
service of the affected facility.
Q. Ufilif ~asemertfs: A 10-foot wide public utility easement (f'Ufr) will be required along tine
property's frontage with Oak and 4°i Streets.
7. Wafer Service: The Cify has no record of water service to Phis tax lot, t# is not known if a #ap to
the water main in Oak street exists. If no existing service exists then all SDCs and associated
fees for connection wit! be required. The Developer shalt determine with the t3uifding
Department what size service line anti meter wilt be required to servir~ the proposed
development
J Y •)
1'~rtr {
General
Devefoprrrenf Plans: Developer shaft submit to file City's PWD for review and approval,
engineered plans and specifications far all improvements proposed for construction or
modifrcations within lire City or public rights-of-way and easements or far connections to Cify
infrastructure. Plans shall show aft existing utilities and City facilities, existing contours,
property lines, benchmarks and other physical site information needed for review. All plans
submitted far PWO review shalt be presented in a common engineering scale sized to fit an
24- by 36-inch, D size drawing sheefs. PWD requires 3 sets of plans for review purposes.
Public improvemen#s include, but are not limited to, streets (including sidewalks, curbs and
gutters and landscape buffers}; alleys; storm drainage and sanitary sewer collection and
conveyance systems; wafer distribution system {up to the service meter and including fire
protection}; street lighting; and traffic cnntraf devices, street signs, and delineation. Alf
construction of pubfic improvements shall conform to the City's PWD Standards, the
conditions approved and stipulated by the Planning Commission, and other special
SpecificatronS, de#aifs, sfandards, andlor upgrades as may be approved by the Cify
Administrator or his designee prior to the approva[ of the construction plans for the proposed
development. During construction, changes proposed 6y the Developer shalt be submitted in
writing by the Developer's engineer to the City PWD for approval prior to installation.
2. Approvals: Fire District No. 3 (f€re hydrant placement, waterline sizing, and emergency
vehicle access), Bear Creek Valley Sanifary Authority (BCVSA, for sanitary sewers}, and City
of Medford Regional Water Reclamation Facility (commerciallindustria[ wastewater discharge
permif} wriften approva# of construction plans shall be submitted to the City PWD prior to final
construction plan review and approval by City PWD.
3. As-Builfs: Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer's engineer or
surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. ~ If feasible, the
Devefope~s engineer or surveyor should provide the drawings in bath a `hard Dopy" form
(produced on Mylar°} and in a "digital" format compatible with AutaCAD°, or other farm as
approved by the City PWD.
As-built drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line" changes to final
approved construction plans which identify the locations and or elevations (as appropriate) of
actual installed items, including, but not limited to, invert, inlet, and rim or lip elevations; spot
elevations identified on drawings; water lines, valves, anti fire hydrants; water and sewer
lateraE; modifications to street section; manhole and curb inlet; street light locations; other
below grade utility linos; etc. Provide a "red-line" hard copy {on Mylar°}, or an approved
alternative format, of construction drawings, and if feasible, an acceptable AutoCAD®
compatible drawing electronic file to the Cify at comp€efion of construction and prior fo
acceptance of public infrastructure facilities completed as part of the proposed development,
or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee.
~. Elevafions: AI[ e€evatians used on the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on
the permanent benchmark shall be tied into an established Cify approved benchmark and be
so noted on the plans.
36
~; ._. .~.
. , J
`~ Fxis(rrrc~ Irrfr~~srrcrcfrrrC Ati <3i~pf,cat~IC, trC1d vi~rr(y all exl5tsng Ir~fr~~structure Clevt~llncis and
locallor~s (r c prpe Inverts, curk~ elevatrons, slrcel elevattorls, e€c }, to whrch tf~e proposed
developr~~ent wrll connect into exrstrng imprnven~ents, prior to frnal construction plan design
and subml€tal for final approval The accurate locations of any existing underground and
above ground public infrastructure, and the location of tl~e associated easements with these
facilities, shall be accurately portrayed (both horizontally and veriically~ on t~~e construe€ion
plans.
G. Fi!! Placemer~f: Af! fill placed in the development shat4 be engineered fill that is suitably placed
and compacted in accordance with pity PWD and C~uilding Department standards, except for
the upper 1.5-feet of fill placed outside of public rights-of-way and that does not underlie
building, Structures, or traveled vehicular access ways or parking areas,
7. Raad/DrivewaV/Parking Areas: The Deve4oper shaft evaluate the strength of the native soils
and determine the access road, parking, and driveway section designs to handle the expected
(Dads {including fire equipment} to be traveled on these private driveways, access roads, and
parking areas, Need to provide section for review. The driveways, access roads, and frock
parking and turning areas on the proposed development rr~ust be designed and positioned in a
manner that will accommodate the turning movements and access of an AASf~TO Single Unit
Truck without crossing into an opposing lane or additional (ravel lane of traffic.
8. UfilifV Puns: We did not receive any utility plans far the proposed development. The utility
plans shat{ be drawn to scale with accurate horizonfal and vertical depiction of utility lines and
appurtenances (transformers, valves, eic.}. As built drawings shall reflect alt utility
locations; located both above and below ground.
9. Area Lighting Plan; Provide and implement an adequate area lighting plan for parking and
public access areas, including the driveway entrance from 4~' Street, and if applicable, the
alley as may be required by the City PWD. Plans should include the mast height, luminosity
and effective light spread at ground level. Lighting shall be designed so as not to interfere with
vehicle traffic on city streets.
10. Public Utility Easements: A minimum 1(~-foot wide public utilities easement (PUS} shall be
dedicated on the proposed development for the installation of public utilities and shall be
located outside the public rights-af-way. At a minimum, the PU1= should be aligned along the
exterior boundaries of the property That border ~~' and Oak streets, if a PUS is not currently
present in this area.
11 Clear Vision Areas: The site plan indicates that the proposed building is outside the sight-
vision Triangle necessary for the alley connection to Oak Street. A 55-foot minimum sight
vision triangle shat! be maintained at the property's corner of Fourth and flak Streets.
12. Fire HVdranfs: provide locations of existing and any new required f"sre hydrants. Fire
Hydrants need to be connected to 8-inch-diameter and larger fines, if applicable, steamer
ports at hydrants 4ocated near the building shat) face the buildings. Fire hydrants shall be
suitably protected from potential vehicle damage and encroachment
~~
r~.r,,
i 3 Wafc_ r Sysferrr Cross Corrnec(rorr Carrlrol Develt~per shtrll corr~piy wati~ Uregor~ f-teallfi
Div€sron {Of~D) grid Ciiy requ€ren~enls for cross connection control Need to know protected
activilres and wafer uses for existing and new cor~~nietcraf btn[dings to detern~rne requirements
for cross connection control and fire protection. t3uild€ng service will f€kely require a backflow
prevention assembly to be installed directly behind the City's meter.
1 ~. Wafer System: Construction drawings shalt include the size, type, and location of all water
mains, hydrants, valves, service connection, meter, service laterals, and other appurtenance
de#ai[s in accordance with City PWD Standards and as required by the City PWD.
t5. Sanifa . Sewe,r_lndusfrial Discfrarge_Perrrrit; If applicable, obtain industrial discharge permit
from City of Medford Regional Water Reclamation Facility {Medford RWRF). Obtain Medford
RWRF's written approval to connect to the sanitary sewer system. Copy of application can be
ob#ained from City PWD.
T6. Roof/,4rea Drains: Atf s#ructures shaft have roof drains, area drains, andlor craw# spaces with
positive drainage away from the building, Roof drains shall not be direr#ly connected to the
public storm drain system.
17. Grading Plans: Grading plans should have original/existing grades and fina! grades plotted
on the plan. Typically, existing grade contour tines are dashed and screened back, and fina!
grade contour €ines are overlaid an fop of the existing grades and are in a heavier fine width
and solid. Contour fines should be labeled with elevations.
18. Overhead Power Lines: if applicable, coordinate efforts with Pacific Power and fight, US
West, and TC[ Cable, fo convert any overhead electrical power, telephone, or cable facilities
within or adjoining the proposed development to underground facilities, prior to the acceptance
by the City PWD of the public improvements associated with the proposed development. Alf
agreements and costs associated with the conversion of these facilities from overhead to
underground facilities, shall be by and between the utility owners and the Developer.
19. Sform_Drain Stisfem Des_gn: Prior to construction plan approval of the improvements for this
development plan, the Developer's engineer shall provide the Cify PWD with a comple#e set of
hydrology and hydraulic calculations and profile plots for sizing the site storm drain system.
The engineer shall use the rainfalf(ntensifyrurve obtained from the Cify PWD for hydrology
calculations, and the negotiated run-off parameters.
38
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 468
A RESOLUTION CONDITIONALLY APPROVING
A SITE PLAN APPLICATION
(Applicant {s}: Dr. Curtis L. Tyerman P.C.)
(372 W 11 BB Tax Lot 400}
Recitals
l . This matter came before the Planning Gonlznission for hearing onNovember 2,1999, on
applicant's site plan application fora 2250 square foot dental building in an C-2Commercial-Professional
district of the City. The Planning Commission reviewed the application and the City staff reports, and
received comments from all persons wishing to be heard in favor of and opposed to the application.
Now, therefore;
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL
POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Criteria Applicable to Decision. The fallowing chapters of the Central Point
Municipal Cade apply to this application:
A. Chapter 17.36, C-2 Commerical-Professional District
B. Chapter 17.64, General Regulations;
C. Chapter 17.64, Off-Street Parking and Loading;
D. Chapter 17.72, Site Plan, Landscaping and Canstructian Plan Approval.
Section 2. Findings and Conclusions. The Planning Commission hereby adopts by
reference all finding of fact set forth in the City staff reports, and concludes that, except where addressed
in the conditions to approval, the application and proposal comply with the requirements ofthe following
chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code:
A. Chapter 17.36, relating to uses, lot size, lot coverage, setback, building height and
screening in the C-2 Commerical-Professional district;
B. Chapter 17.60 relating to paving anal landscaping requirements;
C. Chapter 17.64 relating to off-street parking and loading facilities;
D. Chapter 17.72 relating to site plan requirements.
Section 3. Conditional Approval. The application for site plan approval is hereby
conditionally approved, subject to the conditions set forth in the Planning and Public Wa~lcs Staff Reports
1 -PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 468 ( 11 021999 )
on Exhibit "A" and "B", which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated hexein and the alley be
improved belong the length ofthe property to handle employee parking. A 10 feet PL]E will be required
along the property's frontage on Oak and Fourth, except for the portion in front of the dental building which
will be reduced to 5 feet. .
Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 2 day
of November, 1999.
-- U~ o
Planning Caznmissian Chairman
ATTEST:
City
by me this _ a'~ day of ~1~sv-t~+.G~- , 19~`~
Planning Commission Chairman
2 -PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 468_ ( 11 021999 }
Attachment A
RECOMMENDED PLANNING CONDITIONS OI; APPROVAL
The approval of the Site Plan shall expire in one year on November 2, 2QQQ unless an application
for a building permit oran application for extension has been received by the City. The applicant
shall submit a revised site plan depicting any changes discussed and approved at the public hearing
within 30 days of Planning Comrtrission approval.
2. The project must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations .
3. The project must meet the off-street parking requirements for professional offices, acrd the parking,
access and maneuvering areas shall be paved with durable materials for all-weather use and
approved by the Public Works Department.
IICPi'Dr'DCICity WidclPlanning199U536.WPf]
~~ 31
CSI 1 1 t]t t:i N I Iv\E i't iIN 1
(~f_f'~f~ 1 rt~fEN7 Cif f'Uf3(_1{: Ih~C~f.h ti
SZAFi= FtE=f'Oi11
far
l~yermar~ t~er~tal Clinic
34II Oak Street
Commercial Facility Site Plan
PW#~99053
Date:
Applicant:
Property Owner
Agent:
Project:
Lacafion:
Legal:
Zoning:
Plans:
Repor# By:
Puroose
1~.ttachmen~ ~3
September 14, 1999
Gurus L. Tyerman, P.C., 57 North 2itl Street, Central Paint, bi; 97502
Same as Applicant
Steven G. Sherbourne, 29 South Grape Street, Medford, Old 97501
Dental CIrnic Building
348 Oak Street (SW comer of Oak acid 4~' Streets)
T37S, R2W, Section 1 X813, Tax Lot 400
C-2
Site Plan w! building elevations submitted by Pacific Pioneer Design Group,
dated 6!28199
Paul W. Worth, Public Works Technician
Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer"}
regarding Public Works standards and additional standards and requirements to be mciuded in the
design. Gather information from the Developerl~ngineer regarding proposed developmenf.
Special Requirements
Oak Sfreef arse! Faurr`h Sfreef (mpravements:
Sidewalks: (t is recommended that the Developer be required to construct new 6-foot wide
curbside sidewalks, wheel chair ramps and driveway aprons meeting City PWD standards
along the Oak Street frontage. Developer should also be required to remove and replace the
existing sidewalk an the 4~' Street frontage with a new 5-foot wide sidewalk, separated by the
existing landscape strip between the curb and sidewalk. The landscaped strip on 4~' Street
and the Right-af-Way {ROW} behind the Oak Street sidewalk shall be planted and maintained
in compliance with City Ordinances and PWD standards.
2. Afle~lmt~ravernents: The alley along the southern boundary of the property is unimproved.
The plans indicate that there will be parting movements tYiat will take access off the alley,
which will result in backing and turning movemen€s in tFie alley- This is prohibited in the City's
Municipal Code under Section 17.64.100 (E} (3}.
if access wilt be taken from the alley to the property, then it is recommended that the
Developer be required to improve the alley to current PWD standards. Typically this requires
a minimum of a 3-inch thickness of Class B asphalt over 6-inches of 314-inch-minus base rock
and 8-inches of 4-inch-minus sub-base rock. Wavers geotextile fabric is required to be placed
overlaying tf-ie subgrade. The broken concrete alley apron and sidewalk will also require
removal and replacement to current PWD standards. Construction of the alley apron tQ
current standards w,rili require that the existing catch basin~nlet be relocated to the north-
.`~ Q
r .l,; .'
;~t<7rn1 tv,ttCr c;a!(c~cl,c~n ~~ru~} cornrtry~~nce i43c+lrfre5 sf~alf also tx~ ronstrcrcted or recons(ructed to
~~rourdr~' for slorrii tvalc~r convey~ar~ce front s~rr-face drarnage of the alley <~nd adjacent parff,ng
area, so Ihaf the suriac~~ drarnagc~ dons r7ol sheet fioty across the srdewaffcldrrveway at the
alloy enlranCe
3 Site Drairra_ge/Siornr Drairr Plart: ft rs recor7~n~ended that tf~e developer design and
implement a site drainagelstarm drain plan that corrects and enhances existing site drainage
for tf~e entire area noted an the site ptan Sheet flow surface drainage front tl~e properly onto
ttie public rights-of-way {ir~cludrng the alley} or onto neighboring properties is unacceptable
The storm drainage infrastructure will t?e privately operated and rt~aintained. A suitable system
will need to be designed far a minimum tt?-year storm event. The discharge point and
potential retention of storm water run-off shall be coordinated wffh aspects of the proposed
development to provide an aestheticatfy pleasing, efficient, and law maintenance facility. The
storm water retention facilities shaft be designed to mitigate erosion and sediment and
hydrocarbon deposition, and to mitigate the "attractive nuisance' hazards associated with
these facilities. The developer chaff also secure written permission to connect discharge into
adjoining Cffy storm water conveyance facilities. Catch basins, curb inlets, orifice boxes and
area drains shaft be designed for sediment and petroleum hydrocarbon retention. The f'WD
will require a copy of the engineers hydrology and hydraulic computations.
4. Driveways, Access Roads and Parking Areas: (t is recommended that the driveways,
access roads, and parking and turning areas on the proposed development be designed and
positioned in a manner that accommodate the turning movements and access of an !'~SHTO
single unit truck and the Ffre District's requirements. ,b,fl driveways, access roads, and parking
areas should either have asphalE or cement concrete surfaces.
The driveway entrance "throat"off of Oak Street needs to be moved a minimum of 6 feet to the
west to meet the minimum setback of 30 feet from the property fines at fhe intersection of Oak
and Fourth Streets. Driveway throat is narrow for two way driving.
5. E'xrsfin~ Infrastructure: The Developer shall provide suitable engineering certification and
justification {i.e. calculations, analyses, plots, etc.,) that elf connections to existing
infrastrucfure (t.e. street; water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems, natural drainage
systems; etc.,) will not interfere with or provide for the significant degradation (fn the opinion of
the f~ubfic Works Director} of the existing effective level of service or operation of the
infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have either adequate
capacities to accommodate the flows andtor demands imposed on the existing infrastructure
as the result of the connection of fhe proposed development's infrastructure; ar the existing
facilities will be improved by and of the expense of the Developer to accommodate the
additional flows and/ar demands while maintaining or improving fhe existing effective level of
service of fhe affected facility.
6. UtiiifY Easemenfs: A 1 t?-foot wade public utility easement (PUf;} will be required along fhe
property's frontage with Oak and 4`" Streets.
7 Wafer Service: The City has no record of wafer service io this tax lot. Ik is not known if a tap to
the vrater main in Oak street exists. If no exfsfing service exists then all SDCs and associated
fees for connection wit( be required. The Developer she!{ determine with the ~uifding
Department what size service fine and meter will be required fa service ti7e proposed
devefoprr,eni_
J .. ~ ^ . l
~. ., r •or...
,uy~h•nrh.-~ 1f JVVv
General
~evelopnrenf Plans: Developer shall submit to the City's PWD for review and approval,
engineered plans and specifications for aft improvements proposed for construction ar
modifications within Ehe Gi#y ar public righfs-of-way and easements or for connections to City
infrastructure. Plans shalt show all existing utilities and City facilities, existing contours,
property fines, benchmarks and other physical site information needed for review. All plans
submitted for PWD review shall be presented in a common engineering scale sized to fit on
24- by 3&-inch, D size drawing sheets. PWD requires 3 sets of plans for review purposes.
Public improvemenfs include, but are not limited ta, streets (including sidewalks, curbs and
gufters and landscape buffers); of€eys; storm drainage and sanitary sewer collection and
conveyance systems; wafer distribution system (up to f#~e service meter and inc€uding fire
protection}; street lighting; and fraffic control devices, street signs, and delineation. All
construction of public improvemenfs shall conform to the City's PWD Standards, the
conditions approved and sfipufafed by the Planning Commission, and other special
specifications, defails, s#andards, and/or upgrades as may be approved by the City
Administrator or his designee prior fo the approval of the construction plans for the proposed
development. During construction, changes proposed by the Developer shaft be submitted in
writing by the Developer's engineer to the City PWD for approval prior fo insfal[afion.
2. Approvals: Fire District l~lo. 3 (fire hydrant placement, waterline sizing, and emergency
vehicle access), Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority {BCVSA, for sanitary sewers), and City
of Medford Regional Wafer Reclamation Facility {commerciallindustrial wastewater discharge
permit) written approva! of construction plans shalt be submit#ed to the City PWD prior to final
construction plan review and approval by City PWD,
3. As-Builfs: Prior fo approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer's engineer or
surveyor shaft provide the Public Works Department with ~as-built" drawings. if feasible, the
Developer's engineer or surveyor should provide the drawings in both a hard copy" form
(produced on Mylar/0} and in a `digital" format compatible with AufoCAD°, or other farm as
approved by the City PWD.
As-buflt drawings are fo be provided to fhe Cify which provide `red-line" changes to fnaf
approved construction plans whiah identify the locations and or elevations (as appropriate} of
actual installed items, including, buf not limited ta, invert, inlet, and rim ar lip elevations; spot
e[evaffons identified on drawings; water fines, valves, and fire hydrants; water and sewer
lateral; madificatians to street section; manhole and curb inlet; street light locations; other
below grade utiGfy lines; efc. Provide a "red-line" hard copy (an Mylar°}, or an approved
alternative format, of construct€on drawings, and if feasible, an acceptable AutoCAD°
compatible drawing electronic fife To the City at completion of construction and prior to
acceptance of public infrastructure facilities completed as part of the proposed development,
or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator ar his designee.
4. Elevations: Afl e[evafians used on the consfrucfion plans, on Temporary benchmarks, and an
the permanent bencf~mark shall be tied into an established Cify approved benchmark and tie
so noted on The plans.
3s
~~ . . - ~.
...~~. , . ~1 ~..
..., . ,
`, E~_rsfrnc~.lrr(r,~sfrrrcf[rrr" As tzpplrc~tttlc, Ireid verify ~tf{ exr>hng rnrrizslruClttrC elcv~~Irons artd
{oc~~frorts (r c prpe reverts, curb eft'valiarts, street e#evatrons, etc ), fo w{trch i{ze proposed
devefopn~ent wr{I connect into exrstrng irttprovernenls, prior io flea! construction plan design
and submittal (or flea! approvat. 'f-he accurate locations of any existing underground and
above ground public irtfrastruciure, and t{~e location of the associated casements wit{t these
facilities, shall be accurate{y portrayed (both horizontally and verfica{{y) on lfte construction
plans.
~ Fill Pl~cerrrent: All fill placed in the development shat{ be engineered €ill that is suitab{y placed
and compacted rn accordance with City PWD and Building Department standards, except for
the upper 1.5-feet of fill placed outside of public rights-of-way and that does not underlie
building, structures, or traveled vehicular access ways or parking areas.
7. Road/Driveway/Parking Areas: The Developer shalt evaluate the strengftl of the native soils
and determine Ehe access road, parking, and driveway section designs fo handle the expected
{Dads (including fire equipment} to be traveled on these private driveways, access roads, and
parking areas. Need to provide section for review. The driveways, access roads, and frock
parking and turning areas on the proposed development must be designed and positioned in a
manner that wi{{ accommodate the turning movements and access of an AASHTO Sing{e Unit
Truck without crossing into an apposing lane or additional fravei lane of traffic.
£3. Utility Plans: We did not receive any ufi{ity plans for fire proposed development. The utility
p{ans shad be drawn to scale with accurate horizontal and vertical depiction of utility fines and
appurtenances (transformers, valves, etc.}. As built drawings steal{ reflect all utility
locations; located both above and below ground.
9. area Ligtrfinc~Plan: Provide and implement an adequate area fighting plan for parking and
public access areas, inctuding the driveway entrance from 4'" Street, and if applicable, the
alley as may be required by the City PWD_ Plans should include the mast height, luminosity
and effective light spread at ground level. Lighting shall be designed so as not to interfere with
vehicle traffic on city streets.
i0. Puf~Iic Ufilit Easements: A minimum 10-foot wide public utilities easement (PUE} shall be
dedicated on the proposed development for the installation of public utilities and shalt be
located outside the public rights-of-way. At a minimum, the PUE should be aligned along the
ex#erior boundaries of the property that border 4'~ and Oak streets, if a PUE is not currently
present in this area.
11 Clear Vision Areas: The site plan indicates that the proposed building is outside the sight-
vision Triangle necessary for the alley connection to Oak Street. A 55-foot minimum sight
vision triangle steal{ be maintained at the property's corner of Fourth and Oak Streets.
12. Fire N~drants: Provide locations of existing and any new required fire hydrants. Fire
t-iydrants need to be connected to 8-inch-diameter and larger lines. If applicable, steamer
ports at hydrants located near the building shall face the buildings- Fire hydrants shall be
suitably protected trout potential vehicle damage and encroachment
.~
r~,r~.
i ;? Wafer System Cross Canrrcctiorr Ca_rrfrol Developer sliali coriaply w:th C)regon f icalth
Drvrsion (O1-iD) and City requirements for cross connecfior7 control Need Io know protected
actrvitres and water uses for existrng and new contmercral btrrldrngs fo delern~ine requiren7enls
for cross conneciron control and f€re protect:an. tuilding servrce wilt Irkely require a backflow
prevention assembly to be installed directly behind the City's meter.
i 4. Water S stem: Construction drawings shall include the size, Type, and location of all water
mains, hydrants, valves, service connection, meter, service laterals, and other appurtenance
details in accordance with Gity PWD Standards and as required by the City PWD.
15. Sanifa Sewer Industrial Dischar e Permit: if applicable, obtain Indus#rial discharge permit
from Gity of Medford Regional Wafer Reclamation Facility (Medford RWRF}. Obtain Medford
RWRF's written approval to connect to the sanitary sewer system. Copy of application can be
obtained from City PWD.
t6. Roof/Area Drains: Afl structures shall have roof drains, area drains, and/or crawl spaces with
positive drainage away from the building. Roof drains shaft not be directly connected to the
public storm drain system.
t7. Grading Plans: Grading plans should have original/existing grades and final grades plotted
on the plan. Typically, existing grade contour lines are dashed and screened back, and final
grade contour fines are overlaid on top of the existing grades and are in a heavier fine width
and solid. Contour Lines should be labeled with elevations.
tB. OvertTead Pourer Lines: if applicable, coordinate efforts with Pacific Power and tight, US
West, and TCi Cable, to convert any overhead electrical power, felephane, or cable facilities
within or adjoining the proposed development to underground facilities, prior to the acceptance
by the City PWD of the public improvements associated with fhe proposed development. Ali
agreements and costs associated with the conversion of these facilities from overhead to
underground facilities, shalt be by and between the utility owners and the Developer.
19. Storm Drain System Design: Prior to construction plan approval of the improvements for this
development plan, the Developer's engineer sha11 provide the City PWD with a complefe set of
hydrology and hydraeiic calculations and profile plots for sizing the site storm drain system.
The engineer shall use the rainfall~ntensity curve obtained from the City PWD far hydrology
calculations, and the negotiated run-off parameters.
38