Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 475 - Tyerman Dental - Site Plan Modif.~ c;~~`t PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 475 A RESOLU'1'ION MODIFYING A SITE PLAN APPLICATION (Applicant {s): Curtis L. Tyez-man) {372 W 11 BB Tax Lot 400) Recitals 1. This matter came before the Planning Commission for hearing on February 1, 2000, on the applicant's site plan application for a n7odification of a previous site plan, moving the building to the alley and zxzaving all the parking to the front of the building in the C-2 Commercial Professional district of the City. The Planz~ziz~zg Commission reviewed the application and the City staff reports, and received comments from all persons wishing to be heard in favor of and apposed to the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OIi CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Criteria Applicable to Decision. The following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code apply to this application: A. Chapter 17.36.010, C-2, Commercial-Professional District B. Chapter 17.60, General Regulations; C. Chapter 17.64, Off-Street Parking and Loading; D. Chapter 17.72, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval. Section 2. Findings and Conclusions. The Planning Commission hereby adopts by reference alI findings of fact set forth in the City staff reports, and concludes that, except where addressed in the conditions to approval, the application and proposal cozxzply with the requirements of the following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Cade: A. Chapter 17.36.010, relating to uses, lot size, lot coverage, setback, building height and screening in the C-2, Commercial Professional district; B. Chapter 17.60 relating to paving and landscaping requirements; C. Chapter 17.64 relating to off-street parking and loading facilities; D. Chapter 17.72 relating to site plan requirements. Section 3. Conditional Approval. The application for site plan approval is hereby conditionally approved, subj ect to the conditions set forth on Exhibit "A" and "B", which is attached 1 -PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 475 (02012000) Passed by the Planning Coax~anissio~~ a~~d signed by one in autl~c4~tication of its passage this ~~~ day of ~rryr,.w~ , 2ao(). Planning Coann~ission Ci~air~~~an ATTEST: City Repz~de~tative by me this ~ ~ day of ~~'~~-'•7 , ~aoo. Planning Co~x~n~ission Chairman 2 -PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4'~S (a2a120ao} ATTACHMENT A RECOMMENDED PLANNING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The approval of the Site Ilan shall expire in o>:~e year on liebruary 1, 2001 unless an application for a building permit or an application for extension has been received by the City. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan depicting any changes discussed and approved at the public hearing within 30 days of Planning Commission approval. 2. The project must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations . The project must meet the off street parking requirements for professional offices, and the parking, access and maneuvering areas shall be paved with durable materials for aII-weather use and approved by the Public Works Department 4. The applicant shall submit detailed landscape, irrigation and lighting plans for review by the Planning and Public Works Departments. 5. Any signs installed an the site will require a separate building permit. 11CPPDPDC1Pfanning194053c. W Pn l:l f i X11 c:f N 1 1;-~1 !'~ ~[N I t ~l~! ~~€` 1~M~rv 1 Uf= ~7UL3Lrc; w~~r,~r, STAFF REPORI~ for ryerman Dental Clinic 34& Oak Sfreet Commercial Facility Site flan PW#99053 Dafe: Applicant Property Owner: Agent: Project: Location: Legal: Zoning: Plans: Report By: Purpose .A"~TAC~M~NT B September 14, 1999 Curtis t_. Tyerman, P.G., 57 North 2"d Street, Central Point, bR 97502 Sarre as Applicant Steven G. Sherbourne, 29 South Grape Sfreet, Medford, OR 91501 i~entaf Clinic Building 348 Oak Street (SW corner of C}ak and ~`" Streets) T37S, R2W, Sec#ion 11Bg, Tax Lof 400 C-2 Site Plan w/ building elevations submitted by Pacific Pioneer Design Group, dated 6128199 Paul W. Worth, Public Works Technician Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinaf#er referred to as "Developer"} regarding Public Works standards and additional standards and requirements to be included in the design. Gather information from the DeveloperlBngineerregerding proposed development. Special Regu~remenfs Oak Sfreet ancf ~aurfh S>`ree!` (mprayernents: Sidewalks: It is recommended that the Developer be required to construct new S-foot wide curbside sidewalks, wheel chair ramps and driveway aprons meeting City PWD standards along the Oak Street frontage. Developer should also be required to remove and replace the existing sidewalk an the 4~' Street frontage with a new 5-foot wide sidewalk, separated by the existing landscape strip between the curb and sidewalk. The landscaped strip on ~€`~ Street and the Right-of Way {ROW} 6ef~ind the Oalc Street sidewalks shalt be planted ar~d maintained in compliance with City Ordinances and PWD standards. 2. Alteylmpratremen€s: The alley along the southern boundary of the property is unimproved. The plans indicate tfaat there will be parking movements thaE will take access off the alley, which will result in backing and turning movements in the alley. This is prohibited in the City`s tvlunicipal Cade under Section 17.64.100 (S) {3}. tf access will be taken from the alley to the property, then it is recommended that the Developer be required to improve the alley to current PWD standards. Typically this requires a minimum at a 3-inch thickness of Class B asphalt over 6-inches of 314-inch-minus base rock and S-inches of 4-inch-minus sub-base rack. Woven geofextile fabric is required fo be placed overlaying the subgrade. The t~roken concrete alley apron and sidewalk ~rriil also require removal and replacement to current PWD standards. Construction of the alley apron to current standards vri11 require that the existing catch t~asinrEnlet be relocated to the nortfo. .~~. 5~ h.. ~ r. J ;;i~~srrl w,alt'r t:allc'~'ti~~n ~tr~ti ct~r~v~>y~~r7c;e l,tc;riiEres slaatl also Ise t;or7structed or recon5trucled to l~rc~vr<i~' for stt~rrit w~xt~~f cnnvey~~r~ce front surface drarnagC of tl~e alloy and adjacen€ parking ~trc..t. so tha€ €hc` strr{S~Cc' drainage doCS riot sheet (#aw across the side~valkldriveway a[ tl~e a!!Cy ertrance 3 Site DrainagclS(orrrr Drain PI<~ri: tt is recommended that the developer design and implement a site drainage/storm drain plan that corrects and enhances existing site drainage for the entire area noted on tl~e site plan. Sheet flow surface drainage from the property onto if~e puUtic rights-of-way (includrng the al€ey} ar onto neighboring properties is unacceptable. Tl~e storm drainage infrastructure wilt be privately operated and maintained. A suitable systes-n wit! need to be designed for a minimum td-year storm event. The discharge point and potential retention of storm wa€er can-off shall be coordinated with aspects of the proposed development to provide an aesthetically pleasing, e~cient, and !ow maintenance facility. The storm water retention facilities shalt be designed to mitigate erosion and sediment and hydrocarbon deposition, and to mitigate the `attractive nuisance" hazards associated with these facilities. The developer shalt also secure written permission to connect/discharge into adjoining City storm water conveyance facilities. Catch basins, curbtnlefs, orifice boxes and area drains shall be designed for sediment and petroleum hydrocarbon retention. The PWD wilt require a copy of the engineers hydrology and hydraulic computations. 4. Driveways Access Roads, and Parking Rreas: tt is recommended that the driveways, access roads, and parking and Turning areas on fhe proposed development be designed and positioned in a manner that accommodate fhe fuming movements and access of an AASHTO single unit truck and the lire District's requirements. A,ti driveways, access roads, and pari~ing areas should either have asphalt or cement concrete surfaces. The driveway entrance "throat"off of Oak Street needs fa be moved a minimum of B feet fo the west to meet the minimum setback of 3Q feet from the property lines at the intersection of Oak and Fourth Streets. Driveway throat is narrow for two way driving, 5. Exisfirta lnfrasfrucfure: The Developer shat! provide suitable engineering certification and justification (i.e. caicutations, analyses, plots, etc.,) that a!t connections to exisfing infrastructure (i.e, streef; wafer, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems; natural drainage systems; etc.,} Witt not interfere with or provide far the significant degradation (in the opinion of the Public Works Director) of the existing effecfive level of service or operation of the infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have either adec{uafe . capacities to accommodate the flaws and/or demands imposed on fhe exisfing infrastructure as fhe result of the connection of the proposed development's infrastrucfure; or the existing facilities wilt be improved by and at fhe expense of the Developer to accommodate the additional flaws andlor demands white maintaining or improving fhe exisfing effective tevef of service of the affected facility. ~. UfilifY~asemenfs: A ~0-foot rrride public utility easerr~ent (f~11(=} vriS! be required along the properfy`s frontage with Oak and 4°' SEreels. 7 Wafer Service: The CiEy has no record of wafer service to this tar. tot. ii is not known i(a tap to the wafer main in Oak streef exists !f no existing service exists then af4 SDCs and associated fees for connection vrill be required. The Developer shat! determine vrith the C3uiiding Ucpartment what size service tine and meter will tie required to service the proposed development 51. ~~ /'If l~ ~arN R'rr •. •~~ l~~l~i ~ General Development Plans: Developer shall submit to the City's PWD for review and approval, engineered plans and speciticatians for all improvernenis proposed for construction or modifications within the City or public rights-of-way and easements or for connections to City infrastructure. Plans snail show a€! existing utilities and City facilities, existir<rg contours, properly lines, benchmarks and other physical site information needed for review. Al[ plans submitted for PWD review sl~all be presented in a common engineering scale sized to Ct on 24- by 36-inch, D size drawing sheets. PWD requires 3 sets of plans for review purposes. Publrc fmprovemenfs include, but are not limited lo, streets (including sidewalks, curbs and gutters and landscape buffers}; alleys; storm drainage and sanitary sewer collection and conveyance systems; water distribution system (up to the service meter and including fire protection}; street fighting; and traffc control devices, streef signs, and delineation. All construction of public improvements shall conform fo the City's PWD Standards, the conditions approved and stipulated by the Planning Commission, and other special specifications, de#aifs, standards, andlar upgrades as may be approved by the City Administrator or his designee prior to the approval of the construction plans for the proposed development. During construction, changes proposed by the Developer shaft be submitted in writing 13y the Developer's engineer to the City PWD for approval prior to insfalfafion. 2. A,~ppro,Yals: Bire Disiricf No. 3 (fre hydrant placement, waterline sizing, and emergency vehicle access}, Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA, for sanitary sewers}, and Cify of Medford Regrona( Wafer Reclamation Facility {cammerciaf~industrial wastewater discharge permif} written approval of construction plans shall be submitted to the Cify PWD prior to final construction plan review and approval by Cify PWD. 3. As-Builfs: Prior to approval and acceptance of fhe project, the Developer`s engineer or surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. if feasible, the Developer's engineer or surveyor should provide the drawings in both a hard copy" farm (produced on My[ar'°} and in a "digital" format compatible with AutoCAD°, or other form as approved by the City PWD. As-built drawings are to be provided to the City which provide `red-tine" changes to final approved construction plans which identify fhe loco#inns and or elevations (as appropriate} of actual installed items, including, but not Limited fo, invert, inlet, and rim or lip elevations; spot elevations identified on drawings; water fines, valves, and fire hydrants; water and sewer Lateral; modifications to street section; manhole and curb inlet; streef light locations; other below grade utility tines; etc. Provide a "red-fine" hard copy (an Myfar°}, or an approved aftemative format, of construction drawings, and if feasible, an acceptable AufoCAD° compatible drawing electronic file to the City at completion of construction and prior to acceptance of p€~blic infrastructure facilities completed as part of the proposed development, ar as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee. Elevations: All elevations used on the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on the permanent benchmark sha11 be tied into an established City approved benchmark and be so noted on the plans. 52 ~..'r. : f ~ .. >> Ea~rsfrrrg lrrfr.~sircrcfcrrc As ~tppf,c~~bf~~, f,cfti vc'rrfy Ott! carstrng ,nfr~a;;tructrrrc elcv~7[rons and foca(roris (r e prf>e r,iverts, curls elcv~ttrons, street efevatrons, ctc }, (o whrc#t Use proposed developrt~ent wrfl cortrtect info exrstrng improvers}enls, prior to fatal construcfiort plan design and sutantrttaf (or final approvaf_ The accurate locations of any existrng underground and above ground public infrastructure, and the location of the associated easentenis whit these facilities, shaft be accurately portrayed (both horizontally and vertically) on ilte construction plans. G. Fifl Placement: All fff placed in the development chaff be engineered tiff that is suitabEy p#aced and cor~tpacted in accordance with City PWO and ©uilding Departntenf standards, except for khe upper i .5-feet of (i([ p[aced outside of public rights-of-way and that does not underlie building, structures, or traveled vehicular access ways or parf<ing areas. 7. Road/DrivewaY/Parking Areas: The Developer shaft evaf~rafe the strength of the native soils and determine the access road, parking, and driveway section designs #o handle the expected toads (including fire equipmenf) to be traveled on these private driveways, access roads, and parking areas. Need to provide section far review. The driveways, access roads, and truck parking and fuming areas on the proposed development must be designed and posi#ioned in a manner Ehaf will accommodate the taming movements and access of an AASf-{~-O Single Unii Truck without crossing info an opposing lane or additional travel 4ane of traffic. 8. Utilit~ptans; We did not receive any utility plans far the proposed development. The utifify plans shaft be drawn to scale with accurate horizontal and vertical depiction of utifify fines and appurtenances (transformers, valves, etc.}. As built drawings chaff reflect atf utifify locations; located both above and below ground. 9. Area Lightirrq Plan: f~rovide and implement an adequate area fighting plan (or.parking and public access areas, including the driveway entrance from 4~' Street, and if applicable, the alley as may be required by the Cffy PWD. Plans should include the mast height, fuminosffy and Effective fight spread at ground level. l_fghting chaff be designed so as not fo interfere with vehicle trafffc on Cify streets. 10. Puklic Utilrftr Easemenfs: A minimum ~0-foot wide public utilities easement (PUE) shall be dedicated on the proposed devefopmerzt for the installation of public utilities and chaff be located outside the public rigf-tts-of-way. At a minimum, the PUE should be aligned along the exterior boundaries of the properly that border 4~' and Oak streets, if a PUE is not currently present in lf~is area. ~ 1 clear Vision Areas: The site plan indicates that the proposed huifding is outside the sighi- vision triangle necessary for the alley connection to Oak Street. A 55-foot minimum sight vision friangie shaft be maintained at the property's corner of f=ourth and Oafc Streets. 12 Fire Hydrants: Provide locations of existing and any new required fire hydrants. F=ire t-tydran[s need to be connected to E3-inch-diameter and larger lines. ft applicable, steamer ports al hydrants located near the building sha[I face the buildings. f=ire hydrants shall be suitably protected from potential vehicle damage and encroachment 5~ 1'.r~. ` 13 Water S~sien, Cross t/onflCCtlOr1 Cor,Irof. Oevetoper st~atl coc,~pfy writ, Oregon t~tcallh Oivisron (OND) ar7d City requiren~ent5 for cross connec[ion control Need to kr}ow protected activities and water uses for existing and new cor7onlerciaf bz,rld,ngs to determine requirenaenis (or cross connectron control and frre protection. f3uitd,ng service will trkefy regaire a backflow prevention assembly Eo be installed directly beloind tl~e City's meter 14. Wafer Sysfem: Construction drawings shah include the size, type, and location of all water mains, hydrants, valves, service connection, meter, service laterals, and other appurtenance details in accordance with City PWD Standards and as required by the City PWD. 15. Sanila Sewer frrdus(rial Dischar e Pernlil; ff applicable, obtain industrial discharge permit from City of Medford Regional Water Reclamation Facility t;Medford RWRF}. Obtain Medford RWRF's wriifen approval to connect to the sanitary sewer system. Copy of application can be obtained from City PWD. 16. }7oof/Area Drarns: All structures shat( have roof drains, area drains, and/or crawl spaces with positive drainage away from the building. Roof drains shall not be directly connected to the public storm drain system. f 7. Grading Plans: Grading plans should have original/existing grades and final grades plotted on the plan. Typically, existing grade contour lines are dashed and screened back, and final grade contour fines are overlaid on fop of the existing grades and are in a heavier fine width and solid. Confour fines should be labeled with elevations. 18. Overhead Power Lines: ff applicable, coordinate efforts with Paci€ic Power and Light, US West, and TCf Cable, fo convert any overhead electrical power, Telephone, or cable facilities within or adjoining the proposed devefopn3ent to underground facilities, prior fo the acceptance by the City PWD of the public improvements associated with the proposed development. All agreements and costs associated wifh the conversion of these facififfes from overhead fo underground facilifies, shall be by and between the utility owners and the Developer. "i 9. Sforrrr Drain System Design: Prior fo construction plan approval of the improvements for this development plan, the Developer's engineer steal! provide the Ci#y PWD with a complete set of hydrology and hydraulic calculations and profile plots for sizing the life storm drain system. The engineer shall use the rainfaH~ntensify curve obtained from the Cify PWD for hydrology caiculafions, and the negotiated run-off parameters. 54