Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 476 - Lindsey Meadows PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 476 A RESOLUTION MODIFYING RESOLUTION 420, TENTATNE FLAN APPROVAL FOR A LAND PARTITION (Applicant (s} :Richard Voigtman and Bob Fellows Constr•~.iction } ( 37 2W l ODA Tax Lots 500, 600, and 700 } Recitals 1. Applicant(s) has/have submitted an application For tentative plan approval for a land partition on a 4.03 -acre parcel, located in the R-1-G zoning district in the City of Central Point, Oregon. 2. On February 12000, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted aduly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments on the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Approval Criteria. The requirements for approval of land partitions and tentative plans are sot forth in CPMC Title 16 and 17, relating to informational requirements, zoning, lot dimension, access, and similar requirements. Section 2. Findings and Conclusions. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: A. Tentative Plan Requirements. The application and tentative plan are in the correct form and contain alI of the information required by CPMC 16.10. B. Area and Width of Lot. This partitioning in an R-1-6 zone would create the following parcels: Parcel 1: Approximately 8825 square feet; Parcel 2: Approximately 6000 square feet; Parcel 3: Approximately 6000 square feet. Parcel 4: Approximately 7000 square feet. Parcel 5: Approximately 6039 square feet. Parcel 6: Approximately 6039 square feet. Parcel 7: Approximately 6039 square feet. Parcel S: Approximately 6039 square feet. Parcel 9: Approximately 7178 square feet. Parcel 10: Approximately 7010 square feet. Planning Commission Resolution No. _476 (02122000 ) Parcel 1 l: Approximately 6100 square feet. Parcel 12: Approximately 6004 square feet. Parcel 13: Approximately 6012 square feet. Parcel 14: Approximately 6002 square feet. Parcel 15: Approximately 6985 square feet. Parcel 16: Approximately 8032 square feet. Parcel 17: Approximately 7772 square feet. Parcel 18: Approximately 7437 square feet. Parcel 19: Approximately 15538 square feet. Parcel 20: Approximately 7952 square feet. Parcel 21: Approximately 8563 square feet. Parcels 1 through 21 meet the minimum area { 6,000 square feet For interiot lots and 7,000 square feet for corner lots} and width {60 Feet for interior lots and 70 feet for corner lots) requirements for lots in the R-1 zone as set forth in CPMC 17.20.060, and such parcels meet the general requirements for lots contained in CPMC 16.24.050. Parcel 2 meets the area and width requirements for flag lots contained in CPMC 16.36.040. C. Access to Flag L.ot. CPMC 16.36.040 requires an access of at least 20 feet in widtb, paved with cement or asphaltic surface, for all flag lots created by partition. The tentative plan submitted herein provides fora 20-foot wide access, to be paved with concrete, which satisfies the City code requirement. Section 3. Conditional Approval The application for tentative plan for land partition herein is hereby approved, subject to the conditions set forth on Exhibit "A" and "B", attached hereto by reference incorporated herein, imposed under authority of CPMC Chapter 16.36. Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this ~Sr day of__ C-=~tow~ ~~ , 2000. ~~~~ ~~~ Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Repr e tative Ap roved by me this ~ ~-~ Planning Commission Resolution Na. _476 day of ~'~~"~ , 2000. Planning Commission Chair (02122000 ) .~ ATTACHMENT A PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall submit to the City a copy of the proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions (GCBs) for the Lindsey Meadows subdivision. 2. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of affected public agencies and utilities as they pertain to the development of the Lindsey Meadows subdivision. Evidence of such compliance shall be submitted to the City prior to final plat approval. 3. The applicant shall comply with all federal, state and local regulations, standards and requirements applicable to the development and construction of the Lindsey Meadows subdivision. 6~ ~TTAC~-~MLN~~ ~~ C[TY OF CENTRAL POINT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLfC WORKS STAFF REPORT for L.iNDSEY MEADOWS PW#97t338 Date: Applicant: Agent: Project: Location: LegaL• Zoning: Lots: Units: Plans: Report By: Purpose 10/15/97 Richard Voightman 4294 East Barnett Road, Medford, Oregon 97501 Darrell Cooper, 1500 Spring Street, Medford, Oregon 97501 Subdivision Northwest of Timothy Street and Chicory Lane. T3TS, R2W, Section 10DA, Tax Lot 500 R-1 -6 21 total (no phases proposed) 24 New, one existing Lindsey Meadows, Hammond Engineering, revision 3 dated 8-13-97. Lee Brennan, Public Worics Director Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Deve€oper"} regarding City Public Works ©epartment (PWD} standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed subdivision. Gather information from the Developer/Engineer regarding proposed development. Special Requirements Reslde-rffa~anes: The tentative plan illustrates one street which does not meet the City PWD`s current minimum width requirements and which the City PWD understands is to be a public street {in lieu of a private road). The tentative plan illustrates a 20-foot wide right-of-way. En consideration of this plan and the "infill' conditions of this subdivision, the City PWD is recommending.the utilization of a new Residential Lane standard which consists of the i5ollowing: ^ A 25-foot-wide traveled section, with a 2 percent crown t3 Standard curb and gutters © A 2-foot~+vide strip located behind the curb for installation of water meter service box © Requires a ~0-foot-wide right~•of-'way. ^ Street parking not allowed on residential lanes. The "hammerhead' design of the turnaround at the southern end of this street needs to be as approved by the City PWD and Fire District No. 3. The City PWD is also recommending that a 5-foot wide sidewalk section (with a suitable public ingress and egress easement requirement} would be provided overlying the public-utility-easement to facilitate pedestrian traffic. The sidewalk would be installed as part of the development and will be maintained by the property owner, similar to the City's current ordinance requirement. The City PWD is further recommending that a concrete drive approach (constructed somewhat similar to a driveway apron) would be required at the intersection with Shanthi Drive; the design of which would be jointly determined by the Developer and the City PWD. 2. ~xfsting Infrastructure: The Developer shall demonstrate that all connections to existing infrastructure (i.e. street; water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems; natural drainage systems; etc.,) will not interfere with or provide for the degradation of the existing effective level of service or operation o€ the infrastructure 6 ! l,anrisct' Afeadv+rr P ff'D Srn/J"/;eporr Ocrv8cr 15. f 99? Pr~~e ~ provide the drawings in both a "hard copy" farm {produced on Mylar~) and in a "digital" format compatible with AutoCAD®, or other form as approved by the Cify PWD. As-built drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line" changes to final approved construction plans which identify the locations and or elevations {as appropriate) of actual installed items, including, but not limited fo, invert, inlet, and rim or lip elevations; spot elevations identified on drawings; road alignment; water lines, valves, and fire hydrants; water and sewer lateral stationing; modifications to street section; manhole and curb inlet locations; street light locations; other below grade utility line locations and depths; etc. Provide a "red-line" hard copy (on Mylar~'), or an approved alternative format, of construction drawings, and if feasible, an acceptable AutoCADm compatible drawing electronic file to the City at completion of construction and prior to acceptance of public infrastructure facilities completed as part of the proposed development, or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee. All elevations used on the construction plans, an temporary benchmarks, and on the permanent benchmark shall be tied into an esfabtished City approved benchmark and be so noted on the plans. At feast two permanent benchmarks shall be provided for the proposed development, the location of which shall be as jointly determined by the City PWD and the Developer. If applicable, all existing concrete, pipe, building materials, structures, clear and grub materials, and other deleterious materials shall be removed from the situ and either recycled or properly disposed of in accordance with the requirements of the D1=Q. Easements for City infrastructure {i.e. sanitary sewer, water, and storm drain (if applicable]} should be a minimum of 15-feet wide, and should not split lot fines. Easements for public storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and water lines should be dedicated to the City and not just a P.tJ.E. Centerline of buried infrastructure shall be aligned a minimum of five {5) feet from the edge of the easement. If two or more City owned utilities are located within an easement, then a minimum of 20-foot width should be required. Easement dedications in f:nal deeds or CC~Rs need a statement which should clearly indicate that easements must be maintained with suitable, driveable vehicular access to City public infrastructure facilities, as determined by the City PWD. Prior to the City PWD final approval of the construction plans for the proposed improvements, the fallowing should be submitted: D A copy of written approval from Fire District 3 of the final street and water system improvement plans for the proposed development. © The plans relating to the sanitary sewers should be approved in writing by BCVSA, and the appropriate signature blocks should be completed on the plans. Field verify all existing infrastructure elevations and locations {i.e. pipe inverts, curb elevations, top of banks, ditch/channel inverts, street elevations, etc.}, to which the proposed subdivision will connect into existing improvements, prior to final construction plan design and submittal for final approval. 9. If the proposed development places structures within the 100-year floodzone, the Developer will be required io explain and provide detail as to what affects will the placement of these structures have on the floodzone; what affect will the development have on the floodplain elevation and floodzane boundary; and what affects will the modification of the floodplain elevation and flaodzane boundary have on the existing and proposed facilities, and properties surrounding the proposed development. As applicable, the Developer's engineer shall determine the existing Base Flood Elevation contours and illustrate the existing boundaries of the floodplain and floadvray fora 100-year storm event (commonly referred to as the "E3ase f=lood Event") s8 L.indsry Meadows PWD Sta,~Report Q~taber I S, 1997 Page S Storm Drainage, irrigation improvements Existing Improvements - Shallow irrigation ditches {running west to east) along southern and northern boundaries of proposed development. Daisy Creek is along western border of proposed development. 1. The design of the storm drain collection, retention, and conveyance system (SD System) shall provide for storm water run-off from and run-on onto the proposed development {either surface run-on or culvert or creek/ditch conveyance). 2. During construction plan review, the Developer shall provide the City FWD with a complete set of hydrologic and hydraulic calculations and profile plots for sizing the SD system, which shat! incorporate the use of the City PWD's rainfallrntensity curve, and City approved run-off coefficients, curve numbers, retardance, pipe roughness coefficients, etc., to be used in the engineering calculations. 3. Developer shall demonstrafe how SD system will work during 10-year and 100 year >fioad events associated with Daisy Creek. Identify the HGL in Daisy Creek during 10- and 1DO-year storm event, and what affect will it have on the proposed outlets and storm drain system. System should be designed to adequately drain 10-year storm without surcharging or should be provided with adequate storage to prevent surcharging; and be designed to prevent backflow of water from Daisy Creek up into Sp system during storm events. The allowable storm water discharge rates into Daisy Creek from the proposed development shall not be greater than the run-off flow rates experienced from the property in its current status, unless the downgradient facilities have adequate capacities or will be modified to handle the addifional flows. ~4. Materials shall be PVC (ASTM D 3034 with gaskets), HDPE (meeting ©DOT requirements for corrugated polyethylene storm sewer pipe, including a provision far premium water-tight coupling bands), or approved equal. Provide concrete encasement where required in areas of minimum cover. &. If inlets/catch basins are to exceed 4.5 feet in depth from the lip of the inlet, then the inlets~nd catch basins shaft be designed to afford suitable `man" entry into the inlets/cafch basin for maintenancelcleaning purposes. 6. Developer's engineer shall provide hydrology and hydraulic calculations and. flow line plots for prnrate and public storm drains. Plot HGL on profile or provide a separate proftEe drawing that indicates the HGt_ on the profile. Pipes should maintain cleaning velocity {minimum 2.0 feet per second) and have adequate capacities without surcharging during the design storm. 7. The Developer may wish to incorporate the use of a perforated SD system. If so, then the perforated storm drain system shall be designed to have adequate capacities to: D Canvey the collected groundwater and storm water with the minimum cleaning velocities and without surcharging the collection and conveyance piping; and D Minimize silts, sands, gravels, and fines migration from the native soils into the SD system. The plotted HGL shall include both the groundwater infiltration, and the storm water run-off and run-on inflows into the SD system, 69 Lindsey bfcadows PWD Sta,~"Repor~ OcrarSer 1 S, 1997 Page 7 Site work, Grading and Design, and Utility Flans Developer shall provide tf7e necessary "rough" lot grading to assure that all lots will drain property to the curb and gutfer, or to a drainage system that drains to the curb and gu#ter or public storm drain system, as approved by fhe City PWD and the City Building Department. 2. Grading plans should have originaVexisting grades and final grades plotted on the plan. Typically, existing grade contour Gnes are dashed and screened back, and final grade contour lines are overlaid on top of the existing grades and are in a heavier line width and solid. Contour lines should be labeled with elevations. 3. Indicate location of street lights on plans, with table indicating stationing and offsets. Rights of Ways/i;asements Developer shall comply with all existing easement owner requiremenfs regarding any proposed development that may overlap any existing easement. Any development proposed which overlaps or alters an existing easement should be approved by the easement`s owner in writing, and a copy of that written approval should be submitted to the Gity PWD prior to submission of construction plans for City PWD review and approval. All existing easement locations and thosi; proposed for this development shall be shown on the final plat with reference to the recordation number and Grantee. 2. if applicable, Developer shall provide a Statemen# of Water Rights (on a City approved form), for any affected properties. F'or properties determined fo have water rights, the developer wi11 coordinate with the State Watermaster the re-allocation of any waters attached to lands no longer irrigable as a result of the proposed development. 70 . , .{ 1 t. ~~ n ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ h[r y.a~c+r-~ a l.~'"" K~ wK H ' ~ ~ ~ .,tom ~ ~! ~ t j xccv ~ "y1 [r y t ( / 3 '' ~ ~ ~~ ry f L am t -S .m ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ,.1 ~~,... -^- "'mow w.saee~ = _~ ~ ~, ~ , ~ ~~ ~. `~ - _ ~ ~ x~~ ~ 4 .~ ~ ~~i n~ ~ ii ~ ~ ti~ n ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~..•.~1, t J pit[[ ~,C.Wy,~'ra ^'~ ~7 t ~ ~ ~. f - ' ~ t a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~> ~_ ,L ~ ~ x ~~~~~ ~ u~~~~ ~ ~ s ~~~$~x~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ b ~1~ ~ ~, ~f~ y y, ~ 5 [5~~ pg~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ar~~y~"~pY~~b~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~'~ b y~, `,~r.ira•~ ~aa x