Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 484 - Miller Estates, Ph. I - Final Dev. Plan~ ~~S~a`~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 484 A RESOLUTION CONDITIONALLY APPROVING A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN {Applicant (s}: Brad Miller, Miller Estates Phase I} (3~2W03B Tax Lots 500 and 600} R cci tal s I . This matter came before the Planning Commission for hearing on May 2, 2000, on applicant's site plan application for a final development plan in the R-1, Residential Single Fan2ily and R-2, Residential Two-Family districts of the City. The Planning Con~znission reviewed the application and the City staff reports, and received comments froze all persons wishing to be heard in favor of and opposed to the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section I. Criteria Applicable to Decision. The following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code apply to this application: A. Chapter 17.20, Residential Single Family District B. Chapter I7.24; Residential Two-Family District C. Chapter1.24.020, Planned Unit Developments Section 2. Findin~s,and,Conclusions. The Planning Commission hereby adopts by reference all findings of fact set forth in the City staff reports, and concludes that, except where addressed in the conditions to approval, the application and proposal comply with the requirements of the following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code: A. Chapter I x.20 and 17.24, relating to uses, lot size, lot coverage, setback, building height and screening in the R-1 and R-2 districts; B. Chapter 17.68.060, relating to the Planning Commission reviewing the Final Development Plan; Section 3. _Conditio_nal Approval. The application for site plan approval is hereby conditionally approved, subject to the conditions set forth on Exhibits "A", "B", and "C" which is attached hereto and by this reference incozporated herein. I -PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4$4 (05022000 } Passed by the Planning Conzznissio~z anti signet( by zx-e ia~ authentication of its E~assage this _.~~__day ofd » ~, 2000. ~~~ ~~ ~. Planning Commissioaz Cl~aiz-~z~an ATTEST: City R~~r~sentative pproved by n1e this ~,~ day of ~ c,c~-,~ , 2000. ~~ ~~~~~ Planning Conzzxzission Chairman 2 -PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 484 (05022000 } I_I_ER ESTATES SUBDIVISIQN, PHASE 1 -- " A PLANNCD COMMUNITY - - - ~~. `'~'' 7~ ~ Locatad ln: \ (17) I r„ v ' Th• N.W. ]/< of Srct3on S. T.37S., R.2W., Clty of Csntra} Polnt 3aakson Count Or W.Y.S. ( I i I ~ ~ - - - - !51 (Gfi~~l•I CL~~d SU8!N'tr!S ;,~.: ~ , y, sflon (NUY.TH VD.E_!.~'i E~Ti,T~S SUE7piVl1"iION, t]NlT ~ Np. 1} UNIY N{i. ?! • ~ ~ I (2b) I (23) I (22) I (21) I (20) ! (19) ~ (18) I © \ ~ ' 1 1 I I wirla•41•E I !! aw.aa' 1 ~ ~ I i6f ~ }'~~ tm wrN'u'E 331.51' ~ " _ s, ~ .l3' TD.00' a<aru',a'L sai. 65.00' 78.Da' w' _ ~1~' / ... Maa'4'AI 'C 4L.a5' 4 4, u Q c \ IaI.2a 17!.77' a~ 1, \ ~T {rU[ ~ \ 'nJ ,.I,..Tr y~ aaA3' aldl' I ~ L ^1.00' '_- ~ a1A[' ~alAl ~ riaA[' - ~ iYAt'- aL.D1' ti i ~>.,i -~u W'00~ SIAa' u ~ >Z ~ ~ u• \ ~~ ~ ~ i3aro I: 4 ..r i/r ! ,,. ,ux , ~ S r s . s ~ a "~ ~ i s3' wE r' ~ ~ ~+ ~ ~ ,IS sa:./':..D3• .r ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ •+ `~' \ >r~=a`'a` `+ c ~L F ti ~_ S 7 _ ~ ~ $ I .. ! W ' ~ t 9 _ I ~ ~ i 0 ~ `ss 1 1 ~! `~ i 2 : `>3 ~ ~ 3 _ _ ~ x 14 ~ 1 5 s 1 6 ~ ? 17 a _ ~ Mss ~ a tDaa+ 6 ~ 8 i I & ~ ~ ~ A S ~ 8 & r ~31r 11.C 5 © ~ ~ ~ 13.73' I ~ ~ ! ~( la' MJE ' - - ` ' "" . . •O } 2 © G~ q~'r ~ .s tt ~,'U~\ a7~; +/ _..SE"~3" 1 _ ....~'tf:od''""= _~_-_ ~dd:~4''---b0.3br'-'.'6i:3o"" _ ...._....SiwVLaN4tetYN'S1 - 'tla'bd'"' eu.3- ~~w~-.........__ .,.. el TE3.63~""" aa,a4T oa r _. __..----. _.._ _^_ ~o.m t7 ~~7•u'4}~r ---~ ss.x ~•''` 4y . s~i '' '~ 11 t 7. 3 ~ \ 310']a'S 1 w ~~ ~ f D ' t H1L Y ' 'W arEi1 ~iC "tz 3a¢a• T fi .' a 1r arACE y4 a ~~. ~. •. acrt ~ , ~ p ~ ~i /i ~~, ~ $, ~~~ ~~, AFL :~ cq ~ ~~, '$' luroa.d}•E \ '~J• s ,/la' rt3C 7. s ~; ~ ~ s4.ta' ~ ~'~ tid T'. i ri. i yq ~ \\ ~J 1 ,~ - ova of ~ .Qr,N LL~+w ~• ~,~ ~ yeas 73 s2a.D4 et~r ~~,Md `~ ~ `~ ~, \ p~ 47~~ ~ .z~urc ~ Y/~ 1 '., ~ 4S • ~ ~ ~ ~b o„ ~ ~: ~ s.iie L s.o47 ~" cl• 3 4.x12 \ A aJi3 }a I'~ 1.412 \ \ 3 a 1,x17 3i 5,311 ~ a d,i7a ]x ll,3/i 7 a.7U 73 s.sl: ~.L- isa.ea~ !p ,~ 3a 431[ ~ 3a 15 aXj1 ~ a,l/{ °'3i 1: a.7u 3s 7.1b] t3 i.~a 11 7,670 ,l ~~ _ ~ 6.812 17 a.a7s li Y.3~ M x.471 a'~ 1! m aµx~ a D u c7A7 i,371 x7 73 ui ai a 7W y ~/ {.7Y . ~a u ~ a.taa 6.633 ~ zs al [Dau Utx ortx 7aAE[ 1 arN3 ffAGY I 3.1r7 7Aad r xll KT naa kn 140 cun t rats3 t 4Cl A 1AM Ib1an1 H Ota IN i 1 1 to n iz 1 ' to is ~ 5 31 ]o __._.._ ___. i' Sittil~ 1lUC 26 x~$ 25 ~~~ 24 ~~~ 23 ~~~ 22 ~~$ 21 a~$ 20 xE$ 19 ~~~ 18 29 ~$ 3a ~ ~_ 31 ~ ~ 32 8 33 ~ ~ 34 ~ s 35 ~ ~ 36 ~ $ 37 ~_ IIx a aa'tLY ~/a.1Y _AEARIAH ENUE---_~, " o `, ssr3rs/w i~ N ffi A~ ( r~•~. ~S _ ~ ~ ~ .~a~~ ~ --7i3P...1 ~L9C- I' 7T1Q.7 r[.UG 3a' [ I 1 1 , ruE 45. 0 44 ~ ~ 43 s 42 ~ ~ 49 ~ g 40 ~ s 39 ~ a~ 38 ~ s JS R ~ ~ >i ~ R ~ >~ W {a 'i R [3.i0' I ~ ~ 1 • ea. 7s. sa-a1•u1r ~. rsras'wtir <73.sr - / ~ ~1'u• ~r MDr711UMi k 13SDCy~rES. Mti. 14k7 f. JACKaON 31'al'7:T Ym70ia, ptiL4N (3i1} 776-~YL! iYt 110U4EAS C. YNIANAN ru w. 1113 7iC4.E1 I• w' 11ARCJ1 }a, 2aa6 t3AUS W RLIAIND: 70UM oouHOi.1t+' Dr M4.RH YAIlC* 6TATB SLaarIn1101i. UXFC 114. 5 o .. s.l a/a•lal• r.eor .m. rl.«x. wr .1.,11.E ~0. Y~I{All4il t3 1133'. Xj s.l s/i•c3a' r.mr ran N.rl..ar MOlnl~ 'o. ~ v u 311x. • r.,.,s a/a- Ir.,l rlr ® w 7W a/i' ^ S{• rw.r rile wl.hl .oa .t.me.c 'LS 1113' 1r Mp[CM 4AJi1' C1YATt7 70.fadYl{kly 1)1/{T MD. 1, alM. Q • /~W Y.11 Mt elwnVnwnl 1[tC . i...w,.nt r.r w,la. uwlly,. ,narwr +rolrioD.. ~. IroMr~ Mwtna. filghw,a, .oLll f.+..tn.n .~ L1rIaWy w.r r.rur.. w IIwlnYtiw~ tu3aAwc7_ans a1r31 x a y 1 Attachment B RECOMMENDED PLANNING DEZ'ARTMENT COND~TtONS OF APPROVAL 1. A final development plan, ContaEIllilg in final form tt~e information required in the preliminary plan shall be submitted to the City within six rrEOnths of approval or by March 15, 1999. A six month extension may be granted by the City upon the applicant's request and for good cause. 2. The project must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations including, but not limited to, the Oregon Uniform Fire Code and Structural Specialty Code. 3. The applicant shall submit final parking, landscaping, lighting and sign plans to the City for approval as part of the final development plan. 4. The applicant shall submit a copy of the Covenants, Codes and Restrictions {CC&Rs} or any comparable agreement governing the use, maintenance and continued protection of the PUD as part of the final development plan. 5. The applicant shall schedule and attend pre-design meetings with WP NatwraJ. Gas, Fire District No. 3 and the Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority to more specifically identify utility easements and the placement of fire hydrants and pipelines and other utilities. 6. Tlie applicant shall provide a tot lot in addition to adult recreation facilities, the number and location of which to specified by the Commission. to City of Centre ~!ota ~~r~rr~r~ «C„ r Piarinfn~ peP~rtmeu~ C1 of Central Pont t N T E R MEMO 0 ~ ~ 1 C E To: Tom Humphrey, Planning Director From: twee Brennan, Public Works Director Subject: Memorandum Regarding Public Works Depar#ment Recommendation Regarding Final Development Plan Approval for Miller Estates Date: Apri! 24, 2000 Our department has completed its review and has recommended that the following conditions of approval be placed on the final development plans for the first phase of development of Miller Estates. The remaining portion of the development will likely not occur until the fiaodplain/floodway issueslneeds/problems have been clearly identified and remediated. This work remains to be completed. We have received a verbal approval of the development plans from Mr. Alex Georgevitch of the Oregon Department of Transportation, and a written approval from Neil Shaw of Fire District No.3. The plans still require final approval from BCVSA prior to our department's fnal approval of the plans. It is our department's recommendation to approve the plans for the Development of Phase 1 of Miller Estates with the fallowing conditions and exceptions: Elevation certificates shall be required for the placement of all structures within the Development. Minimum lowest finish floor elevations for the various lots shall be as illustrated by the Engineer on Drawing No. F.2. All lots within the development are considered to be within the 'i0(l-year floodplain of Griffin Creek. 2. Ali connections to the water supply system should comply with OHl7 and City PWb requirements. Install concrete thrust blocks to meet City required horizontal and vertical restraint requirements. An air relief assembly steal! be installed immediately in front of the gate valve installed at the terminus of the 8-inch water line on Orth Drive., at approximate S#ation 19+74. All water line joints and fittings shall be restrained from the terminus of the waterline on Marian Avenue through the crossing of the storm drain pipe line {ta approximate station 2850}. 3. A suitable landscape plan for the required landscape buffer along Highway 99 shall be prepared and submitted to the City far review and approval. Once approved, the landscape plan shall be implemen#ed and maintained for the initial one year period (from the date of acceptance by the City pWD} by the Developer at the Developer's expense. At a minimum, the landscape plan shall include provision for grass and street trees. T'he street trees shalt be installed along the meandering sidewalk, in accordance with the City's draft standards, and the trees shall be selec#ed from the City's draft street tree list, as approved by City's Planning Commission and City Planning Department and PWD staff. The s#reet trees selected shall be compatible with the overhead powerlines in this area and shalt be of a minimum 1-112 inch caliper size. The landscape buffer shat{ be designed with an automated irrigation system that is operated utilizing AC power for the system's controls. f ~. .lfr 7imt !lurrrftltt'c's' R~'c•urrurrrndcrlrart.t urrd C ~o+ulrlrvrrs /ur J-~irrul 1'lcut .~Ilrla'cn'al of !'hcrsc' I uJ cSfr(Icr l~sfnl<•,c Ih'rcllrnrcru :rf~r'!1 z~, znnn ~~~~ z 4. As applicable, developer shall acquire suitable easements across private property not owned by the proposed development's property owners for utility line alignments, storm drainage improvements, fill placement, etc. These easements shall be secured prior to construction in these areas. A copy of the recorded easement shall be submitted to the City PWD prior to Final Plat approval. 5. The streets within this development are considered private streets, and are not the responsibility of the City. The streetlights to be insta!!ed along Highway 99 at approximate stations 11 ~' 19 and 15+24 shall be relocated to be positioned directly behind the sidewalk; aligned perpendicular fo the highway. 6. 'The only storm drainage facilities within this development that will be owned, maintained, and operated by the City are the storm drain pipelines (and associated manholes) which have an inside diameter of 30-inches or {arger. Alf other storm drainage collection and conveyance facilities shalt be considered to be private facilities which steal( be constructed in accordance with the City's Building Department and UPC requirements. A plumbing permit wilt need to be obtained from the City's #~uilding Department for the development of these private facilities. CitylODOT curb inlets shall be constructed so that a maximum depth of 4.5 feet from the gutter "lip" of the curb inlet to the outlet pipe invert is not exceeded, or steps shall be provided as directed by the City PWD. Maximum allowable curb inlet depth shall be 6.0 feet. Storm drain pipes intersecting CityIODOT manholes or curb inlets shad intersect at an angle no Tess than 90` from the outlet pipe. A "flow trough" channel shall be constructed in the bottom of all City(ODOT curb inlets and manholes. Provisions shall be made to collect and convey the surface waterlstorm drainage flaws from approximate station 1$+05 on Orth Drive to the eastern terminus of Orth Drive. City storm drain pipe and fittings which will have less than 2-feet of final cover and which underlie the street section, shall have the pipe encased with a minimum of 6- inches of concrete to a point 2-inches below the spring-tine of the pipe, with the requirement for a minimum of 12-inches of final cover over the top of the pipe. In areas outside the street section, the concrete cap may be substituted with a 2-sack cement-sand slurry mix. Pipe must be laid in a trench that is constructed prior to pipe installation. The 3fl-inch-diameter storm drain pipe constructed upstream of SDMH Igo. 6 shall be constructed with a slurry cap in lieu of the concrete cap required. 7. A suitable permanent #raffic barrier and emergency vehicle gated access shall be designed and submitted for City PWD and Fire District No. 3 review and approval, to be placed at the terminus of Mary's Way across the back of fat 17 and along lot 18. This is for emergency access only, and shall not be utilized for construction or regular access. All crossings of the sanitary sewer mains with the water mains shall be done in accordance with the requirements of OAP. 333-61, including the requirements for installation of a reinforced concrete jacket and centering of full pipe joints at the crossing. Ali other crossings shall maintain a minimum 6-inch clear separation between City and BCVSA infrastructure facilities (i.e. pipes, valves, etc.), unless as otherwise specifically reviewed and approved at the Time of construction by the City's Public Works Supervisor, with the backfilling requirements as specified by the Public Works Supervisor. If no other codes or laws specifying a greater utility separation apply, all other non-City utility infrastructure shall be located to keep a minimum 5-foot horizontal separation with City and BCVSA infrastructure, including a minimum 5-foot separation of all City facilities (i.e storm drain, waterlines, sanitary sewer, etc ). Crossings shaft be performed to maintain a minimum 1.0 foot i2