Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 486 - Elden Smith Partition PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLU"I ION NO. 486 A RESOLUTION GRANTING TENTATIVE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A LAND PARTITION {Applicant (s) :Elden Smith } (37 2W11AD Tax Lot 6300 ) Recitals 1. Applicants}has/Have submitted an application for tentative plan approval for a land partition on a 1.14 -acre parcel, located at 764 Pittview Avenue in the City of Central Point, Oregon. 2. On June 6, 2000, the Centz-al Point Planning Commission conducted aduly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and cozxzznents on the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: section 1. Approval Criteria. The requirements for approval of land partitions and tentative plans are set forth in CPMC Title 16 and 17, rotating to informational requirements, zoning, tat dimension, access, and similar requirements. Section 2. Findings and Cc~,nrl~.zsions. The Planning Commission finds and detez-mines as follows: A. Tentative Plan Requirements. The application and tentative plan are in the cozxect fonrrz and contain all of the information required by CPMC 16.10. B. Area and Width of Lat. This paz-titioning is in an R-1-8 zone, creating 6 parcels. All parcels meet the minimum area { 5000 square feet for interiot lots and 8000 square feet for corner lots) and width (60 feet for interior lots and 70 feet for corner lots} requirements for lots in the R-1~8 zone as set foz•th in CPMC 17.20, and such parcels meet the general requirements for lots contained in CPMC 16.24.050. Section 3. Conditional A royal. The application for tentative plan fez- land partition herein is 1•zcreby approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibits "A", "B", and "C" attached hereto by reference incorporated herein imposed under authority of CPMC Chapter 16.36. Also subject to the Fire District #3 recommendations; adding pedestrian easements to the east and west, with a 10 year sunset clause; and adding sidewalks around the entire subdivision Planning Commission Resolution No. _486 {060520Q© ) ~ Passed by the i'Ianning Commission and signed by i~~c in a~itllentication of its passage this day of .~,~ ~ ~~ , 2000. Planzlizag Coz~z~zxzission Chair Approved ny me znts day of ~~ ~- ~ , 2000. ~~/.~ f Planning Coznznission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. _486 (06052000 } ATTEST: ~yy fit Z r t~11 r` 10 1 i F, ~ 4~ F ~ o~ ~ s ~... ~ . 1, MprS ; N Q~nS k 2)Ya !~ ) °~ Y 3 ; : • ~ s~ t ; ~ --- - - - - - ri.~ -~.Lrrcam° _..._ _.... ~ ' _ ~ oo- rl ~ ti'cr tt h F f /* I f ll r ~ I ~ ~-, ~ ~ a ~ $ \I ix f ~~ ~. d~~ ~1~~ ,~. ~ i I ~~,•~~ ~ ~ I~I~ nl i ~u ~} aka = n~ ! fs °~ i ~ C~ V -~[ ~ ~* ~ ~ Sa9`55 A7~C +'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I w rf I + 7l. ] A ~~ a = Y z1a~ ~ ~ s ~~ I g ~~ ~~~~ ~g err ~ ..,:. : Y ~ E a ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ E f ¢„ ~ ~ f I , I I +[ae sa~n-+' g f I I ~__ rf I C i ~~ E I I a~ l I ~..__ ._ _ ~ f~, ~.. _._ ~ pdffFG ]/ RL [?filM [I' R.( ~7~~ ...._.._ ..... ..............___-___.__~_.._,r PITTyEY! A1h]~IUE ~ i ~ ~ E 4 t_a' E ~ 6 ~ ~~ ,_ ~5 R1 t' ~6 #~ ~ Y Ipl ~ a L~[ ~ ~y ~~ ~ 3 > ~~ ~~ ~~ f;u a ~~ . ~,~ a _~ ~ ~~~ ~ L 0 f ~; ~~{{j1 ~S ~ ~. ' R - ;-- ___.~____~ ___~,~T,-__- +.+~+Mlc ati7V at71 p f LxC.it C yyrr~XX~r ....{yy{~~ TTl4 ~~tt A~J.ChIJI,~JI~~ ~~1~rill~Il~ UC'~3AI'(IIiPiIY 6 C:.17~' C)f= CI:N1l:AI ('()1N] f>f 1'/lfi1r11f.:N7 C)1 I'(If3l_1(; 41'c)1~1~,`~ for CORY SUE3DlVISION ~-E~NTA~f~NE~ PLAN RfWVIt~W raw{~aaaa9 Date: Applicani Properly Owner: Project: Location Legal: Zoning: Area: Units: Plans: Report E3y Purpose t'iariziltit; E)ct~xartm~~r April 24, 2000 lrlden Smith, 9171 Sierling Creek Road, Jacksonville, Oregon 97530 890-~ 720 Agent: L.J. f=riar and Associates,. P.C, 816 W. 8~' Streei, Medford, Oregon 975x1 Same as Applicant Cody Subdivision. Easi o! f3ursell Road and Sydney Court, on tine Nor#hern Side of f'itiview Aver7ue T37S, R2W, Section 011AD, tax lot G300 R-1-8 1.14 Acres (approximately). 7 lots (G new lots and one remainder lot with an existing house and garage. 1 page entitled "Tentative Subdivision Plaf Cody Subdivision, dated March 27, 2000, prepared by t_.J. f=riar and Associates. Lee N. Brennan, Public Worfes Direcfor Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant {hereinafter referred to as "Developer'} regarding City Public Works Department (PWD) standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed planned unit development. Gather information from the DeveloperlEngineerregxrding the proposed development. ik should be noted thaf this plan was absent of any designation or delineation of existing infrastructure, whici~ is required to be placed on a tentative plan far aqy development. As such, the plan is incomplete. 'in working with the Developer, it is i<ielieved that infi-astnacture services (i.e water, sanitary sewer, storm_drainage, power, telephone ~ cable,,~tc.) canes. provided to the proposed subdivision. Our staffreport {s`baseii on a cuisorai resew of ttie ~uir~unding connecting infrastructure. If during design, cfianges to tJhe conditions may need to be made to make sure that the subdivision is adequately served without overtaxing the existing infrastructure and to provide adequate levels of service to the proposed development. The proposed intersection connection of Shayla Lane to Pittview Avenue provides for an intersection separation of approximately 240 feet from the intersection of Sydney Court with Pittview Avenue. This exceeds the minimum intersection requirement of 150 feet for a loco( street to local street connection Special Rectuirements Exisfir~ Irtfr~~sfrercfure The D~veioper sha(I demonstrate that all connections to existing infrastructure (i.e streets; vrater, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems; natural drainage systems; etc.,) will not interfere wrth or provide for the degradation of the existing e€fective Ievul of service or operation of the infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities gave either adegr~ate capacities to accommodate the flows andlor demands unposed on tf~e existing infrastructure a, the result of the connection of the proposed devclot>ment's irttr r3 ;trrTcture, or vrrll Inc ~rttr)r[~vr~d Icy ~~ncf at Iftr~ ex.pc,rtsc, c.tf the [~evefoper tf~ accort~rl;n<J;;tr~ t1t~; ,trfr.iitionr3[ flnvd<; ~3nr'{/nr clr~nt~tntl~~, vrhtlr_ rtt~~,n(<tin~ncs of int~~rr~vir~g tf~~ existEnr} [evr~i ~,( -,f;rvicr. r~i 9 f~<-.!?( hsl~ucs rl !r'nr.7tn~<' 1'i.:.7 fie.'i. ,, 1'i{ 1 { ~r,7j) t;, , 1 ~f+rv,trl~ ~? !t'~'~7 1'.7.•.' the affected faculty, as c`i()t)rOVL'd t}y (a; <~(}l~l{c~lb#e), lhc^ rcgtll~ltory ~1~C'nCy, lltlllty (.?wr1Cr, ~ltld/0{ property owner involved, 2 Residential Lane. The Developer is proposing the use of public streets with a residential fans wiftl a `han~n~ertlead" (Shayia Lane). ~"he PWD has ap{)roved developn~cnt of this residentiai lane concept on Shefter~vood, Griffin Creek estates, Lindsey Meadows, Qeali t.stakes IV, and Packwood Terrace subdivisions. Typicafiy residentiai lanes have been designed to serve a n~axin~um of 12 lots. The proposed fayotlt will serve 7 lots. The residential lane has tine following 5tar~dards: ^ A 25-foot-wide traveled section (curt}-to-curb width), wish a ?_ percent crown ^ Standard curb and gutters ^ A 2-foot-wide strip located behind the curb far installation of water meter service boxes, fire t~ydrants, street tights etc. ^ Requires a 30-foot-wide right-of-way. ^ Street parking not allowed on residential lanes. Another concern regarding the use of a residential Pane for this development is tine tack of visitor parking within the development and on the closest street to the development (Piftview Avenue, We would suggest the possibility of inclusion of an off-street visitor parking area within fhe developmenf. The "T" Shaped uhamrrrerhead" turnaround shall be designed and implemented, as approved by the City PWD and Fire District 1~l0. 3. The connection to t'iffview Ave wilt be a standard driveway connection with a 2-foot concrete "landing` behind fhe driveway apron; the driveway apron shat{ have a 30-foot throat. A temporary asphait connection could be made and the Tina[ concrete driveway connection c;ornpieted when Pitfview Avenue is developed to urban standards. 3. f2emovaf ofDri~ewayConnecfians-to PiftvfewAvenue:;l#.should be ~quired.fo.have:the exi's~ing driveway connections of the remainder of tax lot 6300 removed and require connection to Shayla Lane. This driveway connection would have to start a minimum of 25-feet behind the right-of-way of Pittview Avenue, to provide far proper sight distances and allow fuming movements onto these lots from Shayla Lane that are not made on Pittview Avenue. 4. Street Parking: As we are proposing in fhe revised PWU standards, the use of residential tones require that street parking not be allowed. We would recommend that street parking not be allowed on Shayla Lane. Gonnecfion to_Pitfview ~vettue: t~ieed 30-foot rad~{ on right-af-way as ~t connects to f'iitvievr Avenue right-of-way. --- - G Sidewalks acrd Side~valk.Easerr;_et~t: The residential lane does not provide for sidewalks. The City PWD is recommending that a ~-foot wide public sidewalk section (with a suitable public ingress arld egress easement requirement} t)e provided ad~aining the right-af-way on the east and vrest sides of Shayla L-one. This will also require that the structure setback be increased t~ ?5 feet to afford driveway parking that does not interfere v~r{th pedestrian traffic orr the sidevral(< T#le 10-foot-wide pubfrc utilitiE~s easerllent would be rllaved to the outside of the s{devrt3lt'. easemcrit to r{~{trgatn {re{erfr~rence with pubf~c ~.ltil{ty ir~:~tali~~tEan and face€rty t~l~cc;rr~zrnt (r <~ transfornlc~rs. rrsers, pedesta#s, etc) -rl}c~ !i fnoi sidr'r~aft: c~asen~ent vrould nor tie r, ~' U (- . <3`7 -...~o 1 <~'••i..r•ti .'.' !' :i~ shown on tfte tentative putt As regtrrred on recent developn~r~nts rrtrlizinr~ the resrdeni~~tl lane street standard, the sidewalk would be installed at the Developer's expense as part of the devefoprnent and wilt be maintained by the property owner, similar to f#te City's current sidewalk ordir~artce requirements- It is further recontmertded chat srdewaik also be required along the remainder parcel to the connection with Pittview Avenue. Ufilit~ Easerrrertfs: A 10-foot wide public utility easement {PUE} will be required outside the Gity`s right-of-way of Shayla [_arte, on both sides of the lane. To facilitate placement of the sidewalk section, the PUC would be located adjacent io the sidewalk easement, and extend 15- feet behind the right-of-way Easement to tf~e Ciiy of Central Point stroll be dedicated across a selected lot io tfte norf#~ for connection of a new water line to the existing 8-inch waterline in Juanita Way. The minimum easement width shall be ~ 5-feet wide. Additional easements on lots to flte north may be required to facilitate connection to the existing storm drain and sanitary sewer collection and conveyance systems. 8. Pittview Avenue Right-of--Way, Pittview Avenue is identified as local street and currently has a right-of-way width of 60 feel. No additional right-of-way dedications is warranted. 9. Sight-Triangles: Field review of this property's access to Pittview Avenue indicates that the proper sight #riangles for a local street that connects to a another local street can be afforded at the proposed intersection of Shayla Lane with Pittview Avenue, with removal of the interfering trees and vegetation. This type of street intersection requires a 25-foot sight triangle. 90. fmproyemenfs to Pitfview,Avenue: Improvements to Pit#view Avenue including, but not limited to, street section widening (to 30 feet from centerline to curb-line}, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, bikeways, street fights, storm drainage, and traffic control and delineation, shall be coordinated and approved by the JC Roads and the City PWD. The improvements should be constructed at the expense of the Developer and as part of the development of the proposed subdivision. These improvements extend far the entire frontage of the tentative plat: from the southeast comer of fat 9 to the southwest comer of the remainder of tax lot 6300; a distance of approximately 927 feet. As approved by the City Administrator, the Developer may request or' be required to defer any or all of the required improvements along Pittview Avenue until a later date. If any or all of the improvements are to be deferred to a Eater date, then the Developer will he required to enter into a suitable deferred improvement agreement with the CitylCounty for the developmenUimproverrrent of the street section and appurtenances {i.e. sidewalks, curb, gutter, street lights, storm drainage, etc.) along the developrrtent's frontages wish Piftvievr Avenue, as required and approved by the JC Roads and City PWD 1 1 Reinforced Wafer Connection: Tf~e Developer should be required to constructed an f3-inch diameter water line which connects to the exESting B-rncfl diameter water irne in Pittview Avenue, and which "loops" into the f3-inch-vrater line in Juanrta Way This would prevent this line €rom being a "dead-end" line, which would require signifrcantfy more maintenance and "flushing s° Waterline stub-outs and suitable easements shalt be provrded to extend the 8-inch vrater service to the large parcels to the West (tax lot 100) and E~~ast (tax lot 0100) of the su3~fect Developrt~cnt, vrrtf~ tl3r~ siut~-outs possrhly f>r~nc; 1ora;ecS rtt the "hammenc~~arl" tar Ir}(; to 11 f~ralffsr~urslf Trnt,7rr,t•Pi,tnR<•~'rru.I'Nf),G,,j]>irl~~wr f~~rhn~c~n 11. I VU9 f'ile' J General All construction of public ir~iprovernents shall conform to the City's PWD Standards, the conditions approved and stipulated by the Planning Comr~~ission, and other special specifications, details, standards, andlar upgrades as may be approved by t(~e City Administrator or leis designee prior to the approval of tl~e construction plans for the proposed development. During construction, changes proposed by the Developer shall be submitted in writing by fhe Developer's engineer to the City PWD far approval prior to implementation. 2. Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals, and conditions as may be required by other agencies, including, but not limited to, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (Dl~, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Oregon Division of State (rands (DSl~), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (AGOi=7, affecfed irrigation districts, and JC Roads, as applicable. 3. Prior to approval and acceptance of Ehe project, the Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. ff feasible, the Developer's engineer or surveyor should provide the drawings in both a "hard copy" form {produced on Myfar~) and in a "digital format compatible with AutoCAD~, or other form as approved by the City PWD. As-built drawings are to be provided to the City which provide Nred-line" changes to final approved construction plans that identify fhe locations and or elevations {as appropriate) of actual installed items, including, but not limited to, invert, inlet, and rim or lip elevations; spot elevations identified on drawings; road alignment; water lines, valves, and fire hydrants; water and sewer lateral stationing; modifications to street section; manhole and curb inlet locations; street light Eocatians; other below grade utili#y line loco#ions and depths; etc. Provide a "red- line' hard copy (on Mylar°), or an approved alternative format, of construction drawings, and if feasible, an acceptable AutoCAD° compatible drawing electronic file to the Ci#y at completion of construction and prior #o acceptance of public infrastructure facilities completed.as~part of-the proposed development,.or'as ~atherwrse:appraved by the City Administrator.or~his:designee.. ~€. All elevations used on the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on the permanent benchmark shat[ be tied into an established City approved benchmark and be so noted an the plans. Af least one permanent benchmark shalt be provided for the proposed development, the location of which shat( be as jointly determined fay the City PWD and the Developer. 5. if applicable, all existing concrete, pipe, building materials, structures, clear and grub materials, and other deleterious materials shat! be removed from the site and either recycled or properly disposed of in accordance with the requirements of the DEQ. 6. Easements for City infrastructure (i.e. sanitary sewer, water, and storm drain [if applicable]} should be a minimum of 1~-feet wide, and should not split lot lines. Easements for public stoma drainage, sanitary sewer, and water lines should be dedicated to the City and not just a P.U.E. Centerline of buried infrastructure shall be aligned a minimum of five (5) feet from the edge of the easement. If two or more City owned utilities are located within an easement, then a minimum of 20-foot width should he required. Easement dedications in final deeds or CC&Rs need a statement which should clearly indicate that easements must be maintained with suitable, driveable vehicular access to City public infrastructure facilities, as determined by the Crty PWD. 1~ Rrafl (-.(alts 11' 7"rnlafn+r f'Lvi lirvir~t, f'1{"I~,C[a(J hrfrprf F-r~rrran~ 12. 1999 1'a,t r ~ Prior to the City PWD fir~af approve! of the construction plans for tl~e proposed improver~~ents, the following should be subr~~itted: ^ A copy of written approval from Fire District 3 of the final street and driveway layout, site access, f€re hydrant placement, and wafer systom improvement plans for €t7e proposed development. ^ The plans relating fo the sanitary sewers sf7ould be approved in writing by 13CVSA, and the appropriate signature blocks should be completed on the plans. ^ A copy of written approval from JC Roads regarding Piftview Avenue improvements (as applicable) and street connections to Piftview Avenue. 8. Field verify all existing infrastructure elevations and [ocations (i.e. pipe inverts, curb elevations, top of banks, ditch/channel inverts, street elevations, etc.), to which the proposed development's infrastructure will connect into existing improvements, prior fo final construction plan design and submif#aI for final approval. 9. Ovefiead power lines. [f applicable, coordinate efforts with Pacific Power and tight, US West, and TCI Cable, to convert any overhead electrical power, Telephone, or cable facilities within or adjoining the proposed development to underground facilities, prior to the acceptance by the City PWD of the public improvements associated with the proposed development. All agreements and costs associated with the conversion of these facilities from overhead to underground facilities, shall be by and between the utility owners and the Developer. 7a. The accurate locations of any existing underground and above ground public infrastructure, and the location of the associated easements with these facilities, shall be accurately portrayed {both harizontaliy and verticallyy on the constn,rction plans and as-built drawings. '# 1. The E]eveloper's engineer or surveyor shall provide to the Public Works Department a drawing of the r~econded Ana#. P#at map reproduced on Myiat'® and in an acxeptable electronic-farm in Au#oCAD° format. The Final P#at shat{ be tied to a legal Government comer and the State Plane Coordinate System. The Final Plat shall either reflect ar be Eater madifed to reflect any applicable "red-line' changes noted in the construction "as-bunts", at the discretion of the City Administrator or his designee. Streets/T~affic Existing improvements - Pittview Avenue - t_ocai Street. Current ROW 00` wide, varying street width. Right-of Way required: GO foot widtf~. Jurisdiction - Jackson County. Construction drawings for this Tentative Plan shall include a Street Lighting Plan and Traffic Delineation Plan in accordance with the requirements of the City PWD. Street lights shall be placed in a "zig-zag" pattern along the streets and at maximum 200-foot spacing (as measured from light post to fight post) to afford better lighting of the public rights-of-way. The Street Lighting Plan shalt include two street lights along the residential lane. The street fights on the residential lane wi[1 be of a design and at locations as approved by the City PWD and Pacific Power Street lights will also need to be installed or possibly modified along Piftview Avenge to afford proper lighting of the street intersection 13 1 r . .~.. ~ t .~,~ . ~ , The Crty f'WD, a[ tt~e cost of the f)eveloper, shell ev~llu<~fe thc~ strength of tl~e natives sods arzc4 detern~rne the stree# section designs for Shayla lane <and f'rtlview Avenue ire accordance 4vit1~ tt~e Crty f WD 5landards The City's engir~cering staff or selected engineering consultant (<~t Developer's expense), shall evacuate thc~ sirengtti of tine native soils and deferniine the sheet section designs in accordance Witt} il~e City f'WD Standards Mrr~in~ur~7 street section for' St~ayia Lane shall tic as foilotvs - 3-ir~Ches Class "f3" A.C. - G-ruches of 1 "-~" crushed rock - B-inches of 4"-0" cr~rshed rock (City of Medford specrficatEOr~s). - Woven geotextite fabric over compacted s~rbgracie. Minimum street section far Pittview Avenue snail be as fal(ows~ - 3-inches Class "B" A.C. - 6-inches of 1 "-0" crushed rock - 8-inches of ~"-Q" crushed rack (City of Medford specifications), - Woven geotextile fabric over compacted subgrade. Street section {excluding the asphalt concrete portion) shall be extended underneath and a minimum of two feet beyond the curb and gutter section, and underneath the driveway apron connection with Pittview Avenue. 3. As applicable, stop signs and Traffic delineation {i.e. "stop bars") shalt be required and installed by the City PWD (at the Developer's expense) at the proposed development's intersection with Pittview Avenue. No parking signs and yellow curbing (as needed) wilt also be placed along Shayla Lane, by the City PWD at the Developer's expense. Storm ©rainage, trrigatian Improvements Existing improvements - Various Sized storm drainage pipes along the southern sides of tots 17 and 18 of Tyler Park Subdivision. During the design of the storm drain collection and conveyance system (SD System), which shalt provide for and convey storm water run-off from and run-on Onto the proposed development (either surface run-on or cu4vert or creek ditch conveyance), the Developer shaft demonstrate that the storm vrater flows from the cornpfetron of the proposed development (and at any time prior to completion of development} do not exceed predevelopment flows; or that existing capacity, allowances, or provisions have been made (and approval o€ the applicable properties owners and regulatory agencies has been obtained}, which accamn~odate any additional flow which exceed predevelopment flows The Developer and tl~~ City F'WC7 sl~a€I agree on the applicable run-off coefficients, curve numbers, retardance, etc , to be used rn the engineering calculations Developer's engineer shall provide a site drainage plan with the facit~ties being designed, at ~~ minrrnum, to accorrlmodate a ~0 year storm event The SD system must be designed to adequately drain the i0-year storm event vrrthout serrchargrng downstream facilrties, and pourng vr<~tor pry C;rty streC~is. or must tie provEded wrth adetaEtatr, slarage #o prc:vc'nt surchargrng. i,nd I~r° dF~siynr;~1 Ir, rlr)! rir,F,:,r,t rryrstir3~) ~1r~t~lrr. storr~~~ tirnir~<3c}r~ (t3r;it€t€GS !'vny ~~rr~,3tr Slr~rrn rlrarr~ syslt°rr~ r; r.r.,r;rrr}irt'.~ :, ir,tar(~~~ i(1 Ur~lit~erG~r stif3€I irf~ rfr,5ir~n£~r1 Ir> t~irectly Gor~nr_r,l f<~ tlx: pr~'r~fic; ~,l~:~tr~'~ rSr~~r(t ~>y`~ir~r,1 (~,t <~ rll~)nt1CJl~: ryr c:url~ rnic~l f~nly). <~n~~ ;h~~l! r1C)I t)r~ dc;srynr.>~J Ip rJc~;f:i~r~rr)r, 1o rf~r' 14 R<•i~lf l:cl,~lrs 11' 7c+rt.rln'<' 1'r~ui I:i 1'ri ~~. I'rS"I~ .~.'~~~] Fry>~u'f !-rtlrv~irZ.1.~. l94V 1'~r,~~~ Street 5urface5. 3. Roof drains and underdrains shall not be directly connected to public storm drain fines, and shall drain either to an on-site private storm drain system or discharge at the curb face, 4. Prior to City PWD construction plan review, the Developer shall provide the City 1'WD with a complete set of hydrologic and i~ydraulic calculations and profile plots for sizing the SD system, which shall incorporate the use of the City f~WD's rainfalllintensity curve, and City approved run-off coefficients, curve numbers, retardance, pipe roughness coefficients, etc., that are used in the engineering calculations. 5. Storm drain pipe materials shall be E'VC, f~DPE, or reinforced concrete, wish water-tight joints meeting the requirements of ASTM D3212, F477, and C-443M, as applicable. €'rovide concrete (in areas within the rights-of-way} or sand-cement slurry {in areas outside the rights-of-way) encasement where required in areas of minimum cover. 6. If inletslcafch basins are to exceed 4.5 feet in depth from the lip of the inlet, then the inlets and catch basins shalt be designed to afford suitable "man" entry into the inlefslcatch basin for maintenancelcleaning purposes. 7. Developer's engineer shall provide hydrology and t"~ydraulic calculations and flow line plots for private and public storm drains. f Iot HGL an profile or provide a separate profile drawing that indica#es the HGL on the profile. Pipes should maintain cleansing velocity (minimum 2.0 feet per second) and have adequate capacities withouf surcharging during the design storm. $. The Developer may wish to incorporate the use of a perforated SD system. if so, then the perforated storm drain system shaft be designed to have adequate capacities to: Convey fhe collected groundwater and storm water with the minimum cleaning velocities and without surcharging the collection and conveyance piping; and ~ Nlinimi~e silts, sands, gravels, and fees migration from the native soils into the SD system. The plotted HGL shall include both the groundwater infiltration, and the storm water run-off and run-on inflows in#a the SD system. 9. Maintain a minimum 0.2-foot drop between inlet and outlet pipe inverts in manholes and curb inlets, unless flaw-through velocities during the design storm event exceed 3.0 feet per second (fps). if flow velocities exceed 3.0 fps and the inlet pipe is in relatively direct {i.e. X80 ~ 5 degree) horizontal alignment with the outlet pipe, then as a minimum, tt~e pipe slope shall be maintained through the base of the manhole or curb inlet. If flow velocities exceed 3.0 fps, and there is other than relatively drect horizontal alignment between the inlet and outlet pipes, Ellen a minimum of a 0.1-foot drop between inlet and outlet pipe inverts In manholes or curb inlet must be maintained A bottom channel shall be farmed in the manhole or curb inlet base to mitigate transitional fosses and enhance flow through the manhole or curb inlet. 10 Sheet flow surface drainage from the property onto the public rights-of-vray ar onto neighboring properties is unacceptable Sanitary Sewer 15 f+,•<~rr t_u.~~,•t rr 1 ~,or<,rn,• rr,:,~ r;,~, ~,~„ r~rs tr c,,:~? 1;,;~,~rr f~rf+ru~i,r ., lVVV 1',~tr ~. Ail sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system (SS System} design, construction and testing shall conforr~~ to the standards and guidelines of file Oregon Df~Q, 1990 AfaWA Standards, Oregon Chapter, Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority {BCVSA), and the City 1~W0 Standards, where applicable. 2 The construction p#ans and the as-built drawings shall identity lateral stationing far construction of sewer laterals. 3. The City upon can~piefion of initial construction plan review and prelir7~ir~ary approval, wilt forward the plans to BCVSA far completion of the review procoss. Upon completion of the review by BCVSA, corripfetion of final revisions to the plans by the Developer's engineer, and following the final approval and signature on the construction plans by BCVSA, the Public Works Director will approve tine plans in final form. 4. Ail testing and video inspection of lines and manholes shall be done in accordance with BCVSA requirements, at Developer's expense. The Developer shah provide BCVSA and the City with test reports, TV reports and certification of the sewer system construction prior to final acceptance. Water Systert~ Existing 8-inch-diameter water tines installed in Pittview Avenue and Juanita Way. The water system shall be designed to provide the required fire flaw demand capacities for the proposed facility, which meet Fire District 3 requirements, with fire hydrant placement as approved ny the Cify PWD and Fire District 3. Maximum spacing of fire hydrants snail be 300 feet. Water service lateral connection stationing and size shah be provided on construction plans and as-built drawings. 2. Developer shelf comply with Oregon Health Division (OHD) and City requirements for bacfcflow prevention. 3. Water service meter boxes shalt be Cify PWD specified "Christy" brand meter boxes, that accommodate the Senses touch-read equipment. Ci#y PWD wilt perform ail "hot" connections to active water lines, including service lateral taps, unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Director. Site work, Grading, and Utility Plans Grading plans should have original/existing grades and final grades {dotted on the plan, Typically, existing grade contour lines are dashed and screened back, and final grade contour fines are overlaid on top of the existing grades and are in a heavier line v~ridih and solid. Gonfour fines should be Ia#~e#ed with elevations 7_ Ail structures shall have roof dra~r~s, area drains, and/or crawl spaces with positive drainage away fror~~ the building 3 f'rov~r~c> City wrlli ~.~ r~tElrry 1~1~3n <af?f..r~}vr,d ley r~aCl~ ~ttr[ity corrrt~any vdhEch rrf1PC(S x311 ~.rf~lrty 1tr~e iocalrr~ns, r;ros>~nys, trarisforr~~er ir~r,r3trons, v~3lvc;s. r tc Hr<r!! f'srares !r' l~crrr.rrr~'c IV~irr f~rt'r<•+~. I'IS'1>,ti:,i/) Krl~t~rl f'<hrv<rrz' 1.. Iy99 f'~7.Lr ~ Utility lacatrons must be accurately included on tine as-guilt drawings, or as a sei~arate set of drawings atfacf~ed to the as-built drawings. 5. Ali fil( placed in development st~alf be engineered fill that is suitably placed and can~pacted in accordance with City PWD and 1994 Uf3C standards, except for the upper 1.5-foot of fill placed outside of public rigl~fs-of-way and that does net underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular across ways or parf~ing areas. Rights of WayslEaserner~ts 1f applicable, Develr~per shall provide a Statement of Water Rigf~ts (on a City approved form), for any affected properties. 1=or properties determined to have water rights, the developer will coordinate with the State Watermaster the re-allocation of any waters attached to lands na longer irrigable as a result of the proposed development. ~~ fl4/25/2Qflfl ~E37; 45 Ci2G456C. .7E~ D3 I~r_; CX~C ~ '~4 f l#~_~ ~ 3 FIRE DISTRICT No. 3 ~ACKS{JN COt,~NTY h333 ~GA~'(: I;OA[], ~~rNIT~: CfIY, OR~G[)t'ti~ S75C33-1075 (s~z} sz~-7zoo rfvc (s~z) sa_~-~~s~~ ; ~~nt~ vYj c fx ~, 3. c ~ r t~ April zs, zooo City of Cen~raf point Ken GerschPer RE: Cody Subdivision C~:t~r o t Cez~[z;aZ I'o[nt r ~:~-~~r~~r~~ its r; I'iaz~nizi~ TJe,~aa-tzE~c~tC Fire District .~ has reviewed the tentative plan for the Cady Subdivision with the following requirements. ~.. Y'he fire hydran-i= on i'itt~iew shall be wi~:hin 5QQf-t of the most: remote park of Shayla Lane. 2. Parking on Shayla Lane will be restricted to -one ~I) side only, 3. No parking shall be permit-fed in the hammerhead turnaround a~ the ehd of Shayla ~..ane, ~4. approved "NO PARKING" signage shall he provided in all areas where parking is restricted. Contact Fire District 3 for requirements, 5. All New Name shall have an address sign visible from the street. ~~ ~~ ~~~ Neil Shav~7 Deputy i-ire ~Zarshal 1~ Exhibit C PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OP APPROVAL Tlie approval of the Tentative Plan shall expire in one year on May 2, 2001 unless an application for final plat or extension has been received by the City. 2. The project must comply with alI applicable [oval, state and federal regulations. 3. The tentative and final plats shall depict utility easerr~ents requested by the City, BCVSA and WP Natural Gas. Any changes to utility layout including fire hydrants shall require subsequent approval by the respective service provider. ti('I'I'I)I'UC",I'I;uiriiFi~~i{}n{3ff~1 W!'I)