Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 493 - ODOT Site Plan PLAI~~NING COMMISSION RI:sSOLU7'ION NO. 493 A RESOLD"hION CONDI"I'IONALLY APPROVING A SITE PLAN APPLICA"LION (Applicant (s): Oregon Department of Transportation) (372WO1 C, Tax Lot 3400} Recitals 1. This matter came before the Planning Commission for hearing on August 1, 2000, on applicant's site plan application fora 4200 square foot building in the M-2, Industrial-General Zoning district of the City. The Planning Cornrnission reviewed the application and the City staff reports, anal received comments from all persons wishing to be heard in favor of and opposed to the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION Oh THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Criteria A licable to Decision. The following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Cade apply to this application: A. Chapter 17.52, Industrial General District B. Chapter 17.60, General Regulations; C. Chapter 17.64, Off-Street Parking and Loading; D. Chapter 17.72, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval. Section 2. Findings anc~_Coz~clusions. The Planning Commission hereby adopts by z•eference all findings of fact set forth in the City staff repaz•ts, and concludes that, except where addressed in the conditions to approval, the application and proposal comply with the requirezxzents of the following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code: A. Chapter 17.52, relating to uses, lot sire, lot coverage, setback, building height and screening in the M-2 district; B. Chapter 17.60 relating to paving and landscaping requiren~zents; C. Chapter 17.64 relating to off street parking and loading facilities; D. Chapter 17.72 relating to site plan rcquirezxzents. Section 3. Conditional Approval. The application for site plan approval is hereby conditionally approved, subject to the conditions set forth on Attachments "A", "B", and "C" which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Also subject to changes in the Public 1 -PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. _493 ( 0$012000 ) Works Staff Report. There were several itcn~s i~~ the staff report that referred to iaxaproven~eaits on E. Pine Street. That should read I3a~nricl~ Load. A 10 feet 1'.U.I~. will be retluired along 1-lan~~-ick Road. The Right of V,lay recl~rest is bei~~g droppccl fra~n this staff report and will be dealt with separately. Passed by the Planning, Commission and sigaled by nee i~l acztllentication of its passage this i~-`` day of ~~~~~ ,20~~-~ Plan~ii~7g Con~naission Chairman ATTEST: ~resentat~ve Approved by me this ~~~ day of i~°~_~_ 2 -PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.1493 20~ 47 ~ ~' ~ ,', Planning Commission Chairman ( 08012000 ) c ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ _~ ~~ ~~ ;-. ~~~ '~ ,~- t ,~ Cl7"r ~'~,aW .... r,. y .___.._.....~ o~oT CENTRAL ~'O~N.~, 1V~ArNTENANCE S7 ATIO `~ ~ 441 ~R~C~ RO X ~ CENTRAL POINT, OREGU~ 97502 I I I ~I ,~ ., t i~~~ 4~ i ~` }~i_ d i - - , -~- ~.---rv--~ ~---- ~~ ' .- `'`E .~ ~x ~ w. !. ~ ~_~_JntiStiA ~^ ~ --- k `~ '~ i ~ Y: --x - •.`+- ~ ~~ti `.-'°'"y t~~ "Y„ ~~ ~~ ~% L~ ._.-.-, , .~. '..ti~..~---~ :rr-arr-vas ~_~ ;jx..'.-+t .t-. i;~i~tihit i3 IZI~;C'()~i(1~1?NI}1~,I) E'I,ANNIN(~ I)l~:1'A1Z~1~1~11~;N~I~ ('(}NDI~I't()Nti ()ft Af'1'll()1'rLl, ~I~Itc <tktltr~ctvaf c~1~ the ~itc 1'lart slt~tl(c~ktirc in erne y<<tr ort .luly 1 l . 2.0() l unless an apl7licatiort for <t buildinf; E~~rntit ctr stn <tpplic'~ttion [i}r cxtcnsictrt lt~ts hccrt r~ccci~~rcl h}~ the ('ity. ~I~h~ appkicattt shall strhrttrt a r~c~°isc~d sits plait dcpictinE; an}~ ch~trtgcs ciiscusscd <trtd apltrovcci at tltc public hcarin~~, ~vitltirt (~(} der} s ctf~ l'I~trtrtirt~ ('c~rttrttissic~n aktl~rovttl. The ltrojec€ must cctntpl}< «~ith alk apl~lical?le local, state and fedora[ regulations . Tile applicant shall provide S additional paved par~kittg spaces. 4. The applicant shall update a revised landscape and irTigatiort plant t}tat shows the location of new trees and shrubs. Areas overgrown by weeds sltafl be cleared to improve the appearance of the existing landscaping. Dead shrubs and trees shall be replaced. ~' d CIl Y 01- CEmNTRAL f'C}INT DEPARTMENT OF PUf3L1C WOR1<S Date: Appficantl Owner Project: Location: Legal: Zoning: Area: Units: Plans: Report By: Purpose STA€~1= RCPOIZI for OREGON DEPARTMENT OI= TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN REVIEW PW#00022 I'ta~zzziizf; I)c,I>xz-ttxYa~Y MAINTENANCE YARD .3uly 5, 2000 Oregon Department of Transportatior~, 3500 NW Stewart Parkway, Roseburg, OR 97470 Agent: Raymond E. Cooper Development of a 4,200 Maintenance Building "Pole Barn" West of Hamrick Road; South of E. Pine Street; north of LTM pre-cast concrete facifi€y T37S, R2W, Section 01 C Tax bot 3400 M-2, Industrial-General 7.70 Acres. 3 sheets of hand-drawn drawings illustrating, a site plan; existing irrigation, planting, and parking; and floor plan with building elevations; prepared by ODOT, dated 3-22-00. Lee N. Brennan, Public Works Director Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant {hereinafter referred to as "Developer") regarding Cify Public Works Department (PWD) standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed commercial/professional office facility. Gather information from the DeveloperlEngineer regarding the proposed development. The proposed Development is an addition to the existing maintenance related facilities at the site. This staff report also inGudes recommended requirements that are based on the limited amount of master p{arming performed in this area which involve limiting and comtroiling access to E. Pine Street and Hamrick Road, and other infrastructure master plarrimg. Special Requlreraents Existing lnfrastrucfure: If applicable, the Developer shall demonstrate that all connections to existing infrastructure (i.e. streets; water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems; natural drainage systems; etc.,) will not interfere with or provide for the degradation of the existing effective level of service or operation of the infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have either adequate capacities to accommodate the flows and/or demands imposed on the existing infrastructure as the result of the connecfion of the proposed development's infrastructure, ar will be improved by and at the expense of the Developer to accommodate fhe additional flows and/or demands; while maintaining or improving the existing level of service of the affected facility, as approved by (as applicable) the regulatory agency, utility owner, and/or property owner involved. Master r'l~~ns: /~ ;briefly described above, in association with City PWD staff ar~d property owners anr~ reprr,s;f~ntr~lives or ar~ents of f'ulvc~[ and t_eever, the Pear Qlossorri Center, E3at~r~r. ~ar7r1 V~rllr,y c)f tiir, (?r)[~ur; I3t3nk, rn.')r,tc~t f)i~rn~; r~rr~ t)[~in[~ f)re~<zr[,d tli<jf inrlttrlr, tlir: IErrritC;d r;r)nrrc:r;iir)n', [o f'3nr: Sirr:r~t, tltr: ir7tr.rrttzr ;lrr:r~i/rlrivev~:~y SyS(r:rr~, w~)(r:r, ;Ir>rrr~ ~ir:~irr, .rnr7 >.1riEt.;r•~ ',<~v~r•r rii-,IrEf)rfl3~}rr/f,~rllr.r;lir)ri/rr)n vr: y;3r~r;r: '.y'.is~rrt',, .rrirS r)tlrr~r ¢itrliiEr,', (rz:rlcrr.~I ~S,r•,. ~>`r~~`:r. r rJ)r)J tl~frnl 1.., r:r!t ;i.:~•.•,, i h'.,.:.: /'IS It .\;.t1f !i :'f ~. ~~: .lrrlt S ~{7r)tl 1',r~<' . telef~hane, etc.} for the subject tax lol and a(I tf7e parcels between E3ear Creek and Hamrick Road that adjoin to Pine Street. The master plans will also include "stub-outs" for connections to the surrounding parcels. The master plans will take into account the flows or demands of the proposed development, any future development an neighboring portions of the subject tax lot, on neighboring properties, and any other areas deemed by the City ttlat will need to connect into fhe proposed development's or existing neighboring infrastructure. 3. Easerrlents: If applicable, the Developer shall provide suitable and acceptable 15-foot-wide minimum easements for any City public works infrastructure located outside the public rights-of- way. These easements shall be dedicated for sole use by the City, and shall not overlap (crossings are acceptable, as tong as required infrastructure separa€ion is maintained} other utility or infrastructure easements. A separate 10-foot minimum width public utilities easement (P.U.E.} should also be required far utility installation outside fhe Hamrick Road right-of-way along the property's exterior frontage with Hamrick Road. 4. Clear Vision AreaslTriarr_gles. All driveway approaches of the proposed Development connecting to public roads steal[ maintain a minimum 55-foot sight vision triangle as measured from the edge of the right-of-way to the center of the driveway. This requirement may be adjusted by the City PWD, depending on final orientation and lane layout of fhe adjoining roads, in accordance with AASHTO clear sight-vision requirements. Adequate clear vison arealtriangles shall also be maintained at all infernal driveway intersections, as applicable. 5. improvements to Hamrick Road and Right-of-WaY Dedication: A traffic impact study for the Pear Blossom Center development, prepared by Kittelson & Associates, Inc., dated June 1999, has been submitted to the Cify. The traffic study analyzed the year 2003 (anticipated year of build-out of the center) projected traf#3c flows and intersection levels of service at the major street intersections most likely to be impacted from the Pear Blossom Center development. The traffic study included the residential development already approved to the north and east of the site (Walnut Grove, New Haven, Central Point East, and Parfcwood Terrace); the USF Reddaway site, and the potential retail/professional office facilities on land owned by USF Reddaway on the southeast comer of the intersection of Hamrick Road and East Pine Street. However, the traffic impact study, does not include any new development along the sauthem frontage of E. Pine Street or "build-0ut" (i.e full development within the current UGB} traffic flow conditions far the northeast portion of fhe City which greatly influences the "build-out" design and right-of-way requirements and needs for two of the City's main arterial roads: Hamrick Road and East Fine Street. The City is currently updating the City's Transportation System Master Plan (TSP) which wilt classify certain streets and project `build-out" traffic flows for this northeast portion of the City. Unfortunately the overa4l road classification and lane determination needs for l=ast Pine Street to accommodate "build-out" conditions have not been determined by ttze City, nor by Jackson County Thus, additional master planning will be warranted once the TSP is completed. However", ?t is f,rolected tt~al this additional rnastr~r planning work will probahly not be compleieci f~rlor try t#tr enrS ref ye~~r ?_~01 ~~ririli}r~r S•, •,rrr~ r4{~I ,rrlrlrr, ;~;r,d by ll?r~ lrr3(f€c: crTir3:3r,1 °,llrrjy. r; iu~vr <3r;r,r,',', 1t~ E.r'~1 6'Irrr~ Strr~c't <3r~ri I i,ininr.~ I~r),1r1 vnll hr; riffr~rrlrzrj114rnrtr~r~ fr~r ihr~ I~rr}(1r:rhr.•, fr~r,,ftrsrt lr1 11kr. •,rau!li r)( 6_,i~,t f'Inr: ;~irr:r°j irs 113r, .rrr•.t sresrisr~rli.tlr:ly lrr 11tr, f7rrrll3 r,r Ilrr: (r€ryr>r>',r•rS I)r;vr:tr}r~rr3r:rsl, :t;~~', ::'t.s; .t((r•r.l`, wi(I rlr•vr:lrir,rri~:s~l rii ?lir~ rr.srr.r_I', Ir) 1 hr: •,rr~tllr ref ( f'sr3r: ;Irr~r:l I~.i'!r• rin I}~r~ ~,,~• n li`:r:rf '.Irr•r•r•, .srs•~ • 1 ' . . ' , I ' k : ~ ' , { ~ , } ! Iii r , r 1 r E i r i r i ' I l ~ I r (. i ' i ? ~ i . 1 • I ) ~ f 1 ' ~ ~ '1 .rr~l, ~ 'r l< r{ r 1',,~~ t-o allow for developn~enk of tht~ proposed t~rojeck pr€or Co the contplc~tion of thc~ kraifrc ntasler planning needed for the area, the City F'WD recommends the following A The Developer be required to construct street widening, bike tang, curb artd gutter, storm drainage, sidewalk (min. G-foot wide meandering, including api5licable driveway aprons and wheel chair ramps?, planting strip with lzandscapirtg, traffic delineation, and street (igitting (with rttaximum 200 foot sl7acing) improvements for fire portion of Hamrick Road that adjoin the proposed development. The portion of ~_ Mine Street tha! adjoin the subject development is developed as a "rural" road that does not meet current City or County urban standards. The road wilt need to be improved, as a minimum, to meet City standards, as reviewed and approved by .fackson County Roads, and the City PWD. This could be deferred {as executed in a deferred improvement agreement by and between the Developer and the CitylCounty) until other development is implemented on the adjoining parcels along Hamrick Road. B. Regarding the road right-of-way adjoining the proposed Development; the Developer be required to dedicate additional land for street and City utility purposes a minimum of 44 feet from the right-of-way centerline of E. Pine Street. This would accommodate a commercial/industrial 3-lane collector, Currently the right-of-way width on the "western half" of Hamrick Road {centerline to property fine) is 30 feet. This would require dedication of an additional 14 feet for road and City road and utility improvement purposes. After completion of build-out master planninglconstruction, any dedicated property That was not necessary, would be "vacated" and returned to the adjoining parcels of the proposed Developrnent- C. Because of access restrictions onto E. Pine Street and Hamrick Road City has been working with the property ownersldevelopers to the Wort e subject property on providing for a main access that would be accessibl m the properties to the North. Currently because of access concerns t mrick Road, this access has been aligned along the subject property's north oundary. As discussed with the applicant, a mutual access dr-ivewa street could provide the necessary access. The applicant would also tape a rom this drive street, and eliminate the property's direct access onto Hamr' oad. To accommodate this future drive/street, the Ciry f'WD is recommen that the Developer be required to dedicate a 25-foot width along the property's hern boundary for future road construction purposes. The dedication would con 'n a stipulation that if the road was not developed within a 15-year period, or was developed as a private drive, that the right-of-way would be vacated, as necessary. 6. Eros~ort C©rtfrol Part: A suitable erosion control plan rrtust be prepared and submitted to tt~e Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEO) and City PWD for the construction of any improvements associated with this development. Storrrr Dr<;irra~~ Sysferrr Tftr: ~~1c~rrn dr<-tut ;yst~,rr~ ;lt;tll br: rj{'<;€rtnr:d tr3 ~~r,rrtrnrrtr~rJ~tle th{= Slr~rr~t w~tlr,r rrtrt c~fi Trttrtt rrrtrl rurt•rtrl r)nlo tttc: prc~posr~ri t9r,vr~ir~(~rrtr:nt {r,€l!1r,r ';r 1rT;sr:r. r~}rt-cart r_tr r,rrlvr~rt rtr r.r,:r:klci€Ir;it rr~rtvr~y,trtrr:)• ,`arty f€t!ttrr: r~r:vr~tr~(>rrt(;ni r~rt ;ar1(~3r,r.n1 (irr~(~r;ri;r:',• rrtrtvr>yc:~i <,Ir~€rtt rSr;tirt:a+fr: r~r °,itrf,rr,r~ vr:trr:r (1rJw , .'srtr~ :rrly tlravr•; trr~rrt ~rrr>,t~, cfr~r,rrl+:+f try r}t,: r;El y Ilr.sr vrEl{ rt,.~ •, Irt r.rtr;rt4:+.1 tttl I}tr• f~r'~llrt` ,.,y ryr..rr•In(irit~•ttr •, `ill ','~',1+'r€t (1f •; sr •rt~Sictr~ rl€; I•rturrlr,i,ir,y t`~: . cEt.s f rnr,ltr,,~~ -,~trr.l<<~ vr.tr~•r rlrr.N', f+rNlt tltr: r>rrsr~r:tltr:'. r'.r•,1_ ',r }FtF`:~ .rrtjf w~:~,r r;4 3r,<. ••,~+3 ~•r i i•ar 13 ,!r.yn~ i~ ~ r •'~. ;~~ Y I.t% 1rr1•. 1Ir,'r« <<~r if .rl r,lr•.t!,3~• 1~, r.```/ I'!,'1 t ! .., • ` , ;. ~ .l!rlt ~ .'t3th1 i'.,~~< recori~n~er}ding lh~3t tine Developer be required to dcs~gn the slorn7 drain conveyance system la accommodate projected post-development flows front these adjoining proper#ies. t3. Off-Site Sfarrri Drarrra~c e Irrfrastr~ucture: f=or any storm drainage infrastructure constructed or in7proved outside the City's rigl3ts-of-way or easements for drainage of surface waters from fhe subject development, fhe Developer steal[ provide a satiable docun~eni ar documents which contain approvals for tine impiemenkation of such connection al~d/or in~provements and which describe: O Who is responsible for the operation, maintenance, and repair of the infrastructure facilities to maintain the original design parameters associated with the infrastructure. If the City is to operate and maintain the infrastructure, the applicable funding mechanism that will be created (i.e local improvement district} for the associated City expenditures; ^ How will all-weafher driveable access be afforded and maintained indefinitely to maintain and repair the infrastructure facilities; ^ Thaf an easement or other suitable conveyance document has been granted, as necessary, to provide suitable access on private property for the inspection, maintenance, and repair worn to be performed an fhe infrastructure facilities. The easement shall include a statement which allows access by City personnel for inspection, maintenance, and repair purposes. 9. Wafer Distril~utiarr Sysfertt and__Fire Protecfiort: It is recommended that the water system for the development anc~ neighboring properties to the east, south, and west shall be master planned, to not only accommodate the needs of the proposed Development, but to provide for mainline valves and stub-outs for future main distribution networks and "reinforced looping" of the adjoining properties to the east south and west. The future water distribution system for the proposed Development will be of "reinforced Poop" design: a connection to the ~2-inch waterline in E. Pine Street, and a connection to the 10-inch waterline in Hamrick Road. The wafer lines shall be sized to accommodate all fire demand flaws of the development. Fire hydrant or service vault locations and needs shat( be determined by Fire District Na. 3. Unless fire protection needs can be made from the on-site domestic we11, it is recommended that development not proceed anti( adequate fire protection can be provided. GENERAL Pu61ic._lmprov_ements: Ali construction of public improvements shall coniorr~n to the City's PWD Standards, the conditions approved and stipulated by the Planning Commission, and other special specifications, details, standards, andlor upgrades as may be approved by the City l~drn~nlstrator or his designee prior to the approval of the construction plans for fhe prnpose~i fir~velnprrient During car~stractron, changes proposed try the Dr~veloper sh<311 be x,!11}rnillr;fi ,fl 4Frrihrirl t)y rf~r: [)r:vr~lr}(>r:r' ; r:nr;3iir,r:r try Ihr, (;Ity t'VVt) (f}r .a(}(}r~}v,'31 (>rir}r tc) Ii FS(}lf'rFlf, ll~%f~il7fl 1'r'!!r!!f`, .1f1(f /lfl~)7(}V<l~`, r~" /r'~'1}7"S '.~l.1~E `llrJ'Jfrlrt r.r:~ilr••. fr( .S•`7~ i7r•fl!~[':', 'l.1f1.!EIr !•', .3j11NrY'/.II'. . sr :rl r r;!3r in qr r!.'. .I'. 1lt.l' IN' fr"i!lir"'r ~r~ rll hr.r ,Sr lr'f 1r,U •~. li }r.~!lr t!f Erj ,Ili f~~r a1 ~:!t 1(~r'rF I'r E!tf• r )1''r f'~~ r 1.1 cal>~); tf.~~r~r l,i.,~,.~ Il.r~•+°i,~. A'. -. r.: /~1s(i x:.;11 Rrl,.'~+ ,le~l, S ; tar>r~ 1',i~r Oregon Div€sion of State Lands {DSL), U S. Army Carps of t.ngineers (ACOF), affected irrigation districts, and Jackson County Roads and Parks Services {JC Roads), Fire District No. 3, and Bear Greek Valley Sar~itary Authority {BCVSA), as applicable. The Developer steal( submit wriifen approvals of the final construction plans irori~ t=ire District hlo. 3 (fire hydrant placement, waterline sizing, and emergency vehicle access), t3ear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority {E3CVSA, for sanitary sewers), and JC Roads, {t-iamrick Road ir~~provements and driveway/access road connections, as applicable) prior to final construction plan review and approval by City PWD. 3. As-Suilts: Prior to approval and acceptance of the projec€, tl7e Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. If feasibte, the L7eveloper's engineer or surveyor should provide the drawings in both a "hard copy" form (produced on Mytar'°) and in a "digital" format compatible with AufoCAD~, or other form as approved by the Cify PWD. As-built drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line" changes to final approved construction plans which identify the Vocations and or elevations (as appropriate) of actual installed items, including, but not timited fa, invert, inlet, and rim or lip elevations; spat elevations identified on drawings; water tines, valves, and fire hydrants; water and sewer lateral; modifications to street section; manhole and curb inlet; street tight locations; other below grade utility tines; etc. Provide a "red-line" hard copy {on Nlylar~'), or an approved alternative format, of construction drawings, and if feasible, an acceptable AutoCAD~' compatibla drawing elec#ronic file to the City at completion of construction and prior to acceptance of public infrastructure facilities completed as part of the proposed development, or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee. 4. Elevations: At1 elevations used an the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on the permanent benchmark shall be tied into an established City approved benchmark and be so noted on the plans. At least one permanent benchmark shalt be provided far the proposed development, the location of the benchmark shad be as jointly determined by the City PWD and the Developer's surveyor. 5. Existing infrastructure: As applicable, field verify all existing infrastructure elevations and locations (i.e. pipe inverts, curb elevations, street elevations, etc.), to which the proposed development will connect into existing irrrproverr3ents, prior to final construction plan design and submittal for final approval. The accurate locations of any existing underground and above ground public infrastructure, and the location of ttie associated easements with these €aci4ities, shaft be accurately portrayed {both horizontally and vertically) on the construction p{ans. 6. Fill Placement; All till placed in the development shall be engineered fill that is suitably placed and cor~rpacted in accordance with City PWD and 8ui{ding Department standards, except tar the upper ~,5-feat of fill placed outside of public rights-of-way and that does not underi3e huiidinc~, structures, ar traveled vehicular access ways or parking areas !?oad/Driveway/Parking areas -T hr~ f)r,vrslr}pr,r slt;tll (:u~J131;]Ir~ tltr; ;Irf;ftr~lti r)t thr; rt.lf3vf~ sir}~~~, :3f1Cf ($(?(r'f331tft(? tll(' ~3r;r;C 'i ~ rC}:3rj, 1)~3E{;Ifir~, <iil~j CS~flvr:vd:3y ~;r'r:lic)Ft (ir:`,rf~fY', (r) rY;i'Yr1~(, rf3f• r~;rl)r'r1{,.: lrs:srj~, (irY~.li)rfirtrt tirr. (:raisrt)E7tr:rt!} Irr f)r: rr.3v~:l~:r} c}{3 tli~-~,~- t)f3v.str: rSf~vr~~J~.3 ~•, ,ir.r,r~•,', rr,.i'S•,_ :333 1 (i~)f 1'3f 1{~ .IE (;: i', t 1~3f'r7 rrJ j)f (3'JI(~~[ (~(" ,I!}(3t ~rJ frJ.lrf `,f'r,!1~)fl tr )f (r•Vi~ "v'J t 1t~• f~~: f~il'.1fr.r~3 frlfl'J~'VJ. 1'~' ',~'<.r i~1[:'. 'dlirl!3f1 rl1~; Of 1i )lip. (E/r!1!', f/i ':l.i~',~~. ft~ t~~' °.r )f i'.ri f'.if.~j 1i~'f l11r~ ri°",3 jfe -ir ~l ,r~ { ,1, !~ f'ft) ~ r~ ,. (JIJr J1 tl.rrrrr ! ~i~ rl;r~ li.:•,;•;. ~ ,4.,,r,f ,Irrlt ~ ~{1(1{1 1'~r~~~ h 8. Ufilit~Plarls: Tl~e utility plans shat( be drawn to sc,~ale with accurate harizonial and vertical depiction of utility fines and appurtenances (transforr~~ers, valves, etc.). Utility infrastructure location must be accurately included on the as-built drawings, ar as a separate set of drawings attached to the as-built drawings. 9. Area Ligh(irTg_Plart: Need to provide and irliplement an adequate area fighting plan far parking and access areas, including the driveway entrances. 10. Easements: Easements for City infrastructure (i.e. sanitary sewer, water, and storm drain [if applicable]} should be a minimum of 15-feet wide, and should not split lot fines. Easements for public storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and wafer fines shall be dedicated fo the Cify and not just a P.U.E. Centerline of buried infrastructure shall be aligned a minimum of true {5) feet tram the edge of the easement, if two or more City owned utilities are located within an easement, then a minimum of 20-foot width should be required- Easement dedications in Tina[ deeds or CC&Rs need a statement which should clearly indicate that easements must be maintained with suitable, driveable vehicular access to City public infrastructure facilities, as determined by the City PWD. 11. Storm drainage SYsferrr: Developer's engineer shall develop a facility plan for the storm drain collection, retention, and conveyance system (SD System) which provides for storm water run- off from and run-an onto the proposed development (either surface run-on or culvert or creek ditch conveyance), any existing or future development on adjacent properties, conveyed storm drainage, or surface water flaw, and any areas deemed by the City that will need to connect-into the proposed development's SD System. As applicable, Developer's engineer shall determine how the SD system will work during 10- year and 100 year flood events associated with Bear Creek. identify the HGL in Bear Creek during 10- and 100-year storm event, and what affect it will have on the proposed outlets and storm drain system and building elevations. System should be designed to adequately drain a 10-year storm event without surcharging or shall provide adequate storage to prevent surcharging; and be designed to prevent backflow of water from Bear Creek up into SD system during storm events. The design of the storm drain collection and conveyance system (SD System) should provide far storm wafer run-off from and run-on onto the proposed development (either surface run-on ar culvert or creek ditch conveyance}; the Developer shall demonstrate that the storm water flows from the completion of the proposed development {and at any time prior to completion of development} do not exceed predevelopment flows into Bear Creek; or that allowances or provisions have been made (and approval of the applicable properties owners and regulatory agendes has been obtained), which accommodate any additional flow which exceed predevelopment flaws. The Developer and the City PWD sha(I agree on the applicable rur~-off coefficients, curve numbers, retardance, etc., to be used in the engineering calculations [)r~velU()r>r'S c~nr3lner~r sh<~I! lJrr~v!rJr~ r3 stir, r~r~3!nr:rc~r. t>I~~n dr: ~!c~n(;r~, ~J1 t3 ntrr~lrnum. Ir> r3ccornmodalf~ a 1 Q year storrrt evr~nt l he St) system nii3~>t tx~ dc:sir~ner} to adr:r~J~~3tely dr.~lr~ lltr~ 1U-yr~~)r ~;1(~rrtt (~vrnl w!r}tr>rrl ~>(Jrcit,rrr~lru~ r7r rrtrr;l t)r~ l>rrJVlr7r;d vrlitt .3r7rrrtu<atrs (;tr)rac3r.: lrt ~if4• V(: n I ',Elf (:f t; lrr~lr t(l, ~i nr3 I)r' rfr ",Iltn<'rj tr) (tr~l rit1~J,Jf;r l' yi',l3ttrl l?t Jt)!!f: ',irJrEil r~r;Jln:lrlr' t~lr;llltlr " { ..tlr.ll t;,t',Itt', .Ir~rS .irr•.i r1r.r:r!', '.sJ.JI! t N: ffr:'.Jrtnr:rl lr~r Urt ',Elr: '.r'r11r rr:rtl ,JrIrS Ortlrr~[r~;l:lt f;;<;JrJr,.;r}JrJrt rr~lr~llllrlfl 1 }}~• (;r> >.s'.r• ',lr~rtr3 rir.!Irt '.'/',Ir~rJt '.i;.Jt! I,r. r1; ., a ir,r•r~ r,J rlu r., ~ I r rir;:~ ! :. 11~. tJ;rl}I~; ,!~ il' i ~;[.I;i! ,~~ !i ._; .t'o•i '.r;.Sl1 I! Ir ..rr~;r.r1 !., r, !. S"}r. try 1}„ Irr ~ -.~Jrr,S' ; (' r'l i 1 ~ .G,r17 .~'rr•~ ~~ r Jurt S. 'UOr1 /'<i ~•, Public storm dram pipe materials shall be f'VC, t-iDl'L, or reinforced concrete, witi~ water-tight joints meeting the requirements of ASrM D3212, f=4T7, and C4~3M, as applicable. Provide concrete or sand-cement slurry encasement where required in areas of rt~inimum cover. Roof drains and underdrains shall not be directly connected to public storm drain lines and shall drain to the on-site private storm drain syster~~. As applicable, any disck~arge points of the storm water facilities shall k~e dnsigned to provide an aesthetically pleasing, useful, and low maintenance facility, that are designed to mitigate erosion, darnagc, or loss during a 10fl year storm event; and that mitigate the "attractive nuisance" hazards associated wit#~ these types of facilities. Prior to City PWD construction plan review, the Developer shall provide the City PWD with a complete set of hydrologic and hydraulic calculations and profile plots for sizing the SD system, which shat[ incorporate the use of the City PWD's raihfall/intensity curve, and City approved run-off coefficients, curve numbers, retardance, pipe roughness coefficients,~etc., that are used in the engineering calculations. Sheet flow surface drainage from the property onto the public rights-of-way or onto neighboring properties is unacceptable. Plans which propose to include the discharge to Bear Crr?ek and any construction or modification within the fioodway of Bear Creek or in the road ditches, shall be in compliance with DSt_, ALOE, ODf=W, DEQ, JC Roads, andlor City PWD {as applicable} guidelines and requirements and any applicable conditions and or approvals, of these regulatory agencies. 12. Fire Hydrants; Provide locations of existing and any new reguired ire hydrants. Fire Hydrants need to be connected to 8-inch-diameter and larger lines, with the supp{y lines being "looped" as feasible. if applicable, steamer parts at hydrants located near the building shall face the buildings. Fire hydrants shall be suitably protected from potential vehicle damage and encroachment. 13. Wafer System Cross Gonnection Control. Developer shalt comply with Oregon Health Division (OHD) and City requirements for cross connection control [f a pressurized irrigation system andlor domestic water welts exist on the property, the Developer will be required to install the required backftow prevention assemblies directly behind the City's water meters. 'f4. Water System: Construction drawings shall include the size, type, and location of all water mains, hydrants, valves, service connection, meter, service laterals, and other appudenance details in accordance with City PWD Standards and as required by the Crty PWD. 15. j7oof/Area Drains: All structures sha11 have roof drains, area drains, andlor crawl st~aces wrtli _. m..__.-.....--------- positive drainage avray from the build~nci }f; Grading Purls Gr~~diny plans slialE (r~~vr~ c~rrgEnal/ex.istiny c~radr;5 ~inrf (in~i! r~rades ploitc:d orr 4t~{~ pl<3rt Ty(nr;~al[y, r:Yr~~tinr~ C~r~3r~r, r:c~nlr7r,r lir~r;r> <3rr> d~~ ;tir,r) ;}nrT Srrr>r~r~r~~~ I)~7r:1~, ~anrf f~ra~tE c3r~s~1~• r;r~r~truii t{[lf.'; :rrs~ r>vr~rlr3irf s,n ir,(> r,( Ili+~ r~rr,hnr~ r~i:3r,r. ; rrnr7 :~rr~ ~n :s ru•.rr~~~r liar: vnr711? :inrf Sr~'~~'` (,~z~,l~r;,r IFnr". ~.}r~riilrl lrr- Lrt,r•Ir~r4 •rr~tir ~.I,•:.rr<<,st'. ~i .3111 r.1f ~/ ~, r•iilr~r ~~~{ ,t ri r. If ~ :I~~f ~ r,i, Irv _!I i•~ ,,:3 :~~ pr: , ~ .. ~ .~ ,1',F` ~ - . ~_ l_ t)f>Ol~r~(<tr+r! f~<t,'rlrrs 1Lunrr<'x li~~<t.? Juts ~.:UU(1 construction and testing shall conforn7 to €i~e standards anC~ gl~Id0Iln05 Of 1110 Oregon DIQ, 1990 APWA Standards, Oregon Cf~apter, t3ear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (E3CVSA}, and the City PWD Standards, where applicable. The construction plans and the as-built drawings shall identify lateral stationing for construction of sewer laterals. 18. WaferRrgftts: ff applicable, Developer shalt provide a Statement of Water Rights (on a City approved fora), for any affected properties. f=or properties determined to have water rights, the developer will coordinate with the State Watermaster the re-allocation of any waters attached to lands no [anger irrigable as a result of the proposed development. 1