HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 494 - Cavin and Smith Partition~ (~` ~~.:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLU'I'lON NO. 494
A RESOLUTION GRANTING TEN'I"ATIVE PLAN APPROVAL
FOR A LAND PARTITION
(Applicant (s) : Dona]d A. Cavin and Taae D. Smit11 }
( 37 2W02CB, Tax Lot 3700 )
Recitals
l . Applicant(s) has/have submitted ail applications for tentative plan approval for a land partition
on a .3S -acre parcel, located in the R-2, Residential Two-Family District in the City of Central
Point, Oregon.
2. On August 1, 2000, the Central Point Planning Con3missionconducted aduly-noticed public
hearing oxz the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff z-eports and heard testimony and
comments on the application.
Now, therefore;
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL
POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Approval Criteria. The requirements for approval of Iand partitions and tentative
plans are set faith in CPMC Title 16 and 17, relating to informational requirements, zoning, lot
din-zension, access, and similar requirements.
Section 2. Finding„and Conclusions. The Planning Commission finds and determines as
follows:
A. Tentative Plan Requirements. The application and tentative plan are in the correct
fozn1 and contain all of the information required by CPMC 16.10.
B. Az-ea and Width of Lot. This partitioning in an R-2 zone would create the following
parcels:
Parcel l: Approximately $,800 square feet;
Parcel 2: Approximately 6,600 square feet;
Parcels I and 2 n~zeet the minimum area ( 7,000 square feet for interior Iots and 6,000 square
feet for corner Iots} and width {60 feet for interior Iots and 70 feet for corner lots} requirements for
lots in the R-2 zone as set forth in CPMC 17.24.040-060, and such parcels zxzeet the general
requirements for lots contained in CPMC 16.24.050.
Planning Commission f2esolution No. ~~ {051998 }
~~~
Section 3. Conditio~lal Approval. The application for te~ltativc p]an foE• land partition herein
is hereby approved, s~rbjcct to the conditions set forth on Exhibit "A", "B", and "C" attached hereto
by reference incorporated herein, imposed cinder a~rthority of CPMC Chapter 16.36.
Passed by the Planning Com~i~issian artd signed by me in a~rthentication of its passage this
~~ ~ day of ~ ~ ~-~ ~ , 2000.
Planning Coznzx~ission Chair
~` ~ day of /h~ ~ ~ S ~' , 2000.
Planning Commission Chair
Planning Commission Resolution No. _420 (051998 )
ATTEST:
--`
....~ U., ~.~.
a.w~ R 6.r ~ !kr R . .
~,~x~~~~
~~
~...~..
Yr+.+4 st s..h R..f s rv~c ac t
r~ wcsruw ~c~srw
s.a... c~...y~ o~v..
~ br.a~
iw* 4 rd I r{.d f!
o,~.ar,.,.rar~ ~.+.r
~._,.~.~,.,._.r._~.
~...~ ~« ~.... ««., L
hKwi [s 1 ~1n • (4M R L
~~
~W 11rwlq 1 i.~+~M R
~~ t~wrl4~rfi.f4~1~
H l.wK ~.. _ . f ~~4 s~~+h T+'
~ 1~w~ wr
Qfwwr~
~ s..r. ~. ~y+.
• Mw~+w Fwnr hr
-f- Ilr.w~ ~ f...w
~ \
~- ~
/ hi ~~` `~ ~,.
~y 4\
``\ \?~ <' \ `` \ ~4t it
\A ~
.~ `~ ~ /,.
\ \ ~.,
. ,~
;,. ~,. ~.
fi.t~d L Carr. ~l.l.
1~Of D~tV Iar -LeJf.N, Or. l~7Ff
Jt1dSS-{iK Tri i1td75~t7A
tN+~T T~~ if irsi t OrYr,
~~ t.dnrM 1/r L.rrgRl4lfl~
~r....r Y W..+r r AwW !'~~
- W ~ Ir" - r 7~x
i..e 7'IaS mN7C11.
a ~+~~d
noresccoKAt
AH9 SU ~
g.'°.
~ nee[
tyv~ .R.~.«.2~.
it/.~/
'~
.~
a~/ 0 ~ CCri1~"¢[ gQ~Il~
~~r~r~ t~A tt
Piannin~ Depurtmen~
36
NoY TO gcn~( f
N.cnr
Exhibit B
t'lanning Dep~rtzne:~tt
City of Central ~'oint
1 N T E R
MEMO
O F F I C E
To: Tom Humphrey, Planning Director
From: Lee Brennan, Public Works Director
Subject. Memorandum Regarding Public Works Department Recommendations for the
Tentative Land Partition and Zoning Variance Requests for property located at
644 Maple Street
Date: July 25, 2000
It is the Public Works Department's recommendations that if the Planning Commission
approves the tentative land partition and zoning variance request for the subject property, that
the noted conditions are attached to the appravallvariancegronted:
Maple and Seventh Street Improvements: Construct/reconstruct required driveway
apron and any app[icabfe sidewalk sections (including curb and gutter sections, as
applicable) to current City standards for portions of the subject property that border
Maple and Seventh Streets.
2. AIIey_Improvements: if the Developer is going to take vehicular access to either of he
two parcels from the alley, then it is recommended that the Developer be required to
complete the required improvements to the alley to bring it to urban standards, including
but not limited to paving (including street section), concrete alley apron, traffic
delineation, and storm drainage infrastructure improvements.
3. Site Dralnage/5torrn Drain Plan: It is recommended that the developer design and
implement a site drainagelstorm drain plan that corrects and enhances existing site
drainage far the entire areas Hated an the site plan. This will require site drainage
improvements to the entire tax lot. The current sheet flaw surface drainage from the
properties onto the public rights-af-way or onto neighboring properties is unacceptable.
The PWD review of this project will require a drainage plan which illustrates existing and
future surface grades which illustrate surface drainage flow direction.
The Developer shall verify that the roof drains or foundation drains are not connected to
the sanitary sewer system, but which are connected to either discharge at the face of
the curb, or into the storm drainage system. If the roof or foundation drains discharge to
the sanitary sewer system, than the Developer wiq be required to modify the drains so
that they discharge to a newly installed collection system that discharges at the face of
the curb.
4. Driveways, Access Roads, and ParkingAreas: The Developer shall evaluate the
strength of the native soils and determine the access roadldriveway section designs to
42
614 Af~i~~le S7rc•rf
Tentatn~e I,n~d Parrrrra~a~l~inva•~ J ~«r't~rrac-~~
July .25. 100D
Page 1
handle the expected loads {including fire equipment) to be traveled on these private
drivewayslaccess roads. All driveways, access roads, and parking areas should either
have asphalt or cement concrete surfaces.
5. Utility Easements: A 1 a-foot wide public utility easement (PUE) wilt be required along
the subject property's frontages with Seventh Street. A P.U.E. will no# be required along
Maple Street, as the 80-foot-wide right-of-way already accommodates this, based on the
present and future projected development of Maple Street.
6. Cit Wafer Service Revision/U rode and Backflow Prevention Assemb!
lnstalfation: As applicable, the Developer shall work with the City PWD on
revising/upgrading the site's water service connections to comply with current City
ordinances regarding water service and backflow prevention assembly installation #o
each individual buildingllot. Approved backflow prevention assembly installation (at the
Developer's expense) may be required directly behind all the Ci#y water service meters
that service the proposed developments. Any new connections to the City`s water
system to facilitate the proposed development shall be performed by the City at the
Developer's expense.
Generai
Development Plans: Developer shall submit to the City's PWD for review and
approval, engineered plans and specifications for all improvemen#s proposed for
construction or modifications within the City or public rights-of-way and easements, or
for connections to City infrastructure. Plans shall show all existing utilities and City
facilities, existing contours, property lines, benchmarks and other physical site
information needed for review. All plans submitted for PWD review shall be presented in
a common engineering scale sized to fit on 24-inch by 36anch, D size drawing sheets.
PWD requires 3 se#s of plans for review purposes.
Public improvements include, but are not limited to, streets (including sidewalks, cuffs
and gutters, ADA ramps, driveway aprons, and landscape buffers); alleys; storm
drainage and sanitary sewer coilec#ion and conveyance systems; water distribution
system {up to the service meter and including fire protection); and street lighting. All
construction of public improvements shall conform to the City's PWD Standards, the
conditions approved and stipulated by the Planning Commission, and other special
specifications, details, standards, and/or upgrades as may be approved by the City
Administrator or his designee prior to the approval of the construction plans for the
proposed development. During construction, infrastructure or access changes proposed
by the Developer shall be submitted in writing to the City PWD for approval prior to
installation.
~provals: As applicable, Fire District No. 3 {fire hydrant access/location, fire flow
capadty/line sizing, and emergency vehicle access} and Bear Creek Valley Sanitary
,~ ;
64~ Af<~>!e tifree(
l~entatrve l,tlnd Parrrhr~n2wun,L 1'«rrnnc'c
Jult' 15..2000
Pa fie _3
Authority {BCVSA, for sanitary sewers)written approval of construction plans shall be
submitted to the City PWD prior to final construction plan review and approval by City
PWD.
3. As-Builts: As applicable, Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the
Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "as-
built" drawings. if feasible, the Developer's engineer or surveyor should provide the
drawings in both a "hard copy" form (produced on Mylar~} and in a "digital" format
compatible with AutoCAD°, or other form as approved by the Ci#y PWD.
As-built drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line" changes to fnal
approved construction plans which identify the locations and or elevations (as
appropriate) of actual installed items, including, but not limited to, invert, inlet, and rim or
Gp elevations; spot elevations identified on drawings; water lines, valves, and fire
hydrants; water and sewer lateral; modifications to street section; manhole and curb
inlet; street light locations; other below grade utility lines; etc. Provide a "red-fine" hard
copy (on Myfar®}, or an approved alternative format, of construction drawings, and if
feasible, an acceptable AutoCAD® compatible drawing electronic fife to the City at
completion of construction and prior to acceptance of public infrastructure facilities
completed as part of the proposed development, or as otherwise approved by the City
Administrator or his designee.
4. Elevations: All elevations used an the construction plans, and on temporary
benchmarks shall be tied into an established City approved benchmark and be so noted
on the plans.
5. Exi`sfin_g (nfrastructure: As applicable, field verify all existing infrastructure elevations
and locations (i.e. pipe inverts, curb elevations, street elevations, etc.), to which the
proposed development will connect into existing improvements, prior to final
construction plan design and submittal for final approval. The accurate locations of any
existing underground and above ground public infrastructure, and the location of the
associated easements with these facilities, shall be accurately portrayed (both
horizontally and vertically} on the construction plans.
6. Fill Placement: All fill placed in the development shall be engineered frll that is suitably
placed and compacted in accordance with City PWD and Building Department
standards, except for the upper 1.5-feet of fill placed outside of public rights-of-way and
that does not underlie building, structures, or traveled vehicular access ways or parking
areas.
7. Ufilify Plans: As built drawings shah reflect all utility locations; located both above and
below ground.
$_ Water Sysfem Cross Connecfiort Control. Devela{~er shall comply with Oregon
4~
S44 Afaple Srrecr
Tenlalive Land Par(rlror~lonrn~; !'anaru•e
July 25, 2000
Page 4
Health Division (OHD) and City requirements for cross connection control.
9. Wafer S, sY tem: Construction drawings shall include the size, type, and location of al!
water mains, hydrants, valves, service connection, meter, service laterals, and other
appurtenance details in accordance with City PWD Standards and as required by the
City PWD.
10. Roof/Area Drains: All structures shall have roof drains, area drains, and/or craw!
spaces with positive drainage away from the building. Roof drains shall not be directly
connected to the public storm drain system.
11. Grading Plans: Grading plans should have original/existing grades and final grades
plotted on the plan. Typically, existing grade contour lines are dashed and screened
back, and final grade contour lines are overlaid on top of the existing grades and are in
a heavier fine width and solid. Contour lines should be labeled with elevations.
12. Clear Asian Areas/Triangles. All driveway approaches of the proposed Development
connecting to public roads ar alleys, and the a11ey connection to Seventh Street shall
maintain the required sight vision triangles {25-feet, each side) as measured from the
edge of the right-of-way to the center of the driveway. As applicable, this may require
the removal of vegetation or structures to obtain the required clear sight-vision area.
~~
~~,,C3ity ~ f Ceti tx-tl Point
L1~,1~~~~T~ ccCss
Ptannutg DeP~rtmc~tY
EXHIBIT C
PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. The approval of the Tentative Plan shall expire in one year on August 1, 2001 unless
an application for final plat or extension has been received by the City.
2. The project ~xtust corrtply with all applicable focal, state and federal regulations.
3. The tentative and final plats shall depict utility easements requested by the City,
BCVSA and WP Natural Gas. Any changes to utility layout including fire hydrants
shall require subsequent approval by the respective service provider.
4. Pending the approval of the City Administrator, the applicant shall enter into a
deferred improvement agreement for parcels 1 and 2 of the proposed partition.
39