Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 496 - Shari's - Site Planca c> 2 "7 PLANNING COMMISSION I~I::SOI.,UTION NO. 49G A RESOLUTION CONDI'T'IONALLY .APPROVING A SITE PLAN APPLICA`fION (Applicant (s): Shari's Management Corporation} (372W02D, Tax Lot 2900} Recitals 1. This matter came before the Planning Coznn~ission for hearing on August 1, 2000, on applicant's site plan application fora 4,440 square foot restaurant in the C-4, Tourist and Office Professional district of the City. The Planning Commission reviewed tl~e application and tl~e City staff reports, and received comments from all persons wishing to be heard in favor of and opposed to the application. Naw, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Criteria A licable to Decision. The following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code apply to this application: A. Chapter 17.44, Touz-ist and Office-Professional District B. Chapter 17.G0, General Regulations; C. Chapter 17.64, Off-Street Parking and Loading; D. Chapter 17.72, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval. Section 2. Findings and Conclusions. The Planning Commission hereby adopts by reference all findings of fact set forth in the City staff reports, and concludes that, except where addressed in the conditions to approval, the application and proposal comply with the requirements of the following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code: A. Chapter 17.44, relating to uses, lot size, Tot coverage, setback, building height and screening in the C-4 district; B. Chapter 17.60 relating to paving and landscaping zequirements; C. Chapter 17.64 zelating to off-street parking and Ioadirzg facilities; D. Chapter T 7.72 relating to site plan requirements. Section 3. Conditional Approval. The application for site plan approval is hereby conditionally approved, subject to the conditions set forth on Exhibit "A", "B", and "C" which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein, and also to emphasize no Semi-Truck 1 -PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 496 (08012000 } parking on either LaRue Drive or Pennizzgcr Road. Passed by the Planning Can~znzission a~ld signed by n1e in azrthe~~ticatio~~ of its passage this ~~ r day of ~ ~~ ~ , 20~ , Planning Comnlissio~l Chairman ATTEST: City' Re~z~~entative by me this ~ ~~ day of ~~ut ~- 20~~ . Planning Cornznissian Chairmanz 2 -PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 496 (08012000 ) ~~ y ?i y ~ ~ ~i I v°~ ~ ._. 1 ~ ~ :~ ~ fly ~~ ~ ~~ - ~~ -~ ,,,,,~,.,~ +t,~ ~~ ,7 r ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ Y~ aaa a ~r~ ~ ~ ~l ~ ~ ~ ~ ... ~~ (~ ~. ~ ! ~ ____ .~......~..... ~. ___.._.... j T ~...r i -, ~- ~~ ~~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~~ ~~ ~"~~~ ~-~~ ~ ~~ ! ~ ~~ f { ~ , rl / i .__..._____..~... ._.~...~. o~ ~ °~ ¢~ nnn ,. ,o.~~ __..~ ~~ ,~ anaY ...~ ~ fa'~u ]„~i Wa ~... ~... Peninoer Rood m ~~~m~e era a®~~ 1 ~~i~'~~~~~~~~~ y ~u~aur~x~c3aQ~uguuew ~ ~~~~~N ~~~~~ i ~ ~o ~ir~ o~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ,~ . fE ~~ ~ 1 ~- .~l ~ a~ ; I~ ,~---k- M '~' i .~ #°~ I . ~, ~ ~ i (O r ~~ ~ ~ ~~ '~ ~ ~~ ~r~~ -~ .-.~ -~-- - o ~ - l~~ --~ ~ -~~-- ~ ~ 1 ~ ! f •~a ~ I ~~ ~~ f ~ ~! iw61 !/7 ~ ~ R ' K~aziA G Mr#snn. Arctsucr~ y ~ 'i~ ~~ ~ ^ L~7 ~ / dZli~ S ri Crrcts~,k P1xr 8n~+n i~in !kt 7 71106 1 1 1 7 [5ct'4 ~b i NP, I"n.\ ~`1L~ StlS i 7W (\] 9 ~hxsrslo~ ~ i~c onnc a naa+cxa >s~o ax~eu Ptil"I, UE~C7l ssu~ >~ 7~e Exhibit B RECOMMENDED PLANNING DEPAI2.TMEN`I' CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The approval of the Site flan shall expire in one year on August 1, 2001 unless an application far a building permit or an application for extension has been received by the City. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan depicting any changes discussed and approved at the public hearing within 60 days of Planning Commission approval. 2. The project must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations . 3. The applicant shall work with the Public Works Department to make appropriate improvements or arrangements to improve curbs, gutters, sidewalks and paving in the public Rights of Way. 95 City of C~iltra~ Point E N T E R 4 F F f C E MEMO Tn: Tom Humphrey, Planning Director From: Lee Brennan, Public Works DirectorlCity Engineer ~Xhibl~ C Subject: Calculation of SDCs for 4,400 sf Shari's Restaurant t'tazinin~ Deparfinextt Date: July 25, 2000 The estimated collector and arterial street SDC to be charged for the Shari's Restaurant (based on a building footprint of 4,400 sf} was determined to be $54,505.70. This SDC was based on the following: High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant Daily Trip Ends: ~ 30.34 per thousand grass square feet (TGSF} Reduced Daily Trip Ends (reduced by 44%} 72.99 per TGS1= Central Point Trip Length 3.7 miles Total Gross Square footage 4.4 TGSF Attributable New Travel (ANT) SDC Charge SDC Required: $54,505.70 The four water related SDCs (MWC Water Treatment Plant and Transmission SDC, Central Point Water Distribution SDC, Centro( Point Water Reservoir SDC, and the Central Point Water Supply SDC} will be determined once cons#ruction plans are received, and will be based on the number and size of water meters installed. There will not be a park SDC for this proposed development. The Developer should check with BCVSA regarding SDCs to be charged for sanitary sewer connection. The final SDC amount determination will be made based on approved construction plans and determined and due at building permit issuance. 594.1 trip-~:nd miles $91.745 per trip-end mile ~~ RL<'COMMEND[?U I'LANNINC: I}rl'Alt"['MLN"I' COND1'I'[ONS UI~ A['l'I2t)VAL The approval oCthe Site flan shall expire in one year an august 1, 2(?Q l unless an application for a building perrni€ or an applicatio~~ for extension has been received by the City. "l~he applicant shall submit a revised site plan depicting any changes discussed a~~d approved at the public hearing within b0 days of Planning C:or~lmission approval. 2. The project must comply with all applicable locak, state and federal regulations . The applicant shall work with the Public Works l~epartn~ent to make appropriate improvements or arrangements to improve curbs, gutters, sidewalks and paving in the public Rights of Way. ~~ ,1 CITY Ut= CENTRAL POINT f?EPAf?rMEfV7~ Of= PUBLIC WOf~KS STAI=F REPORT for Shari's Restaurant PW#00027 Date: Applicant/ Agent: Owner. Project: Location: Legal: Zoning: Area: Units: Plans: Report By: Purpose July 25, 2000 Shari's Management Corp, 8205 S.W. Creekside Place, Beaverton, OR 97008-7912 (503} 605-4140 Contact: Kenneth G. McKinney Peninger Leasing, LLC, 1060 Crater Lake Ave. suite C, Medford, OR 97509 Sit-Downl>=amity Restaurant:150 Seat, 4,400 sf. Southwest of the intersection of LaRue Dr. and Peninger Rd. T37S, R2W, Section 02D Tax Lots C-4, Tourist and Office Professional Distric# 0.85 Acres. 1 4,40D sf restaurant 2 Drawings entitled "Site Plan` and "Site Details", prepared by Kenneth G. McKinney, Architect, dated June 29, 2000 Lee N. Brennan, Public Works Director Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer) regarding City Public Works Department (PWD} standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed commercial facility. Gather information from the Developerl(=ngineer regarding the proposed development. The proposed Development is a relatively "low" traffic-impact development that will be located to the south of the existing fast food restaurantltruck fueling facility development on the south side of the intersection of E. Pine Street and Peninger Road. It is the Public Works Department opinion that although the proposed Development wilt provide some impact to the t. Pine StreetlPeningerRood intersection, that these impacts are minor in nature, and wit! not severely degrade the existing level of service of this intersection. However, the proposed Development would be included in any local improvement district that is formed to address these impacts and to make the necessary improvements to the E. Pine StreetlPeninger Road intersection, and adjoining streetsfintersections. Spec[al Requirements Existing Infrastructure: The Developer shall demonstrate that all connections to existing infrastructure (i.e. streets; water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems; natural drainage systems; etc.,) will not interfere with or provide for the degradation of the existing effective level of service or operation of the infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have either adequate capacities to accommodate the flaws andlor demands imposed on the existing infrastructure as the result of the connection of the proposed development's infrastructure, or wit[ be improved by and at the expense of the Developer to accommodate the additional flows andlor demands; while maintaining or improving the existing level of service of the affected facility, as approved by (as applicable), the regulatory agency, utility owner, andlor property owner involved. 2. Master Pfarts: In association with City PWD staff, the Developer shall prepare master plans for the storm drain collection, retention, and conveyance system, the sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system, and the water distribution system for the proposed Development, and the surrounding parcels The master plans should take into account fhe flows or demands of the ~~ 1'rnrn~~•r Le•~rsnt,t, f f ( I r<'vtlnlurowrt lr'~rfe~fn•,' 1'Ierrr/rrr,~li,rrr .~ f1~•srdur<rrrl Juh~ : ~, I944 f'«~z° _ proposed development, any future development on neighboring portions of the sub;ect tax lot, on neighboring properties, and any areas deemed by the City that wil! need to connect-into the proposed development's or existing neighboring infrastructure. The prepared master plans should take into account any previous master plans that have been prepared and approved by the City, Jackson County, ODOT, and BCVSA, as applicable. 3. Traffrc lmpacf Study. Because of the large volume of truck traffic in this area, a traffic impact study would typically be warranted that evaluates the effects on the neighboring intersections and freeway interchange as the result of development on fhese parcels. Based on the current truck and vehicle traffic on this portion of Peninger Road, it is expected that any development permitted on these parcels would be development that typically has few expected traffic movements during `peak" hours. The proposed development with asit-down type restaurant is one such low-impact type development. It is the PWD`s recommendation that the applicant participate in the current traffic analyses work that is being performed by fhe City and others in regards to determining current and projected future levels of service of the intersections along the E. Pine Street corridor. Any improvements necessitated to fhe corridor would be paid for by the formation of a focal improvement district {LID). The proposed development would be a part of the LID formed. Thus, the PWD is recommending that a condition of approval for the proposed Development, would be that the Development be included in any applicable LID formed, foregoing any remonstration rights. 4. Rights-af-Way and Easements; Suitable right-of-way dedication will need to be provided for the extension of LaRue Drive and Peninger Road. To meet the City's soon to be adapted revised street design standards, it is recommended that the right-of-way widths be increased from the current right-of-way width of 25 feet from centerline, to a 29-foot width from centerline to accommodate the local cammercia~ndustrial street standard to be adopted; this will require a dedication of ~-feet for right-of-way purposes along the subject property that adjoin LaRue Drive and Peninger Road. The Developer should provide suitable and acceptable easements {minimum 15-foot in width) for any existing public works infrastructure, or public works infrastructure required for the development, that are located outside the public rights-of-way. A separate 10-foot minimum width public utilities easement (P.U.iW.) should also be dedicated by the Developer for utility installation outside the LaRue Drive and Peninger Road right-of-way along the property's exterior frontage with these streets. 5. Street Layouts The proposed street layout may need fa be modified to provide proper ingress and egress into the proposed development and for future development of tax lot 2600 (which is currently "landlocked") and possibly for tax lot 2700. Tax lot 2700 is a flag lot with access off of Pine Street. Any commercial development on Tax lot 2700 with access to Pine Street would require a separation of 200 feet from any intersection for developmenk of a commercial driveway on Pine Street. Currently there is not enough distance from the I-5 off-ramplon-ramp intersection to fhe access point on Pine Street for a commercial driveway access for tax lot 270Q, without a variance Thus access for tax lot 2700 off of LaRue C7nve may be preferred 6 Site L~~youUTraffrc Circulatiart Plar1/Driveway Locations The developer shall G~repare and ~~ Pc•nrnger Ler~sink. 1.L(~ 1lcrclup>mr•nr TeRtalrve f'!an far,lh<rrr's f2estvurcinr P~4'f? Staff Repvrt July 15, ! 999 Page 1 submit for City PWD approval a suitable site traffic circulation plan far the proposed development and neighboring parcels identified for the master planning work required. The traffic circulation plan shall illustrate that all driveways and connections to streets shall accommodate the taming and access movements of all expected truck, bus, emergency vehicle {i.e fire truck) and all other applicable vehicles including but not limited to a WB-67 truck (long- haul delivery truck), a motor home in combination with a boat trailer; a single unit bus (RVTD or tour bus}; and fire-fighting equipment. A[I vehicular movements shall be designed to avoid infringing into opposing or adjoining travel lanes when the traffic movements are made by the studied vehicle. The location of the most easterly driveway connection to LaRue drive shall be eliminated because it does not meet the City's standard for minimum spacing from the intersection of 75 feet. It is further recommended that parking tae accommodated on the proposed Development's Site andlor adjoining parcels far the parking of long haul trucks {i.e WB-67}, buses, and motor homes in combination with a boat. Truck, bus, and motor home parking will not be permitted on time adjoining streets. The site plan also appears to delineate a western and southern driveway that is connected to the adjoining parcels. The master plans prepared shall illustrate that the required ingress- egress movements are accommodated on these adjoining driveways. 7. Clear ~sron AreaslTrianglES. All driveway approaches of the proposed Development connecting to public roads shall maintain the minimum required sight vision triangles as measured from the edge of the right-of-way to the center of the driveway. This requirement may be adjusted by the City PWD, depending on final orientation and lane layout of the adjoining roads, in accordance with AASHTO clear sight-vision requirements. Adequate clear vison area/triangies shall also be maintained at all intemai driveway intersections, and at the intersection of LaRue Drive and Peninger Road.. 8. Street Improvements on LaRue Drive and_Penlnq'~r Road: It is recommended that the Developer be required to construct street section (40-foot curb to curb width) , curb and gutter, storm drainage, sidewalK (6-foot wide, inciudir~g driveway aprons and ADA ramps), traffc delineation (including no semi-truck, bus, motor home parking signs), and street lighting (with maximum 200 foot spacing) improvements for the portions of LaRue Drive and Peninger Road that adjoin the proposed development. 9. ,Water Distribution Sysfem and Fire Protection: It is recommended that the water system for the proposed Development and neighboring properties to the east, south, and west shall be master planned, to not only accommodate the needs of the proposed Development, but to provide for mainline valves and stub-outs far future main distribution networks and "reinforced looping" of the adjoining properties to the east south and west. Any development on this and surrounding parcels will be connecting into the 92-inch~tiameter water line that is aligned in Peninger Road. This would result in a "single-feed" non-reinforced water distribution system:. City PWD would require that the designed system be of reinforced ("looped") design, with a second connection to the City's water distribution system (preferably with a second connection to the water main on Pine Street). Required fire flows for the proposed Development, and projected development on adjoining parcels will likely dictate line sizes. The water mains will J ~ p~nrn~e'r I,e<rsrnl;, LLC 1)<'rr'lrrlrm<'nr 7erttntrve f'Ion Jor Slrari's Re,rlvr~rn~rt Alf'f) S1a~} Nclrnrt Jul}~ l3, 1994 Pale 4 be of such diameter that facilitate water demands for projected future development in the surrounding areas, and for completion of the City's water main distribution system in this portion of the City. On other recent development projects, the City has or is proposing to reimburse the developer for a portion of the costs for up-sizing of water lines above the minimum water line diameter of 8-inches. The propnsed water line reimbursement is only for projects where the required up-sizing was not the result of the flow demands of the development, but is the direct result of providing additional capacity for the supplemental demands that may be placed on the water distribution system caused by additional surrounding future development. The reimbursement methodology for water line up-sizing includes payment of the estimated material It is recommended that the proposed Development be conditioned to extend the 92-inch- diameterwater lino aligned in Peninger Road to the extended southern property line of the proposed Development. It is also recommended that the proposed Development be conditioned to extend a suitably sized waterline aligned in l:aRue Drive line to the extended westerly border of the subject parcel. As applicable, fire service vaults and any other fire protection connections or appurtenances, shalt be constructed in accordance with standards and requirements established by the City PWD, Medford Water Commission, and Fire District No. 3. ~0. Aboveground Utiiifies: If applicable, coordinate efforts with Pacific Power, US West, and Falcon (TCl) Cable, to convert any overhead electrical power, telephone, or cable facilities within the proposed development to underground facilities, prior to the acceptance by the City PWD of the public improvements associated wi#h the proposed development. AEI agreements and costs associated with the conversion of #hese facilities from avertlead to underground facilities, shall be by and between the utility owners and the Developer. 19 . Erasion Co»froi Ptan: To meet current DEQ requirements, and federal mandated Phase ii Storm Water Quality requirements, a suitable erosion control plan, utit'tzing best management practices and procedures, must be prepared and submitted to the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and the City PWD far review and approval for the construction of any improvements assoaated with this development. The construction plans associated with this development will not be approved by the City PWD until the City PWD receives a copy of the written approval of the erosion control plan by the Dt=Q. The approved erosion control plan must then be implemented to control and mitigate construction site storm water run-off, erasion control, silt and sand migration, nuisance dust generation and migration, and pollution prevention. 'l2. Storm Drainage System: The storm drain system shall be designed to accommodate the storm water run-off from and run-on onto the proposed development (either surface run-on or culvert or creel<Iditch conveyance); any future development on adjacent properties; conveyed storm drainage or surface water flow, and any flows from areas deemed by the City that will need to connect-into the proposed development`s Sp System. It appears that drainage from tax tots 2600 and tax lot 2704 will need to drain to and be conveyed through the designed storm drainage conveyance system associated with the development on tax lot 2900. Thus City PV11D is recommending that the Developer{s) of these parcels be required to design the storm drainage collection and conveyance system to accommodate projected post-development flows from these adjoining tax lots. Storm drainage conveyance pipe stub-outs, through suitable easements in the development, will need to be provided and storm drain conveyance lines may goo 1•,'nu,t~-, r~,.,r,r, r1, !r~•,rl~,f,nr.-nt l~,~nr,rrn~,• 1Y~,r; 1, ~r \Ir,,r; c h•rst, n,, ,,nr ('<)~~• i need to be up-sized as necessary to accommodate existing and future developed property storm water run-off from the applicable tax lots {i.e. "Area of Benefit"). if the storm drain lines are to be public lines, and are needed to be up-sized Pram the size necessary to accommodate the development on tax lot 2900 and the storm water flows from the existing development of the tax lots {i.e. "Area of Benefit") in the vicinity of the proposed development, to provide additional capacity to accommodate the projected future developed flows of the Area of Benefit tax fats, then the PWD would propose to compensate the Developer far fhe up-sizing of these public storm drain collection and conveyance facilities above a minimum pipe size of 24inch-diameter as per the methodology approved by the City Council. 13. Off-Sife Sfarm Draina a Infrastructure: For any storm drainage infrastructure constructed or improved outside the City's rights-af-way or easements for drainage of surface waters from the subject development, the Developer shall provide a suitable document or documents which contain approvals for the implementation of such connection and/or improvements and which describe: ^ Who is responsible for the operation, maintenance, and repair of the infrastructure facilities to maintain the original design parameters associated with the infrastructure. If fhe City is to operate and maintain the infrastructure, the applicable funding mechanism that will be created (i.e local improvement district) for the associated City expenditures; ^ How will access be afforded and maintained indefinitely to maintain and repair the infrastructure facilities; ^ That an easement or other suitable conveyance document has been granted, as necessary, to provide suitable access on private property for the inspection, maintenance, and repair work to be performed on the infrastnucture facilities. The easement shalt include a statement which allows access by City personnel for inspection and maintenance purposes. 1 ~. Sarrita Sewer. All sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system (SS System} design, construction and testing shalt conform to the standards and guidelines of the Oregon DEQ, 1990 APWA Standards, Oregon Chapter, Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Au#hority (BCVSA), and the City PWD Standards, where applicable. General Puhiic Improvements: Ali construction of public improvements shall conform to the City's PWD Standards, the conditions approved and stipulated by the Planning Commission, and other special specifications, details, standards, andlor upgrades as may be approved by the City Administrator or his designee prior to the approval of the construction plans for the proposed development. During construction, changes proposed by the Developer shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's engineer to the City PWD far approval prior to implementation f'e_rm_its an__d Approvals Developer shall provide copies o€ any permits, variances, approvals. and conditrons as may be required by other agencies, including, bet not limrted to, the Oregon (`)r?partn~er7t of fish and Wildlife (Df-W), Oregon Dr partrnent o€ f=nv~ronmental fa~~al~ty (Df~Qj. I ('F•nut~rr ~,erlsirr~. 1.I (~ I r~'r,'I~rjvrra'rtF 7~PnfrurrP f'Iarr for,Ch~rrt~s /u'sf~rirr,rnt ~ur,~ zs. r vvv Pad; e 6 Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL}, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers {ACOE}, affected irrigation districts, and Jackson County Roads and Parks Services (JC Roads), Fire District No. 3, and Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA}, as applicable, The Developer shall submit written approvals of the final construction plans from Fire District No. 3 (f re hydrant placement, waterline sizing, and emergency vehicle access}, Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA, for sanitary sowers}, and JC Roads, (E. Pine Street improvements, as applicable} prior fo final canstnactian plan review and approval by City PWD. 3. As-Buiffs: Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. if feasible, the Developer's engineer or surveyor should provide the drawings in both a "hard copy" farm (produced on Mylar®} and in a "digital" format compatible with Au#oCAD~, or other form as approved by the City PWD. As-built drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line" changes to final approved construction plans which identify the locations and or elevations (as appropriate} of actual installed items, including, but not limited to, invert, inlet, and rim or Gp elevations; spat elevations identified on drawings; water fines, valves, and fire hydrants; water and sewer lateral; modifications to street section; manhole and curb inlet; street light locations; other below grade utility lines; etc. Provide a "red-line" hard copy (on Mylar-~}, or an approved a€temative format, of construction drawings, and if feasble, an acceptable AutoCAD® compatible drawing electronic fife to the City at completion of construction and prior to acceptance of public infrastructure facilifies completed as part of the proposed development, or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee. 4. Elevations: Afl elevations used on the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on the permanent benchmark shall be tied into an established City approved benchmark and be so noted on the plans. At feast one permanent benchmark shat[ be provided for the proposed development, the location of the benchmark shall be as jointly determined by the City PWD and the Developer's surveyor. 5. existing lnfrastructure: As applicable, field verify all existing infrastructure elevations and locations {i.e. pipe inverts, curb elevations, street elevations, etc.), to which the proposed development wilt connect into existing improvements, prior to final construction plan design and submittal for final approval. The accurate locations of any existing underground and above ground public infrastructure, and the location of the associated easements with these facilities, shall be accurately portrayed (both horizontally and vertically} on the construction plans- 6. Fit! Placement. Ali fill placed in the development shall be engineered fill that is suitably placed and compacted in accordance with Ci#y PWD and Building Department standards, except far the upper 1.5-leek of fill placed outside of public rights-of-way and that does not underlie building, structures, or traveled vehicular access ways or parking areas. 7. Road/Drivew_a /Parking Areas: The Developer sha11 evaluate the strength of the native soils and determine the access road, parking, and driveway section designs to handle the expected loads (including fire equipment) to be traveled on these private driveways, access roads, and parking areas. Need to provide designed road section for review The road/streetldriveway sections within the public rights-of-way shall tie constructed per the design of the City PWD ir~~ Pe'rnn,ker (.cnsrrr~. LL(' (7~•s•i(n/irru'n! l Cn(nnve P1nn /i>r .Sh«rr "s 1~esl,nrrnrr! f 1S'U Sr~tf) ticf~orr Ju(~~ 15, (999 f'n fre 7 8. Ufilify Plans: The utility plans shall be drawn to scale with accurate horizontal and vertical depiction of utility lines and appurtenances {transformers, valves, etc.}, Utility infrastructure location must be accurately included an the as-built drawings, ar as a separate set of drawings attached to the as-built drawings. 9. Area Lighting Plan: Need to provide and implement an adequate area lighting plan for parking and public access areas, including the driveway entrances. ~ 0. Easements: 1=asements for City infrastructure (i.e. sanitary sewer, water, and storm drain [if applicable]) should be a minimum of 95-feet wide, and should not split lot lines. Easements far public storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and water lines shall be dedicated to the City and not just a P.U.I . Centerline of buried infrastr~,rcture shaA be aligned a minimum of five {5} feet from the edge of the easement. ff two ar more City owned utilities are located within an easement, then a minimum of 20-foot width should be required. Easement dedications in final deeds ar CC&Rs need a statement which should clearly indicate that easements must be maintained with suitable, driveable vehicular access to City public infrastructure facilities, as determined by the City PWD. 9 ~ . Sfreef Lights: Construction drawings for this Tentative Plan steal[ include a Street Lighting Plan in accordance with the requirements of the City PWD or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee (with maximum 200 foot spacing). The construction drawings shall include clear vision areas designed to meet the City's PWD Standards. 9 2. Storm Draina e S sfem: Developer's engineer shall develop a facility plan for the storm drain collection, retention, and conveyance system {SD System) which provides for storm water run- off from and run-on onto the proposed development (either surface run-on or culvert or creeklditch conveyance), any existing or future development on adjacent properties, conveyed storm drainage, or surface water flow, and any areas deemed by the City that will need to connect-into the proposed development's SD System. As applicable, Developer's engineer shalt determine how the SD system wiA work during 10- yearand 900 year flood events associated with Bear Creek. Identify the HGl_ in Bear Creek during 90-and 100-year storm event, and what affect it will have on the proposed outlets and storm drain system and building elevations. System should be designed to adequately drain a 90-year storm event without surcharging or shall provide adequate storage to prevent surcharging; and be designed to prevent backftow of water from Bear Creek up into SD system during storm events. The design of the storm drain collection and conveyance system {SD System) should provide for storm water run-off from and run-on onto the proposed development (either surface run-on or culvert or creeklditch conveyance); the Developer shat! demonstrate that the storm water flows from the completion of the proposed development (and at any tune prior to completion of development) do not exceed predevelopment flows into Bear Creek; or that allowances or provisions have been made (and approval of the applicable properties owners and regulatory agencies has been obtained), which accommodate any additional flow which exceed predevelopr~ent flows, The Developer and the City PWD shall agree on the applicable run-off coefficients, curve numbers, retardance, etc , to be used in the engineering calculations. ~_ ~ •~ 1'errrvt•~rr Lenstrr,4. L1.(~ 1 >~•ti•cl<tf+rni•r~r Tenrnftre f'Inn fi~r,5lr,tri's Krsl~tiu'<r+r1 1' I i'O .SfnJ) Repvrl July 15. 1999 Page ~4 Developer's engineer shal€ provide a site drainage plan designed, at a minimum, to accommodate a 10 year storm event. The SD system must be designed to adequately drain the 10-year storm event without surcharging or must be provided with adequate storage to prevent surcharging; and be designed to not impact existing public storm drainage facilities. Catch basins and area drains shall be designed for on-site sediment and petroleum hydrocarbon retention. The private storm drain system shat! be designed to directly canned to the public storm drain system, and shall not be designed to discharge to the street surfaces. Public storm drain pipe materials shall be PVC, HDPF, or reinforced concrete, with water-tight joints. Provide concrete orsand-cement slurry encasement where required in areas of minimum cover. Roof drains and underdrains shall not be directly connected to public storm drain lines and shall drain to the on-site private storm drain system. As applicable, any discharge points of the storm water facilities shall be designed to provide an aesthetically pleasing, useful, and [ow maintenance facility, that are designed to mitigate erosion, damage, or loss during a 100 year storm event; and that mitigate the "attractive nuisance" hazards associated with these types of facilities. Prior to Ci#y PWD construction plan review, the Developer shall provide the City PWD with a complete set of hydrologic and hydraulic calculations and pro#ile plo#s for sizing the SD system, which shalt incorporate the use of the City PWD's rainfalllintensity curve, and City approved run-off coefficients, curve numbers, retardance, pipe roughness coefficients, etc., that are used in the engineering calculations. Sheet flow surface drainage from the property onto the public rights-of-way or onto neighboring properties is unacceptable. Plans which propose to include the discharge to Bear Creek and any construction or modification within the floodway of Bear Creek or in the road ditches, shall be in compliance with DSt., ACOE, ODFW, DEQ, .1C Roads, and/or Cify PWD (as applicable) guidelines and requirements and any applicable conditions and or approvals, of these regulatory agencies. 13. Fire Hydrants: Provide locations of existing and any new required fire hydrants. Fire Hydrants need to be connected to 8-inch-diameter and larger lines, with the supply lines being "looped" as feasible. if applicable, steamer ports at hydrants located near the building shat! face the buildings. Fire hydrants shat[ be suitably protected from potential vehicle damage and encroachment. 14. Water System Cross Connection Control: Developer steal{ comply with Oregon Health Division (OHD} and City requirements for cross connection control If a pressurized irrigation system and/or domestic water wells exist on the property, the Developer will be required to install the required backfiow prevention assemblies directly behind the City's water meters. ~ 5. Water_System: Construction drawings shad include the size, type, and location of all water mains, hydrants, valves, service connection, meter, service laterals, and other appurtenance details sn accordance with Ciky F'WD Standards and as required by the City F'WD 1 E1'f 1ulr~ ,ti :U'1'-~ 16 Roof/Area Drains. All structures shall have roof drams, area drains, andlor crawl spaces with positive drainage away from the building. 17. Gradi~ Plans: Grading plans shall have originallexisting grades and final grades plotted on the plan. Typically, existing grade contour lines are dashed and screened back, and final grade contour lines are overlaid on top of the existing grades and are in a heavier line width and solid. Contour lines should be labeled with elevations. 18. SanifarY Sewer. All sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system {SS System} design, construction and testing shall conform to the standards and guidelines of the Oregon DEQ, 1990 APWA Standards, Oregon Chapter, Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA), and the City PWD Standards, where applicable. The construction plans and the as-built drawings shall identify lateral stationing for construction of sewer laterals. 19. Water Rights: If applicable, Developer shall provide a Statement of Water Rights (on a City approved form), for any affected properties. For properties determined to have water rights, the developer will coordinate with the State Watermaster the re-allocation of any waters attached to lands no longer irrigable as a result of the proposed development. ~ ~ )