Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJune 5, 2018 PC packeti i CPOL INT CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA June 5, 2018 - 6:00 p.m. I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ROLL CALL Planning Commission members, Mike Oliver (chair), Tom Van Voorhees, Kay Harrison, Amy Moore, John Whiting, Jim Mock IV. CORRESPONDENCE V. MINUTES Review and approval of May 1, 2018 Planning Commission meeting minutes. VI. PUBLIC APPEARANCES VII. BUSINESS A. Consideration of a Tentative Plan for the development of a 16 -lot subdivision. The project site is located in the R-1-6 Residential Single -Family zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W IIAC, Tax Lot 100. Applicant: Kodiak, LLC, Agent: Jim Zundel. VIII. DISCUSSION A. IX. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS X. MISCELLANEOUS XI. ADJOURNMENT 1 City of Central Point Planning Commission Minutes May 1, 2018 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 6:00 P.M. 1I. ROLL CALL Commissioners, Mike Oliver (Chair), Amy Moore, Jim Mock, Kay Harrison and John Whiting were present. Also in attendance were: Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director, Don Burt, Planning Director, Matt Samitore, Public Works Director, Stephanie Holtey, Principal Planner, Justin Gindlesperger, Community Planner II and Karin Skelton, Planning Secretary. Tom Van Voorhees arrived at 6:35 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIENCE III. CORRESPONDENCE IV. MINUTES Kay Harrison made a motion to approve the minutes of the April 3, 2018 Planning Commission Meeting. Jim Mock seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Amy Moore, yes; Jim Mock, yes; John Whiting, yes; Kay Harrison, yes. Motion passed. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances. VI. BUSINESS A. Public Hearing to consider the Parks and Recreation Element, City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan • Mike Oliver read the rules for a public hearing. Justin Gindlesperger stated the purpose of the meeting was to consider the draft Parks and Recreation Element, obtain feedback from the Commissioners and obtain a recommendation to the City Council which would include any changes or modifications Planning Commission Minutes May 1, 2018 Page 1 the Commissioners suggested. He said the Parks Element was a policy framework that provides guidance for the future Parks and Open Space system. It covers a period of 20 years. He explained how the Elements of the Comprehensive Plan interacted. The goal is to maintain a consistent level of service for the population as it grows. The national goal for city parkland is 10.1 acres per 1000 residents. He said a lot of Oregon cities use the national average as a goal, however not many have achieved it. He stated the City has been fairly consistent in providing parks and open space at 10 acres per 1000, or approximately 6% of its land. This includes core parks, neighborhood parks and open space. He explained the difference between the Parks Element and the Parks Master plan. He said the master plan was much more specific. He said the City allocated funds for the creation and maintenance of the parks. The monies essentially came from SDC fees. Additionally 10% of the general funds was allocated for the creation and maintenance of the City parks. Mr. Gindlesperger explained the goals and policies of the Parks Element. He stressed the importance of community engagement and communication. He reviewed each of the goals of the Parks Element Goal 1: Encourage meaningful public involvement in park and recreation planning and inform residents through department communication. Goal 2: Establish and maintain varied and inclusive suite of recreation programs that accommodate a spectrum of ages, interests and abilities and promote the health and wellness of the community. Goal 3: Acquire and develop a high quality, diversified system of parks, recreation amenities and open spaces that provide equitable access to all residents. Goal 4: Develop a high quality system of multi -use trails and bicycle/pedestrian corridors that connects to regional trails and provides access to public facilities, neighborhoods and businesses to promote exercise, walking and biking. Goal 5: Plan for a parks system that is efficient to maintain and operate, while protecting capital investment. Goal 6: Develop and implement a comprehensive facilities plan in cooperation and coordination with surrounding cities/county and school district. Planning Commission Minutes May 1, 2018 Page 3 The commissioners expressed concern about accessibility of parks, both in relation to ADA regulations and making sure parks are easily and safely accessible to local residents by sidewalks and bicycle paths. They discussed parks that were located in areas where residents could walk or bike safely to them and they discussed parks that were in areas that required people to drive to them. They thought the wording should be more specific in addressing accessibility of neighborhood parks. Parks and Public Works Director Matt Samitore read an example of from a Parks Element from Clark, Washington as an example. The Commissioners discussed the use of school playgrounds as park space when school was not in session. Mr. Samitore said the School District was not amenable to having their playgrounds designated as parks at this time. Public Hearing Was Opened Larry Martin, Taylor Road Mr. Martin said he represents the Taylor Road West Group who owned property in CP - 6A. He said their property would have a requirement for 20% parks and open space which amounted to 27 acres when it was brought into the City. He asked about the process for identifying parks and open space in the development of the property. Mr. Humphrey explained that the city had only done one UGB amendment in the past 20 years. He spoke of Twin Creeks as an example of developing parks and open space and said it was probable that specifics would be identified in the Master Plan process. Stephanie Holtey said that another policy could be added which supported sidewalk connectivity infill projects surrounding parks and schools, however it was her opinion that the Transportation System Plan and the Transportation Element would be the governing documents addressing that issue. She suggested that along with any recommendations in the Parks Element, the Commissioners might request the City Council add a policy in the transportation Element addressing it as well. Don Burt mentioned that the TSP does have a policy, however the language could be clarified. Mr. Humphrey said that part of the Washington element that Mr. Samitore read could possibly be used as an additional policy regarding access to parks. Public Hearing was Closed Mike Oliver said before making a motion on resolution 852 the Planning Commission should discuss suggested changes including verbiage from the Washington element regarding connectivity and recommend the council include a policy in the Transportation Element. Planning Commission Minutes May 1, 2018 Page 4 John Whiting made a motion to approve resolution 852 to include the modifications mentioned. Specifically, verbiage from the Washington element regarding connectivity and recommending the Council include a policy in the Transportation Element. Kay Harrison seconded the motion. The Commissioners discussed the fact that the draft Parks Element seemed to work with the upcoming UGB amendment and development of the Taylor West Properties. They felt parks were essential for the community and the proposed Parks Element adequately addressed a consistent provision of parks and open space within the city. Mr. Humphrey clarified that the motion included the verbiage from the Washington Element and recommending the council include a policy in the Transportation Element. Roll Call: Tom Van Voorhees, yes; Jim Mock, yes; Amy Moore, yes; John Whiting, yes; Kay Harrison, yes. Motion passed. VTI. DISCUSSION A. Rousing Implementation Plan/Regional Housing Strategies Update Stephanie Holtey explained the Citizen's Advisory Committee, at their last meeting, had been presented with a list of draft housing strategies to be evaluated as part of a regional housing strategy. The Committee had not been able to review all the material at that meeting. She said tonight will be an informational meeting to keep the Planning Commission current on the housing concerns in the City. She gave an overview of affordability and housing needs and supply and explained how affordability is measured. She reviewed the draft strategies and explained they are a group of tools that can be applied to address land use efficiency and housing affordability concerns. She said the Regional Plan requires each participating city to develop a regional housing strategy within five years of acknowledgement of the Regional Plan. The City is participating with DLCD to develop a list of principles and a tool kit list of strategies that all the cities could consider in order to begin to tackle housing affordability. She said it will need to comply with the minimum residential density the city agreed to in the Regional Plan. The list of strategies include increasing land use efficiency, providing diverse housing types with a focus on missing middle housing types, using a common definition of affordable housing strategies and strategies that support low and moderate income housing. Planning Commission Minutes Ifay 1, 2018 Page S Ms. Holtey explained there are two recommended approaches. The first entails regulatory reforms such as code amendments to incorporate increased minimum densities in the Housing Element and allowing new housing types such as cottage housing. She stressed the importance of having a user friendly code and developmental process. She added that the Housing Element requires the City to have a Housing Implementation Plan. The second approach entails implementing affordability programs such as tax credits, SDC discounts, loans and grant programs. Ms. Holtey said this will go back to the Citizen's Advisory Committee and hopefully staff will be able to bring the Planning Commission the draft Housing Strategy for consideration in June or July. B. Planning Update Community Development Director Tom Humphrey gave the Commissioners an update on current projects in the City. • The Brodiart law offices on Front Street were underway. • Two tentative plans for small subdivisions have been submitted • The site plan for Dr. Brown on Freeman Court has been approved. • A commercial development was also being planned for Freeman Road • A site plan has been approved for Tail Lite Development Retail next to the Veterinary Hospital on Biddle Rd. • There has been a pre application meeting regarding development on the southwest corner of Table Rock Road and Biddle • Mr. Samitore said the Pine Street Project was going very well • The Twin Creeks Railroad Crossing was having lots of issues. Mr. Samitore gave an overview of the problems to date and said his estimate was the project would not actually begin until approximately November 2018. VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS IX. MISCELLANEOUS Planning Commission Minutes May !, 2018 Page 6 X. ADJOURNMENT Kay Harrison made a motion to adjourn. Amy Moore seconded the motion. All members said "aye". Meeting was adjourned at 7:43 p.m. The foregoing minutes of the May 1, 2018 Planning Commission meeting were approved by the Planning Commission at its meeting on the day of, June, 2018. Planning Commission Chair -.. ., _ .. .. ter_. .. .. .... _� .:r�_. ���c—..ti.�._. ............ _ .�. ..-. �• ..� ... .. - TENTATIVE PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 16 LOT SUBDIVISION 8 City of Central Point, Oregon 140 S 3rd Street Central Point, OR 97502 541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 www.central oil ntornQn.gov Ak CENTRAL POINT STAFF REPORT June 5, 2018 AGENDA ITEM: VII -A File No. SUB -18001 Community Development Tom Humphrey, AICP Community Development Director Consideration of a Tentative Plan for the development of a 16 -lot subdivision. The project site is located in the R-1-6 Residential Single -Family zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W l l AC, Tax Lot 100. AppHeant: Kodiak, LLC, Agent: Jim Zundel. STAFF SOURCE: Justin Gindlesperger, Community Planner II BACKGROUND: The applicant submitted a tentative plan application for View Crest Subdivision, a sixteen (16) lot subdivision on a 2.91 acre property on Pittview Avenue (Attachment "A-1"). Proposed improvements include two (2) new streets for access and utility connections, including water, sewer, and stormwater management. The property is currently developed with a single-family residence and a hardship dwelling approved in 1983 by Jackson County prior to annexation of the property into the City of Central Point. The two (2) residential structures were recognized by the City as a single- family residence and a nonconforming Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) in 2016. The structures are planned for removal as part of the proposed subdivision. The property is located within the R-1-6 Residential Single Family zoning district. Minimum and maximum density in the R-1-6 zoning district is four (4) units per acre to six (6) units per acre. The project proposes 5.5 units per acre, which is within the minimum/maximum range for density. Minimum lot size provided in the proposed tentative plan is 4,752 square feet and the average lot size is 7.140 square feet, which is consistent with the minimum and maximum lot dimensions permitted in the R-1-6 zoning district. ISSUES: Through the review of the project, it was noted that Pittview Avenue is owned and operated by Jackson County. The County's access management standards do not permit direct driveway approaches from a Local Road for individual lots. The proposed tentative plan depicts a single lot, Lot 2, with direct access to Pittview Avenue, Comment. The City of Central Point classifies Pittview Avenue as a Local Access Street, and the City's access management standards permit direct driveway access to Local Access streets. The City is in the process of completing a jurisdictional transfer for Pittview Avenue, but may not have it complete until summer of 2019 due to budget constraints. If the tentative plan is changed in order to comply with Jackson County access management standards, the Page 1 o f 3 applicant shall submit the modifications for review and approval. Staff recommends Condition No. 1(a) requiring any modifications to the tentative plan be submitted to the City for review pursuant to Chapter 17,09 of the CPMC. FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: The proposed tentative plan has been evaluated against the applicable review criteria for Tentative Plans per CPMC 16.10 and the R-1-6 zoning district per CP MC 17.20 and found to comply as evidenced by the Planning Department Supplemental Findings (Attachment --B") and the Applicant's Findings (Attachment' -C"),, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Prior to Final Plat appro,al, the applicant shall: 1. Submit a revised tentative plan that reflects ary changes to the lot layout to corriply with Jackson County Roads Department access management standards, Any proposed modifications to the tentative plan shall be subject to the requirements in CPyiC 17.09, Modification to Approved Plans and Conditions of Approval_ 2. Demonstrate compliance with all agency conditions of approval including the following: a. Satisfy conditions of approval in the Public Works Staff report dated May 17, 2018 (Attachment "D"). b. Comply with conditions of approval provided by the Rogue Valley Sewer Services in a letter dated May 3, 2018 (Attachment "E"). c. Comply with conditions of approval provided by the Jackson County Roads Department in a letter dated May 4, 2018 (Attachment "F"). d. Coordinate with Fire District #3 to plan the location of and install fire hydrants and mark the east -west Residential Lane as "'Fire Lane. No Parking" in accordance with Fire District #3 comments received on March 7, 2018 (Attachment "G") ATTACHMENTS: Attachment "A -I" — Tentative Plan Attachment "'A-2'* — Subdivision Plat Name Approval, Jackson County Surveyor's Office, April 19, 2018 Attachment "B" — Planning Department Supplemental Findings of Fact as presented at the Planning Commission meeting on 6/5/2014. Attachment "C" — Applicant's Findings Attachment "D" — Parks & Public Works Staff Report Attachment "E" — RVSS Comments Attachment "F" — Jackson County Roads Department Comments Pant- 2 otF3 10 Attachment "G" - Fire District No. 3 Comments Attachment "K" - Resolution No. 853 ACTION: Consideration of the View Crest Subdivision Tentative Plan and 1) approve; 2) approve with modifications; or 3) deny the application. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the View Crest Subdivision Tentative Plan per the Staff Report dated June 5, 2018, including all attachments thereto. Page 3 of 3 11 *F PE,vra R rE Par! r or VIEW CREST SUBDIVISION In Lot 17 PI.TI'V&Y SUBDIVISNN AMENDCD & 'aca,ed an ria N- 114 of Sec. f4 T37S, R.2"'V, VW a crer Ol Cenlrel Roble lack^on CbunI jl. Orprop r Id f a f ! f Z k I ! t I I � f n. b n, i..F,�':N'.J�... � YID: �...�' - -• 4r ; rFue ATTACHMENT 12 S w, ?o,ij e ( 51-)1 � 1/'-1-% 1 S—� Subdivision andSurveyors Office JACKSON 10 S. Oakdale Ave„ #318 COUNTY Condominium Plat Name Medford, OR 97501 ;I . Y in Approval Request Form surveyor@jacksoncounty.org This form must be submitted to the Jackson County Surveyor for subdivision and condominium plat name approval. This document maybe submftted by emoll /n PDF file format. Before the plat name is approved a $100 processing fee must be paid. PROPOSED NAME: ALTERNATE NAME: VIEW CREST SUBDIVISION Applicant/ Organization Name: Map and Tax Lot Number: L.J. FRIAR & ASSOCIATES, PC 372W11AC TL 100 Address: PO BOX 1947 PHOENIX, OR 97535 Phone Number: 541-772-2782 Signature of Applicant: Property Owner's Name and Address: K- L.i--_C1 c- {-e 100 cl 795W Location in City/County: CENTRAL POINT Date Surveyor/Engineer Name/Address: Same as Applicant This Plat name will be reserved for a period of two years after which It will automatically expire. This form Is a result of Oregon Rwtled Statutes Chapters 100.105 (5) & (6) and 92.090 (1) which states: OILS 92.090 Approval of subdivlsion plat names: requisites for approval of tentative subdivision or partition plan or plat. (1) Subdfvision plat names shall be subject to the approval of the county surveyor or In the case where there is no county surveyor, the county assessor. No tentative subdivision pian or subdivision plat of a subdivision shall be approved which bears a name similar to or pronounced the same as the name of any other subdivision In the same county, unless the land platted is contiguous to and platted by the same part that platted the subdivision bearing that name or unless the party Filed and record the consent of the party that platted the contiguous subdivision bearing that name. ORS 100.105 Contents of declaration; property name; variable property description. (5) The name of the property shall include the word "condominium" or condominiums" or the words "a condominium." (6) A condominium may not bear a name which is the same as or deceptively similar to the name of any other condominium located in the same county. �1 Nat Name Approved: s Y�Qkrc•kt Date Fee Paid: T i /8 / Invoice Number: MID— By' Jackson County Surveyor Date ATTACHMENT " it 13 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW File No.: STJB-18002 Before the City of Central Point Planning Commission Consideration of a Tentative Plan for the View Crest Subdivision Applicant: Kodiak., L1✓C '744 Cardley A 4 e.Ste 100 Medtord, OR 97502 F'ind:.ngs c p=act aruA Conclusion of Law PART 1 INTRODUCTION The applicant submitted a tentative plan application (Type 111) for the View Crest Subdivision to subdivide 2.91 acres into sixteen (16) lots ("Application')_ The property is located within the R-1-6 Residential Singlc .Family zoning district. A subdivision tentative plan is reviewed as a Type III application. Type III applications are reviewed in accordance with procedures provided in Section 17.05.400, which provides the basis for decisions upon standards and criteria in the development code and the comprehensive plan, when appropriate. The standards and criteria for the proposal are set forth in CPMC Title 16, Subdivisions, and Chapter 17.20, Residential Single Family. The following findings address each of the standards and criteria as applies to the subdivision tentative plan. PART 2 SUBDIVISIONS Title 16 of the Central Point Municipal Code (CPMC) establishes standards and criteria for land division applications including tentative plans and final plats. The sections of CPMC 16 applicable to the Application are: Chapter 15.10, Tentative Plazas. This section of code provides design standards and principles of acceptability, the information required on a tentative plan map and other supplementary material that may be required for review of the application. Finding CPNIC 16.10: The tentative plan, as represented by Attachment "A -I " of'the Planning Department Staff Report dated June S, 2014 has been reviewed for compliance with the requirements of'Chapter 16.10 and found to contain all the necessary information._ The Jackson Page I of 4 Findings & Conclusions of Law File No.: SUB -19001 ATTACHMENT "„ 14 COI 1r.rV Sli `3VOr Llj7pr!iVPd 81_' 0? -00 -_,Ld nccmC r)f Let_? i.A. (�Ii:SIOre, icc,; Crc-sI Subdi.vision, In co!r menu dated �Ipyil l9, Ztil n (wrd mc'urporated uti k(tu-h Meru "A nt the Ptarrnsr>> G<_;r..artmenr .S`tnjFRenr�re dU. ,,d ,,s7:nF' .i, 2� 1,'s, puf'su-ani tra S?ctiorr i %.60.030(4). Conclusion CP'VTC 16,10; Complies, Chapter 16.20, Streets and Other Ways – Design Standards. Streets created by subdivisions and partitions shall be designed and constructed in conformance witil the requirements of the city's comprehensive p€an, this code, the city's public works standards, and all conditions established by the city. FindimyCPMC lii,2l): r,'r:'r; ubiv yUr:% l"�, { .i it r- -' ,i ,., .0 _ •.:� �,'"ce;./ ! _ti)('. _ia'�c.:� El' _ll= fl-_`Ia_':'2rncrl' C�= ,y;ci Pl"Cjl ! !L%7,01 ep. Jr;met 1,i sra'`f fi-roi'l� a:.tt�'rni.:fr?.d r7. J 7fi 1; a n !)nc 'e treets t r o .y {�' i• t <' 1, - %� pr ri,. �t Streets, h.. r 1!aC( •`dC)re Rnd Llassificate0�?, as shown On th tentaedve Dlar C-Vlachi,r;ent �%zl-V n thf: Planning Department Stuj f RL'Port dated .June? 5, 2/1l s,j, comply with rhe Public Worfrs 5'laez;tards for a .Minor Local StrEBi 1t'ti(�t(t N,/o laaci'capF: ro':v:i, iI-i31 and a Res:dentlal Lanes (ST -10). Access to the proposed suhdllcsion will be provided by a ne-oi illinor Residential Street ("retrofit), which aligns with and will serve as an extension of Sydney Court on tlee opposite side of'Pittviei-v Avenue. The northern lots propose to take access from a Residential Lane, oriented in an, east- ivest direction near the north end of'the property. The Residential Street and Residential Lane are designed to minimum construction standards. The Residential Lane is less than 400 -feet in length and provides adequate turn -around area for emergency vehicles. Sidewalks are required along Pittview Avenue and the Residential Street. Conclusion CPNIC 16.20: As evidenced by the Tentative Plan and Parks & Public forks staff Report refkrenced above, the proposal.streets are designed and plannedfor constrzcctioa consistent with the Public r'Yorks Standards as conditioned. Chapter 16.24, Blocks and Lots—Design Standards The lengths. widths and shapes of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites suitable to the special needs of the type and use contemplated, needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and limitations and opportunities of topography. Finding CPMC 16,24: The proposed subdivisionn is an infill development, located in an area with existing subdivision developments on the west, north and east sides of•the subject property. The existing development pattern in the area, including block sines and street paltern,s, limits the connectivity between the proposed sZtlJdivi.sivre and thesurrounding development. Conclusion CPNIC 16.24; Not applicable. Page 2 of 4 Findings & Conclusions of Law File No.: SUB -18001 15 PART 3 LONLING ORMNANCE The purposc oCTitly I? ofthe MMC is to encourage the most appropriate use of !and, pro note orderly gp-owth oCthe city, and promote public health, safety, corivimience and general welfare. The sections of CMIC l i applicable to the application are: Chapter 17.05, Applications and Types of Review Procedures This Chapter establishes standard decision -snaking procedures that enable the city, the applicant, and the public to review applications and participate in the local decision making process. There are four r4;i tyroes of review procedures, Type 1, ll, 11, anal IV rh it are applied to isand use and development applMati ns in Table 1- 015 Mll. k also establishes when a Traffic Impact ,analysis (TIA') is required. Finding CPNMC 17.05: As identified in Table 1, Section 17.05.100.1 a subdivision tentative plana is a'evievved using Type III procedures. As evidenced by the mailed and posted notice documents in Exhibit "A", the application has been noticed and processed in accordance *ith the Type III review- procedures per Section 17.05.400. Per Section 17.05,900, a RA for residential development is required when Average Daily Trips (ADT) exceed 250. Per the Institute of Transportation Fngineers Trip Generation Manual, a single family dwelling generates 9.57 ADT or 133 ADT for the proposed subdivision tentative plan. A TIA is not required. Conclusion CPNIC 17.05: Complies, Chapter 17.20 — R-1, Residential Single Family Districts The purpose o C the K-1 district is to stabilize and protect the urban low density residential characteristics of the district while promoting and encouraging suitable environments for farnily life. Finding CPNIC 17.20: The proposed tentative plan has been reviewed in accordance with the applicable zoning regulations provided in Chapter 17.20. The minimum lot size provided in the tentative plan is 4, 725 square feet and the average lot size is 7,140 square feet. This is within the range of minimum/maximum lot size in the zone (i.e. 4,500 to 9,000). Minimum lot width provided for all interior lots is 52 feet, where 50 feet is required, and 60 feet for corner lots, consistent with rninimuai requirements. Nfinirnurn and maximum density in the R-1-6 zoning district is 4 units per acre to 6 units per acre. The project proposes sixteen: (16) units on a site 2.91 acres in size, or 5.5 units per acre. Conclusion CPNMC 17.20: Consistent. Page 3 of 4 Findings & Conclusions of Law File No.: SUB -18001 16 PART 4 SUNINIARY CONCLUSION As evidenced in these findings, the proposed tentative plan application for the View Crest Subdivision is, as conditioned in the Stag' Deport dated lune 5, 2018, in compliance with the applicable criteria set forth in Title t6 and Title l' of the Central Point Municipal Code. Page 4 of 4 Findings & Conclusions of Law File No.: SUB -18001 17 Ak City of Centra/ Point CENTRAL POINT PUI NNING DEPARTMENT Tom Humphrey, AICP Community Development Director Notice of Public Hearing Planning Commission Meeting Dates: June 5, 2018 Time: 6:00 p.m. Place: Central Point City Hall 140 S. 3`Street Central Point, Oregon NATURE OF MEETING Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will consider a Subdivision Tentative Plan application for the development of a 16 -lot subdivision (File No. SUB -18001) pursuant to § 16.10, Tentative Plans of the Central Point Municipal Code. The project site is in the R-1-6 Residential Single -Family zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 11 AC, Tax Lot 100. Applicant: Kodiak LLC. Agent: Jim Zundel. Pursuant to ORS 197.763 (3) (e), failure to raise an issue during this hearing, in person or in writing, with sufficient specificity to afford the decision -makers and the parties an opportunity to respond to the issue prior to the close of the final hearing means that an appeal based on that issue cannot be raised at the State Land Use Board of Appeals. CRITER!A FOR DECISION Criteria for the subdivision tentative plan application are set forth in the CPMC 16.10, Tentative Plans. The Central Point Municipal Code is available online at www.centrelpointoregon.gov. PUBLIC COMMENTS Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the Planning Commission meeting scheduled for June 5, 2018. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, 140 South Third Street, Central Point, OR 97502 or by e-mail to iustin.aindlesoercer@centraloointoreaon.00v. F.Xl+1%1T ' A ,r 140 S. Third Street • Central Point, OR 97502 • (541) 664-3321 • Fax: (541) 664-6384 18 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING State of Oregon ss. County of Jackson 1, Justin P. Gindlesperger, being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Community Planner 11 for the City of Central Point, a municipality in the State of Oregon. On the 3rd day of May, 2018, 1 caused a Notice of Public Hearing, a copy of which is attached hereto to be placed in the United States Mail at Central Point, Oregon, addressed to the persons whose addresses are attached hereto. Subscribed and sworn to before me this liy of May, 2018. 0FFAMP 0"�LlIOs1T1 CAMY NOTARY PUKIC-OIIEQON COMM ISSKM NO. 9600" Notary Public for Oregon w COMtlI$WN E)Q71E8 W Q, = My commission expires: S-1 U -2C 19 City of Centra! Point, Oregon 140 S 3rd Street, Central Point, OR 97502 541.664.3321 Fax 541,664.6384 www.cenrralpointoregon.gov Meeting Date: Time: Place: NATURE OF MEETING CENTRAL POINT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING May 24, 201 & 7:00 p.m. Central Point City Hall 140 S. Third Street Central Point, Oregon Cotnmynity Development Tom Humphrey. AiCP. Community Development Director Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will consider a Subdivision Tentative Plan application for the development of a 16 -lot subdivision (File No. SUB -18001) pursuant to § 16. 10, Tentative Plans of the Central Point Municipal Code. The project site is in the R-1-6 Residential Single -Family zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 1 IAC, Tari Lot 100. Applicant: Kodiak LLC_ Agent: Jim Zundel. Pursuant to ORS 197.763 (3) (e), failure to raise an issue during this hearing, in person or in writing, with sufficient specificity to afford the decision -makers and the parties an opportunity to respond to the issue will preclude an appeal based on that issue. PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, June 5, 2018. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, 140 South Third Street, Central Point, OR 97502 or by e-mail to Justin Gindlesperger (Tustin. indlespergerP,centrnlnointoregon. gov). 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decision described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicants are available for public review at City Hall, 140 South Third Street, Central Point, Oregon. The City File Number is: SUB -1$001. Copies of the same are available at 25 cents per page. 5, For additional information, the public may contact Justin Gindlesperger at 541-423-1037 or by email at Justin.gindlespergernacentralp4intornon.gov. Additional information is also available online: http://www.centralpointore go_ngov/ ftroject/view-crest- subdivision 20 AFFIDAVIT OF ON SITE NOTICE State of Oregon SS. County of Jackson I, Justin P. Gindlesperger, being first duly sworn, depose and say that 1 am the Community Planner Il for the City of Central Point, a municipality in the State of Oregon. On the 3rd day of May, 2018, I caused a Notice of Application to be placed on property Iocated at 794 Pittview Avenue and identified on the Jackson County Assessor's Map as 37 2W i IAC, Tax Lot 100.. 1< Subscribed and sworn to before me this3�ay of M , 2018. OFFICIAL STAMP DRA1M1A LOW CASEY NOTARY KWIC -OREGON COMOSSION NO. 040044 Notary N lic for Ore oR w corr"M MW Iw is. sna My commission expires: S �l n 21 Application for Tentative Plat BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, I 1N THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR } FINDINGS OF FACT + LAND DIVISION OF PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS } AND 371W17DD TL 700 } CONCLUSIONS r KODIAK LLC, APPLICANT } OF LAW )IM ZUNDEL, AGENT I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Applicant: KODIAK LLC 744 Cardiey Ave, Suite 100 Medford, OR 97504 Agent: Jim Zundel 744 Cardley Ave, Suite 100 Medford OR 97504 Property: 371W17DD TL 700 Kodiak LLC 794 Pittview Ave Central Point, OR 97502 2.91 Acres Single Family Residential (6) units per acre (R-1-6) City of Central Point Summary This application is submitted to comply with the Central Point Municipal Code Section 16.10, titled Tentative Plans FINDINGS OF FACT: Of the 2.91 -acre parcel, there is a 15' -wide easement For storm water granted to the city of Central Point on the most Westerly 15 feet of Lot 17 of the amended plat of Lots 3 to 10 inclusive, Pittview Subdivision, recorded subdivision located in the City of Central Point, Oregon and shown on map. The Tentative plat submitted with this application has been designed to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the General Land Use Plan Map (GLUP), Transportation System Plan (TSP), and all applicable design standards for the proposed public improvements as well as the lot design standards of the Central Point Municipal Code (CPMC). 1 ATTACHMENT " 0 " 22 The lots established with this plat conform to the standards of the CPMC for length, width, square footage, lotfrontage, and access. The Road is designed to the standards set by the Central Point Public Works Department Standards and Specification Table 300-1D Minor Local Street and Residential Lanes Widths and Rights of Way Widths Conclusions of law: The Planning Commission can conclude the proposed tentative plat is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, any other applicable specific plans thereto, including Neighborhood Circulation Plans, and all applicable design standards set forth in CPMC Chapter 16. 17.20.020 Permitted uses. The following uses and their accessory uses are permitted in an R-1 district A. Single -Family dwelling; FINDINGS OF FACT: The tentative plat is for single story, single family homes only. 17.20.050 Density, lot area, lot width, dimension, building height, lot coverage, and yard requirements. The density and lot requirements of the R-1 zoning district are governed by the subcategories of R-1-6, R-1-8 and R-1;10 districts, as delineated on the official zoning map of Central Point The density, lot area, lot dimensions, building height, lot coverage and yard requirements of these subcategories shall be in accordance with the following table: NEXT PAGE 23 Development Requirements R-1-6 Minimum density 4 units/acre Maximum density 6 units/acre Minimum lot area (interior) 4 500 Maximum lot area (interior) 9,000 Minimum lot area (corner) 7,000 Maximum lot area (corner) NIA Minimum lot width (interior) 50 feet Minimum lot width (corner) 60 feet Minimum lot depth N/A Minimum front yard 20 feet Minimum side yard (interior) 5 feet' Minimum side yard (street side) 10 feet`" Minimum rear yard . 15 feet Maximum building height 35 feet Maximum lot coverage Density: The subject property is 2.91 acres within the R-1-6 zoning district. The minimum density is 11.64 single family units and the maximum density allowed is 17.46 single family units and the application is for 16 single family units, Lot Area: All four comer lots 1-6-12-16 meet the minimum lot size of 7.000 square feet and don't exceed the maximum lot size of N/A. They range from 7031 to 8275 with an average size of 7,580 The remaining twelve (12) lots meet the minimum lot size of 4500 square feet and not exceeding the maximum lot size of 9000. The range from 4725 to 7140 square feet with an average size of 6,132. Set Backs -Heights -Lot Coverage: All these elements will be addressed and followed per CPMC at the time of final plat and all will be what is allowed per Code. The street layout proposed is designed to be consistent with the area's circulation plan and provides circulation opportunities for the existing and proposed development in the vicinity. 3 24 I. Relevant Approval Criteria Land Development Code Title 16 Subdivision Criteria: The approving authority (Planning Commission) shall not approve any tentative plat unless it first finds that, the proposed land division together with the provisions for its design and improvement: 16.10.010 Submission of application --Filing fee. The applicant shall submit an application and tentative plan together with improvement plans and other supplementary material as may be required to indicate the development pian and shalt submit ten copies to the city together with a filing fee defined in the city's adopted planning application fee schedule The diagrams submitted shall consist of three copies at the scale specified in Section 16.10.020 and one copy in an eight -and -one -half-inch by eleven -inch format. (Ord. 1941 §11, 2010: Ord. 1786 §4, 1998; Ord 1684 §6, 1993; Ord. 1650(part), 1990), FINDINGS OF FACT.- On ACT:On April 16, 2016 a full application was submitted along with tentative plans, title report, pre -application meeting notes along with fees. 16.10.020 through 16.10.50 All the required items have been incorporated into the plat and was submitted with the application, also title report engineer, and surveyor were included in application. FINDINGS OF FACTS: Surveyor: L.J. Friar and Associates (Jim Hibbs) 1585 Siskiyou Blvd Ste 6, Medford, OR 97504 Engineer: CEC Engineering (Mark Klamrath) 132 W. Main Street Land Development Code § 16.10.030: 16.10.030 General information. The following general information shall be shown on or included with the tentative plan: A. Proposed name of the subdivision. This name must not duplicate or resemble the name of another subdivision in the county,- FINDINGS ounty; FINDINGS OF FACT: The name has been reserved at the Jackson County Surveyors so as not to be in conflict with any other names. 4 25 Conclusions of law: The Planning Commission can conclude the division name proposed with this application is a unique name within Jackson County. 16.20.010 Creation of streets. A. Streets created by subdivisions and partitions shall be designed and constructed in conformance with the requirements of the city's comprehensive plan, this code, the city's public 'works standards, and all conditions established by the city. FINDINGS OF FACT: The Road is designed to the standards set by the Central Point Public Works Department Standards and Specification Table 300-1D Minor Local Street and Residential Lanes Widths and Rights of Way Widths. And is aligned with Sydney Court making it a continuation not requiring a new name. 16.20.020 Streets --Generally. The location, width, and grade of streets shall be considered in their relation to existing and planned streets, to topographical conditions as they relate to drainage and the operation of the water, sewer systems, to public convenience and safety and their appropriate relation to the proposed use of the land to be served by such streets. Where location is not shown in a development plan, the arrangement of streets in a subdivision shall either: FINDINGS OF FACTS: The only road with connectivity was Sydney Court directly on the South of Pittview from our property, we aligned Sydney Court and continued it into our project making it fit in. The properties on the North, East and West allowed for no connectivity, so we consulted with public works and designed a T intersection built to city road standards. 16.20.090 Streets --Names. No street name shall be used which will duplicate or be confused with the names of existing streets except for extensions of existing streets Street names and numbers shall conform to the established pattern in the city and the surrounding area and shall be subject to the approval of the city (Ord. 1650(part), 1990). FINDINGS OF FACTS: If the continuation of Sydney Court is unacceptable to the city we will name the street with a unique name that is acceptable. 26 Additional Narrative Roadwav, The proposed road has no connectivity on three sides, so it has no through traffic and relative low localized traffic, we have taken this into account and planned plenty of off-street parking and even laid out the sub -division to allow for maximum on street parking. Parking is also allowed on Pittview Avenue frontage. The final plat will contain double car garages with parking for two cars to park in the drive- way. The Right of way proposed is 52' from the public works standards and specifications (Table 300-113) with 2 new lanes @ 10' each, 1 parking lane @ 8', 2 sidewalks @ 5' each, and 2 landscape rows @ 6' each. 16.16.010 Standards and procedures. All improvements shall conform to the requirements of this title and other improvement standards or specifications adopted by the city and conditions of tentative plan approval, and shall be installed in accordance with the follovring procedure: FINDING OF FACTS: Mark Klamath of GEC Engineering will prepare all construction drawings including but not limited to underground utilities, sewer, storm drain system, road we will submit these for final plat no work will commence until plans are submitted and approved. Storm Water Quality will be done to the RVSS standards that are applicable for this area. Nb Improvements will be done until the City has been notified ih advance and gives their approval. Developer will comply with C., D., and E. below C. Improvements shall be constructed under the inspection and to the satisfaction of the city. The city may require changes in typical sections and details if unusual conditions arise during construction to warrant such change in the public interest. D. Underground utilities installed in streets by the subdivider shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of such streets. Stubs for service connections for underground utilities shall be placed to such length as will obviate the necessity for disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. E. A map showing public improvements as built shall be filed with the city upon completion of said improvements. (Ord. 1650(part), 1990) 27 APPLICATION SUMMARY AND CONCLUSSIONS: This application for a Subdivision on the subject property demonstrates compliance with all relevant sections contained within the City of Central Point Municipal Code. On behalf of the applicant, I respectfully request the approval of the application for approval of this Subdivision l e Respectively, Jim Zundel/Agent 28 Public Works Department CENTRAL POI N7' PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT May 17, 2018 AGENDA ITEM: Pittview Subdivision (rile No: PAR -18002) 794 Pittview Ave — 16 lot subdivision Applicant: Chris Galpin Matt Samitore, Director Traffic: The applicant is proposing a 16 -unit single family subdivision. Per the ITE, single family dwellings generate 1.0 peak hour trips. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) threshold is 25 PHT. A TIA is not required for this development. Existing Infrastructure: Water: There is an 8 -inch line in Pittview Ave. Streets: Pittview Avenue is a County Local road_ Stormwater: There is a 36 -inch line on the west side of the property. Background: The proposed 16 -lot subdivision has frontage on Pittview Avenue and proposes construction of two (2) new streets: Sydney Court, a Minor Local Street Retrofit (w/o landscape rows, ST -15), and a Residential Lane (no on -street parking, ST -10). Issues: There are two issues relative to this application as follows: 1. Jurisdictional Transfer. Currently Pittview Avenue is owned and operated by Jackson County. The City is in the process of completing a jurisdictional transfer but may not have it complete until summer of 2019 due to budget. This could affect the layout of the subdivision based on County access management provisions. In the event changes are made, the Applicant will need to submit the modification for review and approval to assure the proposed modifications address all applicable Public Works standards. 2. Sidewalk Construction. Sidewalks are required along the frontage of Pittview Avenue; however, construction deferral to building permit .is typical to allow flexibility for locating the driveway approaches. Public Works deems sidewalk deferral acceptable for Lots 1, 2, and 16 provided that sidewalks are constructed prior to Public Works Final Inspection. Conditions of Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall satisfy the conditions of approval: 1. Pittview Avenue Frontage Improvements — The applicant shall install curb and gutter and additional paving along the frontage of Pittview Avenue to match the standards of a standard city residential 140 South 3'd Street • Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 • Fax 541.664.6384 ATTACHMENT 16D is 29 street. Sidewalk construction shall he deferred to when neve homcs arc constructed for lots 1.2 and M 2. East—West Street— Applicant is proposing a Residential Lane that will service five new homes No parking shall be allowed on that street. The Applicant shall submit a no parking sign layout to be approved the City. 3. Water Looping — An 8 -inch waterline will be required to be looped through the proposed subdivision to Shayla Lane east of the proposed subdivision_ 4. PW Stundards and Spect.lications — Appltcant shall comply with the public works standards and specifications for construction within the right of way. 5. Access Management. Any changes to the subdivision layout to address Jackson County requirements relative to access management shall be reviewed by the Public Works Department as necessary to determine that required infrastructure requirements can be met. 6. System Development Charge Credits - There are two existing homes on the parent parcel, but only one is a legal dwelling as the second structure was a hardship. Only one full System Development Charge {SDC) Credit shall be applied to the site. 30 ROGUE VALLEY SEWER SERVICES QP Location: 138 West Vilas Road, Central Point, OR - Mailing Address: P.O. Box 3130, Central Point, OR 7502-0005 Tel. (541) 6646300, Fax (541) 664-7171 www.RVSS.us May 3, 2018 City of Central Point Planning Department 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Re: SUB 18001, View Crest Subdivision, Tax Lots 100, Map 37 2W 11AC The existing homes on the subject property- are currently served by 4 inch service connections to the 8 inch main along Pittview Avenue. The proposed development will not affect these services. Our records indicate an additional service near the west property line which must be located and abandoned per RVSS standards if not in use. Sewer service for remainder of the proposed development will require a main line extension generally as shown on the preliminary layout. The project is within the Phase 2 stormwater quality arca and will require a stormwater management plan in accordance with the Regional Stormwater Quality Design Manual_ The proposed development will disturb more than one acre and will require an erosion and sediment control permit (NPDES 1200 -CN). Rogue Valley Sewer Services requests that approval of this project be subject to the following conditions: Prior to the start of construction: 1. Applicant must provide construction plans prepared per RVSS standards for approval. 2. Applicant must prepare a stormwater management plan in accordance with the Regional Stormwater Quality Design Manual_ 3. Applicant must record an operations and maintenance agreement for all new stormwater quality features. During Construction: 1. Sewer facilities must be constructed and inspected per RVSS standards. 2. An abandonment permit must be obtained from RVSS prior to abandoning the existing unused service to the property. 3. Applicant must sequence construction so that the permanent stormwater quality features are installed and will be operational when stormwater runoff enters them. 4. Applicant must fence off exposed subgrade of stormwater quality features from equipment traffic and storage. K:\DATA\AGENCIES\CENTPTIPLANNG\SUBDIVISION\2018\SUB 1800l_VIEW CREST SUB.DOC r ATTACHMENT " L 31 Prior to Final acceptance of project: 1. All new sewer must be constructed, inspected and accepted per RVSS standards. 2. Applicant must have all stormwater quality facilities, including vegetation when applicable, inspected and approved by RVSS. At the conciusion of construction, RVSS will is ue fwtal acceptance it- writing indicating that all sanitary sewer and stormwatct requirements have been met, Feel fres to call me Nvit.h an\questions. Alec Aa, 1-9 lea Nicholas R. Bakke, PF, [district Lneinecr 11 K:\DATAWGENCIES\CENTPTIPLANNGISUBDIVISION120181SUB 18001 VIEW CREST SUB.DOC 32 Wd JACKSON COUNTY Roads May 4, 2018 Attention: Justin Gindiesperger City of Central Point Planning 140 South Third Street Central Point, OR 97502 Roads Engineering Mike Kuntz Calmly Engineer 200 Antelope Road white City, OR 97503 Phone: (541) 774.9228 Fax: (541)174.8295 kuntzm®iacksoncounty org WWW 16asoncounly arg RE: Residential Development off Pittview Avenue — county -maintained road. Planning File- SUB -18-001; 37-2W-11AC Tax Lot 100. Dear Justin: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this tentative Plan application for the development of a 16 -lot subdivision on 2.91 acres in the R-1-6 residential zoning district. The project site is at 794 Pittview Avenue. Jackson County Roads has the following comments: 1. The applicant shall submit construction drawings to Jackson County Roads and obtain county permits if required. 2. We would like to be notified of future development proposals, as county permits may be required. 3. If frontage improvements are required along Pittview Avenue, they shall be permitted and inspected by Jackson County. Sidewalk placement on Pittview Avenue frontage if required should be directly behind the curb. Jackson County Roads does not maintain planter strips_ 4. The applicant shall obtain a Commercial Road Approach permit from Roads for the new road approach to Pittview Avenue. 5. The paved approach shall have 20' radii and be to Central Point's standard road width, There shall be no direct driveway approaches off Pittview Avenue. 6. Roads recommend the removal of any existing driveways not being used on Pittview Avenue and replacing them with new curb, gutter and sidewalk. 7. The posted speed zone for Pittview Avenue is 25 mph, requiring an approach sight distance minimum of 150'. 1; 1EngineeringlDeveiopmentlCITIESICNTRLPTISU 8-18-001.doc ATTACHMENT " F 11 33 May 4, 2018 Page 2 of 2 8. Utility Permits are required from Roads for any utility work within the county road right- of-way. 9. Please note Pittview Avenue is a County Local Road, Average Daily Traffic counts for this road are unavailable. 10, If drainage is directed to Pittview Avenue, Jackson County Roads would like to review and comment on the hydraulic report including the calculations and drainage plan. Capacity improvements or on site detention, if necessary, shall be installed at the expense of the applicant. Upon completion of the project, the developer's engineer shall certify that construction of the drainage system was constructed per plan and a copy of the certification shall be sent to Jackson County Roads. 11. Jackson County's General Administration Policy 01-45 sets forth the County's position as it relates to the management of County roads located within existing or proposed city limits or Urban Growth Boundaries (UGB). The County has no current plans for improvements to Pittview Avenue Jackson County Roads recommends that the city request road jurisdiction of Pittview Avenue and the proposed new roads. 12. We concur with any right-of-way dedicated. Sincerely, ��Jle- Mike Kuntz County Engineer 34 Jackson County Fixe District 3 8383 Agate Road White City, OR 97503-1075 (541) 826-7100 (Offite..) t (541)326-4566 (Fax) www.jcfd3.cotx1 Request for Comments Permit Nnone 794 Pittview, Ave Central Point, OR, 97502 A Request for comments for a pre -application meeting were requested for a 15 tot subdivision. The Comments are below, Plan review completed by: DFM Maric Northrop Chis plan view is conducted utillzing the 20140mgan FireCode as amended an adopted by JCFD3. The issuance or granting of a permit shall not be construed to be a permit For, or as approval of, any violation of any provision of appGrablecwles and slandards. Permits presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of a code, ordinance, orstandanl .sha 11 not be valid. The approval and issuance of a Permit based on construction ctocunwnb and other data shall not prevent the fire code official from requiring the correction of erro rs in the construction documents or data. Review and approval by the fire code official shall not relieve the Applicant of the responsibility of compliance with applicablecodes, ordinances, and standards, A set of approved plans must be kept at the rnnstruOion site At all fines for use during inspections and installation, ATTACHMENT It it Prepared by Mark Northrop 5/29/2018 35 Page 1 date date Item q NoncompUrtm Reference Corrective action corrected approved L INo Fire Hydrants noted on site plan bFC Appendix C (Please provide 1 or 2 Fire Hydrants tiepending upon location. They must be ivithin 200 feet of road frontage and not pore than 400 between hydrants. 2 20 foot access roadway DFC Appendix D(Please provide Fire lane no parking signs on 16oth sides of the street North and South for the street running East to West. 3 If a connection was made to Sharia Lane the hydrant distance would increase to 250 to road frontage and 500 feet average spacing (between hydrants. 4 5 6 7 i 9 10 11 ATTACHMENT It it Prepared by Mark Northrop 5/29/2018 35 Page 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 853 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A TENTATIVE PLAN FOR A 16 LOT SUBDIVISION TO BE KNOWN AS THE VIEW CREST SUBDIVISION. (File No: SUB -18001) WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a tentative plan application to create a 16 lot subdivision consisting of residential property identitied on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 1 l AC, Tax Lot 100, Central Point, Oregon; and WHEREAS, the project site is located in the R-1-6, Residential Single Family zoning districts; and WHEREAS, the application has been found to be consistent with the applicable approval criteria set forth in Title 16, Subdivisions and Title 17, Zoning, and per conditions noted in the Staff Report dated June 5. 2018; and WHEREAS, on June 5, 2018, at a duly noticed public hearing, the City of Central Point Planning Commission considered the Applicant's request for Tentative Plan approval for View Crest Subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Central Point Planning Commission by Resolution No. 853 hereby approves the View Crest Subdivision, based on the findings and conditions of approval as set forth in Exhibit "A," the Planning Department Staff Report dated June 5, 2018, including attachments thereto, herein incorporated by reference. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 5"' day of June, 2018 Planning Conunission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Planning Commission Resolution No. 853 (06/05/2018) ATTACHMENT " 14 36