Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApril 3, 2018 PC packetA A CENTRAL POINT CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA April 3, 2018 - 6:00 p.m. I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ROLL CALL Planning Commission. members, Mike Oliver (chair), Tom Van Voorhees, Craig Nelson Sr., Kay Harrison, Amy Moore, John Whiting, Jim Mock XV. CORRESPONDENCE V. MINUTES Review and approval of February 6, 2018 Planning Commission meeting minutes. VI. PUBLIC APPEARANCES VII. BUSINESS A. VIII. DISCUSSION A. Consideration of Draft Parks and Recreation Element, City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan IX. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS X. MISCELLANEOUS XI. ADJOURNMENT S City of Central Point Planning Commission Minutes February 6, 2018 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 6:04 P.M. II. ROLL CALL Commissioners, Mike Oliver, Amy Moore, Tom Van Voorhees, Jim Mock, Craig Nelson, Kay Harrison and John Whiting were present. Also in attendance were: Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director, Stephanie Holtey, Principal Planner and Karin Skelton, Planning Secretary. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIENCE III. CORRESPONDENCE • A letter from the Taylor Road West residents • A revision to the draft Concept Plan in the packet was provided by Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director. IV. MINUTES Amy Moore made a motion to approve the minutes of the January 2, 2018 Planning Commission Meeting. John Whiting seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Tom Van Voorhees, yes; Amy Moore, yes; Jim Mock, yes; John Whiting, yes; Craig Nelson, abstain; Kay Harrison, abstain. Motion passed. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES VI. BUSINESS A. Public Hearing (continuation) to discuss a Conceptual Land Use and Transportation Plan for Urban Reserve Areas CP -5 and CP -6 and to make a recommendation to the City Council. Applicant: City of Central Point. Mike Oliver read the rules governing quasi-judicial procedures. Amy Moore stated she recused herself from the December meeting because she owned property in the area. She said after consideration and review she had no conflict of interest as she is not developing her property. Planning Commission Minutes February 6, 2018 Page 2 Tom Van Voorhees said he had made a visit to the area and had had a conversation with a neighbor who was on the schoolboard and was interested in the possible effects on the schools in the area. He did not believe this would affect his decisions. Amy Moore said she also visited the area and had spoken with friends who lived there. She did not believe this would affect her decisions. Jim Mock said he also drove and walked through the area. He did not believe this would affect his decisions. Mr. Humphrey explained the Regional Planning Process. He said its purpose was to thoughtfully manage urban development and preserve farmland. Mr. Humphrey gave an overview of the Concept Plan. He said the City's Regional Plan Element requires that prior to expansion of the urban growth boundary (UGB) into an urban reserve area (URA) it is necessary to adopt conceptual land use and transportation plans for the affected urban reserve. He explained when the City adopted a Regional Plan Element to its Comprehensive Plan in 2012 it agreed to an average residential zoning density of 6.9 units per gross acre of land. He said the Regional Plan Element established a 50 year land supply and identifies general land use types and percentage distribution. He stressed that even when a property is in the UGB, the Citys zoning designation does not affect it unless that property is annexed into the City at the owner's request. He said annexation can only occur if a property is in a UGB and is adjacent to the City limits and it would be a deliberate choice of a property owner. Mr. Humphrey stated that most, but not all of the residents of the southern portion of CP- M would prefer to be left out of the UGB. He said in order to comply with the Regional Plan, the City must assign an urban land use designation to all of the land in the URA and do so using the categories and percentages to which the City and County have agreed. He stated an area of concern had been identified at the area of the anticipated urban/rural interface in CP -6. He said public comments on the CP -5/6 Conceptual Plan were received during the Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) meetings on October 10th and again on November 14th some residents sketched their own ideas for conceptual land use plans. These plans were introduced to the Planning Commission at their December meeting. The Commissioners discussed the proposed transportation plan. Mr. Humphrey explained the flood plain impact on CP -5 and Grant Road's proximity to the creek. He added the concept plan included proposed realignment of streets for illustration purposes only. Planning Commission Minutes February 6, 2018 Page 3 Mr. Humphrey said staff has obtained comments from affected agencies including Jackson County, Rogue Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization, Rogue Valley Sewer Services, the City of Central Point Public Works Department and the Department of Land Conservation and Development. Comments received from citizen input and affected agencies resulted in changes now reflected in the Concept Plan. He said the City is obligated to honor its commitment to the Regional Plan. The Concept Plan is a general guide and the designations the City places on property in this plan do not change the County zoning or force county residents to come into the UGB. Public Hearing was opened Dan and Louise Sakraida Mr. & Mrs. Sakraida stated they were opposed to a road running through their property. They added that Mr. & Mrs. Shipley were fll and could not attend the meeting but they also oppose the road as proposed. They asked if the road would be built on their property whether or not they came into the UGB. Mr. Humphrey said that if they never come into the UGB the City would not impose the constructin of a road on their property. Brady Dunn, Oak Pine Way Mr. Dunn asked how the proposed road would be affected should the density change. Mr. Humphrey said that as long as a property was in the County it was subject to County regulations. He added that should a property come into the UGB, a master plan would have to be approved and there would be a public hearing at that time for discussion regarding proposed roads. Mr. Dunn asked how the irrigation ditch would be affected should development occur. Mr. Humphrey stated that Rogue River Valley Irrigation District would work together with the developer on mitigation if necessary. Mr. Dunn asked if the City had consulted with property owners on the placement of the higher density areas proposed on the map. Mr. Humphrey answered that citizen input was taken at public hearings and by mail. The main input had been from the citizens in the south of CP6 who were opposed to higher density development. Sheila McMahon, New Ray Road Ms. McMann said she agreed with Mr. Dunn and she liked the area as it was. She opposed any high density development. Katy Mallams, Heritage Road Ms. Mallams said she was concerned about the impact of development on the existing wells in the area. She also said she would like to see the Concept Plan show the specific area of concern as it would be when development occurred. Stephanie Holtey explained that the area of concern would be considered at each point in the process of any development. Mr. Humphrey added the City would identify the area of concern as including all property in the southern part of CP -6 rather than just a specific strip of land. Planning Commission Minutes February 6, 2018 Page 4 Sheila McMahon, New Ray Road Ms. McMahon said that she agreed with Ms. Mallams and was concerned about the impact on the existing wells. Ms. Holtey said that the area of concern on the map would be changed to incorporate the lower area of CP -6 as a whole to make it more comprehensive rather than simply a line between upper and lower portions of CP -6. The description of the area of concern could also reference speck concerns regarding impact from development. Those would include impact from lights, noise, traffic and groundwater disturbance. Judy Booth, New Ray Road Ms. Booth expressed concern regarding the increased density proposed on her property. Additionally she was concerned about the proposed road alignment and how it might impact the irrigation ditch. She was extremely worried about the wells in the area. Larry Martin, Taylor Road Mr. Martin said he represented the four property owners who made up the Taylor Road West Group. He said the group supported the Plan and said density could be adjusted to incorporate some low density along the racetrack area which separated their properties from the area of concern. The Group thought Grant Road should be realigned to address safety concerns and to provide traffic flow to the activity center on the plan map. Public Hearing Was closed Mr. Humphrey said he thought it was a good idea to include concerns regarding wells in the area of concern. He stressed that this was a concept and City zoning would only come into effect should a property annex into the City. Otherwise the County zoning would remain as it was. Mr. Humphrey stated should the Planning Commission decide to move to recommend this matter to the City Council, he would advise adding the concerns brought up at this meeting be a part of their recommendation. He identified the concerns as: the specific identification of the area of concern; Grant Road realignment, and concerns regarding how the proposed roads would impact property. Kay Harrison made a motion to approve Resolution No.851 approving a Conceptual Land Use and Transportation Plan for Urban Reserve Areas CP -5 and CP -6 and to make a recommendation to the City Council. John Whiting seconded the motion The Commissioners discussed the language regarding the proposed transportation plan which stated that upon inclusion into the UGB the transportation plan would be implemented. Mr. Humphrey said the wording could be changed to state that at the time of inclusion in the UGB the local street network plan, road alignments and transportation improvements would be implemented. He explained that at the time that a portion of the URA came into the UGB it would need to have a traffic analysis and Planning Commission Minutes February 6, 2018 Page S master plan associated with it which would go to the Planning Commission and the City Council. Mr. Humphrey explained the densities as set out in the Housing Element and the processes for creating the conceptual plan. Ms. Holtey added that a master plan would include requirements for open space and during the development process there would be opportunity for citizen input. The commissioners asked about adding speck language regarding the area of concern to include impacts on wells and groundwater. Mr. Humphrey explained that staff could revise the Concept plan to modify the language describing the area of concern as the entire portion of CP -6 south of the racetrack rbdefine the transportation plan and add specific language regarding the issAs-irr-the area of concern. The Commissioners requested Mr. Humphrey state the amendments agreed to in the implementation guidelines. Mr. Humphrey stated the amendments: 1. Amend the area of concern to include all the land south of the racetract and add language identifying concerns to include groundwater, shallow wells noise and density transitions. This language would state that at the time of UGB amendment, annexation and development, the City shall ensure these issues are addressed and mitigated to minimize and avoid to the extent possible, impacts to residents living in this area. 2. Amend policy statement 6 .2 to say the areas affected by the transportation plan are limited to the areas brought into the UGB. At the time of inclusion into the UGB the local street network plan, road alignments, transportation improvements and jurisdictional transfers identified in that area will be included in the UGB amendment as identified in the UGB conceptual plan. 3. Amend the preferred map to modify the north/south line of Grant Road relocated to the western boundary. The commissioners discussed the proposed roads and identified their preferred transportation plan. Mr. Humphrey said that it would be subject to a traffic analysis prior to any land becoming part of the UGB. Kay Harrison moved to modify the motion to include the amendments. John Whiting seconded the motion. ROLL Call: Tom Van Voorhees, yes; Craig Nelson, yes; Kay Harrison, yes; Amy Moore, yes; John Whiting, yes; Jim Mock, yes. Motion passed. VII. DISCUSSION Mr. Humphrey acknowledged this -was Craig Nelson's last meeting as a Commissioner because he was moving to Medford. Planning Commission Minutes February 6, 2018 Page 6 Current City Projects Update; Smith Crossing has picked up 5 building permits for the apartments on North Haskell. The office Buildings on South Front Street have rectified their issues with the water table. The Pine Street Improvements have hit the halfway point There is a new application for a medical office building on Freeman Court The Land Use element is going to the Counsel this month Don and Tom are going to Portland for recognition of Don and the Housing Element VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS IX. MISCELLANEOUS X. ADJOURNMENT Craig Nelson made a motion to adjourn. Kay Harrison seconded the motion. All members said "aye" Meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m. The foregoing minutes of the February 6, 2018 Planning Commission meeting were approved by the Planning Commission at its meeting on the 3'd day of April, 2018. Planning Commission Chair STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM: VIII -A CENTRAL POINT STAFF REPORT April 3, 2018 Planning Department Tom Humphrey,AlCP, Community Development Director/ Assistant City Administrator Consideration of Parks and Recreation Mement, City of Centra[ Point Comprehensive Plan (File No. CPA -17005) Applicant: City of Central Point. File No.: CPA -17005. STAFF SOURCE: Justin P. Gindlesperger, Community Planner lI BACKGROUND: The City's Parks and Recreation Element ("Parks Element") was Iast acknowledged in 1983 and needs to be updated to account for community changes and to plan for future park needs. As the population of Central Point grows, interest in and use of parks will increase. Although the residents of Central Point are satisfied with the current park system, the current amount of parklands will not adequately serve new residents. The purpose of the Parks Element is to guide City decision -malting to ensure the parks and recreation system meets the needs of the Central Point community as the city continues to grow. The attached draft of the Parks Element includes an inventory of the existing parks system, assessment of future parkland needs, goals and policies and implementation strategies. Future parkland needs were determined by using the level of service adopted by the Parks and Recreation Commission of 3.5 acres for every 1,000 residents and comparing it to the City's existing park inventory and expected population growth. The update of the Parks EIement completes the planning process that includes an update of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan ("Master Plan'). The Parks Element considered the recent updates of the Master Plan, but expands the horizon to 20 -years for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. The Citizen's Advisory Committee (CAC) reviewed a prior version of the working draft of the Parks Element at the January 9, 2018 meeting and provided a favorable recommendation to the Planning Commission. Since the CAC meeting, staff has continued refining the working draft per the CAC discussion. Changes to the draft include consolidating sections and making the Parks Element more applicable in managing future changes in the community. Discussion at the meeting will focus on the needs assessment for future parks development and proposed goals and policies to support the development and maintenance of parks, open space, and recreational facilities. The City's continued growth necessitates the development of additional parklands so as to maintain an expected level of service. The Parks Element provides the necessary policy guidance for the continuation of high-quality recreation opportunities. ISSUES: The primary issue in considering the Parks Element pertains to the parkland needs assessment. Given the current level of service, the City will need to develop 52 acres of parklands by 2038. Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENTS: Attachmenf "X'— Working Draft of the Parks Element ACTION: Consideration of the Parks and Recreation Element. RECOMMENDATION: Direct Staff to schedule a public hearing to take public comment at t'he May I, 2018 meeting. Page 2 of 2 R ►y ss..wr.�.er�r.ti►.wr•w..r MN PARKS & RECREATION ELEMENT 2018-2038 City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan Citizens Advisory Committee 10 March 26, 2018 Draft Page 1 of 37 Contents l' lo�odu�iouand Onnonmm�------__,~_._.-,~-'_-..--------_,.~,..~.^,..., 7 1l. Cuuoozuity Engagement .............................................. ^~~'�^----'--^------`r----' 1.2. Strategic Objectives .......................... ._.................. ....................... _,~,~- / 1.3. Service Standards ............................... .................. - _* 1.4. Future Improvements .................................... _........................ ^........ ~~'_~ 2. Planning Context .............................................................................. ^~^_,,_,9 2.L Central Point Forward, �&C���Y�i�8bzu��oPlan ...-'_'-..~.._-_...-.�__^-'^�---.--_. l0 2.1.1. Ci�'0��u���Stu�ou�t-.-....__..._.^------_~_.._.._-~-~.,__-,.',_,.-_--_. l0 2l2. C�yStu*���tnyn��o��------.---.-_--',.--.,~..~^,,-^,,,~.,~,,,~_^,,~^__-_--_.- l0 2.2. Central Point Comprehensive Plan ....................... ........ ~^"....... ^°--.... .^..~-~ =._11 2.2.1. The Plan 0lea��----_----------'^~`.^^~^'.-^`-'~,.'.°�y=�.-,-^~,.-----' l� 2.2.2. Transportation System Plan .............................................. -,^.,^~~,.~, ------l2 2.2.I Central Point Parks and Recreation MmsWrPlan ..................... _...................... .'_........ l3 2.2.3.1 Parks and Recreation Department Mission Statement ......... ,,_................. ,+,�*~_._*+�l3 2'3' Statewide Planning Goal 0 - Recreational Needs .......................... ^............ ................ 13 2'4' Jackson County Comprehensive Plan ...................... ---.... ~.......... ,.......... ................. 13 2.5. Oregon Trails ZO16: A Vision for the Fxm................. ..................... ...... �-_-...... X3 3' Parks and Recreation Facilities Inventory ...................................... �^-........... ....... `.................. l4 31 Park Cl�s��u6m�.'--._-_~-.°--.----,-,_--___,_,____,`__,~__,-_,~_~__,,_,~_ l4 3.1.1,Cwououu�yParks .-------,.-^~.,.~~_,____,,_______^____^,,.^^~_____ l4 3.1.2. Neighborhood Pu�s-----..,-.._..-.-.--..^~',-__-.'__~. l� 3.1.3.Pouk�Pu�s'_--------._-'_--...^'~...~~~.~.-. __-_ l5 3.1/L Open Space Lands ........................................................... ___ l� 3.15. Special Use Fac�b�u---.-.._...-.-'-_-^.-.--_-_--'_~'-_~'~_-~ ,.................. 1� 3.1.6. Tru�m-------...-~_.~.'--~..~.,,._..~.,.,.,^,,.^,,____,'_~��/+�. .................... l� 12. FucU�yInventory --..-^._.-_..^,..--~^--.-.,,._---_,-.,-__-~~^��~_,^~°,,~__,°~ l� 3.3. O�urQl�rxadwoProvii�m----------.----.--_-.~,,.~^^,.,^-~~"+_^-.-..---- l9 3.3l }uc�muCouog'----~..^..~-~----,-__.__,.___,_,___~^_,,,,_______.. lR 3.l2. &Xcdf�d.~.....~_-~.~.__-..~.-....,___,._,.,^_,^_',~__,_^_,^__'____-_ l9 3.3.3. Phoenix19 .-------~._^..,...^,,,-,.,.,..,,, _~^.,,,_.,^,_~~.~___ ,_.,',,,_,,,,.,. ._.---,-..,,.,._.,._^°_~.^,,_,.,,~,^,,^,,______. 3.3.4. 7u ��-..-......-----. 20 3].5. Oregon State Parks ................ —.~........................ ..................................... ........................ zv 3.3.6. Bureau ofLand D�aouAamz��--_...-.--....---..'~_~.~-..,.-.._^~,'^----_.. 2O Page zm37 ff 4. 1. Community Demographics ............................................................ ... ............... ..... ................. 2O 42' Parkland Gap Analysis: Level oy0wmdom Proximity & Distribution ............................................ 22 42.1. Level ofSo-vice .......................................... ~.~.--'.---~............ .... 33 4.2.2. Proximity 23 4.2.3. Dimtribotimu.-__--_—_.-'_' _+�~.__-"....... ._,_28 4.2.3'1' New Community Pmrlm......................... .... ............... .29 4.2.3.2. Nvrw Neighborhood Pw1cs—....'-.' ~~~,~~°_°29 Page 3 of 37 12 R r r t pw r.w w u+ s mr 40 pm or z Aif 1!. 13 ....................... .............. ....,........ .... .............,.. _ ............. ......,.... 30 4.3. Priorities................................................................................................................................... 31 5. Goals & Policies .............. 5.1. Goals & Policies....................................................................................... .:::.»..:::,............: 31 5.1.1. Community Engagement and Communication:.,....,,K..::.:,»..........:..::....:..:... ...«:..:...,.. 31 5.1.2. Recreation Programming....................................................................................................... 32 5.1.3. Parks & Open Space..........,,;..,,:..:.:.....:.:..,....:.:.:..:..:....::.::..,::::....::.�:...........,.:......:..::...» 33 5.1.4. Trails &-Pathways.............................................................................................................. ,34 5.1.5. Design, Development & Managemunt...... ...........t.................. ............ ......... V .... ................ 4 5.1.6. Facilities Development Plan:«:::..:...::.:u.::.w......:......:.».,::::::Y.::....:.»:.:.tea...::....:..::,. p:.,35 6. Implementation Stxategies..............................................................................................................36 6.1. Acquisition Ouidelines ............................................................................................................... 36 6.2. Design and DevelopmentGuidelines...,:.K....:......:::......::.:.::::.:..:.:....:..:.. .«...�............,........... 36 6.3. Funding Ophons............„.................»...,....,........ .».,.ro,.......,...,,...........„........�»........:.:..:.,...:.: 3 6.4. Project -Level Options 37 6.5. Syatan Wide Options .,,:........:..:......:..'.:,:.::,:....... 4 ..... »......w,.�.., r,=l.,Nw.....,.,�........,».»....ro.... 7 6.6. Enhancing Communications & Outreach .................................................... _ .,...,:.._ ,.....►.:... 37 6.7. Capital Improvement Plsnsring..........................................»...............»...................................... 37 Page 6 of 37 14 1. Introduction and Summary The Parks Element (Parks Element) was prepared in collaboration with city residents, the Parks and Recreation Commission, the Planning Commission, and the City Council. The Parks Element inventories and evaluates existing parks and recreation areas, assesses the needs for acquisition, site development and operations, and sets goals and policies necessary to achieve the community's parks and recreation long-term objectives. The Parks Element is a twenty-year (2018-2038) plan for managing and enhancing the City's parks, trails and recreation services, including goals and policies necessary for the attainment of high-quality recreation opportunities to benefit residents of Central Point. The City of Central Point's park system currently contains approximately 122 acres of developed and undeveloped park and open space lands distributed among 31 parks, special facilities and open space areas. This system of parks supports a range of active and passive recreation experiences, including a skate park and access to approximately 4.9 miles of trails within its parks and along the Bear Creek Greenway. As part of its recreation services the City also offers a variety of general recreational and educational programs, which vary from cultural arts to fitness, education and outdoor recreation. The majority of the City's current recreation programming focuses on the City's youth. 1.1. Community Engagement Community engagement and feedback played an important role in establishing a clear planning framework that reflects current community priorities. Throughout this planning process, the public provided information and expressed opinions about the needs and priorities for parks, trails and recreation facilities, including recreational programs in Central Point. A variety of public outreach methods were used; including community surveys, community meetings, stakeholder discussions, online engagement and emails, and Parks and Recreation Commission sessions. Feedback from the community outreach efforts played a crucial role in updating policies and prioritizing capital investments. The City's residents are generally satisfied with the parks, trails and recreation opportunities in the City. Most residents care deeply about the future of the City's parks, recreation and trail system and appreciate the opportunity to offer feedback in the development of the Parks Element, including a strong interest in additional or expanded services and facilities. Specific recommendations are included in the Needs Assessment chapter and the results from surveys, meeting notes and major findings are included in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, a ten year parks and recreation development program. 1.2. Strategic Objectives Preparation of the Parks Element is based on six strategic objectives intended to guide City decision- making necessary to ensure that the City's parks and recreation system meets the long-term needs of the community. These strategic objectives are: 1. Community Engagement and Communication: Encourage meaningful public involvement in park and recreation; Page 7 of 37 15 2. Recreation Programming: Establish and maintain a varied and inclusive suite of recreation programs that accommodate a spectrum of ages, interests and abilities and promote the health and wellness of the community; 3. Parks & Open Space: Acquire and develop a high-quality, diversified system of parks, recreation amenities and open spaces that provide equitable access to all residents; 4. Trails & Pathways: Develop a high-quality system of multi -use trails and bicycle and pedestrian corridors that connects to regional trails and provides access to public facilities, neighborhoods and businesses; 5. Design, Development & Management: Plan for a parks system that is efficient to maintain and operate, while protecting capital investment; and 6. Facilities Development Plan: Maintain and implement the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, a ten year parks and recreation development program. 1.3. Service Standards The Parks and Recreation Department follows a set of service standards in order to provide quality recreational opportunities and to achieve community goals. The standards are applied to the three (3) main components of the Parks and Recreation system: Community, Neighborhood & Pocket Parks: The City classifies three (3) types of parks (Core Parks); community parks, neighborhood parks, and packet parks. To emphasize the importance of the need for Core Parrs within its park system the City uses an acreage standard of 3.5 acres per 1,000 people for its Core Parks. The City currently provides Core Parks at a rate of 2.07 acres per 1,000 people. Open Space & Trails: In addition to its Core Parks the City provides approximately 73 acres of open space within the UGB. The Parks Element does not include a numeric standard for open space areas and the acreage of open space is not included in the acreage standard for Core Parks. Open Space areas protect sensitive natural areas through existing regulations and provide recreation, including trail corridors as a secondary objective. The area protected along Bear Creek accounts for all of the City's open space acreage and provides a corridor for the Bear Creek Greenway multi -use path Acquisitions of open space focus on properties necessary to fill crucial connections in the greenway and trail system. Similarly, trail acquisition and development priorities are designed to provide a comprehensive pedestrian and bicycle system, connecting neighborhoods to commercial areas and other key destinations, rather than toward meeting a population -based mileage standard. Specialized Recreation Facilities: The Parks Element does not include a numeric standard for special use facilities. Special use recreation facilities are, by their nature, unique and do not translate well to a population based numeric standard. Special use facilities within the City include the Joel Tanzi Skate Park, Skyrman Arboretum and Civic Field. Page S of 37 16 Future Improvements The Parks Element includes a detailed needs assessment identifying the City's parks and recreation needs throughout the twenty year planning period. Within the Parks Element the locations and types of existing facilities, land use classifications, and other factors necessary to identify gaps in the parks system are identified. Understanding the known gaps in the park system will provide a foundation for the continued strategic planning ensuring that tomorrow's residents have convenient access to a system of parks and trails to stay healthy and active. The City of Central Point is anticipated to add approximately 5,580 additional residents by the year 2038 1. Serving existing and future residents will require improvements to, and expansion of, the City's park, trail and recreation system. The implementation strategy includes acquisitions of additional parkland, development and improvement of existing facilities and funding and investment options. Parks and Recreation Master Plan. The application of the goals in the Parks Element is detailed by the Parks and Recreation Master Plan with specific actions in order to ensure existing parks provide desired recreational amenities and opportunities. The Master Plan is a 14 - year guide that includes investments for development and improvement of core parks. For example, the proposed development of Community Park near Central Point Elementary in the south-central portion of the City will expand recreational resources for the community. The Master Plan also includes smaller improvements throughout the parks system to enhance accessibility, safety and usability. • Capital Improvement Plan. Investments in the acquisition, development and renovation of the park system are prioritized in the City's Parks and Recreation Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The CIP lists all parks and facilities projects considered for the next 20 years, with an estimated need for approximately $16.5 million for future improvements. The City does not have a multi-purpose community recreation center, and the number and types of activities the Department can offer in its current facilities are limited by a lack of capacity. Given the interest in establishing a community recreation center, it is recommended to continue the review of funding alternatives, as well as updating the modeling of user demand and analyzing options for community center facility development and operations revenues and costs. New investments in parks and recreation will be necessary over the next twenty years to meet the growing needs of the community, support youth development, provide options for residents to lead healthy, active lives, and foster greater social and community connections. 2. Planning Context Although the Parks Element is represents the community's interests and needs for park and recreational facilities, trails and programming, there are numerous other documents that were used and referred to in preparation of the Parks Element. To appreciate the thoroughness of the Parks Element it is necessary to acknowledge these collaborating documents. Based on Portland State University's Interpolation Table for 2038 with the 2017 Certified Population as the base year. Page 9 of 37 17 As previously noted, current community interests in the City's parks and recreation programing surfaced through a series of public outreach efforts that included mail and online surveys, open house meetings, stakeholder meetings, online engagement, website content and Parks and Recreation Commission meetings. An assessment of the park inventory became the basis for determining the City's current level of performance (2.07 acres per 1,000 people). An overarching needs analysis was conducted for recreation programs and facilities, parks and trails to assess current demands and project future demand accounting for population growth. Past Central Point community plans and other relevant documents were reviewed for policy direction and goals as they pertain to the provision and planning for parks, trails and recreation opportunities in Central Point. The development of each involved public input and adoption by their respective responsible legislative body. 2.1. Central Point Forward, A City Wide Strategic Plan The City maintains a strategic plan, the purpose of which is to envision a preferred future for the City and to "...formulate a way to make this future happen through community teamwork and actions. It is a document that records what people think— the blueprint for positive change that defines the vision, goals and outcomes that must occur to realize the future_ " 2The community's mission, vision and values as set forth in the Strategic Plan serve as the foundation of the Comprehensive Plan, including this Parks Element. The guidance from the Strategic Pian that is carried forward in the Parrs Element is to provide high quality facilities that attract users and provide high quality, age appropriate programs that benefit all residents. 2.1.1. City Mission Statement The City's mission statement reads as follows: It is the mission of the City of Central Point to build and maintain a highly livable community by working in harmony and being a catalyst for partnership with all the members of the community, public and private. 2.1.2. City Statement of Values The Strategic Plan contains a set of five values as follows: • Growth: We value planned growth that will retain our small town atmosphere. • Public Safety: We value a professional service oriented public safety policy that promotes a sense of safety and security in our city. • Transportation: We value a system of transportation and infrastructure that is modern, efficient and sensitive to the environment. • Community: We value a clean and attractive city with parks, open space and recreational opportunities. z City of Central Point Strategic Plan, pp 3, May 24, 2007, Resolution No. 1143 Page 10 of 37 18 Service: Provide highest level of service possible in the most efficient and responsible manner, These citywide value statements provide a foundation for the policies and recommendations within the Parks Element. 2.2. Central Point Comprehensive Plan The Central Point Comprehensive Plan is the guiding policy document for land use and growth -related planning for the City. The Comprehensive Plan consists of ten mandatory elements, one of which is the Parks Element. The Parks Element relies heavily on the Population Element, Land Use Element, Transportation Element, and Regional Plan Element to identify the communities changing demographics, future population growth, and the physical direction of future growth. 2.2.1. The Regional Plan Element The City's Comprehensive Plan includes a Regional Plan Element' adopted in 2012, which addresses the long-term urbanization needs (2060) of the City. The Regional Plan Element is unique in that it contains performance indicators per ©RS 197.656(2)(E)(C) measuring the City's land use performance relative to the Regional Pian Element, which must be addressed in applicable elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City's Regional Plan Element includes eight (8) urban reserve areas totaling 1,721 gross acres set aside for future development4. The Regional Plan provides a general distribution of land uses for each URA. Prior to an amendment to include a URA, or any part of a URA, into the UGB, a conceptual land use plan (Concept Plan) must be completed demonstrating that the proposal is consistent with the land use distributions for each URA The Concept Plans, when approved become part of the City's Regional Plan. Summary Acreage by Urban Reserve Area CP -1B 544 441 0 CT -1C 70 60 0 CP -2B 325 282 6 CF -3 36 27 SE CP -4D 83 52 99 31 CP -6A 444 386 Page 11 of 37 19 At such time as lands are included in the City's Urban Growth Boundary (UGB), the Concept Pians are further refined and the dedication of parkland must be consistent with the needs for future parkland as shown in the acknowledged Concept Plans6, including the Parks Element, the Land Use Element and the Regional Plan. The Parks Element establishes an inventory of parkland needs for future growth. The amount of needed parkland is then used by the Land Use Element to further refine the geographic distribution of land uses provided in the Regional Plan's Concept Plans. 2.2.2. Transportation System Plan The Transportation System Plan (TSP) provides specific information regarding transportation needs to guide future transportation investment across the City for vehicular, rail, transit, bicycle and pedestrian travel modes. A component of the TSP is the Bicycle and Pedestrian System. The goal of the Bicycle and Pedestrian System is to develop more diverse transportation options that are safe and convenient travel. The TSP also maps specific priority improvements for bicycle and pedestrian facilities to enhance connectivity throughout the City, including to parks and recreation sites. The focus of the bicycle system is on the use of the bicycle as a means of transportation, with the recreational use of bicycles a secondary consideration. A systematic approach to filling gaps in sidewalks will provide a safe pedestrian system, with primary focus on connection to schools and transit stops. The Transportation Planning Rule requires that a local government ensure that any plan amendments, including comprehensive plan elements, would not affect an existing or planned transportation facilitys. The Parks Element does not include proposed development on specific parcels and would not have an effect on the transportation system. The proposed parks locations are not site specific, but are a function of future residential growth, which is subject to traffic analysis at time of inclusion in to the UGB. 2.2.3. Central Point Parks and Recreation Master Plan The Central Point Parks and Recreation Master PIan9 (Parks Master Plan) is an adjunct document to the Parks Element the purpose of which is to outline the goals, community needs, and implementation strategies to be achieved within a ten year program period. The Parks Master Plan outlines capital improvement, and lists and prioritizes projects across the city. Major recommendations include the acquisition of additional parkland, development of a swimming pool, development of a community center and the development of additional walking and bicycle paths throughout the city. 6 City of Central Point Regional Plan Element, Performance Indicators Section 4.1.21 " Park Land." 7 City of Central Point Transportation System Plan, pp 84, December 8, 2008, Ordinance No. 1922. s OAR 660-012-0060(1) 9 City of Central Point, Parks and Recreation Master Plan, March 23, 2017, Ordinance No. 2035. Page 12 of 37 20 z1 -ia -- - 0 - -Total 1,721 1,492 192 At such time as lands are included in the City's Urban Growth Boundary (UGB), the Concept Pians are further refined and the dedication of parkland must be consistent with the needs for future parkland as shown in the acknowledged Concept Plans6, including the Parks Element, the Land Use Element and the Regional Plan. The Parks Element establishes an inventory of parkland needs for future growth. The amount of needed parkland is then used by the Land Use Element to further refine the geographic distribution of land uses provided in the Regional Plan's Concept Plans. 2.2.2. Transportation System Plan The Transportation System Plan (TSP) provides specific information regarding transportation needs to guide future transportation investment across the City for vehicular, rail, transit, bicycle and pedestrian travel modes. A component of the TSP is the Bicycle and Pedestrian System. The goal of the Bicycle and Pedestrian System is to develop more diverse transportation options that are safe and convenient travel. The TSP also maps specific priority improvements for bicycle and pedestrian facilities to enhance connectivity throughout the City, including to parks and recreation sites. The focus of the bicycle system is on the use of the bicycle as a means of transportation, with the recreational use of bicycles a secondary consideration. A systematic approach to filling gaps in sidewalks will provide a safe pedestrian system, with primary focus on connection to schools and transit stops. The Transportation Planning Rule requires that a local government ensure that any plan amendments, including comprehensive plan elements, would not affect an existing or planned transportation facilitys. The Parks Element does not include proposed development on specific parcels and would not have an effect on the transportation system. The proposed parks locations are not site specific, but are a function of future residential growth, which is subject to traffic analysis at time of inclusion in to the UGB. 2.2.3. Central Point Parks and Recreation Master Plan The Central Point Parks and Recreation Master PIan9 (Parks Master Plan) is an adjunct document to the Parks Element the purpose of which is to outline the goals, community needs, and implementation strategies to be achieved within a ten year program period. The Parks Master Plan outlines capital improvement, and lists and prioritizes projects across the city. Major recommendations include the acquisition of additional parkland, development of a swimming pool, development of a community center and the development of additional walking and bicycle paths throughout the city. 6 City of Central Point Regional Plan Element, Performance Indicators Section 4.1.21 " Park Land." 7 City of Central Point Transportation System Plan, pp 84, December 8, 2008, Ordinance No. 1922. s OAR 660-012-0060(1) 9 City of Central Point, Parks and Recreation Master Plan, March 23, 2017, Ordinance No. 2035. Page 12 of 37 20 2.2.3.1 Parks and Recreation Department Mission Statement The Parks and Recreation Department mission is to "...provide safe, high quality parks, open space and recreational facilities that encourage residents and visitors to live, invest and play in the community, and develop recreation programs that promote memorable experiences in people's lives. " 2.3. Statewide Planning Goal 8 - Recreational Needs Statewide Planning Goal 8 requires that communities plan for "... recreation areas, facilities and opportunities: (1) in coordination with private enterprise; (2) in appropriate proportions; and (3) in such quantity, quality and locations as is cangistent with the availability of the resources to meet such requirements. State and federal agency recreation plans shall be coordinated with local and regional recreational needs and plans."f °. The City of Central Point has addressed these requirements in the Parks Element. City residents are proud of Central Point for its small town character and for what has been accomplished in the park system with modest resources, but they are also interested in certain facility improvements. This Plan documents those desires and provides a fimnework for addressing capital development and funding in the near-term. 2.4. Jackson County Comprehensive Plan The Recreation Element of the Jackson County Comprehensive Plan includes the continuation of the Bear Creek Greenway program Some of the objectives of the County's Recreation Element include cooperation with affected public agencies and other land owners in planning an interconnecting trail system between the county's population centers, evaluating future recreation needs within urban growth boundaries in cooperation with the incorporated cities, and continuing to offer technical assistance to the cities. The Parks Element reflects the goals and policies of the County's Recreation Element to further access to the Bear Creek Greenway in order to expand its use for non -motorized transportation and pedestrians. 2.5. Oregon Trails 2016: A Vision for the Future The Statewide Trails Plan is a ten-year plan (2016-2025) completed by the Oregon Parks in order to maintain the state's eligibility to participate in the Recreational Trails Program (RTP). The intent of the plan is to provide information to assist recreation planners and land managers with trail planning, including All -Terrain Vehicle, snowmobile, non -motorized, water trail and Scenic Waterways planning components. The plan segments the state into planning regions and identifies the southwest region to include Coos, Curry, Josephine, Jackson and Douglas Counties. With regard to non -motorized trail needs, the plan stresses the need for trail connectivity in the region including making trail connections within urban areas, providing connections between existing trails and providing connections to parks, open spaces and other natural areas outside of urban areas.. 10 OAR 660-015-0000(8) a Page 13 of 37 3. Parks and Recreation Facilities Inventory 3.1. Park Classifications Parkland is classified to assist in planning for the community's recreational needs. The Central Point park system is composed of a hierarchy of various park types, each offering recreation and/or natural area opportunities. Separately, each park type may serve only one function, but collectively the system will serve the full range of community needs. Classifying parkland by function allows the City to evaluate its needs and plan for an efficient, cost effective and usable park system that minimizes conflicts between park users and adjacent uses. The Parks Element categorizes the City's parkland into five (5) classifications based on characteristics addressing the intended size and use of each park type. The classifications include the three (3) types of core parks; community parks, neighborhood parks, and pocket parks, along with Open Space Lands, Special Use Areas and Trails. 3.1.1. Community Parks Community parks are large sites developed for organized play, contain a wide array of facilities and appeal to a diverse group of users. Community parks are generally 10 to 40 acres in size and serve residents within a 2 -mile drive, walk or hike ride from the site. In areas without neighborhood parks, community parks can also serve as local neighborhood parks. Don Jones Park is an example of a community park- In ark In general, community park facilities are designed for organized or intensive recreational act iv it ies and sports, although passive components such as pathways, picnic areas and natural areas are highly encouraged and complementary to active use facilities. Developed community parks typically include amenities such as sport courts (basketball, tennis), covered activity areas, soccer and/or baseball fields and bike and pedestrian trails. Since community parks serve a larger geographic area and offer more facilities than neighborhood parks, parking and restroom facilities should be provided. 3.1.2. Neighborhood Parks Neighborhood parks are small parks designed for unstructured, non -organized play and limited active and passive recreation. Neighborhood parks generally are considered the basic unit of traditional park systems and range from 0.25-5 acres in size, depending on a variety of factors including neighborhood need, physical location and opportunity. Neighborhood parks are intended to serve residential areas within close proximity (up to 1/2 -mile walking or biking distance) of the park and should be geographically distributed throughout the City. Since access to neighborhood parks is mostly pedestrian, they should be located along road frontages to improve visual access and provide sidewalks or other safe pedestrian access. To accommodate a typically desired amount of recreational amenities and open areas a minimum size of 1.5 acres is recommended. Developed neighborhood parks typically include amenities such as pedestrian paths, picnic tables and benches; play equipment, a multi -use open field for informal play, sport courts or multi-purpose paved Page 14 of 37 22 areas and landscaping. Restrooms are typically not provided due to high construction and maintenance costs. When neighborhood parks contain amenities that result in longer visits, such as tennis courts and picnic shelters, restrooms could be an asset to provide services that are conducive to extended playing times. Depending on the size and function of a neighborhood park parking is usually not provided; however, on -street, ADA -accessible parking stall(s) may be beneficial. 3.1.3. Pocket Parks Pocket parks are small parks that provide limited opportunities for active play and passive recreation. They are generally less than 0.5 acres in size and provide modest recreational amenity to residents within a ;4 -mile walking distance. Due to their small size, pocket parks are discouraged and the Parks Element recommends against pursuing additional pocket parks due to the higher maintenance costs and lower recreatiorwl value. The existing pocket parks have limited to no opportunity for expansion. 3.1.4. Open Space Lands Open spaces arc undeveloped lands primarily left in a natural state with recreation use as a minor objective. These lands are usually owned or managed by a governmental agency, which may or may not accoinmodate public access. Open space lands protect sensitive natural areas, and can include wildlife habitats, stream and creek corridors, or unique and/or endangered plant species. The Land Use Element identifies the areas protected along Bear Creek as open space lands that also accommodate the Sear Creek Gteenway trail corridor. No standards currently exist or are proposed for open space lands. Potential acquisition of open space land is typically evaluated for its significant merits beyond outdoor recreation value, with an emphasis on preservation of unique natural features. 3. 1. S. Special Use Facilities Special use facilities include single -purpose recreational areas or stand-alone sites designed to support a specific, specialized use. This classification includes stand-alone sport field complexes, arenas, community centers, community gardens or sites occupied by buildings. 3.1.6. Trails Trails are non -motorized recreation and transportation corridors generally separated from roadways. Trails can be developed to accommodate a single use or shared uses, such as pedestrians and bicyclists. Recreation trail alignments aim to emphasize a strong relationship with the natural environment and may not provide the most direct route from a practical transportation viewpoint. Trails may be developed in conjunction with various recreational activities, such as jogging, cycling and nature observation. Trails should be sufficiently wide enough to accommodate the intended type of trail user(s), preserve the features through which the trail is traversing and buffer adjacent land use activities. Trails are classified Page 15 of 37 23 by use type and function, including regional trails, park trails, community trails and bike routes. Trail should be developed based on the trail standards in the Parks Master Plan. 3.2. Facility Inventory The City's Park and Open Space Inventory identify the City's recreational assets. The City owns and maintains approximately 122 acres of developed and undeveloped park and open space lands. Additionally, the City Hall houses the library and indoor spaces for recreation programs and activities. Figure 12A. Existing Inventory: Park & Open Space Lands by Type Community Park Developed 2.05 Don Jones Park Developed 8.60 Robert Pfaff Park Developed 1.48 Twin Creeks Park Developed 3.21 FjBo�es Total Community Park Acreage 15.34 property Undeveloped 932 Flanagan Park Developed 5.34 Forest Glen Park �! Developed L90 Griffin Oak Park Developed 0.79 Van Horn Park T T Developed 2.04 William Mott Park Developed 3.58 Total Neighborhood Park Acreage 27.97 cascade Meadows Park Developed 0.23 Glengrove Wayside Park Developed 0.24 MenteerPark Developed 0646 Total Pocket Park Acreage 0.93 CivicFieid Developed 7.26 Joel Tanzi Skate Park Developed 0.59 Skyrman Arboretum Developed 1.77 Total Speclal Fddrity Acreage 9.62 Open Space (all combined) Undeveloped 72.87 Total Open Space Acreage 72.87 Total Park System Acreage 121.73 Page 16 of 37 24 The following map shows the location of existing parks, and trails and open spaces within the City (see Map 1). A detailed description of each park is included in Appendix B. Page 17 of 37 25 � „ate x; wn. •.�. ON[u«wS+J • ��hlin,Eway} low q me �MhsNda,n ly,tr�1V u.+ercw•+r•s+e 41A-p�3r•Rwrr��n. 0 0.115 0.35 O.T 1A5 lA _� 1My1 Map 1: Existing Parks,Trails & Open Space jr- i T 26 �.1 I � „ate x; wn. •.�. ON[u«wS+J • ��hlin,Eway} low q me �MhsNda,n ly,tr�1V u.+ercw•+r•s+e 41A-p�3r•Rwrr��n. 0 0.115 0.35 O.T 1A5 lA _� 1My1 Map 1: Existing Parks,Trails & Open Space jr- i T 26 3.3. Other Recreation Providers Although the City of Central Point is the major provider of parks, open space and recreation opportunities within the Central Point planning area, other providers also contribute recreation opportunities. Several other parks, recreation and open space areas are located within close proximity to Central Point and provide city residents opportunities for a wider array of outdoor activities. Providers of these facilities include the following. 3.3.1. Jackson County Jackson County has ten parks with facilities that include a multi -use sports park, RV parks, campgrounds, cabin rentals, meeting space and facility rentals, picnic areas, gardens, boat launches, boat rentals, fishing platforms, swimming areas, a water slide, trails and playgrounds. Jackson County's Expo Park is home to the Jackson County Fair and includes the Bob and Phyllis Mace Watchable Wildlife Memorial Center and the Seven Feathers Event Center. The fairgrounds are used 365 day a year by community groups, private promoters, and organizations that plan special events and private functions. Facilities include the 57,600 sf IsoIa Memorial Arena. the 7,38I sf Padgham Pavilion, the covered 01srud Arena, along with livestock barns. horse stalls, a sale pavilion and lawn areas. Overnight RV parking for large recreational vehicles is complete. 3.3.2. Medford The City of Medford, contiguous on the south and east edge of Central Point, is Southern Oregon's largest provider of recreation services. The City currently provides over 2,500 acres of public parkland and recreation facilities distributed among 36 park sites and numerous open space parcels. This system of parks supports a range of active and passive recreation experiences. Medford's Parks and Recreation Department is responsible for the maintenance and programming of the U.S. Cellular Community Park and the Santo Community Center providing over 300 programs, services and events each year. 3.3.3. Phoenix The City of Phoenix, located approximately six miles south of Central Point, has 35 acres of park land. Facilities at their three parks include playgrounds, a softball field, concession stand, picnic area, community garden, nature paths and wetland observation platforms. Colver Road Park and City Hall Park have localized service areas, which would not likely attract Central Point residents. However, the 24 -acre Blue Heron Park is connected to Central Point via the Bear Creek Greenway. Page 19 of 37 27 3.3.4. Talent The City of Talent, located approximately nine miles south of Central Point, manages 19 acres as parks and recreation facilities. The facilities for their eight parks include playgrounds, sports fields, picnic areas and shelters and trails. The Downtown Park has a multi -use facility for skateboarders, in-line skaters and BMX bikers that may attract Central Point users. Also, Lyn Newbry Park is connected to Central Point via the Bear Creek Greenway. 3.3.S.Oregon State Parks Seven state parks and recreation sites are located in the Central Point vicinity. These include day -use sites, waysides, campgrounds, scenic viewpoints, and state heritage sites. These diverse sites provide recreational opportunities for picnicking, fishing, boating, swimming, bicycling, hiking, bird and wildlife watching and cultural and environmental interpretation. Touvelle State Recreation Site, 8 miles north of Central Point, provides water-based recreation opportunities on the Rogue River. Touveile is a popular site for picnicking, boating, swimming and fishing. Next to the park, Denman Wildlife Refuge is habitat to local and migratory wildlife. 3.3.6. Bureau of Land Management The BLM has a number of campgrounds, day use areas, trails, and snow parks within their Medford District. Some sites have specific functions, such as hiking trails. Some sites, such as the Hyatt Lake Recreation Complex, provide many different recreation opportunities, such as camping, fishing, swimming and hiking. The Upper and Lower Table Rocks are an Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC) co -managed by the BLM and the Nature Conservancy. They are located approximately 10 miles north of Central Point. The Nature Conservancy manages about 3,600 acres of Lower Table Rocks, and the BLM manages 1,280 acres on Upper and Lower Table Rocks. The area provides outstanding opportunities for hiking and environmental education. 4. Park & Recreation Needs Assessment This chapter assesses Central Point's needs for park and recreation facilities and programming, based on the community's vision, input and priorities. The needs and recommendations presented here are based on public input — including survey results, stakeholder discussions, and public meetings — as well as information gathered through site inventories and state and national recreation trends. 4.1. Community Demographics In 2018, an estimated 18,924 people reside in Central Point, according to the Portland State University Population Research Center". The city has been growing steadily for the past four decades, with a 329% increase in population from 1970 to 2010 (see Figure 4.1 B). Much of this increase occurred during " Based on Portland State University's Interpolation Table for 2038 with the 2017 Certified Population as the base year. Page 20 of 37 28 between 1990 and 2000, when the city grew by nearly 5,000 people, an annual rate of approximately 6.6%. While the rate of population growth has slowed since - to approximately 2.7% annually over the past 15 years, it remains three times faster than population growth in Jackson County as a whole. Today, Central Point is the third largest city in Jackson County and is expected to continue to grow over the coming decades. Central Point is home to many families with children, which represent over one-third of households. Residents are relatively young, particularly when compared to the remainder of Jackson County. However, this may be changing. The city is experiencing growth in the percentage of residents over 45 and a decline in the number of young children. Figure 4.1A. Population Characteristics: Central Point, Jackson County, Oregon (2015) Population (2415) 17,485 _ rt 210.975 4.013,845 Population (2410) 17,169 203,206 3,831,074 Population (2000) _12,493 181,269 - 3,4_21,399 Percent Change (2000 - 2015) 40.0% 16_.4% 17.3% Persons wl Disabilities (°/a) 15.6% _ 1.6.9% 14.2% Percent with children Mian HH IncQme - -_ g 765 544,086 $50,521 - Average Household Size 2.61 2.44 2.5 f �LVMV P4 it Size ^ _ 3.04 - ---_—_ 2.96 3.'45 Owner 0=qway Bate 61.8% 62.4% 61.5% 0 Meda A _ 36.5 T 42-1 3 :4 Populati! p !: 5 years of age 7 5°/° 5.9% Population < 18 years of age 26.5% 21.8% 22.60A Population 18 - 64 years o F age 58.7%_ _ -_ 60.6%_� - 63.5% Population > 6S years of age _ 14_8% _ 17.6% LL 13.9% The population forecast projects continued growth over the coming 20 years. It estimates the population of the urban area will grow to 20,484 people by 2025 and 23,290 by 2038. This growth represents a 24% increase in total population between 2018 and 2038 and an Average Annual Growth Rate of 1.0 percent 12. FIS 4.15. Pap ktM Chan/s -1070 - 20U 12 Average Annual Growth Rate is the average increase in the value of population over the 20 -year planning horizon. It is calculated by taking the arithmetic mean of the growth rate over the 20 -year time period. Page 21 of 37 29 25,000 20,000 — -- 15,000 — 10,000 — 6,357 5,000 0 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2025 2090 2005 2038 As the population of Central Point grows, the City will need to acquire and develop additional parkland to meet community needs. The City's recreational facilities and programs will be in increasing demand. The City of Central Point can also expand into urban reserve areas through annexation. These areas fall to the west of the city and to the north, along Interstate 5. Growth in these areas will require the City to plan for and provide parks to serve existing and new residents. 4.2. Parkland Gap Analysis: Level of Service, Proximity & Distribution Central Point residents are fortunate to have access to great parks and the Bear Creek Greenway. Through thoughtful planning, the City has secured several new park sites over the years, and a strong core system of parks and open spaces exist today. However, the continued and projected growth of the city will place further pressure on access to new lands for parks. While about half of residents believe the City currently has enough parks, just over 20% feel that there are not enough park and recreation opportunities in the City. To better understand where acquisition efforts should be directed, the Parks Element examines and assesses the current distribution of parks throughout the city through a gap analysis. The gap analysis reviews the locations and types of existing facilities, land use classifications, transportation/access barriers and other factors as a means to identify preliminary acquisition target areas. Understanding the known gaps in the park system will provide a foundation for strategic planning to ensure that tomorrow's residents have access to a distributed system of parks and trails to stay healthy and active. 4.2.1. Level of Service Central Point's existing community, neighborhood and pocket parks make up approximately 39.24 acres of parkland, of which 30 acres are developed, resulting in a current level of service of 2.07 acres per Page 22 of 37 30 thousand residents (see Figure 4). Given a level of service target of 3.5 acres per thousand residents, the City currently faces a deficit of 27 acres of new parkland, and 36 acres of developed parkland. The above parkland acreage calculations include the undeveloped acreage of the Boes property in the CP -4D urban reserve area. Development of that site to serve as a new neighborhood park results in an urban area deficit of approximately 27 acres. Central Point's population is anticipated to grow by approximately 4,500 residents by 2038. In order to serve future residents, the City would need to acquire and develop an additional 16 acres of parkland, in addition to current needs. Accordingly, the City should aim to acquire 43 acres of parkland, and develop 52 acres, between 2018 and 2038 to fully meet the desired level of service standard (3.5 acres/ 1,000 residents). Figure 4. Level of Service and Parkland Needs - 2018 and 2038 Existing Level of Service (LOS) Standard 3.5 acres per 1,OW residents 2018 Population 18,924 re s i d e nts 2038 Population Forecast 23,290 residents City -owned & maintained TOW Effective Level of Service based on total acreage (acres/1,000 residents) 39.24 acres 39.24 acnes 2.07 1.68 29.92 acres 2992 ISO 1.58 1.28 Net LOS to Standard (acres/1,000 residents) (1.43) (1.82) (1.92) (2.22) Performance to Standard 59% 48% 1 45% 37% Acreage surplus (deficit) (26.99) (42.27) (36.31) (51.60) Source: Population data from PSU Center for Populatlon Research 4.2.2. Proximity In reviewing parkland distribution and assessing opportunities to fill identified gaps, residentially zoned lands were targeted, since neighborhood and community parks primarily serve these areas. Additionally, primary and secondary service areas were used as follows: • Community parks: 1/z -mile primary & 1 -mile secondary service areas • Neighborhood parks: 1/ -mile primary & %-mile secondary service areas Map 2, 3 and 4 on the following pages illustrate the application of the distribution standards from existing, publicly -owned neighborhood and community parks. These maps show that the eastern portion of the city (east of I-5) is well served with reasonable access to public parkland. The portion of the City west of Highway 99 is also reasonably well served, though a gap exists in the southern portion of this Page 23 of 37 31 area. The majority of the City's park needs exist in the central portion of the city, between I-5 and Highway 99. Page 24 of 37 32 lj r r y t ... w w w M r �r+f• ' i i � s .r I Lap.ro. j y{ rt Y�O NaMN W Peh �i,a.fwneya«n NnyhuiMaodiaa;.M?eA Doan �kn r+• ar :weAOmnree f��a .» �•� veoe �tf.enay "N�9d Gaklpvgnry All :eiw• er,r Cy�� Sw .ands jelly ..--.. lfY.rf Farn 0.178 0.35 61 1.05 's Map 2: Park Walkshed Map (Neighborhood & Pocket Parks) 33 .yNswmv,n• ►+NIM Pti+ «Ya.rRt gs�tr.r q ... o,e 3w.•Tw.yj. � a•no-xoaMnvo.a �.:wwcawi,.•.i. i ' CA •MJ.QGm � •+Wn. � 6 P.!:¢ P.36 0.7 ipF I.t s Map 3. Park Walkshed Map (Community Parks y °'t Jw- 34 w� 1'� i L� 11r A• . e. jr410 1 iogohd �, jc'dy iamb •ar rrr� � rw ' .rFM'r'hiN.dU a.iil CWr SPcp �iaf •o f �- - H•,rCM'A GinnweY TfN. ur. wAA �':rnc� 1>Mv�nou•u � W4d gi*,, P,IpOr 11'i, k<v 1 1 w I - t(;q JAp�yOrC ..-I/,ipl Aoed� I Nv' u d 0.?75 0.36 0., 195 4A N,fbA _. _ _ _ = uew ��Iry4rti r+i w f [� AriTR +1!•I_ +�••q • w 4r ►� R•tpRlrr+71lI f lM Map 4: Composite Park Walkshed Map I I Ik Jr. ,- ..._ Yli:ifriC�' r+1K: jy:'i�tiKa{ �••i.+L f'rL{ a P -4 I�f l+�- n TA "'= rir •'�"•r j •y ft 35 4.2.3. Distribution Based on the parks need assessment, the Proposed Parkland Target Acquisition Areas, as shown on Map 5, highlights those areas of the City that will require special focus for park acquisition and development in the coming years. A total of three potential acquisition areas are identified within current city limits and include one proposed community park and two proposed neighborhood parks (see Figure 4.2.3A). The greatest documented land need is for additional community park sites to provide the land base for a blend of passive and active recreation opportunities, such as sport fields, picnicking and walking. Secondarily, new neighborhood parks are needed to improve overall distribution and equity throughout the City, while promoting recreation within walking distance of residential areas. The acquisition and development of the community and neighborhood parks necessary to meet the geographic distribution goals described above would meet, or significantly address, the current and future level of service needs. Figure 4.2.3A. Parkland Service Gap Areas by District & Park Type Additionally, a number of future parkland acquisition target areas are identified within urban reserve areas. As annexations andlor new residential development occur within these urban reserve areas, the City should be prepared to purchase or negotiate for the protection of developable lands for recreational uses. Efforts to secure future parklands in these urban reserve areas may require developer incentives, such as density bonuses, to entice landowners into cooperating to set aside appropriately -sized areas for ftuture use as parks. Figure 4.2.3B. Parkland Service Gap Areas within the URA by Location do Park Type 3 CP -6A — South of scudo Av. Neighborhood 4 CF -6A — Near Taylor Rd. Community 3 CP -6A — North of Beall Ln. Neighborhood 6 CP6-B — Southwest of Beall Ln. & Hanley Rd. Community 7 CP -2B- Southeast of Upton Rd. and Nilson Rd. Community While the targeted acquisition areas do not identify a specific parcel(s) for consideration, the area encompasses a broader area in which an acquisition would be ideally suited. These acquisition targets represent a long-term vision for improving parkland distribution throughout Central Point Page 28 of 37 36 4.2.3.1. New Community Parks Central Point should acquire and develop two new community parks (of 10 to 30 acres in size) to provide adequate space for needed community recreation amenities, improve geographic distribution, and help meet the desired park level of service. One community park should be located in the northern portion of the city, to the east of Highway 99 (see Map 5) to serve residents of neighborhoods near Scenic Avenue and Dobrot Way. A second community park should be located to the east of Interstate 5, northeast of the intersection of Beebe Road and Gebhard Road to serve residents in the eastern portion of the city. For areas of the city that are heavily developed it will be difficult to locate new community parks within these areas. 4.2.3.2. New Neighborhood Parks Central Point's neighborhood park system goal is to provide a neighborhood park within walking distance (`l -mile) of every resident. Achieving this goal will require acquiring new neighborhood park properties in currently underserved locations. Within the current city limits, Central Point should acquire and develop two new neighborhood parks of 3 to 5 acres to serve local neighborhoods. A new neighborhood park, Summerfield Park, is scheduled for construction in the north -central pox -tion of the city, near the intersection of N i 0th Street and. N 3rd Street, see Map 5. A second neighborhood, Don and Flo Bohnert Farm Park, is mrrently under construction in the earth -weal portion of the city, near Stone Pointe drive. A third neighborhood park should ideally be located near the intersection of Glenn Way and Timothy Street to serve residents in the southeastern portion of the city. Other proposed neighborhood park locations are identified on Map 5 and aim to address future parkland distribution needs within the urban reserve areas. Page 29 of 37 37 skip f A t 0 NeigMoftad PaOILACqUMUOn TargetArea Community Puk.."d3Wn T&cjetArea 1w.4w'hb.b'.d; poakc 5wk ThL rnw i%iaeodidfar olunnirc nodinformOonal pwpe•--ol onovo.tnw, been F -wed for, orb, tLftWbleA-r)eok. z%loeirlrig or 5Lrvcvkv purvose} 7aca sr 1W "fie , ;j,Uod -d to KAraftg-4 doRderd.s,'id, Wl b, assesreJ (kirthe, v000 f4um sWei �d pop,rLV o—'&, ftwrl 4—*v 'N'r %PIP U40 49 r"rl A'VS mm.vt-" WO Map 5: Proposed Parkland Acquisition Target Areas, 38 4.3. Priorities As opportunities to acquire large park sites may be limited, the City should prioritize available opportunities to secure large sites and/or multiple adjacent properties and should consider acquisition partnership opportunities with the Central Point School District or other education and recreation providers. The City will need to take advantage of opportunities in strategic locations to better serve residents. The City should look to proactively acquire neighborhood and community park sites in newly incorporated areas, should the City's urban growth boundary and city limits expand in the future. Such acquisitions would help ensure the City can adequately provide parks in future neighborhoods. New parks should be developed with walking paths, play areas, shade trees, picnic areas and benches, spray -grounds or other water features, and other appropriate amenities as desired by the local community. For example, the City could consider adding half -court basketball courts, small skate park elements and other recreation features in the development of new or existing neighborhood parks to expand recreational opportunities. In general, Central Point residents believe parks and recreation are essential to the quality of life in the city. This value holds whether or not residents actually use available park and recreation services. Residents are also generally satisfied with the number of existing pelt and recreation opportunities and the condition of local parks. . S. Goals & Policies 5.1. Goals & Policies Taken together, the goals and policies provide a framework for the city-wide Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Plan Element. A goal is a general statement describing an outcome the City wishes to provide. Goals typically do not change over time unless community values shift. Policies are more specific, measurable statements that describe a means to achieving the stated goals. Policies may change over time. Recommendations are specific actions intended to implement and achieve the goals and objectives and are contained in other chapters of the Plan. The Parks Element supports those policies addressing Oregon Statewide Planning Goal 5: Open Spaces, Scenic and Historic Areas and Natural Resources, and Goal 8: Recreation Needs. The Parks Element also complies with Oregon Parks and Recreation Department's 2013-2017 Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP). 5.1.1. Community Engagement and Communication Goal 1: Encourage meaningful public involvement in park and recreation planning and inform residents through department communications. Page 31 of 37 39 Policies 1.1 Support the Parks and Recreation Commission (Commission)as the forum for public discussion of parks and recreation issues and conduct joint sessions as necessary between the Commission and City Council to improve coordination and discuss policy matters of mutual interest. 1.2 Involve residents and stakeholders in system -wide planning, park site facility design and recreation program development and continue to use a diverse set of communication and informational materials to solicit community input, facilitate project understanding and build public support. 1.3 Support volunteer park improvement and stewardship projects from a variety of individuals, service clubs, faith organizations and businesses to promote community involvement in parks and recreation facilities. 1.4 Continue to promote and distribute information about recreational activities, education programs, community services and events, and volunteer activities sponsored by the City and partner agencies and organizations. 1.5 Prepare and promote an updated park and trail facilities map for online and print distribution to highlight existing and proposed sites and routes. 1.6 Implement a comprehensive approach for wayf"sndiag and directional signage to, and identification and interpretive signage within, park and trail facilities. 3.7 Survey, review and publish local park and recreation prctcrences, needs and trends periodically to stay current with community recreation interests. 5.1.2. Recreation Programming Goal 2: Establish and maintain a varied and inclusive suite of recreation programs that accommodate a spectrum of ages, interests and abilities and promote the health and wellness of the community. Policies 2.1 Expand and enhance the diversity of programs offered, focusing on programs that are in high demand or serve a range of users. 2.2 Enable programming and services to meet the needs of diverse users, including at -risk communities or those with special needs. 2.3 Maintain and enhance program scholarships, fee waivers and other mechanisms to support recreation access for low-income program participants. 2.4 Continue to pursue development of a multi -use community center that provides additional space for recreation programs. 2.5 Pursue opportunities to develop an indoor aquatic facility and recreation center, potentially in partnership with other organizations or agencies. Consider financial feasibility and long term operations needs prior to design or construction of any new facility. 2.6 Implement and support special events, festivals, concerts and cultural programming to promote arts, health and wellness, community identity and tourism, and to foster civic pride. Page 32 of 37 40 2.7 Leverage city resources by forming and maintaining partnerships with public, non-profit and private recreation providers to deliver recreation services; coordinate with the school district for access to existing facilities (e.g. schools gymnasiums, tracks, fields) for community recreational use. 2.8 Explore partnership opportunities with regional healthcare providers and services, such as Providence, Asante and the Jackson County Health and Human Department, to promote wellness activities, healthy lifestyles and communications about local recreation facilities and the benefits of parks and recreation. 2.9 Periodically undertake a comprehensive evaluation of existing recreation program offerings in terms of persons served, customer satisfaction, cost/subsidy, cost recovery and availability of similar programs via other providers. 5.1.3. Parks & Open Space Goal 3: Acquire and develop a high-quality, diversified system of parks, recreation amenities and open spaces that provide equitable access to all residents. Policies 3.1 Provide a level of service standard of 3.5 acres per 1,400 residents of developed core parks (community, neighborhood and pocket). 3.2 Strive to provide equitable access to parks such that all city residents live within one-half mile of a developed neighborhood park. 3.3 Prioritize park acquisition and development in underserved areas where households are more than % - mile from a developed park. 3.4 Explore partnership with local utilities, public agencies and private landowners for casements for parkland, trail corridors and recreation facilities. 3.5 Pursue low-cost and/or non -purchase options to preserve open space, including the use of conservation easements and development agreements. 3.6 Continue to provide community gardens at suitable sites to provide opportunities for gardening, healthy eating and social connections. 3.7 Provide and maintain facilities for alternative or emerging sports, such as pickle -bait, disc golf, climbing and parkour, to offer residents a more diverse range of recreational experiences. 3.8 Coordinate with public agencies and private landowners for the protection of valuable natural areas and sensitive lands through the purchase of development rights, easements or title and make these lands available for passive recreation as appropriate. 3.9 Maintain and apply annually for Tree City USA status. 3,10 Manage vegetation in natural areas to support or maintain native plant species, habitat function and other ecological values; remove and control non-native or invasive plants as appropriate. Page 33 of 37 41 5.1.4. Trails & Pathways Goal 4: Develop a high-quality system of multi -use trails and bicycle and pedestrian corridors that connects to regional trails and provides access to public facilities, neighborhoods and businesses to promote exercise, walking and biking. Policies 4.1 Coordinate recreational path and trail system planning and development with the City's and Jackson County's Transportation System Plan to provide a comprehensive pedestrian and bicycle network. Coordinate with Medford's pathway plans for improved connectivity. Create an updated Pedestrian and Bike Trails Plan. 4.2 Facilitate and provide improved pedestrian and bicycle connectivity from major shared -use paths, such as the Bear Creek Greenway, to parks and other destinations. 4.3 Coordinate with the Planning Department and integrate the siting of proposed path and trail segments into the development review process; require development projects along designated route`; to be designed to incorporate path and trait segments as part of the project. 4.4 Expand the systmn of off-street trails by utiiizing grwmways, parks, utility corridors and critical areas as appropriate; purchase rights-of-way or easements as necessary. 4.5 Partner with local utilities, public agencies and private landowners to secure easements and access to open space for path and trail connections, 4.6 Tat plemcat trail, route and way finding signage For trails and associated facilities, informational maps and materials identifying existing and planned trail facilities. 4.7 Provide trailhead accommodations, as appropriate, to include parking, signage, rest rooms and other amenities. 5.1.5. Design, Development & Management Goal 5: Plan for a parks system that is efficient to maintain and operate, while protecting capital investment. Policies 5.1 Develop and maintain all parks and facilities in a manner that keeps them in safe and attractive condition. Repair or remove damaged components immediately upon identification. Maintain and update an inventory of assets including condition and expected useful life. 5.2 Establish and utilize design standards to provide continuity in furnishings (e.g., signage, trash cans, tables, benches, fencing) and construction materials to reduce inventory and maintenance costs and improve park appearance. 5.3 Update the comprehensive Parks and Recreation Parks Element periodically to ensure facilities and services meet current and future community needs. 5.4 Formulate illustrative master plans for the development or redevelopment of each City park, as appropriate, to take advantage of grant or other funding opportunities. Page 34 of 37 42 5.5 Design parks and facilities to offer universal accessibility For residents of all physical capabilities, skill levels and age, as appropriate. 5.6 Incorporate sustainable development and low impact design practices into the design, planning and rehabilitation of new and existing facilities. 5.7 Estimate the maintenance costs and staffing levels associated with the acquisition, development or renovation of parks or open spaces, and pursue adequate long-term maintenance, life -cycle replacement and operation funding. 5.8 Develop and maintain minimum design and development standards for park and recreation amenities within private developments to address community facility needs, equipment types, accessibility, and installation procedures. 5.9 Update this comprehensive Parks and Recreation Master Plan periodically to ensure facilities and services meet current and future community needs. 5.10 Promote professional development opportunities that strengthen the skills and engender greater commitment Eom staff, Commission members and key volunteers, to include trainings, materials and/or affiliation with the National Recreation & Park Association (NR.PA) and the Oregon Recreation & Parks Association (ORPA). 5.1.6. Facilities Development Plan: Goal 6: Develop and implement a comprehensive facilities plan in cooperation and coordination with surrounding cities/county and school district. Policies 6.1 Pursue and maintain effective partnerships with public, private and non-profit organizations to maintain parks and recreation facilities. 6.2 Formalize partnerships through inter -governmental agreements to meet mutual goals and objectives of all parties. 6.3 Coordinate program efforts with the School District for joint facility development and maintenance for parks, special event venues, athletic fields and other major facilities to increase availability of recreational opportunity to nearby residents.. 6.4 Collaborate with key stakeholders, land owners and other jurisdictions to identify appropriate and community -supported trail routes that improve park access and link parks, green space, recreation facilities and other community destinations. 6.5 Work in partnership with user groups and project proponents to identify and test new recreational facilities. 6.6 Encourage and pursue mutual cooperation and a "good neighbor" policy with residents and businesses located adjacent to park facilities, trails and natural open space areas. 6.7 Maintain a strong and active volunteer program with opportunities for citizens to become actively involved in programs to develop a sense of community pride. Page 35 of 37 43 6. Implementation Strategies The Parks Elemeut (Policy 3.1) establishes a minimum service standard of 3.5 acres of core parks per 1,000 residents. Due to size requirements for community parks, and areas of the city that are heavily developed, it will be difficult to locate new community parks within existing developed sections of the City. As annexations and/or new residential development occur within these urban reserve areas, the City should be prepared to purchase or negotiate for the protection of developable lands for recreational uses. Efforts to secure future parklands in these urban reserve areas may require developer incentives, such as density bonuses, to entice landowners into cooperating to set aside appropriately -sized areas for future use as parks. 6.1. Acquisition Guidelines As Central Point continues to grow, the park system will need to expand through the acquisition and development of new parkland to support the growing population. As opportunities to acquire large park sites may be limited, the City should prioritize available opportunities to secure large sites and/or multiple adjacent properties. The Parks Master Plan defines specific criteria for parkland acquisition that includes distribution equity, site suitability and site-specific concerns, such as environmentally sensitive areas or bazards 13. 6.2. Design and Development Guidelines The establishment of park design and development standards with predetermined requirements for consistency and quality of site amenities creates a unifying identity and enhance park maintenance efficiencies. Shared design standards and amenities, such as signage, helps unity the park system, but each park should retain its own unique character. The shape and size of the land, the layout of circulation and location of key features, the styles, types and colors of play equipment, and design of park structures should be park spec and highlight the character of the park in its local context. The Parks Master Plan provides minimum site design considerations for core parks, open space and natural areas, special use facilities and trails14. 6.3. Funding Options The goals and policies that guide the identification of proposed future projects for future park and recreation service delivery the City will require significant resources for successful implementation. Given that the operating and capital budget of the Department is limited, additional resources will be needed to leverage, supplement and support the implementation of proposed policies, programs and projects. The Parks Master Plan provides detailed list of acquisition tools and methods that include local funding options, grants, donations, bonds and partnerships". 13 Central Point Master Plan, pp 165, Appendix F: Site Acquisition & Development Standards. 14 Central Point Master Plan, pp 169, Appendix F: Site Acquisition & Development Standards. IS Central Point Master Plan, pp 153, Appendix E: Funding Options & Other Toots. Page 36 of 37 44 6.4. Project -Level Options Project -level options are discrete actions in support of individual parks, projects or programs. Actions at the project -level are most effective through coordination and partnerships that leverage resources to the benefit of the community. Project -level actions include acquisition of individual parcel(s) for park development, maintenance of park facilities, volunteer and community -basad activity, and monetary support through donations, grants or sponsorship. 6.5. System -Wide Options Although a variety of approaches exist to support individual projects or programs, the broader assessment of community needs suggests that additional, dedicated system -wide funding may be required to finance upgrades to and growth in the parks system.. The inventory and assessment of the park system identified a backlog of deferred maintenance and ADA enhancements that must be addressed to ensure the provision of a safe, secure and accessible park system. 6.6. Enhancing Communications & Outreach Many of the Parks Element recommendations will require the continued execution of effective communications and outreach. Promoting the City's park, recreation and trail system will require broader marketing and outreach that entails a combination of better signage, more public news coverage, enhanced wayflnding, enhanced user maps and information, expanded use of engaging social media, and intuitive website/online resources. 6.7. Capital Improvement Planning The Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) lists all park and facility projects considered for the next 20 years. The majority of these projects entail the development of parks and facilities, renovating or repairing existing park amenities and improving ADA access to amenities. Based on survey results and other feedback, Central Point residents have indicated an interest in park upgrades and trails as near-term priorities, and the proposed CIP is reflective of that desire. Page 37 of 37 45 Community Park 3.72 acres Cedar, Bush & RostelI Strccts DESIGN OPPORTUNITIES Consider allocating specific sport field areas to allow for the incorporation of a perimeter wallcing trail including areas with shade trees with picnic tables. 46 Community Park AMENrrUS Sports fields (grass) Playground (totlot) Fencing 25 Dora ]ones Park 8.66 acres Hamrick Road Community Park AMENITIES DESIGN OPPORTUNITIES Veterans Memorial Plaza Minor considerations should be given to meeting ADA Parking compliance consistently. Restrooms Sign at handicapped parking near Veterans Memorial is missing. Playground Mutt mitt disperser is not reachable and located Spray Park off paved path. Picnic Shelters (3) Picnic table spacing inside shelters does not allow Tennis courts for wheel chair access. Basketball court Picnic tables (12) Benches MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS Drinking fountain 0 One piece of play equipment is missing its parts. Perimeter paved trail 0 Van -accessible ADA parking signs would be beneficial. Lighting (parking, courts, trail) I Exterior sign for women's restroom is missing its sign. BBQ grills 0 Medallions are missing in a number of the pavers in the Trees Veterans Memorial. Planting beds I At least two (2) or one half of picnic tables should be Open grass lawn ADA compliant. Stormwater basin 26 47 Robert Pfaff Park 1.52 acres M a=nts street AMENITIES Playgrounf (2) Picnic she ter Parking � Restrnams Twnis court ■ Basketball court Playgrounf (2) Picnic she ter Community Park DESIGN OPPORTUNTI'IF.S ■ Add playground ramp for ADA access. Add detectible warning strips wherever trails meet vehicular areas. Handicapped parking signs should be mounted higher to meet ADA compliance. Mutt mitt dispensers should be positioned to allow lower reach and paved trail access. Provide several ADA compliant picnic tables with ADA access (firm & stable surface). 48 27 Picnic tables (5) Benches (4) Drinking fountain BBQ grills (3) Bandshell Kiosk Mutt mitt dispenser Trees Open grass lawn Community Park DESIGN OPPORTUNTI'IF.S ■ Add playground ramp for ADA access. Add detectible warning strips wherever trails meet vehicular areas. Handicapped parking signs should be mounted higher to meet ADA compliance. Mutt mitt dispensers should be positioned to allow lower reach and paved trail access. Provide several ADA compliant picnic tables with ADA access (firm & stable surface). 48 27 Twin Creeks Park 3.21 acres Twin Creek Crossings Loop Community Park DESIGN OPPORTUNITIES AMENITIES Link the primary amenities (connect shelters to the paved Parking (50 spaces) path system for better access and ADA compliance, since Picnic shelters (4) only one shelter has an accessible paved path) � Benches (3) (one in each small shelter) Picnic tables (6) MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS Elk statue (public art) Add handicapped signs for parking to meet ADA Planting beds requirements. Trees Switch out half the picnic tables with tables that provide Open grass lawn wheelchair spaces to meet ADA compliance. Perimeter sidewalk Replace dead and dying (young) trees in park. Mid -park path with bollard lighting 2$ 49 Flanagan Park 5.46 acres Neighborhood Park Tiffany Avenue AMENITIES DESIGN OPPORTUNITIES Playground Add detectible warning strips at end of trails Restroom intersecting with traffic areas. Tennis court Provide an ADA compliant picnic table. Picnic tables Benches (5) Drinking fountain MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS Walking trails 0 Tennis court needs resurfacing and fence repairs. Creek with natural area 0 Playground surfacing (existing pea gravel) should be Bridge removed and replaced with approved safety materials Mutt mitt dispensers (2) such as engineered wood chips. Trees Open grass lawns 29 50 Forest Glen Park 1.96 a" Gatepark Drive DESIGN OPPORTUNITIES Consider how adjacent open space (stormwater basin) could be integrated into park design. Existing playground is surfaced with pea gravel and does not comply with fall safety or ADA standards. Playground needs ADA ramp for access. MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS Plantings along riparian corridor could benefit from restoration efforts once control of invasive species is successful. Switch out one of the picnic tables with an ADA table that provides a wheelchair seating space. 51 Neighborhood Park AMENITIES Playground Swing set Restroom Drinking fountain Basketball court Memorial bench Picnic tables (2) Mutt mitt dispenser Trees Creek with natural area Bridge Stormwater basin (fenced) 011 Griffin Oak Park 0.80 acres Neighborhood Park Between Haskell & Silver Creek, south of Blue Moon Dr. DESIGN OPPORTUNITIES AMENITIES M Add detectible warning strips where paved path meets Playground road. Swing set 0 Add playground ramp for ADA compliance. Paved paths Provide an ADA compliant picnic table. Picnic table Benches (2) Trees Grass lawn Planting beds 31 52 Menteer Park 0.46 Rosewood Lane at Brandon Street AMENITIES ■ Paved path ■ Bollard lighting ■ Ornamental fish pond with waterfall ■ Picnic shelter ■ BBQ grill ■ Benches (2) ■ Horseshoe pits ■ Picnic tables (2) ■ Trees ■ Grass latm ■ Drinking fountain ■ Mutt mitt dispenser ■ Park sign with plantings Neighborhood Parr DESIGN OPPORTUNITIES ■ Provide at least one ADA compliant picnic table. MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS ■ Asphalt path beginning to deteriorate from root heaving, and cracking in some locations. 53 32 Van Horn Park 1� A^ 2.09 Adft NeighborhoW Park Freeman Road DESIGN OPPORTUNITIES AMENITIES Connect the two playgrounds with a paved path- Parking (9 stalls) Add more shade trees between playgrounds and near back Restrooms entrance area. Picnic shelter Add at least two (2) ADA -compliant picnic tables. Picnic tables Add detectible warning strip where back entrance trail Playgrounds (2) intersects with road � Tennis court Drinking fountain Basketball court MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS Benches (3) Tennis court needs resurfacing to be playable. Trees Basketball court will need resurfacing soon, Open grass lawn Re -mount handicapped parking sign to meet ADA compliance. 33 54 Willie Matt Park 3.27 acres (wmWkxhi&q ddmdmp=* Jeremy Street AMENITIES DESIGN OPPORTUNITIES Neighborhood Park ■ Picnic shelter ■ Add playground ramp for ADA accessibility. ■ Playground ■ Detectible warning strips should be added where trails ■ Swing set intersect with traffic ways. ■ Parking (6 stalls plus 8 on -street ■ On -street handicapped parking spot does not allow spots) for a designated (safe) accessway from vehicle to curb ■ Restrooms ramp. Consider relocating H/C space to parking stall, ■ Drinking fountain reallocating spaces and adding an accessible curb cut. ■ Mutt mitt dispenser ■ Add at least one ADA -compliant picnic table. ■ Natural basin (fenced) ■ Benches MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS ■ Picnic table ■ Trees ■ Natural wet basin provides habitat for waterfowl that ■ Planting beds dries up before hatchings can fly. Consider feasibility ■ Grass lawn for design or management changes that facilitate more reliable habitat value. 34 55 Cascade Meadows Park 0.23 W S. Haskell Street Pocket Park DESIGN OPPORTUNITIES AMENITIES M Replace play equipment with manufacturer that Picnic shelter supports its parts. Swing set Add park ID sign. Playground (missing equipment Provide at least one (1) ADA compliant picnic table — closed) (with wheelchair space). � Picnic table Add ramp into swing set area for ADA access Drinking fountain compliance. � Trees Planting beds Grass lawn 35 56 Glengrove Wayside Park 0.25 om Pocket Park Glengrove Avenue AMENITIES DESIGN OPPORTUNITIES Paved path ■ Consider streambank naturalization plantings combined Picnic shelter with limbing-up existing Lawson cypress hedge to allow Trees partial views of the creek bank. Elk Creek Bench Grass lawn 36 57 Civic Fields 2.09 pis Special Facility Silver Creek Road & Twin Creeks Loop DESIGN OPPORTUNITIES AMENITIES Areas north and south of sports courts c0111d provide Soccer fields (natural grass) additional amenities such as picnic tables, shade trees and Sand volleyball courts (2) playground. Basketball courts (2) Add detectible warning strips wherever paths meet Parking vehicular traffic/parking areas. Picnic tables (2) Drinking fountain MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS Perimeter sidewalk and paved path Parking provision is inadequate for existing fields. SWM basin Switch out one picnic tables to provide ADA Trees and plantings along south compliance. path Port -a -potties (2) Mutt mitt dispenser Lighting along south path 58 Joel Tanzi Skate Park 3.72 acres S.4th Street AMENITIES ■ Parking (5 paved spaces) ■ Street style skate/bike amenities ■ Paved perimeter path ■ Restrooms ■ Drinking fountain ■ Tree ■ Planting beds ■ Grass lawn Special Facility DESIGN OPPORTUNITIES IS Consider how/if the skate park's perimeter path could connect to Community Park and a potential perimeter path with picnicking facilities. 59 APPENDIX B: PARKS & RECREATION SURVEY 60 CONSERVATION �It611Q0Y To: Jennifer Boardman, Recreation Manager From: Steve Duh, Conservation Technix, Inc. Date: June 30, 2016 Re: City of Central Point Parks Master Plan Community Survey Summary Results Methodology Conservation Technix is pleased to present the results of the survey of the general population of Central Point assessing residents' recreational needs, preferences and priorities. In close collaboration with staff and Parks Commissioners, Conservation Technix developed the 19 -question survey that was estimated to take approximately five minutes to complete. A total of 380 completed surveys were recorded_ The survey was mailed to a random sample of 2,000 households in Central Point on April 26, 2016. An online version of the survey was posted to the Central Point's website on the same day. Reminder postcards were mailed to the 2,000 households on May 6'". Information about the survey was provided in the RECreate guide, on the City's website home page and on the Park and Recreation Department's subpage. Program users, stakeholders and civic groups were noti fled about the survey via email. The survey was also promoted during a public open house meeting held on May 10, 2016 that serviced as the first public meeting for the update to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. The survey was closed on May 27, 2016, and preliminary data were compiled and reviewed. In all, 278 responses were completed from the print version mail survey, and 102 responses were generated via the online link published on the City's website. This report includes findings on general community opinions. Since the survey was open to the general public and respondents were not selected solely through statistical sampling methods, the results are not necessarily representative of all Central Point residents. Percentages in the report may not add up to 100% due to rounding. 61 II. DEMOGRAPHICS The following table compares Central Point's demographics, based on the 2014 American Community Survey, to the respondents to the Central Point Parks and Recreation Survey. The survey did not accommodate a controlled collection protocol, and response quotas by age or gender were not included. Of the 380 residents who completed the survey, 44% were over 65 years old, 33% were between 45 and 65, 229/6 were between 20 and 45, and less than I% were tender 20 years old. The majority of respondents were female (65°/0). Most (70%) have no children at home while the remainder had a single child (90/6), two children (11%), or three or more chddren(9%). In general, survey respondents were significantly more likely to be older adults and female as. compared to Central Point's population in general. Female Male Younger than 20 20 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 and odder No children 1 ddid 2 Children 3 or more children East of 1-5 Between Hwy 99 i 1-5 West of Hwy 99 Don't Ike In Central Pant 52% 48% +W 28AN 18.1% 13.7% 11.0% 10.8% 17.9% Children hinder 18 In Household 67,2% 32.8% (all households with children under 18 combined) Residency 4000on nja n/a n/a 62 64.996 35.176 'N.' 0.6% 9.5% 12.9% 18.4% 14.9% 43.7% 70.1% 9.2% 11.2% 9.5% 18.3% 44.2% 36.3% 1.2% III. KEY FINDINGS & AWARENESS AND PERCEPTIONS i. Community Value of Parks and Recreation Seven in ten residents feel that parks and recreation opportunities are essential to the quality of life in Central Point. An additional 22% believe that they are important to quality of life, but not really necessary. Fewer than 5% believe parks and recreation are "a luxury that we don't need". Female respondents were significantly more likely to Feel that parks and recreation are essential to quality of life (78% for female to 63% for male respondents). When you think about the things that contribute to the quality of life in Central Point, would you say that public parks and recreation opportunities are.., (QZ) Response options Response Percent Essential to the quality of life here 70.8% 93`6 Important, but not really necessary 22.2% More of a luxury that we don't need 4.7% Don't know 2.2% Similarly, the majority of respondents (85°/0) feel that Central Point's parks and recreation services are important to the community's quality of life, regardless of their use of the services. Younger residents were more likely to feel that "members of my household use parks and reereation programs on a regular basis, and I believe that these facilities are important to quality of life." For example, 73% of respondents under the age of 34 agreed with this statement, compared to 21 % of residents over 65. Which one of the following statements comas closest to the way you feel about parks in your community? (Q3) Response options Response Percent Members of my household use parks on a regular basis, and I believe that these 38.4% facilities are important to quality of life. 85,A96 Although members of my household do not use parks frequently, I believe that 47.0% they are important to quality of life. Parks do not currently play an important role in my life or the life of my 14.9% immediate family members. ii. Satisfaction with Parks and Recreation More than three-quarters (77.6%) of respondents indicated that they are very or somewhat satisfied with the overall value they receive from parks and recreation in Central Point. Less than 8% of respondents are very or somewhat dissatisfied. Approximately one in seven respondents answered "Don't know", which is similar to the percentage of respondents who stated that parks do know currently play a role in their or their family's life (reeQrrestion 3 above). 63 Please rate your satisfaction with the overall value your household receives Central Point Parks & Recreation. (01.5) Satisfaction rating Response Percent Very Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied 44.0°% 33.6% Somewhat ❑issatisfled 5.7% Very Dissatisfied 1.9% Dont Know 14.9% iii. Information Sources Cityreaidents obtain information about park and recreation facilities and programs from a variety of sources. The City's recreation guide, RECreate, is a popular source of information and used by nearly 80% of survey respondents. Family and friends, social media and community event signs are sources of information for approximately one-third of respondents. Though not explicitly mentioned in the survey, a number of respondents wrote in the "city's water bill" or "utility bill" as a source of information. Notably, RECreate, the City's website and event signs are popular sources of information for residents of all ages. Other sources ofinformation are less popular, but may still provide information to certain segments of the population. For example, social media, the internet, and friends and neighbors are more popular sources with younger residents — though residents of all ages gain information from these sources. Newspapers ate used most by older respondents, including 42% of those between 55 and 64 years of age and 35% of those over 65. Response options Response Perrent RECreate, the Cit)/5 recreation guide 79.1% From family, friends and neighbors 37.2% Social media 36.1% Community event signs 35.8% Newspaper 28.5% city website 24.7% Internet/Search Engine 11.9% Flyers at City facilities 11.1% School fliers/newsletters 9.3% Other 8.7% Conversations with City staff 7.6% None 4.1% 64 B. PUBLIC USE OF PARK & RECREATION FACILITIES The City asked residents a number of questions about respondents use of parks and recreational facilities in Central Point. i. Frequency of Park Use Respondents were asked how often they, or members of their household, visited parks or recreation facilities over the past year. Over half (57.7%) of respondents replied that they, or member of their household, visited a park or recreation facility at least once per month in the past year. More than one in five visited at least once a week (23%). However, 16% of respondents did not visit a park or facility at all. Younger respondents were more likely to visit parks frequently - 91% of respondents between 20 and 34 years old visit at least once a month, as compared to 41% of respondents over the age of 65. Residents of neighborhoods west of Highway 99 were more likely to be frequent park visitors than residents of other areas: 31% visit a park at least once a week, compared to 24% of residents east of 1-5 and 18% of residents between Highway 99 and 1-5. Approximately 21% of residents of neighborhoods between Highway 99 and 1-5 did not visit a public park in the past year. How many times over the past year have you or members of your household visited a public park or recreation facility in Central Point? (Q6) 3096 25% 11.65% i 20% - MISS , 15% t I 10% 5% 0% At least oncea Two or three week times a month 24..66% 35.57 % About once Two or three Did not vlslta month times overthe public park year ii. Park & Recreation Facility Use 1.91% don't Know The City asked residents which parks and recreation facilities they, or members of their household, have visited. All City parks and recreation facilities were visited by at least 9% of respondents. The 65 most popular parks were Twin Creeks Park (70% of respondents) and Robert Pfaff Park (63%). The Bear Creek Greenway is also popular with residents — 45% of respondents have used the Greenway. Cascade Meadows and Glengrove Wayside Parks were visited by Iess than 10% of respondents, the lowest rate for City parks. Generally, respondents who live near parks are most likely to report using them. However, some park and recreation facilities — Community Park, Robert Pfaff Park, the Bear Creek Greenway, and the Central Point Senior Center — attract visitors from across the city. As might be expected, residents over the age of 65 were more likely to have visited the Central Point Senior Center than younger residents. Please indicate if YOU or any member of your HOUSEHOLD has used any of the following parks and recreation facilities listed below. (Q7) Twin Creeks Park RobertPfaff Park Bear Creek Greenwa y Community Park Van Horn Park Forest Glen Park Central Pant Senior Center Flanagan Park Griffin Oak Park Civic Fields William Matt Park Joel Tanzi Skate Park MenteerPark Cascade Meadows Park Glengrove W ayside Park C. FACILITY PRIORITIES i. Rating of Park Condition 0% 0% 10% 20% 90% 40% 50% 60% 70% Percent who have visited in the past year ("Yes") I 800/8 Survey respondents were asked to rate the general condition of parks and recreation facilities that they had visited. Residents were most critical of the condition of the Bear Creek Greenway (35% rated the condition as either "fair" or "poor' and Cascade Meadows Park (30% rated the condition as either "fair" or "poor"). However, a large majority of residents (at least 75%) rated the condition as of all other City parks and recreation facilities as either "excellent" or "good". 66 For those you marked with a YES on the previous page (carried forward below), please indicate how you would rate the condition of the park or recreation facility. (Q8) ii. Need for additional park and recreation opportunities A slight majority of residents (54.4%) feel there are "about the tight number" of park and recreation opportunities in Central Point. Approximately 21% believe there are not enough opportunities, while 13% believe there are more than enough. Approximately one-quarter of respondents who live west of I-5 feel there are not enough parks and recreation opportunities (22% for those between Hwy 99 and I-5, and 23.4% for those west of Hwy 99). When it comes to meeting the needs of the community, would you say there are... (Q4) Response options Excellent Good Fair Poor Total Responses Twin Creeks Park 70.9% 27.3% 1.8% 0.0.0 220 William Mott Park 55.2% 37.9% 6.9% 0.0% 29 Van Horn Park 44.3% 47.1% 8.6% 0.0% 70 Menteer Park 39.1% 56.5% 4.4% 0.0% 23 Griffin Oak Park 43.2% 43.2•% 13.5% 0.0% 37 Civic Fields 28.1% 71.9% 0.0% 0.096 32 Forest Glen Park 36.5% 53.9% 9.6% 0.0% 52 Community Park 40.5% 50.0% 4.1% S.4% 74 Robert Pfaff Park 35.6% 52.6% 10.3% 1.6% 194 Flanagan Park 25.6% 67.4% 7.0% 0.0% 43 Joel Tanzi Skate Park 39.3% 39.3% 214% 0.0% 28 Glengrove Wayside Park 30.0% 55.0% 15.0% 0.0% 20 Central Point Senior Center 35.9% 49.1% 9.4% 5.7% 53 Cascade Meadows Park 25.0% 45.0•% 15.0% 15.0% 20 Bear Creek Greenway 15.7% 49.6% 26.1% 8.7% 115 ii. Need for additional park and recreation opportunities A slight majority of residents (54.4%) feel there are "about the tight number" of park and recreation opportunities in Central Point. Approximately 21% believe there are not enough opportunities, while 13% believe there are more than enough. Approximately one-quarter of respondents who live west of I-5 feel there are not enough parks and recreation opportunities (22% for those between Hwy 99 and I-5, and 23.4% for those west of Hwy 99). When it comes to meeting the needs of the community, would you say there are... (Q4) Response options Response Percent More than enough parks and recreation opportunities in the City of Central Point 13.5% About the right number 54.4% Not enough parks and recreation opportunities in the City of Central Point 21.4% Don't know 10.7% 67 iii. Park and Facility Improvement Priorities Survey respondents were presented with a list of potential improvements to Central Point's parks and recreation system, including upgrades to existing facilities and development of new facilities. Over half of respondents were very or somewhat supportive of nearly all improvements listed. More than three-quarters of respondents supported upgrading existing and developing new walking and biking trails, upgrading existing neighborhood parks, and upgrading picnic shelters and playgrounds. Between 50% and 74% respondents supported a variety of other park improvements including developing a swimming pool, off -leash park, indoor recreation space, and additional parks and sports fields, as well as upgrading the Bear Creek Greenway, community gardens, and existing sports fields and courts. Of the responses to this question, fewer supported development of a disc golf course (48%) and improving Joe Tanzi Skate Park (38%). In general, younger residents— particularly those between 35 and 44 years of age _ were more than twice as likely to support park and recreadon improvements than residents over 55. Women were more likely than men to be very supportive of upgrades to Joe Tanzi Skatepark (17% to 8%) and picnic shelters and playgrounds (49% to 28%) as well as the development of additional indoor recreation space (38% to 21%) and a swimming pool (48% to 29%). The Fallowing are major actions that the City of Central Point could take to UPGRADE and DEVELOP parks and recreation Facilities. Please indicate whether you would be very supportive, sornewhat supportive, not sure, or not supportive of each action by checking the box next to the action. (CLIO) Upgrade walking and biking trails Develop additional walking and biking trails Upgrade existing neighborhood parks Upgrade picnic shelters and playgrounds Develop a swimming pool Upgrade the Bear Creek Greenway Develop an off -leash dog park Upgrade community gardens Develop additional indoor recreation space/gymnasiums Develop additional large and small parks Develop additional sport Fields Upgrade tennis and basketball courts Upgrade City soccer fields Develop a disc golf course Upgrade Joe rami Skate Park 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% ■ Very Supportive ■ Somewhat Supportive Y Not Supportive ■ Don't Know 68 iv. Willingness to pay to support park improvements The City asked residents about their willingness to pay additional fees or taxes to support the improvement and development of parks, trails and recreation facilities. The majority of residents (65%) were willing to pay at least $4 per month to fund improved recreational opportunities. One in five respondents were willing to pay at least $10 per month. Sixteen of 278 respondents to the mail survey (71/6) wrote in that they were not willing to pay any additional fees or taxes — these responses were included in the "Less than $4" category. Female respondents were more likely to support additional taxes or fees to fund improvements to the park and recreation system. Nearly one-quarter of women (23.89/6) were willing to pay $10 or more per month, compared to 13.8N of men; while 31.4% of womcn were willing to pay less than $4 per month, compared to 43% of men. Approximately 45% of respondents over 55 would prefer to spend less than $4 per month to fund park and recreation improvements. This represents a higher percentage of respondents than in younger agegroups. Costs to improve and develop parks, trails and recreation facilities (including a pool facility) may need to be paid through additionar fees paid by partiriparits and taxes paid by the r;.otllmitnity. Knowing tizat, what is tate maximum amount of additional money you would be willing to payto develop and operate the types of parks, trails and recreation facilities that are most important to your household? (412) !k to #7; L 7% 69 ■$12to$15 •$10to$11 • $B to $9 %to$7 IOU to $5 Lass than $4 Page 10 City of Central Point Parks and Recreation Survey 2016 D. RECREATION PROGRAM PRIORITIES i. Quality of Recreational Programs Survey respondents generally feel that Central Point's recreational programs and activities are of excellent (45%) or good (27%) quality. Only 2% of respondents feel that programs they, or member of their household, have participated in are of poor quality. How would you rate the overall quality of the programs and activities that you and members of your household have participated in? (Q11) Poor, 3% ii. Participation in Recreational Programs Special events had the broadest appeal with a majority (531/6) of respondents having pirticipated during the past year. Residents between the ages of 35 and 44 were more likely to have used youth and teen programs, likely with their children. Adults over the age of 55 are the primary users of programs for adults 55 and over, such as classes, trips, and drop-in activities. Please indicate all of the Central Point Parks and Recreation programs and activities that you or members of your household have participated in during the past year. (Q9a) Percent 1%) who have parddpated in listed recreational program 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% SMA 609A Special events, such as concerts, festivals, movies & community fun runs Youth sports programs a rid camps, such as tennis, basketball, soccer and dance Educational classes, such as technology, natural history, safety & health ia,l Arts programs, such as music, dance, arts &crafts1z,1% Programs for adults 55 and over, such as classes, trips, and i drop -In activities � 9.81/6 Adult sports and fitness classes, such as pickleball and yoga VL" Teen activities7 Uzi KldVenture preschool �alg 70 2L81% Page 11 City of Central Paint Parks and Recreation Survey 2016 iii. Recreational Opportunities Respondents were asked whether existing recreational programs and activities were adequate. Very few respondents (less than 29/4) felt the City should reduce offerings of any of its recreational programs. Remaining respondents were relatively evenly split on whether they thought the City provided adequate offerings for each type of program, or whether more are needed. (Note: Many respondents ansnemd PartA of this question, wbkb asked aboutparticipation, u+ithout answering Part B. Ar such, the total percentages for Part B do not add to 100%.) For each activity, please mark whether you think there should be more of this type of activity available, whether the current program offerings are adequate, or whether there should be less of this activity available. (Q9b) Special events, such as concerts, festivals, movies & community fun runs Educational classes, such as technology, natural history, safety & health Arts programs, such as music, dance, arts & crafts Adult sports and fitness classes, such as pickleball and yoga Youth sports programs and camps, such as tennis, basketball, soccer and dance Teen activlties Programs for adults 55 and over, such as classes, trips, and drop -In activities KidVenture preschool 0.0•1A 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% ■ More Offerings are Needed %Current Offerings are Adequate ■ Fewer Offerings are Needed I 71 Mare Offerings Current Offerings Fewer Offerings are Needed are Adequate are Needed Special events, such as concerts, festivals, movies &community fun runs 25.5% 23.9% 0.9% Youth sports programs and camps, such as tennis, basketball, soccer and dance 15.6% 20.4% 1.3% Educational classes, such as technology, natural history, safety & health 18.2% 17.6% 1.0% Arts programs, such as music, dance, arts & crafts 17.6% 19.2% 0.7% Programs for adults 55 and aver, such as classes, trips, and drop-in activities 15.4% 20.3% L6% Adult sports and fitness classes, such as piddeball and yoga 16.2% 18.1% 1.391. Teen activities 15.6% 16.9% LO% KidVenture preschool 8.9% 19.6% 1.7% Special events, such as concerts, festivals, movies & community fun runs Educational classes, such as technology, natural history, safety & health Arts programs, such as music, dance, arts & crafts Adult sports and fitness classes, such as pickleball and yoga Youth sports programs and camps, such as tennis, basketball, soccer and dance Teen activlties Programs for adults 55 and over, such as classes, trips, and drop -In activities KidVenture preschool 0.0•1A 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% ■ More Offerings are Needed %Current Offerings are Adequate ■ Fewer Offerings are Needed I 71 a City of Central Point Parlor and Recreation Survey 2016 iv. Special Events Citywide yard sales are incredibly popular with residents of all ages, including 100% of respondents between the ages of 20 and 34. From the following list, please check ALL the Central Point sponsored special events you and members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months. (Q13) City Wide Yard Sales Community Christmas Lights Parade Munch - N - Movies (Formerly Friday Night Festival) Memorial Day Commemoration Easter Eggstravagama Veterans Day Commemoration 2nd Saturday Markets at Pfaff Park Run 4 Freedom Bike Safety Fair Page 12 0% 10% ZO% "% 40% SO% 60% 10% 80% 90% v. volunteerism The survey asked about respondents' volunteer activities. Two-thirds of respondents (67.41/6) have not volunteered in the community. Just under one-fourth (23.69/6) have volunteered with a community organization or group, such as schools, faith organizations and neighborhood groups. Approximately 9% have volunteered with Central Point Parks and Recreation Department. 72 City of Central Point Parks and Recreation Survey 2016 A copy of the survey instrument follows. 73 Page 13 Page 14 City of Central Point Parks and Recreation Survey 2016 A Central Point Parks & Recreation POINT Community aui vsiy 1Dh Pa(ki & Aecreattibo Pi�ferences ArrtNaWPOW e.Iton S"A111wt4r- the ry of CiwVr4 ►own ' , rrrtduco%- it *ad tart." of ON—W tgr l w*m ro vr"W in �4" Ora v)H.; 01 1 00 IV++•n ►Irw Pae A&* PFth+thRt WAK ■ µ,m an-I&Wd iw. pnrpryrtA OW# ewNtr.. 0 0 -0 M+/- •tr,e.., I,ait� -A fn:eaelMp-r--%r..t r11-1ArAr`AA owGt# In. Pir.".t144th $Why W%l1r "Jr*W +parr+kC VKWei Ick fl1- clt f . Pat, , out Ia2rP-jopw far:lllk-, Ax *. Pk M S 10 ir+r, F*14 row,.w ut IJ M? PI.M to 44NOy P.4rp'ad IW ir+6rr01011. afar rMOdpddom b OW br 00 of tris /roto The v& v" cwn.,I.44 17 q,.e,lmmn teopoft um rent rte tat bclt+ae. prt4"tdaC�� Wt far hAswVWQV. Twft It tAm%on mutat, ab*W 54 r►R1att, b vwr* -W aad rostift% atANapsaf Maytrwip" flt�tY Nit M rtw�ijli� /, when you bgnl1 abw A ate tlgnat eonlrilaute to Me gewtllty of W fn cent".( MK Oda po in+ t%m pLAak putts arrd feerMtl4n appo"um t&n art fchwct, oft apdam U Cw-"wVrqurnrJu7-We U kroonarK. tLK root fealty ""[weary O: Akre tat a W-ury uvt +re darl't ntad d DoPt fflfol. 1 Whkh otw of the foiMwbq threw statenvots corrxs chews(to the vray you Bret d"'OMW attar rearartfon In control F4& L Q wrmbers of w Wr4trf6d twr part,, and reurarrH, pm a , alts modw 61*r "At bAmdutw fly we kgp&tapd to g6w;ty of W - Q ushm h r Mban► oa ww horrMaald do nm4 taw ptrrlser AtiMtl"t ti*wftA I omftti w1 "Fan wvwtrrt w "&my Of IUt, O Pal to axaf rr.t%m p"W a-ne do no -(a lIM9 4 Iw a4 ioloaba roU 4 ON we w w we 0 ratrlawrtlP WMk Ieeinben. P.. WVM It 0 Mi it ffliitm� ar+trr.wtecy. . ,r, xAd yev Uy VW* Me— Q +►he ttwt rase r py11s awd repFMf<x1 Dpppltwwft, in cvwol 1pfrrt E) AbM w rWK MNT r 9 " + v+rla RW WJ a twn ostoortwrtks In C*Wo Id pvtn f, Flute ft" "W + vPt wwr'de ewrar> TAWD VOW lieeuldtoid i is it m. 6 pn 4"twl 1111ate part"( 01 Il.ey..uett. oSett "Im *re~ D swfiewl.f aw*"Fl►a o V44V ftsbww Q wtommi 3, Now "nrnrs over the past year hwt► y" or 1Mut6/Ps M year 1 - M I*Md a MAft M* 4r relaMeWo foci ity in ["throw Paint? 0 AtW"rnwawm* 0 *m tx tlwr Unca a marsh E3 Abax me a month 0 Sm or the« wen ow Uw year 0 Cid not vkft a VjMk park O Don't WAW 74 V Page 15 City of Central Point Parks and Recreation Survey 2016 1. Pkv Indcota all or the Central !bent Parks and R*sroaitlon prosramx and rctrvittes U+at Twe ar NMMnbwri. a1 your houmhoid haw pwtk*eted to dorm; etre post year Far each act4vlty, pfeese -&* "Ow~ you Wr* Owry should 6& mors of ebbs typo a1 *,MAty avxl&WE a. wtwU wr the current program after r. we adequ4e, Arwti/tfrr UMM stwutd be Nss of this actMW asa4le 69 �+•+1'�►+ntnwNn j Mr►w 1A•..L wr+MwM F. rr.r ,.... _ ....� ❑ D V p 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ i d a r•► D ❑ O Fjrr/Wow% ft VF rlsbwMk.-. •a. _—M. ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Nr 13 13 0 G ttaaa�lltit 0 ❑ ❑ Lt0 Li CI 14thc 75 sow a Mampi 7afr+ thh tu+wtr Onp" at tho Otys W"$"*- htlp Lj!m-%O •nn wnrwApi. y.nr W %r.•6+ t to wf r� M:-rmr�sro w'+.Yh.{w pr.7rprr rbMA V" in uenLr•er 4f fTrMr�AM� 1 P%4*o indltaW it YOU or any member or y o Htll16UKU has used OW elrtti . re[re4tkn 1/Cfl U4 fisted below. It YES, Oew r kdChbe how you vM" awr dw COn& tin Bt the Park a 1wCSM fllta OMOM M.rr.rwa.ar. alr�faWr�dl�rtet�awaMrwd e..nt ,.rr Ma aceta... &D r., Lawle" ■ad r�...h. tirs�. •.. ❑ ❑ 13M rrr ❑ ❑ 0 13Q C..-r-.�, •N 13 13tt.�.l.r ❑ ❑ �] D 13 •rry/ •M ❑ ❑V wrr.■+�.�+.. ❑ ❑ D ��..�..., n n v ❑ ❑ O U❑ w.. *.. 0 (03 t...t rrea.t ❑ El❑ .. ... ._ ...�... ❑ ❑ 13 0 03....w n n ❑ n ❑ ❑ ..�..... D ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ w.w-.4. .• ❑ r; ❑ u u a ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 1. Pkv Indcota all or the Central !bent Parks and R*sroaitlon prosramx and rctrvittes U+at Twe ar NMMnbwri. a1 your houmhoid haw pwtk*eted to dorm; etre post year Far each act4vlty, pfeese -&* "Ow~ you Wr* Owry should 6& mors of ebbs typo a1 *,MAty avxl&WE a. wtwU wr the current program after r. we adequ4e, Arwti/tfrr UMM stwutd be Nss of this actMW asa4le 69 �+•+1'�►+ntnwNn j Mr►w 1A•..L wr+MwM F. rr.r ,.... _ ....� ❑ D V p 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ i d a r•► D ❑ O Fjrr/Wow% ft VF rlsbwMk.-. •a. _—M. ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Nr 13 13 0 G ttaaa�lltit 0 ❑ ❑ Lt0 Li CI 14thc 75 City of Centra! Point Page 16 Parks and Recreation Survey 2016 CENTFLAL *. The tolivwing we,& mr4ta..c6wu that tAr City of (4mi d Point could taiw ev L*CAADf anal VC010P pwrks ,rnd r.tirodtlon fjKMOrs PPaamt kt wAc wtwO er woo woaid b. very %opv►tim s* wnitrt •tep"Mie v. nor Qv, dr root umppony v of w4M action by Cire►km Ow bex nwxt to Cho action tlrr taw M a�W7yM. t�R MYaw�r o ❑ [] a.a..ata..+.... 0 i7 a ar..a,.+•.•Ma�.ar Q 1d rr/►.F r•ww N r a r �•,,.rw,t„t.�,..Mr„f••.. r q p �'YMM wrwV� �M� ax..a..rrxwme...l 1. How woutd you low the awfatl guanty of the praptaltts and oed0r fw that *mmj11M11wM IV *w hotwfwid ha"w wtKnNited irrt Q Fair S ► D PMw 19 GMb to htlps m and dowtup pills. bath and rrtitwtiwn MCINtaoim [if,chmMj a pmW F.K111tyi aw r*A0 too ba pW d w#jg% odamonw fc*s puma by yaetwipeab and fate-% paid toy V%r camrnuraty knov& t; dw. wt.at IF the w"inwan anovunt of oftdo I money rvu world bre- wit" bo pay to do rake M4 "No 4 r dw hvwb i pWkwF trans and rtxreateon Wbttrs that are roast Wnpartant to trout tmKirwhold! D $12.515 pw It mth D i'tait t per two ❑ w"per ama ❑ ice" per MUM& U i*ta par mid ❑ L tt rw is pre month 76 City of Central Point Parks and Recreation Survey 2016 Page 17 ill- Aetw We IWWM tg ft prao O%M* ALI, 00 f qmW 1dint walmi *0 #Pedw worst Mw apt tit ohm at tArlr iw.r�uwlt. ortbda.r� � era. � u t�rngelc ULVArA d am CI sf�e+�tt CI 2rd•fa wdW w ioU at xfafr tuk Oftfttwros an AYty 14 • ocs 11 D Wt 4 Frwdom 0 M6Mh • N • MOWN fro W1`y friday WIN Fasthall o w F* Q� uml ..k 12. Mm yew vuhmommed MOM Mr Cw" FOM comm ft wllllilt lieu r.w vow? 'PA, V Mt CO" FOK ftft & 0111041111411 w I$, i}MI tIM fol toMnt tht, p"ie rh"k ALL the war that yams hour ld hAx hog""#Ami! dlb� 1`IWG wjk% re- rI"t40n pfopam afp %pedal em U dtnfhg tM 0"1 12 CiS9t[tllt. IKCj,?A,P.,t* City s r Kr..N n„ ,�, , Cho wewe Serial neddr a cmwwuwm MIS cmy,s.r* Q =Z=, , Q FfVm rwity, mwrM ad' 0 IHOara Isms th trsk v a wAOw% f Cpl P loop OV@M %,,.I O th,nr am" Vbw W - u.f} �s t.tlrlr..+tri>taM.r star iAaw.aws ttaatitiw r rr alrr r'waw tiM fw a *oftM a M" Omem *000 ilw ow IW 49MIM aw a 14. ftxwpwaw 1b MsMll/i►/It"r�, - -000*00W / a O� 11 f0c at "" "rs Ls O!.d © "W OMM" G 4806* C] ban's Uw 1a Crural racta G 0064 Q IiMalllr 1.7. MM � a11M�r utter a' � Mb feast Mse■that� fl 1 g12 �...�. — + ?STT 1fr M% yrx, I. t w tGtnMl/pM . .. .. _ .a,.s - --. a .,• .••+..t.. Sm a uampf Tatra ehn aur vay or,�ne. S.rm the bawl peen mww Me/nnr on May tpth h rW +rwn fv ..,r/!• t••4 In &P r•1e•'s 1rfi,.� r.�r T. -AV. trii w 6. 77 Page left intentionally blank 78 v '1 YOUTH SURVEY SUMMARY 79 Page left intentionally blank 80 )1 $ Q1 Which park do you go to most? Answered: 333 lYpped: a Twin Creeks Park- Elk Park Von Jonas Park. Walar... Uan Horn Park - Tennis COUM.. � r• PimaParr Fork - no TrAL'. ark-noTni... Unbar! Rall Park- 0ar1rA* Casal Ywdala Puk- Parwt Glen Pari,..,. G rl oaks o{ Park-,.. E�dl Joar Toom Park -!kala - QArko Paalr surer Manrorfsl Par... WNPA n 11a1t ►ark- Ilasllan... I Jerre to to MI 0% 110% Answer CWcee Twin Cranks Park- Elk Park Don Jones Park- Welar Perk Van Ham Park- Tennis Court Park Flanagan Park- Walking Troll Perk Robert Pfaff Park- Downtown Park Cascade ksadowe Park- Neighborhood Park 20% 111011111 :40% sox W% 70+c 111% 90% 1100% 81 Ilasporaare 3e.3�rr 31.113% /A1% 9e10X 3.10% 3.00% 10 Forest glen Park- NeighoaYheod Park OWN, Oaks Park- Neighborhood Park Joel rami Park - 3:tate Park Gle,gru,o- Gazebu Parc klenlecr Mom0llal Park Small Pond Parc wAr"kim man Park-'IleCand Park I dent go 10 any parks Total 82 3,0011. 1.90 t.8o% 0.90% 0.30% o.aa� 11.71Y. 10 s 6 3 42 What do you like to do at parks? (Pick all that apply) Anmurd:3M Mpped:3 Run an the grams Nay on playprsunr r--i�r Mandtalk i r .4 .. . Walk So Valls s" - play wo y.. doe PLy M to sp-N" 0% 1OlG 7D'i 30% 4m SPG 6076 70% WY. 90% IOD% AM mow Ch ax r a •aapauss Run on the grass AL70'Ji Play on P}aY,FOV11 ' 4US% Sd and ba 4LTt% Wdk the "Its and exome phry wRh Y— dN �1.l37f. Play in the water M.a/76 6161aa.(plea.e speci(yY 45.6176 Total Reopond.nb:334 83 IN 161 156 132 112 119 153 14 i • TOM A"sft • snee�rar�:. 4 StNrrr, i9 wn'IS sr:; y�rauc ClimboawSwingsParcoreBaseball Playground for Older KidsRide Bikesswim Basket Ba I I Parkour P lay chase Football FUN Grass P,at Frisbee,,,, Gymnastics i ----+�*— Q,► a .W, a, i -Q(+ Gir,alt�3i 1rx,.�� � b3 re-�►v�e � i 84 I � i 03 What would you want to add to a park? Ansunnd: M IMPOsd:4 A D" NIU AM . Yw� Nlslsr �r aH1seY11aa Yw eowr'� I VI+ ODM {�s i M, M% { X116 mb us m fm f0k A OLV FWk Mss m" wwo Pants N � OWA"w AKr OMW� "%Oka 7a_M O"W (press Weefr) >r-qft I 85 m 71 0 76 101 m V J� I •TextAnalysls I • `-PBS-1 �e>R'n�_- .� _ _ _ir4 Sh rrmy 2'1 res>, �♦ x:W lurrexr5 1 Trsrnpohne P I a Ce LeoaTables Space Parks Line Pool Jumps Field Obstacle COUrtS Gras i Climbing Area Ramps Older KidsBasketasFun gn: Irl Cep 86 Q4 Do you take classes with Parks and Recreation? Anwnrnd:332 9hlpped:9 1W YM Annlw Clwrlss Y6! Atr I dd rot 11 hm herr wan cbmus iNft d What is Osrhaand ncreadw? 0% 1071 20% W4 40% 50% 60% 70% /0% WA 1011% �� 7211 STAR 1Z5 Mm 70 87 I 05 Would you like to have building you can go to after school to do :ports, take classes, SWIM, etc? Anww ad:376 8kippod: f Y" -1 4w mii6' I" AnnarCheNo WOPW— Vef No "VA Umbe W 2% hod dwe 9-42% Tad 88 217 M 32 336 Q6 What is your current grade level? Armwspd: 996 314ppsd_ t 4th 3rd F 6th bride 70Grob f :0046f Flown im1br M&W. 0% 10% 20% 3676 4076 W% W% M% am 806, 16076 AIWWWCt - OR Cimd� Ah fto Sh GrfM FMOMMrr 30OW ON Junior Senior Tsh6 89 NIX T I 9.62% 7.147E r 3�277'i