Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 504 - Fairfield Inn PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 504 A RESOLUTION CONDITIONALLY APPROVING A SITE PLAN APPLICATION (Applicant {s}: Sycan Development Corporation) (372W02D, Tax Lot 2900) Recitals 1. This matter came before the Planning Comzrzission for hearing on Navezxz6er 7, 2000, on applicant's site plan application fora 6$ Roozn Hotel in a G4 district of the City. The Planning Cozxzzxzission reviewed the application and the City staff reports, and received comments froze all persons wishing to be heard in favor of and opposed to the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section l . Criteria A licable to Decision. The following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code apply to this application: A. Chapter 17.44, G4 Tourist and Office Professional B. Chapter 17.60, General Regulations; C. Chapter 17.64, Off-Street Parking and Loading; D. Chapter 17.72, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval. section 2. Findings and Conclusions,. The Planning Comznissian hereby adopts by reference all findings of fact set forth in the City staff reports, and concludes that, except whez•e addressed in the conditions to approval, the application and proposal comply with the requirements of the fallowing chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code: A. Chapter 17.44, relating to uses, lot size, lot coverage, setback, building height and screening in the C-4 district; B. Chapter 17.60 relating to paving and landscaping requirements; C. Chapter 17.64 relating to off street parking and loading facilities; D. Chapter 17.72 relating to site plan requirements. Section 3. Conditional Approval. The application for site plan approval is hereby conditionally approved, subject to the conditions set Earth on Exhibits "A", "B", and "C"which are attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. I _ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. S04 (I 1072000} Passed by the Planning Co~n~~iission acid sighed by i~1e in auther~ticatioz~ of its ~~assage this ATTEST: City I resentative Approved by ine this ~ ~' day of i~1S-~.-~~2C-~--~ ~~/ry~~~~ ~~~~~~~- Planning Cointnission Cilainr~an 2000. Planning Co~x-anission Chairman 2 -PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 504 {11072000) . 3 . ~ _ ~ ~ ' ~ ^ , ,. ~ . ~ ~ .. ~ Exhibit «A» _ _ 1 :.,z~ ~ : ~ - ~ ~L ~~ ~ a~ ~, ~ ..vw.2a r F~=J 1 ._ ~ oacmn ..w,.,M.. _.,,,..n,u„m.n.. ~~ AT P!.RKiNC STAl15 ~ 1 ~,% ~ ^..,_.-~ ~F-- ~ rmw a~~+..~~ .rI GFt D. BASE. !~1 L'•.~...''~.,.~~`~L~~d•~«..:~Sr".......wo..~ '~''T"' '~ N ~ 9 I ~ \ r_____ taste w.~.~ r r.. $ wPARKING SIGNS_ ,~ y O.1 "'{' 0 O ~ I 1 " ~IDE~ ALK r5EC Y. __.[1 1 '~^'r^r '~~-i I I ~ J ~.waan .,~wrrrc Q I I j 1 I 'i•J . j. ..~~ om mn 1 L ~.nw. ~..... s ..+ Y 4 I l Ix TRV DE D'•.C VRB DET 1~ y , ~ ~ I a I I I ..~ '"`* O of ~I~ II SITC DATA 1 w -' I II \ \ ,,. ~ I # iK~ 52ACK rim 7~""~' I1 _ waX.c w rrxx,. iss 'jt~ _ IY ~~ III I 1 I .11 r I . ~ 1 "__ _ LEGEND ~ .,~~. . ~.s - I ~-^-n.....- ~ II r ~+ ~ II If ~~ _ .,r ~~~ ~ II I E .~.e„e.m.~ .ski .,,r..~.K r~ SITE_~LAN ,~ ~.r, ~w ....._~M,...._... vr>c~bw e.aa. ~..~,~...n,.w...,e Exhibit "B" RECOMMENDED PLANNING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The approval of the Site Plan shall expire in one year on November 7, 2001 unless an application for a building pern~it or an application for extension has been received by the City. The applicant shall submit a revised sife plan depicting any changes discussed and approved at the public hearing within 30 days of Planning Commission approval. 2. The project must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations and those requests made by the affected agencies in Attachment "li". 3. The project must meet the off-sheet parking requirements for motel development, and the parking, access and maneuvering areas shall be paved with durable materials for aIl-weather use and approved by the Public Works Department. ~. Landscaping and signage shall be inspected by the Plaru~ing Department to ensure compliance with the approved plans. 5. The project must meet any requirements recommended by the Public Works Staff Report. H:IP l ann i ng10004 5. wp d EX~~1b1~: "~" CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DEPARTMB'NT OF PUBLIC WORKS PRELIMINARY STAFF REPORT for Marriott Fairfield Inn & Suites PW #00045 Date: Applicant: Contact: Project: Location: Legal: Zoning: Units: Plans: Report By: Purpose November 3, 2ggq Hotel Investment Group I1 3486 Saldy View Lane Springfield, OR 97477 Timothy Hovet (54 ~ } 746-8444 Marriott Fairfield Inn & Suites Larne Rd. (under construction) T37S, R2W, Section 2, Tax Lot 29gq C-4 88 rooms Titled: Marriott FairFeld Inn & Suites Received: October 24, 2gg0 Robert W. Pierce, Public Works Technician Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer"} regarding Public Works standards and additional standards and requirements to be included in the design. Gather information from the DeveloperlFngineer regarding proposed development. The Developer is proposing the construction of a 68 room hotel Special Requirements 1. Larne Drive Improvements: The Developer shall provide the City with sufficient right of way to accommodate the construction of Larne Rd to the limits established by the Public Works Department. All improvements an and connections to Larne Drive shall be coordinated and approved the City PWD, and should be designed and implemented at the expense of the Developer. Construction drawing improvements shall include or delineate sight triangles, sidewalks, and all other public improvements. Tie-ins to the existing city infrastructure must be permitted and approved by City PWD. The driveway into the proposed development from Larne Rd. should be designed and positioned in a manner that will accommodate the turning movements and access of emergency vehicles. Fairfield Marriott Inn & Suites PWD Staff f2eport November 3, 2000 Page 2 It is the Public Works Department's recommendation that construction of the hotel not be permitted until the improvements to Larue Rd are completed to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department. 2. Water: The Developer must comply with the recommendations of Fire District 3 Water service connections should be made at the new 8-inch water line on Larue Rd. Al! water service connections should be completed prior to paving Larue Rd. 3. Sife Draina a/Storm Drar'n Plan: The developer shalt design and implement a sits drainagelstarm drain plan that corrects and/nr enhances existing site drainage for the entire area noted on the site plan. If the storm drainage infrastructure is to be privately operated and maintained, a suitable system will need to be designed far a minimum 10-year storm event. If applicable, any storm water retention facilities shall be designed to mitigate erosion and sediment and hydrocarbon deposition; and to mitigate the °attractive nuisance" hazards associated with these facilities. The storm drain system which the development intends to tie into is under construction and will not be completed until proper permits are obtained from the Oregon Division of State Lands and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to connect to Bear Creek, The Public Works Department recommends that the City not issue a Certificate of Occupancy for the hotel until a suitable contingency plan fnr handling storm water run-off is developed by the Developer's engineer and approved by the City. 4. Exis#ng Infrasfructure: The Developer shall provide suitable engineering certification and justification (i.e. calculations, analyses, plots, etc.,} that afi connections to existing infrastructure (i.e. street; drive-thru queuing; water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems; natural drainage systems; etc.,) will not interfere with or provide for the significant degradation (in the opinion of the City of Central Point) of the existing effective level of service or operation of the infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have either adequate capacities to accommodate the flaws and/nr demands imposed on the existing infrastructure as the result of the connection of the proposed development's infrastructure; or the existing facilities will be improved by and at the expense of the Developer to accommodate the additional flows andlor demands while maintaining or improving the existing effective level of service of the affected facility. General Development Plans: Developer shaft submit to the City`s PWD for review and approval, pians and specifications for all improvements proposed for construction ar modifications within the City or public rights-af- way and easements or for connections to City-infrastructure. Public improvements include, but are not limi#ed to, streets {including sidewalks, curbs and gutters }; storm drainage and sanitary sewer collection and conveyance systems; water distribution system (up to the service meter); street lighting; and traffic control devices, street signs, and delineation. All construction of public improvements shall conform to the City's PWD Standards, the conditions approved and stipulated by the Planning Commission, and other special specifications, details, standards, andlar upgrades as may be approved by the City Administrator or his designee prior to the approval of the construction plans for the proposed development. During construction, changes proposed by the Developer shall be submitted in writing by the Developer`s engineer to the City PWD for approval prior to installation. 2. ~provals: ]f applicable, Fire District No. 3 (fire hydrant placement, waterline sizing, and emergency vehicle access), Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA, for sanitary sewers}, and written approval of construction plans shall be submitted to the City PWD prior to final construction plan review and approval by City PWD. Where applicable, the Developer must coordinate activities with all Federal, State, and Local agencies to insure that all appropriate permits are in place prior to construction, 3. As-Built Drawings: Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer's engineer ar surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. If feasible, the Developer's engineer or surveyor should provide the drawings in both a "hard copy" form {produced on Myla~') and in a "digital" format compatible with AutoCAD®, or other form as approved by the City PWD. As-built drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line changes to final approved construction pians which identify the locations and or elevations {as appropriate} of actual installed items. 4. Elevations: All elevations used on the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on the permanent benchmark shall be tied into an established City approved benchmark and be so Fairfield Marriott Inn & Suites PWD StaJ~'Report November 3, 2(100 Page 4 noted on the plans. 5. Fill Placement. All fll! placed in the road right of way shall be engineered fill that is suitably placed and compacted in accordance with City PWD 6. Roads: The City shall evaluate the strength of the native soils and review the road section designs at the Developer's expense. Roads should be designed to handle ail expected loads, including fire equipment. 8. tltiiit Px -ans: Prior to construction the developer must coordinate, with the City PWD, the placement of proposed utilities #o avoid conflicts and insure adequate separation with a!I infrastructure. Utilities include, but are not limited to, electric power, cable television, natural gas, and telephone. 1 Q. City Utility Easemen#s: Easements must be provided for existing City infrastructure (i.e. sanitary sewer, water, and storm drain} and any of the City's infrastructure that is to be installed as part ofi this development. Easements must be a minimum of 15-feet wide, and should not split lot lines. Easements for storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and water lines should be dedicated to the City and not just a public utilities easement (PUE). Centerline of buried infrastructure shall be aligned a minimum of five (5} feet from the edge of the easement. PUEs must have a minimum 10-foot width. 11. Clear Vision Areas: The construction drawings shall include clear vision areas (i.e. sight triangles} designed to meet the City's PWD requirements. 12. Fire Hydrants: Provide locations of existing and any new required fire hydrants. Fairfeld Marriott Inn cg Suites PWD Staff Report November 3, 2000 Page 5 Alf fre hydrants shat! be suitably protected from potential vehicle damage and encroachment. 14. Water System: Construction drawings shall include the size, type, and location of all water mains, hydrants, valves, service connection, meter, service laterals, and other appurtenance details in accordance with City PWD Standards and as required by the City PWD. 16. Storm_ Drain System Design: Prior to construction plan approval ofi the improvements for this development plan, the Developer's engineer shah provide the City PWD with a complete set of hydrologic and hydraulic calculations and profile plots for sizing the site storm drain system. The engineer shall use the rainfall/intensity curve obtained from the City PWD for hydrologic calculations, and the negotiated run-off parameters. 18. Grading Plans: Construction plans should have a suitable grading plan. Grading plans should have original/existing grades and final grades plotted on the plan. Typically, existing grade contour lines are dashed and screened back, and final grade contour lines are overlaid on top of the existing grades and are in a heavier line width and solid. Contour lines should be labeled with elevations. 19. Erosion Control Plan: Construction plans shall have a suitable Erosion Con#rol Plan.