HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 506 - Rosewood Estates, Ph. IIX:r G r,
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. S06
A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PUD PLAN APPROVAL
AND SUBDIVISION
(Applicant {s} :Dallas Page, Parthenon Construction )
( 37 2W02C, Tax Lot 2904 and 372W I OCA, Tax Lots 5900 and 6000 }
ReciitaEs
1. Applicant{s) leas/have subzmitted an application for tentative plan approval for PUD and
subdivision on 4.81-acres located East of Hanley Road and West of Diego Court in the City of
Central Point, Oregon.
2. On December 5, 2000, the Central Paint Planning Cornznission conducted aduly-noticed
public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard
testimony and comments on the application.
Now, therefore;
BE 1T RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL
POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. A roval Criteria. The requirements for approval of land paz-titions and tentative
plans are set forth in CPMC Title 15 and 17, relating to infarnational requirements, zoning, tat
dimension, access, and similar requirements.
Section 2. Finding and Conclusions. The Planning Cormznission finds and detez-znines as
follows
A. Tentative Plan Requirements. The application and tentative plan are in the correct
foz-zn and contain all of the information required by CPMC 15.10.
B. Area and Width of Lat. This subdivision in an R-1-8 and R-1-10 zone would create
21 parcels:
All parcels zxzeet the minimum area and width requiremments for lots in the R-1-S and R-1-10
zone as set forth in CPMC 17.20, and P.U.D. set faz-th in CPMC 16.10 and such parcels meet the
general requirements for lots contained in CPMC 16.24.050.
C. Prelizminaz PUD Plan. The prelizminary development plan contains those items
necessary to proceed with the development proposal.
Section 3. Conditional Ap rp oval. The application for tentative plan far land subdivision
herein is hereby approved, subject to the conditions set forth on Exhibits "A", "B", and "C" attached
Planning Commission Resolution No. _50fi (12052000 )
hereto by reference incorporated herein, imposed under authority of CPMC Chapter i C.3C. Also
subject to constructing the mini~l~un~ width sidewalks alo~lg the castside of Rosebud Circle.
Passed by the Planning Co~~n~lission and signet{ by me in authentication of its passage this
`~~ day of ~'-Q ~~ ~~--- , 2000.
-,~ ~~
Planning Commission Chair
pproved by ine this
~~
day of ~~^~ ~~ , 2000.
Planning; Commission Chair
Planning Commission Resolution No. _506 (12052000 )
ATTEST:
I'
i
f
1 i
1~
e
i ~~
~+
~ ,~
t$
{«,
C
i
t
~ E
t
\ `.
~i~ +
SiI
lr v~
~`
~ ~
~ ~
~~ ~ ~ }
~~~~ Y v ~
~u~~-~
N, ~ ~
u~
i .~-
~ .3-
b
y .~
(~
iti1
fi ~ ~
~~ ~~ ~
^~ ~~ ~ ~
~~ ~~
~~ ~
R
Exhi bid "B"
RECOMMENDED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. A final development plan, containing in final form the information required in the
preliminary plan shall be submitted to the City within six months of approval or by June
5, 2401 A six month extension may be granted by the City upon the applicant's request
and for good cause.
2. The project must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations including,
but not limited to, the Oregon Uniform Fire Code and Structural Specialty Code.
3. The applicant shall submit final parking, landscaping, lighting and sign plans to the
City for approval as part of the fnal development plan.
4. The applicant shall submit a copy of tha Covenants, Codes and Restrictions (CC&Rs) or any
compazable agreement governing the use, maintenance and continued protection of the PUD
as part of the final development plan.
5. Water service meters shall not be located within a sidewalk.
fi. Decks and fences may be allowed at the discretion of the Building Official and Public Works
Director in special setback areas. It is important that fences and decks along Jackson Creek
receive particular attention since these structures could potentially impede the regular flow
of water in the creek during a flood event.
~, ~ ~dr-"~i ~ v~ y~fe ~~c~ ~ ~~ ~~e~ 4~ ~e au ~
~~ r~ cJ/ C/~C./C9 ~~1 ~~~~ ~~~5 f CJ C ` fl'l ~#1 r rYIGE YY~ UJrrJ ~~'l
43
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
DEPARTMEfVT OF PUBLfC WORKS
PRELIMINARY STAFF REPORT
for
ROSEWOOD ESTATES, PHASE 2
PW # 00011
Date:
Applicant:
Contact:
Project::
Location:
Legal:
Zoning:
Units:
Plans:
Report By:
Purpose
November 27, 2000
Dallas Page
900 Windmar
Ashland, OR 97520
(541 } 488-4478
Dallas Page
Planned Unit Development, Phase 2
Hanley Rd. between Beall Ln. & W. Pine St.
T37S, R2W, Section 10 CA, Tax Lots 5900, 5000, & 2904
R-1-8 & R-1-10
21 Single Family Dwellings
Preliminary site plan
Robert W. Pierce, Interim Public Works Director
Exhibif "C"
Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant {hereinafter referred to as "Developer")
regarding Public Works standards and additional standards and requirements to be included in the
design. Gather information from the DeveloperlEngineerregording proposed development.
The Developer is proposing the construction of a 21 unit Planned Unit Development {PUD} on Hanley
Rd. between Beall Ln. and W. Pine St
This is the second phase of a two phase PUD. A staff report for this project (both phases} was
prepared by this oftioe on December 1, 1997. The purpose of this staff report is to amend the previous
staff report.
Special Requirements
1. Nan1e Road Im rovements:
Hanley Road is under the jurisdictional authority of Jackson County. The City is anticipating that
in the future this portion of Hanley Road will be dedicated to the City. Therefore, all
improvements on and connections to East Pine shall be coordinated with and approved by
Jackson County and the City, and should be designed and implemented at the expense of the
Developer.
Construction drawing improvements shaft include or delineate sight triangles, sidewalks, and
at! other public improvements.
The Developer shall provide the County with sufficient right of way to accorr~modate the
construction of Hanley Road to the limits established by Jackson County and the City of
44
Central Point.
Tie-ins to the existing county andlor city infrastructure must be permitted and approved by
Jackson County and the City of Central Point.
One permanent bench mark shall be installed by the developer's surveyor at a location
established by the city Public V1r'orks Department.
All streets within the proposed development are private streets. The Developer must comply
with the recommendations of Fire District 3 for street width requirements.
2. Water:
The Developer must comply with the recommendations of Fire District 3
The water Tine to be constructed along Rosebud Circle should be a 12-inch line and connect to
the south end of the 12-inch water line on Hanley Rd. it should also be connected to the 8-inch
water line in Rosewood Estates, Phase 1
,~
;~
3. Site Drafnage/Storm Drain Pfan:
The developer shall design and implement a site drainagelstorm drain plan that corrects andlor
enhances existing site drainage for the entire area noted on the site plan.
The storm drainage infrastructure is to be privately operated and main#afned, a suitable system
will need to be designed for a minimum 10-year storm event.
if applicable, any storm water retention facilities shall be designed to mitigate erasion and
sediment and hydrocarbon deposition; and to mitigate the "attractive nuisance° hazards
associated with #hese facilities.
4. Exfstfnq Infrastructure:
The Developer shall provide suitable engineering certification and justification (i.e. calculations,
analyses, plots, etc.,) that all connections to existing infrastructure (i.e. street; drive-thna
queuing; water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems; natural drainage systems; etc.,) will not
intertere with or provide for the significant degradation (in the opinion of the City of Central
Point) of the existing effective level of service or operation of the infrastructure facilities, and
that the existing infrastructure facilibies have either adequate capacities to accommodate the
flows andlor demands imposed on the existing infrastructure as the result of the connection of
the proposed development's infrastructure; or the existing facilifies will be improved by and at
the expense of the Developer to accommodate the additfona! flows andlor demands while
maintaining or improving the existing effective level of service of the affected facility.
General
Develo ment Plans:
Developer shall submit to the City's PWD for review and approval, plans and specifications for
all improvements proposed for construction or modifications within the City or public rights-of-
4 ~.~
Rosewood Estates. Phase !
P~~f7 Stafj~Report
November 18, 2000
Page 4
5. FiII Placement:
Alf fill placed in the road right of way shall be engineered fill that is suitably placed and
compacted in accordance with City PWD
6. Roads:
The City steal[ evaluate the strength of the native soils and review the road section designs at
the Developer's expense. Roads should be designed to handle all expected loads, including fire
equipment.
8. Utili#y_Plans:
Prior to construction the developer must coordinate, with the City PWD, the placement of
proposed utilities to avoid conflicts and insure adequate separation with all infrastructure.
Utilities include, but are not limited to, electric power, cable television, natural gas, and
telephone.
14. City Ufilify Easements:
Easements must be provided far existing City infrastructure (i.e. sanitary sewer, water, and
storm drain) and any of the City's infrastructure that is to be installed as part of this
development.
Easements must be a minimum of 15-feet wide, and should not split lot lines.
Easements for storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and water tines should be dedicated to the City
and not just a public utilities easement (PUE}.
Centerline of buried infrastructure shalt be aligned a minimum of five (5) feet from the edge of
the easement.
PUEs must have a minimum 10-foot width.
11. Clear Yrsion Areas:
The construction drawings shall include clear vision areas {i.e. sight triangles} designed to
meet the Cit7~'s PWD requirements.
12. Fire Hydrants:
Provide locations of existing and any new required f[re hydrants-
All fire hydrants shall be suitably protected from potential vehicle damage and encroachment.
r~
R(uewttod Estates, Phase 1
PWD Staff-Report
November 18.1000
Page S
14. YVa#er Sys#em:
Construction drawings shall include the size, type, and location of all water mains, hydrants,
valves, service connection, meter, service laterals, and other appurtenance details in
accordance with City PWD Standards and as required by the City PWD.
All water lines will be reinforced {looped) systems.
16. S#onn Drain S ry_s#em Design:
Prior to construction plan approval of the improvements for this development plan, the
Devetopet's engineer shall provide the City PWD with a complete set of hydrologic and
hydraulic calculations and profile plots for sizing the site storm drain system. The engineer
shall use the rainfal~ntensity curve obtained from the City PWD for hydrologic calculations,
and the negotiated run-off parameters.
18. Cratfing Plans:
Construction plans should have a suitable grading plan. Grad'mg plans should have
originallexisting grades and final grades plotted on the plan. Typically, existing grade contour
lines are dashed and screened back, and final grade contour lines are overlaid on top of the
existing grades and are in a heavier line width and solid. Contour lines should be labeled with
elevations.
'l9. Erosion Control Plan:
A suitable erosion control plan must he prepared and submitted to the Oregon
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ} for the construction of any improvements
associated with this development. The construction plans associated with this
development will not be approved by the Gity Public Works Department until the city
receives a copy of the written approva[ of the erosion control plan from DEQ.
4.~