Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 547 - Layton Property~~~~~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RIaSOI;U'IION NO. 54'7 A RESOLUTION CONDI"I'IONALLY AI'1'ROVINCi A SITE PLAN APPLICATION (Applicant (s}: Layto-1 I'ropel-ty (Greg I-Iornecker) (37 2W 02D, Tax Lots 2100 and 2200) Recitals 1. This matter came before the Planning, Commission far bearing on Tune 4, 2002, on applicant's site plan application for six commercial buildings in the G4 district afthe City. The Planning Colnmisslan revlewed the appllCatlOn and the Clty staff I'epOI'tS, and recelVed COI11It1entS from all persons wishing to be heard in favor of and opposed to the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OI" THE CITY OF CENTREIL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Criteria Ap~alicable to„Decision. The following chapters of the Celatl•al Point Municipal Code apply to this application: A. Chapter 17.44, C-4, Tourist and Office-Professional District B. Chapter I7.60, General Regulations; G Chapter 17.64, Off-Street ParlGing and Loading; D. Chapter 17.72, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval. Section 2. Findings and Conclusions. 'I he Planning Commission hereby adopts by reference all findings of fact set forth in the City staff repol-ts, and concludes that, except where addressed in the conditions to approval, the application and proposal comply with the requirements of the following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code: A. Chapter 17.44, relating to uses, lot size, lot coverage, setback, building height and screening in the C-4 district; B. Chapter 17.60 relating to paving and landscaping requirements; C. Chapter 17.64 relating to off street parking and loading facilities; D. Chapter 17.72 relating to site plan requirements. Section 3. Conditional Approval. The application for site plan approval is hereby conditionally approved, subject to the conditions set forth on Exhibits "A" and "B" which is attached hereto aI-Id by this reference incorporated herein, 1 -PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 547 (06042002) Passed 1?y the Planning Comz~~ission a~ld signed ~y me in atzthe€~ticatio~l c}fits Passage tl~is 4~'` day of .~+rv~. e._. , ? p o a-- . Planning Con~n~issio~7 Chairman ATTEST: City ved by me this ~ ~ day of ~ ~-~-- , 20~~ _.; r Planning Coznznission Chairman 2 -PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 547 (06042002) Exhibit "A" RECOIVIMENDFID PLANNING D~PAIt.TMENT CONDITIONS OI+' APPI~O'VAL The approval of the Site Plan shall expire in one year an June 4, 2003 unless an application, for a building permit ar an application for extension has been received lay the Gity. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan depicting any changes discussed arld approved at the public hearing within 60 days of Planning Commission approval. 2. The project must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations . 3. The project anust meet the off-street parking xegnireanents for professional offices, aad the parking, access and maneuvering areas shall be paved wztla durable materials for all-weather use and approved by the Public Works Departnrzent. 4. The applicant/propertyowner shall submit final parking, landscaping, lighting and signpians to the Planning, Public Works and Building Departments for approval prior to obtaining any building permits. 5. All buildings located within the Special Flood Hazard Area of the 100-year flood plaza must be built the standards set by the City of Central Point Building Department. EX~li~7lt "B„ CITY Ol~ CENTIZA.L POINT DEP~4.~TMENT 4FPUBLIC WO.R,KS STAFF REPORT` Date: June 4`~, 2002 Applicant/ Owner: Layton Property {Greg Hornecker) 1060 Crater Lake Ave., Suite C Medford, Or 97504 Agent: Abeloe and Associates 827 Alder Creek Drive Medford, Oregon 97504 Location: East Pine Street, Central Point, Oregon Legal: 37 2W 02D, Tax Lot 2104 -- 3.48 Acres Zoning: C-4, Tourist and Office Professional District Report By: Public Works Department Purpose Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer") regarding City Public Works Departrrxent (FWD} standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed commerciaUprafessional office facility. Gather information from the Developer/Enginser regazding the proposed development. It is the public works department's recommendation that only limited ingress and egress access be allowed to the southern side of E. Pine Street, similar to what is being considered for the Peaz Blossom Center, which is located across E. Pine Street from the proposed Development. This would include a "main driveway" entrance (affording westbound, northbound, and eastbound traffic movements} aligned across from. the "central driveway" of the Pear Blossarrr Center (signalized intersection). Other right- in/right-out driveway connections could also be afforded along the south E. Pine Stress frontage at minimum spacing to be determined by the Public ~Tl~orks Department and the Developers Trafixc Engineer. ~t is further recommended that prior to construction plan and final plat approval (and possibly before tentative approval} of the proposed development, that approved master plans of connections to Pine Street, internal street/driveway layout, water, storm drain, and sanitary sewer, and ether utilities be prepared for the subject tax lots and all the parcels between Bear Creek and Hamrick Road that adjoin to Pine Street. Special Requirements 1. .,F,.xislinp Infrcrsfructrrre: The Developer shall demonstrate that all connections #o existing infrastructure {i.e. streets; water, sanitary sewer, storm drawn systems; natural drainage systems; etc.,) will not interfere with or provide for the degradation of the existing effective level of service or operation ofthe infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have either adequate capacities to accon~madate the flows and/or demands imposed on. th;e existing infrastnicture as the result of the coi~nectian of the proposed developaxaent's infrastructure, or will be improved by anal at the expense of the Developer to accornrnodate the additional flaws anchor demands; while maintaining or improving the existing level of service of the affected facility, as approved by tas applicable) the regulatory agency, utility owner, and/or property owner involved. 2. Masfer Flans: Currently the City of Central Point in cooperation with the Oregon Department of Transportation is developing a master plan based on the traffic studies on this portion ofEast Pine Street. After the completion of this traffic study a Master Plan will be developed az~d recorrunendations will be issued. 3. Easements: The Developer shall provide suitable and acceptable 15-foot-wide rninitnum easements for any City public works infrastructure located outside the public rights-of--way. These easements shall be dedicated for sole use by the City, and shall not overlap (crossings are acceptable, as long as required infrastructure separation is maintained} other utility or infrastructure easements. A separate l 0-foot minimum width public utilities easement (P.1:1.E.} should also be required far utility installation outside the E. Pine Street right-of--way clang the property's exterior frontage with E. Pine Street. A l S-foot wide maintenance easeanent will be required from the top of the East hank of Bear Creek continuing 1 S-feet east on the subject property. Vehicular and Pedestrian Access to All Proposed Development: Access agreements or similar documents will need to be granted on the proposed Development's property to allow for public and private vehicular and pedestrian access {ingress and egxess} on andlor across the proposed Development's property to afford access to the various adjoining parcels {cross-access easement agreements}. All construction plans and as-built drawings shall accurately portray tooth horizontally and vertically} utility line and appurtenance locations and the locations of any existing and new easements on the proposed development. All final plats shall accurately portray the horizontal location of all easements and right-of--ways dedicated as "part of the development of this project. All right-of--way and easement dedication shall be completed prior to final construction plan approval. ~. Site LayoutlTra}frc Circulation Plan: The developer shall prepare and submit for City l?V~D approval a suitable site traffic circulation plan for the proposed develapment.Thetroffic circulation plan shall illustrate that all driveways and connections to streets shall accommodate the turning and access movements of all expected truck, bus, emergency vehicle (i.e, fire track) and all other applicable vehicles. 5. Clear Vision Areas/Trian~tes. All driveway approaches of the proposed Development connecting to public roads shall maintain a minimum 55-foot sight vision triangle as measured from the edge of the right-af way to the center of the driveway. This requirement may be adjusted by the City PWD, depending on final orientation and lane layout of the adjoining roads, in accordance with AASflTO clear sight-vision requirements. Adequate clear vision area/triangles shall also be maintained at all internal driveway intersections. 6. Traffic Sfudyr J'nr~rovemen~s to Hamrick Xoad and E. Pine Street; and Right-o%War ]7edication: A traffic irr~pact study for the,Pear Blossom. Center development, prepared by Kittelson & Associates, Inc., dated June 1499, has been submitted to the City. The traffic study analyzed the year 2003 (anticipated year of build-out of the center) projected traffic flows and intersection levels of service at the major street intersections mast likely to be impacted from the $ear Blossorri Center development. The traffic study included the residential development already approved to the north and east of the site {Walnut Grove, New Haven, Central Point East, and Parkwaod Terrace); the USF Reddaway site, and the potential retaiUprofessional office facilities on Land owned by USF Reddaway on the southeast earner of the intersection of Hamrick Road and East Pine Street, However, the traffic impact study, does not include any new development along the southern frontage of E. Pine Street or "build-out" (i.e. full development within the current UGB) traffic flaw conditions for the northeast portion of the Ciry which greatly influences the "build-out" design. and right-of way requirements and needs far two of the City's main arterial roads: Hamrick Road and East Pine Street. Another issue not addressed by the traffic impact study, is how access to East Pine Street will be afforded limited for the properties located to the south of East Pine Street in the area immediately to the South of the proposed Development;'and what affects will development of the parcels to the south of E. Pine Street have on the identified streets and intersections in the Pear Blossom Center Traffic Irripact Study. T© allow for development of the proposed project prior to the completion of the traffic master planning needed for the area; the City PWD recommends the following: 1. The Developer be required to pay an equitable share of the signal development and installation costs (and associated improvements) to the signal at the intersection of the Pear Blossom Center's Central Driveway and East Pine Street. 2. The Developer be required to construct street widening, bike Zane, curb and gutter, storm drainage, sidewalk {including driveway aprons and wheel chair ramps), planting strip with landscaping, traffic delineation (including median traffic islands on E. Pine Street), and street lighting {with maximum 200 foot spacing) improvements for the portion of E, Pine Street that adjoin the proposed development. The portion ofE. Pine Street that adjoin the subject development is developed as a "rural" road that does not meet current City or County urban standards. The road will need to be improved, as a minimum, to meet City standards, as reviewed and approved by Jackson County Roads, and the City PWD. This could be deferred (as executed in a deferred improvement agreement by and between the Developer and the CitylCounty) until other development is implemented on the adjoining parcels south of E. Pine Street. 3. Qnly one access would be afforded either temporarily or permanently. Additional right-in/right-out accesses to E. Pine Street could be afforded, that are located at a minimum spacing to be determined by the Public Works Department and the Developer's Traffic Engineer. 4. Regarding the road right-of way adjoining the proposed Development: the Developer be rerli~ired to dedicate additional land far street and City utility purposes a tninizalutn of S7 feet from the right--of--way centerline of E. fine Street, Currently the riglxt-of-way width on the "southern hall" of E. Pine Street along the subject property's frontage is 50 feet. 'This would require dedication of an additional ?feet for road and City road and utility improvement purposes. After completion ofbuild-out master planning/construction, any dedicated properly that was not necessary, would be "vacated" and returned to the adjoining parcels of the proposed Development. 5. That appropriate "deceleration" and "acceleration" tapers (both temporary and permanent} on E. Pine Street be constructed at the driveway entraneelexit to the proposed development, as jointly determined by the Developer's trafftc engineer, the City PWD, and Jackson County, 7. Landscape Buffers. Meanderirz_a S`idetvalks, acrd City Utility Strip: Tn keepizrg with the landscape buffers and meandering sidewalks established with the Central Point East Development and proposed for the Pear Blossom Center Development, the City PWD is recommending that the Development be required to develop an approved landscaped buffer (including suitable irrigated landscaping and meandering sidewalks} located in the strip of land between 12.5 feet to 2.5 feet from the back edge of the E. Pine Street right-o#~way to be established for the Development. 'The remaining 2.5 feet ofright-off way is to be reserved for City utility location. {i.e. street lights, f re hydrants, air relief vents, etc.}, but should be . landscaped as appropriate. $. :Erasiari Contrat Ptc~n: A suitable erosion control plan must be prepared and submitted to the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality {DEQ} and City PWD for the construction of any improvements associated with this development. The City PWD will not approve the construction plans associated with this development until the City PWD receives a copy of the written approval of the erosion control plan by the DEQ. 9. ~Yorm Drainage System: The storm drain system sha11 be designed to accommodate the storm water run-off from and run-an onto the proposed development (either surface run-on or culvert or creeklditch conveyance}; any future development on adjacent properties; conveyed storm drainage or surface water flaw, and any flows from areas deemed by the City that will need to connect-into the proposed development's SD System. Depending on topography, this may include surface water flows from the properties south, and west of the subject tax Iats that drain across the subject tax lots. however, if applicable, the City PWD is further recommending that the Developer be required to design the storm drain conveyance system to accommodate projected post-development flows from these adjoining properties. City PWD would propose reimbursement to the Developer for up-sizing the applicable up-sized portion{s} of the storm water conveyance system to accorr}rnodate the future development on these neighboring properties, as applicable. I0. Off Site Storm Drainage Irr frrestruclure: For a~zy storm drainage infrastructure constructed or improved outside the City's rights-a~ way or easements for drainage of surface waters from the subject development, the Developer shall provide a suitable document or docuzrzents which contain approvals far the irnpletnentatio~r of such canaiection and/or irzxprovements and which describe: 0 Who is responsible for the operation, maintenance, and repair of the infrastructure facilities to maintain the original design parameters associated with the infrastructure? ifthe City is to operate and maintain the infrastructure, the applicable funding Enechanism that will be created (i.e. local improvement district) for the associated City expenditures; © How will all-weather drivable access be afforded and maintained indef nitely to maintain and repair the infrastructure facilities; © That an easement or other s~zitable conveyance document has been granted, as necessary, to provide suitable access on private property for the inspection, maintenance, and repair work to be performed on the infrastructure facilities. The easement shall include a statement, which allows access by City personnel for inspection, maintenance, and repair purposes. 11. Wafer Distribution System and Fire Protection; The water distribution system for the proposed Development shall be of "reinforced loop" design; a minimum of two connections will need to be made to the City's distribution system. 12. Aboyegroutrd Utilities. Tf applicable, coordinate efforts with Pacific Power, QWest, and Falcon (TCl) Cable, to convert any overhead electrical power, telephone, ar cable facilities within the proposed development to underground facilities, prior to the acceptance by the City PWD of the public improvements associated with the proposed development. All agreements and costs associated with the conversion of these facilities from overhead to underground facilities shall be by and between the utility owners and the Developer. General l . Public Improvements; All construction of public improvements shall conform to the City's PWD Standards, the conditions approved and stipulated by the Planning Commission, and other special specifications, details, standards, andlar upgrades as may be approved by the City Administrator or his designee prior to the approval of the construction plans for the proposed develaprnent. During construction, changes proposed by the Developer shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's engineer to the City PWD far approval prior to implementation. 2. Permits and .Ap rp ovals: Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals, and conditions as may be required by other agencies, including, but not limited to, the Oregon Department of Fish and 'Wildlife (DFW), Oregon Department of Environmental Quality {DEQ), Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOEj, affected irrigation districts, and Yackson County Roads and Parks Services (7C Roads), Fixe District No. 3, and Bear Creels Valley Sanitary Authority {BC'dSA), as applicable. The Developer shall submit written approvals of the final construction plans from Fire District No. 3 (fire hydrant placement, waterline sizing, and emergency vehicle access), Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA, for sanitary sewers), and JC Roads, (E. Pine Street improvements and drivewaylaccess road connections) prior to f nal construction plan review and approval by City P'VVD. 3. As Briilis: Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer's etagineer ar surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. If feasible, tlae Developer's engineer or surveyor should provide the drawings in both a "hard copy" form {produced on Mylar~ and in a "digital" format compatible with AutoCAD~', or other forth as approved by the City PWD. As-built drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line" changes to €inal approved constt-oction plans which identify the locations and or elevations (as apprapt7atc) of actual installed items, including, but not limited to, invert, inlet, and rim or lip elevations; spot elevations identif ed on drawings; water lines, valves, and fire hydrants; water and sewer lateral; modifications to street section; manhole and curb inlet; street light locations; other below grade utility lines; etc. Provide a "red-line" hard copy (on Mylar~'}, or an approved alternative format, of construction drawings, and if feasible, an acceptable AutoCAD~' compatible drawing electronic Pilo to the City at completion of construction and prior to acceptance of public infrastructure facilities completed as part of the proposed development, or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee. 4. .Elevations: All elevations used on the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on the permanent benchmark shall be tied into an established City approved benchmark and be so noted on the plans. At least one permanent benchmark shall be provided for the proposed development, the location of the benchmark shall be as jointly determined by the City PWD and the Developer's surveyor. 5. Existing Infrastructure: As applicable, f eld verify all existing infrastructure elevations and locations (i.e. pipe inverts, curb elevations, street elevations, etc.}, to which the proposed developmen# will connect into existing improvements, prior to final construction plan design and submittal for final approval. The accurate locations of any existing underground and above ground public infrastructure, and the location of the associated easements with these facilities, shall be accurately portrayed (both horizontally and vertically) on the construction plans. 6. Fall Placement: All fill placed in the development shall be engineered fill that is suitably placed and compacted in accordance with City PWD and Building Department standards, except for the upper 1.5-feet of fill placed outside of public rights-of--way and that does not underlie building, structures, or traveled vehicular access ways or parking areas. 7. RoadlDrivewa~/ParkinQ Areas: The Developer shall evaluate the strength of the native soils and detert~rine the access road, parking, and driveway section designs to handle the expected loads {including fire equipment) to be traveled on these private driveways, access roads, and parking areas. Need to provide designed road section for review. Tire raad/streetldriveway sections within the publicrights-of way shall be constructed per the design of the City PWD. $. Ufality Flans: The utility plans shall be drawn to scale with accurate horizontal and vertical depiction of utility lines and appurtenances (transformers, valves, etc.). Utility infrastructure location must be accurately included an the as=built drawings, or as a separate set of drawings attached to the as-built drawings. 9. Area Li.~hfin:~ Plan: Need to provide and in~pler+ient an adequate area lighting plan for parkitzg and public access areas, including the driveway entrances. 10. Easerr3enfs: Easements for City infrastructure (i.e. sanitary sewer, water, and storm drain [il' applicable]) should be a minimum of 15-feet wide, and should not split lot lines. Easements for public storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and water lines shall be dedicated to the City and no# just a P.U.E. Centerline of buried infrastructure shall be aligned a minimum of flue {S) feek froxz~the edge of the easement. if two or more City owned utilities are located within an easement, t}zen a minimum of 20-foot width should be required. Easement dedications in fix3al deeds or CG&Rs need a statement, which should clearly indicate that easements must be maintained with suitable, drivable vehicular access #o City public infrastructure facilities, as determined by the City PWD. 11. Street Lights: Construction drawings for this Tentative Plan shall include a Street Lighting Plan in accordance with the requirements of the City PWD or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee (with maxizx-urn 200 foot spacing}. The construction drawings shall include clear vision areas designed to fneet the City's PWD Standards. 12. Storm Drainage Sysfetn: Developer's engineer shall develop a facility plan for the storm drain collection, retention, and conveyance system (SD System) which provides for storm water ~n- off from and run-on onto the proposed development {either surface run-on or culvert or creek/ditch conveyance), any existing or future development an adjacent properties, conveyed storm drainage, or surface water flow, and any areas deemed by the City that will need to connect-into the proposed development's SD System. As applicable, Developer's engineer shall determine how the SD system will work during 10- year and 104-year flood events associated with Bear Creek. Identify the HGL in Bear Creek during 10-and 100-year storm event, and what affect it will have on the proposed outlets and storm drain system and building elevations. System should be designed to adequately drain a 10- yearstorm event without surcharging or shat! provide adequate storage to prevent surcharging; and be designed to prevent backflow of water from Bear Creek up into SD system during storm events. The design of the storm drain collection and conveyance system {SD System} should provide for storm water run=off from and run-on onto the proposed development (either surface run-on or culvert or creek/ditch conveyance}; the Developer shall demonstrate that the storm water flows from the completion of the proposed development (and at any time prior to completion of development} da not exceed predevelopment flows into Bear Creek; or #hat allowances or provisions have been made (and approval of the applicable properties owners and regulatory agencies has been obtained), which accommodate any additional flow which exceed predevelopment flows. The Developer and the City PWD shall agree on the applicablerun-off coefficients, curve numbers, etc., to be used in the engineering calculations. DeveIoper's engineer shall provide a site drainage plan designed, at a minimum, to accommodate a 10-year storm event. The SD system must be designed to adequately drain the 10-year storm event without surcharging or must be provided with adequate storage to prevent surcharging; and be designed to not impact existing public storm drainage facilities. Catch basins and area drains shall be designed for on-site sediment and petroleum hydrocarbon retention. The private storm drain system shall be designed to directly connect to the public storm drain system, and shall not be designed to discharge to the street surfaces. Public storm drainpipe materials small be PVC, HDPE, or reinforced concrete, with watertight joints. Provide concrete or sand-ceaY~ent slurry encasement where required in areas of zninin~u~ii cover. Roof drains and under drains shall not be directly connected to public storm drain lines and shall drain to the on-site private stoz~n drain system. As applicable, any discharge paints of the storm water facilities shall be designed to gro~vide an aesthetically pleasing, useful, and tow maintenance facility, that are designed to mitigate erosion, damage, or loss during a 100-year stomp event; and that mitigate the "attractive nuisance" hazards associated with these types of faciliti~;s. Prior to City PWD construction plan review, the Developer shall provide the City PWl] with a complete set of hydrologic and hydraulic calculations and profile plats for sizing the SA systerzl, which shall incorporate the use of the City PWD's rainfalUintensity curve, and City approved run-off coeff cients, curve numbers, pipe roughness coefficients, etc., that are used in the engineering calculations. Sheet flow surface drainage from the property onto the public rights-of--way or onto neighboring properties is unacceptable. Plans which propose to include the discharge to Bear Creek and any construction or modification within the floodway of Bear Creek or in the road ditches, shall be in compliance with DSf., ACOE, ODFW, I7EQ, JC Roads, and/or City PWD {as applicable} guidelines and requirements and any applicable conditions and or approvals, of these regulatory agencies. 13. Fire Hydrants: Provide locations of existing and any new required fire hydrants. Fire Hydrants need to be connected to $-inch-diameter and lazger lines, with the supply lines being "looped" as feasible. If applicable, steamer ports at hydrants located near the buildzng shall face the buildings. Fire hydrants shall be suitably protected from potential vehicle damage and encroachmezrt. 1~. Water System Cross Cannect~of~ Cvnirot: Developer shall comply with Oregon Health Division (OHD} and City requirements for cross connection control. If a pressurized irrigation system and/or domestic water wells exist on the property, the Developer will be required to install the required baclcflow prevention assemblies directly behind the City's water meters. 7 5. Water System: Construction drawings shall include the size, type, and location of all water mains, hydrants, valves, service connection, meter, service laterals, and other appurtenance details in accordance with City PWD Standards and as required by the City PWD. 16. Raaf~Area Drains: Ail structures shall have roof drains, area drains, and/or crawl spaces with positive drainage away from the building. 17. Grading Plans: Grading plans shall have originallexisting grades and final grades plotted on the plan. Typically, existing grade contour lines are dashed and screened back, and f nal grade contour lines are overlaid on top of the existing grades and are in a heavier line width and solid. Contour lines should be labeled with elevations. 18. Sanitary Sefver: All sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system (SS System} design, construction and testing small conform to the standards and g~~idelines of the Oregon DEQ, I990 APWA Standards, Oregon Chapter, Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA}, and the City PWD Standards, where applicable. The construction plans and the as-built drawings shall identify lateral stationing for construction of sewer laterals. 19. Wafer Ri~hfs: if applicable, Developer shall provide a Statement of Water Rights (on a City approved form), for any affected properties. For properties determined to have water rights, the developer will coordinate with the State Water piaster the re-allocation of any waters attached to lands no longer irrigable as a result of the proposed development.