Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 549 - Miller Estates Ph. IIas 7 ~-~ ~ , PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 549 A RESOLUTION APPROVING 'I"I-IE FINAL PUD DEVEI.,OPMENT PLAN FOR 27 LOTS 1N MILLER ESTATES PHASE II (Applicant {s} :Brad Miller, Trustee { 37 2W 038, Tax Lot 541 } Recitals 1. Applicant(s) has/have submitted an application for a PUD final plan approval for 271ots. The subj ect property is located on .Iackson County Assessment Plat 37 2W 03 B, TL 541, within the City of Central Point, Oregon. 2. On.Iune 18, 2002, the Central Point Planning Comzr~ission conducted a hearing onthe application, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments on the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Approval Criteria. The requirements for approval of final PUD plans are set forth in CPMC Title 16 and 17, relating to informational requirements, zoning, lot dimension, access, and similar requirements. Section 2. Finding and Conclusions. The Planning Commission finds and deteirnines as follows: A. Final Plan Requirements. The application and final plan are in the correct foz-m and contain all of the information required by CPMC 16.12. B. Area and Width of Lot. This PUD in a R-1, Residential Single Family District and R-2, Residential Two Family District would create 26 lots: All lots meetthe mini mum area and width requu•ements for lots i~1 the R-1 Residential Single Family District and R-2 Residential Two Family District zone as set forth in CPMC 17.20.050, CPMC 17.24.054 and P.U.D. set forth in CPMC 16.10 and such parcels meet the general requirements for lots contained in CPMC 16.24.050. C. Final PUD Plan. The final development plan contains those items necessary to proceed with the developrrzent proposal. Planning Commission Resolution lVo. _549 (06182002 ) Section 3. Conditional A z-oval. The application foz• a final PUD plan herein is hereby approved, subject to the conditions set forth on Exhibits "E1", "B" a~~d "C", attached hereto by reference incozporated herein, imposed under authority ofCPMC Chapter 16.36. Alsa subject to reco~rzznc~~datian to n~zodifythe paved driveway widths and making design changes to homes fronting Second Street. passed by the Planning Comznissiaz~ and sigzaed by me in authentication of its passage this ~l8th_ day of .rune , 2002. ~' Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City pproved by nrze this 1 Stl~ day of June , 2002. O Plazuxing Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution Na. _549 {06182002 ) .„ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 433 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR A PLANNE~3 UNIT DEVELOPMENT (Applicant: Brad and Marian Mi11er) (37 2W 3B Tax Lots 540 and 600} BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 Nature of Application and Procedural Backctround. This matter came before the City on applicants Planned Unit Development (~~PUD~' hereafter} application for a 78-unit single- family residential. manufactured home development located on North Pacific Highway south of Scenic Avenue in R-1 and R-2 districts of the City. On September 15, 1998, the Central Point .Planning Commission held a duly-advertised public hearing wherein it considered the application, the City staff reports, and written comments and testimony from all interested persons in favor of and apposed to the application. 2. Criteria Applicable to Decision. The following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code apply to this application: A. Chapter 1.24, Public Hearings Procedures; B. Chapter 17.20, R-1, Residential Single-Family District; C. Chapter 17.24, Residential Two-Family District; D. Chapter 17.60, General Regulations; E. Chapter 17.64, Off-Street Parking and Loading; and F. Chapter 17.68, Planned Unit Developments (PUD}. 3. Findinr~s and Conclusions. The Planning Commission hereby adopts by reference all findings of fact set Earth in the City staff reports, and concludes that, except where addressed in the conditions to approval, the application and proposal comply with the requirements of the following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code: A. Chapters 17.20 and 17.24, relating to allowed uses in the R-1 and R-2 zoning districts; B. Chapter 17.60, relating to paving and landscaping requirements; C. Chapter 17,64, relating to off-street parking and loading facilities; and D. Chapter 17.68, relating to Planned Unit Developments. 1 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 433 (102098} 4. Conditional A~ rp oval. The within appliaatian for a Preliminary bevelopment Plan for a Planned Unit Development is hereby conditionally approved, subject to the conditions set forth an Exhibit '~A~', which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 1'S"}''"`~ day of ~Y~~r't°~`~ ~ 19 9 8 . ~'.~~ ' ' PlanningTCommissian Chairman ATTEST' City Represent e Approved by me this ~ day of ~rv~~ ~"'. , 19 9 8 . ~~~ P~.anning Commission Chairman 2 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. x€33 002098) ATTACHMENT D RECOMMENDED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. A final development plan, containing in final form the information required in the preliminary plan shall be submitted to the City within six months of approval or by March 1 S, 1999. A six month extension maybe granted by the City upon the applicant's request and for good cause. 2. The project must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations including, but not limited ta, the Oregon Uniform Fire Cade and Structural Specialty Code. 3. The applicant shall submit final parking, landscaping, lighting and sign plans to the City for approval as part of the final developrrzent plan. 4. The applicant shall submit a copy of the Covenants, Codes and Restrictions (CC&Rs} or any comparable agreement governing the use, maintenance and continued protection of the PUD as part of the final development plan. 5. The applicant shall schedule and attend pre-design meetings with WP Natural Gas, Fire District No. 3 and the Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority to more specifically identify utility easements and the placement of fire hydrants and pipelines and other utilities. 5. The applicant shall provide a tot lot in addition to adult recreation facilities, the number and location of which to specified by the Commission. ~xFii6it "`B" To: FROM.[: SUBJECT: Ap,•plicant/ Otivner: ~~ Suznmary: ..._ _..At~thority: .. __. : . PLAIVNZNG DEPARTI14Ii1NT S3'~.I+F REPORT HEARING DATE Tune 1$, 2002 Central Point Piazuzing Commission Matt Samitore, Community Planner Final Development Plan- Miller Estates P.U.D., Phase II Brad Miller, Trustee 2364 E. McAzzdrews Road Central Point, OR 97502 Hoffbulu & Associates, Ine./Douglas C. McMahan 3155 Alameda Street #201 Medford, OR 97504 • Tlie applicant, Brad Miller requests that the Comzrzission review and approve the Final Developzrzent Plan for the second phase of the Miller Estates Planned Chit Development. The site is split..zoned as R-1, R~sidenti-al tingle=Family-and R-2~ Residential ~b~Farzily a~icl is Iocated'.-_ ~.__. _ _ _ in fhe vicinity of Scenic Avenue anti tlae Rogue~Valley~I-lightivay. ~ • CPIv1C 1.24.020 vests tine Planning Cornzrussion tivith the authority to review and approve Final Development Plans for P.U.D.'s. No public notice is required in this situation. . Applicable X,a`y: CPMC 17.6.$.010 et seq. Planned Unit Development CPMC 17.20.010 et seq. R-1, Residential Single FazraiIyDistrict CPMC 17.24.010 et seq. It-2, Residential Two Faznily'District I}iseYZSSion• CPMC Chapter 16.68 describes the requirement and application processes for Planned Unit Developments. Inifially, the applicant submits a prelirxzinary development plan with maps describing Iot configuration, property boundaries and a schedule of the planned completion dates. If the plan is approved by the Planning Commission, the applicant is allowed a period of six rnanths to provide the City with a copy of the Final Development Plan demonstrating that all o, f the conditions artd requirements of the Preliminary Development plan leave been met. The Planning Comamission will Plzen review the Fiaal flan and decide to approve or deny the plan as szzbmitted. The City Council will review the Commission's decision at a subsequent meeting. The preliminary d evelapment plan acid a Conditional Use Permit for the Miller Estates P.U.D. was approved by the Commission ora September 15,,1998~,sub3ect to certaiza conditions of approval described in Resolution 433 (Attachnaerat "13"). The applicant subrni#ted a portion of the entire project as Phase 1 ~vhich was approved orz May 5, 20x0. The frst phase of the P.U.D. has begun to fill with new homes and the applicant is requesting the approval of Phase il. The flood issues with Phase ll still exist. Alt homes within Plaase II are within the lt?Q-year flood plain of Griffui Greek. 'The City does believe that some of the flooding issues have been resolved around Iha site because of work that has been done since the last flood. Anew storm sewer line was installed in 2t}DO on Comet Drive and a new bridge and culvert were put in at Scenic Avenue and Griffin Creek. A ~aew study of Grim Creek is currently being completed by l~amrnond Engineering for the Central Points Storm Water Masten Plan and tlae results of that study tivill be available in the next few months. At that time the City will re- evaluatewhich of the Iots will continue to be in the 100-year flood plain. The special setback. ordinance is also in effect on Phase II. No structure, including fencirzg,.cara be placed within twenty-five feet from the top of the bank.of Gz'il"fin Creek: This may cause a problem-wsth tlxe RV~ Stoirage facility. A suitable RV parkiri~'p1at~~iieeds `to be subar-itted to Ilse City prior to the construction of the facility. A landscaping plan ~`or tfie Grr~n Creek area also needs to be submitted and accepted. fn the landscape plan a "tot-lot" and adult recreation areas will:need•-to ~be-shcs:'~3'h"~s'e'~are ~iiicllt~ns iif Final Plat Approval. The Public Works_staffreport {,A.ttachment "G"~that.addresses i#ems that still needto'be - . ~ _ .- . ` - ' completed from Phase I~ A landscape and irrigation plan for Highway 99 has yEt to be approved; and will need to be-designed and built before, the. Phase II can .be platted. A pe~,rnanerat barrier..:. . - . , - - .. _ ._.. will~need to be -approved for the end of Mary's Way. A suitable permanent traffic barrier and . emergency vehicle access shall be designed anal submitted for the terminus of Nancy's Way. A ~ - locking.pedestrianGate will also be.required. Staffrecornznerads~that all of These be completed before the Final-Plat application is signed by the City: The Final Development Plan is in substantial compliance with the approved Preliminary Development Plan (Attachment "A"). Provided that to the conditions required by the Planning, Public Work departments, BCVSA and Firc District Three. Planning Canaznissioza Action The Planning Coruanission 3nay take one of the fo]Iowing actions in regard #o the final development plan~for Phase Jl of tlae Miller Estates Piazaned Uxait Development. 1. Approve the final development plan, based on findings of fact and conclusions of law T contained in the record and subject tot he recommended conditions of approval as set forth in Resolution 433 and this staff report; or ~.~ ~'~ _ 2. Deny the final development plan based an findings of fact articulated by City Staff. 3. Cosztinne the review of the final development plaza at the cliscretioza of the Commission. CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DFPARTMEIVT OF PUBLIG WORftS Exhi6r"t "c~~ STAFF REPORT For MILLER >/STATES PHASE 11 PCiD _ -- PW# 9$051 Date: dune 18~; 2002 Applicant: Brad Miller, 2364 ~. McAndrews, Medford, Oregon 97504 Pro}ect: Miller estates Planned Unit Development Location: Along Highway 99, east of South of North Valley Estates Legal: T37S, R2W, Section 3B, Tax Lots 500 and b00 Zoning: R-1-6 (Tax tot 500} and R-2 tTax Lot b00} Area: 14.0 Acres Units: 78 Lots + 1 existing Iot + 1 Iot for open space common area + 2 unidentified lots + RV Storage tot. Plans: Miller Estate Phase IC (CEC Engineering} Report By: Department of Public Works Purpose Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer") regarding City Public Works Department (PWD) standards, requirements, and - :_ conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed industrial facility. . _ . .. ,Gather. information from the Developerlingineerr~garding the proposed development. Special Reyuiremei~ts 1. Exisfin Infrasfrucfure: The Developer shall demonstrate that alt connections to existing~infrastructure (i.e. streets; water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems; natural drainage systems; etc.,} will not h~terfere with or provide for the degradation of the existing effective level of service or operation of the infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have either adequate capacities to accommodate the flows and/or demands imposed on the existing infrastructure as the result of tl~e connection of the proposed deVelopn7ent's infrastructure, or will be improved by and at the expense of file Developer to accommodate file additional Mows andlor demands; while maintaining or improving tl~e existing Ieve1 of service of the affected facility, as approved by (as applicable}, the regulatory agency, utility owner, andlor property owner involved, 2. private fZoadways: As illustrated on the tentative plan, Orth Drive and Marian Avenue are proposed to have a "street-right-of.--way" width of 2~ feet. We understand that these . will be private streets we no available street parking. As a r~tii~~in~urn, City. PWD would suggest the possible inclusion of a locking pedestrian gate at ~I~iiller Estates PUD 7'enfative Plan - Pi~D Staf,~'Repart June 18`'; 2002 Page 2 the fire lane to facilitate pedestrian trafhc access to Nancy Avenue. if the developer is proposing to make these access ways private streets, then the following n~inimum vehicular trafhc paved access widths {excluding the portion of Urth -Drive from the connection to Highway 49 to Marian Avenue} would be recommended: Privafe Streets: The City's approved private street widths range between 2~-Moot curb to curb width, with 0.5 foot curbs on bath sides of the street equating 25-feet of total width; to Z9-foot curb to curb width with 0.5 foot curbs on bath sides of the street for a total width of 34-feet. No parking an streets permitted. A minimum 25-foot width 424-foot width curb-to-curb with curbing} with no street parking permitted is recommended. Allowances would need to be made to provide for visitor parking. Public Streets: The City is utilizing a new "Residential lane" standard, which consists of the following: A 25-foot-wide traveled section, with a 2 percent crown Standard curb and gutters ... _ w.. :._ ~ ... -. ~ -. - _ - -. - -A Z-faflt-wide strip located behind the curb=for-installation of water meter .... ~__ .._:__._... ._ -service box _. - _... . ~ ...... -..-'-:~~~=-- _~ - -`..: Requires a ~tJ-foot-wide right-olaway. Street parking not allowed on residentia[ lanes. However, these Residential Lanes are designed to accommodate access to a maximum of Y 4 dwelling units, and are intended to be used for "in-fill" type projects only. The proposed pro;ect is soruewhat of an "in-fill" type project, but I~as a signifcantly greater number of dwelling units (7$} than the planned use of the Residential Lane. If a residential lane were detern3ined not to be appropriate for this development, then a standard Coca[ street would be required, which has a 50-foot right-of way and a curb-to-curb width of 36 feet. Allowances would need to be made to provide for visitor parking. 3. Private Sidewalks: The City P1+VD is recommending that a minimum 5-foot wide sidewalk section (with a suitable public ingress and egress easement requiretiment} be .provided overlying the public-utility-easement or partitioned "spaces" andlor lots to facilitate pedestrian traffic (if the streets are to be private streets or Residential Lanes}, on at feast one side of the street or lane. The sidewalk would be installed as part of the development and wilt be maintained by the property owned similar to the City's current ordinance requirement. ; 4. Landscape Pfan/Suffer: A suitable landscape plan for the required landscape buffer Miller .states PUD 7'eniatlve 1 PWD ,S`ta11"Report June 18`h 2002 Page 3 a(ong,H(ghway 99 shat( be prepared and submitted to the City for review and approval. Once approved, the landscape plan steal( be implemented and maintained for the init(a( one-year period (from the date of acceptance by the City PWD} by the Developer at the Developer's expense.. At a minimum, the landscape plan shat( include provision for grass and street trees. The street trees shall be installed along the meandering s(dewalk, (r~ accordance with the City's draft standards, and the trees steal! be selected from the City's draft street tree list, as approved by City's Planning Commission and City Planning Department and PWD staff. The street trees selected steal( be compatible with the overhead power Lines in this area and shat( be of a minimum 1-112 inch caliper size, The landscape buffer shall be designed with an automated irrigation system that is operated utilizing AC power for the system's controls. It is the Department of Public (Norks opinion that this requirement be completed prior to finaP platting of Miller Estafes Phase 11. 5. Sform Draina a Infrastructure: The developer steal( develop a Facility plan for the storm drain collection and conveyance system which provides for run-off from and roll-on onto the proposed development, any future development on adjacent properties, and any areas deemed by the City that will need to tie-into the proposed development's storm - water collection and canveyance system (i.e. tax lots to the south of the praposed ... __ = ~- -_~_,: = : development}. lt.is our understanding that.the storm drainage infrastructure yvill.be a public system, operated and maintained by the City. Suitable easements for storm - ,._..~-. _._ .--_}_,,_-:;.._.__ra..drainage infrastructure will_need to be dedicated-to.the.City.-fox.. alignment, construction, --- - ~ and maintenance of the necessary storm drainage infrast~cture. A suitable system-will need to be designed for a minimum 10-year storm event, designed to the City's Public Works Department's Standard Specifications and Details (PWD Standardsy, ar as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee. To a(de in the reduction of flooding problems associated with Griffin Creek, City PWD is recommending that the Developer be required to discharge the majority, if not all, of the storm water run-off from this development into the storm drainage infrastructure stub-out of the Tlorth Valley Estates (NVI*} development (between lots 2~ and 22 of NV~}, 6. Ri Pits-of-Wa and Easements: Provide dedication for expansion of the right-of-way along Highway 99 as may be needed to afford the requirements of ODOT and the City PWD. Provide suitable and acceptable easements for any public works (PW) infrastructure located outside the public right-of-way; minimum easement widths are 15- feet for one infrastructure utility; and a minimum of 20 feet for up to three infrastructure utilities. A separate 10-foot minimum width public utilities easement (P.U.P.} should also be required outside the Highway 99 right of way, and on both side of the proposed development's streets, for utility installation. The City PWD is also requesting the requirement to grant tl~e City a storm drainage Miller ~'statesPU17 Tenlalive Plan PWI~ Staff'Repar! September 10, 1.998 Page 4 easement in the open space area on the east side of the development, east of Griffin Greek, for inclusion of the ditch and access banks associated with the Comet Way storm drainage discharge ditch. There may already be an easement recorded in this area for the former storm drain pipe alignment, but the flood of 1997 necessitated the construction of a storm drainage ditch which may be [orated outside any existing easement. Ail City of Central Point Easements shall consist of a minimum section of 6-inches of (4" shale} 4 inches of t~t4" minus}, graded and compacted to create a drivable surface, 7. Greek Setback Requirements; Creek setback requirements (particularly CPMC ] 7.60.090 E.} may make the fencing of the RV storage lot un-buildable due to setback requirements. The City will require a maintenance access easement and a 20-foot maintenance access road as indicated in the creek setback requirements of the City's municipal code, 'This access road would also provide access to BCVSA`s facilities. 8. Traffic Barrier Requirement. A suitable permanent traffrc barrier and emergency vehicle gated access shall be designed and submitted for City PWD_ and Dire District Na. ,..~....~,~- - ~ ...- . - . 3 review and approval, to be placed. at the terrrsinus of riancy`s. lA~ay. TS~is €s #or -_ : -~ -- __ - - ~ ~. --. - -. -- -- ~erriergerc}r~access:cirilY, and shall not be-utit~z~d for construction ar regular access. . - - Furthermore, a traffic termination barrier~at the.. end of Mar's Way will be mandatory": . ~. , . .. 9. Flood Study ~ Flood Pfain Elevations: The entire Miller Estates Phase ll development is located in the ] OD-year flood plain. Base flood elevations have been determined for the subject properties. However, currently the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA} is updating the flood plain in gelation to Griffin Creek. As a result of this study the existing flood plain and base flood elevations are subject to change. ] 0. Reimbursemenf: Tfie Public Works Department recommends the developer be required to fully reimburse the Developers of North Valley Pstates the amounts set forth for both Storm brain ~ Water infrastructure, in the Miller Estates Phase 1 Staff Reports before further development is considered. ~Iler Estates 1'UD Tentative 1'i«<e PWD SiafJ'Report Sept¢mber !0, 1998 .gage 5 GENERAL ] . Alt construction of public improvements shalt conform to the City's PWD Standards, the conditions approved and stipulated liy.the Planning Commission, and other special specifjcations, details, standards, andlar upgrades as may be approved by the City Administrator or his designee prior to the approval of lire constnrction plans for the proposed development. During construction, changes proposed by the Developer shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's engineer to the Ciry PWD {and Building Department (as applicable} for approval prior to implementation. 2. Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals, and conditions as may be required by other agencies, including, but not limited to, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW}, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality {DEQ), Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL}, u.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE}, affected ~~ irrigation districts, and ODOT. ~. Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer`s engineer or surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. If feasible, the - .. ,.. ..........Developer's engineer or surveyor should provide the drawings in both a "hard copy" .. -form {produced ori~ Nlylar'} and iri a ~"digita'1"~ format compatible with AutoCAD ; or ~ ~ ~ ~ . .. ..... ; :; ..A,... . other form as approved ~~iy t#ie City PWD. -- As~built drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line" changes to final approved construction plans that identify the locations and or elevations (as appropriate) of actual installed items, including, but not limited to, invert, inlet, and rim or lip elevations; spot elevations identi#ied on drawings; road alignment; water fines, valves, and . fire hydrants; water and sewer lateral stationing; modifications to street section; manhole and curb Inlet locations; street light locations; other below grade utility line locations and depths; ere. Provide a "red-line" hard copy (on Mylar°}, or an approved alternative format, of construction drawings, and if feasible, an acceptable AutoCAD° compatible drawing electronic fie to the City at completion of construction and prior to acceptance of public infrastructure facilities completed as part of the proposed development, or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee. d. All elevations used on the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on the permanent benchmark shall be tied into an established City approved benct;mark and be so noted on the plans. At ]east one permanent benchmark shat( be provided for the proposed development, the location of which shall be as jointly determined by the City PWD and the Developer. S, if applicable, all existing concrete, pipe, building rziaterials, structures, clear and grub materials, and other deleterious materials shall be removed from the site and either recycled or properly disposed of in accordance with the requirements of tl~e DEQ. M:l(er Estates PUU Tentative ~Ia~: P3YD StafJ"Report Septem5er 14, 199$ gage 6 b, Easemenks far City infrastnucture {i.e. sanitary sewer, water, and storm drain cif appiicabte~} should be a minimum of 15-feet wide, and should nvt spilt lot Lines. Easements for public storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and water lines should be dedicated to the City and not just a P.LI.E. Centerline of buried infrastructure shall be aligned a minimum of five {5} feet from the edge of the easement. if two or more .City owned utilities are located within an easement, then a minimum of 2Q-foot width should be required. Easement dedications in final deeds nr CC~Rs need a statement, which should clearly indicate that easements must be maintained with suitable, all~weather, drivable Vehicular access to Clty public infrastructure facilities, as determined by the City PWD. 7. Prior to the City PWD final approval of the conutruction plans For the proposed improvements, the following should be submitted: A copy of written approval from lire District 3 of the final street and driveway layout, site access, hre hydrant placement, and water system improvement plans for the proposed development. W._ :.-.:..~~... _ The plans relating to_ the=sanitary seviters shc~utd be approved in writing ~by BC~SA, . _ -:: ~ r~-"`'::: ~ ~ and the appropriate signature blocks should be -completed on the plans. ._~.. .. ,: .. ~..~- -- A copy of written approval from ODOT regarding Highway~49 improvements {as applicable}. $. Field verify all existing infrastructure elevations and locations {'r.e. pipe inverts, curb elevations, top of banks, ditch/channel inverts, street elevations, etc.}, to which the proposed development's Infrastructure will connect into existing improvements, prior to final construction plan design and submittal far final approval. 9. Uverhead power lines. if applicable, coordinate efforts with Pacific Power and light, US West, and TCI Cable, to convert any averl~ead electrical power, telephone, ar cable facilities within the proposed development to underground facilities, prior to the acceptance by the City PWD of the public improvements associated with the proposed . development. All agreements and costs associated with the conversion of these facilities from overhead to underground facilities shall be by and between the utility owners and the Developer, i 4. The accurate locations of any existing underground and above ground public Infrastructure, and the location of the associated easements with these facilities, sha11 be accurately portrayed (bath harizontaliy and vertically} on the construction plans and as- bc~ilt drawings. 1 1. The Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide to the Pr~blic Works Department a MilferEstates PUD ?'entative Ptu~: PI~YD Stafj"Report September 1 D, 1998 Page 7 drawing of the recorded I;inal Plat map reproduced on Mylar and in an acceptable electronic form in AutoCAD° format. The Final Plat shah be tied to a legal Government corner and the State Plane Coordinate System. The Final Plat shalt either reflect or be Later modified to reflect any applicable "red-line" changes noted in the construction "as- builts", at the discretion of the City Administrator or his designee. 12. If the proposed development places structures within the 100-year flcwdzone of Griffin Creek, the Developer's engineer will be required to explain and provide detail as to what affect the placement of these structures will have an the floodzone; what affect it will Dave an the fioodplain elevation and floodzone boundary; and what affects the modification of the floodplain elevation and floodzone boundary will have on the existing and proposed . facilities, and propeities surrounding the proposed development. As applicable, the Developer's engineer shall determine the existing Base Flood Elevation contours and . illustrate the existing boundaries of the Floodplain and flaodway fora 100-year storm ~. event commonly referred to as the °Base Rood Event"j associated with Griffin Creek, on the construction plans submitted far the development. The drawings shall also indicate the revised Base Flood Elevation contours and boundaries of the Floodplain and Floadway expected to occur fallowing the completion of any development within the Identified ...~._~__ : .._ _. floodzone (also referred to asxhe._'Area.of Special F1ood.,Hazard").. Streets/Traffic ~ _ . ~~ _ . Existing Improvements -Mary's Way and Nancy Avenue. - Current ROW SO'-wide, 36'-wide street width. 1. Construction drawings for this Tentative Plan shall include a Street bighting Plan in accordance with the requirements of the City PWD or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee. The construction drawings shall include clear vision areas designed to meet the City's PWD Standards. 2. The Developer's engineer shall, at the cost of the Developer, evaluate the strength of the native soils and determine the driveway/street section designs to accommodate the expected loads (including fire equipment) to be traveled on these driveways. If a public street, then the City will design the required street section. Storn~ Drainage, Irrigation Improvements Existing improvements - Griffin Creek across the eastern boundary of proposed development. Rogue River Valley Irrigation District potentially controls MillerFsfa~es P~II~ T'¢ntative,F'lan 1 PFYD Stuff Repprt Seplem6er 10, 1998 Page 8 irrigation rights within the project area including conveyance of water in Griffin Creek. 1. Developer's engineer shat! develop a facility plan for the storm drain collection, retention, and conveyance system (SD System) which provides for storm water run-off froru and run-on onto the proposed development (either surface run-on or culvert or creek ditch conveyance}, any existing or future development on adjacent properties, conveyed storm drainage, or surface water flow, and any areas deemed by the City that will need to connect-Into the proposed development's SD System. 2. Developer's engineer shall determine how SD System will work during ~ 4 year and 100- year flood events associated with Griffin Creek. Identify the HGI. in Griffin Creels during ~ 0- and 100-year storm event, and what affect It will have on the proposed storm drain system. System should be designed to adequately drain I4-year storm without surcharging or should be provided with adequate storage to prevent surcharging. ~. During the design of the SD system, the Developer's engineer shall consider the effect of the proposed improvements and structures with regard to the 104-year basE_~lood event . floodway and floodplain of_Gri~'fin_.Creek. _ The cfesign.z~f the storm: drain collecti~tr and =~~ -= ~ ~ ~ - ~onveyanee system (SD~Syst~m} should provide for storm water run-off from and r€~it-on y ' ~ ~ onto the proposed development (either._surface run-on or-culvert or-creek ditch .-- :._~.. ~ ~~ ~~ _ ~ conveyance); and that the majority of storm-water from the-site is colleted and discharged downstream of the Scenic Avenue box culvert. The Developer and the Gity PWD shall agree on the applicable run-off coefficients, carve numbers, retardance, etc., to be used in the engineering calculations. 4. Roof drains and under drains shat[ not be directly connected to public storm drain lines, and shall drain to the street. Discharge of these lines into Griffin Creek is not allowed by the DI;Q. ~. Any discharge points of the storm water facilities (other than connection to the NVh storm drainage collection and conveyance system} snail be designed to provide an aesthetically pleasing, useful, and low maintenance facility, that are designed to mitigate erosion, damage, or loss during a 104 year storm event; and that mitigate the "attractive nuisance" hazards associated with these types of facilities, b, Prior to City I'WD construction plan review, the Developer shall provide the City FWD with a complete set of Hydrologic and hydraulic calculations and profile plots Far sizing 'the SD system, which sl~alf incorporate the use of the City PWD's ralnfalllintenslty curve, and City approved run-off coef#cients, curve numbers, retardance, pipe roughness coefficients, etc., that are used in the engineering calculations. 7. Storm drainpipe rz~aterials shat! be i'VC, H©PE, or reinforced concrete, with watertight Miller Estates PUD Tentalrve Pau.. Pli'D Stafj"Reporl September 10, 1998 Page 9 joints. Provide concrete orsand-cement slurry encaset~~ent where reciuired in areas of minimum cover. 8. if inietslcatch basins are to exceed 4.5 feet in depth from the lip of the inlet, then the inlets and catch basins shall be designed to afford suitable "man" entry into the inletslcatch basin for maintenance/cleaning purposes. 9. Developer's engineer shall provide hydrology and hydraulic calculations and flow line plots for private and public storm drains. Plot HGL on profile or provide a separate profile drawing that indicates the HGL on the profile, Pipes should maintain cleaning velocity {minimum 2.0 feet per second) and have adequate capacities without surcharging during the design storm. ] 0. The Developer may wish to incorporate the use of a perforated SD system. 1 F so, then the perforated storm drain system shat! be designed to have adequate capacities to: Convey the collected groundwater and storm water with the minimum cleaning velocities and without surcharging the collection and conveyance piping; and . ~ ~--.Minirriize silts,.-sarids;''gravels; and fines-fnigr~tion from the=inative soils into the SD °.._ -._.: system. The plotted HGL shall include both the groundwater infiltration, and the storm water run- off and run-on inflows into the SD system. ~ ] . Maintain a minimum 0.2-foot drop between inlet and outlet pipe inverts in manholes and curb inlets, unless flow-through velocities during the design storm event exceed 3.0 feet per second (fps), if flow veiocities exceed ~.0 fps and the inlet pipe is in relatively direct ~i.e. ] 80 ± 5 degree} horizontal alignment with the outlet pipe, then as a minimum the pipe scope shall be maintained through the base of the manhole or curb inlet. If flaw velocities exceed 3.0 fps, and there is other than relatively direct horizontal alignment between the Inlet and outlet pipes, then a minimum of a 0,]-foot drop between inlet and outlet pipe inverts in manholes or curb inlet must be maintained. A bottom channel shall be formed in the manhole or curb inlet base to mitigate transitional losses and enhance flaw through the manhole or curb inlet. 12. Sheet flow surface drainage from the property onto the public rights-of--way or onto neighboring properties is unacceptable. ] ~. if determined applicable by a City of Central Point representative, a hydrologist will be consulted to determine the nature of existing groundwater conditions and any consequences that may occur as a result of the proposed development. Miller Estates PUD 7'enlative Plars Pr3~D Staff Report September I0, 1998 Page 1 U 13. Plans, which propose to include the discharge to Griffin Creek and any construction or modification within the lloodway of Griffn Creek, shall be in compliance with DSL, ACOI±, ODTW, DLQ, and/or City PWD {as applicable) guidelines and requirements and any applicable conditions and or approvals, of these regulatory agencies. Sanitary Sewer t . All sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system (SS System) design, construction and testing shall conform to the standards and guidelines of the Oregon DEQ ~ 990 APWA Standards, Oregon Chapter, Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA), and the City PWD Standards, where applicable. 2. The construction plans and the as-built drawings shall identify lateral stationing for construction of sewer laterals. 3. The City upon completion of initial~corutruction plan review ar~d preliminary approval, wilt forward the plans to BCVSA for completion of the review_ process. Upon completion ._ _ - _. _...-.-:_..._ of the review by BC'~ISA, cornpletian o~:titiat revisfons.to.the-planrhy the Devetope~r`s ~-'_- --~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~'--~er~grrreet', and-followingthe fnal approval and signat~rre on the constrciction pfarrs by BCVSA, the Public Works Director will approve the plans in Trrzal form.- ~ - ~4. All testing and video inspection of lines and manholes shall be done in accordance with BCVSA requirements, at Developerrs expense. 'The Developer shall provide BCVSA and the City with test reports, TV reports and certiFcation of the sewer system construction prior to final acceptance, - 'mater System The water system shall be designed to provide the required lire flow demand capacities for the proposed facility, which meet fire District 3 requirements. Maximum spacing of fire hydrants shat! be ADO feet. The water system shall be of reinforced flow {"cooped"} design. Water service lateral connection stationing and size shall be provided on construction plans and as-built drawings. 2. Developer shat! comply with Oregon Health Division ~OHD) and City requirements for backllaw prevention. Site work, Gradi~~g, and Utility Plans 1. Grading plans should have originalt'existing grades and final grades plotted on the plan. Typically, existing grade contour lines are dashed and screened back, and final grade Milfer Estates PUD Tentative Pla,~ P1f'1] Staff Report Seplem5er ID, 1998 Page II contour [fines are overlaid on top of the existing grades and are in a heavier Tine width and solid, Contour lines should be labeled with elevations. 2. Al[ structures shall have roof drains, area drains, and/or craw[ spaces with positive drainage away from the building or structure, ~. Provide City with a utility plan approved by each utility company, which reflects ail utility line locations, crossings, transformer locations, valves, etc. ~I. Utility locations must be accurately Included on the as-built drawings, or as a separate set of drawings attached to the as-built drawings. Rights of Ways/basements 1. If applicable, Developer shall provide a Statement of Water Rights (an a Cit}r approved form}, for arry affected properties. For praperti~s determined to have water rights, the __ ._..__ _~__._._._:_. developer.wil[ coordinate with .the. State 1Nater master the re--allocation of any waters . .~ ... . . ..:. ~ W i ~ ~ - _ attacFied~~o-lands ncs~[onger irrigab[e~s a result of the pt'oposed developmerit: ~ =~--- - ---.-~ Rl/COMiY~:ENDEU PLA.NNZIVG DFPARTM~N'I' CONI~IT~ONS OF APFZZOVAL 1. A suitable landscape and irrigation plan must be submitted, accepted, and constructed for area bordering Highway 99 prior to Phase II being platted. A landscaping plan for Griffin Creek needs to be submitted showing the placement of a "tot-lot" and adult recreation areas. 2. A parking and fencing plan must be submitted to the City prior to the construction of the RV storage area. 3. The applicant shalt submit a copy of the Covenants, Codes, and Restrictions {CC&R's) or any comparable agreement governing the use, rnaintenaz~ce and continued protection of the PUD as part of the canal deveioprnent plan. . d. A Parking plan shalt be prepared anal submitted to City Staff prior to recording of fhe Final Flat. The parking plan shall include locations far visitor parking, striping and circulation plan for RV parking, and the_no .parking-pones. ~ ~- ~ - -- . S.- - The applicant must meet alt of the conditions of approval set forth in tI~e Public Works .. _.. _ . ..._.Staff Report... __ .. ~ -.` _. - G:iPlan~ingl~$OS 3 miiler2.wpd