Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 562 - Pheasant Creek Estates TPSection 3. Conditional A royal. `l'he application far tentative plan for subclivision 1lerein is hereby approved, subject to the conditions set faz•tla on Exhibits "A" and "13", attached hereto by z•eference incorporated herein, imposed under authority of CPMC; Cllaptcr 16.36. ltu~•thern3ore, approval is contingent upon the City Council's approval of a zone cha~zge for tl~e property in questia~~. Approval would change the zoning district from R-1-10 to R-1-8. Passed by the Planning Conlnlissian and signed by zne in authentication of its passage this 18th day of February 1 S, 2003. PIannirzg Canazxzission Chair ATTEST: City Repr~s~ntative Approved by zne this 18th day of February, 2003. Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. 562 (02/18/2003) ~'xFti6i~ "~~~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDED CQNDITIONS OF APPRQVAL 1. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall submit to the; City a copy of the proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs} for 1'laeasant Creek Estates Subdivision. 2. The applicant shall comply with all requirements unposed by affected public agencies and utilities as they pertain to the development of the Pheasant Creek Estates Subdivision. Evidence of such compliance shall be submitted to the City prior to final plat approval. 3. The applicant shall comply with all federal, state and Iocal regulations, standards and requirements applicable to the development and construction of the Pheasant Creek Estates Subdivision. r v ~xhiFit "13" Pheasanf Creek Esfafes 2/14/2003 1 Purpose Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer"} regarding City Public Works Department (PWD} standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed. Gather information from the DeveloperlEngineerregording the proposed development. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS The fallowing items are specific Public Works infrastructure recommendations identified while reviewing the Ten#ative Plat for Pheasant Creek estates. 1. Exisfinc~ Infrastructure: The Developer shall demonstrate that all connections to existing infrastructure (i.e. streets, water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems, natural drainage systems, etc.} will not interfere with or provide for the degradation of the existing effec#ive level of service or operation of current infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have either adequate capacities to accommodate the -flows andlor demands imposed on the existing infrastructure as the result of the connection of the proposed development's infrastructure, or will be improved by and at the expense of the Developer to accommodate the additional flows andlor demands; while maintaining or improving the existing level of service ofi the affected facility, as approved by has applicable}, the regulatory agency, utility owner, andlor property owner involved. CITY DF CENTR~.L PDINT PUBLIC WDRKS DEPARTMENT STA.FFREPORT Pheasant Creek ~'sfafes 2/14/2003 2 2. Street Layout/Section: It is the understanding of the Public Works Department that the Developer intends to construct a Local Street, including two cul-de-sacs, a connection to Grant Road located near the northwest property corner, and a connection to Hanley Roatl located near the soufheast property corner. The Developer s engineer should consult the City of Central Point Standards & Specifications for construction regarding the requirements for street sections, right-of way width, curb & gutter, sidewalk, landscaping rows, wheel chair ramps, and all other necessary street design guidelines. 3. RigLh_t_of-Way Ded%cation: The City of Central Point Public Works Department is Recommending 10 feet of right-of way dedication along both the east & west proposed development's boundaries. The east & west development boundaries border Hanley Road & Grant Road respectively, both are unimproved Jackson County Roads which require right-of-way dedication for future improvements. 4. Granf Road & Hanley Road Improvements: The Developer of Pheasant Creek Estates will be responsible for "half-street" improvements to Grant Road & Hanley Raad where the proposed development shares a boundary with each of subjec# roads. The improvements include, but are not limited to, street section, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, an irrigated landscape buffer, bike lanes, street lighting, storm drainage, and traffic delineation. Na immediate plans to improve either Grant Raad or Hanley Road exist. However, the Developer will be responsible to construct their required improvements to accommodate future improvements, compensate the City of Central Point for the cost of the required improvements, or establish a bond for the estimated construction cost related to the required improvements. 3. Public Utilify Easements. The Tentative Plat for Pheasant Creek Estates clearly identifies a 90-foot wide public utility easement bordering a!I lots in the proposed development. The Public Works Departmen# Staff recommends caortlination between the Developer's engineer and surveyor to create the necessary easements for utility provisions relative to future development located on the east side of Pheasant Creek Estates. 4. Storm Drainage Infrasfructure: Astorm drain connection for the proposed development exists in close proximity to the northern property boundary. This connection was stubbed-out for future deveiapment and is recommended by the Public Works Department as the paint of connection to the existing City of Central Point storm drain system. The Developers engineer shah develop a facility plan for the storm drain collection and conveyance system which provides for run-off from and run-on onto the proposed development, any future development on adjacen# properties, and any areas deemed by the City that will need to tie-into the proposed development's storm wafer collection and conveyance system. Acknowledging Pheasant Creek Estates storm drain system will be a public system, operated and maintained by the City. Suitable easements for storm drainage infrastructure will need to be dedicated to the City for alignment, construction, and maintenance of the necessary storm drainage infrastructure. An appropriate system will need to be designed for a minimum 70-year storm event, designed to the City of Central Point Public Works Department's Standards & Specifications for construction. 5. Wafer System: The City of Cen#ral Point Public Works Department is recommending three connections to the existing City of Central Point wafer distribution system as well as the upsizing of the proposed development's water lines. The location of the three recommended connection points are as follows: Pheasant Greek ~sfates ~:, •_ 2/14/2003 ~~ 3 Y., ^ Connect to the existing 12-inch ductile iron water line located at the intersection of Grant Road and Grey Hawk Way. ^ Connect to the existing 12-inch ductile iron waterline located near the north property boundary. (Within the boundaries of the 10-foot wide pedestrian walkway,} ^ Connect to the existing 12-inch ductile iron waterline located at the intersection of Beall Lane & Hanley Raad. The connection located at the intersection of Beall Lane & Hanley Road will require an additional 435- feet of 12-inch ductile iron waterline to be constructed outside the limits of the proposed development. However, the City of Central Point will negotiate compensation with the developer for the construction of this waterline. Furthermore, the City of Central Point will compensate the developer for the necessary upsizing from $-inch ductile iron waterline to 12-inch within the limits of Pheasant Creek Estates. The City of Central Paint will be reimbursed for the additional 435 of waterline and the necessary waterline upsizing, as future developments are constructed adjacent to the proposed waterline along Hanley Road. 6. Rights of Ways/Easements: If applicable, the Developer shall provide a Statement of Water Rights (on a City approved form), for any affected properties. For properties determined to have water rights, the ~- developer will coordinate with the Sta#e Water master the re-allocation of any wafers attached to lands no >~ , conger irrigable as a result of the proposed development. General All construction of public improvements shaii conform to the City's PWD Standards, the conditions approved and stipulated by the Planning Commission, and other special specifications, details, standards, andlor upgrades as approved by the Ci#y Administrator or his designee prior to the approval of the construction plans for the proposed development. During construction, changes proposed by the Developer shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's engineer to the City PWD (and Building Department, as applicable) far approval prior to implementation. 2. The Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals and conditions as maybe required by other agencies, including, but not limited to, fhe Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ}, Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL}, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE}, affected irrigafion districts, and ODOT. 3. Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. If feasible, the Developer's engineer or surveyor should provide the drawings in both a "hard copy" form (produced on Mylar~) and in a "digital" format compatible with AutoCAD~, ar other form as approved by the City PWD. 4. "As-built" drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line" changes to final approved construction plans that identify the locations and or elevations (as appropriate) of actual installed items, including, but not limited to, invert, inlet, and rim or lip elevations, spot elevations identified on drawings, road alignment, water lines, valves, and fire hydrants, water and sewer lateral stationing, modifications to Pheasant Creek Esfafes 7J14/2043 4 street section, manhole and curb inlet locations, street light locations, other below grade utility line locations and depths, etc, Provide a "red-line" hard copy {on Mylar~} or an approved alternative format, of construction drawings, and if feasible, an acceptable AutoCAD~ compatible drawing electronic file to the City at completion of construction and prior to acceptance of public infrastructure facilities completed as part of the proposed development, or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee. 5. All elevations used on the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on the permanent benchmark shall be tied into an established City approved benchmark and be so noted on the plans. At leas# one permanent benchmark shall be provided far the proposed development, the location of which shall be as jointly determined by the City PWD and the Developer. 6. If applicable, all existing concrete, pipe, building materials, structures, clear and grub materials, and other deleterious materials shall be removed from the site and either recycled or properly disposed of in accordance with the requirements of the DEQ. 7. Easemenfs for Gity infrastructure {i.e. sanitary sewer, water, and storm drain [if applicable]) should be a minimum of 15-feet wide, and should not split lot lines. Easements for public storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and water lines should be dedicated to the City and not just a P.tJ.E. Centerline of buried infrastructure shall be aligned a minimum of five {5} feet from the edge of the easement. If two or more City owned utilities are located within an easement, then a minimum 20-foot width should be required. `. Easement dedications in fnal deeds or CC&Rs need a statement, which should clearly indicate that easements must be maintained with suitable, all-weather, drivable vehicular access to City public infrastructure facilities, as determined by the City PWD. 8. Prior #o the City PWD final approval of the construction plans for the proposed improvements, the following should be submitted: / A copy of written approval from Fire District #3 of the final street and driveway layout, site access, fire hydrant placement, and water system improvement plans for the proposed development. / The plans relating to the sanitary sewers should be approved in writing by BCVSA, and the appropriate signature blocks should be completed on the plans. / A copy of written approval from Jackson County Roads Department regarding highwaylcounty road improvements (as applicable}. 9. 1"ield verify all existing infrastructure elevations and locations {i.e. pipe inverts, curb elevations, top of banks, tlitchlchannel inverts, street elevations, etc.), to which the proposed development's infrastructure will connect into existing improvements, prior to final construction plan design and submittal for final approval. 10. Overhead power lines. if applicable, coordinate efforts with Pacific Power and Light, Qwest, and Charter Communications, to convert any overhead electrical power, telephone, or cable facilities within the proposed development to underground facilities, prior to the acceptance by the City PWD of the public improvements associated with the proposed development. All agreements and costs associated with the Pheasant Creek Estates ~~> 2/14/2003 }~ ~ conversion of these facilities from overhead to underground facilities shall be by and between the utility owners and the Developer. 11. The accurate locations of any existing underground and above ground public infrastructure, and the location of the associated easements with these facilities, shall be accurately portrayed (both horizontally and vertically} on the construction plans and as-built drawings. 12. The Developer's engineer ar surveyor shah provide to the Public Works Department a drawing of the recorded Final Plat map reproduced on Mylar~ and in an acceptable electronic form in AutoCAD~ format, The Final Plat shall be tied to a legal Government corner and the State Plane Coordinate System. The >=inaf Plat shall either reflect or be lafer modified fo reflect any applicable "red-line" changes noted in the construction "as-bunts", at the discretion of the City Administrator or his designee. 13. If the proposed development places structures within the 100-year floodzone, the Developer's engineer will be required to explain and provide detail as to what affect the placement of these structures will have on the floodzone; what affect it will have on the tloodplain elevation and floodzone boundary; and what affects the modification of the floodplain elevation and floodzone boundary will have on the exiting and proposed facilities, and properties surrounding the proposed development. As applicable, the Developer's engineer shall determine the existing Base Flood Elevation contours and illustrate the existing boundaries of the floodplain and floodway far a 100-year storm even# on the construction plans submitted for the proposed development. StreetsfTraffic © EXISTING 1NFRASTRt)CTURE ^ Grant Road (Jackson County Jurisdiction} Classification -Collector ^ Hanley Raad (Jackson County Jurisdiction} Classification -Minor Arterial Construction drawings for this Tentative Plan shall include a Street Lighting PIanlDriveway Lighting Pian in accordance with the requirements afi the City PWD or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee. The construction drawings shah include clear vision areas designed to meet the City's PWD Standards. 2. The Developer's engineer shall, at the cost of the Developer, evaluate the strength of the native soils and determine the drivewaylstreet section designs to accommodate the expected loads (including fire equipment) to be traveled on these driveways. If a public street, then the City of Central Point Public Works Department Standards & Specifications will stipulate the design of required street section. Storm ©rainage, Irrigation tm~rovements ^ EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE ^ 24-inch Storm Drain (northern property boundary} 1. Developer's engineer steal! develop a facility plan for the storm drain collection, retention, and Pheasant Creek twstates ~;.~.. ZH4/2003 6 conveyance system (SD System} which provides for storm water run-off from and run-on onto the proposed development (either surface run-on or culverf or creeklditch conveyance}, any existing or future development on adjacent properties, conveyed storm drainage, or surface wafer flow, and any areas deemed by the City that will need to connect-into the proposed development's SD System. The system should be designed to adequa#ely drain a 10-years#orm event without surcharging or should provide adequate storage to prevent surcharging 2. Roof drains and under drains shall not be directly connected to public storm drain lines, and shall drain to the street. 3. Any discharge points of the storm water facilities shall be designed to provide an aesthetically pleasing, useful, and low maintenance facility, that are designed to mitigate erosion, damage, or loss during a 100- yearstorm event; and that mitigate the "attractive nuisance" hazards associated with these types of facilities. 4. Prior to City PWD construction plan review, the Developer shall provide the City PWD with a complete set of hydrologic and hydraulic calculations and profile plots for sizing the SD system, which shall incorporate the use of the City PWD's rainfalllintensitycuwe, and City approved run-off coefficients, curve numbers, retardance, pipe roughness coefficients, etc., that are used in the engineering calculations. The developer's engineer shall further provide hydrology and hydraulic calculations and flow line plots for public storm drains. Plot HGt_ on a profile or provide a separate profile drawing that indicates the HGL on the profile. Pipes shouid maintain cleaning velocity (minimum 2.0 fee# per second} and have adequate capacities without surcharging during the design storm. 5. Storm drainpipe materials shall be PVC, HDPE, or reinforced concrete, with watertight joints. Provide concrete orsand-cement slurry encasemen# where required in areas of minimum cover. 6. Sheet flow surface drainage from the property onto the public rights-of way or onto neighboring properties is unacceptable. Sanitary Sewer 1. All sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system {SS System} design, construction and testing shall conform to the standards and guidelines of the Oregon DEQ, 1990 APWA Standards Oregon Chap#er, Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA}, and the City PWD Standards, where applicable. 2. The construction plans and the "as-built" drawings shall identify lateral stationing for construction of sewer laterals. 3. The City upon completion of initial construction plan review and preliminary approval, will forward the plans to BCVSA for completion of the review process. Upon completion of the review by BCVSA, completion of final revisions to the plans by the Developer's engineer, and following the final approval and signature on the construction plans by BCVSA, the Public Works Director will approve the plans in final farm. ~. Ail testing and video inspection of lines and manholes shall be done in accordance with BCVSA Pheasant Creek t;'states 2/14/2003 7 requirements, at Developer's expense. The Developer shall provide BCVSA and the City with test reports, TV reports and certification of the sewer system construction prior to final acceptance. Water System ^ EXISTING 11~FRASTRUCTURE ^ 12-inch Waterline (Grant Road) ^ 12-inch Waterline (Diego Court) 1. Developer shall comply with Oregon Health Division (OHD) and City requirements for bacicflow prevention. 2. The Developer's engineer shall consult Fire District #3, and comply with any and all suggestions regarding fire protection. 3. Each building shall be served by a separate water meter. 4. Construction drawings shall include the size, type, and location of all water mains, hydrants, air valves, service connections, and other appurtenance details in accordance with City PWD Standards and as required by the City PWD. 5. Water system shall be tested in accordance with City PWD Standards and requirements at Developer's expense and must be approved by the City. 6. Specifications far the design and construction of the water system shall be in accordance with City PWD standards. Site work, Grading, and Utility Plans Grading plans should have originallexisting grades and final grades plotted on the plan. Typically, existing grade contour lines are dashed and screened back, and final grade contour lines are overlaid on top of the existing grades and are in a heavier line width and solid. Contour lines should be labeled with elevations. 2. All structures shall have roof drains, area drains, andlor crawl spaces with positive drainage away from the building or structure. 3. Provide City with a utility plan approved by each utility company, which reflects all utility line locations, crossings, transformer locations, valves, etc. 4. Utility locations must be accurately included on the as-built drawings, or as a separate set of drawings attached to the as-built drawings.