Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 567 - 323 Manzanita 4-plexes.,, :IZ s.:..1 i ~-.as.. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 567 A RESOLUTION CONDITIONALLY APPROVING A SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR TWO FOUR PLEX STRUCTURCS LOCATED AT 323 MANZANITA STREET {Applicant {s): Bryan Camarezia (dba: Cainercna Construction, Inc.) {37 2W 03DD Tax Lot 7800} Recitals 1. This matter came before the Planning Cozrzmission for hearing on April 1, 2003, an applicant's site plan application for two four-plea structures near the intersection of Manzanita and Third Street in the IIMR, High Mix Residential district of the City. The Planning Commission reviewed the application and the City staffreports, and received comments frorri all poisons wishirzgto be heard in favor of and opposed to the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY TI-IE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 Criteria Applicable to Decision. The following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code apply to this application: A. Chapter 17.65, TOD Districts and Corridors B. Chapter 17.60, General Regulations, C, Chapter 17.64, Off Street Parking and Loading; D. Chapter 17.72, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval. Section 2. Findings and Conclusions. The Planning Conli~zissiaza hereby adopts by reference all findings of fact set forth in the City staff reports, and concludes that, except where addressed in the conditions of approval, the application and proposal comply with the requirements of the following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code: A. Chapter 17.65, relating to uses, lot size, lot coverage, setback, building height and screening in the HMR, High Mix Residential district; B. Chapter 17.60 relating to paving and landscaping requirements; C. Chapter 17.64 relating to of:F street parking and loading facilities; D. Chapter 17.72 relating to site plan requirements. 1 -PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 567 (04012003 } Section 3. Conditional Approval. The application for site plan appz•oval is hez•eby conditionally approved, subject tothe caziditionsset faz-th ozz Ex hit~it "A" a~ld Exhibit "B" possible , is artached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein, also meeting aEry possible requirements fY•om the Sanitary Authority. Passed by the Plaz~xzizig Comznissiorz and signed by zne in autheziticatiozx ofits passage this _1 st day of -April _ , 2003_. Plarmz~iz~g Commission Chaiz~an ATTEST: Approved by me this _1 st day of April , 2003 Planning Commission Chairman 2 -PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 567 (04012003 } ~'xh.r.6it "~" PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS QE APPROVAII 1. The approval of the Site Plan shall expire in one year on April 1, 2004 unless an application for f nal plat or extension has been received by the City. 2. The site plan must comply with alI applicable local, state and federal regulations. 3. The building must be moved a miniznuan of one foot from. the Westerly property line. `~x~.i.C%t "~3" M'anzanifa 8-flex 3/28I2p03 1 Purpose Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Deus#oper") regarding City Public Works Department (PWD} standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed. Gather information from the Deve#operfEngineer regarding the proposed development_ SPECIAL 14EG?UEREMENTS The following items are specific Public Works infrastructure recommendations identified while reviewing the Proposed Site P#an for an $-Plex development #ocated on Manzanita Street. 1. Existin Infrastructure: The Deve#oper shall demonstrate that all connecfiions to existing infrastructure (#.e. streets, water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems, natural drainage sysfiems, etc.) wi## not interfere with or provide for the degradation of the existing effective #evef of service or operation of current infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure focilities have either adequate capacities to accommodate the flows andlor demands imposed on the existing infrastructure as the result of the connection of the proposed development's in#ras#ructure, or will be improved by and a# the expense of the Developer #a accommodate the addit#ona# flows andlor demands; while maintaining or improving the existing #evef of service of the affected facility, as approved by (as applicable}, the regulatory agency, ufii#ity owner, andlor property owner involved. crr~ of c~NTRA T PorNT r'UBLrC ~(]RKS DEPA.r~TMEN7' STAFF R~PO.1~T Manzanita 8-PI~x 3/28/2003 2 2. AlleytStreet Improvements: It is the recommendation of the Public Works Department that the Developer be required to design and construct street improvements along the Southerly property boundary, including but nat limited to curb, gutter, landscape rows and sidewalk (consult the T.O.D. design manual for specific guidelines). The Developer will also be responsible for improving the City a11ey, which parallels the Southerly property line far the entire length of the subject property. The Public Works Department would prefer the Developer compensate the Gity of Gentraf Point for the expense of the required alley improvements, thus allowing the City to improve the entire length of the subject alley when funds become available. 3. Public,Utility Easements: The proposed site plan provided by Harkey Homes fails to identify a 10-fioot wide public utility easement bordering all lots in the proposed development. The Public Works Department recommends coordination between the Developer's engineer and surveyor to create the necessary easements far utility provisions relative to the proposed development. if the proposed development is unable to provide a 10-foot wide public utility easement along Manzanita Street a 10- foot wide public utility easement may be provided along the Northern property boundary. 4. Private Draina_ae/Parkin_g Lof: It is mandatary the proposed parking lot be designed by a civil engineer registered in the state of Oregon. Furthermore, a site drainage plan meeting all the warrants specified in the City of Central Point Public Works Standards for Construction is required. General All construction of public improvements shall conform•to the Gity's PWD Standards, the conditions approved and stipulated by the Planning Commission, and other special specifications, details, standards, andlor upgrades as approved by the City Administrator or his designee prior to the approval of the construction plans for the proposed development. During construction, changes proposed by the Developer shat! be submitted in writing by the Developer's engineer to the City PWD (and Building Department, as applicable) for approval prior to implementation. 2. The Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals and conditions as may be required by other agencies, including, but not limited to, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW}, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL}, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE}, affected irrigation districts, and ODOT. 3. Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. if feasible, the Developer's engineer or surveyor should provide the drawings in both a "hard copy" form (produced on Mylar~'} and in a "digital" format compatible with AutoCAD®, or other form as approved by the City PWD. Marrzanita 8-flex 3/28/2003 3 4. "As-built" drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line" changes to final approved construction plans that identify the locations and or elevations {as appropriate) of actual installed items, including, but not limited ta, invert, inlet, and rim or lip elevations, spot elevations identified on drawings, road alignment, water lines, valves, and fire hydrants, water and sewer lateral stationing, modifications to street sec#ion, manhole and curb inlet locations, street light locations, other below grade utility f ne locations and depths, etc. Provide a "red-line" hard copy {an Mylar~ or an approved alternative format, of construe#ion drawings, and if feasible, an acceptable AutoCAD® compatible drawing electronic file to the City at completion of construction and prior to acceptance of public infrastructure facilities completed as part of the proposed development, or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee. 5. AI! elevations used on the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on the permanent benchmark shall be tied into an established City approved benchmark and be so noted on the plans. At least one permanent benchmark shall be provided far the proposed development, the location of which shall be as jointly determined by the City PWD and the Developer. 6. If applicable, all existing concrete, pipe, building materials, structures, clear and grub materials, and other deleterious materials shall be removed from the site and either recycled or properly disposed of in accordance with the requirements of the DEQ. 7. Easements for City infrastructure {i.e. sanitary sewer, wa#er, and storm drain [if applicable]) should be a minimum of 15-feet wide, and should not split Ivt lines, Easements for public storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and water lines should be dedicated to the City and not just a P.U.E. Centerline,of buried infrastructure shall be aligned a minimum of five {5} feet from the edge of the easement. if two or more City awned utilities are located within an easement, then a minimum 20-foot width should be required. Easement dedications in final deeds or CC&Rs need a statement, which should clearly indicate that easements must be maintained with suitable, all-weather, drivable vehicular access to Ci#y public infrastructure facilities, as determined by the City PWD. 8. Prior to the City PWD final approval of the construction plans for the proposed improvements, the following should be submitted: ~ A copy of written approval from Fire District #3 of the final street and driveway layout, site access, fire hydrant placement, and water system improvement plans for the proposed development. ~ The plans relating to the sanitary sewers should be approved in writing by BCVSA, and the appropriate signature blocks should be completed on the plans. Manzanifa 8-Plex 3/28/2003 9. Field verify all existing infrastructure elevations and locations {i.e. pipe inverts, curb elevations, top of banks, ditch/channel inverts, street elevations, etc.), to which the proposed development's infrastructure will connect into existing improvements, prior to final construction plan design and submittal for final approval. 10. Overhead power lines. If applicable, coordinate efforts with Pacific Power and Light, Qwest, and Charter Communications, to convert any overhead electrical power, telephone, or cable facilities within the proposed development to underground facilities, prior to the acceptance by the City PWD of the public improvements associated with the proposed development. All agreements and costs associated with the conversion of these facilities from overhead to underground facilities shall be by and between the utility owners and the Developer. 11. The accurate locations of any existing underground and above ground public infrastructure, and the location of the associated easements with these facilities, shall be accurately portrayed (both horizontally and vertically) on the construction plans and as-built drawings. 12. The Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide to the Public Works Department a drawing of the recorded Final Plat map reproduced on Mylar®and in an acceptable electronic form in AutoCAD~ format. The Final Plat shall be tied to a legal Government corner and the State Plane Coordinate System. The Final Plat shall either reflect or be later modified to reflect any applicable "red-line" changes noted in the construction "as-bunts", at the discretion of the City Administrator qr his designee. 13. If the proposed development places structures within the 100-year floodzone, the Developer's engineer will be required to explain. and provide detail as to what affect the placement of these structures will have on the floodzone; what affect it will have on the floodplain elevation and floodzone boundary; and what affects the maditlcation of the floodplain elevation and floodzone boundary will have on the exiting and proposed facilities, and properties surrounding the proposed development. As applicable, the Developer's engineer shall determine the existing Base Flood Elevation contours and illustrate the existing boundaries of the floodpiain and fioodway fora 100-year storm event on the construction plans submitted for the proposed development. StreetslTraffic © EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE Manzanita Street (Jackson County Jurisdiction) Classification _ Lacaf Street Construction drawings for this Tentative Plan shat! include a Street Lighting PianlDriveway Lighting Pian in accordance with the requirements of the City PWD or as otherwise approved by the City Adminis#rator or his designee. The construction drawings shall include clear vision areas designed to meet the City's PWD Standards. Manzanrta $-flex 3/28/2003 5 2. The Developer`s engineer shalt, at the cost of the Developer, evaluate the strength of the native soils and determine the driveway/street section designs to accommodate the expected loads (including fire equipment) to be traveled on these driveways. !f a public street, then the City of Centro! Point Public Works Department Standards & Specifications wilt stipulate the design of required street section. Storm Drainage, Irrigation ilmpro~ements ^ EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE ^ 12-inch Storm Drain (Manzanita Street} Developer's engineer shall develop a facility plan for the storm drain collection, retention, and conveyance system (SD System} which provides for storm water run-off from and run-on onto the proposed development (either surface run-on or culvert or creeklditch conveyance}, any existing or future development on adjacent properties, conveyed storm drainage, or surface water flow, and any areas deemed by the City that wilt need to connect-into the proposed development's SD System. The system should be designed to adequately drain a 10-year storm event without surcharging or should provide adequate storage to prevent surcharging 2. Roof drains and under drains shall not be directly connected to public storm drain lines, and shall drain to the street. 3. Any discharge points of the storm water facilities shall be designed to provide an aesthetically pleasing, useful, and low maintenance facility, that are designed to mitigate erosion, damage, or lass during a 100-year storm event; and that mitigate the "attractive nuisance°' hazards associated with these types of facilities. 4. Prior to City PWD construction plan review, the Developer shall provide the City PWD with a complete set of hydrologic and hydraulic calculations and profile plots fior sizing the SD system, which shall incorporate the use of the City PWD's rainfalllintensity curve, and City approved run-off coefficients, curve numbers, retardance, pipe roughness coefficients, etc., that are used in the engineering calculations. The developer's engineer shall further provide hydrology and hydraulic calculations and flow line plots for public storm drains. Plot HGIr on a profile or provide a separate profile drawing that indicates the HGi_. on the profile. Pipes should maintain cleaning velocity (minimum 2.0 feet per second} and have adequate capacities without surcharging during the design storm. 5. Storm drainpipe materials shall be PVC, HDPE, or reinforced concrete, with watertight joints. Provide concrete or sand-cement slurry encasement where required in areas of minimum cover. 6. Sheet flow surface drainage from the property onto the public rights-of-way or onto neighboring properties is unacceptable. 7. Private storm drain infrastructure will require a plan review by the City of Central Point Manzanita 8-flex 3/28/2003 6 Plumbing Inspector, a plumbing permit, and on-site inspection by the Plumbing Inspector. Sanitary Sewer 1. AI! sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system (SS System} design, construction and testing shall conform to the standards and guidelines of the Oregon DEQ, 1990 APWA Standards Oregon Chapter, Bear Greek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA}, and the City PWD Standards, where applicable. 2, The cons#ruction plans and the "as-built" drawings shall identify lateral stationing for construction of sewer laterals. 3. The City upon completion of initial construction plan review and preliminary approval, will forward the plans to BCVSA for completion of the review process. Upon completion of the review by BCVSA, completion of final revisions to the plans by the Developer's engineer, and following the final approval and signature on the construction plans by BCVSA, the Public Works Director will approve the plans in final form. 4. All testing and video inspection of Imes and manholes shall be done in accordance with BCVSA requirements, at Developer's expense. The Developer shall provide BCVSA and the City with test reports, N reports and certification of the sewer system construction prior to final acceptance. Water System o EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE ^ 12-inch Waterline (Manzanita S#reet} 1. Developer shall comply with Oregon Health Division (OHD} and City requirements for backflow prevention. 2. The Developer's engineer shall consult Fire District #3, and comply with any and all suggestions regarding fire protection. 3. Each building shall be served by a separate water meter. 4. Construction drawings shall include the size, type, and location of all water mains, hydrants, air valves, service connections, and other appurtenance details in accordance with Gity PWD Standards and as required by the City PWD. 5. Water system shall be tested in accordance with City PWD Standards and requirements at Developer's expense and must be approved by the City. 6. Specifications for the design and construction of the water system shalt be in accordance with City PWD standards. Manzanifa &Plex 3/28/2003 7 Site work, Grading, and Utility Plans Grading plans should have original/existing grades and final grades plotted on the plan. Typically, existing grade contour lines are dashed and screened back, and final grade contour lines are overlaid on top of the existing grades and are in a heavier line width and solid. Gontour lines should be labeled with elevations. 2. Ali structures shall have roof drains, area drains, andlor crawl spaces with positive drainage away from the building or structure. 3. Provide City with a u#ility plan approved by each utility company, which reflects all utility line locations, crossings, transformer locations, valves, etc. 4. Utility locations must be accurately included on the as-built drawings, or as a separate set of drawings attached to the as-built drawings.