HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 586 - Westside Lumber VariancePLANNING CC~~t~~i(~;S[~7~ i~:F'SOLUTIt~N N(~. 58G
A RESC?LIJTIJN C 1ZAN"DING A FENCE VARIANCE
(Applicant:. ~~'cst~id~~ Lu~xaber Comps r~~, iazc.)
(37 2W 1 t CI3, 'i~ax Lots 500 <C ~;~~(~~
Rrit.tl4
This matter cai°ne before the Planning Co117n1issi~Qn for hearin {,, on. Air ~-~~ ~t S, 2003, on applicant's
application for a variance. Applicant requested to remove the exist i t]~; thaitlli~ll~ 1r:zice with barbed wfre
and replace with an ~' concrete wall without barbed wire. Tl~e 1'it~~~ni~ig Commission reviewed the
application and the City staffrepo~-ts, and received comments from. ail persons wish~a to be heard in favor
of and opposed to the application.
Now, therefore;
BE IT RESCtLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY t7F CENTRAL
POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Criteria Applicable to Decision. The following chapters of the Central Point
Municipal Cade apply to thi application:
A. Chapter 15.20, Fences
F3. Chaptcr 17.80, Variances.
~ctic,~~~?. _FinclingsandConclusions. The PlanningCornn~i~ionhereyadoptsby~~c(crcnc
all finding a1 f~:~ct set forth in the City staff reports, and concludes that applicant has dem~~nstrated
compliance with the requirements of CPMC Chapter 7.80, pertaining to variances.
Section 3. Variance Granted. Applianeeisherebygra7lte~lal~provalforthc~-cci~~estcd~~~uiance
consisting ofremoval ofexisting chain link fence l~ itkl I~~u died wire and to replace it with an 8' concrete wall.
Passed by the Plain-ti ii,~u Commission and signed by e f n authentication ofits passage this
day of ~~-~"` , 20C?~~ ,• ,~,
fy !'•. Jy ...
S.. l •~ Fr ,y
~~.._.. _
Pl~1f~ni~~F; Commission Cl~:~it•