HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Resolution 1116
RESOLUTION NO. / (~(o
A RESOLUTION REVISING THE WATER,
TRANSPORTATION, PARKS, AND STORMWATER
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
WHEREAS, Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 223 and Central Point Municipal Code
Chapter 11.12 authorize collection of system development charges for water supply, treatment
and distribution; transportation; parks and recreation; and drainage and flood control; now,
therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT,
OREGON, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. IMPROVEMENT PLAN. The City Council hereby adopts, as its
improvement plans required by ORS 223.309 and Central Point Municipal Code Section
11.12.080, the project lists contained in Exhibit A. Said exhibit defines the cost of projected
capital improvements needed to increase the capacity of each system to which the improvement
fee is related and lists the estimated cost, time, and percentage of costs eligible to be funded with
revenues from the improvement fee for each improvement.
The improvement plan adopted herein maybe modified from time to time by resolution
of the Council, as provided in Central Point Municipal Code Section 11.12.080.
Section 2. SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES. Effective August 1, 2006, the
water, transportation, parks, and stormwater system development charges contained in Exhibit B
shall be required.
Section 3. COLLECTION OF CHARGE. Effective August 1, 2006, the water,
transportation, parks, and stormwater system development charges are payable to the City of
Central Point as provided in Central Point Municipal Code Section 11.12. 090. ~
Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this ~~ day of
.~S`u , 2006.
ATTES
City Representative
Approved by me this ~ day of~ , 2006
` 1
MAYOR
/I% ~!~y d-o ~
MAYOR
City of Central Point EXHIBIT 'A'
SDC Study
Project List: Stormwater
Table 4
Project Project Cost
# Source (1) Year Estimate Yr Project Description
Inputted Default
Allocated % Allocated
to Growth (2) to Growth (3)
Original 2006 SDC
Project Project Eligible
Cost Cost (4) Cost
1 CIP 2006 2005 Rose Valley Rd /Mingus Creek 0% $ 98,887 $ 104,177 $ -
2 CIP 2009 2005 Crater High School /Third St 0% 176,175 $ 185,600 -
3 MP 2004 Bear Creek drainage basin 57% 1,980,686 $ 2,192,221 1,247,842
4 MP 2004 Mingus Creek drainage basin 38% 1,426,388 $ 1,578,724 607,088
5 MP 2004 Griffin Creek drainage basin 54% 1,082,666 $ 1,198,294 644,590
6 MP 2004 Elk Creek drainage basin 57% 125,370 $ 138,759 78,779
7 MP 2004 Daisy Creek drainage basin 71% 137,104 $ 151,746 108,291
8 MP 2004 Horn Creek drainage basin 85% 35,415 $ 39,197 33,369
9 MP 2004 Jackson Creek drainage basin 70% 15,098 $ 16,710 11,701
Curb inlet retrofit
10 MP 2004 0% - -
27 MP 2004 0% - -
Total
plus: SDC Credits Outstanding
Iess:.Current Improvement Fee Fund Balance (n/a) April 06
Total Future Capital Projects for SDC Calculation
$ 2,731,660 $ - $ 5,077,788 $5,605,429 $2,731,660
$0
$2,697,53
NOTES:
(1) CIP =Five-Year Capital Improvements Plan 2005-2010 (March 2005)
MP =Storm Drain Master Plan (March 1, 2004)
(2) Storm Drain Master Plan (March 1, 2004)
(3) Calculated Growth Allocation: 0.00%
(4) Source: Engineering News Review, March 21, 2005 issue.
Total Growth in Customer Base: 31.36%
Year (month of March) 2002 2003 2004 2005
20-City Avg. Construction Cost Index 6,502 6,627 6,957 7,309
2006
7, 700
~~ FCS Group, Inc. (425) 867-1802 7/20/2006
City of Central Point
SDC Study
Project List: Water
Table 4
Cost Inputted Default Original 2006 SDC Operations
Project Project Estimate °~ Allocated °~ Allocated Project Project Eligible Cost
# Source Year Year Project Description to Growth to Growth Cost Cost Cost
1 CIP 2007 2005 Ninth /Laurel Waterline 28.6% 225,000 237,000 67,740 169,260
2 CIP 2007 2006 SCADA System Phase III 28.6% 80,000 80,000 22,870 57,130
3 CIP 2007 2005 Beebe Road Waterline Phase I 85% 108,600 114,000 96,900 17,100
4 CIP 2007 2006 Water Rights Purchase 28.6% 347,175 347,000 99,240 247,760
5 MP 2007 2002 B5: Connects Bealle meter with Central Point sys 15.0% 51,000 60,000 9,000 51,000
6 CIP 2008 2005 Peninger Road WL Construction (B3) 65% 431,000 454,000 295,100 158,900
7 CIP 2008 2005 Freeman Road 28.6% 200,000 211,000 60,310 150,690
8 MP 2008 2002 Peninger Road WL (C2) 33.3% 394,000 467,000 155,510 311,490
9 CIP 2009 2006 Carlton Ave Waterline 28.6% 65,000 65,000 18,590 46,410
10 CIP 2009 2006 Grant Road Waterline 28.6% 300,000 300,000 85,750 214,250
11 MP 2009 2002 Downtown Small Pipe Replacement Program 10.0% 350,000 414,000 41,400 372,600
12 CIP 2008 2006 Water Rights Purchase 28.6% 303,700 304,000 86,890 217,110
13 CIP 2009 2006 Water Rights Purchase 28.6% 376,500 377,000 107,760 269,240
14 CIP 2010 2006 3 Acres- Water Reservoir 35% 1,000,000 1,000,000 350,000 650,000
15 MP 2010 2002 Downtown Small Pipe Replacement Program 10.0% 350,000 414,000 41,400 372,600
16 MP 2011 2002 Automate MWC Connections: valves/SCADA system, for 2 mg tank 35.0% 115,000 136,000 47,600 88,400
17 CIP 2011 2005 New Pump Design 35.0% 81,857 86,000 30,100 55,900
18 CIP 2011 2005 2-MG Reservoir Construction 35% 1,317,400 1,388,000 485,800 902,200
19 CIP 2012 2005 Gebhard Road Waterline 35% 265,000 279,000 97,650 181,350
20 CIP 2013 2005 Beebe Road Waterline Phase 2 85.0% 1,000,000 1,053,000 895,050 157,950
21 MP 2013 2002 Downtown Small Pipe Replacement Program 10.0% 350,000 414,000 41,400 372,600
22 MP 2014 2002 Wilson/Upton Rd WL (C3) 33.3% 1,230,000 1,457,000 485,180 971,820
23 MP 2015 2002 C4: Connects existing 16" on Bealle Lane 33.3% 440,000 521,000 173,490 347,510
24 MP 2016 2002 Front St Replacement (C5) 33.3% 200,000 237,000 78,920 158,080
25 MP 2022 2002 New 2mg Tank near Vilas: new ground storage t2 65% 1,440,000 1,705,000 1,108,250 596,750
26 MP 2022 2002 VilasPS:fi°ncapacity2800gpm,3°%ofeatimaled2°22peakMurdemand 65% 1,080,000 1,279,000 831,350 447,650
Total $ 5,264,106 $ 549,161 $12,101,232 $13,399,000 $5,813,250 $7,585,750
;. FCS Group, Inc. (425) 867-1802 7/20/2006
City of Central Point
SDC Study
Project List: Parks
Table 4
Project
Source (1)
Cost
Estimate Yr
Project Description Inputted Default
% Allocated % Allocated
to Growth (1) to Growth (2) Original
Project
Cost 2006
Project
Cost (3) SDC
Eligible
Cost
CIP 2006 Twin Creeks: trails 42.88% $ 290,000 $ 290,000 $ 124,400
CIP 2006 Twin Creeks: open space 42.88% $ 134,000 $ 134,000 $ 57,500
CIP 2006 Twin Creeks: soccer fields 42.88% $ 87,000 $ 87,000 $ 37,300
CIP 2006 Twin Creeks: covered picnic areas 42.88 % $ 58,000 $ 58,000 $ 24,900
CIP 2006 Twin Creeks: sohball field 42.88 % $ 145,000 $ 145,000 $ 62,200
CIP 2006 Twin Creeks: picnic tables 42.88% $ 12,000 $ 12,000 $ 5,100
CIP 2006 Twin Creeks: play equipment (four) 42.88 % $ 116,000 $ 116,000 $ 49,700
CIP 2006 Twin Creeks: tennis courts (three) 42.88% $ 87,000 $ 87,000 $ 37,300
CIP 2006 Twin Creeks: basketball courts (two) 42.88% $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ 15,000
CIP 2006 Twin Creeks Restrooms 42.88 % $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 42,900
CIP 2006 Cascade Meadows: sidewalks, benches and landscaping 42.88% 35,D00 $ 35,000 $ 15,000
CIP 2006 CP Community Park: community center 42.88% 2,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 1,286,500
CIP 2006 CP Community Park: open space 42.88 % 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 21,400
CIP 2006 CP Community Center Feasibility Plan 42.88 % 130,000 $ 130,000 $ 55,800
CIP 2006 Flannagan Park: restroom facilities 42.88% 90,000 $ 90,000 I $ 38,600
CIP 2006 Bear Creek Greenway Master Plan 42.88 % 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 19,300
CIP 2006 Beebe-Gebhard Neighborhood Park 42.88% $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 64,300
CIP 2006 Blue Grass Downs: covered picnic areas 42.88% $ 17,000 $ 17,000 $ 7,300
CIP 2006 Blue Grass Downs: open space 42.88% $ 58,000 $ 58,000 $ 24,900
CIP 2006 Blue Grass Downs: picnic tables 42.88 % $ 12,000 $ 12,000 $ 5,100
CIP 2006 Blue Grass Downs: walking trails 42.88 % $ 64,000 $ 64,000 $ 27,400
CIP 2006 Don Jones Park 42.88 % 230,000 $ 230,000 $ 98,600
CIP 2006 Don Jones Park I 42.88 % 830,000 $ 830,000 $ 355,900
CIP 2006 Don Jones Park II 42.88% 850,000 $ 850,000 $ 364,500
CIP 2006 Pheasant Creek: covered picnic areas 42.88% 15,000 15,000 8,400
CIP 2006 Pheasant Creek: open space 42.88 % 10,000 10,000 4,300
CIP 2006 Pheasant Creek: picnic tables 42.88% 5,000 5,000 2,100
42.8fl1
CIP 2006 Snowy Butte Station: basketball courts ([wol 42.88 % 37,000 37,000 15,900
CIP 2006 Snowy Butte Station: covered picnic areas 42.88% 17,000 17,000 7,300
CIP 2006 Snowy Buhe Station: open space 42.88% 108,000 108,000 46,300
CIP 2006 Snowy Butte Station: picnic tables 42.88% 12,000 12,000 5,100
CIP 2006 Snowy Butte Station; play equipment 42.88 % 12,000 12,000 5,100
CIP 2006 Snowy Butte Station; walking trails 42.88% 64,000 64,000 27,400
CIP 2006 Summerfield Park: basketball court 42.88% 15,000 15,000 6,400
CIP 2006 Summerfield Park: covered picnic areas 42.88% 15,000 15,000 6,400
CIP 2006 Summerfield Park: open space 42.88% 40,000 40,000 17,200
CIP 2006 Summerfield Park: picnic tables 42.88% 7,000 7,D00 3,000
CIP 2006 Summerfield Park: play equipment 42.88% 10,000 10,000 4,300
CIP 2006 Boes Park :Master Plan 42.88% 15,000 15,000 6,400
CIP 2006 Boes Park :Constructions 42.88% 300,000 300,000 128,700
42.88
42.88%
42.86% 0 0
Total ~ 510,400 ~ 3,195,783 7,176,000 38,116,000 $3,705,800
plus: SDC Credits Outstanding $0
less: April 2006 Park SDC IMP Fund Balances (4) $7.0.4,225
Total Future Capital Projects for SDC Calculation $3,501,525
NOTES:
MP - `Central Point Parks and Recreation, Master Plan' (August 2003)
CIP -Five-Year Capital Improvements Plan 2005-2010 (July 20061
Parks standard: 10 acres per 1,000 persons. Sowce: "Central Point Parks and Reoeation, Master Pl an' (August 20031, page 15.
It is assumed that performance of the plan will result in achievement of the Ciry standard.
Current Park Acreage: 129.4 Current Population (Year 2005): 17,500
Curren) Parks Requirement (acres): 175 Prolecled Population (Year 20151: 21,332
Future Parks Requirement (acres): 213
Acreage added through the P)an: 84
Percentage of added acreage for growth: 45.7% Calculated Crowth Allocation: 42.88°
Source: Engineering News Review, Ma xx, 2006 issue.
Year (month of March) 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
20-CI Av .Construction Cost Index 6,502 6,627 6,957 7,309 7700
Source: "City of Central Point, Cash and Investments, December 31, 2004"
FCS Group, Inc. (425) 867-1802 7/20/2006
CIP 2006 Flannagan Park Restrooms 42.88% 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 23,600
City of Central Point
SDC Study
Project List: Transportation
Table 4
Project Project Cost
# Source (t) Year Estimate Yr Project Description
Inputted Default Original 2006 SDC
Allocated % Allocated Project Project Eligible
to Growth (1) to Growth (2) Cost Cost (3) Cost
20 CIP 2007 2006 Hwy 99 RR Crossing 40 % 337,500 337,500 135,000
17 CIP 2007 2006 INTX. Of Scenic Ave/10th SUUpton Rd 40 % 1,501,250 1,501,250 600,500
19 CIP 2008 2005 Haskell Rd: Pine St to Snowy Butte Road 40 % 750,000 790,122 316,049
16 CIP 2008 2005 Freeman Road: Oak St to Hopkins Rd 40 % 1,898,000 1,999,535 799,814
18 CIP 2009 2005 BeebeROad 40% 934,000 983,965 393,586
1 RTP 2009 2005 10th Street, Hazel Street to Scenic Ave: widen to three lanes with bike 8 sidewalks 40 % 1,250,000 1,316,870 526,748
22 CIP 2010 2005 GebhardRoad 40% 1,817,000 1,914,202 765,681
21 CIP 2010 2005 Tenth Street: Hazel St to Scenic Ave 40 % 1,250,000 1,316,870 526,748
23 CIP 2011 2005 Brad Way, Saxbury Drive, Rachel Drive, Manzanita St. Oak St, Ash St 40 % 672,000 707,949 283,180
25 CIP 2011 2005 INTX. Of Beebe Rd 8 Hamrick Rd 40% 150,000 158,024 63,210
28 CIP 2011 2005 Scenic: Tenth to Griffin Creek 40 % 500,000 526,748 210,699
26 CIP 2012 2005 East Pine St: Signal at 4th and 2nd 40 % 375,000 395,061 158,024
24 CIP 2013 2005 Taylor Road 40% 1,000,000 1,053,496 421,398
27 CIP 2014 2005 West Pine Street 40 % 730,000 769,052 307,621
8 RTP 2014 2005 HWY 99 and Beall Lane intersection: realign and upgrade signals and railroad crossing 40 % 452,000 476,180 190,472
32 East Pine Plan 2015 2004 New traffic signal, 700 ft west of Hamrick Road 55 % 350,280 387,690 213,229
33 East Pine Plan 2015 2004 New public street from new signal (project #4a) north to Beebe Road and south to Project #10 55 % 2,250,910 2,491,305 1,370,218
34 East Pine Plan 2015 2004 Install second right-turn lane on northbound off-ramp and eastbound right-turn at Peninger Road I E. Pine S 55 % 609,400 674,483 370,966
35 Easl Pine Plan 2015 2004 Construct second eastbound left-turn lane when Project 4b is completed to Beebe Road. 55 % 402,470 445,453 244,999
36 East Pine Plan 2015 2004 Construct second eastbound left-turn lane and second receiving lane on Hamrick Road north of E. Pine Stre 55 % 733,460 811,793 446,486
37 East Pine Plan 2015 2004 New traffic signal when Project 4b is completed to Beebe Road. 55 % 295,330 326,871 179,779
38 East Pine Plan 2015 2004 Southbound ramp terminal -eliminate westbound left-turn movement and replace w/ loop ramp & right-turn I. 55 % 556,700 616,155 338,885
39 East Pine Plan 2015 2004 Construct new bridges over Bear Creek north and south of E. Pine Street 55 % 8,677,750 9,604,524 5,282,488
40 East Pine Plan 2015 2004 New public street betweeen Peninger Road and Hamrick Road (south of E. Pine Street) 55 % 1,570,350 1,738,062 955,934
41 East Pine Plan 2015 2004 New public street betweeen Peninger Road and Beebe Road / Gephard Road. 55 % 1,214,680 1,344,406 739,424
42 East Pine Plan 2015 2004 Remove traffic signal at Peninger Road and E. Pine Street and convert intersection to right-in /right-out only 55 % 45,720 50,603 27,832
43 East Pine Plan 2015 2004 2nd northbound left-turn lane, 2nd westbound left-turn lane, exclusive northbound and southbound right-turr 55 % 538,120 595,591 327,575
44 East Pine Plan 2015 2004 Construct second eastbound left-turn lane 55 % 393,730 435,780 239,679
45 East Pine Plan 2015 2004 Construct eastbound left-turn lane 55% 332,770 368,309 202,570
46 East Pine Plan 2015 2004 Northbound ramp terminal -eliminate eastbound left-turn movement and replace w/loop ramp and right-turn 55 % 556,700 616,155 338,885
47 East Pine Plan 2015 2004 Widen E. Pine Street to 3 lanes in westbound direction beween Hamrick Road and southbound 15 ramp tem 55 % 4,442,520 4,916,976 2,704,337
48 East Pine Plan 2015 2004 Widen northbound approach for dual left-turn lanes and a shared through right-turn lane. Widen southbounc 55% 840,960 930,774 511,925
49 East Pine Plan 2015 2004 Construct westbound right-turn lane 55% 344,550 381,348 209,741
50 East Pine Plan 2015 2004 Southbound ramp terminal -construct second southbound left-turn lane. 55 % 455,040 503,638 277,001
51 East Pine Plan 2015 2004 Northbound ramp terminal -construct exclusive westbound right-turn lane. 55 % 760,220 841,411 462,776
52 East Pine Plan 2015 2004 Widen E. Pine Street to 3lanes in westbound direction between Table Rock and Hamrick Road. 55 % 1,227,420 1,358,507 747,179
53 East Pine Plan 2015 2004 New public street from southern terminus to Peninger Road. 55% 1,048,080 1,160,014 638,008
54 East Pine Plan 2015 2004 Construct bridge over Bear Creek and roadway between south end of Project #20 and Hamrick Road. 55 % 5,543,100 6,135,097 3,374,303
7 RTP 2016 2005 Scenic Ave, Mary's Way to Scenic Middle School: realign, widen and add bike lanes 8 sidewalks 40 % 630,000 663,702 265,481
9 RTP 2017 2005 Hazel Street, 3rd St to 10th St: add sidewalks, repair cub and gutter 40 % 300,000 316,049 126,419
10 RTP 2017 2005 3rd St, East Pine St to Hazel St: add bike lanes and sidewalks 40 % 192,000 202,271 80,908
2 RTP 2005-2009 2005 Upton Road, approaches to I-5 overcrossing: widen to two lanes with bike 8 sidewalks 40 % 762,000 802,764 321,105
3 RTP 2005-2009 2005 East Pine St, Bear Creek Bridge to Peninger: witlen for turn lanes and bike lanes, add sidewalks 40 % 120,000 126,419 50,568
15 CIP 2005-2010 2005 Miscellaneous alley improvements (paving existing alleys) 40 % 690,000 726,912 290,765
4 RTP 2010-2015 2005 East Pine St and Third St intersection: upgrade signals 40 % 225,000 237,037 94,815
5 RTP 2010-2015 2005 Hwy 99, Pine St to Griffin Creek: provide bike lanes & sidewalks 40 % 600,000 632,097 252,B39
6 RTP 2010-2015 2005 New Haven Rd and Hamrick Rd intersection: add signal for pedestrian crossing 40 % 350,000 368,723 147,489
11 RTP Tier 2 2005 East Pine St, Hamrick Roatl to Bear Creek Bridge: widen for decel/octet lanes, add bike lanes and sidewalk 40% 355,000 373,991 149,596
12 RTP Tier 2 2005 Burrell Rd, Beall to Hopkins: widen to two lanes with bike lanes and sidewalks 40 % 1,262,000 1,329,512 531,805
13 RTP Tier 2 2005 Scenic Ave and HWY 99 intersection: add traffic signal and realign intersection 40% 375,000 395,061 158,024
FCS Group, Inc. (425) 867-1802 7/t 7/2006
Project Project Cost
# Source (1) Year Estimate Yr Project Description
Inputted Default Original 2006 SDC
Allocated % Allocated Project Project Eligible
to Growth (1) to Growth (2) Cost Cost (3) Cost
14 RTP Tier 2 2005 HWY 99 ,Beall Lane to Pine St: provide bike lanes 8 sidewalks 40% 900,000 948,146 379,258
40% - -
Total
plus: SDC Credits Outstanding
less: April 2006 Street SDC Fund Balances (4)
Total Future Capital Projects for SDC Calculation
$ - $28,752,022 $53,568,O1U $58,104,450 $'18,752,OZ2
$0
$846.894
$2 7,905,128
NOTES:
(1) RTP = "Draft RTP Project List 2005-2030 (Model Area Only)"
CIP =Five-Year Capital Improvements Plan 2005-2010 (March 2005)
(2) Calculated Growth Allocation: 40.00 % Total Growth in Customer Base: 40.00
(3) Source: Engineering News Review, March 21, 2005 issue.
Year (month of March) 2002 2Q~ 2004 Q 2006
20-Ciri Ava. Construction Cost Index 6.502 6.627 6.957 7,309 7,700
(4) "City of Central Point, Cash and Investments, December 31, 2004"
" FCS Group, Inc. (425) 867-1802
7/17/2006
City of Central Point
SDC Study
SDC Calculation: Transportation
Table 1
Not Valid
EXHIBIT 'B'
Reimbursement Fee Avera a Dail Tri s Peak-Hour Tri s
Cost of Net Unused Capacity $ 1,838,674 $ 1,838,674
Growth to End of Planning Period (1 & 2) 35,143 Average Daily Trips 7,375 Peak-Hour Trips
Reimbursement Fee $ 52.32 per ADT $ 249.32 per P-HT
Improvement Fee
Capacity Expanding C1P $ 27,905,128 $ 27,905,128
Growth to End of Planning Period (1 & 2) 35,143 Average Daily Trips 7,375 Peak-Hour Trips
Improvement Fee $ 794.05 per ADT $ 3,783.80 per P-HT
Total System Development Charge
Reimbursement Fee $ 52.32 per ADT $ 249.32 per P-HT
Improvement Fee ~ 794.05 per ADT $ x,78 .80 per P-HT
SDC Subtotal $ 846.37 per ADT $ 4,033.11 per P-HT
plus: Administrative Cost Recovery 3.57% $ '10.25 per ADT S 144.13 per P-HT
Total SDC $877 per ADT $4,177 per P-HT
NOTES:
(1) Source: ODOT. Adjusted (increased) by 10% to account for trips on local streets.
1~
FCS Group, Inc. (425) 867-1802 7/20/2006
City of Central Point
SDC Study
SDC Calculation: Transportation
Table 2
EXHIBIT 'B'
~ Customer Data ~
ADT Growth on Arterials and Collectors (1) 31,948 Year 2002 Population: 13,818
10% Factor for Systemwide ADT Growth Estimate 1.1 Year 2005 Population: 17,500
Total ADT Growth = 35,143 Year 2030 Population: 28,711
P-HT Growth on Arterials and Collectors (1) 2,529 Derived 2005-2030 trip growth, using calculated 2002-2030 growth and populati~
10% Factor for Systemwide P-HT Growth Estimate 1.1
Total P-HT Growfh = 2,782
(1) Source: Oregon Department of Transportation. Growth from Year 2002 to 2030.
Average Daily Trip Growth 42,441 (adjusted above for growth from 2002 to 2005)
Peak-hour Trip Growth 3,360 (adjusted above for growth from 2002 to 2005)
FCS Group, Inc. (425) 867-1802 7/20/2006
City of Central Point
SDC Study
SDC Calculation: Stormwater
Table 1
Reimbursement Fee
Cost of Net Unused Capacity $ -
Growth to End of Planning Period 6,821 Equivalent Service Units
Reimbursement Fee $ - per ESU
Improvement Fee
Capacity Expanding CIP $ 2,697,539
Growth to End of Planning Period 6,821 Equivalent Service Units
Improvement Fee $ 395.46 per ESU
Total System Development Charge
Reimbursement Fee $ - per ESU
Improvement Fee $ 395.46 per ESU
SDC Subtotal $ 395.46 per ESU
plus: Administrative Cost Recovery 3.57% ~ 14.13 per ESU
Total SDC per Equivalent Service Unit S 410 per ESU
NOTES
(1) One equivalent service unit (ESU) equals 2,500 square feet.
1~
FCS Group, Inc. (425) 867-1802
7/20/2006
City of Central Point
SDC Study
SDC Calculation: Stormwater
Table 2
~ Customer Data ~
Demog~nhict # Year
Current Population: 17,500 2005 Source: Ciry Staff. May zoos.
Future Population: 25,494 2024 End Year for Stormwater Plan: 2024.
Current square feet of ISA in City 37,330,920 Source: Memo from Public works Dept, 3/17/05
Assumed square feet (ISA) per ESU 2,500 Source: Based on (1) persons per ESU, (1) 2005 Impervious Surface
Area, and (3) escalated 2004 population to 2005.
Current number of ESUs 14,932
all
FCS Group, Inc. (425) 867-1802 7/20/2006
City of Central Point
SDC Study
SDC Calculation: Water
Table 1
Reimbursement Fee
Net Cost Unused Capacity
Cost Basis
Unit Basis
ERUs (1) EMUs (2)
$ 2,285
352
$ 3,070
262
$ 2,285
1,335
$ 3,070
993
$
$ 352
1,335 $
$ 262
993
$
$ 1,687
60 $
$ 1,255
45
$1,747
per ERU $1,300
per EMU
Growth to End of Planning Period
Reimbursement Fee
$ 804,880
Improvement Fee
Capacity Expanding CIP: $ 3,049,281
Growth to End of Planning Period
Improvement Fee
Total System Development Charge
Reimbursement Fee
Improvement Fee
SDC Subtotal
plus: Administrative Cost Recovery 3.57%
Total Base SDC
NOTES:
(1) One equivalent residential unit (ERU) = 435 gallons per day.
(2) One equivalent meter unit (EMU) =flow capacity of a 3/4" meter.
~~
FCS Group, Inc. (425) 867-1802 7/20/2006
City of Central Point
SDC Study
SDC Calculation: Parks
Table 1
Reimbursement Fee
Cost of Net Unused Capacity
Growth to End of Planning Period
Reimbursement Fee
Improvement Fee
$ 692,250
3,832 Persons
$ 180.63 per Person
Capacity Expanding CIP $ 3,501,525
Growth to End of Planning Period 3,832 Persons
Improvement Fee $ 913.66 per Person
Total System Development Charge
Reimbursement Fee $ 180.63 per Person
Improvement Fee $ 913.66 per Person
SDC Subtotal $ 1,094.29 per Person
plus: Administrative Cost Recovery 3.57% ~ 39.11 per Person
Total SDC $ 1,133 per Person
Example SDCs
Customer Type Density (1) SDC Basis
1 SFR DU 2.69 $ 3,049 per Dwelling Unit
2 MFR DU 2.02 $ 2,287 per Dwelling Unit
3 Mobile Homes 1.88 $ 2,134 per Dwelling Unit
NOTES:
(1) Source: City Staff. May 2005. Assumed MFR density: 75% of SFR. Assumed Mobile Home density: 70% of SFR.
~~
FCS Group, Inc. (425) 867-1802 7/20/2006
:` ~ .
City of Central Point
SDC Study
SDC Calculation: Parks
Table 2
Customer Data
2005 2015 Growth
Population 17,500 (1) 21,332 (2) 3,832
NOTES:
(1) Based on 2% annual population growth. Source: Water System Master Plan (December 2002), page 4-7
(2) Ending Year for Study Period is FY2015. Source: Parks and Recreation, Master Plan.
1~
FCS Group, Inc. (425) 867-1802 7/20/2006
~,.
Medford Water Commission
Medford Water Commission $948
Administration Fee $17
Total $965
1~