Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 710 - Wisnovsky (Hamrick Glen) Tent. PlanPLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 7 t 0 A RESOLUTION GRANTING TENTATIVE PLAN APPROVAL TO CREATE A NINE (9} LOT ATTACHED SINGLE FAMILY (PADLOT} SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS HAMRICK GLEN SUBDIVISION (Applicant: Wisnovsky I-iarrzes, LLC) (37 2W 01CB, Tax Lat 900, AI'N # 10195531) Recitals 1. Applicant has submitted application to create nine (9) single family attached Iots on property identified by Jackson County as Account 10195531zn the City of Central Point, Oregon. 2. On, November 7, 2006, the Central Paint Planning Commission conducted adult'-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments an tl-~e application. Now therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Criteria Applicable to Decision. The following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code apply to this application: A. Chapter 17.24, R-2, Residential Two Family District B. Chapter 17.60.210, Padlat Developments C. Chapter 17.64.040, Off-Street Parking Requirements Section 2. Findin sand ConcIusians. The Planning Commission hereby adopts by reference all findings of fact set forth in City staff reports, and concludes that, except where addxessed in the conditions of approval, the applications and pxoposal comply with the requirements of the following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Cade: A. Chapter 17.24, relating to uses, lot size, lot coverage, setback and building height. B. Chapter 17.60, relating to development requirements for padlots. C. Chapter 17.64, relating to off-street parking requirements. Planning Commission Resolution No. ~_ {110706) Section 3. Conditz~nal Approval. '1"he application for 'l~entative Plan is hereby approved, subject to the conditions set forth on Exhibit "!1", the Commission Report dated November 7, 2()06 which iz--cludes attacl~zz~ents, which is attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein, imposed under the authority of CPMC 16.36. Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by zxze in authentication of its passage this 7~ day of November, 2006. Plan ng fission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this ~~, day of November, 2006. Plannin Co ion Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. ~ 1 ~ (110706) ,i i;~lli~llli~ ~ ~~'~~;ii~~l~l~'I!i_ ;. ] I ,. t ~ r ~,-~~ ~.. ;,t~ninni~~ h~~,,t~':~~>in~~ut I;n~~~ tier; tV'~~,i~,i~uii (ii (1~I~i~~;utif~<ziur I'~ot-c~all~t~r 8, '(~0(i APP~~I~:-'~"~'I~~( ~'1~1~IY7t 1+'11L-~ ~+TCDa ~iO1~'~'s~-~t~ti~~~~ tpt~~~a lap~~li~a~fi~,9t Public hcariz~~ to c~>>~siclez tl~e c~•eation ~~Ctii t~it~c (~)) tztt<~~~h~~ci ~i»L~Ic i'amil~~ rc5icl~°~itial l+~,is 1t7~~.itccl northwest ofHam~~ic1: Road. Property is icic~~ti~iccl on the ~lacl<sC~t~ C'o~~nty ~1~~scss~~~-'s n~at~ gas a7 2ti~' O1C8~ Tax Lot 900, AP2~T# 1x195531. The physical ~~ddt~c;,s of the s~~t~jcc•l pr<~pe~~t,}~ is ~~~~;~~) l Iar~~rt~ick Road. :applicant: Wisnovsky Hoi~lcs, LLC STA~"F ~fStZ~CE» Lisa Mai Tan, Planning Techmc~an The subject property was successfully a~~ncx~:~d i~1to city limits under City C<~t~l~cil Resolution X10. 1122, in September, 2006.. The property is zoned R-2, Residential Two ~" i1y and consists ofappro~imatcty 1.U3 ~icres, As stated in the annexation staff report dated ~rz~ust 1, 2006, ill ~~ccessar~~ ~~r~h-~tr~ serti~iees are available to the property and are adequate in capacity to service develop~~acnt ~~i'the ~~rc>t~erl}~ at R~2 densities. There is anticipated growth as well as cl~rrent ~lc~elopz~~ent in the i~~lir~edia~te ~-iel~ljCy c~!'the subject property. The City determined that it was approp~~iatc to consider a Drtift C`ire~~ltition t'Ia~~ propc~scd for general circulation for the vacant larxds south of 13cc~c Road. Tl~e applica~~t°s tcr~t~ative i~h~~~ is consistent with the recommended proposed Draft Circulato~~ Plan. ~"I~ DINGS: 12~fcr to Attach ent "G>'. isnovsky Homes Tentative Plan Page 1 of 2 ISSUES: The following issues have been noted during the review of this application. 1. In the findings (Attachment "C") it is noted that at time of the Site Plan review that the applicant will need to address on-street parking. Although the street is wide enough to accommodate on-street parking, the eventual presence of driveway aprons will greatly compromise the availability of on-street parking. The City does not have standards for an-street parking and with the trend toward narrow lots and attached dwellings this is becoming an issue. 2. Fire District 3 has requested fihat the temporary turnaround be located on the property to the north. Final location of the temporary turnaround has to be deferred to final plat approval and subject to Fire District 3's approval. Note: The property to the north is not in the city limits, therefore, the city does not have jurisdiction aver said property. Fire District 3 has noted that if this could not be accomplished the present proposed turn around will work. (See Attachment "F"} ATTACHMENTS/EXHIBITS: Attachment "A" _ Tentative Plan Attachment `B" -Jackson County Road Comments Attachment "C" -Planning Department Findings Attachment "D" -Public Works Staff Report Attachment "E" -Building Department Staff Report Attachment "F" --Fire District # 3 Comments Attachment "G" -Planning Department Conditions of Approval Attachment "H" -Proposed Resolution ACTION: Consider approval of Resolution No. 710, approving a nine {9) lot subdivision per the Planning Commission Report dated 1118106. RECOMMENDATION; Approve Resolution No. 710. cc: Jackson County Roads Wisnovsky Homes Tentative Plan Page 2 of 2 t-~ z w i= 'U iQ ,.~..- Srv,-_._ HALF STREET IM ' ROVEMENT STANDARD RESIDENTIAL LOCAL STREET _ . ('REST ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ . ---- --- i ~ ~~ d !k d 1 V tS A1~' ~R4NUs ,~~~`-~34.~ ~ 28 ...~.~. ~ r 3~. 3 i! .,C /~.0 30.G 15~ ...'y ~~ 1 .]ll ._ ~~ ~ C 1 ! N~N` ~ , ~I 3 ~ `w~~~~~~ i _ I, r 3 ~ l J t.o~ io c ~ ~oi is I i .~I ~. i. ;LOT 9 LOT B LOT T ' ; ~ ;`LOT 6 ~ LOT 5 I i ' 3,551 SF ! 3,0.21 SF 3,71DSF :' 3,71DSF~ 3,18DSFi I 34 X40' ._IoA3C ~jgOO ' 35 0 :' i 35.0 ~ 0.0 _ _ _ _ (EAST rF1~IPORAJ2Y TURNARdU11'D TO --'~ 8c ExrINGU15x~D ~ RE,vrO,IED 3NHEN AfvfAURY LANs 15 I ~xrEnld~:~ ro r~-~~ Wrs r it la a/w '!-,o .ter ~s' Fac rq rcc ~ -.. F1 Tn~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i .~,~ 57AND.VRD~ ~ EET AMAURYlAN6 ~,~~ ~--- ....... _.~ ~ r....-~.- ---~.~ ci I € [ ; ,' a t I ~, ! i I ~ ~ Q ~ ~ i ~ r,~ P ` o I ~I °. { ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ©! o ' ~~ =~ `,~~~3i iLOT2 LOT1~ ~!~~ E E ~. 13,18D SF 3,18D SFi ! 13,18D SF 4,1D5 SF ~ ~ ~ ! [ ~ i i E O~ I I ! ~ ~ ~ E { ., 3C,0 30.G [ 30.0 40.0 PROPOSED TREE PLAN HAMRICK GLEN 9-LOT PAD LOT SUBbIVl510N Lowied On Tax Got 300 of 7hBN.W 1/4 oflheS.W f/4o7SEC. Y, T.37S., t?.2W, W.M. ~:;~s (cooo~- E.. i, I :~ SJ :1., .JG . _>~.... .;~„, ;~=PRUr~us{coon) •.i' r ~xrsr~ r~~G r0 6~ R~rAlNFD ~~ x :` P~unus ~coon> U -, EXrSTG TPI:F_ ro ~~ Relh~>,~~~ ^ ` ~ ~ ~ [~ AP ~~ J ~~ I -l ,! , ~ ~~ r~+~r/ rR~~ ~ ... ~ AGED PU6RU.":,' lP,ED 1~PPL%1 kL T F,GE"r~ PEAS rANOroES !AfGRV/AY IfAPLEI 3sc.o Ta ~) !___ ~ }-~ i r, i ;~ 372W02~7 .00 ~! ~ ~ 41+Ai_-U~ART STORiwS f?~C E NGT~~ STR~Er TREES IN LANDSCAPE STRIPS WILL r3E WArE1~ED FROiA nc~ ADJOINING LOTS SP.RINJCLER 5Y5Tr~1d BY DRIP leP,l6ArlGn+ e .o za +o So _.W. NJ FEET SUIE. I"s20' 1~T7E £ng~ncoring days no! a@nn axpresxl/ ar by dcmorcalion on lhesc plans eslahlish ar dclrnaolo 7hR v 's HAR fS ONE 1NCH (Y. p/oparly, right-a!-way, and Basemen( ORfG7NA! AQAVfHG boundarras. This d:nw;rg aha.rld t.R used p Fw~ww~w,n~l t• for pfann~rg puroo>e5 only l~ropcrfy lire If f.Y1r ONE :IYH QN baundarres Iram r cardaa fcga! rhrs sf+eer an~os' . desrx~phans and cons; ~uc6on dwgs ory ; SCRLCS AC~DR-1huCY ~, q O C}J ¢ ~~ w o ~N u~ z ~~ `G ~ U ~ ~ ~ Q~ Q ~~ ~S~ n •roac 4 Apo y~: ~~F r.~i ~~ ~'~ Of " ` 2 z ''~_~ [~ ~ S ~/~~ ~~ ~~i~ ,~~`J ~~ti C~~ ©5!23!2005 07:45 2541774625 .JACI<50N COUNTY RPM PAGE i_11101. ~1TTA~~M~NT " JACKSON COUNTY May ~ 3, 2f105 Attention: E*isa Morgan City of Central point Planning '! 55 South Second Street Central Point, OR 97502 RE: Annexation offi Hamrick Raad - a eourtty-maintained rand. Planning File: 05x60; 3721N01 CS Tax ir.ot 940. Dear Lisa: ~o~a~ Turin Niemegcr, p~ Tru~jlc c& .Dr.~'~lopmen r Engirte~t' 2C~n Antelope Road whi<8 cny, o~ e75Qa Phana:(541)774.6230 Faz: (5a1 } 774-6295 nlemeyel(nZjackvoncounry.org vanv.JaCkSOncounty.arg Thank you fnr the opportunity to comment on this appiica#ion for the Jakabosky ~.nnexation. Roads and Parks has the following comments: ~. When the property is developed, the applicant shall submit construction drawings to Jackson County Roads and Parks and obtain county permits it required. 2. Jackson County Roads and Parks would like to review and comment an the hydraulic report, including the calculations and drainage plan, for any de~efopment an the subject property, Capacity improvements or an site detentiari, if necessary, shad be installed at the expense of the applicant. 3. Jackson County Roads and Parks recommend right in and right out ingress and egress to Hamrick Raad. 4. The annexation should also include Hamrick Raad right-of-way. The Board of County Commissioners C?rder Na. 5-99, adopted the 7`" day of January, 1999, recommends that the city request rand jurisdiction and annex the entire road right-of-vtray, pending amendrr~ent of the Urban Growth Boundary Management Agreement. ~. Please note that Hamrick Road (County Arterial) is a county-maintainEd road. The Average baily Traffic Count fifty yards north of Biddle Road was 14,654 on June 2443. if you have any questions or need further information feel free to call meat 774-823(1. Sincer 1y, ~~i~ ~ a~ E c Niemeyer, PE TrafFi~ S~ De~relopm~nt Engineer [:`Engirteerir~glDevelopmer~tlCETI ESICN7RLF~T~o505p,u~pd ATTACHMENT " G Planning Department Findings Purpose: Consideration o€ a Tentative Plan Application for a nine (9) lot subdivision known as Hamrick Glen Applicant: Wisnovsky Homes, LLC File No. 070X4 CPMC 16.10.010-16.10.090 -Relating to Submission of application and filing fee; Application and Review; scale; general information; existing conditions; additional information; partial development; explanatory information, tentative plan approval; and conditions on tentative plan approval. Findings: The applicant has submitted all the necessary inforzxiation relevant to reviewing a tentative plan application. Conclusion: The application was deemed coxx~plete on October 16, 2006. CPMC 17.24.010 -Purpose -The purpose of the R-2 district is to promote and encourage a suitable environment for family Iife at a slightly higher density tlu~n tl~nt permitted in the R--1 district, and also to provide opportunities for the development of Lower cast duplex and attached dwellings. Where this district is applied to areas of existing single family homes, the intent is to presenle fhe low densitrt~ neigltborj~ood character, promote continued home maintenance and rehabilitation, and allows replacement housing at slightly higher densities tlu~t is compatible zt~ith tl~e overall character of the neighborhood. Findings: The applicant has met the purpose o£ the R-2 zoning district by proposing attached single family homes {pad Lots). The proposal is compatible with the development that has occurred in the immediate vicinity. This subject property is located on the west side o£ Hamrick Road, across from Beebe Woods. Beebe Woods consists of all attached single family dwelling units. Conclusion: The applicant has satisfied the purpose of the R-2, Residential Two Family zoning district. CPMC 17.24.040 -Height Regulations - No building ar structure shall exceed thirtz~-five feet in height in an R-2 district. Findings: This is a tentative plan application and would not be addressed through the tentative plan criteria. Conclusion: This will be reviewed during the site plan application process and building permit review process. Page 1 of 4 CPMC 17.24.050 -Area, Width and Yard Regr~iremerrts- Tire fallnzr~fng Int requirerrrents sTraIl e observed in the R-2 district: (A) -Lot area. The lot area shall be a nrinitrrurrr of six tlrausand square feef zuitlr corner Ints being a minimum of seven tTrousand square feet. (B) - Lot xvidth -. The minimum width of a lot shall he sixty feet, urith corner lots being a minimum of seventrj feet in width. (C) - Lof depth - no requirements. (D) -Front yard - T1re front yard shall be a minimum of tzl~entrj feet. (£) -Side yard. Side yard shall be a minimum of five fret per store. Side yards abtr.tting a street shall be a minimum of ten feet; provrded that, side yards abutting streets slzrrIl comply rvitli the following: (1) Sight distance and clear vision area requirerrretrts set forth in the Public Works Standards. (2) Special setback rules set forth in 5ectiorr 17.60.090; and (3) Fnr structrsres or a part of any structure served bra a driveway located on the side yard, the minimurrt side yard setback, for that part of the structure serving the driveway, such as a garage or carport shall be twenty feet. (F) -Rear Yard. Tire rear yard shall be a mininrurrr of ten feet. (G) -Nat withstanding the yard requirements above and depending on the location of the lot, special setback requirements pray apply as specified in Section 17.60.090. Findings: As specifically outlined in findings as set forth in CPMC 17.60.210 (Padlots}, the parent parcel meets the requirements for items (A} - (B). Item (C} does riot have a lot depth requirement. Items (S) - (G} shall be met during the Site PIan review and building permit review process. Conclusion: The applicant has met the criteria applicable to the Tentative Plan application. CPMC 17.24.060 -Lot Coverage- The maximum permitted aggregate building coverage in an R-2 district shall be frffiy percent of the lot area. Findings: The applicant shall meet the criteria during the Site Plan and building permit review process. Conclusion: Not applicable to the Tentative PIan application review process. CPMC 17.60.210 -Padlot developments - Padlot developments shall be a permitted use in all zoning districts in the city, except R-1 districts, subject to the following: (A) -Padlot development applications shall be presented to the city, and processed by t]re cit1~, in the same manner as a parfition or subdivision application: first, in the form of a tenfative plan, then in the form of a final plat. All provision of Title Z6 of this code that apply to subdivisions and partitions shall also apply to Padlot developments; provided, that the lot size provisions of this Code sluzll apply only to the parent lot and not to the Padlot. Findings: The application being submitted as a tentative subdivision plat in accordance with Section 1b. Page 2 of 4 Conclusion: The parent parcel complies with the minimum lot standards for the R-2 zoning district. CPMC 17.60.210 (B) -The parent parcel, from zvhiclz the padlots and common area, if any, are created, shall conform to the standard requirements for lots in the particular zone in xvhich the parent parcel is Located, including, but not limited to, requirements pertaining to tot area, lot xvidth, lot depth, lot coverage, yard and setback requirements, number and height of buildings, density restrictions, parking requirements, and distances betxveen buildings. Finding: The parent parcel exceeds the minimum requirements for lot area, width, and depth as required in the R-2 district. Lots 1 ~9 meet or exceed the minimum lot width requirements, lot axea requirements and allowed densities far a padlot development. Conclusion; The applicant has met the applicable criteria for Tentative Plan approval. Lot coverage, setback requirements will be verified far compliance during the Site Plan review and building permit process. CPMC 17.60.210 (C) -The padlots within the parent paraei are exempt from the lot area, xvidtlt and depth, yard and setback, and lot coverage requirements to which the parent lot is subject. Findings: It is proposed that the project will be developed as nine (9} single family attached units. As illustrated on the Tentative Plan each unit will comply with the minimum front, side and rear yard set backs for the R-2 district. As proposed each unit shall comply with the underlying zoning district set backs. Conclusion: This will be verified far compliance through the Site Plan review and building perrn.it review process. CPMC 17.60.210 {D) - Structures on padlots must meet all applicable state of Oregon building code requirements, as well as all other applicable city, state, and federal regulations. Findings: Applicant shall include party wall and maintenance easements on the final plat submitted far approval. Specificity for the allowed uses of the party wall and maintenance easements shall e clearly stated under "Declarations" of the signature page for final plat. Conclusion: This will be reviewed during the final plat application xeview to ensure that this language is included on the declarations page, as well their locations identified an the final plat, prior to signing final plat. Refer to "Conditions of Approval" -- Condition numbers 4 -5. Page 3 of ~k CPMC 17.60.210 (E1 -- Structures on padlots must be izrulti-dzc~cllizzg zcnit attached brriIdings, No detached, single-dzveIling unit buildings slieII be constrcccted orz a padlot. Findings: All Tots pxoposed are to be attached dwelling ,units. Conclusion: The applicant has met the criteria. CPMC 17.60.210 (F) - No final plat for the creation of a padInt dez?elalrrnent shall 27e approved unless and until tlrc developer luzs also previozcsl~ submitted and received citzj approval for the covenants, conditions and restrictions applicable to the common area, if an, prnvidi~zg the continual zzzanagertzent and zzraintenance of the cor~zmon area and arz~ improverrrents tlrereotz. Findings: The pxoject does not include any common area. Conclusion: Not applicable. CPMC 17.b4.040 (A) (1) -Off-Street Parking and Loading - A private garage or carport accommodating not less than tzc~o parking spaces foreaclz dzz~eIling unit. Findings: Compliance with this requirement will be met during the Site Plan review and building permit review process. Conclusion: Though the City will ensure the off- street parking requirements shall be met as outlined above, the applicant is encouraged at the time of Site Plan Review to address where guests wi11 be able to park. With the narrow lots and driveway aprons, on-street parking will be adversely impacted. However, the City does not have a minimum standard for the number of on-street/ guest parking required per dwelling unit. Page 4 of 4 Public Works Department CEI~ITRAL POINT ,.. PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT October l 7, 2006 ,~"T~~~~ENT ce J Bob Pierce, Direcfor Matt Samifore, Dev. Services Coord. AGENDA ITEM: Nine Lot Subdivision for 37-2W-01CB, Tax Lots 900 Applicant: Robert Wisnovsky, Wisnovsky Homes, LLC, 220 Wells Fargo Drive, Jacksonville, OR 97530 Zoning: R-2, Residential Two Family Zoning Traffic: Based an the Institute of Transportation Engineers (1TE} Trip Generation Manual, a nine lot subdivision will generate approximately 9.09 peak hour trips (PHT}. The City of Central Paint typically requires traffic studies for any development that generates more than 25 PHT. No traffic study is warranted for this development. Existing Infrastructure: Water: There is an existing 16-inch ductile iron waterline in Hamrick Road. Storm Drain: There is an existing 15" HDPE storm drain line in Hamrick Road. Street Section: Hamrick Road is an improved County Road that has been improved to County Arterial Status. No sidewalks exist in front of the proposed parcel. Engineering and Development Plans and Permits: The Central Point Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction" shall govern how public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specif cations from the Public Works Department. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued, except Public Works Inspection fees. After project completion during the final plat application process, the Public Works Inspector will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection time to assess the developer. Before the final plat application is processed the developer must pay the relevant inspections fees and bond for any uncompleted improvements (as determined by the Public Works Director}. 14a Soufh Third Streef Cenfral Poinf, OR 9T502 •541.664.3321 ~ Fax 541.664.6384 System Development Clrarge Credit: System Develapment_Charges Credit (SDC): The developer is eligible for SDC credit far the portion of the street dedicated for right-of way. The City shall pay thirteen dollars a square fiat far the area dedicated. Conditions of Approval: 1. Hamrick Road brontage Improvements: Hamrick Road is classified as a Minor Arterial Street. Developer will be responsible far constructing sidewalk and landscape row, with street trees, for the Hamrick Raad frontage. 2. Restricted Movement onto Hamrick Raad: The City concurs with Jackson County Roads that a restricted movement of right in and out ingress and egress onto Hamrick Road. Applicant shall construct a concrete delineator or `pork chop' at the intersection of the proposed street and Hamrick Road. 3. Right-of--Way Dedication: Applicant shall dedicate ten feet of right-af-way along the frontage of Hamrick Road for future widening to a minor arterial street. 4. Temporary Turn Around; Once the proposed street connects with the local neighborhood street plan to the west the temporary turn around shall be eliminated. Once removed applicant shall put in curb, gutter and sidewalk and landscape raw. 5. Street Tree Plan: Tree plantings shall have at least a 1 '/z" trunk diameter at the time of installation. All street trees shall be irrigated with an automatic underground irrigation system. Maintenance of the Iandscape row will be of the property owners who own the property directly adjacent to the landscape row. 140 South Third Sfreef Cenfral Paint, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 & Fax 541.664.fi384 ~TTACHMEN f " ~ " City of Cent~a# Point, Oregon 144 So.`fhird St., Central Point, Or 9752 541.664.3321 Fax 541-664.6384 www.ci.central-point.or.us Building Department Lois I]eSenedetti, Building Official BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPC?RT DATE: 10/23/06 T4: Planning Department Planning file: 07014 FROM: Building Department SUBJECT: Hamrick Glenn Tentative Plan Name: Robert Wisnovsky Address: 270 Wells Fargo Rd. City: Jacksonville State : 4r. Property Description: 37S-2W-01CB-900 PURPOSE: Zip Code: 97530 The staff report is to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Applicant regarding City Building Department requirements and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed project. This is not a plan review. This report is preliminary and compiled solely for use by the Central Point Plane-ing Commission. 1 City of Central Point, Oregon 140 Sa.~"t~ird St., Ce~ral i•'aint,Qr 97502 541.fi64.3321 Fax 5 ].664.b384 www.ci.ceniral-poi~t.ar.us Building Department Lois ae8enedetti, 8ui~ding Df~eial BUILDYNG DEPARI'MEN"~' CCIMMENTS: 1. Applic~ax-t, agent and contractors must comply with all current State of Oregon adopted eode~, and apply for all permits through the Central Paint Building 17epartment. 2. if a private storm drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Centr ~l Point Plumbing Department. 3. Any p ivate street lighting rnust be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Electrical De artment. 4. Provid the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by 4SSC Appendix J d chapter 18 of the OSSC. A written report of the investigation shall include, but ed not he limited to, the following information: a. plot plan showing the location of all test borings and/or excavations. b. descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered. c. elevations of the water table, if encountered. d_ ~tecommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, pro isions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liq efaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. When expansive soils are present, special provisions shah be provided in the foundation d sign and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design all be based on geotechnical recommendations. 5. Grad' glexcavation permits are required in accordance with OSSC Appendiz J and chapter 18 d regarding any fill material placed on the site. Fills to be used to support the foundati of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering radices. A soil 'nvestigation report, and a report of satisfactory placement of fill {including special inspe tions of placement of fiill and compaction) acceptable to the ~~~ilding Official, shal be submitted prior to final of the grading/excavation permit. $uilding permits will of be issued until gradingfexcavationpcrmit is finalled. Exception: l . Th~ upper l .5 foot of fill placed outside of public rights-of--way. 2. Th~ upper l .5 foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. 2 City of i40 So.Thirc4 5t.,C~ 541.664.3321 Fax WWW.Ci.centr~3i-pr point, Oregon ral Paint, Or 97502 1.664.&384 wilding Department Lois Qe[3encdetti, building Official b. Tom e or demolish any existing structures located on the property call tlae Building De artment for permit requirements. 7. Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on th property. S. Any d velopment (any man-made change) to improved or unimproved real estate located with' the flood hazard area of the City of Central Point shall require a Developmen Permit as set forth ixli the Central Point Municipal Code 8.2.120. 9. Dust c ntrol, and track out eliminations procedures must be implemented. 10. Appli ation for building permits will require three sets of complete plans indicating co pliance with Oregon Residential Specialty Code (2005). Note requirement for'zero lot line construction in appendix d. 11. p`ire 1.7 strict ~ will determine fire hydrant location, as well as access to buildings. The Internati nal Fire Code X2003} with Oregon Amendments (2004 will be implemente as part of the plan check code requirement for these proposed buildings. Any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Applicant, or Applicant's contractor to the Building Depart:nraent for approval prior to start of work. This staff report prepared by TM 3 ATTACHMENT " ~__ Jackson County Fire District No. 3 8333 Agate Road y White City OR 97503-io75 (541) 826-71Q0 (voice) (541) 82fi-4566 (fax) In~err~atior~al/y Accr~dite~ - ZOI~S-~Q~A October 31, 2006 City of Central Point Planning Dept. Project # 07014 Hamrick Glen Plan (Wisnovsky) The proposed turn around will indeed work as submitted. When speaking with Matt on Oct 30, 2006 we discussed other options which we thought would better serve the project long term. Providing a temporary turn around, on adjacent property until Amaury Lane continues through to the south would present a better match design for lots 6 and 7. If either adjacent property owner would agree to allow the temporary turn around along the west edge of Amaury or at the south end of Amaury then when the lane connects to the neighboring street we would not have the altered face on buildings 6 & 7. Mark Moran DFM ~~'TACMMENT °~ ~~ Planning Departrx~ent Conditions of Approval Applicant: Wisnovsky Honnes, LLC Pile No. 07014 Condition No. Descri tian of Condition ~ AppIicant shall meet the requirements of the Planning Department, Public Works Department, Building Department Jackson Coon Roads and Hire District 3 Exhibits B-G . 2 The applicant shall submit a Site Plan Review application, as well as the required submittals, and fees for approval prior to final plat approval. The Site Plan Review application shall be for all nine 9 lots. 3 Specificity for the allowed uses of the party wall & maintenance easements shall be clearly stated under "Declarations" of the si afore a e for the final lat. 4 Party wall & maintenance easements shall be identified on the fir-al lat submitted fora roval. 5 Prior to final plat approval the applicant shall provide final written acceptance from Fire District 3 for the temporary turn around location. 6 The final plat application shall be submitted prior to expiration of the tentative plan approval. Approval for the Tentative Plan is valid for a period of one year, which shall ex ire on Wednesda ,November 7, 2007. A~"~ACHMENI"" ~ " PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING TENTATIVE PLAN APPROVAL TO CREATE A NINE (9) LOT ATTACHED SINGLE I~AMILY (PADLOT) SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS HAMRICK GLEN SUBDIVISION (Applicant: Wisnovsky Homes, LLC) {37 2W 01CB, Tax Lot 900, APN # 10195531) Recitals 1. Applicant has submitted application to create nine {9) single family attached lots an property identified by ~aekson County as Account 10195531 in the City of Central Point, Oregon. 2. On, November 7, 2006, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted aduly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments on the application. Naw therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Criteria APplicable_to_Decision_ The following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code apply to this application: A. Chapter 17.24, R-2, Residential Two Family District B. Chapter 17.60.210, Padlot Developments C. Chapter 17.64.040, Off-Street Parking Requirements Section 2. Findings and Conclusions. The Planning Commission hereby adopts by reference all findings of fact set forth in City staff xeports, and concludes that, except where addressed in the conditions of approval, the applications and proposal comply with the requirements of the following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code: A. Chapter 17.24, relating to uses, lot size, lot coverage, setback and building height. B. Chaptex 17.60, relating to development requirements for padlots. C. Chapter 17.64, relating to off-street parking requirements. Planning Commission Resolution No. {110706) Section 3. Conditional Approval. Tl~e application for Tentative Plan is hereby approved, subject to the conditions set forth on Exhibit "A", the Planning Department Staff Report dated November 7, 2006 which includes attachments, which is attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein, imposed under the authority of CPMC 16.36. Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 7~ day of November, 2006. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this 7t~ day of November, 2006. Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. {110706)