HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - October 5, 2010~
CENT#tAt
POlNT
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PL.ANNING CQMMISSION AGENDA
October 5, 2010 - b:00 p.m.
Next Plaiuiing Commission
Resolution Np. 773
I. 1VIEE"I'~~1G CALLED TO ORDER
II. R~LL CALL
Connie Moczygemba, Chuck Piland, Pat BeCk, Mike Olitrer, Justin Hurley, Tirn
Schmeusser and Keith Wangle
III.
I1'. M[NUTES - Review and appraval of Septennber 7, 2010 Planning Cornmission Mxnutes
V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES
VI. BUSINESS
Fgs. 1- 7 A. File No. 11007. Consideration of removal of sigYix~icant tree in Cez~tral Point East
Subdivisioi~ per CPMC Section 12.36.040. AppGca~t: Margie Runia
Pks. 8- 4$ B, File No. 10010. Gontinued discussion of propased amendments to the Tourist
and 4ffice-P7'ofesssional (C-4) zoning district. Applicant; Cit;y of Central
Point
Pks. 49 - 75 C, ~'~le No. l I001. A public hearing to consider forwarding a recommendation to the
City Council on praposed Centzal Point Municipal Code amendments to provide
uniform land development appraval expiration dates and a process for review of
time extension requests. Applicant: City of Central Point
Pgs. 7b - 89 D. File No. 11002. A public hearing to consider forwarding a recommendatian to the
City Council on proposed Central ~'oint Municipal Code amendrneYits to Sectio~~
17.77, Accesso~-y DwelliYig Units (ADUs) for laz~g«age to confonn to the Public
Works Deparhnent C1lapter I3 staYldards. Applicant: City of Central Foint
~II. DTSCUSSION
P~s. 40 - 92 A. Urban Reserve Management Agreements (URMAs}/Parcel Sizes
VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE REVYEWS
I7~. MISCELLANEQUS
~. ADJOURNMENT
City of Central Point
Planning Commission Minutes
September 7, 2010
AiEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 6:00 P.M.
II. ROLL CALL
Coin7nissioners Conrue Moczygemba, Chuck Piland, Tim Schmeusser, Keith
Wangle and Mike Oli~~er, and Pat Beck were present. Justin Hurley was absent.
Also in attenda7~ce were: To~n Hu7nphrey, Community Development Director;
Don Burt, Flanning Maz~ager; Connie Clu.ne, Comrnui3ity Plaruier; Dave Jacob,
Conimunity Plaruier; and Dxdi Thomas, Planning Secretary.
III. CORRESPONDENCE - None
IV. MINUTES
Tim Schmeusser made a motion ta approve the minutes of the August 3, 2010
Planning Commission meeting as submitted. Chuck Piland seconded the
motion. ROLL CALL: Piland, yes; Olit~e7-, abstained; Beck, yes; Schmeusser,
yes; Wangle, abstained; and Maczygemba, yes. Motion passed.
V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES - Nane.
VI. BUSINESS
A. File No. 10010. Continued discussion of proposed atnend~nents to the Tourist
and Office-Prafessional (C-4) zoning district. Applicant: City of Central
Point
Plaru~ing Mai~ager pon Burt advised Planning Commission inembers that the praposed
amendments to the Tourist and O~ce-Professional {C-4) zaning c~istrict were still in
working draft fonnat.
Mr. Burt presented a breakdown of the proposed code amendments by section as follows:
Section 17.44 -- Taurist and Office Professianal District - the proposed cha7lges are
rninimal; redundancies between the permitted uses and a~nditional uses of this section
have been corrected; size restrictions an the "large retail establishments" k~ave been
~•emoved; site plan and architectural review to be requireti with any new development.
Pdattning Comrnission Mdnutes
Septernber 7. 2010
Page 2
Cornmunity Developrnent Director Tom Hurxipluey stated that he tliought the Department
af Land Gonservation and Developrne~t (DLCD) would be most concerned about traffic
impacts as a result of the elimination of size restrictions in this section of the code. Mr.
8urt added that we wauld probably get a"big box" establishment in Cent~•al Paint when
the economy improves.
The revisions to this sectio7z of cc~de can be adapted iz~dependent~y. They wi11 also work
with the rest af the code without further changes. The Planning Com~nissioi~ members
agreed that they were agreeable with the propased changes.
Section 17.72 - Site P1an and Landscaping Plan Approval - aznended to clarify the
process of reviewing major and ininoi• projects; Planning Com~nission would review the
major projects with staffreviewing the minor projects. Standards for zeview have been
c~~anged and are reflected i~n section 17.75. Section 17.72 is just the process.
Section 17.64 - Off-Street Parking - change in the minirnurn parking standards to
ma~:imum; addition of parking lot landscaping standards. Bicycle parking has been
included as well.
Section 17.75 -- Design Standards - This is a new sectio:~ of code altogether and is
intendeci to address all design standards for all uses and districts. Currently addresses
uses uz the coinniercial district but is structured to be arnended in the future as need
arises. Section 17.72 {Site Plan and Architectural Review) wiil need to be modified in
arder to effectuate sectaon 17.75.
Staff would like ta bring this matter back ta the Planning Cammission in October for
final discussion and set the aniendments for public hearing in November. Commission
members agreed to this proposal.
B. File No. 11401. Discussion of proposed Central Point Muxucipal Cade
amendments to provide uniform land developnlent approval expiratian dates
and a process for review of time extensioi~ requests. Agplicant: City of
Central Ppint
Cammunsty Planner Connie Clune prese~ited proposed amendments to multiple sec~ions
af the municipal code which would pravide for unifornz and clear expiration dates for
various types of land use applications, a.nd provide a re~~iew process of tim~ extension.
requests.
It was noted that if a fee is established for reviewing these extension requests, City
Council wouXd do this bv resolution.
Mike Oliver made a motion to direct staff to scheducle a public hearing on
this matter for ~ctober 5, 2010. Chuck Piland seconded the mation. ROLL
Plannrng Conrmrssion tLli:nutes
Se~tember 7, 201(J
Pagc 3
CALL: Piland, yes; Oliver, yes; Beck, yes; Schmeusser, yes; and Wangle, yes.
Mation passed.
C. File No. 11002. Discussion of proposed Central Point Municipal Code
arnendments to Section 17.77, Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs} #ar
language to canfonn to the Public Works Department Chapter 13 sta~ldards.
Applicant: Cit,y of Central Point
Community Planner Cannie Clune explauled that with the recent amendment to Sectian
13.04.100 of the CPMC by the Public Works department. which allows for one water
meter to se7ve both a pri~iiary dwelling and an accessory dwelling unit, pla~uling staff is
requesting an amendment to CPMC Section J 7.77 (Accessory Dwelling Units). Said
amendment would provide a property owxier with the flexibility af utilizing just one
water meter for a primary dwelli;ig and an accessoiy dweliing unit on the same praperty.
Chuck Piland made a motion to direct staff #o schedule a public hearing on
this matter for October 5, 24l Q. Pat Beck seconded the motion. ROLL CALL:
Piland, yes; Oliver, yes; Beck, yes; Schmeusser, yes; and Wan~le, yes. Motion
passeci.
VII. DISCUSSION
VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS
IX. MISCELLANEOUS
Tatn Humphrey advised that Gentral Point ~vould be making another presentation before
t.he County Plai~ning Commission in November of 2014 on the Re~;ional Plan.
1. ADJOURNMENT
Mike Oliver made a mation ta adjourn the tueeting. Chuck Piland seconded
the motion. Meeting was adjourned at 7:45 p.m.
The foregoing niinutes of the September 7, 2010 Planning Commissian nieeting were
approved by the Planning Coxnmission at its ~neeting on the Sth day of October, 2010.
Planni7~g Comrr~issian Chair
P~a~os~D F~~MOUA~ oF
SIC I~IIFYGAI~T 'T~F~~~
~~
CENTRAL
POINT
Stephanre Noltey, tFM
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Floadplarn/Stormwater Coordinator
140South 3`dStreet • Central Point, OR 97502 •(541) 664-76~2 ~ www.centralpointoregon.gpv
STAFF REPORT
October 5, 2010
AGENbA ITEM: File No. 11007
Consideration of a request ta remo~e a Cottonwaod tree located within the right-of-way at 111
Meadawbrook Drive; Applicant: Margie Runia.
STAFF SOURCE:
Stephanie Holtey, Floodpfain/Stormwater Coordinator
MEETING QBJECTIVE:
The objecti~e of this meeting is to consider a citizen's request to remove a Cottonwaod tree located within
the public right-af-way, due to ~iew obstruction and infrastrudure ConfliCts, and replace it with a Red
Sunset Maple tree in a new lacation adjacent to the right-of-way.
BACKGROUND:
Trees are regulated in accordance with Chapter 12.36 of the Municipal Cade, which pro~ides a framework
for the City to establish and maintain tree co~er throughaut the City, especially along streets, in a manner
that minimizes hazards, nuisance, damage and maintenance cost, Removal oftrees planted in the public
right-af-way or pri~ate praperty that directly affects public infrastructure requires appro~al by the Planning
Commission. Section 12.36.OS0 establishes review criteria for tree removal requests, Approval for tree
removal applications can be made when a tree is determined by a certified arborist to be unsafe, diseased
or dead; in conflict with public improvements; 2nd/or, is part of an approved de~elopment project, public
impra~ement project ar street tree impravement program.
The subject Cottonwaod tree is locateci in the public right-of-way and h2s been determined by a certified
arbaristto be hazardous to surrounding infrastructure. In the arborist's report, Cattonwood tree species
are not recommended in the urban en~ironment unless planted in a 12-foot wide landscape row to allow
sufficent area for trunk and root development. In the case of the Runia's Cottonwood, there is
approximately 5 ta 6 feet between the trunk and the adjacent sidewalk at the corner of Meadowbrook
Dri~e and Biddle Road. Although the Public Works Department has nat abser~ed damages to
infrastructure that requires immediate action, the Arborist's report recommends removal and replacement
with a different species to a~oid future infrastructure con#licts that will arise as the tree continues to
mature. Photagraphs provided in Attachement "B" illusstrate surace roots expanding taward utilities and
the sidewalk. Upon appraval, that applicant praposes to plant a Red Sunset Maple tree in new location in
the front yard, outside of the right-of-way to a~oid infrastructure conflicts.
ISSUES:
Cottonwoods are fast growing trees that have been documented to cause extensive damages to sidewalks,
storm drain and sewer systems as the roots expand ta seek water. In the e~ent the Planning Commission
denies appra~al of this application, the Cottonwood tree is expected to increase damages to public
infrastructure that will require extensi~e action to cut the roots and repair damages,
~
EXH I B ITS/ATTACH M ENTS:
Attachmenfi "A" - Right-af-way Determinatian Map
Attachment "B" -- Photographs
Attachment "C" - Site Plan
Attachment "D" -- Arborist Report
ACTIOM:
Discussion and decision by the Planning Commission.
Approval of the request to remove the Cottonwood tree per the Staff Report dated October 5, 2d14
subject to t#te following conditions:
1, Replacement of ihe removed tree with a Red Sunset Maple in the #ront yard as shown on the site
plan provided in Attachment "C."
~
v
~
.~
~
~
0
0
~
~
0 0
~~
c~ ~
~ ~
~ ~~
~
~ ~
~~
~ a~
.. p
~ ~
o ~
~~
~Q o
~~
Q ~
~~
0
~^,
~W/
l..L
~
L
~
z "
~
~
~~
L ~
~ `
~ 5
m ~
~ M
~
Q ~
_ Q
~ ~ ~
~
~; ~ O
~ a~
o in ~
_ ~ ~o
~ ~ ~~
~ a~
.~ ~ Q
c~ •
~ a~
~ Q ~ N
~ N ~ C
~ ~ V a
~
~ ~ ~ N
N ~ L ~
~ (4 O Q~
U ^ cA U
A7TACHMENT " A "
I~ ~
~
.
~ ~trv~~la~ 1~t ~~ S~ ~ ~~ ~
~ nv~ ~ir+ee ~
~~ ~ ~~~~w~~oak a~.
~ r~
~ 4
ATTACHNlENT " ~ '!
ATTA~H iV! ENT "~..~"
~ ~ ~
~~
.- ~
F~
~ _;
~~
od `~ee ~en~~va.~ ~e ur~~, i~ ;
~nv~o . ~ ~
ea~v~bYaok br~ ~~.
~1~ M Y~
~ ., ~ ~
~',
...>~, _ ~ ~,
'~ t'+' ~ ~^ n ~ 1~ 'la
'~~,, ~ ~ ~'~~ f G~ C~ ~~' fi,, a' ~',~~' `~ ~
~ ~
'~ -~ =~, \\ ~, ~~_______ _._.._..~.._. _ _ .
~ ~~ ~
~ ~ ~
n ~~ ~ ~ _
~, ~~~.'o:° . , . . .. _. ..,.. .. _.
~ '~ ~ ~~ >
~~ . ;~ ~,~~~-
~_ ,, ~ . _ _ _.
,~
~ ~.
,,~ ~ ~
~ , ~ ~
.~ ~
Ci~ . "' - ~
~
.l ~ ~
'7-
r' C ~~ ~
1f
~~
~
l y.
`~~
'C.,
_. ~
~
. ~ ~~
~
V
••i4
J T
~~
~V~
~
~
.~
~
~
~
~
~~
~ y,
~
~
~1'
~
~
I . ` w.........
~
j ~., ~ ~
~J ~•' '~
W • ~
~~
~ M
~{~ ~
1
~+
~
~~ ~•~
~~~
~ ~~~
J ~
~ ~s
~ ~
...--.,
~ ~
.~ ~1~'"_~
_~
~~.1
~
AT~ACHIU~EN~' " bMZ '~
-_ ____ .-~.. _ ..- - . , _
~ ~ ~.~.
,a,.,.....~,~..r . _ . ~ . ~.. -
I ....~ _ _ ..._ ..._.... ~" ' '~_ . ~ .,_..
~
~ ~ ~`.:'~
~~ ~~
~ .~
?~~'' ~ ::~
~ 4~~ d~
V ~~ ~
E-~"'
T ~J
~
' ,~
`
•A
~
y r
w ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~
Lu
Y~ ~ >3 ~
'
~ ~~
1,~ F',
i
t( -
6r - ~+.+~. ~
~ ~ ~ ~
- ~ .~ ,
(~ ~-
-
~ ~ ;
\
~~ ~_,,,,
.r /
/
,
, ~
t, ,i1
W~:
~ '`~... _
- ~..1 J
I ^•~
~
~X
1
~
~
W
1 ~~`~.
<,
~`~
(
~
~.
~..
i ,•~
~ ~
,
s
K. ~q ~~
Y _`:~]
n„ ,~,.3'
~
~.-. 6~
~,5 "'qa, ~~
~~
. ,
~"`
~.
-
~
~'
~ ~.t
~
~
~ ~.,. w'.
~ *5.`
~ _\
~
~ ~ ~«.. , `
~
~ ~
ATTACHMENT " C
l~e. City of Central Point
Subject: Cottonwood Tree - Populus de/toides
Loc•~tian: il? NieGdow Brao~: Qr., Central Poini, or 9750?
-i o Whom It May Conce~°n,
Regarding the cottanw~od tree la4ated in the south ~st corner of the Runias yard is, in r~y opinion; a
h~zard t~ the infrastructure surrounding it.
I strongly suggest tEie IZest altern~4v~ ta eEiminating it~is p,obl~m is the remo~~ai of ~he tree and tr~~t th~
stunip ~nd roats with an herbicide.
Co~zcn waod trees can grow ~rery fast, can grow large hea~ry Ilmbs, are weak wooded, are ~rane to
diseGse and wood cecay, and on average haue a lifespan of 70 years.
Thc area between i~e tree trunk and sidewa~k shauld be at least IZ feet wide lo al~ow a coitonwood to
develcp tn its ful! trunl~ a~id root flair potentiaf withaut damaginc~ ather infrastructure, such as th~
sidew4f;€ ~r~~f street. i~ eotton~;occl planted in a narraw t~r s~r~all ground site will push up tlie sid~~tvalw at~c~
cur~ ~:~r the ~ree, w~7ici~ requires repai~ of ~he damage. Replacing curbs, gutiers arid siuewal~s requires
c~~:fng tr~e roos. Often, I~rge roots will have ta be cut. TreGs with cuk roots result in structural siability
prablerrts for the tree and diminishec3 water attd nutrient upt~ke by the tree, which can r,~us~ a deciin~ in
tree health. A c;ecEin~ in tree health cati result in in~reased inseci Gnd di~ease aC~zc',;, limb die-b~ck, ar
complet~ tree martaliy.
7he cot~onwoai tree in q~~estion is half the recommended distance. The tree iS apnCGxirllatefy 1.{} to 12.
yea~-s ofd witl~ ~he pat~ntiaf to g~t ~~ ta ~ times its size, meaning imme~surabi;~ amounts crF dartta~c~s trs
the sidewafk, street, waterlines, and fence, afl in which the tree is grawing a r"ew fe~t frorrt, This will c~st
th~ hQme awners and the hame owners association thousands of dollars in expenses.
t~~at~anwoods uecome large trees quiclcfy and are nat recammended For residential setrings. So ~Ehe mos~
feasibEe thing to do in t4~is situ~tfon is remC~ve t1~e probl~n befo~•e it becomes a much larg°r ex{~~:nsive
one,
Th~ ^unia~ t~~ould like to rMnfGce the cottartWOOd tree, wi~h a red sunset maple tr~e, This ~`~~uple tree
4ti~ou,~ u~ p~a~ttecl a~ a recarrzmend~d distance away frc~m the sid~walk and ui~w ~f c~e stop sig~~, Tl~n Red
s;~n e.~t r~+aple is a much mare ;~ractica~ tree for this urban enviro~~r~ent>
?'ha~k you, Kyle ~a~te[l ---- Cer~ific?~1 a~rborjst PN-6891A
~
Tov~~sT Ar~~ C~~F~c~~PR~F~SSIC)1~AL
zoHl~~ DisY~icT
~~~~~ ~ P'ROPOSED AM~I`IDIVIEI`~ITS
~
Planning Department
STAFF REP~RT ~~NTRA,L Tam Hu~,~n~e~,AICP,
PC~~NT ~ommunity Qe~elopment Directar/
STAFF REP~RT
Octaber 5, 2010
AGENDA ITEM: File No. d8160(Q2)
Canti~iueci discussion of proposed amendments to the Tourist and Office-Professional {C~1) zaning
district; Applicant: City of Central Paint.
STAFF SOURCE:
Don Burt, Planning Manager
MEETING OBJECTI~'E:
The objective of this meeting is to address any final corrune~ts o~l the public hearing draft of the C-4
Ordinance amenduients. The attached cdrafts are scheduled for eoi~sideration at the Noven~ber 2, 201 Q
Planning Conlmission meeting.
BACKGROUND:
At the last Ptanning Comnussion the draft C-4 amendrnents and the amendment strategy were discussed.
Cha7iges to t11e section numberuig have been made consistent with current canvention. The ~ollowing is
an o~~erview of each section:
1. Section 17.44 Tourist and Off'ice Professional District. Addresses changes in use correcting
redundancies and eliminating the "large retail establishment" size restrictiaa~.
2. Section 17J2 Site Pls~n and Landscaping Plan Approval. Restructures the site plan and
architectural review process, including the provision for clear and understandable standards.
3. Section X7.64 Off-Street Parl:ing. Adds maxunum vehicular parking standards, handicapped
parkin~ standards, and bicycle standards. References Section 17.75 foz parking construction
standards.
4. ~ection 17.75 Design Standurds. This is a new section that is structured to eventually contaui
de~.~elapment standards far aIl zoning districts. As currently written this section includes block
and access provisions that apply to all zoning districts, and site plan and architectural provisions
that apply to conunercial districts. Resen-ations are inc]uded for other zoning districts and
development standards.
iSSUES:
not appear to be any
EXHIB~TSIATTACHMENTS:
Attachment "A" - Toiuist and Office Professional {C-4)
Attaclu~lent "S" - Site Plan and Arclzitectural Review
Attachment "G" -- Of~-Street Parking and Loading
Page 1 of 2 ~'
Attachment "D" - Design and Develapment Standards
ACTION:
Discussion and direction.
REC~MMENDATION:
Direct staff to set a public hearing for Novernber 2, 2010.
~
Page 2 of 2
9-20-IO Draft ATTAC H M E NT "A"
C-4 Zoning Distria Code Modification
~ ~
GHAP'TER 'f 7.44
C-4 TQUR~ST AND OFFICE-
PROFESSIaNAL DiSTRICT
17.44.000 Sections
Section 17.44A 10 Purpose
Section 17.44.020 Permitted Uses
Section 17.~14A30 Conditional Uses
Se~tion I 7.44.040 ~I-~eig#~-Reg~l~+er~sSite Plan and Architectural C}evelo~ment Standards
Section 17,44.050 , ,
General Use Requirements
Sectian 17,44.06tJ SiQnage Standard~
c....~;,... ~~ de ndn70~eig#~Eegt-la~+er~s Off Street Parking
c..~«;,,., i ~ de n7n rn .,.,a~ ~ : ~
17.44.010 Purpose
The C-4 District is intended to provide for the development of concentraced tourist commercial and
entertainment facilities to ser~e both local residents and traveling public, and also for the development
I of compatible ~ajs~professional of#ice facilities. C-4 development should occur at lotations that will
maximize ease of access and visibility from the Interstate 5 freeway and major arterial streets and to be
convenient to the users of Expo Park, the airport, and downtown.
17.44.020 Permitted Uses
The fallawing uses are permitted in the C-4 district
{3) Professianal and financial, including:
~, Ban[cs and similar financial institutions,
b. Accounting and bookkeeping affices,
c. Real Estate ~ffices
d. Insurance Company Off`ices,
e. Legal Ses-vices,
f. Architectural and Engineering Services,
g. Prafessianal Photo or Art Studios,
h. Counseling Services,
i. Corporate or Government Offices;
(4} Tourist and Entertainment-Related Facilities, including:
a. Convenience Market, Meat, Poultry, Fish and Seafood Sales; Fruit and beverage
Stan d s,
b. Drugstores,
~ ~j Page I of 5
9-20.10 Draft
C-4 Zoning Disvict Code Modificatipn
C. Automobile Service Station, Automobile and Recreationaf Vehicfe Parts Sales and
Repairs; and Truck Rentals,
d. Motel and Hotel,
e. Walk-In Movie Theater,
f. Bowl i ng AI ley,
g. Photo and Art Galleries,
h. Photo Processing Pickup Station,
i. Tr-avel Agencies,
j. Barber and Beauty Shops,
k. Sit-Down Restaurants or Dinner Houses (including alcohol),
I. Cacktail Lounges and Clubs serving alcoholic beverages,
m. Tavern with Beer Only,
n. Commercial Parking Lot,
o. Community Shopping Centers which may include any of the permitted uses in this
section and may also include the fpllawing uses:
i. Supermarkets,
ii. Department Stores,
iii. Sporting Gaods,
iv. Books and Statianary,
v. Gifts, Notions and Variety,
vi. Florists,
vii. Leather Goods and Luggage,
viii. Pet Sales and related supplies,
ix, Photographic Supplies,
x. Health Food,
xi. Self-Ser~rice Laundry,
xii. Antique Shop,
xiii. Delicatessen,
xiv. Pastry and Confectionery,
xv. General Apparel,
xvi. Shoes and $oots,
xvii. Specialty Apparel,
xviii, Jewelry,
xix. Clocks and watches, Sales and Service,
xx. Bakery, retail only,
xxi. Bicycle Shop,
xxii. Audio, Video, Electronic Sales and servi~e,
xxiii. Printing, Lithography and Publishing,
p. Mobile Food Vendors,
q. State-Regulated Package Liquor Stores,
r. Other uses not specified in this or any other district, if the planning commission
finds them to be similar to the uses listed above and compatibEe with ocher
permitted uses and with the intent of the C-4 district as provided in Section
17.60. I 40. Authorization for Similar Uses.
s. Large Retail Establishments ' ,
c,...«:,.., i~ nQ n in ~,.r~•i ~~r.,~..i«~..»,,,..~ i.,
~..,..~.~~. ~ . .~ . , , .
17.44.30 Conditional Uses
~ ~ Page 2 of 5
9-20- I p prak
C-4 Zoning District Code ModificaUon
A. T~e following uses are permitted in the C-4 district when authprized in accordance with
Chapter [ 7.76, Conditiona! ~1se Perm'rLs:
a) Campgrounds and recreational vehicle overnight facilities,
b} Drive-In Movie Theater,
c) Golf CaurselDriving Range,
d) Ice and iioller Skating Rinks,
e) Dance Halls,
f~ BiliiardlPool Hafls,
g) Miniature Golf Courses,
h) Amusement Center (Pinball, Games, etc.},
i} Nonindustrial BusinessNocational Schools,
j) Physical Fitness/Conditioning Center; Martial Arts Schools,
k} Carwash,
I) Taxicab Dispatch Office,
m) Ambulance/Emergency Services,
n) Day Care Center,
a) Drive-In Fast Food Outlets,
p) Other Specialty Food Outlets, ,
q) Television and Radio Broadcasting Studio,
,
~)rj Accessory buildings and uses customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, such as
incidental storage facilities, may be permitted as conditional uses when nat included
within the primary building or structure,
~Permitted uses that are referred to the planning commission by city staff because
they were found to exhibit potentially adverse or hazardous characteristics not
normally found in uses of a similar type and size.
B. Uses other than those listed above may be permitted in a C-4 district when included as
a component of a commercial, tourist, ar dffice-professional planned unit de~elopment
that consists predominantly of uses permitted in th~ zons and is planned and developed
in actordance with Chapter 17.b8 P ern PUD . These uses shall
include the following:
i) Department Stares,
ii} Sporting Goods,
iii) Baoks and Stationary,
iv) Gifts, Notions and Variety,
v} Florists,
vi} Leather Goods and Luggage,
vii) Pet Sales and related supplies,
viii) Photographic SuppEies,
ix} Health Food,
x} Self-Service Laundry,
xi) Antique Shop,
xii) Delicatessen,
xiii} Pastry and Confectionery,
xiv} General Apparel,
xv) Shoes and Boots,
xvi) Speciafty A{~parel,
xvii} Jewelry,
xviii) Clocks and watches, Sales and Service,
~ `~ Page 3 of 5
I~P
9-Za-10 Draft
G4 Zoning District Code Modification
xix) Bakery, retail onEy,
~oc) Bicycle Shop,
~oci} Audio, Video, Electronic Sales and service, and
~ocii) Printing, Lithography and Publishing.
Section 17.44.838 040 Site Plan and Ar4j~~ectural Development Standards. Development
within rhe C-4 district shall be subject to che siee and architectural standards set forth in Chapter 17.75,
p~~grr and Develqp~ent Ssandards.
~~
I~Ainimi im I n~ Arn.e ~
dtl--hr
~
i ~n ~+
Vv--rr.
1 n4 C~niror~+a~/ ~i4a ra•+1 ~ ~ ~
~cva~vrcrL'~~o~ iv--arvrc~.-vrLa7 'r~
0 ~~~~
~~p~~ ti-v7b
"" .....1
~ YVtii~ ~
~# ~ .~.y
tl"~'~
~~~d~ ~-8-~~
~-9 ~~
R~ ~~I~1 T., i~ ~ rfao+~
~@I~f @&~~{~8
~f6F~f~ ~
~-
~~ ~~
~~f2~~-~1~@ 4-~~
+ ' ~
i~ Page 4 of 5
9-20-IQ Draft
C-4 Zoning District Code Modification
I . . .._.. -• - --• r -r-• -i -~-•- ----- ---~ - --~---~--- ~--i -------- -. .._.r _.....__. r_.~....._ ,.........~ _...- ......
I$ection 17.44.A~050 General Use Requirements
A. Uses that are normally permitted in the C-4 district but that are referred to the planning
I commission for further- re~iew, per Section 17.~44.030(A)(~r), Conditiana! Uses. will be
processed according to application procedures for conditional use permits. No use shall be
permitted and no process, equipment or materials shal! be used which are found by the planning
commission ta be harmful to persons living or working in Che vicinity by reason of otldr, fumes,
dust, smoke, cinders, dirt, refuse, water-carried waste, noise, vibraCion, illumination or glare, or
are found to involve any hazard of fiCe or explosion.
B. All businesses, services and pracesses shall be conducted entirely within a completely e~closed
structure, with the exception of off-street parking and laading areas, outdaor eating a~eas,
service statians, outdoor recreationaf facilities, recreational vehicle overnigt~t facilities, and other
compatible activities, as approved by the planning commission.
C. Open storage of maCerials related to a permitted use shal[ be ea~~~permitted only within
an area surrounded or screened by a solid wall or fence ha~ing a height of six feet; provided;
that no materials or equipment shall be stored to a height greater than that of the wall.
• , , ,
,
#~e~let~i~~
Section 17.44.8-~~ObO Signage Standards
:, :. .:: ..a ,,,-~„ «s,..« i,.,.. ;«w•.. ,.,a„ t ~n~ a~ ~ «
~.:~..:.u~ ~. ~.....~..«v ~~;:u ,
. ,
> >
C.A. Signs in the C-4 district shall be permitted and designed according to pravisions of
Chapter_ 17.75.054, Srgnoge Standards and Chapterl5.24, Sign Cod
1 ~:6A.1-~ 9.
S~~i~~.4~1.070 Off~treet Parking
Off-street parking and lo~~~~~~~s shal! be provided as required in Chapter 17.64, Off-Street Parktng
and Loading, and developed to the srandards set forth in Chapter I 7_75.430(B . P~rking D~~ig,p ond
Develo~ment Standards.
Page 5 of 5
~ ~
9-20_ ~~ o~~~ ATTAC H M E N T"B"
C-4 Zoning Disvia Code Modifimtion
S PAR
CHAPTER '~ 7.72
SITE PLAN~ AND
_ ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
s~t~o~s:
17.72.010 Purpose
I 7.72.420 AnpEicabilitr
17.72.030 Information Required
17.72.44U Standards
17.72.050 Conditions on Site Plan and Architectural ~ev~~ e iew
17.72.060 Building Permit Issuance - Plan Change
17.72.070 Expiratian
I 7.72.080 Site Plan and Architectural Review Plan Compliance - Cert.ificates of Occupancy
17.72.10 Purpose.
The purpose af si~,~g,.~i~~an anc~~Chitectural Review,
~al is to review the site, landscape, and ~~~plans of the proposed use,
structure or building to determine compliance with this titl , and to promate the
arderly and harmonious develapment af the city, the stability of land values and investments, and the
general welfare, and to pramote aesthetic considerati~ns, and to help prevent impairment or
depreciation of land ~alues and de~elopment by the erection of structures or additions or alterations
thereto without proper attention to site planning, fandscaping and the aesthetic acceptability in reEation
to the de~elopment of neighboring properties. (Ord. 1436 §2(part), 1981).
I 7.72.020
submitted and a~pr~~red,_ or a~proved vrith conditions, as set forth in this cha er_.
(I) 6cempt_Proj~ts~~c~QPt as provided in subsection 2~) the following ~rQje~ts do not require Sit~
n d arc '
__ _ . _ _ ... _.....
A Single-family detached regid~~i~'~l~tructures:
~._ Any rtt~lti~le-family residentiai r~o~e~t cantaini~g three 3 or less units:
C. Landscapgplans, fences, when not part of a rnajor Rroject~
~ ~ Page I of 6
9-20-10 Draft
C-4 Zoning DiscriCt Code Modification
D. Stara~e sh d~s, paxio coaers, garages and car~ort~, declcs, ebos._and
similar non-QCCU i d r "n con-uncti~n with res~dentiai
~e~; and
E. 5igns that ~onform.to a pr~viousiy a~proved mast~~- sign pr~gr~m fflr
the project sitQ.
_
Ex m t ro e ar r i d I vvith all a lica le d v I m t srandards f this cha tQr.
A. New construction incl din r' ublic roiects, that:
a. Include~ a new build~ng ar buifding addition o~five thousand~5 OQQ~s uare feet or
• more:
b. Includes the construction of a~,~-king lot of t~n ( I 0} or more Rarking spaces• or
c. Reaui~-es one or more variances or conditionaE use ~rmits and, in the jud~ment of
the d~rector, will h~yg a significant effect upon the aesthetic character af the city or
the surrounding area;
B. An attached r id ' t that contains four 4 or mor units•
C. Any rninor project, as defined in subsection {3~, that the director determines v~n;~l
significantJy alter the character, a~pearance, or use of a building or site.
requirements of Chapter 17,QS. Appjications Qnd T~rpes of Review Pro~edures:
~Q~)_N~w construttion, including_pr~vate and public prajects. X~j~t involves a new building or
building~dditian of less than 5.000 square {eet.
(B) Si~ns that rneet al) applicable standar~s as set fc~,rth in Chaoter I^ 7~75.05Q~ Si~n~gg
Standards;
_(~) Exterior remQdeling~ntithi~ the commerciai or industriai zoni~ diszricts when not part
of a major aroiect~
~p~,p~CJcinQ lots~ess than ten (~O~parking sQaces_
{E) An~project relating to the installation af cabinets containing comr unications servi~e
g~~Ilpm~nt or faci~ities owned and aperated by a public utility a~ot subject to Section
I 7.60 040
LF~ ["],jnor chang~o th~ followin~
i. Plans that h~v_@ pr~.vious y received Site Plan and Architecturai Revi~w drov~;
'i a roved fanned unit developments;
~s Page4of6
9-20-10 Draft
C~ Zoning Discrlct Code Modification
~~) At tt~e discretion of the director any thar~ es to orevi~usly ap~roved plans reauir~ng Site
Plan and Architectu~-ai RQView.
As used in this subsection, thQ te~rn "minor° rneans a change that,is,~j I~ttie visual significance,
does n9t materially aiter the a~pearance of ~eviousiy a~rove~ improvemenis. is n~t prQposed
f r he f i nd in i n nd aracter of the str~ct r in I d. A
the discretion of the director if it is determined that the c~mulative effect of rnultipf~ minor
changes would result in a major chan$e, a nevv a~pli~cat~on far Sit~ Plan and Ar~hitectura! Rev~ew
is required. All minor changes must compiy with the developrroerrt, sxandards of th~s chapt~r.
• > >
,
~ . . .
~ . ;
• ~ ,
..~.... ...1 ....f:..,...,:«4. ~:.I....t:..f
~crv~ . ~
~ .
- • ~ ~ r • • ~ . ~
i ~° rT•
17.72.030 Information ~eqtfes~R ir
A~vJiratian for Site Plan and Archit~ctural Review shall be ~nade to the Communit,~ Development
~ ~ Page 3 of 6
9-2a-10 Draft
C-4 Zoning District Code Modi~icatian
. ~
. ~
. ;
-
~~s ~ , ~
T~
~: .Ci£$ isFI~
~c-c!S?v $N j
. o
. ~
. ~
~ ~
- ! ~ r > > r
` r
O /
_...
'~ - ..~...J .... ~J .. ..L .:~,...«~.....I ,.I..~.n*; .-..~
r
i n n:
. ~«......., w,.~.. .,,.... ~...,,i.r :..,...
, _i.:.... ,.
°> ..«..,...~.. ..
> :a,....~u.~ ....a .. ~~..... : .. ,.~
. ,
,'-'~: E~ er~eF~t
• ~
i ~ e
. a
....,...~ ....,,,,.~ ~
,
. ,
I t C~,
. ~«~.... ~ r.,.,~
,
I L d..
. .l.,~*r ., .. ..,..« .,.- .,..,J ..~. J....,..IL ..
,
~ g
.
..~ I'« .... .. rl.... .. ~
.
G I.. ~.L... .J'..
..«~.,..
..~tl..-.
.+~., w +w ;
.~F:.. ~t~
,.1,..~....-F.. ..~.
~ 1... 1;
.. ...J :
...J
~
~
~ ~
~ s • ~
17.72.40 Site Plan and Archit~~_k~r~l Standards.
In approving, conditionally apprt~ving, Qr denying ~~I~r~~t~an~r~it~ Plan and Architectural
Review a~olication, the e+~approving authori~shall base ~e+~+~d~Ci5ion on compliance vYith the
following standards_
A, ,/~,Rp~ ite plan, landscaping, and architectura design standards as set forth in Seaion I 7J5.
,
Page 4 of b
~ ~
4-20.10 brak
C-4 Zoning Distritt Code Modification
& Ci o CentrQl Paini D~ rxm rrt o P~ lic rk rd S er~ cattons an n' rm
~an~gl~g~jJ~~'or Publii WQrks Construct~an• , -
D.
;
E. Accessibility and sufficiency of fire fighting facilities to such a standard as to provide for the
reaspnable safety of life, limb and property, including, but not limited ta, suitable gates, access roads and
fire lanes so that all buifdings on the premises are atcessible to fire apparatus;
, , . .
,
;
I 7.72.050 Conditions an ~~~Sit~_ Plarn and Architectural Revi~~y_Appraval.
The c~y-apvro~ing authoritv may attach ta any Site Plan and Architectural Review approval given
under this chapter specific conditionsLQJ r~~rictions. deemed necessary " _o~rotect
the public health, safety or welfare including, but not limited to, the following:
(I) Construction and installation of any on-site or off-site improvements, including but not limited to
sidewalks, curbs, gutters, streets, bikeways, street signs and street lights, tr•affic control signs and signals,
water, storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and park and recreation improvements. In requiring off-site
impravements, the city shall find that the improvements are reasonably related to the develapment and
I would serve a public purpdse such as mitigating the negative impact of the proposed development.
All improvements required under this subsection shall be made at the expense of the applicant, and
shall conform to the provisions of the
Cit~ nf Centraf P~int D.~artment o f Publrc Worics
Debartment $~pn~o~,~~s~~o~rQ~$ nnd Uni£orm D~tails for ~'ublic Y1~orks CvnstrUCLpJT. H4wever, the city, in
its discretion, may modify such standards and determine site-specific design, engineering and
construction specifications when appropriate in the particu[ar de~elopment;
~ f1 Page 5 of 6
~
. . , , • , , • ,
~$-~~
9-20.10 Draft
C-4 Zoning District Code Modification
(2) An agreement by the owner of the praperty to waive, on his or her beha!#, and on behalf of alf
future owners of the land, any objection eo the formation of a local impravement district which may be
I farmed in the future to provide any of the improvements specified in subsection ~~of this section;
(3) An agreement by the owner of the praperry to enter into a written deferred improvement
agreement, providing that one or more of the impra~ements specified in subsection A of this settion
shali be made by the owner at some future time to be determined by the city;
I (4) Any agreement entered into pursuant ta subsections ~2 or ~3 of this section shall be recorded
in the county recorder's office and shall be intended to thereafter run with the land, sa as to bind future
owners of the lands affected to the conditions oi the agreement. Any and all recording casts shall be
I~e~-e-~y~ethe responsibility of the appficant; and
(5} Any other conditions deemed by the city to be reasonable and necessary in the interests of the
public health, safety or welfare. (~rd. I b84 §68, I 993).
17.72.060 Building Permit Issuance--Plan Change.
( I} No buiiding permit will be issued for the construction with~ut the pri~r approva~ by the ~g
ee~issie~ ' which will be noted on the first page of the plans. A~e~-ef~e
(2} Any change or deviation from the plans approved ~y the -~~~ro~ing au~
without the written -
~e~a~e~community de~elopment director ,
~e~-shall be considered a violation, (Qrd. I 684 §b9, I 993; ~rd. 143b §Z(part}, 198 I},
17,72.070 Expiratian,
{ I) A site plan approval shall lapse and become void one year foll4wing the date on which it became
effective unless, ,
~ , prior ta the expiration of one year, a building permit is issued by the
building inspector and construction is commenced and diligently pursued toward completidn. The
m n' d ~ lo dir r may extend the site plan approval far an
additional period of one year, subject to the requirements of Section ~6:A49 7
T es of Reriew Procedures.
(2) If an established time limit for development expired and na extension has been granted, the s+~e
~Site Plan and Architectural Review approval shall be void. {Ord. 1684 §70, 1993}.
I 7.72.080 Site Plan and Architectural flla~-Review Compliance--Certi~cate of Occupanry.
The city may refuse issuance of a certiftcate flf oeCUpancy #e~-a-~g~until the applicant for a
<Ssite P~lan and Architectural Review application ~~ has ccampleted all requirements and conditions
'in accordance with the ~plans approved by the ~letx~irig-e rovi a~thori . G'~JJo person
~shall use or occupy a building or property unless such person has eomplied with the all applicable
re~uirements of this tit1~Q ^~~, any conditions placed an the S~te Pian and Architectural
vie ' application, and has obtained a certificate of occupancy. ~Ord. 1684 §71,
1993).
Page 6 of 6
~i ~
PC 8-3-10 Draft ATTAC H M E N T' "G"
C-4 Zoning District Code Modifiration
CHAPTER 17.f 4
OFF-STREE~' PARKING AND L~3ADfNG
I 7.64.0 I 0 Pu r-pose.
17.64.0 Applicability
17•64•03Q O~f-Street Loading
17.64.044 Off-Street Par-king Requirements
v,.~.;..i., a....1.;~.. [....,i:t;,...
I .....J....~...7.... ..L D....i.:.... C....717r7....
17.b4.010 Purpose.
The following regulations are established to provide far the number of off-street parking~€-a~e~ek~i~e~
*°"~~~ ^~a ~~~~~ .,~~~~'~° ~oading and bicycle spaces for new uses and enlargement of existing uses in
connection with the uses of land ~ermitted by this zc~ning ordinan~e.
~~~
on ad~acent land uses.
I 7.64.020 Apqlitabilitv
In ali districts. in cannettion with any use wh,~t~Q~v~r, there shall be provided at the time any building or
structure is erected, enlarged ar increased in ta~y, or Che use is changed or increased in intensit~
off-street parking spaces for automobiles, off-str-eet {oading, and bicycle parking facilities for th~enLged
Page 1 of I3
~ ~
PC 8-3-10 Draft
C-4 Zoning Disvia Code Modification
Section 17.64.030 Off-Street Loading.
A. in all districts~ , for each use for which a building is to
be erected or structurally altered t~ the extent of increasing the floor area to equal the minimum floor
area required to provide loading space and which will require the receipt or distribution of materials or
merchandise by truck or similar vehicle, there shall be provided off-street laading space er~#e-~asis-e#
, : in accordance with the standards set foreh in Table 17.b4„QI, ~ff
Street l.oading_f~.~~emer~ts.
• , ,
#e~evv+~g~e~
~
~_~ ~ • : ~~~ ~ -`'- ~-- ~ t ~ ~ ~ _
Use Categories i. a' 1 ~ ~~.~ h' ~~ ~' ~ . ~ _~_~ ~ - - - - -
C)ff-Street Requirerr~ent
(fractions rounded up to the closest whole number)
~ • ~ e - a • ~ . e - ' ~ ' •
Less than 5,40~ 0
5,000 to 30,000 I
30,001 to IOd,000 2
100,001 and ~~er
~~' ~D ~ ~i ra ~ ~ ~ ~D '~ ' _ 6. 3
N, ~ # ? p
.,~ ' C
~ a o o'
e ~ m, o ~ u - ~
Less than 30,000 0
3d,001 to 100,000 I
100,001 and ~ver 2
B. A loading berth shall not be less than ten feet wide, thirty-five feet long and have a height
clearance of twelve feet. Where the vehicles generally used for loading and unloading exceed these
dimensions, the required lengch of these berths shall be increased.
G. If loading space has been provided in cannec#ion with an existing use or is added to an existing
use, the Eoading space shall not be eliminated if elimination would result in less space than is requi~ed to
n~ Page 2 of I 3
~i+
PC 8-3- I ~ Draft
C-4 Zoning DistrtiCt Code Modification
adequately meet the needs of the use.
D. Off-street parking areas used to fulfill the requirements of this title shall not be counted as
required loading spaces and shall not be used for loading and unloading operations, except during
periods of the day when not required ta meet parking needs.
~ E. fn no case shaEl any partian of a street or alley be counted as a part of the required parking or
;Goading space, and such spaces shall be designed and located as to avoid undue interference with the
public use of streets ar alleys. (Ord. f 436 §2(part}, I 98 i).
17.b4.04a , ff-Street Parki~g Requirements. ~~1
, , ,
,
~
~ ,~
~. 911.uses shall not exceed the ma~cimum number of off-street
parking spaces in accordance with Table 17.64.02, (}~Sireei Purkrng Rea{~iremerns. The maximum number
of off-street par-king spaces may be reduced in accordance with 5ection ! 7.64.04~~, Redudiorr o~'
M~ximum ~ff Stt'eet Yehicle Parkrn~
The requirement for any use not specifically listed shall be,d~~~rrrined by the comm~nit-~r de~elapment
directc~r on the basi~~}~~uirements for similar uses, and on the basis of evidence of actual demand
created by similar uses in the city and elsewhere. ~nd such other traffic engineering or_~lanning data as
may be available and a~propriate to the establishment of a minimum reauirement.
B ~
n ~. ~ ~ ~ e
~
Use Categories ~aximum Vehicle Parking Requirement
(fractions rounded down to the closest whole number)
^ •
Single-Family Residential 2 spaces per Dwelling Unit, both of which must be covered.
Accessory Dwelling Unit I space per Accessory Dwelling Unit
Twa-Family Two Spaces per Dwelfing Unit, both of which must be covered.
I space per studio or 1-bedroom unit;
Multiple-Family I.5 spaces per 2-bedroom unit; and
2 spaces per 3-bedroom unit.
2 spaces per Dwelling Unit on the same 4ot or pad as the mobile
Mabile Home Parks home (may be tandem); plus I guest space for each four mobile
homes.
Boarding Houses, Bed and
Breakfast I space per bedroom plus I space per each twv employees
• ~ •~
Hotel or Motel R'^*'~~~ ~~~~ I space per guest; plus I spaces per each twa
Page 3 of I 3
~`~
PC S-3 I U Draft
C•4 Zoning DistricC Code Modificatian
employees. Units having kitchen facilities shall provide 2 spaces ~
unit with kitchen.
r i. ,~~ge
•
Welfare or Correctional
Institutions
f space per five beds for patients or inmates.
Group Living such as
Convalescent Hospitals, Nursing I space per each two beds for patients or residents bedrooms
Home
Haspitaf ~`'^~'~~~ ~"~~ 3 spaces per each two beds, determined by the
maximum design capacity of the facility.
, ` . -
Churches, Chapels, Mortuaries ~ space per 75 sq. ft. of main assembly area; or per $e~~tion i%.71,
Site Plan and Architecturai Review
Libraries, Museum, Art Gallery I space per 400 sq. ft. af net flvor area; plus I space per each 2
employees
••
~~~°°~i space per empfoyee; plus one space per fi~e children
Day Care Center, Preschool the facility is designed or intended to accommodate. No
f
f
l
f
requirements
or
aci
ities caring
or five or fewer children
simultaneously.
Elementary and Junior High 3 spaces per classroom, or I space per four seats in
Schools (public and the main auditorium, gymnasium, or other place available for public
privatelparochial) assembly, whichever is greater.
High Schools ,Colleges, and I space per each five students, based on the design
Trade Schools (public and capacity of the facility, or I space per four seats in the main
privatelparochial) auditorium, gymnasium, or other place available for pubiic assembly,
whichever is greater.
~ ~ + .
Theaters, amphitheaters, ^'^}'~~n }"~~ I space per eaCh four fixed seats or eight feet of
stadiums bench length.
5 spaces per lane; plus one spate per each two emplqyees. Other
Bawling Aliey uses in the building shall be calcuiated separately per Section
17.64.85AQ40(F~, Mixed Uses.
'`'~`'~°° '"~~ I space per each one hundred square feet of net floor
Dancehall, Skating Rink (or ice) area or fraction thereof; plus one space per each twa
employees.
Swimming Poa!
"'~~'~°° `"~~ I space per each one hundred square feet of ~oal
surface area.
. . .
ReCail Stores, Personai Services ^'^~ '~~~ ~"~~ I space per each two hundred square feet af net #loor
area ~excluding storage and other non-sales or non-display areas).
Furniture, Appliances ~~~ space per each five hundred square feet of gross flaor
area.
Automobile, Boat, Manufacture ~`'~~'~~r ~~°~ I space for each employee on the major shift; plus 2
Home and Recreational Vehicle spaces for each service bay; plus I space per each three hundred
Sales, Service, and Rental square feet of showraom area; plus I space per each two thousand
Page 4 of I 3
aq
PC 8-3- I 0 Draft
G4 Zoning Distrid Code Modification
square feet af used or new vehicle sales area, or other outdoar
sales area.
n'~~':.~'~~rl space for each employee on the major shift; plus 2
Nurseries, Gardening and spaces for each service bay; plus I space per each three hundred
Building Materials square feet of showroom area; plus I space per each two thousand
square feet of used or new vehicle sales area, or dther outdoor
sales area.
Service and Repair Shops ^'^~.a~l~3 ~~~I space per each thr-ee hundred square feet of gross
floor area.
Eating & Drinking Establishments 10 spaces per I,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area
Restaurants, Fast Food ~~~ I space per one hundred ( I 00} feet of gross floor
area, plus three (3} stacking spaces for drive-through window.
• -• ~ ~
Banks and other ~inantial I space per ~krthree hundred square feet of gross
Inseitutions floor area ~ . In no case shall there be fewer than
three spaces provided.
General and Professional Offices I soace ~e 2~50 sq. ft. af gross floor area.
ni,-.~ i...... ~~.,,.. ~ ~~•~~„~~r. .,i, r ,.w
"~"
~
Medical and Dental Offices ,
~,
.,~,,. ~~s~ ...~u,. .,
e~4eYee~e~-er~~l space per 25Q square feet of
rg OSS flaor area; ..,~•~~^"~_ ~ ~~~~~
~ . ~ . .
~let-~e~e~2 spaces per each three employees on the two
Assembly and manufacturing largest shifts~~, pr one space per each five hundred square feet of
gross floor area, whichever is greatest.
{*One space per emplayee if the business has only one shift).
2 spaces per each three employees an the two
Warehousing and storage largest adjacent shi#ts*, or- one space per each one thousand square
feet of gross floor area, whichever is greater. {*One space per
emQloyee if the business has only one shift}.
lndustria! Vehicles ~~~~I space for each vehicle kept or operated in
connection with the use.
A) Calculation of Required Off-Street Parking. Off-street par[cing facili~y requirements set forth
in Table 17.64,Q2,_Q,f~-S~~Qt Parking Requircments, shall be a~plied as foliows:
a. Where the a~plication of the schedule resu{ts in a fractianal requirement it shall be
~ d d n whole number.
b. For purposes af this chapter, gross floQr ar@~$h~1~ not include enciosed or co~ered areas
used far off-straet parking or Roading, ar bicycle facilities.
c. Where uses or activities subject to differipg~~uirements are Iocated in the same
structure or on the same site, or are intended to be served by a common facility the
mmuni de el m n dir when issuin a ermit s for multi le uses on a site
may restrict the hours of operation or plate other conditions on the multiple uses so
~~ Page 5 of I 3
PC 8-3-10 brak
C-4 Zoning Qistrict Code NlodificaUOn
that ~r c~g_r~ s do_not overlap and may rhen modify the tata~parking requirement to
be based on the most intense cort~f~ination of uses at any one time.
d. Where requirements are es~~(ished on the basis of seaes or person ~~, city the building
regulations~rovisions a~pEicable at the time of determination shall be used to define
ca aci .
e. Where residential use is conducted together with or acc~$sory to other permitted uses
a licable residentiai r uirements shall a I in addition t h r nonresidential
requirements.
f. In addition to the parking requirements oudined in Table 17.64.02. D~f-Street Parkin
tandards pat-king for handica~ped persons shali be provided pursuant to the
re uiremen f ' n 17 0 C Accessible Parkin Re urrements.
B) Reduction of Maximum Of~ Street Vehicte parking. The off-street„oarking requirements in
Table 17.64.02, Qft=Street Parking Requiremenis, may be reduced in any commercial (~} or industrial
(M) district as follo~sL
a. By one space for each on-street parking saace vyben iti~ orl the block face abutting the
general public use of on-street,spaces are prohibited.
b, By~~Q~P~~~rve_sign~ficant srands of trees or ~rotected trees in addition
to those requ~red to be r~rYed by the Code.
c. Through ~, $eparate o~ng demand analysis prepared by the ap~icant as part of the Site
Plan and Architectural Revie,yY Process.
Unless otherwise specifed, the above reductions may be a~plied cumulatively but in no case ma~r
the maximum off-street parking requirements be reduced by more than 20 percent.
sect~on
r@q.uj!-ements and are not subject to reductiorts per Section 17.64.050{2};
b. Accessible parking shall be located in ~Iose r~oximiYy to buiiding entrances and shall be
desigrE. . to [~Cmi~~C~up~nts of vehicles to reach the entrance on an unobstructed path
or wafkway; and
.
+.+ ~' Page 6 of 13
PC 8-3• I U praft
C-4 Zoning Discrict Code Modificaaon
c. Accessible spaces shall be grouped in pairs where possible.
Required accessible parking spaces shall be identified with signs and ~avement marki~s identifying
them as resenred for persons with disabilities; signs shall be posted directly in front of the ~arking
space.at a height of no less than 42 inches and no more than 72 inches above pavement level. Van
;paces shall be s e~y identified as such.
I to 25 I I 0
2b ta SO 2 I ~
5 I to 75 3 I 2
76 to I 00 4 I. 3
I01 to 15d 5 I 4
I 5 I to 2~0 {~ I 5
20 I~q 300 7 I l
30 I~g 40~ 8 I ~,
401 to 500 9 2 7
2% of total arkin
'~` 718 of Calumn
501 to 104Q I I$ of Column A *~
Provided ln each I~t A
20 plus I for each ~ 7/8 of Column
I 0~ I I!8 of Calumn A ~'~''~`
100 v~er 1000 A
~;}D~ r arkin . ~a~ea
Re~uired parking facilitie~{or two or more uses, structures, or parcels
of la~d in any cammereiai (C) or industrial {M} dastrict may be sacisfied by
the same parking facilities u~ed jointly, to the extent that
the owners or operators show that the need far a~g facifities does nq~a~eriall~r overf~p (e.g..
uses ri~y of a daytime versus nighttime nature: weekday uses versus weekend uses). and
pra~ided that pr~ar ta the issuance of any buiEding~ermit for the propert~ that the right of joint
use is e~idenced by a recorded deed, iease, contract, or similar written instrument establishing the
jaint use. The City may a~prove owner requests for shared parking through the Site Plan and
Br~hitectural Review Rr~~s~._
, , •
,
~~ p.i Page 7 of I 3
~~
PC 8-3-10 Draft
C-4 Zoning District Code Modification
,
~
£;E~Off-Site Parking. Except fcsr single-family dwellings, the vehicle parking spaces required by this
Chapter may be located on another par-cel of land, provided the parce! is within three hundred
(300} feeC of the use it serves and the City has appro~ed the off-site parking through the Site Plan
and Architectural Review process. The distance from the parking area ta the use shall be
measured from the nearest parking space to a building entrance, following a sidewalk or other
pedestrian route. The right to use the off-site parking must be evidencecf by a recorded deed,
lease, easement, or similar written instrument in the same manner as set forth in Sectaon
I 7.b4.A58040~4A)~.
~)F~~~&Mixed Uses.
,
unless it can be shawn that the peak parki~ demands are actually less (see Section 17.64.a40(D}_
Shored Parkin~).
I ~3~-N~4:A7~~Compact Car Adjustment.
a. Any parking lot or otherwise required publit parking area containing ten dr mare parking
spaces shall be eligible for a compact car adjustment, provided all requirements of this
chapter are adequately met.
b. Up to, but not exceeding, twenty-five ,(25~percent of the total number of required
parking spaces may be designed and provided for the parking of campatt cars.
c. All compact parwng spaces tnust be identified for compact parking only. Compact parking
spates shall :be desi ne in accordance with the
minimum standards set forth in Se~~n 17.75.030(B~(2), Parking Stall Minimum Dimensions.
`T"~~`'Qt~i~~ , . . .
.~ ,~ .
~ -A~! ,
E3H~+~64:~8~Change ~e-A~e~#erQf Use.
Prior to the change of use of ~_~uildin~ or structure the applicant shall demanstrate that adeauate
parking s~aces are availabie to accommodate,the new use(s) as required in this cha~ter. ~'°~~~ ~~~a~a
,
Cj ~ Page 8 of I 3
..d
PC 8-3- I 4 Drah
C-4 Zoning l7istrict Code Modification
A $ 6 ~ ~ F-I- F~
8:99 8$S ~?09 ~3~9 ~8:9~ +a:~
~ &§9 &3S +~80 ~B8 ~4_BB ~
~y A-A9 ~9A ~9A ~3:Ae ~A9 ~ra
~5A ~39 a ~:9A ~3AA 3-1:9A a-~
8-09 ~~4-AA -1-~9A -23:48 3~:9A 3a-5B
. 8:5A ~4-59 aa~B ~4:98 49:99 ~~~A
~A BeSre~
~:6A
~ S9A
a-~9B
~b_3B
4-~A9
~2:§A
~59 a-5:59 -I-1 ~8 -~,?88 4Z0A ~3~$
8:09 a-638 a-a :A9 ~ 6:A9 44:AA ~7: E$
S:~A a 6_99 a 1;99 ~9A 44:88 3-~46
~8- 9eS~ees
~:AA
~39
a+90
~~8.99
4~.bg
~7:~
~9 -I-~89 a--~B~ +~A9 46-bA 3S:4B
?~ Page 9 of I 3
PC 8-3-10 Dr•aft
C-4 Zoning District Code Madific3tion
$:99 a.B:3A ~-3:9A ~~48 4~69 4~5A
8:~9 ~B ~69 +~A 49:48 R~?4A
~~
~iA9
+~-EA
~AA
a-4-B8
~9:~9
4~39
o_~n ~9-5A ~A9 a-4.8A 3 4:98 43:~9
8:9A ~ a-¢AA a-4:3A ~2~~9 ~b38
8:39 a 9,4~ a 3:59 ~90 ~39 46.3A
4~ BeSrees
A:99
a-~:$$~
a-3:A9
+~B
~~~-69
~
~3A ~A:1 ~ ~9A ~46 ~3-~A 4b:56
8:69 ~'~ a-4:6A +935 b 3:4A 48:3A
8~A ~8-9&~ ~a ~_58 ~A 3~~58 47:90
~A-Begrees
~469
~A-4&'~
~AA
a-13$
~~,88
47:86
~5A ~8~78~ a~:96 12:4A ~3:48 4~39
8~6 ~4a~ ~88 ~A ~9~9 ~$A
8:5A ~29_79~ a8_58 SLS9 ~99 3sr.b8
b8-Begrees
~88
~
a-&66
a-&49
b9:8A
~~59
~:~58 ~~ a8.AB ~~9 69~A c~_cn
8&AB ~'~ ~A:99 &3A 61:29 ~8~59
838 ~9_89~ a9;59 ~98 6a-19 ~8_2A
~$ 9eK+-ees
~&6
~A9~
~A9
~9
6-~99
~4a
~58 ~9~ ~8-~8 a-A:~A b8s19 ~9
fi:~8 ~6:1-8~ ~3:A$~ 8-1-9 b~29 b~88
8:5A ~A.29~ ~4-9~~ 8:69 64~49 b?~99
~
~98
:A:3$~
~4~
~ 19
64~A
b~9
~59 ~6:4A~ ~4A~ ~:bA 64:F38 6~A
~~ Page I 0 of f 3
PC 8-3-10 Draft
C~ Zoning District Cpde Modification
8:A9 ~ z~6-.~Ba~ ~$$ 64 _A9 r~
8:59 a-~AB~` ~~ B.~A 63:9A ~
~~
~I:99
-I-9~
~4:AA~
~f:99
62:98
~
~1:5A a~:~9'~ ~4:58~ ~30 6~99 +r~
P~e~
,
. ,
t~.. ,.
~ .. ,.a .
,..t,. ~:a
.. ., u~ ..~~... .,..,~,.~*.. ~
.
~~e~5~ 8+~
~
, ,
~ •
• ~ ,
3~ Page I I of 13
PC B-3-10 17raft
C-4 Zoning pistrict Code Modification
~ ,
~ •
I) Bicycle Parking~~j~ycle parking shall be provided in accordance Tabie 17.64.04. 8~cycle Porkir~g
Requrrements.
~
~ L2~nd Use
~
I Single-Family Residential
Minimum Required
~
Minimum
Covered
NA
I Multi-Family Residential, ,C~,~neral I space per unit 140%
I Multi-Family Residential, S~r~jors or with
Physical Disabilities
~
I Schools. Elemer~rv I space per S units
4 spaces per classroom 100%
I 00%
I Schools, Junior HighlMiddle School 4 spaces per classroam _I90%
I Schools, Senior Hi~h 8 s a~~er classraom 104%
CollegelTrade School I space per 4 students
~plus I space per student housing
roomlunit 100%
I~_r~Sjs ~~~r~LPark & Ride Lots 5% of automobile parking s ces f 00%
~ Religious Institutions I s~ace per 40 seat capacitv 25Yo
i Hospitals f sp~per 5 beds 75%
I DoctorlDentist Offices 2 r I ft.
whichever is greater 2~
I LibrarieslMuseums, etc.
~ •
I Retail Sales z or I space per I,000 sq. f~,
whichever is gr r
D..i3 spaces per I.UUU sq. ft 25%
5i~%
I Auto-Oriented 5ales z or Q.33 spaces per I,000 sq. ft.
whithever is greater ~¢(
I GrocerieslSug~rmarl~ets 0.33 spaces per I,OOa sq. ft 10%
I Office 2 or I space per I,000 sq. ft,
y~hichever is greater ~
I Restaurant I space per I,000 sq. R. 25%
I Drive-In Restaurant I space per I.000 sq. k. 25%
I Sho~ping Center 0.33 spaces per I,000 sq. ft. 50%
Financial Institut~ons 2 or 0.33 spates ~er I.000 ~q. ft,
whichever is greater I D%
I TheaterslAuditoriums, etc.
I ~ y I space per 30 seats I~
3 ti~ ~ge i s of i a
PC 8-3-10 Draft
C-4 Zoning Discrict Code Modification
I Industrial Park ~Qr g Lsp~per I,000 sq. ft,
whichever is greater I DO%
I Wareho i~se 2 or 0. I space per I,000 sq. ft,
whichever is greater I~0%
Manufacturing, etc. 2 or 0. [ 5 space per I.Q00 sa, ft,
whichever is greater f 00%
Page 13 of 13
~ e
t~'
9-20-10 Draft ATTACHIIII~N~ ~` - ~ ~'
C-4 Zoning District Code Modificaoon
CHAPTER 17'.75
DESIGN AND DEVELOPIVIENT
STAN DARDS
17.75.010 Purpose
17.75.02Q Applicability
17.75.030 Site Design ~nd Develapment Standards
17.75.03 f General Connectivity, Access, and Circulatiqn Standards
17.75.033 Residential Site Design and Development Standards
17.75.035 Cammercial Site Design an~ Development Standards
17.75.037 Industrial Site Design and Development Standards
17.75.039 Parking Standarcfs
[ 7.75.040 Building Design and Development Staridards
A. Residential Building Design and Development Standards (RESERVED)
B. Cammercial Building Design and Develapment Standards
C. Industrial Building Design and Development Standards (RESERVED
I 7.75.050 Sign Standards (RESERVED)
I 7.75.060 Exceptions
17.75.010. Purpose
The purpose of this chapter is to set forth clear and objective design and development standards to
facilitate the submittal and review of develapment proposals in a manner that implements the gaals and
palicies of the Comprehensive Pian maintain and enhance the city's Smal[ Town Environment. The
standards set forth in this chapter are considered minimums and may be, on a case by case basis,
supplemented by the approving authority as necessary to mitigate impacts on abutting property that are
unique to the proposed develapment.
17.75.020. Applicability
The regulations set forth i~t this chapter appiy tv all development within the City of Central Point.
I 7.75.030. Site Design and ~evelopment Standards
The design and develapment standards of this section apply to all deveEopment within the City of
Central Point The site design and development standards are presented in twa parts;
17.75.031 General Connectivity, Circulation and Access Standards.
The purpose of this section is to assure that the connecti~ity and transportation policies of the
City's Transportation System Plan are implemented. kn achieving the objective af maintaining ~nd
enhancing the City's small town environment it is the City's goal to base its de~elopment
patter-n on a general circulation grid using a waEkable block system. Blocks may be comprised of
publiclpri~ate street right-of-way, or accessways.
`Z /~ Page I of 15
v •x
4-za-io ~~ft
C~ Zoning District Cade Modifiracion
I. Streets and Utilities. The public street and utility standards set forth in the City of
Centra! Point Department of Public Works Siandard SpecificQrrons and Uniform 5tandard Detoils
for Public Works Construction shall apply to alf development within the City.
2. Block Standards. The following block standards apply to all development
a. Block perimeters shall not exceed two thousand 2,044 feet measured along the
public street right-of-way, or outside edges of accessways, or other acknowledged block
boundary as destribed in subsection d.
b. Black lengths shalf not exceed six hundred feet between through streets or
pedestrian accessways, measured along street right-of-way, or the pedestrian accessway.
Block dimensions are measured from right-of-way to right-of-way along street frontages.
A block's perimeter is the sum of all sides.
c. Accessways or pr-ivate/retail streets may be used to meet the blotk length or
perimeter standards of this section provided they are designed in accordance with this
sectian and are open to the public at all times.
d. The standards for blvck perimeters and fengths may be modified to the
minimum extent necessary based on written findings that compliance with the standards
are nat reasonably practicable or appropriate due to:
i. Topographic constraints;
ii. Existing development patterns on abutting property which preclude the iogical
connection of streets ar accessways;
iii, Major public facilities abutting the property such as railroads and freeways;
i~. Traff'ic safety concerns;
v. Functional and operational needs to create lar-ge commercial building{s); or
vi. Protection of significant natural resources.
3. Qriveway and PropertyAccess Standards. Vehicular access to properties shall be
located and constructed in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Ceniral Point
Depo-7ment o f Public Works Standard Speci frcations and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works
Constrt~ction, Section 320. ! 0.30 - Driveway and Pro~erty Access.
4. Pedestrian Circulation. Attractive access routes for pedestrian travel shall be
provided through the public sidewalk system, and where necessary supplemented through the
use af pedestrian accessways as required to accomplish the folEowing:
a. Reducing distances between destinations or activity areas suth as public
sidewalks and building entrances;
b. Bridging across barriers and abstacles such as fragmented pathway systems,
wide streets, heavy vehicular traffic, and changes in levef by connecting pedestrian
pathways with clearly marked crossings and inviting sidewalk design;
3~ Page 2 of I 5
9-2U-10 Draft
C-4 Zoning District Code Modi~ication
c. Integrating signage
and fighting system which
offers interest and safety for
pedestrians;
d. Connecting parking
areas and destinations with
retail streets or pedestrian
accassways identified
through use of distinctive
paving materials, pavement
striping, grade separation, or
landscaping.
6. Accessways, Pedestrian.
Pedestrian accessways may be
used to meet the block
requirements of Section
17.75.03 I (2). When used
pedestrian accessways shall be
developed as illustrated in
Figure 17.75.0 I. All landscaped
areas ne~ to pedestrian
accessways shall be maintained,
or plant materials chosen, to
maintain a clear sight zone
between three and eight feet
from the graund level.
PEDESTRIAN AGCESSWAY
FIGURE 17.75.01
FIGUR~ [ 7.7S,Q2
RETAI L STREET
35' Right-of-Way
T'ravel Lanes (2 @ I 2 feet}
On-Street Parking Lanes (optional}
Sidewaiks ( I@ 5 feet, I@! 0 feet}
~E
o~
Pa.ge 3 oF I 5
~ ~
~
I ~- .~
1~^0 ,
9-20-10 D raft
C-4 Zoning District Code Modification
7, Retail Street. Retail streets may be used to meet the block requirements of Section
17.75.03 I(2). When used retaif streeu shall be de~eloped as illustrated in Figure 17.75.02.
17.75.033 Resider~tial Site Design and Development Standards (RESERVED)
17'.75.035 CommerciaE Site Design and Development Standards
a. Commercial Site Design Standards. The lat area, dimension, set batk, and
coverage requirements for development within commercial districts shall be subject to
the standards set forth in Table 17.75.02.
~ • ~ ~ •• ~~•o
. - ~
Lot Area N.A. N.A. iV.A. N.A.
Lot Width N.A. N.A. N.A. 50 ft.
Lot Depth N.A. N.A. N.A. 100 ft.
Front Yard N.A. I S ft. I 0 ft. I 0 ft.3
Side Yard N.A. 5 ft. 5 ft 4 0 ft. - 5 ft.~
Rear Yard N.A. N.A. I 0 ft.5 0 ft. - 20 ft.~
Lot Caverage 50% 50% N.A. N.A.
I, Wherever the side or rear yard pr-operty lines of a par-cel in the C-5 district abut parcels in a residential {R)
district, a solid wall or fence, ~ine-covered open fen~e or eompact evergreen hedge six feet in height shall be
located on that property line and continuously maintained to ensure effective buffer"ing and ~isual screening
beLween the two land uses. Where a public alley or street separates the two properties, the barrier or screen
shall be placed on the C-5 properq at the time of construcaon and may include driveway and pedesuian openings
to the alley or street, as appro~ed by the planning commission.
Z, Where abutting a residential zone the rear yard setbacks shall be a minimum of 2U ft., except when sepal'ated by
arl alley or public street, in which case no rear yard setback is required.
3, When aff-street parking is located in the frant yard area, the iandscaped strip may be reduced to not less than six
feet with the planning commission approval of the site plan.
4. Plus %z ft. for each ft. of building heigfit in excess of 20 ft,
5_ Except when the rear property line abuts any residential (R} d'istrict or any unincorporated lands> the rear yard
shall be increased by '/z ft, fpr each fG af building height in extess of 2U ft.
17.75.037 Industrial Site Design ~~nd Development 5tandards (RESERVED}
I 7.75.039 ~ff-Street Parking Design and Development Standards. All off-street vehicular
parking spaces shall be improved to the following standards:
A. Connectirity. Parking lots for new development shall be designed to provide vehicular
and pedestrian connections to adjacent sites unless as a result af any of the follawing such
connections are not possible:
a. Topographic constraints;
b. F~cisting development patterns on abutting property which preclude a logital connection;
c. Traffic safery concerns; or
1' ~ Page 4 of I 5
~
9-20-10 Draft
C-4 Zoning District Code Modification
d. Protection of significant natura~ resources.
B. Parking Stall Minimum Dimensions. All pff-street parking spaces shall be improved
to confot-m to city standards for surfacing, storm water management, and striping. Standard
parking sp~~es shall conform to the following standards and the dimensions in Figure 17.75.03
and Table 17.75.02.
C. Access. There shall be adequate provision for ingress and egress to all parking spaces.
~. drivewa~-s. Driveway width shall be measured at the driveway's narrowest point,
including the curb cut The design and construction of driveways shall be as set forth in the
Standard Specrfications and Public Works Department Standards and Specifcat+ons.
E. Improvement af Parking Spaces.
a. When a concrete curb is used as a wheel stop, it may be placed within the parking
space up to two feet from the front af a space. In such cases, the area between the
wheel stop and landscaping need not be pa~ed provided it is maintained with
appropriate ground cover, or wa[kway, In no event shall the placement of wheel
stops reduce the minimum landscape ~r walkway width requirements.
Figure 17.75.3
Figure 17.75.03
A ~ Parking Angle
B = Stall Width
C = Stall to Curb
D = Aisle Width
E = Curb Length
F I = Maximum Center-ta-Center'
Width of 2-Row Bin
F2 = Nested Center-to-Center Width
of 2-Row B'in
~ ~ Page 5 of 15
9-2U I0 Dralt
C-4 Zoning Distritt Code Modification
i ~ • ~
•
8.00 8.00 12.00 23.00 28_00 n,a.
0 Degrees ~•50 8.50 12.p0 23.04 29.00 n_a
(parallel~ 9.04 9.00 12.00 23.00 30.00 n.a.
9.54 9.50 12.00 23,00 31.00 n.a.
8.00 14.00 II.00 23.40 39.00 31.50
8_50 14_50 II.QO 24.90 40.00 32.00
20 Degrees
9,04
IS.00
II.00
2b.30
41.00
32.50
9.50 15.50 I1.00 27.80 42,00 33.10
8,00 16.50 II.~O 16.00 44.00 37.10
8,50 I 6.94 I I,00 17.00 44.80 37.40
30 Degrees
9.00
17.30
II.OU
18.00
45.60
37.80
4,50 ! 7,80 I I,00 19,Oa 46.60 38.40
B.UO 18,30 13,~0 12.40 49.6D 43.50
8.50 18.70 12,00 12,20 44,44 42.90
~10 Degrees
4.04
19.14
12.40
14,00
50,24
43.30
9.50 19,50 12,00 14,80 51.Ob 43.70
8_b0 i 9.10'~* 14.00 I I.30 52.20 4b.50
B.SU 14,40~* 13,50 12,04 52.30 4b.3Q
45 Degrees
9_00
19,80~
13.00
12.70
52,b0
4b.20
9.Sd 20.IQ~'* 13.40 13.44 53.20 46.50
8.00 I 9,7Q*~ 14,Q0 I Q,54 53.40 48.30
SO Degr•ees
8.50
20,40~''
12,50
I I. I U
52.50
47.00
3~ Page 6 of I 5
9-ZO-]0 Draft
C-4 Zoning District Code Modificacion
9,00 20,44'~ I 2.00 I I,70 52.80 47,W
9,50 20.70+~ 12.00 12.44 53.40 47.30
8.00 20.4(Y~* 19.00 9,20 59.84 55.80
$.50 2d.70~* 18.50 9,$0 59.90 55.6~
b0 Degrees
9,00
21.00**
18.00
14_40
60.00
55.50
9.50 21.20*k I$.00 I I.00 60.40 55.bfl
8.00 20.60'~°~~ 20,00 8.5d 6 I,20 58.5Q
8.50 20.84*~ ~ 4.50 4.06 b I. I 0 58.20
70 Degrees
9.00
21.00~*
19,00
9_60
61.00
57.90
9.54 21.24''~ 18.50 ! 0.10 bb.90 57.70
8_04 20.10~` 25.00* 8.10 b5,2Q 63.80
8.50 20.20~ 24.00* 8,b0 &4.44 62.90
80 Degrees
9.00
20.30**
24.00*
9.[D
b4.34
62.7Q
4.50 20.40** 24.06* 9.60 64_40 52.70
8.60 14,00~ 26.00* 8.04 64.00 n.a.
8.50 19.06~~ 25.00* 8.50 63,00 na.
90 Degrees
9.00
19.00~`
24.00*
9.00
62.Ob
n.a.
4.50 I R.00~~ 24.00* 9.5d 62,04 n.a.
.-
.
. . . . . . . ..
b. All areas utilized for off-str'eet parking, access and maneuvering of vehicles shall
be paved to the standards of the City of Central Point for all-weather use and shall
be adequately drained, including prevention of the flow of runoff water acr•oss
sidewalks or other pedestrian areas.Required parking areas shall be designed with
painted striping or other approved methad of delineating the individual spa~25, with
the exception of lots containing single-family or two-family dwellings.
c. Parking spaces for uses other than one- and two-family dwellings shall be
designed so that no bacEcing movements or other maneuvering within a street or
~„ Page 7 of I 5
~~
9-20- I 4 Draft
C-4 Zoning District Code Modification
other public right-of-way shall be necessat`y.
d. Any lighting used to illuminate off-street parking or loading areas shall be so
arranged as to reflect the light away from adjacent streets or properties.
e. Service drives shall have a minimum vision clearance area formed by the
intersection of the driveway centerline, the street right-of-way line, and a straight
fine joining the lines through points twenty feet from their intersection.
f. Parking spaces located along the outer boundaries of a parking lot shall be
contained by a curb or a bumper rail so placed to prevent a motor vehitle from
extending over an adjacent property line, a public street, public sidewalk, or a
re9uired landscaping area.
g. Parking, loading, ar ~ehicle maneuvering areas shall not be lacated within the
front yard area ar side yard area of a corner lot abutting a street in any residential
{R) district, nor within any portion of a street setback area that is required to be
landscaped in any commercial (C) or industrial {M) district.
F. Limitation on Use of Parking Areas. Required parking areas shall be used
exclusively for vehicle parking in conjunction with a permitted use and shal! not be reduced or
encroached upon in any manner, The parking facilities shall be so designed and maintained as
n~t to constitute a nuisance at any time, and shall be used in such a manner that no hazard to
persons or proper-ey, or unreasonable impediment to traffic, will result,
G. Parking Facility Landstaping and Screening. Parking lot landscaping shall be used
to reinforce pedestrian and vehicular circulation, intluding parking lot entries, pedestrian
accessways, and parking aisles. To achieve this objective the following minimum standards shall
apply; however, additional landscaping may be recommended during the Site Plan and
Architectural Review process (Section f 7.72). All parking lots shall be landscaped in accordance
with the fallowing standards:
a. perimeter and Street Frontage Lancfscaping Requirements. The perimeter and
street frontage for all parking facilities shall be landscaped according to the standards set
forth in Table 17.75.03.
Ptancs Requi~-e~! ,per- :1:p0 Li
fir4ntage
Arterial/Collector I Sft. 4 20
Local 10 ft. 3 I 5
- ~. .
Residential 20 ft. 4 24
Commercial 10 ft. 3 15
Industrial 5 R. 2 i{~
4 i, Page 8 af I 5
1
9-20- I 0 Draft
C-4 Zoning District Code Modification
b, Termina! and Interiar Islands. For parking lots in excess of 10 spaces all rows of
parking spaces must provide terminal and interior islands a minimum of six (6} feet in width
t4 pratect parked vehicles, provide visibility, confine traffic to aisles and driveways, and
provide a minimum of five (5) feet of space for landscaping. In addition, when 10 or more
~ehicles would be parked side-by-side in an abutting configuration, interior landscaped
islands a minimum of eight {$) feet wide must be located within the parking row. Far p~rking
lots greater than fifty (50) parking spaces, the location of interior landscape island shall be
allowed to be consolidated for planting of farge sCands of trees to break up the scale of the
parking lot.
i. The number of trees required in the interior landscape area shall be dependent
upon the location of the parking fat in relation to the building and public right-of-way:
a) Where the parking lot is located between the building and the pubfic right-of-
way, one tree for every four spaces;
b) Where the parking lot is located to the side o#the building and partially abuts
the public right-of-way, one tree for every six spaces;
c} Where the parking lot is located behind the building and is not visible from the
public right-of-way, one cree for e~ery eight spaces.
c. Bioswales. The use of bioswales within parking lots is encouraged and may be located
within fandscape areas subject to Site Plan and Architettural Review. The tree planting
standards may be reduced in areas dedicated to bioswales subject to Site Plan and
Architecturaf Review.
H. Bicycle Parking. The amount of bicycle parking shall be provided in accordance
17.64.44 and constructed in accordance with che following standards:
a) Location of Bicycle Parking. Required bicycle parking facilities shall be located
on-site in well ligfited, secure locations within 54 feet of well-used entrances and not
farther fram the entrance than the closest automobile par-king space. Bkycfe parking
shall ha~e direct access to both the public right-of-way and to a main entrante of the
principal use. Bicycle parking may aiso be provided inside a building in suitable, secure
and accessible locations. Bicycle parking for multiple uses {suth as in a commercial
~enter) may be clustered in one or several lor_atians.
b) Bicycle Parking Design Standards. All bicycle parking and maneuvering areas shall
be constructed to the following minimum design sr.andards
i. Surfacing. Outdoor bitycle parking facifities shall be surfaced in the same manner
as a motor vehicle parking area or witfi a minimum of a three-inch thickness of hard
surfacing {i.e., asphalt, concrete, pa~ers or similar material}. This surfaee wiil be
maintained in a smoath, durable and well-drained condition.
ii. Parking Space Dimension Standard: Bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 6 feet
long and 2 feet wide with minimum overhead clearance of 7 feet.
~ ~ Page 9 of 15
9-24-10 draft
C-4 Zoning Distri~t Code Modifi~ation
iii. Lighting Lighting shall be provided in a bicycfe parking area so that a!I facilities are
thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks or motor vehicle parking
lots during all hours of use.
iv. Aisfes: A 5-foot aisle for bicycle maneuvering shall be provided and maintained
beside or betweeR each row of bicycle parking.
v. Signs: Where bitycle parking facilities are not dir•ectly visible from the public
rights-of-way, entry and directional signs shall be provided ta direct bicycles from
the public rights-of-way to the bicycle parking fatility.
c) Exceptions to Bicycle Parking. The community development director may allow
exceptions to the bicycle parking srandards in connection with temparary uses or uses
that do not generate the need for bicyclists parking such as Christmas tree sales and
mini-storage units.
17.75.040 Building Design Standards. The fallowing building design standards are established to
maintain and enhance the Smafl Town Character of the City,
17.75.d4! Residential Buifding Design Standards (RESERVED)
17.75.042 Commercial Suilding Design Standards. The following design standards are
applicable to development in all commercial zoning districts, and are intended to assure pedestrian scale
commercial development that supports and enhances the small town character of the community. All
publicfy visible buifdings shalf comply with the standards set farth in this section.
A. Massing, Articulation, Transparency, and Entrances
I. Building Massing. The "top" of the building . ;
shall emphasize a distinct profrle or outline with ~!
~,
elements such as a projecting parapet, cor•nice,
upper level setback, or pitched raofline. ~
2. Fa~ade Articulation. Facades longer than
forty (40} feet and visible from a street or residential area shall be divided into smalf
units through the use of articulation, which may incfude offsets, recesses, staggered
walis, stepped wafls, pitched or stepped rooftines, o~erhangs, or other elements of the
building's mass.
For purposes of complying with the
rec~uirements in this subsection "fa~ade
articulation" shall consist of a compination of
two of the following design features:
a. Changes in plane with a depth
af at least Za inches, either
horizontaliy or vertically, at
inter-vals of not less than 20 feet
and not more than ~40 feet; or
~~
; !
.
._..
~' ~ y.
~
1
. _
' ~~"~
j:: , ,.:w-~r
~: u~ ,
1 ---- - ~'•~-~
~~ ':. `
n
.
-
~, ~
N.
L 3._ ~ I
h;-i
n~-~.,
~ '~hri~r p
- = E
~" ~~L _~ - s' : ~ h
'.
.
~ ~
r ;s-
-1 *~
r
~~i , '
~ ~ ,,.;.
~
i!y"~;
I
~~e
~
=
s..~ • `j
~
~= ~ ~ ~.,~i~. o
a
;
^}... c~~
~ -~ s~,, -
~~~ .
~~
~~ Page I 0 of I 5
4-2410 Drak
C-4 Zoning Distlict Code ModifiCatiOn
b. Changes of color, texture, ar material, either horizonrally or verticalfy,
at intervals of not less than 24 feet and not more than 100 feet; or
~. A repeating pattern of wall recesses and projections, such as bays,
offsets, reveals or prajecting ribs, that has a relief of at least eight inches.
3. Pedestrian Entrances. For buildings adjacent to a street, a primary pedestrian
entrance shall be provided that is easily visible, or easily accessible, from the street
right-af-way, or a pedestrian access way. To ensure that building entrances are clearly
~isible and identifiable to pedestrians the principal encry to the building shall be made
praminent with canopies, or overhangs.
To achieve the objectives di this subsection the design of a primary entrance should
incorparated at least three of the following design criteria:
a. Building facades over two hundred feet in length facing a street or
at~essway shall provide two or more public building entrances off the
street.
b. Architectural details such as arches, iriezes, tile work, murals, or
moldings;
c. Integral planters or wing walls that incorporate landscape or seating;
d. Enhanced exterior light fixcures such as wall sconces, light coves with
concealed light sources, ground-mounted accent lights, or decorative
pedestal Itghts;
e. Prominent three-dimensional features, such as belfries, chimneys, clock
towers, domes, spires, steeples, towers, or turrets; and
f. A repeating pattern of pilasters projecting from the fa~ade wall by a
minimum of eight inches ar architettural or decorative cofumns.
4. Transparency. Transparenty (glazing)
pro~ides interest for the pedestrian,
cannects t~e building exterior and interior,
puts eyes an the street/parking, pramotes ;
reusability, and provides a human-scale 8' ~. _
k ~ ~ ~ ~
element an building facades. The ~ 3~
transparency standard applies to the building ~,_._
facades that front a street, sidewalk, or
ac~essway. Projects subject to this section ~o'
shall meet the following minimum glazing ~;:
requirements, but glazing shall not be limited ~`~
to the areas discussed:
~. A minimum of for•ty (40) percent of any ground floor fa~ade shall be
tomprised of transparent glazing from windows or doors. Reflective or tinted
glass, or film is not permitted on ground floor fa~ade windaws. See subsection
~~ Page I I of 15
9-20- I 0 Draft
C-4 Zoning Disu~itt Code Modification
17,75.070{5)(a) for alternati~e design solutions.
b. The second floor must provide a minimum of 25 percent glazing
between three and eight feet, as
measured from that story's finished fltior
I evel.
c. On all other publicly ~isible
facades, at least 25 percent of the wall
area between two and ten feet above
grade must cdnsist of glazing. This
requirement shall not apply if the
building code prohibits windows on such
facades.
d. If a single-story building has a fa~ade taller than 20 feet, the fa~ade area
above 15 feet is subject to the same window requirement as the se~ond floor
requirement in Subsection b.
e. Any fa~ade that is built up ta an interiQr mid-block property line is not
required to have glazing on that fa~ade if no prohibitions and no contractual or
legal impediments exist that would prevent a building being constructed on the
adjacent property up to the wall pf the fa~ade.
5. Wall Faces. To ensure that buildings do not display unembellished walls visible
from public or residential areas the following standards are imposed on wall faces that
front a street, sidewalk, accessway, or an abutting residential zane:
2. As applicable each side of a building shall be given architectural treatment to
meet the intent of this section by using three (3} or more af the following
i. Varying rooflines with one fooc or greater changes of height at least
every forty {44) feet;
ii. Transparent windows that comprise at least forty (40} percent of the
visible fa~ade;
iii. Secondary entrances that include giazing and landscape treatment;
iv. Balconies;
v. Awnings/canopies;
vi. Planted trellises;
vii. Projecting cornices at least twelve inches in height;
viii. Yariation in building form and materials demonstrated ta meet the
intent of this section.
Page 12 of I 5
~ ~
9-2D-10 Draft
C-4 Zoning D~strict Code i"iodification
b. As applicable, where transparent windows are not provided on at least forty
{40) percent of walls (or portions of walls} to meet the intent of this section, at
least three (3} of the following elements shall be incorporated:
i. Masonry (but not flat concrete block};
ii. Concrete or masonry plinth at wall base;
iii. Belt courses of a different texture and color;
iv. Projecting cornice;
v. Projecting awning/canopy {minimum 4 ft overhang);
vi, Decorative tile work;
vii. Trellis containing planting;
viii. Artwork af a scale clearly visible from the associated
right-of-way;
ix. Vertical articul~tidn;
x. Lighti ng fixtu res;
xi. Recesses or bays;
xii. Use of other architectural elements not listed that is
demanstrated to meet the intent of this section.
c. Building facades adjaining other buildings (attached to more than 5Q%of the sidewall),
or designed to abut other buildings are exempt.
d. Building fa~ades not abutting residentially zoned lands, but facing loading areas, or
rear services areas are exemp~
6. Screening af Service Areas and Rooftop Equipment. Service areas, loading zones,
waste disposal, storage areas, and rooftap
eguipment (mechanical and communications) p~u~d
MC(ni~4A FrIpi1GIN
shall be fully screened from the ground le~el {'"~ _~~
o{ nearby streets and residential areas within
204 feet, the following standards apply: ~
a. Service Areas
i. A six-foot masonry
enclosure, decorative metal fence
enclosure, a woad enclasure; or
other appr•o~ed materials
complementary to adjacent buildings; or
a~~b
~~ V~J~wrd
n;~.:ae
l~.*Ce+e~ip~
' ~~
1.at L Pub~k plgM9t-Wey ~
4~ Page 13 of 15
9-20-10 Draft
C-4 Zoning District Code Modification
ii_ A six-foot solid hedge or other plant material screening as
;approved.
b. Rooftop Equipment
~
i. Mechanical equipment shall be
screened by extending parapet
walls or other roof forms that are
integrated with the architetCUre of
the building. Painting of rooftop
equipment or erecting fences are not acceptable methods
of screening.
ii. Raaftop mounted voice/data transmission equipment shall be integratecl with the
design oi the roof, rather than being simply attached to the raof-deck.
I 7.75.043 Industrial Building Design Standards {RESERVED}
1 T.75.050 Signage Standards (RE5ERVED)
17.75.Ob0 Exceptians
Ex~eptions to the standards set forth in this subsection shall be considered as a variante per Chapter
17.13.
17.75.070 Definitions
The following definitions are applicable to all of Chapter 17.75:
Pedestrian Accessway. The term "pedestrian a~cessway" means a walkway that provides pedestrian
and/or bicycle passage either between streets or from a street to a building ar other destination such as
a school, park, or transit stop.
Block. The term "biock" means the area surrounded by streets, or a combination of streets, existing
develapment, accessways, and/or impenetr-able natural features. The block is the core element of the
City's small town urban design strategy, and is the foundation of the City's pedestrian friendly
development goals. Depending on the underlying zoning, blocks may be subdivided into any number of
smaller lots or parcels, or other forms of tenure. The minimum and maacimum requirements for block
size are set forth in Section 17.75.03d of this chapter,
Building Fa~ade Line. A line that is parallel to a lot line or internal circulation route curb line, as
applicable, and the same distance from the lot line or curb line as the closest portion of a building.
Glazing. The panes or sheets of glass or other non-glass material made to be set in frames, as in
wind~ws or doors,
Parking Space. 7he terrr~ "parking space" means on-street and off-street parking spaces designated
#or automobile parking.
5treet. The term "street" means the entire area within the right-of-way (ines of every public, or private
way used for vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic and includes the terms road, highway, lane, place,
avenue, alley, and other- similar designation.
~ ~+.~ Page I 4 of I 5
~
4-20-10 Draft
C-4 Zoning District Code Modification
Street, Retail. A street, either public or private, with or without on-streec parking, that is the primary
frontage for commercial lots.
Smalf Town Environment. The citizens of Central Point recognize and support the continued
grawth of the community, provided that such grdwth maintains and enhances the City's small town
char'acter as represented by the development of a pedestrian scale city. The term "small town
environment" refers to the physical and social advantages of a community that is designed to be
walkable, safe, and buildings designed with the pedesrrians in mind (human scale),
Principal Entrance. The place of ingress and egress most frequentfy used by the public.
Publicly Visible. A site, building, structure, object, ar any part thereof, that is visible from a public
street or other area to which the public has legal access, from a vantage point of three feet to six feet
o{f the ground.
Page 15 of 15
48
UNIF'OR1VI L,AI~ID D~V~L,OPM~NT
APPROYAL EXPYF~ATID~I DAT~S
City of Central Point, ~regon
140 S 3rd Street, Central Point, OR 47502
541.664.3321 Fa~c 541.664.6384
www.centra l po i ntoregon.gov
CENTR~-L
~-~ P~INT
~:;"~t=C.;S
STAFF REPORT
October 5, 2010
__Cammunity Develo~ment
~ Tom Humphrey, AICP,
Community De~e€opment Director
AGENDA I'I'EM: File 1~Io. 11001
Consideration of praposed Central Point Municipal Code amendnients to provide uniform lanc~
development appror~al expiration dates and a process for review of tiine extensian requests.
Applicant: City of Central Paint
STAFF S~URCE:
Connie Glune, Community Planner
BACKGROUND:
The Planning Commission has directed staff to draft code amendments to resolve the
inconsistencies concerning expiration dates for land use applications and to provide an
extension request process. I~i the CPMC, there are differing expiration dates for t~ie
various types of land use applications, as well as ambiguities related ta tune extensi~ns
allowed far the different types ~f appli~ations. The proposed Chapters 16 and 17
amendments (Attachments A and B) provide a uniform one (1) year expiration date fQr all
applications. Tlie procedure for ti~ne extension applications is detined as a Type I
(Admiiustrative) pracess revieweci by the community de~~elopment director. Also
included is a correction on Table 17.02.1, Subdivision Fina1 Flat, This is a clerical
{typographic) err~r and should read as a Type I re~iew. Tlle tirne exte~zsion review criteria
are based on a demor~stratian that the project remains compliant with the Comprehensive
Plan ar Land Development Code.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A- Proposed CPMC Aniendrnents for extensioYi proceclure:
1. Chapter 17.05 Applications and Types af Review, Sectian 17.240 (E) Type I pracedure
2. Chapter 17.66 Application Review Process for the T~D r?istrict and Co7~ridor, Sectioz~
17.6b.070
3. Chapter l 7.64 Planned Unit Development {PUD), Section 17.68.05 - 1'7.68.70
4. Chapter 17.72 Site Plan, Landscaping and Caristructi~n Pla~i, Section 17.72.074
5. Chapter 17.7b Conditional Use Pe7mit, Sectio7i 17.76.460
Attachmer~t B-'Title 16, Tentative Plans and Fitial Plats Ame~idrnents ft~~~ extension procedure:
I. Chapter 16.10 Tentative Plans, Section 16.10.80 -- 1b.10-091
2. Chapter 1 b.12 Final Plats, Section 16.12.014 - 1 b.12.460
Attachment G - Findings
Attachment D - Resolution
~ ~'
ACTION:
Consideratioi~ of Resolutian No. , a recommendation to the City Cauncil for approval of
the tert amendments to the Central Point Municipal Code, Title 16 and Title 17, Sections 16.10;
16.12; 17.05; 17.66; 17.68, 17.72; and 17.76 to provide a uiuform land development approval
expiratian date and e~tension request process (File: 11001 }.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of Resolution Na. , forwarding a favorable reco~ntnendation to the City
Councii.
5~
Page 2 of 2
Amendment A. 1:
Chapter 17.05
APPLICATI(}NS AND TYPES ~F REVIEW PRQCEDURES
ATTACHMENT A
Sections:
17.Q5.100 Purpose and applicability of review procedures.
17.45.2p0 Type I procedure (administrative).
17.45.300 Type II procedure (administrative).
17.05.400 Type III proceclure (quasi-judicial}.
17.05.500 Type IV procedure (legislative}.
17.05.600 General provisions--One-hundred-twenty~day rule--Time camputatian--Pre-
applieation conferences--Acceptance and review--Plaiuung official's duties--
Amended applications--Resubmittal.
17.05.700 Special procedures.
17.05.900 Traftic ilnpact analysis.
17.05.100 Purpose and applicability of review procedures.
A. Purpose. The pur}~ose of this chapter is to establish standard decision-making procedures
that ~vill enable the city, the applicant, and the publxc to review applications and participate in the
1oca1 dec;ision-m~aking process in a ti;nely and effective way. Table ~ 7.05.1 provides a~ey for
determining the review procedure and the decision-making body for particular approvals.
B. A~~plicability af Re~~ieu~ Procedures. All land use and development permit applicatians and
approvals, except building permits, shall be decided by using the procedures c~ntained in this
chapter. The procedure "type" assigned to each application ~overns the decision-7naking proeess
for that permit or approval. `I~iere are four types of permit/approval procedures: Type I, C7, III,
and IV. These praceclures are ~escribed in subsections (B)(1) through (4) of this section. Table
~7.05.1 lists all of the city's land use and development approvals and their required review
procedure(s).
1. Type I Procedure (Administrative). Type I decisians are made by the eommunity
development directar or designee without public natice and without a public hearing.
The Type I procedure is used whec~ there are clear and objective appraval criteria and
applying city standards and criteria requires no use of diseretion;
2. Type II Frocedure (Administrative}. Ty~e II decisians involve li~nited discretion and a~re
rnade by the cornmunity development direetar or designee with public notice, and an
opportunity for a public heari7~g if appealed, The appeal of a Type II decision is heard by
the plannzng coninlission, who inakes the city's fiYial decision.
a~ ~
3. Type III Procedure (Quasi-Judicial). Type III decisions are made by the planning
comrniss~on after a pubtic hearing, with appeals reviewed by the city council. Type III
decisions generaily use discretionary approval criteria.
4. Type ZV Procec~ure {Legislative). Type IV procedures apply to legislative niatte7s.
Legislative rnatters involve the creation, revision, or large-scale im~lementation of public
policy (e.g., adoption of land use regulations, zone changes, and conlprehensive plan
arneYldments that apply to entire districts, ratk~er than just one property}. Ty-pe IV matters
are cansiderec~ initially by the planning commission with ~inal decisians 7nade by the city
council.
Table 17.OS.1Summary of Appravals by Type of Review Procedure
~
Approvals Review
Procedures Applicable
Regulations
Anz~exatian Type IV Chapter 1.20
Code Interpretation Type II Chapter 17.11
Code Amendment Type IV Chapter 17.10
Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment Type IV Chapter 17.96
Conditional Use Permit Type III Chaptea• 17.76
Extension Request Type I Chagter 17.05
Home Occupation Type I Section 17.d0.190
Planned Unit De~-elopment Type iII Chapter 17.68
Modification to Approval
Minor
Major
Type II
Type III
Chapter 17.09
Chapter 17.09
Plan Amendme~nt or Zone Change
- Quasi-Jt~dicia~
- Legisla~itre
Type III
Type IV
Section 17.12.030
Chapter 17.96
Property Line Adjustments and Lot Consalidations Type I
CJ `~
~
Transit Oriented District/Corridor Review Type II~ Chapter 17.b6
Nonconforn~ing Use Type II Cliapter 17.56
Partitian
Tentative Plan
Fina1 Flat
Type II
Type II
Chapter ~ 6.3b
Chapter 16.12
Land Use Review Type ~
Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan
Review Type II Chapter 17.72
Subdivisioia
Tentatzve Plan
Final Plat
Type III
Type ~ I
Chapter 16.10
Chapter 16.12
Right-of-Way Vacation Type IV Section 12.28.020
Tree Removal Type II Chapter 12.36
Variance Type TI or III Chapter 17.13
Zoning, Major
Zaning, Minor Type III
Type II Chapter 17.13
Chapter 17.13
Suhdivisions, Major
Subdivisions, Minor Type III
Type II Chapter 17.13
Chaptei- 17.13
Conversian Plan Review Type II Cha~ter 16.32
Uxlcategorized Decision Type I1
* An a~pli~ant may be required to obtain approvals from other age~icies, such as the Oregan
Department of Trans~ortation, ar Rogue Valley Sewer. The city anay notify agencies of
applications that rna}~ affect tlieir facilities or services.
(ora.1 ~~~ ~ 1 ~pa~t), zoo~).
17.OSZ00 Type ~ procedure (administrative).
A. Applicatioz~ Requirememts.
1. Application Foz~ns. Type 1 applications shali be made on forms provided by the planning
department.
5~
2. Application Requ~rements. Type I applications shall:
a. ~nclude the infflrniation requested arx the application form;
b. Address the criteria in sufficient detai~ for review and action; and
c. Be filec~ with the required fee.
B. Administrati~~e Decisio~i Requirements. The community developrnent director's or
designee's decision sliall address all of the approval criteria. Based on the criteria and the facts
contained vvithin the record, the commnnity development director shall approve or deny the
requested petYnit or action. A written record of the decision shall be provided ta the applicant
aYid kept on file at City Hall.
C. Final Decision. A Type I decision is the fin.al decision of the city and may nat be appealed
further.
D. Ef~ective Date. A Type I decision is fi~nal on the date it is made. (Ord, 1$74 § 1(part}, 2006}
E. E~tension.
The community developznent director sha11, upon written request by the ap~licant and t~avment
of the required ~ee, ~ant a written one year extension of the apprayal period pro~ided that:
1. No changes are made to the ori -i~na] application as approvea bv the Citv;
2. There have been no chan es in the Code oz Com rehensive Plan rovisions on which the
a roval was based. In the case where the lan conflicts with a code or Com rehensive
Plan change, the extension shall be either:
a. denied; or
b. at the discretion of the carnrnunity develo~ment dire+ctor ra-revi~xed as a
rnodification per Section 17.09.300.
3. The extension reauest is xnade before expiration of the ori ~ig~p rp oved plan.
4. If the tirne limit expired and no extension has been ~ranted, the antalication sha11 be void.
17.05.300 T,ype II procedure (administrative}.
A. Pre-Application Conference, A pXe-application conference is optional fQx ~'ype II 7-eviews
{Pre-application conference requirements and procedures are found in Seetian 17.05.600{C}.)
5~
Amendment A. 2:
Chapter 17.66
APPL~CATION REVIEW PROCESS FOR THE TOD DISTRICT AND C~RRID~~2
Sections:
17.66.0~0 Purpose.
17.66.020 Applicability.
17.&6.Q30 Application and review.
17.&6.040 Parks and open spaces.
17.Gb.050 Application approval cziteria.
17.6b.064 Conditians af appzoval.
17.66.070 Appraval expiration.
17.66.070 Approval expiration.
A. Application approvals grantecl. according ta the provisions of this chapter
, .
- ~
~... , ~ ~ •
shall expire and becorne voici one year frflm the date on which it was issued uriless:
~. an ap~rlication far extension is filed and approved subject to tl~e requirements of Section
1?.OS, or
2. buildin~permits for the development ~iave been issued and conshuction dili~y
pursued to initiate construction.
~ • ~~
B. If the tirne lirnit for development expired and nq extension has been granted, the application
shall be void.
5~
Amendment A.3
Chapter 17,68
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMEN'I' (PUD)
Sections;
17.68.OJ 0 Purpose.
17.68.020 Size of the pla7~ned unit developrnent site.
17.68.030 Application and review.
17.68.040 Criteria to grant or deny a PUD.
17.6$.OSU 1'reli~nunary development plan.
H. Other pertinent infonnation shall be included as the planning cornmission finds necessary to
determine any appxopriate and desirable ~•equirements that rnay differ froin those ordinarily
applicable under this title. (Ord. 1615 §68, 1989}.
I. A preliminar~(tentative~plan appzoval shall expire and become ~oid one _~_ from the date
on which it was issued unless the final development plan has been approved pursuant to Section
I7.6S.060 or an a lication for extension is filed and a roved sub'ect to the r u~rements of
Sectian 17.05.
J. If the time limit for developmerrt exvired and no e~ension has been granted the tentatzve PUD
plan st~all be void.
~ 7.68.i~6(~ Final development plan.
I A. ollowing the approval of the preliminary development p1an, the
applicant shall file a~nal development plan wi$~ the city, cantaining iYl final for~n the
information required uz tlie preliminary plan. The satne shall be reviewed
yV}iii iiJJ1Vi1 ~~-~ a°~;~°a'~•r +'~° ~;+.. ~ ~~' as set foi~th in Chapter 17.05 of this code. ~#e
7 7
B. The ~°~„~* ~ r~ D' TT` final approved developmer~t ~lan shall expire and become void one
year from the date on which it was issued unless an applicarion for extension is filed and
I approved sub7ect to the requirements of Section 17.45. The one year shall colnmence with
approval of the final develaprnent plan.
~~
~C. The fu~al development plan shall contizlue to conErol the plantled uiut development after it
is finisheci. (Ord. 1631 §2, 1490; Ord. 1615 ~69, 1989).
17.68.070 Control of the PUD during and after completion.
If the city ~finds evidence of a major de~~iatian from the ~zelzminary or final developrnent
plan, it sha11 advise the applicant ta subinit a~1 applicatio~i to the planning comrnission for
I amendment to the planned ur-it develop~ieYit~urs~tant to Section 17.09. An ainendment shall be
considered in the same Y~iaYiner as an original application.
17.68.080 ExceptioYis to zoni7ig and subdivision ti~les.
17.b8.090 Accessory uses in a plaru~ed urait development.
17.68.100 Density bonus.
17.68.110 Comznon open space.
17.68.120 General conditions.
17.68.13Q Residential conditions.
17.68.140 Appeals and permit revocatian.
5~
Amendment A, 4:
Chapter 17.72
SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPING A1~dD CONSTRUCTION PLAN AP~RQVAL
Sections:
17.72.010 Furpose.
17.72.020 Site plan appro~-al required.
17.72.421 Application and review.
17.72.030 Infarmation required.
17.72.040 Standards.
17.72.054 Conditions on site plan approval.
17.72.060 Building perrnit issuance~-Plan change.
17.72.070 Eapiration.
A. A site plan approval shall lapse and become void o~ie year fallowing the date on which it
became effective ui~less, , ,
•~.aa „a,+;,,.. ~~- „~~,.~,,,,~ r~ ~~~ p~or to the expiration of one year, a building
~,~ ~~:.~ ~ ~v~. u~ ° , ^
permit is issued by t}~e building ins~ectar and consiructian is com~nenced and diligently pursued
toward completion. The commani devel~ xnent directar may extend the
site plan approval for an additiona~ period of o~ie year, suhject tv the requirements of Section
17.05. ~84~
B. If ~-es~ the time li~nit fvr developznent expired and no e~:tension has been ~ranted,
the site plan approval shall be void. (Ord. 1684 §70, 1993}.
17.72.080 Site plan campliance--Certificate of occupancy
5~
Amendrnent A. 5:
Chapter 17.76
CONDYTIONAL USE PERII~ITS
Sections:
17.76.010 Purpose.
17.7fi.011 Application and review.
17.76.020 Information required.
17.76.040 Findings and conditions.
The planning cornmission in granting a co~lditianal use peirnit shall tind as fallows:
A. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use and
t~ nieet all ather develo~ment and lot requirements af the subject zaning district and all other
provisions of this code;
B. 'T11at the site has adequate access to a public street or highway and that the street or highway
is adequate in size and condition to effectively accommodate the traffic that is expected to be
generated by the proposed use;
C. That the propased use will have no signi~icant adverse effect on abutting property or the
permitted use thereof. In making this determi~iation, the cammissian shall consider the propased
location of improvernents on the site; vehicular ingress, egress and internal circulation; setbacks;
height of buildings and structures; walls and fences; landscaping; outdoor lighting; axid signs;
D. T~~at the establishment, nlaintenance or operation of the use applied for will camply ~vith
local, state and federal health a~id safety regulations and therefore will not be detrimental to the
health, safety or general welfare of persoiis residing or working in the surrounding
neighborhoods and will not be detrimental ar injurious to the pi•operty and improvements in the
neighborhoad or to the general r~velfare of the cornmuriity based an the review of those factors
listed in subsection G af this seetion;
E. That any conditions required for approval of the pennit are deemed necessary ta pratect the
pu~lic health, safety and ge~zeral wel£are and may include:
1. Adjustme~lts ta lot sxze or yard areas as needed to best accarnmodate the proposed use;
provided the lots or yard areas conform to the stated minimum d'unensions for the subject
zoning district, unless a variance is also grantecl as provided for in Chapter 17.13,
2. Increasing street widths, modificarions in street desi~is ar addition of street signs or
traffic signals to accommodate the traffic generated by the proposed use,
53
3, Adjustm~nts to off street parku~g requiretnents in accordance with any unique
characteristics of tlZe proposed use,
4. Regtzlation of points of vehiaular ingress and egress,
5. Requiring landscaping, irrigation systems, lighting and a praperty maintenance program,
6. Regulation of si~ns and their locations,
7. Requiring fences, berms, walls, landscaping or other devices of orgaluc or artificial
cornposition to eliminate vr reduce the effects of noise, vibratians, odors, visuat
incampatibiIity or other undesirable effects on surroundii~g properties,
8. Regulation of tiine of operations far certain types of uses if their operatior~s may
adverseiy affect privacy of sleep of persons residing nearby or otherwise conflict with
othe~- community or nex~hborhood fiuictions,
9. Es~ablish a tzme period within which the subject land use must be develo~ed,
14. Requirement af a band ar other adequate assurance within a specified period of tirne,
11. Suc11 ather conditions that are faund ta be necessary to protect t~ie public health, safety
and general welfare,
12. In considering an appeal of an application far a conditional use perrnit for a l~ome
occupation, the plaruung comrnission shall review the criteria listed in Section
17.60.190. {Ord. 1823 §5, 2001; Ord. 1684 §72, 1993; Ord. 1615 ~55, 1989; Ord. 1533
~1, 1984; Ord. 143b §2(part), 1981).
17.76.060 Expiratian.
A. A conditional use permit shall lapse and became void one year followin~ the date ozi which it
hecame effective, unless:
1. By conc~itions of the conditianal use permit, a greater or lesser time is prescribecl as a
condition of approval;
2. Prior to the expiration of oi~e year, a building permit is issued by the city and
construction is commenced and diligently pursued toward campletion, vr
3. If no building permit is required in the particular case, the conditzonally-approved use
has been conunenced.
s~
B. The community devel~pment directflr may extend the conditional use
permrt for an additianal ~eriod of one year, subject to the requirernents of Section 17.05.
~:849:
I C. If ~ the time limit for de~~elopment expi~ed and na extension has been granted,
the canditional use per,nnit shall be void. (Ord. 1684 ~73, 1993; Ord. 143b §2{partj, 1981}.
17.76.070 Revocation.
17.76.080 Appeal.
17.76.090 E#`fect.
17.76.110 Mapping.
17.76.120 Change of ownership.
~~
ATTACHMENT B:
Amendment B
i Ch~pter 16.10
TENTATTVE PLANS
Sections:
16.10.010 Submission of application--Filing fee.
16.10.015 Application and review--Fees.
16.1(}.020 Scale.
16.10.030 General inforniation.
16.10.040 Existing wnditions.
16.10.050 Additional information,
16.10.060 Partial development.
16.10.070 Explanat~ry information.
16. I0.080 Tentative plan appi•oval.
16.10.090 Conditions on tenta#ive p1a~i approval.
16.10.010 Submissi.an of application--Filing fee.
The applicant sliall subYnit an application and tentative pIan together with irnprovement plans
and other supplementary material as may be required to indicate the develo~ment plan and sha~l
submit ten copies to the city together wit~i a filing fee defined in the city's adopted planning
application fee schedule. fihe diagrams submitted sha11 consist of ~rthree c~pies at the scale
specified in Section 16.10.020 and one copy in an eibht-and-one-half-in~h by eleven-u~ch
format. (Ord. 1786 ~4, 1998; Ord. 1 b84 ~6, 1993; ard. 1&50(part}, 1990).
16.10.015 Application and review--Fees.
16.10.020 Scale.
16.10.030 General infonnation
16. i 0.040 Existing conditioY~s
16.10.050 Additional information.
16.10.060 Partial development.
16.10.07Q Explanatory information.
Ib.10.080 Tentative plan appxoval.
A. Approval of the tentative plan shall not constitute final acceptance of the final plat of the
proposed subdivisior~ ar partitian for recording; howe~rer, approval of the tentative plan shatl be
bindi~ig upo~i city for the purpose of the approvaI of the final plat if the ~nal plat is in substantial
cornpliance witli the tenta~ive plan and any conditions of approval thereo£ ~'"° °~*~~r ~~*',°
b ~
n.,o ~ ,.~-+~-,a*e~~.,f;,.o „i,,,, .,t,.,~i t.a
. vltV ~Vt.l}'T Vf lJlA4 GL
~ ~
*'~° ~~*~~~ ~~*'~° ~ ~, {Ord. 1650(part}, 1990}.
A tex~tative lar~ a roval sha11 ex ire and become void one ear from the date on which it was
issued ~ess the final plat has been approved pursuant to Seetion 16.12 or an applicatian for
extension is filed and approved subject to the requirements of Sectians 16.1(}.09I and 17.05.
B. VVhen it is the intent to develop a tentative plan and record a final plat in phases, the citv, at
the time of tentarive plan appraval, may authorize a time schedule for plattin~ the various phases
in periods exceeding one year, but in no case shall the total time period far plattin~ all phases be
greater than five years vvithout review af the tentative plan far compliance with tk~e current code
and comgrehensive plan. Each phase so platted shall conform to the applicable requirements of
this cl~apter. Phases p)atted after the passage of ane year from appraval of the tentative plan wil]
be required to ~odify the tentative plan as necessary to avoid conflicts with chan~es in the
com rehensive lan or this cha ter.
~6.10.U90 Conditions on tentative plan approval,
16.10.91 Extension
A. _ The cornr~unity deve~opmer~.t director shall, upan written request by the applicant and
pavment of the rec~uired fee, ~rant a written one year extension af the appraval periad provided
that:
1. No chan~es are made to t1~e original plan applicataon as ap~roved by the Cit r},'
2. There have beex~ no chan~es in the Code or Com~rehensive Plan vrovisions on
wlzich the a~proval was based. In the case where the plan conflicts with a
code or ~lan change, the extension shail be either:
a. denied; or
b. at the discretion of the cornrnunity development director re-reviewed as a
modification per Seciion l 7_09.340
3. The extensiun recluest xs r~zade before expiration of the ori 'ginal approved plan.
~3. ~f the time linnit expired and na extension has been granted, the tentative plan sball be void.
s~
Alnendment ~. 1:
Chapter 16.x2
FINAL PLATS
Sections:
i 6.12.010 Submission--Procedure.
16.12.020 Submission--Fees.
16.12.030 lnformation require~..
16.12.040 Supplemental information.
16.12.050 Staff review.
16.12.060 Final plat approval.
1 b.12.070 Agreement for irnprovements.
1 b.12.080 Bond.
1 b.12.090 Fiiing.
16.12.010 Submission--Procedure.
Within one year after approval of the tentative plan, the applica7lt shall cause the subdivision to
be surveyed and a final plat prepared and a roved in conforrnance with the at~t~roved tentative
plan. . The applicant sha11 sub~nnit the ~inal plat as ~•equireci by state law and this title,
~e~rtl~ree prints thereof, one eight-a~d-one-half-inch by eleven-inch reduction thereof, and any
sup~lernentary information, including a~iy ~~~oposed separate document imposing further land use
restrictions in the area, (~rd. 1684 §8, 1993; Ord. 1650(part), 1990}.
16.12.020 Submission-~~ees.
16.12.030 Irifonnation required.
16.12.040 Supplernental infonnatian.
16.12.050 Staff review.
16.12.060 Final plat approval.
A. Review and appraval or denial of final plats shall be made by city staff_ ~~~~'°°~ ~*~~ ~~, ~*~
~ , . Final plat appraval
shall be evidenced by signat~tre of an authorized city representative on tk~e original plat. The
approval of the final plat by the city shall nat be deemed to constitute or effect an ac;ceptance for
znaintenance responsibility of any street or easernent or way shown on t~he final plat.
{Aloved to: Te~ztative pla~z apps~~oval Sectiort 16.1 U.080 (B)}
s~
. . ~ , ; .
> ; ~ . ; • ~ .
16.12.070 Agreerner~t for improvements.
1b.12.080 Bond,
] 6.12.090 Filin~;.
r
~
Attachment C
FINpINGS OF FACT
AND
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
F~e No: 11401
INTRODUCTI~N
Cansideratiot~ of a text arnendment to sectians of Title 16 and Title 17 of the Central Point
Municipal Code to provide utufonn land development appraval expirarian dates and a
pracess for revie«~ of time extension request.
These findings are prepared in four (4} parts to address the statewide plaruiing goals, the
applicable elements of City's Comprehensive ~lan, public facilities and the Transportation
Planning Rule as required by CPMC 17.05.504 ai~d 17.10.600.
PART 1 CPMC LEGISLATIVE AMENDMENT
17.10.200 Legislative amendments.
Legislative arnendment~s ar•e poliev d~cisioj~ts made by city council_ T~t.ey ar~e rcn~iewed using
the Type IYprocedure in Section .l7.OS.SUU utad shall corzform to the state~vicl~ plannirag
goals, the Central Point conzprehe.r~sive plan., the Cenn°al Poin.t zor~ang ordirzance arid the
tt°ansportutio~ plarztzing rule p,•ovisions ifa Section 17.1 ~. b~JO, as applicable.
Finding: The City of Central Poiirt Planning Commission directed staff to prepare
code amendments to resolve the inconsistencies concerning expiration dates for laY~d
use applications and to provide an extension request process. a text amendment of
the Central Point Municipal Code. These aznendments are reviewed as a Legislative
ainendme~~t using the Type IV procedure in wnformance with Section 17.10200.
Conclusion: A text amendment is reviewed as a Type N, Legislative decision.
17.05.500 Type IV procedure {legislative).
G. Decisiori-Making Criteria, The r~commendatiorz by the plan.~aing comrnissiorl a~td the
dec%sion by the cit~, council shall ~e based on 11ae follo~-virag.factvrs:
1. Nnaether^ the request is consisten.t 1-vith. the ap~licable stateivide planning goals,-
2. YYhether the r°equest is consislent with the com~t-ehensive plan; and
3, .If the~roposed legrslafive chafrge is pa~-ticular to u particular° site, tlae ptroper•ty
and a,ff'ected area is presently provided ~vith adeyuate publie facilities, s~~~ices ar~ad
transpot•tation net~vorks to support t.Ize use, o~• stsch facilities, sef~.~ices afad transportatr.ora
net~-vorks as°e planned to be-. provided concur~°erztly~ tia~ith. th.e development of the propef•ty.
Page 1 of 8 ~ ~
PART 2 STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS:
17.O.S. S00 G. 1. YT'he.ther t.he t~equest is consistent with. the applica~le statewide planning
goals;
~0~4L 1. CITIZEN INVOL I~EMENT - To develap a citizen involvemer~t. prog~•arn
that insures the o~porta~n.in~,for• citizen~ to be involved in nll phctses of'the
plan~ain.g pr°ocess.
Finding, Goal l: T`he p7•opasecl te~t amendment does not enhance, or detraot, from
citizen participation in the City's planning process. A duly Yioticed public hearin~; is
sclieciuleti for October 5, 2010 to review the proposed text amendment.
Conclusion, Goal 1: Consistent.
~GOA~ 2. LAND L1SE PLANNING - To establislt a larzd use planni~g process afad
policy frameword- as a basis,for all decision arrd actions r•elated. to 2.cse of
land and to assuf-e an adequate fact~~al base,for such decisions ancl action.~,
Finding Goa12: Element I of the Central Foint Comprehensive Plan addresses the
Goal 2 requiremeYlt that plans and implementing ordinances be revised on a periodic
cycle to take into account changing public polices, cam7nunity atCit~zdes and other
circumstances; as such the proposeci code amendment provides a process arid policy
framer~rork as a basis for land use decisions.
Finding Goa12: The proposed text anlendment is in accordance with CpMC Section
17.10.200 and t11e7•efore daes not modify or otl~erwise affect the City's planning
process as set forth in the Cotnprehensive Plan. The praposed text amend7nent serves
to clarify current code language by providing clear and measurable standards.
Conclusion Gaa12: Cansistent.
Gval 3. AGRICULTUR~L L~4NDS - To preserve and rnaintai.r~ ag~°icultu~°al la.nds,
Finding Goa13: The p~•oposed text amendment does not involve, or othenvise affect
lands designated for agricultural use.
Conclusian Gaal 3: Not applic;able.
Page 2 af 8 ~ ~
Gval 4, FOREST LANDS - To cortse~~e forest lands by maintairring the_foj-est land
base an~l to protect the state's fopest econorray by ~nakr.rag possible
eco~~orrafcally ef~icien.t f'ores~t pf•actices that assur•e the contanuoaas gy~ox°ing
and laas~~esting of foj°e.~t tree species as the ler~dr'n.g tcse on. forest ltr~rc~
corasistent with .sound managerrierzt ofsoil, ctir, water, and fsl~ c~nc~ wildlife
resoic~~ces and to pt°ovide fof~ ~°ecreational oppo~°tunil.ies and agt•icultttre.
Finding, Goal 4: The propased text amendment does not involve, or othsrwise affect
lands desi~nated for forest use.
Conclusion, Goa14; Not applicable.
GDAL S. OPENSP4CE, SCENIC~iND HISTORICARE~IS, AND NATURAL
RESOURCES - To p~'otect nat~urul resources ~t~a~l con~sen~e scerric and
histor•ic m-eas and open spaces.
Finding Gaa15: Tlie pxoposed text amendrnent does not involve, or otherwise affect
~ands desigrlated as natural, scenic, or histoi7c resaurces.
Conclusion Goa15: Not ap~licable.
GOAL 6 AIR, W~1TER, AND LAND RESOURCES QUALITY - To maintain ar~d
irrapt°o~~e the qualit.y of the air, water af2d land f-esour•ces of'the state.
Finding Goa16: The proposed text amendment does nat involve, or othe~~vise affect
re~zlations maraaging t~1e quality of air, water and land resources.
Cflnclusion +Goal b: Not applicable.
GO~iL 7. AREASSLTBJ~'CT TO NATZJ~AL ~IAZARDSAIVD DISAST~`~S - To
~s•otect ped~vle and propet~ty~fi•ont rratural laazards.
Finding Goal fi: The praposed text amendment does not involve, or otherwise affect
regulations protecting the citizens of Cenbra~ Point from natural hazards
Conclusion Goa17: Consistent.
GQAL $. RECREATIDNNEEDS- To satis~fy the recreational rteeds of'the citizer~s af
the stute artd ~1isitors and, tivhei•e al~propr•rate, to pf~ovide foj° the siting of ~
necessarv recreational, facilaties inclacdir2g c~estrncztiora r~esorts.
Finding Goa18: The propased text amendment does not involve, or otherwise affect
the City's pravision of necessary recreational facilities.
Conclusion Goa18: Not applicable.
Page 3 af 8 ~ ~
G014L 9. ECONOMY OF ~'HE STATE - To provide adequate opportLtnrties
throughout the state fo~• a variet~~ o, f econonzic a.ctivities vital to the healtla,
ivelfas-e, a~rdprospef•it}- of~Oregon's citizens.
Finding Goa19: '~'he proposed text amendznent does ~zot alter the City's provision of
adequate econornic opportunities. The proposed text amendment serves to clarify
current code language by providuig clear and measurable standards specifically for
the subinission and review of time extensian requests of land use applications.
Conclusion Goa19: Consistent.
GOAL 1R. HDUSING - To pf~ovide,for° the lzousitzg needs o,f citizens of'th~ state.
Finding Goa11Q: 1'Ize proposed text amendment daes not involve, or otherwise affect
regulations and developmerit standards that address the City's housing needs.
Conclusion Goal 10: Consistent.
G4AL 11. P~ iBLIC FACILITIES AND SER IjICES - Ta plan. arul develo~ a tirrzely,
or•der~ly und ef~cient arjajzgem~t~t ofpicblre_f'acilities ar:d sef~vice.s to sef~ve
as a f'ranaewor•k-,for u~~ban and j•ural developmen.t.
Finding Goa111: The proposed text amendment does not invalve, oY~ otherwise affect
the City's pravision of timely, orderly and efficient public facilities and services. The
proposed text amendment daes not cause an increase in the demand for public facilities
and ser~~ices not already available within the City.
Finding Goal.11: The text arnendment to Section 17.77, Accessory Dwelling Units
provides for conformity to the recent arnendment ta the Public WoY•ks Department
water regulation, Section 13.{}4.100 to allow one water meter ta serve both the primary
dwelling and the accessory dwelling unit.
Conclusion Goal 11: Consistent.
GOAL ~Z. TRANSP~RT.~4 TIDN - To pt•ovide czrtd encourage a snf'e, ~onvetaient and
econornic ts~unspot"tL~tT0~2 S)1S1.eyn_
Finding Goa112: The praposed text arnendment does not involve, or otherwise a#`fect
the City of Cent~-al Point Transportation System Plan or modi~y CPMC Section
17.05.900, Traf~ic impact analysis.
Conclusion Goal 12: Consistent.
GDAL 13 ENERGY- To coraset~~e enetgy.
Finding Goa113: The proposed text amendrnenf does not involve, or othe7~vise affect
and development standards or regulatioxls that address conservation of energy.
Conclusian Goa113: Not applicable.
Page 4 0.£ $ E' ~
GOAL 1~ L~RBANrZATIQN- To pj-ovide for an nrr~e.rly and efficient trar~sitian fi°ona
rac~al to ur•ban land use, to accommodate urban. popailation and urbari
employmeiat inside t1~~bar~ grotivtll boundaf-ies, to ensarre efficzent ~u,se of
lccnd, and to p~•ovide, fnr liva.ble cornm.uni.ties.
Finding Goal 14: The proposed text aniendment does not involve, or otherwise
affect, regulations addressing aY1d regulating the transition from rural ta urban lands.
Canclusion Goa114: Nat applicable.
G0~1L 1S. WILLAt12~ETTE GREENWAY- To protect, consen-e, erthance and
maintain tlie n~ltur•al, scenic, historical, agricultural, econon~ic ar~d
r~ec~•eatianr~l qualities of'lc~~tds along the i3'r'llr~~net.te. Rivet~ as the b~'illc~melte
River Gr°eenway,
Finding Goa115: The proposed text amendinent daes not invol~~e, or otherwise affect
the Willamette River or Willarnette Rivet• Greenway.
Conclusion Goal 1~: Not applicable.
G4AL 16. ESTUARINE RESOURCES - To ~•ecag~aize and protect the unique
envir•onmerztal, e.conomic, and social values of'each estuary ar~d a~sociated
wet.lands,- urld to ~~r°otect., maintain, 1-vhe~•e appropriate develop, and ~-here
appropriate f°estoYe the lo~2g-term envif~onmental, ~conomic, a~sd social
valT.ies, diversity> and benefits of Of'egara's estt~aj'ies.
~'inding Goal 16: The proposed text amend.~ner~t does not involve, or othenvise affect
estuaries and associated wetlands.
Concl~sion Goa116: Nat applicable.
GOAL 17. COASTAL SH~RELANDS - Ta cofzsej-~~e, protect, whe~°e ~p~ropriate,
develop and w1ae,-e appropr~iate ~~esto~°e the resoacf°ces and benef ts of all
coastal shorelands, re.cogni~rrrg tlzeir value_ fot- pr-otectio~2 artd nzaintenance
of'watef~ qaeality, fish arrd wfldlife ~aubitat, ~a~ater--depende~it uses, econonaic
s•esoasrces and recreatio~a and aesthetics. The naanagerr~er~tt of'these
shorel~tnd areus s~hall be campatible with the characteristics of ~tlte adjacent.
caastal wate.rs; and To ~•educe t.lae hazard ta humart life and pf~ope~•ty, and
tlae adverse e_ff~ects upon watef° qualii~~ and fisXi and ~vildlife. h.a.bitat,
resulting fro~n the use ctnd enjoyrnent of'Oj-egon's coastal shar•elands.
Finding Goal 17: The p~~oposeti text amendment daes not involve, or otherwise a~fect
coastal shoxelands.
Conclusion Goal 17: Not applicable.
Page ~ of $ +~ ~
GOAL 18. BEACHES A1VD DUNE`S - To eonse3^~~e, protect, where approp-~iate
del~elop, und ~vl~ef°e appr•opriate restor•e the resources ar~c~ benefits of
coastal berach arad d~snc~ areus; crnd to ~~ed2cce the hazai'd to huntan life and
propet°~j~Ji-orn ruztut~al o~~ ~rian-induced actions as~socic~t.erl with. these areas.
FYnding Goa118: The proposed text amendment does nat involve, or ot~lei-wise affect
coastal beach or dune areas.
Conclusion Goal 18: Not applicable.
GDA~ 19. OCEAN RES0~IRCES - To conserve nuirine y-esotsrces and ~cological
fisnetrons for• the purpose of provi.ding long-terrn ecologieal, econoncic, and
social valu~ and benefits to futic~~e gerae~ations.
Finding Goal 1.4: The City of Centrat Point is not adjacent to, or near the ocean. The
~proposed text arnendment does not invol~cYe, or otl~erwise affect znarine resources and
marine ecological funetions.
Conclusion Goal 19: Not applicable.
PART 3 CITY OF CENT[tAL POINT CQMPREHENSIVE PLAN
17.OS.S00 (~) {2)(m) filae r~eqi~e.st is consistent ~vith the Cenlrul Point compr'eltensi~~e
~JIQlI;
Finding; `I?~e aniendments are consistent with the cornprehensive plan and serve to
clarify current cade language by providing clear and measurable standards by the
unifortn one yeaz expiration date of approved land use applications and to prot~ide an
extensian tilne request procedure as a Type I, Adxnuustrative review.
~nding: Coi-rection of a clerical or typographic error, Section ~'7.05.1 Table Sununary
of Approvals by Type: Subdivision Final Plat, should read Type I review as provided by
16.12.060. This correctian is consistent with CPMC Section 17.10.100.
Conclusion: Cpnsisten.t
1. Transportation
Finding: The City af Central Point Transportation System Plan 2030 (TSP} replaces
Cha~ter XI, Circulation/Tra7isportation of the Comprehensive Plan. Tl~e TSP provides
an inventory ofthe City s existing transportatzon system, including street standards, This
eIernent of the Comprehensive Plan addresses Statewide Plaru~ing Goal 12,
Transportation.
Finding: The praposed text aznendment will not cause an increase in land uses that
would result in levels of travel or access that would be inconsistent with the City's
functional street classiftcatioi~ systern foz existing and pIaimed transpoi-tatioYi facilities.
Conclusion: Cansistent
Page 6 of 8 '7 ~
PART 4 TRANSPORTATION PI,ANNING RULE
17.10.600 Transpor~ation planning rule compliance.
Section 6~0-012-0060(1) i~'here an amendj~2ent to a funct~onal pla3i, an ach~o~alledged
coinp~°ehensive plan, ar a land z.rse r•egulation n-ould sig~7.i~cantly af~'ect arz. existin.g or
pla~aned transportation facili~7; the l.occcl govej-nnzent s~aall pict in place measu~°es us
provided irt sectiort (2) of this t~ule t.o ussz~~•~ that allawed land uses ar•e consisten.t with the
identifed,fisnc~iora, capacrty, and pet forrruzr2ce startdards (e.g, level ofset-vice, volzsme to
capacaty~ ratia, etc.) of the,facrlity_ A plan of• land use regulatrora ameyrclrnent srgnificant.ly
affects n t~°anspay-tation,facili,ty if it would:
a) Claange the f cractional classr.fr.cution o, f an existing of• plataned tt°ansportation
facility;
b) Claar:g~ standas-ds ina~~lem~ntirag u. fi~nctio~zul classif~cation. system.; or
c) As nzeasur•ed at the erad of the plan•ning pet•ivd identifieil ir~ 1he adopted
tt•ansport~rtiori s~.~stem plnn:
(.f1) ~Illow ~I~es at~ level.~ of land uses th.a.t la~attld result in. l.evels of travel or
access tlzat aye iriconsistent ~vith the, fia~actronal cla,ssi~ication of a~ existing o~°
planned truns~o~•tation., facilrn>;
(B) Recluce tlze perfof°mance of'an. exis•ting or• planned tYa~tspartcition facility
below the mirairrtu~tz. acceptable~erfor~rnurt.ce stand~rd ident~ed in the TSP oj~
comprchensivc plcrr~.; or
(C) Wot°sen the pefforn~ance of a~Z existing oj~ pl.ataraed tf^QfYSjJOF•tatior~ f~rcilit~~
that is othenvise projected to pej°fo~~nz below the ~ninimt~~t2 acceptabl~
per form~ar~ace standard identified in the TSP or com~rehe~zsrve plan.
Finding 6b0-012-0060{1){a): The propose~ text amendment sen~es to provide clear
and measurable code standards while resolving the current nebulous language. The
p7•opose,~ teYt amendment will not cause any changes ta ~he funetional classi~ication
of any existing or planned transportation facilities.
C~-~aciusion 660-012-0064(1)(a}: No si~mificant affect.
Fxnding b6Q-012-0064(1)(b): The praposed text amendment does nat modify a~~y
e~sting land use regulati~ns. The proposed text amendment will not cause a change
to standards implementing the City's transportation system.
Conclusion b6Q-012-0060(~){b): No sigziificant affect.
Finding 660-OX2-0060{1)(c){A}: The proposed text amendfnent will not cause an
increase in land uses that would result in levels of travel ar access that would be
~~
Page 7 of 8
incoz~sistent with the City's functional sfreet classificatian systern for existing and
planned tzaz~sportation facilities.
Conclusion b60-012-OObO{1}(c)(A}: No significant a.ffect.
Finding 660-012-0060{1){c}(B): The propased text amendment wilt not cause a
reduction in the perfornnance of any exist~ng or planned transpartation facilities
below the minimum acceptable performance standard identified in the TSP or
Gomprehensive Plan.
Conclusion~ 660-012-0060{1}{c)(B): No sigiuficant affect.
Finding 660-012-0060(1)(c}(C): The proposed text amendment will not cause the
urorsening of al~ existing or planned transportatian facility that is ot~terwise projected
to perform below the minimum acceptable performance standard identified in the
TSP or Comprehensive Plan.
Conclusion 660-012-0060(1){c)(C}: No significant affect.
Summary Conclusion: As proposed, the text amendment is in confonnance with the
ackn~wledged Comprehensive Pla~i, Transportation Syste~n Plau and Central Point
Municipal Code.
Page S of 8 ~ °~
ATTACHMENT " -~`
PLANNING C~NIlVIISSION RESOLUTI4N NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FORWARDYNG A FAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATION TO TFfE CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS Tfl
THE MUNICIPAL CQDE TITLE 1G, SECTIONS 16.10 TENTATrVE PLANS; 1G.12
FINAL PLATS; TITLE 17 SECTIONS 17.05 APPLICATIONS AND TYPES OF
REVIEW; 17.66 APPLICATION REVIEW PROCESS FOR THE TOD DISTRICT
AND CORRIDOR; 17.68 PLANNED UNIT DEVEL~PMENT (PUD); 17.72 SITE
PLAN, LANDSCAPTNG AND CONSTRUCTION PLAN, AND 17.76
CONDITIONAL USE PERMi~TS
(File No: 11001)
WHEREAS, on October 5, 2010, tt~e Plaiming Co~nrtiussion of fhe City of Central Point, in a
public bearing declared the need to amend Sections 16.10 Tentative Plans, 16.12 Final Plats;
17.05 Applications and Types af Review; 17.66 Application Review Process for the TOD Distnct
a~id CorridoY~, 17.b8 Plaxuied Unit Development (PUD); 17.72 Site Plan, Landscaping and
Construction Plan, and 17.76 Conditional Use Pernuts and determined that t1~e amendments as
proposed were in the public interest and that the ~eneral welfai.•e of the public will benefit by the
praposed amendment; and
WI3EREAS, on October 5, 2010 the Plaluung Comrnission, held a public hearing to cansider
public festimony on the proposed amendments; and
WHEREAS, after reviewing the requested proposal and considering public testimony it is the
determination of the Planning Comnussion t~iat tl~e propased amendments as set forth i~7 Planning
Department Staff Report (E~ibit "A") dated October 5, 2010 are n~ior adjustments that do not
alter, or otherwise modify the uses and character of development and land use within the City of
Central Point, and is therefore deterniined to be consistu~it with all of the goals, objectives, and
policies of the City's Compt•ehetzsive Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RES~LVED by the Planning Comnussion of the City of Central
Poi~1t, Orego~i that the ainendments as set forth ui E~ibit "A" be forwarded to the City Cauncil
with a recommendation that the City Couc~cil favorably cansider amending the City of Geiitral
Point Municipal Code as speeitically set forth in the attached Exhib~t "A".
Planning Gornrnission Resolution No. (10/512d10}
~
Passed by the Plaruling Commission and si~ed by me in authentication. of its passage this
day of , 2010.
ATTEST:
Planxung Gomnussion Chair
City Represen#ative.
Approved by Ine tliis day of , 2010.
Plaruu~ig Commission Chair
Ptarming Commission Resolution No. {10I512010)
~J
PROpos~~ AM~~D~~HTS ~ CPMG
S~c~r~oH ~ 7.77 ~ ADUs
~
City of Central_Po~nt, C~regon__~ CENTRAL.
140 S 3rd Street, Central Point, OR 97502 p01 NT
541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.638j1 %~~°,;;Fc;r:
www.ce ntral po i ntorego n.gov
STAFF REP~RT
October 5, 2410
Community Development
Tom Humphrey, AiCP,
Community Development Director
AGENDA ITEM: File Na. 11002
Consideration of proposed Central Point Municipal Code amendments ta Section I 7.77,
Accessory D~~elling Units (ADUs) for language consistent with the Public Works Departrnent
Chapter i3, Water Rates and Regulations standards. Applicant: City~ of Central Point
STAFF SOURCE:
Connie Clune, Commuiuty
BACKGROUND:
In respanse to the City of Central Pou~t City Council approved Central Point Municipa~ Code
{CPMC} text changes ta Section 13.04.100, Water Rates and Regulations (by Ordinance No.
1939), the adopted wate~• regulation standard provides ~o~r ane meter to serve both the primary
dwelling and the accessoiy dwellin~ unit. The proposed axnendment to Section 17.77, Accessory
Dwelling Units (ADUs), provides for this change and specifies the application for an ADUs as a
Type I review procedure (see Attachrnent A).
Attachment A- Ghapter 17.77 Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs}
Attachment B- City Council Ordinance No.1939
Attachment C - Findings
Attachment D - Resolution No.
ACTION:
Consideration of Resolution No. , a recornmendation ta the City Council far approval of
the text amendments ta the Cer~tral Point Municipal Code, Section 17.77, Accessory Dwell~ng
Units {File: 11002).
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of Resolution No. , forwarding a favarable recommendation to the City
Council.
f ~'
ATTACHMENT A
Chapter 17.77
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS (ADU)
Sections:
17.77.005 Pu~rpose,
17.77.d10 Permitted in residential dist~~icts, R-L and R-1.
17.77.020 Provisioi~s for water and sewer.
17.77.030 Only one accessoiy dwelling unit per single-farnily dwelling.
17.77.040 General p~~ovisions.
A. ADUs shall be permitted as second dwelling units that are added to or created within or on
the same lot as a single-family dwelling.
B. All housing and building codes a~~.d standards sha11 be applicable to aIl ADUs including, but
not limited ta, the building code, the plumbing code, the electrical code, the 7nechanica~ code, the
fire code, and all requirements of the city of Central Point.
C. ADU's, whether attached or detached,
are not ~reyuired ta have separate independent utility connections~~
D. Tlie gross floor area of an accessory dwelling unit shall cantain no more fhan thirty-five
percent of the ~rass floor area af the main dwelling in existence priar to the construction of the
accessory dwelling unit or eight hundred square feet, whichever is less.
E. No subdivision af land, air rights or condominium is allowed so as to enable the sale or
transfer af the accessory d~relling unit independently o~the mau~ du~elli7zg unit or ather portions
of the property.
F. Al~ ,ADUs shall be designed to maintain the appearai~ce of the si~igle-family dwelling tc~
tivhich they are accessory. If an ADU extends beyond the current foatprint of the single-family
dwelling it must be consistent with the existing roof pitch, siding and windows of the single-
family dwelling. If a separate entrance doar is provided, it must be located either off the rear or
side of the single-family dwelling. Any additians to an existing structure oi- building sha11 not
e~ceed the allowable lat coverage oY• encroach into the required setbacl~s.
G. All ADUs which are attached ta a single-family dwelling sk~all have a separate entrance for
the accessory dwellinb unit, but it sha1l not be located on the £ront of the existing ruilding.
Page 1 of 3
~~
~T. At least one off-street parking space sha11 be provided for each ADU in addition to the off-
street parking spaces required for the sin~e-farnily dwelling.
I. All ADUs shall have separate street addresses that are visible frorn the street and that clearly
identify the location of the ADU. (Ord. 1884 (part}, 2406).
17.77.OS0 Special pravisions.
A. The awner ar contract purcliaser of record of the single-farnily dwellin~ to which an ADU is
accessory shall reside either i7i the single-family dwelling or the ADU as a permanent place of
residence az~d shall not be pe~~iutted to rent or Iease the same. The ownership af ADUs rnay ~iot
be separated from ownership of the sulgle-family dvvelling to which tl~ey are accessory.
B. No home occupatians, day care centers ar adult foster homes shall be perniitted in AT.}Us or
in single-family dwellings to which they are accessory. (Ord. 1884 {part), 2006).
17.'77.060 Permit--Fee--Application-~Inspection.
A. No ADU may be added to, created within, or constructeci upon th~e sarne Ivt as a single-
family dwelling withotit a permit th~refore, issued by the planning depart7ne~xt. ADU permits
shatl be processed as a Ty~e I]and use application.
B. Al1 applicatians for ADU pennits shall be on forms pro~-icied by tlie planning departtnent, and
the fee for such permzt shall be as pi-ovided in the buildiz~g code.
C. Before ai~y pennit for the creatian or eonstruct~on of a~i AZ}U is granted, the proposed site
thereof and the plans and specifications therefore shall be inspected by the build'uig official to
assure that the provisions af this chapter are not viola#ed. {Ord. 1884 (part), 2006).
17.77.070 ADUs Detached ~rom single-family dwelling--Special.
The following provisians shall be applicable to detached ADUs:
I A. Water, sewer and solid waste co~lection ~ may be by way of connections a~nd service that
is c:c~inpletely separate, apart and independently metered ~irom the si~gle-family dwelliYig to
~ which sucla ADU is aecessory.-. or by other means a~praved by the gublic woxks d~par~ment.
B. All detached ADUs shall comply with all setback and separatian requirexnents far detached
accessory buildings except that the minimum rear yard setback shal~ be te~i feet.
Fage 2 af3 ~ ~
C. Detached ADUs shall be designed in such a manner as to blend with~ or comple~nent fhe
architectural design of the single-~amily dwelling to which such ADU is accessory; approval of
such desi~i sllall be tnade by the a~peal board of adjustment.
D. Detached ADUs shall share the sa~ne hard-surfaced driveway as the single-faniily dwelling to
which such ADU is accessory, aY~d sllall have direct access ta the street upan which the single-
family dwelling fronts, ox take access from an alley. No new or additional curb cuts shall be
permitted for the ADU, except on carner lots where a new curb cut will be allowed on the street
frontage having no e~sting curb cut.
E. Detached ADUs shall have a minimurn of twenty-five feet of u.nabstru.cted street fxontage
with ~io intervening structures to ensure adequate ~~isibility and access for ernergency vehicles.
(Ord. 1884 (part), 2006).
Page 3 of 3
7~
ATTACHMENT "~
ORDINANCE NO. ~ ~ ~
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13.04.100 PERTAIl~ING TO
THE AMOiJNT OF WATER METERS PER
SEPARATE BUII,DINGS
Ti-~ PEOPLE OF THE CITY UF CEN'I'RAL POIl~T, OREGQN, DQ QRDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Sec 'on 1. C}aapter 13.01.100 amends the ardinance perta~ning to the allowed uses for one
meter to read as follows:
CHAPTER 13.i}~
WA'TER RATES AND REGULATIONS
Section:
13.04.100 Separate,buildings
13.04.100 Separate buildings;
Muiti~le water meters to a sin~le bu[Iding are discouraged, but unde~
special circumstantes mul#iple water met~rs to a single building may be allowed with written permissidn
from the publfc v~orks direetor or his/her designee. O~-e water mefer shall be ollowed ~o serve are
parcel fnr the pGrpose of prariding watcr to the rrrain d~-elllnq a~d an accessory structure.
Passed by t}ae City Council and signed by me i.n authentication af its passage this
,~,~- day a~ ~ 2Q 10.
f / ~
~,~~'^ ~~~~+~ T ti
Mayor Hank Williams ~ F
1~T°I'ES •
Ci Recarder
Approved by me this ~ ~y of 2010
~
c..!: ~~'~~~ ~.
._.__._. ~~r
M~yor Hatik Williazns
t3rdirsance No. ~_ (09o910j ~ ~
Attachment C
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND
~NCLUSIONS OF LAV4J
File No: 11002
INTR~DUCTION
The text arnendrnent to Section 17.77, Accessory Dwelling U~~its (ADUs) is language to
c;on£o7~n ta the adopted code change to the Public Works water regulation standards, Section
13.U4.100.
Tl~ese findings are prepared in four {4) parts to address the statewide planning goals, the
applicable elernents of City's CoiYlprehensive Plan, public facilities and the Transportation
Planning Rule as required by CPMC T 7.05.500 and 17.10.600.
PART 1 CPMC LEGISLATIVE AMENDMENT
17.10Z00 Y,egislative amendments.
Legislative ame~dmen.t.s are polr'c~~ decisions rnade bv city counerl. 7Tie}~ c~re r~evie~a-ed using
Zlae Type I Uprocedure iya Section 17, OS. S00 and shall coy forni to the statewide plunnirlg
gvuls, t~ae Cent~~al Poin.t co»z~rehensive plcrj2, the Ceritr•al Point ~ojaing ordinance arxd the
trcrnsportation plannirag rt~le pt'ovisions in. Sectiorz. 17.10.600, as applicable.
Finding: By ardinance No. 1939, the City of Central Paurt City Council approved
CeY~tral Point Municipal Code (CPMC) text changes to Section 13.04.100, Water Rates
and Regulations. The adopted standard provides for a single meter to serve Ehe main
dwellzng and an accessory dwelling. The amendment to Section 17.77 of the CPMC is
to confonn to the adopted water regulation standards and to provide for a Type I,
Administrative review far an Accessary D~~elling applicatian. The amendrnent is
reviewed as a Le~slative amendment using the Type IV procedure in confannane~
with Sectian I7.10.240,
Conclusion: A text atnendment is reviewed as a Type IV, Legislative decision.
17.05.540 Type IV procednre (le~slative).
G. Decision-M'ukirtg Cr~iteria_ T'he recomm~~tdation. by the planniyag co~nmission artd the
decision. bv the cit~~ couracil shall be based on the,follo~a~r'n.g,factors:
1. ~Yhether tlae reqase.st is consistent ivi.tl~ tlae applacable statewrde ~lanning goals;
~. YYhether the ~-equest is consistent ia-i.th tlae compr~ehensive pl~an; and
3. If't.he pr•oposed legislativ~ change is pay~ticulas~ to a partici~lat• site, t.he propej°ty
af~d affecterl ut•ea isr~t~ese~atly pf-ovided ~vith adequate pisblic faciliti~s, se~vices arad.
tf~anspor-tation raet~vorks to suppo~°t tlae use, or such_facilities, se3vices and trc~nspo~•tation
network,s are planned to be pr~ovided concur•r•ently with tdae de~~elopmerat of the proper~j~.
Page 1 of $ $ ~-
PART 2 STATEWIDE PLANNING G~ALS:
~7.05. S0~ G. 1. YVltether the req~a~es~t. is consistent. ~vr'th. the czpplrcable statewic~e planni~ig
goals;
GOAL X. CITfZEN INVOLYEMENT - To develop a catizQn invol~~erttent pf°agraf~a
thut insuf•es the oppotRt.unit7,~,for• cr'tizens to be irivolved in. all phases of tdte
~lunning pr~acess_
Finding, Goai 1: The proposed text arnendment does not enlzance, or detract, from
citizen participation in the City's planning process. A duly naticed public hearing is
scheduled for October 5, 2010 to review t~ie proposed text amendment.
Conclusion, Goal 1: Consistent
GU~L 2. LA~VD LISE PLANNING -?'o establish a lanc~ use plannin~ process and
~olicy fi•atrae~vork as cr basis for~ all decision. und actr'ons related to use of
tand und to assure an adeqi~ute,factual base for• such decisions and actions
Finding Goa12; Element I of tbe Central Point Cornprehensive Plan addresses the
Goal 2 requirement that plans and implementing orduZances be revised on a periodic
cycle to take inta acct~unt cllanging public polices, community attitudes and other
circumstances, as sucl~ the proposed code amendment provides a process and policy
framework as a basis for Iand use decisions.
Finding Goa12: The proposed text ainendrnent is in accordance with CPMC Sectio~i
17.10.200 and theY•efore daes not modify or otherwise affect the Czty's planning
pracess as set fot~th in the Camprehensive Plan. The proposed text amendment serves
to clarify current code language by providing canfo~tnxty with the Public Works wat~r
regulation sta~idards, Section 1 ~.04.100.
Conclusion Goal 2: Consistent.
Gaar 3. AGRICULTURAL L<4NDS - To pt°eseive arad maintain agr°icultacr~ccl lands.
Finding Goa13: The proposed ~ext arnendrnent does not involve, or otherwise affect
lands designated for agricultural use.
Conclusion Goa13: Not app~icable.
ti
g~
Page 2 of 8
Goal4. FOREST LANDS - To conse-ve,for~st lands by ~naintaining tlic,forest land
bas~ and to p~-otect the stat.e's forest econorn.y by~ rraakirag possible
econonaicully c~cient,forest practices ihat assus~e the corttinuous growing
a~t.d fzarvestifag of`forest tree ~species a.s the leading use on forest larid
eonsis~terit ~vith soicncl mc~nagerraerat of soil, air, ~aJuter, and,fish. anc~ 1-vildlife
reso2~r•ces and to p~•ovide for recreatio~~c~l opporturarties and agt°icultu~e.
FYnding, Goa14: The proposed text atnendment does not uivo~vs, or otherwise affect
lands desi~iated ~oz forest use.
Conclusion, Goa14: Not applicable.
GOAL S. OPENSPACE, ,SCENIC~4N17 ~17ST(1RICAREAS, AND 1~fITURAL
RESOU~tCES - To ps-otect nat~sral resouf°ces and co~2se~~ve scenic anr~
laistoric areas and opera spr~ce.s.
Finding Goa15: The propased text amendnient does not in~•olve, or othervvise a~fect
lands designated as natu~al, scenic, or historic resources.
Conclusion Goal S: Not applicable.
G4AL 6AIR, WATER, AND LAND RESOLlRCES Q~~f1LITY- T`o maintnin and
i.naprove tl7e qualr:ty o~ f'the air, wuter an~l la.rad resouy°ces of tlae state.
Finding Goa16: The proposed text amendment does not involve, ar otherwise affect
regulations mana~ng the quality of air, water and land resources.
Conclusion Goa16: Not applicable.
Gp.~4L 7. ARE.qSSUBJECT TO N,9TURAL HqZARDSAND Dl'SAS7'ERS - To
prote.ct people. and pr•o~er•ty frotn natTtral lzazat•ds.
Finding Goal 7: The proposed text arnendlnent does not involve, or othei-wise affect
regulations protecting the citizens of Central Point from natural liazards
Conclusion Goa17: Cansistent.
~'t)AL $. RECREATION NEEDS - To satisfy th,e r•ecreatior~al tzeeds of'the citizens of
the state anc~ >>°isitors and, where uppf-opriute, to provide. f or ihe siting of
neeessa~y recreatioraul facilities i~aclisding destinatiori r~esot•ts.
Finding Goa18: The proposed te~:t amend7iierlt does not involve, or otherwise affect
the City's provision of necessary recreational facilities.
Conclusion Goa18: Not applicable.
Page 3 of 8 8 4~
G0~4L 9. ~CON~MY OF THE STATE - To provide adequate opporta:nities
throicghout the state,fo~ a~~ari.ety o,f`economic activities vital to tlae Iiealth,
tivelfa~°e, cznd prosperit}- of 4regon's citiaens.
Finding Goa19: The propased text amendment does not alter the City's provisioz~ of
adequate economic opportunities. The proposeci text an~e~~dinent serves to provide
consisteYicy ~vith Title 13 of the CPMC standards specifically for the number of water
meters necessary for single faznily and an ac;cessary dwelling.
Conclusion Goa19: Consistent.
G~AL ~0. HOUSING - To provide,for the housing needs p,f citizens of the stat~.
Finding Goal 10: The propased text amenc~rnent does :not involve, or otherwise affect
regulations that address the City's hou.~ing needs.
Conclusion Goal 10: Gonsistent.
GOAL IY. PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES - To plajz and develop a tinzely;
c~rdet•ly arid ef~cient arrc~rigement o,f'public facilities af~ad servicES tQ set~ve
as a,fra~ework,f'of° urban and rtrral del~elo~rrrerit_
Finding Goal 11: The proposed text amer~dment does not involve, or otherwise affect
the City's provision of timely, orderly and e£ficient public facilities and services. The
propased text amendrnent daes not cause an uacrease in the demand for public
facilities. Water service is avaitable within the City_
Finding Goal 11: The text amendment to Sectiori 17.77, Accessory Dwelling Units
provides for conformity to the recent arnendment to the Public Works Depattment
water regulation, Section 13.04.100 to allaw one water meter to serve both the prunary
dwelling and the accessory dwelling unit.
Conclusion Goal 1L• Consistent.
G4A~,12. 7'RANSPQRTATION- To proi~~ide and encaurage a safe, corzvenient. c~rad
econonzic transpot°tation systen~.
Finding Goa112: The proposed text amendment does not involve, or otl~erwise affect
the City of Central Point Transporfation System Plan or modify CPMC Section
17.05.900, Traffic irnpact a~nalysis.
Conclusion Goa112: Consistent.
GOAL Y3 ENLG'RGY - To cor~tser-ve erzergy.
Fincling Goal 13: 'I~ie proposed text amendrnent does not involve, or otllerwise affect
and development standards or regulations that address conservation of energy.
Conclusion Goal 13: Not applicable.
Page-~of8 gl~
GO~tL 14. URBANIZATION- To provide fo~• afa ot-r~erly and efficient transition from
r~urczl tv urban lan.d it,se, to accotnmodat.e ur•bar~ popaclation and acj•ba~z.
eniplayment rnside urban gr~owth. boundarres, to ensut•e efficierit u.se of
land, and to pj•ovide fof• livable commicnaties.
Finding Goa114: The proposed text amendment daes not involve, or otberwise
affect, regulations addressing and regulating the transition frozn rural to urban lands.
Conclusion Goa114: Nat applicable.
GOAL I5. R'ILLAIYI~7'TE GREENWAY- To protecl, con~serve, enhance and
rr~aintain tlze n.at~sral, scenic, histor~ical, agr•icasltur•al, eeono»zic and
i~ecrea.taon.a.l q~isalities of ~lands along the ~3jrllamette Rrver as the WallametCe
River Gr•eeraw~cry.
Finding Goa115: The proposed text amendment does not involve, or othe~-~rise affect
the Willamette River or Willamette Rive7• Greenway.
Conclusion Goal 15: Not applicable.
GOAL I6. ESTI/ARINE.RESOURCES - Ta ~•ecograiz~ and protect tlze unique
environrnental, ecorz.o~nic, arzd social values of ~each estuary a~ul associated
wetlands; and to protect, maintain, where up~ropj•aate develop, and where
appropr°iate restore the long-term. erti~it•onrnentnl, ecortomic, arul social
values, div~rsih~ a~zd bene.fits of 4rego~~.'s estacarr:es,
Finding Gaa116: The proposed text amendment does not involve, oY~ ot~eY~wise affect
estuaries and assoeiated wetlands.
Conclusion Gcrallb: Not applicable.
GOAL ~7, CDASTAL SHORELANDS - To conser~ve, pr•otect, wher•e appropriate,
develop arad ~a~het•e appr•opriate restore lhe res~orst~ces and bettef ts of all
~oastal s~aorelunds, s°ecognizrng theis- value,fo~~ proteetiorr. and maintenn~ace
af iaJaiet• quality,.fish ur2d ~-vrldlif'e laabitat, tivater-depend.e.nt uses, ecnrtomic
resou~°ces a~2c~ recrer~tt'on urtd aesthetics. The nzanagernent of ~these
shc~reland at°eas sl~all be corrapatible wit12 the char~cteristics oj~the adjace~t
cocrstal w~lters; aru~ To reduce the huzutd to lrunaafa life and pr•opet°ty, and
th.e adti~ef•se ef.j`ects tcpofa wat.er quality u~~d.fish aful wildlife lrccbitat,
f-esult.ing,ft-onz the. use and enJ'oyment of'Oregon's coastal shoyelands.
~nding Goal 17: The proposed text aznendment does n.ot involve, or otherwise affect
coastal shorelands.
Conclusion Goal 17: Not applicable.
Page ~ c~f $ ~ ~
G4AL 18, BEACHESAND DUNES - To conse~-~~e, proteet, wltet•e appf°opriate
develop, and ~1~here appy~op~~ate restore the i°esources and benefits of
coa,~tal beach and dzcr~.e at•eas; c~nd to r~disce tlte hc~zard to human. life. and.
property.~-om ra~rt~~•al or man-induced c~ction,s ussociated with these at•eas.
Finding Goal i8: The proposed text amendment does not i~volve, or otherwise affect
coastal beach or ~u~ie areas.
Conclusion Goa118: Not applicable.
GOA~ 19. OCEANRESOZIRCE,S` - To conser^ve maf-ine resozcrces and ecological
,fitn.ctiorts foj- tlae pu~pose of provr'ding long-ternz c~coXogical, econornic, and
social value afad henefits to,fista~re ge~erat.ior~.s.
Finding Goal 19: The City of Central Point is not adjacent to, or neaz tlie ocean. The
propased text ~nendment does not i7ivolve, ar otherwise affect marine resources and
rnarine ecalogical functions.
Conclusion Goa119: Nat applicable,
PART 3 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
17.05.54Q (G) (2)(nz) T7ae reqtsest is consistent ~ti=ith the Ce~~tr•al Point conapre.het2sr.'ve
plan;
Finding: The amendment to Section I7.77 is consistent with CPMC Sectian 13.04 and
the comprehensive plan. The anie~idrnent serves to provide clear and measurable
standards with ADUs request procedure listed as a Type I, Administrative review.
Conclusion: Consistent
1. Transportation
Finding: The City of Gentral Point Transportation System Plan 2U30 (TSP) replaces
Chapter XI, CirculationlTransportation of the Cornprehensive Plan. The TSP provides
an inventory of the City's existing transportation system, including street standards. T}.~is
element of the Camprehensive Plan addresses Statewide Planning Goa1 12,
Tra~isportation.
Finding: The proposed texfi amendment will not cause an increase ~n land uses that
would result in levels of travel or access that vvould be inconsistent with tl~e City's
funcrional street classification system for existing and planned transportatian facilities.
Cancl+usion: Cansistent
PART 4 TRANSPORTATION PLANNIlVG RULE
1.7.10.600 Transportation planning rule compliance.
Page 6 of 8 ~ ~
Section 660-OIZ-0060(1) Wlaere an anaendment to a,~tcnction~l plan, an ctcknowledged
carriprehe~l~s~ive plan., or c~ land ttse regr~lutio~ ~voulc~'sigri~carttly a,f'fect an ~,~istif~g or
pXanned trunspor•tatio~2 facilitt~~, the local govenrment slzal.l xrc~t in. place measzsres as
pt•avided in section (2} of thrs r-ule to asszsre that allo~~ed larur zc.ses a.r•e eonsistent with the
rden.tified function, capacity, a~ad ~~erf'ormc~nce star~.c~ards ~e.g. level of ~,~e.rvice, volacme to
capacity ratro, etc,) of~the facilih~. A plari. or lancl. use regi.clation amenclmentsr~nrificantly
affects a tr•ansportation~facility if it wor.~lc~:
a) Clzunge the,f'unetio~al classifica~zan of an existing or-planned tr°anspo3'tation
_facility;
b) Cha~zge standaf°ds if~zplententin.g a,funetiorzal classificattata system; or
c~ ~s rneasured ut the efad of tlie plannir~g period ident~~ed in t.lae adopted
tra~~sportax~on system yla~i:
(A) Allow t~~pes or leveds of'la~r,tl uses thut ~vould r-eszrlt in le~~ers of ti°ctvel o~
access that are inconsistent witla the,~icnctiotz.al classifica.tion of'an existi~~.g or°
planned tr'a~sportation facilit~~; ~
(B) Redacce the pet,~for-~na~ace of an e.r.isti~g or planraed transpor•tatio~z,facilih1
belo~-v the rnininruj~a acceptable perfoy°mance st~ndard iclenti~ed in. the TSP or
cotrapr•ehensi~~e plan; ot•
~C) I~or~sen the ~erfoi°mance of an ea.7sti~ag or plar~nec~ t~~anspor°tation,facilr'ty
tlrat is othcy-~l=rse projected ta perforrrt belol~v the minimtsm acceptable
performance stafzdard iden.ti~ed in the TSP os~ con2preliensive plan.
Finding 660-012-0060{1)(a}: The proposed text amendment serves to pravide
CPMC cotlsistency, review process and measurable code standards. The propased
text amendmer~t will not cause any changes to the fiuictional classification af any
existing ar ~lac~ned transportation facilities.
C~nclusion 660-012-0060(1)(a}: No significant affect.
Finding 660-012-d064(1}(b}: The proposed te~t arnendment serves to rnaintain the
density standard of residential property consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
The praposed text anae~ndment will not cause a change to standards implementing ti~e
City's transportation system.
Canclusion 660-012-0060{1}(b): No significatlt affect.
Fincling 660-012-d060{1}(c)(A): The proposed text amendment will not cause an
increase in land uses that would result in levels of travel or aceess that would be
incoYisistent with the City's #unctional street classification system for exisiin~ and
planned transportation facilities.
Page 7 of S ~ ~
Conclusion 664-012-0060(1)(c){A): No significant affect
Finding b60-012-0060(1)(c){B): The proposed test amendment will not cause a.
reduction xn tlie pe~•forniance of any e~isting or planned transportation facilities
below the rninimum acceptable perfarmance standard ide~itified in the TSP or
Comprehensive Plan.
Conclusion ~60-012-0060(1}(c}(B); Na sigtuficant affect.
Finding 660-O12-0060(1}(c}(C): The proposed text ainendment will not cause the
woYSeYUng of an ezcisting or plaruied transportatian facility that is atherwise pf-ojected
to perfonn below the miniinum acceptable perforlnance standard identified in tl~e
TSP or Comprehensive Plan.
Conciusipn 660-012-Od60{1){c}(C}: No significamt affect
Sunimar,y Conclusion: As proposed, the text anlendnient is in conformance with the
acknowledged Comprellensive Plan, Transportatian System Plan and Centrat Point
Municipal Code.
Page 8 of 8 ~ ~
ATTACHMENT "~"
PLAl~NI1VG CaMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
A RES~LUTION OF THE PL~NING COMNllSSION FORWARDING A FAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATiON TO TflE CITY COUNCXL TO CONSIDER ARZENDMENTS TO
MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 17 SECTION 17.77, ACCESSORY DWELLING
UNITS {ADUs}
{F~le No: 11402)
Wi3EREAS, on September 7, 2010, ~vith the adaption of Council Ordxnance No. 1939, tbe
Planning Commission of the City of Central Point, i7i a public meeting clectared the need to
amend Section 17.77, Accessory Dwelling Units, and d~ennined that the amendments as
proposed were in the public interest and that t~ie ge~eral ~~~elfare of the public will benefit by t~~e
proposed amendment; and
W~IEREAS, on October 5, 2010 the Planning Commission, held a public heariug to oc~nsider
public testiuiony on the proposed axnendments; and
WHEREAS, after reviewing the requested proposal and coiLSidering public test.imony it is the
detertnination of the Planning Conlnussion that the proposed amendments as set forth in Planning
Department Staff Report (Exhibit "A"} dated Ocfiober 5, 2010 are rzunor adjustments tliat do not
alter, or otlierwise ~nodify the uses and character of development and land use within the City of
Central Point, and is t.herefore detertnined to be consistent with all of the goals, objectives, and
policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan,
1~iOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOGVED by the Plantvng Corrunission of the City of Central
Point, OregoYi that the amendments as set f~rth in Exhibit "A" be forwarded to the City Cauncil
wit~i a recon~rnendation that t~e City Council favorably consider amending the City of Central
Point Municipal Code as specifically set forth in the attached Exhibit "A".
Passed by the Pianning Carrunission and signed by rne in autt~esitication of its passage this
day vf , 2010.
Planning Comnussion
ATTEST:
City Representative
Approved by me this ciay of , 201 U.
Pla7uiing Commission Chair
Plaiming Co~nrnissian Resolutian No. (1{115/2010}
~ ~;
UI~BAI`,i R~S~RY~ MAl`IAC~M~1'~I'T
~~R~~M~HTS CLJRMAS~
~
, _ ~-
~~
City of Central Point, Oregon _~,,ENTR,A.~.
144 S 3rd Street, Central Point, OR 97502 p~l NT
54 i .664.3321 Fa~c 54I .664.63$4
www.centralpointoregon.gov `~' `' ` `
TO: City of Central Point Plaiming Commission
FROM: Tom Humphrey, AICP
DATE: October 5, ?O10
_ _,Community Development
Tom Humphrey, AICP,
Community Development birector
Discussion Item: Urban Rese~ve MaY~agement Agreement (URMA)/~arcel Size
I~i October t~ie City will meet with Jackson County Planning Cotnmission to discuss
elements of the Urban Reserve Managerne7rt A~neement (URMA). This agreement is a
part of tl~e Regional Problem Sol~ving process to insure c~ordinated planning for lands
designated within the Urban Rese7ve Areas (URAs} for Central Point. The lands will
continue to be under the jurisdiction of the County until the area transitiorts to Central
Poixtt's Urban Growth Boundary and city lirnits. Conceptual plans for the UR.As will be
developed and larger parcel siz~s will provide better design optians. Until this occurs and
to insttre this design apportunity remains, the Ciry will request that tlie Gounty adopt a 40
acre nninirnum parcel size for n.on-f°esoui~ce land as part af the agreement.
Two maps are attached to help illustrate the cunent cc7nditions. The parcel sizes of URA
lands are depicted on the first rnap and the Jackson Counry Zoning as shown on the
second map.
~~
~
~
CENTRA.L
PQINT
i~~~,.a~~ ~.~~~,~~,z~~a~
~ UGB
Central Point
~~t~e~wEw+rzrM~na~NNNCwps~~,nyzW,i~,acp~uRr~aa~s~aso Urban Reserve Area
9 ~ Parcel size
j6~c-:::~
~-,~'~
~
CENTRAL
PQINT
Cenfral Point
lkpfile~lDEPART.IENTPIANNING1qPS1CPUqINnuelAraaRdapvlCouiry2oningCPS County Zoning and Urban Reserve
~ ~
~
Legend
N
JDCkson Gounty Zoning Woodland Resource f Rurel Servlce CommerC(al ~Urban ReserveAreas ~
Q EFU Rural Residential -2.5 J Urban Resldenfivl (_~ UGB
~ Open Space Reserve Ruraf Residential -5