Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Resolution 715 - Providence Site Plan
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 7 ~ 5 A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A SITE PLAN FOR A MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING FILE NO. 07019 Applicant: Providence Health System-Oregon; Agent: Michael Robinson 37S 2W 11 CB, Tax Lots 401 and 500, 870 Front Stz•eet. WHEREAS, the Applicant submitted an application for a Site Plan fora 32,000 square foot, two-story medical office building on a 2.63 acre prapez-ty identified on Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W 11 CB, Tax Lots 401 & 500, in the City of Central Point, Qregon; and WHEREAS, the property is currently zoned C-5, Thoroughfare Commercial and Transit Oriented Development {TOD} Cazx-idor General Commercial zoning district and the application is consistent with the permitted uses set forth in Title 17, Section 17.46.20 and Site Plan criteria of Section 17.72; WHEREAS, the project site is within the GS Thoroughfare Cozxzzxzercial and the Transit Oriented District Corz-idor (TOD}. Section 17.65.020{B} of the CPMC states "At the discretion of the applicant, a development application within the TOD corridor shall be subject to: (1}. The norzxzal base zone requirements as identified on the official zoning map and contained in this code;" The Applicant has elected to use the C-5 base zone requirements for this Site Plan review; WHEREAS, on l~ebruary 6, 2007, at a duly noticed public hearing, the City of Central Paint Planning Commission considered the Applicants request for a Site Plan; and WHEREAS, after duly considering the Applicants request, it is the Planning Coznmissian's determination that the Application does comply with the applicable standards, criteria az~d subject to compliance with conditions as set forth in the Planning Department Staff Report (Exhibit "A") dated February 6, 2007; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission. City of Central Point, Oregon by this Resolution No. "115 hereby approves the Application based on the findings and conditions of approval as stated in Exhibit "A", the Planning Department Staff Repoz-t dated February 6, 2007 which includes attachments, attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. Planning Commission Resolution Na. 1 ~~ (216/2007) P:~SSEI3 br the Planning Commission. and si~;neci y mc; in authentication of its ~assa~;e this ~ day ofFcbruary, 20~J'7. ATTEST: City Rcpresentdta ~, Approved by me this T'lanning Commission Resolution No "day of Februarys 2tJ07 ,~ _ _ i'lanni~x;~ COWJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . i, ~,~ ~ l ~ ~.~ir ".~ - (2/Gf2f707~ ~~ i~~I 1 i s!Sj; e^_~_~1 ~`'tY ~. ,~'..: is ~..!, r o S.t~~/VF~~r „, .... M.....~. _... .... ._.... ._ _.. G(ai~sid~.i°atioi~ (11 L~ `~~it4' )~lai~ a~vic~r~ lt~i~ ll~c~ ~~~I~str-a~ci.ia~it c~I. :~~,QC1O ~.>c)Ii.~rr (<~u~, (~.~~~1~-ht~ir~ rli~°(~i{:<cl (~f~i~~cc~. I~si?ilc3inrt ic~r..;~atec <zi F"l() I~'rc?Iat ~ir<°c:i, I Inc j1+<Ijici ~;it~° a;; r(l;~Iatiii~tl i~i~ ih~ J~~.~:I;~,~1~~ (`"r>i~~j~l~ ~~_s5ti;ssc>r~ ~~ ~~~~~~~ <~~, ~ I`~ ~~' 11€.`.H. 1 ~r'~ I ~~1~; ~tt)1 ~aMacl '~>U{). I~i~(~ ;~7r(~li,°1-i~ 1~; 1(~criii,(I ~~~~ihar~ sa (`--~, "l~h(~I~oi_~gh~fa.ru C~o,r~tri~_ ~~ri~_,l ^s~;~ ~"~,.j~~,i; ~}r~it~ilti~tl I.~~>,~,>1~~~7yiit°~~t {'"1 O1'~1 ~ ~;;~~i~i~)(~r 4 ~~~ru~,<~I C.~4>r~~ai~cx'c:,i~~ ,~~~i~k~~~+s:a~~, I'l ,~ ~ . __.ti_`:IL._J_L~~~_~ tl ~ ®L. ~ I I i P'~'f ~~~ ,I )l' 1.'_ F ®~ _.0111114 ~:~l1ii~'. ~~01'7it71Uilt1~' ~~!~!~,~ i..~ L_~~, (~j l~a ~.~ PxfJ\%1de~1C{:- ~1C;~~ltJ1 `"~1SL~.C13-~i:~ ~7(~L1IS ]`)It)hOSll~ ,]s~~ ~ ,~;r:iri_ir_'itt~llCM~a iYl~.(itt,~l.l 0i)1Gt' i)Lli){iii ', t~~ii .~~ acres ~Ta~ 1_Jots ~~Ul ~~ _`{)0? to Inc loci;tc(1 ciil tll~ `~~'c~~>~sicl(~ l`.uimber . site ~t r7t) l i~oili ~tr~~~t f;~~iirl~«~~~ 9f;), 'I I~(~ ~~rvijo~;~cl I~~cilii~~ ~~ll t~~ , . . Ct"lilslst <~9~a t~5,~~-store. ~2.O{)O sgi.iar~. f<~(~a halil(3ir~~~~ l'arhail~ a1ICl ~~ ~ ,~'^. loa(lila~ ~l~z~rlC~'. far°1_;_irl~~, stalls a11Ci 0110 1(~a~)illr h~~~~~ ~~,(~I111~71~,~ ~,~i~h ~ ~~~° ~. ~tlae code regtur~clll_erlt c,~ ~c-c~iiai~ 1. f.t~~1~~.G1~iQ llrl ~}. i'l~o~ide~.cc ~~iii ~. . als() )7LiI'~'Ilas(: ~ «~ ),()lti t>f)() ~': '7(~}{,i LCD it~e. ~L.'Lltll tJ~ ti1G ~7r0()05t'~ ~ M l ~)I'OJt'C'! sYt~ 101- lillU 't; t::y;.~}ai1s~(371. TJlc stal7ject sii(, leas existil3i~ stl-uctul-c,s ~~.ssca(~iatcJci ~,~'itli tllc; la~mber ` e,„ l~ti~iiic'ss. "I'h~-.,c° str'uctlix(~:~; t~iiJ tlc~ cierilolishcr~ ~;~; llai°t of tllc site ° hr~har<aiioils. V4~'ith the i~~ccpti(arl oa~storill c~r~ail7a~t;, all otllel~ '~~~ utilities arc. availahi.c; aid adequate itl size a11c1 capacity co serve the ~ i7t'(?jcct. 'l~hc~ pzol7c~sal in~ill hay>e 017e full-I1loveillei~t drivewa~~ fl~c~tn ~~` ,~ §~ ~M 1~1~(~l~it ~tr-cet (l-Jv~~~ 9~)z thus elit-~~l~~~titig cir~e of thy; two curret~C `,~' .~,~` ,. access f~oitats. ~ ~. ~ "~~ ~ ~ ". .~ This 151'ojec~t site is v,rilhgar t1~c~ ~-~~ Tl~{~rougllfai•e ~ommereial a~ld ~~' ~ ~'~ ~"~:< 117c: 1,1-aiksit f)I~icllted District (~~€.~~'j C'c~rridol°. `~ectian 1'7,6,5.024(Pj ai:'the, Ci'i`~~C~', states, `4r'`~tthe ~1is~t°etioi~ (~~'~ t~hc a~shlicai_~t, ~. deg%c l.ol7t~~ct~t ahhlicatioi~ within the TC)1 c~~i~r~id~oi~ sh~~li 1~e :~t~~,jcct ~tc~: 1, The txorr~la~ h~~sc ~.oile 1"°e~uir°ua~t,ents ~i.<~ i~eiltificd oal tl~l(~ ofEieia~t Q211I7~ ~~ah aild contaitlcre3 iza_ ~I~zs c(xle; ~r ~. The T(~D col-ri_cac~r° rc;quii•cl~ierits corltaiilcd iil tl~ti5 chap~ter~'~ The /~,}~plicarit t~a~, (~tcc ccl to rase ~tlae ~-5 bye gone r(~gtzire~~~7_ei~~ts foh this ;~it~,. Mall ~°cwi~w. Page 1 c'<f 4 The two-story building is thirty five {35} feet high in compliance with the C-S height regulations, Section 17.46.040. Rooftop mechanical equipment is approximately 7.5 feet and will be screened by a louvered metal screen sa that views of the equipment are obscured on all elevations. The rooftop mechanical equipment ar screening is not required to be included in the calculation of building height by definition, Section 17.08. During preliminary discussion with Providence representatives, landscape and `hardscape' revisions were suggested along Front Street to visually draw the building closer to Front Street and to provide for pedestrian access in accordance with TOD Corridor standards. In addition, Front Street (I~iighway 99) is classified as a Major Arterial Street and as such the street tree provisions of CPMC Section 12.36.100 apply to this application. Five (5} additional street trees and suggested redesign features have been implemented as shown on the landscape plan, (refer to Applicant Exhibit Sheet L 1. l ). The Site Plan application includes architectural elevations, parking and landscape plans (Attachments B and C} and a traffic analysis far the proposed praj ect. The Providence Health & Services Traffic .Impact Analysis, November 30, 204b, found that all mobility standards are met or exceeded and no proposed mitigation measures are required far this development. The City Public Works Department reviewed this report and is in agreement with the conclusion. Internal circulation is provided by a two-way drive aisle that circumnavigates the building, providing continuous internal circulation. Providence will also provide two (2) cross-access easements to adjacent properties on the north {tax lot 400) and the Providence awned tax lots to the south of the project site. Providence has requested that the cross-access easements be granted with the understanding that they will be developed later and that Providence will be allowed to control its an-site parking. Each cross_access easement will ultimately eliminate three parking spaces per easement. The Site Plan shows 162 parking spaces and a minimum of 160 parking space is a requirement of Section 17.64.040 H(2}. The additional four (4} spaces can be generated by the use of compact car parking spaces as described in Section 17.64.070. Parking spaces can also be added as a part of a future Providence expansion to the south (Tax 600). On Thursday, December 7, 2006 Providence held a community meeting to introduce the project and to answer questions raised by residents and business owners in the vicinity. The project design and scope, hours of operation, landscape plan and access were the general topics discussed. The project has been well received by adjoining property owners. FINDINGS: Refer to Attachment "H". ISSUES: 1. Providence has agreed to provide two cross-access easements to enhance internal circulation and public safety. While they agree, they have also expressed concern that any future restaurant and pharmacy uses may infringe on the medical practice and patient parking. Staff's recommended conditions of approval allow Providence to draft easement language that will enable the applicant to manage this concern (see Condition of Approval No. 1 a & b). Page 2 of 4 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: _. __. 1. Applicant shall prepare and record two cross-access easements as follows: a. A reciprocal cross-access easement along the north property line (Tax Lot 400) which, is not intended as shared parking. Said easement will become effective at such time as Tax Lot 440 reciprocates with across-access easement. The easement shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to recordation with the Jackson County Clerk and building permit approval. At the discretion of the applicant, the cross-access easement may restrict access from restaurant and pharmacy uses on adjacent property. b. The second reciprocal cross-access easement for property to the south {Tax Lot 600), also owned by Providence, is to become effective at such time Tax Lot 600 reciprocates with a crass-access easement. The easement shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to recordation with the Jackson County Clerk and building permit approval. At the discretion of the applicant, the cross-access easement may restrict access from restaurant and pharmacy uses on adjacent property. 2. The Applicant shall submit a site plan diagram indicating the two future crass-access easements and a revised parking plan to illustrate all of the required parking spaces for the medical off ce building prior to building permit approval. 3. Consolidation of Tax Lots 401 and 500 will be done prior to approval of any building permits. 4. Conditions as listed by the Central Point Public Works Department {Attachment D}, Rogue Valley Sewer Services (Attachment E), Fire District 3 (Attachment F}, and the Central Point Building Department (Attachment G}. 5. The Applicant shall submit lighting and signage plans prior to building permit approval Said plans shall be consistent with the provisions of CPMC Sections 15.24; 17.60.110 and 17.67.050{M). 6. Site Plan Approval shall lapse and become void one year following the date on which it becomes effective. ATTACHMENTSIEXHIBITS: Attachment "A"- Aerial and site photographs Attachment "B"- Providence Health System Project Narrative and Response Attachment "C"- Site Plan Map/Landscape P1anlElevations Attachment "D"- Public Works Staff Report Revised Attachment "E"- RVSS Coanments Attachment "F"- Fire District No. 3 Review Attachment "G"- Building Department Staff Report Attachment "H"- Findings Attachment "I"- Proposed Resolution Page 3 of 4 ACTION: Consideration to approve, approve with conditions, ar deny a Site Plan application for Providence Health System -Oregon medical office building. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution ,conditionally approving the Site Plan far Providence Health System - Oregon medical office building. Page 4 of 4 ca rx P 1 t~) ~" t' 1fi r~ [' f ~G ~ 1C q~ Itt ~'~ ~~AC H ~ ANT ".~,,,~ BEFORE Ti-iE CENTI7AL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION In Ilse Matter of tl>Ie Site Plan IZevic~cv ) ApPlicatiai~ icy Pravide~ice Iiealtli ) System- Or•ego>Ii far Apl3rovai of a ) Medical Office I3uildi~t~; i~~ the C-5 ) Za~ting District ) APPLICANT'S RIaSPONSE TO AI'PLICAI3LE APPROVAL CRITERIA I. DESCRIPTION OF SITE PLAN REVIEW PROPOSAL Providence Health System - O€•egon ("Providence"} is €~equesting Site flan Review approval for a proposed 32,000 square foot, two {2) story €nedical office building ("MOB"} [ocated at 8701880 Front Street (Oregon Ilighway 99} in Central Poi€~t, Oregon (the "site"). (Exhibit I., Aerial) The MOB will provide for general medicine, diagnostic imaging, MRI, rehabilitation sez•viccs and a laboratory. It will e€npIoy a total of 12 doctors and 59 staff. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS Site Descri tiara. Ownerslu ar~d Current Use. The 2.b3-acre site comprises two {2) tax lots, 372WI 1 Cl3 TLs 40l a€~d 500. These lots form a rectangular site that lies in a northwest to southeast orientation along I=ront Street. {Exhibit 2, Survey) The existing buildings o€~ the site will be razed. 2. Vicinit•- azad Surrounding Uses. As shown in the Vicinity Map inset of 1/xhibit 1, the site is located on Front Street on the west side of the City. Suz•roiznding uses include asingle-family subdivision to the noz-theast, a battery sales warehouse to the southeast, and a retail center and drive-through coffee stand to the €IOrthwest. Front Street separates the site fi•orn uses to the west. A vacated public street with a 20-foot wide sanitary and storm sewer easement separates the site from the single family homes to the east, Lanin~. The site has two zoning districts, the Thoroughfare Commercial Zone {C-S) and tl7e Central I?oint Transit Oriented District (TOD}, The C-5 zane is the base zo€Ze for the area. 1#s purpose is "to provide for corz~mercial and business uses that are most appropriately located alozag ar near major highways or thoroughfares, and are largely dependent upan highway visibility and eas}7 vehicular access." The TOD's purpose is "to promote ef~cie€at and sustainable land development and the increased use of transit as required by the Urcgon Transpoz-tatio€~ Plannizxg Rule." A development application ~vitliin the 'I'OD coz~ridor can choose either the base zone requirements or the TOD zoning requirements. Central Point Zoning Ordinance {"CPZO"} 3SCa38-UU281I.,I;CiAt.i 1932772.1 17.65.020. Pravide~lce has elected to use tlzc C-5 bast o~ac rcquircn~cnis but wllez•evcr feasible has designed the MOB to pro~l~ate tine efficient and sustatnahlc land development practices advocated in the TOD dist~•ict. 4. Tz-ans~~artatiall [facilities. The site has fi•antage on and access to Orego~z I-Iigl~~vay 9q, a four-lane zx~ajor arterial under the jurisdictia~l of Central Poi~zt. 'l~he closest ~xzaja€~ i:ltez-scctiozis to the site are Pinc Street (4 lanes) and Beall Lane (two lanes), bath of which aec minor arterials. 5. Utilities and Public Services. The site is fizlly served by public azad private utilities iz~cludi~zg water, sewer, power, and natuz-aI gas, and is within established fire azxl police service areas. i<)T. PROPOSED L15E Site Design. As shown on the site plan in Exhibit 3, Sheei A1.0, the MOB has been located in the center of the site, in eazzlpiiance with the setback requirements of fhe C-S zone. This location provides for an even distribution of parking around the site, thus nziniznizing walking distances to the building, an important consideration for medical facilities. Access to the site is franc Fz-ont Street at a single full-movement access point located on the south end of the developzxzent. This access point provides for one lane into the site and separate left and right turn exit lanes. Once an site, vehicular circulation is lrovided by a two-way drive-aisle that circumnavigates the building, providing for continuous circulation. Providence will also provide two (2) crass access casements to adjacent properties to the north and south of the site. For the property to the north, tax lot 400, a cross access easement will be granted at the northeast comer of the Providence site, subject to this property being approved for a use consistent with the medical office use and parking requirements. The second cz-ass access easement will be provided on the south side of the site to tax lot b00 which is also in Providence's ownership. 2. BLZildiiz Design. The 32,000 square foot, two-story building is 35' high in compliance with the C-5 rrzaximuzxz height. Rooftop zrzcchanical equipment, which is z~at subject to the 35' height limitation, is approximately 7.S' high and will be screened by a louvered metal screen so that vie~~~s of the equipment are obscured on all elevations. (Exhibit 4, SI€eef A1.1) As illustrated in the elevations depicted an Exhibit 5, Sheet A4.i and Exlxibit G, Sheet A4.2, the building is of a canteznporary design that combines traditional azld modern materials. The extez-ior consists of bz-ushed silver znctal panels and tan colored pre-cast concrete, caznplen~ented by the generous use of traditional red brick. Brushed silver znctal 3$G3$-Oo2$~1.~GAI.I 1932772.1 -2- panels are also used far screening rooftop n~ecl~a7zical equilm~ent. Window design consists czf an alurninuzrz/glass storef~•oz-zt system with brushed silvcr• frazzzes arzd light-br~aw€z glared glass. 'I'he two-story n~aizz entrance uses ligllter~ colored glared glass wlzicll lzr•ovidcs foz- greater visibility izzto the public entrance where it is apprc>priatc, unlike privacy concerns irz other pars of the building. (Exhibit 7, Color copy pf 11'tat.e~•ials 113oa~•d} Parkins, and I.,aadin~. The site provides for 3 G2 parking spaces, six {G} of which are accessible to those with disabilities, This ar2~aunt of` parking meets the rzziztimun~z requirerxzent of i GO spaces for the 32,000 square foot MOB based an tl~e parking n~inimuna far zz~eciical offices of one: space per two hundred square feet of floor area. One (1) loading berth is provided in the reaz- of the building in compliance with the requiren~czat for one bez•tli far buildings of 30,x()0 to i a0,a0a square feet. The berth's dimensions are 17'-G" x 33'-a, exceeding the nzinimuzn size requirements. {Extzibit 3, Sheet A1.Q) 4. Pedestz•ian Facilities. The building and its main entrance are oriented toward Front Street, where an ample pedestrian zone is provided between the sidewalk and the main entrance. This pedestrian zany includes a marked crosswalk constructed of textured concrete within a largez• area of stamped asphalt that helps to differentiate this area fi-on~ general circulation and highlight the building entry. The sidewalk an Front~Street adjacent to the izztez-nal crosswalk has been wider-red and the pedestrian entry point into the site demarcated by low concrete walls and planters that provide an attractive pedestrian entrance. Once on site, an internal five-foot (5') walk4vay surrouzads the building, providing for continuous pedestrian connectivity to and arouzzd the building. {Exhibit 3, Sheet A1.0) 5. Landscaping and Fencing. The landscaping plan provides for 29,969 square feet of site area to be landscaped, far a total of 2G% of tl~e site. The C-5 zone does not require a minimum amount of landscaping. As showza in Ex[ribit S, Sheet L1.1, landscaping is pro~fided in three distinct areas: around the perimeter of the site, adjacent to the building and at key vehicular and pedestrian entry points. The planting list can be found an Exhibit 9, Sheet L1.2 Perimeter landscaping along Front Street consists of ground cover and low, two-three feat tall shrubs. Tl1is creates open visual access to the site from the street, while framing the site. Landscaping at the rear, adjacent to the residential area, has been designed to be sensitive to the Heads of the residences by creating an approximately 18-foot deep strip, adjacent to the existing six-foot high concrete wall. This strip makes use of an evergreen hedge, a mix of deciduous trees and base planting that includes foundation plants ranging in height from ground cover to four-feet. Landscaping on the north and south property lines is designed to aid in the screening of adjacent uses by adding new trees to the existing trees in conjunction with evergreen materials to maintain year-round landscaping. Additionally, the exterior of the trash enclosure will be landscaped to screen it from view from adjacent properties. 3$633-Op2~?€_TiC;AL€ l93?771_.I -3- Landscaping adjacent to the building illcltldes special treatment for the four corners cif the building with trees of Iarge canopies tk~at help balance and soften the building ol~ tl~c site. The initial planting will feature large calipez• trees for ilnlnc;clictte impact, Other planting adjacent to the building includes some tall trees with crowns it~tersperscci ~z ith foundation plantings that will znait~tain views frot-1~ the windows. Additionally, specimen plants «-ill be distributed throughout the planting beds fc~r seasonal il~ierest. Entries into the site, both vehicular and pedestrian, will E}e: given special laladscal~ing treatment to frame these entries and provide far a welcot~ling presence. `t'his treatment includes trees, raised planters and ]n•otnincnt plant materials that highlight these areas, ~vlai[e maintaining site lines. 6. I.si~l~ting and Signa~e. Lighting consists of cut-off site light fixtures at 18'-0" above fillishecl grade. Detailed lighting plans will be submitted at the tithe of development permits and will colnpfy ~~~idi all applicable lighting standards. No signage has bceli developed for the site yet; a signage plan ~~~ill also be submitted at a latex- date in cotnplialice with all applicable signage standards. 7. Transportation Impacts. A Traffic Irrtpact Analysis was conducted by JRI-I Transportation Engineering in accordance with the Cit}r's study z-equiz-ements. `I'he study is included as Appendix A and is incorporated by reference in its entirety. The report al~alyzed year 2008 baclcgrozlnd traffic wide the 32,000 square foot medical office building in place. Trip generation ~~vas calculated according to the ITE Trip Generation Manual 7"' ldition land use code 720 -Medical-Dental Office T3uilding. These trips were distributed and assigned to the surz•ounding traffic net~~,orlc during the I'cak I'M hour, which was deterlx~ined to be 4:15 I'M to 5:15 I'M. The stud}r demonstrates that for die year 2008, with the developn~zent in place, all movezrzents fi-anz the proposed project and the unsignalized intersection at Highway 99 and Cupp Drive will perform above the City's minimum mobility standards. Therefore, rzo mitigation is requiz-ed or proposed for this developn-tent. 38G3R-QU28/I.1wGAt.1 1932771_.1 -~- IV. RI+JSPONSE "TO APPLICAI3LX~ APPROVAL CRI'I'LRTA 1. The following approval critcz-ia of Title 17, "Zozzing" {tlze; "CPZO"), of the Central Point Municipal Code apply to this Site flan Izcview application: • Chapter 17.65 TOD Districts acid Corridors; Section 17.65.p20, Area of Application • Chapter 17.46 C-S, Thoroughfare Coznznercial District • Chapter 17.72 Site Plan, I~ac~dscaping and Constructio~~ Pla~z Appz-oval • Chapter I7.G4 Off-Street Parking a~zd Loading 2. CPZO CHAPTER 17.65, TOD DISTRICTS AND CORRIDORS 17.65.020, Area of applicatio~a. These regulations apply to the Central Point TOD district and corridor. The boundaries of these two areas are shown on the official city comprehensive plan and zoning maps. A. ~ A development application within the TOD district shall comply with the requirements of this chapter. B. At the discretion of the applicant, a development application within the TOD corridor shall be sub~cct to: 1. The normal base zone requireznezits as identified on the official zoning znap and contained in this code; or 2. The TOD corridor requirements contained in this chapter. RESPONSE: Providence has elected to use the Thoroughfare Coznznercial District, base zone requirements for this Site Plan Review application. The TOD requirements do not apply. 3. CPZO CHAPTER 17.46, C-5, THOROUGIIP`ARE COMII~IERCIAL DISTRICT A. 17.46.020, Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted iz~ the C-5 district: "A. Professional and financial, includizlg: 1. Banks and sin3ilar financial institutions, 2. Real estate, insurance, and similar offices, 3. Contractor's office, 4. Medical services, clinics and laboratories." 3803&-0028?i.I~GA[,I 1932772.1 -5- RESPDNSE: The proposal medical of'fzce l~uilcling is a pcr~nittecl use iii the C~;-5 district. I3, >17.4G.040, Heinizt reg~z[atiozzs. "No buildi~lg or structure shall exceed thirty-live (3S} feet in height iza the C-5 district." RESPONSE: The height of the building to the top of the parapet is 35' lcet i~z compliance with this standard. hoof top utilities, which arc not subject to tltc height nzeasureznent, are 7.5' tall and will be screetzed. C. 17.46.05Q, Area, tivicltlx acid yat•cl requirezzietzts. a.: "Lot Area. No recluireznez~-ts except as necessary to comply with applicable }card and parking and loading recluiz-eznents." RESPONSE: The site size is 2.G3 acres which accommodates the building anti all yard, parking and loading requirezncnts as deznonstratecl izi the responses to the further requirezncnts of this section and Clzaptcr 17.G4Ofif-Street Parking and Loading. b. "Lot Width. The zninin~um lot width shall be fzfty feet." RESPONSE: The site, coznpriscd of tax lots 401 atzd 500, is approximately 400' wide. This standard is met. c. "Lot Depth, The minimum lot depth shall be one hundred feet." RESPONSE: The site is approximately 300' deep. This standard is zxzet. d. "Front Yard. The frozat yard shall be a minimum often feet and shall be maintained as landscaped open space. When off--street parking is located in the front yard area, the landscaped strip Wray be reduced to not less than six feet with plazuzing commission approval of the site plan." RESPONSE: The front yard setback is approximately SO' deep. The proposed site plan provides for a S'-G" Iandscape strip for a portion of this front yard setback, slightly less than the six (G} foot depth. '1~lze landscape plan pro rides for four (4) additional areas of landscaping along this front yard setback in depths of over 20 feet, well in excess of the six-foot (G') miniznuzn depth. Tlie Iandscaping requiz-ement within the fiont yard setback is znet. e. "Side Yard. The side yard shall be a n~inizxzum of five feet, except when abutting stz-uctures are proposed far a connnon wall that coznplics with die Uniform Building Code." 38G38-0028/i,1~GAi.I 1932772. l -{)- RESPONSE: The setback on bot11 sick yards is app~~axi~nately 1(?5' deep. This standard is met. f. "Rear Yard. No roar yard shall be required in tl~e G5 district except when the rear lot line abuts property izz a residential (R) district a~~d tl~e~~ the rear yard shall be a zxzi~~izxzuzm of twenty Feet. Where property in the. C-5 district is separated from i~rope~•ty in a residential (R} district by a public alley or street, no rear yard setback sl3all be required." RESPONSE: The rear setback is approxiz~iately 11`7' deep, in excess of the miniilzu~m 20' setback from adjacent residential pz~operty. This standard is nlet. g. "Lot Coveraf;e. No requirements except as necessary to comply with applicable yard, parking and loading requiren~ezits." RESPONSE: The proposal con-zplies with all applicable yard, parking and loading requirezrzents as documented in these findings. 'I'bis standard is z~lct. D. 17.46.060, GeYieral Y•egr~ii•ert~e~its. a. "Uses that are normally permitted in the C-5 district but that are referz-ed to the planning conu~ziission for further review, per Section 17:16.030(26), will be processed according to application procedures far conditional use perrrlits. No use shall be permitted and no process, equipment or materials shall be used which are found by the plazu~ing commission to be haz-zrzful to persons living oz- working in the vicinity by reason of odor, fi~zmes, dust, smoke, cinders, dirt, ref~zse, water-carried waste, noise, vibration, illuzrzination or glare, or are found to invotve a~ly hazard of fire or explosion." RESPONSE: The application will be heard by the Plarrziing Commission as a Site flan Review, not as a Conditional Use. No harmful odors, dust, smoke, cinders, diz-t, refuse, water-carried waste, Horse, vibration, illurrzination or glare will result froze this use. Garbage will be contained within a brick-faced enclosure. Deliveries will be accoanmodatcd in tho desigzlated loading space adjacent to the buildizxg, set back over 65' from the adjacent residential area. Normal delivery and garbage pick-up schedules will be observed. Lighting will be designed so that there is no spill--over onto adjacent uses. There are no known hazards of fire or explosion. This standard is net. b. "No use shall be permitted and no process, equipment or zzaaterials shall be used unless in coimpliancc with all applicable state and federal environzmental, health and safety regulations." R~'.s'SPONSE: This proposal can or will con~.ply with all applicable state and federal environzmental, health and safety regulations. This standard is imet. c. "Wherever the side or rear property lines of a parcel in the C-5 district abut parcels in a residential {R} district, a solid wall or fence; vine-covered 38638-OU28ILlCi~tL11932772. [ -7- open fence or caznpact cvergreezz hedge six feet in height shall be located o~~ that property line and continuously maintained to ezasuz-c effective buffering and visual scrceni~zg between tlzc f~vo lazzd uses. Where a public alley o~- street separates the two properties, the barrier or scz-ecn shat[ be placed oaz the C-S property at the time of eonsirtzctioz3 tznd nay izzclude driveway and 1~edestria~z openings to the alley or street, as appra~rcd by tl~e planning camn3issiazz." RESPOIITSE: An existing six-foot {G} high CMU fence alozag the rea~~ praperry line adjacent to the residential area will be retained. Additiozzally, a 13'-6" wide landscape strip with trees will be plazzteci next to the ~~~a11, providing nzo~•c buffcri~lg and visual screening. This standard is n~ct. d. "Whenever feasible, buildings shall be located toward the rear of the tat with parking toward tlae street in the front yard- area far easy access and to zxziilimize traffic raise at the roar of the property, especially when the z-eaz- property line abuts a residential {R) district." R.~SPONSE: The building is set back 116'-7" franc the adjacent z•eside3ztial area, greatly exceeding the 20' zniniznun-z rear setback. Parking and circulation are distributed around the building, thus dispersing traffzc noise around the site and reducing izxzpacts on the residezztial area. This standard is znet. E. 17.4~.0'~0, Signs acid lightiztag of ~rentises. a. "No illuzninatian sign or lighting standard far the illuzninatian of premises shall lie so designed and izlstalled that its direct rays are toward or parallel to a public street or highway or directed toward any prapez-ly that lies within a residential {R) district." RESPONSE: Alighting plan will be submitted at the tinge of building permit review and will meet this requirement. On-site lighting will consist ofcut-off site light fixtures located at l8'-0" above finished fn-ade which will avoid spill-over onto adjacent properties and public rights-of way. b. "No red, green oz- amber lights or illuminated signs may be placed in such a location or position that they could be confused with, or niay interfere with, any offzcial traffzc control device, traffzc signal or diz-ectional guide signs." RESPONSE: No green or amber lights or illuminated signs will be placed iz~ locations that result in confizsian uritlz or iz~terfere~lce wit11 office traffzc contra} sigzlals. c. "Signs in the C-S district shall be pe;z-znitted and designed in accordance with Chapter 15.24 and with Section I7.60.110." RESPONSE: A signage plan will be submitted at a later date in accordazlee with the provisions of Chapter 15.24 and Section 17.60.110. ~s~3a-~nas,z.rcnz.~ i~3z;~z.i -8- p`. 17.46.080, Off street lrar-l:irrg. "Off-street paz-king and loading space sha[1 be provided as required i€1 Chaptez- 17.64." RESPONSE': Off street parking and leading has bee€i provided in accorclancc with the criteria of Chapter 17.64 as provided i€1 the responses to that Chapter dez~ronstrated in the findings fc}r that Chapter. This standard is n1et. 4. CPZO CIIAPT>CR 17.72, SITE PLAN, LANDSCAI'1NG AND CONSTRUCTION PLAN APPROVAL A. 17.72.010, Purpose. The puzpose of site plan, landscaping and constz~zctian pla€r appz-oval into c•eview the site and landscaping plans of the pz•opased use, structure or building to cletcrmine co€npliance with this title and the building code, and to prozxzote the arderly a€zd lzaz-€nonious development of the city, the stability of land values and investments, and the general welfare, and to promote aesthetic cozrsidez•ations, and to help prevent iznpairnaent or depreciation of Iand values and development by the erection of st€-uctures or additions to alterations thereto without proper attention to site planning, landscaping and the aesthetic acceptability in relation to the devclopznent of neighboring properties. RESPONSE: This applicatiaz3 provides the necessazy infor€natiori by which the City can make a determination that proper attention has bee€a paid to site pIa€uling, landscaping and the aesthetics of the project in compliance ~vith the applicable standards. made: B. 17.72.020, Site plan approval r•egrrireci. A site plan application canforrnizxg to the requirements of Section 17.72.030 shall be 1. For all construction;` requiring issuance of abuilding pez-znit; or 2. Upon a change of use. RESPONSE: The medical office building is a change of use for which a building perz~ziit will be required. C. 17.72.021, Applicatio;r acrd revieFV. Applications shall be accompanied by a fee defined in the city's adopted planning application fee schedule. Such applications and the review thereof shall cozlfaz~n to tl~e provisions of Chapter 17.05 and alI applicable laws of the state. RESPONSE: The fee for Site Pla€~ Review before the ):'lazuiing Commission has been submitted with tlzis application. 38638-04281I.1rGAt.i 1932772.1 -~- D. I7.72.034, I~~fay~tyafiion e•alui~•ecl. "Azl application shall be filed which shall include the following inftar~rratiorx: A. Narne arzcl address of tl~e applicant; 1.3. Statezncnt that the applicant is the o~~~r~cr of the property or is the authorized agent of the owner; C. Address and legal description of the assessor's parcel r~utlzbcr of the property; D. Tl7e application, shall include; an accurate scale drawing of the site, containing, at a nnirlirt~unn, the following: 1. North arrow, . 2. Scale used, 3. Address and legal clescripticzri ofthc assessor`s parcel nuz~~ber and tai lot of the property, 4. Lat dinzcnsians, 5. Applicable city zoning designation, 6. Setbacks, '1. Proposed larndscaping, 8. Location of all buildings, parking areas; streets, accesses, ~ diznensions sidewalks, and othez• izxnpr•ovezi~ents, including the~ of each, 9. Ground and az-chitectural elevations, 10. Distances between buildings, parking areas, streets, sidewalks and other inlpravemcnts, 1 1. Surrounding land uses, 12. Easernezrts, 13. Adjacent streets, 14. Off-street parking calculations, 15. Existing trees, l~. Pedestrian ratites and sidewalks, 17. li encing, 18. Screening of outdoor tz-ash bins, and 19. The location of all public irrzprovennents and all utilities, izzcludirrg theiz• relation to otllez- utilities in the area; E. Construction plans and such other plans and information as are requiz•ed to sho~xr the architecture of all buildings and other improvements; F. 1n the discretion of the city, a traffnc study performed by a licensed professional engineer; and G. Such additional information as is necessary to caz7•y out the purposes of this chapter." 38f 38-on2~~T.rGnr_I ~ 9?2772. i " ~ ~~ RESPONSE: All required inforznatioz~ for this al~lilict~ticm as listed above has been provided. This includes an application foz•zn, lcga[ description, lettez• of a~ithoz-iration, mailing labels to all properties within I Ofl' of tl~e site, a narrative demcn~strating compliance with. applicable standards, site; plan, elevations, landscape plan, matcz•ials board and traffic impact study. E. 17.72.Q40, Sta;>IClarcls. In approving, conditionally approving, or cienyiz~g the plans submitted, the city shall base their decision on the following sta~~daz-ds: a. "Landscaping and fencing and the construction of walls on the site in such a manner as to cause the same to not substantially interfere with the landscaping schczne of the neighborhood, anti in such a manner as to use t11e 'same to screen such activities ants sights as might be heterogeneous to existing neighborhood uses. The pla~u~ing commission may require the maintaining of existing trees for screet~iz~g purposes and for sound and sight insulation from existing neighborhood use;°` RPSPONSE: Landscaping, fencing and screening have been designed to screen the building from the adjacent residential area. An existing six-foot (6'} high CMU fence along the rear property line adjacent to the residential area will be retained. Additionally; a 19'-6" wide landscape strip with trees will be planted next to. the wall, providing snore buffering and visual screez7iaig. Rooftop mechanical ecluipznent will be screezted from view by surrounding uses. This standard is rnet. b. "Design, nuz~zber and location of ingress and egress points so as to improve and to avoid interference with the traffic flow on public streets;" RESPOME: Two existing access points will be consolidated into one full- moveznent access located at the southern end of the site, thereby improving upon traffic flow onto Front Street. This standard is met. Additionally, the city has requested that Providence consider providing access easements from its parking lot to the adjacent lot to the north izx the event of redevelopment. Provide~ice will agree to provide one cz-oss-access easement providing the Planning Coznn~ission includes two conditions of approval: That the easement shall become effective with the grant of a zeciprocal cz-oss- access easement by the adjacent property, and • That Providence shall have the right not to provide the reciprocal cross-access easement in the event it disapproves of the use or the amount of paz-king provided for the proposed use. Providence agrees with the city that in some instances, cross-access easements would be helpful to further the flow of traffic off the highway. However, Providence has long experience operating medical office buildings. Because of the high demand for 3863&-0028/LEG~1.11932772.1 -] ] - parking, competing pal-king uses have all adverse in7j}act on Providence facll]tles. I11 the event the Site to the llOrth is 1"L'dCVC}Ol}e{i and a ~}al'lClllg-111tC:nslv{; lIS{; is prapased, Providence wisixes to reserve the 1•ight to prohibit across-access caselxlellt ill order to prevent that use's parking fi-orlx }}arkilxg all 1rovidence }}roperty. c. "To proviclcnff-street parking and loaclizlg facilities and pedestrian and vehicle f1o~v facilities ill sucix a zxxanner as is colxxpz1ti17Ie witlx the use for which the site is prol7osed to 1}e used and capable of use, alld ill such a ]xlallner as to izl-lI}rove alx{l avoid interference with the traffic flow c}lx public streets." RES~'ONSL: Adequate parking alld loading facilities lxave bee€1 provided and distributed on site in a luanlxer tlxat prollxotes internal eirculatiatl via tlxe two-way aisle that circulxxlxavigates the building. This allows for all ilxtclxxal circulationx to be accozrzznodated all-site without need of reentering I~z-ollt Avelxlle. Pe{lestriazl flow is aclxieved by the gelxerous pedestrian colxlxectiozx frozxl front Sti-ect to tale buildiixg's main entrance, to wlxez•e tlxis cozlnection zxxeets a live-foot (5') internal walkway around the building. This standard is zxxet. d. "Signs and otlxer outdoor advertising strictures to ensure that they do not conflict with or deter froth traffic control sighs ar devices and that they are compatible with the design of their buildings or uses alxci will lxot interfere with or detract froze the appearance or visibility of nearby sigzxs;" RESPONSE: Sigzxage will be designed so that it does not calxflict witlx traffic control signage or interfere or detract fz•ozlx nearby siglxage. e. "Accessibility and sufficiency of fiz-a fighting facilities to such a standard as to provide for the reasona171e safety of life, linxb alxd property, ilxcludillg, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads and fire lanes so tlxat all buildings on the premises are accessible to fire apparatus;" RESPONSE: Access and on-site circulation have been designed with adequate widths and accessibility so that fire apparatus calx reaclx the building. This standard is zx~et. f "Cozxxpliazxce with all city ordinances and z•cglllations, including Section 16.20.080 pertaining to the lxlaxizxzuzxl number ofsingle-falnify dwellings or dwelling units allowable on cul-de-sac streets, and applicable state laws;" RESPONSE: No d`velling units are proposed. Does not apply. g. "Compliance with such architecture and design standards as to provide aesthetic acceptability in relation to the neiglxbol-lxood and tllc Celxtral Poilxt area and its environs. The architecture and design characteristics of adjacent propez-ties or uses. In addition, the plalulizlg commission resel-ves the right to establish additional lxeight, setback, bufferilxg, or other clevcIoplxZelxt 38634-fl028/LSCiALI 1932?72.1 -12- requircrnents that may be necessary to ensure l~rnd i€sc colz~patibility alzd ensure the health, safety, allci privacy of Central Point residents." RESPONSE: As deznorzstrated irz the site l~lcuz, elevations, landscape plan, arlci materials board, the proposed medical building is aesthetically ploa5izag azzd can be found to be acceptable in relation to the neighborhood and the C'.c17tz'al Point area and its environs. 5. CPZO Chapter 17.04, OFI+-STR11L'I' PARKING ANll LOAI)IN{; A.. 17.G4A10, Pr~rpase. "The followizag z•egulations are. establisl3ed to provide far the off street paz-kizrg of automobiles, trucks and other vehicles in connection with the uses of Iand permitted by this zoning ordinance. Various land uses generate vehicular traffic according to (heir specific characteristics and z-egtriz-e differing amounts of off strec;t parking and loading area. T11ese requireznezzts will help to relieve on-street parking demand and traffic congestion by cnsurizzg adequate off street parking and loading facilities where they az-e nec;dcd most." RESPONSE: Parking and loading leave been designed in con~l~liance with the pur-l~ose of this Chapter. B. 17:64.020, Oi"f street loading. a. "ln all districts, except those specifically excepted and rioted, for each. use for which a building is to be erected or structurally altered to the extent of increasing the floor area to equal the minimum floor area required to provide loading space and which will require the receipt or distribution of materials or merchandise by truck or similar vehicle, there shall be provided off-street loading space on the basis of minimum requirerncnts, as follows:" 2. "Office buildings, Hotels, motels, hospitals, schools, izastitutions, public buildings, recreational or er~tertairunent facilities, and any similar use which has a gross floor area of thirty thousand square feet or more shall provide off street truck loading or unloading berths in accordance with the fallowing table:" Square Feet of Floor Area No. of Berths Reauireci Less than 5,000 0 30,000 to 100,000 100,001 and over 2 RESPONSE: The 32,000 square foot building requires one (l~ Ioading berth which is provided to the rear of the building. This standard is rnet. 3~C~3~-Qf12S?LfiGAL[ 1932772.1 -1 ~- b. "A loading berth shall not lac loss than ten feel wide, tlzi~-ty-rive feet long and have a lzeigllt clet-rance of twe;lvc feet. Where the vehicles generally used far loading and uzzloacling exceed these dizncnsio~zs, the required length of these berths shall be increased... RESPONSE: The loading berth is 17'-C" x 35' -0". `l"his standard is nlet. c. "If loading space ltas been l~roviclcd in co~~neciio~~ with an existing use or is added to an existing use, the loading space shall not be elin~inatcd if elin~inatian would z•esult i« less than is required to adequately meet the needs of the use." RESPONSE: The loading space is provided izz connection with a new use. Does not apply. d. "Off street parkicig areas used to fulfill the z•equirezz~ents of this title shall not be counted as rcquiz-ed loading spaces and shall not be used fo~• loading and unloading operations, except during periods of the day wlzezz not required to meet parking needs.,, R.L~SPONSE: The one {1}loading berth does not rely upon off street paz-king and is dedicated to loading only, q"his standard is znet. e. "In no case shall any ~ortioz~ of a street or alley be counted as a part of the required parking or loading space, and s~zch spaces shall be designed and located as to avoid undue interference with the public use of streets oz- alleys." RESPONSE: No poz-tion of any street ar alley is counted towards the parking oz- loading requirements. This standard is zxzet. C. 17.G4.030, Off-street lzarkiyig..~._Required. "In all districts, except those specifically excepted and Hated, izz connection with any use whatsoever, there shall be provided at the tizz~e any building oz- stz~zeture is erected ar is enlarged or increased in capacity oz• the use is changed or increased in intensity, off street parking spaces for autonlobilcs for the enlarged az- increased portion in tl~e case of aza addition or far the building, stzlzcture or use in athez- cases, in accordance with the z-cquirements herein." RESPONSE: Off street parkizzg is provided in accordance with the proposed change in use. This standard is naet. D. 17.64.040, Off-street pari~I~~;-Nuiz~I~e~• of spaces. "LJSE STANDARD office-1'rofessionaI 34b38-0028![,I:GAI,1 1932772.1 -1 q.- 2. Medical azrd dental offices; Not less tl3an tl3ree spaces per practitioner; plus clinics. o[~e space per each two eml~loyees, oJ-, o[ze space per each two huJZC1z-cd square feet of floor area, whichever is g[•cafce." R~CSPONSE: `1,lae 32,00 square foot building requires a [ni[3imu[3~ of 160 parkiztg spaces. The site plan provides for 1 G2 parking spaces. This staJZC3ard is J11Ct. E. 17.64.140, PaJrki~>t~; c~esil;rJl recluircJ>I~eJ;xts. a. "Size of Parking Spaces. The standard size for automobile parking spaces shall be nine feet i[1 width by twe€zty feet in le€~tgth. A compact oar parking space shall be eight feet in width by fifteen feet iz~ length, as provided zn Sect€on 1'1.61.070." . RIs"S'PONSE: All parking spaces are of the standard size, zzizze feet by twenty feet. This standard is met. b. "Parking Lot Aisles. The width ofparking lot aisles shall lie as illustrated in the diagz-a[rts entitled "Parking Standards," contaizzed in Ordinance 1512, and adopted by reference." I~SPONS-E: The parking lot aisles are consistent with City's parkizzg standard diagra.n~s. This standard is znet. c. "Access. There shall be adequate provisioz-t far ingz-ess and egz-ess to all parking spaces." RESPONSE: All parking spaces have direct access to two-way internal circulation aisles. This standard is znet. d. "Driveways. Driveway width shall be measured at the driveway's z~arz-owest point, including the curb cut. The design and constz-uction of driveways shall be as set forth in the Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction Manual." RL'Sl'ONSE: The proposed driveway width of 3C'-0" provides for three (3} 12--foot drive aisles in accordance with the referenced standard. This standard is znct. e. "lznprovement of Parking Spaces. 1. All areas utilized for off-street parking, access and nlaneuveriJ~g of vehicles shall be paved with durable materials for all-weather use and shall be adequately dz-ained, including prevention of the flow of i-ui~off water across sidewalks or other pedestria€~ az-eas." 34638-OD28/t~i?GALJ 1132772.3 -1 S- RESPOllrSE: The access, parki[~g and circulation aisles will be paved with a hard, durable surface and will be engineered with adequate drainage facilities to prevent the flow of runoff water across sidewalks anti other pedestrian areas. This standard is znet. 2. "Required parking areas shall be ciesigneci with painted striping or other approved method of delineating the individual spaces, with the exception of lots coz~tai[~ing single- or t~vo-family dwellings." RLSI'ONSE: Parking spaces will be clelincated by striped painting. This standard is zrzet. 3. "Parking spaces for uses other than one- and two-family dwellings shall be designed so that no backing rnoven~zents or other znaizeuvering within a street or other public right-of way sl~tall be necessary." RESPONSE: All parking spaces back into the intez-z~al drive aisles, not ozato a stz-eet oz- other publicright-ofway. This standard is znet. 4. "Any lighting used to illuminate off street parking or loading areas shall be so arranged as to reflect the light away from adjacent streets az- propezties." RESPONSE: A Iightizzg plan will be subzilitted at the time of building permit review and will meet this requirement. On-site lighting will consist of cut-off site light fixtures located at 18'-0" above finished grade which will avoid spill-over onto adjacent properties and public rights-of-way- 5. "~czvice drives shall have a rz~zinizxzun~ vision clearance az-ea farmed by the intersection of the driveway centerline, the street right-of way line, and a straight line joining the lines tlu-ough points~twenty feet from their intersection." R.LSP011'SL': The driveway centerline of the access drive at its intersection with Front Street provides for minin-zum vision clearance. Landscaping on either side of the driveway will consist oflow-growing vegetation that will z~ot izlterfere with zniniznuzn vision clearance. This standard is nzet. 6. "Parking spaces located along the other boundaries of a parking lot shall be contained by a curb ar a bumper rail so placed to prevent a motor vehicle from extending over an adjacent pz•opez-ty line, a public street, public sidewalk, or a requiz•ed landscaping area." RESPONSE: Curbs or bumper rails will be provided next to parking spaces located adjacent to other properties. `Phis standard is znet. 7. "Parking, loading, or vehicle maneuvering areas shall not be located within the front yard or side yard area of a corner lot abutting a street 33635-0023/Lr:.GA[.l 1932772 [ -1 ~?- in any residez--tial {R} district, zaoz- within a11y portion oi' a stz-cet setback area that is required to be landscaped in any conuncrcial {C) or industrial (M} district." RESPONSE: The front yard setback lronl liral~t Street is 10' per C-S requircnzellts 1'7.46.OSO.D. This setback is to be maintained as lalulscapecl opeli space, but may l}e reduced to a depth of six (6} feet whey off street parking is located in this frolic yard area. The proposed site plan provides fora 5'-6" landscape strip for a portion of ibis font yard setback, slightly less than the six {6} foot depth. ldowever, the landscape plan provides for four (4} additional areas of landscaping along this front yard setback in depths of over 20 feet, well in excess of tl~e six-foot {6'} millilnuzn depth. Therefore, on the whole, the landscaping requiz-eznent within the front yal-d setback is met. F. "Limitation an Use of):'arkii~g~Areas. Required parking areas sh~>11 be used exclusively far vehicle parking in conjunctidn ~~~ith a perzxzitted use and shall not be reduced ar encroached upon in any n-zalanez-. Tllc parking facilities shall be so designed and maintained as not to constitute a nuisance at any tine, and shall be used in such a manner that no hazard to persons or property, or unreasonable iznpediznent to traffic, will result." RESPQNSF_: The parking area will be used exclusively for the zr~edical office building and has been designed to provide for adequate parking spaces and circulation That will not result in a hazard to persons az- property, or unreasonable izripediments to traffic. This standard is zxzet. V. CONCLUSION For the reasons contained in this application, the applicant respectfully requests that the city approve this application. 3sG33-0~2s/LI:GAL11932772.1 -17- rxx~;<31Ts l::xhibit l: Aerial Exhibit 2: Survey Exhibit 3: Sheet A1.4 Exhibit 4: Sheet Al.l Exhibit 5: Sheet 114.1 Exhibit 6: Sheet A4.2 Exhibit 7: Colon copy of Materials Board Exhibit S: Sheet L1.1 Exhibit 9: Sheet L1.2 33638-Op28lLr:CrAL! 1432772.1 -~ ~'- '~~ ~~ ~ _~ r < 4~~;. f.'~~ .y. i{- t t<' .i. '~ 1 it "~, ° , - J i: , ti ' , _~ °1 "1-~.~iY~ r~ ~,wr Ro¢rrm Vs±tny ~owar fiervtca 5awtar L.4neav 4 ~..i ~~~ i - ~ i i.nk ~j ~~ 1 ~ ~~~ I I ~_f ~ ~ ~ ~T I I~ {i ~ _Y ~__ ., _ _ 1 ~ ~l ( "( 7 5 t ` ~ _ 1 j ~. - --` ~.~ , -- - - aM - .. „ >. _ ~,~ .. ~:a . , r { M JACSaN t~ x ~ r .. ~ `~~' r ~C~~7I~TY ~., ~ ,. `. :. " w ~'~r " T ~ ~~~ This ~ 98 based art a dr0asl datebaso ' ~ ~ ~ W, y .~ ~~ Y c W by Jacksao County From a variety . `4 ,'~ pYp "2 ° ~ ~"~~„~d of sources. ,7aaksan Gaunt canner aaaept E. i a y ° P ~~° '" responsll~ByBortarrore.amissians,ar . ° ~ .,Y: ~ ° :., .ar ..... ~ ®~ O pasitianal aaauraay. There era +w ,,~` °--~ -- ~... ~°"~ -~ warranties, expressed ar impifed. k`~~~' Pl,~nsti r,~:.4+U~+ n~ti~ ccr!~ra<1 ntgct9 yrarirr p:~par Created wNh MapMakar Map created arr 11t22120Qa 14:36.2A AM using wab.jacksancauoty org A.A1A X A .[ r ~.. 4 , N,4~.';5. r ar'1 t'c~Git`'I ~ ~~ i ~ ~ ~ ~i +}~ 3 s ~ i~. ~~ i ' ~q ~ ° I' 1YJ1"l7[tMAAIi(kiTECHMt)t 4ItSY i t ~,. i ] N9 P~kr l; , t~ ~ ; t ~ ~ ) hk 'RS ' ( 1I1 ~ i ~ ~ tr q ~'y e~~y,p r^~ n HP'~~t1rlR ltvrF i_' ('` "~ ~., 4 ) } ~ i ' ic 4 ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ . l ~rontCpLCntarY.~gand _ t t l ii ~ - ~ ~ ;~~~~~~ ~ ~s~` - 1 i` ~ U raxl~attxttiarws ~ j r ~ I~'" ~ r t 7+*t; ~ "I~j ~,r q, ` ~ Hrx: Tnx Lot t~rritwrs Collar -..... _ ,.:..„_._ _ Aari,al f'iwtars 2405 R _.J _ _ ~~ S ,1]9610' C 5x5.1 ~'-~ • mart t t' iY-Y oa. w °°' ' 9 __x-_. RT f- ~~~ ~ -~~ ~ sae..•v~ --~i." ~ e~ yd l ~~° ~ ww~ -.119P \9+q __ .. ... ~ nin: >x~ ~~. d w I ow ~~ 5 ' __ ~ 6 usw. N,¢ ~. 'SL I i1 ti"~: ' ~ ,y R_ a;p ~ ~ ---- ~- R ,orµ fro. n, 4 i1 o, y , .7 c. £ v £~ C' I . a '~ ° 5 w .. ~ " ~ ~C ~ pAOOS ~ 4 o ~ ~ ~ut ~1 W 1 ~ A.. m 6 s.. - ~xl s 1~ a x, R~> { i ;: a:,: ~ q~fy9 i 5 ~ 9 ~ ~~ }f p i p~ i - "x V ~ 6`9~ ~ ~I $ I ~ W 1 a s - a Ix 1 a - ~ 15 ~ I 1 1 ~O - , w, ,., 9 ~~ , ~ ~ yl 3 1 "w' u X15 ~' A ',, c j ~ G. 3 ~~. .. G~ e~ Y I e 1 4s~ LO I ---_____~___..__ i r.~ sa n. e ~ ~ 1 rpp6 ' m' 1 1 ' c: 1 t ~P ~Sr x-,c a ~~ " A. ,:w ~ f SF I ~ ~ ~: 1 ~M u.• wg cmo a 1 f F I i , ; ~ to i • G,t ~ I ILa~~ ~«. ,~..~ _ ,.. 1, -G- ~ rz i 4 ' ^ 1 l y..~ ` i~n.w. w», i 1 `° 1.__ - 'mod .Ix_,o•n.i 1: ~~„ x51wc R ;IS ~~ ~ I ».ia,..d„s.,fi ,s , ~ ~ ~ ~~.. ~. ..----- i ~,.,.. ~.Ma y ~"' Z C Q Q gI~ SO,iTFf:R11 YACIFlL RAILROAD S zo a m ~~IIAII {.Firth. Q - - - - wGWr OF WAY W CATat 8F911 - - - PRO FRTY ud • FWAO 5JA' IR W(rVC SrAW(p oasmAxr Iw[ REL9uu6A es ]s]5• ulata OhE9 V4 Aalea -a- ~ art < vALVE Su Ymm) -___•-•-•• EOCE OF PA590E•Il • V£1lIL {AS nOlt9} C GA5 D Y/ia1LYC {AS YORL] aw SHiTPAY J F1RC N7DPA91 541 5ruku d CtaN1 WT uvT wmrn6't0.~'0 TR1P110NL a YrA1tt PALE P `°~ ~ The ix mr ausrmvs UP ~ ~~ ® YVWEn GF PIJYW:G SrALLS rPC lawc PLASnc GAr ~~ sa WaW xso .9+ uA4 sax af9VY aiF ~1)'.F~{,~'~j(f~'p{yV01tiG TO 7177 F RHIORT F%fl9TfklG: f~a 1a fWT WIDE W Wr 9F AWl aF WAY FOR IR]x9PS4a1 A~xs~ Ta9uilal R Elurwnrc, wauourc uAW11u+AACF AAs a] coLwuulr raAlcnv m PA(y1~s, Au al¢osW oos8oRUlas. REaO1L1EY av ,YYUAttr s1, 1951, w SQe0.E ara. PAGE x]. Alm w wuwc cn5, aA~' a1a. AecaROm au RARl1AAr 1 7955. O1F10.1 Ix[p0~{ .tlatywl Wl1N1Y. LixE00r1 ~~ FtTacr Suelsar PRa~e>z1Y AM rs 1xir YoTm 4U A war m vur Fax aw.c wwaes WwK1so ro nx Q SWIIOx wSEP1CT. Po:COfrsEil aA wr [& 19YJ, w VWJYE 1]2 PAGE 560. ORIaAL FOOfYmS. ,upg9y 00111frY, aRLG01L TC YE57 F1YE FEYY R' AaA {l, 1 A?)D 15 NO1rD l6~ rar Ir or WAr rox weu PIwRa~s o)x5e5tn 70 [xW a AWAm: asnacr. Reeamm sx xawlem7 1s, S9eo, w 1ou9.E c44 P.sF 151. a~wu Poxawa IAaaar asEwrY, OVROY, a4'$ w)T Ai]EGT 9Ja.ECI Poxa'+EWTY Iu0 15 AOT 1prW WTW[aI. r© Rzsmla»oAS w nE vAanar oawAWTe 1a1a TNT 1;0 51RUGluRES aR ARanoxs m s7R51GnwE~ ESRSr rsn PLIKFS YAr z.a WAST1ucTn wrwY TE vAGAle9 Ppisla of rms 51AEx AAO coax olalc PlCOR9a1 oA upy./a01 za 1ao1 oooRrexr nuultu ot-sze~s, nnaAS SRWms..uao]u oaersr. olmaaL ours AfFLC1 PAAms 1. 1 Ave s a sueecr PHQlFR' ANO 15 NOSFD a11T1E0Y, FASCVOSr Fq! YAwiENA4CL raPAWt Alm ISMAG](M7 aE' ALL. mSSwe ururcs wTw TIE vAclzo Pn7naW a lwsr srxerr •W QIAE OPo1L Po av Wp1rT,I9Eq 2t 2001 OOaE11Wi 11.n1erR ozwlas4 amoAL REL9A05. aasaR caulr asaxv, A ~n~IRm.} 5, 2 um a s ~n><a-r Pao~xr+ Pxs a O A lam Foar IYnc srwY ptux AY9 w.sAZr gnTs 9F ~IIGI, P~VwfIX q~l W~l~~R 1G~NW. a>a.Y arr Wu1weW aow-almsa oss7aP1 Reosos .uacsou o6wesr caaGSV, aaES AFrter pusazs z u19 ~ or s1o,eGr PRaPfRTY AYO 15 PWT1F911e9saY. . ~~ o~ cvurs Iwo •ssoar.TCt wc. aryzrar cwTSlr~cr m[ AE w:lw1~EY awwHY 9P ~P PAE~A9~ A Aaa~ aF ,1E~ a11oE >o: ]ao~ ]115 Ino~s41 [awM, ORrml. ]195 SWt,S'/ WAa SVOseORwgY RD] w 1110 NOSW WIW1rY. 54FK1' Pia, OEA HAS PaWKRp 9JEnaq)171A.91aCA a PaYrg SEl OR FOlOm M T4S 91WV(•.v TO RU.pISwVC7 ]1Q LOGATIai OF lla: eaAmvsr A5 5110111. 1 PROPLEIY raoRESx araeea saurx ]Rwr sTPTa'r Cf]1TAAt AOWiT, OafVi! %W2 a IOTAL AREA: 154a15 SOVARE FETT Ol a61D ACl4"5, YGRe Oq 1(S$. t. ~Lq Iw,~. Vl),1nE5 WWg1 AAE SeSYCC a 161UY IWOWGE P- 4 AnIM fpY1S w.K BFA1 apw. M ~W~W 1Y3 AaT AH1JGStY iACATID 1110 UAOFRp1RP10 b5R11iE5 ALTWOOGII PAS PMY9aALLY LOCAT£0 TIIa C69JIYABIa SLWMLa TFAIIltES ~. Ait STRELIS AAa POOSa PoWT-p-WAY iNP255 a1h611i5[ NOrF~. a, 15ae ARL As rtAWnan >w5a1s aW sR Aaaaralc TE S1L ]. Wi MAK NO ATIG[LTA;S Q' AW RUEgSA fEI.S. SLOaa15. SPxwaS, Fk1ID~M MQL. [1516LK a! SFFP lmtFS CW 11E PACPapry. e. nnL RERaar aanavEa or uvisnnt vnE wBaRNa~ aanurc a axraw, rmzsYOalav TAL x[aart owan IA11ePR smmo . OPIr9 J.LY 14 1006. 9. i1K C1ATaEM Za4YG IS G-5 (n10ep]G(fAAL Cg13IFMW. crsracr) uo rco saYmaA 1cv+asu calaaTaW. lrE SL19AU Wppmtpepn5 A1S AS PEA nQ qtt R W1T1AL PNET unaPAr Woe naa 5]. usr caaAnn Ir1EL 1a 1aa6 Alm Sscun ae Tvmlm W1m rHE Lsau ao5TwlwG AGTreer. la TIE SASS a eulerra rm nxs wRxv xu sYaS~ 1pp+een nw1. SR1uY armROS ~wacsa+ caxxn, mE6aA 11. E#SRNa PAPo0X0 SPACES STNID]Jm - 5 SPAgS 11 AS PoR F1A1 YP-, COYYIMIY PAAe1 lApIrFR ,155x4 OtO]Q +uP ooi ~~nmlo 1rw~i1 a °A951°sxw~r~'~zp¢ F ux uz 1WT1a1 »1e ,a TE aws m Esc Amr lus 11.s aWew, rs nle nanoue rcoacEla s..xvcr vpsnvl wm eEAaWnalc rlLwaelt 1z5z e 1wu a5a sEWlc A r ehrss arc w calrnLrE Ar x1E 9]UTRMFSr GOPoER R //aiVAY W A1O Bfx>_ IAAL GC1a11a1 IS 119].ll FaC'r. rl. n9s SAmY n aum a A aE., FY]D amET aAtm Auas< 19. 1006. 1]. r1E]Y IS lq 0a5Y)xV.e r iMOM'S d< f .9M Yn1NC MO6[ a1FL4ec aanm5lcnen av el4swc rasshsx ke1.r AEmer YWTlS OF 1135 SX11F,Y'. 1a TNE4[ 15 ss laotrmt cF wAx auvices w smear xlnrt-aF-WAY <111R P556A WYgelay w PR0Pa3ED. AA0 YµAgl,( ET[(WI i11C Oa11R0.1RfG ,1AQSaLTGe. TEAL B Aq a9. A /YBLE [1'IOOIC[ R faSAir SRCiT OFI 9adN% aaBlAVan01I OR RWARS. ,>. t1tbK rs WO 004rivAELC CSSPPEZ R 91E US: AS 4 SOtA wASrE snWw, ~ as sA16rARr EA19FEl. ,1 R nlE nlnowcs Aa uE.,wRCO Ar aRaRaaR10 CfVE1 u10 TAe yJJARE 190TAGE a' TIE E%lileal FaOT Hal[ R Ai P101W I[Sp.. s9. Alt oevRlAC rqg AA7 p11EA Ppapppp)LIR tR RA9V). TO PxOPEATY iwFS LFf.AI. Tr"Sa11PTON• A -ARCL. R S,wO ObAO 9rvAlEn w A PQ1Tg1 OF DQVAiIa'1 41m aA91 u, oc rlE sartxyesr WA41ER or sacmY n. iovwswP s] sam, AA1r.t 1 vtsr, 55•LweTle 1.~+w Ave a]iee LOTS 1a v. x ~ 9LGas a AAO La>s 1 wm A vaxraW aF Lor 5, a auos a r•nlESre+n AaBS EA'10f9a1: ws. 1 u Po:CaImED w rOeIAAE 8 p' KATa PAGE i). AW AL30 111 R TIE VAGTPR ExAaLS oraK AM A PaTIOk a vxcAlm tmsr srrmar. u vAUlm trz a1aR1Ax¢ Rs. lelo a lsE ott n ae1lm.1, AoWlr, RCOMRD G! 1A11F1W]FR 0] 2]02 M aCCN1ETT AO o;-6]154 OFF1a11 Poa60fa16 .GlXSaI C91wTY OIE,W4 510 PARGR EEM OlSWOm A5 FSIAYS 7%5 LLGN. sesci6Pnov Is na sAYt As oe5Q64CD w AutxnWL Tu wsuWl¢ aarPAAY, PRevYwAg1' nnL Poacars, arL1TT YVY@A urro]v. wlm +uLr za zwa. 1~. zaeam cane urr aF LTSUIRAL Pair YIaPaPa WeE, 1me ) (EASr ~ro+.tt +/1/1006) xasrl¢ nYn9YarAxe aua411a.L am6ar {o-6) ras cnueooR {urER11 aa~RaAV Pt]a9TiF31 uses: [aYUmau., wsnrYmvti xLTAr- PROFLSSnxllt Alm onml uxs Ramc aaronA rss rMWE]IU05 m how IEALCIl. SlE ffaTCNS 1T.65, ANO I].S6 OF' TYE Opl1TW Pawl uwaPAt xsE+1c WoE uwyuu nxw1l 9LWnHC SLra1lxs rRp1r .. a F[cT; asE - a 1rcr: 1s eTrr MAUIRW IIF]aIT: W £F1ET enr ssSaeAac es Pnxallr PAPoOWO Po'AURf31DITS CPoTIRA n1a IA4E1101R m ISPW~ fP]iQl. SET SECTIAI 1].a4A5p R CdRUt Pa~tT WwOPAI WOE. zaalc .wnwofTa an sF a>r1RU Paver 5{p5a1TY 11RIO 51MT1 CdrxA4 POM, CR 9Y501 calms-s5z1 Exr. au 41R4fY0it`S C4iEnF1CATYIN: TO PIN110CAfE SGt1M 55yTy, N0 AYO6PIIE THE R15lIRUIEE cm1PIxT R aaEaal: 7sPg rs m ctxrar Tar TES uw m Poo mx TIE ar SFr pr EMaE sr rs BASED Yu5 YA6E Pt AtamwEE SEn1 11E Y•!WN fe'fu R[a~1PGne 1TR ALTA/AWI LNm nnE 3M1lYa mI1tT fATAwF9E9 AY0 AMP20 Jn AITA ANa YSP6 w ]005, AWO Sw]tl1iAYS°~54 a~F r~ ~ '' 6. o~~(~r~ ~ o. ra II a la. STAWpa'q$ A6 AOOPTA EY ALTA AIO kSPS ASm W ETTFCT OA 7WE OAIa R Tw5 a0i1W1G1i1aY. iMOfR9alm METER CQlTEES iIUT x Yr WGFQCNIL OP9AGY A5 A LI510 aiRlklVR Rp7$reR4p w 1110 aTATE A 9REOaW. T[ AMSfNE PDYIARIN. AmwACt 6 m5 61wIlY OaeS EDT FS® niAl W W! LS 3f4G~'41 TEAFAF 1V>D nyT ALL EAm1Uri5 Aim Tdaila-0F-wY TxAT aPo~LY A9 rPEaFFD w TWe 55TaWMINT n51L Weaaxr, amoi YIAGth vrrr9m PRJ'IOm aY AYEIETIlE nnL u1Sa1AYFL easw.Wr cP aseoel[ oAlm .uLr 14 zoos ARE slalu+. nE am 91,om.a9eWls ARE A5 xorm aw GAxr WuTa¢mx Pis Ea mrz sEPrzvaen I, also PnoP~'raaiali u aal.ls aarvsraa o, c:aTa~r~iussr .4[.ti sl /ni ~~ „,~~ 0. W z4 O~ [fj ~ $ ~ ~ $~a~ ~ can 7pw x $ fem.. ...) 1- ~ ~qQ ~ U °u O~~ a Z Q ~ ~~~i o ~~~ ~~uu ~ww ~~~ Y(y _t Z 5110 •` [lNm Pi Q N ~~ gg# qp b3 q 4 &~~ P ~M1 Imauora. a9PO. wrs xP. a. zoou sSaroEr: cAc wuEA: ras cl¢c~: sal sous, l'MO' T1IWEGT RVILa61. PROV0060-0007 aRAnAC rux Sr.wWw,v6s sE~r A9- oP 1 V~ITY MAP L~LJ - 1s scue tmh ~~kn W.muw'H. YUx . _~ kyk~ tr~ ~~qy ~ .TW p .~ A n N y- S S! I k ~~_~:T__,___ ~ ~$~ ~~~ ;; ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ _~ ~ #.~ --w.~ ~~ ~ #~~ w ~W Mb #wd da rt A4Ma RMrwms~ w 1 ~.. x, ~~ ~ ~ ~ i ~' ~~ o .... - - ~ s m.xe ~ w w I ____ - ~. -.ap ao sw. .~.«. . Ma*on rortq«am EXHIBI"I' 3 i __ V __..... f I i i ~f c g .~___ .~..._ ~' _ , ~ .'. 1 . , t 4 r } ~ f` t r 1 1 ~'-', 1 E .' h l t 1 ' ,.._ ~ i ~ ' t 5 .. ~~',,, t 5 l y t t t d l t W e ! ' ~ ~~ .t , EXdSTit~s 4T6i STET ~SInE r 4~ j . f I ~ .~~ 'RmE:i ~ ~ 1 ; ~ } ~ ~ ~~ ~~ , '~~ 1~~' ~ { ~ ._ _ t3 ~ i ~~~ '. ~~, ti ~ ' rii - ~. ', ~~~ I~ ~ 1~ q c ing cn e:. nce y u u ~ „®1 eaavy MNanxww YL NO{ ! Nms~~~oewy~+di~>.ua as~rwepaxMC .W W s»R wpw.newaxmee .~.~.._. J .. , va _,,,,, ,,,,,,,, 1 .. ~ y a ~ ff Y µ~ 5"~x2j'.,~,,,,~, i ~6 ., ~ i ~' I ~~ 1 (* ~ ] ~~. „"~" i '.. ~.~ n~ , (w; ;,A i ~8 i I ~ 1 I { ~~ ~ ' ~~ Ilf I Y., ~~ I ~ ', `»~, ~ I ~ ~"-.. ~ ; i ~ ~~ I' ~ ~ ~•• . ~ ~ ~.r S ~' ~ 1 ~ '~ ""~„ ,~ i (; ~~ I I '', f ~ ~, ~~ ~. 1._..,.~1 I ., { ~M~ M d ~^ : ,~ n~ ~ ~ ... ., I i i gg f ~ ( I t I. ~ t ~ I ~ ~"' .. i` I i ~ I ~ i ~. ~ ~ ~ ' ~•,. i y ,j'~ I ~ .., 4p ...., . ~ I ~~~ I i "~ r ~~~ ~t& ^~i°. "'~N iro; t {'. ~'} ky .~ ~~ ~x N >°/ R ~ ""-,_. i i -. ,. ;~ ~w.. I ;., ~ ~rv~~~ '". ... ~' ,~,~ {' ~ '~ I., ro i ~~ d x I hyV N C~ i '. nro ry ~IC W ~ ~ 1 ~ S~= ?,'„ ~ ., t ~~ ~~, ..1 `~ ~ ~r ~> ~ ,t ~. ~;;:. ~, ~?~ ~ ~ ~' j A caring dlttewenca you can fee! i. ~ a v V~ Iti ue ~,~ i n i i, .: i v ii I i~ ~ ~v 9~ ~ I I ' ., .., ° s 1 i x ~ i 1 ~~~~ "~~~ rSs ~~ ~~~ '~. ~ '. .i '. _ I ,, ., .. w a ^4 ~t l x WU l ~ ' ..p ,; , ~~ r ~ r) { ~ ~ N ~L` t ~ ~~ ~.'~ u )O~N P4. jLfF.QEMS &ASSCCIATBS, INC. AP4'; 111TC.G"CUilt iCt AP7 i.'CMti ouec~rrWR ~N~mN wwwdw ~n~v{T gr~s~ma» EXHIBIT V ~~ I ' '' A siring d4fference you san f9o1 w ~.a `~"., ~ y 1\ ~ 3~CQJD:iQ~ \w<~~i~Ar`.~ try y,+\ \ \',}p~;1JJa1 tv1 `,(•~;,~ \ ~ `~ "\ \ \CJD~QJ~'~ \r ~\f~ ~'~` 1}h' rj„ ~c '~` '{`' ")` °~ '~lc~'' {~i~ ..-'k.~..-y''4"' 1 s Sv~er7.~. ..,~,.. ~~ ~rs...~ ~' ~, ~` ~ a.~ rq` .~` "'~ y ,a. ~. ~ i ~` .. .., :~ ~.~ :. ~~ i~ tt _....... ,.~„~ . .. __ ~ .... .. ... _ ~,, _- ~ b,~ ,. ~ i ... ~~~ '.. ~y II . ~~ i. ' ~~' sourH ~>zaNr sr~~~r ~~ .M ~- - "_.. ~ l 1 ,~ ~ .'t~'3cr,~ G~Rx ~ ~ ~". ~a~ 1. yy;>;.y~~„~"~t>;~r; , ar .~ i ¢ t ~,~...._~~+'~ ,~-:[~~''>~.~?~-~~ as tk '~aA~a>~~~-, ~` i ~~: ~ .. ' ~~~ '' ~ s 4 ..r y k "(':' ~"~ . ~ ~ ~,k, ` ~~ ~~ f ~ ~` ' ._ y i , , _ -- .... 'E _ ' -'r f _.:.~ ~Y3 f$}~'~c „ ~ - i ~ ~ ~ft'K ~a 1 ' .M~Ip.L~n - } ~ ~cy~~ - ~ c ~ ;, ,. / psi r»,ye, ~ .. 3 ~ ~1 ' . ,.1~~~ ~ ~ ~" ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ r~L ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ LantlscaPO ~. .... - ... Plan Scato 1" = 2Q' siuv~, rw„~ Madara Deign inc ~ ;`;A ......: . .......~ ..... ~ ~L'~ .'1 ..,:~, . _ _, .. ' ~~ S:HEi!!SlCil000kfh'FS ~, c~ ~p R V `c u a ~a r 5~ m " v G ~ ~ ~ v »""- 0.. C ~' v ~rn~ Q Pi0.,DLxc1 uAD+f+xo ufo,[Ct c[xfax~ ttn+4 L0~~1AG+~ fi5lE~IxlfJxl111fff V 0 Os ~G t M [: F i ~ V ,~ ~ ~ a s 4„ r f i ~ 1~~ ' ' ' } ~`~i'r', ~ C,1S 17.4 t ~, ~ ~ . ! 1hA 7 ~ I i ~- € ~ ~~ ~ ; x ~ ~, j ~x'+t:~ ~ L ~ "~.~~ 11 ~~'!P~_ ni`1>` ;}c,]'~fSi e~~,i,~NGS tiJ~ ~~'w~1~~?'; s F~a~~3 Gn~~id~,,i 3~ i E, ,. 'i~ 1iy ~: ~ a 7.. 4'"vs' ' s,,~>c X>k'~r~caxxx>7a~, ~~~T>:?t{!', `S(,^?r~d. ~ ~ ~.-.cxx~o~x,,.gxaa~.~t J1,i -.•~t ~~s_'~_..,.~~ ~, t~'.,t w~_~ccx+oaE.ax~:.:~.~;'i.'~U~ ~-~».~r' .. PLANT LIST L\v^Y{ GJr.RYr h:rnbs kM.nY.: TJnw CiC ltck'c ' - Ctrrrr. figa'S:rpeuf Iku kti sPN.aln'liOla!13n~as7l - ' lidti>,us-F,rq , ' Cv4v"+M1iv]f;r,a'f :l4ria[o Ka 'u nl rnn Cwr:a;.`.y:LrtlYsxwm rc ~ G4:In.Un F'Mt3>:k0'G'uW V~ .. - ll.:itn-kiaaru: rl rnGUn'fwMfa: .. '. - - l.Ly t, JJ,v'x'sn Os'un6M nu - ' hrn lsMr"a:u:,'Lna~yyvr ^Y I -t , .a G.bhx G vV P ' ' ' F:.r<F J rn ~Oawor G , , ' w a~a.~ a ' : • F1 •ay' LI'h'n[oa'.r. ' I q= s4 Farce PUsty Zccr o ciruw l' Corc6 wvYV~s,y~a'FNw: Pa:iy . sa< [ti;o:nsu,ur.6.'vun V.fsk~ .. S!x,y$ t~ `. h'n'a L:JmkN i;;;.~i :ww!ro'F.C~u~c{'faxlwr Y~a G i1',`v xils'.ass'S<ra'a~ i J ., 1:5 vJ vNOS; va fx[xY} /i:Ygl'[s:}Yy arv~lr :y ' GS Ar.ttibry C'u-sot. L'yl)'rv Gyncn 1 6 L? ' UV+1Y.a'.'f,^:>vLarC1st:xst P:lkr.~ n B i w 1, . pn Cn S + UD 13 Lu1,stNAn J:FLY'CIXr,'y10 r.'a e t u ;u r . sfif Lnr > i{anRrOCd,h1'SlpiltlD'q' 1V ~'~ . , y~ ,:' Cuh. US cn' a ' ksfurizw 'G:r:P.A'Aa' . M a el C an:Y G'ucs F4:^wsi R 'a [uxrynrrrtlJadso'tnxvJq Gary 3p `• r r, e Ca'J£S e ` s~rs'A Rs f PVri'yW;r.S SN.naacn''itWnrn 1R ~ S% . • . ax a IWV•]f:r M1basp:gv r P„si ksca,Yaar 5elpu's'C JClln4b Llvori iU •. , „ . {; {au,va-.' . n'GO A vrr P &u_v ngU;ttngst7'PeNv' ' Z k $ `. , y _ w uF4a 1YamM j&anG ] ~I h mry:kx 6xlmsKV'Dna1 YU{,:Y 26 ~ , Q . , OWrs RO,] Jo-spsr PI:wC p 4+a:as Narsjxu Rk'nON:cd'Mlytt. ROP b v.1 , H.xY^~~-'h i~ :c~v. J<sKx,.'~41r]ri`.xYn2s Esrr'v! c[ V,t:'ns' :G O ,wnb IXlV L:> 'W] ac;orrynywr ~..ws, xus,'a>,wlli 13 R: ~ n , uxry: P y; Pr P,Vass U(s'0.•e::c'as'G.Ip LMlrhdl' S0 t s . n',uY 1}'v31?Yxsad] Y ' NJ.llT{NJP3 xfa^n Yr:ry, YulS,sti :~ i"f< • M ,ur veu~s,rr M'r.] IUke'.a50.'YYp:'.4am:.•.v' V2sp[uT Caae~~ i,i ~f, raFZrcarlaN 1. a-a.:.a:lscr:~:ae avs(.ntaNr+araoa'a al pa:l: n,ram~[rn:. if nxd:arx~• 'v Y.3..ary sy'akux $i61wr.,s nugrrpa ;a {kxla'm u; 3:r pan av Ji: P;I Ca'Nnm psric N? np'n[ppa<`v .. :. .ure:'.a:s. nrb:o tle vv n'x1 m n ,ra: a~v~r..;,n 3. G[~.,la'1 LY a:pfl ib W:Spa;UJfRyn Pn(ry0 N41«Eyn'sUp;:(1Nf6LVS.Y.fl:+rfk.v>`ro nv{n;V]SJ XCal i:).]s:9:a alpfJa,'G' 11.':'[i Y.:n TJ i(tsf Llrr4e.4'ao({35~xn •1 Sixxi,lar,nJ[V"a'aSO+KllWblj"f>y.1.yW xffd/!Yn'bsmalt'(-0A'wtirorl e'IxKT<cy L. Hy ixti%1; u, in..,t,YVrs hlt Inkb> n'AIN ri:a'.' W Wla, ar.IY<11n.±! ;1550.: t,~ius Ily { may rr yytlV I.wag pyp p( mrullxrn M 1D' =' I.ry~p dSPraY.:ur rk4aa{[ikr4'a'bSx:OW Gr:N M0.1p yyr}I ~rpr.Ylgyu gel!iJ:Yal:y, ......_...... ..h~U ETCE.PSIfayS ..............«._.. o alnaxnwi mLk,mm~muncrl,"aopr. ~o~a,Rnlawc;oy,:,. srwmra,y,n'unwi+n'ar:l.:, 1J$'rctad'INrIM 8ws,i:is'wrlb tibqualn:Y<Pryhw.loy<v.d,;}~ryVpvy;ryyrl:a l;xlrxr ad;leq .4:i nlnvvsWriyV Slvil DS Pyf. s[4DrvW S1rz',t,stitxtn hl kl v4 Sn:lw fNC G2Pl y"q 1" merman svu. i; L::wyfwx ttb,bw(ax:.:aW:9::NW a~tUxY,.V(Nh3.LIlaS w.lfrR [`M:.LKU51MW: xu.[W. 3 Can:rn'wi'(ua'uluNanlerivxxud lGOU nnS SPa;al Nllll+rurv~'W!V.'(lR.k:.u'u a'l:y 7D. JWUS~n~10 W IktlVrt;.V cx Y3Vr ;YEnaor<:'],,Yt tlY (wrsv:a ctiv:JdW la, naM.kllh[PUWs 11 Irtgxea'1>YN[p1U 10 tx~giA' wJ ~~n<ly: sIJIM13iw nlnlPrA aurrFrld Zp Str aN y'aar l:Urys Irk OLf.O MIruJ n:ctlxava 1:' I'rcrJeOUry'rW.v,avo'3.trLib bFLwNtrXapry N; vanli,. uini.Plwvs. r:IT:tl WW Ahl any f"awvYy '3. IPrbv.rlV klnfkx wYJ, Isro.n>nyy x'alMirly El'Fwa:la IM lW],fu,xixh3y IyY15d]se. r."n(w mn\x lr,nl con,a!do as of xsn7nn i Is!r].cr ins ra' .arT'rlmr[ of arrl:'.Ia yy>i«I, uv.wry> elrrfi]U;wSW a'c'cM.pgsfbihl n:s.5 xtn;a GWtY1 t~' lM1r<'h6.ll,P".hrq[~}r;Eaml:rOaY6f.4n'wi;r„1:~I:sr~a,.'alM ir[S•Jt'.'J N.s C:o4vacn s" L7;.rJ;v Ctrxa. NnuO la ir(~nl 0A ay61a.11 9"r+VC. Sva,s' CI 1:5n1ulrc;twn GENERAL NOTr"5 PLANTING 1 P'r,:,{nsl'k'ludl:. W~pn.:f;+]~.Sis-.:~Nik:nw!h SW:eatl. ntr5sW 4Wn;nros rnara:W t,c:hv. S,l Gxutpns rood>r»~Sa wr"f[`:pVlly:4:J: f"nA15p:sln~NVw.Knln'a nm N.,x.fa{oyw~u, v.xo,u[y~aal:rm,,;awiy:,,rr~d„yr :n nlu <r:rµrowu:a;'w 3lUp:,rNta:v,]lo Wri,•d7f.n0:{Itli SVY[:n OI Pk•Y laIX izfJ Sis-0 L11.yJlll ct~Y ra,•s,N o-' 1,3 apafr nx(Ln ;J_ rvLrn sul ;rtlynlY~uSUlyk:nsy ees/ 3G 16~Sti lair~fs aF.`a:l:n.a 1AR: I V. s:;rai :tin- Irror Y. 4 VcvV Vi~aJ".m'Ni:K~u IVD:.x~lgs(:s;<;'O:tA'f;UhrVia:x; u,:P Sy Psl~~s, siu':rb'Va trn; IYa`.kn+.'k,.'•_WxNVJ:vr„v. lrb(riY(v In ab F(;rna 5U 5i to lfv suu~M UpaN Va,l nx'nxr:lp ass;ola'f:'n. nI S:IJ/~')] $:av:sL"S:Qb'~/:a :'.a>~a'1 N3bcts: pxsWnfaN> :< S.rT':na~:,1 ra51J:clxtl lurir:gJ.WLk:'la;, lra1'. a'grr,4ly]d Vs75r6J: W:I s~.nr [w; w',:s rJ ra.Yn:s vu:~f:ivra n,cu: hYxxJ ca,,:Nae rw.ra cmont ru; to apna„ a vac ra.(W Is:'rra';ly, S::aa rvrl0.,y ua,s [,unw;n::~Y rU;a uisua:la V Nlu:,n ~ V f4^,kY:~ C:,W I:!. s(1*.IrpSrxr a[ro;l:l;y inavh,. 1i[y :a 10.:5, :.'n1 f~l o,l vMU. Llr kv5lxvA,f:+l31J'ysl.rVl>w: [trY:v:(tic:Y`a5t u!k'f:,::br. ll u:a lOSmlL 3nh!(>'i(<SSI txlS 1e1'u6 W r'pV. JS IrY<t'i'Y lbva,t, :proY nry'.P' rn]:rGrJi P:nr44 d (isrva,;wlk.TYn,yua':a:weu'n:onvmv,crs:,$,u'orp;plsitan. b,Crn't'g:h;er wnnun vr:a'ro d, nvrti :,u u'u ycer 1 li.yyub;, Pa;r mau'::p! rut s(niwri M v: Pan' co.Ja;:uJp,.Yxrl s;,Y•u•Navya=:M d 4'Miarn p!ryllba':n¢:Vnt"a in h_n':4'a:3.]i u!Ih (N ^'rL,1 [i!~tCdw%fxfss of rA :,:SSN.vu:G.[lV Owx:'~. C Uar::ran C'li55 ai isa:fnul.•ryY'3V:G In r1'rrFi[a1. IrVaE+~«:vl3 Wrx1;'vu by d'w5 :Lrtw:, ,N Iron C(v::rn;la'zray,:wa N.M r4s,~a,sdvty .-.., ~'t 1 I< ., ,,:: ., C..._ r_... ... r - ~' 7 e - - - ~ l~~r._.~ Way ,r.,r";M.. >.>.~.. fl u, } ~ ~ / s,,xti[1Lf%Jli! 1 iva v:f ixaP.v'iiyld si:V barl(Je la Rlrrgr.ZdW. m,s[y[i;l~>prs Ca1'xi:1l2~dI mar i.fir,:v4r.r';F:s ct['uV'v. vs;Y,a-, u ~v'r<raP W CN%1aJ',ui by L'fs WJ:[, irixnypU N1r U Eirra.:lbon d xVapn Wbq}'1 Vq Wli?:W u{K;V:Uilak'1 dlKrL~a;SV.s, nli>NVIa a:vq burem la!:'~I ;. S'.]M,lwia(~:bu[c::M1.LS'avmj Mnrlsl.'»~eoJn(dM3::~n'tx ioann:ncu'y'lon:l,v.r. a0:.cvsv:u P s:iwv urn,"Wi;u V,IYry dGtr any sau•„.r(,m a17 i!V'rv:li5: LvH ypHs S l,:[v;r UC WYr IOUsle:eslsrn's(:reloM Snlae(rygkxl::,IXIVSYiY lu nlu'AU]p l7 f:'i, n,NU:n >'VVYAvJbu:'F;,1;f bb P:a;g1„vll (.IYV:I tax,a Ib u r{pv'ih W 1' 4 $Wtb L4lka~xli:yV U: TS>L',aU rs trykrl soar:u,,a1N.a, V. A Li aft: L::Y IV p1aw'i a.'il:[Nh1rm53rany<; 4J IxuTn'aa[NlWf 1!'.,r u'a~tN i:nrxair II Fa:vSyYbt.l;u sLW u~rs 1'G;rnx'vnryq'.aJ SUfoa« C L,>tAl yP,s-R~a+1:ti+w'dnnawu:,y]n f iM1l';LU[.Y:~()gYSCX'rt411hF4Nh'C[; Nrm lift cfy q(ysrryaorxV. V>r,lv.:Y]Gx rn( h PVO SO~iil,l:yuSL'r'z,s/rk]SVMa4i:.s lrn, svlar,}'11J alMrvr gmv'll.UUVa:.ig ru• Fan'i:µPSUOpiJylOmnl:YlKSUOS IOOpllptaV0lu.(;hI PkYlka.:N ,(YI'.~p,tubc r['crme:k'fV!ia ~ 1Awxi:x L'sv},f{idt furvry to aysq.q uYS apt U MV:N(4n14 N.'s7:xn.ain;r nVR:'JYY. wnu6 (rep f4: Wi;1~l'va,;lha[prMl,und tz"nacwy ran:. C fieP:rwn'1y n:u:wu:wv,.f>a s,:ry+ods[raw U 7k-:t,~v ivra;nivala cu:h, I:,]iy] i; P{drxW CaTktiNi!LL'G]Y:raln LxlM Hlsen;NIUM1f IM (YXLCahCl c3R._ 'l Yi:nnaa:nex;nwJ mau:u'vmunic [tKxadN (aiaunxap"w,n a:yuor ~; wn liw ru>;xnc-nr.ly u! liu ~vllrrrrw to cw.,~eiln:awk'h vu (nnlsn rquovwu:N 5;+ GRADING 1 G`4.(LiuSUx::;Ipp:SLrJi 6NYtnaW fVl<srrald WJY,>11fZ'alnrgi. (TS3lnv runfm'Jp «++,.u' c.+wr(ek.ra y~a•w ra r:IFtnn(ap aacmy.•1 awt !o Jseave pprur„ uau ntnm i'M sW~,o-kr Up:'s5isls' 12'[+, v;],yq ypfi, EI mvl W rb-:t:r1f1 b ayJ Lh`:miu t0. na':bY6 St~T'JU( CA'VVli1] d N.UJ!V >ui PW.VnMn:d[rly sU316NOp;MIP?J'tlxlr4i0rl vllls yurnylurw:Ixv lGSC li«1 ?p Lilo (all\'flr:f cW nrr„u la Sail 5;h ytAb 1 GJr+sb un:'uYO'rNSff]"s:olV i3 pUVpdeaW{}'O:A wI1M 6'p lvf~[p'rs,9onryl sx A!:>,A'inadpslohyrypppsn v:Y!'sm IWJk1.:l Wrp 6w:i5 c[riaiaa'1CS1 IpWSGykrEP;n'e1WG pcavI,ariatl 181aosu]eiJSV ib)40:i tn'J,Vw l.vsh pa6ai irs:]s. f'ia]la,'Idr. la waAnd wen rklf:w cal ~s,al aa~ruln;rrup;f'I"I rw,r,:cv,d sc.',nxy by a<.zasarY u»r u'w:vaw, nYeimau arlrr„ ao.l. 5 F4>:h D:a'a,n a'vW U'rws to oaa omc tnevrn prnoo nw,.wotl 3"Ir4', i+Y :lu nvc7,uy (i nayti mJ uk:na 5` bogh [urwlct,g rvtlw. N! f 4un or W Jp to Frcnw[c iv:ah+v 4vG'!ulip a.ve]'lrprl SSZ>]uUS.Yp Nav4 c'f;WySawvY ntl In Glm+:alVµMl:iylp P: lo~lin U!wata G kl'T1[h,;nuv-Aryvl;x'fVS~x]x'oN IU JSYbx::s~0.'+Y U:hlaip pµgh:]bvrAx:V:VO li:rr~p Gx, kp,r W: s{cauVac;~fl, wNr onMYS,O{ausa:binp Y[priGe VMicr Mx.;a1W,IV..S: y'nftl G3Latltcsl larPWi:f0.'a'aln~ Lnndacapp flotlyllRi Madam L?e5ign Inc . . ...,.. ar4'.• n.M1 ... V.v ..,..• o~ b~ ~~ cr U a ~~ L~~ CHJYS a[r.'~[l'.!'blOHe OIU,IL LW I[F" ualxa; re.v'iDi I,CIabIxlRan arr(1: tIN1AL' M/R e:Y::Jr u .~ G '~ ~, a 'L'.W {s -w o ~7ti ~` `i \L`~~}1~f fa~~~~ (~ ....,.4 7,. 1, 'Iionas`a uriu~: Q~~.CAf h 1 Rx1xN:rarrx.w'. a,.~1...u,. wA: L'1.2 sc~E4~nceocveEirrs `~ Public Works Departmenf vY~, I~c:;;~.:,;~ ~ENT(V'1~ P~1 NT ~~~~~~`~IVI~IV~ ~~ 1 } --qs Bob Pierce, Director Matt Samitare, Dev. Services Coord. PUBLIC WORKS ST.~FF REPORT REVISED January 24, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Site Plan Review for a medical office building oz~ property known as 37-2W-11CB, Tax Lots 401 and 500. Applicant: Providence Health Systen-is, 4706 NE GIisan Street, Suite 100, Portland, 4R 97213 Zoning: C-5, Commercial Thoroughfare Zoning Traffic A Traffic Study was required and prepared for the proposed application. Tlie study was prepared by JRH Engineering. The study concluded that the proposed development would not deteriorate the level of service at the proposed intersection with Highway 99 or at the intersections of Highway 99w at Beall Lane, Highway 99w at Cupp Dz-ive or at Highway 99w and E. Pine Street. The Public Works Department has reviewed this document and is in agreement with the conclusions. Existing Infrastructure: All City utilities exist in fiont of or adjacent to the proposed development. Engineering and Development Plans and Permits: The Central Point Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and storn-z water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction" shall govern how public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications from the Public Works Department. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storzxi drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a trafftc control plan. A Public Works Perzxiit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the dcvelopinent will be calculated and attached to the public works pern~it. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued. Conditions of Approval: ". Conditions have been znet 940 South Third Street ~~ Central Point, OR 97502 •547.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 i31!E12/2~~3 X9:36 ~~~~ ~~~ ~~' s~,~ ,,,,;, 1a~~E~~,,.15: 511-F=6diJ.r1 ~'~,~'~ PnC-~E f12~(~i4 i ~~VI i~E~~ i` X91 _- ---ROGUE `V~,LLEY SEVtiCER SERVICES .. i.c~cacipn; 138 West Vilgs €~oad, Ccr~t~:v[ Point, Ors ~ ~tnilir~~ Arldres4: P.p, Box 3130, Ccntral ~'oint, t)F 7502.4005 -~.- Tcl. (5~1.) 664-630, ~'~x (5~i1) 6G4•']1~1 wwrv.~VSS.~~s December 29, 2006 Cpnnie Clure FAX G64_638~ City of Central Point Planning department 'I55 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Re. Sifie Plan review for Providence Medical Center, File # 0709 Sewer service to the subject property comes from an existing $ inch main line located within the vacafied portion ot'Ist Street. Connection to this sewer maid will require a permit from RVS along with payment of related development fees. The property is within the NPDES Phase 2 Stormwater Quality management area and must comply with relevanfi stormwater quality guidelines. Rogue Valley Sewer Services requests that approval of the proposed development be subject to the following conditions: '[. Applicant must obtain a sewer permit and pay all related development charges prior to connecting to the sewer. 2, Applicant must dedicate a. sewer easement over the existing main line if none already exists. 3. Applicant must submit a stormwater management plan to RVS tc~ demonstrate compliance with water quality standards. Feel free to call me if you f3ava any questions regarding this project. Sincerely, ~~ ~. ~~, Carl Tappert, PE District Engineer ..K:ID.f1.TAlAgcncicslCF~7'~'~~`1PLAV~7GISitcPlan~eviaw1200710'1007-Oak Glcn.doc A1~~SACH M'~f~~ ~~~„ January 4, 2007 Connie Cfune Planner City of Central Point Jackson County Fire District No. 3 8333 Agate Road ,,~.~ 4Q WhEte City OR 97503-1475 (541.) 826-7100 (voice) (541} 826-45fi6 (fax) Internationa!lyAccredited - 2005-2010 ~'~ ` ' `~~ Project # 07019 Providence Hospital • Larger size plan will need to be reviewed by the Fire District to verify access lane will meet the required width of this size building. • Parking Lot is a single entrance I exit style design. We would prefer to see a second egress point on the North 1 West side of the building. • Fire authority will need to approve the location of (FDC) Fire Department Connection, Vault and Hydrants. • Signage and Curb Paint plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Authority. • 13 ft 6 inch height clearance is required far all travel access points Mark Moran DFM ~ A~J~11/~~f tl~ f6~97 City of Central Paint, Oregar~ Building Department i 40 So.7~rird St, Central Point, Or 97502 541.bb4.332.1 Fax 541.b64.6384 www.ci.ce ntra i-poi nt.or.us Lais E3eBenedetti, Building Official BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DATE: 12/27/06 TO: Planning Department Planning file: 47019 FROM: Building Department SUBJECT: Name: Providence Health Sys. Address :4706 NE Glisan St, Suite 100 City: Port. State: OR Zip Code: 97213 Property Description: PUR.I'QSE: The staff report is to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Applicant regarding City Building Department requirements and conditions to be included in the design and development of tlae proposed project. This is not a plan review. This report is preliminary and compiled solely far use by the Central Point Planning Commission. 1. City of Ccntra! Pont, Oregon 140 5o.7hird St., Central Point, Or 97502 541.664.3321 E:ax 547.664,6384 urww.ci.central-point.or.us Building Department Lois [~eBenedetti, ~3u'slding Official BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: l . Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with all current State of Oregon adopted codes, and apply for all permits through the Central Point Building Department. 2. If a private storm drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing Department. 3. Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Electrical Department. 4. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by OSSC Appendix J and chapter l $ of the OSSC. A written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the following information: a. A plot plan showing the location of all test borings and/or excavations. b. Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. When expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geotechnical recommendations. 5. Grading/excavationperrmts are required in accordance with OSSC Appendix J and chapter i S and regarding any fill material placed on the site. Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practices. A soil investigation report, and a report of satisfactory placement of dill (including special inspections of placement of rill and compaction.) acceptable to the Building Official, shall be submitted prior to final of the grading/excavation permit. Building permits will not be issued until grading/excavation permit is finalled. Exception: 1. The upper 1.5 foot of fill placed outside of public rights-of"way. 2. The upper 1.5 foot of rill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. 2 City of Central Point, Oregon 140 Sa.7hird 5t., Centro[ Point,Or 97502 541.bb4.3321 fax 541.b64.63II4 www.ci.cent ra I- po i nt.or.us Building Department Lois DeF3enedetti, Building INficial 6. To move or demolish any existing struct~ires located on the property, call the Building Department for permit requirements. 7. Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on the property. 8. Any development {any man-made change) to improved or unimproved real estate located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central Paint shall require a Development Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code 8.24.120. 9. Dust control, and track out elimination procedures must be implemented. l0. Application for building permits will require three sets of complete plans indicating compliance with Oregon Structural Specialty Code {2004). l 1. Fire District 3 will determine fire hydrant location, as well as access to buildings. The International Fire Code (2003) with Oregon Amendments (2004) will be implemented as part of the plan check code requirement for this proposed building. Any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Applicant, or Applicant's contractor to the Building Department for approval prior to start of work. Attachment "H" FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW File No: 07019 INTRODUCTION In the Matter of a Site Plan Review for construction of a 32,000 square foot, two-story medical office building located at 870 Front Street. The property is identified oza floe Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 11CB, Tax Lots 401 and 540. The subject property is located within a C-5, Thoroughfare Cozxznaereial and Transit Oriented Development (TOD} Corridor General Commercial zoning district. Applicant: Providence Health System-Oregon; Agent: Michael C. Robinson. CPMC 17.46.010 PrslPose. The C-S district is intended to provide far carnnaercial and business uses that are mast appropriately located along or near rnajar high3alays ar thoroicghfares, and are largely dependent upon highway visibility and easy alehicrslar access. CPMC 17.46.020 (A) (4) - Per•trtitted Uses - Pr•ofessiorral and frrrancial, including: Medical services, clinics and laboratories Finding: Under the above referenced section medical office building is a permitted use. As noted in the Staff Report dated Febz-uary 6, 2007, this project site is within the C-5 Thoroughfare Caznmercial and the Trazasit Oriented District Corridor (TOD}. Section 17.65.020(B} of the CPMC states, "At the discretion of the applicant, a development application within the TOD corridor shall be subject to: I. The normal base zone requirezrzents as identified on the official zoning zxzap and contained in this code; or 2. The TOD corridor requirements contained in this chapter." The applicant has elected to use, the C-S base zone requirements. Conclusion: A medical office building is a permitted use iza the C-5 zoning district. The applicant has elected to use the C-5 base zone requirements. The findings provided in this attachment will address the approval cz-iteria applicable to this project within a C-5 zoning district. CPMC 17.46.440 Height regrrlations - Na building or structure shall exceed thirty five feet in height in the C-S district. Finding: The proposed two-story building is designed to be 35 feet high. The applicant notes that the rooftop mechanical equipment is approximately 7.5 feet high and will be hidden by a louvered metal screen. The rooftop equipment is not required to be included in the calculation of building height by definition {Section 17.08). Page 1 of 10 Conclusion: The proposed building meets this requirement. CPMC 17.46.OS0(B) Lot wicltlt. The minimum lot width shall be f fty (50) feet. Finding: The subject site (Tax Lots 401 and 500} is approximately 395 feet in width. Conclusion: The lot width exceeds the zi~iniznun~ lot width required. CPMC 17.46.050 (C) Lot depth. The minimum lot depth slzall be one ht.rnclred feet. Finding: The subject site lot depth is approxizxzately 290 feet deep. Conclusion: The lot depth exceeds the minimum lot depth requirement. CPMC 17.46.050 (D) FYOnt yar~I The front yard shall be a minimum often feet and shall be maintained as landscaped open space. When off-street parking is located in the front yard at•ea, the landscaped strip may be reduced to not less than six feet tivith Planning Commission approval of the site plan. Finding: The submitted building location site plan (diagram A1.0} depicts the front yard setback at approximately 86 feet. This setback area is intended to include the landscape strip (approximately 6 feet in width}, five concrete site wall planters planter areas (approximately 25' deep) and off street parking. The landscape plan (Applicant Exhibit Sheets Ll.land L1.2} describes the plant varieties and specific planting location within the front setback. Finding: Front Street (Highway 99 West) is classified as a Major Arterial Street and as such the street tree provisions of CPMC Section 12.36.100 apply to this application. The landscape plan does provide a sufficient number of street trees within the Front Street landscape strip. The fve (5) additional street trees, recommended by Public Works have been added to the landscape plan (L1.1) meeting the number required by Section 12.36.100 as evidenced by the Public Works Revised report dated January 24, 2007 stating conditions of approval have beezz met. Conclusion: The proposed building exceeds the (rant setback and minimum landscape area required in the C-5 zone district. Additional street trees have been added to meet street tree requirements of Section 12.36.100. CPMC 17.46.050 {E) Side Yas•d. The side yard shall be a minirnirm of free feet, except when abutting structures are proposed with a common wall that complies 3vith the Uniforlaa .Building Cade. Finding: The site plan indicates a 105 foot side yard for both the north and south side yards. Page 2 of 10 Conclusion: The proposal exceeds the side yard setback requirements. CPMC 1'7.46.050 (F) Rear Yar•rL No rear yard shall be regt.aired in the C-5 district except when the rear lot line abuts property in a residential (R) district and then the rear yard shall be a minirnrcrn of twenty feet. Where property in the C-S district is separated from property in a residential (R) district by a public alley or street, no rear yard ,setback shall be required. Finding: The subject parcel abuts property in a residential district and a 117 foot rear yard setback is indicated on the site plan. Conclusion: The proposal exceeds the requirement far a rear yard setback. CPMC 17.46.050 (G) Lot coverage. No requirements except as necessary to comply with applicable yard, parking and loading requirements. Finding: The proposal complies with all applicable yard, parking and loading requirements as demonstrated in the above findings. Conclusion: The proposal complies. CPMC T 7.46.060 General requirenterats (A). Uses that are normally permitted in the C- S district but that are referred to the Planning Commission for further review, per .Section 1 x.46.030(26), will be processed according to application procedacres for conditional use permits. No use shall be permitted and no process, equipment or materials shall be used which are found by the Planning Commission to be harmfarl to persons living or• working in the vicinity by reason of odor, fismes, dust, smoke, cinders, dirt, refisse, water-carried waste, noise, vibr•atian, illumination or glare, or are found to involve any hazard of fire or explosion. Finding: The proposed medical office building is a permitted use in the C-5 zane district. The proposal is not expected to emit orders, fumes, dust, smoke, cinders, diz-t, water-carried waste, noise, vibration, illuzxzination or glare, or otherwise be harmful to persons living in the vicinity. Conclusion: The proposal complies. CPMC 17.46.060 (B) Na use shall be permitted and no process, equipment ar materials shall be used unless in compliance with all applicable state and federal environmental, health and safety regulations. Finding: The proposed medical office building will comply with all applicable state and federal environmental, health and safety regulations as stipulated in applicant's response "b", page 7 {Attachment "B"}. Page 3 of 10 Conclusion: The proposal complies. CPMC 17 46.060 (C) Wherever the side or rear pr°oper-ty lines ~f a parcel in the C-5 district abutparcels irz a residential (IZ) district, a solid wall or, fence, vine-co~~ered open fence or compact evergreen hedge six, feet in Height shall be located on that property line and continuously maintained to ensz~r•e effective buffering and visual screening bettiveen the two land uses. Where a public alley or• street separates the two properties, the barrier or screen shall be placed on the C-S property at the time of construction and may include driveway and pedestrian openings to the alley or street, as approved by floe Plmaning Comrazission. Finding: There exists a concrete block wall ~CMU) along the rear property line. This wall buffers the residential area from the proposed medical office building. The applicant states that the wall will be retained. The proposal also creates a 19 foot, 6 inch wide landscape buffer between the CMU fence and the parking area at the rear of the property. This landscape strip is to be planted with trees and is expected to act as a visual screen. Conclusion: The proposal complies. CPMC 17.46.060 (D) Whenever feasible, buildings shall be located toward the rear of the lot with parking toward the street in the front yard area for easy access and to minimize traffic noise at the rear of the property, especially when the rear property line abuts a residential (R) district. Finding: The proposed building is located on the property to best buffer the medical office building from the residential uses on the east (rear] property line anal to visually draw the building closer to Front Street in accordance with T4D Corridor requirements. A vegetation screen, parking a~1d a concrete wall will rr~inimize traffic noise at the rear of the property thus providing a buffer. CanclEision: The proposal complies. CPMC 17.6.070 Signs and lighting of prer~iises. A. No illumination sign or lighting standard used for the illumination of premises shall be so designed and installed that its direct rays are toward or parallel to a public street or highway or directed toward any property that lies within a residential district. B. No red, green or ambeY lights or illuminated signs may be placed in such a location or position that they could be conficsed with, oY may interfere with, any official traffic control device, traffic signal or directional guide signs. C. Signs in the GS district shall be per•rnitted and designed in accordance with Chapter 1 S. 24 * and with Section 17, 60..110. *Note: The sign requirements in Chapter 15.24 shall govern in the TOD district and corridor with exceptions listed in Chapter 17.67.050(M) of the CPMC. Page ~ of 10 Fi~iding: The applicant states that a lighti~lg plan will be submitted at the tune of building permit review and will meet this requiz-cznent. In addition, o-i-site lighting will consist afcut-off site light fixtures located at 1 S fect above finished grade which will naini~nize light spill-over onto adjace~it properties and public rights-af way. Fincli~ig: The applicant states that na green or amber lights or illunliztated sig~ls will be placed in locations that result in or interfere with office traffic control signals. Findixxg: The applicant states that signage plans will be submitted in accordance with the provisions of the CPMC Sections 15.24, 17.60.110 and I7.67.050(M}. Conclusion: The proposal complies. CPMC ].7.46.084 Off street parking Off-street parking and loading space shall be p~°ovided as f•egasired in Chapter 17.64,- CPMC 17.64.020 Off Street Loading (2} Office buildings, hotels, motels, hospitals, schools, institactions, ptcblic buildings, recreational or entertainment facilities, and any similar use which has a gross floor area of thirty thot~rsand square feet or more shall provide off-stf•eet truck loading or unloading berths in accordance with the following table: Square Feet of Floor Area No. of Berths Required Less than 30,ODD 0 30, 000 to .100, 000 1 CPMC 17.64,040 (HJ (2): Not less than one space per pf•actitioner; plus one space per each en2ployee, or, one space per each t~~o (200) hundred square feet of gross floor area, whichever is greater Finding: The gross floor area is 32,000 square feet; therefore one loading berth and a total of 160 parking spaces are required. The proposed site plan and application have provided 162 parking spaces. Six (6) spaces have been identified as ADA accessible as well as one (1}van space meeting the requirements of the Uniform Building Code. In addition, one (1}loading berth (17' 6" X 35') is provided to the rear of the building. Findiaag: Providence will also provide two (2) cross-access easements to adjacent properties to the north (Tax Lot 400) and the Providence owned Tax Lot 600 to the south of the project site. Each cross-access easement will consume approximately three parking spaces per easement. The Site Plan provides for 162 parking spaces. The additional four (4} spaces can be generated by the use of compact car parking spaces as described in Section 17.64.070. Parking spaces can also be achieved as a part of a future Providence expansion to the south {Tax 600). Page 5 of 1.0 Conclusion: The proposal can meet tl~e parking requirements and provide reciprocal cross-access easements from the project site. CPMC 17.72.010 (A) Purpose. The purpose of site plan, landscaping and corzstrtcctiorz plan approval is to review the site arzd landscaping plans of the proposed use, str•arcture or building to determine compliance with this title and the building code, and to promote the orderly and harmoraioass development of the city, the stability of land values arzd investments, and the general welfare, and to promote aesthetic considerations, and to help prevent impairment or depreciation of land values and development by the erection of structures or additions or alterations thereto wilhotct proper attention to site planning, landscaping and the aesthetic acceptability in relation to the development of neighboring properties. CPMC 17.72.020 Site plan approval r•equirerl: (A) A site plan application confor°rraing to the requirements of Section 17.72.Q3Q shall be made: 1. For all construction requiring issuance of a building permit; or• 2. Upon a change of use. (B) Except for the C-3 zoning district, the requirement for a site plan application upon a change of use may be waived by city staff if staf, f determines that no modifications are necessary to the existing access, parking, driveway, or any other facilities on the site. Finding: The application. and supporting documents provide the information necessary for review of the proposed medical office building. The proposed building will require issuance of a building permit and is a change of use. Finding: The proposal, a medical office building to be located on the site of the former Westside Lumber, Inc., and therefore does require nccessary modifications to the existing access, parking and derzxolition of existing structures located on the subject site. Conclusion: A Site Plan Review for the proposed structure is necessary and the submitted application complies. CPMC 17.72.030 (A) .... (E} Infor•nration Required. This section of the code addresses all of the necessary information to make a decision for approval or denial of the site plan application. Finding: The applicant has provided all of the necessary information as outlined in the above referenced code. Conclusion: The proposal complies. Page 6 of 10 CPMC 17.72.030 (F} In the discrwtian of the city, a traffic study pet, formed by a licensed professional engineer; Finding: A traffic study was required by the City of Central, and tEze study was prepared by JRH Engineerizag. The study, dated Noven~bei• 30, 2006, co~icludec3 that, "Because all mobility standards are net or exceeded at all locations under the build condition there are zzo proposed mitigation incasures associated with this development." Providence Health & Services Medical Office Bui9din s Traffic Iiripact Ana~sis, November 30, 2006, page 20. Finding: The Public Works Deparhnent has reviewed this documczlt and is in agreement with the conclusion as noted izz the Public Works Staff Report dated January 24, 2007. Concirxsion: The proposal complies. CPMC 17.72.040 Standards. In approving, conditionally approving, or• denying the plans submitted, the city shall base their decision ors the following standards: CPMC 17.72.040 (A). Landscaping and.fencing and the construction of walls on the site in such a manner as to caacse the same to not substantially interfere with the landscaping scheme of the neighborhood, and in such a manner as to use the same to sc,•een such activities and sights as might be heterogeneous to existing neighborhood uses. The Planning Commission may require the maintaining of existing trees for screening purposes and for sound and sight insulation from existing neighborhood use; Finding: Applicant Exhibit S, Sheet L1.1and L1.2 illustrates the landscape plan for this proposal The landscape design provides a perimeter frame of trees, shrubs and other plant varieties. The specific tree species, variety and size are listed on Sheet L1.2. The plan also provides for plantings adjacent to the building and at strategic pedestrian and parking locations. Finding: Along the east or rear property line is an existing concrete block wall that is incorporated in the rear vegetarian buffer plan. The applicant states that the CMU wall or fence will be retained. Finding: The proposal provides for a i 9ft. 6 inch wide landscape buffer between the CMU fence and the parking area at the rear of the property. This landscape strip is to be planted with trees and is expected to act as a visual screening between the medical office building and the adjacent residential uses. Finding: Front Street {Highway 99 West} is classified as a Major Arterial Street and as such the street tree provisions of CPMC Section 12.36.100 apply to this application. The landscape plan does provide a sufficient nuzxzber of street trees within the Front Strcet landscape strip. Page '7 of 10 Conclusion: The zaccessazy street trcc standards of CPMC Section 12,36.100 have been naet and are shown ozi the landscape plazas Applicazat Exhibit L1-1 and L1-2. CPMC 17.72.040 {B) Design, ntzzraber and location of ingress and egress points so as to improve and to avoid interference wit12 the traffic_flow ozz ptclilic streets; Finding: There are two existing access points from Frazat Street. Tlais praposal will consolidate these into ane fu11-nloveznezat izagz-ess anti egress point frozxz Front Street (Hwy 99) thus eliminating one of the two current access points. Tlae location and design of the access has been studied by the applicant's Traffic Engineers and by the City of Cexztral Point Public Wars Engineer and is determined to adequately serve the needs of the project. Conclusion: The proposal cozxzplies. CPMC 17.72.040 (C} To provide off street parking and loading facilities and pedestrian and vehicle flow facilities in saaclz a manner as is compatible with th.e arse for which the site is proposed to be used and capable of arse, and in such a manner as to improve and avoid intef ference with the traffic flow on public streets; Finding: The CPMC Section 17.64.040 H(2) requires 1 GO parking spaces, one (1) loading berth. The proposal provides 162 ofd street parking, six (6) designated ADA accessible, ane {1}van space and one (1}loading berth located at the rear of the building. Conclusion: The praposal complies. Finding: The building main entrance is oriented toward Front Street (Hwy 99) and a pedestrian zone is provided between the sidewalk and the zaaain entrance. This pedestrian zone includes a marked crosswalk differentiated frozaa the general circulation and the main building entrance. The existing sidewalk along Front Street adjacent to the internal crosswalk is proposed to be widened and the pedestrian entry point into the site. Once an site, the proposal describes aza internal fzve {5) foot walkway surrounding the building providing continuous pedestrian connectivity to and around the building. Conclusion: The proposal complies. CPMC 17.72.040 {D) Signs and other outdoor advef•tising structures to ensure that they do not conflict with or deter from traffic control signs ar devices and that they are cotnpatible with the design of their buildings or uses and will not interfere with ar detract from the appearance or visibility of nearby signs; Finding: The site plan submitted for this propasai does zaot identify signs or sigzz locations. The accompanying Applicant's Response narrative states that Page & o~ 1Q "signage will be designed so that it does riot conflict with traffic control signage or interfere or detract from nearby signage" {Response narrative page 12). Fizzding: Sign standards and permit requir•crne~~ts are found iza Section 15.24 of the CPMC. The sign requirements in Chapter 15.24 shall gover~~ in the TOD district and cor-r-idor with exceptions Iisted in Chapter 17.67.050(M} oftiie CPMC. Conclusion: Compliance with CPMC 17.72.040 (D); CPMC 15.24 Sign Cade and CPMC 17.67.050(M} will be monitored during the building per~r~it process. CPMC 17.72.040 (E} Accessibility afzd sufficiency of fire fighting,facilities to sz~ch a standard as to provide for th.e reasonable safety of life, limb and property, including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads and_fire lanes so that all buildings on the premises are accessible to fire apparatus; Fizading: Fire District No. 3 reviewed this proposal and provided written comments dated January 4, 2007. The review and comments, Attachment "F" of the Planning Department staff report dated February 6, 2007, have been forwarded to the Applicant's agent for consideration. Finding: The access and internal or on-site circulation have been designed to provide the width necessary to accozxrmodate fire vehicles with attention to the turning radius of such equipment as evidenced by site diagram, {Applicant's Exhibit 3 page A1.0}. Finding: Providence has agreed to cross-access easements on the north and south sides of the project site. Conclusionz: Fire District 3's review and comments can be addressed by Providence as specified by said fire authority. In addition, Fire District 3's requirements can be monitored in the building permit review process. CPMC 17.72.040 (F) Compliance with all city ordinances and regulations, including Section 16.20, 080 pertaining to the maximum number of single family dwellings or dwelling units allowable on cul-de-sac streets, and applicable state laws; Finding: No single-family dwellings are proposed with this application. Conclusion: Not applicable CPMC .17.72.040 (Gj Compliance with such architecture and design standards as to provide aesthetic acceptability in relation to the neighborhood and the Central Point area and its environs. The architecture and design proposals may be rejected by the Planning Commission if found to be incompatible with the existing architectural or design characteristics of adjacent properties or uses. Page 9 of 10 .lii addition, the Plannifzg Coittfnission reserves the rigltt to establish additiataal height, setback, buffering, or other development rec~rsirentents that Wray be necessary to ensatl•e land use compatibility and ensacre the health, safety, and privacy of Central Point residents. Finding; Applicant Exhibit 5, Sheet A4.1 and Exhibit 6, Sheet A4.2 illustrate the proposed design of the building. The arclaitecturc is a contemporary design that combines traditional and nkodern materials. The building exterior utilizes traditional red brick, tan colored pre-cast concrete and brushed silver metal panels. Brushed silver metal panels are also used to screen rooftop mechanical equipment. The window design is described as an alurxrinuzxrJglass starefror~t system with brushed silver frames and light-brown. glazed glass. Finding: The proposed structure is similar in design. to buildings recently constructed in the city and can provide aesthetic acceptability in relation to the neighborhood, the TOD Corridor and the City of Central Point. Conclusion: The proposal complies. Page IO of 10 ~~~~~~~~V~ ~~~w PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A SITE PLAN FOR A MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING FILE N0.07019 Applicant: Providence Health System-Orega~~; Agent: Michael Robinson 37S 2W 11CB, Tax Lots 401 and 500, 870 Front Street. WHEREAS, the Applicant submitted an application for a Site Plan fora 32,000 square foot, two-story medical office building on a 2.63 acre property identified on Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W 11 CB, Tax Lots 401 & 500, in the City of Central Point, Oregon; and WI-IEREAS, the property is cuz-rently zoned C-5, Tharougl~fare Camzxzercial and Transit Oriented Development {TOD) Corridor General Commercial zoning district and the application is consistent with the permitted uses set forth in Title 17, Section 17.46.20 and Site Plan criteria of Section 1'7.72; WHEREAS, the project site is within the C-5 Thoroughfare Commercial and the Transit Oriented District Corridor (TOD). Section 17.65.020{B) of the CPMC states "At the discretion of the applicant, a development application within the TOD corridor shall be subject ta: {1). The norr~zal base zone requirements as identified on the official zoning map and contained in this cadet" The Applicant has elected to use the G5 base zone requirements for this Site Plan review; WHEREAS, on February 6, 2007, at a duly noticed public hearing, the City of Central Point Planning Commission considered the Applicant's request far a Site Plan; and WHEREAS, after duly considering the Applicant's request, it is the Planning Cozxzmission's determination that the Application does comply with the applicable standards, criteria and subject to compliance with conditions as set forth in the Planning Department Staff Report (Exhibit "A") dated February 6, 2007; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Camznission City of Central Point, Oregon by this Resolution No. hereby approves the Application based on the findings and conditions of approval as stated in Exhibit "A", the Planning Department Staff Report dated February 6, 2007 which includes attachments, attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. Planning Camznission Resolution No. (216/2007) PASSED by the Planning Ca~ntnissian and signed by Inc in authentication of its passage this _ __ day of February, 2007. Planning Can~n~ission Chair ATTEST: City lZepresentative Approved by zxze this day of February, 2007 Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution Na. (2IGI2007)