HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 714 - Lanfear - Denial of VariancesPLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1 1 L`4'
A RESOLUTION TO DENY A CLASS C VARIANCE FROM:
1. Section 16.36.040(B} of the CPMC: A two (2) foot vaz~iance to the 20 ~. llag
pole access standard.
2. Section 17.20.050 of the CPMC: A variance to the 50 fi. zninimu-n lot width
requirement of the R-1-6 zo~~e.
3. Section 17.20.050 of the CPMC: A variance to the zniniznum interior side yard
setback of five (5) feet.
OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT MUNICIPAL CODE.
Applicants: Calvin and Jeannine Lanfeaz-.
(37 2W 11D Tax Lot 300) 683 Pittview Avenue
WHEREAS, the Applicants have submitted an application for a Class C Variance from
three standards of the City of Central Point Municipal Code as listed above on property
identified by Jackson County as Tax Lot 300 in the City of Central Point, Oregon; and
WHEREAS, on January 2, 2007, at a duly noticed public hearing the City of Central
Paint Planning Commission, considered the Applicants' request for a Class C Variance
froze three standards of the City of Central Point Municipal Code as listed above; and
WHEREAS, the property is currently zoned R-1-6, Residential Single Family; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's consideration of the application is based on the
standards and criteria applicable to Flag Lots, Section 16.36.040, R-1-6, Residential
Single Family zoning district Section 17.20.050 and Class C Variance Section 17.13.500
of the Central Point Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, after duly considering the Applicants' request rt is the Planning
Commission's determination that the Application does not comply with the applicable
standards and criteria as set forth in the Staff Report (Exhibit "A") dated January 2, 2007;
now therefore
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission City of Central Point, Oregon by
this Resolution No. hereby denies the Application based on the findings and
conclusions of denial as stated in the Staff Report (Exhibit "A") dated January 2, 2007.
Planning Commission Resolution No. ~ 1
{liz~2oo7)
PAS"ED by t1~~ Planning Comlr~issicr~~ and ~~~neri by ~~~~ in a~athet~ti~atit~n t~f'its ~?a~~~~~~c
this ~_ '?~ clay ofJanuary, 2007.
LL ~
f
ATTEST;
~`
City Kepres~ntati ,~~
Approved by me this ~~ day of January, 2007
~ r
Pi::~ln:u~ (.~oznrrt~~,~i~~n Cki~air ~~ .
Planning Cc~mznissic~n Resolution I'~~. "'°1 ~'
(l 12/2007)
EXHIE3IT'" '
~ ~
a
I ~~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~. a
® ~ i
4, f,>It'E9!`lldtpl4}~ (}{:`1,?a'(i~d(t111R^7}1 (3151?I.~EK'rY%
F'1~K,ISt,,,'}s'}e (Il,g, ~ec311tsiti5tlt;txas
Y~ ~k.f 1
,~a~auary ~ ~)~~~
Consideratioza of an applicaticzn requesting ~ Class ~' V<zri~.r~t;c t~.> three standards of t}zc ~'~'~1(.~, tlzc 2 ft.
access standard, a vari ce to the zaaizainauna lot r~idila and zaainin7z~zta side° yard setback z•cgzrircnac~ats in
preparation ofa lvlizaor Lang 1'az~ition (1°ile ]Ica, ()7~t7), '"lae subject proerty is located rn za l~"1-G,
l~esidcntial izagl Family ozaing district and is identified oza tlac :lacksoza Cor~zzaty ~Ksscssoz•'s neap as 7S
2 l l l~, Tai Lot 0~?, E Pittvie~~ l~vezaue. ~ ~iarats< Cl~rira era .learz~z6ne ,a t~+~a~
"`A.FF >CT
Connie Chine, Coz unity Pla ex
~. ~.T~I
In 195 property to the-west vras partitioned Filed Plat s,i~~~K<~ wKO(~~~y ~aa
~ ~
F M
d ~
~ V~
a''
~
~' ~ v '""` I ry?"
"~'M, ......, P
.~ { `_
;ate„„ 9 F6AA W A i~,.
m 8" "
", A
a , ~
~ ,
~ ° ~ P1-1995}. A.t that tzme a nezghborhood
"
, ~, "
~
~µ
circulation plan vvas prepared by Czty stal`f
~X
} ~
z ~ qn .
~~' illustrating laova the general area. could be
~ " I y developed (Figure 2), '1"lais neighborhood
,
{
~°
~"~ , .
~
~~ ;u
, circulation plan lass never been officially
~
V
~ ~ ~~
~
,, ~
~~ adopted and currently serves as ~. preferred
i ..9 ' ~ ~ ~,,, Y ~~,~ r.,3
.:.
:,
t '
~~ ~ • ~ ~ ~tfi '~'; Figure 2