Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - November 7, 2000CITY C1F CENT"I2.AL Pf)IN'I' PLANNING C()MMISSIC3N AC~ENT3A Nc~vem~ber '7, 2000 - 7:00 p.m. ~R~ ~~ ~g~ l~Iexfi Plannizag Cozaamissiozz Resolution No. 502 I. MEETING CALLED T4 ORDER II. ROLL CALL City Planning Chuek Piland -Candy Fish, Don Foster, Karolyzae Johnson, Jolan LeGros, Paul Lunte and Wayne Riggs III. CORRESPONDENCE I V, MINUTES A. Review and approval of October 3, 200(3, Planning Commission Minutes. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES VI. BUSINESS Page 1 - '7 A. Public meeting to review a request by a developer to modify the original conditions of approval for the Cedar Shadows Planxzed Unit Development. The subdivision is located iza the R-3, Residential Multiple Family zone district on Map 37 2W I IA, Tax Lot 301. 8 -18 B, Public hearing to review a conditional use pez'mit application for the fitness center named "Curves for Women". Tlae subject propez~ty in tlae Mountain View Plaza Shoppizag Center is located in the C-4, Touz'ist and Offzce Professional District on Jackson Couzaty Assessment Plat 372W 1 OD, Tax Lot I300. 19 - 46 C. Public meeting to review a Site Plaza application that would allow the construction of a ~8 room motel near the intersection of South Peninger Road and LaRue Drive. The subject property is located in the C-4, Tourist and Office Professional District on Jackson County Assessment Plat 3'72W02D, Tax Lot 2900. 47 - 70 D. Public mooting to revicv,~ a Fite flan applicatio~a that would allow the construction of a l Oq room motel and 4,000 square foot restaurant near the intorsoction of South F'oninger Road and L ali.ue Drive. "1"ho su~?ject property is located in the C-~, Tourist and pffico Professional District on Jackson County ~ssossment Plat 372W02D, Tax Lots 2600, 2700 and 280(}. VII. MISCELLANEpLS VIII. ADJpURNMENT City of Central Foint Planning Commission I O13i2(~~0 I. MEETING CALLER TC3 ~JRDER AT '7:00 P.M. II. RC1LL CALL: Cluck Piland, Candy Fish, John LeGros, Don Foster, and Wayne Riggs were present. S~.arolyne Johz~soz7 and Paul Lunte were absent. Also in attendance were Tom Humphrey, Planning Director; lien Gersclaler, Community Planner, and Matt Samitore, Planning Technician. III. CORRlCSPC}NDENCE There was no correspondence. IV. MINUTES Commissioner Fish made a motion to approve the minutes from the September, 19, 20001 meeting as presented. Commissioner Foster seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; LeGros, yes, and Foster, yes. Commissioner Riggs abstained. Motion passed. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances. VL BUSINESS A. Withdrawal of Jones ro ert 1.43 from Jackson Count Fire Protection District No. 3. following its annexation to the Cit,~of Central Point. Tom Humphrey, Planning Director, presented the Planning Report. The three properties were recently a~u~exed into the City of Central Point. Since the city is not within Fire District #3, any property that is annexed. from the L)GB must also be "detached" from the Fire District. Once the City, is annexed into Fire District Number 3, effective the first of the year, this procedure will no longer be necessary. Commissioner Fish recommended that the City Council withdraw the subject annexation area from. Jackson County Rural Fire Protection District #3. Commission I.,eGros seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: motion passed unanimously. B. Review and recommendation on Proposed Comprehensive Plan Text and Map Amendments to Include the Central Point Transit Oriented Development {TOD). C. Review and reGOmmGndation on Proposed Toning C~rdinaz~Ge Text and Map Atnez~dznez~ts to 1nGlude the Central Point '1"ransit C)rie~~tGCI Development {`I'{~TJ}. Tom Humphrey, Planning Director, and Paul Morris, of MGKcevcr/Morris, prese~~ted ite~z~s B & C before the Gon~ission. The Coznmissio~~ went through the new changes a~ld rcformattcd the document that discussed the land use and zoning Ghazages that are proposed for the Transit t~riented Development area. Commissioner Riggs recommended the Comprehensive Plan Text and Map Amendments, and the Zoning Ordinance Text and Map Amendments to the City Council for approval, with the following changes to the document. Adding a section describing the LMR and MMR in the Roof and Street Lighting Sections. Adding a section on I:~ecorative Murals, and time limitations on temporary signs. Clarifying the section on horizontal windows. Add descriptions fo each header describing which zones correlate to a given section. Fixing the tables regarding LMR zones. Changing to the Zoning Map to include the block in- between E. Pine and Oak anal 6"' and '7`~ Streets. The Northerly portion, would be included in the EC zone, Currently, the Tom Malot building resides an the property. The Southerly section ~vauld be zoned IIMR. Also, adding that the code, that there be periodic review fo make, sure it is functioning correctly. The first review of the code will be within one years time of adoption, Commissioner Fish seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: motion passed unanimously. D. Review and ReGOmmendation on Central Point Transportation Systems Plan (TSP). Tom 1-lmphrey, presented the Transportation Systems Plan. A table was added to the document, that showed the widths of the new street Gross-sections. The Commission asked that the maps, and all the Gross-section diagrams be incorporated in the document appendix or in its own seGtlOn. Commissioner Fish recommended the Central Point Transportation Systems Plan to the City Council, for approval, with the changes of adding the maps and the street cross- section diagrams. Commissioner Foster seconded the motion. ROLL CALLc Fish, yes; LeGros, yes; Foster, yes; Riggs abstained. Motion passed. VII MISCELLANEOUS There was no miscellaneous items. VIII AllJOURNMENT Meeting Adjourned at I x}:041 P.M. PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMOIZANI)I1M 1-1E~IZINCi D~TI:~: Ntave;~a--lacr 7, 2flC1~3 TO: FROM: SUBdECTs Owned Applicant: Pz-€ztaerty Description/ Zo_ ni~z~: ~umnzary Central Point Plazaning Conaznissioza Ken Gerschler, Community Plazazaez• Modification of Final Dcvelopzaaezat Plaza -Cedar Shadows P.U.D. Dallas Page 900 Windemar Drive Ashland, (~rcgon 97520 372W 11 A, Tax Lot 301 - 2.30 acres C-4, Tourist and C}ffice-Professional District The applicant is requesting Plazming Commission approval to modi:Fy the front yard setbacks in the previously approved Final Development Plan for the Cedar Shadows Planned Unit Development. Applicable Law CPMC 17,68.010 et seq. -Planned Unit Development CPMC 17.8.010 et seq. - R-3, Residential Multiple Family District Discussion In July of 1999, The Plazarzing Commission approved the Final Development Plan for tlae Cedar Shadows Planned Unit Development. The applicant, Dallas Page of Parthenon Construction is now asking that the Planning Commission consider a modification to the previously approved plan by allowing the minimum ~0 foot front yard setback to be reduced for each of the units to allow some flexibility in breaking up an otherwise straight facade of home fronts along the street .The requested modification would not apply to the minimum 20 foot required setback for the poz~#ion on the structure that has the garage to ensure adequate offwstreet parking and maneuvering space for vehicles. Staff has met with the applicant to address the feasibility of such a request and it appears that the requested modifications could improve the street appeal and promote better social interaction between this neighborhood provided that the units closest to the street right of way have aza outdoor oriented deck or porch area. The purpose of the Planned Unit Development {CPMC I'7.~$.OI (}} is to gaiza n~orc effective use Qf open space, realise advantages of large scale site lalanning, mixing of building types or land uses, unproved aesthetics az~d ez~viz•oz7nzez-ztai preservation lay allovrzn~ a variety ofl~uilciii~~s, stz-~zctures, open spaces, allowable heights azad setbacks of bzzildings and structures. Any modif catioza to a Planned Unit Development requires an approval by the I'lazazaing Comnaissiozz, Reca7mmendation staff recommends that the Planning Cozxaznission take one of the following actions: I .Adopt Resolution I~lo. ,approving the modifications subject to the recommended conditions of approval, or ~. Deny the proposed znodifzcations; or 3. Continue the review of the modifications at the discretion of the Commission. At#achrnents A. bite Plan B. Notice of Public I-~earing C. Recommended Conditions of Approval. ,~ -. ~ ,4 ._x~ ~.. ; .`~ 1 f ~f ~i _..~ 7~ J '~ ~ t ~~~f ~~' ~ [ ~~ 15/ t .Jr~~ ~-` ~ ~= .i ,~' ....(1(~ f, ~~ .:~ ~ r~;'~/fir,, /~ i~ 0 ?. ,: ~. ` _ .__~_______,_a_. __.. E ;~.:: ti ~; ~ ~- ~- s ~ ~ f ~r L• 7 /~'~~~~ ~ Y ~ ` 4 i\i \, j ¢ 5`, ~. ~~ V ~~ a i ~; w= ~~_ ~. ~~\~_ i ((~ 5 i1. r~ ~ f • f ~. t. h "-. ) fl ff-t~ J^.4 •"l S _..._._.._...._.~_.._~.. ~_. _=N { u . ~ I JI ..1 i Ej 44 `~~f'f i~ .r J //, f~/''/E f /: ~ ~ 3 !'~ V ~ i ~ 1 I ' f.. F i i 1 i ` 3.~ ~~ t -- N J ATTACHMENT C RECQMMENDED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CC~N~)ITI()NS 4F APPRf~VAL 1. Approved modifications to the front yard setback shall apply only to t11e habitable portion of the structure with no portion of the structure being closer than thirteen and one half feet when measured from the front lot line. All units proposed for the reduced setback shall have a porch with useable outdoor space to accommodate activities. Any changes from this condition shall require approval by the Planning Commission. 2. The project must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations . r 'G©,,,` O~ '~'{7TIT ~~T.II"1l~}~1S'{'.~r, 1~1~,T3 ~ T{e,t~~ Cc~rschle:r ~ ca TTi TT1 TT T~T i ~. y 1' ~ a I~ T1 ~ T" i~~tt ~arrTik,ore i-'I~ITITiTTg `T'cC1Tn}c;ir~IT Notice of ~~eeting Date of Notice: October 19, 2[}~{~ Meeting Date: November 7, 2{}04 Time: 7:00 p.m. {Approximate} Place: Central Point City I-~all l55 South Second Street Central Point, ©regon NATURE QF MEETING Beginzaing at the above time and place, the Central Paint Planning Commission will review a request y the developer of the 25 lot Cedar Shadows Planned Unit Development to modify the previously approved minimum front yard setbacks. If approved, the front yard setbacks could be reduced to allow the habitable portion of each unit to be positioned closer to the street giving the developer the ability to offset an otherwise straight row of houses. The garage portion. of each unit would remain at the previously approved setback distance. The proposed development is located in a R-3, Residential Multi~Family zoning district on tax lot 301 of .Tackson County Assessment Plat 37 2W 11 A. CRITERIA FQR DECISION The requirements far Planned Unit Developments are set forth. in Chapter 17 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Regulations, Off=street parking, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plans, The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City`s Public Works Standards. PUBLIC COMMENTS l . Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written. comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled far Tuesday, November 7, 2040. 2. Written comments tray be sent in advance; of tl~e n~zectirlg to Central Point City flail, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, C)1~ 07502. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written coz~~rzettts about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Cazxzmission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, ©rcgon. Copies ofthe same az•c available at 15 cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public zrtay contact the Planning Department at {541 } 664- 3321 ext. 231. SUMMARY ©~' PRflCET1URE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staff reports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the request to modify the minimum front setbaclCS in the Cedar Shadows P.U.D.. Any testimony or written. comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the request. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Punning Commission decisions. 155 South Second Street • Central Poiztt, C}R 97502 ! {541) 664-3321 !Fax: {541} 664-6384 PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT 1-lEAR1NG D~~l~l~: November 7, 2040 TO. FROM: SUBJECT: Owner/ At~~iicant• Pro er Descri tea ionl Zoning,:, Summary Central Paint Planning Commission Tom i-Iumphrey AICP, Piant~in~ Director Conditional Use Permit of 37 2W 14D, Tax Lot 13{30 - "Curves for Women" fitness center .lim and Nicole Martin Curves for Women 1350 Plaza Boulevard, Suite D Central Point, Oregon 87542 372W14D, Tax Lot 1300 - 7.25 acres C-4, Tourist and Office-Professional District The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for the "Curves for Women" fitness center located in the Mountain View Plaza Development. Authority CPMC 1.24.450 vests the Planning Commission. with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a Conditional Use Permit. Notice of the Public Hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.460 (Attachment "A'>). Applicable Law CPMC 17.44.414 et seq. - C-4, Tourist aaad Office-Professional District CPMC 17.64.414 et seq, -Off Street Parking and Loading CPMC 17.76.010 et seq.- Conditional Use Permit Discussion The applicant Curves for Women opened a fitness center on October 16`~ in the Mountain View Plaza. Lluring a review of the business license application, it became apparent to staff that the business was indeed a fitness center and that a conditional use permit would be required. Fitness centers are not included iza the list of permitted uses that are a part of a community shopping center. The municipal code requires the issuance of a conditional use permit to ensure that certain types of businesses don't conflict with surrounding uses, particularly residential uses. The project meets ail ofthe z~•zinimum lot, setback ,parking and landscalaing requirements for on site C-4 zoning district that were established wl~czz tl~e anginal site plan for the Mountain V iew was approved in 1998. This business occupies Building "D" with floe flallzxaark store and there are currently four vacant stzitcs available for other activities. There are a total of 89 parking spaces in the vicinity of Building "T}" CPMC 1'7.44.070 stipulates that zxo illuminated sign or lighting standards used for the illtzn7ination shall be designed and installed is in a manner that their direct rays are toward or parallel to a public street or directed toward any property that located within a residezttial district. There are currently street lights located along the parking areas adjacent to the Curves for Womez~z business site with no light rays directed toward nearby parcels. Signage associated with this project meets the requirements described in CPMC Chapters 15.24 and 1'7.60.110. The Central Point Building Departznez~t loos issued permits for wall mounted signage and this has been installed (Attachnxent `B"). Hours of operation for the business are from 9:OOAM to 7:OOPM seven days a week and this is consistent with the hours of other businesses on site.. The applicant has submitted a schematic of interior and exterior facilities for consideration by the Commission (Attachment "C"). Findin s of Fact & Conclusions of Law Conditi~anal Llse ~'et•tnit The Planning Commission in granting a conditional use permit shall find as follows: That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use and to meet all other development and lot requirements of the subject zoning. district and all other provisions of the code, ^ The fitness center requires the issuance of a conditional use permit. The site is adequately prepared for this sort of commercial activity, off street parking requirements have been met. That the site has adequate access to a public street or highway and that the street or highway is adequate in size and condition to effectively accommodate fine traf~ c that is expected to be generated by the proposed use; ~ The project site takes access to Freeman Road, a secondary arterial, via two private roadways that are a part of the Mountain View Plaza development. Scheduled improvements along Freeman Road will alleviate increases in traffic that are expected when this and other businesses are opened. That the proposed use will have no significant adverse effect ox~ abutting property ar the pern~ittcd use thereof: Tn making this determination, the commission shall consider the proposed location of improvements on the site; vehicular ingress, dress and internal circulation; setbacks; height of buildings; walls and fences; landscaping outdoor lighting and signs; ~ The location of Curves for Women faces the on-ramp for southbound Interstate Five trafficwhich will not result in an adverse impact upon residential properties in the area located along Freeman Road. That the establishment, maintenance ar operation of the use applied for will comply with local, state and federal health and safety regulations and therefore will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding neighboriload or to the general welfare of the community. ~ The project must comply with all applicable federal, state and local regulations. That any conditions required far approval of the permit are deemed. necessary to protect the health, safety and general welfare. The Planning Commission may at it's discretion, assign reasonable conditions of approval to protect the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The Planning Department received a letter from Curtis Tessman an Freeman Road who raised issue with the number of fitness centers in the city. The Department responded to his concerns {See Attachment "E") Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take one of the following actions: l .Adopt Resolution No, ,approving the Conditional Use Permit subject to the recommended conditions of approval; or 2. Deny the proposed Conditional Lase Permit; ar 3. Continue the review of the Conditional LTse Permit at the discretion of the Commission. Attachments A. Native of Public I-Tearing T3. Approved Building Permit for Signage C. Site Plan and Schematics D. Planning Department Recommended Conditions E. Correspondence ak ~~. ~.~ ~~ ~r ~yti, ~~/ R~ .L 1JL 1 ~.t 1' S .L Y Lf 1f .Lt .L ~ ~ .L ~1J ~.1 7 'I'orr~ Ilt~rnpl`~rey, r~ICP I'I~~7~~iT~~ 1)ircc,t.or If~rx Ccrsc:kfler G'orrit'n~nil.y I'l~i~ner ~taf.t ~~arr~itore I'1ar~niri~ `I'echz~ician Na~ice of ~1Zeeting Date of Nance: gctaber 19, 2aa4 Meeting Date: Time: Place: NATURE OF MEETING November 7, 2444 7:44 p.m. ~Appraximate} Cezxtral Paint City Ka11 l55 Sauth Second Street Central Point, Oregan Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Plazxning Commission will review a tonditianal use permit applitatian for a exercise facility located at 1354-D Plaza Boulevard in the Mountain view Plaza This parcel islocated in a C-4, Tourist and Offzte Professional Zoning District and is identified in the retards of the Jatksan County Assessor as Map 3'] 2W 42D, Tax Lot 1240. CRITERIA I~'OR DECISION The requirements for Conditional use permits are set Earth in Chapter 17 of the Central Paint Municipal Cade, relating to general information and conditions of approval. The proposed applitatian is also reviewed in atcordante to the City's Public Works Standards. PUBLIC COMMENTS l . Any person interested in Commenting an the above-mentioned land use decision nxay subnxit written comments up until the Close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, November 7, 2404. 2. Written Laments may be sezxt in advance of the meeting to Central Point City l-loll, l SS South SeCOnd Street, Central Paint, OR 97502. 3. Issues which may provide the basis far an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the txpiration afthe cazxxzxxent period noted above. Any testimony and written camnxents about the deCisioxxs dtsCribed abovC will nerd to be related to the proposal and should be stated dearly to the Plaxxni~xg Ca~xx~rzissian. l55 Sautlx SeCOnd Street ~ Central Point, C7I~. 97502 ~ (541} 664-321 A Fay: (54l} 664-63b4 ~- 5. Copies of all evidence relied upon by tl~e applicant arc available for public ~•cvicw ctt City ~-lall, 155 South Second Street, Central 1'cai~~t, C~rcl;on. Copies of tl~te s~ut~e are available at 15 cents per page. • T'or additional information, the public tray contact the 1'lat~nin~;l~epartnaent at (541) 664- 3321 ext. 291. i ~~ _, v J~' ~i f ~? ~_.. t Q ~~ i ~1 Y' +~ i -.. [[[ I ~ :. 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, C7R 9750211- {5411 664-3321 • 1;ax; {5411 664-6384 ~ atr~-h ~~r ~ ~r~~ t~~~- r~~r~ S~~~F,~ Past Office Sax 5287 4843 Table Rack Read Central Paint, Oregan =37502 Phane {543) 684 3939 Fax {543} 664-8136 /-~-~`r4-~f~f`Y1 ~ ~ r~ ~tt ~~~e: 9th 10 2000 Contract©r: ~.an~piighter Sign CCB #'113935 City license #38 Proje~~t: turves far Women Pr©ject Address: J2Q5 Plaza Blvd. Prflject Owners: Jim & l~licale Martin Pr©ject type: Signs 1»acation: front ~~ Building aty: ~ ~,~.. uppercase '~~~~ lower case . ~=>~ ..,, ._ ,.;~ .; ~1,._. :._. - `~ -r., t-,~ V ~~~'.~_ ~~_ - ., .. ~,-s .. ~iur VE~S F'AN CFlANNEi.. LETTERS PLEX FACE..._.....-.ftED CLEAR PLEX TR[~f+CCAP__..........,.__»__SRDNZE 5" RETURNS----»»...._»L7 BEtG'~. TD MATCH BLDG. $" RACEWAY--.-----LT: E3EIGE TO MATCH BLDG. ~,,.1,. iv-~~2-2a~ F'~~;2`31'lll'1~ department r:~~~ ~~ Central Point ...`.. „t~~..._ f I~C1~'SS ft)1" WflC11E'il PAN CHANNEL cAt~ 1=ACS-__.,...-- WH17'~ FLEX SHEETED LT, BE~lE2E01.'*T'CEEtS TRtMCAR-----RED 5" E~ETURNS-----LT. BEEGE TCi fk~iATCi-t 8Lt)G. Tt3TAL HEIGHT --36" Tt)TAL LENGTH--8f1" SQUARE FT.----- 20 4... ____-~----...._---~...___.._._._.....---_._ ~r~~~ _.____....,.._..---....___~ __... ATTACHMENT ~ RECOIVIMENDEI[l PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The project must comply with. all applicable local, stag and federal regulations . >:~ vn ;i FZRS2 FEBERAL C 12i ~~~. ~ , r s , ;.r c ~: D ~:; G -- 1228 PI ;:._ .,,.~~~?, STE. A c n E tx H z .s K L - LITT PIZZA 1360 PLAZA T3LI~17. sT~. A 13x0 PL,AZA.$I.4ll. s°r~. A s c n - 1350 PT ~~':, ~ ST~» A tifa ~ _~!;iC ~ i ~ , ~ :x c x s x r.~~ ,~. :~ ~~ ~ - ,_ __ ~ cis' ~' ,~ ! , ~ l'~~n, 'I~ ~~, + ~ i ~;, "` ~ I ~' ~-~~ ~ i ~ s~~ ~ ~ J ~~ ~ ' ~( ',~~ {~ ;~ ~I,I~IIiI;Jlllli I ~°: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~f j ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ 1~~ i ~flllililm I! i~ I ~y~~~ i 9 203 ~ ~ ` i-`~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ r~ r, C~ ~ i i ! ~ D° I,~ ~- ~ I ~=' I I 'i i.;: i : y rl s I~~~ i~ , ': ~, ~- , , . „ ___,~_ _ i 228 ~ ~~ ! ! ~ ~~_ i t a '¢ a ' )!- II ~~~~ ;;11 A~ .r i ~ ..... _ _ _ ~..~ i ~ ~rl~ r ~ ate` J l ~ 1 ~' `~~' 1r:.~ Fl.A23C~ r~~~~dr;~. ,_ ~~~ -~ ~ ~ _ ,~ ` ` ~ { ~~ + ~ ~ e~ . ~ `~ ~~_ I it s,~ ~~''- t ~~ ~ ~`~,", ~ ;-~ ~_ ~., ~ ~ r ~ ~_~.~ i f _ L~ 5 ~ ~; ~ J -- ~ fi i J ~ i ~a.~.. a ._. z ~ ,~; ~ e ~~ ~ \ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r-~ti ~~~ ~ ~ ~, U ~ M° g .. . A ~~~ ~~'V ~. ~',~V~\ \~ `\~.~ V ~~ ~,i\~,~~'~~\V~~\`~.`,`~`~ ~~, ~l~\_"~`~~\\~ - ~, ~~~\vvv~,`~~s.~v,~~~~'v _~_ ~, _-.-~ ., -,xr.# xxz -,ccam3.e. ~. ^~~# ~xx a n txm n nv. acx..e,xw. l~..~_. ti ._. ~'\ I~ t f~ ~ ~~ u ~-rr~ ~~rn~,~r G ~~ j 1~~ J ~~ _~ jjgd ..... ., i ~ ~~~~~ ' f ~~ ~ _ ..~ ._ c lr 0 ,-.!~- b`r+Yr~ ~1f 3 "..,4-~f ~~~. ? F '~ .f £ {~j.`~ .. F''~i'~' r.. jl'.~ L,iG"'~.",t``i.--C...i, ~~,..CP ~.~`{ L! " ~~.,~'~--t:'i,..,r~ Y t -° ~~ 9 t ~ s -~, n s: J, k .~ ff __ _ .._. .. Cttz-lis Tess~~i~~n ;Central 1'oizlt C}R 975~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ ,~.,~~ ;~ ,~ ~ ~ - ~ P~annin Tie artment ry :~:~',;~'t^~''~ .-~'"~ o, Tour Jltvnphrey ~C1 ~ ~ 1 nfi - i ~ 1'tarrnirag Director _~. e'en CrcrscJrler Clctaber 3(), 2000 ~orrrrrrrrnityPlarrrrer .Merit Sarrrilore CUrtiS t~ L~alsy Tessman I'Icrnnirrg TecJrniciatx 142 Freeman Road Central Point, QR 97502 Dear Mr. c~ Mrs. Tessman: Thank you for writing to the Central Point Planning Department and expressing your feelings about new development in your area. The exercise facility, Curves fvr ~o;'nen, is one of many commercial uses that is going in to the Mountain View Shopping Center and is a legitimate service provided to residents of Central Paint. In this case the new business is being very well received. In response to your interest in over night lodging, I thought I'd let you know that the City has received two separate proposals to build motels in town_ Both are located on the east side of the freeway and will be built near the Chevron service station on East Pine Street. One of the new motels will be awned and operated by Marriott which should be a welcome addition to Central Point. if you are interested in learning more about the development you may wish to attend the Planning Commission meeting ors Tuesday evening, November 7'k at '7:00 p.m. As time passes you can expect Freeman Road to be fully improved from Mountain View Plaza to Hopkins Road. One of the benefits of making road improvements or offering alternative modes of transportation {sidewalks, bike lanes, etc.) is to reduce reliance upon the automobile and to irnprave air duality. That is what we are trying to do in your neighborhood. Z encourage you to participate in the City's planning process when your schedule permits. There are a variety of new development concepts that are being considered by Central Point which will result in a better quality of life for its residents and you might like to learn about them and pass the information on to your friends, Y"ou are welcome to call me for more information at 664-3321 extension 230. Thanks again for your interest in the City. AICP C: James ~. Bennett, City Administrator 15S South Second Street ~ Central Point, C}R 9'7502 ~ {541} 664-3321 ext. 231 +11 Fax {541)664-6384 PLANNING DrPARTMEN I' STAFF REP{JRT f1E~R1NCr I)ATI: Novembez• 7, 2000 TGI: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: Ken Gersclaler, Community Planner SUBJECT: Public Hearing- Site Plan Review for 37 2W 02D, '1'ax Lot 2900 - Marriot Motel Glwners Sycan Development Corporation 3405 Baldy View Lane Springfield, dregon 97477 A~erxt Timothy D.1-lovet President, Sycan Development Corporation 34(}5 Baldy View Lane Springfield, dregon 97477 Pro er D-escri _tp onl 37 2W ODD, Tax Lot 29D0 - 1.32 acres total. Zonit~~: C-4, Tourist and dffice Professional l~istriet Sumrnary• The applicants have requested a Site Plan Review for the construction of a 5S room motel. The subject property is located in an C-4, Tourist and Professional zoning district on Tax Lot 2900 of Plat 37 2W 02D. The tax lot is in the process of being subdivided {platted} into three parcels previously approved by the Commission}, The motel will reside on the western most parcel. Authority CPMC 1.24.050 vests the Planning Commission. with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a Site Plan. Notice of the Public Dearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.050 {Attachment "A"). Applieabie L aw: CPMC 17.4q-.010 et seq. - C-4, Tourist and dffice Professional District CPMC 17.54.010 et seq. - dff Street Parking and Loading CPMC 17.72.010 et seq. -Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval Discussion• The applicant Timothy I-Iovet is working on behalf of property owner 1-lotcl Investment Property Two, LLC to develop a 68 room 3 stony "Mazxiot"znotcl near the intersection of South Peninger Road and LaRue Drive. According to the attached letter of description {Attachment "I3"} the foot print of the structure is 12,tJ45 square feet with tl~ze total sgzzare footage of approximately ~fa,(}~0 square feet. An indoor swimming pool is also being proposed. Primary access to the site is from a curb cut in the LaRue Drive cul-de-sac. Secondary access is via a 26 foot wide shared drive with the proposed Sl~ari's Restaurant to the east {Attachment "C"}. Sidewalks are proposed along the building for pedestrian access. Currently, South I'eninger Road is frequented with a mix of truck. and automobile traffic. The Planning Department has evaluated the project density and building distance requirements far the zoning district and determined that the development is compliant with the zoning ordinance. The applicant has provided his own CPMC compliance analysis {Attachment "B") The Municipal Code requires not less than one space per guest unit; plus one space per each two employees. Seventy spaces have been proposed, $ of which are compact and ~ are handicap. The code also requires one loadinglunloading berth which has been provided in the portico area. The exterior is proposed to be constructed with an EIFS exterior finish similar to stucco {Attachment "D"). While the first floor will be a coppertone color, the second and third floor will be manor white. Windows frames will be aluminum or vinyl, fascia will be wood with metal. Roofing will be composition material slate in color. Any proposed fencing will be constructed of aluminum. The structure will have three wall mounted signs on the south, north and east elevations in addition to one pole zriounted sign { Attachment "D"}, The Central Point Building Department will require separate building permits for the signage. Tom Madara Landscaping has prepared a landscaping plan {Attachment "F,>') that includes an automatic irrigation system, a variety of shrubs and an extensive use offlowerizzg trees which include pear, plum and dogwood as well as other decorative species such as jaquernonte birch and paper bark cherzy. The Public Works Department has prepared recommendations for on and off site improvements which are believed to be reasonably related to the proposed development. These include, but are not limited to; driveway aprons, sidewalk improvements; site grading and drainage; on-site lighting; paving and utility {water, sewer and storm drain }connections {Attachment "H"}. Jackson County Fire District Number 3 has submitted comments that relate to the project { Attachment "F " }. They would like to review a set of blueprints and plot plat from the applicant that shows general information, on-site water storage and/ar hydrant location. They have asked that I I:1P ] an n i ngiQ00~t5. ~r~ d the trash enclosure lac moved East away frosza the building. The fzve foot wide concrete; sidewalk should lac inlaid so that fzre vehicles can laass. Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority has indicated that the property can be served with sewer service subject to building location coordinated with tlzc physical connection. The sanitary sewer service will also require the payment of connection fees {Attacl~n-tent "»}. Avista Utilities {Natural Gas Provider} has indicated that there are no specific requirements at this time and that the meter location will lac decided at a later elate {Attachment "F"}. Paeif e Power {Electrical Service Provider} has requested that tl~e Plannixg Commission consider a condition of approval that would establish a l 5 foot wide Public Utility easement along the north, east and south property lines {Attachment "F" }. City staff has discussed this request and determined that an easement may not be feasible along the entire length ofthe northerly property line but rather up to a point where LaRue Drive ends. The t~regon Department ofTranspoz-tationhas asked that the applicant submit a copy ofthe grading and drainage plaza to ensure that surface drainage sloes not affect lrnterstate Five {Attachment "F"}. Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law: Sits Plan Reviez~ In approving, conditionally approving or denying tlac plans submitted, the City bases it's decision on the following standards froze Section 1'7.72.fl40: A. Landscaping and fencing anal the construction of walls on the site in such a manner as to cause the same to not substantially interfere with the landscaping scheme ofthe neighborhood, and in such a manner to use the same to screen such activities and sights as might be heterogeneous to existing neighborhood uses. The Commission may require the maintenance of existing plants or the installation of new ones for purposes of screening adjoining propez-ty. ^ The site plan shaves landscaped areas distributed throughout the project area . B. Design, number and location of ingress and egress points so as to improve and to avoid interference with the traffzc flow on public streets; ^ Access is shown to betaken i`ronz LaRue Drive and a shared access with the previously approved Shari's Restaurant. C. To provide off street parking and loadiz~zg facilities and pedestrian and vehicle flow facilities in such a manner as is compatible with the; use for which the site is proposed to be used and capable of use, and in such a manner as to improve and avoid interference with the traffze flow on public streets; zz:ti~~~n~,zn~,io~oas.,3 ~~ ^ CPMC 17.64.040 {B~f) requires that 7() parking spaces be provided. The applicant has met this requirement. D. Signs and other outdoor advertising structz~res to cz~zsure that they do not conflict with or deter from traffic control signs or devices and that they are cozi~patible with the design oftheir buildings oz• uses and will not interfere with or detract from the appearance or visibility of nearby signs; ^ Any signage proposed for the project would require a separate building permit. E. Accessibility anal suffzciency of fzre fzghtiz~zg facilities to such a standard as to provide for the reasonable safety of life, limb and property, including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads and fzre lanes sa that all buildings on the premises are accessible to fire apparatus; ~ The project, if approved, would need to meet any requirements of Jackson County Fire District 3. The district has requested that the five foot wide sidewalk be inlaid as to permit fire trucks unobstructed access during emergency circumstances. Additionally, the district has asked that the trash enclosure be re-located eastward. F. Compliance with all city ordinances azzd regulations; ^ The project as presented by the applicant is in compliance with the requirements of the Central Point Municipal Code subject to the recommended conditions of approval (Attachment "G"~. G. Compliance with such architecture and design standards as to provide aesthetic acceptability in relation to the neighborhood and the Central Point area and it's environs. ~ The motel is designed to be aesthetically compatible with the interchange commercial developrtzent located in the surrounding area. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take one of the following actions: 1. Adopt Resolution No., approving the Site Plan subject to the recommended conditions of approval; or 2. Deny the proposed Site Plan; or 3. Continue the review of the Site Plan at tl~e discretion of the Commission. I~I:IF'lann ing1fl4Q45.4ti~pd Attachments A. Notice of Public i-Tearing B. Site Plan C. Letter ofPrt~ject Description D. Structure Elevations E. Landscaping Plan F. Correspondence G. Planning Department Recoznznendcd Conditions of Approval K. Public Works Staff Report ~ I:~r~~~~»~~~looaas.ti~,~,a /~'- v ~~o z '^i. ~-'l1'~~um~fT" rr~ ~' __. ___ _ .~L~N.NIN~ I~.~'.1~~.~'I'~1.~'NT 'I'c~ir~ E-Trirz~tat~r•ey, ~1IC;P t'L~~znrrirr~ t~ir~ct.or Ke ri Gerscl~ter Community t'1~1~ner i~fatt Sar~-~it,ore 1'tariz~ing `I'~chniciari Notice of 1Vleet~ng Date of Notice: October t9 , 2~fl{l Meeting Date; Time: Place: NATURE OF MEETING 7:00 p.m. {Approximate} Central Point City Hall 1 S5 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon Beginning at the above tine and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review site plan applications that would allow the construction oftwo motels near the intersection of Larne and South Peninger Roads on Jackson County Assesszxzezxt Plat 372W02D, Tax Lots, 2600, 2700, 2800 and 2900 in the C-~, Tourist anal Office-Professional District. {Application 00045-SP} Marion Fairfield Inns and Suites has proposed a three story facility with 68 rooms for guests. {Application 00046} Daniel Park and Associates has proposed a three story facility with 109 guest rooms amid a separate 4,000 square foot restaurant. At the rxzeeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications to determine that all applicable provisions of the Central Point Municipal Code can be met. CRITERIA. FOR DECISION The requirements for Site Plan. Review are set foz~h in Chapter 17 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Regulations, C)ff-street parking, Site Plan, Lazxdscaping and Construction Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed ii~z accordance to the City's Public Woxks Standards. PT~BLIC COMMTNTS Any person izaterested in commenting oz~ the above-mentioned la~~c1 use z•ecommendatio~~ z~~ay submit written comments up until the close of the n~e:eting scheduled for Ttzcsclay, Novezrzber 7, 2000. 2. ~Nritten coznznents may be sent in advance of the zneetizlg to Central Point City bail, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, CSR 97502. 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the n-zatters shall be raised prior to the expiration ofthe cozxzmez~t period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to e related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to tlzc Planning Coznznission. 4. Copies oftlzese applications are available for public review at City plan, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, fJregozz. Copies of the same are available at 25 cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at {541 } G64-- 3321 ext. 291. SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staff reports, read testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the applications. Any written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion ofthe review the Planning Coznznission znay make a recommendation to the City Council. 155 South Second Street 91 Central Point, QI~. 97502 ~- (541} GG4-3321 i Fax: {541} 6~~1-d384 ~~~~~~~~ ~ r~~tt The site is located in Central Point, Qregon in the southeast quadrant of the I-5 Exit 33/East Pine interchange. Heading east on East Pine, south on Peninger Road and west on LaRue Drive the site is at the west terminus of LaRue Drive. The site is within the city limits of Central Point. The property is zoned C-4 Tourist and {~f~ce-Professional District and is currently vacant. The site has not been addressed and is a portion of Map 3?2W02D Tax Lot 2900. The property to the north is zoned C-4 and is largely vacant except for two service stations located on the north end of the parcels adjacent to East Pine. The property to the northeast is zoned C-4 and is developed with a Burger King Restaurant and a Pilot Truck Stop. The property to the east of the site is zoned C-4 and is currently vacant but has received site review approval for a x,000 square foot Shari's Restaurant. The property to the south of the site is zoned C-4 and is currently vacant. The site is bounded on the west by Interstate 5. The site is level with a general elevation of I.257 to 12~~. The soils were surveyed by Rick Swanson of Marquess and Associates Inc. of Meford. A copy of the soils report with be submitted to the Central Point Building Department with construction drawings, The soils were found suitable to handle the proposed development. A Level C?ne Environmental Site Assessment was performed by David Fawcett of Coleman Creek Consulting of Medford, The site was found to be free from contamination. A wetlands survey was performed by Scott English of Northwest Biological Consulting of Ashland, No evidence of wetlands were found. G SPECIFIC PRdJECT DESCRIPTIQN The proposed development consists of a 68 roam, 3-story, wood framed, exterior insulated 1•rnish system, slab on grade motel with indoor pool. The foot print of the proposed structure is x.2,045 square feet with a total square footage of approximately 3,000 square feet. The site is approximately 57,067 square feet. All common area uses are incidental to the operation of the motel and will not be used by outside parties. The building will be completely fire sprinkled to include the attic space and will comply with NFPA-13 standards. The structure will comply with all applicable building codes, Primary access to the site is from a curb cut in the LaRue Drive cul-de-sac. Secondary access is via a 26-foot wide shared drive with the proposed Shari's Restaurant to the east. The driveway network allows for complete vehicular and fire and life safety circulation within the site. Minimum 5-foot wide sidewalks adjacent to the building provide pedestrian access. In addition, an at grade concrete walk is provided from the motel east to link up with the sidewalk system at the proposed Shari's Restaurant as well as ~ walkway being stubbed to the south property line for future extension if desired when that property develops. Twenty percent of the site is landscaped with an automatic irrigation system. The site makes liberal use of flawing trees ~- pear, plum, dogwood- as well as decorative trees such as jaquemonte birch and paper bark cherry= The structure will have three wall mounted signs ~ one on each of the south, north, and east elevations as well as one 65 foot tall pylon sign. Standard Fairfield Inn and Suites sign package information is included as an exhibit to this narrative, D, APPLICABLE CODE PROVTSIOI~IS 1. Central Point Code Chapter 17.44.020 B 4 shows "Motel and Motel' as permitted uses in the C-4 Tourist and Office-Professional District 2. Central Point Code Chapter 17.44.040 Height restrictions state "No building or structure sha11 exceed srxly feet ire height", The proposed structure is approximately 44 feet in height to the highest peak. 3. Central Point Code Chapter 1.7,44.050 Area, width and yard requirements state the following applicable standards: A. "Lot area shall be a minimum of eve thousand square feet': The lot is 57,667 square feet in area, B. "Lot width shall be a minimum of~fty feet': The lot is approxirrtately 212 feet in width. C. "Lot depth shall be a minimum of one hundred feet`: The lot is 1.62.17 feet in depth at the narrowest depth. D, "The front yard shall be a minimum often feet': The front (east} yard is 145 feet at the narrowest point. E_ "The side yards snail be a minimum of fire feet plus one-half foot for each foot Icy t~hich the building exceeds trNenty feet". The building elevations {north and south} are 40 feet in height. The closest side yard north} is fifteen feet which is the minimum allowed by code {40 feet _ ~.0 feet = 20 feet x ,5 = 10 feet + 5 feet = 15 feet}. The south side yard is a minimum of twenty feet from the property line, F. "The rear yard sha11 be a minimum of.10 feef." The rear (west} yard is 10 feet at from the property line at the narrowest point. 4. Central Point Code Chapter .17.64,020 Off-street loading 2 A ",..hotels, motels,... ujhich has a gross floor area of thirty thousand square feet or more sha11 provide off street truck loading and unloading berths in accordance t~ith the following table...3CJ, 41117 to .ll?0, t1tJt1 square feet)". Furthermore 13 of the same Chapter states "A loading berth shall not be less than .t t1 feet wide, thirty feet lung`; The footprint of the proposed motel is 12,045 square feet with a gross square footage of approximately 36,000 square feet. One loading unloading berth is therefore required. The off street loading/unloading berth is the portico area. This area exceeds the width and length requirements of the code. 5. Central point Code Chapter 17,64.040 Cuff street parking number of spaces B 1 states "hotel or motel nut less than one space per guest unit; plus cane space per each two employees Unr"ts having kitchen facilities shall provide two spaces each. "None of the units has kitchen facilities. The site plan shows 70 parking spaces. The motel has 68 units. The maximum number of employees on site during peak usage of the motel {6p.m. to 8a.m.}will be two. At off peak hours {8a.m. to 6p.m,}the number of employees typically will not exceed 4. If occasion arises that the number of employees on site at one time needs to exceed 4 this would occur only at off peak hours when the parking lot is not being heavily utilized, 6. Central Point Code Chapter 17.64.070 Compact car adjustment B states "Up to, but not exceeding, twenty live percent of the required number of parking spaces maybe desrgned and provided far the parking ofcumpact cars`; Section C of the same Chapter states "~`ompact car parking spaces shall not be less than eight feet in width and not less than fifteen feet in length. " Seventy parking spaces are provided of which 8 {11,4°l0} are compact spaces. The dimensions of these spaces comply with this Code standard. 7. Central Point Code Chapter 17.64.100 Parking design requirements A states "The standard size for automobile parking spaces shall be nine feet in width by twenty feet in length. "The parking spaces comply with this requirement, 8. Central Point Code Chapter 15.24.600 Signs along freeways -- Restrictions governs the signage in the C-4 zone. All signs shown on the site plan comply with the restrictions "...not higher than eighty feet above the ground"and "contain not over three hundred square feet of advertising surface'; E. UTILITY INFt~RMATION {THIS INF(~RMATIQN IS PRELIMINARY PENDING FINAL DESIGN BY THE CIVIL ENGINEER} 1. Water -- City of Central Point. The proposed development will require a one-inch irrigation meter, athree-inch domestic meter, and asix- inch detection fire flow meter. It is anticipated that the meters will be set in street right-of-way at the west terminus of LaRue Drive. 2. Sanitary Sewer -Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority, The proposed development will be served with a private 6-inch sanitary sewer connecting to an ~-inch BCVSA facility extended to the property at the time of street construction. 3, Storm Sewer ~- City of Central faint. The proposed devefoprnent will connect to a public storm sewer facility anticipated to be at the swath end of the property and which will be constructed in conjunction with streets. 4. Electric -Pacific Power and Light, The proposed development will require 208 volt, three phase. The exact location of an~site transformers will be established in conjunction with the electrician and the electrical provider. 5. Gas - Avista Utilities. The proposed development will require natural gas service. Exact location of facilities will be determined by the Civil Engineer and the gas provider. 6. Cagle Television -Falcon cable. 7. Telephone - Qwest Camrnunicatians. N.W. CORNER D.l.C, NO. 56 rouxn z r!z' muss ~, aeut x r~izrrsa~~zaar t ~~ F---- _.. ~4 tocaf•d 1n: in the Southeas# i ~4 0# Secfion 2, Cifiy of Central Pot fi ~ Jaakaon Ccun#jr, OroQon fcr. 1.AI2UE aEYEL~P~IEN'C, L»l..C. 1060 Craler (.ak• Avenue lied#ord, Oregon 97504 esTaa• ra` ~~~ '~ ~ J I ~itl6. r . *~'`. \ lf~~i uss Tacos` }x` \ l \\ ` ` S,W. CORNER b ~ ,•~ `~'~~ ~ ..~Y rs eaz „~ .1..C. NO. 58 ~`' S ~. 1t'ONU,itCN! CaBI P.iR riles .~it,Op'tTN CtTtXIl7'! ~ x~ t t ~~ ~~ T .. t T 2a' ~ za' 4 ~~ 1 t I~ rar-ssrzasxrsara~vr ,~ .,,~ , :~. ~. ~ '`'`::~::;::. ra` Fvx~ REGISTERED ~" ~~~~'~'~'''`' LAND ~'ESSIONAL ~" ~. ~~~::,-.::~~ ........ SURVEYOR ~ ~ ~,Ta, t ..::.. ~:•:.. ~4` ~: ~ r; \ ,~ azTT a C}REGt7N l \\ ` ~ JLLY 21, folk{ \ Q. ~. DAY1D l~A. TrttFIFiEGI ~ ~ ~r,tp. 2348 `~ T: .EXPIRES 12f31/UU ~ t zw so. sand t " '-.tG7Li3d' A~4~J~i1~` 10t'3N~,tACT;sON~• SNC. YYc OAYfD 4. YlNNF01 gp{# N0. 2541 sc~,T~: T ~ . ao` ul~r Ta, soao a,TSea or acupNO; 3URVLr NUiI»i~T Bass CwESr T~NC ar oic No. as) o ssr s/a• x xa- ~RaH rrN vmx rusTSc CAP STAYtEO "D, klNNECt lS 2S{C". 3~ - sct a!a• x so anal P!N MTrTN wTSTFc car arram~n 'a, NRTNCO! Ls zats', a ~ xl: r i.tno rtua :wo rap: wnTl u~r~i w+~wvr+ar aUNPEO `La YSdi' Ix CONCAL7C of SiDT1MALN. • _ ;swNO a!a• IRON Pw wml riasz€c GTP aruTrcn r1 0. YfNM[CI L3 xS49' I'ER ajN T3a36. L.r ~ COTlNA GRASS CAF YONUItENr AS N07ED .aC7. TtT:r a/a' % so" laoN t+w w~rN u.uurNU~ CAt STATiP[D 'l.S 2STa', sn+ - T:~TT~ NUT,aTR cue us~kckr rcR auaJC umlres. small ~, SEWER CON3r31~U4'T~3Q~N `ANOiWNtU#~ AkG SiWTFMY ,~ 1iUE,WAt._K TSE „r.r ~,, ~e,.ru...r ~ ii> ~~> .xua xrRU~^t.D cuR$ p~R' ua ~~ren ., '~~ :KE RACK r_________7 i i i i ~ v i ~ 3 i:.a ..,r ir`^io °°' ,f; New..: ti MSMW 5~'+%40".tttxyBUrc i~:~~ ~ , ~s~ `~ xr:r+,rw co..+e..a ~PkRi4ING SIGNS ~n.~~ size aura _, ro`~-~--~4 ~~.z$ ~sss*~~ ..... z~.._~c_._: uwx,ws+c x >r~ttc s.5sa I.EGE.t~D „K ..O ~ .. ~ r,.r: .,~ ~,~* ....o w.~ux. ..wo. .._.. ,..e...-.... wr.c s.z+aax~.. w ~w _.....µv e9++x..,.0..4 _t793ELui2':S~6k£! 544Gt1:._ SIT--~E Pl'AN i .en ~~~~, ij . Q ~~a~~~ ~____~ ri ~ # xti € c' €' ~~ ~3 `- s I ~- € ... _~ _ x ~ ~ € .... [E'""" E€ Ef If 1 [NNt9VITl n i FR(7id"f" ~L~VATiC?N ~~.u.,.~~..~. ---- m--= ~--; sa-- 2t--=~ R~AFi RL~VA'T'IC~ht ~q_~ ~_ a ~yy ~-1. ~:._:~ ~.. ~ ~''~ ~~ ~} - ~.- ~ ..W,.,. 1T 1 j t~~ ti-t~t ~ ~r~ ~ f~4t ~i~JrJr~ ~ ~....._~.~,n ~ S~ r ~~xx. r ,..,,sax. +~~!\ ~r._ _ _ ~ _...5 :. .r.,.ar.. :, n ~. :. au~. - .:~~. _._ „,~ ^[ __ _ ~ W- ~ _ ~~C s ~~ $a~ h-; w. 0 ~ ---------~.,..,,.-~.,,~4.~i F.~ Mw...~... :* M'~ ~~~.u.....~, ._..~ ,..x.,.~...~..~ ~_~__ rr- COLORS •Fairfield lrzn: Fairfield Blue. =Underscore: Fairfield Red. •zl~tarriarr & Logo: z'Vlarriarr Red. MATERIALS •All compszrer ctzt .25{} (t14" thicl~} liar alurrzinum, polyurethane paitzted. ELECTRICAL •Exrernally Fllurrzinarcd. 9' ~ 118" ~~~ ,;~~,~CCit~1~t ~ z4°~ ~~ ~ ~n~' 1 Cl 114 "~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~..~ ~~ 11' S-S/8" ~D karnott ~_ ~AI ELD T INN& SUITES ,_ 13' 9-3116>` 36" 15 114" ,~~ ,karnott ~, ~„ EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATEIl TOTAL ACTtlAL St1t1ARE I+OOTAG ~: FIS 2481.: 39.39 sq. ft. FIS 308L: 61.64 sq. ft. F!S 368L;129.63 sq. ft. INN & SUITES COLORS pRIi1rIA Y IGN =Sign Cabiner & Retainer Caps: Fairfield Blue. •Face Background: Fairfield Blue. •Copy & Border Stripe: Wlxite. •Underscore: Fairfield Red. •Cladding: Fairfield Beige. t~PTIOIvIAt.. QPY CABINZ;T •Cabinet: Fairfield Beige. •Copy: Fairfield Red. MATFRIAFS PRIxV1ARY SICiI'~I •Sign Cabinet & Retainer: painted aluminum, *Face: Bleed face 314'1 white pana#tex overlaid witlx Fairfield Blue vinyl, computer cut to expose white copy and border. [lnderscore overlaid witlx Fairfield Red vinyl. t~7pTlpt~IAL COpY ~ABIi'~ET •Cabinet: fainted aluminum. 'Copy: Cabinet routed and baeked with white acrylic overlaid with Fairfield Red vinyl I~! z Ils„ I ~ E 37 13!16" ~- -~... FI.FC~'RICAL Iiv1A Y S "hl =La€xxps: Nigh outpr€t fluorescent. =FIS pI4~: I20 volts, 17.6 amps, 2-20 amp circuit. •FIS p2f}0: I20 volts, I7.G anxps, 2-20 arnp circuits. Q~TIC)NAL COPY CABII~tET •Lamps: Nigh or€tput fluorescent. •FIS p20b: I20 volts, 4,4 amps, I-20 amp circuit. •FIS p14fl: 12t} volts, 4.4 amps, I-20 amp circuit. 9` 6" ~ I2` 18~ 1~~~~~ P~fJL~ ~~~~~ Shown at Std' overall height with optronttZ poo! panel 34 1I4" 17"~ DO~BI.E FACFp FI.l10RESCFNI' ll.I.UMINATE© TOTAL. ACTUAL. SQl1ARE FOOTAGE: FiS P14U:138.g4 sq. ft. FIS P2C1G:163.t9sq. ft. FIS P141~lOptional Pool Panel: 1?7.99 sq. ft. FIS P200/Optional Pool Panel: 2(}6.94 sq. ft. 15' ~ ~~s„ i 8' ~<, f 1 __._. ~ ~ ~oo~. ~~~~ ~~ ~,~ Shown at 3S` overall height with optional pool panel r. GEHE£tA~ HO7ES € ~. V ~Y::~ . . U v ~l 0 .cc c;c -- W %ir ~ _. e J'TFl' ...-.- ~ ~' T. :`~_.IIIi11[F11E1[IF.. Wa:CKiuwY _ .17 ._.. ___.. _ ~ti.I 'n ' ; i f %3 S r5 i I Ai.AHTIt10 ~i.A~NT~IS7 ~..~..-.. k. a,..,:+.,. a+ .,,...,..,. ~.a.. ,,:. ~~ , ~ _'fi'~~ ~ [ws9~cxCna-w N+~~rrn.C,o,~~+l' ~rfi c«., ~...,.. . ~~ ~ z:~,+ vvw E~aV fsM1 £•rv~6.W S. k+ ~}~ °y, r~ a~~rau~G ~~++ ia~w '~.M.. K ~r~Vti ca+e }.fY ~ ~ x h t>Y i i _. ~x• -- >: mrv+ &nv e,.ns sr......av '.ks -a.~.n.c...~.w ~x~ __ +. i . Scats 5"=20' ~, f~C N SSS N ~ fi ~-- ~ ~.. Sv 1~ ~'": ~ {~ i+-~ _ L '~ 04 L G ~ m C."S ~ ~ c .49r CJ i.3-. s~ro a. ~ ~, vam ; "wren sr ~ m S Matef nlartmg Pssn _.,.~ € 10,:''05~20H0 10.20 0264566 JCF~S33 ~1.~~ C1F~ Pr=;G. 02,02 f }'~~~~1~1~ f .~%~.t 8333 A~AT~ RQAL7, WHITS CITY, OR.EGt~Iti' 975C?3-~OiS ~s~~.~ sz~-7~oc~ pax Cs~~) sus-~~~~ r~;v_K~v~ cfd 3 . cant October ~, 2.baC3 Ken Cerschler City of Central Point RE: Marriott FairField Inn ~x Suites ~"he Building Department and Fire District ~3 will require a set ~ blue prints from the applicant for review. ~"he plans shall include a plot plan showing placement of building, main access roads and driveways. Fire District ~fi3 wii~ apply all Uniform Fire Cade requirements, whic~t may include on-site water s;~orage and ~'flr hydrants for fire protection, and road access prior to construction. IfyQU have any questions, Please call me Don Hickman 'peputy Fire Marshal ~T~ Y 8915 SOU'PW PAGFfiC NWY. c #t1EDFORD, U6tEGOAi 97801-9089 • (541) 535.5193 • {841} 778-4144 t=AX #541}'538.8278 • www.bcvam.org September ~~, ~~~{} Ken Cerschler City of Central Point Planning Depaz~tment 155 South Second Street Central POInt, Oregon. 9'7502 Re: Marriot Hotel, File # 00045 Dear Ken, We have reviewed the proposal with regard to providing sanitary sewer service. The description under Section E.2. of the Site Review Narrative is accurate. The developer will need to coordinate the location ofthe connection with BCVSA. All new sewer construction must be designed and constructed to BCVSA stazzdards. Connection to the sanitary sewer system will also require payment of connection fees. ~e request that the City not issue building permits until all sewer connection fees have been paid. BCVSA will submit a letter to the City confzrrning payment of fees. if you need additional information, please call me at "T79-4144. Sincerely, .. P,. G:: r Carl Tappert, P.E. District Engineer l:1DATA1AgenczeslCEI~ITPTIPLANNCT1DQ045-Marriot 1-lotel.wpd Avisia 13tiEities 580 gi3siness Park Drive PU ~iox 1109 iti4ed[~rd, Orec~pn 97501 i"~fapl~on~ Sat-772~a28i 1"011 Frey 900-G59-AA27 ~ c~~.~~ ~ DaGC.• ~`~,fA~~is~il it ~C~Iri~JCr C3~ ~a~~S ~ Incltzclin~ cove~- `.i'c~: Attn: Ken Gerschler ~~~ Ufilifies WF' Nxcrrrai Gas Diirr`~in» 3~ roxn: Mike Smith ~'Gj11 f GG4-G3$4 3i aX: 541-$58-47~I Clffice: 543.-$5$-4725 $~}~-65~-442'7 Cell: X41-x}41-40G5 E-mail: rz~ike,s~nith ~ avi stt~cc~~Ri~. ~ c~zn Ite; Fite Ng. f~(1Q~5 "1VZ~:rriott Fair~ie~el Inn c~z Suites" Kell `.~'hcre are ~~o s~-ecial require~ncnts that Avista Utilities ncecls at this time. As noted its the Site Re~uie~~ Narxative, the meter it~c~ation will he decidc:cl. at a later date, rl'ht nks, ~~~ i I~erna~~ks: ~o~ }rc~~~~ reuie~v ~e~ly ~~,s.~.,~. LTr~ent 925 S. Grape Sl. P.O. Bar 4190 Merlfmrl, Oregon 97507 (.i41) 358-,3092 PACIFIC POWER A Paci fiCorp Ca»pany Ken Gerschler Community Planner 1S5 South Second St. Central Point ,OR 97502 Dear Ken September l9, 2000 ~~ Reference: PP&L W.O.dt 00045 'T'hank you for sending us the preliminary site plan for the new Marriot I-Intel project, file # 00045. After reviewing the plans we feel that Pacific Power will need a 7 S' P.U.L. along the north, south and east sides of the project within the property line. This will enable us to provide better service for this and future projects in the location. Thank You for your help in this project. Sincerely, Mike I Ia(e Pacific Power & Lighl OCT-02-2000 1tON 10 43 AN ODOT ROGUE VALLEY AREA FAX N0. 541 774 6349 P, 02 ~.,:~ H"~ vrPnt~Tal~z`ir or ~innsi~oit'rnrto October 2, 2000 Central Point Planning Department Ken Gerschler, Planner 155 S. 2nd Street Central Point, OR 97502 Dear Ken: We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this application for the 68-unit Fairfield Inn Hotel, which is proposed for a site at the terminus of LaRue Drive, south Pine Street on the east side of Interstate 5. ODOT has the following concern regarding this proposal. To assure that drainage from this site will not impact the freeway, we request that a grading and drainage plan be reviewed and approved by ODOT, prior to the issuance of building permits. If you have additional questions, please contact Alex Georgevitch, Access Management Engineer at 774-6354 or me at 774-6399. Sincerely, Shirley Roberts, Planner Cc: Monte Grove, Area Manager jCentPt3.sr] ~~°.., sS~%~i ~~ni. jo;.~i~. :,~ l`~ \Yi3b./ .............................................................. ^C;ii .;\--c!o?c Read VC'h ur Cit, f~i l: '.750;i i:~n: X41` g?rt.3L~ Pns li-Flj dSQ.G :Io ATTACHMENT G RECOMMENDEll PLANNING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The approval of the Site Plan shall expire in one year on November 7, 2001 unless an application for a building permit or au application for extension has been received by the City. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan depicting any changes discussed and approved at the public hearing within 30 days of Planning Commission approval. The project must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations and those requests made by the affected agencies in Attachment "F". 3. The project must meet the off-street parking requirements for motel development, and the parking, access and maneuvering areas shall be paved with durable materials for all-weather use and approved by the Public Works Department. 4. Landscaping and signage shall be inspected by the Planning Department to ensure compliance with the approved plans. 5. The project must meet any requirements recommended by the Public Works Staff Report. ]i\Plannina\00045.wpd ~~ , CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PRELIMINARY STAFF REPORT for Marriott Fairfield Inn & Suites PW #00045 Date: Applicant: Contact: Project: Location: Legal: Zoning: Units: Plans: Report By: Purpose November 3, 2000 Hotel Investment Group II 3405 Baldy View Lane Springfield, OR 97477 Timothy Hovet (541) 746-8444 Marriott Fairfield Inn & Suites Larue Rd. (under construction) T37S, R2W, Section 2, Tax Lot 2900 C-4 68 rooms Titled: Marriott Fairfield !nn & Suites Received: October 24, 2000 Robert W. Pierce, Public Works Technician Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer") regarding Public Works standards and additional standards and requirements to be included in the design. Gather information from the Developer/Engineer regarding proposed development. The Developer is proposing the construction of a 68 room hotel Special Requirements Larue Drive Improvements: The Developer shall provide the City with sufficient right of way to accommodate the construction of Larue Rd to the limits established by the Public Works Department. All improvements on and connections to Larue Drive shall be coordinated and approved the City PWD, and should be designed and implemented at the expense of the Developer. Construction drawing improvements shall include or delineate sight triangles, sidewalks, and all other public improvements. Tie-ins to the existing city infrastructure must be permitted and approved by City PWD. The driveway into the proposed development from Larue Rd. should be designed and positioned in a manner that will accommodate the turning movements and access of emergency vehicles. Fairfield Marriott Gin & Suites PFf~D StajjReport November 3, 2000 Page 2 It is the Public Works Department's recommendation that construction of the hotel not be permitted until the improvements to Larue Rd are completed to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department. 2. Water: The Developer must comply with the recommendations of Fire District 3 Water service connections should be made at the new 8-inch water line on Larue Rd. All water service connections should be completed prior to paving Larue Rd. 3. Site Drainage/Storm Drain Plan: The developer shall design and implement a site drainage/storm drain plan that corrects and/or enhances existing site drainage for the entire area noted on the site plan. If the storm drainage infrastructure is to be privately operated and maintained, a suitable system will need to be designed for a minimum 10-year storm event. If applicable, any storm water retention facilities shall be designed to mitigate erosion and sediment and hydrocarbon deposition; and to mitigate the "attractive nuisance" hazards associated with these facilities. The storm drain system which the development intends to tie into is under construction and will not be completed until proper permits are obtained from the Oregon Division of State Lands and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to connect to Bear Creek. The Public Works Department recommends that the City not issue a Certificate of Occupancy for the hotel until a suitable contingency plan for handling storm water run-off is developed by the Developer's engineer and approved by the City. Existing Infrastructure: The Developer shall provide suitable engineering certification and justification (i.e. calculations, analyses, plots, etc.,) that all connections to existing infrastructure (i.e. street; drive-thru queuing; water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems; natural drainage systems; etc.,) will not interfere with or provide for the significant degradation (in the opinion of the City of Central Point) of the existing effective level of service or operation of the infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have either adequate capacities to accommodate the flows and/or demands imposed on the existing infrastructure as the result of the connection of the proposed development's infrastructure; or the existing facilities will be improved by and at the expense of the Developer to accommodate the additional flows and/or demands while maintaining or improving the existing effective level of service of the affected facility. General 1. Development Plans: Developer shall submit to the City's PWD for review and approval, plans and specifications for all improvements proposed for construction or modifications within the City or public rights-of- wayand easements or for connections to City infrastructure. Public improvements include, but are not limited to, streets (including sidewalks, curbs and gutters ); storm drainage and sanitary sewer collection and conveyance systems; water distribution system (up to the service meter); street lighting; and traffic control devices, street signs, and delineation. All construction of public improvements shall conform to the City's PWD Standards, the conditions approved and stipulated by the Planning Commission, and other special specifications, details, standards, and/or upgrades as may be approved by the City Administrator or his designee prior to the approval of the construction plans for the proposed development. During construction, changes proposed by the Developer shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's engineer to the City PWD for approval prior to installation. 2. Approvals: If applicable, Fire District No. 3 (fire hydrant placement, waterline sizing, and emergency vehicle access), Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA, for sanitary sewers), and written approval of construction plans shall be submitted to the City PWD prior to final construction plan review and approval by City PWD. Where applicable, the Developer must coordinate activities with all Federal, State, and Local agencies to insure that all appropriate permits are in place prior to construction. 3. As-Built Drawinas: Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. If feasible, the Developer's engineer or surveyor should provide the drawings in both a "hard copy" form (produced on Mylar~') and in a "digital" format compatible with AutoCAD®, or other form as approved by the City PWD. As-built drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line" changes to final approved construction plans which identify the locations and or elevations (as appropriate) of actual installed items. 4. Elevations: All elevations used on the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on the permanent benchmark shall be tied into an established City approved benchmark and be so Fai~f eld d3arriott !nw & Sz~ites P hVD StajjReport November 3, ?000 Page 4 noted on the plans. 5. FiII Placement: All fill placed in the road right of way shall be engineered fill that is suitably placed and compacted in accordance with City PWD 6. Roads: The City shall evaluate the strength of the native soils and review the road section designs at the Developer's expense. Roads should be designed to handle all expected loads, including fire equipment. Utility Plans: Prior to construction the developer must coordinate, with the City PWD, the placement of proposed utilities to avoid conflicts and insure adequate separation with all infrastructure. Utilities include, but are not limited to, electric power, cable television, natural gas, and telephone. 10. City Utility Easemenfs: Easements must be provided for existing City infrastructure (i.e. sanitary sewer, water, and storm drain) and any of the City's infrastructure that is to be installed as part of this development. Easements must be a minimum of 15-feet wide, and should not split lot lines. Easements for storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and water lines should be dedicated to the City and not just a public utilities easement (PUE). Centerline of buried infrastructure shall be aligned a minimum of five (5) feet from the edge of the easement. PUEs must have a minimum 10-foot width. 11. Clear Vision Areas: The construction drawings shall include clear vision areas (i.e. sight triangles) designed to meet the City's PWD requirements. 12. Fire Hydrants: Provide locations of existing and any new required fire hydrants. Faiifeld dlarr~ott Lvr & Suites PWD StafjReport Noven¢Ger 3, 2000 Page 5 All fire hydrants shall be suitably protected from potential vehicle damage and encroachment. 14. Water System: Construction drawings shall include the size, type, and location of all water mains, hydrants, valves, service connection, meter, service laterals, and other appurtenance details in accordance with City PWD Standards and as required by the City PWD. 16. Storm Drain Svstem Design: Prior to construction plan approval of the improvements for this development plan, the Developer's engineer shall provide the City PWD with a complete set of hydrologic and hydraulic calculations and profile plots for sizing the site storm drain system. The engineer shall use the rainfall/intensity curve obtained from the City PWD for hydrologic calculations, and the negotiated run-off parameters. 18. Grading Plans: Construction plans should have a suitable grading plan. Grading plans should have original/existing grades and final grades plotted on the plan. Typically, existing grade contour lines are dashed and screened back, and final grade contour lines are overlaid on top of the existing grades and are in a heavier line width and solid. Contour lines should be labeled with elevations. 19. Erosion Control Plan: Construction plans shall have a suitable Erosion Control Plan. PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: November 7, 2000 TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: Ken Gerschler, Community Planner SUBJECT: Public Hearing- Site Plan Review for 37 2W 02D, Tax Lots 2600, 2700 and 2800 - Eastside Motel and Restaurant Development Owners Agent Pro er Description/ Zoning: Summary William C. Cornitius and Dorothy B. Cornitius 8 River Road Sun River, Oregon 97707 Daniel L. Park Daniel Park and Associates Architects 6180 Shady Brook Drive Central Point, Oregon 97502 37 2W 02D, Tax Lots 2600, 2700 and 2800 - 2.77 acres total. C-4, Tourist and Office Professional District The applicants have requested a Site Plan Review for the construction of a 109 unit motel and 4000 square foot restaurant. The subject property is located in an C-4, Tourist and Professional zoning district on Tax Lots 2600, 2700 and 2800 of Plat 37 2W 02D. The City has received requests from O.D.O.T. and Jackson County that this item be continued in order to work out the traffic circulation and site access issues. Authority: CPMC 1.24.050 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a Site Plan. Notice of the Public Hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060 (Attachment "A"). Applicable Law: CPMC 17.44.010 et seq. - C-4,'fourist and Office Professional District CPMC 17.64.010 et seq. -Off Street Parking and Loading CPMC 17.72.010 et seq. -Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval Discussion: The applicant Daniel Park is working on behalf of property owners William and Betty Cornitius to develop a 109 room 4 story motel near the intersection of South Peninger Road and Larue Drive(Attachment "B"). According to the attached letter of description (Attachment "C") the foot print of the structure is 12,045 square feet with the total square footage of approximately 42,000 square feet. An indoor swimming pool has been proposed in conjunction with a breakfast lounge, two conference rooms, laundry facilities and an exercise room. Near the northwest corner of the parcel, the applicants propose to construct a 4,000 square foot restaurant. No elevation details have been provided for the restaurant as it is in the conceptual stage. Primary ingress access will occur on an consolidated entrance off East Pine Street where traffic will be routed to the Motel. The specifics of this have not been worked out with the State or the County. Egress would occur via LaRue Drive and Peninger Road where traffic will be conveyed through a signalized intersection. Mr. Tim Hovet of Sycan B Development has been working with the City to develop a motel facility on the parcel to the south. He has submitted a letter for consideration (Attachment "D") by the Commission recommending that the traffic pattern be modified along East Pine Street as the proposed driveway access could present a hazard to motorists due to the proximity to the Interstate Five Interchange. The Planning Department has evaluated the project density and building distance requirements for the zoning district and determined that the development is compliant with the zoning ordinance. The Municipal Code requires not less than one space per guest unit; plus one space per each two employees. One hundred and seventy two (172) spaces have been proposed, 7 ofwhich are handicap. The code also requires one loading/unloading berth which has been depicted near the westerly property line on the attached site plan. The exterior is proposed to be constructed with an EIFS exterior finish similar to stucco. The elevations (Attachment "E") depict that the building surface will have accent painting but does not identify the color scheme. Roofing will be metal material of an undisclosed color. The structure will have wall mounted signs on the building exterior in addition to shared pole mounted signage for the motel and restaurant. The Central Point Building Department will require separate building permits for the signage. A landscaping plan has been incorporated into the site plan with a shrub list which includes Anthony Waterer Spirea, Otto Luyken Laurel, Davidii V iburnum and Compact Oregon Grape. Proposed trees are Raywood Ash, Moraine Honey Locust and Silver Maple. An irrigation system with an approved backflow device will be required to assure that the landscaping will remain healthy. The Public Works Department has prepared recommendations for on and off site improvements which are believed to be reasonably related to the proposed development. These include, but are not limited to; driveway aprons, sidewalk improvements; site grading and drainage; on-site lighting; paving and utility (water, sewer and storm drain) connections. Jackson County Roads and Parks has requested that the applicant submit construction drawings to their agency for review and obtain County road approach permits for East Pine Street (Attachment "F" ).The County has also recommended that the paved approach be shared with the Chevron station and be restricted to right in and right out traffic movements. Pacific Power (Electrical Service Provider) has requested that the Planning Commission consider a condition of approval that would establish a 15 foot wide Public Utility easement along al l property boundaries (Attachment "F" ) Jackson County Fire District Number 3 has submitted comments that relate to the project ( Attachment "F" ). They would like to review a set of blueprints and plot plat from the applicant that shows general information, on-site water storage and/or hydrant location. Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority has indicated that the property can be served with sewer service from an 8 inch diameter sewer main located along the easterly boundary of the subject property. (Attachment "F "). The agency will require that the developer determine the pipe capacity to determine that the line will meet the demand. The agency further will require that connection fees be collected prior to issuance of building permits. Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law: Site Plan Review In approving, conditionally approving or denying the plans submitted, the City bases it's decision on the following standards from Section 17.72.040: A. Landscaping and fencing and the conshuction of walls on the site in such a manner as to cause the same to not substantially interfere with the landscaping scheme of the neighborhood, and in such a manner to use the same to screen such activities and sights as might be heterogeneous to existing neighborhood uses. The Commission may require the maintenance of existing plants or the installation of new ones for purposes of screening adjoining property. ^ The site plan shows landscaped areas distributed throughout the project area. B. Design, number and location of ingress and egress points so as to improve and to avoid interference with the traffic flow on public streets; H:\PI an n i ng100046. wpd ^ Access is shown to be taken from East Pine Street through a consolidated driveway and a secondary access through the La12ue Drive cul-de-sac. 1'he specifics of traffic circulation and site access have not yet been worked not with O.D.O.T. or Jackson County. C. To provide off=street parking and loading facilities and pedestrian and vehicle flow facilities in such a manner as is compatible with the use for which the site is proposed to be used and capable of use, and in such a manner as to improve and avoid interference with the traffic flow on public streets; ^ CPMC 17.G4.040 (B-1) requires that 149 parking spaces be provided and 1 loading berth. The applicant has met this requirement. D. Signs and other outdoor advertising structures to ensure that they do not conflict with or deter from traffic control signs or devices and that they are compatible with the design of their buildings or uses and will not interfere with or detract from the appearance or visibility of nearby signs; Any signage proposed for the project would require a separate building permit. E. Accessibility and sufficiency of fire fighting facilities to such a standard as to provide for the reasonable safety of life, limb and property, including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads and fire lanes so that all buildings on the premises are accessible to fire apparatus; ^ The project, if approved, would need to meet any requirements ofJackson County Fire District 3. F. Compliance with all city ordinances and regulations; ^ The project as presented by the applicant is in compliance with the requirements of the Central Point Municipal Code subject to the recommended conditions of approval (Attachment J). G. Compliance with such architecture and design standards as to provide aesthetic acceptability in relation to the neighborhood and the Central Point area and it's environs. The motel is designed to be aesthetically compatible with the interchange commercial development located in the surrounding area. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take one of the following actions: 1. Adopt Resolution No., approving the Site Plan subject to the recommended conditions of approval; or I-C \ P l a n n i n,\ 0 004 6. w p d 2. Deny the proposed Site Plan; or 3. Continue the review of the Site Plan at the discretion of the Commission. Attachments A. Notice of Public Hearing B. Site Plan with Incorporated Landscape Plan C. Letter of Project Description D. Letter from Mr. Tim Hovet E. Structure Elevations F. Correspondence G. Planning Department Recommended Conditions of Approval H. Public Works Staff Report H:\PI ann i n s\00046. wpd C'1 ty o~ Cen t~a~ P In trn~~~~ PL~INNINC UL'P11R1'MFNT 'Corn Ilumpl~~rey, AICP Planning Director I<en Gerschler Community Planner Matt Samitore Planning Technician Notice of Meeting Date of Notice: October 19 , 2000 Meeting Date: Time: Place: NATURE OF MEETING November 7, 2000 7:00 p.m. (Approximate) Central Point City Hall 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Plamring Commission will review site plan applications thatwould allowthe construction oftwo motels nearthe intersection ofLarue and South Peninger Roads on Jackson County Assessment Plat 372W02D, Tax Lots, 2600, 2700, 2800 and 2900 in the C-4, Tourist and Office-Professional District. (Application 00045-SP) Mariott Fairfield Inns and Suites has proposed a three story facility with 68 rooms for guests. (Application 00046) Daniel Park and Associates has proposed a three story facility with 109 guest rooms and a separate 4,000 square foot restaurant. At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications to determine that all applicable provisions of the Central Point Municipal Code can be met. CRITF,RIA FOR DECISION The requirements for Site Plau Review are set forth in Chapter 17 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Regulations, Off-street parking, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Works Standards. PUBLIC COMML,N"I'S Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use recommendation way submitwritten comments up until the close ofthe meeting scheduled far Tuesday, November 7, 2000. 2, Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Ha11, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. Copies of these applications are available for public review at City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at 25 cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664- 3321 ext. 291. SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the meeting, the Plarming Commission will review the applications, technical staff reports, read testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the applications. Any written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may make a recommendation to the City Council. 1 ~~ South Second Street ®C;entral Point, OR 9'1502 ~ (541) 664-3321 i lax: (541) 664-6354 ~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~ - coc a~ ~ ~~ YND l~y~ tNTRANCE i CH VRON ~ 1 ------~ f~ t :~~= r.. ~ ~~~ kr M .}~~ .._.. ~~r~ r.-+~.r. ev ~... . ~~ ~.~ "~~~ ~~ a' o) ~ w ~I CT.f U, I' 1 _~ ~ ~~ ~ a ~. ~ P n ~mn b m4~.~~v C ~~~rn~~T C daniel park & Associates ARCHITECTS 6180 Shady Brook Drive Cenllal Point, OR 97502 September 29, 2000 City of Central Point Planning Department I55 South Second Street Central Point, OR 97502 Subject: Site Plao Review Application FIotel and Restaurant Development 37S 2 W S2 Tax lots 2600. 2700, 2800 I he proposed development is an exciting addition to the City of Central Point and will be complimentary to the cw'rent adjacent development. It will be one of the largest Hotels in the Rogue Valley offering a selection of moderately priced rooms and roomy Suites. ft will be located at the Rogue Valley's Gateway - Central Point, for those traveling from the North and positioned at the cross-roads to the Medford International Airport, the Jackson County Fairgrounds, the L.DS Temple, Historic Jacksonville and the Britt Gardens. The development is proposed as follows: • 2.77 acre nicely landscaped and irrigated site with a consolidated entrance off Gast Pine Street, with ingress and egress access to Larue. The existing freeway signage pylon will be utilized by both proposed facilities. The Hotel and restaurant also have building mounted illuminated signage. A portion of the Hotel Roof' is planned to extend to an elevation of approximately 70' for which a variance is being applied for. • 42,000 sq. ft. four story Hotel consisting of 109 rooms, indoor pool, breakfast lounge, rivo conference rooms, laundry and exercise room. • Approximately 4000 sq. fr. fine dining family restaurant (separate facility) on the same development. • Paved parking for approximateh 172 cars with required accessible spaces. • All the required facilities for access, trash collection, site lighting, fire pirotection and maintenance will be incorporated into the site design. Thank you, ~~2~zz ~~~~~~~~ Daniel Park Principal Architect ce C\MyFiles\N[yFiles\2014 site plan appl.wpd ~! tl t; ~ >~7~ff~HW1~~I" D Sycan B ~CLL (541) 746-8444 Fax (541) 746-2590 3405BaldyViewLane Springfield, OR 97477 f' October 26, 2000 City of Central Point Planning Commission C/o Planning Department 155 S. Second Central Point, OR 97502 RE: Site Review application 00046, 109 unit hotel/4,000 square foot restaurant Dear Commissioner, As you may know, Sycan has made site review application fora 68 unit Fairfield Inn and Suites on a parcel adjacent to and south of the above referenced development. We believe that the above referenced application confirms our belief in both the short term and long term value of quality development in Central Point. From review of the materials in SR Application 00046, it certainly appears that the proposed 109 unit hotel and the 4,000 square foot restaurant would be a positive addition to the specific neighborhood and to the City of Central Point. I would like to address one area of concern with the development, specifically the proposed access from and to East Pine. The access as shown is extremely close to the exit ramp from I-5. In addition, many vehicles leaving the site, either from the restaurant or the hotel, would need to make a left turn movement against both east and west bound traffic. From my research, based on the Institute of Traffic Engineers Manual 6cn Edition, the restaurant would generate 130.39 daily trips per 1,000 square feet of floor area for a total of 522 daily trips during the weekday, with weekend trips being even higher. The proposed hotel would generate 5.63 daily trips per room on weekdays (9.11 per occupied room) for a total of 614 daily trips. The proposed development would generate a combined 1,136 daily trips. Assuming half of these trips are exiting and the vast majority would be making the left turn across traffic movement, this would be almost 568 vehicles per day using the proposed East Pine exit driveway. The concern is that this volume of traffic would have an overall negative effect given the already high traffic level at this intersection: safety would be jeopardized, congestion greatly increased, and travelers would begin to avoid the area altogether. Even aright- in only access off of East Pine would aggravate both safety and congestion since the traffic exiting I-5 east bound would have such a short decision time on either merging to the left through lane or stacking up behind the right-in traffic. The proposed development has frontage on LaRue to the south. This access would be much safer and efficient. Access to the site would be all right turns and vehicles leaving the development would have a traffic signal controlled left turn onto East Pine. Requiring that traffic solely use LaRue for both ingress and egress would insure the continued viability of the intersection, decrease congestion, and increase traffic safety on East Pine. In summary, we are pleased to see this development proposal as a confirmation of the desirability of the area. However, we would ask that serious consideration be given to requiring access only from LaRue to the south with no ingress or egress from or to East Pine. Real Estate Development Cc: Ken Gerschler, Community Planner, City of Central Point Vice President %1} j' L W ~~~ ~~ W "-:% ~~I~I~~T. o.- ......._......... --. _ _. n~,, 9 111!l~ifl'I~IlI11P11~I~III~I~111 111!Ilill~~~~ll~l! Illi~[ll~~~li~ ~1~11 ~~li~l i' ~l~~l ~'1~1~~I~lI ~I~I ~T~~I~I! ~'~Il llllll~ lll~l~l~l':[I~I~~Ill~ i~l~~ ~ll~~~~~r~~~a~~~~, .. , W W, W~77 ~I - ~ Ll.1 W W ~ ~ , W-_WI m mm I; -i . W t , _ . , ~_~mm ~~_ _ ..,~.. ~J<Ll ~~_ ~ W __W I - I ~~ ~. ~ I I ~ ~ ~~ W-WI II T. ,_ ~~ ! ~ ~ ~ o m ~ ~~ _i ~ ~ -~ E , ~~ l i~ i l l I I ~ ~' s~,I~,~~e~u~iT~,.~l m w_ !-!-J LJ-~_._ .._u-1 f T1 W-.~ I,TI i ~._W ! - W.~. W ~: ~ I - - ~ --Cf e o ~-i I'i't 4,l J- u~ i I ~ :~ I~ . i - ,,, 77 ___, _. , i~~ _.I,p` - ' "~77'-7T~~ W-'_4~ ~ _. TTT~-Y~ ~ . -""' .-..,.,.1.9J 1. ~~jj TT77~~ 6~.1..._6Sd ~ W_~ ~~'-77 ~m'j'~ ~.l...J.~I i I ~I I W -.W LLj~j~~_* .,:_:a d ph @M1~d p~xsa~ Ad3e~s~? y Q ''' ~~ H~ ~0.EI7 APLi~ vw ~, ~y,~~.~ ~o lF OF Q~E' ~\ LLE VA"IGN ~; ilW ~W' ~~W W ! W W W_W W1W I l_l.l_W~ i W W W ~ ILL~7 . W ~I -h W W W W . "l.l.l W ~I ~~ W_ llJ W WII ~~W Wit W .W I ~I~~_~I 'W.::mlIi. ~.;\GLC-VA-ION WI' IW WI-I~ ::.. U ~ C'. O a; w' a O! W, w': a~ F- F o w ~ U rr~_~rn~ ti grn ~n _< `¢y .~ 60 z xn ~m y .y dp z ' Daniel P k u. ays aeciJp ,if ~ ~J~d=i€i)''~ MOTEL PROJECT ~ „ f ~ aociatea - - ~ ~ s tI I ~ ARCHITECTS FOR S .~ t a ~ b,aos~ms.~tn~,< a' 'r cams eo a,ohao~vros fC0 ~\ ~ (f IN ,f 11'" i5t ~ T.L.~a...~.. P.ar~tsa 'rt:n GENTRAI POINT ~ iJR1 ° eo. rs+o ew svs~ ~~ ~77t}CffM~NT r ROADS, PARKS AND PLANNIN(s SI;R~1C1;5 JACKSON COUNTY Roads October 17, 2DD0 Attention: Tom Humphrey City of Gentrai Point Planning 155 South Second Street Central Point, OR 97502 RE: Development off East Pine Street - a county maintained road. Planning File 00046-SPR; Hotel and Restaurant. Dear Mr. Humphrey: JOSEPH L. STRAIII„ P.F. UIltECi'Of( evniu City 4llke Metltata once 2tU nntelove Roed 10 S. O~kdala Avemw VJnno Cily, Oragw 97503 McU(pd, OrB(ipn 3]501 Fou: 15411 ]746285 Pax 1547)774S79i Ewneil: yvehl l(~jeck,onV.aniry.n~ Fhone'(va11 ]7aG2'JO Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this application for a Hotel and Restaurant to be located on the south side of East Pine Street, adjacent to the easterly side of the I-5 Interchange. Roads and Parks Services has the following comments: The applicant shall submit construction drawings to Jackson County Roads and Parks Services and obtain county permits if required. 2. The applicant shall obtain road approach permits from Roads and Parks Services for road approaches to East Pine Street. We recommend the paved approach be shared with the Chevron station to the East and be restricted to right in, right out movements. 3. Jackson County Roads and Parks Services would like to review and comment on the hydraulic report including the calculations and drainage plan. Capacity improvements or on site detention, if necessary, shall be installed at the expense of the applicant. If you have any questions or need further information feel free to call me at 774-6230. Sincerely, ~~ Eric Niemeyer, PE Traffic & Development Engineer I:\Enpln ee ringl0 evelo pm9n!\CITI ES\CNTRLPTOOOae•SPR.wpd BEAR CREEK GREENWAY / ENGIPIEERING / FLEET MANAGEMENT / Mo7oR POOL / PARKS l ROAD MAINTENANCE / vFGETq TION MANAGEMENT 77d•6231 7T4.818a 774.8184 J7B-7379 77a-8183 174.0184 777-6307 925 S. Grape St. ~' P.O. Baz 4190 Medford, Oregon 97501 (541) 858-3092 PACIFIC POWER A PaaJiCorp Cmnprsxy Ken Gerschler Community Planner I55 S. Second St. Central Point,OR 97502 Dear Ken: October 24, 2000 Reference: PP&L W.O.# 00046 Thank You again for sending us the preliminary site plan for the new Eastside Hotel project, file #00046-SPR. After reviewing the plans Pacific Power would like a 15' P.U.E. along the entire exterior of the project within the property line. Thank you for your consideration. Si~njcer~ely, Mike Hale Pacific Power & Light FIRE DISTRICT No. 3 JACKSON COUNTY 8333 AGATE ROAD, WHITE CITY, QREGON 47503-1075 (541) 826-7100 FAX (541) 826.4566 ~yww.ic{T13.com October 5, 2000 Ken Gershler City of Central Point RE: Eastside Rote! The Building Department and Fire District #€3 wilt require a set of blue prints from the applicant for review. The plans shall include a plot plan showing placement of building, main access roads and driveways, Fire District #3 will apply all Uniform Fire Code requirements, which may include on-site water storage and (or hydrants for fire protection, and road access prior to construction. if you have any questions, Please call me at (541) 826-7100 Don Hickman Deputy Fire Marshal A'T"I'ACHMENT G RECOMMENDED PLANNING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The approval of the Site Plau shall expire in one year on November 7, 2001 unless an application for a building permit or an application for extension has been received by the City. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan depicting any changes discussed and approved at the public hearing within 30 days of Planning Commission approval. 2. The project must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations . 3. The project must meet the off-street parking requirements for motel development, and the parking, access and maneuvering areas shall be paved with durable materials for all-weather use and approved by the Public Works Department. H:\Plann ing\00046.wpd ~~>9~Nm EN t tf ~~ CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PRELIMINARY STAFF REPORT for Hotel/Restaurant P W#00046 Date: November 3, 2000 Applicant: Phil Tannenholz Agent: Daniel L. Park Project: Hotel/Restaurant at E. Pine St. and Larue Dr. A.K.A. "East Side Hotel" Location: West of Penninger Rd between E. Pine and Larue Rd. Legal: T37S, R2W, Section 2, Tax Lots 2600, 2700, 2800 Zoning: C-4 Units: Hotel - 109 units Restaurant - 4,000 square feet Plans: 3 pages dated 9/29/00, titled "HOTEL PROJECT FOR CENTRAL POINT" Report By: Robert W. Pierce, Public Works Technician Purpose Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer") regarding Public Works standards and additional standards and requirements to be included in the design. Gather information from the Developer/Engineer regarding proposed development. The Developer is proposing the construction of a 109 unit hotel and a 4,000 square foot un-attached restaurant in two phases. The first phase, to be completed as soon as practicable, will include the hotel and associated necessary improvements. The second phase, to be completed at an undetermined future date, will include the restaurant and associated necessary improvements. It is the recommendation of the Public Works Department that the hotel and restaurant be reviewed separately with separate staff reports being generated for each. Therefore, this staff report is for the hotel and will reference the restaurant only as it pertains to the hotel. The restaurant staff report will be generated prior to its construction. Special Requirements Larue Drive Improvements: The Developer shall provide the City with sufficient right of way to accommodate the construction of Larue Rd to the limits established by the Public Works Department. All improvements on and connections to Larue Drive shall be coordinated and approved the City PWD, and should be designed and implemented at the expense of the Developer. Construction drawing improvements shall include or delineate sight triangles, sidewalks, and all other public improvements. Tie-ins to the existing city infrastructure must be permitted and approved by City PWD. Eas[ Side Hote! PIf'D StaJJRepni~l \`oven~ber 3, 2000 Page 2 The driveway into the proposed development from Larue Rd. should be designed and positioned in a manner that will accommodate the turning movements and access of emergency vehicles. It is the Public Works Department's recommendation that the hotel building permit not be issued until the improvements to Larou Rd are completed to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department. E. Pine Streef lmprovemenfs: All improvements on and connections to E. Pine Street shall be coordinated and approved the City PWD, and should be designed and implemented at the expense of the Developer. Tie-ins to the existing city infrastructure must be permitted and approved by City PWD. Because of the complexity of issues associated with ingress and egress to the proposed restaurant location from E. Pine Street, it is the recommendation of the Public Works Department that E. Pine Street Improvements be deferred until construction of the restaurant. 3. Water: The developer shall design and install an 8-inch water line connecting the existing 12-inch water line on E. Pine Street with the existing 8-inch water line on Larue Rd. Water service connections shall connect to the proposed 8-inch water Tine. Afire hydrant shall be placed near the northwest corner of tax lot 2600 The Developer shall provide the City with a 15-foot exclusive water line easement to be 5-feet on one side of the water line and 10-feet on the other. Site Drainage/Storm Drain Plan: The developer shall design and implement a site drainage/storm drain plan that corrects and/or enhances existing site drainage for the entire area noted on the site plan. If the storm drainage infrastructure is to be privately operated and maintained, a suitable system will need to be designed for a minimum 10-year storm event. If applicable, any storm water retention facilities shall be designed to mitigate erosion and sediment and hydrocarbon deposition; and to mitigate the "attractive nuisance" hazards associated with these facilities. 4. Existing Infrastructure: The Developer shall provide suitable engineering certification and justification (i.e. calculations, analyses, plots, etc.,) that all connections to existing infrastructure (i.e. street; drive-thru queuing; water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems; natural drainage systems; etc.,) will not interfere with or provide for the significant degradation (in the opinion of the City of Central Point) of the existing effective level of service or operation of the infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have either adequate capacities to accommodate the flows and/or demands imposed on the existing infrastructure as the result of the connection of the proposed development's infrastructure; or the existing facilities will be improved by and at the expense of the Developer to accommodate the additional flows and/or demands while maintaining or improving the existing effective level of service of the affected facility. Existing Structure: An existing, former gas station is located on tax lot 2800. The Developer shall remove all existing underground storage tanks from the property prior to final acceptance of the Hotel by the City. The Public Works Department recommends that the structure at the former gas station site, along with all associated infrastructure and miscellaneous concrete, sign posts, and brick work be removed and replaced with suitable landscaping prior to final acceptance of the Hotel by the City. General Development Plans: Developer shall submit to the City's PWD for review and approval, plans and specifications for all improvements proposed for construction or modifications within the City or public rights-of- wayand easements or for connections to City infrastructure. Public improvements include, but are not limited to, streets (including sidewalks, curbs and gutters ); storm drainage and sanitary sewer collection and conveyance systems; water distribution system (up to the service meter); street lighting; and traffic control devices, street signs, and delineation. All construction of public improvements shall conform to the City's PWD Standards, the conditions approved and stipulated by the Planning Commission, and other special specifications, details, standards, and/or upgrades as may be approved by the City Administrator or his designee prior to the approval of the construction plans for the proposed development. During construction, changes proposed by the Developer shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's engineer to the City PWD for approval prior to installation. 2. Approvals: If applicable, Fire District No. 3 (fire hydrant placement, waterline sizing, and emergency vehicle access), Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA, for sanitary sewers), and written approval of construction plans shall be submitted to the City PWD prior to final construction plan review and approval by City PWD. East srde Hotel AWD StaJfRepa~( November 3, 2000 Pnge d 3. As-Built Drawings: Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. If feasible, the Developer's engineer or surveyor should provide the drawings in both a "hard copy' form (produced on Mylar'~) and in a "digital" format compatible with AutoCAD®, or other form as approved by the City PWD. As-built drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line" changes to final approved construction plans which identify the locations and or elevations (as appropriate) of actual installed items. Elevations: All elevations used on the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on the permanent benchmark shall be tied into an established City approved benchmark and be so noted on the plans. 5. Fill Placemenf: All fill placed in the road right of way shall be engineered fill that is suitably placed and compacted in accordance with City PWD 6. Roads: The City shall evaluate the strength of the native soils and review the road section designs at the Developer's expense. Roads should be designed to handle all expected loads, including fire equipment. 8. Ufilify Plans: Prior to construction the developer must coordinate, with the City PWD, the placement of proposed utilities to avoid conflicts and insure adequate separation with all infrastructure. Utilities include, but are not limited to, electric power, cable television, natural gas, and telephone. 10. City Utility Easements: Easements must be provided for existing City infrastructure (i.e. sanitary sewer, water, and storm drain) and any of the City's infrastructure that is to be installed as part of this development. Easements must be a minimum of 15-feet wide, and should not split lot lines. East side Hotel PIVD Stajj2epor[ n'onenrher 3, 2000 Page 5 Easements for storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and water lines should be dedicated to the City and notjust a public utilities easement (PUE). Centerline of buried infrastructure shall be aligned a minimum of five (5) feet from the edge of the easement. PUEs must have a minimum 10-foot width. 11. Clear Vision Areas: The construction drawings shall include clear vision areas (i.e. sight triangles) designed to meet the City's PWD requirements. 12. Fire Hydrants: Provide locations of existing and any new required fire hydrants. All fire hydrants shall be suitably protected from potential vehicle damage and encroachment. 14. Wafer System: Construction drawings shall include the size, type, and location of all water mains, hydrants, valves, service connection, meter, service laterals, and other appurtenance details in accordance with City PWD Standards and as required by the City PWD. 16. Storm Drain System Design: Prior to construction plan approval of the improvements for this development plan, the Developer's engineer shall provide the City PWD with a complete set of hydrologic and hydraulic calculations and profile plots for sizing the site storm drain system. The engineer shall use the rainfall/intensity curve obtained from the City PWD for hydrologic calculations, and the negotiated run-off parameters. 18. Grading Plans: Construction plans should have a suitable grading plan. Grading plans should have original/existing grades and final grades plotted on the plan. Typically, existing grade contour lines are dashed and screened back, and final grade contour lines are overlaid on top of the existing grades and are in a heavier line width and solid. Contour lines should be labeled with elevations. 19. Erosion Control Plan: Construction plans shall have a suitable Erosion Control Plan. NOV-03-2000 FRI 02 28 PM ODOT ROGUE VALLEY AREA FAX N0. 541 774 6349 P, 02 DEPAR'1'A41;;NT Or TRANSPOIt'['ATION November 3, 2000 Tom Humphrey Central Point Planning Director 155 S. Second Street Central Point, OR 97502 Re: Proposed Hotel and Restaurant -File 00046-SPR Dear: Tom: This letter contains comment from both Jackson County Roads and the Oregon Department of Transportation(ODOT), regarding the hotel and restaurant proposed for development at 1480 East Pine Street. The subject property contains 2.77 acres and is described as 37-2W-2, Tax Lots 2600, 2700 and 2800. This proposed development is one of several under consideration at this time, occurring along East Pine Street between Interstate 5 and Hamrick Road. Additional development with access to Pine Street impacts the safety and operation of this roadway and potentially the Interchange. We are therefore requesting a continuance on the hearing for this application, to give the City of Central Polnt, Jackson County and ODOT time to study the potential for developing a traffic master plan for this area, If you have questions or need further assistance please contact either of us listed below. Sincerely, ~~ John Vial ODOT District 8 Manager (541) 774-6355 °~'~~Z Dale Petrasek, PE County Engineer (541)774-6202 C~~~~ `~` ti ............_......_.... ,'d(7U Atucli7pe, 7?md 1~'hiru C;n~r, C')t? Ji~03 I'itona h-Flj 77}~G350