Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - November 6, 2001~ .. ii" ~. X e' q~3~ ~ ~t~i ~;{a pp4 ~ i~*~.77~~9,/i S A ~ 1 '~ ~ ~ pp b.~.w_a. ,, .~~~V~N Q..q ~,y'~~1~'R Wt~,-4,.~kW ~~~. ~~ 'l t1~?~'G, '1~ i 1'v ~~\~ } }tll'~l`J I'-' ~t~t~11~111S~IC)]? II. C?L BALI.. C`(Ittc',~ l.'ital~~~. - C;an~;' J'islt. DoI~ T'C~si t', ~,arolyc li~llrl;,~~I~, ,4~~hn j,~(i1 c>~. l'titrl ~.i,,I~ti' ~n-~d ~~,%•~r~ ire I~ i t} <~ III. C"~~~~~~~;~;t~C~~~~~;~~~'{'; ~;.. Rey i~: ~~r rlta~t ~1i,~,~ovl cat:: Sci;t~°1~11~e~ ~~, t?~7~ . }'}~1nl~tirl~r ~c~t.~IxJissi~I~'1~s1~i1~r I'ae ~-16 A. Pu1~Iic I }cal~ili? iC~ ~vi~«~ a sit~* 1?}~1u <u.ci ~ <t al~ce a}~;?licafiol~s t},<~t «ot~l;' a1}e~w the air}itit~~rl o~'~ n~~ti~,' rru?ti-pxlnc~~sc roo~tI, c}as5z~oonIS azu thy. rc:I~IOC}e~ cy~" t}~;~ t`'C))~1J1131I1it~' l3}~Ic {'hJt;-t:11 at ~()(~ %tioI'tl~ i t)th ~tl~e~'i. 'I he stii~jec( }7i't~}SCI"1`;' 1~ }C?CIltC(1 iJl t}z~' }~-} . }~G~Ii'~I1~IF1} ~Jii~?,lC; }'~?~111i}yk %t7T7JIl<?, ~JS1i:li (?i? 41~~ J ~ `tiV (J? I3C;, 'fax } ;cat ?(?(). ~° ~~ ~ll})}1C. lllt'l't1I1`,? til 1't;',\ l~:b`' ~IJ3 <1}jl~1lC,~:1t1()1 l)2' ~ :~CT7CC''t'~lI'1~111CC ~1i{?J1' Iiil~ C:11~12'E' i~:<1stel~l` br~ul~dar~ o~ t}3:; l3rool;li ]d 1;st~ltes `uhc3ivision. "I'he ~Ip}~licaJ~t is t~ei}1lcstin~ that thy- fence. e.~cce~i the It~a~in~i1I11 six 1oc~t l~ei:,llt ref}llil-cd b~ code. "I Its:. subtlivi5io.. is 1<~r;atec} irl ~: IZ-1-5. Resiclel~ti~11 fi,ir~~~ l~tlt~rily 1e~ne J)istric;t on'~~I<tl? 3 ~ "'~~~ 2f?T3A, Tax Lots c~=-}til, ~~Ql a1;~.6~0. .~ 25 - 28 C. 1'ub}ic CIc~rr'irl~~~ t€~ z'vie~v ass a}~~,licatii~I~ c} ~t terataii~re `~ lt~fi commercial suhc}zvision can 1tit~rp ~'7~~,~' t1?I7, T~~ Lt~t:; 1 ~Oi), l ~)(}] 1;IJ.f ~1ap 37 ~ti~% 1 If1, Tat Lr~t l ()1. `l,he 1~aJ~e,1 Js located i ~ C~4, `} ortr~ist aJ~c} (~~iee T'~oft ssi~xaa~ ' " ~.., ,Zorn I7zstrict. I, I~~.~~~'.~LLAI~T~~tz VIII. ~.~~~~i[~~~I~~T ~"ity of Central Point Planning Canamission Minutes September 4, 2t?f11 Page 4 stated that he would like to wait to plant any trees or shrubs until the spring, In addition, to trees and shn~bs, decorative ground coverage is needed to cover exposed plastic sheeting within the planter strip adjacent to Ash Street. The building itself will be a pole barn type construction with the highest point being approximately twenty feet. The required setback from the current fence is ten feet on each side. Ann Britt, 15 Ashley Place, was concerned that the roof would reflect sunlight into nearby neighborhoods. Mr. Pierce explained that the roof will be constructed with anon-reflecting coating that will eliminate any glare caused by the sun. Mr. P`ieree also stated that Public Works equipment and vehicles will be stored under the new pole barn type building to keep them out of the weather. Mrs. Britt also commented that the Public Works crews have been great neighbors. Commissioner Riggs made a mo#ion to approve the modification to the Public Works site at 399 South Fifth S#reet on map 3'7 2W 1.1I38, Tax Lot 8240 subject to the recommended conditions of approval. Commissioner Foster seconded the motion. RULL CALL; Motion passed unanimously. V.ll.. MISCELLANEOUS Matt Samitore, Comzxaunity Planner, presented a site plan change to the 4-plex at the intersection of Hiatt Lane and flaskel Street, Tax Lot '7240. The proposed changes will include the construction of caxports instead of garages, placing parking spaces in front of the 4-plex, reducing apartment sizes to 1,044 square feet, moving apartments to the west, away from f-Iaskell Street, and placing garbage pick-up to the west, The proposed changes also include an improved landscaping plan that meets TC.}D standards. Commissioner Fish made a motion to approve the modifications to the 4-plex a# the in#ersection of Hiatt Lane and Haskell Stree#, Tax Lot ='72U4. Commissioner Zunte seconded the motion. RdLL CALL; Motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Lun#e made a motion to adjourn the mee#ing. Commissioner Foster seconded the motion, ROLL CALL: Motion passed unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 8:55 P.M. City of Central Point Planning Commission Minutes Septemfier 4, 2t1Q1 Page 3 building further back from the highway for the purpose of additional parking spaces. In addition, ()Dt~T will require that all property owners sign a statement indicating concurrence with the use of these access points. This correspondence was given to the applicant at the meeting, The applicant will need to contact UII:3C}T for further information and details. The Planning Staff also recommends that a shared parking agreement be made with the adjacent property. Both parcels are owned by the same individual. Trees and shrubs will be required as indicated in the staff report. Signs for the proposed coffee stand will need. to meet current TUI7 standards. This proposal will affect business signs that arc currently in place at 82(l South Front Street. blew signs for these businesses will also be required to meet current TUD standards when a change in use is proposed. Bob Pierce, Public Works Director, stated that he leas not received any plans from the applicant and added that any work done at the site must meet Public Works standards and specifications and be required to be done by qualified Public Works personnel or contractors. Ty Sylivan of Dutch Bros. Coffee stated that he will beautify the site by seeding the lawn area, installing a sprinkler system and setting up picnic tables. Also, he would like to be on city water and BC~SA sewer system. There will be no deck or awning at this site. In addition, Mr. Sylivan said he will contact QDC?T to clarify any access problems. Commissioner Foster made a motion to adopt Resolution Number 530, approving the installation of a drive-thru espresso cart along South Front Street on map 37 2W 11CB, Tax Lot 405, subject to the recommended conditions of approval. Commissioner Lunte seconded the motion. RQLL CALL: Motion passed unanimously. C. Public Hearing to review and modify a previously approved site plan for the Central Point Public Works Department. =The modification would take place at 399 South Fifth Street on map 37 2W 11BB, Tax Lot $200 in the R-1-6, Residential Single Family Zoning District, Ken Gerschler, Community Planner, presented the staff report, Included in the recommended conditions of approval is the installation of "wine" or "whiskey" barrel planters with flowers, replacement of six Cypress trees and inclusion of additional shrubbery adjacent to Ash Street. Bob Pierce, Public Works Director, City of Central Pdint Planning Carnrnissian Minutes September ~, 2IJ01 Aage 2 Zoning District. The parcel meets the area requirements for the proposed office building. Any signs associated with the off ce building will require separate permits. Parking spaces will exceed the recommended 13 spaces with a total of 23 spaces. The Planning Staff recommends that a sidewalk be constructed for pedestrian traff c from Freeman Court to East Pine Street. The Commission asked staff if the sideway. was necessary and it was explained that this would allow easier pedestrian flow from Freeman Road to East Pine Street. Tlae Agent for MAD LLC, Jeff Mayfield, pointed out that only a small portion of the subject property is next to East Pine Street and they would like to put in the sidewalk to connect Freeman Court and East Pine Street. Mr. Mayfield also added that the building will be constructed with lap siding and a false brick front, He is also in the process ofputting together plans for Public Works and BC~SA. Mr. Mayfield was informed by staff' that this site may be included in the flood plain when FEMA re-maps Mingus Creek. Commissioner Lun#e made a motion to adapt Resole#ion Number 529, approving the construction of a 3,950 square foot commercial building near the intersection of Freeman Road and Freeman Cour# of map 3'7 2W 02D, Tax Lots 940 and 1000 subject #o the recommended conditions of approval. Commissioner Fish seconded the motion. RC?LL CALL; Motion passed unanimously. B. Public Hearing to review an application for the ins#allation of a drive-#hru espresso cart along Sou#h Front Street. The subject property is located in the C-5, Thoroughfare Commercial Distric#, TOD-GC, TDD Corridor on map 3'T 2W 11C8, Tax Lot 405. Ken Gerschler, Community Planner, presented the Planning .Department Staff Report. The applicant, Brian Maxwell of Dutch Bros. Coffee, is proposing a drive-tlu~.z espresso cart along South Front Street on 0.47 acres and is located in the C-5, Thoroughfare Commercial District, TOD-GC, TOD Corridor. =~ The parcel meets the area requirements for the proposed drive-thru espresso cart. This would be the second Dutch Bros, Coffee stand in Central Point. In a late correspondence, Shirley Roberts, a Planner with the t~regon Department of Transportation (C}DC7T} sent a letter stating that access to the state highway is subject to compliance with the Access Management Administrative Rule '734- 4151,and that an access permit will be required for this use. Prior to the issuance a revised site plan must be submitted to OD£)T for review showing the coffee sales City of Central Point Punning Commission Minutes September 4, 24(11 I. MEETING CALLED Tfl ORDER 11, ROLL CALL: Chuck Piiand, l~.arolyne Johnson, Candy Fish, John LeGros, Paul Lunte, Don Foster and Wayne Riggs were present. Also in attendance were Ken Gerschler Community Planner; Matt Samitore; Community Planner, Dave Arkens; Planning Technician and Bob Pierce; Public Works Director. III. CflRRESPflNDENCE There was no correspondence. IV. MINUTES Commissioner Lunte made a xnotian to approve the minutes from the August 7, 2001 meeting as presented. Commissioner Fish seconded the motion. RCJLL CALL: Johnson, abstained; Fish, yes; LeGros, yes; Lunte, yes; Foster, yes and Riggs, yes. Motion passed. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances. VI, BUSINESS A. Public Hearing to revie~cv an application fora 3,950 square foot commercial office building near the intersection of Freeman Road and Freeman Court. The subject property is located in the C4, Tourist and Office -Professional Zoning District on map 3'7 2W 02D, Tax Lots 900 and 1000. Commissioner Johnson declared that she will be associated with the new office but will not bereft monetarily by the construction or operation of the new office building. l~.en Gerschler, Community Planner, presented the Planning Department Staff' Report, The applicant, MDD LLC, is proposing a 3,950 square foot commercial building on 0.58 acres near the intersection. of Freeman Road and Freeman Court. The subject property is located in the C4, Tourist and Offzce -Professional secondary arterial. The proposed circulation plan indicates that there are no plans for vehicles from the church to access Hazel Street, however the site plan does show a proposed connection onto I-lermosa Drive. The existing church will remain at the same elevation with the addition being constructed as a two story~Attachment `B>'), A majority ofthe exteriorwill be treated with lap siding, the exception being the existing brick f Wish along the westerly side facing Tenth Street. The roof structure will be modified to improve the architectural appearance of the building as seen from ail directions. A lattice ofopen beams amongst the composition shingles will add a unique perspective to the structure mass anti provide ambient light to the courtyard area. Eight exit points are shown on the building exterior, two of which are handicap accessible with ramps at the rear of the building. Once completed, the building will have fve off ces, thirteen classrooms, four restrooms, a large multi-purpose room and various storage areas throughout the entire structure. The sanctuary appears to be unchanged in size. Construction of the addition will require the removal and relocation of an existing parking area, tennis court, playground area, storage facilities and parking lot lights {Attachment "C>'}. A garage located adjacent to the southerly property boundary will remain as-is. A landscaping plan has been submitted (Attachment "D»). The lawn areas between the front parking area acrd the church appear to rernain untouched. Three trees will be removed from an existing planter strip in the front parking area, while two others will be removed in the area of the building addition. Sixteen existing trees on the property will be retained, including an Oak tree on Tenth Street unless required right of way improvements warrant removal. The large grass area near the boundary with Interstate Five will remain unchanged unless additional parking is needed at a future date. ~ ~{ r~~t ~~~'S To proceed with construction a variance from the off street parking requirement will be needed. For projects such as the Community Bible Church expansion, the code allows a degree of flexibility when calculating the necessary parking space requirements based upon multiple uses. The Church operates generally on Wednesday evenings and Sundays for religious activities. During weekdays, a Child Care Center and Preschool are the pximary operations. CPMC 1.7.64 requires 1 space per 300 square feet of office areal space for every four people in a sanctuary area, or 1 space per employee and 1 space per five children for child care centers. Based upon this criteria, the Church would need to provide X66 spaces. The site plan shows that 57 spaces have been provided in the front and 72 spaces at the rear of the building (129 total, 6 of which are handicapped} with a new driveway connection to Hermosa Drive. The proposed plan modifies the existing vehicle circulation by the establishing one way traff c westbound along the North and eastbound along the South_property Imes. As the Commission is well aware, there has been a reluctance in the region for churches to expand or relocate facilities due to traffic and parking concerns. The Applegate Christian Fellowship is a church that was established. during the 1980's in Ruch, a small community located approximately 1 S miles from Jacksonville. As the popularity ofthe Fellowship grew, so did the traffic that traveled. on amain highway through Jacksonville to attend services. In 1999, the City ofJacksonville received a Iand use application requesting to build a new Presbyterian Church in a residential neighborhood. 1.. tit 1~esidents surrounding the prapased church vaicecl concerzas that the traffic az~d parleizag wazzlcl lazzvc an adverse effect on their neighborhood based up what tl~zey hacl observed with increrasing attendance at the Applegate Christian Fellowship. The Presbyterian ~lacarch taltizrzately received an appz~oval subject to conditions that were designed to mitigzate; traffic az°zd parking concerns. The Building I3epa ent has been notified afthis application but has not received building plans. C1nce these plans are submitted, they will be examined far complzance with the applicable regulations, p'indin~s of Fact & Conclusions of I.,aw Variance The Variance wil~....provide added advantages to the neighborhood or the City such as beautification o safety;; ~~.__. ^ Churches are commonly situated in residentially zoned areas and are an integral part of a healthy community. Improvements made to the street accesses and parking lot will improve the appearance of the site and the neighborhood. Construction of a new sidewalk section will improve pedestrian safety along North Tenth Street. 2. The Variance will not have any significant adverse impacts upon the neighborhood; ~ The lack of adequate off street parking has the potential of impacting neighboring properties if the issue is not properly addressed at this time. 'T'here are several options that could be "triggered" as church membership and attendance increases. 3. The Variance will utilize property within the intent and the purpose of the zoning district: ^ Churches are a permitted use in the R l zoning district. At issue is the number of off street parking spaces needed to meet the code. 4. Circumstances affect the property that generally do not apply to property in the same zoning district; and ~ Topographically, this irregularly shaped land drops significantly towards Interstate Five with a portion being used by the surrounding neighborhood used by neighbors as open space. 5. The conditions for which the Variance is requested were not self-imposed through the applicant's own actions, not the actions of the applicant's agents, employees or family members. ^ This particular finding would be difficult to make since there is a direct correlation between building size and the number of off street parking spaces required. To meet the minimum off street parking requirements without a variance, the building size would need to be reduced. Site Plan In approving, conditionally approving or denying the plans submitted, the City bases it's decision on the following standards from Section I7.72.04~: J ., ,. A. Landscaping and fencing and tl~e construction of walls on the site in sczch a manner as to cause the same to not substantially interfere with the landscaping scheme oftha neighborhood, and in such a manner to use the same to screen such activities and sights as nxight be heterogeneous to existing neighborhood uses. The Commission may require the mintez7azzce of existing plants or the installation of new ones for purposes of screening adjoining property. ^ A landscape plan has been submitted by the applicant, Most o#'the existing trees have been retained. Staff recommends that the front parking area receive landscape similar to that proposed in the rear including, but not limited to low shrubs and trees. z ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~s~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~ B. .Design, number and location of ingress and egress points so as to improve and to avoid interference with the traffic flow on public streets; ~ Traffic will have three access points, two ofwhich are from North Tenth Street and one from Hermosa Drive. There are presently two driveways onto North Tenth Street and a third is proposed from a driveway cut onto Hermosa Drive. Service drives are required to have a minimum vision clearance of 20 feet from the intersection of driveway centerlines and the intersecting street right-of way line. It appears that the church can design its driveway accesses to satisfy this requirement. Traffic generated by churches typically occurs at off peak periods. The preschool and kindergarten operate Fveekdays. G To provide off street parking and loading facilities and pedestrian and vehicle flow facilities in such a manner as is compatible with the use for which the site is proposed to be used and capable of use, and in such a manner as to improve and avoid interference with the taff c flow on public streets; ^ The City has received the parking plan which depicts a total of 129 parking spaces. Under CPMC 1'7.64.040{D} seating capacity for the sanctuary itself {400 people} would necessitate 100 spaces and as many as,166 spaces could be required to accommodate classrooms and kitchen areas. Design requirements in CPMC 17.64.1.00 call for paved, adequately drained parking areas for all-weather use; painted striping, lighting and the placement of bumper rails along property lines, sidewalks and landscaping areas. Additionally, parking areas should not be erected or maintained in special setback areas which in this case would be 60 feet from the centerline of North 10th Street. The project would be eligible for compact car adjustment of up to 25°la of the total which could bring the parking space total up to 140. ~?. Suns and other outdoor advertising structures to ensure that they do not conflict with or deter from traffic control signs ar devices and that they are compatible with the design of their buildings ox uses and will not interfere with or detract from the appearance ar visibility afnearby signs; ^ No additional signage has been proposed at this time. A sign permit is required should the church change or add new signs. E. Accessibility and sufficiency of fire fighting facilities to such a standard as to provide far the reasonable safety aflife, limb and property, including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads and fire lanes so that all buildings on the premises are accessible to fire apparatus; ~ The project, if approved, would need to meet any requirements of Jackson County Fire District 3. The .district was involved in the pre-application process but did not submit correspondence for this report. F, Compliance with all city ordinances and regulations; ^ The proposed construction meets the minimum setback requirements for the R-~. District. There are general regulations governing special setbacks and landscaping (1.7.60,090 and 17.60.135 respectively). Special setbacks on secondary arterials like North 10th are intended, among other things, to permit eventual widening, The project ' when constructed, will be in compliance with the requirements of the Central Point ' Municipal Code subject to the recommended conditions of approval. G. Compliance with such architecture and design standards as to provide aesthetic acceptability in relation to the neighborhood and the Central Point area and it's environs. ~ Most Church facilities are located within residentially zoned areas. The pitched composition roof proposed for the sanctuary is generally compatible with the surrounding structures and the building itself presents an attractive appearance. The applicants have submitted building elevations as part of their application package. Site landscaping and full parking improvements by the applicants would enhance the aesthetic value of the project. -- Rect~mmendatic~n StaF recommends that the Punning Commission tape one of the following actions: 1. Adapt Resolution No:~~~' ,approving the Variance and Site Plan subject to the recommended conditions of approval; ar 2. Deny the proposed Variance and Site Plan; or 3. Continue the review of the Variance Site Plan applications at the discretion ofthe Commission. Attachments A. Site Plan, B. Elevations and Floor Plan C. Demolition Plan D. Landscape Plan E. Notice of Public Hearing F. BCVSA Con~n~ents G. Public Works Department Memo K. Planning Department Recommended Conditions ., ., { t t +'+~ { R { ~ . l ~~ ! ~ t i V Gt0 FiKRYQIA LR. R V SL Sd l~ /~ C { TL Yit C \ C 1 '{~~{~.}.~ t1sl nuMa ek t ,/ ~ au t,xu.oat ck ~"') }} ` ~ft-1 YLWINPi /-~+ t ~ 10~L, F4,~1, pt { ~..C> f \ OAV 4 {?RQR-+' ~ ~ ra0 Mlck}M ilk t C ~1 { ~ ~ y 1\ fJY~YF ita[ lo1CC 1 ~I ~ \ `T~.., f TL ,t4 { \\ R d'~i t4°E"fx~axt~ic~rq ~\ R rL ,ax 4.!' ('~ G t Sao ,aw.c nc at,or Rbw ~i ~ t s,. t ` t t" ~ .,..e ,a.oV at.ts'--# sSAY 4 \ araaai icmc ox ~ ` J' ~ { t rs. na { 4 3~G' \ \ S' * qty ,}o \ ~ \''1 ~5. ~, a ''g \ !/" Ynn rn.nc x ' • q0 \4 \\ a '~, \ .~ *t, \ ~ a>xae s ,! t ~ t * 4 a \ \ ~' \ \ a `'y nor. (io1 rc.~ \ ~+ /' I ftii ( .1. i \ \ ~'K ~.~, 8. qtb 'r4 Y \ it 1 4 ^y \ ~ \ \ !E'} ~ { { ~, 1 4 4 \ \ ~+¢ t ~e r~ // ,.v ~i~~ e~ taa`xt'wscce i { 11111 i .t ~ ~\\A4 ~' 4t"81 \;\\ ~s'1 C+ ~g °tm'~}~~ "Nac ~'~`~~~'~? °4P1'~,m,a /"~~ f { •~ ~~~ f t ~,\ t i ii .a \.~D y; ,y4 'v,\ \ ~ ~ ~y,7~ 1~L./ rL~'~~ // t ~ { .,«''~ ((i i ` \ Uq ` t`'~a`Ra .pw~}~} ~r'~ymg. ~ ~' f'~ ! t i~`TKMS Ok $« «y ~Qat1.~ ~ ~ fMl' ..00' Nt,GC~' ^4{w `k~w '~ ~Y // ~ ° luar rqr 1 6UKDlNC \ ~' r ° ,e' xr}~aT ~n°'wcvts U'" t- ra^ 1 ~` .ra'1° scRr saxar wl aw-e ww { tvsrntt, Rw >,ar R (I 11 6 ~ ',~,. Y ~ ~ t . ' rr Leel i'n^.os'm° Nsz ort R lii ~~6^X ~ ' R""""" t"'..."" 4'dsy,~!SR.......~,. i t a32,+s~,~-w aso ~x~~ ~-p~,saecinrc I anti 2~- ~' ~1 sx. Roe R t ~ t:~q ° ; i +es~e fu va nar eent~s^ }' R-3 zotmG { xa ~' 1 I ,,~ t b \\ ` ~ t Ate ~{ ~~~ nx Tn a \ $Uf G a~ a'~ar m per r.'~. ,wr R TL os a~~+w 'ra f//' 9 \' +tr.c ur{rrr~li4CaaRr \ aeaa ~ ~ p.A1\/ ~.J qq ...~ \\ ,~ ~ R ~^^~.rc w muw, sam w~u °' °~ru. .~n,r ~ T sank 1SY r ,e,1 -~-, ,~,r. iv \`~~ t '' \ SfOPNN,X (.Sa' 1 ~~'~ ~ k ~ ~.(C~ t _ 1^ (Id ac ~. Br an ~' S,R x. Yom at.,,. _ 1 ! wnert~ 1 ,/ ~i r \ T~~.P' J1 l 7tl %ii371d+1' MMIL d s ¢~\: CJYYM ~ R ~ ~ ~ ~ Tr 1 to \ b `+ x R ¢~ ~r \ q 4 \ ¢Y GalKl { r / /q ,ri, /\ 6 esm t ioto~l'A iT. {\\ R t / \ \ ~ ,./~ ~G+G R ,~ ~iN'C ~OCtNr3~ILT~2~'LA ~ t , tc t ~rrr~a~Rrrr a~Rr~w ~ aa+ssrazva ~ OIR dP bRAIG9 ~•~•~••••••~• n ~ Y IsnM [R2MM a pry, .y ~ ~ ]e TM arm ~ ~THi4t tY atR%~ R7 LW1p1'C aXS ~ g m~at~ ..s+~vz~ mw~r arta,«a:~ aamrc ma ue rur ra Rux aws aaats xrs ak aux easwes sr artta r ~ { i~a wxa s4 O+u rr+~snR {wah~ram "R "•Ra ~m,'n' suroea"c~if ,xu. +r+a {sett +sa-»rr 7AUCaQ1~Yt aa-aeul'ftter CRIB axc a acutx. rtr ~ r ra aRrwnarroeaGx ~ tau aaRUr muxraar etttt+. t ryes7~ ~~tusr esti<wc rewL At raxee gra°~'"`Mw "e' "'w P , t / 7rmrc+~r4 nn.Mar (Nij JJ9-iaN f3.~ty a / e .StWR4YU CN eeM rRt T?m aeR Rfa RMkaa ttwa at tlat0er' INU lK C4+kYf JaeAraf rm"af6r iMrl laf trwx taaeuT a{{M«C~w~C,Ntt jra~y ~ ~ +« al ~t MaRar (.wq lriat e4lkYAt l+`aa1'!tt<I.N19 ~aQRR~a aGw.tr><rsw tkreR r+Nnnm ru sorarrwav taxes usourrs trt Krit lOl~YON yyYQ tftlrfO OOYIAOrDaM t txv~a rr war eat TRtkn-wa+wta. !xs mx,a- raurar_xa. mom. ~~ mete grin '., i.1'WII'lA wFf aw A'ttRW tTirrM '., tIX+aLlW4lat K+b>+wtl ',, IaAC, ~~ ''., ReYMtTtW.MK ifRIRaRa twl7lRY} iT.MM dW L iM.e rr. YrweM/ r w starw,rr ~Yw~ L~WNM ~W MMm t. G4r pwWw+M xY..Irp aYM M6nx.T 1N~f r rr,s,.r.. tws Rwer.lrwraa.a n.rs+~^ ts°k+A ,na E M elaMrrrrR wirwM Rw ermeert .` r M+NM+ > tb1~i NM JwN+ iY~PIP M Nei Nal.. i ~asesa4'1"A1'avo a~r~ ...r""«: a spJ.t..e nr a 1N GMr wr nR .Yr wiwtl.r b Ar ~I~~~t~..eMM~le ~f.~~~Xxw1YYy...~ y a..t ~w.W~ rr Gse wa .Ny, a w.r n,...w ser srK a,N..,M.~y .I twe rr«+r gwP~.I+m r.yte.W.wn +W !~: IF M }a ~MS«ea Ma a w.a.Kr...« rw ts.. r sr +e-+tr w. sr M taw ,wuY.. rar Ai'+: +~+• swkr ~. w r tr.MP+.~.S".r a: a~~M CtMe~s+r ~rrMy}ww.++ww. r..,.+wwn4w a rrsaMYO'u.Yw~«'a~ra.r [wX (iYr~ ~~ ~ M 'a u. c..sw stir sw r..r~. u..a,w' wx+..w' m ,w sygwr stir. Tnr n..aww sNaw r.,p,... ar arnm~""`a.4r,ai .ems ~ ~ ra kr a.ry.wr.nRr.wre m.....s+r ray aaw» r Mrrrab +NePORIt r MMe'waM1 of try !t. AN rN1 rWtl rlw4 R1r rarR rrrtwtr b talY tatr. RtC tL et ~ E4~s4..M1Y^ rerR {YeW asr k+e.aa, ra a..es w~ M smc«a Mae RtrM arG bf~ ur .aa em a,. ~ 1r o ~m xso. t kW Kl tN{ Zf. { {NECal1: isic~l tto er ~ t SITE PLAN-(,7)MMUNITY 13lRLEGFItIt[GN '"~ iG:~t;dfsk ,3rJVr„swtr! W1E: ea or .Yk t'sr „mJfor+l, ui wrrn y75 ~ ~Y~ ~ ~" tea , ~ r~4 =°" ~ ~ 6 N COMMUNITY BIBLE CH~IRCH~~ ~~\ ' { { ~~^~'~~"~~~ CAtt, FQR U77UYY LtIC;tT£ ~iB NDURS a gr €S£ / / ra D~cnaxrrcrr ~ t-enxi-szz swu ~ r. row' ...ww~~~***tt: N'i'h'Al.. F'V~! (N'i`, {.?K~(eU1~i i { VICINITY !t fAF MY.S l ~j..ti" 3"'^~ r ~^~ l t ~~. +... +~ ~-~}~-~y s yt C4 S4 i ... i...++-^'~ "" ~ Lwai...1 ~~11~3 ~ICI~.iC~t:J~3 S~C1~.1~33~1CI j.,,~ ~~ ~, ~' ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I r $ ' / / ", ~ ~~ *y 4 4 r ^ ,y ~ ~ ^~,\ r ~ ^ ~~ '`~,, r ~'`~ # cis ~ . Y v ~,'' ~'~J'~.ti ~ \ r ~ r ~` © ~ ~ ~ ~'" ~' ,~ ~' l ,~ ~{ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r J / ~+ J ~ ^~t a ~'~ ' ~ ~ ~f ~ ~i J l~~ / / j ~~ J/ff,/ ~` ..... ~~~Y `" V ~r ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' J f J ~r r ~ ~ r `~ hJ ~~,!x~ r t ;~ ~rtt _ 'y s^~ cf „„ ~It _ ..~ .... J l i ~~ ! 1 t ~~ ~ ~ ff ~ f~ f ,r~ l~~ rj tj ~~~ ~ J~~J }~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~' CIA " ` t ~ E ' ~~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~y~ 1~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~f r ~~ r r .~ r ~ r r ~a ti~ . / 1~m ~~ ~~ f~ / ~ ~ J~' ,~ ~. o~ '°~ a •~ r ~" r 'w. ~x r ,~ ~ ~ ~~4 ~ S `,~ l ~~~ ~` ~x ~~ ~y~\l 4 W ~~ ~, 1 ~ ! / {)' f y asrt~ 4 / `"tlf~f~~`? rrr ~' n~.*Yt. r . ~~- ~ ~' ~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~~ ~ rtr rr r ~ r rr ~ ~ ~~~ x ~ K ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ri ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ro en 4' z DY~OL~ ~~ r{ ~,ti PLANN.~.N~ .D.~'.PA.R~M~'.N~' Tom I-Iurrlphrey, AICP Planning Director Ken Ger~chler Community Planr~.er Matt Sazx~itore Co~nnnunity Planner Dave Arkens Planning Technician Notice of ~1~eefzng Date of ~Tot~ce; Uctobelr 9, 201 Meeting Date: Time: Place: NATURE (3F MEETING November 6, 2001 7;00 p.m. {Approximate} Central Point City Hall 155 South Second Street Central Point, C}regon Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Coznrnission will review site plan review and variance applications for the construction and remodel ofthe Community Bible Church. A proposed 21,848 square foot addition for classrooms, offices and rr~ultipurpose space will require a variance from the minimum off street parking requirements ofthe Municipal Code. The parcel is located in the R-1, Residential Single Family zoning distract and is identified in the records of the Jackson County Assessor as Map 37 2W 02BC, `I"ax Lot 200. CRITERIA F4R DFCISIflN The requirements for Site Plan Review and "Variance are set Forth in Chapter l7 cif the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Regulations, Off-street parking, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Works Standards. PUBLIC GC?MMENTS 1. Any person interested in conunenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, November 6, 2001. 2. Written comments nay be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, l55 South Second Street, Central Point, tJR 97502. l55 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 541 664-3321 ~ Fax: 541 } 664-6384 3. Sssues ,which may provide the basis for an appeal on the natters shall be raised prior to the expiration afthe comment period noted above. Any testimony anal written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Flail, 155 South Second Street, Central. Point, C?regon. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page. 5, Far additional information, the public may contact the Plaiming Department at (S41} 664- 3321 ext. 291. Si;iMMAR~' OF PR4CED~~1~E At the meeting, the Plazu~.ing Commission will review the applications, technical staffreports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments an the applications. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria. set forth above. At the conclusion of the revi evv the Planning Commission may approve ar deny the Site Plan application. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. ~~ 156 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 9'~5{l2 S41} 664-3321 Fax, (541 664-6384 September 25, 2001 ~~~,~,~ ._ CITY ~F C~~TRR[. pC}I,'~T Ken Cerschler City of Central Point Planning Department ~ ~. r' ~ ~ L 0 0 ~ 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 C~LANNING t~''~urr"orr~r~ ~ ~u~r.ra wc~~s orrpr. d Re: Community Bible Church, File # 01049-SPR, VAIN 1'~ear Ken, There are two sewer mains located within. Haskell Street, an l inch and an 8 inch. The existing building is served from the 8" sewer main. The proposed addition. maybe either connected to the building drain ofthe existing structure or connected to the existing 8 inch main with a new service lateral. In either case there will be development fees due to BCVSA for the addition. The development fees will be based on the number and type ofplumbing fxtuxes in the building. Please have the applicant contact BCVSA so that the development fees can be calculated and paid prior to construction of the addition. If you need additional information, please call me at 779-4144. Sincerely, Carl Tappert, P.E. District Engineer I:IDATAIAGENCIES1CEltitTPT1PLATTNGI(31 Q49-SPR CC}RrIlVI BIBLE C~CH.~C?C ~~ A"~'TACHMENT H REC()MMENUED PL~~S~NING DEPARTMENT CUNDITIt3NS QF APPROVAL 1. The approval of the Variance and bite Plan shall expire in one year on November fi, 2fl02 unless an application for a building permit or an application for extension has been received by the City. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan depicting any changes discussed and approved at the public hearing within 6C} days of Planning Conunission approval. 2. The project must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations . 3. The applicants shall work with City staffto create a phased approach parking mitigation plan that will reduce potential conflicts with neighboring property owners as the church membership increases. The plan shall include, but is not limited to, incorporating the compact parking space percentage into the site plan and obtaining a shared parking agreement with the IO©F Lodge. 4. Landscaping for the front parking area shall receive the same treatment as has been depicted in the rear lot which includes plantings. The applicant shall submit a revised plan to city staff for approval. ..k4 .. ~. t. PLANNING DEFARTMENT STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: 1'~ovetnber b, 2001 TO: Central Point Planning Coxnrnission FROM: Tom Humphrey, Platuxing Director SUBJECT: Variance from fence requirements along the eastern boundary of the Brookfield Estates Subdivision Lots 1-12 { ~'72W10 Tax Lots. Applicant: PacTrend loc. 1014 N. Riverside Avenue Medford, Qregon 9'7501 Suznzna~~y: The applicant wishes to vary from fence requirements in order to add a 2 foot lattice screen to a 6 foot high fence along its coztanon boundary with the Rustic Mobile Home Park. The subject property is zoned R-1, Residential Single-Family and the Park is zoned R-3, Residential, Multiple-Family. Authority: CPMC 1..24.020 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to review and decide , without a public hearing, any application for a fence variance. Review is being performed in accordance with CPMC 1.24.050. Applicable Laws CPMC 15.20.040 et seq. -Fence Height on Lots & Fence Variances CPMC 11.20.010 et seq. - R-1, Residential Single-Family District Discrtssifln~ The Applicants have decided to request this fence variance and have provided their rationale as part of the attached application and exhibits. CP,IhiC Sections I S.2a t14Q. C states that the maximum height fray fences ctn yr along the back lrrt line shall be six feed Retluests for fence variances shall be made by application ... artd shall be reviewed in accordance with Chapter .1.24 (which involves Planning Gotnmissian cvnsideratidn ivt'thvut a public hearing}. __ PacTrend, Inc. is requesting that the Planning Comzrussion grant a variance from the 6 foot height requirement for a portion of a newly constructed fence located along its common boundary with Rustic Mobile Home Park, The Park has existed since the 1960's and was annexed to the City in 1983 in order to obtain a better source ofwater. Unlike newer manufactured home subdivisions, the mobile homes in the park are elevated above the existing grade so that porches, doors and windows all sit higher than those on adjacent property. ~7 City staff are in the midst of discussions with the Rustic N.[aiaile Hame Park management and the property owners to define on-going permitted uses, matte an-site impraveznents, and negotiate the development and use of pedestrian. path through the park to Brad Way. If findings can be made far approvat, the applicant wautd be allowed to add a two foot lattice to the tap of the existing six foot fence. if hndings can not be made the applicant will have to leave the fence at its current height. Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law A variance maybe granted if fZndings are made as follows: l .The strict application of the provisions would result in unnecessary hardship; ar The applicant has stated that they have had difficEZlty selling new homes because of a perceived lack of privacy associated with the proximity and height of the mobile homes. The hardship in this case is economic and it can be argued that the strict application of the Clydinance prevents them from addressing the concerns of prospective home bixyers. ~. The fallowing considerations will either result from a granting of the variance or the faltawing cansideratians da not apply to the requested application: a. The variance will pravide advantages to the neighborhood ar the city, 'The applicant has stated that the new fence and nvo foot lattice will screen two different house types and zones which is an advantage for the new residents and actually improves the appearance of the property for mobile borne park residents. b. The variance will pravide beautification to the neighborhood or the city, The construction of a fence with quality materials consistently results in the beautification of a neighborhood. The applicant believes that the new fence anal proposed extension is a significant improvement over the previous wire fence that it replaces. c. 'The variance wilt pravide safety to the neighborhood ar the city, While the increased fence height would not necessarily pravide additional safety to the neighborhood, it would allow the applicants a greater sense of security and privacy. d. The variance will provide protection to the neighborhood or the city, An increased fence height presents a greater obstacle to persons trying to climb it between the new single family dwellings and the mobile home park, hor~vever the height is not intended to change beh~veen the lots in Brookfield Estates, e. The variance will not have any adverse impacts upon the neighborhood. Neighboring property owners have not expressed any objections to the installation of a lattice and it appears as though there will be no adverse impacts to either side of the fence if approved. f. The variance will utilize property within the intent and purpose of the zone district. Wood fences like the one constructed by the applicant are commonly constructed in residential neighborhoods but usually comply with the required setbacks. 'T`he applicant has submitted Endings for consideration by the Commission (Attachment A~. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take one of the following actions: l . Approve the fence variance applica#ion based on the findings of fact contained in the record and subject to the recommended conditions of approval; or 2. Deny the proposed. Variance application; or 3. Continue the review for the Variance application at the discretion afthe Commission. Attachments A. Application for Fence Variance & Findings of Fact B. Applicant's Site Plan showing fence height C. Assessment Plat 11CPPDPDCICity WidelPIannin~l0tfl$8,WPD Application ~"iling Deadline .A~~„a~,.~c~-~3.+~acx ~'c~-r :~~""~anc~.+c~. ~~ :~ic,~rx. v'ax.~.. ~,rs,,G~ Name ~Q..~~1""~ i 1 k`~ Addxess 1~l ~ ~ e ~~~ Phone ~~1 ~~~~ --'-~~~~ Pxoposed bite Zocat~.an J" ~? / / J Addxess ~c max` ~ Dr~7 4Y1 1~T ~~'CXJ -t7~'_!{~ ~S~C~'~'S ~4T5 ~~~,~. Assessor's Mag Page I.+ocation 'fax I,ot{ s} Briefly descxibe the fence ox sign improvement you intend to build on this pxc~pex~Y. ,.. ,-, r ~ t~ ~ , n ~ .--~ ~'xovide a statement which explains how stxict application of the provisions of the City's fence ox sign regulation would result in unnecessary hardship. {Be specific identify the exact regulation fox which you are requesting an exception} Required Infoxmataon Accurate scale drawing of the site and fence ox sign improvements proposed. ~`he drawing of the sate must be adequate to enable the Planning Comnta.ssion to determine the compliance of the proposal with the requirements of the applicable section of the Central Point Municipal Code which is attached to this application. .7~PPL-FENCE f SIGN . ADMIN ~} We are requesting an exemption from regulation 15.24.f}40 -Fend height on lots. This regulation states that the maximum height for Fences on or along the back lot line shall be six feet. We would. like to add a 2 foot screening to the existing 6 foot Fence on the back lot Tines of lots 1 through 12 of Brookfield Estates Subdivision, Unit No. 1. Due to the height of elevation of the mobile homes behind the above-mentioned lots we have had prospective homebuyers concerned about privacy in the back yards and have decided not to make a purchase. We believe that adding a 2-foot screening to the top of the fence would. help this situation. ~. Fence Variance To justify your request for variance, provide clear facts and logical conclusions which satisfy each of the following criteria Ifa standard does not apply to your variance request, so state along with an explanation of why you think the standard is applicable. 1, The variance will provide advantages to the neighborhood or the City; The two foot variance and screen creates a buffer between two distinctly different house types. 2. The variance will provide beautif cation to the neighborhood or the City; The new wood fence and proposed lattice will be an improvement over the old three-wire agricultural fence that did not screen either property, 3. The variance will provide safety to the neighborhood or the City; The wood fence replaces the barbed-wire and the lattice work will add height so it can't be climbed given the difference in elevation. ~. The variance will provide protection to the neighborhood or the City; The fence and proposed lattice is intended primarily for privacy and aesthetics, 5. The variance will not have any adverse impacts upon the neighborhood; and ~. The fence and lattice will restrict access to respective back yards but will not prohibit movement between neighborhoods since a walking path is still planned from Silver Creek Drive to Brad ~Vay, b. The variance will utilize property within the intent and purpose of the zone district. The fence and proposed lattice helps to create a buffer between the R-I and R-3 zoning districts that is attractive but not exclusive. ~~ " ` >a~~, d ....1 V C, ~~ JJ~~~~.L~ ~.U~.1J L'tr,~ .,E.H~.Li~ -J tJ~~~~~1.3~~~ ~~.~~ .1V ~, ~~ Locatsd tn: T11e ~.~. ~ J4 Of Sec'fiOn ~ ~}, T.37S., ~{.~~., ~,~, Clfiy of Central F'ainfi, 'Jac~CSOn Counfy, Oregon `°"-' N84't9'FS"£ 1547.42' {RASES OF 4EAft1NO} Out14 t52rS65'P18CR~t£} tx FOUNDS#,4uP ORS3ft7S8R2W OFSC . _ ~ TAYI.{7R sz4.s4` I~C1AD .~~s`tt' 2 {tTt cats -- ~ coR 10 . c.s. ,,. -- ~' N69't4'15"E 290.! 6` y ~-". ,,, I ~ +-540' f 0'15"£ 30.00' LJ FOUND 8RA55 DISC ~• ~ .... ^ i a.6O ^< ~ I~ "' ~ .... v. -' .- ` .._. ` .•........- -,- - ._. NW CORNER - / N84't9'15"£_ ~-S~i0 t3"~ 10.xO' I -.-. Nb4'i9'i5"E 138.65' DLC NO. 53 AREA t3E€NG 1x0.16' €; ^ ~I~ ~~ `N84't9'15"£ j. - "'~--...1NITtAL P01NT STAMPED •DED€CAT£D FxR lOO.OO' 3x,40' a SfT BRASS DISC tN I v "T3DLC 2W STRf£T FURFO5E5 a o ~ Cy ~a ~ FN CONCRETE I rq CC ~~ ~ C.S. ~ m t x' PUE ~ 25' 25' ~ 10' FU£ ~ I ~ "tN T1AL FONT ~ o 1485" ~ N84`t9'15"E ~- 584';9'15"W RRa0KF1EtD £STATE3 I -' N78'3t'23"f ~`{<~~\ ~ t2D.16` € { I €20.00' I SU80S Ng€~3N0. ! ~ ~ /~ 34.00' j`~'~ "~7jr'+~ ~ ~ a h ,At °% ,°a, ~ I ° W€R£ #"ENCE I ~ s,..+ ~i on ~ L.xF- n a ,^,~ ~ ~ ENCROACHES 0.2' 1 x ~o 0 52.77' 'D ( ~~'~ t N84't9`15"E t ~ I 569'19'15"W ~ .......~ ~ t ~ti '~{y,; "- t, v Found SC8` €ron pin p "tb['..R_ .-N89`t9' € S"f t 55.02' _ 120. € 6' 120.x0' S g " . CENTRAL FO1NT' ~ ~ ~~ ~ I per /N 3071 I z ~ {~ t [' ",~ 41.96' - +> > ~` £AS£1.SENT FOR 'Z tr. t63Q 1 ° '~ J7 °• .n o ~ I o ^€ ,3LY OF AVERAGE: b s 0' ~ r w wr" c m ~ I ~ i~ ~*~U O iiEREDN, "' o , H70"18't2"f t ! t € 589';4'15"W I I ~ ~~ '!S.'i' ~4.xD' a N88';s'iS"E WIRE FENCE 3NK 4F JACKSON ~ ,~ ~ ~ fNCR0ACi1£S O.7' I .~ 12o.t6' € ~, € tzx,xa' ~ I ~ APANY EASEMENT ~ ~ I ~ )F O£ED RECORDS ~ ~ ~ ~? 3 ^ ~ ~ ~ ( ^ 4 I r- { _, rr. No6•z1'32"W .,, ~ I to '„ "' e ~ ° i 1 ts.6s"~"' t ' r Nss•1s'1s"£ ~ sas^1s'ts`W I wiR£ FENCE I ° ya`k' Hbati ~o~"E 1 xx'1 ~` ~ { Ht7TE j t b 120.16" o € t 20.40' 3 ~ CROACIIE5 x.4' I ~ -a i ` ARiNC NOTEE/2 ~~ i ~ $ ~ x ° ~ .~ ° $ ~ ~ I € {?~ONU>+fENT 37'17"W M t n 1x' FO£ "~ +~~, a b W1RE FENCE { ` r„ 4'SEL Hxl 31.1 t"w ~ ~ ~ ~ ._,,,,~ `~ ~ ! 1 I HcRaAC1tE5 a.4' 1 -~C ~;.~.~ -' 4€.17 ~. ^'100.16' 1 584'19'15"W a -^ X3'24"W ~. p € 20.00• .Q I .W '~ -- -- - 10.14 03'24"£ Ht€'30'55"W /' t 0. 0` ~ 584't9'15"W 23€.62' 3C € I a ~ ! ~'"`' }50,00 ~. ST.04' ~,""" 3;'1 t"f t~ ~ ~ ( wtRf FENCE I / .,, _ Ol ri4y }.5'~__ 1. 37'17"E `'" 34.x4''" SUMMER~IN pR;VE VJ a ~n ENCROACHES T.2' E ` b ..._ ~ ~; 01.15"w 1' srR£Et~--"'"~'' ' " c~ € j N4x~s'37`w 1 ~ p p~ ~r~ - °-- FLUD ~ tzt.st~.~ ._s4,x4' to r_ s8s•49'15"W ~ 1 ~ 7.37' s ~~ of Ot't5"W "" 1 T- ~~' M09€tE H4ME ~ Tn p t{t 1'42'16"}V t t r 120.6x' ENCROACHES 0.6' 31'33"E .- ~.s s ~ ~ 1 ~.~\ t5` 8"£ 64.76' ~ € ~20'y t0' P€7E ~ _ €. W 1 I- { .fly s^ ~' 1 ti' ~ 2O'Sx"£ "~ t ! ~'~ ~ °_ ° 1 ~ `~, ."! .,, 1 O' FUE I n ~ I ~."~ ~, r'ti t ~ 1 2x'4;"f Nxs•1ts's3"W t ~.. 6sbD.oo9`E w ~ rn ~584't9'15"w ~ o I 1 '~^~. ~~il. a2"25"f ;1.77' t ~ '~} ~ ~ z € ! 124.x#' I o L ~ ".....~ ~ ,_ ._ _. ~ w _. ~ ....._ ~`._ - 43'O7'E `~-~~ E- ~143.6t' -" 80.x0' { o ~ - vi WSRE FENC£ 31'x1 "W N0 3t d$~ '¢ ''• 3 N64'14'15"E € 63.6<' -^- € ~{ ~ ~ I ~ ENCROACHES t.2' I +o 43'11"f 10'11"£ `. I t 1 119 ~ ~ $ H01`33'23"E o " n ~ E 584`14'15"W ( t20 xp' ' " 35.61' ~ " I ~~ ~N65'S3'25"£ 30.00' r' ~ ; . ' 14 15 E `' N69'19'!5`£ 182.54' ~ ~` d ' ra ~ I~ I ' "LT4 o m 30 x. ~~ ~ b ter; ~ ~ ~+ y "' ( SE414'15"W I » ,~,~ , a # v t; yti,~ SEE ~ € ' ' ' 124,0x' . o ' N T£ ~2 25 25 ~ ~ ~. W€RE FENCE 11 T3,116 ~ --~ 9'19'#5"£ 173.12' - ' ;~ ~ {~ ( £NCROAC1TfS tA' 15 tO.96; _ 31.38 -G a N76'21"2j"£ ~ I w ' t 6 t 1.313 *> w 1rJ30A0 # t ~ ~ ~ 2' 569`;9' 15"W~ 15 R.R.Y.1,D. EASEMENT F£R t8 12 764 } ~'~ 20~ 3 119.T4' YOi.56&, FG.37~ J.C,D.R. €~ 2x . 8,711 t•8 _. '~~ $ 14'15"E 138.6 t ~, WIRE FENC£ ENCROACHE5 4,8' 21 22 t2,281 8,;;5 E.051 / *~ O. g£ .... G--- ~".+'~~¢ ^NOTCEj1 9 ~ _,,, ; ,~~„ ~ ~ I -~.' WIRE FENC£ ENCROACHES 8.7' ~" cua~ CURVE DELTA RAO#FJS t BO'04'00" 20A4' 2 3 1 5 6 `1 4" 33'14';Z" 3 1 s' " 3fi5t' S" t "at'1 " .4' 20.44' 4.4 ' 50 4 ' x.4 ' 7 31'51`55" 5x.4 ' 8 31`5;' 0. ' 4 ; 2 '1 4.4 ' k0 32'32'ft" 54, ' 11 '54'11" t2 40.00'40" 24. ' t3 40'00'0 . ' i1 40'00'0x" 2x.44' 23 8,051 ~` ~ ~^w ~# ~ ` J R-5O• IN85' { W ~ CNA€N LINK LL H18'20`07"W '~"' € 2t 8A51 52.57' ~ ~+~"T. a 8 04'00"Ty FENC£ ENCROACHES 4.3' 26 _ 24522T ~t ! Tj4~+~' t`~~ 8 ~ g 103.11' 1 S2x.8t'"C ~ / ~.' !~ r"4y1 ~ tk` FUE ~ t LS ,~4 ~ b irk ~..F-••-SE~ S~ 1.ttl~ { { ~ W~ r t t `~ ~tro 't'/ tiQ' n 1 NC7R BRASS Disc €N cxucR£TE .,•w 3414x' ~ Q ~ 1 ~ Lz I ° j I DE'FAIIr "A" M~-x~£~ ~L FxtNi WEST P€NE V1LU ~ ~~'~ } 1~ '~ t~. 4'~ o .- L1I~ ~ MO~~ ~ a '< x t5` j WIRE FENCE '42"E {FLAT~RECORD N89T42,8~526.;9~ ~ ---1~ ,.c._97.x6'~ 1.-,.-~.JLft,~L2_... _ .~ 124.~5'CROACN£S x.b~ t~ ~,. ! t ~ '~'~"{PLAT RfCORO N89'.i9'tS"£}~ ~~ ~~ ~ >>~W 1~1 tD' P£D[sTR N L6 i°`--~=•Y`saa•xe'~Sa°E{RECaRD s4o`a4'ts"£} t- ..ti `~ ~~ t . {LOT 1;} ~ \ wASr ~ 8.68 _.i~_4.., _.. r°~ ss.ox' , ~~~GK 3 ~'~1'C ~aT z~ ~.- -~LOf 1 s} ~ tLOt t 7} .~cc {WEST PINE VILA SUBDEVi514N} ~f Ec 6900 - ~ v ~~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: November 6, 2{~E31 TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: Tom Humphrey AICP, Planning Director SUBJEC'T': Land Partition & Property Line Adjustment for LaRue T}evelopment, LLC Bacl~cground This planning application was received in 3uly shortly after a proposal was submitted to the state for technical and financial assistance relative to improving traffic circulation east of Interstate S. City staff did not schedule this item because we thought that a planning analysis would lead to tentative map modifications, Consequently, we closed in on the State's statute of limitations for processing land use applications {l20 days} and so had to schedule this for a hearing. Discussion We have been meeting with the applicants and representatives from Pilot to come up with alternative circulation and land use scenarios that will improve the level of service on South Peninger Road and also at its intersection with East Pine Street, We are still in the midst of discussions with the effected parties and all have expressed a desire to work toward a satisfactory resolution. The applicants have consented to waive the l~0 day statute of limitations in this ease and a letter from them is forthcoming. It is anticipated that the Pilot truck stop will agree to change its access to the site and that this will consequently change the tentative plan that has been submitted. We hope to have an alternative layout in the next two months so that this item can be rescheduled. Action Staffreconunends that the Comrr~ission table this item coincident with the request for waiver submitted by the applicants. We expect that they will want the City to rehear this item i~ d0 days. If the applicants do not consent to waive action on this item in writing by the time of the meeting, staff strongly recommends that the application be denied. Since the application has been noticed {Attachment A} it is acceptable to take public eon~ent in the event that persons in the audience will not be able to return to a later meeting. Attachments A. Notice of Public Hearing c~ Tentative Plat ~~ ~~az~ ~-lur-nphrey, AICP Planning Director Kern Gerschler ~nrnrnunzty Planner Matt Saznitore ~oxnznunity Planner Dave Arkens Planning Technician ~ofice of ~'ubxc :-Ieariug Date of Notice: C3ctober ~, ~~-Q1 Mee#iz~g Da#e: Time: Place: NATURE OF MEET1hIG I~lavember 6, 2441. 7:44 p.zn. {Approximate} Central Paint City Hall 1.55 Sau#h Second S#reet Central Point, Oregon beginning a# #Ize abave tune and place, the Central Pairz# Planning Comrnissian will review an application far a 31a# Tentative Subdivision an Map ~'~ 2 W 42D, Tax Lats 184,1901 and Map 37 2W l lA, Tax f.o# 1fl1, The subjee# parcel #a be subdivided is located an C-~, Tourist and Office Professional Zane Dis#ric#. '1'he Central Pain# Planning Corrzrnission will review the applica#lan of Tentative Subdivision #a determine if all of the requirements of the Cen#ral Point Muzzicipal Gode can he met. if the Camm.ission determines that the subdivision can be created, a ten#a#ive approval could be issued . Once a ten#a#ive approval has been issued, the applican# must file for a final pla# of the subdivision within one year of the Commission's decision. CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for Tentative Subdivisions are set forth in Chap#er l6 of the Central Point Municipal Cade; relating #o General Informa#ion,ten#a#ive plan approval and condi#iazas az~ ten#ative plan approval. The proposed ,plan is also reviewed in accordance to the Ci#y's Public ~~lorlrs Standards. PUI3I..I:C COMMENTS l . Any person interested in caznznezz#ing azi tl~ze abave-n~en#ioned land use decision may submit written coznznen#s up until the claw of the meeting scheduled far Tuesday, Naven~ber 6, 2001. J 4r 2. Written cozrzments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City I fall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, C}R 9752. 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration ofthe con~zrzent period. noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above wi11 need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. ~. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, aregon. Copies ofthe same are available at 15 cents per page. 5. lior additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at {541 664- 3321 ext. 231. SUII~.MARY OF p'Rt]CET3UI~E At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review tine applications, technical staff reports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the Tentative Partition. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Co~cit be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. ~~ ----- 155 South Second Street Central Point, aR 975112 {541 664-3321 Fax: {541} 664-634 .~ -x~,• r s ~ ~ ... 1,~ ,~~ ~ _ ~, ts' esnsn ~,ti 3g,~t+fi~ of ~~ ` ~^ r~~ `~`~, y4 ~ ao~ '~,,\ ~ ~ ~ ~ w M. ~,~w.~ p ~ M r.+i,rw~~wu. ~,t- yS~tYtlfT 1 ` ti ~ ~ ~~ ~~ \ \ :,'~ ti ~ L ~~ ~ ~~ a~~ ~~,~,TtT~Q~tr ~ . ~ ~~ ~~~r ~ ~~ ~R~~* t~~ ~~~ ~ e 9eatts~kt 11 C1~A~ . ,~ the ~tart~*~t 1C~ c Tax 4.~ ttL'; hi 3"i ~ ~~ e 2 111~st, U!S"i» Y6 ~ al r 1Yt 7tsUi ~~~ ~it~ a£ ~~~ .IAG~aYJ } M4~~ q~j y 1 ~y,~,~r t , y ~GS ~~ "~1w~r~~l .! l t"`~" . ,'cif ~ ~~ *"" ~~ ~ ~~~`~ n. ~~ 1rs Gar+~ 4F prar~c. i~ c,.iit~ ~ \ ' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~+1G T t~`~'~ ~ ~`'' ~ 3"i"f ,baer~ctstese, Inc. 1~iatFYsu W ~~ „e... ~ ,~ ~~~ on. ~ . ~ ~ 69~+'~ of ,,,,, u. ° '`^~ `~ `~. v~ ~,,..k ~` `•, ~ raM«w~^t+ ~ ~~, ~ ~, ~ *~, 4 '~i. y~yi~tG„ , Y,AGAhIT' ~tdt. IQ°+~~C> tia~s Gtr 1, `. .`~ ~~~ ~; ~~ ~~~ ~ \. ''~ ~i,F.9.