HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - January 16, 2001CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
January 16, 2001 - 7:00 p.m.
n ~ ~
Next Planning Commission
Resolution No. 508
I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
City Planning
Chuck Piland -Candy Fish, Don Foster, Karolyne Johnson, John LeGros,
Paul Lunte and Wayne Riggs
III. CORRESPONDENCE
IV. MINUTES
A. Review and approval of December 5, 2000, Planning Commission Minutes
V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES
VI. BUSINESS
Page 1 - 26 A. Public hearing to consider a site plan application that would allow the
construction of a four unit apartment complex (four-plex) new the
intersection ofHiatt Lane and Haskell Street. The subject property is located
in the R-3, Residential Multiple Family Zoning District and the TOD
Corridor-MMR (Medium Mix Residential) overlay zone on Map 37 2W
I OAA, Tax Lot 7200.
27 - 38 B. Public Hearing to consider a tentative land partition to create two tax lots of
11,094 and 28,349 square feet from an existing 0.90 acre parcel. The subject
property is located in an R-I-8, Residential Single-Family Zoning District on
Map 37 2W 36CD Tax Lot 3500.
39 - 44 C. Public hearing to clarify the flood plain boundary for Miller Estates PUD and
corresponding subdivision phases on property located south of Scenic Drive
and east of State Highway 99.
D. Public hearing to modify a condition and consider a new location for a
pedestrian and bike path for Brookfield Estates Subdivision. Arr oral
presentation: will be made at the meeting.
VII. MISCELLANEOUS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
City of Central Point
Planning Commission
12/5/2000
I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 P.M.
II. ROLL CALL: Chuck Piland, Candy Fish, John LeGros, Paul Lunte and Don Foster were
present. Karolyne Johnson and Wayne Riggs were absent. Also in attendance were Tom Humphrey,
Planning Director; Ken Gerschler, Community Planner, and Matt Samitore, Planning Technician.
III. CORRESPONDENCE
There was numerous correspondence related to all items on the agenda.
IV. MINUTES
Commissioner LeGros made a motion to approve the minutes from the October, 3,
2000 meeting as presented. Commissioner Fish seconded the motion. ROLL CALL:
Fish, yes; LeGros, yes; Lunte, yes; and Foster, yes. Motion passed.
V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES
There were no public appearances.
VI. BUSINESS
A. Continued public meetine to review a Site Plan application what would allow the construction
of a 109 room motel and 4.000 square foot restaurant near the intersection of South Penineer
Road and LaRue Drive The subject property is located in the C-4 Tourist and Office
Professional District on Jackson County Assessment Plat 372W02D Tax Lots 2600 2700
and 2800.
Tom Humphrey, Planning Director, presented the Planning Department Staff Report. Since the last
meeting the Planning Department had a meeting with Jackson County Roads and Parks and Oregon
Department of Transportation (ODOT). At that meeting a set of criteria was set that would be
imposed on this project that would help with improving the Peninger Road and E. Pine Street
intersection. 1. Additional Right-of--way (ROW) dedication on E. Pine Street as needed. 2. Right
in/Right out only access on E. Pine Street, and limiting the access onto E. Pine to only the one
driveway, and to preferably share one with the Chevron Station 3. Circulation in between various
developments, motel, restaurant, and Chevron Station. 4. Clear well defined internal circulation plan
prepared and submitted to City staff for approval. 5. Also, submit a corrected parking and landscaping
plan to the city.
JRH, Transportation Engineering Consultants were hired by Daniel Park and Associates to redo a
traffic study with these changes and to come up with an internal circulation plan. These were submitted
to the staff for review. It appears that the additional hotel and restaurant will not severely impact the
intersection, if the improvements are done on E. Pine and S. Peninger Roads. These improvements
being; Dedicated right turn land south bound onto S. Peninger Road, Raised median extending from the
Taco Bell drive through land south to LaRue Drive, an alternative entrance for the Pilot Station, a raised
median extending from I-5 off ramps east to Peninger Road, a reduction in the number of access points
in from the of the Cornitius and Bell properties from four to two, and possibly even one co~mnon
access, and signal synchronization between Peninger and I-5 ramps.
Ken Gerschler, Community Planner, stated that the hotel and restaurant meet the zoning requirements,
setback requirements, and have adequate parking. The utility easement on the South property line will
only be as long to serve the hotel and Marriot hotel to the South.
Daniel Park, agent for the applicant, stated that the drawing from JRH is conceptual and would have to
be worked out, in order to meet the requirements. To better serve cross-connections with the Chevron
station.
Phil Tannenhon, stated that it would be best to move the Cell Tower, located on the Bell property, to a
better place in order to have one access to both properties. The traffic plan would be better served to
share its access with the Bell property and the Burger King.
Ken Gerschler stated that the Cell Tower cannot be moved without the applicant's pennission. The
internal circulation plan is conceptual, and will have to be worked out with City staff. Mr. Tannenhon's
recommendations could not work because of the current configuration of the Burger King parking lot.
David Fletcher, from ODOT, stated they needed to review the Final Drainage Plan.
Commissioner Fislr made a motion to approve Resolution 505, approving the Site Plan subject
to the recommended conditions of approval, and the five criteria indicated by the Planning
Department. These being: 1. Additional Right-of--way (ROW) dedication on E. Pine Street as
needed. 2. Right in/Right out only access on E. Pine Street, and limiting the access onto E.
Pine to only the one driveway, and to preferably share one with the Chevron Station 3.
Circulation in between various developments, motel, restaurant, and Chevron Station. 4.
Clear well defined internal circulation plan prepared and submitted to City staff for approval.
5. Also, submit a corrected parking and landscaping plan to the city. Commissioner Foster
seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: motion passed unanimously.
B. Public hearine the review the Tentative Development Plan fora 21 lot subdivision to be known
as Rosewood Estates Planned Unit Development, Phase II. The proposed subdivision is
located in the R-1. Residential Single Family District on Jackson County Assessment Plat
372W02C Tax Lot 2904 Plat 372W IOCA Tax Lots 5900 and 6000.
Ken Gerschler, Community Planner, presented the Planning Department Staff Report. The Rosewood
Phase II, will be an continuation of the Rosewood subdivision, delivering high quality homes. There will
be 21 lots in the PUD that will range in size from 4,761 to 16,965 square feet. The project was
submitted as a PUD because of the unique topographical limitations imposed by Jackson Creek with
traverses the property and due to the special road classification of Hanley Road. Access will be
provided by a 30' wide private driveway. A ten foot wide strip of land had been identified for
dedication along the entire length of Hanley Road, with Public Utility Easements proposed within the
interior roadways. Parking would be limited to the East side of Rosebud circle. There will be an
additional seven parking lots in front of the proposed pool area. There shall be no parking along the
hammerhead portion of the Rosebud Circle. Permits for road way construction will have to be made
with Jackson County roads, and acceleration and deceleration lanes may have to be built. Setbacks for
the units can be at 19 feet, as long as the garage is at least 20 feet from the property line. A sidewalk
along the east side of Rosebud Circle is recommended and no water meters shall beset in the sidewalk.
Special setback requirements for Hanley Road and Jackson Creek will have to be abided by. No
structures shall be built within 20 feet of the top of the stream bank.
Dallas Page, the applicant, stated that he will replace the pool area in Phase 1 with an open space area,
he will build a covering over the bridge connecting the two properties, and will setback the gates to the
community to meet the requirements for queuing off of Hanley Road. Mr. Page asked what the
definition of structure was and if he could put fences along the property backing up to Jackson Creek.
Lighting will be private and individually maintained and additional lighting will be provided around the
pool area. Mr. Page will renovate one of the homes on the property adding atwo-car garage.
Mr. Gerschler stated that only uncovered patios are not defined as structures. A temporary fence could
be placed, as long as it was removable during a flood event. No accessory structures, covered patios
or decks can be built within that setback area. For further interpretation of the ordinance will have be
modified by the City Council.
Commissioner Lunte made a motion to adopt resolution number 506, approving the
preliminary development plan fro Rosewood Estates PUD, based upon the findings of fact and
conclusions of law contained in the record and subject to the recommended conditions of
approval as set forth in the staff reports. Also subject to constructing the minimum width
sidewalks along the eastside of Rosebud Circle. Commissioner Fish seconded the motion.
ROLL CALL: Motion passed unanimously.
C. Public hearing_to review the Twin Creeks Master Development Plan to guide the development
of a 230 acre parcel of land contained within the Central Point Urban Growth Boundary The
proposed development is located north of Tavlor Road and wet of State Highway 99. The
nroiect area is part of the proposed Transit Oriented District (TODI being considered b
City
Mr. Humphrey stated that the Master Plan they have in front of them is almost the same as the plan they
addressed at a special study session, and that Paul Morris, from McKeever/Morris will discuss the
modifications to the document.
Paul Morris, from McKeever/Morris stated that on pages 50 and 51, they added sections regarding
small lot/0 lot line single family developments. Modifications were done to the Auto-court sections and
to the Charleston housing types. The Charlestons will range in size from 1200-2400 square feet, and all
be alley loaded.
Commissioner LeGros made a motion to extend beyond 10:00 P.M., Commissioner Lunte
seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Motion passed unanimously.
A lighting plan will be updated, and they have contracted with one lighting company to have unique
lighting for all aspects of the development. Mr. Morns stated that the central green area is designed to
have 3 football fields on it. This was in response to Commissioner Lunte's question regarding adequate
park space for sporting events.
Commissioner Fish made a motion to adopt Resolution Number 507, recommending approval
of the master development plan to the City Council subject to the recommended conditions of
approval. Commissioner Foster seconded. ROLL CALL: Motion passed unanimously.
VII MISCELLANEOUS
The Commission decided to move the January from the 2"d to January 16"'.
VIII ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Lunte made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner LeGros seconded
the motion. ROLL CALL: Motion passed unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 10:40 P.M.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
HEARING DATE: January 16, 2001
TO: Central Point Planning Commission
FROM: Ken Gerschler, Community Planner
SUBJECT: Public Hearing- Site Plan Review for 37 2W IOAA, Tax Lot 7200 -Greenland
Apartments.
Owners Greenland L.L.C.
711 Medford Center #421
Medford, Oregon 97504
Agent American Eagle Construction
Don Miles, President
71 I Medford Center #421
Medford, Oregon 97504
Pro er
Description/ 37 2W l OAA, Tax Lot 7200 - 0.27 acres.
Zoning: R-3, Residential Multiple Family District
Snmmary'
The applicant has requested a Site Plan Review for the construction of a four-plex on the northwest
corner of Hiatt Lane (private) and Haskell Street. The subject property is located in an R-3,
Residential Multiple Family district and in an area recently rezoned as TOD Corridor-Medium Mix
Residential (TOD-MMR) overlay district.
Authority
CPMC 1.24.050 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and
render a decision on any application for a Site Plan. Notice of the Public Hearing was given in
accordance with CPMC 1.24.060 (Attachment "B").
Applicable Law:
CPMC 17.28.010 et seq. - R-3, Residential Multiple Family District
CPMC 17.64.010 et seq. -Off Street Parking and Loading
CPMC 17.65.060 et seq. -Land Use - TOD Corridor
CPMC 17.72.010 et seq. -Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval
Disa~ssion
~~
The applicant, Greenland L.L.C. is requesting site plan approval to construct a two story four-plex
on a parcel of property which currently has two dilapidated residences that will be removed. The
letter of project description states that the size and configuration will allow four 3 bedroom units
each having 2 %z bathrooms. The exterior of the structures will have lap siding, porches and
composition roofs. Access will be taken via a curb cut on Hiatt Lane (private street) which intersects
Haskell Street. Sidewalks will be constructed along both streets.
The Planning Departrnent has evaluated the project density and building distance requirements for
the zoning district and determined that the development is compliant with the zoning ordinance. The
landscape plan depicts grass areas but will need additional specificity as to the type and location of
shrubs and trees.
There is a mature cedar tree on the property that City staff have determined is worth saving.
Discussions to preserve the tree have only recently begun and a revised site plan has not yet been
formulated. However the applicant has agreed to work around the tree if mt alternative building
layout can be designed. An alternative would involve moving the building fin•ther east based upon
a revised parking plan.
The Municipal Code for the R-3 zone requires two parking spaces for each dwelling unit, at least one
of which shall be a garage or carport; plus one guest parking space for each four dwelling units. The
minimum number of parking spaces required for this development would be 9. The applicant has met
the offstreet parking requirement by providing 4 covered spaces(single car garages) and 5 uncovered
spaces. However, since the property is now located in the TOD Corridor-MMR district the parking
requirements can be reduced to siz, the building shifted to the east and the tree can be saved. The
MMR district does have more stringent requirements for landscaping but the applicants are not
adverse to this and there would be ample area resulting from the parking space reduction to add
more landscaping and also move the building.
The Public Works Department has prepared recommendations (Attachment "D") for on-and off-site
improvements which are believed to be reasonably related to the proposed development. These
include, but are not limited to; driveway aprons, sidewalk improvements; site grading and drainage;
on-site lighting; paving and utility (water, sewer and storm drain) connections. Hiatt Lane (private)
is currently unpaved adjoining the project site and the PWD may request or defer street
improvements at this time.
The Central Point Building Department has provided a staff report for consideration by the
Commission which addresses plan review guidelines (Attachment "E").
Jackson County Fire District Number 3 would like to review a set of blueprints and plot plan from
the applicant that shows general information, on-site water storage and/or hydrant location. Bear
Creek Valley Sanitary Authority has indicated that the property can be served with sewer service
from Haskell Street (Attachment "F"). Avista Utilities does not request any special conditions at this
time.
Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law:
\\CPPDPDC\City Wide\Planning\00049.v,7td
0 O ,.-
Site Plan Review
In approving, conditionally approving or denying the plans submitted, the City bases it's decision
on the following standards from Section 17.72.040:
A. Landscaping and fencing and the construction of walls on the site in such a manner as to cause
the same to not substantially interfere with the Landscaping scheme of the neighborhood, and in such
a manner to use the same to screen such activities and sights as might be heterogeneous to existing
neighborhood uses. The Commission may require the maintenance of existing plants or the
installation of new ones for purposes of screening adjoining property.
The site plan shows landscaped areas distributed throughout the project area but a
landscape and irrigation plan was not submitted. Staff requests that the applicant
submit a specific plan for review prior to the issuance of building permits. Staff
believes that the existing mature cedar tree should be preserved.
B. Design, number and location of ingress and egress points so as to improve and to avoid
interference with the traffic flow on public streets;
Access is shown to be taken from Hiatt Lane (private) and Haskell Street. The Public
Works Department may require that improvements be installed on portions of Hiatt
lane and Haskell Street to address the increased vehicular demand.
C. To provide off-street parking and loading facilities and pedestrian and vehicle flow facilities in
such a manner as is compatible with the use for which the site is proposed to be used and capable
of use, and in such a manner as to improve and avoid interference with the traffic flow on public
streets;
^ CPMC 17.64.040 (A-2) requires that 9 parking spaces be provided (4 covered and 5
uncovered). Guidelines in the new TOD Corridor MMR zoning district permit 1.5
parking spaces per unit for a total of six in this case. The applicant is able to meet both
requirements however, the lesser number would allow the building to be shifted east
to preserve a mature cedar tree.
D. Signs and other outdoor advertising structures to ensure that they do not conflict with or deter
from traffic control signs or devices and that they are compatible with the design of their buildings
or uses and will not interfere with or detract from the appearance or visibility of nearby signs;
Any signage proposed for the project would require a building permit. Directional
signs and building address identification should be installed in a manner that satisfies
emergency service agencies. Signs located in sight vision areas determined by the
Public Works Standards shall not exceed 42 inches in height.
E. Accessibility and sufficiency of fire fighting facilities to such a standard as to provide for the
\\CPPDPDC\City Widc\Plnnning\00049.wpd
O V `i
reasonable safety oflife, limb and property, including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads
and fire lanes so that all buildings on the premises are accessible to fire apparatus;
^ The project, if approved, would need to meet any requirements of Jackson Comity Fire
District 3.
F. Compliance with all city ordinances and regulations;
^ The project as presented by the applicant is in compliance with the requirements of the
Central Point Municipal Code subject to the recommended conditions of approval.
G. Compliance with such architecture and design standards as to provide aesthetic acceptability in
relation to the neighborhood and the Central Point area and it's environs.
The apartment complex is designed to be aesthetically compatible with the higher
density development located in the surrounding area.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take one of the following actions:
1. Adopt Resolution No._, approving the Site Plan subject to the recommended conditions of
approval; or
2. Deny the proposed Site Plan; or
3. Continue the review of the Site Plan at the discretion of the Commission.
Attachments
A. Site Plan, Elevations
B. Notice of Public Hearing
C. Planning Department Conditions
D. Public Works Staff Report
E. Building Department Staff Report
F. Correspondence
\\CPPDPDC\City Widc\Planning\00049.wpd
0 0 ~~
~~k~
`v ~~
~ ~,
J Q
~ ~
~ $
U't iLi'R'
~oL~
..~
-- -- ------ ------ NIA 1-P~ .... ---~`- 12'-Of - 30,.
~- Y ~ 1~ ~IAG~~T' s
UNiT ~ #Q -O 2deJa ~ydTN? ~` ~ ,n .~
ATE GUR6 >=t1LL ;; : /~ ~. i ; }.
5117 { ~ ~ .'~`'~~t
g ~ ~ ~ ; ~, , ;R -cb.
! if
P J`
UNIT ~ 'rjf ~ ~~ ~~/
4 UNtT ~~ ~ ~; ; x
(!
i t"r f/ ,'/1r
12'x2 ~ ,.a`;!,~1,`, 1 ~j
F,A-r, .: f:~/'/; /; is
4 ~ _ ~~ ~ AREA "` "' ,,J, t ~ 1~'
~` „~ ~
{ ~~#q X513 PARKING{Q) ~IN6{AREA~~~~~r~, 7 `l',
Fz-3 ZANINt~
j~C L.~ 20~
~~s~iPENTOM 2~ 8A~
1^ooxT' ~r~2~ SC~Ff
~{WING PAN AREAS'ibC7 `-~~
GO~~
P- ~~r~ATn ~Ur'"f~
G ~ ~p /~p,SPNAL't AREA" 2~'
lypSGA~ P'~p~ 5a~
~
Ea 12EA~~ ~~ (',~'~
4r"~
PAT1
EAcR.,~ptENT~ 1~~ ~~
~E`~ j
~
AC.
L6f AREf'" 114 ~~ 'i
~,>.:~.
~,:<-
N
-~I
s~
ti~
cv ~.
~Q~.
v.~,
;~
~~
r~
ca
Q
f ss
"y~.
!i- q ~ ~
~R
..- ~
~, ~ ~ ,,
ro
~~
~~ ~~
Q
p u ~,o~
o ~
~w ~
~~
r~
~~~
ti~ f~~~~
;, . ~~
-;~
~~
~~
g
IRIiFlT CI.L'VATIGN
YN<YMP
d
~+
~~
~k
~'
C
~~
~i
J
_i~
u ~~
! --
® ~
~
~
~
~
_
.
~
!
® - i
-°~ }
~„~ ~
,~~~ ~
(1 (1 R
~' ~~
~_
~ ~
~~
f~
I
~
I
~
1_.',
~
~
I
0
~
i
w~ I
I
I ~ ___
i
1 Q ® ® __
--
--
I
i
f$] a
Y
I
i
i
0 i
i
I
I
1
~
I
1~11r
IY~ i
1
1
1
~
I
I
I
I
1
~
~
°
M~ j
i
j
~
I
I
~
I
i
~
~
i
~ _ _ I
~
I
I
~ 0 v ~ __
--
-- I
i
I
I
I
I
a ~
~
j
I
I O 1
i
i
~
~
i 0
i
j
i
i
1
~
~
~
~
I
I
IM~
I~Yr j
i
~
I
I
I
I
~
__ _ _- -- -
,,
V.
C
Cz ~y of Cen trap.
f}TI'~4CF1W{t=iJ7~ `~~~c
P0112 t
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Tom Ilumphrey, AICP
Planning Director
Ken Gerschler
Community Planner
Matt Samitore
Planning Technician
Notice of Meeting
Date of Notice: December 26, 2000
Meeting Date:
Time:
Place:
NATURE OF MEETING
January 16, 2001
7:00 p.m. (Approximate)
Central Point City Hall
155 South Second Street
Central Point, Oregon
Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review an
application for a Site Plan for afour-plex. This parcel is located in a R-3, Residential Multiple
Family Zoning District on Jackson County Assessment Plat 372W I OAA Tax Lot 7200.
The Central Point Planning Commission will review the Site Plan application to determine that all
applicable provisions of the Central Point Municipal Code can be met.
CRITERIA FOR DECISION
The requirements for Site Plan Review are set forth in Chapter 17 of the Central Point Municipal
Code, relating to General Regulations, Off-street parking, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction
Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Works Standards.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit
written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, January 9, 2001.
2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, 155
South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502.
3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the
I55 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 ~ (541) 664-3321 ~ Fax: (541) 664-6384
Q ~~
expiration of the oomment period noted above. Any testimary and written comments about
the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated
clearly to the Planning Commission.
4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City
Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at
15 cents per page.
5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664-
3321 ext. 291.
SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE
Atthe meeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staff reports, hear
testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the applications. Any
testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of
the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the and Site Plan and Variance. City
regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission
decisions.
155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 ~ (541) 664-3321 ~ Fax: (541) 664-6S2S4
v o ~~
ATTACHMENT C
RECOMMENDED PLANNING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The approval of the Site Plan shall expire in one year on January 16, 2002 unless an
application for a building permit or an application for extension has been received by the
City. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan depicting any changes discussed and
approved at the public hearing within 30 days of Planning Commission approval.
2. The project must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations .
3. The project must meet the off-street parking requirements for high density residential
development, and the parking, access and maneuvering areas shall be paved with durable
materials for all-weather use and approved by the Public Works Department.
4. The applicant shall prepare, submit and obtain approval from City Staff for a landscaping
plan including an acceptable selection of shrubs and trees and an irrigation plan.
Any structures removed or demolished will require a separate permit from the Central Point
Building Department.
H:U'lann ing\00049.wpct
~ 12
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
DEPARTMENT OF PUBL/C WORKS
STAFF REPORT
To:
Date:
Applicant:
Agent:
Project:
Location:
Legal:
Zoning:
Units:
Plans:
Report By:
Purpose
Cental Point Planning Commission
January 12, 2001
Greenland L.L.C.
American Eagle Construction
Four-Plex
Intersection of Hiatt Lane (private) & Haskell Street
Tax Lot 7200 Plat 37 2w 10AA (0.27 acres)
R-3, Residential Multiple Family District
4
4 pages (10-26-2000) "Proposed Four Plex Apartment Units"
Christopher S. Clayton
Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant regarding Public
Works standards and proposed new standards to be included in the design. Gather
information from the Applicant/Engineer regarding proposed development.
Special Conditions
1 . Requirement of 10' Public Utility Easement along Haskell Street (measured
from boarding property line)
2. Recommendation of Paving all Driveway Entrances, Exits, Parking areas.
3. Recommendation of Non-Removal in regards to the Cedar Tree which
currently exists on property.
General
1 . Applicant shall submit to the City's Public Works Department (City's PWD)
for review and approval, plans and specifications for all improvements
proposed for construction or modifications within the City or public rights-of-
ways and easements.
0 i3
Greenland C.L.C.
January 12, 2001
Page 2
2. Public improvements include, but are not limited to, streets lincluding
sidewalks, curbs and gutters); storm drainage and sanitary sewer collection
and conveyance systems; water distribution system (up to the service meter
and including fire protection); street lighting; and traffic control devices,
street signs and delineation.
3. All construction of public improvements shall conform to the City's Public
Works Standard Specifications and Details (City PWD Standards) and other
special specifications, details, standards, and/or upgrades as may be
approved by the City's Public Works Director.
4. During construction, changes proposed by the Developer shall be submitted
in writing by the Developer's engineer to the City PWD for approval prior to
installation.
5. No construction shall commence until the City PWD has reviewed, approved,
and issued a Public Works permit for the proposed improvements.
6. The Applicant shall pay for all costs associated with the design and
installation of the improvements specified on the approved plans.
7. Applicant shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals, and
conditions as may be required by other agencies, including, but not limited to
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality (DEQ), Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL), U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), affected irrigation districts, and Jackson
County Road and Park Services Department (JC Roads).
8. Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer's engineer or
surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with a digital drawing of
the construction "as-builts" in an AutoCAD compatible format.
As-built drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line"
changes to final approved construction plans which identify the locations and
~~~
Greenland L.L.C.
January 72, 2007
Page 3
or elevations (as appropriate) of actual installed items, including, but not
limited to, invert, inlet, and rim elevations; spot elevations identified on
drawings; road alignment; water lines, valves, and fire hydrants; water and
sewer lateral stationing; modifications to street section; manhole and curb
inlet locations; street light locations; other below grade utility line locations
and depths; etc. Provide a "red-line" hard copy (on Mylar) of construction
drawings, and an acceptable AutoCAD compatible drawing electronic file to
the City at completion of construction.
9. The Applicant's engineer or surveyor shall provide to the Public Works
Department a drawing of the recorded Final Plat map reproduced on Mylar
and in an acceptable electronic form in AutoCAD format. The Final Plat shall
be tied to a legal Government corner and the State Plane Coordinate System.
10. All elevations used on the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and
on the permanent benchmark shall be tied into an established City approved
benchmark and be so noted on the plans. At least one permanent
Benchmark shall be provided for the proposed development, the location of
which shall be as jointly determined by the City PWD and the Developer's
surveyor.
1 1 . All fill placed in the development shall be "engineered fill", and compacted to
City standards. All existing concrete, pipe, building materials, structures,
clear and grub materials, and other deleterious materials shall be removed
from the site and either recycled or properly disposed of in accordance with
the requirements of the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality.
12. Identify easement dedications and widths on the Plot Plan.
13. Easements for City infrastructure (i.e. sanitary sewer, water, and storm
drain) must be a minimum of 15-feet wide, and should not split lot lines.
Easements for storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and water lines should be
dedicated to the City and not just a P.U.E. Centerline of buried infrastructure
shall be aligned a minimum of five 15) feet from the edge of the easement.
Q ~~
Greenland L.L.C.
January 12, 2001
Page 4
14. All design, construction plans and specifications, and as-built drawings must
be prepared to acceptable professional standards.
15. All street and water improvement plans must be approved in writing by Fire
District 3 prior to review by the City's PWD.
16. If the proposed development places structures within the 100-year
floodzone, how does the placement of these structures modify the
floodzone. What affect will it have on the flood plain elevation and floodzone
boundary, and what affects will the modification of the flood plain elevation
and floodzone boundary have on the existing facilities and properties
surrounding the proposed development.
17. Prior to the City PWD final approval of the construction plans for the
proposed improvements, the following must be submitted:
O A copy of written approval from Fire District 3 of the final street and
water system improvement plans for the proposed development.
^ The plans relating to the sanitary sewers must be approved in writing
by BCVSA, and the appropriate signature blocks must be completed
on the plans.
^ Copies of written approvals and/or permits from the various agencies
involved: DSL, DFW, DEO, and/or ACOE.
18. Field verify all existing infrastructure elevations and locations (i.e. pipe
inverts, curb elevations, street elevations, etc.), to which the proposed
subdivision will connect into existing improvements, prior to final
construction plan design.
19. The Applicant's engineer shall provide suitable engineering certification and
justification (i.e. calculations, analyses, plots, etc.,) that all connections to
existing infrastructure (i.e. street; water, sanitary sewer, storm drain
systems; natural drainage systems; etc.,) will not interfere with the effective
E.3
Greenland L.L.C.
January 12, 2001
Page 5
level of service or operation of the infrastructure facilities, and that the
existing infrastructure facilities have adequate capacities to accommodate
the flows and/or demands imposed on the existing infrastructure as the result
of the connection of the proposed development's infrastructure.
20. The accurate locations of the MWC water line and the natural gas main (and
any associated appurtenances), and the location of the associated easements
with these facilities, shall be accurately portrayed (both horizontally and
vertically) on the construction plans and final plat.
21. Overhead power lines. Coordinate efforts with Pacific Power and Light to
convert overhead electrical power facilities to underground facilities, prior to
the acceptance by the City PWD of the public improvements associated with
the proposed development. All agreements and costs associated with the
conversion of the electrical power facilities from overhead to underground
facilities, shall be by and between Pacific Power and Light and the Developer.
Streets/Traffic
Existing Improvements
- Haskell Street 60ROW Partially Improved
- Hiatt Lane (Vacated)
1 . Construction drawings for this Tentative Plan shall include a Street Lighting
Plan and Traffic Control Plan in accordance with the requirements of the City
PWD. The construction drawings shall include clear vision areas designed to
meet the City's PWD Standards. 25-foot unobstructed sight triangle areas
shall be required at all uncontrolled intersections. 55 feet shall be required at
arterial intersections.
2. The City PWD shall, at the cost of the Developer, evaluate the strength of
the native soils and determine the street section designs in accordance with
the City PWD Standards. The City's engineering staff or selected
engineering consultant (at Developer's expense), shall evaluate the strength
Q ~~
Greenland L.L.C.
January >2, 2007
Page 6
of the native soils and determine the street section designs in accordance
• Recommended minimum curb to curb width of private driveways is 12 feet
• The applicant shall construct all necessary street improvements to Haskell
Street (i.e. curbs(rolledl, gutters, sidewalks, street construction and paving,
storm drains) or shall enter into a suitable deferred improvement agreement
with the City for their future construction.
Storm Drainage
Existing Structure
^ 30" Storm Drain on Haskell Street
1. Applicant's engineer shall determine how SD system will work during a 10
year event. System must be designed to adequately drain 10-year storm
without surcharging or must be provided with adequate storage to pre vent
surcharging.
2. Prior to construction plan approval of the improvements for this Site Plan, the
Applicant' engineer shall provide the City PWD with a complete set of
hydrologic and hydraulic calculations and profile plots for sizing for SD
system. The engineer shall use the rainfall/intensity curve obtained from the
City PWD for hydrologic calculations, and the negotiated run-off parameters.
2. The SD system shall be designed to carry runoff from a 10 year storm event
if Q<100cfs. use runoff for 50 year storm if Q> 100 or <200cgs. Use
100 storm runoff if Q is > 200cfs.
4. Deed restriction or CC&Rs shall include a covenant or restriction that
prohibits the introduction of substances other that storm water, irrigation
water, or fresh water into any private or public storm drain system.
5. Roof drains and under drains shall not be directly connected to public storm
drain lines, and shall drain to the street at the curbline, whenever possible.
d ~~
Greenland L.L.C.
January 12, 2001
Page 7
Lots should be raised if necessary. Building foundation under drains (and
these type of facilities only) may drain to private storm drain lines that
discharge onto the streets, or into a storm drain curb inlet or manhole only;
must be approved before construction by the City PWD; and must be
identified and accurately portrayed on as-built drawings.
6. Storm water run-off from the proposed development into any public SD
system shall be minimized and be as approved by the city PWD.
Sanitary Sewer
1. All sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system (SS System) design,
construction and testing shall conform to the standards and guidelines of the
Oregon DEO, 1990 APWA Standards, Oregon Chapter, Bear Creek Valley
Sanitary Authority (BCVSA), and the City PWD Standards, where applicable.
^ Applicant shall make application for sewer service and construction with
BCVSA. A Public Works Permit will be required to construct sewer within
the street ROW.
^ The construction plans and the as-built drawings shall identify lateral
stationing for construction of sewer laterals.
Water System
^ 8inch Transit waterline on Haskell Street
1. Applicant shall provide properly sized service lines to the buildings in
accordance with the Oregon State Plumbing Specialty Code. Applicant shall
pay any associated costs with up sizing the meter or tap required to serve
the buildings.
0 1~
Greenland L.L.C.
January 12, 2001
Page 8
2. Each building shall be served by a separate water meter.
3. Provide construction drawings for the relocation of the fire hydrants.
Steamer ports at hydrants located in the complex shall face the buildings.
Fire hydrants shall be protected from vehicle damage and encroachment.
4. Specifications for the design and construction of the water system shall be in
accordance with City PWD Standards.
5. Lateral /connection stationing and size shall be provided on construction
plans and as-built drawings..
6. Developer shall comply with Oregon Health Division (OHD) and City
requirements for backflow prevention. An OHD approved backflow
prevention assembly shall be installed immediately downstream of the water
meter serving each dwelling unit.
7. Construction drawings shall include the size, type, and location of all water
mains, hydrants, air valves, service connection, and other appurtenance
details in accordance with City PWD Standards and as required by the
City PWD.
8. All connections to the water supply system must comply with OHD
requirements. Water will not be "turned on" by the City until such
requirements have been met to the satisfaction of the City's designated
inspector (currently the Jackson County plumbing inspector).
9. Water system shall be tested in accordance with City PWD Standards and
requirements at Developer's expense and must be approved by the City.
Site work, Grading and Design, and Utility Plans
1 . Applicants shall provide agrading/paving plan(s) with the construction
drawing submittal to the City P.D. Plan(s) shall illustrate the location and
~~
Greenland L.L.C.
January >2, 2001
Page 9
elevations of the base flood event flood zone and flood way of streams in
proximity to the development (if applicable); curb elevations; finish grades;
and building pad and lowest floor elevations.
2. All structures shall have roof drains, area drains, and/or crawl spaces with
positive drainage away from the building. Drain lines shall be connected to
the curb and gutter and discharge from the curb face.
3. Applicants shall provide the necessary "rough" lot grading to assure that all
lots will drain properly to the curb and gutter, or to a drainage system that
drains to the curb and gutter.
4. Provide the City with copies of any required permits and approvals (including
any mitigating requirements or conditions) from DSL, DEQ, and ACOE
(including any mitigating requirements), for any required wetland or flood
hazard mitigation work to be performed as part of the proposed
development.
5. Grading plans must have original/existing grades and final grades plotted on
the plan. Typically, existing grade contour lines are dashed and screened
back, and final grade contour Tines are overlaid on top of the existing grades
and are in a heavier line width and solid. Contour lines must be labeled with
elevations.
6. Need to place street lights on plans, with table indicating stationing and
offsets.
7. Provide City with a utility plan approved by each utility company which
reflects all utility crossings, transformer locations, valves, etc.
8. Utility locations must be accurately depicted on the as-built drawings, or as a
separate set of drawings attached to the as-built drawings.
U N 1_
Greenland L. L C.
January >2, 2001
Page 10
Rights of Ways/Easements
1 . All easements for improvements dedicated to the City shall have a minimum
15 foot width and shall be located (whenever possible) contiguously along
the exterior boundaries of properties and shall not split lot lines. Public utility
easements shall have a minimum width of 10 feet.
2. The City will require a 50 foot ROW width on local streets and 60 foot ROW
on collector streets.
3. Applicants shall comply with all existing easement owner requirements
regarding any proposed development that may overlap any existing
easement. Any development proposed which overlaps or alters an existing
easement must be approved by the easement's owner in writing, and a copy
of that written approval must be submitted to the City P.D. prior to
submission of construction plans for City P.D. review and approval.
4. All existing easement locations and those proposed for this development
shall be shown on the final plat with reference to the recordation number and
Grantee.
c~
N s~d
. ~~I~Nr~eH~ E
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPOKT
APPLICANT:
Name: GREEN LAND L.L.C.
AddiesS: 7111 MEDFORD CENTER 11421
City: MEDFORD State: OR Zip code: 97504
AGENT:
City:
State: Zip code:
OWNER OF RECORD:
Address:
City: State; Zip code:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
4 FLEX APARTMENT UNIT
148 HASKELL STREET CENTRAL POINT, OR 97502
BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS:
SEE ATTACHED
CENTRAL POINT BUILDING DEPARTMENT
By: _. Dated: jZ Z J-~
STAFF RBI'ORT.wpdC:\Corel\SuiteB\Template\Custom WP Templates\Business Pomis\STAFF REPORT.wpd
~~ ~
b
STAFF REPORT
GREENLAND LLC APARTMENTS
148 HASKELL STREET
CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502
PRELIMINARY PLAN CHECK REQUII2EMENTS
1. Building is an Rl Occupancy and type VN Constniction.
2. A geotechnical report is required. A written report of the investigation shall include, but
not be limited to the following information:
A. A Plot Plan showing the location of all test borings and/or excavations.
B. Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered.
C. Elevation of water table (if encountered).
D. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria including bearing
capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to
mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent
loads.
E. Expected total and differential settlement.
3. Fill used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in
accordance with accepted engineering practice and compacted to a rninimum of 95%
relative compaction. A soil investigation report and a report of satisfactory placement of
fill (including special inspections of placement of fill and compaction) acceptable to the
Building Official shall be submitted before building permits will be issued.
4. Group R, Division 1 occupancies having more than 3,000 square feet of floor azea above
the first story shall not be of less than one-hour fire resistive construction throughout (see
OSSC 310.2.2 and 601.5.2.2).
5. 1 hour separation required between garage section and dwelling section. (ITBC Table 3B)
6. 1 hour separation between dwelling units. (LTBC310.2.2)
7. Indicate compliance with draft stops and fire blocking on submitted plans as per UBC
708 required.
8. Guardrails as per UBC 509...stairs as per UBC 103.33.
9. Egress windows to comply with UBC 310.4.
10. Energy conservation per UBC chapter 13 (Rec Path 1).
11. See Chapter 11 UBC for parking.
12. Lighting and venting to UBC Chapter 13 Spec.
13. Fire District 3 wilt have additional requirements that will be noted at plan check.
14. Property line set backs to be in compliance with UBC Table SA.
15. Plans must be submitted by a licensed architect or engineer (State of Oregon), unless
exempt (UBC 106.3.2).
16. Submit 4 complete sets of plans for Plan Review.
0 ti ~1
f{rAct(Y~I EN% ~~ ~ ,~
BEAR CREEK VALLEY SANITARY AUTHORITY
3915 SGU7N PACIFIC Nw7. • MEOFORD, OREGON 97301.9089 • (541) 535.3193 • (541)779-4144
FA% (541j E3S5275 • www.bcvu.or8
RECEfVE~
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
December 28, 2000
JAN - 2 2001
Ken Gerschler K•E'
City of Central Point Planning Department Pueuc woRKS oEPTGo
155 South Second Street
Central Point, Oregon 97502
Re: Greenland LLC 4-plex, File # 00049
Dear Ken,
There is an 8 inch diameter sewer main located in Haskell Street and another located in the
access easement along the Northwest boundary of the subject property. Either of these main
lines may be used to serve the project.
Connection to this line will require a sewer permit and payment of connection fees. We request
that the City withhold building permits on this building until all sewer connection fees have been
paid.
If you need additional information, please call me at 779-4144.
Sincerely,
~--'~_
Carl Tappert, P.E.
District Engineer
I:\DATA\Agencies\CENTPT\PLANNG\00049-Greeland LLC 4-plex.wpd
w ~'
Arica Uti1Ri.s
5®l BusiruriY Park ~riv9
Poaoktms
ModtoN,Oregon9T501
Tclcphona 597-A2-~BI
TaA Free 806694417
Datc: -~2=1000- /~C~~O~
Number of Pages
Including cover: 2
`i'o: Ken Gerschler
~~City of Central Point
,Ptapning Department"
Fax:.541-664-0384
..~wil'/S~',f~'
Utilities
"FA7~"
RECEIVED
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
JAN - 3 2001
PLANNING BUILDING ^
PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. b
b'rom: Mike S-nith
Fax: 541-$58-4791
Office: 541-858-4728
800-659-4427
Cell: 541-941-4065
E-mail:
nuke.smith C~ avistacorp.com
7) File # 00049
Avista Utilities does not require any special conditions for the
Greenland 4-Flex.
2) File # OOOSfi
Avista Utilities does not require any special conditions for the LaFon
Partition.
Thanks,
Mike Smith
Marketing Design Tech
O ~.d l,"
M aHiliele of Avista Corp.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
HEARING DATE: January 16, 2001
TO: Central Point Planning Commission
FROM: Ken Gerschler, Community Planner
SUBJECT: Public Hearing- Tentative Minor Partition for 36 2W 36CD
Tax Lot-3500
Owner/ Ruby D. LaFon
Applicant: 1405 Naples Drive
Central Point, OR 97502
Agent: Herbert A. Farber
120 Mistletoe Street
Medford, Oregon 97501
Pro er
Description/ 36 2W 36CD Tax Lot 3500, 0.90 acres
Zoning: R-1-8, Residential Single-Family District
Summary
The applicant is proposing the minor partition of a 0.90 acre parcel into two parcels. The
property is located near the intersection ofNaples Drive and West Vilas Road in the R-I-B,
Residential Single-Family Zoning District.
Authority
CPMC 1.24.020 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing
and render a decision on any application for a tentative land partition. Notice of the public
hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060. (Attachment B).
Applicable Law
CPMC 16.10.010 et seq. Tentative Plans
CPMC 16.36.010 et seq. Major and Minor Land Partitions
CPMC 17.20.010 et seq. R-1, Residential Single-Family District
0 2'7
Discussion
The applicant, Ruby LaFon is requesting that a 0.91 acre parcel at 1405 Naples Drive be
partitioned into 2 separate parcels of 0.65 acres and 0.25 acres respectively(Attachment A).
As the Commission may recall, this area was excluded from the development of the New
Haven Estates Subdivision a few years ago. However, Ms LaFon would now like to
subdivide her property for development. CPMC 17.24.050 requires that corner lots have a
minimum area of 7,000 square feet and interior lots 6,000 square feet. These area
requirements can be met by the applicant.
Ms LaFon would like to retain the existing dwelling on the larger of the two lots and can
meet the setback requirements with the lot configuration being proposed. The minimum
setbacks for the R-1-8 zoning district are 20 feet for front, ten feet for side yards adjacent to
streets and 5 feet for interior side yards. Back yard setbacks are I S feet. CPMC 17.08.290
classifies the front lot line as the property line abutting a street and in the case of a corner lot,
the property line having the shortest street frontage. The proposed partition would put the
front lot lines for Parcel I as Naples Drive and Parcel 2 as West Vilas Road. However the
reconstruction of Hamrick and Vilas Roads has resulted in all access being taken from
Naples Drive. Parcel 2 will have a 55 foot sight vision triangle at the intersection of Naples
Drive and West Vilas Road as measured from the property line.
Since the LaFon property was not part of the New Haven Estates subdivision there is a
discrepancy between the street rights-of--way from one area to the next. The Planning
Department recommends that the applicant dedicate an additional two (2) feet ofright-of-
way for the entire length ofNapies Drive. The Planning Department further recommends the
establishment of a ten foot wide P.U.E. behind the property line along Naples Drive and
Vilas Road. The Public Works Department concurs with this recommendation (see
Attachment D).
Most of the area surrounding the LaFon property has been developed as residential
subdivisions yet there are a few remaining parcels that are not developed to full potential,
particularly a lazge parcel to the west. Development of this area could lead to difficulty as it
is unlikely that Jackson County will permit any additional traffic to access Vilas Road via
existing driveways. The LaFon partition can serve to alleviate access issues in the future if
a 30 foot wide strip of land is kept clear of structures between proposed parcels 1 and 2.
Although the City cannot require this as a condition of approval, staff recognizes that this is
an appropriate time to "plan" an area while the opportunity is present. A future residential
lane would serve to benefit the surrounding property owners in the future as it would provide
access for approximately 5 additional residential lots, one of which could be created on the
LaFon property.
\J N ``
The Planning and Public Works Departments have reviewed the site plan and the tentative
plan for the proposed minor land partition and have concluded that they comply with city
requirements if all conditions of approval pertaining to site development, minimum lot size,
public works standards and specifications and access to public roadways can be met.
Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority and Avista Utilities have submitted correspondence
for consideration by the Commission. Avista does not require any special conditions for the
partition. BCVSA has indicated that parcel 1 is presently served by the agency and parcel 2
can be connected to the same lateral line( Attachment E). Jackson County Fire District
Number 3 did not comment on this application.
Findings of Fact & Conclusions of La~v
Minor Partition
CPMC 16.10.010 requires that applications for tentative plans be submitted with
improvement plans and other supplementary infornation as may be needed to indicate the
development plan.
^ The proposed minor partition satisfies the snbdivision requirements listed in
CPMC 16.36.030 and CPMC 16.36.040. The Public Woc•ks Department is
requesting additional information to satisfy standard specification
requirements.
CPMC 17.28.050 establishes minimum area, width and access requirements for the R-1,
Residential Single-Family district.
Parcels 1 and 2 of the proposed partition meet the area, width and access
requirements for the R-1, Residential Single-Family District.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take one of the following actions:
Adopt Resolution No., approving the Tentative Minor Land Partition of 37 2W
36CD Tax Lot 3500 subject to the recommended conditions of approval (Exhibits C
and D ); or
2. Deny the proposed Tentative Minor Land Partition; or
3. Continue the review of the Tentative Minor Land Partition at the discretion of the
Commission.
o u~
Attachments
A. Tentative Plat
B. Notice of Public Hearing
C. Recommended Conditions of Approval
D. Public Works Staff Report
E. Correspondence
~~
~~
U
ST. JAMES WAY
P~
~ °'
~Y `7 ~
Lf1 ~
Ln Ln
~ 32'
1
35• Lot
ss
G ~ O ;
J ' J
O
J
~ O ~ O
J J
'
' i
ii~
_
..__.. _.... W
(/~
..
~
;~ r Q
rdEW HAGEIV ESTA TES
PHASE 1 ~°~ pl ~
. ,
• ,,~.
' f , Lot
.-.
_
•
' --_.. ........... ........
566Y6'S3'E 11300' . ... .F. ~6.46ySE
141.16'
'~'-
~ ;
;
55
'
'
. ,
,r_ .__..______
________ ..___ ~. pi ~, '
W
'
' ~ PROPOSED
~ i
~
16
SANITARY SEWER EA6EYENT ~ PARCEL N0. 1
0.25 Acres ~ I
~I ~
..~_ ___ ________ _ _ Q.-.;
11094 Sq. Ft.
_ _ ______SD_ff_A_6'1_3'E___5_E3_.5_7_ _ _ ___
c -
PROPOSED PHOPERiY UNE / ~
_
!
~
i
> ;d;
L
l
W
•
' ~ ,
o' o Z
:
g i~Awmat No, 61_3sv3 8 x ~i
~ ~ 54
O
N QQ
t~
OUSE
x
Ym
g
._
.~
~
p ~
' ;
W ;
W
J
Q '
'. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z '' S
~ I I
~
Lot -'-
PROPOSED I 55 Z
PARCEL N0. 2 3s•
0.65 Acres ~ i
•
~ ''
28349 Sq. F[. ~ ~' ' ~'
.
~--
.-
_ -~
~___.
• r. (Q - -
gip
PEE
N66'47'33'W tY5.00; 205'
569'4i'33-E jt ]56.35'
' 'Ah' NB6.47AS~E 271.25'
m ; S ,'4. •-~3/4' Yon >M
,?ryW Roed W /-~
m {Y 5(N 356 ~_-~ ~ -
I .55(SSrAS NArv rrtC rs4. JG 3iv 36[D II JSM
;~ ~ Roo
/~/~/
,r ~
~,
i'
Sheet 1 01 1
Vilas Road
(County Road)
TENTATIVE PARTITION PLAT
TAX LOT 3500
Ip-olee ;..
SOU7HWESi ONE-QUARTER CF SECTION 36,
70WNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST,
WILLAMETTE MER701AN, JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON
/pr
Ruby D. La Fon
1a05 mFPLES JN!cE
iENi3PL PCINT. C.P!'v-Oh 9'>Oi
NPtes: -ASSesso/z Map No. 3525vJ/6C0 vL 3C>OC
con Po;ning .9% acres
-propcrry 4 zcn<O R-+_E. 6000 SC F' ~^.~.~'..
-Tnf P/oPe/ly 'z O.'OZZ IarO evCePl Ipr ! ../~-.~
Shown SIOIVZ U Ivn%rn S z'+Owrv n./eC
-P. U.E 10 Teel :n x!Jln ..a re c Jroo . s 'ze:
/~G$jj~~ 1ron0ogez.
5'Gd - Tree
NCINITY MAP (NO SCALE]
Si. JANE3 WAY
g
SUBJECT PROPERtt------
WESi Ntus Ro.o
q
S
S ~
° W
W
x g
cuRVE TABL
R DO.iA RAWW IfR:M pGYO 6C.MM0 /IA 4[IAx6
>SJ'Jl'
JO M" ]9 X' E
xJ'9>yrY
9v,veyeo p,: ~~
FARB£R d( SONS. INC.
tlDa FARBER SURVEYING ~~,
(54f) 776-0846
CFfIEE COCAiION: ~muNL <CPRE65~
1,^0 N15TLETOC • P.C <OX •29n
MEDFCi!D, CPCCON 9%fi0t CEN!>d! FC%NT OP¢~.,..h r-5p;
SUl[r
DAfC: NGV(NPCP ~., :0.+1 '.
Jon ,.o.: aw>-oo
OR.. KIHC lM1 l: JCB$\ru\£Ilb\L+IJN-ICh %F~n>:L~
/--NB6'{YSYE 10.V,9 h
Ran PC to 1/4 c ms 36(1
_~_--' Pr /N 13650
Cz ty c.1~ Central Po~~~ t
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Tom Humphrey, AICP
Planning Director
Ken Gerschler
Community Plarrner
Matt Samitore
Planning Technician
Notice of Meeting
Date of Notice: December 26, 2000
Meeting Date
Time:
Place:
NATURE OP MEETING
January 16, 2001
7:00 p.rn. (Approximate)
Central Point City Hall
155 South Second Street
Central Point, Oregon
Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review an
application for a Tentative Partition on a parcel of property located between Hamrick and Vilas
Roads and Naples Drive. The subject parcel islocated in a R-1-8, Residential Single Family Zoning
District on Jackson County Assessment Plat 362W36CD, Tax Lot 3500.
The Central Point Planning Commission will initially review the application of Tentative Partition
to determine if the proposed split of the existing .91 acre tax lot meets the requirements of law. If
approved, the partition would create two parcels.
CRITERIA FOR DECISION
The requirements for the Tentative Partition are set forth in Chapter 17 of the Central Point
Municipal Code, relating to General Regulations, Off-street parking, Site Plan, Landscaping and
Construction Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Works
Standards.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
1. Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit
written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, January 9, 2001.
2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, 155
South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502.
155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 ~ (541) 664-3321 ~ Fax: (541) 664-6384
n ~ ~~
3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the
expiration ofthe comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about
the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated
clearly to the Planning Commission.
4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City
Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at
15 cents per page.
5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664-
3321 ext. 291.
SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE
At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staff reports, hear
testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the applications. Any
testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of
the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the and Site Plan and Variance. City
regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission
decisions.
155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 ~ (541) 664-3321 ~ Fax: (5411664-6384
0 3~
EXHIBIT C
PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The approval ofthe Tentative Plan shall expire in oneyear on January 16, 2002 unless an
application for final plat or extension has been received by the City.
2. The project must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations.
The tentative and final plats shall depict utility easements requested by the City, BCV SA.
Anychanges to utilitylayout including fire hydrants shall require subsequent approval by
the respective service provider.
4. Pending the approval ofthe CityAdininistrator, the applicant shall enter into a deferred
improvement agreement for parcels 1 and 2 of the proposed partition.
5. The applicant shall dedicate to the public for right ofwaypurposes a two foot wide strip
of land adjacent to Naples Drive.
0 3 ~~
A4#~ct~r~Hk-
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PRELIMINARY STAFF REPORT
for
Minor Partition
Date:
Applicant:
Agent:
Project:
Location:
Legal:
Zoning:
Report By:
Purpose
January 12, 2001
Rudy D. LaFon
1405 Naples Drive
Central Point, OR 97502
Herbert A. Farber
120 Mistletoe St
Medford, OR 97501
Minor Partition
Naples Dr. near Vilas Road
T37S, R2W, Section 36 CD, Tax Lot 3500
R-1-8
Robert W. Pierce, Public Works Director
Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as
"Developer") regarding Public Works requirements and recommendations for the partition of Tax Lot
3500 in Section 36 CD, T37S, R2W.
Special Requiremenfs
1. Lot Drainage
2.
3.
Proposed Parcel 1 is known to have drainage problems. When the property is further
developed, the entire lot should be final graded so that it drains to the south and east.
Sidewalks
The Public Works Department recommends that a sidewalk be constructed the full length of
the Naples Drive side of the property. In order to construct the sidewalk the fire hydrant and
air relief valve located at the southeasterly corner of the property will have to be relocated.
Wafer:
Proposed Parcel 1 does not have water service available at this time. In order to acquire a
0 3 ~>
LnFon Partition
PYPD Staff Report
Jnmrrrry 12, 200/
Page 2
water service the water main in Naples Drive will need to be tapped.
4. Right of Way & Public Utility Easement
A two foot wide strip along the entire length of Naples Dr. must me dedicated to the city for
right of way purposes.
An additional ten foot wide strip of land running the length of Naples Dr. and Vilas Rd. running
behind and adjacent to the respective Naples Dr. and Vilas Rd. rights of way must be
dedicated as a Public Utility Easement.
0 3C
d-tl a c1~.~•~ ~ ~ ~
BEAR CREEK VALLEY SANITARY AUTHORITY
3915 SOUTH PACIFIC HWY. • MEDFORD, OREGON 87501.8099 • (541) 5333193 • (341) 778A144
FAX (541) 5353270 • www.bcvs~.ore
RECEIVED
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
December 28, 2000
Ken Gerschler
City of Central Point Planning Department
155 South Second Street
Central Point, Oregon 97502
Re: La Fon Partition, File # 00056
Dear Ken,
JAN - 2 2001
K.~~
PLANNING BUILDING^
PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. ^
Sewer service is available to the subject property from the main line shown on the plans. There
is a service lateral already constructed that would serve proposed Parcel 1. Pazcel 2 is already
connected to the sewer system.
Connection of Parcel 2 to the sewer will require a sewer permit and payment of connection fees.
We request that the City withhold building permits on this building until all sewer connection
fees have been paid.
If you need additional information, please call me at 779-4144.
Sincerely,
~~'T~...-s~-
Carl Tappert, P.E.
District Engineer
I:\DATA\Agencies\CENTPT\PLANNG\00056-LaFon Partition.wpd
~I(
d~
Avista Utilities
SBfI Busuress PaAc Drive
PO Dox 1209
Madfort,Oregan42509
Tekptrono 591-A2-5281
ToA Free /IgO~•482/
Date: -1-3=~~-2900- /~C~/G/
Number of Pages
Cncluding cover: 2
To: Kcn Gerschler
"City of Central Point
Planning Department"
Fax:.541-664-6384
~~FA~"
mil''/,S"~",~f#'
Utilities
RECEIVED
CITY OF CENTR4L POINT
JAN - 3 2001
U ,6'/
PLANNING f~ BUILDING ^
PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. d
b'ront: Mike Smith
Fax: 54I-858-4791
Office: 541-858-4728
800-659-4427
Cell: 541-941-4065
E-mail:
ttuke.smith @ avistacorp.com
]) File # 00049
Avista Utilities does not require any special conditions for the
Greenland 4-Flex.
2) File # 0005G
Avista Utilities does not require any special conditions for the LaFon
Partition.
Thanks,
Mike Smith
Marketing Design Tech
M attigate of Avista Corp.
O
<:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
HEARING DATE: January 16, 2001
TO: Central Point Planning Commission
FROM: Ken Gerschler, Community Planner
SUBJECT: Public Meeting- Modifications to the Miller Estates P.U.D. on 37 2W 03B
Tax Lots-500 and 602
Owner/ Brad Miller
Applicant: 2364 McAndrews Road
Medford, OR 97504
Pro er
Description/ 37 2W 03B Tax Lots 500 and 602, approximately 13.99 acres
Zonine: R-1-6, Residential Single-Family District and R-2, Residential Two Family
Discussion
Last year, the Commission approved Phase 1 of the Miller Estates Final Development Plan
which has subsequently been final platted. One of the conditions recommended by the
Public Works Department and approved by the Commission was to place all of the lots in
Phase 1 within the 100 year flood plain. Upon further investigation it has been determined
that the City cannot expand the boundary shown on the FEMA maps without appropriate
justification. In fact, City staff believe that further study of Griffin Creek will actually result
in a narrower map boundary.
Accurate flood plain identification is significant since structures located within the flood
plain require special construction techniques designed to ensure a reduction of flood damage.
Parcels in flood plain areas also have significantly increased insurance costs. Staff is seeking
to revise the Commission's earlier approval and use the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM)
boundary for Miller Estates rather than the boundaries recommended previously in
Attachment A.
The applicant has asked that the Commission consider a revised map (Attachment"C") that
depicts both phases of the Miller Estates P.U.D. The majority of the lots shown in Phase 1
with the exception of Lot 17 are out of the flood plain and should be recognized as such.
The Central Point Municipal Code requires that changes to approved Final Development
Plans be approved by the Planning Commission and this is why staff is bringing this issue
back to you.
~J
Attachments
A. Public Works Staff Report
B. Notice of Public Hearing
C. Applicant's Map
~~
,~
~~,,.
N T E R
fI i~TA~!/m~N i ~~/~~}
City of Central Point
MEMO
O F F I C E
To: Tom Humphrey, Planning Director
From: Lee Brennan, Public Works Director
Subject: Memorandum Regarding Public Works Department Recommendation Regarding
Final Development Plan Approval for Miller Estates
Date: April 24, 2000
Our department has completed its review and has recommended that the following conditions of
approval be placed on the final development plans for the first phase of development of Miller Estates.
The remaining portion of the development will likely not occur until the floodplainlfloodway
issues/needs/problemshaue been clearly identified and remediated. This work remains to be
completed. We have received a verbal approval of the development plans from Mr. Alex Georgevitch of
the Oregon Department of Transportation, and a written approval from Neil Shaw of Fire District No.3.
The plans still require final approval from BCVSA prior to our department's final approval of the plans.
It is our department's recommendation to approve the plans for the Development of Phase 1 of Miller
Estates with the following conditions and exceptions:
1. Elevation certificates shall be required for the placement of all structures within the
Development Minimum lowest finish Floor elevations for the various lots shall be as illustrated
by the Engineer on Drawing No. F.2. All lots within the development are considered to be within
the 100-year floodplain of Griffin Creek.
2. Alt connections to the water supply system should comply with OHD and City PWD
requirements. install concxete Thrust blocks to meet City required horizontal and vertical restraint
requirements. An air relief assembly shall be installed immediately in front of the gate valve
installed at the terminus of the 8-inch water line on Orth Drive., at approximate Station 19+74.
All water line joints and fittings shall be restrained from the terminus of the waterline on Marian
Avenue through the crossing of the storm drain pipe line (to approximate station 28+50).
3. A suitable landscape plan for the required landscape buffer along Highway 99 shall be prepared
and submitted to the City for review and approval. Once approved, the landscape plan shall be
implemented and maintained for the initial one year period (from the date of acceptance by the
City PWD) by the Developer at the Developer's expense. At a minimum, the landscape plan
shall include provision for grass and street trees. The street trees shall be installed along the
meandering sidewalk, in accordance with the City's draft standards, and the trees shall be
selected from the City's draft street tree list, as approved by City's Planning Commission and
City Planning Department and PWO staff. The street trees selected shall be compatible with the
overhead poweriines in this area and shall be of a minimum 1-1l2 inch caliper size. The
landscape buffer shall be designed with an automated irrigation system that is operated utilizing
AC power for the system's controls.
~~
C_ ty of Cen t r~, ~' Pozn t
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Tom Hwnphrey, AICP
Planning Director
Ken Gerschler
Community Planner
Matt Sainitore
Planning Technician
Notice of Meeting
Date of Notice: December 26, 2000
Meeting Date:
Time:
Place:
NATURE OF MEETING
January 16, 2001
7:00 p.m. (Approximate)
Central Point City Hall
155 South Second Street
Central Point, Oregon
Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review an
application for a modification, to an already approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) application,
to review the 100 year floodplain requirements for Miller Estates. The property is located South of
Scenic Drive and East of Highway 99. The subject pazcel is located in a R-1-8, Residential Single
Family Zoning District and a R-2, Residential Two-Family Zoning District on Jackson County
Assessment Plats 372W03B, Tax Lot 500 and 602.
CRITERIA FOR DECISION
The requirements for the Planned Unit Development are set forth in Chapter 17 of the Central Point
Municipal Code, relating to General Regulations, Off-street parking, Site Plan, Landscaping and
Construction Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Works
Standards.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit
written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, January 9, 2001.
2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, 155
South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502.
155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 ~ (541) 664-3321 ~ Pax: (541) 664-6384
fl ;1 ~~
Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the
expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about
the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated
clearly to the Plamiing Commission.
4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City
Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at
15 cents per page.
5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664-
3321 ext. 291.
SUMMARY OF PROCEllURE
At the meeting, the Plamiing Commission will review the applications, technical staff reports, hear
testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the applications. Any
testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of
the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the and Site Plan and Variance. City
regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission
decisions.
155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 ~ (541) 664-3321 ~ Fax: (541) 664-6384
:1
~`.
`~~
i`
Q
}
N
d
FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARY