HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - July 11, 2000CI"I`Y O1~ CI?N'1'R.41, POIN"I
PLANNING CO~YIMISSION AGP:NUA
.lul}' 1 1, 20110 - 7:00 p.m.
Nest PlanningConunission
Resolution No. 490
L MEETING CALLED'I'O O12DI?R
[I. ROLL CALL
City Planning
Chuck Piland -Candy Fish, Don Poster. Karol_vne.tohnson, John LcGros,
Paul Lunte and Wayne Riggs
[II. CORRESPONDENCE
[V. MINU'T'ES
A. Review and approval of.iune <, ?000, Planning Commission Muurtes.
V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES
VI. BUSINESS
Page 1 - 19 A. Public hearing regarding a tentative subdivision that would create nine
parcels in an area between Mendolia Way and West Pinc Street. The subject
property (2.30 acres) is located in an R-1-8, Residential Single-Family
toning Dish~ict opt Map 37 2 W l OC, Tax Lot 4700.
20-32 B. Public hearing regardingavarianceandtentative]andpailitionthatwillallow
an existing 0.45 acre lot to be divided into two separate lots of 7.(39 and
12,016 square feet respectively. The subject property is located near the
residence at 527 Bush Street in the R-1-6, Residential Single Family zoning
district on Map 37 2W 11 BA, Tax Lot 3100.
33 - 51 C. Public meeting to review a Site Plan application that would allow the
construction of a 4200 square foot building at the Oregon Department of
Transportation's maintenance yard on IIamrick Road. "I'he subject property
is located in the M-2, Industrial-General Zoning District on Jackson County
Assessment Plat 372W01 C, "I"ax Lot 3400.
52 - 59 D. Public meeting to review modifications to a previously approved Site Plan
application for the Valley of the Rogue Bank and Data Center at 1780 East
Pine Street. "fhe subject property is located in the C-4, "hourist and Office
Professional Zoning District on Jackson County Assessment Plat 372 WO 1 C,
"hax Lots 2600 and 2700.
VI1. MISCELLANEOUS
V111. ADJOURNMENT
City of Central Point
Planning Commission Minutes
June 6, 2000
I. MEETING CALLED "f0 ORDER AT 7:00 Y.M.
ROLL CALL: Chuck Piland, Candy Fish, Paul Lunte, and Wayne Riggs were
present. Karolyue Johnson and John LeGros were absent Also in attendance
were `tom Humphrey, Planning Director; ken Gerschler, Community Planner;
Matt Samitore, Planning Technician; and Lee Brennan, Public Works Director.
III COIti2ESPONDENCE
The Platming Department received a petition from concerned property owners
regarding the Mt. View Plaza Conditional Use Permit Application, and a letter
from Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority regarding the payment of connection
fees for the Mt. View Plaza Conditional Use Permit.
IV MINUTES
Commissioner Riggs made a motion to approve the Planning Commission
Minutes from May 6, 2000. Commissioner Lunte seconded the motion. ROLI,
CALL: Motion passed unanimously.
V PUBLIC APPEARANCES
Couneilmember Carol Fischer addressed the Planning Commission with concerns she had
on the proposed tree ordinance.
VI BUSINESS
A. riling a tentative enhdivisirni that would create
C'nntinued puhlic hearing reu
a
_
~
h
h
t 7F4 P
Y1
i
A
t
i
i
l
Th
i
e
nuec. a
1
V
eW
vetme
e_et prnnT
T
z
e
x narce
s near t
e snh
located in an R-1-R, 12e¢idenfial Single-Family Toning l~ietrict nn Map
I7~ W 1 1 AD. Tax i nt h300
Ken Gerschler, Community Planner, presented the Planning DeparUnent Staff Report.
Mr. Gerschler explained that this item was continued from May s Planning Commission
so that the applicant, Elden Smith, could meet with City staff. Subsequently, staff and
Mr. Smith met and worked out the details of the reports. 'fhc Planning Department
would like to add to the plan a pedestrian easement on both ends of the hammerhead of
the partition, both east and west. The easement would be used for access to a future park
or subdivision, as well as providing an easement for water lint extensions.
Tom Ilumphrcy. Planning Director, added that a Dclcrrcd Improvement agreement is
already existing on both parcels and a sdcwalk will have to be extended a(I arround the
subdivision on Shayla Lane. Also, a sunset clause would be ncedcd on the pedestrian
easements.
Lee Brennan. Public Works Director, presented the Public Works Staff Report. The
infrastructure csists for the subdivision except for a looped water line, which would occur
when the parcels to the Last or the West develop. An easement will be ncedcd in each
direction for the lines. 'fhe street is not wide enough for parking, so uo parking will be
allowed on the street Au agreement may be worked out with the Pire District for parking
in the hammerhead portion. "fhe existing house access on Pittview needs to be moved as
far West as possible. The sidewalks for the existing home will not need to have a 2-foot
utility easement on it The driveway access from Pittview nccds to be 30 feet, then can
adjust to 24 once in the subdivision.
Mike Lanier, Agent for the Applicant, and Elden Smith, the Applicant, stated they concur
with those changes.
Commissioner Fish made a motion to adopt Resolution 486, approving the tentative
subdivision for the Cody Subdivision, located at 764 Pittview Avenue, subject to the
recommended conditions of approval, the staff reports, adding pedestrian easements
to the east and the west, with a 10 year sunset clause, and adding sidewalks all
around the subdivision. Commissioner Riggs seconded the motion. ROLL CALL:
Motion passed unanimously.
B. Rev iew of a Bite Ip an and conditi onal nse ern nit ,1pplicatinn that would allow the
cnn etn+ctinn of a cnnvenienre m arket,gas star inn and carwaeh in the Mrnmtain
Vie w Playa Develnnment near th e. intereectinn of Playa Rnnlevard and 1'reelll all
Roa d in the C'-4,Jnnri~t and Pmf essinnal Diehict
Ken Gerschler, Community Planner, presented the Plamring Department Staff Report.
Mr. Gerschler stated that the gas station and convenience market are a permitted use in
the C-4 zone and fall within the Site Plan Review criteria. The Car Wash is a conditional
use, thus the Planning Commission can deny or set guidelines for the carwash. The
Planning Department would recommend that the architecture of the new building
resemble the Albertson s store, and not have an industrial feel to it. A Striping Plan for
the development is also needed. Abetter landscape plan nccds to be submitted to the
City of Central Point. This plan will be available to the neighboring residences Co look at.
The plan will address trees in the sight distance triangle as well as new trees that shield
the gas station from the residences on Freeman Road. The Planning Department would
also ask that the Planning Commission set the hours of operation for the Car Wash and
possibly the Cias Station and Convenience store.
Lee Brennan, City Engineer, presented recommendations to the Planning Commission.
Mr. Brennan suggested revising the exit and entrances, shifting the driveway into the
development further east and making it a right in only. the Storm drainage system needs
to address separating the water and soap ii~om the car wash, heforc it enters into the crock,
the City of Central Point needs a elevation certiticate fbr the car wash and convenience
store because they are located in the 100-year (loodplain, and the City also needs an area
lighting plan.
Cal Wheeler, 212 Freema~t Road, stated he would like the Car Wash shut down by at least
10 P.M.
George Zentgraf, stated the Commission should decry the Car Wash, and move the gas
station and convenience store further back. "hhe Car wash should only be open from 9 or
10 in the morning to 10 or I 1 at night.
Mr. Humphrey addressed the Commission about setting hours of operation and the
landscape plan.
Commissioner Fish made a motion to pass Resolution 487, approving the Site Plan
and Conditional Use Permit subject to the recommended to the Planning and Public
Works Staff Reports, Limiting the hours of operation of the Gas Station and
Convenience Store to the same as the Albertson s main store, setting the hours of
operation for the Car Wash from 9 A.M to 9 P.M., Submitting a set of plans
detailing the catch basins and how the applicants are going to separate the
petroleum and soap from the water before it enters into Horn Creek, Submitting an
area lighting plan, creating a motif on the buildings that is similar in architecture to
the Albertson s, realigning the entrances for larger vehicles, submitting a Traffic
Circulation Plan, making the entrance from Plaza Boulevard Right in only, and
Submitting a new Landscaping Plan. Commissioner Lunte seconded the motion.
ROLL CALL: Motion passed unanimously.
C. Withdrawal of Rnchy/Malnt ILP~rty~3 00 acres) from Tackcnn Cnnnty Fire
Prntectinn District Nn 3 fnllnwing_it c Annexatinn to the CitTof Central Pnint.
"Tom Humphrey, Planning Director, presented the Planning Department staff report. Mr.
Iumphrey stated that when a property is annexed into the City of Central Point they are
withdrawn from the Fire District and brought into the City s Fire District. In this case it
is the same Fire District. "hhis could possibly change in the future if the City of Central
Point ever has there own Fire Department again.
Commissioner Fish made a motion to Pass Resolution 488 approving the withdrawal
of the Busby/Malot property (3.00 acres) from Jackson County Fire Protection
District No. 3 following its Annexation to the City of Central Point. Commissioner
Lunte seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Motion Passed unanimously.
D. Withdrawal of ITiill ~~~~ 30 acres) from hckson County Fire Prntectinn
Dich~ict Nn 3 follnwing it s Annexatinn to the City of CcMral Pninf
fom ({umplu~ey, Planting Director, presented the Planning Department staff report. Mr.
Fhunphrey stated that ~~~hcn a property is annexed into the City of Central Point they arc
withdra~cn front the I~irc District and brought into the City s I~irc DisUict.
Commissioner Fish made a motion hi Pass Kesohrtion 489 approving the withdrawal
of the Hull property (2.30 acres) from Jackson County Fire Protection District No. 3
following its Annexation to the Cit}~ of Central Point Commissioner Lunte
seconded the motion. 12OLL CALL: Motion Passed unanimously.
Marion Hull, asked if he would still be in the County or the City of Central Point.
Keu Gerschler explained the entire property was annexed and that he was now in the City
of Central Point.
VIII MISCELLANEOUS
Mr. Humphrey asked which date for the next meeting. It was agreed that July ll, 2000
would be the next scheduled meeting.
IX. ADJOURNMET
Commissioner Riggs made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner Foster
seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Motion passed unanimously. Meeting adjourned at
9:12 P.M.
PLANNING DGPAR'1'MF,NT STAFF RLPOR"I-
H1ARING DA"fli ,iuly 11, 2000
TO: Central Point Planning Commission
FROM: Ken Gerschler, Community Planner
SUBJECT: Public Hearing- "Tentative Subdivision of 37 2W IOC Tax L,ot 4700 -
Marion Hull.
Owner/ Marion Hull
Annlicant: 3545 1-Ianley Road
Central Point, OR 97502
Agent; Robert Fellows
2950 Phillips Way
- Central Point, OR 97502
Pro er
Deseri tp ion/ 37 2W l OC Tax Lot 4700, 2.30 acres
Zoning: R-1-8, Residential Single-Family District
Summary
The agent, Robert Fellows working on behalf of Marion Hull is proposing the partition of
a 2.30 acre parcel into nine parcels. The property is located in an area between Mendolia
Way and West Pine Street in the R-1-8, Residential Single-Family Zoning District. The
subdivision is an infill development that takes advantage of new access created by the
Country Meadows Estates Subdivision.
Authority
CPMC 1.24.020 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing
and render a decision on any application for a tentative land partition. Notice of the public
hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060. (Exhibit B).
Applicable Law
CPMC 16.10.010 et seq. Tentative Plans
CPMC 16.36.010 et seq. Major and Minor Land Partitions
CPMC 17.20.010 et seq. R-I, Residential Single-Family District
J..v 1
Discussion
Bob Fellows is working on behalf of the applicant, Marion I-Iull to develop the subject
property. City Staff has been working with neighbors in this area to plan for the development
of this and other properties that have been surrounded by new residential construction during
the Last few years. The I lull property has recently been annexed and Mc Fellows would like
to tie this development to the existing Country Meadows Subdivision while an opportunity
still exists. In order to accomplish a connection with Phase 2 of the Country Meadows
Estates Subdivision, Mr Fellows has eliminated a single lot and extended a new street
Zachary Lane) from Mendolia W ay. The owners of several remaining properties to the south
have chosen not to annex at this time. However, the proposed layout would accommodate
further annexation and subdivision in the future.
This subdivision known as Country Meadows Estates Phase 1, Unit 3 consists of nine
parcels ranging in size from 8,015 to 8,946 square feet. Each lot would have a 5 foot wide
stomr drain easement and a 10 foot wide public utility easement located along the proposed
street right of way. Lots 3, 4 and 5 are unusually shaped lots that could create building
setback difficulty for contractors. Structures on these lots may need a smaller "building
footprint" in order to meet the front yard setback requirement. No parking will be permitted
in the "hammerhead turnaround". Lot 6 shows a proposed lot line adjustment. Staff would
recommend that the lot line adjustment be removed from the tentative plan as submitted
since the adjusted area is located outside of the City.
The standard setbacks for each lot would be 20 feet for the front, 5 feet per story on the sides
and I S feet for the rear lot lines. If sidewalks are placed on privately owned property, staff
would recommend that the front setback be increased to a minimum of 25 feet for garages
in order to leave adequate space for off street parking that would not block pedestrian traffic.
Topographically, the land appears lower than the surrounding Country Meadows Estates
Phases where fill was added within the last two years. Fill material will likely be needed for
this phase of the subdivision and must meet any requirements of the Central Point Building
Department. Structures constructed in the 100 year floodplain must meet FEMA
requirements.
The Public Works Department may require additional Right of Way dedication,
improvements and or the recording of deferred improvement agreements for W est Pine Street
in preparation for future road widening. Please refer to Attachment "C" for details.
The Plam~ing Department has reviewed the tentative plan for compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan and the City's zoning code. The area is designated for low density
residential development and is zoned R-1-8, which is an 8,000 square foot residential lot
minimum. This infill development will result in a more efficient use of residentially zoned
land and improve the overall appearance and value of this neighborhood.
The Public Works Department has reviewed the tentative plan with the City's water, sewer,
storm drain and transportation standards. The Public Works staff have sunnnarized
department requirements in the staff report included as Attachment C.
This project would need to meeC any requirements of the Bear Creek Valley Sanitary
Authority and the Jackson County Fire District Number'I'hree. BCVSA has submitted a
letter dated July 3, 2000 outlining the districts recommendations (Attachment D). Fire
District Number 3 has not provided comments as of yet.
Findins~s of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Staff suggests the following findings of fact and conclusions of law as applicable to the
project and necessary for its approval.
1. The project site is located in the R-1-8, Residential Single-Family Zoning
District and increases residential land use efficiency in this area.
The proposed tentative plan for single family residential development is a permitted use in
the R-1-8 zoning district. The zoning in tum is consistent with the Low Density Residential
Comprehensive Plan map designation. The extension of Zachary Lane creates improved
access to the subject property and the proposed subdivision is a more efficient use of this
land.
2. The project consists of a tentative plan application for the subdivision of
approximately 2.30 acres for the purpose of developing asingle-family residential
subdivision, Country Meadows Estates, Phase 1, Unit 3. The total number of lots
proposed for the subdivision is 9.
The proposed single-family subdivision meets the density requirement for the R-1-8
residential zone which is a maximum of 4.5 units per acre. Each lot within the subdivision
will meet the requirements of the City's subdivision and zoning codes for residential lots as
well as the specific requirements of the R-1-8 zone. The tentative plan includes the
information required by CPMC 16.10.010 et. seq. There are sufficient building envelopes
to meet all setback requirements.
., ., .
3. The Planning and Public Works Departments have reviewed the tentative plan
for the proposed subdivision and the findings of fact and determined that the project
meets all City standards and requirements subject to the recommended conditions of
the Planning Department (Attachment E) and the Public Works Departruent
(Attachment C).
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following action:
1. Adopt ResolutionNo., approving the tentative subdivision subject to the recommended
conditions of approval (Attachment E); or
2. Deny the tentative subdivision; or
3. Continue the review of the tentative subdivision at the discretion of the Commission.
Attachments:
A. Tentative Plan
B. Notice of Meeting
C. Public Works StaffRe_port
D. Correspondence
E. Planning Department Recommended Conditions
VACPPDPpCAPlamiin~V00017 WPD
~~~ 4
'\
~ ~
~. , ~
9
~\ ~~~
~' -~ -~
~ 9=i /~ i
L~~f ~.
d
C1ty otCeii~il Fnint
~~'~-~~~~~ tt~ tt
E'lanninG Departm~nC
ec -a--~ ~
~.
~~._
_~_ .owe . -'"-- ----_--
n -_. __ --____
'~- i -----__ _
------- -
07 J _ ~ '.
'
'
T
~"~
'I ~1 I ~
~ ~
~
t
z~ ~
-- 1~! I I!~ ~ /
a
N
h~
gt
~S
6 ~ _
~~I ~/ ~ ~ ~p/`~)
(x
U!/<
S
.. p,~ M~V I 6
E
.ayb
~ ~ ~t. ~;~E '
`°~ 'II I~E~ ~`
I ~ ~ i
~
3
sR 8
~Y
~! ~ ~/ I ~
~;1 I EE
i
CFi
~~~~ ~ ~~; ~; r-- tE;r_
I t
~~ ~
,, I 'I 1
, I ;1 ~_____1__ ~. ~~__
_~___ f____~
'-
~~~
-
~..~ ..w«o,
°
i ~
-t ~! l~A,
~ 1 ~
' ~ ~i i ~
i
~ ~
!
~~ a6~, \\` ~ lam
\ i. ~O_\ \
1 i'C
~._--'-V ~ 6 ~?~
~ _ _ Y-- ~\~ i ,
~ `. \/
~
~~
. ` ° f ~
I i
I ~ ~ « //\
~ ~ ~,
~\ I ,-~~., ~Qi
~ 1
~
~ 1\ , / ~, , ~_ ,~
_ ~
`'~. /
~/
-...•u'1'71I1
-_'!~ -~
r
1
~.
v ~~
r-~ 4
f~i:
1:SSY,
`:
~.
c
~~, i
..~~
i. _?k~~
~' ~ k_ i~
- i ~ ~~
5
W£S7 PIAE' VILLA SU&IINISJCN
jonrd R-2-10
~ ~ ~ -
4f ---~- _-, __ 181 ~. _ ._. - _. 145_
,e - - - _ tiy~ 8026 SQ FT ~ \ `, -- -- - - - -
~ ~ -_... -~ _ m ~I R.~4rv f
~ I ~ ~,
~ 2 1_.. - ------ - `~
8446 SO Ft 8663 Sg~T 3 ~
to u~ 8012 SO FT '~ ~ j -
-- i y. ~ ,/ ~ '-1~ ~ f ,62h- ~ 24776 SO F7 ~'
..,
{ 5 ~
i ~ N 1 / ~ OS
_ 1 J /~ ~ 801 5Q FT _
10' PLE~ 1 . - -- r~
'i- iI
-, ~ '.
4ME ~ ~
~ VEWAY i;
. i ~ N ~ •r , o, }, •.
ES(JS77 v PROPERTY lFt~£ p Sr'T!^ F~YIPR~ATY'L~
- X4.5 ~ _h4.~ ' r b4,Z_. ~ -_...._._._~---, _ ---~-- ~
I ~ ~ ~ PR~pS~- D~T9"LD~'"T;
~,
~, 4 823750 FT ~ 8255 SO FT ~ PF20POSED TL 5000 /
j 8222 SO FT
1
~~
~' ~
' i.
'i
26752 SO FT
In Ca~ntyy
Ctty (arDp~afed R-1'10
City of Ceritr•al 1'orrrt
PLANNXNG DEPARTMEN"X'
City o f central Point
~~:I-i~~~~T ttB ~t
Planning Bepulmen't
Notice of Meeting
Date of Notice: June 21, 2000
Meeting Date:
Time:
Place:
NATURE OF MEETING
July 11, 2000
7:00 p.m. (Approximate)
Central Point City Hall
155 South Second Street
Central Point, Oregon
"Ibm Ilumphrcy, AICP
Planning Director
Ken Gcrschler
Community Pfanncr
Matt Samitorc
Planning Technician
Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review an
application fora 91ot Tentative Subdivision (Country Meadow Estates Subdivision, Unit I, Phase
3) to be located in an area between Mendolia Way and West Pine Street. The subject parcel to be
subdivided is located in an R-1-8, Residential Single Family Zoning District on Jackson County
Assessment Plat 372W10C, Tax Lot 4700.
The Central Point Planning Commission will review the application of Tentative Subdivision to
determine if all of the requirements of the Central Point Municipal Code can be met. If the
Commission determines that the subdivision can be created, a tentative approval could be issued .
Once a tentative approval has been issued, the applicant must file for a final plat of the subdivision
within one year of the Commission's decision.
CRITERIA FOR DECISION
The requirements for Tentative Subdivisions are set forth in Chapter 16 of the Central Point
Municipal Code, relating to General Information, tentative plan approval and conditions on tentative
plan approval. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Works
Standards.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit
written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, July 1 1, 2000.
..
2. Written conunents arty be sent in :ui~~ance oC the meeting to Central Point Citl` I lall, 154
South Second Street, Central Point, OIZ 97502.
3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeai on the matters shall be raised prior to the
expiration of the conunent period noted about. Any testimony and written comments about
the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated
clearly to the Planning Commission.
4. Copies of alt evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City
Hall, I55 South Second Street, Centra] Point, Oregai. Copies of the same are available at
15 cents per page.
S. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664-
3321 ext. 231.
SUMMARY OF PROCEDURIJ
At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staff reports, hear
testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. Any
testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of
the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the Tentative Subdivision. City
regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Plamung Commission
decisions. h , . , , , ,
I SS South Second Street ~ CenU~cd Point, UR 975Q2 ~ (54l) 664-3321 • Par, (541) 664-6384
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
STAFF REPORT
for
COUNTRY MEADOWS UNIT 1, PHASE
TENTATIVE PLAN REVIEW
PW#00017
Date:
Applicant:
Property
Owner:
Project:
Location
Legal:
Zoning:
Area:
Units:
Plans:
Report By:
Purpose
aty of centrtl mint
E~~II~IT «C»
Planning Department
July 5, 2000
Marion Hull, 3545 Hanley Road
Agent: Robert Fellows, 2950 Phillips Way, Central Point, Oregon 97502
Same as Applicant
Country Meadows Subdivision, Unit 1, Phase 3.
East of Hanley Road, West of Mendolia Way.
T37S, R2W, Section 1.OC, tax lot 4700
R-1-8
2.30 Acres (approximately).
9 lots (8 new Tots and one remainder lot with an existing house and shop.
1 page entitled "Tentative Plat Country Meadows Subdivision, Unit 1, Phase 3 dated
April 19, 2000, with a one page revision with no date, prepared by L.J. Friar and
Associates.
Lee N. Brennan, Public Works Director
Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer")
regarding City Public Works Department (PWD) standards, requirements, and conditions to be
included in the design and development of the proposed planned unit development. Gather
information from the Developer/Engineer regarding the proposed development.
This project is an "in-fill" type residential development of land that is somewhat "landlocked". This
proposed Development utilizes a modified residential lane, that provides for street parking.
The Public Works Department is recommending approval of this project based upon the following
requirements and conditions:
Special Requirements
Existing Infrastructure: The Developer shall demonstrate that all connections to existing
infrastructure (i.e. streets; water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems; natural drainage
systems; etc.,) will not interfere with or provide for the degradation of the existing effective level
of service or operation of the infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities
have either adequate capacities to accommodate the flows and/or demands imposed on the
existing infrastructure as the result of the connection of the proposed development's
infrastructure, or will be improved by and at the expense of the Developer to accommodate the
additional flows and/or demands; while maintaining or improving the existing level of service of
the affected facility, as approved by (as applicable), the regulatory agency, utility owner, and/or
property owner involved.
2. Residential Lane: The Developer is proposing the use of a public street as a modified
residential lane with a "hammerhead" (Zachary Lane). The PWD has approved development of
this residential lane concept on Sheltenvood, Griffin Creek Estates, Lindsey Meadows, Beall
Estates IV, Parkwood Terrace, and Cody subdivisions. Typically residential lanes have been
C~ounln• bfcaAou~s, Unir 1, Phnsc 3. (lob Fcllo+rs
Zenmth~e Plan ReweN~ Staff Rcport
/u!}~ 5, 1000
Page 1
designed to serve a maximum of 12 lots. The proposed layout will serve 8 lots, with the future
possibility of serving up to 12 Tots. The residential lane has the following standards:
^ A 25-foot-wide traveled section (curb-to-curb width}, with a 2 percent crown
O Standard curb and gutters
^ A 2-foot-wide strip located behind the curb for installation of water meter service boxes,
fire hydrants, street lights etc.
^ Requires a 30-foot-wide right-of-way.
^ Street parking not normally allowed on residential lanes.
To address the lack of on-site or near-by visitor parking, the Developer is proposing to modify
the residential lane standard by providing for a standard 36-foot wide street, thus adding two
parking strips to allow for on-street parking. This will require a 41-foot-wide right-of-way width.
The "T" shaped "hammerhead" turnaround shall be designed and implemented, as approved by
the City PWD and Fire District No. 3.
The connection to Mendolia Way will be a standard driveway connection with a 5-foot concrete
"landing" behind the driveway apron; the driveway apron shall have a 30-foot throat. Zachary
Lane will have a minimum width of 30 feet (measured curb face to curb face} from the
connection to Mendolia Way, to a minimum of 60 feet to the east of the driveway connection to
provide for required turning movements, and safe ingress and egress from Mendolia Way and
Zachary Lane.
3. Sidewalks and Sidewalk Easement The residential lane does not provide for sidewalks. The
City PWD is recommending That a 5-foot wide public sidewalk section (with a suitable public
ingress and egress easement requirement) be provided adjoining the right-of-way on the east
and west sides of Zachary Lane. This will also require that the garage structure setback be
increased to 25 feet to afford driveway parking that does not interfere with pedestrian traffic on
the sidewalk. The 10-foot-wide public utilities easement would be moved to the outside of the
sidewalk easement to mitigate interterence with public utility installation and facility placement
(i.e transformers, risers, pedestals, etc.). The 5-foot sidewalk easement would not be a P.U.E.
As required on other recent developments utilizing the residential lane street standard, the
sidewalk would be installed at the Developer's expense as part of the development and will be
maintained by the property owner, similar to the City's current sidewalk ordinance requirements.
Utility Easements: A 10-foot wide public utility easement (PUE) will be required outside the
City's right-of-way of Zachary Lane, on both sides of the lane. To facilitate placement of the
sidewalk section, the PUE would be located adjacent to the sidewalk easement, and extend 15-
feet behind the right-of-way. A 10-foot P.U.E. should also be required to be dedicated outside
of the Pine/Hanley Street right-of-way on lot 6.
5. W, Pine Sfreet/Hanley Road R~ht-of--Way Access and /mprovemenfs: W. Pine Street/
Hanley Road is identified as a secondary arterial. The existing right-of-way width adjoining the
subject proposed development's property (lot 6) is 60 feet (30 feet from centerline). To
accommodate future street widening work and to accommodate the installation of sidewalks
and street appurtenances behind the curb, the City will require additional right-of-way. The City
PWD is recommending that the development be required to dedicate an additionai 14 feet of
right-of-way along the development's property frontage with W. Pine Street/Hanley Road.
io
Coun(rv M1'feado+vs, lJrti( !, Phare 3. Bob Fclloxtc
Tentative Plan Ren,ex~ StafjRepor(
/uh' S, 2000
Pagc 3
We are also recommending that no construction or permanent access be allowed onto W. Pine
Street/Hanley Road from the proposed Development's property, except the access used
exclusively for Lot 6.
The PWD is also recommending that the Developer be required to design and construct the
necessary improvements to W. Pine Street/Hanley Road along the property's frontage with
W. Pine Street/Hanley Road (lot 6). W. Pine Street/Hanley Road along the frontage of the
subject tax lot is a rural road that does not meet City or County urban standards. The road will
need to be improved, as a minimum, to meet City standards. The Developer will be responsible
for, as a minimum, all "half-street" improvements to W. Pine Street/Hanley Road along the
proposed development's property frontage with W. Pine Street/Hanley Road, and any
applicable taper or end sections. The improvements include, but are not limited to, street
section, curbs, gutters, sidewalks (meandering sidewalks set back a minimum of 3-feet from the
back of curb), an irrigated landscape buffer, bike lanes/ways, street lighting, storm drainage,
and traffic control and delineation, which shall be coordinated and approved by the JC Roads
and the City PWD, and designed and constructed at the expense of the Developer as part of
the development of the proposed residential subdivision. Sidewalks will need to be 6-feet in
width.
As approved by the City Administratdr, the Developer may request or be required to defer any
or all of the required improvements along W. Pine Street/Hanley Road until a later date. If any
or all of the improvements are to be deferred to a later date, then the Developer will be required
to enter into a suitable deferred improvement agreement with the City/County for the
development/improvement of the street section and appurtenances (i.e. sidewalks, curb, gutter,
streetlights, landscape buffer, storm drainage, etc.) along the development's frontages with W.
Pine Street/Hanley Road, as required and approved by the JC Roads and City PWD.
6. RRV/D Facilifies: If the development will require the alteration or modification of existing
RRVID irrigation facilities, then the Developer should be required to coordinate with and
perform the required alterations/modifications to accommodate the proposed development and
maintain the RRVID facilities.
7. Sight-Triangles: Field review of the subject property's access to Mendolia Way indicates that
the sight-triangles can be developed that afford the proper sight triangles for a local street
connection to a local street. This type of street intersections require establishment and
maintenance of a minimum 25-foot sight triangle. Fencing will also have to be constructed on
the two existing adjoining lots to facilitate required setbacks and sight vision triangles.
W. Pine Streef/Hanley Road Water Main Transmission Lines: The Development of the
Country Meadows Subdivision (and for future development of the Rosewood Estates
development) required the installation of a new water line along Pine Street. The costs for this
waterline were to be borne by the affected developer's . Since the developer's changed, the
City paid for the cost of the installation of this line. The City is in the process of establishing a
project fee and area of benefit for the water line project, to be assessed to the development's
that will benefit from this extension. The subject proposed development lies with the area of
benefit, and thus would be assessed the apportioned project cost at the time of final plat
submittal.
11
Coun(rv Afeado~rs. Unii [, Ph¢re 3. Bob Della ws
Tentative Plan Rcricx' Sniff Report
Ju(v S, 1000
Page 4
9. Wafer Distribution Svstem:. The water distribution for the proposed Development shall be of
`reinforced loop" design; a minimum of two connections will need to be made to the City's
distribution system: one connection to the 12-inch line in Mendolia Way, and a second
connection to the 12-inch-diameter line in W. Pine Street/Hanley Road.
General
All construction of public improvements shall conform to the City's PWD Standards, the
conditions approved and stipulated by the Planning Commission, and other special
specifications, details, standards, and/or upgrades as may be approved by the City
Administrator or his designee prior to the approval of.the construction plans for the proposed
development. During construction, changes proposed by the Developer shall be submitted in
writing by the Developer's engineer to the City PWD for approval prior to implementation.
Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals, and conditions as may be
required by other agencies, including, but not limited to, the Oregon Department of Fish and
Wildlife (DFW), Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Oregon Division of State
Lands (DSL), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), affected irrigation districts, and JC
Roads, as applicable.
3. Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer's engineer or surveyor shall
provide the Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. If feasible, the Developer's
engineer or surveyor should provide the drawings in both a "hard copy" form (produced on
Myla~) and in a "digital" format compatible with AutoCAD®, or other form as approved by the
City PWD.
As-built drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line" changes to final
approved construction plans that identify the locations and or elevations (as appropriate) of
actual installed items, including, but not limited to, invert, inlet, and rim or lip elevations; spot
elevations identified on drawings; road alignment; water lines, valves, and fire hydrants; water
and sewer lateral stationing; modifications to street section; manhole and curb inlet locations;
street light locations; other below grade utility line locations and depths; etc. Provide a "red-
line" hard copy (on Myla~'), or an approved alternative format, of construction drawings, and if
feasible, an acceptable AutoCAD® compatible drawing electronic file to the City at completion of
construction and prior to acceptance of public infrastructure facilities completed as part of the
proposed development, or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee.
4. All elevations used on the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on the permanent
benchmark shall be tied into an established City approved benchmark and be so noted on the
plans. At least one permanent benchmark shall be provided for the proposed development, the
location of which shall be as jointly determined by the City PW D and the Developer.
5. If applicable, all existing concrete, pipe, building materials, structures, clear and grub materials,
and other deleterious materials shall be removed from the site and either recycled or properly
disposed of in accordance with the requirements of the DEQ.
6. Easements for City infrastructure (i.e. sanitary sewer, water, and storm drain [if applicable))
should be a minimum of 15-feet wide, and should not split lot lines. Easements for public storm
drainage, sanitary sewer, and water lines should be dedicated to the City and not just a P.U.E.
1.2
Coun(n• Afeadox•s. Unit 1, 1'lmse 3, IJah Fe!lou:c
Tenta(ire Plan Reviex• StaJjRepar(
July 5, 2000
Page 5
Centerline of buried infrastructure shall be aligned a minimum of five (5) feet from the edge of
the easement. If two or more City owned utilities are located within an easement, then a
minimum of 20-foot width should be required. Easement dedications in final deeds or CC&Rs
need a statement which should clearly indicate that easements must be maintained with
suitable, driveable vehicular access to City public infrastructure facilities, as determined by the
City PWD.
7. Prior to the City PWD final approval of the construction plans for the proposed improvements,
the following should be submitted:
^ A copy of written approval from Fire District 3 of the final street and driveway layout, site
access, fire hydrant placement, and water system improvement plans for the proposed
development.
^ The plans relating to the sanitary sewers should be approved in writing by BCVSA, and
the appropriate signature blocks should be completed on the plans.
^ A copy of written approval from JC Roads regarding Hanley Road/W. Pine Street
improvements (as applicable) and any street connections to W. Pine Street/Hanley
Road.
8. Field verify all existing infrastructure elevations and locations (i.e. pipe inverts, curb elevations,
top of banks, ditch/channel inverts, street elevations, etc.), to which the proposed
development's infrastructure will connect into existing improvements, prior fo final construction
plan design and submittal for final approval.
9. Overhead power lines. If applicable, coordinate efforts with Pacific Power, US West, and TCI
Cable, to convert any overhead electrical power, telephone, or cable facilities within or
adjoining the proposed development to underground facilities, prior to the acceptance by the
City PWD of the public improvements associated with the proposed development. All
agreements and costs associated with the conversion of these facilities from overhead to
underground facilities, shall be by and between the utility owners and the Developer.
10. The accurate locations of any existing underground and above ground public infrastructure, and
the location of the associated easements with these facilities, shall be accurately portrayed
(both horizontally and vertically) on the construction plans and as-built drawings.
11. The Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide to the Public Works Department a drawing
of the recorded Final Plat map reproduced on Mylar~' and in an acceptable electronic form in
AutoCAD® format. The Final Plat shall be tied to a legal Government corner and the State Plane
Coordinate System. The Final Plat shall either reflect or be later modifed to reflect any
applicable "red-line" changes noted in the construction "as-builts", at the discretion of the City
Administrator or his designee.
13
Caurttry Ffeadows. Unit !, Phase 3, Bob Fel/ox~s
Tentative Plan Review S1aJf Report
July S, 1000
Page 6
Streets/Traffic
Existing Improvements - Mendolia Way -Local Street. Current ROW 52' wide, 36-foot
street width.
W. Pine StreeUHanley Road: Current right-of-way: 60-feet.
Right-of Way required: 88-foot width. Jurisdiction -Jackson
County.
Construction drawings for this Tentative Plan shall include a Street Lighting Plan and Traffic
Delineation Plan in accordance with the requirements of the City PWD. Street lights shall be
placed in a "zig-zag" pattern along the streets and at maximum 200-foot spacing (as measured
from light post to light post) to afford better lighting of the public rights-of-way. The street lights
on the residential lane will be of a design and at locations as approved by the City PWD and
Pacific Power. -Street lights will also need to be installed or possibly modified along Mendolia
Way to afford proper lighting of the street intersection.
2. The City PWD, at the cost of the Developer, shall evaluate the strength of the native soils and
determine the street section designs for Zachary Lane in accordance with the City PWD
Standards. The City's engineering staff or selected engineering consultant (at Developer's
expense), shall evaluate the strength of the native soils and determine the street section
designs in accordance with the City PWD Standards. Minimum street section for Zachary Lane
shall be as follows:
- 3-inches Class "B" A.C.
- 6-inches of 1"-0" crushed rock
- 8-inches of 4"-0" crushed rock (City of Medford specifications),
- Woven geotextile fabric over compacted subgrade.
3. As applicable, stop signs and traffic delineation (i.e. "stop bars") shall be required and installed
by the City PWD (at the Developer's expense) at the proposed development's intersection with
Mendolia Way. No parking signs and yellow curbing (as needed) will also be placed along
Zachary Lane, by the City PW D at the Developer's expense.
4. Traffic Barricade and Turnaround: a suitable City approved permanent traffic barricade shall be
designed and implemented at the western end of Zachary Lane. A suitable "T" shaped
"hammerhead" turnaround shall be designed and implemented, as approved by the City PWD
and Fire District No. 3.
Storm Drainage, Ircigation Improvements
Existing Improvements - Existing 24-inch-diameter storm drain to the west of lots 1 and 9.
During the design of the storm drain collection and conveyance system (SD System), which
shall provide for and convey storm water run-off from and run-on onto the proposed
development (either surface run-on or culvert or creek ditch conveyance), the Developer shall
demonstrate that the storm water flows from the completion of the proposed development (and
at any time prior to completion of development) do not exceed predevelopment flows; or that
existing capacity, allowances, or provisions have been made (and approval of the applicable
properties owners and regulatory agencies has been obtained), which accommodate any
additional flow which exceed predevelopment flows. The Developer and the City PWD shall
1d
Country Alcadows, Unu /, Phasc J. t3ob Fclloxs
Tentatiir Pfmr Renew Sta~(jReporr
Julv 5, 1000
Page 7
agree on the applicable run-off coefficients, curve numbers, retardance, etc., to be used in the
engineering calculations.
2. Developer's engineer shall provide a site drainage plan with the facilities being designed, at a
minimum, to accommodate a 10 year storm event. The SD system must be designed to
adequately drain the 10-year storm event without surcharging downstream facilities, and
pooling water on City streets; or must be provided with adequate storage to prevent
surcharging; and be designed to not impact existing public storm drainage facilities. Any private
storm drain system exceeding 3-inches in diameter shall be designed to directly connect to the
public storm drain system (at a manhole or curb inlet only), and shall not be designed to
discharge to the street surfaces.
3. Roof drains and underdrains shall not be directly connected to public storm drain lines, and
shall drain either to an on-site private storm drain system or discharge at the curb face.
4. Prior to City PWD constnaction plan review, the Developer shall provide the City PWD with a
complete set of hydrologic and hydraulic calculations and profile plots for sizing the SD system,
which shall incorporate the use of the City PWD's rainfall/intensity curve, and City approved
run-off coefficients, curve numbers, retardance, pipe roughness coefficients, etc., that are used
in the engineering calculations.
5. Storm drain pipe materials shall be PVC, HDPE, or reinforced concrete, with water-tight joints
meeting the requirements of ASTM D3212, F477, and C-443M, as applicable. Provide concrete
(in areas within the rights-of-way) or sand-cement slurry (in areas outside the rights-of-way)
encasement where required in areas of minimum cover.
6. If inlets/catch basins are to exceed 4.5 feet in depth from the lip of the inlet, then the inlets and
catch basins shall be designed to afford suitable "man" entry into the inlets/catch basin for
maintenance/cleaning purposes.
7. Developer's engineer shall provide hydrology and hydraulic calculations and flow line plots for
private and public storm drains. Plot HGL on profile or provide a separate profile drawing that
indicates the HGL on the profile. Pipes should maintain cleansing velocity (minimum 2.0 feet
per second) and have adequate capacities without surcharging during the design storm.
The Developer may wish to incorporate the use of a perforated SD system. If so, then the
perforated storm drain system shall be designed to have adequate capacities to:
^ Convey the collected groundwater and storm water with the minimum cleaning velocities
and without surcharging the collection and conveyance piping; and
^ Minimize silts, sands, gravels, and fines migration from the native soils into the SD
system.
The plotted HGL shall include both the groundwater infiltration, and the storm water run-off and
run-on inflows into the SD system.
Maintain a minimum 0.2-foot drop between inlet and outlet pipe inverts in manholes and curb
inlets, unless flow-through velocities during the design storm event exceed 3 0 feet per second
(fps). If flow velocities exceed 3.0 fps and the inlet pipe is in relatively direct (i.e. 180 t 5
C~oiuitn' Aleadox_c (but 1. Phase J, Boh Fr!lae~c
Tenmtne' Plmi Aerrcw .Sta/j Report
July 5, 2000
l'ngr S
degree) horizontal alignment with the outlet pipe, then as a minimum, the pipe slope shall be
maintained through the base of the manhole or curb inlet. If flow velocities exceed 3.0 fps, and
there is other than relatively direct horizontal alignment between the inlet and outlet pipes, then
a minimum of a 0.1-foot drop between inlet and outlet pipe inverts in manholes or curb inlet
must be maintained. A bottom channel shall be formed in the manhole or curb inlet base to
mitigate transitional losses and enhance flow through the manhole or curb inlet.
10. Sheet flow surface drainage from the property onto the public rights-of-way or onto neighboring
properties is unacceptable.
Sanitary Sewer
All sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system (SS System) design, construction and
testing shall conform to the standards and guidelines of the Oregon DEQ, 1990 APWA
Standards, Oregon Chapter, Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA), and the City PW D
Standards, where applicable.
2. The construction plans and the as-built drawings shall identify lateral stationing for construction
of sewer laterals.
The City upon completion of initial construction plan review and preliminary approval, will
forward the plans to BCVSA for completion of the review process. Upon completion of the
review by BCVSA, completion of final revisions to the plans by the Developer's engineer, and
following the final approval and signature on the construction plans by BCVSA, the Public
Works Director will approve the plans in final form.
4. All testing and video inspection of lines and manholes shall be done in accordance with BCVSA
requirements, at Developer's expense. The Developer shall provide BCVSA and the City with
test reports, N reports and certification of the sewer system construction prior to final
acceptance.
Water System
Existing Improvements - Existing 12-inch-diameter water lines installed in W. Pine
Street/Hanley Road, and on Mendolia Way.
The water system shall be designed to provide the required fre flow demand capacities for the
proposed facility, which meet Fire District 3 requirements, with fire hydrant placement as
approved by the City PWD and Fire District 3. Maximum spacing of fire hydrants shall be 300
feet. Water service lateral connection stationing and size shall be provided on construction
plans and as-built drawings.
Developer shall comply with Oregon Health Division (OHD) and City requirements for backflow
prevention.
Water service meter boxes shall be City PWD specified "Christy" brand meter boxes, that
accommodate the Sensus touch-read equipment. City PWD will perform all "hot" connections
to active water lines, including service lateral taps, unless otherwise approved by the Public
Works Director
16
Country Meadows, Unit !, Phase 3, 606 Fella~oc
Tentative Plan Review SlaJfRepor!
July 5. 2000
Page 9
Site work, Grading, and Utility Plans
Grading plans should have original/existing grades and final grades plotted on the plan.
Typically, existing grade contour lines are dashed and screened back, and final grade contour
lines are overlaid on top of the existing grades and are in a heavier line width and solid.
Contour lines should be labeled with elevations.
2. All structures shall have roof drains, area drains, and/or crawl spaces with positive drainage
away from the building.
3. Provide City with a utility plan approved by each utility company which reflects all utility line
locations, crossings, transformer locations, valves, etc.
4. Utility locations must be accurately included on the as-built drawings, or as a separate set of
drawings attached to the as-built drawings.
5. All fill placed in development shall be engineered fill that is suitably placed and compacted in
accordance with City PWD and 1994 UBC standards, except for the upper 1.5-foot of fill placed
outside of public rights-of-way and that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular
access ways or parking areas.
Rights of Ways/Easements
If applicable, Developer shall provide a Statement of Water Rights (on a City approved form),
for any affected properties. For properties determined to have water rights, the developer will
coordinate with the State Watermaster the re-allocation of any waters attached to lands no
longer irrigable as a result of the proposed development.
17
BEAR CREEK VALLEY SANITARY AUTHORITY
J915 SOUTN PACIFIC HWY. MEDFORD, OREGON 97501-9099 • (541) 779-4144 FA%(541) 5J5-5278
July 3, 2000
Ken Gerschler
City of Central Point
Planning Department
I55 South Second Street
Central Point, OR 97502
City of Centxal Point
L~iI~iI~3IT ~'I?'~
Planning Department
Re: Country Meadows Subdivision, Unit 1, Phase 3, Rile # 00017-TP
Dear Ken,
Sewer service to the project will require extension of the sewer main from Mendolia Way. The
main on Mendolia is part of Country Meadows Unit 1, Phase 2 which has not yet been accepted
by BCVSA. Unit 1, Phase 2 must be completed and accepted by BCVSA before fmal plan
approval of the construction plans for Phase 3. BCVSA will also require that a sewer service
lateral be provided to the adjacent Tax Lot 5000. BCVSA will enter into a reimbursement
agreement with the developer to recover the cost associated with this service lateral.
Please have the applicant contact BCVSA for mainline extension requirements.
Since[i~-`
~~ ~~-,
Carl Tappert, PE
District Engineer
L\Dl~TA~Agencies\CGNTP"i\PI,ANNG\00017-"T P.wpd
?~~
~r
EXHIBIT E
PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. The approval of the Tentative Plan shall expire in one year on July 1 I, 2001 unless
an application for final plat or extension has been received by the City.
2. The project must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations.
3. The tentative and final plats shall depict utility easements requested by the City,
BCVSA and WP Natural Gas. Any changes to utility layout including fire hydrants
shall require subsequent approval by the respective service provider.
~~c~~i~ot~oc:v>i„~,~,~~,E~oaoi~ win
19
PLANNING DEPARTMGN.p S'T'AFF R);I'ORT
HEARING DATE: July I I, 2000
TO: Central Point Planning Commission
PROM: Tom Humphrey AICP, Planning Director
SUBJECT: Public Hearing- Tentative Minor Partition and Variance for 37 2W 1 1 BA
Tax Lot-3100 Doug and Camelle Giese
Owner/ Doug &Camelle Giese
A~nlicant: 525 Bush Street
Central Point, OR 97502
Aeent: Neathamer Surveying, Inc.
304 South Central Avenue
Medford, OR 97501
Property
Description/ 37 2W 11BA Tax Lot 3100, 0.45 acres
Zonine: R-1-6, Residential Single-Family District
Summary
The applicant, Doug Giese is proposing the minor partition ofa 0.45 acre parcel into two parcels,
one ofwhich is a flag lot. The applicants are unable to meet the area for the creation ofa flag lot
and are requesting they be allowed to include the access to the new lot as part of the overall area
calculation. The property is located near the intersection of Rostell and Bush Streets in the R-1-6,
Residential Single-Family Zoning District.
Authority
CPMC 1.24.020 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and
render a decision on any application for a tentative land partition. Notice ofthe public hearing was
given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060. (Exhibit B).
Applicable Law
CPMC 16.10.010 et seq. Tentative Plans
CPMC 16.36.010 et seq. Major and Minor Land Partitions (Flag Lots)
.~. 2n
CPMC 17.20.Ot0 et seq. R-l, Residential Single-[~amily District
CPMC 17.80.010 et seq. -Variances
Discussion
The applicant, Doug Giese is redeveloping the subject property which is currently occupied by a
wood frame house. The back of the lot is vacant and underutilized. 'this area is one of a few
remaining sections of the city that have not been developed to the full potential of the zoning
ordinance and comprehensive plan.
The municipal code (Section 16.36.040) provides the conditions underwhich a flag lot maybe
created including; 1) the lot created is at least twice as large in area, excluding access, as the
mininnrm lot size for the zoning district lira this case 12, 000 square feet; and 2) access to the
lot is no less than nventyfeet n~ide and paved... to city standards. If approved, this partition
would create a total of two parcels of 7,639 and 12,000 square feet respectively.
The applicant wishes to retain the existing dwelling on the smaller ofthe two lots but cannot satisfy
both the building setbacks on the smaller lot and the area requirements for the larger lot. He is
therefore requesting that the area for access to the new lot be included in its overall area
calculation.
The Planning and Public Works Departments have reviewed the site plan and the tentative plan for
the proposed minor land partition and have concluded that they comply with city requirements if
all conditions ofapproval pertaining to site development, minimum lot size, public works standards
and specifications and access to public roadways can be met.
Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law
Minor Partition
CPMC 16.10.010 requires that applications for tentative plans be submitted with improvement
plans and other supplementary information as may be needed to indicate the development plan.
^ The proposed minor partition satisfies the subdivision requirements Listed in
CPMC 16.36.030 and CPMC 16.36.040. The Public Works Department is
requesting additional information to satisfy standard specification requirements.
CPMC 17.28.050 establishes minimum area, width and access requirements for the R-l,
Residential Single-Family district.
21
Parcels t and 2 of the proposed partition meet the area, width and access
requirements for the R-I,Residential Single-Family District. "Che Public Works
Department is requesting frontage improvements along Bush Street (refer to
Attachment C).
Variance
CPMC 17.80.010 stipulatesthat the PlanningConunission may grant a variance if findings are
made that the following considerations will either result from the granting ofthe variance or do not
apply to the requested application:
The Variance will provide added advantages to the neighborhood or the City such as
beautification or safety;
^ The newlotwouldactuallyexceedtheminimumarearequirementsfortheR-1-6
zoning-district and be a more efficient use of infill property.
2. The Variance will not have any significant adverse impacts upon the neighborhood;
^ The residential character of the neighborhood would not change as result ofthe
proposed subdivision and residential densities would be maintained.
3. The Variance will utilize property within the intent and the purpose of the zoning district:
^ Single family residences are a permitted use in the R-1-6 zoning district.
Dwellings are typically required to meet zoning setbacks.
4. Circumstances affect the property that generally do not apply to property in the same
zoning district; and
^ The 0.45 acre parcel is the last in an older developed area of town where other
property has already been subdivided. Adhering to the `letter oftire law' in this
case would result in the removal of the existing dwelling and/or inability to fully
develop and underutilized piece of property.
The conditions for which the Variance is requested were not self-imposed through the
applicant's own actions, notthe actions ofthe applicant's agents, employees or family
members.
__ 22
The applicants have submitted their own findings of fact for consideration by the
Commission (P,xhibit "D").
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take one of the following actions:
Adopt Resolution No., approvingthcTentative Minor Land Partition of37 2W 1 1 BA
"hax Lot 3100 subject to the recoovncndcd conditions ofapproval (Exhibits C and E ); or
2. Deny the proposed Tentative Minor Land Partition and variance; or
3. Continue thereviewoftheTentativeMinorLandPartitionandvarianceatthediscretion
of the Commission.
Exhibits
A. Tentative Plat
B. Notice of Public Hearing
C. Recommended Conditions of Approval
D. Applicant's Request for ExcepCion
E. Public Works Staff Report (Verbal)
~.,. 23
g
6~
a•I
I
8N
i
'~ 2
d (p
~~~
i
ry~ i
,il ~
i
'~ ~
i
i
m
,i
i
i
i
i
i
~'
i
i
i
i
K
' ~ ~trkf0a
b~Q.
i ,p~~,6
k~o~~
~_~ ~`~~
K ~~bs~
4.` robC`~q
bap
O ~ bC
~ en
f'
y
~ ~1_~.
-1--
i
i
~I
R~
.~
i
~I
i
.~
i
i
i
i
I
I
I
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
ATTACHMENT A
~~ H
ROSTE'LL STREET ~ ~ ~-~--
~.~~~ ~
dR
~~k
~~
aRy
¢
"y
~ey
~ ~y4
8 $ ~kQ ~ ~ ~~4
. 8 ~
d~~~ ',.
__
~~
r- ------
- - - y%
.
~ 4
P ~
ewrsiix vaue s cer
p ~._
r ~
~ ~ ,___
--. ¢~
\
ti .eaw ea.~ne ewe
____~
' i
,~.~ ~ ~ ,-
8; ~ V 1
~; y u
~
88
~~Y
4
-I-
~ ~~
,
tiro S
4
'~~~ i~laommlo II ~~
~~
~ ~
g~~ N~ 9 9 A 9 4 4 9 9= 9 9 b q 4 ~ 5~ 3~
x x . . o
~ s4~~ 33,3333,33 33 ~ ~~ ~ a§g
o ~ 7
~~~ ~'~~~q = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~4 ~~g z
~~~~s~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~~~ 4~gF~ ~ ~~~ y
y£
?~Syy yEy~
1g4 ~84
City o~ Ce~it~°al Point ~~'~~` `~`~~,~; ~
PLANNINU DEPARTMZNT
Tom Flumplucy~ AICI'
Planning Director
Kcn Gcrschlcr
Conununity Planner
Matt Samitorc
Planning 'T'echnician
Notice of Meeting
Date of Notice: June 21, 2000
Meeting Date:
Time:
Place:
NATURE OF MEETING
July 11, 2000
7:00 p.m. (Approximate)
Central Point City Hall
155 South Second Street
Central Point, Oregon
Beginning at the above time and place, the Centra(Point Plamring Commission will review variance
and tentative plan applications for a parcel of land located at 527 Bush Street. This parcel is located
in a R-1-6, Residential Single-Family Zoning District and is identified in the records ofthe Jackson
County Assessor as Map 37 2W 11 BA, Tax Lot 3100. If approved, the Commission would allow an
existing 12,016 square foot parcel to be divided into two separate tax lots.
CRITERIA FOR DECISION
The requirements for variances and tentative plans are set forth in Chapters 16 and 17 of the Central
Point Municipal Code, relating to general information, variance procedure, tentative plan approval
and conditions on tentative plan approval. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the
City's Public Works Standards.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
I . Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit
written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, July 1 1, 2000.
2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City hall, 155
South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502.
3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the
expiration of the continent period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about
the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated
clearly to the Planning Commission.
I S5 South Second Street ~ Centr<il Point, Olt 975Q2 ~ (541) GG4-3321 • Pax: (541) 664-6384
4. Codes of all evidence relied upon by the applicant arc available for public review at City
Hall, 155 South Scco+td Street, Central Point, Orcgoit. Copies of (he sauic arc avaiiablc at
15 cents per page.
5. fior additio~ial infomtatioa, the public may contact the Planning Department a! (_541) 664-
3321 ext. 291.
_.
~;~1 _:~__, f 7~~ l_~~
Sub~ec1 P(Q~n "' _ U~
15S South Second Street ~ Central Point, OK 97502 ~ (541) 664-3321 • Pax: (541) C>64-6384
~, .,
E\IiII31"C C
PLANNING DI?PAR'PMGN"I' RECOMMGNDGD CONDITIONS Oh APPROVAL
The approval oftheTentiativc Plan shall expire in one year on July I I, 2001 unless
an application for final plat or extension has been received by the City.
2. The project must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations.
The tentative and final plats shall depict utility easements requested by the City,
BCVSA and WP Natural Gas. Any changes to utility layout including fire hydrants
shall require subsequent approval by the respective service provider.
4. Pending the approvaloftheCityAdministrator,theapplicantsha]lenterintoadeferred
improvement agreement for parcels 1 and 2 of the proposed partition.
The applicant will work with the City on a master plan for storm drainage.
Neathamer Surveying, Inc.
304 Safi Central A~x~e, Nleclford, Oil 97501
Telephone: (541)7322869 Fax (541)732-1382
Request for Exception
Code Requirement 16.36.040 - Flay Lots
f~ 77'A ~H h1e~ ~ D
No partition shall be approved in which a flag lot, as defined in this chapter, is
created unless:
A. The lot created is at least twice as large in area, excluding access, as
the miuimum lot size for tl:e zoniug district in which the lot is
located;
B. The access to the lot is no less than twenty feet wide and paved with
cement or asphaltic surface to city standards.
Neathamer Surveying, Inc. would like to request an exception to Item "A" of Code
Requirement #16.36.040 of the City of Central Point's Land Development Code.
Due to development of the contiguous properties, any further development of this
property is limited to the proposed land partition. By including the access as part of the
lot calculations, this exception would allow the creation of a lot that makes use of a
large lot for an infill project, therefore utilizing the properly to the highest and best use.
nn
Arr~~N~F~r- e
City of Central Point
N T E R
MEMO
O F F I C E
To: Tom Humphrey, Planning Director
From: Lee Brennan, Public Works Director
Subject: Memorandum Regarding Public Works Department Recommendations for the
Tentative Land Partition and Zoning Variance Requests for property located at
527 Bush Street
Date: July 5, 2000
It is the Public Works Department's recommendations that if the Planning Commission
approves the tentative land partition and zoning variance request for the subject property, that
the noted conditions are attached to the approval/variance granted:
Bush Street Improvements: Construct/reconstruct required driveway apron and
sidewalk section for proposed driveway connections onto Bush Street and along the
subject property's frontage with Bush Street. As approved by the City Administrator,
the Developer may request or be required to defer any or all of the required sideway and
driveway apron improvements along Bush Street until a later date. If any or all of the
improvements are to be deferred to a later date, then the Developer will be required to
enter into a suitable deferred improvement agreement with the City for the required
improvements
2. Site Drainage/Storm Drain Plan: It is recommended that the developer design and
implement a site drainage/storm drain plan that corrects and enhances existing site
drainage for the entire areas noted on the site plan. This will require site drainage
improvements to the entire tax lot. The current sheet flow surface drainage from the
properties onto the public rights-of-way or onto neighboring properties is unacceptable.
The PWD review of this project will require a drainage plan which illustrates existing and
future surface grades which illustrate surface drainage flow direction.
The Developer shall verify that the roof drains or foundation drains are not connected to
the sanitary sewer system, but which are connected to either discharge at the face of
the curb, or into the storm drainage system. If the roof or foundation drains discharge to
the sanitary sewer system, than the Developer will be required to modify the drains so
that they discharge to a newly installed collection system that discharges at the face of
the curb.
Driveways, Access Roads, and Parking Areas: The Developer shall evaluate the
strength of the native soils and determine the access road/driveway section designs to
handle the expected loads (including fire equipment) to be traveled on these private
driveways/access roads. All driveways, access roads, and parking areas should either
29
517 Bush Stree[
Tenta[ive Land Par[i[ior/Zoning Variance
Ju!}~ S, 2000
Page 2
have asphalt or cement concrete surfaces.
4. Utility Easements: A 10-foot wide public utility easement (PUE) will be required along
the subject property's frontages with Bush Street.
5. City Wafer Service Revision/Uagrade and Backflow Prevention Assembly
Installation: As applicable, the Developer shall work with the City PWD on
revisinglupgrading the site's water service connections to comply with current City
ordinances regarding water service and backflow prevention assembly installation.
Approved backflow prevention assembly installation (at the Developer's expense) may
be required directly behind all the City water service meters that service the proposed
developments. Any new connections to the City's water system to facilitate the
proposed development shall be performed by the City at the Developer's expense.
General
~eveloament Plans: Developer shall submit to the City's PWD for review and
approval, engineered plans and specifications for all improvements proposed for
construction or modifications within the City or public rights-of-way and easements, or
for connections to City infrastructure. Plans shall show all e>isting utilities and City
facilities, existing contours, property lines, benchmarks and other physical site
information needed for review. All plans submitted for PWD review shall be presented in
a common engineering scale sized to fit on 24-inch by 36-inch, D size drawing sheets.
PWD requires 3 sets of plans for review purposes.
Public improvements include, but are not limited to, streets (including sidewalks, curbs
and gutters, ADA ramps, driveway aprons, and landscape buffers); alleys; storm
drainage and sanitary sewer collection and conveyance systems; water distribution
system (up to the service meter and including fire protection); and street lighting. All
construction of public improvements shall conform to the City's PWD Standards, the
conditions approved and stipulated by the Planning Commission, and other special
specifications, details, standards, and/or upgrades as may be approved by the City
Administrator or his designee prior to the approval of the construction plans for the
proposed development. During construction, infrastructure or access changes proposed
by the Developer shall be submitted in writing to the City PWD for approval prior to
installation.
Approvals: As applicable, Fire District No. 3 (fire hydrant access/location, fire flow
capacity/line sizing, and emergency vehicle access) and Bear Creek Valley Sanitary
Authority (BCVSA, for sanitary sewers)written approval of construction plans shall be
submitted to the City PWD prior to final construction plan review and approval by City
PWD.
30
527 Bush S(rcet
Ten(a(ioe Lnn~ PmYi(ia/7,miieg L'arimice
July 5, 1000
Page 3
As-Builfs: As applicable, Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the
Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "as-
built" drawings. If feasible, the Developer's engineer or surveyor should provide the
drawings in both a "hard copy" form (produced on Mylar'"') and in a "digital" format
compatible with AutoCAD®, or other form as approved by the City PW D.
As-built drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line" changes to final
approved construction plans which identify the locations and or elevations (as
appropriate} of actual installed items, including, but not limited to, invert, inlet, and rim or
lip elevations; spot elevations identified on drawings; water lines, valves, and fire
hydrants; water and sewer lateral; modifications to street section; manhole and curb
inlet; street light locations; other below grade utility lines; etc. Provide a "red-line" hard
copy (on Mylarr~"), or an approved alternative format, of construction drawings, and if
feasible, an acceptable AutoCAD® compatible drawing electronic file to the City at
completion of construction and prior to acceptance of public infrastructure facilities
completed as part of the proposed development, or as otherwise approved by the City
Administrator or his designee.
4. Elevations: All elevations used on the construction plans, and on temporary
benchmarks shall be tied into an established City approved benchmark and be so noted
on the plans.
5. Existing Infrasfructure: As applicable, field verify all existing infrastructure elevations
and locations (i.e. pipe inverts, curb elevations, street elevations, etc.), to which the
proposed development will connect into existing improvements, prior to final
construction plan design and submittal for final approval. The accurate locations of any
existing underground and above ground public infrastructure, and the location of the
associated easements with these facilities, shall be accurately portrayed (both
horizontally and vertically) on the construction plans.
6. Fill Placement: All fill placed in the development shall be engineered fill that is suitably
placed and compacted in accordance with City PWD and Building Department
standards, except for the upper 1.5-feet of fill placed outside of public rights-of-way and
that does not underlie building, structures, or traveled vehicular access ways or parking
areas.
Utility Plans: As built drawings shall reflect all utility locations; located both above and
below ground.
8. Water System Cross Connection Control: Developer shall comply with Oregon
Health Division (OHD) and City requirements for cross connection control.
9. Water System: Construction drawings shall include the size, type, and location of all
water mains, hydrants, valves, service connection, meter, service laterals, and other
:~ 1
527 Bush So-ce(
Terr(alive LmrA Partition/Z,mung Vm-iancc
Ju1~~5, 2000
Page 4
appurtenance details in accordance with City PWD Standards and as required by the
City PWD.
10. Roof/Area Drains: All structures shall have roof drains, area drains, and/or crawl
spaces with positive drainage away from the building. Roof drains shall not be directly
connected to the public storm drain system.
11. Grading Plans: Grading plans should have original/existing grades and final grades
plotted on the plan. Typically, existing grade contour lines are dashed and screened
back, and final grade contour lines are overlaid on top of the existing grades and are in
a heavier line width and solid. Contour lines should be labeled with elevations.
12. Clear Vision Areas/Triangles. All driveway approaches of the proposed Development
connecting to public roads shall maintain the required sight vision triangles (25-feet,
each side) as measured from the edge of the right-of-way to the center of the driveway.
As applicable, this may require the removal of vegetation or structures to obtain the
required clear sight-vision area.
~~
PLANNING DEPAIZ'I'MENT STAFF 12EPOR'I'
IIEARING DA"fL: July 1 I, 2000
TO: Central Point Planning Commission
FROM: Ken Gerschler, Conununity Planner
SUBJECT: Site Plan Review of 37 2W O1 C, "I"ax Lot 3400 -Construction of a pole barn at the
O.D.O.T. facilities on Hamrick Road.
Owner/ Oregon Department of Transportation
Annlicant: 3500 NW Stewart Parkway
Roseburg, Oregon 97470
Agent: Raymond F. Cooper
Oregon Department of Transportation
3500 NW Stewart Parkway
Roseburg, Oregon 97470
Pro er
Description/ 372WO1C, Tax Lot 3400 - 7.70 acres
Zonini?: M-2, htdustrial-General District
Summary
The applicant is requesting a Site Plan Review that would allow the construction of an enclosed pole
barn at the O.D.O.T. maintenance yard located at 4141 Hamrick Road.
Applicable Law
CPMC 17.48.010 et seq. - M-2, Industrial-General Zoning District
CPMC 17.64.010 et seq. -Off Street Parking and Loading
CPMC 17.72.010 et seq.- Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval
Discussion
Mr. Raymond Cooper, working on behalfofthe Oregon Department ofTransportation, is requesting
that the Planning Commission review a Site Plan application that would allow the construction of
a 4200 square foot building in the maintenance yard located on Hamrick Road. The 50 by 84 foot
"pole barn" type building is to be used for miscellaneous storage. This would be the fifth building
to be situated on the parcel.
The setbacks far the M-2, htdustrial-General "/_oning District are ] 0 feet for the front yard, 10 feet
for the side yards and 10 feet Cor the rear yard. Sun~ounding uses include Bear Creek Greenway to
~~~ 33
the West and Liningcr Truc Mix (I;I~M) to the South. The Rcddaway mucking It~cility is located
across E [amrick Road to the [last and several rural residences are located between the subject
property and East Pine Su~ect to the North. [?vcntually, the properties along Bast Pine Street will gain
a conuncrcial zoning designation once the area is annexed into the City.
CPMC 17.64.010 identifies the off street parking requirements for various land use and business
activities within the City of Central Point "I"his particular site has tlu~ee distinct activities (office,
shop and storage) that each require a separate calculation of required off-street parking spaces.
Office facilities must provide "not less than one space per each three hundred square feet of gross
floor area". The office area as shown on the site plan (3300 sq. ft.) would need a minimum of 33
spaces. There are 3300 square feet of shop area that will need eleven spaces as the code requires "not
less than one space per each three hundred square feet of gross floor area. The storage facilities as
proposed comprise a combined area of 7500 square feet requiring "not less than two spaces per each
three employees on the two largest shifts, or one space per each one thousand square feet, whichever
is greater" which equates to 5 spaces. The total number of required spaces is 52 with the applicant
providing 47 paved spaces. There is adequate area to create an additional 5 spaces on site.
The applicant has submitted a landscaping plan that depicts the existing layout of shrubs and trees
with no additional landscaping being proposed at this time. Staff recommends that the existing
landscaping be updated as the area is severely overgrown by weeds. New trees should be planted
along the F Iamrick Road frontage in the existing landscape area, similar in size and shape to those
recently planted across the street at the Reddaway Freight facility.
A portion of the subject lot is within the 100 year floodplain with the area proposed for the new
building located out of the area shown on the FLMA maps.
The Central Point Public Works Department may require the design and implementation of a plan
for storm retention facilities on site. The Public Works Department may further require that
improvements such as curb, gutter and sidewalk be installed or deferred in an agreement with the
City for installation at a later date.
"the proposed structure or cun~ent workforce of 16 employees is not likely to increase traffic to the
facility with access provided exclusively onto FFamrick Road via a single gated entry. The City will
be negotiating with ODOT to construct a new street west fiom Hamrick Road along common
property lines. This is discussed in the Public Works staff report.
No new signage has been shown on the site plan but future signage will require a separate building
permit though the Central Point Building Department. Plumbing and electrical permits will also be
needed if the proposed building connects to either service.
Jackson County Eire District Number Three has been notified ofthis site plan review application and
will likely respond with recommendations for consideration by the commission. "fhc [3ear Creek
Valley Sanitary authority has commented (Attachment E) that the property is served by a (inch
sewer service line located along the southerly property boundary.
,3 4
Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law
!n approving, conditionally approving or den}~ing the plans submitted. the City bases it's decision
on the following standards from Section 17.72.040:
A. Landscaping and fencing and the construction of walls on the site in such a manner as to cause
the same to not substantially interfere with the landscaping scheme of the neighborhood, and in such
a manner to use the same to screen such activities and sights as might be heterogeneous to existing
neighborhood uses. The Commission may require the mainteuauce of existing plants or the
installation of new ones Yor purposes of screening adjoining property.
^ No additional landscaping is proposed at this tune, however an upgrade to both
irrigation and landscaping would improve the overall appearance.
B. Design, number and location of ingress and egress points so as to improve and to avoid
interference with the traffic flow on.public streets;
The current ingress and egress from the facility Fvill remain unchanged but the Central
Point Public Works Department is recommending an alternate access via a new street.
The Central Point Public Works Department or Jackson County Roads and Parks may
require additional off-street improvements.
C. To provide off-street parking and loading facilities and pedestrian and vehicle flow facilities in
such a manner as is compatible with the use for which the site is proposed to be used and capable
of use, and in such a manner as to improve and avoid interference with the traffic flow on public
streets;
The code requires a total of 52 spaces for this project. The applicant will need to revise
the site plan to include an additional 5 paved spaces to meet the off street parking
requirement.
D. Signs and other outdoor advertising structures to ensure that they do not conflict with or deter
from traffic control signs or devices and that they are compatible with the design of their buildings
or uses and will not interfere with or detract from the appearance or visibility of nearby signs;
Any new signage that may be associated with this project will require a separate
building permit.
E. Accessibility and sufficiency of fire fighting facilities to such a standard as to provide for the
reasonable safety of life, limb and property, including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads
and fire lanes so that al(buildings on the premises are accessible to fire apparatus;
"i'he project, if approved, would need to meet any requirements of.lackson County Fire
District 3 which generally requests review during the building permit development
`~ r.
process.
P. Compliance with all city ordinances and regulations;
^ The project Fvhen constructed, will be in compliance with the requirements of the
Central Point Municipal Code subject to the recommended conditions of approval.
G. Compliance with such architecture and design standards as to provide aesthetic acceptability in
relation to the neighborhood and the Central Point area and it's environs.
^ This building is similar in appearance to others in the M-2 zoning district.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take one of the following actions:
1. Adopt Resolution No. ,approving the Site Plan subject to the recommended conditions of
approval; or
2. Deny the proposed Site Plan; or
3. Continue the review of the Site Plan at the discretion of the Commission.
Aftachments
A. Site Plan, Building Elevations
B. Notice of Public Hearing
C. Public Works Staff Report
D. Planning Department Recommended Conditions of Approval
E. Correspondence
..
~ ~ ~ ODOT
~' ~ ~ CENTRAL POINT
MAINTENANCE STATION
o ~ G ~
X 4141 ~CANIIZICK ROAD
~ ~ CENTRAL POINT, OREGON
'~ ~' 97502
i ...•
b
c
r
oaw.o vw.a.~ w....~..,wm ^."• ~ tCwa r~ac r..c vnwi
~A~Tas a+mnara.rr K4s.i w~n.t ~~~i ktiWK Wf ~ I
ply\{ral~( a-ta-ao :.FJRi.'asK Pl4Y 3
\~• ~y
~~,
v
2 j
i
~ I ~ ~~
_ - _ STOREAGE -~
30'x 60' -I i
- .~ i
_1
>~ I I~
~~.;~ ;
~ - {
i :1 :I
~- a
-~
i
t
~ g2veled area ~
~ paved area ~N..~~A.~.
X
0
C
. ~~
_.~ _, rf~Y .
.,
! k
•;
'
.
{~
t
~ ,
~ _
~
! QI 4
4
• 4~
.~
1 .
~ _~ ~ Q
~
~
51-gP 40 x ~5• OFFICE t
Y
f
~ ..~ ~~
>
~ x x x I
.,
i
i
EXISTING IRr~1GAT1ON PLANTING SPARKING
s21e -
ar
Af ~yv1
a~~Y-T-itii
Y~
ry~10.~~
Y[ 1
+Y~.~ YAK
A
Ir A
. ~
uup N.u'wwT ~~ ppir Wf~
Cixe~Y-~Asv' ffiT'-T6A~Zi 3~c -'-l ~~"" ~+'""` ^"+*.oan ~3
I ~q lirr~.a.r a y,, yY U~ ;Taac w+.• Ewwd. u~nxa~Wa
,,
I
3
4
} A
h
~
x
P
4 ~'
~ J
1
L
5[ icaS'
2
~ ~I~'2
~ ~]
[~
D
N Wi V
E~ E(fj}7-TONS
p ~ P
~
--
~- 1_ 1
-_
--
~ _', ,
--~
~~
-~
z;
G
-o e
-fl
Czty of Ccrrtr°ar Poi~tt
PI,ANNXNG .DEPARTMENT
~„~.. Tom Humphrey, AICP
City Of Central POfnt Planning Director
~-,.tTT]'x~ fFT ttB tt I<en Gerschicr
L11a.1JL 1 1 Community Planner
Planning Department
Matt Sanlitorc
Planing TCC11It ICI3R
Notice of Meeting
Date of Notice: June 21, 2000
Meeting Date
Time:
Place:
NATURE OF MEETING
July 11, 2000
7:00 p.m. (Approximate)
Central Point City Hall
155 South Second Street
Central Point, Oregon
Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review an
application for a Site Plan that would allow the construction of an 4200 square foot storage building
in the Oregon Department of Transportation Yazds located near the intersection of Hamrick Road
and East Pine Street. This pazceI islocated in a M-2, Industrial- General Zoning District on Jackson
County Assessment Plat 372WO1C Tax Lot 3400.
The Central Point Planning Commission will review the Site Plan application to determine that all
applicable provisions of the Central Point Municipal Code can be met.
CRITERIA FOR DECISION
The requirements for Site Plan Review aze set forth in Chapter 17 of the Central Point Municipal
Code, relating to General Regulations, Off-street parking, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction
Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Works Standards.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit
written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, July 11, 2000.
2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City hall, 155
South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502.
I55 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 ~ (S41) 664-3321 • Pax: (54O 6C>4-6384
3. Issues which Wray provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the
expiration of the comment period noted above. Auy testimony and written comments about
the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated
clearly to the Planning Conunission.
4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City
Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at
15 cents per page.
5. Por additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664-
3321 ext. 291.
SUMMARY Or PROCEDURE
At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staff reports, hear
testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. Any
testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of
the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the and Site Plan. City regulations
provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions.
155 South Second Strcct ~ Central Point, 012 97502 ~ (541) 664-3321 • hax: (541) 664-6384
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
STAFF REPORT
for
Date:
Applicant/:
Owner
Project:
Location
Legal:
Zoning:
Area:
Units:
Plans:
Report By:
Purpose
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MAINTENANCE YARD
SITE PLAN REVIEW
PW#00022
July 5, 2000
Oregon Department of Transportation, 3500 NW Stewart Parkway,
Roseburg, OR 97470
Agent: Raymond F. Cooper
Development of a 4,200 Maintenance Building "Pole Barn"
West of Hamrick Road; South of E. Pine Street; north of LTM pre-cast concrete facility
T37S, R2W, Section 01C Tax Lot 3400
M-2, Industrial-General
7.70 Acres.
3 sheets of hand-drawn drawings illustrating, a site plan; existing irrigation, planting, and
parking; and floor plan with building elevations; prepared by ODOT, dated 3-22-00.
Lee N. Brennan, Public Works Director
Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer")
regarding City Public Works Department (PWD) standards, requirements, and conditions to be
included in the design and development of the proposed commercial/professional office facility. Gather
information from the Developer/Engineer regarding the proposed development.
The proposed Development is an addition to the existing maintenance related facilities at the site.
This staff report also includes recommended requirements that are based on the limited amount of
master planning performed in this area which involve limiting and controlling access to E. Pine Street
and Hamrick Road, and other infrastructure master planning.
Special Requirements
Existing Infrastructure: If applicable, the Developer shall demonstrate that all connections to
existing infrastructure (i.e. streets; water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems; natural drainage
systems; etc.,) will not interfere with or provide for the degradation of the existing effective level
of service or operation of the infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities
have either adequate capacities to accommodate the flows and/or demands imposed on the
existing infrastructure as the result of the connection of the proposed development's
infrastructure, or will be improved by and at the expense of the Developer to accommodate the
additional flows and/or demands; while maintaining or improving the existing level of service of
the affected facility, as approved by (as applicable) the regulatory agency, utility owner, and/or
property owner involved.
2. Master Plans: As briefly described above, in association with City PWD staff and property
owners and representatives or agents of Pulver and Leever, the Pear Blossom Center, Batzer,
and Valley of the Rogue Bank, master plans are being prepared that include the limited
connections to Pine Street; the internal street/driveway system; water, storm drain, and sanitary
sewer distribution/collection/conveyance systems, and other utilities (natural gas, power,
ary or c~r,~u It~tnt
r,~xzgr~r «C~,:
Planning DeparttueuC
~n
ODOT Afamt. Facility, Ilamnck RonA
P(f'D S(aJf Report
July 5, 1000
Page 1
telephone, etc.) for the subject tax lot and all the parcels between Bear Creek and Hamrick
Road that adjoin to Pine Street. The master plans will also include "stub-outs" for connections
to the surrounding parcels. The master plans will take into account the flows or demands of the
proposed development, any future development on neighboring portions of the subject tax lot,
on neighboring properties, and any other areas deemed by the City that will need to connect
into the proposed development's or existing neighboring infrastructure.
3. Easements: If applicable, the Developer shall provide suitable and acceptable 15-foot-wide
minimum easements for any City public works infrastructure located outside the public rights-of-
way. These easements shall be dedicated for sole use by the City, and shall not overlap
(crossings are acceptable, as long as required infrastructure separation is maintained) other
utility or infrastructure easements. A separate 10-foot minimum width public utilities easement
(P.U.E.) should also be required for utility installation outside the Hamrick Road right-of-way
along the property's exterior frontage with Hamrick Road.
4. Clear Vision Areas/Triangles. All driveway approaches of the proposed Development
connecting to public roads shall maintain a minimum 55-foot sight vision triangle as measured
from the edge of the right-of-way to the center of the driveway. This requirement may be
adjusted by the City PWD, depending on final orientation and lane layout of the adjoining roads,
in accordance with AASHTO clear sight-vision requirements. Adequate clear vison
area/triangles shall also be maintained at all internal driveway intersections, as applicable.
5. Improvements fo Hamrick Road and Righf-of--Way Dedication: A traffic impact study for the
Pear Blossom Center development, prepared by Kittelson & Associates, Inc., dated June 1999,
has been submitted to the City. The traffic study analyzed the year 2003 (anticipated year of
build-out of the center) projected traffic flows and intersection levels of service at the major
street intersections most likely to be impacted from the Pear Blossom Center development.
The traffic study included the residential development already approved to the north and east of
the site (Walnut Grove, New Haven, Central Point East, and Parkwood Terrace); the USF
Reddaway site, and the potential retail/professional office facilities on land owned by USF
Reddaway on the southeast comer of the intersection of Hamrick Road and East Pine Street.
However, the traffic impact study, does not include any new development along the southern
frontage of E. Pine Street or "build-out" (i.e full development within the current UGB) traffic flow
conditions for the northeast portion of the City which greatly influences the "build-out" design
and right-of-way requirements and needs for two of the City's main arterial roads: Hamrick
Road and East Pine Street.
The City is currently updating the City's Transportation System Master Plan (TSP) which will
classify certain streets and project "build-out" traffic flows for this northeast portion of the City.
Unfortunately the overall road classification and lane determination needs for East Pine Street
to accommodate "build-out" conditions have not been determined by the City, nor by Jackson
County. Thus, additional master planning will be warranted once the TSP is completed.
However, it is projected that this additional master planning work will probably not be completed
prior to the end of year 2001.
Another issue not addressed by the traffic impact study, is how access to East Pine Street and
Hamrick Road will be afforded/limited for the properties located to the south of East Pine Street
in the area immediately to the North of the proposed Development; and what affects will
development of the parcels to the south of E. Pine Street have on the identified streets and
intersections in the Pear Blossom Center Traffic Impact Study.
~ 7
ODOT Mawr. Fnr-dur, llmru'rrk Xnart
P {V[) Sm/JReporr
Juh~5.2000
Pa~c 3
To allow for development of the proposed project prior to the completion of the traffic master
planning needed for the area, the City PWD recommends the following:
A. The Developer be required to construct street widening, bike lane, curb and gutter,
storm drainage, sidewalk (min. 6-foot wide meandering, including applicable driveway
aprons and wheel chair ramps), planting strip with landscaping, traffic delineation, and
street lighting (with maximum 200 foot spacing) improvements for the portion of Hamrick
Road that adjoin the proposed development. The portion of E. Pine Street that adjoin
the subject development is developed as a "rural" road that does not meet current City
or County urban standards. The road will need to be improved, as a minimum, to meet
City standards, as reviewed -and approved by Jackson County Roads, and the City
PWD. This could be deferred (as executed in a deferred improvement agreement by
and between the Developer and the City/County) until other development is
implemented on the adjoining parcels along Hamrick Road.
B. Regarding the road right-of-way adjoining the proposed Development: the Developer be
required to dedicate additional land for street and City utility purposes a minimum of 44
feet from the right-of-way centerline of E. Pine Street. This would accommodate a
commercial/industrial 3-lane collector. Currently the right-of-way width on the "western
half' of Hamrick Road (centerline to property line) is 30 feet. This would require
dedication of an additional 14 feet for road and City road and utility improvement
purposes. After completion of build-out master planning/construction, any dedicated
property that was not necessary, would be "vacated" and returned to the adjoining
parcels of the proposed Development.
C. Because of access restrictions onto E. Pine Street and Hamrick Road, the City has
been working with the property owners/developers to the north of the subject property
on providing for a main access that would be accessible from the properties to the
North. Currently because of access concerns to Hamrick Road, this access has been
aligned along the subject property's northern boundary. As discussed with the
applicant, a mutual access driveway or street could provide the necessary access. The
applicant would also take access from this drive/street, and eliminate the property's
direct access onto Hamrick Road. To accommodate this future drive/street, the City
PWD is recommending that the Developer be required to dedicate a 25-foot width along
the properry's northern boundary for future road construction purposes. The dedication
would contain a stipulation that if the road was not developed within a 15-year period, or
was developed as a private drive, that the right-of-way would be vacated, as necessary.
6. Erosion Confrol Plan: A suitable erosion control plan must be prepared and submitted to the
Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and City PWD for the construction of any
improvements associated with this development.
Storm Drainage Sysfem: The storm drain system shall be designed to accommodate the
storm water run-off from and run-on onto the proposed development (either surface run-on or
culvert or creek/ditch conveyance); any future development on adjacent properties; conveyed
storm drainage or surface water flow, and any flows from areas deemed by the City that will
need to connect-into the proposed development's SD System. Depending on topography, this
may include surface water flows from the properties east, south, and west of the subject tax lots
that drain across the subject tax lots. However, if applicable, the City PWD is further
A ~
ODOTA1ain1. Facilrtr, llmnncA Xond
PIt'D StaJjRepon
Jre(y 5, 1000
Page 4
recommending that the Developer be required to design the storm drain conveyance system to
accommodate projected post-development flows from these adjoining properties.
8. Off-Site Storm Drainage Infrastructure: For any storm drainage infrastructure constructed or
improved outside the City's rights-of-way or easements for drainage of surface waters from the
subject development, the Developer shall provide a suitable document or documents which
contain approvals for the implementation of such connection and/or improvements and which
describe:
^ Who is responsible for the operation, maintenance, and repair of the infrastructure
facilities to maintain the original design parameters associated with the infrastructure. If
the City is to operate and maintain the infrastructure, the applicable funding mechanism
that will be created (i.e local improvement district) for the associated City expenditures;
^ How will all-weather driveable access be afforded and maintained indefinitely to maintain
and repair the infrastructure facilities;
^ That an easement or other suitable conveyance document has been granted, as
necessary, to provide suitable access on private property for the inspection,
maintenance, and repair work to be performed on the infrastructure facilities. The
easement shall include a statement which allows access by City personnel for
inspection, maintenance, and repair purposes.
Wafer Disfribufion System and Fire Protection: It is recommended that the water system for
the development and neighboring properties to the east, south, and west shall be master
planned, to not only accommodate the needs of the proposed Development, but to provide for
mainline valves and stub-outs for future main distribution networks and `reinforced looping" of
the adjoining properties to the east south and west. The future water distribution system for the
proposed Development will be of `reinforced loop" design: a connection to the 12-inch
waterline in E. Pine Street, and a connection to the 10-inch waterline in Hamrick Road.
The water lines shall be sized to accommodate all fire demand flows of the development. Fire
hydrant or service vault locations and needs shall be determined by Fire District No. 3. Unless
fire protection needs can be made from the on-site domestic well, it is recommended that
development not proceed until adequate fire protection can be provided.
GENERAL
Public Imorovemenfs: All construction of public improvements shall conform to the City's
PWD Standards, the conditions approved and stipulated by the Planning Commission, and
other special specifcations, details, standards, and/or upgrades as may be approved by the
City Administrator or his designee prior to the approval of the construction plans for the
proposed development. During construction, changes proposed by the Developer shall be
submitted in writing by the Developer's engineer to the City PWD for approval prior to
implementation.
Permits and Approvals: Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals,
and conditions as may be required by other agencies, including, but not limited to, the Oregon
Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ),
~ r
ODOT Alnint. Facility, Hmnrick Rond
P I f'D S1nJf Report
Ju(y 5. 1000
Pnge 5
Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), affected
irrigation districts, and Jackson County Roads and Parks Services (JC Roads), Fire District No.
3, and Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA), as applicable. The Developer shall
submit written approvals of the final construction plans from Fire District No. 3 (fire hydrant
placement, waterline sizing, and emergency vehicle access), Bear Creek Valley Sanitary
Authority (BCVSA, for sanitary sewers), and JC Roads, (Hamrick Road improvements and
driveway/access road connections, as applicable) prior to final construction plan review and
approval by City PWD.
As-Builts: Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer's engineer or
surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. If feasible, the
Developer's engineer or surveyor should provide the drawings in both a "hard copy" form
(produced on Mylar~') and in a "digital" format compatible with AutoCAD®, or other form as
approved by the City PWD.
As-built drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line" changes to final
approved construction plans which identify the locations and or elevations (as appropriate) of
actual installed items, including, but not limited to, invert, inlet, and rim or lip elevations; spot
elevations identified on drawings; water lines, valves, and fre hydrants; water and sewer lateral;
modifications to street section; manhole and curb inlet; street Tight locations; other below grade
utility lines; etc. Provide a "red-line" hard copy (on Myla~'), or an approved alternative format,
of construction drawings, and if feasible, an acceptable AutoCADe compatible drawing
electronic file to the City at completion of construction and prior to acceptance of public
infrastructure facilities completed as part of the proposed development, or as otherwise
approved by the City Administrator or his designee.
4. Elevations: All elevations used on the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on
the permanent benchmark shall be tied into an established City approved benchmark and be so
noted on the plans. At least one permanent benchmark shall be provided for the proposed
development, the location of the benchmark shall be as jointly determined by the City PWD and
the Developer's surveyor.
5. Existing Infrastructure: As applicable, field verify all existing infrastructure elevations and
locations (i.e. pipe inverts, curb elevations, street elevations, etc.), to which the proposed
development will connect into existing improvements, prior to final construction plan design and
submittal for final approval. The accurate locations of any existing underground and above
ground public infrastructure, and the location of the associated easements with these facilities,
shall be accurately portrayed (both horizontally and vertically) on the construction plans.
6. Fill Placement: All fill placed in the development shall be engineered fill that is suitably placed
and compacted in accordance with City PWD and Building Department standards, except for
the upper 1.5-feet of fill placed outside of public rights-of-way and that does not underlie
building, structures, or traveled vehicular access ways or parking areas.
Road/Driveway/Parking Areas: The Developer shall evaluate the strength of the native soils
and determine the access road, parking, and driveway section designs to handle the expected
loads (including fire equipment) to be traveled on these private driveways, access roads, and
parking areas. Need to provide designed road section for review. The road/street driveway
sections within the public rights-of-way shall be constructed per the design of the City PWD.
~ n
OUOTAfavil. Faciliht Hamrick Rond
Pi3'U SmJJ~Reporl
hd~~ 5, 2000
Page 6
8. Utility Plans: The utility plans shall be drawn to scale with accurate horizontal and vertical
depiction of utility lines and appurtenances (transformers, valves, etc.). Utility infrastructure
location must be accurately included on the as-built drawings, or as a separate set of drawings
attached to the as-built drawings.
Area Lighting: Need to provide and implement an adequate area lighting plan for parking
and access areas, including the driveway entrances.
10. Easements: Easements for City infrastructure (i.e. sanitary sewer, water, and storm drain [if
applicable]) should be a minimum of 15-feet wide, and should not split lot lines. Easements for
public storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and water lines shall be dedicated to the City and not
just a P.U.E. Centerline of buried infrastructure shall be aligned a minimum of five (5) feet from
the edge of the easement. If two or more City owned utilities are located within an easement,
then a minimum of 20-foot width should be required. Easement dedications in final deeds or
CC&Rs need a statement which should clearly indicate that easements must be maintained
with suitable, driveable vehicular access to City public infrastructure facilities, as determined by
the City PWD.
11. Storm Drainage System: Developer's engineer shall develop a facility plan for the storm drain
collection, retention, and conveyance system (SD System) which provides for storm water run-
off from and run-on onto the proposed development (either surface run-on or culvert or
creek/ditch conveyance), any existing or future development on adjacent properties, conveyed
storm drainage, or surface water flow, and any areas deemed by the City that will need to
connect-into the proposed development's SD System.
As applicable, Developer's engineer shall determine how the SD system will work during 10-
yearand 100 year flood events associated with Bear Creek. Identify the HGL in Bear Creek
during 10-and 100-year storm event, and what affect it will have on the proposed outlets and
storm drain system and building elevations. System should be designed to adequately drain a
10-year storm event without surcharging or shall provide adequate storage to prevent
surcharging; and be designed to prevent backflow of water from Bear Creek up into SD system
during storm events.
The design of the storm drain collection and conveyance system (SD System) should provide
for storm water run-off from and run-on onto the proposed development (either surface run-on
or culvert or creek/ditch conveyance); the Developer shall demonstrate that the storm water
flows from the completion of the proposed development (and at any time prior to completion of
development) do not exceed predevelopment flows into Bear Creek; or that allowances or
provisions have been made (and approval of the applicable properties owners and regulatory
agencies has been obtained), which accommodate any additional flow which exceed
predevelopment flows. The Developer and the City PWD shall agree on the applicable run-off
coefficients, curve numbers, retardance, etc., to be used in the engineering calculations.
Developer's engineer shall provide a site drainage plan designed, at a minimum, to
accommodate a 10 year storm event. The SD system must be designed to adequately drain
the 10-year storm event without surcharging or must be provided with adequate storage to
prevent surcharging; and be designed to not impact existing public storm drainage facilities.
Catch basins and area drains shall be designed for on-site sediment and petroleum
hydrocarbon retention. The private storm drain system shall be designed to directly connect to
the public storm drain system, and shall not be designed to discharge to the street surfaces.
4'7
ODOT Mauu. Fac-ililp, Hmrvick Road
PWD S1aJf Report
Jufy 5, 2000
Page 7
Public storm drain pipe materials shall be PVC, HDPE, or reinforced concrete, with water-tight
joints meeting the requirements of ASTM D3212, F477, and C443M, as applicable. Provide
concrete or sand-cement slurry encasement where required in areas of minimum cover.
Roof drains and underdrains shall not be directly connected to public storm drain lines and shall
drain to the on-site private storm drain system.
As applicable, any discharge points of the storm water facilities shall be designed to provide an
aesthetically pleasing, useful, and low maintenance facility, that are designed to mitigate
erosion, damage, or loss during a 100 year storm event; and that mitigate the "attractive
nuisance" hazards associated with these types of facilities.
Prior to City PWD construction plan review, the Developer shall provide the City PWD with a
complete set of hydrologic and hydraulic calculations and profile plots for sizing the SD system,
which shall incorporate the use of the City PWD's raihfall/intensity curve, and City approved
run-off coefficients, curve numbers, retardance, pipe roughness coefficients, etc., that are used
in the engineering calculations.
Sheet flow surface drainage from the property onto the public rights-of-way or onto neighboring
properties is unacceptable.
Plans which propose to include the discharge to Bear Creek and any construction or
modification within the floodway of Bear Creek or in the road ditches, shall be in compliance
with DSL, ACOE, ODFW, DEO, JC Roads, and/or City PWD (as applicable) guidelines and
requirements and any applicable conditions and or approvals, of these regulatory agencies.
12. Fire Hydrants: Provide locations of existing and any new required fire hydrants. Fire Hydrants
need to be connected to 8-inch-diameter and larger lines, with the supply Tines being "looped"
as feasible. If applicable, steamer ports at hydrants located near the building shall face the
buildings. Fire hydrants shall be suitably protected from potential vehicle damage and
encroachment.
13. Water System Cross Connecfion Control: Developer shall comply with Oregon Health
Division (OHD) and City requirements for cross connection control. If a pressurized irrigation
system and/or domestic water wells exist on the property, the Developer will be required to
install the required backflow prevention assemblies directly behind the City's water meters.
14. Water System: Construction drawings shall include the size, type, and location of all water
mains, hydrants, valves, service connection, meter, service laterals, and other appurtenance
details in accordance with City PWD Standards and as required by the City PWD.
15. Roof/Area Drains: All structures shall have roof drains, area drains, and/or crawl spaces with
positive drainage away from the building.
16. Grading Plans: Grading plans shall have original/existing grades and final grades plotted on
the plan. Typically, existing grade contour lines are dashed and screened back, and final grade
contour lines are overlaid on top of the existing grades and are in a heavier line width and solid.
Contour lines should be labeled with elevations.
17. Sanitary Sewer. All sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system (SS System) design,
~n
ODOTAlaint. Facilipt HmnrirA RoaA
PWD Smfj'Reporr
July 5, 2000
Page 8
construction and testing shall conform to the standards and guidelines of the Oregon DEO,
1990 APWA Standards, Oregon Chapter, Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA), and
the City PWD Standards, where applicable. The construction plans and the as-built drawings
shall identify lateral stationing for construction of sewer laterals.
18. Wafer Rights: If applicable, Developer shall provide a Statement of Water Rights (on a City
approved form), for any affected properties. For properties determined to have water rights, the
developer will coordinate with the State Watermaster the re-allocation of any waters attached to
lands no longer irrigable as a result of the proposed development.
49
A'I°I'ACIIMENT D
RECOMMENDED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
I . The approval of the Site Plan shall expire in one year on July 11, 2001 unless an application
for a building permit or an application for extension has been received by the City. "I~he
applicant shal{ submit a revised site plan depicting any changes discussed and approved at the
public hearing within 60 days of Planning Commission approval.
2. The project must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations .
3. The applicant shall provide 5 additional paved parking spaces.
4. The applicant shall update a revised landscape and irrigation plan that shows the location of
new trees and shrubs. Areas overgrown by weeds shall be cleared to improve the appearance
of the existing landscaping. Dead shrubs and trees shall be replaced.
ri (1
- ~ -
>,;:
~~"~~
:~.,~:_
BEAR CREEK VALLEY SANITARY AUTHORITY
3915 SOUTH PACIFIC HWY. • MEDFORD, OREGON 97501.9099 • (541 779-4144 • FAX (541) 535-5278
July 3, 2000
Ken Gerschler
City of Central Point
Planning Department
155 South Second Street
Central Point, OR 97502
Re: ODOT Storage Building, File # 00020-SPR
Dear Ken,
City of Central Point
E~:HIUIT ttE <t
Planning Department
Sewer service is available to the proposed development by connecting to the existing 6" sewer
service line along the Southerly property boundary. Please have applicant contact BCVSA for
permit and connection information.
Sin~cerely~,
Lam" ' ' ~~-_.
Carl Tappert, PE
District Engineer
L\DATA\Agencies\CENTPT\PLANNG\00020-5 PR.wpd
51
PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 1 1, 2000
TO: Central Point Planning Commission
PROM: Tom Humphrey AICP, Planning Director
SUBJECT: Modifications to Valley of the Rogue Bank (VRB) Sitc Plan
Back r~ ound
The Planning Commission considered and conditionally approved the VRB site plan application last
October. The applicants requested and were authorized to use two driveways, each of which was to
be abandoned upon the development of other access points on adjacent properties. The Planning
Commission motion was specific to the extent that the secondary access would (ofzly) be abandoned
when the property to the east is developed (refer to Attachment A, Planning Commission motion on
Page 4).
Discussion
Subsequent site engineering and architectural design for the VRB project have resulted in the
recommendation that only one access be used and that the second easterly driveway be eliminated at
this time rather than when property to the east develops. The Public Works Director concurs with this
opinion and has commented on the proposal in Attachment D. The applicants have demonstrated that
turning movements for a motor home with a boat can be accommodated in the revised site plan
(Attachment C). Further provisions have been made to align part of the remaining driveway with the
signalized intersection and to alternatively connect the site with Hamrick Road along the common
VRB/ODOT property line.
The Planning Commission is being asked to modify their previous conditional site plan approval and
allow the changes reflected in Attachment D.
Attachments
A. Planning Commission Resolution and Minutes from October 5, 1999
B. Tentatively Approved Site Plan
C. Revised Site Plan
D. Public Works Memorandum dated July 5, 2000
52
PLANNlNC3 COMI`11SS[ON RESOLII~hION NO 464
A RESOLUTION COND[1~IONALLY APPROVING
A SITE PLAN APPL[CA'I'ION
(Applicant (s): Valley of the Rogue Bank)
(372W01 C Tax Lot 2600)
Recitals
City or Cettaal Faint
E~S:j-$~X3IT ttAtr
Planning Department
I . This matter came before the Planning Commission for hearing on October 5, 1999, on
applicant's site plan application fora 3215 square foot branch office and 15,000 squaze foot data center
in an C-4 Tourist and Office Professional district of the City. The Plamring Commission reviewed the
application and the City staffreports, andYeceived comments from all persons wishing to be heard in favor
of and opposed to the application.
Now, therefore;
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OP CENTRAL
POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Criteria Applicable to Decision. The following chapters of the Central Point
Municipal Code apply to this application:
A. Chapter 17.44, C-4 Tourist and Office Professional Zone
B. Chapter 17.60, General Regulations;
C. Chapter 17.64, Off-Street Parking and Loading;
D. Chapter 17.72, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval.
Section 2. Findines and Conclusions. The Planning Commission hereby adopts by
reference all finding of fact set forth in the City staffreports, and concludes that, except where addressed
in the conditions to approval, the application and proposal comply v/iththe requirements ofthe following
chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code:
A. Chapter 17.44, relating to uses, lot size, lot coverage, setback, building height and
screening in the C-4 "Tourist and Office Professional district;
B. Chapter 17.60 relating to paving and landscaping requirements,
C. Chapter 17.64 relating to off-street parking and loading facilities;
D. Chapter 17 72 relating to site plan requirements.
Section 3. Conditional An royal The application for site plan approval is hereby
I - PI,nNNING ('OMMISS[ON R(?S(>I.II~f(()N NU 464 (I~)0~199~) 1
53
conditionally approved. subject to thecondiUOns set tbrth in the Panning and Puhhc Works llcparunent
Staff Repo~l on Exhibit "A" and "13", which is attachal hereto and by' this reference incorlx~nucd herein and
subject to abandoning the primary driveway access o(hof Pine Street when a tra(tic signal is developed and
the secondary access will be abandoned when die properly to the east is developed. A detention pond wil C
be built to handle the storm drainage fora 10 year event. .~
Passed by the PlanningConunissionandsignedbymeinauthenticationofitspassagethis
day of ~~~~_., 19~.
ATTEST:
~~~ ~~~~.
Planning Commission Chairman
-.
City Re entative
Approved by me this 5~=~ day of OvI~ bc.~ , 19`j`1 .
Planning Commission Chairman
2 - PI.ANNI~IG t'(>MMISSION RIfSUI,li~llOIv Nt) 4G4 (IOt);19~)9
54
( )i I~~hi I ~. 1 ~)V~)
I'.l,e
Gus Ico o, (,'S Berhi I:oad. >p~tkr In opp~tsuutn of thi> drt rlopntcnt \tr I iiitlli, ;l.ked that a harrier
be built ut urdcr to protect Ihr orchard he nr,uta~cs
I.nr ~il'nk\ii', Jackson County Iralllc f{ngulrer. spoke as a nruu;tl party I\9r Nlrmr~rr asl.cd thr
amnnission to condition appntt~al of this pro~cct upon tha atmplction of nutre thoroueh progresston
analysis and a more thorough qucumg analysts
Dave Gtlnuxu. ~1dti Man~anlta Su~eut, spoke as a ncuUal parq~ 1~4r. Citlmour asked it a ditch constructed
on the back of the property would help ~~~iih water problems for the adjacent propert} owners. He also
asked how the U~affic circle, depicted in the master plan, would tltnetion properly.
,Jim May, of BCVSA, spoke as a neuU~al party. Mr. May informed the conumssion that the easiest sway to
get sewer to the site would be through the Picol(o property. Also, there is no sewer on G. Pine Street as
depicted on the subdivision map.
Curt Burill, responded to the opposition and neutral parties. Mr. Burin stated that the traffic study was
done to specifications oCODOT, the county, and the city and all requirements were met. The study
concludes a traffic signal is warranted. Pie also stated that an environmental study has already been
completed and implemented. an 8 feet high wall is acceptable, and they will ~.vork wuh BCVSA to get
se~a~er to the site.
Lee Brennan, responded to the questions about the hydrology study and stated that only a professional
hydrologist could deternune know the scope of the study. If it did include a wide geographic area the
applicant would share the costs of the study with affected property owners.
Commissioner Fish made a motion topass Resolution Number 463 approving the tentative
subdivision of 21 6 acres into 16 tax lots located in the C-4 Tourist and Office Professional
District, subject to the recommended conditions of approval from the planning and public works
departments. A traffic signal will be built when 50 % of the land is developed or when an anchor
tenant starts construction. The deferred improvement agreement will be shortened from IS years
to 10 years. The interior Traffic circulation plan will be brought before the planningcommission.
A 6 foot high wall Fvill be built on the norfhern property line with a 2 foot berm underneath it
brin~i~ it to an to a 8 foot high structure A hydrology study will be conducted on the site prior to
construction. Comrissioner Foster seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Motion ~`issed
unanimously.
<~ A Public (fcanng,to consider a site flan introduced b~alle~f the Rogtlc Bank to construct t~a~o
new commerci;Il bwldin~totalin~,~ I R~215 sduare feet on the south side of Lau I'inc 5trerL 1 hr subicct
- - - -- - --
plohcs~~_Iti loc. Itcd in the ('-d founst and_O.f(cc_Profcssional zonine disU~icL
Inm I lumphrc} I'I.utnintr Ihtcuor prcticntal the Planning I)cparlmcnt tilall rc lxtrt I he applicant IS
icyuesting a Site flan kc~ ie~~ Gu~ the construction of two nc~+~ hank huildin{tti_ a > ~ I ~ syuarc lo~~l branch
nflice and a I S,UUr) tiquurc lo~~i clailu center I he hrane:h ollice n prnpntied Ut he c~punllcd h~ an
.uhliunnal _'tifil) ,y n;ur ICl'I in Ilic luuin: I he ;ipplieani'•, Itic~hc;t~ i. ~~eatrd ~.nulh of I :ru Pinr tilrrit ;uu
.i It~nlnn~ ..I it ;ihs-n~. ~~ IL .i n~ ~~, Irillc ~~n;i ih:il h;~~, h~cn icc~uuntrn~ki a, Dail ~~I 1!:: 'Jnunir~. 'c.u
55
( ii fc~bi r ` `i`i`i
I`.I~l '!
111ossunt (~iniir the Il:tnk is rcyucsUn~ I~ui dri~rwa~s al Ibis ante that ~~ill sri~c ihi branch hanl,
\\ hrn thi ualllc si~,nal is ionsuuried ihi iwo drniwu~s gull hi ahandonid \ irmhoran hulldmc i<
ins isumed for the sill while ihi branch huddm~s i< nadir consuuruon
Lcc Brennan. Publie Works Uircctar, prescntai the Public b\~nrks tilnfl~ Ripart ~(r Brennan stated that
the rcconuncndauons for the Naumes Devclopntcnt ~~ould also apply to the Valle of the Rnguc Bank
consuucuon. "I he sUC needs to he master planned I~or Iluurc dcvilopmeni to the ~~ist and cast of the site.
A ~hraflic circulation plan needs to be completed and class access a~~recmcnts ~~ ill have to be obtained
with adjoining property owners for joint use of the signal and other points of access. I( the applicants
build a temporar}` storm water detention pond. it needs to be able to hold ~~•ater (item a 10 year event.
When the Data Center is constructed, an internal stone seater plan would have to be constructed.
Peter Gating, of Abeloe and Associates, is the agent for the applicant. Mr. Gutmg stated that the branch
bank would start construction inunediatch~ and that the recommendations ti~om the Public Works
department would be done.
,lim May, of BCVSA, stated that there is a sewer service already that would work for the branch bank,
but when the data center is constructed a new service line.
Commissioner Ries made a motion to pass Resolution Number 464 attnrovittg the Site Plan for
the construction of a 3215 sonar foot branch office and a 15,000 square foot data center in the C-4
tourist and office professional district, subject to the recommended conditions of a approval from
the Planning and Public Works Staff report It will also be subject to abandoning the primary
driveway access off of Pinc Street when a traffic signal is developed and the secondary access will
be abandoned when the property to the east is developed. If a detention pond is built, it will have
to be able to hold a 10 year event. Commissioner LeGros seconded the motion. ROLL CALL:
Motion passed unanimously.
D. Public hearing to consider a request by the Central Point Public Works Department to modify a
previouslyapproved variance and site plan by adding a second story to a utili builduig. The subiect
propei?y is located in the R-I-6 Residential Single-Famil ~ za1[ng_ district.
Ken Gerschlcr, Community Planner, presented the Planning Department Staff Report Last year, the
Public Works Department requested and received approval to construct an addwonal building at the
City's utility yard an have since identified the need for a mamd story. "i~he second Moor would be for
archives only to consolidate all the archives into one location. "hhe Planning Department would also like
to have the driveway apron improved when construction bcgms.
Lcc 13rcnnan, Public W<uks Dircctor:uxl npphctuti slated the rcywrcmcnis would he ntci
( unnnissiuncr Poslu' made a motion to pass IZesalutron nunilxr 4GS appru~~ir~ the proposed
mndt~cafion to the .Site Plan and Variance subject to the r'ecununendul conditions of appru~ al
from the 1'lannin;,~ and I'uhlic Works I)eparlmenls and impru~ing the dri~e~~a}' apron fur the site.
( ummissiancr Lunte seconded the motion. kOI.I. (~:AI.I.: ~Aqutiun passed un:utinunrsl~.
~.~I~~~:n into :il
.rl
t >_____ _..,
&5 City of Central Point triion~
Planning Department
~ ~I=1 ~IPI ,III (~ ~ ~ ( ~~
~, ~ j ~ 4
~ 1~EI~~~~~~~
~~~f ~
: xauax au =
-._.._ --- - _
_
_._ ___.
. - - - - __
_. -..w_r- _
_ - _ - - - - _
.--
-_.
_
_
.. _.
_
..
_
-
-__.
-
r, ., I R
a
i ~
;
• ~-
~
~ ~
- e ~8 _ ,. ...rte... __ ~ ' ~ ~ '
¢~
g p F ~s
~ g 1
K K K IY K M M I< K p N: rM
-«- G
_ ~
! ~^`
~ W•
I
~.
1 - xama~ac
t
8t i
5 j
§~ S S
~ ~
~~
-
i it C
Q
~
6
~
~ ~ ~
n
R. ~
R `~ ~ i a a
4: 13
~C6 t~
Sg~ ~t
~
~
P
?` ~ M
~ -
y
`g
<b~
~R R ~ ~ k ~ t
j
~SBI~€~~~ 4
.~~
e
~~
~ °
'¢
' ~
~ ~ k
p
fi ~g~ ,~. ~~ L _ _._ _ k
~
Rip
~ a o - ~,.-~
l&
~ ~ ~ ~4
~
tt
~
~
J _ _ ~ R
~
.
~
g
ss
rr
gg
gg
44
9~~~~sFt~ 8!!F2~A5,~ xa~oa .n ,f ~
3~
sxnwvnsri
e
8 9 6~
S
' 3 ~8 ~ ~
~ gp~~y~[a~ la ~g5g~~ ~ ~~ ,R
tl p[ < f~2g
gP s° ~ ~ ~~~ dgP~~~~
e Ik r'?
~4~~ ~p €~
S~p~~ aA ~~ ~ A ~~~aagga~ !~ '~
!l~~~~~~ ~~ ~x ~~~~~~~~!
.r,'7
~~
m
L
In
C
m
6
W
5~
i
~~~ Cxryotcentr~itFoint
~ r+1~r~rrgr~r «~„:
~ Punning Departrneut
c7
----------------------------
\ \ ~ .: ; : , rsx "`sta. I F
~ ~~~~~~
e
-,
o ~--~
~+
i
i
-,
~ ~
N
3
~~
~~,
~ ~ --~--~
i
i
®~ r
i
-----~
.......J
~~
0
~~
~; ~> ~ a•
s ~~
v~
.~;
58 ~ "
Qty of Cenu-al Point
EXHIIIIT "T1"
Piannin~ Department
City of Central Point
1 N T E R
__
MEMO
______
O F F I C E
To: Tom Humphrey, Planning Director
From: Lee Brennan, Public Works Director
Subject: Memorandum Regarding Single Access to New Valley of the Rogue Branch Bank
Development
Date: July 5, 2000
After discussions with the Developer's Architect and Engineer, it became apparent that the
elimination of the second eastern temporary driveway connection depicted on the approved
tentative plan for the subject development would eliminate more ingress and egress problems
that it was meant to resolve. As such, it is the Public Works Department's recommendation
that if modifications are made to the site circulation layout so that the required AASHTO study
vehicle (i.e motor home with a boat) and Fire District No. 3 equipment have adequate access
and turning movement capabilities as outlined in the staff report, that the single driveway
connection to E. Pine Street would be the preferred alternative for temporary and eventual
permanent connection E. Pine Street. It is our understanding that some of the outlying
temporary access issues will be addressed utilizing a base rock section, and that the
permanent paved access and mobility on the site (i.e after signal and primary driveway
development) will be designed to accommodate the required vehicle turning movements.
59