Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - January 4, 2000 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA January 4, 2000 - 7:00 p.m. fl Q Q Next Planning Commission Resolution No. 471 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL City Planning Chuck Piland -Candy Fish, Don Foster, Karolyne Johnson, John LeGros, Paul Lunte and Wayne Riggs III. CORRESPONDENCE IV. MINUTES A. Review and approval of December 7, 1999, Planning Commission Minutes V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES VI. BUSINESS Page 1 - 16 A. Public hearing to consider a site plan and change of use for the building located at 155 North First Street in a C-5, Thoroughfare Commercial Zoning District on Map 37 2W 03DD, Tax Lot 7000. 17 - 25 B. Public Hearing regarding a Tentative Partition that would create 2 parcels at 764 Pittview Avenue. The subject property is located in an R-1-8, Residential Single-Family Zoning District on Map 37 2W 11AD Tax Lot 6300. VII. MISCELLANEOUS VIII. ADJOURNMENT CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES December 7, 1999 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 P.M. II. ROLL CALL: Chuck Piland, Candy Fish, Karolyne Johnson, John LeGros, Don Foster, Paul Lunte, and Wayne Riggs were present. Also in attendance were Tom Humphrey, Planning Director; Ken Gerschler, ConmrunityPlanner; Matt Samitore, PlamringTechnician; and Lee Brennan, Public Works Director. III. CORRESPONDENCE There was no correspondence 1V. MINUTES Commissioner Fish made a motion to apprrove the Planning Commission Minutes from November 2, 1999. Commissioner Foster seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes, Foster, yes, Johnson, yes, LeGros, yes, Lunte, yes, and Riggs, yes. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances. VI. BUSINESS A. A Public hearing to consider a conditional use permit that would allow a mobile home to be temporarily located behind a residence at 721 Pittview Avenue. The subject property is located iu the R-1-8 Residential Single Family 7.oninE District. Ken Gerschler, Community Planner, Presented the Planing Department Staff Report. The applicants have asked to temporarily position a mobile home on their property that would assist in the care of an elderly parent with medical needs. A temporary mobile home placement on a lot with an existing home is allowed by Conditional Use Permit in residentially zoned districts if a family related medical need can be identified and the parcel is one acre or more in total size. The parcel is exactly one acre and the applicants have a letter from Dr. Earl Peterson stating that it is in the best interest of the elderly mother-in-law to live near family. The applicants have met all the requirements for this Conditional Use Permit. City of Cennnl Potnt Planning Commission Minutes December 7, 1999 Page 2 Lee Brennan, Public Works Director, presented the Public Works Staff Report. Mr. Brennan stated that the applicants will have to work out the sewer wifli BCVSA, the city will not enforce the system development charges (SDC) for water, streets and parks because it is only a temporary structure and their will be no SDC's for water because they are on a well. The applicant Louis Barker, stated that he has all the sewer, water, and electrical work done and is just waiting for approval to move the mobile home on to the property. He also stated that other relatives live directly across the street from him, so there will always be a family member present, and this would be an ideal situation for the family. Commissioner Fish made a motion to approve Resolution 469 approving the Conditional Use Permit for temporarily positioning of a mobile home on their property that would assist in the care of an elderly parent with medical needs subject to recommended conditions of approval and staff reports. Commissioner Foster seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: motion passed unanimously. B. Public Hearing regarding a Tentative Plan for Cedar Shadows Unit 2, a 4-lot "padlot" residential subdivision. The subject property is located in an R-3, Residential Multiple Family Zoning District. Ken Gerschler, Community Planner, presented the Planning Department Staff Report. The applicant, Dallas Page is proposing the subdivision of a 0.26 acre parcel into four parcels. The parcels would take their access from Shadow Way, a private roadway off of Freeman Road. The minimum lot size for Pad Lot Subdivisions for the parent lot is 6,000, which as been met. There will have to be some road widening to handle new lot access to Freeman Road and the applicant has also adjusted a building foot print so that it isn't in a BCVSA easement. The applicant met with the Planning and Public Works Department in a pre- application meeting. Lee Brennan, Public Works Director, presented the Public Works Staff Report. The Public Works Departments recommended that Shadow W ay be improved from a 25 foot to a 30 foot throat. The first 25-feet of this approach, shall be at a maximum grade of 3%. The Road will look like a driveway and not a regular street. The sight distance triangle for the structures will be 25 feet on Shadow Way and 350 Feet on Freeman Road, which will require a hee to be removed. The Public Works Department would also recommend adding 10 feet for a PUE behind the Right of Way on the Freeman Road side, and adding a street light on the site to illuminate the driveway entrance off of Freeman Road. The Applicant Dallas Page, 900 Windemar Drive, Ashland OR, stated he did not agree with all of the recommendations. He stated that he did not believe he should have to add a street light, make engineered plans, pay for the cost of improving Freeman Road right now, do an City of Cezural Poizzt Plnnning Conzmassaozz Mizzutes December 7, 1999 Page 3 additional flood study or storm drainage plan, add sidewalks on the north side, and be responsible for talking to the property owners to the south and cutting down anything that exists in the sight distance triangle. He acquired that many of the recommended conditions have been addressed as part of the Cedar Shadows PUD. Lee Brennan addressed Mr. Page stating that the improvements for Freeman Road could be deferred until the construction plans are ready for that street, the street light could also be deferred as well, as long as there is enough temporary lighting available. The state requires engineered plans for the new lots and street grade and the applicant will have to do them in order to proceed. There is no requirement for sidewalks on the north side of the street, and an additional flood study and storm drainage plan would not have to be done if the proposed development does not have an adverse affect on the existing storm drainage plan. Council Member Bob Gilkey, spoke about the sidewalk requirements and the Sight Vision Triangle problems. Jim May, Engineer for BCVSA, spoke about the problems with the original building plans and the sanitary sewer easement. Commissioner Johnson made a motion to approve Resolution 470 conditionally approving the Tentative Plan for the subdivision, at 475 Freeman Road, subdividing the R-3 property into a 4 parcel "padlot"subdivision. The approval is contingent upon the recommended conditions of approval, with changes discussed at the meeting and the Planning and Public Works Staff Reports. The Conditions of approval per the discussions are: 1.) The Sight Distance Triangle be approved by the Public Works Department 2.) Sidewalks only be installed on the South side of Shadow Way 3.) Improvements on Freeman Road will be deferred until Freeman Road is expanded, and the City Attorney will determine whether or not the cost of upgrading Freeman Road can be passed on to lots within the Cedar Shadows P.U.D. as we114.) The Street Light can be deferred until Freeman Road is improved, if there is enough temporary light to light the entrance on Shadow Way 5.) The applicant submits plans to BCVSA showing the movement of the building out of the easement. Commissioner Fish seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: motion passed unanimously. C. Review of the Traffic Impact Analysis in Northwest Central Point compiled by JRH of Eugene. Tom Humphrey, Planning Director, presented the report. In June the City had three different proposals that would take access turn of Taylor Road. At the time the Planning Commission required a traffic study to be done for this area. This report finds that additional signalization Cit7~ of Central Poirot Planning Comnrissiort Minutes Decerreber 7, 1999 Page 4 and changes need to be made in the Northwest portion of Central Point in order to handle the additional traffic. The main changes would be a third railroad crossing on Highway 99, reconfiguration of the Haskell and Taylor intersection, adding a signal at Scenic and Hwy 99, putting a signal at Haskell and Pine Streets, and making various upgrades at the Highway 99, Pine Street intersection. No action was required by the commission at this time. VII. MISCELLANEOUS There were no miscellaneous items. VIII. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Fish made a motion to adjourn. Commissioner Lunte seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Motion passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 8:52 p.m. PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT HIiARING DATE: January 4, 2000 TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: Tom Humphrey AICP, Planning Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing- Site Plan Review of 37 2W 03DD, Tax Lot 7000 -Rogue Valley Council of Governments. Owner/ Rogue Valley Council of Governments Applicant: 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Agent: V. Alan Hudson, Finance Director Rogue Valley Council of Governments 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Pro er Description/ 37 2W 03DD, Tax Lot 7000 - 0.32 acres Zonine: C-5, Thoroughfare Commercial District Summary The applicant is requesting a Site Plan Review that would allow a change of use and a future addition to the building at 155 North First Street. Applicable Law CPMC 17.46.010 et seq. - C-5, Thoroughfare Commercial District CPMC 17.64.010 et seq. -Off Street Parking and Loading CPMC 17.72.010 et seq.- Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval Discussion Earlier this year, the Rogue Valley Council of Governments (RVCOG) announced that the organization had purchased a commercial building and that the agency would vacate City Hall. The building purchased by the RVCOG (formerly occupied by the Hard Bodies Fitness Center) is located at 155 North First Street iu a C-5, Commercial Thoroughfare zoning district. CPMC Chapter 17.72.010 requires a Site Plan Review by the Planning Conunission for all new construction and changes in use. Mr. Alan Hudson, Finance Manager for the RVCOG, has requested that the Planning Commission review and approve the Site Plan for the building in hopes that the agency could move by February of 2000. The site plan and elevations depict a phased approach where the interior of the building would initially be converted and remodeled to office space. At a future date, a second phase would include the addition of 1,040 square feet of meeting space as funding becomes available. The Planning, Building and Public Works Departments are reviewing the plans as submitted and have allowed the RVCOG to work on interior demolition in preparation for renovation with the explicit understanding that any modifications or monies committed are at the applicant's risk and that an approval of the site plan by the Planning Commission or City Council is not guaranteed. CPMC 17.64.040 requires that governmental offices provide not less than one parking space per each three hundred square feet of gross floor area or fraction thereof. Based upon this criteria and a projected total square footage of 7,460, the RVCOG would need to provide a minimum of 25 spaces. Since there are currently only 15 spaces shown as available on site, the plan fails to meet this requirement. The Planning and Public Works Departments are working with the RVCOG to provide an alternative parking arrangement that involves shared parking with the senior center. An arrangement will be consummated prior to the construction of the building addition and planning staff has added this as a condition of approval. Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law In approving, conditionally approving or denying the plans submitted, the City bases it's decision on the following standards from Section 17.72.040: A. Landscaping and fencing and the construction of walls on the site in such a manner as to cause the same to not substantially interfere with the Landscaping scheme of the neighborhood, and in such a manner to use the same to screen such activities and sights as might be heterogeneous to existing neighborhood uses. The Commission may require the maintenance of existing plants or the installation of new ones for purposes of screening adjoining property. c°a ., ._ .. ~r The applicant has submitted a plan that shows no change to the existing landscape scheme. B. Design, number and location of ingress and egress points so as to improve and to avoid interference with the traffic flow on public streets; Access to the site is gained from rivo curb cuts along First Street. Sidewalks have been installed along Manzanita and First Streets. No changes to access are being proposed at this time. C. To provide off-street parking and loading facilities and pedestrian and vehicle flow facilities in such a manner as is compatible with the use for which the site is proposed to be used and capable of use, and in such a mamrer as to improve and avoid interference with the ri~affic flow on public streets; ^ The project requires a minimum of 25 off street parking spaces. There are currently an insufficient number of spaces shown on the site plan. There is a possibility that the RVCOG will enter into an agreement with the City to share parking at the senior center. D. Signs and other outdoor advertising structures to ensure that they do not conflict with or deter from traffic control signs or devices and that they are compatible with the design of their buildings or uses and will not interfere with or detract from the appearance or visibility of nearby signs; ^ No signage has been proposed at this time however the applicant will be required to apply for a sign permit and submit plans to the City prior to any sign installation. E. Accessibility and sufficiency of fire fighting facilities to such a standard as to provide for the reasonable safety of life, limb and property, including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads and fire laces so that all buildings on the premises are accessible to fire apparatus; ^ The project, if approved, would need to meet any requirements of Jackson County Fire District 3. F. Compliance with all city ordinances and regulations; If the off-street parking requirement is met, the project would meet all applicable ordinances and requirements shown in the zoning ordinance. The existing footprint of the building encroaches into the side yard setback along the alleyway between Manzanita and Laurel Streets. The 1,040 square foot addition will meet the setback and coverage requirements of the code. Offices are a permitted use in this zone. ~s -' G. Compliance with such architecture and design standards as to provide aesthetic acceptability in relation to the neighborhood and the Central Point area and it's environs. ^ The exterior of the existing stweture will remain unchanged until the applicant constructs the new addition at a future date. Building elevations have been provided for the Planning Commission's consideration. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take one of the following actions: 1. Adopt Resolution No. ,approving the Site Plan subject to the recommended conditions of approval; or 2. Deny the proposed Site Plan; or 3. Continue the review of the Site flan at the discretion of the Commission. Attachments A. Site Plan and Building Elevations B. Notice of Public Hearing C. Correspondence D. Public Works Staff Report E. Planning Department Conditions of Approval ~. .~ A+~1d'1'/~Q:1y' ~, ~--- Ntf0 ~I°AK E9.t7G. ~I ~I ~I I I --- --~- 20' WI(7~ AU,~Y---------~ i00~ ~MOf7El, ~,,XIII~~STING ~L~~IVI~t 6300 5,~, i aa~wi +. sr~ea.cfr~~~s ~auveras~ '~ 5 4 3 2 I wtt.-atxare 1g11N'-M. ~ RAIfhE r7791tY riNP /-ifGRfYJNLF111t~t~' ('AlSfOQMMU i ~' ' I 8 I ~wk~ car.ara 10 I II 112 ~ Mf' i f c~~ cum nrn rM:~T , ~~~ ~o`~ City of Central Point E~%H~~~T t,A" Planning Department VK.ANf I.Of (~1~ i~ ~ I rre+t~ ~ ~ I~ rax.i.et ' cm~ ~ anar ( ~ I I ~~~ ~z~irA s~r, 511 ~I.!AN 37s, ~; o3vv, n ~ooo ' zap c-3 OI~IG1:5 r r.~o-300- a5 r~a~n i5 s~ncesr~roc~v, a ~~sro~ra~vtxna~s~. __ City of Central :`point PLANNING DEPARTMENT Tom Humphrey, AICP Planning Director Notice of Meeting Date of Notice: December 14, 1999 Meeting Date: January 4, 2000 Time: 7:00 p.m. (Approximate) Place: Central Point City Hall 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon NATURE OF MEETING Ken Gerschler Community Planner Matt Samitore Planning Technician City of Central Point EXHT~~-IT t'g't Planning Department Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review an application for a Site Plan Review that would allow the renovation and change of use for a commercial building at 155 North First Street. This parcel is located in a C-5, Thoroughfare Commercial Zoning District on Jackson County Assessment Plat 372W03DD, Tax Lot 7000. The Central Point Planning Commission will review the Site Plan application to determine that all applicable provisions of the Central Point Municipal Code can be met. CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for Site Plan Review are set forth in Chapter 17 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Regulations, Off-street parking, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Works Standazds. PUBLIC COMMENTS Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, January 4, 2000. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502. 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 ~ (541) 664-3321 ~ Fax: (541) 664-6384 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matter`s shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at Ciry Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664- 3321 ext. 291. SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staff reports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the and Site Plan. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. ~ ~~ 1~~ 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 ~ (541) 664-3321 ~ Fax: (541) 664-6384 11/tl3/lyyy tly:4tl ti164566 JCFD3 Bl~ l]FC -~ PAGE 02 JACKSON COUNTY FIRE DfSTRiCT N0.3 8333 Agate Road, Whife City, Oregon 97503-1075 (541}826-7100 Fax (541)826-4566 UNIFORM FIRE CODE REV-EW DATE: 12/3/99 (l Jackson County Department of Planning & Development Attn: 10 S. Oakdale Medford, OR 97501 City of Central Lt!o$it EhHIS~YT «C» Planning Deparimm't (x~ City of Central Point Planning ~ Development Attn: Lois Debsnedetti 155 S. 2"~ Central Point, OR 97502 Applicant: Rogue Valley Council of Governments Business Name: Rogue Valley Council of Govemments Address: 155 North First Street City: Central Point, 97502 Construction Type: 5-N Occupancy Classification; 8 New Construction Sq. Ft: 1214 new and 7,000 ald The Unrform Fire Code (OREGON REVISED 1996 EDITION) captains minimum sfandards and shall supplement any and all laws relating to fire and life safety. The building plans submifted to Jackson County Fire District No. 3 are subject to the following Uniform FITS COd@ regUirem@nts. Both the Building Department and the Fire District shall approve any changes, modficafions or alterations of the building plans or changes made in the character of the occupancy. 1210311999 09:40 ADDRESSING ANY BOX WITH AN "X" SHALL APPLY 2. 3. PAGE 03 [X] Approved address numbers (min. 3"~ shall be placed on all buildings in such a manner to be plainly visible and legible from the street fronting the property. 0264566 .TCFD3 BUS OFC UNIFORM FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS Address signs are available at no charge from Fire District No. 3. FIRE APPARATUS ROADWAYS (X] Fire apparatus roadways shall be within 150 feet of every portion of the first floor of a building, vaith a minimum unobstructed width of 24 feet and vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed to provide an all weather driving surface, capable of supporting 50,000 pounds load. A temporary fire apparatus access road shall be established during construction. Temporary access roads shall be of a width, vertical clearance and surface adequate to provide access for fire department apparatus until permanent roads are ins#alled. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet shall be provided with an approved turnaround for fire apparatus. The minimum taming radius is 28 feet. WATER SUPPLIES FOR FIRE PROTECTION [ ] Not required based on current design of building and occupancy classification. [X] Fire Hydrants are required: SEE STEM 15 A. Required fire flow 2500 G.P.M. B. Fire flow duration: 2 hrs. [ ] Fire hydrants are required prior to construction. (] Location of fire hydrants shall be approved by the fire district prior to installation. [ ] Approval required by water provider (see Specie! Requirements Number 95). 0 ~. 12!03!1994 fl9:0.fl 6264566 JCFII3 BUS OFC - PAGE 64 [ ] On-site water storage tanks are required. Water storage required: gallons [ } Contact Fire District No. 3 Fire and Life Safety Division far installation requirements for on-site water storage tanks. [ j On-si#e water tank canstruction plans shall be submitted to the Firs and Life Safe#y Division for review and approval prior to installation of the water storage system. The water storage tank systems shall be flow tested by the fire district prior to: [ j Opening for business [ j Construction 4. 5. FIRE EXTINGUISHERS [Xj Fire extinguisher types and placement shall be approved by the fire district prior to installation. FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT [X] The installation and maintenance of automatic fire alarm systems, automatic sprinkler or water spray systems, standpipes and hose or fixed extinguisher systems shall be required as listed below. (Xj No requirement [ } Automatic fire extinguishing system required. Type of system: [ ] Alarm system required. Type of system: [ ] Automatic fire extinguishing and alarm systems sha11 be tested annually and documentation shall be available on request. 6. HEATING APPL.EANCES [X] Heating appliances shall bs installed and maintained in accordance with (heir Iisting and the Building, Electrical, and Mechanical Codes. The use ofi an un-vented fuel-fired space heaters shall be approved by the fire district. The use of portable electric heaters and fuel-filled space heaters in Group 1 and SR occupancies is prohibited. cA ~- 12103/1999 09:40 6264566 ?. EXITS 8. 9. 3CFII3 BUS OFC PAGE 05 [Xj Every building or portion thereof shall be provided with exits as required by the Uniform Building Cade and Article 12 of the Uniform Fire Code (see Special Requirements, number 15). FLAMMABLE AND COMBUSTIBLE LIQUIDS { ] Provide the fire district with a listing of all flammable and combustible liquids and quantities that will be stored, used or handled. After review, all applicable code requirements will be issued to the applicant. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS [ ] Provide the fire district with a listing of all hazardous materials and quantities. After review, ail applicable code requirements will be issued to applicant. Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for hazardous materials shall be readily available on the premises. t0. 11. Technical report{s) maybe required (without charge to the fire district) to determine the acceptability of technologies, processes, products, facilities, materials, and uses attending the design, operation or use of a building or premises. The opinion and report shall be prepared by a qual~ed engineer, specialist, laboratory or fire safety specialty organization acceptable to the Fire District. j ] Technical report not required. [ J Technical report re uired. DUMPSTERS AND CONTAINERS [X] Dumpsters and containers with an individual capacity of 1.5 cubic yards {40.5 cubic feety or more shah not be stored in buildings or placed closer than 5 feet to a building. ELECTRICAL WtRiNG jX] Electrical wiring shall be in accordance with the National Electrical Code. ., 1. P.1b 12!03/1999 09;40 6264566 JCPD3 SUS OFC PAGE 06 12. SPRAY FINISHING [ ] All spray finishing operations utilizing flammable and combustible liquids shall be conducted in a spray booth or spray room constructed in accordance with the Uniform building Code and maintained in accordance wifh the provisions of the Uniform Fire Code, [ ] Spray booth or spray room required (see Specia(Requirements, number 15). Spray booth and rooms require a mechanical permit form the 8uiiding Department. [ J Approval by fre district required. T3. HIGH PIt.ED 5TORAGE [ ] Any building that is used for storage over 12 ft. shall meet the requirements of article 81 of the Unfform Fire Code. Contact Fire District No. 3 for requirements. T4. FUEL DiSPENSiNG [ ] NOT allowed [ ] State Fire Marshal PERMIT APPLICATION required 15. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS [X] A. Current fire hydrant viii provide the required fire flow. No additional fire hydrants are required. [ ] 8- [ ] C. [ ] D. 16. FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY INSPECTION [X] Afire and life safety inspection is required by Fire District No. 3 prior to Opening for business. Contact the district at 826-7100 to schedule an inspection. If you have any questions regarding this review or to schedule a meeting to discuss any portion of the Uniform Fire Code requirements, please contact Neil Shaw, plans reviewer, at 826-7100. Lou Gugliotta Fire Marshal P- City of Central Point EXHIEIT t'Tltt Planning Department THE PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT WILL BE DELIVERED SEPARATELY. ATTACHMENT E RECOMMENDED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The approval of the Site Plan shall expire in one year on January 4, 2001 unless an application for a building permit or an application for extension has been received by the City. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan depicting any changes discussed and approved at the public hearing within 60 days of Planning Commission approval. 2. The project must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations . The project must meet the off-street parking requirements for professional offices, and the parking, access and maneuvering areas shall be paved with durable materials for all-weather use and approved by the Public Works Department. The applicant will need to enter into an agreement with the City to share parking with the senior center prior to construction of the building addition. The applicant/property owner shall submit final parking, landscaping, lighting and sign plans to the Planning, Public Works and Building Departments for approval prior to obtaining any building permits. J v ~ ~ ~8 PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REP012T HEARING DATE:.Tanuary 4, 2000 TO: Central Point Planning Convnission FI20M: Tom Humpluey, AICP, Planning Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing- Tentative Minor Partition for 37 2W 1 IAD Tax Lot 6300 - Elden Smith. Owner/ Elden Smith Aprplicant: 9171 Sterling Creek Road Jacksonville, OR 97530 Aeent: L.J. Friar and Associates 816 West Eighth Street Medford, OR 97501 Pro er Description/ 37 2W 1 lAD Tax Lot 6300, 1.70 acres Zoning: R-1-8, Residential Single-Family District Summary The applicant, Elden Smith is proposing the minor partition of a 1.70 acre parcel into two parcels. The property is located near the intersection Pittview Avenue and Sydney Court in the R-1-8, Residential Single-Family Zoning District. Authority CPMC 1.24.020 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a tentative land partition. Notice of the public hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060. (Exhibit B). Annlicable Law CPMC 16.10.010 et seq. Tentative Plans CPMC 17.20.010 et seq. R-1, Residential Single-Family District CPMC 16.36.010 et seq. Major and Minor Land Partitions .l t Discussion The applicant, F,ldon Smith has been working with the Planning and Public Works Departments to determine if a residential subdivision could be constructed on one of several large parcels located north of Pittview Avenue. The area is one of a few remaining sections of the city that have not been developed to the full potential of the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. Mr. Smith has recently purchased one of the lots, a 1.70 acre parcel at 764 Pittview Avenue in the R-1-8, Residential Single-Family District. He would like to segregate the existing residence from a larger undeveloped portion of the property in preparation for a future residential subdivision. If approved, this partition would create a total of two parcels of 0.31 acres and 1.39 acres respectively. The Planning and Public Works Departments have reviewed the site plan and the tentative plan for the proposed minor land partition and have concluded that they comply with city requirements if all conditions of approval pertaining to site development, minimum lot size, public works standards and specifications and access to public roadways can be met. Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Minor Partition CPMC 16.10.010 requires that applications for tentative plans be submitted with improvement plans and other supplementary information as may be needed to indicate the development plan. The proposed minor partition satisfies the subdivision requirements listed in CPMC 16.36.030 and CPMC 16.36.040. The Public Works Department may request additional information to satisfy standard specification requirements. CPMC 17.28.050 establishes minimum area, width and access requirements for the R-1, Residential Single-Family district. ^ Parcels 1 and 2 of the proposed partition meet the area, width and access requirements for the R-1, Residential Single-Family District. The Public Works Department may request additional right of way on Pittview Avenue. i~ Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take one of the following actions: 1. Adopt Resolution No., approving the Tentative Minor Land Partition of 37 2W llAD "Tax Lot 6300 subject to the recommended conditions of approval (Exhibits CandD);or 2. Deny the proposed Tentative Minor Land Partition; or 3. Continue the review of the Tentative Minor Land Partition at the discretion of the Commission. Exhibits A. Tentative Plat B. Notice of Public Hearing C. Recommended Conditions of Approval D. Correspondence E. Public Works Staff Report -~X,~I~' ~~~''tt pianninU ~~~~~ ~'~'__. ~'~`~ .,,.. -------" M3N.lltd _.- --~- 3fIN3~Y uau .rte»9°~. (89Et ~ ~ OC^M ` r ~ rv.rt nxao'^ _ _ ~d k b S .~22 8 1`+~ ~ ~~_ 4 ~_~ ~~ _- ~ °~ ~ i1' R ~ g$11 ~ a~ i 1 a ~~y Yp ~~ ~N ~~~~ (~°si z. ~~c${ Q A[ ~~ t L 3.ud~nas a .~* ~¢~~ r.~ :~ ~., ~~ pyy~^ o~~ ~~ ~E~4a V ~* 1 ~~ d ~~ City of CentYal T pint PLANNING DEPARTMENT Tom Humphrey, AICP Planning Director I<en Gersch(er City of Central Point EXHI~~I'T t:B,t Planning Department Notice of Meeting '- Date of Notice: December 14, 1999 Meeting Date: Time: Place: NATURE OF MEETING January 4, 2000 7:00 p.m. (Approximate) Central Point City Hall 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review an application for a Tentative Partition in the vicinity of Sydney Court and Pittview Avenue. If approved, the partition would create two parcels of 13,644 and 60,701 square feet respectively. The subject parcel is located in a R-I-8, Residential Single Family Zoning District on Jackson County Assessment Plat 372W11AD, Tax Lot 6300. CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for Tentative Subdivisions are set forth in Chapter 16 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Regulations, Off-street parking, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Works Standards. PUBLIC COMMENTS Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned (and use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, January 4, 2000. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502. 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, Oft 97502 ~ (541) 664-3321 • I'ax: (541) 664-6384 ~~ 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Please ask for file number 99079. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664- 3321 ext. 291. SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staff reports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the Tentative Subdivision Plan. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 ~ (541) 664-3321 ~ Fax: (541) 664-6384 ca 2 ~. EXFIII3IT C PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMF,NDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The approval ofthe Tentative Plan shall expire in one year on January 4, 2001 unless an application for final plat or extension has been received by the City. 2. The project must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations. 3. The tentative and final plats shall depict utility easements requested by the City, BCVSf1 and WP Natural Gas. Any changes to utility layout including fire hydrants shall require subsequent approval by the respective service provider. ~~ t[/Ly(1999 09: ~7 6264566 JCFD3 BUS OFC PAGE 02102 FIRE DISTRICT' No. 3 JACKSON COUNTY 8333 AGATE ROAD, WHITE CITY, OREGON 97503-1075 (541) 826-7100 FAX (541) 826-4566 Hnvw~cfd3.com December 29, 1999 Ken Gerschler City of Central Point Re: 99079 (Eldon Smith Partition) CYry of Central Point E~HI~3IT' t'T1 tt Planning Department Fire District 3 will review the plans for this project when development submitted. Some of the area's to be reviewed are. 1. Minimum street width is 20ft with NO PARKING allowed. 2. Fire hydrants shall provide a minimum fire flow of 1000gpm. 3. Ali fire hydrants shall be painted to fire district 3 standards. ~. Addressing shall be visible for the street. If you have any questions please give me a call. ~~~s~~ Neil Shaw Deputy Fire Marshal are GYty of Central Point EXHIBIT ttE tt Planning Department THE PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT WILL BE DELIVERED SEPARATELY.