Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 724 - Chancellor Tentative PlanPLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ~ ~' A RESOLUTION GRANTING TENTATIVE PLAN APPROVAL TO CREATE FOUR (4) SINGLE FAMILY LOTS (Applicant: Matthew and Pamela Cllazlcellor) (37 2W 10DB, Tax Lot 9300, APN # 10202375) Recifal~ 1. Applicant has submitted an application to create four (4) single family residential Lots on property identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W 10DB, Tax Lot 9300, APN No. 10202375, consisting of approximately .90 acres in the City of Central Point, Oregon. 2. On, May ~., 2007, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted a duly-noticed public hearing on the application, at wl~icl~ tune it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimozly and comments on the application. Naw, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Criteria Applicable to Decision. The fallowing chapters of the Central Point Municipal Cade apply to this application: A. Chapter 16.10, Tentative Plan B. Chapter 16.36, Flag Lots C. Chapter 17.20, Residential Single Family Zoning (R~1-6) Section 2. Findings and Conclusions. The Planning Commission hereby adopts by reference all findings of fact set forth in City staff reports, and concludes that (City File No. 07102) the application and proposal comply with the requirements of the following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code: A. Chapter 16.10, relating to tentative plans B. Chapter 16.36, relating to flag Lots Planning Commission Resolution No. ~ Z ~ (050107) C. Cl-~apter17.2U, r~~1<~tit~~; to,Z~i»ir~7unz~1~1~7xin~u~~!~ c~t;ns~ti~~~,, l'S"I11~1~1(L11"k ~C,t{ ljl'l1Crt"1S1(>~15, 1111illlTll:li'~ l~)~;,~1%t' t~~ lllil\i111li~;l J4)~ sTC',,~ Section. Conditi~~~~a~l A rova~l. TI1~_~ City c>tCc~~~-~~'(, ~l~'c~i~t '1~~,~~~in4; Commissioa~ htc~rcl>~~ ~~~~~n~oves tl~e Apl~li{ ~ltiot~ ~~~i'~t~~i ~>~~ flu ~in~ii~~~,;; t:~~~cL cor~cl~ ions t7~ ~lpla,rov~ll ~~5 S('t fc7rtll ort ~~hihit "~", ! ~"it' I'1a111111~z?, f~)t'~~~li'~171ei1t Staff 1Zeport dated May 1, 2007, which ir-tl~~~l~~s attac~l>>~n~n[s, t~ntl ~ti~I~irJl is attached hereto by rcf~~~~~~n~°<~ a~~c~ incorp<~r~=tt~ti l~{~rei~~t, Passed by the Pla~~rtir~g Co~~z~~xli~sic?~~ and sigrlecl ~y «~~~ i~~t~~t~il~~ci~ti~'atio~~. of its passage this 1st clay of May, Zl)07. ATTEST: City I~~~rese~~tati4 Approved by e this 1st clay of May, 2007.. I'1a ~ r, ;i~ ~.g C~>m~zi~is:~;o~~~z.~ha i r ~ ~ . I'lanr~ing Commission l~.esolution l~io. ' 1 ~ ~ (050107) STAFF REPORT Ems''„ CENTRAL P41 NT STAFF REPORT May 1, 2007 Planning Department Tom Fiurriphrey,AlCf, Community Development Director/ Assistant City Administrator EXHIBIT 86 '°` '° APPLICATION ITEM: FILE NO. 07102 Tentative Plan Application A Public hearing to consider a Tentative Plan application for the purpose of creating four {4) residential lots -- three (3) new Iots and one with an existing home located at 3275 Snowy Butte l..ane. The subject property is located in an R-1-b, Residential Single 1lamily zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W l ODB, Tax Lot 9300. Applicant: Matthew & Pamela Chancellor .-, STAFF SOURCE: i Lisa Morgan, Planning BACKGROUND: The subject parent parcel consists of approximately .90 of an acre. There is an existing home on proposed Lot 1 of the Tentative Plan that will remain. It was constructed in 1998. There is a shed located within the proposed access to Lots 3 and 4 that will be removed. The existing home on proposed Lot 1, meets the setback requirements for the zoning district. Lots 1 and 2 would take individual direct access onto Snowy Butte Lane, with Lots 3 and 4 taking access from a flagpole easement and they are considered flag lots. The proposed Tentative Plan application meets all requirements, as outlined in detail in the Planning Department findings. (Refer to Attachment "B"}. FINDINGS: _ _ Refer to Attaclarr-ent "B". ISSUES: No issues have been noted during the review of this application. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Applicant shall meet the requirements of the Planning Department, Public Works Department, Building Department and outside agencies. Riley EstatesTentative Plan Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENTS/EXHIBITS: Attachment "A" -Tentative Plan Attachment "B" --Planning Department Findings Attachment "C" -Public Works Staff Report Attachment "D" -Building Department Staff Report Attachment "E" -Rogue Valley Sewer Services Comments Attachment "F" -Proposed Resolution ACTION: Consider approval for a Tentative Plan application to create four {4} single family lots. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Tentative Plan application per Staff Report dated May 1, 2007 including all attachments and exhibits to create four {4} single family lots, known as Riley Estates Subdivision. Riley EstatesTentative Plan Page 2 of 2 Nb r1a €'9~ C ~5 I K~ ~~ I I ;ovi aum m r.>swnn ,(YM N172SVri cc-ar-cv ~uxJ or-.: 73vJs ,u` ~ ~ C 5 ~ {~ s 11 ss i ~,'~ ,~ `I 3jS[{E{f; I f s I ! w/rt a Nr D m z f . r 4~nr w~f 553x03 !AY aSTN:M ~soaore ~'. )W+ <Gi Jt JLtlaf~Cf Y I ~OKftl IL t X .. +: "'-- ~.~ .. ~ t t! .P~h ./\. .OCI ./\„I STY ~. ft ~ ~# n ~ y ~ fsrc»Y..nc aoo ~.~'~! i,,3Jr Tarr ~~ ' ~.4nBi .. .S[Wf . ll I ~~ ~~ i ~~~ ~' '`' ~~: ~:,~ -iA3 (:343' '45 6s5p 4sr'.P ._._,._~.~~.___.__,..~. .., ~_) ~ (ssun~J~s reiot ~_. .... __ ..fr'ui't '... `r, 4 (ill 3 r~:e.ar rwsm ~' ~ .' (ssc+r~l LJm tin E ~ ! LV7 ; 1 I- AJl:s rxf ,..•f 4: 3usrkz:va '. ~ ` _oT ~I, I .. ~ _ 1 ~ ' . -~.._....s._ 1 G--r"-_:__.-. i ^g ~ YY~ •c .--~ VJ liP.Slt [•re11 ~.--~ yyN 4r~48 l~ .. '+~ ~1 1 1 l ,1 cr,al: I ~4. pmlflZ_t t \ h 1 runt O r 1 '.` rrP015 .% C}OrY"f1 ~ U~'e'1 n ~rdsxl'> =-1a --- t 1 1 ~: 1 ~14} ; 1' ; ~~ r'1 V ~~ 1~~F ~', 1~ .1 ~t v~ ,o ~ ~ ~s Mtl)11 _, fem. tn1 x+t atTlr +J tS xrvl hA[HI Jnard sc:C Av iJT`OVV A eAYf .x M'Oi A >ta !<7\f xf trMNY A'nY. 2rrr i13i/]rp.'1 Y 0. i~Tr 1331 41'SaLI~ rUll A]T13vYE 31[48 ix01n' ONY 7rh Y~ r>)tl J3fk]L 4r 1s1( r. .'VyLPA7 Y3{ V3'JYV13 dsJ xrrxMPl wWIJf ' tt4.1YJ rFHptl TYYilf1) S) lIr) ,v, n.1: xyrrt+,n18 1[al i]1 NS) N~ 3lotarYJr tpxs .Javurrr (s~ 3rownn rnYw nbau O .rtrn 4nY~ n [rn•OWH )yn JClt Lf YiS Yl1 iLY{] ]vlSW3a 3gLLffTJL to Ik'd b3SM W(7 lnv lnjU aao WIYf SYa XOV l4flJafs' ]I+WI[f xBb An.frLlsYJ AL: kur ,;rtpM Tn'i V31Y.:wY LUnlsrJ .~Jlarn yvaa .lrer3W Yr ---- ~fJfxn Jr fny[Tir1 N39NW --.- rm-s4x~~~u~n~r nnrtn c.m wm - -to- 1nn rraumf w~ora >.ri•ur P - r:Y,.~. vnY ;,+u~lv wxx~ra;rr+ Tr.i ilf Y~ -r.~-- - ~ST ran ~~~ -xr rrreo .uvys -w- Qfl~?: Lo~r 7 V~3 V +~JYi AbG ~~ Fs /-"i Lf~1t.3nFSnsar•:'n IYN~v~x~3~Q~fd .h.M9y R: df 1~.'LO t,SYI'e~Y' J371Lf5 HIYfRf 3S Sd0 L 31 &15 QYYI'1 rNV A9:sYi1A/ '?f.Fl AC'S kll ~$V2f2I;7. f. C is NCYY.3UV '.LN[9~'1v4.Lr[:SJ ]MY1 ,ry,r„a.lin w.ti\OtIS 9EC[i YTT±M1 rJ07: Rln ,Sw'Ifl.l 1YH,I.V:I.l _i.^IYT:1. r„L_[1a apttl NS Y1.'L.` 1t0'1"73~ttYF1~'V Y-1~L1'VSi P~'V M=1Ff.L~.I.Y Sti ~.~_n 1w yv AOL'i.f ['aa rr[.a: 1.T1 a -a tlLln4S uurvlt rfrSV~f .upJnYA+nl.io Aat]': <vtalwin tlta.lr:-l:,n }i. i_.xl gv.Ki .YJNYN lLe.wa 6 of [[tx~O.S e! v~f 1..\ K.iU Y:it NrlV [yv',nu[n» x1:. ~~ <~+[ r»• ~ofstntaans ~ S3tL1~.LS~ ~i3"tI2~ A.~"TACHMEN`f "~.." FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW File No. a71oz Applicants: Matthew and Pamela Chancellor INTRODUCTION In the matter of consideration of a Tentative Plan Application to create four (4) single family residential lots, identified on Jackson County Assessor's xnap as 37 2W IODB, Tax Lot 9300, APN # 10202375. CPMC 16.10.010-.16.10.090 ~ Relating to Submission of application and filing fee; Application and Review; scale; general information; existing conditions; additional information; partial development; explanatory information, tentative plan approval; and conditions on tentative plan approval. Findings: The applicant has submitted all the necessary information relevant to reviewing a tentative plan application. Conclusion: The application was deemed complete on April 2, 2007. CPMC I6.36.040 _ FIag Lots ~- No partition shall be approved in which a flag lot, as defined fn this title, is created unless: {A) The parent and flag Tots, excluding the flagpole, whether fee title or an easement, shall compl y with the minimum Iot size, Iot dimensions, and setback reguirernents for the zoning district in which the Tots are located; Findings: The parent parcel consists of apprnxin~ately .90 acres. The parent parcel is located within the R-1-C, Residential Single Family inning district with a minimum lot size requirement of 5,000 square feet. The subject parent parcel is 39204 square feet. The existing house which is identified to remain an proposed Lat 1 was constructedzn 1998. The existing house is compliant with the setback and Iat coverage requirements of the R- 1zoning district. The four proposed lots range in size from 6,909 - 8,724 net square feet not including the flagpole easement that lots 3 and 4 would take access from. Lots 3 and 4 are considered flag lots. Lots 1 and 2 would have their awn individual access from Snowy Butte Lane, and are not considered flag lots. The width of the proposed lots range fra~xr 61..90 on proposed Lot 3 to 85.22 net on proposed Lot 1. The setback requixenr-ents for Lats 2, 3, and 4 will be verified for compliance during the building permit review process. Conclusion: All Iots meet this requirement. (B) The flagpole shall be no less than twenty feet wide and paved to private standards as set forth in the Standard Specifications and Linifortn Details, City of Central Point Public Works Deparhnent; Page ~ of 3 Findings: The applicant has provided a 21' wide easement for access to proposed Lots 3 and 4, as well as a turn around between same mentioned lots. Conclusion: The proposed Tentative Plan meets this requirement. (C) No fence, structure, or any other physical obstacle shall be placed within the flagpole; and Findings: The Tentative Plan reflects an existing shed located within the flagpole easement. The shed is going to be removed. Conclusion: The Tentative Plan meets this requirement, and conditions of the Fire District ensure that compliance is maintained. {D} A maximum of two lots are allowed access from a flagpole. Findings: Lots 3 and 4 are the only Lots that will be taking access from the flagpole easement. Lot 1 will retain its existing access and Lot 2 will have its own access directly onto Snowy Butte Lane. Conclusion: The Tentative Plan meets this requirement. CPMC 17.20.010 -Purpose -The purpose of the R-1 district is to stabilize and protecf the urban Iozv densih~ residential clurracteristics of the district while promoting and encouraging suitable environments for family life. Findings: The applicant has met the purpose of the R-1 zoning district by proposing foux (4) single family residential Infs. The design and lot size requirements in the R-1-6 zoning district are consistent with the development that has occurred and will occur in this neighborhood. Conclusion: The applicant has satisfied the purpose of the R-1, Residential Single Family zoning district. CPMC 17.20.040 -Height Regulations - No building ar structure shall exceed thirtE~-free feet in height in an R-1 district. Findings: This is a tentative plan application and would not be addressed through the tentative plan criteria. Conclusion; This will be reviewed during the building permit review process. Page 2 of 3 CPMC 17.20.050 - Densify, Lot Area, Lot Width, dirnertsion, building height, Iot coverage, and yard requirements -The follozc~ing regtsirentents shalX be obsen~ed in tfre R-1-& district: Findings: Densify: In the R-1-6 zoning district the minimum. density allowed is 4 units per acre, and the maximum density allowed is 6 units per acre. Based upon the size of the parent parcel (.90 of an acre) the minimum density allowed would be three (3) lots and the maximum density allowed would be five (5) units. However, in order to maintain the minirx~um/maximum lot size requirements and access requirements for this parcel, the applicant can yield a maximum of four (4) lots. Conclusion: The applicant has met the density requirements of the zoning district. Minimurr~/Maximum LotArea: The minimum lot area permitted in the R-1-6 zone is 5,000 square feet and the maximum allowed is 9,000 square feet. The proposed lots (excluding the flagpole) range in size from 6,909 - 8,878 square feet. Conclusion: The applicant has proposed lots that are within the square footage range allowed in this zoning district. Minimum Lot Width and Lot Depth: The mirumum lot width within this zoning district is 50 feet. There is not a minimum lot depth requirement. The applicant has proposed lots ranging in width from 61.90 to $5.22. Conclusion: The Iots proposed meet this requirement. Minimum setbacks, building height and maximum lot coverage: The minimum front yard set back is 20 feet, the maximum building height is 35 feet, maxirnurr- lot coverage is 50%, and the side yard setbacks for new construction will be determined by calculations during the building permit review process. Conclusion: Review of the building permits will ensure compliance with these requirements. Page 3 of 3 Public Works Department ~. CENTRAL PC) I I\IT PUBLIC T~DRKS ~SYT~(FF IZL 1'OR `~' April l l., 2007 AGENDA ITEM: ~TT~~HM~NT "~~ Bof~ Pierce, Director Maft Samifare, Dev. Services Coard. Four Lot Subdivision for 37-2W-lODB, Tax Lot 9300 Applicant: Matthew and Pamela Chancellor, 3275 Snowy Butte Lane, Central Point, OR 97502 Zoning: R-1-6, Residential Single Family Traffic: Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (1TE}Trip Gezzeration Manual, a four lot subdivision will generate approximately 4.04 peak hour trips {PHT}. The City of Central Point typically requires traffic studios for any development that generates more than 25 PHT. No traffic st~idy is warranted for this development. Existing Infrastructtiyre: Water: There is an existing 8-inch waterline in Holley Way and a 12-inch in Snowy Butte Lane. Stann Drain: There is an existing 12-inch storm drain line in Holley Way and Snowy Butte Lane. Street Section: Snawy Butte Lane is a City Minor Residential Street. Engineering and Development Plans and Permits: The Central Point Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Constz-uction" shall govern how public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications from the Public Works Department. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and prof le for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin znap, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the f nal construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Perrriit is issued. Conditio~zs of Approval: 1. Snow~Butte Lane Moratorium -There is a two-year moratorium on all street cuts on Snowy Butte 940 Sauth Third Sfreet ~ Central Paint, OR 97502 ~ 541.664.3321 Fax 641.664.6384 Lane. The Street was paved infrastructure associated with until October of 200$. n October of 2006 and caz~~~ot be cut a~;t~in until October of 2008. All the developEnent of Riley Estates 31~ust come fi-otl~ Holley Way or wait 140 South Third Street Cenfral Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 Fax 541.664. &384 ATTACHMENT "~" City of Central Point, Oregon Building Department 14DSa.T~irdSt.,Central Point, Or975D2 541.664.33,21 Fax 54i.b64.6384 www.ci.cent ra I -poi nt.o r. u s Lois [JeBer3eclctti,l3uildiny Official BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF' KEPORT DATE: 415/07 TO: Planning Department Planning file: 0X02 FROM: Building Department SUBJECT: Subdivision (Riley Estates) Name: Chancellor Address: 3275 Snowy Burte Lane City: Central Point State; OR Zip Code: 97502 Property Description: 37S-2W-IOD$-9300 PUI2.POSE: The staff report is to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Applicant regarding City Building Department requirements and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed project. This is not a pion review. Tlais report is preliminary and compiled solely for use by the Central Point Planning Commission. 1 City of Central F~oint, Oregon i405o.T#~ird St.,Central €'oint,Or97502 541.bb4.33~1 Fax 541.6b4.6384 www.ci.central-point.or.us Building Department Lois DeBcnedetti, f3uildinq Official BU~LD~NG DEPARTMENT C4MMEN'TS: 1. Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with all current State of O>;'egon adopted codes, and apply for all permits through the Central Point Building Department. 2. ff a private storm drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing Department. 3. Any pit~ivate street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Electrical Department. 4. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 of the OSSC. A written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the following information: a. A plot plan showing tl~e location of all test borings and/or excavations. b. Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. When expansive soils are present, special provisions sl;all be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geotechnicai recommendations. S. Grading/excavation permits are required in accordance witlx OSSC Appendix J and chapter I $ and regarding any f 11 material placed on the site. Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practices. A soil investigation report, and a report of satisfactory placement of fill {including special inspections of placement of fill and compaction) acceptable to the Building Official, shall be submitted prior t© final of the grading/excavation permit. Building permits will not be issued until grading/excavation permit is approved and finalled. Exception: f . The upper 1.5 foot of fill placed outside of public rightsWof way. 2. Tl~e upper I.5 foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. 2 City of Central Paint, Oregon 1~4 Sa.Third St.,Central Point. Or9/SD2 541.b64.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 www.ci.central-point.or.us Building Department Lois UeBenecietti, t3uildinq 0€ficial 6. To move or demolish any existing structures located on the property call tlae Building Department for permit requirements. 7. Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on the property. 8. Any development (any man-made change) to improved or unimproved real estate located within the flood hazard area of tl~e City of Central Point sha11 require a Development Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code 8.24.120. 9. Dust control, erosion control, and track out eliminations procedures must be implemented. 10. Application for building permits will require tlaree sets of complete plans indicating compliance with Oregon Residential. Specialty Code (2005). 11. Fire District 3 will detezmine fire hydrant location, as well as access to buildings. Any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Applicant, or Applicant's contractor to the Building Department for approval prior to start of work. Respectfully, Todd Meador Plans Examiner {6b4-3321-ext. 228) 3 ATTACHMENT " ~- " ~~~~ ~~w~~~~ ~~ April 5, 2007 ROGUE VALLEY SEWER SERVICES 1_ncalirns: 133 \i'csi Vilas Kuaci. C'cr3rc,il 1'ninl- (3R - Alailing Adciress: E'.U. 13nx ? 13r), ('cntr~fl I'oinl. utt 75t1~-I)(1OS l-cI. (~~~ 1 } (,bd.n3Oq. I~ax (i4 I 1 (,(i f-7171 w~eu•.€tVfi,ti.lis Lisa Morgan City of Central Point Planning Departai~ent l55 Sorlth Second Strect Central Paint, Oregon 97502 Re: Riley Estates Subdi~isioy~, 1+iie #07102 Dear Lisa, The existing house is currently served by a connection to the sewer main an Snowy Butte Station. The proposed development will not affect this service. Sewer service to the new lots will require a main fine extension. This main line must be designed and constructed in accordance with RVS standards prior to the issuance of any sewer permits. The project is within the Phase 2 Stormwater area and is required to meet relevant stormwaterquality requirements. Rogue Valley Sewer Services requests that approval of the proposed development be subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant must submit a Stormwater plan to RVS. The plan must be approved by RVS prior to the start of construction. 2. The applicant must design and construct the sanitary sewer extension in accordance with RVS standards. Feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding this project. Sincerely, .--~-~~- Carl TaPpert, P.E. District Engineer K:IDATAIAGENClES1CENTPTIPLANNGISUBDIVISION12007107102 RILEY ESTATES. DOC a~rra~HM~Nr;~ ~ ,~ ____~. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING TENTATIVE PLAN APPROVAL TO CREATE FOUR (~) SINGLE FAMILY LOTS {Applicant: Matthew and Pamela Chancellor} (37 2W IODB, Tax Lot 9300, APN # 10202375} Recitals 1. Applicant has submitted an application to create four (4} single family residential Lots on property identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W 10DB, Tax Lot 9300, APN No. 10202375, consisting of approximately .90 acres in the City of Central Point, Oregon. 2. On, May 1, 2007, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted a duly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments on the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Criteria Applicable to Decision. The following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code apply to this application: A. Chapter 16.10, Tentative Pian B. Chapter 16.36, Flag Lots C. Chapter 17.20, Residential Single Family Zoning (R-1-6) Section 2. Findings and Conclusions. The Planning Commission hereby adopts by reference all findings of fact set forth in City staff reports, and concludes that (City File No. 07102) the application and proposal comply with the requirements of the following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code: A. Chapter 16.10, relating to tentative plans B. Chapter 16.36, relating to flag lots Planning Commission Resolution No. (050107) C. Chapter 17.20, relating to minimum/maximum densifies, minimum Iof dimensions, rninimurn lot size & maximum Iof size Section 3. Conditional Approval. The City of Central Point Planning Commission hereby approves the Application based on the findings and conclusions of approval as set forth on Exhibit "A", the Planning Department Staff Report dated May 1, 2007, which includes attachments, and which is attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this xst day of May, 2007. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this ~.st day of May, 2007. Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. X050107}