HomeMy WebLinkAboutCM110971~D~.
C~
City Hall Building
`?50 East Pine Street
Central Point, Oregon 97501
November 9, 1971
..The Meeting was called to order at 8:05 P.M. by Mayor,Manasco.
Present: Mayor Manasco, Councilmembers Almquist, Hadley, Hamer and Tally.
Absent: Councilmember Rowe, and unfilled vacancy. ,
Other Present:. City Treasurer Tate, City Administrator Hutton,. Police Chief
~Sander.s, Fire Chief Higinbotham, Public Works Superintendent Capps, and
Building Inspector Chastain.
U.thers Absent: City Recorder Zander.
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council held October 26, 1971
,were approved on motion by Hamer, seconded by Almquist and unanimous, affirma-
tive vote of Counc-ilmembers present.
The Oath of Office for Mayor Manasco was announced as having been administered
,,by..City Recorder Zander at 4:45 P.M. on Thursday, November 4, 1971.
-The appointment of a councilman to fill the vacancy in Ward,.4.was continued`to
the Regular Meeting to be held on December 14th, 1971.. by .unanimous consent of
the• Council... ~ -
The election~of~a Chairman of the Council was the next consideration. Council-
members Almquist, Rowe and Hamer were nominated. The City Attorney tallied the
votes and~announce.d~that one nominee had received a plurality but, not .a majority
_ and the other two_ had received identical votes., Due to the absence of Council-
man Rowe and the unfilled vacancy, it was agreed by the. Council that another
effort be made to elect the Chairman at the December 14, 19.71 Mee ing of .,the„
. Council.
Mayor Manasco announced receipt of a notice of a meeting on Water Cross Connee-
tion to be held in-the Medford City Hall at 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday November 16`,
- 197.1..` Public Works. Supt. Capps or one of his staff will attend.
The request of Councilman Tally for repairs to North Central Valley Drive was
reported~on by~the City Administrator showing an estimate of $3,AOO.UO ao recap
`.66.0 lineal feet of ;36 foot paving but pointing out the deficiency of the curbs
which should be .replaced before street. repair - and this would cost approx-
mately X2,500.00 additionally. It was recommended by the Administrator, .that
this .should be considered a property-owners cost and could be financed by the`,
Bancroft Act. Messrs.. L. Hoback, Jim McBee., Kerry Lay and Mrs. Tom~Malot, all
,residents on the street in question, presented themselves stating their individ-
Dual vie'ws~to the effect that the street shouldn't be repaired until the .curbs
` were. repaired and that the curb cost shouldn't be charged to the property-owners
since: apparently the City. had accepted inferior work .and. material some seven
years ago-when the Subdivision was accepted. Some concern was shown that any
'~
great amounts of money should be expended on this street; as the type and
amount of street base was a question, also. All aspects of the street
condition and proposed repair were thoroughly discussed and each who cared
were given the chance to present their views. No decision was reached by °:-
the Council and the matter was continued to allow Councilman Tally to ex-
plore the possibilities with the property-owners and consider the costs
involved.
Mr. Earl Kelley next appeared before the City Council to inquire.of any
steps that could be taken or any progress that had been exper_3eneed in
acquiring a°separate mail ZIP code for the City., The Mayor reviewed past
efforts made on behalf of the Gity to this~end and indicated an effort would
be made to see what additional steps could be taken at this time to acquire
this number. It was pointed out that the name or number of nearly every street
in Central Point was duplicated in the City of Medford and this fact seriously
hampers the timely mail distribution.
Mr. Edward Bassett once again presented the problem of residential construction
without provision for sanitary facilities for the workers. He stated that
this was objectionablhe to neighboring houses which were occupied. Upon re-
consideration of this subject previously presented by the citizen, the City
Council instructed the City Attorney to provide the necessary amendatory ordi-
nance for its consideration.
'Mayor Manasco announced that funds were available through. the Rogue Valley
Council of Governments, Jackson County and Federal programs for the 701
Planning grants and-there, were few requests for these funds from eligible
agencies. He explained that if the City approved the application for these
funds and it was approved,`certain benefits could accrue to the City; namely,
to update and expand the General Land, Use Plan to a point where it can be
adopted, plan for fringe areas to the City to outline. future growth and con-
trol of development,, and to provide factual information for consideration of
,.zoning ordinance revision. Upon motion by Hadley, seconded by Almquist,
authority was granted Mayor Manasco to prepare an application for a grant of
701 Planning Fonds in the amount of ~8,000.OU for the City of Central Point.
An Ordinance amending~Ordinance No. 1022 "An Ordinance initiating the street
proceedings for real property therein described, setting a.time and date for
public hearing to be held on the question of_said vacation, and providing for
the giving of notice as required by ORS:Chaper 271" was presented which would
add Lot 15 of Block 2, Oak Park Addtion~to those lots mentioned in the original
ordinance and erroneously omitted therefrom. On moti"on by Almquist, seconded
by Hadley, Ordinance No. 10221 as revised, was adopted by unanimous affirmative
. vote of Councilmembers present.
An .Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 1026 "An Ordinance vacating a certain
pub"lic street and alley, as described herein" was next presented which also
included the additional of Lot 15, Block 2 of the Oak Park Addition which also
had been erroneous y omitted from the original version<`of the ordinance was
adopted. Upon motion by Almquist, seconded by Hadley and unanimous votes of
all councilmen present, Ordinance #1026 (revised) ivas adopted..
w ~, '_.
• kt~ ~'-'
City.Attorney Mansfield presented an ordinance for_ Council, consideration •
which would initiate proceedings and set, December 14, 1971 as a date ,of •
public hearing on the.. matter of the withdrawal of the Elmore annexation
from;the Bear Creek ValleyxSanitary Authority and ahe Central Point Rural
Fire Protection Di trict.. On motion by Hadley, seconded, by Almquist, City
Ordinance No. 102as adopted by a unanimous vote of Councilmen present.
The City Administrator presented application for renewal of liquor licenses
from the-following:
_.- ~Riehard's,Food.Centers, Inc_. dba Pay and Save Market
~~C..R. McDowell dba Economy Market ,
~` - R.F. and R.. I. Arndt, dba The Corner Clnb
~"'` ~ ~ Dale and, Evelyn Van Wey, .dba Van Wey's Market.
~ ' Motion by Hamer, seconded by Tally and affirmative vote•of Councilmen .
~~, 'present, the~four applications were approved.
~?
The City Administrator then presented the application of Mayor Manasco for
a'variance to permit the construction of a 6-foot fence along Mazama Street,
..approximately 12 feet inside the curb line instead of the 32 foot height
.authorized by code. After a thorough discussion of the application and. the
. variance procedure as authorized by the City code and the description by
,.Mayor Marasco that this was repairing or replacing an existing fence which
was constructed prior to the aoioption of the fence ordinance anoi would not
obstruct.v;eion at. the street intersection, the variance was approved.on
motion by Hadley, seconded by Almquist and a unanimous affirmative vote.of
~the.Councilmembers..present.
•i The City •Administrator•then presented the situation at-the site-of construe-
tio)n of'.2•oiuplexes at 253 and 255 North First Street; Doug Pickell, contractor
and owner. These are-concrete block buildings being constructed in City Fire
Zone l and either. through ignorance of requirements or oversight,• flexible
plastic wiring had ..been installed instead of conduit or thin-wall (flexible
metal cable~~. This violation was noted by Mr. Brooks, State Electrical
.Inspector., and construction was halted. Mr. Pickell had requesteoi relief
through-ahe City ..Administrator through ,a,waiver or variance which would. allow
hm:to,proceed. -The Ciay Attorney advised the Council that they. did ,not have
the legal authority to ..grant a waiver or variance in this matter. ,After
thorough;dscussion of the matter, .the City Council, by common consent,..,.,
determined that the contractor must comply with-the restrictions before pro-
ceedng, and was not interested in considering amending the ordinance to
-allow.for•a variance procedure. The Council concluded the matter by refusing
to takeaction on Mr. Pickell's request as related by the City Administrator.
The ;City Attorney presented an ordinance for Council consideration"Relating
to trespass and loitering in school buildings or. on school grounds and
amending Ordinance No. .306". This proposed ordinance was discussed by.the~
City Attorney and indicated that it had a reserved approval by the .,Gity:Police
' Chief. and had been the result of various meetings with school officials. It
was suggested that if the Council wished time to review the progisions and
consequences, the matter of adoption could be postponed to a later meeting as
..y.
{ d ~ ~ .. ..
~~
~'' (1
e~:_c~
it was agreed that .no dire emergency existed which would require its
immediate adoption.' By common consent of the City Council, the consider-
ation for adoption of this Ordinance was delayed until the Regular Meeti+ng
of the City Council to be held December 14, 1971. Mayor Manasco then
announced that it would be his desire that only ordinances ordered prepared
by the Council or emergency ordinances should be considered for adoption
on"the day presented, and all others should be accepted-for study only;
and consideration for adoption at.a later date.
The City Attorney next presented an Ordinance "Relating .to the. Building
Code and amending Ordinance No. 853". It was explained that this removed
the objection of having to first get a permit before doing`roiitine mainten-
ance on~dwellings and other buildings. There appeared to be some ambiguity
to the ordinance as permits .for maintenance work was required in one section.,
but in another section of the ordinance they were not required. This amenda-
tory ordinance would require a'permit only in the case of involving'structural
changes and structural additions. Ordinance No. 1030 was adopted.on motion
by Hamer, seconded by Tally and unanimous affirmative vote of Councilmembers
present.
The City .Attorney next presented an Ordinance '!Relating to Trains and amending _
Ordinance No. 108". It was explained that .this ordinance provides for a fine
of not less than $5.00 or more than $200.00 and imprisonment of not less than
1 nor more than 30 days, or both, upon conviction of blocking any City streets
with trains .for a period greater°than 5 minutes. The former provisions.in-
cluded fines of $5.00 to $20.00 and imprisonment of 1 day to 10 days or both.
This Ordinance was prepared at the direction of the Council in an effort to
relieve-past infractions. Ordinance No. 1031 was adopted on motion by
Hadley,..seconded by Tally and unanimous affirmative vote of Councilmembers
present.
The .City .Attorney explained the case of State of Oregon (Department of Environ-
mental Quality" versus The City of Central Point.. This case relates to the
City dumping raw `sewage into .Bear Creek., The full legal implications of all
the. legal aspects were discussed and 'the City Attorney .requested authority
from he ,City Council to proceed to enter a stipulation .for consent decree.
The case originally scheduled for Court on November 8, 1971 had baan~;:continued
. to November,l5, 1971 and could be extended further if necessary to allow proper
officials to appear who would be in Portland attending the annual conference
o~f The League of Oregon Cities,+
Mayor Manasco then inquired of progress by the City .Planning Commission on
the formation of a policy on the removal of trees in the street-right-of-way.
He was advised that the Planning Commission had not yet had an opportunity
to meet on this subject since the .matter had been referred by the Council.
A report from the City Administrator on a.proposal for gasoline storage
facilities was not available for presentation at this time.-
1
~~,
~3
-}.~pr
r/o:1
l
The Mayor announced the following committees of the City Council:
Administrative Committee: D. Almquist, Chairman
a H. Tally':
L. L. Rowe
Police"~ and Fire:
- Water and Sewer:
Street and Parks:
D. Hadley, Chairman
D. Almquist
L. L. Rowe, Chairman
H. Tally
0 Hamer
0. Hamer, Chairman
D. Hadley
It was-pointed out that when the Council vacancy from Ward 4 was filled,
"that individual would fill the third spot on the Committees formed which
only had: two members".
Upon motion by Hamer, seconded by Hadley, the bills as presented for payment
Gist attached were ordered paid upon the unanimous affirmative vote of the
Councilmembers present.
There being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting was
adjourned at 10:37 P.M. upon a motion by Hamer and seconded by Almquist and
a unanimous affirmative vote of Councilmembers preaent.
Warrant.. No. ~
.6057 ~ ...:. Petty Cash 29.74
6058...• Petty Cash 400.00
6059.,,.,< U. S. Post Office 85.00
6060 .:~. State of Oregon, Dept. of Revenue 90.00.
6061 Petty Cash 85.U0
6062 -, Petty Cash 280.00
6063 >.. Bond and Interest Account 6,292.50
6064 ~= Atlantic Richfield Company 5.97
6065-~. Automotive Machine Co. 22.93
6066 - e American Linen Supply 55.97
6067 .~,- Baumans Fire Equipment Sales 6.00
6068--.. .,_ Badger Meter, Inc. 75.88
6069 -. Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority 8,764.59
607U •~_ Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority 623.94
6071 Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority 953.61
6072 Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority 119.89
6U73 Central Point Pharmacy 3.15
6074 Joe R. Chastain -14.82
6075 Central Poirit Cleaners 44.32
6076 Chuck's Pump Service, Inc. 144.96
6077 Meza Electrical Contracting 50.00
-6078 Central Point Florist 15.00
~~~~~
Warrant No.
6079
6080
6081
6082
6083
6084
6085
6086
6087
6088
6089
6090
6091
6092
6093
6094
6095
6096
6097
6098
6099
6100
6101
6102
6103
6104
6105
6106
6107
6108
6109
6110.
6111
6112
6113
6114
6115
6116
6117
6118
6119
11.46
12.41
41.07
104.0?
145.19
12.70
37.OU
646.15
6.40
26.99
11.25
7.40
4,287.33
25.00
7:50
15.22
25.00
308.00
3,845.24
16.01
62.40
9.30
65.00
451.20
23.36
2.50
26.15
27.49
274.00
7.41
85.00
437.74
62.45
350.23
97.06
1,L58.63
213.0$
114.00
2,261.54
10.00
14,059.00
Approved ~% /~/~~ -
Attest:
California Pacific Utilities Co.
California Pacific Utilities Co.
Concrete Steel Corporation
Cascade Eleetric~Motor Service
Del Chemical Corporation
Farmer's Light & Electric Supply Inc.
Ray George
General Electric Company
General Machine Works
Grange Cooperative Supply Assn.
Hoopers Radiator Service
Industrial Air Products Co.
International Harvester Co.
Federal Aids Service, NLC-USCM
Lind's Photographic Repair Service
Gorden Hardware
International Assn of Chiefs of Police
M & M Agency
Jackson County Circuit Court Clerk
Medford Printing Company
McLaren Oil Company
SYalt-Young Medford Stationery
Nudelman Brothers
Neptune Meter Company
Power Transmission Products
Southern Oregon Trophy Company
Southern Oregon Stationery
Selby Glass Company
Texaco, Inc.
Van Wey's Market
Valley Janitor Service
Valley Office Equipment
Xerox Corp.
Pacific Northwest Bell Tel. Co.
Medford Water Commission
Pacific Power and Light Co.
Pete's Time Oil Station
Anhorn-Faber Ins.
City of Medford -
State of Oregon Traffic Safety Programs, DMV
Payroll Account
Approved by me this
L.3 ~ day of /~/(~(~' . 1971.
Approved ~/ ~~~~~~.~ .
7
1