Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Resolution 727 - Malot CUP & Site Plan - Oak St.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ~ ~ ~ A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FITNESS CENTER AND SECOND FLOOR PROFESSIONAL OFFICES AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MIXED USE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT Applicant: The Crossing at Center Point, LLC, Agent: Tornrny Malot (375 2W 11BB, Tax Lots 500, 600 and 700) File No. 0710& WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted applications for Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan approval for the construction of a three-story mixed commercial and residential building located within a TOD- l-IMR, High Mix Residential zoning district. The property consists of approximately 23,1D0 sq. ft. gross acreage and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 11BS, Tax Lots 50D, 600 and 700, located at 312 Oak Street, in the City of Central Point, Oregon; and WHEREAS, on May 1, 2007, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted a duly-noticed public hearing on the applications, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments on the applications; and WHEREAS, the PIanning Commissions consideration of the applications is based on the standards and criteria applicable to the TOD-HMR, High Mix Residential section 1.7.65, Application Review Process section 17.66 and Design Standards - TOD District section 17.67, Conditional Use Permit section 17.76 and Site Plan criteria section 17.72 of the Central Point Municipal code; and WHEREAS, the PIanning Commission, as part of the Site PIan application, has considered and finds per the Staff Report dated May 1, 2007, that adequate findings have been made demonstrating that issuance of the conditional use is consistent with the intent of the TOD-HMR District ,now therefore BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point PIanning Commission, by this Resolution No. ~'2"] does hereby approve the applications based on the findings and conclusions of approval as set forth on Exhibit "A -Revised", the Staff Report dated May 1, 2007, which includes attachments, is attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. PIanning Commission Resolution No. ~ ~~ (050107) PACED lay tl~~~ l'laz~i7~g C;c~n~tn~tissi~~n and signe>cl lay n~e~ i~, a~.~tl~c~nticatic~n c~( its laassag~ this 1~~ clay c~1 ~`C~~ ~ , 2007. I~la_~_rrl.~-~~. Ct7m~~~~~5~~;i{~~~.~t, I,,,i~~ ~.TTEST: ~~ pity Repl~:~~ ~lativ~: Apprt~v~c~ lay ~ fhis 14t c~iay cif lvlay, 2007. ~PL. t~r~il ~ ~ ~, ~~_>1~Zt11iw5~t~~ri ~ _ ~.~_ir Planning Ccammissican Rcscalutic~n ltiIa. ~~ {050107) EXHIBIT" A " S CI Cep M W .. ~--. ay 1, ~t707 I""tC31 .1"t~lf ~lorrr iir.rr~r~~lrr~y, AIC:{? ~.carrrrYrrrr~ity ~:)c~velr~~'srr~r>rrt f3irecEr>rP d~ssi~t<arrt City ~rirr~ir~istr~atr~r Tam fluauphrey, C~anu~.x ity Develapment T)irectar ~-CI~G ~1 ~ 'r y ~ ;r~ ,Lr.at> b .i~ ~ i ~~'~ s t~ ~~ ,~ ~, ~. ~'~ ~.~ ~""" ' a _ ~ ~ '` .~ <~ Qr1 B:diQ LIL1T(I. ILrfJQT. l.3rT~CtUi1t11LU^tiT Dti[SiT1~SS~S WitilLil d ,~,,..,.. ultif °ly huildin are pe fitted ar permitted with review in the TC?i~ HMR caning district. Perrsan~l service erientecl businesses such ;~ the fitness center and the ascend start' prefessienal offices require a ~anditie ~.Tse Pe it review. The s c 's fatal grass Haar a is 26,030 sq a feet. Ttetail ce ercial and a member's fitness rater are prapesed far the gra d Haar, elevater will previde access to the ascend Haar offices 'th a sec "ty card central far the third Haar to eg d access far the residents, i CPM!~ Section 17.5.+DS4, T~bte i The residential units will be two-bedroom apartments, each one with a balcony. `I'fie project's design includes landscaped areas and twenty-three (23}off-street parking spaces. Eight of the off street parking spaces will be covered and assigned to the unit residents. Diagonal parking (19 spaces} have been incorporated into the design along both Oak and Third Streets. Utilities are available and adequate to service the proposed development. Designated landscaped areas also along Uak and Third streets will provide street trees and pedestrian travel ways. Oak and Third Streets, along with an existing alley provide public access to the project. Ingress and egress to the interior parking area will utilize the existing twenty foot wide alley. The alley, located along the southern property line, will be paved as part of the project development. Conditional Use: The intent of this project is to support the City's ongoing efforts to promote `mixed- use' development where people live and work at a single location that combines personal service, commercial, professional affce space and residential uses. Because the project proposes a fitness center and the second floor professional offices2, a conditional use review is required. The TOD District encourages multifamily and senior housing along with complementary commercial use within the HMR district. The TOD-HMR designation and this site are located in the center of the Downtown TOD District. Given the higher densities, support activities, such as retail sales and services, and professional offices are permitted in addition to multiple family residences. Second story professional offices are permitted in areas adjacent to Employment Commercial (EC} districts. As the name implies, the EC designation supports employment and is generally located along Pine Street where there are existing EC uses. City Hall is adjacent to the subject property and is considered its own employment center with offices located on the f rst and second floors. Although the zone designation for City Hall is Civic, the function and location of its offices are similar to those being proposed in `The Crossing'. City Hall and this proposed development are both positioned along Third Street which is intended to be a `civic corridor'. The Central Paint Downtown Revitalization PIan3 supports the TOD-District in recognizing the location of Third and Oak Streets as an important cross-axis to Pine Street. The Plan notes that Third Street can play a significant role in the revitalization of Downtown and the area has already been enhanced by the siting of City Hall and the County Library. The addition of The Crossing is expected to contribute further to vibrant redevelopment on Oak and Third Streets. The Downtown Plan states that the City should continue to encourage new upper-story office space to house community serving businesses as well as new retailers. When considering a Conditional Use in the TOD District, key criteria in the CPMC include: l . That the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use and to meet all other development and lot requirements for the zoning district; and 2. That the site has adequate access to a public street that the street can effectively accommodate traffic that may be generated by the proposed uses; and z CPMC Section 3 7.G5.050 Table T a CentzaI Point Downtown Revitalization Plan, pages E 8 &42. Page 2 of 5 3. That the proposed uses (fitness center and the professional offices} will have no significant adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted uses thereof, and 4. That second story offices may be permitted in the HMR zone when adjacent to Employment Commercial areas; and whether employment centers within the Civic designation (the Library and City Hall} have the same ar a similar intent as the EC zone, 4 and; 5. That the conditions required far approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health safety and general welfare. In reviewing the project, it has been determined that as presented, the project is in general compliance with the above key criteria {see Attachment "G" far detailed Endings). Density and Coverage: For the property, the minimum allowed density is 16 units per net acres. The project proposes 18 units, which is consistent with the HMR density requirements. The minimum lot area for multifamily ar senior housing is 1,000 sq. ft. The project proposes eight (8} residential units, which fall within the HMR lot area requirements. The maximum allowed coverage is 85%. This figure is based on a gross acreage calculation. After taking into consideration, the gross acreage of the project the proposed coverage is 83.3%, which is in compliance with the CPMC. Table 1 Setbacks: The property is located at the comer of Oak and Third Streets. The site plan (Attachment B, sheet 1 }provides a twenty-one {21 }foot rear setback, a six (6) foot west side yard and a fifteen (15} foot east side yard setback, each of which is within the requirements of the CPMC. Parking: Section 17.65.050, Table 3 identifies the minimum parking requirements for the project. Parking standards may be reduced 25% when parking: Required The Crossing Residential 8 Unifs 1.5 (5D% 12 Covered = 6) Or Senior Housing 1 (50% Covered =4) 8 Professional Office 1 sp per 400 sq ft 20 -20 Refail 5aleslServiee 1 sp per 500 sq f# 18 =16 To#ai Parking 48 25% ReducedlTransit = 12 3S 44 transit service is provided an the TOD district. Shared parking is also encouraged in the TOD and requirements may be further reduced when reciprocal agreements for shared parking are recorded. In this case, there are opportunities for shared parking in the immediate area. The project site is within the Rogue Valley Transportation District. Based on the project's specifc uses, a minimum of 36 parking spaces are needed, ~1~1 are proposed. Eight to twelve parking spaces are required for the residential use. Per the TOD regulation, 50% of these parking spaces must be covered (six spaces). As designed, the project provides for eight covered parking spaces. The above table, Table 1, illustrates that the project complies with the City's minimum parking requirements. Architecture! Design: The TOD District encourages multifamily housing along with complementary commercial use within the HMR district. a CPMC 17.65.040(B)(1)and (C} 5 CPMC Section 17.6S.OS0 Table 2 Page 3 of 5 The Site Plan application includes architectural elevations, parking and landscape plan (Attachment 13}. The building design is similar to new construction in the area and the earth tone material colors are found to compliment the adjacent City Hall. The developer is proposing to use construction techniques that will give the new building an `aged' appearance. Landscaping and Open Space; The project includes 3,025 square feet of landscaped open space accounting for 13% of the total property area. The minimum landscape requirement is 1 S%6 . The applicant has agreed to provide additional landscaped areas. The addition of a rooftop garden and patio- scapes on the individual balconies are two suggestions presented by the applicant. A review of the planting diagram finds that additional street trees are required on Third Street in order to meet provisions of Section 12.36. The additional landscaped areas} and street trees will be included in the landscape and irrigation plan submitted to the Public Works Department for review prior to issuing a building permit. This is recommended as a condition of approval. FINDINGS: See attached Attachment "G" ISSUES: 1. The Conditional Use Permit requires the interpretation and finding that the intent and current uses in the Civic zoning district are similar to the Employment Commercial (EC} designation which would subsequently allow second story professional offices in the HMR zone when adjacent to either EC or Civic zones. 2. Additional landscaped areas and street trees are necessary to meet the code requirements. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The consolidation of tax lots 500, 600 and 700 will be done prior to approval of any building permits. 2. The additional landscaped areas} and street trees will be included in the landscape and irrigation plan submitted for review to the City Public Works Department prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. The applicant shall submit lighting and signage plans prior to building permit approval. Said plans shall be consistent with the provisions of CPMC Sections 15.24, 17.60.110 and 17.67.050(M}. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide plans that illustrate a required minimum number of covered parking as part of the project. 5. Conditions as listed by the Central Point Public Works Department (Attachment C} 6 CPMC Section 17.65.454 Table 2 Page 4 of 5 5a. Prior to the building permits being finaled, an irrigatio~l plan is required. Additionally, all perimeter and interior landscaping and street trees must be installed per the applicants Landscape and Irrigation Plan. Sb. A Street Tree Plan for Third Street is required. A minimum of four trues is needed. Se. The Alley between South Third and Fourth Streets is required to be paved as part of the application. 6. Conditions as listed by Fire District No. 3 (Attachment D}, Central Paint Building Department (Attachment E) and Rogue Valley Sewer Services {Attachment F). 7. The approved conditional uses will comply with local, state, and federal health and safety regulations. 8. The Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan approvals shall lapse and become void one year following the date on which it becomes effective. EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS: Attachment "A -Applicant's Statement Attachment "B" -Proposed Project & Landscaping Plans Attachment "C" -- Public Works Staff Report Attachment "D" -Fire District No. 3 Comments Attachment "E" -Building Department Staff Report Attachment "F" -Rogue Valley Sewer Services Attachrraent "G" ~-Planning Department Findings Attachment "H" - Propased Resolution ACTION: Consideration of Resolution No. , approving the Site Plan Application and Conditional Use Permit. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Resolution No. _, granting Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit approval. Page 5 of 5 Ma~ot enterprises, ~~C 650 E. Pine 5#reet, 104 Cents! Point, 4R 97502 (541) 564-1258 Fax: (541) 554-2554 e-mail: tornrn maiotconstruction.com City of Central Point Planning Department 140 S Third Street Central Point, OR 97502 RE: File No. 07106 The proposed project will include a three story structure of high mix residential commercial use in the TQD district. This structure will include a fitness club and retail space on the first floor, professionai office space on the second floor and ~rnonth to month residential rental space on the third floor. It is our intention to provide business and residential units within the structure so ownerslemployees would have the option to live above their places of employment, thereby reducing excess traffic in the district. The structure will utilize complimentary materials that will flow with and enhance neighboring businesses and structures such as City Hall. The structure will be approximately 24,070 square feet. The first floor being 7,810 sq.ft., the second floox being 8,130 sq.ft. and the third floor being 8,10 sq.ft. There will be a three stop elevator with secured access to the third floor residences. ~,~r~~~n~~~~ ;j ~ .~~~ ~ ~~ i ~~ ~~ M E ! 4 ~ I i' ? ~ ~ u~ ~~ /, Q .~ ~ ~ ~~, i ,~ -~ - ._.~.: ~,a._~:. «. '~ i iY P { w ,~ 4~~ ~ ~ ~ ~z~-~z ~ ~~~~~~s ~,a ~a ~~~ ~~ ~ X ~ ~; ~. ~~ J F r Q ~ Q1 ~ Ql ~- ~ cf1m S J) CI) Sf' _- { 9 ~~ QI ` ~; ~-. o fY A) SY 7 {}~ m ~ n ~_ ci Ei~ k .~ 111 7: d ~~~R #£~g uFSOIJi ~ F ~i) w ,~ ~°j`sp~ ~ ~~ ~ Cl~ l l Ikl L) ~ x sii.[ ` ~~~~ . ~ Ui ~! l7 ~ xe ~ a ~, i ~ N F- f _. 131 W ~ ~ ~y ~. R~ ~y U J U ~ y }{f p ~~~"~ ~I 4 ~~ ~ R w uJ qyh S F- x ~'. F= l U ~ {- E. Q `~ ~ t-~ lil I[I I Ii1 11I I- 111 d iiJ _ i~ F- cf) O ,~- (f~ !IJ Cf) g s~~~ i Y ~.. 4 ~ I. ~g g fY. - 3 ~~ s ~ €! 1 is _~ a / ' ~R ~is ~ ~ ~~ v /:/ x ~ ~ ~ ~i~ a ~ r... ~~FF~ ~0 ~ 'v ~ ~ X `~7~ rn ~ ~ ~ 4;{ .97 ~ '~ i ~ _. ~ ~ I ii V n ~d~~ ~ °1 }_ .-~- 'o I ~dG ,g's V .._--_..... .. __~. 3~1 ..._ ~.[_~ ..r......._.____._~._...~~_ _ ................. ..._.._.. ,,~. ,~,t t t(} J) ~ ~7#~ N d ~ o~ ~i~-U~~~b ~J, G~ €u,n O lJf z O ~ ri~'tr r -1 7 ui ~ ` a ~''~ ~ , ui0{~IJJ~~ ii ~~a~~ ~~a~ w ~ ~ ~: xr'zJ ~z qp ~ a t 'mClt~ ~U P ~^ ~ ~ ~ ~i O ~ R i s: LF.~~r.3 ~ L.'-c~ u.~s 1 ~~ .. ~ VT _ _ y '3~'0 -Yo'o r ~ 9 2 ~p ~ ~~ ry ~ C r13 (~ ~~_ Sl k 9 ~ d ~~~q of T ~ ,Y¢ r~ 6~ U (t W .S ' 6 3~- ~ ~ d ~e ~ a ~ ~ ~ f ~@ ~.rn EII~Orn x~ ~U H t Q -~~-~ Y:~a Fa~~B ` ~ >; p ~R :tl .4 .lf ~:~ _{ -U p ~A r~rtro .n. s ~• ~, f ~u {S J rif N X (1~;1 ~~.~~ t ~ ~.a~ g ,r ~ ~ ~! ~ ' u ts~ s r rra c4 <s~ __ _ ~- _ -- ~• ~e _.__4 _ aw_ _ ~, ~ _ _~ .~ ~ ~ ~ - ~~' - _~ _ r_ _ _ _ ~.. _~,_ r_.. ,, .. .~. ,~ ~- - -_ _ ~~ , , - ° -- .. d -_ ~tl~t~~ Iagei_edit~l.ti 4/27/2Q07 ~tTtJ~~1~~.~1 Public Works Depari~menf _~-~'i. CENTRAL PAINT .~ :. Bab Pierce, Direcfor Maft Samifore, Dev. Services Coard. PUBLIC WORKS ST~F"F REPORT Apri123, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Mixed Use Buildings Site Plan far 37-2W-11 BB, Tax Lats 500, 600 and 700. Applicant: Toznzny Malat, P.O. Box 3$47, Central Paint, OR 97502 Zoning: TOD-~1MR, kligh Mix Residential Traffic: The City of Central Point has studied the impacts of new development in the clawntown several times through the Downtown Rcvitaliration Study, East Pine Street Corridor Study and ~~ow the ~lewest reslditio~i of the City's Transportation System Plan (TSP). There are several intersections iza the downtown that are currently failizag. Any new development will not further deteriorate the system. Overall system clevelopanent alo~ig Pine Street is deeded to allow for tl~e overall system to perform greater than a Level of Serviee "D". Existing Inf~•astructure: Water: There is an existing $-inch waterline in Oak Street. Stone Drain: There is a 24-inch stoz-zn drain line in Oak Street. Street Section: Oak, 3xcz and 4`~' Streets are all defined as standard local streets and az-e paved accordingly. Engineering and Development Plans and Permits: The Central Point Public Works Department is charged with znanageznent of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and stone water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Constz-uction" shall govern how public facilities are to be constructed. The Dcvelaper is encouraged to obtain the latest versioza of these specifications from the Public Works Departmment. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, stare drainage calculations, storm drainage basin zmap, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. A Public Works Pernit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued. Conditions of Approval: 140 South Third Street = Central Point, OR 97502 ~ 541.664.3321 Fax 547.664.6354 1. ITI'l~ation Plans and Ilnproven~ents -Prior to the buildit3~ pcrn~its being finaled, an 3rrl~;atlon plan Is required. Additiongally, all perimeter anti interior ]alldscaping and street trees Inust be installed per the applicants Landscape and ln-igation Plan. 2. Third Street Tree's - A Street Tree Plan for TIZiI•d Street is required. A minimum of four trees is needed. 3. Allen Improvement - The Alley between South Third anti Fourth Streets is required to be paved as part of tl~e application. 140 South Third Street =Central Point, OR 97502 .541.664.3321 Fax 547.664.5384 March 2$, 2007 Connie Ciume Planner City of Central Point /~~~~HM~N~ sa j) ~~ Jackson County Fire District No. 3 s 8333 Agate Road ~ - White City ~R 97543-1075 {541) 826-7X00 {voice) {541) 826-45fi6 (fax) IrrternationallyAccredlted - 2005-2010 - FD#3 Preliminary Comments Malot Enterprises Mixed use Building File # 07106 312 Oak Street Central Point, 97502 • Provide full set of construction plans for review and additional comments will be provided. • Potentially this type of development will require an approved NFPA 13 type Sprinkler Systems. • The Fire Department Connection {FDC) and Vault location will need to be pre approved by Fire Department. All NFPA 13 standards shall apply. • Alley Access width will need to be a minimum of 20 feet. There is a moderate fire threat to vehicle parking lots and primary building entrance for occupant accessibility. It appears the main entrance to the occupants will be through the parking lot entrance. With additional detailed construction plans and information, it may change the 20 ft requirement to a lesser width standard. • Alley shall be clearly Posted "No Parking Any Time" • All Building and Fire codes shall apply in the review process. Mark Moran DFM City of Central Point, Oregon 14Q So.7hird St., Central Point, Or y75D1 541.664.3321 Fax 541.66.63$4 w~r~w.ci.central-point.or.us CE~TiiAL PSI NT ~TT~C~~~~VT "~.. Building Department Lois Dek3encdctti, Building Off~cial BUILDING DEPARTMEN"lry S"fAl{F Rl~l'OR"l" DATE: 04124/07 TO: Planning Depart~~~ Planning file 07106 FROM: Building I3epartment SUBJECT: ~- Story Commercial Bld. (Mixed Use} APPLICANT: Tommy Malot P.O. Box 3847 Central Point, Or. 97502 Property Description: 37S-2W-11BBT500/6~4I7'00 PURPOSE: The staff report is to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Applicant regarding City Building Department requirements and conditions to be inel~lded in the design and development of tl~e proposed project. This is riot a plan review. This report is preliminary and compiled solely for use by the Central Point Planning; Coxnmissio~>.. 1 City of Central Point, Oregon 140 5v. TF+"srd 5t.. Central Poi~it, Or 97502 541.f64.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 www.ci.centra I-poi n t.or.~€s ~~~lr'~v^;~ C E f~~TA'"~~"" L C ~' ! ~3 i Building Departrr~ent Lois UeBenedetti,BuildinclOfficial BUIIIDING DEPARTMENT C:UMMF.,NTS: 1. Applicant:, agent a>;ad co~>:tractors must comply with all ct~>-rent State oi'Oregon adopted codes, anal apply for alI permits t1lro~igl~ the Central Point 13E~ildiz>g Department. 2. If a private st:arm drain syste:~n is proposed it. 11-lust be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Pluznbirzg Department. 3. Azzy private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Electrical Department. 4. Provide the building department: with a Geot.echnical report. as req>iiire;d by OSSC Appendix J and clzaptcr 18 of the C?SSC. A written report of the ii;zvestigation shall i~zclude, but need not be limited to, the following i~zformatian: a. A plot plan showing the location of alI test borings and/or excavations. b. Descriptions and classili.cations of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encount:ez-ed. d. Recommendations far foundation type and design cz'i.teria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. When expansive soils are present, spacial provisions shall be provided in the foundation design azad construction to safeguard against damage due to expansive>>.ess- Said design shall be based on geotechnical z'ccomznezzdatiozzs. 5. Grading/excavation pez'mits are required izz accordance with OSSC Appendix 1 and chapter 18 and regarding any fzll material placed on the site. Fills to he used to support the foundation of any building or stxl_~cture shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practices. All private storm drain work zn>rzst be permitted and inspected by City Building l:7ept (prio~• to backfill). A soil investigation report, and a report of satisfactory placement of #'i.ll (including special inspections of placement of fill and compaction) acceptable to the Building Official, Shall be SUbznitted prior to final of the grading/excavation pern~it. Building permits will not be issued until grading/excavation permit is fizzaled. Exception: 1. The upper l .5 foot of fill placed outside of public rights-off way. 2- The uppez' 1.5 foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or- parking areas. 2 r~„ti ~,%o;''e' City of Cent~•al Point, Oregon Building Department 144 Scr.Tlurd 5t., Central Point, Or 9/502 CENTRAL Lois i7eBcne[ielti, l3uildirtc~Ufftcial 541.564.3321 Fax 541.b64.G3II4 ~~~T ~Nw:a~.ci.ceniral-pnint.or.us 6. To move or demolish any existing structures locatod on the properly, call the Building Department for pennit~ requirements. 7. Notify tl~e City Building Departme>it ofany existing wells, or septic systems located on the property. S. Any development (any man-made change) to unproved o~' unimproved real estate located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central Point shall require a Development Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code 8.24.120. 9. Dust control, and track out elimination procedures must be implemented. A comprehensive erosion control plan m~~st be s>`abmitted and approved by the Building Department prior to start of work. 10. Application for building permits will require fo~~r sets of complete pla~~s indicating compliance with Oregon 5truct>~iral Specialty Code (2007),The International Fire Code {with the State of Orego~a Amendments-2007), Nli PA 13, Oregon Mech. Spec. Code (2007), Uniform Plumbing Gode (with Oregon Blue Pages-amendments). Plan check may take from 3 to $ weeks, depending on completeness when submitted... _...if requested, plan check may be initiated simultaneously with Planning Dept. evaluation (Pla~i Check Fee must be paid prior to start of plan check). A complete code analysis sha~~ld be a part of the s~lbmitted plans. i 1. Fire District 3 wil] dcterznine fire hydrant locations, as well as access to buildings. 12. Propez-ty lines must be established and pinned by Lic. Oregon Surveyor prior to any building inspections. 13. No work is to start until Grading and Erosion Control Plans are approved and permit 15sued. 14. Recommend consolidating property (one tax lot) Any changes proposed shall be sub;initted in writing by the Applicant, ar Applicant's contractor to the Building Department for approval prior to start of work. If questions, please call Todd Meadoz'.......G64-3321 ext.228 _~ ~~~~~Y s~~~~~a ~~ ~ April 23, 2007 ROGUE VALLEY SEINER SERVICES i.acalictn: 13ti \\'csl Vilas Road. ('cnl3~al {'~~inl- OR - \irtilins. Ad~lrr~ti: P.O. 13ctx a I a(i. {'i:nlral Pitiii~r. {lk ?5l}?.{)(1(15 'ft•I. 1511 } {tG4-h3f1li. 4°~s [5<11 } f,fz:1-7171 tttttt~.l2Vtiti_iis Connie Clune FAX 66~-6384 City of Central Point Planning Department 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Re: Site Plan review for Malat Mixed Use Building, File # 07100 The subject properties are currently served by three service connections to the sewer main on Oak Street. These services must be located and sealed at the property line when the existing buildings are removed. They may later be extended to serve the proposed development, The property is within the NPDES Phase 2 stormwater Quality management area and must comply with relevant stormwater quality guidelines. Rogue Valley Sewer Services requests that approval of the proposed development be subject to the fallowing conditions: 1. Applicant must locate existing service laterals and sea! them at the property line when the existing buildings are removed. 2. Applicant must obtain a sewer permit and pay all related development charges prior to connecting to the sewer. 3. Applicant must submit a stormwater plan to RVS to demonstrate compliance with water quality standards. Feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding this project. Sincerely, Carl Tappert, PE District Engineer K:IDATAIA~*encieslCl::N`I~I'"I~F'I..ANN{31SitePltlnItevic«-12{}{plp7 tOf)_I•~Ialc~t Mixccl u5c.cic)c At4ilCl~~aE'~~t• 44~T77 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OI+ LAW File No: 07106 INTRODUCTION In the Matter of a Conditional Use Perzx~it azad Site Plan Review foz- the constztizction of a 24,070 square foot, three-story mixed use building located in the TOD-1-1M1t, High Mix Residential zoning district and identified on the Jackson County Asscssor's znap as 37S 2W 11BB, Tax Lots 500, 600 and 700. The proposed project area is located at 312 Oak Street. {Applicant; The Crossing at Centre Point, LLC, Agent: TaztlztZy Malot} CPMC 17.65. DSO Zaftif:g r•egirl~rtiatrs--TOD district. A. T'ertnitted Uses. Pern7itted zrses in 'T'able 1 are slrozs~~a with a "T'. " `T'hese Lrscs are allowed if dzey comply with the applicable provisions of this title. They are sarbject to the same application afid f•eview process as other per•nzitted uses identified i~2 tlzis title. Finding: The subject property is located within the TOD-HMR, I-Iigh Mix Residential zoning district. Mixed coznznercial, senior housing and Multi-plex apartments are designated as a perzrzitted use, Section 17.65.050 TOD Table 1. Finding: Tl1e proposed project is a three-story structure with retail cozrzznez-cial az~d a fitness cezater an the f rst floors, professional offices on the second floor azid eight residential units designed on the third floor. Findi~ig: The second floor professional office space will require a Conditional Use Permit review. A Conditional Use Porn-zit application has been submitted and is a part of the Site Plan review application. Finding: The fitness center is considered a personal service oriented use and requires a Conditional Use Perzxzit review. A Conditional Use Permit application has been submitted and is part of the Site Plan review application. Conclusion: The retail and residential uses are pei-znitted in the TOD-HMR zoning district. A Conditional Use Permit application has been submitted for the fitness center on the fzrst floor and professional office spaces proposed on the second floor. CPMC 17. b5.050(,8). Limited Uses. Li»iited uses in Table 1 at-e shown with an "L. " These uses aye allowed f'they comply with the specific limitations described in this chapter and the applicable pt~ovisions of this tide. Tlzey are subject to the sate application and t°eview process as other permitted uses identified itz this title. Finding: The second floor professional office may be penxzitted in areas adjacent to Employzrzent Commercial zoned districts and is reviewed as a Conditional Use. A Page 1 of 15 Conditional Use Per~~~it al}placation has been submitted anti is a part of the Site Plan review application. Conclusion: The applicant leas ~z~et tl~e procedural requircme~~ts with the iili~~g of a Conditional Use Permit application. CPMC I7.6S.050 {C}. Conditioizrrl Uses. CofTditio~~al ir.s•e.s inI'alile 1 are sl~otivrz ~vi11i a "C." These arses are allazved if they coi~zply vvitlt the applicable provi.sio~~s ojtlti,s title. They are subject to the same application ar2d rezaiezv process as other conditional arses ide~ztilied in tlzis title. Finding: The proposed fitness center on the first i7oor is classified as a personal service oriented use and may be permitted with the Conditional Use Pez-mit al~plicatio:~ review. Finding: The proposed professional offices on the second floor z~~.ay be permitted with the Conditional Use Permit application review. Conclusion: The applicant Ilas met the procedural requirements with the fzling of a Conditional Use Perzrzit application. CPMC 17.6S.OS0 {D). Density. The allozval~le residential density and employment barildirtg floor area are specified ira Table 2. Finding: The net Land area consists of 23,100 square feet (.53 acre). The TOD-HMR zoning district requires a n~inizxzuzn of 30 units per net acre. Based on the net acreage, a minizx~um of sixteen {16) units are required. The applicant proposes eighteen (18} units. Conclusion: The application exceeds the minimum of 30 uzaits per acre. "There is na maximum number of units allowed per acre for this zoning district. CPMC 17.65.OS0(E}. Dimensional Standards. The dimensional standards,for lot size, lot dimensions, building setbacles, and building height are specified in Table 2. Finding: The minimum lot depth in the HMR district is 50', there is not a miniznuzn lot width required, with the exception of row housing. The subject site is 160 feet in width and 140 feet in depth. Finding: The proposed structure height is approximately forty-six {46j feet and is within the sixty {60j ft. maximum height standard allowed in the ~iMR zoning district. Finding: The furthest extension of the building (stairwell) from the rear property line is 12 feet meeting the ten { 10j ft. rear yard setback is required, CPMC 17.65.054. Conclusion: The lot size and lot dimension as specified in Table 2 have been met. The building; is below the maximum height allowed in this district. Page 2 of 15 CPMC 17.65.050, Table 3 - TOD district artrl Cnrrirlnl• Pur•kirr~r Stcrrrrlar•rCs Findings: Section 17.05.050, Table 3 identifies tlzc nzinizzzum parking rcquiz•cme~zts for the Project. The total number of parkizzg spaces z•equirecl is 4~. Finding: Parking standards znay be reduced 25% wlze-z trii~zsit service is proved i~z the TOD district (Sec. 17.65.050{3}. The project is within the Rogue Valley Transpoz•tation District (RVTD). Based on the Project's specific uses, a znininnzEn ot'3G parking spaces are needed and 44 are proposed. Reciprocal agreements for shared parkizzg znay also be pursued and the total number of required spaces further z-ecluced. Finding: Twelve paz•ki~zg spaces are required for the residential use. Per the TOD regulation, 50% of these parking spaces must be covcreci (six spaces). As clcsignecl, the Project provides for eight covered parkizzg spaces. The Project complies with the City's zxzizaizxzuzn parking requirements. C©nclusion: The Project complies with the City's mininnzzn parkizzg requirenlcnts. CPMC 17.66.030 (4). Conditional Use. Conditional a{ses shall be j°evieu~ed as provided in Chapter 17.76, Conditional Use Perjnits. Finding: A Conditional Use application was submitted for Planning Commission review of the proposed ground floor zzzezxzbez-'s fitness center and the second floor professional offices. The project z-eview utilizing CPMC Section I7.7G and the TOD District criteria is found elsewhere in this document, Attachnent "G" of the staff report dated May 1, 2007. Concl«sion: An application has been subzrzitted for public hearing and review. CPMC .17.66.050 Applicatiora approval criteria. B. Site Plan, Landscaping and Constr°Lrction Plan Approval. A site plan, landscaping and constr°a{ction plan application shall be approved when the approval aasthority f nds tlrat the following criteria are satisfied or can be shown to be inapplicable: 1, The provisions of Chapter- 17.72, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval, shall be satisfied; and 2. The proposed improvements coraiply ~vitlt the approved TOD district or car•ridor master plan for the propert~~,- and 3. Chapter 17.67, Design Standards--7'OD district and TOD corridor. Finding: A site plan and building elevation have been submitted as paz-t of this application. Land area and dimensions, parking spaces, and proposed uses have been evaluated utilizing the site plan and TOD district criteria of CPMC Section 17.05.050 and 17.67. Findings addressing Sections 17.72 and 17.67 are included elsewhere in this document, Attachment "G" of the staff report dated May 1, 2007. Finding: Conditions of approval that must be nzet prior to issuance of a construction building permit are listed and found within the staff report dated May 1, 2207. Page 3 of 15 Additional conditions nay be imposed liy the Planning Comrnissior~ and will become part of the r•ceord. The applicatzt will receive wr-ittetr notice of tl~e conditions of any approval. Conclusion: The application it~cludcd a site plan arxi landscape planting plan. CPMC I7.6b.OS0 (D). Conditional Use. 1. A conditional use application shall be appr°ovecl tivhcn the appr°oval autltoritj1,~irtds that the following criteria are satisfied or cart be shotititrt to be inapplicable: a. The provisions of Chapter 17.76, Conditional U.se Perrrzits; arzd b. The proposed conditional t.rse corrzpli.es with th.e approved IY)D district vr• car•r•idor master plan for the property,- and c. G`hapter• 17.67, Design Standards--TOD district an.cl TOD corridor. 2. A conditional r.rse application shall not be regitirccl.for• a conditional u.re 1a%laiclz was approved as part of a valid master plan approval as provided in Section 17.66.050(A) 1<indit~~: A Conditional Use application was submitted for Plarrr~inl; Corl~r~~ission review of the proposed ground floor ixrembcr's fitness centct• and the second floor professional offrces. The project review utilizing CPMC Section 17.7 arld tl~e TOD District criteria is found elsewhere in this document, Attachtl~ent "G" of the staff report dated May 1, 2007. I+inding: The subject property is located out of the Twin Creeks Master Platt land area and is therefore not a part of that plan. The parcel size of 0.53 acre does not require a rzaaster plan as provided in Section 17.66.050(A}. Co~iclusion: An application has been submitted for public hearing acid review. CPMC 17.67.040 Circulation aftrl access .rtandcrrrls. A. .Public Street Standards. 1. Txcept,for specifrc transportation facilities.iderztified in a TOD district or cort•idol• master plan, the street dimensional standards shown in Table 1 and Figure 1 shall applyfor all development located within the TOD district arzd_for de~relopntent within the TOD corridor which is approved according to the provisions in Section 17.65.020 and Chapter .17.66. 2. Block perimeters shall not exceed one thousand six hundred feet measured along the public str°eet right-of--way. 3. Block lengths for patblic streets shall not exceed five htfndred_feet between through streets, measured along street right-af sway. 4. Public alleys or major off-street bike/pedestria~z pathways, designed as provided in this chapter°, nay be used to meet the block length or per•inzeter• standards of this section. S. Tlie standards for block perimeters and lengths shall be modif ed to the ntininzum extent necessary based on findings that strict compliance tiaJith the standards is not reasonably practicable or° appropriate due to: a. Topographic constraints; Page 4 of 15 h. Existing develapment patterns vra abt.rttirtg property ~vhiclr preclt.tde the laglCal COnnG'CtiOn Of Sir"Gels aY aCCC'.5.5'14%CIy.S; c. Railroads; d. Traffic safety cor2cer•ns; e. Ftsractional and open-ational needs to create a large building; or f. Protection ofsignificant natural r•csotcrces. Finding: The subject property is located at tl~c corner of Oak azzd '1'hit-d streets. Both are improved City of Central Point standard residential streets. The existing twenty {20) foot wide alley will be improved as paz-t of the project. No new streets are proposed. Conclusion: The proposal complies. CPMC I7 67 040 (G) - (9} - Relatitag to Utility lines, pedestrian/bike access3vays, sicle~a%allr,s, off-street trails, etc... Finding: Utilities are available and adequate to service the proposed developzzlezzt. Finding: These items are reviewed by the Public Works Departt~~ent during the civil drawings approval process for coznpliancc with City code. Conclusion: Approval of the on-site civil improvetrzents shall be detern3iz~ed by the City Public Worlcs Departznezrt. CPMC I7.67.040(B). Parking I,ot Driveways. 1. Parking lot driveways that link ptrhlic streets and/or private streets tivith parlcing stalls shall hG designed as private streets, t.tnless one of the fallowing is ntet. a. The parking lot driveway is less than one hundred feet long; b. The parking lot driveway serves one or two residential units; or c. The parking lot dr~ive~ajay provides dit°ect access to angled par°king stalls. 2. The number and width of dr•ivetivays and curb ct.sts shoicld he minimized and consolidated when possible. 3. Where possible, parking lots for- raew develaprnent shall be designed to provide vehicular and pedestrian connections to adjacent sites. 4. Large driveways slzotdd arse distinctive paving patterns. C. On-Site Pedestrian arad Bicycle Circulation. Attractive access rotates for pedestrian travel should be provided by: I. Deducing distances between destinations or activity areas such as public sidewalks and building entrances. Where appropriate, develop pedestrian rotates through sites and buildings to stapplement the public right-of--way; 2. Providing an attractive, convenient pedestrian accessway to building entrances; 3. Bridging across harriers and obstacles such as,fragmerzted pathulay systems, wide streets, hea~ry vehicular traffic, and changes in level by connecting pedestr°ian pathways tivith clear°ly marked crossings and inviting sidewall~ design; 4. Integrating signage and lighting system which offers interest and safety for pedestrians; Page 5 of 75 5. Connecting parking areas and clestrrxatrorxs il~ith pecle,str•icm paths identified through use of distinctive paving materials, pavet~rtent stripings, gl-adc scpcrratiorzs, or landscaping. (Ord. 181 S y~l (part), Exh. C(par•t), 20fXJ). '~ Editor's Note: Table 1, Desigrx Starxdards, and I~igtrr•e 1, Street Cross Sectiora.s, crre on file in the planning department. Finding: Ingress and egress to the interior parking area will utilize the existing twenty (20} foot wide alley. The alley, located along the southern property line, will be paved as part of the project design. A covered walkway has been designed to connect the Oak Street building e~ltrance with the i~--tcrnal parking area, thus providing vehicular and pedestrian connections. Finding: The project design provides diagonal street parking alojig Oak and Third Streets. No additional access curb cuts are necessary for the project as desig~zed. Finding: The site plan provides a twelve foot wide sidewalk along the Oak Street entrance to the building {Applicant subn7ission sheet 1}reducing the distance between the entrance and public sidewalks. Finding: The site plan provides connecting parking areas and pedestrian paths through the use of planting areas and hard surface walkways. Variation of material is recoznznendcd to distinguish the walkway and parking areas. Conclusion: The project can meet rcyuireme~lts of this section. CPMC 17.67.050 Site design sta~trlarcls. ~. Respect for Existing Facilities crrtd On-Site Features. 1. Adjtcstrsxents should be mode during land division arxd site design to improve trite overall relationship of a development or an individual building to the strrrotrndirxg context. Finding: The applicant's architect has designed a building that will be compatible with the design of City Hall and Four Oaks Centre. The applicant has oriented the Third Street view in order to enhance visual civic corridor established by City Hall and leading to Central Point Elementary. Finding: The landscaped parking area provides physical space and a buffer between the existing residential neighborhood to the south and the proposed project. Conclusion: The proposal complies. ,2. Buildings should be clustered to preserve natural areas. Finding: No identified natural areas are located on or near the subject site. Conclusion: The proposal complies. Page 6 of 15 CPMC X7.67.050 (B). Nate{j-a11~'catc.~res. 1. I3zsildings shoulcl be sited to pre,.ret-re signl~icant trees. Finding: April 3, 2007, the City of Central Planning Co~nn~ission (File No. 07110} reviewed an application foz- z-en~oval of az~ existing; Oak free located on t11c 1n•oject site. It was determined that based an the root system t}~e tree would snot survive a4~y type of disturbance, such as sidewalk izlrtpravenlents or other on site construction. Conclusion: Review was eanzpleted April 3, 2007. CPMC I7.67.050(C). Topography. Finding: The proposed project site is level with no ~~nzssua} topagraphic features to consider. Conclusion: NIA 2. NeuT buildings pt°oposed,for existing neighborhoods with awell-de~ner,1 and desirable character shoz,dd be compatible witli or conzplelnent the architectural character and siting pattern of neighbor°ifTg buildings. Finding: The proposed design of the building is coznpleznentazy to the adjacent City Hall and Library buildings in architectural style. The bui}ding arientatia3l reflects the applicant's concen~ far the existing neighborhood to the southeast. The unproved alley surface will provide access to these properties and to the project site. Conclusion: The application complies. CPMC 17.67.050{F). Nerd Pt°ominent Sti°uctacres. 1. Key public or civic buildings, such as conz.~jntnity centef°s, clar.crches, schools, libraj°ies, post offices, and tnasseunis, shoicld be placed in pj°ominent locations, stcch as f'onting on pr,rblic squares of• whet°e pedestt°ian street vistas tef•~ninate, in order- to serve as landn2af°Ics and to symbolically reinforce their inapo~°tance. Findings: Although the proposed building is not considered a civic building, the architectural design does complizrzent the adjacent City Hall. The applicant has proposed an architectural design that is compatible the adjacent civic use while maintaining a prominence at the public intersection. Conclusion: The proposal complies. CPMC 17.67.050 (G). views. The massing of individical bi.~ildings sho~cld be adjusted to preser~~e important views while benefiting new and existing occupants and sisrrounding neighborhoods. Findings: The proposed project site is level with no remarkable views. Page7of15 Cone[usion: TIIe proposal coll~plies. CPMC I ~ 6:050 (H). Adjoining Uses and Adjacent Scr'vices. I. When rrtor-e intensive uses, such. as neighbarhaod conrnter'cial or multifamily dwellings, are within or adacent to existing single-/irrrrily neighbarhoods, care slroclld be taken to minimize the impact of noise, lighting, arzd tr-uf~c on adjacent dwellings. 2. Activity or equipment areas should he str•ate~>ically located to avoid clistrlr-bing adjacent residents. 3. AlI on-site service areas, loading zones crud otltdaor° starage areas, waste .stor'age, disposal, facilities, transfor"mer"and zltllrty Vaults, and .siralilar activities shall be located in an area not visible from a street or acrbari space. 4. Screening shall be provided for' actii~itic.r areas and equrpralerzt that bvrll crecttc noise, such as loading and vehicle areas, air conditioning units, Beat pt.rntps, exhaust fans, and garbage corrzpactor'.s, to avoid distl.lrbing adjacent residents. S. Ur'oup mailboxes are linxited to the n~r.urlber of houses an any given block of development. Ortly those boxes serving the units rrzay be located ors th.e block.. Mzrltiple units of mailboxes Wray be combined titi-ithin a centrally located br,rilding of four tii~alls that rrleets the design guidelines for rrtaterials, entrance, roof;forrrr, i~~indo~vs, etc. The ,strr.rcture must have lighting both inside and out. Findings: The building orientation reflects the applicant's concern far the existing neighborhood to the southeast. The improved alley surface will provide access to these properties and the project site. The landscaped parking area provides a physical space or buffer between the existing residential neighborhood anal the proposed project. Conclusion: The proposal complies. CPMC 17.67.050 (Z). Transitions in Density. I. Higher density, attached dwelling developments shall rni.nimi.ze impact on adjacent existing lower density, single-family dtivelling neighborhoods by adjusting height, massing and materials and/or by providing adeg2rate buffer' strips with vegetative screens. 2. Adequate buffer strips with vegetative screens shall be placed to mitigate th.e impact of higher density development on adjacent lower density development. 3. Ne~v residential buildings within fifty feet of existing low density residential development shall be no higher than thirty-five_feet and shall he limited to single family detached or° attached units, duplexes, triplexes or four plexes. 4. New commercial buildings within fifty feet of existing low density residential development shall be no higher than forty f ve,feet. S. Dwellings types in a TOD district ar carridar shall be mixed to encour°age interaction among people of varying backgr°ounds and income levels. 6. Zoning cltartges should occur ntid-block, not at the street centerline to ensure that compatible building types face along streets and within neighborhoods, When dissimilar building types face each other across the street because the zoning change is at the street Page 8 of ~5 centerline or naol°e infill I~ousi~zg is desired (fvr instance, dt.Iplexes acf•oa•.s dire street fi•anI Single' dl~.~ellIngS), desagn Shall e12Sllre' S1)7Y1lCIl"It)~ l1Y Y71Ilssln~;, SC'tl)C1Cli, Clj'Id CItCIl'aCICI". 7. Density should Ise increased if~crenlentally, to Iltcffer existing ilcighborhooclrJi•anI incotnpatible building types ar densities. Sequence den,s•ity, generrllly, a.s~ follows: las~~re lat single duelling, small lot single duelling, duplex, toiwnhanles, coLlrtyard ~nultifcr»Iily apartments, large ntl~ltifanlily apartments, and mixed arse I~ISildings. Finding: `l'he applicant has provided a landscape plan and site plan. The applicant has provided snore than the required percentage of landscapi~lg for the proposal development and moved the buildi~~g as far to the north as setbacks allow in oa~cler to minimize impacts to adjacent reside~~tial l~ropcrties. The service areas aE•c located away from the existing R-3 zoned neighborhood. Finding: The adjoining properties to the south are zo~ied for lligl~er dealsity residential use. Although there are no immecliatc pia~is to change the cu~-c-ent uses nn these tax lots, the densities could be increased anci they would become even more compatible with the proposed mixed use. Conclusion: Steps have been taken to transition from the density being proposed in the new development. CPMC 17 67:050 {J). Parking. Finding: The applicant has provided parking options for the residents a~~d employees of the proposed project. The applicant proposes 44 parking spaces, eight (8} will be covered and two spaces have provided to meet the ADA accessible requirements. Finding: Table below illustrates that the project complies with the City's minimuEn parking requirements. Parking: Required The Crossing Residential $ Units 1.5 (SO% 12 Covered - G} Or Senior Housing 1 (SO% Covered =4} $ Professional Office 1 sp per 400 sq 20 ft =22 Retail Sales/Service 1 sp per 500 sq 1G ft=1G Total Parking 48 2S% Reduced/Transit = 44 12 36 Conclusion: The application complies. Page 9 of 15 CPMC 17:6 D5D (K}. Landscaping. ~. Pet"imeter Screening and 1'larating. a. Landscaped buffers shor.rld be ztsed to achieve s2lfficierat screening while still preserving views to allow areas to be t~~atched and gtulyded lay nciglrliors. b. Landscapingshotsld be tl.sed to screen and harffer utrsigl2tly uses and to separate ,SL(CIa 1r1.CRnapatrble 21SCS as pat'k2ng al"eaS Clrlrl l1'C1stL' storage and piclcr.tp areas. 2. Parking Lot Landscaping aracl Screening. 3. Landscaping Near I3ttildings. Landscaping shall s'et•ve as a screen ar' buf~cr" to soften the appearance ofstructures or arses stech as parlcirag lots• or large hlanlc tivalls, or to increase the attractiveness of conarr2on open spaces. 4. Sen~ice ftr°eas, Service at"eas, loading zones, tivaste rlisl)osal or ,storage areas must be fully screened fi"ona parblic view. S. Str"eet Trees. Street trees shall be rec~trir"ed along both sides of all public ,streets with a spacing of twenty feet to. for-ty,feet on center" depending ora the rrratl.rre tia%icltlt of the tree croti~ura, and planted a rrain.in2r.rna of t~vo,feet fi"otn the back of ctcrb. 'frees in the right-of- way or" sidewalk easements shall be appr"owed actor"ding tv size, r~ualitl-, tree tilaell design, i f applicable, a12d 17"r"lgatiorl SI1a11 be reCllll.r"ed. Tr"ee SpeC1eS SI2a11 be Cltosera fl"ot11 the Clty Of Central Paint approved street ti"ee list. Finding: The applicant has provided a landscape plan desiga~ed with 13% sat coverage. Additional landscaped areas are necessary to the ininimu~a~ landscaping requircnzent of 15% far this site. The addition of a rooftop garden and patio-stapes an the individual balconies are two suggestions presented by the applicant. Finding: The review of planting diagram finds that additional street trees are required on Third Street in order to meet provisions of Section 12.36 The additional landscaped area(s) and street trees will be included in the landscape acid irrigation plats submitted for review by the City Public Worlcs prior to issuance of a building permit. Conclusiau: The application complies. CPMC.17:67.OSD(L}, Lighting. 1. 1[lirairnum Lighting Levels. Minin2uraa lighting levels shall be pr"ovided-for public safety in all urban spaces open to public circulation. a. f1 nainim.urn average light level of one and ttvo-tenths footcandles is r"equired .for urban spaces and sidewalks. 2. Fixture Design in Public Rights-of--Way. a. Pedestrian scale street lighting shall be provided incltrding all pedestrian streets along ar"terials, major collectors, minor collectors and local streets. h. Pedestrian street lights sl2all be no taller" Haan ttiven.ty, feet along arterials and collectors, and sixteen feet along Local streets. 3. On-Site Lighting. Lighting shall be incorporated into the design of a project so that it reinforces t12e pedestrian environn2ent, pr"ovides coratinacity to an area, and enhances the dr-an2a and presence of arcliitectur"al features. Street lighting should be provided along Page 1Q of 15 sidewalks and in medians. Selected ,street lt'glrt .standards slwuld be appropriately scaled to the pedestrian environment. .~deglsate illunrinativn .slloldd be provided for' b1t11drng cntrie.s, corners of buildings, courtyards, plazas and i~~allc.~ti~ays. a. Accessways through stlr;face parking lots shall be ~a~ell lighted with.fxtlrres no taller than twenty feet. Finding: A specific lighting plan will be presented atad reviewed by the City Plant~it~~ Department prior to issuance of a building permit to i~~sure that standards of Section 17.67.050(L} are met. Conclusion: The project can meet the criterion. CPMC 17.57.050 (M), Signs. 1. The pr°ovisions of this section are to be used in conjl.cnction ~a-itla the city sign regulatioras in th.e Central Point Sign Cvde, Chapter° IS.24. the sign r°egc.iirernents m Chapter 15.24 shall govern in the TOD district and corridor ; Finding: A specific sign plan will be presented and reviewed by the City Planning Department prior to issuance of a building per~x~it to insure that standards of Section 17.67.454(M} are met. Conclusion: The project can ~7~ect the criterion. CPMC I7.75.0~0 Carrclitiorral Use Permit: Firadirrgs r~racl eorarlitiotrs. The planning COr71rr2lSSlOr2 In gr"antlrag Q Col~dltlOnQl llsE; per"nllt S11.Ql1 find as follows: A. That the site for the proposed use is adequate irz size and shape to accornrraadcate the use and to meet all other development and lot requirements of the subject zoning district and all other provisions of this code; Finding: The project proposes 18 units, which is consistent with the HMR density requirements. The minimum lot area for multifamily or senior housing is 1,040 sq. ft. The project proposes eight (8}residential units, which fall within the HMR lot area requirements. The maximum allowed coverage is 85%. This figure is based on a gross acreage calculation. After taki~lg into consideration, the gross acreage of the project the proposed coverage is 83.3%, which is in compliance with the CPMC. Conclusion: The project can meet the criterion. CPMC 17.75.040 (B). That the site has adequate access to a public street or highway and that the street or highway is adequate ira size and condition to effectively accommodate the traffic that is expected to be generated by the proposed use; Finding: Oak and Third Streets, along with an existing alley provide public access to the project. Ingress and egress to the interior parking area will utilise the existing twenty foot wide alley. The alley, located along the southez-~a property line, will be paved as part of the project development. Pale 11 oI=15 Concltasion: The project can meet the criterion. CPMC .17.76.040 (C). 'That the proposed lrse will have rao signi~carit adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted apse then°eof. In rna]{irtg dais dc'ter'rnlnatlOrl, the commission shall consider the proposed location of improvements on floe site; 7~ehicadar ingress, egress and internal cir~ctclation; setbacks; ]teight of buildings and strrlctalres; tii~alls and fences; landscaping; o:,rtdoor° lighting; and signs; Finding: City Hall and this proposed development are both positioned along Third Street which is intended to be a `civic corridor'. "l"he Central Point Downtown Revitalization Plant supports the TOD-District in recognizing tl~e location of Thiz-cl and Oak Streets as at1 important cross-axis to Pine Street. The flan notes that ~I'lliz-d Street cats play a significatzt role in the revitalization of Downtowns and the area has alroady been etlhanced by the siting of City Hall and t11e Couzlty Library. The addition of The Cz~ossing is cxpcctecl to contribute further to vibrant redevelopment on Oak and Third Streets. The Downtowns flan states that the City should continue to encourage now upper-story offzce space to house community serving businesses as well as new retailers. Conclz~sion: The proposed use is consistent with the TOD-HMR zoning and City's intent for this area. CPMC 17.76.040 (D). That tla.e establishment, rnainteraance or operation of tla.e use applied for' will comply with local, state and,feder~al health and safety regulations and therefore will not be detrimental to the healtli, safety ar general tivelfare of persons residing or ~a~or•ki.rlg in. the surroa.~nding neighborhoods and il~ill not be detr•irraental or• injurious to the property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the community based on the review of those factors lr.'sted in salbsection C of this section; Finding: Second story professional offices are pez•znitted in areas adjacent to Employment Coznzrzercial {EC} districts. As the name implies, the EC designation supports employment and is generally located along Pine Street where there are existing EC uses. City Hall is adjacent to the subject propez-ty and is considered its own cmployzxzent center with offices located on the fzrst and second floors. Although the zone designation far City Hall is Civic, the function and location of its offices are similar to those being proposed in `The Crossing' Conclusion: The proposed use is consistent with the TOD-HMR zoning and City's intent for this area. CPMC 17.76.040 (E). That any conditions required far approval of the permit are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare and may include: ~ Central Point Downto~x~ai Revitalization Plan, pages 18 &42. Page 12 of 1~ 1. Adjt2strttents to lot size or yard ar•cas cr,s rzcecled to lest accontrnoclatc tlrc proposed arse; provided the lots ar•yar•d areas cortforrrr to the stated rninirrtartrt dirrten.sion.s_fi~r the subject zoning district, unless a variance is also grcrrzted as provided for in Chapter 17.13, 2. Increasing str°eet a%idths, r9lpdrflCCrlrOIYS irz street clesrgrzs or' addition ofstreet .sign's or traffic signals to accommodate the traffic generated by the prnpnsed use, 3. Adjustments to aff-street parking requirerttents in crccnr•clarzce with arty trrug2re characteristics of flee proposed i2se, 4. Reg2rlation of points of vehicular ingr'e.ss and egress, S. Reg2.rir°ing landscaping, irrigation systems, liglttirzg arzd a property nraintcnance program, 6. Regtrlatiorz of'signs crud their locations, 7. Requiring fences, berets, titi1alls, larzdsccrpirig nr other devices of organic or artificial corzzposition to eliminate or' reduce the effects of raaise, vibrations, odors, visual incompatibility or otlz.er zrndesirable effects on surrounding properties, 8. Regulation of tirtae of operatiorts,for cer"lalY1 ljrl?es of 2d,Se,s if their operations play adversely affect privacy of sleep ofpersons residing nearby or otherwise conflict tit>ith other cortalntsnity or rteighbarhood f tnctions, 9. Establish a time period ~a=ithin which the subject land use nzt.2st be developed, 10. Reclarir•ern.ent of abond or other° adequate asst2rance ~vithira a specified period of tl n4 e, 11. St,cch other conditions that are found to be rzecessar_y to protect the public health, safety and general welfare, 12. In considering an appeal of an application for a conditional a2se perrnit,for a borne occarpatiori, the planning commission shall r°evielal the criteria listed in Section I7.G0.190. Finding: Eight conditions are recozx~mended to satisfy the review criteria. Conelusian: The proposal is consistent with the TOD-HMR zoning acid City's intent for this area. CPMC 17.72.020 Site plate approval rerluired: {A) A site plan application conforming to the requirements of £S'ection 17.72.030 shall be made: 1. For all canstructinn requiring issuance of a building pernait; or (I3) Except for• the C-3 zonilig distr°ict, the requil•errzent for a site plan application upon a change of use may be i~~aived by city staff if staff determines that no modifications are necessary to the existing access, parking, driveway, or any outer facilities on t1z.e site. Finding: The application and supporting documents provide the information necessary for review of the proposed mixed conlniercial and residential building. The proposed building will require issuance of a building permit and is a change of use. Page 13 of 15 Finding: The proposal, a commercial, professia~~al offices anti residential building, to be located on the corner of Oak azzd `1'laird Street. The project requires rcmova[ or demolition of existing structures located o~z tl~e subject site, Cone[usion: A Site Flan Review for tl~e proposed stz•€zcture is necessary a~-~d t11e submitted application cozxzplics. CPMC .17:72.030 (A) ~ (E) Ittfnrt~tatinti Require{L This section of the cacle addresses all of the necessary infortnatian to make a decisiozz for approval or dc~zial of the site plan application. Finding: The applicant has provided all of the necessary izifoz-n~ation as outlined in the above referenced code. Conclusion: The proposal complies. CPMC X 7 X2.040 (D). Signs and atlter outdoor advertising structures to ensr.tr•e that they do not conflict with or deter ft~atn traffic control signs or devices and that they are compatible 7vith the design of their bttiildings or uses crr7d will not i.riter,fere with or detract •f •om the appearance or visibility of nearby signs; Finding: The site plan submitted for this proposal does not identify signs or sign Iacations. The accompanying Applicant's Response narrative states that "signage will be designed so that it does not conflict with traffic control signage or intez•fere or detract froze nearby signage". Finding: Sign standards and permit requirements are found in Section 15.24 of the CFMC. The sign requirezxzents in Chapter 15.24 shall govez-n in the TOD district and corridor with exceptions listed in Chapter 17.67.050(M) of the CPMC. Conclusion: Compliance with CFMC 17.72.040 {D); CPMC 15.24 Sign Code and CPMC 17.67.050(M) will be monitored during the building permit process. CPMC X ~ ~.2.040(E). Accessibility and sacfficiency of fire fighting facilities to such a standard as to provide,for the reasonable safety of life, Iitnb and property, including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads and f re lanes sa that alI bicildings on the premises are accessible to jet°e apparatus; Finding: >"ire District No. 3 reviewed this proposal and provided written comments dated March 28, 2047. The review and comments of the Planning Depaz-tment staff report dated May 1, 2047, have been included in this report. Finding: The project site has public street access on two sides, Oak Street to the north and Third Street to the west, and intez•z~al or an-site circulation, with the width necessary to accoznznadate fire vehicles. Page 14 of 15 Conclusion: Fire District 3's review atui crn~~i7~ea~ts can be adclresseci by tl~e applicant as specified by said lire autf~ority. Its adc9itic}n, Fire District 3's requirements can be inonitorecl in the building pcrn~it review E~rocess. CP111C I7.7Z.~40 ~~}. COmpIlancc 14t1t12 LlII C1ty oi'Cl11TaltCG'S alld 1'Cgl~1C1t1oftS, 1nGI1ldlltf,' Section 16.20.080 pertaining to the nraxinzu~n nt.lmber of single-family dwellings or diwelling units allowable o~z cul-de-sac streets, and applicable state Icn1-s,- Finding: No single-family clwelEiclgs are proposed with this application. Conclusion: Not applicable CPMC I7.72.O~10 (G}. Cornpliarlce with satcl~ cr!•chitecttlj•e anal desigta standards as to pt-ovide aesthetic acceptability in relation to the neighbor°ltood and the Central Point area and its environs. The architecture and design proposals may be rejected by the planning commission iffolind to be incompatible with the existitzg a!°cltitectacral or design characteristics of adjacent propertl:es or uses. In addition, the plcnning cantntis,siolz reserves the right to establish additional height, setback, bl{ffering, or other developt~telzt requl:renlents t17at may be necessary to ensure land t.lse cofztpatibility and erzslll~e the health, safety, and prioracy of Central Paint residents. Finding: The proposed structure is similar in design to buildings recently constructed in the city and can provide aesthetic acceptability in relation to the neighborhood, the TOD District, Corridor and the City of Central Point. Conclusion: The proposal complies. Page 15 of 15 =~.~ TIC H l1~ E~~" " I~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FITNESS CENTER AND SECOND FLOOR PROFESSIONAL OFFICES AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MIXED USE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT Applicant: The Crossing at Center Point, LLC, Agent: Tozilyny Malot (37S 2W 11SS, Tax Lots 500, 600 and 700} File Na. 07106 WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted applications far Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan approval far the construction of a three-story mixecl commercial and residential buildzng located within a TOD- HMR, 1-filth Mix Residential zoning district. The property consists of approximately 23,10[) sq. ft. gross acreage and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 11BB, Tax Lots 500, 600 and 700, located at 321 Oak Street, in the City of Central Point, Oregon; and WHEREAS, on May 1, 2007, the Central Point Planning Conunissian conducted a duly-noticed public hearing on the applications, at which tizxze it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and cazxzznents on the applicatioz~zs; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's conszderatzon of the applications is based an tl~e standards and criteria applicable to the TOD-HMR, High Mix Residential section 17.65, Application Review Process section 17.66 and Design Standards -- TOD District section 17.67, Conditional Use Permit section 17.76 and Site Plan criteria section 17.72 of the Central Point Municipal code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Caz7zmission, as part of the Site Plan application, has considered and finds per the Staff Report dated May 1, 2007, that adequate findings have been made demonstrating that issuance of the conditional use is consistent with. the intent of the TOD-HMR District ,now therefore SE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning Commission, by this Resolution No. does hereby approve the applications based on the findings and conclusions of approval as set forth on Exhibit "A -Revised", the Staff Report dated May 1, 2007, which includes attachments, is attacl~Ied hereto by reference and incorporated herein. Planning Commission Resolution No. (050107) PASSE~7 by the Planning Commission anal signed by znG iz~ authentication of its passage this 15t clay o~ May, 2007. Planning Comznissian Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved lay me this 1s~ day of May, 2007. Planning Commission Chair Planning Coznznission Resolution I~lo. (050107)