HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - July 6, 2010~
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
July 6, 2010 - 6:00 p.m.
Next Planning Commission
Resolution No. 772
I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Connie Moczygemba, Chuck Piland, Pat Beck, Mike Oliver, Justin Hurley, Tim
Schmeusser and Keith Wangle
ITI. CORRESPONDENCE
IV. MINUTES - Review and approval of April 6, 2010 Planning Commission Minutes and
June 1, 2010 Planning Commission Study Session Minutes
V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES
VI. BUSINESS
Pgs. 1- 19 A. Fi1e No. 07106. Consideration of a Major Modification application of the
approved Conditional Use Permit to include expansion of Anytime Fitness to the
second floor of the Crossing at Center Point buitding at 312 Oak Street Central
Point, Oregon. The subject property is located in the TOD-HMR, Transit Oriented
Development-High Mix Residential/Commercial zoning district. The subject
property is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 11BB,
Tax Lots 500, 600 and 700. Applicant: Tom Malot Construction Co., Inc.;
Agent: Tommy Malot
Pgs. 20 - 44 g, File No.10001. Continued discussion of proposed amendments to the Tourist
and Office-Professsional (C-4) zoning district. Applicant: City of Central
Point
VII. DISCUSSION
VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS
IX. MISCELLANEOUS
X. ADJOURNMENT
City of Central Point
Planning Commission Minutes
April 6, 2010
I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 6:00 P.M.
II. ROLL CALL
Commissioners Connie Moczygemba, Chuck Piland, Pat Beck, Mike Oliver, Tim
Schmeusser, Keith Wangle, and Justin Hurley were present.
Also in attendance were: Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director;
Connie Clune, Community Planner; Dave Jacob, Community Planner; and Didi
Thomas, Planning Secretary.
III.
Community Development Director Tom Humphrey advised Planning
commissioners that the City had received a final order from the Oregon
Department of Transportation Rail Division to begin construction of a railroad
crossing at Twin Creeks and Highway 99.
IV. MINUTES
Justin Hurley made a motion to approve the minutes of the March 16, 2010
Planning Commiasion meeting as aubmitted. Mike Oliver seconded the
motion. ROLL CALL: Piland, yes; Oliver, yes; Hurley, yes; Beck, yes;
Scluneusser, yes; Wangle; yes. Motion passed.
V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES - None.
VI. BUSINESS
A. File No. 09017. A resolution forwarding a favorable recommendation to
the Central Point City Council regarding adoption of the Greater Bear
Creek Valley Regional Plan. Applicant: Jackson County
Tom Humphrey explained that as a result of the public hearing held on March 16, 2010,
the Planning Commission directed staff to address the preliminary regional plan and to
deal with the issues that arose during the public hearing in a formal resolution. The
Planning Commtsslon Minutes
Aprt16, 2010
Page 2
resolution being presented to commissioners contains some standard language that will
be used by all participating cities, Mr. Humphrey added, as well as proposed
modifications to the Plan.
Mr. Humphrey stated that the proposed draft Plan is consistent with the Agreement Plan
and pointed out that Exhibits C through F attached to the resolution indicate in red the
corrections made to issues raised.
Justin Hurley made a motion to approve Resolution 771, a resolution on
behalf of the Clty of Central Point Planning Commisaion forwarding a
favorable recommendation to the City Council regarding adoption of the
Greater Bear Creek Valley Regional Plan based on the standards, t"~adings,
conclusions and recommendations atated in the staff report. Chuck Piland
seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Piland, yes; Oliver, yes; Hurley, yes; Beck,
yes; Schxneusser, yes; and Wangle; yes. Motion passed.
B. File No. 07038. Consideration of a request from Nor[h Valley Center for an
extension of time within which to submit a final development plan for a mixed
use commercial shopping facility. The property is located on East Pine Street
(Biddle Road) in the C-4, Tourist and Office Professional zoning district
(Jackson County Assessor's map 37S 2W O1C, Tax Lot 802). Applicant:
Bank of the Cascades
There were no conflicts or ex parte communications to disclose.
Community Planner Connie Clune presented a staff report on the requested extension for
this mixed use commercial shopping center, noting that a map of the location of the
subject property and a previously approval site plan were included with the staff report
for easy reference. Ms. Clune stated that Bank of the Cascades received this pmperty in a
foreclosure proceeding and is continuing to market it.
Tom Humphrey added that an extension of site plan approval will provide more options
to a potential buyer.
Chuck Piland made a motion to approve the request from North Valle~
Center for an eatension of time within which to submit a final development
plan for a mized use commercial shopping facility (Jackson County
Asaesaor's map 37S 2W O1C, Tax Lot 802) based on the atandards, findings,
conclusions snd recommendationa stated in the staff report. Pat Beck
seconded the raotion. ROLL CALL: Piland, yes; Oliver, yes; Hurley, yes; Beck,
yes; Schmeusser, yes; and Wangle; yes. Motion passed.
VII. DISCUSSION
VIII. ADNIINISTRATIVE REVIEWS
Plann/ng Commissron Minutes
Apr116, 2010
Page 3
IX. MISCELLANEOUS
Tom Humphrey urged commissioners to read the current issue of "The Commissioner"
that was distributed. Mr. Humphrey noted that he and Planning Manager pon Burt
would be attending the national conference in New Orleans this month.
Mr. Humphrey advised that there had been a gradual improvement in building activity
recently with the construction of several new homes in Snowy Butte Station, a new
subdivision under construction near North Valley by Bob Fellows, and plans for some
new row houses to be built by Bret Moore. Mr. Humphrey added that Todd Meador, the
Building Official, had been occupied with keeping code current and supervising the High
Tech Crime Lab improvements.
A meeting of the Downtown Revitalization Committee had been held on Monday
evening, April 5, 2010, at which Mr. Humphrey introduced John Galbraith, Galbraith and
Associates, who will be coming up with some designs for the Exit 33 interchange to
make it a more noticeable city entry.
In response to questions raised by commissioners, Mr. Humphrey said that he would ask
ODOT about restriping the overpass to make it safer for bicycle tr~c. Mr. Humphrey
advised that Mon Desir could not be rebuilt as a restaurant. If a transit oriented
development district is created for the east side, the properry could be utilized for both
commercial and mixed use development.
A question was raised with regard to the property located at Haskell Street and Taylor
Road. Mr. Humphrey assured that code enforcement was working on this matter, and at
such time as there was enough material available, Mr. Humphrey would send a letter to
the owner of the pmperty.
X. ADJOURNMENT
Mike Oliver made a motion to adjourn the meenng. Chuck Piland seconded
the motion. Meeting was adjourned at 6:30 p.m.
The foregoing minutes of the April 6, 2010 Planning Commission meeting were
approved by the Planning Commission at its meeting on the of ,
2010.
Planning Commission Chair
City of Central Pofnt
Planning Commiesion
Study Sesaion Miputea
June 1, 2010
I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 6:05 P.M.
II. ROLL CALL
Commissioners Connie Moczygemba, Pat Beck, Tim Schmeusser, Keith Wangle,
and Justin Hurley were present.
Also in attendance were: Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director;
Don Burt, Planning Manager; Connie Clune, Community Planner; Dave Jacob,
Community Planner; and Didi Thomas, Planning Secretary.
III. DISCUSSION
-4 Zonine District Amendments
Planning Manager pon Burt advised the Commissioners that the purpose of the
study session this evening was to discuss the basic concepts for the proposed
changes to the C-4 zoning district and that details (specific standards) would be
discussed at a later time. Mr. Burt asked that the focus be on design elements.
Staff would be meeting with an ad hoc committea of business people on June 10,
2010 and wished to impart the Planning Commission's wixhes at that titne in
order to provide direction to We businessmen.
The City's Strategic Plan tttat was adopted in May of 2007 expressed a desire to
maintain a"small town" environment as one of the City's core goals, a
community that was walkable with buildings designed to pmject more human
scale with attractive streetscapes and pedestrian ways. Connectivity between
destinations by way of pedesdrian paths is key to cresting and maintaining
walkability in the corrununity.
Connie Moczygemba expressed concerns for design criteria to apply also to the
service components of new conshucrion that abut residential areas.
Tom Humphrey, Commwrity Development Director, pointed out that building
orientation on a property could also serve as a buffer to interface with residendal
properties.
Planntng Commtsslon M-nutes
June l, 2010
Page 2
"Transparency" and the creation of human scale, Mr. Burt said, is created by
utilizing window spsce for display aress, awnings ovar storefronts and vagetation,
This is what provides a smali town feel.
Commissioners expressed concecns about design criteria, and making Central
Point look "eute". Mr. Burt stated that any given standazd doesn't guarantee
quslity and that we certainly wouldn't want to creste a theme. Architecture
shouid be flmetional and can be broken up with the use of different materials.
The code amendments do not advocste sn architectural theme.
Commissioners generally agreed that there should be 40% transparency as a
design standard and tlsis would apply to public street frontage where thare is
pedestrian movement. Wallcability and human scale were slso considered to be
necessary components for consideration.
Mr. Burt said that future study sassions would desl with refining design
requirements in conjunction with uses.
Jusrin Hnrley expressed concerns about where the funding would come from for
infrastructure improvements. Don Burt said that this would always be a constant
issue.
Keith Wangle menrioned tree clearance and canopy as a concern. Tlus is where
the sidewalk widths would be important to compensation. Mc. Burt noted that
streetscape design is always fraught with compromises which should be made
consciously.
IV. ADJOURNMENT
Meeting was adjourned at 6:55 p.m.
The foregoing minutes of the June 1, 2010 Planning Commission Study Session were
approved by the Planning Commission at its meeting on the of ,
2010.
Planning Commission
MAJOR MODIFICATION TO APPROVED
GONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (MALOT)
Citv of Central Poin~ OreQOn
140 S 3rd Street, Central Point, OR 97502 C
541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384
www.centralpoi ntoregon.gov
Community Development
Tom Humphrey, AICP
Communlty Development Director
STAFF REPORT
July 6, 2010
AGENDA ITEM: File No. 07106
Consideration of a Major Modifications application of the approved Conditional Use Permit (File
07106) at 312 Oak Street, (37S 2W 11BB, Tax Lots 500, 600 and 700), TOD-HMR, Transit
Oriented Development-High Mix Residential/Commercial zoning district. Applicant: Tom
Malot Construction Co., Inc.; Agent: Tommy Malot.
STAFF SOURCE:
Connie Clune, Community Planner
BACKGROUND:
The Crossing at Center Point is a three story, mixed-use building with apartments on the third
floor, professional office space on the second floor, the fitness center and pizza parlor on the first
floor.~ At this time the applicant is proposing the following two (2) modifications to the current
Conditional Use Permit:
1. A 2,080 sq. fr. expansion of Anytime Fitness to the second floor of The Crossing (Suites
205 and 206). An interior staircase from Suite 101 to Suite 205 will be constructed to
provide member access to the added second floor exercise area; and
2. Use of the remaining five vacant second floor suites as follows:
a. Future expansion of the fitness center, and
b. Other personal service2 oriented businesses (blueprint services, tanning, hair
salon, martial arts etc.) on the second floor.
The applicanYs primazy objective is to secure flexibility in the recruiting of various personal
service uses without having to repeatedly modify the Conditional Use Permit. Within the HMR
District entertainment and personal service uses, and second story professional office uses are
permitted subject to receipt of a Conditional Use Permit.
Entertainment, Fitness Center
The fitness center has been previously approved as a conditional use on the first floor. The
Planning Commission's initial consideration of the fitness center as a conditional use focused on
pazking and use compatibility with the third floor residential units. It was determined, and has
since been demonstrated, that the first floor fitness center is compatible with the residential units
~ Resolution No. 727
2 Section 17.08.410(D)(b)
01
140 South Third Street • Cenhal Point, OR 97502 • 541.664.3321 • 541.664.6384
and that the parking is adequate. Expansion of the fitness center to the second floor will require
additional parking and bring the fitness center operation physically closer to the third floor
residents.
Parking - The project was initially designed based on the second floor being used for
professional offices (1:400). As such, personal service uses will not adversely affect the
parking requirements. The TOD parking standards for entertainment uses (1250), which
includes fitness centers, is greater than professional offices (1:400). The conversion of
2,080 sq. ft. from office to entertainment use would typically require additional parking.
However, in the case of the fitness center, 54% of the parking demand occurs after 6:00
p.m, allowing the shared use of the vacated office parking. Conservatively, and under a
mixed-use scenario, a parking ratio of 1:400 is adequate for the fimess center.
Use Compatibility - The applicant is proposing low impact fitness use (stationary
bikes/treadmills) of the proposed second floor expansion. The building's design
(separated access and sound insulation) should be adequate to buffer the third floor
residences from the proposed expansion. The proposed fitness center request has been
conditioned to further reduce uses that may cause adverse impacts to the third floor
residents.
Personal Services
The applicant is requesting the flexibility to a11ow personal services as an allowed use
eliminating the need to repeatedly modify the conditional use permit. This is not an unreasonable
request provided that it can be found that there will be no adverse impacts to the parking and use
compatibility with the third floor residential units. The applicanYs request to allow personal
services on the second floor can be supported subject to conditions.
Parking - The parking requirement for personal service uses is less than for professional
offices. Any conversion of professional office space to personal service space will result
in a reduction in the currently required minimum number of parking spaces. Therefore,
parking is not an issue.
Use Compatibility - The operational characteristics of personal services and professional
offices are very similar (clients/employees); however, some personal services can haue
operational characteristics that may not be compatible with abutting residential uses, i.e.
uses that generate noise, etc. The building's design (separated access and sound
insulation) should be adequate to buffer the third floor residences from most personal
services. However, there are other personal services (music/karate studios, blueprint
shops) that could have adverse impacts on the third floor residential units. To avoid such
occurrences it is recommended that the Community Development Director be given the
discretion to approve or deny personal uses.
ISSUES:
In considering this application there are two basic issues:
Page 2 of 4 ~~i
1. Adequacy of Pazking. Because of the mixed-use nature of The Crossing at Center Point
project and the off-set peak use periods the parking can be adequately accommodated
(see findings).
2. Use Compatibility. As the commercial uses (fitness center and personal services)
encroach onto the second floor, the issue of use compatibility with the third floor
residential units becomes more of a concern, depending on the type of activity allowed.
As conditioned, allowing the Community Development Director the discretion to approve
or deny personal service uses, the issue of compatibility can be addressed on a case by
case basis without having to reopen the Conditional Use Permit.
FINDINGS:
See Attachment "D"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. Prior to the issuance of a final tenancy occupancy permit for Suites 205 and 206, the
applicant shall enter into and record a shared parking agreement with the City of Central
Point for the Oak Street parking lot for the creation of the equivalent of three (3) parking
spaces.
2. The parking requirements for the fitness center are hereby modified to one space for
every 400 sq, ft. (see findings for justification). Other than the adjustment for the fitness
center, The Crossing at Center Point project shall comply with the City's parking
requirements as set forth in Section 17.65.050, Table 3.
3. The second story fitness center expansion shall be limited to activities that do not cause
excessive vibration or loud music.
4. Personal Service uses are subject to approval by the Community Development Director
as a Type II, Minor Amendment procedure. The Community Development Director has
the discretion to require a conditional use permit of any proposed personal use that has
the potential to adversely affect the residential units.
5. Conditions as listed by the Central Point Public Works Staff Report dated June 14, 2010.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment "A"- Applicant submittals
Attachme»t "B"- Central Point Public Works Staff Report
Attachment "C"- Anytime Fimess Trip Study
Attachment "D"- Findings of Fact
Attachment "E"- Resolution
Page 3 of 4 ~ 3.
ACTION: ,. _. . ._, ._ . ... ..,.., , ..
Consideration of Resolution No. _, approving the proposed Major Modifioation to Conditional
Use Permit File: 07106.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of Resolution No. _, granting a Major Modification of Conditional Use Permit File
07106.
Page 4 of 4 ~~
,
ATTACHMENT "A,,."
650 E. Pine St., Ste. #102A
Central Point, OR 97502
(541) 664-1258 Fax (541) 664-2554
CCB#521
May 10, 2010
The Crossing at Center Point, LLC
Anytime Fitness
312 Oak Street, Suite 205/206
Central Point, Oregon 97502 '
To; The City of Central Point Planning and Building Department.
Conditional Use Permit File # 07016
Major Modification (Type III)
Sec 17.09 and Sec 17.76.040 Findings and conditions
The site of the proposed Conditional Use Major Modification (Type III):
A. 312 Oak Street, Central Point, Oregon, inside the building known as The
Crossing at Center Point, on the second floor. It wil~ occupy Suites 205/206
with an address of Suite 205. At this time, we would like for the remaining
Suite's 201, 202, 203, 207 and 208 to also be considered in this Major
Modification.
B. The proposed use of this site will not have any significant adverse effect on the
abutting property as it is located in previously approved mixed use buiiding.
C. The proposed establishment is an expansion of Anytime Fitness that is presently
located at Suite 101 in The Crossing building. The approximate square footage
for the expansion is Approx. 2,080.
D. Residential Interface.
'~ 1. Hours of operation:
a. Operation is 24 Hours a day and 365 days a year.
05
2. Noise.
a. The location of Suite 205/206 is above a portion of Suite 101 which is
occupied by Anytime Fitness and the Breezeway that gives access from Oak
Street to the back parking lot of the building and Bobbios Pizza.
b. The Crossing Building was constructed with anti Sound Buffering. Also,
additional Sound Buffering will be added to the ceiling and adjacent walls.
E. Pedestrian Traffic (interior).
1. One internai Stairway will be added from Suite 101 to Suite 205. Handicap
access is already available with the external elevator.
F. Parking.
-: 1. Parking Standards for Fitness Center: -
a. Meets Standards of Conditional Use P~rmit File #07016.
- b. There are no Adjustments needed.
43 Parking Spaces are required and the building has 44. Also, additional
: overflow parking will be available at the upcoming Planed City Parking Lot
located on Oak Street.
Thank you for this consideration,
Tommy Malot
~~
ZNm
~~o
v~n~
Q ~ Z
Zm~
-im
~-1D
H
mCn
~ ~
A
O~
hg S
n
Y g p~ o
H
O ~
JmNAWN~O
~m~xnpP~
8R~~~~%..
a~'~„ ~~
xq•~e~ 'e
3 ao~
~oNOagR~
~9?j~$
R~ ~~,'
9 ~
5 ~ ~• o
,s l 0 5'
o ~m
ti o<px
n NNO
O
~ a n'~
8 g ~R
~ A 3C
N ~']
l,~4
~40
9.~9'
~o~
o ..'
~' ~
9$
~~
n°
m~
5'~
e
H
~~
Om
~ ' " ~O ~ . .. ._ ~ .
T~ ~
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . .. ~ , .
~ ^ ~ ~
!- £ ~
~~ A Q
f0
~ N :
P ~~ ~ ~ . .. _ . .
~ ~
IL~p
u--~--e ~ ~
~~ ~ ~
~
~-~ ~=~ ~
~ ~-°~ Q~
38'-8' -
ti
c
~
~
m
N
0
V
C C~3. ~ C1 ~,'-`, Cl7 ~' .c" w° o- ~u r r w w
~ ~ S~; cd i''-7, r-' ~' °« o~ n~ Q' . aa
T
~~ oa ao ~~ .
B~
p' ~ ~
G~ (~~'~~o~ ~~ o
~ ~ ~ a~ X ~
0
•~
r
•
~ ~ P. o~
a '" ~.K+. (7
Y
o~ ~+ ~ ~-,y
~-1
^' ~
f ,
~
`~ CJ ~
~ A.
!y
f
D
G
¢,
n
i~. rt ~
~ ~
~ ~ y .
~..
,n y
~
a "
q P ~IQ
~, ~
~
~ ~ ~ m ~ \ p Q ~~.. '.
~
~ e
N N N
N N N N F+ I-+
1~ F+
F+ ~
F+ ~
Y+
i+ ~D OD ~
ln A W
l Q
N ~
+
~ ~.
~
OV
ATTACHMENT " ~ "
~
CENTRAL
POINT
Matt Samitore, Public Works Olrector
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
140 South 3rd Street • Central Point, OR 97502 •(541) 664-7602 • www.centrelpointoregon.gov
Stephanle Holtey, CFM
PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT
June 14, 2010
AGENDAITEM:
Approval of Anytime Fitness expansion to include 2,000 square feet encompassed in Suites 205 and 206 of the
existing Twin Creeks Crossing building. The proposal is a modffication of Conditional Use Permit No. 0706 and
also fncludes a provision to allow future expansion of the health club activities into Sultes 207 and 208.
Applicant: Tom Malot Construct(on Co., Inc.
Zoning: TOD-HMR
Ex(stinglnfrastructure:
Water: There Is an existing 8-inch waterline in Oak Street.
Storm Drain: There is an existing 24-fnch storm drain line in Oak Street to drains the east.
Street: Oak and 3'" and 4`h Streets are 40-foot wide City-owned local streets paved accordingly.
System Development Charges:
System Development Charges (SDCs) assessed at this time are based on the expansion of Anytime Fitness
health club to include 2,000 square feet of additional area located wfthin Suites 205 and 206 of the Twin
Creeks Crossfng Bulld(ng. The applicant has requested approval for future expansion of the existing use to
Include Sultes 207 and 208; however, use of Sultes 207 and 208 by Anytime Fitness is not proposed to occur at
this time. Any additional expansion to Anytime Fitness beyond the 2,000 square feet will increase impacts to
the transportation system and will be subject to SDCs in effect at the time that the expansion occurs.
Conditions of Approval:
1. A shared parking agreement between the landowner and/or business operator may be required to
meet traffic demand, as determined by the Community Development Department. In the event a
shared parking agreement Is requlred, it shall be approved by the Clty Councll and recorded w(th the
City of Central Point Finance Oepartment prior to construction of the proposed facility expansion.
2. Future expansion beyond Suite 205 and 206 will be subject to Public Works System Development
Charges at the time additional expansfon occurs and will be subject to the SDC rates in effect at the
time of expansfon.
09
Al"FACHMENl" "~"
Summary of the Anytime Fitness Trip Study Submitted to Public Works
Peak Hour 1 Peak Hour 2 Building Peak Hour
4:00-5:00 PM 5:00-6:00 PM Total Average Square Trips
Albany
Day 1 9 2 70 5 5,380 0.93
Eugene
Day 1 9 4 73 6.5 5,738 1.13
Sutherlin
Day 1 9 S 17 8.5 5,545 1.53
Day 2 10 5 75 7.5 5,545 1.35
Day 3 6 7 73 6.5 5,545 1.17
Redmond
Day 1 2 6 8 4 5,480 0.73
Day 2 13 7 20 10 5,480 1.82
Day 3 4 3 7 3.5 5,480 0.64
1TE
Study 1 48 15,000 3.20
Study 2
185 44,000 4.20
Total 16.72
Average ITE 2.09
1U
Attachment "D"
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
File No: 07106
INTRODUCTION
The Crossing at Center Point, a three story building at 312 Oak Street, is located in the TOD-
HMR, Transit Oriented Development-High Mix Residential/Commercial zoning district. At this
time the applicant is requesting specific review of the second floor use permitted by the
Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan review, File: 07106. The project scope includes expansion
of Anytime Fitness Center to suites 205 and 206, a 2080 squaze foot floor area as well as
commercial use flexibility of the remaining second floor suites. Applicant: Tom Ma1ot
Construction Co., Inc.; Agent: Tommy Malot.
CPMC 17.09.300 Major modifications.
A. Major Modification Defined. The community development director shald determine that a major
modification(s) is required if one or more of the changes listed below are proposed.•
1. A change in land use;
2. An increase in density by more than ten percent, provided the resulting densiry does not
exceed that allowed by the land use district;
3. A change in setbacks or lot coverage by more than ten percent, provided the resulting setback
or Zot coverage does not exceed that allowed by the land use district;
4. A change in the type and/or location of accessways, drives or parking areas affecting off-site
tra~c;
5. An increase in the fdoor area proposed for nonresidential use by more than fifteen percent
where previously specified;
6. A reduction of more than ten percent of the area reserved for common open space; or
7. Change to a condition of approval, or a change similar to subsections (A)(1) through (6) of
this section, that could have a detrimental impact on adjoining properties. The city planning official
shall have discretion in determining detrimental impacts warranting a major modiftcation.
Finding: The proposed expansion of Anytime Fimess to the second floor of the project site is an
increase in the floor area of the approved Conditional Use Permit by more than fifteen percent.
Conclusion: It has been determined that a major modification application is required since one
or more of the changes listed in CPMC 17.09.300 (A) are proposed.
CPMC 17.09.300 B. Major Modi~cation Applications; Approval Criteria. An applicant may
request a major modtfication using a Type II or Type III review procedure, as follows:
1. Upon the community development director determining that the proposed modification is a
major modification, the applicant shall submit an application form, filing fee and narrative, and a site
plan using the same plan format as in the original approval. The community development director may
require other relevant information, as necessary, to evaluate the request.
1~' Page 1 of 7
2. The application shall be subject to the same review procedure ('1'ype II or III), decision-
making body, and approval criteria used for the initial project approval, except that adding a
conditional use to an approved project shall be reviewed using a Type III procedure.
3. The scope of review shall be limited to the modification request. For example, a request to
mod~ a parking lot shall require site design review only for the proposed parking lot and any changes
to associated access, circulation, pathways, lighting, trees, and landscaping. Notice shall be provided
in accordance with the applicable notice requirements for Type II or Type III procedures.
4. The decision-making body shall approve, deny, or approve with conditions an application for
major modification based on written findings on the criteria.
Finding: The applicant submitted an application for review by the Planning Commission as a
Type III Major Modification of the Conditional Use Permit (File 07106) is in compliance with
section 17.09.300 (B).
Finding: The applicant is requesting review of the second floor use permitted by the
Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan review File: 7106 as provided by subsection 3.
Conclusion: Application complies
CPMC 17.65.050 (C). Conditional Uses. Conditional uses in Table 1 are shown with a"C. " These
uses are aldowed if they comply with the applicable provisions of this title. They are subject to the same
application and review process as other corzditional uses identified in this title.
Finding: The fitness center, the second floor professional office spaces and personal service-
oriented businesses are listed in CPMC Section 17.65. O50 Table 1 as conditional uses in the
TOD-HMR zoning district. Anytime Fitness center and the professional office spaces received
an approved Conditional Use Permit as part of the 2007 Site Plan review (File: 07106). Parking
and use compatibility with the third floor residential units was reviewed. The Planning
Commission determined the use compatible with the residential use and parking is adequate.
Finding: CPMC Section 17.08.410 The TOD district definitions provide categories for land use
and activities in the TOD district on the basis of, "common functional, product, or physical
characteristics". Subsection (B)(2)(a.-1.) are twelve (12) factors considered to determine what
category the use is assigned.
Finding: The applicant is proposing low impact fitness use (bikes/treadmills) of the second
floor suites as an expansion of the fitness center. By TOD definition, a fitness center (health
clubs) is assigned to the entertainment category of commercial uses. The operational
characteristics of a fitness center are similar in the type of floor space, clientele and services as
found with personal services-orientated business category.
Conclusion: The axpansion of the fitness center, personal service-oriented businesses and
second floor professional office spaces are listed conditional uses in the TOD-HMR district, and
are reviewed with this application.
CPMC 17.66.030 (4). Conditional Use. Conditional uses shall be reviewed as provided in Chapter
17.76, Conditional Use Permits.
1~ Page2of7
Finding: A Conditional Use application (File 07106) was reviewed and approved by the
Planning Commission, Resolution No. 727. This application is a request to modify the previous
approval.
Conclusion: An application has been submitted for public hearing and review.
CPMC 17.76.040 Conditional Use Permit: Findings and conditions. The plarzning commission in
granttng a conditional use permit shall f:nd as follows:
A. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use and to
meet all other development and lot requirements of the subject zoning district and all other provisions of
this code;
Table 1
Finding: Per the applicanYs narrative, suites
205 and 206, are a 2080 square foot floor area
and adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the fitness center expansion.
Finding: The remaining second floor suites
were constructed as lease office spaces and are
of sufficient size to accommodate
professional office use or future expansion of
the fitness center (Suites 207 and 208) as
Table 1 illustrates.
Conclusion: The project can meet the
criterion.
CPMC 17. ~6.040 (B). That the site has adequate
access to a public street or highway and that the
street or highway is adequate in size and condition to
effectively accommodate the tra~c that is expected
to be generated by the proposed use;
The Crossing: Suite Size By Square Feet
Sq. Ft. as per building plans
First Floor
Ste.A 101(Fitness)
Ste.B 103 (Bobbio's)
......... 5527
2800
.........83 27..
Second Floor
Ste.A 201 1120 1120
Ste.B 202 1040 1040
Ste.C 203 690 690
Ste.D 204 (Leased) 1690 1690
Ste.E 205 1040
Ste.F 206 1040 2080
Ste.G 207 1040
Ste.H 208
..... 1090
.....
.
. .. 2130
..........
..
0
875 87 50
Finding: The Crossing is a new development completed in 2008 with adequate access to public
streets effectively meeting the anticipated traffic that would be generated by the expansion of the
fitness and other uses within the development. An internal staircase located in the current fitness
center will be constructed to provide members access to the second floor exercise room. The
Crossing has an elevator and exterior staircases that provide access to the second and third floor
of the building.
Conclusion: The project can meet the criterion.
CPMC 17.76 040 (C). That the proposed use will have no signif:cant adverse effect on abutting
property or the permitted use thereof. In making this determination, the commission shall consider the
~ 3 Page 3 of 7
proposed location of improvements on the site; vehicular ingress, egress and internal circulation;
setbacks; height of buililings and structures; walls and fences; landscaping; outdoor lighting; and signs;
Finding: The building was designed with separate suite accesses, pedestrian walkways and
sound buffering insulation between each floor to facilitate commercial use compatibility with the
third floor residential units.
Finding: The operational characteristics of personal services and professional offices are very
similar (clients/employees); however, some personal services can have operational
characteristics that may not be compatible with abutting residential uses, i.e. uses that generate
noise, etc. The building is designed (separated access and sound insulation) to adequately buffer
the third floor residences from most personal services. However, there are other personal
services (music/karate studios, blueprint shops) that could have adverse impacts on the third
floor residential units. To avoid such occurrences, and a as condition of any approval, the
Community Development Director shall be given the discretion to approve or deny personal uses
deemed to be in conflict with residential uses.
Finding: All site improvements, vehicular ingress, egress and internal circulation, building
setbacks, landscaping, and outdoor lighting were addressed with the approval of The Crossing.
Conclusion: As a condition, by allowing the Community Development Director the discretion
to approve or deny personal service uses, the issue of compatibility can be addressed on a case
by case basis.
CPMC 17.76.040 (D). That the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use applied for will
comply with local, state and federal health and safety regulations and therefore will not be detrimental
to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding
neighborhoods and will not be detrimental or injurious to the property and improvements in the
neighborhood or to the general welfare of the community based on the review of those factors listed in
subsection C of this section;
Finding: The applicant agrees to comply with all of the above requirements as stated in the
applicanYs narrative.
Conclusion: The applicant has or intends to meet this criterion.
CPMC 17.76.040 (E). That any conditions required for approval of the permit are deemed necessary to
protect the public health, safety and general welfare and may include:
1. Adjustments to lot size or yard areas as needed to best accommodate the proposed use;
provided the lots or yard areas conform to the stated minimum dimensions for the subject zoning
district, unless a variance is also granted as provided for in Chapter 17.13,
2. Increasing street widths, modifications in street designs or addition of street signs or traffic
signals to accommodate the traffic generated by the proposed use,
3. Adjustments to off-street parking requirements in accordance with any unique characteristics
of the proposed use,
14 Page 4 of 7
4. Regulation of points of vehicular ingress and egress,
5. Requiring landscaping, irrigation systems, lighting and a property maintenance program,
6. Regulation of signs and their locations,
7. Requiring fences, berms, walls, landscaping or other devices of organic or artificial
composition to eliminate or reduce the effects of noise, vibrations, odors, visual incompatibility or other
undesirable effects on surrounding properties,
8. Regulation of time of operations for certain types of uses if their operations may adversely
affect privacy of sleep of persons residing nearby or otherwise conflict with other community or
neighborhood functions,
9. Establish a time period within which the subject land use must be developed,
10. Requirement of a bond or other adequate assurance within a specifted period of time,
11. Such other conditions that are found to be necessary to protect the public headth, safety and
general welfare,
Finding: The Crossing was constructed subject to a prior land use action (File: 07106). In
consideration at this time is the operation of a use within the existing building. As such the
above conditions aze not applicable to the project with the exception of E(3)). The proposed
modification required recalculation of off-site parking requirements.
The project site has thirty-nine (39) parking spaces auailable. With a 25% credit for transit
service proximity, forty-two (42) pazking spaces are required to meet the needs for all the
existing uses. As provided by Section 17.65.050(3)(d), a reciprocal parking agreement with the
City of Central Point was a listed condition of approval in the previous Conditional Use Permit
(File 09028) for the project site. A reciprocal parking agreement shall be a condition of any
approval with this application.
The TOD district parking standards, Section 17.65.050 Table 3, establishes pazking requirements
in connection with the land use category. The TOD parking space standard for entertainment
uses at 1250 includes fitness centers. As found in above findings, a fitness center has similar
characteristics identified by common functionality and site factors as does personal service uses,
i.e. martial arts and dance studios. The standard for professional offices is 1:400 and personal
services is 1:500.
The TOD district encourages shared parking by users within a mixed-use building. The
difference in the time of day distribution of peak parking demand is a determining factor to the
success of shared parking. The following is an Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)
Parking Study comparison of the Crossings mix-uses.
ITE Peak Period Demand
Use Peak Hour(s) Vehicles/ 1000 GFA
Health Club
/F(tnessCenter 6:OOp.m: 7:OOp.m. 1.77-10.56
Office 9:00 a.m: 4:00 p.m. 1.36-6.81
Multi-Residential 12:OOa.m.-5:00 a.m. 0.68-1.94 per DU
Source: Ins[ttute of Transpatatlon Engineen: Parking Gmeretlm 3rd Edition
15 Page 5 of 7
The conversion of 2,080 sq. ft. from office to entertainment use would typically require
additional parking. However, in the case of the fitness center; 54% of the parking demand
occurs after 6:00 p.m. allowing the shared use of the vacated office parking. Conservatively, and
under a mixed-use scenario, a parking ratio of 1:400 is adequate for the fitness center.
The p.m. peak hour parking demand is substantiated by published studies by the Institute of
Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation 7`h Edition. The ITE report finds that a fitness
center generates 1.2 peak a.m. trips and 4.05 peak p.m. hour vehicle trips per 1,000 square feet
floor area. Evening peak hour trips for Anytime Fitness is supported by the facility trip study
submitted to the City of Central Point Public Works Department. The study of four (4) Oregon
Anytime Fitness centers found the average peak hour trips for each center to be below the
national ITE average (see study summary Attachment C).
The expansion of the fitness center to suites 205 and 206 is a 2080 square foot conversion from
professional office space. The future expansion of the fitness center to include suites 207 and
208 is not contracted at this time; however, the applicant is requesting that this option be
considered as part of this modification. The specific tenant use of the remaining vacant suites
has not been determined. Table 2 provides an illustration of the proposed lease tenants and
required parking.
Table 2: The Crossing Parking Space Analysis
2010Uses Requlred Modiflcation Requlred Modiflcation Required Modiflcation Required
Building Sq.Ft. Parking ScenarioA Parking Scenario8 Parking ScenarioC ParMng
~g4 ~. y Si
.. ti~3~
~~~
~~
~
~ kd 'St9 b
~~§'.~n ~ ~ ~(:f; ~"r
"4'K~+
~
~ r4,,a a°
sy~2
$*
Y A~a t
"F. ~
~~"''
~r 3 K~~#~' ~d
~y~4kk~.~ ~, ~ ,5 `k. ^1
^a~ ~~e}1
' u u;: m T
~^..,',~y t ~ ~ }
~ ~ J~S,Y `" z~~.
d¢~~e~~t~v„t~$~,
~
~
.
,}.. ,e+
#
+'
a' L. ~kuv~a> u
,-...}~4'.
.
.~eL :.
~
4i$.Y b4 ~ ~'{-sai a4 y
~
{aa ...,}?v t ~h'Tx y .fi{rY.~
4i~!F~! SS...
b `4 T..,ti` Ti#] Sili'
i
U4
Entertalnm ent A
@ 1/250 2800 11 2800 11 2800 11 2800 11
_-
Retall/Service --_- -- ----. .. ---_..__ ._ ...~..__ .. ., ..___._ . .~_._ _ _.~...~.
@ 1/500 5527 11 5527 11 5527 11 5527 11
~gr$~`y f r('wrr z
2
b F
~ ~ ~ S 1+ s t'T{,~
`~`~'~~U
x su` ~3
d ~ ~ i'f ~ ~}
b' C`~r ~* h'~~a' F
S f ,~~
$ 3
~%t
~y '4 vr-, r s
~y ~ 4 ~ 'i
w~ tt' ~/i,. ~'~'
Y ^.(fk; 5t 9 ~
~~ ,~{ t'":a
~`L:'~ ~
~ « 4 Y'a ~ s
y3 ''~s~ t}3.$
ti
$' x 7:a ,~>
`F . °i'n
rl ~.'.
~z
"'Y 5
snafts.xt~d:.~,iC~. +r
t
z>h.~~*rnn~:fc < g
a~ x,
,
2'.i.i la.ti..°k a f °R€
w~,f..~i...a. %
- ~
~n"1~...2~. w_es.N 2 ~
i ..,.., ~v,~ t
.n.,, ;`2ilb+k ~_ ~
,.
n
~,Z't.3+...
Professional Offlces
@1/400 8750 22 4560 11 1690 4 1690 4
~_ _.~.~~ . ._
FltnessCenter ----~~ - - ---- -
~~ ~~~~ ~~~
~ ~
~ ~~ ~~ ~-~~ ~
@ 1/400 0 0 4210 11 4210 11 7060 1S
Perso nal Service
~al 1/500 0 ~ 0 0 0 2850 6 0 0
"~*Tb 7~y j~ `g ~,~gj ~g*}g~
.v
5i
L''
~
~~4~ ~ F :`1 e`n ~~S
~
~
~
~ f ~TjS'y`st~
/lk~"P ~
~' }'£i{ ~} S ~FyT~
It~aS~+~~~~/~°f
~
~ Y~Rd*-.rsU, iStiA'{
`~.c(
~v
~
~ ''*c3J '"*~
4~`R ~~~
~k
~
' ~iS $ 2%"'~
~eYy?5 Y
~
~ ~'h~''a~+.f.i ?. 7'
PJnf'§~'. Y4~ {.i5MSP,~ :i
t
~~
4
~
i~{,l
~
1
r. t~ ~.'~'
:~°
r,
#
e {
~j
u Dg.,
?.. ,
¢.,3?~ 0
Yia...++i
. 2
f.,+.i ,
i*'W,
,e {t
x<bf~ ~ A. _s d,..., h
,.1
8 Resldentlal Units
~
@S 5 per Unit 8 12 8 12 8 12 8 12
{
~~°M` ~~ a^~s,, n
~' G'X~..~i`~+} b
~ ~ [~ZR
' l~+
T~~ '~ *v .d~
~L.~'''Y
~'~~' ~
~ . f a
~4'~'4 ~ a l
}~
k~ `~i~
~~ t
~r ~~^~ ~ ~ ~+ r
s'~' ~2~ 7
~
~ g s
!~ ~: g .:.
~
5y
~~~t`~GU 5'-} YtaLY "~S}~G~~eYSe
~{ 55~
a~ta'i~~% ,
~~~~j~t"~iae2~ ~tE'4 :H
S6k~AR1F
a '~f~`C 41A'~~ y
~L~ad~¢f
~x~~M yi
k" ''£ ~r'1P(
2 $~o ~ ~ ~
Reduced/Transit
i 14
14
14 ~
14
"QF 4~ ~Vj t
p }'~~
~
~~
~
~
~ ~~p( ~~D rR~' j}~s {
Y$
> ~5~ 4Y<tigi'S '2 A"
~y($
i~K~ ~-t p
Y~.t'f i2~ k4Yb/5
#~ ~
~
~ o- i~~~ f4T.
~
~
~
~
~~ (
S -piv'Y ~T?Sx
~Y`~{
~
yhf
~ Y
W5~4 f~gl 9
~~}"
4~p£
~
~ .v~
2T.aCl FY'ti ~ta~~'
# 4{ tv
3i `s
Y ¢~
j~
) Ay'rf
}~
~$.
A
~&w d i
P Fy.
~,u~c ~'S u
~
.ei~.y~.~. i~
,
iL~~nlLi{~~ i`u~~ y'
C
~
4
d...., ~
,~
~.E~}GU}h,s.~'„~
h' ~
„~
.k43w.r ~
..
~i~hNYau~uEl.L;y ,
t.ft4.,,.~'-~•.
ParkingProvlded 39 39 39 39
NetSurplus/(Deflcit) -3 -3 -2 3
16 Page 6 of 7
A parking evaluation of the general project area (300 ft. radius from the project) was conducted
as part of File 09028 and it was determined, based on current parking standards, that there is a
parking surplus of 81 spaces.
Conclusion: The project was initially designed based on the second floor being used for
professional offices and as such, personal service uses will not adversely affect the parking
requirements. The p.m, peak hour parking demand variation for a fitness center provides for the
utilization of the same parking spaces at different times of the day. A shared parking agreement
with the City of Central Point compensates for lack of on site pazking and is compliant with
Section 17.74.40 (E) required parking. Said agreement is a condition of any approved
modification.
i. ~ Page 7 of 7
ATfACHMENT "~E,,.,."
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A MAJOR MODIFICATION
TO AN APPROVED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
LOCATED WITHIN "THE CROSSING AT CENTER POINT"
Applicant: Tom Malot Construction Co., Inc.
(37S 2W 11BB, Tax Lots 500, 600, and 700
312 Oak Street)
File No. 07106
WHEREAS, the applicant submitted an application for a Major Modification to the
Conditional Use Permit for the second floor uses located within The Crossing at Center
Point. The subject property is located in the Transit Oriented Development-High Mix
Residential/Commercial (TOD-HMR) zoning district and is identified on the Jackson
County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 11BB, Tax Lots 500, 600, and 700.
WHEREAS, on July 6, 2010, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted a
duly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff
report and heard testimony and comments on the application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's consideration of the application is based on
the standards and criteria applicable to Major Modifications in accordance with Section
17.09.300, the TOD-HMR zoning district section 17.65, and Conditional Use Permit
section 17.76 of the Central Point Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, a8er duly considering the ApplicanYs request, it is the Planning
Commission's determination that the application does comply with the applicable
standards, criteria and subject to compliance with conditions as set forth in the Staff
Report dated July 6, 2010;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning
Commission, by this Resolution No, does hereby approve the application
based on the findings and conclusions of approval as set forth on Exhibit "A", the Staff
Report dated July 6, 2010 which includes attachments, attached hereto by reference and
incorporated herein.
~. t7
Planning Commission Resolution No. (070610)
PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its
passage this 6`h day of July, 2010.
Planning Commission Chair
ATTEST:
City Representative
Approved by me this 6~h day of July, 2010.
Planning Commission Chair
1~
Planning Cominission Resolution No. (070610)
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO TOURIST
AND OFFICE~PROFESSIONAL (G~1I~)
ZONING DISTRIGT
STAFF REPORT
~
CENTRAL
POINT
STAFF REPORT
July 6, 2010
Planning Department
Tom Humphrey, AICP,
Community Development Director/
AGENDA ITEM: File No. 10001
Continued discussion of proposed amendments to the Tourist and Office-Professional (C-4) zoning
district; Applicant: City of Central Point.
STAFF SOURCE:
Don Burt, Planning Manager
MEETING OBJECTIVE:
To: 1) Update the Planning Commission on recent discussion regarding the proposed amendments to the
C-4 district; and 2) to continue discussion and input. The proposed order of discussion is:
i. Definitions
ii. Purpose Statement
iii. Allowed Uses
iv. Site Design Standards
v. Building Design Standards
BACKGROUND:
On June l, 2010 the Planning Commission was given an overview of the dra8 C-4 ordinance, followe8' by
a brief discussion. It was noted that the ordinance as presented was a"dra8" and subject to further input
and modification. Since that meeting stafFhas met with a group of local C-4 propeMy owners (the
"Committee") to discuss the draft ordinance. In general the Committee found the ordinance to be
unacceptable. It was their position that the ordinance was too reshictive and would discourage large
format (Big Box) retail development. The Committee did not give specific examples of the prohibitive
nature of the ordinance, nor did they offer any alternatives. There was some discussion of scheduling a
future meeting to continue the dialogue. Since the meeting with the Committee staff has prepared
drawings illustrating (site plan only) the impact on existing and proposed C-4 developments. These
drawings will be presented at the meeting on July 6, 2010.
EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment "A" - General Commercial (C-4) Draft Ordinance 7-6-10
Allowed Use Comparison Table (Attachment - "B")
NAICS Sample Text (Attachment - "C")
ACTION:
Discussion, draft C-4 ordinance (Attachment "A")
RECOMMENDATION:
Direct staff to modify the draft per discussion, and to schedule a public hearing on August 3, 2010 to
consider the final draft and forward a recommendation to the City Council.
Page 1 of 1 ~ ~
CHAPTER 17.44
MIXED-USE COMMERCIAL
17.44.000 Seaions
Section 17.44.010 Purpose
Section 17.44.020 Allowed Uses
Sectlon 17.44.030 Design Standards ~ -
Sec[lon 17.44.031 Connec[Ivlty Standards ~
Sectlon 17.44.032 Site Design Standards
Sectton 17.44.033 Parking Design Staridards ~~
Section 17.44.034 Access Standards.~ ~
Section 17.44.035 Building Design Standards ~
Sectlon 17.44.036 Screening `~., ~~ '~ .
Sectlon 17.44.037 Signage ~
Sectlon 17.44.050 ResidentlalbevelopmeM ~ ~
Sectlon 17.44.060 Exceptlons~~ ~~-. ~~ ~
Sec[lon 17.44.070 Definftions ~ ~
17,44.O10PUrpose ~ -~
The C-4 Dlstrict Is Intended~to provldg:for the development of concentrated mixed-use commerclal
facillties that serve the needs of local and~~~eglonal residents ^^" •"^ ••^..^ ^^ ^ " ^ ^^" ^ •^ ~^• •"^
a-..^ ^^^-^^•''0~°-^^-•:'~'^ ^'°s^~~':°-" °~-° °-~°'•:^• The uses allowed within the G4 district are
17.44.020 Allowed Uses
A. Use Classiflcetion. The uses allowed within the C-4 District are presented in Table 17.44.020.
The Ilst of uses is based on the North American Industrial ClasslFlcatlon System (NAICS), which
uses a six-dlgit code to Identi(y all business uses. The flrst two dlgits identify business sectors,
the third diglt identifles subsectors, the fourth diglt deslgnates the Industry group, and the flfth
and slMh diglts designate speciflc Industrles.
Page 1 of 34
21
Table 17.44.0201dentifles allowed uses first by thelr name, then business seaor (flrst 2-digits),
and if necessary by the business subsector (third digit~. Unless otherwise speclfled all uses
Identified within a sector, or subsec[or, are allowed, e.g. In the Retall Category (44-45) all uses
Iisted in the NAICS as seMOrs 44 and/or 45 are allowed, In the Accommodations Category only
uses within the subsector 721 are allowed. If a sector, or subsector, is not Iisted, It is not
allowed. The deflnitlon of each speclfic use Is based on the latest NAICS definitions, hereby
adopted by reference.
B. General Use Restrlctlons. The following general use restrictions shall appiy;. .
1. All businesses, services and processes shall be conducted efitirelywlthin an enclosed
structure, with the exception of off•street parking and loading areas, oUtdoor eating
areas, service stations, or other similar uses approved~by the Community Development
Director, . ~ ~~ .... ..
2. Open storage shall be permitted only as an'accessory~use, and only within an area
screened by a solid wal~ or fence. No materlal, or equipment shall be stored to a height
greaterthanthatofthescreeningwallorfence... ~ .
TABLE 17.44:020 Allowed Uses,'C-4 District
Uses Status of Uae~~~ ~ Uaea Status of Use
NAICS Classification ~ ~ ~ C~4 ~ NAICS ClasslflcaHon ~~ C-4 ~ . ~~
Wholesala (42) ~ N~. ~ Health Care R Soclal P
. Assistance (82)
Retail (44-453) p~ ~~
~~ Arts, Entertainment, & ~
.
~ Recreation 83
Transportatlon & Warehousing ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~: Accommodalions (721) P
(48-09)
Utilities Dlstribution (2212 -~~
~ ~
P Food Services & Drinking
P
2213) :. ~ ~
. ~ ~. Places (722)
Information (51) ~ p ~~ 87pair & Maintenance N
Finence~& InsuranCe (52) p
~ Pereonal R Laundry P
Services 812
~ Religious, Grantmaking,
Rea~ Estale, Rental, & Leasing
P
~ Civic, Professional, &
P
(53) . Similer Organizations
873
Professional, ScleMiflc, &
Professional Services (54) P " pdvate Households (814) C'-
Managament of Companies & P ~ Ag~cuHure, Foreslry (11) N
Enterprises (55)
Page 2 of 14
22
TABGE 17.44.020 Allowed Uses, C-4 District
Uses Status of Use Uses Status of Use
NAICS~CIassiFlcation~. ~C~4 NAICS~Classtflcation Cd~~
AdminlstratNe & Support
Services (581) P . Mining, Quarcying (21) N
Waste Management and
Remediation Services 562 N :.~ Construction (23) iN ~
Educatianal Services (61) P ~ ManutecWring (31-33) ~ ~~~ N ~~ ~
i See Sectlon 17.44.050
17.94.030 Design Standards ,
A. ObJective. It is the objective of the C-4 des(gn standards to introdu~e basic design elements
that enhance a developments sense of place,.complement abutting~zoning districts, and support
the Clty's obJective to maintain its small town~chaFacter',~This objective is attained through the
appllcatlon of development standardsYhat result in a bui~t environment that Is human in scale
and pedestrian friendly, taking into cohsideration block, s(te design, access, and building desigo
standards. ~
B. Applicability. All development within the C-4 districtshall be designed in compliance with
the standards of this section, and su4ject to the review and approval of the approving authority
as set forth In Table~~ 17.05.1.~ ~~
17.44.031 Connectlvity Standards. To encourage and support the development of a walkable
envlronment th'e following connectiviry standards shall apply to all devefopment wlthin the G4
dlstrict: ~ ~ ~
~ FI ure 17 44 031 1 Commerclal Block Exam le
g . . . . p
~1. Connectlvity ObJectlve. The s~ree~ .. __ s«~~
ob)ective of the connectlvlty standards " -t ~"~v ~ ' ^ ts'st.T"~ ,' ~Q}' ^
is to assure thak the basic ' ' z ' ` ' ~
`'
~
GR ~
~'~, }~ ~ -~ ~ ~ ~
~~
~
~~
~
~
tlevelopmentpatternwithintheC4 .
L,O
i ~~ L
~
~x
~
district fs 6ased on a walkable grid .; : ~
~ ~ ~2~ y; .~
system (blocks) that encoureges and
t :r.~ ..~ J
=~
i..' ... ~3 ~1.:1
-
~; promotes convenlent and attrective 5t~~ sireei
"
~
^
~~pedestrianconnet[Ivitybetween .T~
~ ~~ ~ 4
: 3
ypT .
~~
i ; i '~ "~ I
adjecent land uses, the atreet system ~
'. t t 3 t=, L~ ~'~ ~f
K
parking, and omsite uses (see Sectwn ` i>~~~K `,. I ~; p4 ;
~ fi~ u° I
17.44.OSOfordeflnitionof"Block) ~,_" ,r,~~, ,,,~; ~ ~n',;~` 4~,~~,a,~~,r,,,~
~ See Definition "Small Town Charactet'
Page 3 of 14
_ . ~ - {FMmattetl: FonC Bold _ _ _ ]
2~
B. Block Maximum Length/Width/Perimeter. Unless exempted below, the site shall be
divided into blocks no longer than 600 feet by 300 feet and having a maximum
perimeterdimenslon of 1,600 feet (See Figure 17.44.031,1). The maxlmum block length
applies both to blocks containing buildings and blocks contalning surface parking.
Block length and width are measured from right-of-way to rlght-of-way along the street ..
frontage. A block's perimeter is the sum of all sides.
C. Exceptlons. The above block standards may be modlfled to the minimum extent
necessary based on flndings that strict compliance with the block itanda~ds is not
reasonably prectical, or appropriate, due to: . .
1. Topographicconstrelnts; . ~
2. Exlstingdevelopmentpatternsonabuttirigpropertywhichprecludesthe
Iogical connection of streets, or p~destrianaecess ways; or
3. MaJorpubllcfacilitfesabuttingthepropertysuch'asrailroadsandfreeways.
Section 17.44.032 Commercial Site Design Standards. The purpose of the slte de5ign standards
Is to manage the arrangemenf.of bulldings and parking in a manner that promotes human scale
development~and preseivatlon ofthe community's small town character. The following
standards address the basRS.ite design requirements for all development within the C-4:
Commercial
~ . .~~ ~. ~ .,~5 : F~.~ ~ 't i{~b_~r~,. * a~. G'{:.
. ~ ~ . ~k~M]iprt5:.~ LoS W~yidth g, ,Nj.A.
. ti!S.~A~C ..,~~`t,G~~~~~1~~z~r~gY2~~>lY:~t,~~#} i~rU~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Maximum Lot Coverage 90%
~ - ~.~t~~r.~.~~J~~S~.~~, ~,'..~ ~ fe~.4 ~~'.x. ~'~~
~ SldeYardSetBack Ok.-Sft.
~~E~~~~la=~d~~f ~~~~l~k,';'~~r ~~ ~t~m`2A h ~`zf: i
Section 17.44.033 Building Frontage Standards
1. A minimum of 50%of a proJect's street frontage shall be occupied by bulldings.
~SmSw~ionl744 forPeAesir'enAccessweyslenderds
'SeeSectionl]44. fnrRete'IqreMSlenderds
~ Reer Yard: Minimum ten (10) R. W hen ebuving raidentielly zoned/plenned lends tAe rear ymd shell be e minimum of twenty (20) R.
Page 4 of 14
24
Sectlon 17.44.039 Off-Street Parking
Standards ~
Off-street parking is prohibited between .
the bullding(s) and the property Iine
adJacent to a pubBc street for buiidings
within 200 ft. of the publlc street right-of-
way. Where buildings are located more
than 200 feet fr However, on sites 200
feet deep or more, parking may be
located between thE.street~facingfacade
Ilne and the putilic stYeet subjecS to all of ~ .
thefollowingstandards:~~ ~ .
1. ; ~~Slte Design Standards. Surface
A.
parkingiots along a puhlic street shall
se~~o ~~~ppp c-commm<i.i havea minimum~~20ft. landscape buffer
PedestrianWay iiiipipipiii n.x.,mmn.i '~alongthepublicstreetfrontage~see
Block Pkg.-OH-StreatPerkinp Section 17.44.033(2,B~; and
Location. Parking lots shall not be locajed between a:bulldipg and the public street. The
exceptlons to this standard are: ~ -
1. At least 50%of a proJecYs ~publlc street frontage is occupied by buildings and it is
demonstreted that the'frontage can be In-filled~at a later date; or
2. The reuse of,an~existing bullding predutles compllance with this standard and is
accepted bytfie Communlty:Development Director.
B. Perimeter Screening. The~~following screening standards apply to parking lots:
a. Parking~Jots that abut the public rfght-of-way shall be screened as follows:
I. Lo~v:walls; ratsed planters, or landscaped mounds not exceeding three (3) feet
. made of concrete, masonry, or other simllar materlal that complements the
. .~ buildingarchitecture.
(i. Landscape planting shall consist of eighty percent evergreen trees, shrubs,
.and groundcoversatleastxfeetin width.
Note: Chain Ilnk fencing shall not be permitted to screen or enclose parking.
C. Interlor Landscaping. The following Interior Iandscaping standards apply to parking lots:
a. Parking lot Iandscaping shall be used to reinforce pedestrlan and vehicular
circulatlon,including:
I. Parking lot entrences;
il. Ends of driving aisles;
Iii. Defining pedestrian access ways through parking lots
Page 5 of 14
25
b. All landscaped areas next to pedestrian access ways shall be maintained, or plant
materlals chosen, to maintain a clear sight zone between three and eight feet from the
ground level.
c. For parking lots greater than flfty (50) parking spaces, the location of Interior
landscape island shall be allowed to be consolidated for planting of large stands of trees
to break up the scale of the parking lot.
d. The number of trees required in the interior landscape area shall,be dependent upon
the Iocation of the parking lot in relatlon to the building and public right-of-way:
I. Where the parking lot is located between thebuilding and ~he public rl~ht-of-
way, one tree for every four spaces; ~ ~ ~
IL Where the parking lot is located to tNe~side of~the bullding and partially abuts
the publlc rlght-of-way, one tree for e'very siz spaFes; .
Iii. Where the parking lot is located behinii~~the builtling and is not vlslble from
the public righbof-way, one tYee'for every eigh(spaces.
D. Llghting. All Ilghting shall be energy-efficlent, glare-free, and shlelded from the night sky and
adJacent properties to minim(ze off-site spill-over. .
2. Maximum Off-Street Parking~RequirementrShe maximum permitted off-street parking as
calculated in Section 17,84ahallbe.reduced by 20%.
3. Reductlon of Mlnlmum Off-StreeL ParklnB.Requirements. This sealon provides for reduc[ions
In the minimum off-streBiparking requlrements In Section 17.64, Off-Street Parking and
Loading. The minimum off-street parking requlrement shall be reduced as follows:
~ PEOESip1~N~CCE55WAY
a..~ $y one space for each on-street parking space
~ located adJacent to the site on a public street,
- Including spaces on Internal Circulatlon Routes
~~~ ~ that meet public street standards.
b. By,upfo~l0percenttopreserveslgniflcant
~ stands of trees or protected trees in addition to
. those required to he preserved by the Code, Y
,--~.pursuant to protectlon measures spedfied in the ~
Environmental Criteria Manual.
c. By20spacesforeverycar-sharingvehicle
provided in a program that complles with the
requlrements prescrihed bythe Director by
adminis[rative rule.
Page 6 of 14
26
Unless otherwise specifled, the above reductions may be applied cumulatively, and may be
applled In addltion to the reduction authorized in thts section, but in no case may the minimum
off-street parking requirements be reduced by more than 40 percent.
Section 17.94.034 Access Standards. Vehicular and
pedestrian access shall comply wlth the following
standards:
A. Pedestrian Access. To create a network of
safe, consistent, and convenient Iinkages for
pedestrians the following standards apply:
1.
A comprehenslve system of
pedestrian sidewalks/access ways
shall Iink all site entrances, bullding
entries, park~ng facilities, and
common outdoor activity areas
with public sidewalks or pedestrian a
2. Clearlydeflnedpedestrlan ~
accessways shall be provided:. ~
- Betweenpublicside~valksend .
building entranceswfien builtlings
are not located dGec[ly adJacent to..
thesidewalk,and ~~~ ~
- Between~parkinglotsand~bullding
3. WheYetransltstojis,occurinthe
. . public~iigKt-of-way,' ~
`'Sidewalks/pedestrlan accessways
. shali proviile.a clear and direct
~ ~ ~~: ~~~connectiorrfrom the main butld(ng
~ .. . ~entrance to the transit stop.
~~~ 4. ~,Pedestrian connections shall occur, or
. -~ be planned, between adjacent
~ developments where feasible.
5. Pedestrian Accessway Design. All on-
site pedestrian accessways shall be
improved to the following standards:
i. A raised walkway with a minimum
width of ten (30) feet, and a minimum
improved unobstructed width of six
Page 7 of 14
27
(6) feet.
Ii. Special boflards, and/or other architectural features to accent the pedestrian
access way between the parking bays.
Iil. Speclal paving, such
as concrete or unit
pavers.
B.VehkularAccess. Driveway
access along arterlal streets Is
prohlblted, with the following
exceptlon; driveways along arterial
streets will he allowed upon
demonstration that there are no
other alternatives, and that the
driveway can be shared with
abutting properties.
aw~ca.wq
1m,a We~a ~ ~ikeq
On.SUx~ AhM6 LrKa loYh^JI
w.~.~n~,w.~~~o~.o
Section 17.44.035 Bullding Design Standards. The following design standards are Intended to assure
pedestrian scale commerNal development that supports and enhances the small town character of the
community. All publicly visible building frontages shall complywith the standards setforth In this
sec[lon. ' ~ . ~
A. Massing,Anlculation;~Transparenry,andEntrances
1. BuIlding~Massing, The "top° bf the
bullding shall emphasize a dlstind
proflle or outlfne with elements such
as a projeMing parapet, cornice, upper
level setback,~tir pitched ~oofline.
2. Fatade Articulation. Facades longer
than forty~~40)~feet and vislbie from a
street or residential area shall be
broken.down Into small unlts through
the~use of artlculation, which may
inc(ude offsets, recesses, staggered
walls, stepped walls, pitched or
stepped roofllnes, overhangs, or other
elements of the bullding's mass.
Guidelfnes, Fasade Artlculadon
For purposes of satkJy(ng the
requirements ln subsectlans 2 above,
~7ofode artlculation"shall conslst of
one oj the following deslgn features,
Page 8 of 34
28
RETAILSTREET
none of whlch can be trademarked deslgn features:
a. Changesln plane wlth a depth af at least 24 lnches, elther horizontally or
vertlcally, at Intervals of not
less than 20 feet and not more
than 40 feeh or --- ' ~.~.t,..v;:, ..
b. Changes of color, tex[ure, or ~~~~~ ^~' ~~ ~
materlal, eltherhorizontallyor ~ Q ~: . ~ ~
vertlcally, aNntervals of no[
less than 20 jeet and no[ more
than 100 feeh or
i
c. Arepeatingpattem~ ~ ~ -~
wall recesses and
proJectlons, such as bay.~
ojfsets, reveals or
proJecting rlbs, that has
reqef of a[ least eight
Inches.
3. Pedestrian Entrances. For `~.
buildings adjacent to a~st~eet, a
primary pedestrian entrance sh~
be provided thatil3~easily~visible,
or easily acce;sib~e, from the
street dght-of•way, oY @
pedestf~an acceSS way. To ensure-~
that bulliling entrences are
clearly vislble.and Identlfiable to
: ~.pedestrian"s,thepHncipal'entryto
~. the~buildingshallbe.made
~ ~~ ~~.prorjilnent wl4h wnopies, or
oGeiFangs.~.
~`Guldellnes: Toachleve
' ~ [he ob/ectlves of [hIs
-~ section the design of a
-~ pdmaryentrancedesign
should incorpora[ed at
least three of the
jollawing deslgn:
o. Archltectural details sucR as arches, frlezes, tlle work, murals, or
mold(ngs,•
Page 9 of 14
n
b. Integral
planters or
w(ng walls that
lncorporate
landscape or
seating;
c. Enhanced
exterior light
flxtures such as
wall sconces,
1lghtcoveswlth . ~
concealed 1lght sources, ground-rt)ounted accent Ilghts, or ~
decorative pedestal Ifghtr, : ~ - ~
d. Prominent three-dlmensional features, such vs belfdes, chlmneys,
clock towers, domes, splres,'~steeples,.towers, or mrrets and
e. A repeatlng pqttern of pilasters pro/ect~ng from the fafade wall by a
minlmum ojelght lncfies or 6rchltec[ural or decoratlve columns.
4.Transparency. Transparency(glazing~providesinterestforthe pedestrlan,connectsthe
building exterlor and Interior,,puts eyes on the street, promotes reusability, and provides a
human-scale element on bu~lding facades. Projects SubJect to thls section shall meet the
following minfmum glazing,requirements, hut glazing shall not be Ilmited to the areas discussed:
a. A minimum of foity (40) percent of any ground floor faqade facing and wlthin fifty
(50) feet of ~ street rlght-of•way or pedestdan access way shall be comprised of
tranSparent glazing from windows or doors. Reflectlve glass or fllm is not permitted
on a~ground floorfayade.
.. b.'~ The second floor must provide a minimum~of 25 percent glazing between three and
~ eight feet; ds measured from that story's finished floor level.
~~ a ~~Qn ail otfier publicly vlslble
~ ~~ . facades, at least 25 percent of ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~the wall area between two and
~~ ten feet above grade must j~
- consist of glazing. This ~ ~
requirement shall not apply if the
building code prohiblts wlndows ~ ~ ~
on such facades. ,o•
~ ~
d. If a single•story building has a ~=~ I I--I~-I
fasade tal~er than 20 feet, the
fasade area above 15 feet Is subJect to the same window requlrement as the second
floor requtrement in Subsection 1.
Page 10 of 14
30
e. Any fasade that Is built up to an Interior mid-block property Ilne Is not requlred to
have glazing on that fasade If no prohibitions and no contractual or legal
impediments exist that would prevent a~ building heing constructed on the adJacent
property up to the wall of the faSade.
B. WallFaces.Toensurethatbuildingsdonotdisplayunembellishedwallsvisiblefrompublicor
residentlal areas the following standards are Imposed on wall faces that a[2 within fiky (50) feet
of a street, sidewalk, pedestrlan access way, or an abutting resldentlal zone: ~~ .
1. As appliwble each slde of a building shall be given architectural treatment~to meet
the intent of this section by using three (3) or more of the following:~ ~~ . ~
i. Varying rooflines with one foot or greater chapges of h'elght at least every
forty (40) feet; . ~ . ~
Ii. Transparent windows that comprlse at least forty (40)percent of the visible
fasade; ~ . ~ ~.
iil. Secondary entrances that Include glazing and landscape treatment;
iv. Balconles; ~ ~
v. Awnings/canopies; ~
vl. Planted trelllser,~~..
vii. Projecting cornices 0t least twelve inches in helght;
vili. Variation in bulldingform and materials demonstrated to meetthe intent of
- thlssection~.~~
3. As applicable, where transparent wlndows are not provided on at least forty (40)
~ ~~ percent of walls (or portlons of walls) to meet the intent of this section, at least
~~ tfiree{3) of the following elements shall be incorporated:
I. Masonry (but not flat concrete block);
ii. Concrete or masonry plinth at wall base;
Iil. Beltcoursesofadifferenttextureandcolor;
iv. ProJectingcornice;
v. ProJeaingawning/canopy~minimum4ft.overhang~;
vl. Decorative tile work;
Page 11 of 34
31
vil. Trellls containing planting;
vlii. Artwork of a scale clearly visible from the associated right-of-way;
ix. Vertical articulation; -
x. Llghtingflxtures;
xi. Recesses or bays; . ~ ~
xii. Use of other architectural elements not Ilsted tliat Is demonstrated to
meet the intent of this section. ~
3. Bulldingfacadesovertwohundredfeetinlengthfacinga.streetshall~providetwoor
more public building entrences offthe street. ~~
4. BuIldingfawdesadJolningotherbuildings(attachedtoinorethan50%ofthe
s(dewalp, or designed to abut otheF buildings are exempt.
5. Buildfngfacades not abuttingxesldentially zoned lands, but facing loading areas, or
rear services areas are exemp£ . ~
C. Building Height Regulations. Maximum helghYnot to exceed sixty (60) feet in height.
Sectlon 17.44.036 Screening of ~~
Servlce Areas and Rooftop
Equipment To scrEen the viEw
ofanyrooftopmechaniwl3nd ~
communicatlons equlpment.
from the ground levelpf nearby..
streetsand residential'areas. ~
wltFin 200 feet, the following
standards apply:
~'1. Mechantcal ~
. equipment shall be ~°-' I' voeiwA~m~oi~wev
screened by extending
parepet walls or other roof forms that are
2tntegrated with the architeaure of the bullding.
Pa(nting of rooftop equipment or erecting fences
are not acceptable methods of screening.
2. Rookop mounted volce/data trensmisslon
equipment shall be Integreted wlth the design of
the roof, rather than being simply attached to the
roof-deck.
Page 12 of 34
32
Sectfon 17.44.050 Resldential5tandards
Wlthin the C-4 distria residential uses are permltted subJect to the EC TOD standards as set forth in
Section 17,65.050.
Sectlon 17.44.060 Ezceptions
Exceptlons to the standards set forth in this subsection shall be
considered as a varlance per Section 17.3.
Section 17.44.070 Deflnlllons
The following deflnltions are applicable to all of
SeMion 17.44:
Block,Theterm "block" meansthe area surrounded by
streets, or a combination of streets, existing
development, and/or Impenetrable natural features.~~ ~~
The block Is the core element of the Ckys~4mall towp
urban design stretegy, and is the foundatlon of the Cfty's pedestrian friendly development
goals. Depending on the underlytng zoning, blotks may be suhdNided Into any number of
smaller lots or parcels, or other forms of tenure. The minimum and maximum requ~rements
for block size are set forth in Sectfon 17.44.030 of this code. Pedestrian accessways, or
major off-street bicycle/pedestrian patHs may be used to meet the block standards.
Building Fa4ade Line. A I~ne that is parallel to a lot Ilne or internal clrculation route curb Iine,
as appliwble, and~the same distancefrom the lot line or curb Ilne as the closest portion of a
bullding. ~ ~. ~ ~ ~
Glazing.7he ~panes or sheets~of glass or other non-glass material made to be set in frames,
as In windows or~doors. . . '
~ Street. The',term "street" means the endre area wlthin the right-of•way Iines of every public,
~~ ~~ ~or private way used for veh(cular, bicycle, and pedestrian trefflc and includes the terms
~road, highway, lane, place, avenue, alley, pedestrlan access way, and other slmilar
dealgnation.
Street, Retail. A street, e~ther public or prfvate, wlth on-street parking, that is the prtmary
frontage for commercial lots.
NAICS. The term "NAICS" refers to the latest offlcial version of the North American Industrlal
ClassiFlcation System. The NAICS is the standard used by Federal statistical agencfes In
classifying buslness establfshments for the purpose of collecting, analyzing, and publishing
statistlcal data related to the U.S. business economy.
Page 33 of 14
33
Small Town Environment. The citlzens of Central Point recognize and support the
continued growth of the community, provided that such growth malntalns and enhances
the City's small town charecter as represented by the development of a pedestrian scale
clty. The term "small town envlronmenY' refers to the physlcal and social advantages of a
community that Is designed to be walkable, safe, and buildings designed with the
pedestrians in mind (human scale).
Pad-Site Building. A building that is Intended for a single commercial use~and that is
physically separete from the other buildings on the site. Typlcally used~lq the context of
retall shopping center development, a bullding or bullding site that is pFiysically separate
from and smaller than the principal building and reserved forfreeafanding~eommeicial
uses. Typlcal pad site uses Include, by way of Illustration only, free-stantling restaurants,
banks, and service statlons ' ' ~ . .
Principal Bu~Iding. A building in which Is conducted the prlncipal use of the lot on which It Is
located. . .
Prlncipal EMrance. The place of Ingress ~ntl egress most frequently used by the public.
Prindpal Street. In this Subchapter, the principal street of a lot or slte Is the street wlth the
highest priorlty that Is adJacent to the lot or site. If a lot is adJacent to more than one street
of equally high prlorlty, the principal street isc thestreet with the hlghest level of trensit
service, as determined by the Communlty Devefopment Director; or, If the streets do not
have transit service or the~level of trenslt service Is equal, the street designated by the lot
owner. ~ ~ ~ .
Publicly Visible. A stte, building, structure, obJect, or any part thereof, that Is visible from a
publlc street or other area fo which the public has legal access, from a vantage polnt of
three feet tp six feet off4he ground.
Page 14 of 14
34
Mechanical Ventilation Equations
Calculation Table
~;~i~~ w.,= o . z, ~ ~,.. r.~ p' R~,) ~ ~:<s;~~ ~' -x` ,..,'~" F ~ ~_,..
Az = Area of zone: the net occupiable floor area of the space or spaces in
the zone (section 03.3.1.1).
D= Occupant diversity: the ratio of the system population to the sum of
the zone populations determined in accordance with Equation 4-7
(section 403.3.2.3.3).
Ev = System ventilation efficiency: shall be determined using Table
403.3.2.3.2 (section 403.3.2.3.2).
Ez = The zone air distribution effectiveness: shall be determined using
Table 403.3.1.2 (section 403.3.1.2).
PS= System population: The total number of occupants in the area
served by the system (section 403.3.2.3.3).
PZ = Occupant load: the number of people in the space in the zone
(section 403.3.1.1).
R8 = Outdoor air rate: the outdoor airflow rate required per unit area
from Table 403.3 (section 403.3.1.1).
Rp = People outdoor air rate: the outdoor airflow rate required per
person from Table 403.3 (section 403.3.1.1).
Vbi = The outdoor airflow rate required in the breathing zone of the
occupiable space or spaces in the zone. Shall be determined in
accordance with Equation 4-1(section 403.3.1.1).
VOt = Outdoor air intake flow rate: shall be determined in accordance
with Equation 4-8 (section 403.3.2.3.4).
Vou = Uncorrected outdoor air intake flow rate: shall be determined in
accordance with Equation 4-6 (section 403.3.2.3.3).
Voz = Zone outdoor airflow rate: shall be determined in accordance with
Equation 4-2 (section 403.3.1.3).
VpZ = Primary airflow: The airflow rate supplied to the zone from the air
handling unit at which the outdoor air intake is located. It includes
outdoor intake air and recirculated air from that air handling- unit but
does not include air transferred or air recirculated to the zone by other
means. Equation 4-5 (section 403.3.2.3.1).
Zp = Primary outdoor air fraction: shall be determined for each zone in
accordance wlth Equation 4-5 (section 403.3.2.3.1).
35
Mechanical Ventilation Equations
Calculation Table
, , ~
~~~° ~ ~;z , ~ ~ ~ ,~. ~~~ . ~ ~; ~ > ~ ~ t
~ u ,._ ~ :~ ~~ ~~~ ~ , ~,~.; .;
Az = Area of zone: the net occupiable floor area of the space or spaces in
the zone (section 03.3.1.1).
D= Occupant diversity: the ratio of the system population to the sum of
the zone populations determined in accordance with Equation 4-7
(section 403.3.2.3.3).
Ev = System ventilation efficiency: shall be determined using Table
403.3.2.3.2 (section 403.3.2.3.2).
Ez = The zone air distribution effectiveness: shall be determined using
Table 403.3.1.2 (section 403.3.1.2).
P5= System population: The total number of occupants in the area
served by the system (section 403.3.2.3.3).
PZ = Occupant load: the number of people in the space in the zone
(section 403.3.1.1).
Ra = Outdoor air rate: the outdoor airflow rate required per unit area
from Table 403.3 (section 403.3.1.1).
Rp = People outdoor air rate: the outdoor airflow rate required per
person from Table 403.3 (section 403.3.1.1).
Vbz = The outdoor airflow rate required in the breathing zone of the
occupiable space or spaces in the zone. Shall be determined in
accordance with Equation 4-1(section 403.3.1.1).
Vot = Outdoor air intake flow rate: shall be determined in accordance
with Equation 4-8 (section 403.3.2.3.4).
Vou = Uncorrected outdoor air intake flow rate: shall be determined in
accordance with Equation 4-6 (section 403.3.2.3.3).
Voi = Zone outdoor airflow rate: shall be determined in accordance with
Equation 4-2 (section 403.3.1.3).
Vpz = Primary airflow: The airflow rate supplied to the zone from the air
handling unit at which the outdoor air intake is located. It includes
outdoor intake air and recirculated air from that air handling - unit but
does not include air transferred or air recirculated to the zone by other
means. Equation 4-5 (section 403.3.2.3.1).
Zp = Primary outdoor air fraction: shall be determined for each zone in
accordance with Equation 4-5 (section 403.3.2.3.1).
36
Mechanical Ventilation Equations
Calculation Table
x ~~
~ S~ . Y~ ~
`di^y_ ~ ~ "t '~ {r~ ~ ~ " ;~~.: .~ ~+~y~q t., ~ ~° ~ ~e ~, , t~~°~
*{z eb"~Lw ~d . `f. S~ h`~.n
Az = Area of zone: the net occupiable floor area of the space or spaces in
the zone (section 03.3.1.1).
D= Occupant diversity: the ratio of the system population to the sum of
the zone populations determined in accordance with Equation 4-7
(section 403.3.2.3.3).
Ev = System ventilation efficiency: shall be determined using Table
403.3.2.3.2 (section 403.3.2.3.2).
Ez = The zone air distribution effectiveness: shall be determined using
Table 403.3.1.2 (section 403.3.1.2).
Ps= System population: The total number of occupants in the area
served by the system (section 403.3.2.3.3).
Pi = Occupant load: the number of people in the space in the zone
(section 403.3.1.1).
Ra = Outdoor air rate: the outdoor airflow rate required per unit area
from Table 403.3 (section 403.3.1.1).
Rp = People outdoor air rate: the outdoor airflow rate required per
person from Table 403.3 (section 403.3.1.1).
Vbz = The outdoor airflow rate required in the breathing zone of the
occupiable space or spaces in the zone. Shall be determined in
accordance with Equation 4-1(section 403.3.1.1).
Vot = Outdoor air intake flow rate: shall be determined in accordance
with Equation 4-8 (section 403.3.2.3.4).
Vou = Uncorrected outdoor air intake flow rate: shall be determined in
accordance with Equation 4-6 (section 403.3.2.3.3).
VOZ = Zone outdoor airflow rate: shall be determined in accordance with
Equation 4-2 (section 403.3.1.3).
VpZ = Primary airfiow: The airflow rate supplied to the zone from the air
handling unit at which the outdoor air intake is located. It includes
outdoor intake air and recirculated air from that air handling- unit but
does not include air transferred or air recirculated to the zone by other
means. Equation 4-5 (section 403.3.2.3.1).
Zp = Primary outdoor air fraction: shall be determined for each zone in
accordance with Equation 4-5 (section 403.3.2.3.1).
3'7
Mechanical Ventilation Equations
Calculation Table
~y
Y( a~,~ ~
('.t ~'. ~ J..{' e s
~Si ' . .k A`~'xi:?N qf}~.:j 5~ R';-L ~~~~7~~,i'{4'`~I{;' ~~tl'~1~~.':~'~~t~( ~.~:t
a 3~ Y:', Al ~v `~ ?'i` ~" ~R/,,33° ~ ~i< ~
I~'i Y~ `3~ .~ '~i 4....r. - aY Ai
Az = Area of zone: the net occupiable floor area of the space or spaces in
the zone (section 03.3.1.1).
D= Occupant diversity: the ratio of the system population to the sum of
the zone populations determined in accordance with Equation 4-7
(section 403.3.2.3.3).
Ev = System ventilation efficiency: shall be determined using Table
403.3.2.3.2 (section 403.3.2.3.2).
Ez = The zone air distribution effectiveness: shall be determined using
Table 403.3.1.2 (section 403.3.1.2).
P5= System population: The total number of occupants in the area
served by the system (section 403.3.2.3.3).
P2 = Occupant load: the number of people in the space in the zone
(section 403.3.1.1).
Ra = Outdoor air rate: the outdoor airflow rate required per unit area
from Table 403.3 (section 403.3.1.1).
Rp = People outdoor air rate: the outdoor airflow rate required per
person from Table 403.3 (section 403.3.1.1).
Vbz = The outdoor airflow rate required in the breathing zone of the
occupiable space or spaces in the zone. Shall be determined in
accordance with Equation 4-1(section 403.3.1.1).
Vot = Outdoor air intake flow rate: shall be determined in accordance
with Equation 4-8 (section 403.3.2.3.4).
Vou = Uncorrected outdoor air intake flow rate: shall be determined in
accordance with Equation 4-6 (section 403.3.2.3.3).
VOi = Zone outdoor airflow rate: shall be determined in accordance with
Equation 4-2 (section 403.3.1.3).
VpZ = Primary airflow: The airflow rate supplied to the zone from the air
handling unit at which the outdoor air intake is located. It includes
outdoor intake air and recirculated air from that air handling- unit but
does not include air transferred or air recirculated to the zone by other
means. Equation 4-5 (section 403.3.2.3.1).
Zp = Primary outdoor air fraction: shall be determined for each zone in
accordance with Equation 4-5 (section 403.3.2.3.1~.
~O
Mechanical Ventilation Equations
Calculation Table
E.
i
'
. I I 49 .X M1n~Y ir '£ EMi i 4 V W i~KSP ~~ ~ i~..
[R'~~n~.~~, " ~'. ~ ~ ~,~
,;~? ~~: ~~`z
'*~
°y- ~° i~''~"~*::21
e~~;b
..
t
. ~
.
.
,
Az = Area of zone: the net occupiable floor area of the space or spaces in
the zone (section 03.3.1.1).
D= Occupant diversity: the ratio of the system population to the sum of
the zone populations determined in accordance with Equation 4-7
(section 403.3.2.3.3).
Ev = System ventilation efficiency: shall be determined using Table
403.3.2.3.2 (section 403.3.2.3.2).
Ez = The zone air distribution effectiveness: shall be determined using
Table 403.3.1.2 (section 403.3.1.2).
PS= System population: The total number of occupants in the area
served by the system (section 403.3.2.3.3).
PZ = Occupant load: the number of people in the space in the zone
(section 403.3.1.1).
Ra = Outdoor air rate: the outdoor airflow rate required per unit area
from Table 403.3 (section 403.3.1.1).
Rp = People outdoor air rate: the outdoor airflow rate required per
person from Table 403.3 (section 403.3.1.1).
Vbz = The outdoor airflow rate required in the breathing zone of the
occupiable space or spaces in the zone. Shall be determined in
accordance with Equation 4-1(section 403.3.1.1).
Vot = Outdoor air intake flow rate: shall be determined in accordance
with Equation 4-8 (section 403.3.2.3.4).
Vou = Uncorrected outdoor air intake flow rate: shall be determined in
accordance with Equation 4-6 (section 403.3.2.3.3).
VOZ = Zone outdoor airflow rate: shall be determined in accordance with
Equation 4-2 (section 403.3.1.3).
VpZ = Primary airflow: The airflow rate supplied to the zone from the air
handling unit at which the outdoor air intake is located. It includes
outdoor intake air and recirculated air from that air handling - unit but
does not include air transferred or air recirculated to the zone by other
means. Equation 4-5 (section 403.3.2.3.1).
2p = Primary outdoor air fraction: shall be determined for each zone in
accordance with Equation 4-5 (section 403.3.2.3.1).
39
Mechanical Ventilation Equations
Calculation Table
~ y (,~~ ~ ~y. S
r ~as ~,~p ,
~ S.' 35T'.,'. ~.4 ; f f i P .~`" ~~ ~.~y^.}t:,i?. ~ E ~^4" 1 d ~ f..
AZ = Area of zone: the net occupiable floor area of the space or spaces in
the zone (section 03.3.1.1).
D= Occupant diversity: the ratio of the system population to the sum of
th~ zone populations determined in accordance with Equation 4-7
(section 403.3.2.3.3).
Ev = System ventilation efficiency: shall be determined using Table
403.3.2.3.2 (section 403.3.2.3.2).
Ez = The zone air distribution effectiveness: shall be determined using
Table 403.3.1.2 (section 403.3.1.2).
PS= System population: The total number of occupants in the area
served by the system (section 403.3.2.3.3).
PZ = Occupant load: the number of people in the space in the zone
(section 403.3.1.1).
Ra = Outdoor air rate: the outdoor airflow rate required per unit area
from Table 403.3 (section 403.3.1.1).
Rp = People outdoor air rate: the outdoor airflow rate required per
person from Table 403.3 (section 403.3.1.1).
Vbz = The outdoor airflow rate required in the breathing zone of the
occupiable space or spaces in the zone. Shall be determined in
accordance with Equation 4-1 (section 403.3.1.1).
Vot = Outdoor air intake flow rate: shall be determined in accordance
with Equation 4-8 (section 403.3.2.3.4).
Vou = Uncorrected outdoor air intake flow rate: shall be determined in
accordance with Equation 4-6 (section 403.3.2.3.3).
VOZ = Zone outdoor airflow rate: shall be determined in accordance with
Equation 4-2 (section 403.3.1.3~.
VpZ = Primary airflow: The airflow rate supplied to the zone from the air
handling unit at which the outdoor air intake is located. It includes
outdoor intake air and recirculated air from that air handling - unit but
does not include air transferred or air recirculated to the zone by other
means. Equation 4-5 (section 403.3.2.3.1).
Zp = Primary outdoor air fraction: shall be determined for each zone in
accordance with Equation 4-5 (section 403.3.2.3.1).
40
Mechanical Ventilation Equations
Calculation Table
i d'}~~,
d~~~~ ~. '"5S %'
+°5.... .z a ~ L, ~.y'S 8 3d y,,~~,ti ki:~ r~? C. N < '
~~x "fE~s`L:, 4 15 ~`St'~'ik` 4A ..} U~ J, <~'fi,r'~> ~'*'..z~~ ~~ 3 aE4Y~ ;7,` ~A'.
A2 = Area of zone: the net occupiable floor area of the space or spaces in
the zone (section 03.3.1.1).
D= Occupant diversity: the ratio of the system population to the sum of
the zone populations determined in accordance with Equation 4-7
(section 403.3.2.3.3).
Ev = System ventilation efficiency: shall be determined using Table
403.3.2.3.2 (section 403.3.2.3.2).
Ez = The zone air distribution effectiveness: shall be determined using
Table 403.3.1.2 (section 403.3.1.2).
P5= System population: The total number of occupants in the area
served by the system (section 403.3.2.3.3).
PZ = Occupant load: the number of people in the space in the zone
(section 403.3.1.1).
Ra = Outdoor air rate: the outdoor airflow rate required per unit area
from Table 403.3 (section 403.3.1.1).
Rp = People outdoor air rate: the outdoor airflow rate required per
person from Table 403.3 (section 403.3.1.1).
Vbz = The outdoor airflow rate required in the breathing zone of the
occupiable space or spaces in the zone. Shall be determined in
accordance with Equation 4-1(section 403.3.1.1).
Vot = Outdoor air intake flow rate: shall be determined in accordance
with Equation 4-8 (section 403.3.2.3.4).
VOU = Uncorrected outdoor air intake flow rate: shall be determined in
accordance with Equation 4-6 (section 403.3.2.3.3).
Voz = Zone outdoor airflow rate: shall be determined in accordance with
Equation 4-2 (section 403.3.1.3).
Vpz = Primary airflow: The airflow rate supplied to the zone from the air
handling unit at which the outdoor air intake is located. It includes
outdoor intake air and recirculated air from that air handling - unit but
does not inciude air transferred or air recirculated to the zone by other
means. Equation 4-5 (section 403.3.2.3.1).
Zp = Primary outdoor air fraction: shall be determined for each zone in
accordance with Equation 4-5 (section 403.3.2.3.1).
41
Mechanical Ventilation Equations
Calculation Table
"g~,i.~.' T q
~s . ~~ ,~ $'= ~,•~,Y b c~r
t .~ r°y • t `~ ,„~:x~a"a~Y.,7~~, A`i'`5.€ .R«S'~~ LY 4''•', 4'~ Y~~i,,',. fi~ ~S'~"~'~i~, <esa<=zi
•1'~ v~t~.` ~_ 4 r ~~ ~3 f .~
AZ = Area of zone: the net occupiable floor area of the space or spaces in
the zone (section 03.3.1.1).
D= Occupant diversity: the ratio of the system population to the sum of
the zone populations determined in accordance with Equation 4-7
(section 403.3.2.3.3).
Ev = System ventilation efficiency: shall be determined using Table
403.3.2.3.2 (section 403.3.2.3.2).
Ez = The zone air distribution effectiveness: shall be determined using
Table 403.3.1.2 (section 403.3.1.2).
P5= System population: The total number of occupants in the area
served by the system (section 403.3.2.3.3).
Pz = Occupant load: the number of people in the space in the zone
(section 403.3.1.1).
Ra = Outdoor air rate: the outdoor airflow rate required per unit area
from Table 403.3 (section 403.3.1.1).
Rp = People outdoor air rate: the outdoor airflow rate required per
person from Table 403.3 (section 403.3.1.1).
Vbz = The outdoor airflow rate required in the breathing zone of the
occupiable space or spaces in the zone. Shall be determined in
accordance with Equation 4-1(section 403.3.1.1).
Vot = Outdoor air intake flow rate: shali be determined in accordance
with Equation 4-8 (section 403.3.2.3.4).
VOU = Uncorrected outdoor air intake flow rate: shall be determined in
accordance with Equation 4-6 (section 403.3.2.3.3).
Voi = Zone outdoor airflow rate: shall be determined in accordance with
Equation 4-2 (section 403.3.1.3).
Vpz = Primary airflow: The airflow rate supplied to the zone from the air
handling unit at which the outdoor air intake is located. It includes
outdoor intake air and recirculated air from that air handling - unit but
does not include air transferred or air recirculated to the zone by other
means. Equation 4-5 (section 403.3.2.3.1).
Zp = Primary outdoor air fraction: shall be determined for each zone in
accordance with Equation 4-5 (section 403.3.2.3.1~.
42
Mechanical Ventilation Equations
Calculation Table
S, r ~ ~g
.Rc. :~If5~ }~ SF lY
.F~~. a3 Ar ~'+5 ~ t?. c ~ 5~{~x y, }' ~/! ~+e3 ~.t '9~e 5 qi~" l i'2S ~f d r{ , v~
~., k..s.^Pis ~~';~fi3PL~...1sY+p:~" ,'~A4.q..Yh,4w..},Px,,,rLf~x pft.~~c=
Az = Area of zone: the net occupiable floor area of the space or spaces in
the zone (section 03.3.1.1).
D= Occupant diversity: the ratio of the system population to the sum of
the zone populations determined in accordance with Equation 4-7
(section 403.3.2.3.3).
Ev = System ventilation efficiency: shall be determined using Table
403.3.2.3.2 (section 403.3.2.3.2).
Ez = The zone air distribution effectiveness: shall be determined using
Table 403.3.1.2 (section 403.3.1.2).
P5= System population: The total number of occupants in the area
served by the system (section 403.3.2.3.3).
Pz = Occupant load: the number of people in the space in the zone
(section 403.3.1.1).
Ra = Outdoor air rate: the outdoor airflow rate required per unit area
from Table 403.3 (section 403.3.1.1).
Rp = People outdoor air rate: the outdoor airflow rate required per
person from Table 403.3 (section 403.3.1.1).
Vbz = The outdoor airflow rate required in the breathing zone of the
occupiable space or spaces in the zone. Shall be determined in
accordance with Equatfon 4-1(section 403.3.1.1).
Vot = Outdoor air intake flow rate: shall be determined in accordance
with Equation 4-8 (section 403.3.2.3.4).
Vou = Uncorrected outdoor air intake flow rate: shall be determined in
accordance with Equation 4-6 (section 403.3.2.3.3).
VOZ = Zone outdoor airflow rate: shali be determined in accordance with
Equation 4-2 (section 403.3.1.3).
Vpz = Primary airflow: The airflow rate supplied to the zone from the air
handling unit at which the outdoor air intake is located. It includes
outdoor intake air and recirculated air from that air handling - unit but
does not include air transferred or air recirculated to the zone by other
means. Equation 4-5 (section 403.3.2.3.1).
2p = Primary outdoor air fraction: shall be determined for each zone in
accordance with Equation 4-5 (section 403.3.2.3.1).
43
Mechanical Ventilation Equations
Calculation Table
~ q ~.r
~,~&,:`.n ~., i7a ~.. ,e~
,Y i1'~iz~'#~J ~~~'ez lYN~~ {,~Y! fd~i.xt~ ~.~ ~~~.:.~.~, ~Y~ *4f:.~`.;EE:~~~~~b~"~~:'4~t§ 9 fis~, ~ r+~.~
.x..,n. 5~~.;. .§,1~. 3t'~'` ~W a~a~ '3s. ~~ x{I ~~k'~ [ ~ a:..
AZ = Area of zone: the net occupiable floor area of the space or spaces in
the zone (section 03.3.1.1).
D= Occupant diversity: the ratio of the system population to the sum of
the zone populations determined in accordance with Equation 4-7
(section 403.3.2.3.3).
Ev = System ventilation efficiency: shall be determined using Table
403.3.2.3.2 (section 403.3.2.3.2).
Ez = The zone air distribution effectiveness: shall be determined using
Table 403.3.1.2 (section 403.3.1.2).
Ps= System population: The total number of occupants in the area
served by the system (section 403.3.2.3.3).
Pz = Occupant load: the number of people in the space in the zone
(section 403.3.1.1).
Ra = Outdoor air rate: the outdoor airflow rate required per unit area
from Table 403.3 (section 403.3.1.1).
Rp = People outdoor air rate: the outdoor airflow rate required per
person from Table 403.3 (section 403:3.1.1).
Vbz = The outdoor airflow rate required in the breathing zone of the
occupiable space or spaces in the zone. Shall be determined in
accordance with Equation 4-1(section 403.3.1.1).
VOt = Outdoor air intake flow rate: shall be determined in accordance
with Equation 4-8 (section 403.3.2.3.4).
Vou = Uncorrected outdoor air intake flow rate: shall be determined in
accordance with Equation 4-6 (section 403.3.2.3.3).
Voz = Zone outdoor airflow rate: shall be determined in accordance with
Equation 4-2 (section 403.3.1.3).
Vpz = Primary airflow: The airflow rate supplied to the zone from the air
handling unit at which the outdoor air intake is located. It includes
outdoor intake air and recirculated air from that air handling- unit but
does not include air transferred or air recirculated to the zone by other
means. Equation 4-5 (section 403.3.2.3.1).
Zp = Primary outdoor air fraction: shall be determined for each zone in
accordance with Equation 4-5 (section 403.3.2.3.1).
44
MISCELLANEOUS
LIEGAI~ ~RIEFS
...
TPR and City Responsibilities
~llamette Oaks, LI.C. v. City of Eugene, 232 Or App 29, 220
P3d 445 (2009)
his case concerns a zone change and a city's responsi-
Tbllity under the transportation planning rule ("TPR").
The TPR is an Oregon Department of Land Conservation
and Development rule found at OAR Chapter 660, division
12. The rule generally requites cities to determine whether
comprehensive plan and zoning amendments, includ-
ing zone changes, will "signiftcantly affect" transportation
facilities and put in place measures to ameliotate any such
effects.
In ~llamette Oaks, an applicant sought and Eugene
approved a zone change from medium to high-density
residential. The city did not evaluate whether the zone
change would significantly affect ttanspoctation faciliries,
but instead imposed a condition requiring the applicant to
demonstrate TPR compliance prior to any development on
the property. Cities commonly defer TPR compliance to
the development stage, as Eugene did here.
Willamette Oaks appealed Eugene's decision to the Land
Use Board of Appeals ("LUBA") and acgued that the city
must evaluate the TPR before the zone change could be
approved. LUBA rejected Willamette Oaks' argument and
determined that the TPR analysis could be defeaed until
the applicant applied to develop the property. Willamette
Oaks appealed LUBAs decision to the Oregon Court of
Appeals.
The Court of Appeals limited theit discussion to the ques-
tion of "whether, pursuant to OAR 660-012-0060, prior
to approving the zone change, the city was required to
evaluate whethet that zone change would significantly af-
fect transportation facilities." The couct determined that
the text of the rule shows that "an evaluation of significant
effect is intended to be perfotmed prior w a contemplated
amendment" Id. at 35, 448 (emphasis in original). The
coutt held that any approval of an amendment subject to
the TPR (e.g. any zone change) could only follow a"signifi-
cant effect" deternunarion.
With development projects significantly stalled as a result
of the recession, many cities are using this time to focus on
Long range planning issues. The lesson here is that it is im-
perative for cities to consider what impacts a comprehensive
plan amendment, zoning code amendment or zone change
will have on transportation facilities and make the necessary
TPR findings before approving the amendment. In the wake
of the WiUamette Oaks decision, the days of deferring TPR
analysis to a later stage are, unfortunately, oves ^
28 JUNE1010 M/WWORCI7IES.ORG