Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - December 3, 2002CITY OI• CENIRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA December 3, 2002 - 7:00 p.m. 4^3 fv) C°3 Next Planning Commission Resolution No. 558 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Chuck Piland -Candy Fish, Don Foster, John LeGros, Paul Lunte, Rick Perry and Wayne Riggs III. CORRESPONDENCE IV. MINUTES A. Review and approval of November 5, 2002, Planning Commission Minutes V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES VL BUSINESS (I -18) A. Public hearing to review an application for a tentative land division that would create 3 lots on a 1.04 acre parcel near the intersection of West Vilas and Hamrick Roads. The parcel is located in the R-1-8, Residential Single Family zoning district and is identified in the records of the Jackson County Assessor as Map 36 2W 36CC, Tax Lot 2700. (Pg 19-43) B• Public hearing to review an application for a site plan that would allow a new fraternal lodge and future drive-through coffee stand to be constructed on a parcel of land north of the I.O.O.F. cemetery. The parcel is located in the R-1-8, Residential Single Family zoning district on Map 37 2W O1BB, Tax Lot 1100. (Pg 44-58) C. Public hearing to review an application for a tentative subdivision that would create 5 lots on a 1.66 acre parcel near the intersection of Isaac Way and Marilee Avenue. The parcel is located inthe R-2, Residential Two Family zoning district and is identified in the records of the Jackson County Assessor as Map 37 2W I 1 DA, Tax Lot 400. (Pg 59-75) D. Public hearing to review an application for a tentative subdivision application for Phases 2 and 3 of the Jackson Oaks Subdivision and would create 54 residential lots on 27.17 acres located approximately 200 feet North of Tulane Avenue. The developrnent area is located in the TOD-LMR, Low-Mix Residential and TOC-C, Civic zoning districts and are identified in the records of the Jackson County Assessor as Map 37 2W 03CC, Tax Lot 100, Map 37 2W 03CD, Tax Lot 214, Map 37 2W 03C, Tax Lots 100, 101, 201, 203, and 206. VII. MISCELLANEOUS VIII. ADJOURNMENT City of Central Point Planning Commission November 5, 2002 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORllElt AT 7:00 Y.M. II. ROLL CALL: Chairman Chuck Piland, Rick Perry, Candy Fish, Paul Lunte, Wayne Riggs and Don Foster were present. John LeGros was absent. Also in attendance were Tom Humphrey; Planning Director; Matt Satnitore, Community Planner III. CORRESPONDENCE There was no correspondence. IV. MINUTES Commissioner Fish made a motion to approve the minutes from the October 1, 2002 meeting as presented. Commissioner Riggs seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Peary; yes, Fish, yes; Lunte, yes; Foster, yes; and Riggs, yes. Motion passed. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances. VI. BUSINESS A. Public hearing to review an application for hvelvc residential homes to be included as an additional phase of the Cedar Shadows Planned Unit Development. The subject property is located near the intersection of Freeman Road and Shadow Way inthe R-3, Residential Multiple Family zoning district on Map 37 2W i IBA, Tax lots 8600, 8800 and 8900. There were no conflicts of interest to declare, or ex-paste communications. Matt Sainitore, Community Planner, presented the history of the Cedar Shadows area. In 1997 and 1998 itwas developed undertwo different appl ications. One being the Mock partition, which subdivided 2 of the 31ots. The Mockpartition, was ajoint application with Parthenon Construction to develop the Cedar Shadows PUD, which was dependent upon a private access road. Thcrc was ail approval through the PUD process to construct aprivatc road. Part of the condition ofthat approval was to allow the Mock properties to access Shadow Way. The cun~ent properly owners Darren Lecomte and Chris Alderson own a portion of Shadow Way, part ofthe tax lots actually extend into the road. Although the owners development was originally submitted in two applications, they were asked by the Planning Depaz hnent to consider aj oint PUD expansion. They both agreed in favor of that idea, to give them the design flexibility, set back flexibility and to create a neighborhood very similar with Cedar Shadows PUD. "I'hePlanningDepartmentisprocessingthePUD,becauseoftheuniquenessofthisdevelopment It has a creek running along one side of the property, is R-3 zoned, fronts a secondary arterial and a private street There is also a significant grade change from Freeman Road. Under the Cedar Shadows PUD, they would be able to do zero lot line detached houses with 5 foot setbacks on the other side. If they desire to have doors or windows to open out to the other side, there is a 3 foot set back. They are not asking for any changes from those set backs with the exception of one lot. Some ofthe homes will be Craftsman style,and some will be townhouse style, that are similar to Cedar Shadows across the street. 'there will be a 12 foot right of way dedication along Freeman Road, which is similar to the Mountain View Plaza and Cedar Shadows, Phase II developments to allow for future expansion of Freeman Road. This proposed development follows Mingus Creek, and does pose some problems. No structure can be built within 25 feet from the top ofstream bank, howeverthis does not include driveways. This would make this development a first where the developers use some design creativity forprivate access roads next to the creek. There will be landscaping next to the creek, including the planting oftrees and shrubbery for creek stabilization. Mr. Sanritore discussed the FEMA study currently being conducted by Northwest Hydraulic Consultants. Ifthe sitidy finds that there has been sib uficant changes in the base flood elevation , all ofthese homes will have to be constructed to the minimum FEMA standards and the City of Central Point uniform building codes. Mingus Creek I/states can form their own Home Owners Association independent ofthe Cedar Shadows I-Iome Owners Association. However, an agreement must be made between the Cedar Shadows I Iome Owners Association for future maintenance of Shadow Way. This agreement must be in place prior to the final plat application. Cedar Shadows was built with aprivate storm drain facility. "I'he applicants eau either hook into the private storm drain system of Cedar Shadows, or they can design their own storm drain system, that drains into Mingus Creek. Jackson County Roads has submitted a letter with their only recommendation being that there is no more than one access road onto Freeman Road. Freeman Road is going to be a very heavily traveled road in the future. The applicants are proposing twelve tax lots which range in size from 2,500 square feet to a little over 4,000 square feet. This is very similarto what has already been built in the Cedar Shadows PUD. Each unit will have a two car garage. Mr. Adderson has asked for a five foot setback (lather than the normal 10 foot setback) for Lots 1 and 12, along Freeman Road, due to the large right of way dedication on Freeman Road. This is the only change within the PUD expansion. The Fire Dish~ict stated that they need a minimum 20 feet ofopen space to be able to park a large vehicle to gain access to lots 9, 10 and 7. They do not need to add more fire hydrants due to the existing infrastructure. Commissioner Fish, stated that there is a lot of existing fill dirt that was added to this area from the Meadows when Mingus Creek had been moved, back in the 1970's. The developers currently have equipment on site to remove this dirt. The intention is to have the grade match Shadow Way as much as possible. Chairman Chuck Piland, asked if the expansion for Freeman Road, included 2 drive lanes, a center turn lane, and a bike path. Mr. Samitore explained that was correct, but that generates some issues for on street parking on Freeman Road when the expansion occurs. Currently on street parking for Freeman Road is allowed, once expanded it would not be allowed. There are also some restrictions for on street parking on Shadow Way. Parking is al lowed inside the development within the parking area, but this is Invited to existing residents. Chairman Chuck Piland, feels that putting twelve iuuts in, without allowing on street parking, will create parking problems. Commissioner Fish, added that there will be two car garages though. Darren Lacomte stated that everything Mr. Samitore said sums up what the developers are trying to accomplish. He is not in favor of apartments, and after looking at this site, it became clear to him that apartments did not fit into the surrounding area. Mr. Lacomte wants to provide affordable homes in the $130,000 - $140,000 range, and the landscaping will certainly be planned accordingly.. Mr. Lacomte then discussed the setbacks required in a PUD, and will continue to move lines around a little to make the houses fit on the lots as best as possible to offer some more space in the yards. Mr. Lacomte is also very willing to look at other possibilities to avoid having vehicles backing out onto Freeman Rd. When looking at lot I ,the problem that existed with access off of Shadow Way is that it would not have any back yard. If a set back of 5 feet was given on the Freeman side then there would be a sight distance triatrgle problem. That was the reason the developers accessed it from Freematl Road. Mr. Adderson said that he and Mr. Lacomte coutd look at the configurations and try access offof Shadow Way. Chairman Piland asked Mr. Adderson and Mi•. Lacomte if they had come up with any ideas during discussions back and forth on the driveways where residents would have to back onto Freeman Rd. There was discussion about the driveway forlotlcomingoffofShadowWay,ratherthanFreemanRd. Chairman Piland, asked ifwe would run into fence problems later on down the road. Mr. Samitore said that yes there would be problems, and it was decided to allow the house on lot 12 to have a 5 foot setback, on the Freeman Road side, would make a 6 foot fence permissible. The question of open space was raised. Mr. Samitore explained that open space is usually a component ofa PUD. In this case, with the landscaping that is going to be done next to the creek, there will be more than the 2,000 square feet of open space. Commissioner Fish asked if there were going to be some home design examples when the final development plan is brought in. Mr. Lacomte said that he would do that and assured that he plans on making a very good statement with this development. Chairman Piland, asked if anyone else had any comments regarding this application. Darlene Turner, Presidentofthe Homeowners Association for Cedar Shadows introduced herselfand John Lean, a tenant across from proposed lots 4, 5 and 6. Darlene explained that they had CC and R's and a homeowners association in place, they intend to protect their interests. As members, they welcome this development, but want to iron out any concerns or problems before they arise. Their main concern is the parking. Rightnowthereare 19 homeownersoutofaproposed29. They have an extraparkinglot with 12 - 14 spaces in addition to 2 car garages and driveways. Darlene stated that on weekends this extra parking lot is always full. Darlene feels that Mingus Creek Estates should have extra parking also. Darlene wants to get together with the developers to address the parking issues, entrance signs, lighting and landscaping. Mr. Lead then asked why it had to be two separate home owners associations rather than just combining into one. Mr. Samitore explained that it does not have to be that way. Mr. Lacomte said that after reviewing the CC and R's for Cedat• Shadows, he would like to have one cohesive plan between the two. Mr. Lean thurked the Planning Stafffor their recommendations and listening to them. Mr. Lean also wanted to discussjoint maintenance for Shadow Way, along with the possibility compensation for the use of Shadow Way. Mr. Humphrey explained that ifthe Planning Commission was to grant approval tonight, everyone would have a minimtmi ofsix months or more with extensions, to get together acid agree on all ofthese concerns. During this period we expect to see the maintenance agreements worked out, and the development of CC and R's . This is the time that these issues would be negotiated. Commissioner Fish commented on lots 4,5,7;8,9,10 and 12 only having 2 car garages with short driveways. Mr. Lacomte said that even though the driveways meet the criteria as is, he is adjusting some lot lines, and will come up with a few ideas for adding more parking spaces. Chairman Piland wants Mr. Adderson and Mr. Lacomte to address lots 1 and 12, along with the concerns for off street parking, and about common CC and R's. Mr. Lacomte closed by addressing the shared maintenance of Shadow Way, and stated that it is a conditionofapproval, sothathasbeenresolved. CompensationforaccessuscofShadowWay,wasnot aconditionwiththepurchaseofhisproperty. Mr.Samitoreaddedthatthisroadwaspartoftheoverall development plan for Cedar Shadows and the PUD, could not have been developed withoutthe Mock Partition giving up land for the roadway. Commissioner Fish made a motion to adoptI2esolution 557 approving the Preliminary Site Plan of 37 2W 11BA, Tax Lots 8600, 8800 and 8900 subject to the recormnended conditions of approval,withaminimumof5footsideyardsetbacks, and recommendationforthedeveloper to increase off street parking. Commissioner Foster seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: The motion passed unanimously. VII. MISCELLANEOUS Mr. Samitore passed around a memo from Nancy Hanson, Park & Recreation coordinator. This memo invited members of the Planning Commission to attend a meeting regarding the skateboard park on November 6 at S:OOpm.. Chairman Piland asked about the upcoming agenda. There ai~e 4 or 5 items coming up for the December 3`~ meeting. VIII. ADJOURNMENT Conunissioncr Foster made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner Riggs seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Motion passed unanimously. Meeting was adjourned at 8:35 P.M. PLANNING DEPARTMENT STArr REPOR`[' MEETING DATE: December 3, 2002 TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: Matt Samitore, Coimnmrity Planner SUBJECT: Public Hearing - To consider a Tentative Plan fora 4 lot subdivision at 4993 Hamrick Road. (362W36CC Tax Lot 2700). Ap licant/ Owner: Cal Lanfear 846 Mendolia Way Central Point, Oregon 97502 Bob Fellows 2750 Phillips Way ~~.: Central Point, OR 97502 t ~~f >> Agent: Douglas C. McMahan/Hoffbuhr & Associates, lnc. 3155 Alameda Street #201 Medford, Oregon 97504 Summary: The applicant has submitted a development proposal to subdivide 1.04 acres of land into 4 residential lots. This tentative plan is located within a R-I-8, Residential Single Family zone. Authority: CPMC 1.24.050 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a Tentative Plan. Notice of the Public Hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060. Applicable Law: CPMC 16.10.010 et seq. Tentative Plans CPMC 17.20.010 et seq. Residential Single Family District CPMC 17.60.010 et seq. Special Setback Requirements CPMC 12.26.010 et seq. Trees Discussion: The applicants, Cal Lanfear and Bob Fellows are requesting that a1.04 acre parcel at 4993 Hamrick Road be subdivided into 4 separate parcels (Attachment A). CPMC 17.24.050 requires that the lots have a minimum area of 8,000 square feet. These area requirements have been met by the applicant. ~, Setback requirements for the parcels will be 20 feet for front lot lines, five feet for interior side yards, and I S feet for the rear yard. Lot 2 has a special setback requirement of 70 feet measured fi•om a street centerline, since Hann-ick Road is a major arterial. No Right-of=way dedication is needed for the property. Neighboring property owners were notified by mail (Attachment Band the Planning Department did not receive any correspondence. The Planning and Public Works Departments reviewed the proposed subdivision and concluded Yhat they comply with city requirements and all conditions of approval pertaining to site development, minimum lot size, public works standards anti specifications and access to public roadways (Attachments C and D). The configuration of the access road is designed to avoid vehicular movement over the City's Master Water Vault and because Jackson County will only endorse the subdivision if they use the existing driveway.. A ten foot wide Public Utility Easement is shown paralleling Lot 2. There is no PUE shown on the North side of the access road for Lots 1 and 4. Normally the PUE is placed outside of a street ROW or driveway. In this case the Public Works Department will need to define the PUE location. Public Works is requesting that the drive be built to the minimum design standards for a City Residential Lane. A Private Lighting Plan must also be submitted prior to the issuance of a Final Plat. There is one large tree located on the lot. The exact location must be shown on a map. If the applicant wishes to remove the tree a permit must be issued. Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority, Jackson County Roads and Jackson County Fire District Number Three have been notified of this land use action. BCVSA has submitted correspondence (Attachment E) stated that the subdivision will not adversely impact the system. Jackson County roads (Attachment F) stating that there be no direct access onto Hamrick Road. In a previous letter the Road Department indicated the driveway is adequate for the development. In a conversation with the Roads Department it was determined that the first letter will be used for this development. Fire District Number 3 (Attachment G) stated that no parking signs must be posted and a Fire Hydrant be installed at the entrance to the subdivision. Findines of Fact and Conclusions of Law Tentative Subdivision CPMC 16.10.010 requires that applications for tentative plans be submitted with improvement plans and other supplementary information as maybe needed to indicate the development plan. ^ The proposed development satisfies the subdivision requirements listed in CPMC 16.36.030 and CPMC 1.6.36.040. CPMC 17.20.050 establishes minimum area, width and access requirements for the R-I, Residential Single-Family district. ^ All parcels of the proposed partition meet the area, width and access requirements for the R-1, Residential Single-Family District. ~.` CPMC 12.36.080 establishes that every effor should be made to retain existing trecson public or private property as an intregal part of the development process. The planning commission shall make every effort to modify setback requirements to include existing U~ees. ^ A map showing the tree location must be submitted to the City, prior to any construction or final plat. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take one of the following actions: Adopt Resolution No._, approving the Tentative Subdivision of 36 2W 36CC Tax Lot 2700 subject to the recommended conditions of approval (Attachment C); or Deny the proposed Tentative Subdivision; or Continue the review of the Tentative Subdivision at the discretion of the Commission. Attachments: A. Tentative Plat B. Notice of Public Hearing C. Planning Department Recommended Conditions of Approval D. Public Works Staff Report E. Comments from BCVSA F. Comments from Jackson County Roads G. Comments from Fire District No. 3 G:U'lanni ng\02059.wpd ;. .,.,.r---"-- T _ "'~ TEPt'EATIVE PI.A F-R ---- `~ SAMES WAY ' ~ ~ .- --- \ 1I S~ 1 ~~~,¢ 1K: ~65~ R2'K WIA ~„~ .. 36. ~, ORES i 1 5„ + F ~~°~, -' T ~ ~ ~ ~1 Yuxs g,m ~ ~ } ctN ov ~ tiac t~ zioo t ..... -- "` -`t' "' ~ rlx un 3~ ' r3c z'++ ~ ~ ~ 521 t •~u~ `t r~ ~ 3~ ~ ~ ~ ` ` ROT 59 ~ tLOT ~ t4J3t WAY tLpK 491 ~ 0.0T 567 } ~ ~ t ~ ~NDPD Nr ORE•GON 8'7502 ,~ tLOT G71 i I c[i~,7.~_5526 ~ tLOK a>3t ` ` ~ 1 1 t t ` =i11 t5st) `II t~ `~ -_ ...J: ~~x~SllaC sIN1tARY 3[wtA 1 y' ~,~y~p ~gN1Ul1~~ p~ 9T7S '~ ~ T~ ~ 5~ 1 'S~!¢s~' ...w 1116' t1 is a~w IIaG° ~ Dt ~ PH ~~W4R. 137~C54~'~..54~a ~- T2 1 } I .r ~ N' CE~'8gy..156g tLOT L6i -i 1 A ~'~ ~ f5'~~v~` ` ~ ('Slt) ~ ""+ l ay~jy4AA'( AIIfRaRaY 3 1tAM' ~ 1 ` ~f W~1.~ C•~~SUTE',1A1 904 _ ..- `'~ py~o ~ ~ iw ~ 1{ ~ ~ ~ IXs ~ , ~ 3jjE',pfpRR~ ~~iN Y7 r~ ms xe+p '~ ,.,,, a \ ~ (54t) 779 36 ZW '~` 20' ti tS' _ ~ ~ tIOK L5} ~ tar' n. t I aS A=25 } I c m 1 1 _._. _. t 111 A~s• ' "a > 1 - •~ .- Rw2S' l ~ t } v~crv~.! laaa 1 rsa ~ ~ xo' alt .LL.a ~/ 1 ' - V\LA5 ROAfl iLOT 591 e~ ~ t r oc~'+I~ ...c . -'. -' ' -" `f J ,~,..,...- 1 If\ t \ I i1! ' V Wti a~,CX / / J / ~ i •+ 1 'R • ~ht~' ~' ~ `` .boa i ~ ,._--~ Imo. "~y,""' Jq~\G`~' / p~'(`~, CLOT 151 1! ~ ~ / / /~P / ' lYl~1O , I., ao' I A t g6~yn ~ `•. ~ 11 / / / / ~ 3T zw a,AF ' t2J5t1D2 '~~.'S"'.~ / 30. ,1 ~ ~ ``'.'y'am/ ! ~` /r~moie°°aa' 1 ". -./ / l t / ' ~ ° ~ ~1 ~y of CYen l.~«, Pole l 1'.Z,A INNING I>1s'I'/1I~ TMI'NT 'I`om Ffumptrrcy, t1(CP Planuin~ llirecLor I(en Cerschler Comrnunit.v 1'lanuer Matt Sarnil.ore Community Planner Uavc Arkcns Planning 'Pechnician Notice of Meeting Date of Notice: November 12, 2002 Meeting Date: December 3, 2002 Time: 7:00 p.m. (Approximate) Place: Central Point City Hall 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon NATURE OF MEETING Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review a tentative land division application that would create 3 lots on a 1.04 acre parcel near the intersection of West Vilas and Hamrick Roads. The parcel is located in the R-1-8, Residential Single Family zoning district and is identified in the records of the Jackson County Assessor as Map 36 2W 36CC, Tax Lot 2700. CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for Tentative Partitions are set forth in Chapter 16 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Regulations, Off-street parking, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Works Standards. PUBLIC COMMENTS I . Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, December 3, 2002. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502. I55 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 ~ (541) 664-3321 ®Fax: (541) 664-6384 k°: 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the convnent period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664- 3321 ext. 292. SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staff reports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or tentative partition application. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. - I -- ~ _ ST. JAMES WAY r 23321 2342 ~ 2452 ~ 24621 24721 2582 I 259 Subject I 7490 2337 I 2341 I 2451 ~ 2461 ~ 2d]1 I 2581 2586 I 2597 7480 tmo 2330 ~ 2340 I 2450 ~ 24601 24701 7355 ~ ~ 25901 X94\ 1460 23]9 1325 ~Q' ~ 1315 2`(` t340 7350 1305 O`C` 7330 04 7289 1303 ~ t320 4957 85 2357 ~P ---~~~Aj t310 ;1200 2623 2632 2612 2652 a993 twos ,sec 768 1424 Q W 1420 J a z ,4i0 1390 W VILAS RD 155 South Second Street O Central Point, OR 97502 ~ (541) 664-3321 ~ Fax: (541) 664-6384 ~> ATTACHMENT C PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The approval of the Tentative Plan shall expire in one year on December 3, 2003 unless an application for final plat or extension has been received by the City. 2. The project must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations. 3. The applicant shall submit a private lighting plan, showing the location of private driveway lights, prior to the issuance of a final plat. G:\Pl an n i ng\02059. wpd r~ ~~ ,~~~ r~ Susie Lanfear Estates 9 9/27/2002 1 CITY OF CENTRAT• POINT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STAFFRBPORT Cal Lanfear 846 Mendolia Way :Central Point, OR 97502 1Bob Fellows 2750 Phillips Way: Central Point, OR 97504 roject Susie Lanfear Estates - ocaton: Hamrick Road, Central Point, Oregon:. oning: R-1-8 agal: 36 2W 36CC - TL X700! rea 1.04 Acres,.. " nits: 4 Residential Units ahs: Susie Lanfear Estates Tentative Plat Hoffbuhr& Associates, Inc. 3155 Alameda Street #201 Medford;: Oregon 97504, Pub Purpose Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer") regarding City Public Works Department (PWD) standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed. Gather information from the Developer/Engineer regarding the proposed development. Special Requirements Existing Infrastructure: The Developer shall demonstrate that all connections to existing infrastructure (i.e. streets, water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems, natural drainage systems, etc.) will not interfere with or provide for the degradation of the existing effective level of service or operation of the infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have either adequate capacities to accommodate the flows and/or demands imposed on the existing infrastructure as the result of the connection of the proposed development's infrastructure, or will be improved by and at the expense of the Developer to accommodate the additional flows and/or demands; while maintaining or improving the existing level of service of the affected facility, as approved by (as applicable), the regulatory agency, utility owner, and/or property owner 4, R~~ *.e Susre Lanfear Estates 11/27/2002 2 involved. 2. Easement for Minimum Access: The tentative plat for Susie Lanfear Estates depicts a 20-foot wide easement for minimum access. The describe easement for minimum access must support for the turning radius and loading produced by a 50,000 lbs. emergency vehicle. It is the recommendation of the City of Central Point Public Works Department that the easement for minimum access be constructed with a section equal to a City of Central Point Residential Lane section. (Section = 8-inches of 4-inch Shale, 6-inches of 3/" crushed rock, and a 3-inch lift of class "B" asphalt). 3. Public Utility Easement: A 10-foot wide public utility easement shall be dedicated to allow for existing and future public utility infrastructure. Currently the tentative plat positions the 10-foot wide public utility easement alongside the West & South property boundaries of Lot 2 concluding at the South property boundary of Lot 1. The City of Central Point Public Works Department recommends the public utility easement be divided by the property lines of (Lots 2 & 3) and (Lots 1 & 4) extending to the North property boundaries of Lots 1 & 4. 4. Storm Drainage Infrastructure: The developer shall develop a facility plan for the storm drain collection and conveyance system which provides for run-off from and run- on onto the proposed development, any future development on adjacent properties, and any areas deemed by the City that will need to tie-into the proposed development's storm water collection and conveyance system. 5. Existing Landscape: Currently the subject property contains a diverse variety of trees and vegetation. Prior to development a City of Central Point Arborist shall evaluate the existing landscape, and mark appropriate trees for removal General 1. All construction of public improvements shall conform to the City's PWD Standards, the conditions approved and stipulated by the Planning Commission, and other special specifications, details, standards, and/or upgrades as may be approved by the City Administrator or his designee prior to the approval of the construction plans for the proposed development. During construction, changes proposed by the Developer shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's engineer to the City PWD (and Building Department, as applicable) for approval prior to implementation. 2. Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals, and conditions as may be required by other agencies, including, but not limited to, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), affected irrigation districts, and ODOT. 3. Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. If feasible, the Developer's engineer or surveyor should provide the drawings in both a "hard copy" /t §'s, t • ~% Susie Lanfear Estates 11/27/2002 4 / A copy of written approval from ODOT regarding Highway improvements (as applicable). 9. Field verify all existing infrastructure elevations and locations (i.e. pipe inverts, curb elevations, top of banks, ditch/channel inverts, street elevations, etc.), to which the proposed development's infrastructure will connect into existing improvements, prior to final construction plan design and submittal for final approval. 10. Overhead power lines. If applicable, coordinate efforts with Pacific Power and Light, Owest, and Charter Communications, to convert any overhead electrical power, telephone, or cable facilities within the proposed development to underground facilities, prior to the acceptance by the City PWD of the public improvements associated with the proposed development. All agreements and costs associated with the conversion of these facilities from overhead to underground facilities shall be by and between the utility owners and the Developer. 11. The accurate locations of any existing underground and above ground public infrastructure, and the location of the associated easements with these facilities, shall be accurately portrayed (both horizontally and vertically) on the construction plans and as-built drawings. 12. The Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide to the Public Works Department a drawing of the recorded Final Plat map reproduced on Mylar®and in an acceptable electronic form in AutoCAD® format. The Final Plat shall be tied to a legal Government corner and the State Plane Coordinate System. The Final Plat shall either reflect or be later modified to reflect any applicable "red-line" changes noted in the construction "as-builts", at the discretion of the City Administrator or his designee. Streets/Traffic ^ EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE ^ New Haven Road Hamrick Road 1. Construction drawings for this Tentative Plan shall include a Street Lighting Plan/Driveway Lighting Plan in accordance with the requirements of the City PWD or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee. The construction drawings shall include clear vision areas designed to meet the City's PWD Standards. The City of Central Point Public Works Department is recommending that a driveway lighting plan be developed for Susie Landfear Estates. 2. The Developer's engineer shall, at the cost of the Developer, evaluate the strength of the native soils and determine the driveway/street section designs to accommodate the expected loads (including fire equipment) to be traveled on these driveways. If a public street, then the City will design the required street section. Susis Lanfear Estates 11/27/2002 5 Storm Drainage, Irrigation Improvements ^ EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE 12-inch Storm Drain (New Haven Road) Catch Basin (Intersection of New Haven Road & Hamrick Road) 1. Developer's engineer shall develop a facility plan for the storm drain collection, retention, and conveyance system (SD System) which provides for storm water run-off from and run-on onto the proposed development (either surface run-on or culvert or creek/ditch conveyance), any existing or future development on adjacent properties, conveyed storm drainage, or surface water flow, and any areas deemed by the City that will need to connect-into the proposed development's SD System. 2. Roof drains and under drains shall not be directly connected to public storm drain lines, and shall drain to the street. 3. Any discharge points of the storm water facilities shall be designed to provide an aesthetically pleasing, useful, and low maintenance facility, that are designed to mitigate erosion, damage, or loss during a 100-year storm event; and that mitigate the "attractive nuisance" hazards associated with these types of facilities. 4. Prior to City PWD construction plan review, the Developer shall provide the City PWD with a complete set of hydrologic and hydraulic calculations and profile plots for sizing the SD system, which shall incorporate the use of the City PWD's rainfall/intensity curve, and City approved run-off coefficients, curve numbers, retardance, pipe roughness coefficients, etc., that are used in the engineering calculations. 5. Storm drainpipe materials shall be PVC, HDPE, or reinforced concrete, with watertight joints. Provide concrete or sand-cement slurry encasement where required in areas of minimum cover. Sanitary Sewer 1. All sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system (SS System) design, construction and testing shall conform to the standards and guidelines of the Oregon DEO, 1990 APWA Standards, Oregon Chapter, Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA), and the City PWD Standards, where applicable. 2. The construction plans and the "as-built" drawings shall identify lateral stationing for construction of sewer laterals. 3. The City upon completion of initial construction plan review and preliminary approval, will forward the plans to BCVSA for completion of the review process. Upon completion of the review by BCVSA, completion of final revisions to the plans by the wy ~.. _~ M Sus,'e Lanfear Estates 11/27/2002 6 Developer's engineer, and following the final approval and signature on the construction plans by BCVSA, the Public Works Director will approve the plans in final form. 4. All testing and video inspection of lines and manholes shall be done in accordance with BCVSA requirements, at Developer's expense. The Developer shall provide BCVSA and the City with test reports, TV reports and certification of the sewer system construction prior to final acceptance. Water System ^ EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE • 16-inch Waterline (Hamrick Road) ^ 12-inch Waterline (New Haven Road) 1. Developer shall comply with Oregon Health Division (OHD) and City requirements for backflow prevention. 2. The Developer's engineer shall consult Fire District #3, and comply with any and all suggestions regarding fire protection. 3. If the Developer chooses a water connection design, which includes construction of a manifold of water meters privately, plumbed to residential structure the following should be noted. ^ All water service connection infrastructure located on the property owner's side of the water meter is the responsibility of the property owner to which the service connection applies. The City of Central Point Public Works Department is not responsible for the service of maintenance of water service connection infrastructure located on the property owner's side of the water meter. 4. Each building shall be served by a separate water meter. 5. Construction drawings shall include the size, type, and location of all water mains, hydrants, air valves, service connections, and other appurtenance details in accordance with City PWD Standards and as required by the City PWD. 6. Water system shall be tested in accordance with City PWD Standards and requirements at Developer's expense and must be approved by the City. 7. Specifications for the design and construction of the water system shall be in accordance with City PWD standards. Site Work, Grading, and Utility Plans 1. Grading plans should have original/existing grades and final grades plotted on the Susee Lanfear Estates 11/27/2002 7 plan. Typically, existing grade contour lines are dashed and screened back, and final grade contour lines are overlaid on top of the existing grades and are in a heavier line width and solid. Contour lines should be labeled with elevations. 2. All structures shall have roof drains, area drains, and/or crawl spaces with positive drainage away from the building or structure. 3. Provide City with a utility plan approved by each utility company, which reflects all utility line locations, crossings, transformer locations, valves, etc. 4. Utility locations must be accurately included on the as-built drawings, or as a separate set of drawings attached to the as-built drawings. Rights of Ways/Easements 1. If applicable, Developer shall provide a Statement of Water Rights (on a City approved form), for any affected properties. For properties determined to have water rights, the developer will coordinate with the State Water master the re-allocation of any waters attached to lands no longer irrigable as a result of the proposed development. N~V_a6_2©D2 10:37 W[NDERMERE VRN ULEET 541 779 2268 P.02iD2 6~9 BEAR CREEK VAL.M.EIf SANITARY AUTHORITY lY13loUrN PACIFlC MVYY. • MLDC0110, Oq[OON l7801SOY0 • teaq eae s~os • sat} »o•asaa rnn ta++~ e~e.es~e , vnw.~evM.ero November 4, 2002 Cal 1.,anfeaz Windermere Van Vleet & Associates 779-2268 R>;: Susie Lanfear IwStates Deaz Mr. Lanfeaz, The proposed 20 foot wide access drive easement on the above-mentioned project will not adversely effect the sanitary sewer easement in the same location. Peel free to call me if you have any questions regarding this project. Si~ncer~ely, Carl Tappert, PE District Engineer -~ -.- - TOTRL P. 02 10/01/2002 10:56 154177^,295 JACKSON COUNTY RPS PAGE 01 - ~ ~~~ >~oaas Eric NiCmCycr, PE .Tr~c d Develo~tnenr,Engineer wane aty oR s~soa Phon°: 647-775-5230 f AC KS ON COUNTY ~~~'°~R~d F'aX: 549~Tl48296 nicmeycl~jack;oncounly,org Roads ~v>,vJ~soncounry.org September 98, 2002 Attention: Tom Humphrey City of Central Point Planning 115 South Second Street Central Point, OR 97502 RE: Land Division off West Vilas Road - acounty-maintained road. 362W36CC Tax Lot 2700; 3-lot residential partition. Dear Mr. Humphrey: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the application for a tentative land division that would create three lots on a 9.04 acre parcel near the infersection of West Vllas and Hamrick Roads. The parcel is located in the R-1-8, Residential Single Family zoning district and is identified in the records of the Jackson County Assessor as Map 36 2W 36CC Tax Lot 2700. Roads and Parks Services has the following comments: We would like to be notified of future development proposals, as county permits may be required. 2, We recommend shared access with no direct parcel access to West Vilas Road. The applicant shall obtain a road approach permit from Roads and Parks Services for the shared road approach to West Vilas Road. If you have any questions or need further information feel free to call me at 774-6230. Sincerely, ~~ Eric Niemeyer, PE Traffic & Development Engineer .~ s_a H Vta'^LO^tlL G6:J1 M19 LUb YCLLUVJS LUIYJIKULI LUfY Oil bb4 J4b4 Y.F91 F?~M EPGv^Wth~SFMEr~ PHJNE ~, SSd1 830 1550 Jul. 23 2002 051 b3?M P! JACKSON COUN'~Y Roads Juy 17, 2002 bob Fellows Canatruetion Cal Leutfeai 94t3 MendoliQ Way Cantrat Point, QR 97Bti2 ROADS, PARKS AIVU PLANNING 5t;:lt~'[Ck~9 PAUL KOHOULtC dtrtri rox wv.ppA1yyuna ~w XCAneJrp Mb 10 ~ OMwrtAwn. ~i C! +•YTSR 44b1lA 07101 i« *~~n1:~ x ~tarM~r"~a t2E: hiemrick Road ~ Vtiea Road Iriveway Var}flcatton 3fS-2W3BCt.-27o0 Over Mr, LaRhar, Thta letter b to gMorm you subject property at Hamrick Road and Vllas Reed has an adequate and pre-axiatirlo driveway ae verified by our Central! pistrlci Maintenencc Martaper, Mike Soren. You wits not bd required to obtain a Road Appra~ch Pemilt from th{s department unless modlfkalions or etberatbns are made to the existing drhtaway. H you have any tlueatiar's or need more Information, ptease feet fr®t~ to aontad me at 774-6204, 131ncarely, -~'~~~~ Julie A, BtauQhter Olrice ascictance III cc: Flanning 1, ,• DCAR CI~ETiCRE.aNWAY l ENOIhEEFlMO t rLilr NAl'WC1M[I(r ! Mo»T~1~ L /n~Jx~l / JlO~/e ~NT6VANGt / VFOFTI~~~INf.6x6Nr Trcua+ f7~B*6e nFtftO 1{ 1"! 3364 P. Et2 gUG_28_p2 Gr~:31 pM BOB FELLOLJS CONSTRUCTION 541 664 ,•' i FI~.~ ~~ST'~,IC~"' ~c~. ~ 4333 AGATE RbAb, wHYI'f (sail sae-r~,oo F ,jury Mr, Bob Feliows construction Fire District ~3 Comments per ttntform 1. Driveway width minimum 20 feet 2. 25 fain radius an at) curves 3. s=ire Hydrant required at entrance and distance to exist'sng hydrant. +6. Turh Around Required for this which exceeds 15Q feet length. 5. Physical address(s} for the dwelling ~~ci~saN QRCGON 97503-1075 Oil s26~ase6 Code and Uniform Building Code end posted nd parking, driveway due to iength of driveway due to the driveway length, Attached is a copy of the adopted county stand&rds for turn around. Yau may use the one that works far you. T would s~lggest it be integrated into a driveway servicing one of the home sites. Please caU me if you need additional {nformatton. Mark Moran D¢puty Ftre Marahai ~;: PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: December 3, 2002 TO: Central Point Planning Coimnission ~ G C' ~7 .. FROM: Ken Gerschler, Community Planner SUBJECT: Site Plan Review of 37 2W OIBB, Tax Lot 1100 -Construction of Central Point Lodge Owner Central Point Masonic Lodge Applicant: P.O. Box 3761 Central Point, Oregon 97502 Agent: Alpha Group, Architectural and Engineering, L.L.C. 6180 Shady Brook Drive Central Point, Oregon 97502 Property Description/ 372WO1BB, Tax Lot 1100 - 1.38 acres Zoning: R-1-8, Residential Single Family District Snmmary The applicant is requesting a Site Plan Review for the construction of a new 10,080 square foot lodge and adrive-through coffee stand. Applicable Law CPMC 17.20.010 et seq. - R-1, Residential Single-Family District CPMC 17.64.010 et seq. -Off Street Parking and Loading CPMC 17.72.010 et seq.- Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval Discussion The Central Point Masonic Lodge is proposing the construction of a new building on a parcel of land located north of the I.O.O.F. cemetery at 4900 Hamrick Road. The Lodge has been an integral part of Central Point and fonnerly occupied the large concrete building near the intersection of East Pine and Sixth Streets. In recent months, the organization sold the facility on East Pine in preparation for the construction of anew lodge on property they had acquired from the I.O.O.F. (Oddfellows) (Attaclunent A). a'? The plans for the Lodge are progressing following the annexation of the land and an approval of a tentative partition that created a separate parcel for the structure. The Plamring Conunission approved the tentative partition earlier this year however there are still a few outstanding conditions ofapproval that need to be completed prior to the City approving the final plat Ofparticular interest is the dedication of a strip of land for public right-of--way for the deceleration lane and sidewalk improvement area. The dedication ofproperty for the deceleration lane is relatively simple however the Public Works Deparhnent has expressed concerns that sidewalk improvements along the Mason's property could conflict with existing graves. Ifgraves are located within an area designated forsidewalk construction, the conflict could ultirnatelyr•esult in costly exhumation and the relocation of remains. The Planning Deparhnent will recommend that all previous conditions of approval be met prior to the release of the final plat and subsequent site plan approval. The property surrounding the Lodge is occupied by single family dwellings west and north across Hamrick Road, while the proposed Don Jones park and LO.O.F cemetery lie to the east and south respectively. The City and the Lodge members have been working to create a shared access drive that would serve both the new Lodge and Don Jones Park. The new driveway would be designed to align with the existing New Haven and Hamrick Road intersection with a traffic signal to be installed at a future date. The Lodge has asked that the Commission consider an approval for• a drive through coffee stand included as a part of the site plan. The idea is that this limited commercial activity would allow the lodge to obtain income for operating expenses. Currently, the residential zoning does not permit commnercial activity and a zoning amendment would be required in order to allow this sort of business. Planning Staff has discussed the options and determined that the most feasible solution would be a re-zone of the I.O.O.F. property and Don Jones Park from R-1-3 to civic use. The civic designation would include a "Conditional Use" provision for limited commercial activities such as concessions since they arc activities commonly associated with parks and public uses. The Conditional Use would give the City the discretion to control the appropriateness of the business. If the Cornrnission felt that the coffee stand is acceptable, a recornrnendation could be made to the City Council to consider the re-zone. The building elevations show the building as a single story structure (Attachment B) treated with brick finish and a metal roof. Five exit points are shown on the building exterior all of which could be handicap accessible. Once completed, the building will have seven office/classroom areas, two restrooms, a large multi-purpose room, sanctuary, foyer and various storage areas throughout the entire structure. A landscaping plan has been submitted as a part of the site plan with various trees and shrubs distributed along Hamrick Road and within interior planter strips. For projects such as the lodge, the code specifies the necessary parking space requirements based upon specific uses. The Lodge operates generally on selected evenings and weekends for ceremonial activities. The organization can lease the building to other organizations for private functions. Generally CPMC 17.64 requires 1 space per 300 square feet of office area and 1 space for every four people in the meeting area plus 1 space for each 50 square feet of area available for portable seating, secondary assembly or classroom purposes. Based upon these standards, the lodge would need to have 111 spaces available. The site plan shows that 51 spaces have been provided (4 of which are ~a~R r.., handicapped). The plan shows that the parking lots are divided by the driveway to the proposed Don Jones Park. It is unlikely that the total required number of spaces would be occupied at any single event or function at the lodge and therefore any additional off-street parking requirements for the (,0 space shortage could be met through a shared parking agreement with the City when the park develops. The Planning Department has yet to receive any comments from surrowiding property owners who received a notice of the land use action (Attachment C), Jackson County Roads and Parks and Fire District Number 3 have submitted correspondence for the Commission's consideration (Attachment D). Both agencies recommend that the Lodge submit improvement plans for review and obtain pei7nits as needed. The Public Works Department will identify issues such as surfacedrainage,parking, driveway access and lighting improvements when construction plans are submitted. Public Works will specify the location of facilities such as sidewalks and any required additional right-of--way that may be needed. Sidewalk cun•ently does not exist along the applicant's frontage and will be needed to tie into existing facilities. A Public Works Memorandum (Attachment "E") explains the development requirements. The Building Department has been notified of this application but has not received building plans. Once these plans are submitted, they will be examined for compliance with the applicable regulations. Findings of Fact & Conclusiats of Law Site Plan In approving, conditionally approving or denying the plans submitted, the City bases it's decision on the following standards from Section 17.72.040: A. Landscaping and fencing and the construction of walls on the site in such a manner as to cause the same to not substantially interfere with the landscaping scheme of the neighborhood, and in such a manner to use the same to screen such activities and sights as might be heterogeneous to existing neighborhood uses. The Commission may require the maintenance of existing plants or the installation of new ones for purposes of screening adjoining property. A landscape plan has been submitted by the applicant. Landscaping will need to be installed prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. B. Design, number and location of ingress and egress points so as to improve and to avoid ~R :..,`: interference with the h~affic flow on public streets; ^ Traffic will have one access point from Hamrick Road. Service drives are required to have a minimum vision clearance of 55 feet from the intersection of driveway centerlines and the intersecting street right-of--way line. It appears that the lodge can design its driveway accesses to satisfy this requirement. Once a traffic signal is installed this requirement will be farther satisfied. C. To provide off-street parking and loading facilities and pedestrian and vehicle flow facilities in such a manner as is compatible with the use for which the site is proposed to be used and capable of use, and in such a manner as to improve and avoid interference with the traffic flow on public streets; ^ The City has received the parking plan which depicts a total of 51 parking spaces. Under CPMC 17.64.040(D) the various uses for the lodge world necessitate 111 spaces to accommodate sanctuary, dining,classrooms and kitchen areas. Design requirements in CPMC 17.64.100 call For paved, adequately drained parking areas for all-weather use; painted striping; lighting and the placement of bumper rails along property lines, sidewalks and landscaping areas. The Public Works Department will be working with the applicants to formulate an appropriate development plan with phased improvements for the driveway and shared parking. D. Signs and other outdoor advertising structures to ensure that they do not conflict with or deter from traffic control signs or devices and that they are compatible with the design of their buildings or uses and will not interfere with or detract from the appearance or visibility of nearby signs; ^ A sign has been shown near the intersection of the private street with Hamrick Road. A sign permit will be required prior to construction. E. Accessibility and sufficiency of fire fighting facilities to such a standard as to provide for the reasonable safety of life, limb and property, including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads and fire lanes so that all buildings on the premises are accessible to fire apparatus; The project, if approved, would need to meet any requirements of Jackson County Fire District 3. :~ ~ a e.; : , F. Compliance with all city ordinances and regulations; ^ The proposed construction meets the minimum setback requirements for the R-1 District. There are general regnlations governingspecialsetbacksandlandscaping (17.60.090 and 17.60.135 respectively). Special setbacks on secondary arterials like Hamrick Road are intended, among other things, to permit eventual widening however it is unlikely that firrther improvements will occur since the roadway received extensive upgrades in 1999. The project when constructed, will be in compliance with the requirements of the Central Point Municipal Code subject to the recommended conditions of approval. G. Compliance with such architecture and design standards as to provide aesthetic acceptability in relation to the neighborhood and the Central Point area and it's environs. ^ Most lodge and church facilities are located within residentially zoned areas. The pitched metal roof proposed for the sanctuary is generally compatible with the surrounding structures and the building itself presents an attractive appearance. The applicants have submitted building elevations as part of their application package. Site landscaping with eventual full parking improvements by the applicants would enhance the aesthetic value of the project. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take one of the following actions: 1. Adopt Resolution No. ,approving the Site Plan subject to the recommended conditions of approval; or 2. Deny the proposed Site Plan; or 3. Continue the review of the Site Plan application at the discretion of the Commission. Attachments A. B. C. D. E. F. Site and Landscape Plan, Elevations and Floor Plan Notice of Public Hearing Jackson County and Fire District Correspondence Public Works Department Staff Report Planning Department Recommended Conditions ~~ 4B f i ~IIb 3U5 W'IV-~20 I~ mia s dnm~ s.wr ~P y ~~ 0 i~ 0 c~i a~ Qg00 d0 31N ~~ ~~B~dY 0309yS mioii~v'asis - oesrcva 'TS GtlbI .COL%AS ~~IS ONIQ-119 52YJV BCI ~ ZAStOI oS~~d ,~yb`'~ Liu /~d on ~ / ~/ OF ~p+o / 1 / t~. ~~/ _ / bS ~~~ ~~~ ~.. _ ~~,~ /~~ .;?~~J ^ /"l /~7 e ~~~~ i/ \ ~ ~ ~ \ ~`. Y ~ ~~ ~ \ 0~ 8~ .~ ~` .~, ~: a -.~. 52 ~ ~~_. .~ ~r_ooK ~~nn (~L~T () T (~'eS1L'C'2l Paint EXl[~~~~>~~T' ttB tt Planning Department 9,~Fy,CU ~~!i E~ "e ae aR~~ ca s 0 F ~ ~O g ga ~ o ~ o~ U FIAOR P4W :Wyn u xoro oxs,~:.~. rtww vuv i AI.1 ~. eo ~ s~~ ~mr ~'yi <Y 1 '~} vri O^. j "e oe ogvc, w a 0 a U z ~ s ~s a o~ 8 U ~~ /1SOUTN ELEVATION u x..a w ..a II uct nxs F/i5/+il k iro~~ 0305-tale [nLgN f/(vtLYiS ~tEAST ELEVATIOk Uee.u. w . is /1WEST ELEVATION ~~. ~.~~ Cz~y o~~ Ccrll.r~~I I'o~11C I'I,/(N.NLNG I>L'I'~1 h7'MIs'NT Tom Iluuiphrey, AICP Planning Uircctor I<en Gerschl~~~r Cotnnumil.y Planner Matl. Samitore Community Planner Dave ~rkens Planning 'I'eehnician City of Central Lfoint Notice of Meeting ~~iI~I~IT ~~C" Date of Notice: November 12, 2002 planning I)epartmmt Meeting Date: Time: Place: NATURE OF MEETING December 3, 2002 7:00 p.m. (Approximate) Central Point City Hall 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review a site plan application that would allow a new fraternal lodge and future drive-through coffee stand to be constructed on a vacant parcel of land located North of the I.O.O.F. cemetery. The parcel is located in the R-1-8, Residential Single Family zoning district and is identified in the records of the Jackson County Assessor as Map 37 2W Ol BB, Tax Lot 1100. CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for site plan review are set forth in Chapter 17 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Regulations, Off-street parking, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Works Standards. PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written commnents up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, December 3, 2002. 2. Written comments maybe sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502. 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 • (541) 664-3321 ~ Fax: (541) 664-6384 war-9 r. . 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shat] be raised prior to the expiration ofthe comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will aced to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664- 3321 ext. 292. SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staff reports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve the site plan application and direct City Staff to investigate a zone amendment that would allow limited comrnercial activity. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. €,, F.. :._ I55 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 ~ (541) 664-3321 O Fax: (541) 664-6384 r'Het ©lr Pal Roads EricNicmoyer,.RE . 1}a~c $ AevClvpment.L•'f{gineer 200 Antabpe Read WMIa City, OR 87503 Ptrone: (Sd1)77q.8230 Few (541} 7748295 niemey~IQjad,sancamiy.Org wumJadGwr~countya~g November 25, 2002 Attention: Tom Humphrey City of Central Point Planning 115 South Second Street Central Point, OR 97502 City of Central Point E~i~~3~T tt~,<t Planning Department RE: Masonic Lodge off HamricK Road - acounty-maintained road. Planning Fite 02069-TP; T37,2W,01 BB Tax Lot 1100 Dear Mr. Humphrey: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this application that would allow a new fraternal lodge and future drive-through coffee stand to be constructed on a vacant parcel of land located north of the IOOF cemetery. The parcel is 4ocated in the R-1-S, Residential Single Family zoning district. Roads and Parks has the following comments: 1. The applicant shall submit construction drawings to Jackson County Roads and Parks Services and obtain county permits if required. 2. Additional right-of-way is required for the deceleration lane improvements, dedication should be required before pemlits are issued. City of Central Point standards maybe utilized for road improvement if the City agrees, in writing, to future maintenance. 3. The applicant shall obtain a road approach permit from Roads and Parks Services for the new road approach to Hamrick Road. The paved approach shall have 30' approach radii and a 30' minimum width. Also, the road shall line up with New Haven Road to the west. If you have any questions or need further information feel free to call me at 774-6230. S1inc_erety, Eric Niemeyer, PE Traffic & Development Engineer 1:\Ettgitteef~ng~L]evelapmeni\CnIES1CNYRlPT\02069-TP.wpd 6kat o: 11!2012002 12:07 8264566 JCFD3 RUS OFC PAGE 02 ,JACKSON COI.tNTY FI>I~E DISTRICT NO. 3 8333 AGATE ROAD, WHITE CITY, OREGON 97503-1075 (541) 826-7100 FAX (541) 826-4566 UNIFORM FIRE CODE REVIEW DATE: November 20,2002 n Jackson County Department of Planning Fx Development Attn: 10 S. Oakdale Medford, OR 97501 [x] City of Central Point Planning ~ Development Attn: Ken Gerschler 155 S. 2nd Central Point, OR 97502 A licant: A ent: Ron B'orlc Business Name: Masonic Lod e Central Point Address: PO Box 37b1(Namrick Road Ci : Central Point Ore on Construction Ty e: unknown Occupancy Classification: unknown New Construction Sq. Ft. 10,000 The Uniform Fire Code (OREGON REVISED 1997 EDITION) contains minimum standards and shall supplement any and all laws relating to fire and life safety The building plans submitted to JacksonCounty Fire District No. 3 are subject to the follow Uniform Fire Code requireMents. Bath the Building Department and the Fire District shall approve any c}#anges, modifications, or alterations of the building plans or changes made in the character of the occupancy. ~$ ~;,; R~ .y 11/20/2002 12:07 0264566 JCFD3 BUS OFC FACE 03 ANY BOX WITH AN "~" SHALL APPLY I. ADDI2IJSSING [x) Approved address numbers (miri. 3") shall be placed on all buildings in such a manner to be plainly visible and legible from the street fronting the Property. Address signs are avai s1bb~ al no charge from Fire District No 3 2. FIItE APPARATUS ROADWAXS [x) Fire apparatus roadways shall be within 150 ft. of every portion of the first floor of a building, with a minimum unobstructed width o£ 20 ft. and vertical clearance of not less thaa'• 13 ft. 6 ia. Fite apparatus access roads shad be designed to provide an all-weather driving surface, capable supporting 50,000 lbs. load. A tentnorarv fixe apparatus access road shall be established during construction. Temporary access roads shall be of a width, vertical clearance, and surface adequate'. to provide access for fire department apparatus until permanent roads ire installed. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 ft. shall be provided with an approved turnaround fdr fire apparatus. The nrinimum turning radius is 28 ft. 3. WATER SUPPLIES FOR FIItE PRO'I'EC'I'TON [J Not required based on current design of building and occupancy classification. [x] Fire Hydrants are required A, Quantity o£hydrattts required: [dick here tQ,gnter inf_g] B. Required fire flow: click sere to enter ~nfo CrPM. C. Fire flow duration: [click ere to enter ia£oJ hrs. [x] Fixe hydrants are required prior tb construction. [x) Location o£ £.re hydrants shall be approved by the fire district prior to installation. 1 o ,~ 11/20/2002 12:07 8264566 JCFD3 BUS OFC Approval required by water provider (see Speciad,Requirements Number IS). PAGE 04 [] On-site water storage tanks are required. Water storage required: [click bars to enter info] gallons. Q Contact Fire District No. 3's Firs and Life Safety Division for installation requirements for on-site water storage tanks. (reference NFPA II42) [] On-site water tank construction plans shall be snbmitted to the "Fire and Life Safety Division" for review; and approval prior to installation of the water storage system. The water storage tank system shall be flow tested by the fire district prior to: [] Opening for business [] Construction 4. FIRE EXTINGUISHERS [x] Fixe extinguisher types and placerhent shall be approved by the fire district prior to instaUatian. 5. FIRE 1'TtOTECTION SXSTEMS ANID EQUIPMENT [x] The irtstaliation and maintenance of automatic fire alarm systems, automatic sprizzlcler, or water spray systems, standpipes and hose or fixed extinguisher systems shall be requited as Usted below. [] No requirement [] Automatic fire extsttguislti~tg system required [xJ Alarm system required. Type of system; If requireed by building department system shall comply with all codes aad;staadards [] Automatic fire sxtinguis$ugg and alarm systems stroll be tested annuaIIy and documentation shall be available on request. 2 ak~~. ~'..: 11/20/2002 12:07 8264566 JCFD3 BUS OFC PAGE 05 6. 7. HEATING APPLIANCE [x] Heating appliances shall be inst9lled and maintained in accordance their listing and the "Building, Electrical, and Ivlechatrical Codes." The fine district shall approve ;the use of nozt-vented fuel-fired heaters. with space The use portable electric heaters; and fuel-fired space heaters in "Group 1 and SR occupancies" is prohibited, EXITS i (xJ Bvezy building, or portion thereof, shall be provided with exits as required by the "Uniform Building Cody" and "Article 12 of the Uzaiform Fire Code" (see "Special Requirement`s, number ISL. S. F'7,A.MNIABLE AND COMBUSTT$L~ LIQUIDS [] Provide the fire district with a listing of all flammable and combustible liquids anal quantities that wi11 lie stored, used, or handled. After review, all applicable code requirements dill be issued to the applicant- 9. HA7.AIi.AOUS MATEItTALS [] Provide the fare district with ~ listing of all hazardous materials and quantities. After review, all app cable code requizemezats wiU be issued to applicant. lvlatez9a] Safety Data Sheets (N1SD5) for hazardous materials shall be readily available on the premises. I Technical report(s) may be required (without clparge to the fire district) to deternzine the acceptability of technologies, processes, products, facilities, materials, and uses attending the design, operation or use of a building or prezfzises. The opinions and report shall be prepared by a! gzaalified engineer, specialist, laboratory, or &re safety specialty organization acceptable td the fire district. [] Technical report not required. [] Technical report required. ~n° F,." :.. i 11/20/2002 12:07 8264566 JCFD3 SUS OFC PAGE 05 10. DUMP5TER5 AND CONTAINERS j i [xj Dumpsters aad containers with $n individual capacity of 1.5 cubic yards (40.5 cubic feet) or more shall dot be stored in buildings or place closer than 5 ft. from a building. 11. ELECTRICAL WIRING [x] Electrical wiring shall be in accordance with the "National Electrical Code." 12. SPRAX FINISHING [] All spray fuushing operations uti~izittg tlawzuable and combustible liquids shall be conducted in a spray booth or spray room constructed in accordance with the "UmfolY>~ Building Code" and maintained in accordance with the provisions a~the "Uniform Fire Code." I [] Spray booth or spray rdom required (see Special Requirements mrmber 15). Spray bt}oth and rooms require a "mechanical permit" from the BuildinglDepartment [] ,Approval by fire district required. i 13. HIGH PILED STORAGE [] Any building that is used fq~r storage over 12 ft, shall meet the requir~eroents of "article 81" ~f the "Uniform Fire Code." Contact Fire District No. 3 for regnirergents. 14. FUEL DISPENSING [] Not aIIowed ' [j State Fire Marshal PI'rRl~ll'1' A~'PLICATION required 15. SPECIAL REQUIREMEhTTS [x] A. Trocxtion of Hydrants shall be approved by the lire district prior to constzuction. [x] B. Kitchen shall have an approve hood and duct system and comply with extinguishment system requirements. (ie~ ~UL300 system.) °:1 ~,- 6 ~~.~2e~~ee~ ~~.e~ ~zsa~s~ sc~a~ qua arc ~a~E e~ 3 [x~ C. Com~iete set o~'plaz~s for fire district review is required ~`or our additional con~r~e~.ts. [~ D~. dick here to ester iard"o . E ~x~ ~ "dire end Life Safety Inspec~iott" is required ~y Fire District No. 3 prior tt~ opening i"ar busin+ess.; Cor4tact the districf at 826y'71.Eifl to schedule an inspection. ~#' you have any questions regard this revie~ or tc~ schedule a meeti~z~ to discuss any pt~rtion o£ the "Ux~if`orm Fire Code" requirements, ples.se ~cozat~ct ~~ark ~. Ivloxan, piaxzs reviewer, at 826-'7100. E Lou gliatta Fire MarslZal ~''lar~s revx~;Wad by; sari; E. ~Ora.z~ i ~~ ~. `:~> 5 Cerlfral Point Masonic Lodge ~ 1/27"/2(1Q2 ~.I~7"~' CAF C.:~'NT'~ I''L?INT I'irTBL.IC tY~D.R`KS .DE~'AR Z~YIL"NZ' Date:: __ December 3f`~, 2f}02 Applicant; :.Central Point 1Vlasonic dodge . . P,O: Box 3751 Cents! Point, Greg©n 97502 Project: Central Point Masonic Lodge Location: Intersection of Hamrick Road and New Naven Roar Zoning: R-1~8 Legal: 3~ 21N 01 BB TL - '19 00 Area: ~1.~8 Ades Units: 1 -Lodge Plans: Central Paint IVlasonic Lodge Alpha Grqup, Architectural and Engineering, L.~:.C. 6180 Shady Brook Driv-e Central Point, C)regc~n 0?5012 Public rit Purpose Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant {hereinafter referred to as "Developer"} regarding City Public Works Department {PUVD} standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed. Gather information from the DeveloperlEngineer regarding the proposed development. Special Requirements 1. Existing /nfrastructure: The Developer shall demonstrate that all connections to existing infrastructure ~i.e. streets, water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems, natural drainage systems, etc,} will not interFere with or provide for the degradation ofi the existing effective level of service or operation of the infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities Dave either adequate capacities to accommodate the flows and/or demands imposed on the existing infrastructure as the result of the connection of the proposed development's infrastructure, or will be improved by and at the expense of the Developer to accommodate the additional flows and/or demands; while maintaining or improving the existing level of service of the affected facility, as approved by {as applicable}, the regulatory agency, utility owner, and/or property owner involved. a~ ~.# ~ °-- Cer~tra! Point Masonic Lodge 111.27'I2tJ(?2 2 2. Driveway C3esi_gn: To allow for the heavy traffic which may exist on the Masonic Lodge Driveway/Access Road during the construction ofi Don Jones Park, it is the recommendation of the City of Central Point Public Works Department that the street section be designed in accordance with City of Central Point Public Works Standards for a typical street section which wou#d #nclude. {8-inches of 4" shale, 6-inches of ~l" crushed rock, and a 3-inch lift of class "B" Asphalt}. 3. Sidewalks: The City of Central Point Public Works Department is recommending Sidewalk to be constructed along the entire length of the northwest property boundary excluding the driveway access. Sidewalks, curb & gutter should continue along both sides of the driveway access road extending to Don Jones Park. Commercial driveway aprons designed following the guidelines of City of Central Point Public Works Department Standard for construction should provide access to the North & South parking areas. 4. Storm Drainage Infrastructure: The developer shall develop a facility plan for the storm drain col#eetion and conveyance system which provides for run-off from and nin- on onto the proposed development, any future development on adjacent properties, and any areas deemed by the City that will need to tie-into the proposed development's storm water collection and conveyance system. ~. Existin_g Landsea_pe. Currently the subject property comains a diverse variety of trees and vegetation. Prior to development a City of Central Point Arborist shall evaluate the existing landscape, and mark appropriate trees for removal. 6. Right ot~-Wav DedicationlDeceleration lane• The City of Centra# Point Public Works Department is requesting right-of-way dedication to allow for a deceleration lane when approaching the Masonic Lodge entrance from the southwest. Furthermore, the Public Works Department is requesting right-of-way dedication to allow for the construction along the entire northwest property boundary. A Concern about possible conf#ict between existing grave locations in the adjacent cemetery and proposed dedicated right-of-way bas been expressed to the City ofi Central Point. Clarification regarding the location of existing gravesites versus the proposed area for sidewalk wi#1 be required before final plan approval. 7. Shared Parking: The proposed parking areas provide 51 parking spaces. liven the square footage of the proposed Masonic Lodge `# 11 parking spaces will be required. The City of Central Point is prepared to allow the additional 60 necessary parking spaces to be provided by the Parking area located on the interior of Don Jones Park through a shared parking agreement between the City of Central Point and the Masonic Lodge. S. Jackson County Comments: ,The tentative site plan for the Central Point Masonic Lodge was submitted to Jackson County for review and comment. Jackson County responded with the following comments: ~~;~ e~ Central Point Masonic Lodge 19I2TI2~t12 3 o The applicant shall submit construction drawings to ~Iackson County Roads and Parks Services and obtain county permits if required Additional right-of-way is required for the deceleration lane improvements, dedication should be required before permits are issued. City of Central Point standards may be utilized for road improvement if the City agrees, in writing, to future maintenance. © The applicant shall obtain a road approach permit from Roads and Parks Services for the new road approach to Hamrick Road. The paved approach shall have 3t~' approach radii and a 30' minimum width. Also, the road shall line up with New Haven Road to the West. General All construction of public improvements shall conform to the City's PWD Standards, the conditions approved and stipulated by the Planning Commission, and other special specifications, details, standards, andlor upgrades as may be approved by the City Administrator or his designee prior to the approval of the construction plans for the proposed development. During construction, changes proposed by the Developer shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's engineer to the City PWD {and l;3uilding Department, as applicable} for approval prior to implementation. 2. Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals and conditions as may be required by other agencies, including, but not limited to, the Qregon Departmenfi of Fish and Wildlife (D1=W}, {~regon Department of Environmental Quality {DEQ}, Qregon Division of State hands {DSL}, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers {ACC~E}, affected irrigation districts, and 4D~}T. ~. Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. If feasible, the Developer's engineer or surveyor should provide the drawings in both a "hard copy" form (produced on Mylar°} and in a "digital" format compatible with AutoCAD°, or other form as approved by the City PWD. 4. "As-built" drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line" changes to final approved construction plans that identify the locations and or elevations {as appropriate} of actual installed items, including, but not limited to, invert, inlet, and rim or lip elevations, spot elevations identified on drawings, road alignment, water lines, values, and fire hydrants, water and sewer lateral stationing, modifications to street section, manhole and curb inlet locations, street light locations, other below grade utility line locations and depths, etc. Provide a "red-line" hard copy {on Mylar°} or an approved alternative format, of construction drawings, and if feasible, an acceptable AutoCAD° compatible drawing electronic file to the City at completion of construction and prior to acceptance of public infrastructure facilities completed as part of the proposed development, or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee. ta ~ :.; r ;.. Central Point Masonic Ladge 7 9I2712t~02 4 5. All elevations used on the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on the permanent benchmark steal[ be tied into an established City approved benchmark and be so noted on the plans. At least one permanent benchmark shall be provided for the proposed development, the location of which shall be as jointly determined by the City PWD and the Developer. 6. If applicable, all existing concrete, pipe, building materials, structures, clear and grub materials, and other deleterious materials shall be removed from the site and either recycled or properly disposed of in accordance with the requirements of the DEQ. 7, Easements for City infrastructure {i.e. sanitary sewer, water, and storm drain [if applicablej} should be a minimum of ~ ~-feet wide, and should not split lot lines. Easements for public storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and water lines should be dedicated to the City and not just a P.U.E. Centerline of buried infrastructure shall be aligned a minimum of five {~} feet from the edge of the easement. if two or more City owned utilities are located within an easement, then a minimum 20-foot width should be required. Easement dedications in final deeds or CC&Rs need a statement, which should clearly indicate that easements must be maintained with suitable, all-weather, drivable vehicular access to City public infrastructure facilities, as determined by the City PWD, 8. Prior to the City PWD final approval of the construction plans for the proposed improvements, the following should be submitted: / A copy of written approval from l=ire District #3 of the final street and driveway layout, site access, fire hydrant placement, and water system improvement plans for the proposed development. ~ The plans relating to the sanitary sewers should be approved in wri#ing by BCV~A, and the appropriate signature blocks should be completed on the plans. / A copy of written approval from C}DQT regarding highway improvements {as applicable}. J. Field verify all existing infrastructure elevations and locations {i.e. pipe inverts, curb elevations, top of banks, ditch/channel inverts, street elevations, etc.}, to which the proposed development's infrastructure will connect into existing improvements, prior to final construction plan design and submittal for final approval. 1 g. overhead power lines. if applicable, coordinate efforts with Pacific Power and Light, Qwest, and Charter Communications, to convert any overhead electrical power, telephone, or cable facilities within the proposed development to underground facilities, prior to the acceptance by the City PWD of the public improvements associated with the proposed development, All agreements and costs associated with the conversion of these facilities from overhead to underground facilities shall be by ~:~ ~~ ~.. ~ ~_. Central Paint Masonic badge '~ 9127l20fJ2 5 and between the utility owners and the Developer. ~ 1. The accurate locations of any existing underground and above ground public infrastructure, and the location of the associated easements with these facilities, shall be accurately portrayed {both horizontally and vertically} on the construction plans and as-built drawings. 12. The Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide to the Public Works Deparkment a drawing of the recorded Final Plat map reproduced on Mylar®and in an acceptable electronic form in AutoCAD° format. The Final Plat shall be tied to a legal Government corner and the State Plane Coordinate System. The Final Plat shall either reflector be later modified to reflect any applicable "redline" changes noted in the construction "as-bunts", at the discretion of the City Administrator or his designee. Streets/Traffic D EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE ^ Hamrick Road ^ New Haven Road Construction drawings far this Tentative Plan shall include a Street Lighting PlanlDriveway Lighting Plan in accordance with the requirements of the City PWD or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee. The construction drawings shall include clear vision areas designed to meet the City's PWD Standards. 2. The Developer's engineer shall, at the cost of the Developer, evaluate the strength of the native soils and determine the driveway/street section designs to accommodate the expected loads {including fire equipment} to be traveled on these driveways. If a public street, then the City will design the required street section. Storm Drainage, Irrigation Improvements © EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE ^ 18" storm drain {Hamrick Road} Developer's engineer shall develop a facility plan for the storm drain collection, retention, and conveyance system {SD System} which provides for storm water run-off from and run-on onto the proposed development {either surface run-on or culvert or creek/ditch conveyance}, any existing or future development on adjacent properties, conveyed storm drainage, or surface water flow, and any areas deemed by the City that will need to connect-into the proposed development's SD System. ~. Roof drains and under drains shall not be directly connected to public storm drain lines, and shall drain to the street. ~. Any discharge points of the storm water facilities shall be designed to provide an aesthetically pleasing, useful, and low maintenance facility, that are designed to t~ ~~ Central Paint Masonic Lodge 9 9I2TI20f12 6 mitigate erosion, damage, or loss during a 100-year storm event; and that mitigate the "attractive nuisance" hazards associated with these types ofi facilities. 4. Prior to City PWD construction plan review, the Developer shall provide the City PV1ID with a complete set of hydrologic and hydraulic calculations and profile plots for sizing the SD system, which shall incorporate the use of the City PWD's rainfall/intensity curve, and City approved run-off coefficients, curve numbers, retardanCe, pipe roughness Coefficients, etc., that are used in the engineering calculations. ~. Storm drainpipe materials shall be PVC, NDPE, or reinforced Concrete, with watertight joints. Provide concrete or sand-cement slurry encasement where required in areas of minimum Cover. Sanitary Sewer All sanitary sewer collection and Conveyance system {SS System} design, construction and testing shall conform to the standards and guidelines of the C}regon DEQ, 1990 APWA Standards Uregon Chapter, Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority {BCVSA}, and the City PWD Standards, where applicable. 2. The Construction plans and the "as-built" drawings steal! identify lateral stationing for construction of sewer laterals. 3. The City upon completion of initial construction plan review and pre#iminary approval, will forward the plans to BCVSA for completion of the review process. Upon completion of the review by BCVSA, completion of final revisions to the plans by the Developer's engineer, and following the final approval and signature on the construction plans by BCVSA, the Public Works Director will approve the plans in final form. 4. All testing and video inspection of lines and manholes shall be done in accordance with BCVSA requirements, at Developer's expense. The Developer shall provide BCVSA and the City with test reports, TV reports and certification of the sewer system Construction prior to final acceptance. Water System a EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE ^ 16" Ductile Iron Waterline {Hamrick Road} 12" Ductile Iron Waterline {New Haven Road} 1. Developer shall Comply with Uregon Nealth Division {C3ND} and City requirements for backflow prevention, 2, The Developer's engineer shall consult Fire District #3, and Comply with any and all suggestions regarding fire protection. -~ ~~w ... Central Point Masonic Lodge ? 1I27I2Q(JZ 7 3. Each building shall be served by a separate water meter. ~. Construction drawings shall include the size, type, and location of all water mains, hydrants, air valves, service connections, and other appurtenance details in accordance with City PWD Standards and as required by the City PWD. ~. Water system shall be tested in accordance with City PWD Standards and requirements at Developer's expense and must be approved by the City. 6. Specifications far the design and construction of the water system shall be in accordance with City PWD standards. Site work, Grading, and Utility Plans 1. Grading plans should have originallexisting grades and final grades plotted an the plan. Typically, existing grade contour lines are dashed and screened back, and final grade contour Tines are overlaid an top of the existing grades and are in a heavier line width and solid. Contour Tines should be labeled with elevations. 2. All structures shall have roof drains, area drains, andlor crawl spaces with positive drainage away from the building ar structure. 3. Provide City with a utility plan approved by each utility company, which reflects all utility line locations, crossings, transformer locations, valves, etc. 4. Utility locations musfi be accurately included an the as-built drawings, or as a separate set of drawings attached to the as-built drawings. Rights of WayslEasernents 1. if applicable, Developer shall provide a Statement of Water Rights {on a City approved form}, for any affected properties. t=ar properties determined to have water rights, the developer will coordinate with the State Water master the re-allacatian of any waters attached to lands na longer irrigable as a result of the proposed development. .:. ,.~ ATTAC~IMENT Z< RECOMMENDED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIC}NS ©F APPROVAL The Final flat application shall be co~~npleted and released by the City before construction plans can proceed far the Lodge. 2. The approval of the Site Plan shall expire in one year on Dece~nbcr 3, x{}03 unless an application for a building perz~it or an application for extension has been received by the City. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan depicting any changes discussed and approved at the public hearing within G0 days ofPlanning Commission approval. 3. The coffee stand will require a zone modification before plans can be submitted for the activity. 4. The project must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations . ~ ,;x PLANNING ~EPARTMEN`I' STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT. Appl~cazzt/ nti~~,~~~ Decez~~ber 3, 2002 Central Point Planning Com-z~ission Matt Saz~~itorc, Con-zzrzunity Planner Public Hearing _ To consider a Tentative Plan fora 5 lot subdivision at 881 Isaac Way {372W 11 DA Tax Lot 400}. Michael A. & Janet M. Sowell 861 Isaac Way Central Point, ©regon 97502 Agent: Herbert A. Farber 120 Mistletoe Street Medford, Uregon 97501 Szzznma~~y: The applicant has submitted a development proposal to subdivide 1.66 acres ofland into 5 residential Tots. This tentative plan is located within a R-2, Residential Two-Family zone. Authczrity: CPMC 1.24.(}5(} vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decisioaz on any application for a Tentative Plan. Notice of the Public Kean-ing eras given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060. Applirab~e Law: CPMC 16.10.010 et seq. Tentative Plans CPMC 1'7.24.01 {~ et seq. Residential Two Family District CPMC 1236.010 et seq. Trees Discussion: The applicants, Michael az~d Janet Sowell are requesting that a 1.66 acre parcel at 881 lssac Way be subdivided into 5 separate parcels {Attachment A}. CPMC 17.24.050 requires that interior lots have a zniniznuzn area of 6,000 square feet and 7,000 feet for corner Tots. These area requirements have been met by the applicant. Setback requirements for the parcels will be 20 feet for front lot lines, five feet setback for interioz• side yards, and 10 feet for the rear yard. There are several large trees on the lot that must be preserved according to municipal code. A znap showing the locations and types of the trees shall be submitted to the City before any tree is removed and before a final plat is approved {refer to Attachment "E"}. C}nce a map is subzllitted the City, file Parks crew will evah~ate the healthiness of file trees. The City will work with lizture builtlez-s to etlsure file ~llaxiznunl amount of trees can be preserved. Neighboring property owners were notified by mail {Attachment B}and the Planning Department received a letter From James Kothc at 124C} Marilee Street (Attachment C }. Mr. Kothe leas stated lie would like the City to purchase the property for all area parr. The City has beczl looking at property further to the North for parkland, but llas zlot considered the lssac Way property. Since the owner plans to retain lot #1 the remaining "park" area would only result izl three quartez-s of a€l acre. The Planning and Public Works Departments reviewed the proposed subdivision and concluded that they comply with city requirements and all conditions of approval pertaining to site deveiopzllent, minimum lot size, public works standards and specifications and access to public roadways (Attachments E and F}. Sidewalks will be required for all of the tax lots. All of the manufactured homes will be removed from the site, A building permit must be issued if file applicant chooses to demolish the manufactured homes. Fire District No. 3 commented (Attachment D} that the applicant will need to provide a revised znap with fire hydrant locations to the fire district prior to construction. There is no coznzment from BCVSA.. Firtdings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Tentative Subdivision CPMC 16.1 t~,01 ~} requires that applications for tentative plans be submitted with iznpz-ovezment plans azld other supplementary information as znay be needed to indicate the development plan. ^ The proposed tentative subdivision. satisfies the €•equirements listed in CPMC 11.36.030 and CPMC 11.36.040. CPMC 17.24.{}S{} establishes zninimuzn area, width and access requirements for file R-2, Residential Two-Family district. ^ Ali parcels of the proposed tentative subdivision meet the area, width and access requirements far the R-2, Residential Two-Family District. CPMC 12.36.U80 establishes that evezy effort should be made to retaizl existing trees on public or private property as an integral part of the development process. The planning cozmznission shall zmake evezy effort to modify setback requirements to include existing trees. ^ A map showing the trees an the lot must be submitted to the City prior to any ccznstr€€ction or final plat. ~ ,,._ Reco~mznendatic~n: Staff recazxzznends that the Piannizzg Caznz~zission take one of the falIawing actioczs: i . Adapt Resolution Na._ ___, a~praviz~g tine Tentative Sut~divisian of 37 2V~ I i DA Tax Lat 4~t~ subject to the recaz~znended canditians afapprovai (Attachment C}; ar 2. Deny the proposed Tentative Subdivision; ar 3, Continue the review of the Tentative Subdivision at the discretion of the Cozz~zz~ission. Attachrnents~ A. Tentative Plat B. Notice afPubiic Hearing C. Letter frazrz I1rIz-. i~.othe D. Letter from Fire District Na. 3 E. Punning Department Recoznznended Conditions of Approval F. Public Works Staff Report G:13'1 ~~ani~lgl(?2f172. ~,v~ci .~' ~~ , mQREc1 G! E:N rxfi.SE ru 2ORiNG k--?. 7`~N TA Tt VE' SLJBL>! VfSlC7N !'L.A T ISAAC WAY SUHDtt/tSfON A REPEAT OF' PARCEL NO. 2, J'-.37-T995 taecied ir: SOUTHEAST ONE QUARTER OF SEC7?ON 7t TOWNSHIP 3? SOU7H, RANGE 2 WEST 6SlfLLAMETTE ME'RtIJtAN, ,JACKSON COt1NTY, OREGON {Of rJV;'NEFfjAPPLtCAR r oRSS? cLEnt --~ _ .~... - -r--- - - MJGNAEi. A. & JANET M. S©WELL ~ Et81 ?SAAG WfiY ----------~~ ~ ~ C£N7RAL PJIfV 7, tJFtECD,N 97502 ( ~ i vlclnrrrr fu;Ar- ~`G'RESr GLEItir F'ri FtSE' Ill sJn .<o9s loi t52 r o; 14,^. Let 74i Lsst 191 G3~~ emu, ~~~ ~ lot i4& s Cot i49 Lo! ;5G ~ r Lot 2!9 ~_ 75.CC, zu8. .rr. ° LQr 4 lag R-t'L 5' ~~ 4r -; 1 crc~a^:c :t~:c~ ~~~ lac~'a~r t z~ ~'--~r~-- r°,w t nor spa r.~o sr..~,e :acs . ~c .4:~G.~t ?. 1 t~ ~ ~-~t I NOTES j~ na. r x I 1 y cad ~Qr 2 ~~ ~ ~' ~' _ -- ...ry'v~> „ .. i~ PA s~,"70N GAwnGQ a ui-~iS71o cQ, r=tg7' 4 p~} iN ~~S. ~r ~ 4 -7ato+ urec = GB acres ~i{? t ~; r'L ~ ~ ~oS n_ ~ :'.CUSe p 1 11 _ ~ i i &1 SO. ~1C0'~ t ( 6nE:E7.E YhY cr. J ~ LOt ~ i iG' f R~~G f -SS - -SS SS--SS- SS-SS ~SS-SS---SS-~ SS- S _..._ -____ ..-45~-°-i~ ~,.._...._. _ ._._._-_ ~W-W-I~- W--W-W-W-VF-W-W-Yr~--3h;---V.'-i~--lf~-~t3~-~ lSF.AC' IJFiY ~ - ~____~~ ~ ~ 1 Lot "9 I r tot S ~ LG~ R7 {.Qt SJ Le. 3v I F . ~ UOt Tj~j l t l+ 3 Z ~ ( . a Lot I ~ E E ~_! ~ € I I II 1 VALLEY RCYlv7 I~HAuE !I Zt7N1ty~G RW 2 I A SS: SS^?.~' n:AX I;i,l: nz, 3y p;y Jtt}h 7!. 5LD Sheet 7 of 1 Lot 36i -Avercga fat wren - :~SCS+ SR 1t VFtLLE}` F'Q1N7 "Cerrtrct aoint Scraai C7tstrtc: - -Frro Qiw=r1Ct tj .~ PHASI it! -t3ear Creek vctlef Sont;atio» stufho<;,y ZC1fVlittG f,~... ~7 -ftt ttti;t;t ie~ Avoi7abfc+ 7rrcuah Scr~iGe Carrecca -Nab;fe Homes V.rii7 Se RBrrtoveC t;r Adi;ts.eC 7a C'omply Nti:Y. SE! F~nCks ktt~GE P}itE Lct 3C2 re~at~xsnt:a taf zaj PROFESSIONAL LATSD SITRVEYOR aREgCri ax,r 25, 1885 rf3r:~R'^1d8 ARa;N Lot 3C~ ~ChCWh4 Dh3: te'-3/-OS 5urvey¢c' by: FARBER & SONS, INC. d6a FAR81~R SURYENNG (64fi} ?78-0848 4t-F'iCE LOCA7;pr.: r.4AlL tA~G Anc?fcE55. ". 20 NtSFLE7^vE A. C1 80}. 5x'86 ME'7FORt7, {7R£GCN 3?St37 CctJ TRAt RCftd 7, ptiE GOk 975L12 t}A tf: CC:Of3:R 2~, 2GC2 rw rc.: a:~on-oa on~+:xC rcc: Joo.~crurx.: ra„r~vuecY wH rc r.r cc nc., Co-r~,senrutrn. ~sa.c n~h r,r,x °~ ~ e• I~L1~.NN~N~ L1~.~'.1-~.~.~~'~'~~'N`~' 'I'o~x~ 13t~r~~~~k~rey, AICI' ]'lr~rrr~ir}~; t)irect.or Kc;n ~~rsc,laier Cornrl~r~r~it.y ~'la~~~~~r Maf,t. ~arr~iLot'~ Comrnunit.y I'Ianraer I)avc~ ~lrkens F'lann~n~ Tectxnician ~atice a~' Meel~ing Da>~e ©f Notzce: Novem~~r 12, 24~~ Meeting Date: Tune: Place: NATURE OF MEETING December 3, 2002 7.00 p.m. (Approximate) Central Point City HaII 155 South Second Street Central Point, Uregon Beginning at the above time and glace, the Central Point Planning Commission will review a tentative subdivision application that would create 5 lots on a 1.b6 acre parcel near the intersection of Isaac Way and Marilee Avenue. The parcel is located in the R-2, Residential Two Family zoning district and is identified in the records of the Jackson County Assessor as Map 37 2W 11DA, Tax Lot 400, CRITERIA FUR DECISIUN The requirements for Tentative Subdivisions are set forth in Chapter 15 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Regulations, Off~street parking, Site Flan, Landscaping and Construction flans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the Cites Public Works Standards, PUBLIC COMMENTS 1, Any person interested r`n commenting on tl~e above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, December 3, 2002. 2. Written comments maybe sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City hall, 155 South Second. Street, Central Point, UR X7502, ,~ ~~ :} 3. Issues which nxay provide the basis for an appeal on the matters slxall be raised prior to tl~e expiration ofthe coznzxxcnt period noted above. Any testimony and wz-itten comments about the decisions described above wall need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planing Coznzxxissiozx. ~#. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, 15S South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Departzxxezzt at (~41) 6~~€- 3321 ext. 292, SUMMARY CtF_PR(~CEDU~:E At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staffreports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments ozi the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or tentative subdivision application. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be infornxed about all Planning Commission decisions, --° --- 9~3/ 1r31 1174 4172 1135 :47 849 1485 1582 1137 851 855 857 $59 863 865 869 871 873 875 877 879 883 887 895 897 1192 1139 4 1281 #242 888 888 898 848 8:A 856 856 -- 874 872 878 878 882 s356 845 853 }, ~ 1252 ~N 1222 848 92251242 9243 1252 12x1 ~- 1z7z 1243 y, --'-- 1245 PropeEfi 3247 1248 1z~ 4z14 ____ ~ 1249 `~ 1224 1231 1251 1261 1z74 873 ISAAC YY I 881 ~~~ Z ' }Q- E!J 862 868 874 874 878 882 886 894 892 887 865 8G9 873 877 881 885 891 899 942 958 878 99a 1222 1224 1za1 12x4 1226 1247 1230 1259 Q lzaa t! ! 1271 r~. . V .-~ 4248 d 1283 9S4 953 959 982 "7 out Sewn Street ®Central Point CAP 975021 {541} G64-3321 ~ £~ax: (541 ~b4-638 _ ______ . ss 1i 1i 979 fry ~ ~ A~ c, `~ . `~ ~t~ .~ ~" ~ ~ ~ ~ .:,~ ~~"~ i`~ n' "`I ~ jam! r~. ~ ~- ~~~~ ~ ~ ~,~, -~ `~ ~ ~- ~~ z ~~ ~~ ~.,. ~~ ~.~~ ~ ~~'~-- ~` ~~ ~ ~' u ~~~ .. ~._> ~.. 11{20,~2~~2 11.37 82645F6 FIRE DIST ~JCFI~3 81~~ OF'C PACE @2I~J3 I I ~ ~~~~' ~~~' ~~. ~ ,~AC~so~ c~ulvr~ 8333 AGA'T~ ROAD, VI+~11T~ CI,'T'Y', QR~Gt7N 97503.1075 ~5~~.) 826-710Q ~ ~5~1~ 826-566 'mo'd .corn i November ~4, 2#~C32 City of Cents! Point At~n~ Ken Gerschler x.55 S. 2`~ St Central Point, Oregon 975012 F i Fire District ~3 Commence: Isaac Way SWipdivision The plat map provided does not show firs hydrant Ivcation, (Jwner applicant will need to provide a revised map with h~rdrant locations to the fire district for approval Prior to construction, .r~~ d~ E Mark Moran Deputy dire Marshal a PLANNING DEPARTMENT CE~NDITIC3NS C}F AFPRUVAL The approval of the Tentative Ilan shall expi~-c in one year o~~ Decetl~ber 3, 20(}3 u~zless an application for final plat or extension has been received by the City. 2. The subdivision must comply with all applicable local, state anti federal regulations. 3. The property owner shall preserve several existing large cedar trees that are located along the southerly property boundazy. C}ther trees on the property should be kept when possible. The owner/developer shall submit a snap depicting the location and type of trees on the site. Said snap must be received and will be evaluated prior to the approval of any i~nproven~ent plans and for a final plat. G:iP 1 ~~t n i n x;102 {7? 2. wpd Isaac; Way Subdivision 9 9/2712f1f12 3 or lip elevations, spot elevations identified on drawings, road alignment, water lines, valves, and fire hydrants, water and sewer lateral stationing, modifications to street section, manhole and curb inlet locations, street fight locations, other below grade utility line locations and depths, etc. Provide a "red-line" hard copy {on Mylar~'} or an approved alternative format, of construction drawings, and if feasible, an acceptable AutoCAD® compatible drawing electronic file to the City at completion of construction and prior to acceptance of public infrastructure facilities completed as part of the proposed development, or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee. 5. All elevations used on the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on the permanent benchmark shall be tied into an established City approved benchmark and be so noted on the plans. At ]east one permanent benchmark shall be provided for the proposed development, the location of which shall be as jointly determined by the City PWD and the Developer. 6. if applicable, all existing concrete, pipe, building materials, structures, clear and grub materials, and other deleterious materials shall be removed from the site and either recycled or properly disposed of in accordance with the requirements of the D~Q. ~. Easements for City infrastructure {i.e. sanitary sewer, water, and storm drain [if applicable]} should be a minimum of '15-feet wide, and should not split lot lines. Easements for public storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and water lines should be dedicated to the City and not just a P.U.E, Centerline of buried infrastructure shall be aligned a minimum of five {5} feet from the edge of the easement, if two or more City owned utilities are located within an easement, then a minimum 0-foot width should be required. Easement dedications in final deeds or CC&Rs need a statement, which should clearly indicate that easements must be maintained with suitable, all-weather, drivable vehicular access to City public infrastructure facilities, as determined by the City PWD. 8. Prior to the City PWD final approval of the construction plans for the proposed improvements, the following should be submitted; A copy of written approval from Fire District #~ of the final street and driveway layout, site access, fire hydrant placement, and water system improvement plans for the proposed development. ~' The plans relating to the sanitary sewers should be approved in writing by BCVSA, and the appropriate signature blocks should be completed on the plans. ~ A copy of written approval from C7D{~T regarding highway improvements {as applicable}. 9. Field verify all existing infrastructure elevations and locations {i.e. pipe inverts, curb elevations, top of banks, ditchlchannel inverts, street elevations, etc.}, to which the proposed development's infrastructure will connect into existing improvements, prior to Isaac; Way Subdivision 19I27I20t}2 4 final construction plan design and submittal for final approval. ~ ~3. Overhead power fines. if applicable, coordinate efforts with Pacific Power and Light, G2west, and Charter Communications, to convert any overhead electrical power, telephone, or cable facilities within the proposed development to underground facilities, prior to the acceptance by the City PWD of the public improvements associated with the proposed development. Alf agreements and costs associated with the conversion of these facilities from overhead to underground facilities shall be by and between the utility owners and the Developer. 11. The accurate locations of any existing underground and above ground public infrastructure, and the location of the associated easements with these facilities, shall be accurately portrayed (both horizontally and vertically} on the construction plans and as-built drawings. '12. The Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide to the Public Works Department a drawing of the recorded Final Plat map reproduced on Mylar®and in an acceptable electronic form in AutoCAD° format. The Final Plat shah be #ied to a legal Government corner and the State Plane Coordinate System. The Final Plat shall either reflector be Eater modified to reflect any applicable "red-line'° changes noted in the construction "as-bunts", at the discretion of the City Administrator or his designee. Streets/Traffic © EXISTING 1NFRASTRtJCTURE ^ Isaac Way ^ Marilee Street Construction drawings for this Tentative Plan shall include a Street Lighting Plan/Driveway Lighting Plan in accordance with the requirements of the City PWD or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee. The construction drawings shall include clear vision areas designed to meet the City's PWD Standards. 2. The Developer's engineer shall, at the cost of the Developer, evaluate the strength of the native soils and determine the driveway/street section designs to accommodate the expected loads {including fire equipment} to be traveled on these driveways. If a public street, then the City will design the required street section. Storm Drainage, Irrigation Improvements © EX1STiNG INFRASTRUCTURE ^ 15-inch Storm Drain (Marilee Street} ^ Curb Inlet ~lntersection of Marilee Street & Isaac Way} ^ Curb Inlet (Intersection of Isaac Way & Heather Lane} Developer's engineer shall develop a facility plan for the storm drain collection, retention, and conveyance system {SD System} which provides for storm water run-off Isaac Way Subdivision 7 9127'/2f/02 5 from and run-on onto the proposed development {either surface run-on or culvert or creek/ditch conveyance}, any existing or future development on adjacent properties, conveyed storm drainage, or surface water flow, and any areas deemed by the Gity that will need to connect-into the proposed development's SD System. 2. Roof drains and under drains shall not be directly connected to public storm drain lines, and shall drain to the street. 3, Any discharge points of the storm water facilities shall be designed to provide an aesthetically pleasing, useful, and low maintenance facility, that are designed to mitigate erosion, damage, or loss during a ~ 019-year storm event; and that mitigate the "attractive nuisance" hazards associated with these types of facilities. 4. Prior to City PWD construction plan review, the Developer shall provide the City PWD with a complete set of hydrologic and hydraulic calculations and profile plots for sizing the SD system, which shall incorporate the use of the City PWD's rainfalllintensity curve, and City approved run-off coefficients, curve numbers, retardance, pipe roughness coefficients, etc., that are used in the engineering calculations. ~. Storm drainpipe materials shall be PVC, HDP~, or reinforced concrete, with watertight joints. Provide concrete or sand-cement slurry encasement where required in areas of minimum cover. Sanitary Sewer All sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system {SS System} design, construction and testing shall conform to the standards and guidelines of the aregon DEQ, 19901 APWA Standards Oregon Chapter, E3ear Greek Valley Sanitary Authority {BGVSA}, and the City PWD Standards, where applicable. 2. The construction plans and the "as-built" drawings shall identify lateral stationing for construction of sewer laterals. 3. The City upon completion of initial construction plan review and preliminary approval, will forward the plans to BGVSA for completion of the review process. Upon completion of the review by BGVSA, completion of final revisions to the plans by the Developer's engineer, and following the final approval and signature on the construction plans by BCVSA, the Public Works Director will approve the plans in final form. 4. All testing and video inspection of lines and manholes shall be done in accordance with BCVSA requirements, at Developer's expense. The Developer shall provide BCVSA and the City with test reports, TV reports and certification of the sewer system construction prior to final acceptance. Water System isaa~ way Subdivision ?' 9I2T/2Qf12 6 © PXISTING INFRASTRIJCTURI; ^ 8-inch Waterline (Isaac Way & Marilee Street} developer shall comply with C7regon Health Division ~QHD} and City requirements for backflow prevention. The Developer's engineer shall consult Fire District #3, and comply with any and all suggestions regarding fire protection. 3. Each building shall be served y a separate water meter. 4. Construction drawings shall include the size, type, and location of all water mains, hydrants, air valves, service connections, and other appurtenance details in accordance with City PWD Standards and as required by the City PWD. 5. Water system shall be tested in accordance with City PWD Standards and requirements at Developer's expense and must be approved by the City. 6. Specifications for the design and construction of the water system shall e in accordance with City PWD standards. Site work, Grading, and Utility Plans Grading plans should have original/existing grades and final grades plotted on the plan. Typically, existing grade contour lines are dashed and screened back, and final grade contour lines are overlaid on top of the existing grades and are in a heavier line width and solid. Contour lines should be labeled with elevations. ~. All structures shall have roof drains, area drains, and/or crawl spaces with positive drainage away from the building or structure. 3. Provide City with a utility plan approved by each utility company, which reflects all utility line locations, crossings, transformer locations, valves, etc. 4. Utility locations must be accurately included on the as-built drawings, or as a separate set of drawings attached to the as-built drawings. Rights of Ways/Easements If applicable, Developer shall provide a Statement of Water Rights {on a City approved form}, for any affected properties, For properties determined to have water rights, the developer will coordinate with the State Water master the re-allocation of any waters attached to lands no longer irrigable as a result of the proposed development. lot size being approximately 8,487 square feet (Attaclazaacnt A}. This proposed subdivision is one of seven distinct neighborhoods located within tlac Twin Creeks Development which lags been master plazaned with stringecat standards designed to ensure project quality and to create a form afcoznmucaity that lessens reliance upon the automobile by emphasizing public transportation, bicycle azad pedestrian activities. Jackson Oaks, Unit Numbers 2 and 3 is in compliance with the Twin Creeks Transit-Oriented Master Plan wllicla includes pedestrian and bicycle paths, traffic calming measures, open space, landscaping and street light standards. This development represents the beginning of the next phase in W.L. Maare's agreement with the City. The Comzrzission may recall that the applicants entered into apre-annexation development agreement with the City which established public izxzproveznent "triggers" tied to vehicle trips associated with the number of housing units. Griffzn Oaks and the first phase of Jackson Oaks was tied to the Haskell/Pine Street intersection improvements. Phases 2 and 3 of Jackson Oaks are tied to Highway 99 and Pine Street improvezrzents which axe now in the design stage. The Highway 99/Pine Street trigger could allow up to six ar seven hundred new housing units. It is likely that the Pine Street improvements will be under construction ~20{~4} before any of the new homes in this subdivision are completed. The Commission can conditionally approve this proposal contingent upon the City Council's annual review of the pre-annexation agreement and their concuzx'ence. Park and open space has been accommodated along the southerly boundary of the proposed neighborhood where a pedestrian path is Shawn to meander south and east of lot 13 to a pocket park immediately east of the subdivision boundary. There is a '7.23 acre parcel identified for civic use within the easterly fringe of the proposed subdivision. This should became the location of a new elementary school ar community center. The Punning Department recommends that a 1 foot wide "non-access strip"(Attachment C} lac positioned along the westerly periphery of the proposed subdivision so that access cannot be taken to this subdivision from adjoining properties. This access restriction would be lifted once the area is developed in accordance with the T.O,D. Master plan previously approved lay the City Council. The Rogue River Valley Irrigation District, Jackson County Fire District Number 3 and the Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority have been notified of the this tentative subdivision. Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority previously identified that there is a public sewer main located along Tulane Avenue and the service will lac extended north between fats 18 azad l9. The proposed water service will travel through the sazrze route. Fire Offzcials will require that the applicant provide a copy of maps with hydrant location far review by the district (Attachment D}. The Public Works Department has provided their comrxzents, recommendations and requirements ~ ~rt~. for this application which can be found in Attacl~~ncnt E, it should be noted that on-street l~arki~a~ maybe iimiteci to one side of tl~e street where there are 52 foot z-igl~t-of--ways. Findings of Fact aa~cl Conclusions of Law Staff suggests the following findings of fact anti conclusions of law as applicable to tl~e project and necessary for its approval. 1. The p~•oject site is located in the T4D-LMR (Low Mix Residential) a~~d TC1D-C {Civic} Zoning District and increases residential and mixed ~zse land use efficiency in this area. The proposed tentative plan for low mix residential development is a permitted use in the TCJD zoning district. The zoning in turn is consistent with the TC}D Comprehensive Plan map designation. The Comprehensive Plan encourages innovative residential planning and developmment techniques that would help to increase land use efficiency and reduce casts of utilities and services {Comprehensive flan, page X11-12). 2. The px•oject consists of a tentative plan application for the subdivision of approximately 2'7.1.'7 acres for the purpose of developing a mixed use development, Units 2 and 3 of the Jackson (7aks Subdivision. The total number of Tots proposed for what the applicants have identified as the second and third phases of their subdivision is 54 together with a 7.23 acre civic area. The proposed mixed use subdivision meets the density requirement for the TGD-LMR {Low IVlix Residential} Zoning District which is a maximum of 12 units per acre in the T4D-LMR. Each lot within the subdivision meets the requirements of the TC}D Design Requirements and Guidelines. The tentative plan includes all information required by CPMC 16.1 Q.(} 14 ct. seq. 3. The Planning and Public Works Departments have reviewed both the tentative plan for the proposed subdivision and the findings of fact and determined that the project meets all City standards and requirements subject to the recommended conditions found in Attachments E and F. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following action: 1. Adopt Resolution I~o.______, approving the tentative subdivision subject to the recommended conditions of approval; or . 2. Deny the tentative subdivision; or 3. Continue the review of the tentative subdivision at the discretion of the Co~n~mission. I-I;il' 1 a ra z7i r~ gt020'7S. ~vptl s.. :~. Attaehments• A. Copy ofTezttative Plat B. Notice of Public ~-~eaz°iz~~; C. Map to Identify Street Plug Placezxzez~t D. Coz-respondence Received froze Affected Agencies l~. Public Works Staff Repoz-t F. Planning I~}epartznez~t Reco~nzzzended Conditions ofApproval ~I:1F~l~nn ingto2075.~vpd ~~~ ~ p'K FtpC 'V07T'S ' 7NiS PRQJ£CT !S Nt7T 1N TttE tq0-'e't siR F'LQOfJ AREA PER F`#_DOD INSt112AtJCL`` `-R~A._7E MAP, COMMON7Tr-PANEL 1vuM6ER 4t55F39 t1zOZ i3, f1A?f:U nPt.rL t. 1962. _ ~ ~: 7 ~ 9- t 4P~ ~~ ,y'r ¢~~BJ RSbFST6RE:n aQ' ° U+" 3 Yra Y`j;~ '~+~` ,~mt, f'R4F~SIONAL $ i N~ ~ .O a :,;`~a' 3.+2 Zud413t} SE7t2VBY0E2 T224c 3tR. ~ c M .. sx.,o fia4z' s64z' 475 a d t66~ At 39. < .U.T 7G S9d5 ~ ~ ,Q PHRSEw I 1 i z7 ~~, ~~F~ ~o~h `} ~ 6A68' fi2.05 62.07 2Te9 ~ ' }W36 1~ ~ ~ ~~ REHEr.'H. bhTE ,2-3a-03 ~~ tr LIIT 57 0 ^+^ a..r y o-, 14657 5¢tt, ~#'1 '~ 11497 sq n-u, ~Ya ~=' ~'~ ~ n S °- '„ S .U ~ ~ c ? .' ~~ S 4 Ca~'O1161:sE R.It?GE ORtVE r .1~"' .".'.`--~~•~.r-~- 4 w - 237.74' 1 g4.56~ o. J ~ t ~ 2T '7 25'(26' LQY 47 ~ xr t29$'---.-,~'' s ~ y 70~ ~ T ~ 7328 s9.Rr ~ 37.p7 - 56533' , ° ~ EAi ~ fO4Sf Sq. LaY 46 6768 S4R ~~~ ~~ 6' Ft N ~ 501.42' _ ~ ~Sn Tr„~,#~ Lti _ LbT 4Fi L6T 5i +"1; 9&50 ~ 5626 50.R- ~ ~ 5855 $q,M. 1~Yt 8 11 °o WT 56 37.C0' Kn ~ ~ ,03.63' m°°5713 Sq.2 N L67 4+ 't w 5 LGT 53 98.56' {)' 5626 8q.tt .7467 5¢fL- ^~ ~67t3t ~/tL ~ 97.06' 96.5(3. Ott LOT i7 y„ '`..µ 582E Sq.Rn l 2T ~ L6T 52 97.06' ~Z~g ...r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7742 5Q.R. ~ L6T 42 37-2W-{}3C TL 268' lgf 3?~ 26' 26 SE46 S¢-RYO STE4E & JVLFA 6EN5TpY ~ .cy, Oy. 97 ~, lAi 4T +~ f ~ m, 64,96 5¢ft.;: 2Y 593.E rNTATt1/L SUBt}1Y1.5tC~N FLAN ' 67 JACKSON OAKS, PHASES !t 8c 111 betneT a Oart of T4l/1N Cf2EE"KS locnfed in tiTr sauTNw=ESr dNE-C}LIARTER ar SECl7dN s> TaNlNSH1P .37 5aUTH, RANGE 2 Y1EST, €YtLLAMET7'E ktERtUtAN, CITY dF CENTRAL PdINT, JACKSdN COt1NTY, aftEGDN for 7`WltJ CR,~EKS t}EVEL©Fl4t~tdT CO., LLC tdbT cncr ~+-~~~^^ ~~ U~ ~~tttx~ Foust ~~~~`~~ ~4~ft ~~ILS~,III~ J~~p~z-~eT1.'~ ~ ~ M ~ X7.9>~ PHA~~ ! f ! ~ rw~ra e,fzr~~s c.~c~sstr~ - Rl ~ ~ 0 52.1 ! ill1~ ] ~ 21$.dfi` n ~~5' E7~62TS~q 766 . 9656` 26' x6' LOF SO" ~ ~ ~~ ~~ iDi 34 $ ~ 7i2."r~uq.it ( 2Y » LtlT 32 ~i ii263 Sq. t ~ ~ • 1 ,59,42 ~ °`73675q.R ~ " ° LdT J4 4° ~ c ,~ 126.06 48.5x} ~ _ ~ ~ ?785 54n a ~ -..._.-"'. "3 Ct}T . ~ t "(SQ, f~' .}¢ ~` ~'' n ~ ~ o K !x9.62 ~ ur 1 "T35i S,T°R €€" ~ tbT 38 ~ ) lit ( T76.6a' ~ 7/85 Sgf4 '4& ' tN . f ~ *7s'r~ ~ ` ,~ ' ~p9 Sp ~ € ' o L6t 3D C !0094 S¢R ~ 76 97637 ` ~ ~ F7Xl754.R '` ~~ . ! ~,~ i ~ „" 6F ~~ ` 1 (~ A T~ // >nt ~ {L ~ 5,,~ V~L J-ifC~A ~' CA I .,i~f..`*.f .- ~ ,- 32&42' 519.45 - e°-e ~ ° 314990 S4.ff. *.... A 38' 38' S €'F-1A5~ I'I ~r+ r~iz€v~ ~ 7.zs AcRes i4.92 -J .-35.6D-.- ....25.OA ~.7S4.OD.. ..7 5~ I = ' ~ I t2Jr~, I G i C.. ~ 6L a° ~"$ E t"e1 `u ~utre e°a t"~ $ LOT 75 ~ ~ ,_,__ ~' s~ ~' ~n w ~ ~ gg '~ o~ ~ 12656 si rt. ~ ~ - I y ~ ~ 7594' 75.60' '~ 75.QD' 75.60' F10.90' ~ I ~ .^ 75.9D TS W' . •. 75.00 75.04' S4QD0' ~ ` l J I ~ ~~"} t wS 8 # ~ a ~ LOT 22 ~ tAT 23 $ T21I~0 Sq w a~'S R a 30 36 I .. n L6 K ~ ' 7 S . G" 7 _ 4 w ~` ~ t x ^ ~ ~ 8625 SqR 8675 5q.ft - + o ~s - S Tw. J ~ ~ ,R 1 `- a 5(.36 u x a STEAtu~t.?AT t~t:3ViE 2as a ' r ~'` , 3 ~ .... d3%g6' ..-,. ~' 7'.Q.6j. 4611 >; xar+.... uss r 1 ~ ~ 38 3E5 , ` _-FSR,Uf2 - S2A6 ~SO.OE ... .3 ~ TT.ss s7.cs "r---. k ~.. s ~ „~4q ~` O ~. ~. _ ~rba 4r \ a O ~`~ ~ ~ ~^ \1 ' ~ r,~ ~ ~~ 4 qtr ~. ~~ ~ 'd t0T S1 a~, }'~ Lr A [^ ~ ~ *~ o ' ~~ ° ~ `~ ~ ~ " he ~ ~ ~ sr-tv--atx R J,T ,wt fY~EtK". Kv~IXWtt ce, u[ 1t ~97 t !!! ~,,. v~ ' `b~ , • ~ ~ ` r 3 i t~1J .. yby Y '",C` .. "'~M1 ,yy ~ » 4 ' "'.." "~ ( 4i 4' ~ 9tY 4~C' 4 _"' `-'~ x )) 7 tsz."4 95 9(' 9 77 Ea 77 56 6 ' ' ' ' - )) . . . 8P- 6 86.06 >S4.d6 84 t).OD ~ !°- t0T „ ( LOT so ~ kOx 9 S 1 a 75.6(( ,W.O~ Ttq.46' 40D.0o' SW,94' Q I ~ t~ ~ ,6i.C6' '^ ~ $ I ^^~ --~--~-- ~~ l0T } y ~ tOY 2 ~ L4i 3 ~ !61 4 I toi 5 ++~ tDi 6 'I ~Y ++55 - °~ ( ~ ~ 37-2ri-D3C T! 208 - - for ] * $ p 1 STCYE &.?JtIA BCHSTdfi I ICI ~ i I"'I t'}~E I I I ~ ~~ ~ ~p tors ~~ ~ _ I IT.at.;...~..:J, 7~ ~ IW.Oti~ ~Op.00' ~ ~.QCZ._ ~#„ t60.e?' _~_-~_,_ -~y,-. I 12k3S ~y 1GJ.G9• i BEAR CRC£ft VALG.£Y SANfTARY- -- ~~~~{n~ ss.~--a---x---a--~-r~----u--.e.--u-~--xi ss----v.-sz- g---a-w--m ~--~= ~ ~ ~ AVTHO#tITY PVAdr' STA?ION (>~, L.,S~{y1 iVLANE AIT. SSkiti SSAtf{ SSMH ~r ~ Surveyed by. ~G {~ ~ ~ ___~___ ~ _____~_ ~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ FAR9ER 8r SONS, 2NC. p`?' 1 NOTES ~ b dbo xAR~ER Su>zur:~rNc --- PROPERTY 1S 2'C5NE0 7RD^LMR & TPLt-C # e I QFF1C£ LOCATION: RfA7LING ADQR2-5S: 120 M+5TLE7t}£ P.O. 6PX 5286 - TOTAL AREA - ?.7.17 ACRES MEpFORp, OREGON 9TS0! CENTRAL AOtN T, QREGPN 9750.2 ~- CQt~t TQ{/R INTERVAL .7'; CONTOURS P£ft7Vl;,'p FRQhf AEI?tAL PNQ TO -° 54 LOTS. SMALLEST CQ7 a 5626 Sq, i't. AYE'RAGE LPT = $97 r S i't. SCbLE': 1" a taa` q- t)A Tf': N44£M8£R t3. 2002 Jflfl XCt.: 0540-96 A$SESSQR$ ASAP FILE ND. 37-2K'-03CC R 700: 03C 7R 1116, 101, 101, 203 Qpri; 63CD Tt pt4 u~tTGO~ T Of T 1TKiN CR£E+{S Lt C~JRCK59N OAICSIJ. O. fiHS x N[w OFT)fNi.T'LR ~ r i i'. ~~~~~~ O~ "`") J~~~ a _ ~ -a ~ Fu.''d .. .-- l .s/ 1 .- _ Y~ a ~' av ~ ~mw city ~f {~.rex~tt~ai ~'vint Planning- BeP~rtrn~n~ Cz ~y o~ Central Pole C J .I.1~.1V.tVI(Vt_7 J~.1~i1-~~1~LT~~rir~Jrrr 'i'orra 1[ura~a[71ar~cay„ l~lC~l' I'iararaira~; [)i~"ec.k.or kic.r~ Cxers<.tal~r C,oa~raaraa_traif.y ~'[aaarace, I~tr~l.f. S<~Ixailc7r~c~ ~~orrat~~tta~if.y I']~~rarae~r~ I7~ve rlrf~cra~ ('lana7ira~ `]'c}c:laraiciala I'~otice of Meefiing Date of Nonce: November 12, 2Q42 Meeting Date: Time: Place: NATURE OP MEETING December ~, zoo2 '7:00 p.m. (Approximate} Central Point City Kall 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review a tentative subdivision application for Phases 2, 3 and ~ of the Jackson Oaks Subdivision. As a part ofthe Twin Creeks Transit-Oriented Development, Jackson Oaks would create 61 residential lots on 29.'77 acres located approximately 200 feet North of Tulare Avenue. There is no direct automobile connection from Tulare Avenue to this proposed subdivision. The development area is located inthe TOD-LMR, Low-Mix Residential and TOC-C, Civic zoning districts and are identified in the records of the Jackson County Assessor as Map 37 2W 03CC, Tax Lot 100, Map 37 2W 03CD, Tax Lot 211, Map 37 2W 03C, Tax Lots 100, 101, 2(31, 203, 206 and 208. CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for Tentative Subdzvisions are set forth in Chapter l6 and 17 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to TOD Requirements, General Regulations, Off street parking, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Works Standards. PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the zx~eeting scheduled for Tuesday, December 3, 2002. :~ _, 2. Written cotntnents tray lie sent in advance of the meeting to Cetxtral Point City I-lall, 1 SS South Second Street, Central Point, C}R 97Sf}2. 3. Issues which may provide the basis for art appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period t~otetl above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Cotntrtission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, ©regon. Copies of the same are available at 1 S cents per page. S. 1~or additional information, the public tnay contact the Planning T~epartment at {541 } 664- 3321 ext. 2}2. SUMMARY OF FRUCEDU~;E At the meeting, the Plataxting Commission will review the applications, technical staff reports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and bear arguments on the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or tentative subdivision application. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. ;::~ 155 South Second Street i Central Point, 4~R 9'75€32 ! {S41 } 664-3321 i Ij ax: {541 } 664-6384 F`t~C7£' r NC}t" '. 7t lE" 7 7. ... ... .. . R:, W .., Jd+lt7Y- 31. ~• - o.e 1, 1:J«i~ `:_ t~+ ,' /~ ;Y Lam' ,~U~1)! L'f S; (~ ^`~ I ~`LA1~t # A /~,t~r. ~t tP) Vt'14fi .34.'!~`; LJ t'57~. ~. ~~J )ll ,1..,,,y ~{ ~ Idt i~- , cr ;-- of 1 ~trliti'' C% ~,. 7O1 ,^ r7~"t .)/ 'i17, I-', 1l ;I. ,'rt 57,. WfLL~ di_; lr rrd nr r;Jr, % t,,~,r,n~, f~Gfrd7; Ji117 _.. ~ "UNiY, C;,. 7"Y~N {~1~'~°_~F~~iCS Iii=.~.LC)i`~~.~EIV~f C::~7„ E.C.CJ ~Qxx-Access Strip s ,~ ~~.„ V1CttV1; Y ~f~ t r. ~~:~ :..v E) i _ ~~, ~m,~ ~ , ,~ (1 i ~(~~` rd f ~ ~, ~ 'j}1f~ ' _t I - __ "_ _ ~~ ~~-t " i ~,; " I 1/ ._ ._.:. ~.. __. V ~.~..~. ,_. _...1 ~~I Ali St _ - 1 ' I ~_ ~ ~ y ~ I f+3S Sn ^! ~ f 'i 1 ~ t~ ~ F ~ ~ f ~, F ~ 't .~ ~, ~ ! < ~ --~--- ~ 1 ~r ~`, ~: d ' `~ E V~ ^' '~ ~ 1 ~ f ~~~~ 1 ~ m ~l ~i a .~ ~ ~ i ` CIVIC AREA .-- ,~,~ .. ~ ~ 31 *k , ~ ~, ~ ~ ....~ I _i:,^ ~' ~ F ~ ~'~`~S2 ~---- ~ ~ ~ c; ~',. ~ w ~ _ ~ ,_:;~ ~ ~ rt ~ ~~,, ~i .: ~A. .~- ~.«. _, ~_ w ___ ~, , , ,~~' <<~ - ~ ~ _ ~ ~ f ,n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. ~ p "'_ sazZY _"_ ,L, ,~___ ~ (°~ f fi ~ t61 t1Y 14A ~ a,.. I ? ! N 1 ~, 1~ i ' .. ~ 141Jt ~ Mi ll LL ,~y ~.~ ~IXI,Gd 9nW t {OS 'l 1~• c~ 1w c.or $ ~ ~ _ , ; ~ -. ~ _,(., tOd._+.4 i~ .a t # rd.1.Oti' t ,. - 1ta.3J` ,y1 tOts,;_oo~ _ ._ u a _ -C._.,...~ .T , t 7UL '.E dVF ~'.y~,..'+..c~ __ f _ - T.Y. ~ _ ~ - 7UCY-G -- 7OTRL 7 -- 54 LOSJ. JNIF1I.lC.aT LSIT =-. Jk51CS Sq. F , tC7M rt6RfftL Pd~fC7TQ s COSY ;.~ gata Sq. t'#. I __ d. 2r~ Sh.°~? P of 1 FAREt c f ~. d a F ? ~':;' "~w n' ;5~~) /~~ ~~-gat, ~. . ?C'.72 \Tb'fiN ~d?E .-S tt.4'1-.,., ...1k9 \J.. i7, ~:p~ 1:. NEW a~'7dpN.7'GX 11,/2H1~~302 11.3 824566 JC~D3 BIJ~ OFC Pr~GE ~3~l03 ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~c~so~ ~au~~r £#333 AGA7'~ RaAE~, w~i~ car, aR~Gara 97503-075 ts~~~ sz~-7~,oa ~A#c Cs~~7 ~~~-~-ss~ F i November ~4, 2a42 City of Ce»tral Poi»~ City c-f C~entr~~ P~ixi~ ~'i~nnin~ D~pari~nien~ Attn: Ken Gerschler ~ { l~5 S. 2"`~ 5t . Central Point, Qregon 97502 Fire District #3 Comments.,~aekson fla~Cs i Applicant wi11 need t© provide xnap of Firs hydrant locatiat~s t© the fire i_ocatians must meefi Cifiy Standard and t~ni-~©rrn Fire Cade standards. Mar~C Moran ' Subdivisiv» Phases 2,3,~- ©eputy Fire Marshal ~ i,~~ u. E t district. Jackson Qaks Phase 2,3 7 9t27'/2t1Q2 1 CIS OF ~`.EN~''.~~A.L POINT' PL~J.BLIC ~O.RKS DEPAR 7".IV1ENT STA 1~`~` R.~'POR ~'"` Date: December ~~~; ~~{}~ Applicant: Twin Creeks;C}evelnpmer-t [.::I~.:C. "1461 McAndrev+rs Road Medford; C~r~on, 9641 ;Project: Jadkson ©aks; PEiases 2 C_cioatiori: I~Idrth of Taylor Road & last o~F Grant Goad Zoning; Tt~D-I~.NIR ,&`~QD~G l~.egai 37' 2W O~CC'Tl,.. - 1 ~C}, 37 211 03GD TI_ -~- 214, `~ ~1N C~3C`T -- 16~,10fi;2(}1;2tJ3,206,2G18: ......Area: 29..`7 ~ Acres llr~it: 64 -- Lots ~- Civic Area Plan: Jackson Q~ks Sbdivis`ton Phases 2,,3,4 ?entative P[an Herbert A: Farber 2~ Mistletoe Street:. Medford, C3regon X750 art By: Public 1lVorks l~partmer~t Purpose Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant {hereinafter referred to as "Developer"} regarding City Public lNorks Department {PVtID} standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed. Gather information from the DeveloperlEngineer regarding the proposed development. SpeeiaC Requirements Existing Infrastructure: The Developer shall demonstrate that all connections to existing infrastructure {i.e. streets, water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems, natural drainage systems, etc.} will not interfere with or provide far the degradation of the existing effective level of service or operation of the infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have either adequate capacities to accommodate the flows and/or demands imposed on the existing infrastructure as the result of the connection of the proposed development's infrastructure, or will be improved by and at the expense of the Developer to accommodate the additional flows and/or demands; while maintaining or improving the existing level of service of the affected facility, as approved by {as applicable}, the regulatory agency, utility owner, and/or property owner involved. Jackson C7aks Phase 2,3 9 9/27"12102 2 2. Street Desi n: The Jackson Oaks Development is a collection of streets designs including: Central Loop Streets, Standard Residential Local Streets, Minor Residential Local Streets, and Alleys. All street configurations should be designed in accordance with the Transit Oriented Development design requirements and guidelines together with the Transit Oriented Development Master Plan. Street Sections should be designed following the guidelines described in the City of Central Point Public Works Department Standards and Specifications far construction. Furthermore, street design should prohibit access from properties located to the West of the proposed development until property located to the West is developed according to the Transit Oriented Development Master Plan. 3. Civic Area /Park Space: 7.23 acres has been designated along the southerly boundary of the proposed phases of Jackson Oaks Development. The designated Civic & ParklRecreation areas shall be developed to conform to the Transit Oriented Development Master Plan for Community Design Features {Recreation & Open Space Section}. 4. Storm t~rainage Infrastructure: The developer shall develop a facility plan for the storm drain collection and conveyance system which provides for run-off from and nin- on onto the proposed development, any future development on adjacent properties, and any areas deemed by the City that will need to tie-into the proposed development's storm water collection and conveyance system. The Jackson Oaks Development is described in the Transit Oriented Development master plan as drainage "Basin 'I ". Storm water management shall be constructed per the guidelines described in the Transit Oriented Development master plan 5. Existing Landscape; Currently the subject property contains a diverse variety of gees and vegetation. Prior to development a City of Central Point Arborist shall evaluate the existing landscape, and mark appropriate trees for removal. 6. Street Lighting: A street lighting plan should be developed for ,ackson Oaks Phase 2,3,4 per the Streetscapes lighting plan located in the Community Design Features section of the Transit Oriented Development Master Plan. General All construction of public improvements shall conform to the City's PWD Standards, the conditions approved and stipulated by the Planning Commission, and other special specifications, details, standards, and/or upgrades as may be approved by the City Administrator or his designee prior to the approval of the construction plans for the proposed development. During construction, changes proposed by the Developer shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's engineer to the City PWD (and Building Department, as applicable} for approval prior to implementation. 2. Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals and conditions as ~~ 4,, Jackson oaks Phase 2,3 91/2712t?Q2 3 may be required by other agencies, including, but not limited to, the t'~regon Department of Fish and Wildlife {DFW}, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality {DEQ}, t~regon Division of State Lands {DSL}, D.S. Army Corps of Engineers {ACC~E}, affected irrigation districts, and C~DQT. 3. Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. if feasible, the Developer's engineer or surveyor should provide the drawings in both a "hard copy" form {produced on Mylar®} and in a "digital" format compatible with AutoCAD®, or other form as approved by the City PWD. 4. "As-built" drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line" changes to final approved construction plans that identify the locations and or elevations {as appropriate} of actual installed items, including, but not limited to, invert, inlet, and rim or lip elevations, spot elevations identified on drawings, road alignment, water lines, valves, and fire hydrants, water and sewer lateral stationing, modifications to street section, manhole and curb inlet locations, street light locations, other below grade utility line locations and depths, etc. Provide a "red-line" hard copy {on Mylar®} or are approved alternative format, of construction drawings, and if feasible, an acceptable AutoCAD° compatible drawing electronic file to the City at completion of construction and prior to acceptance of public infrastructure facilities completed as part of the proposed development, or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee. 5. All elevations used on the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on the permanent benchmark shall be tied into an established City approved benchmark and be so noted on the plans. At least one permanent benchmark shall be provided for the proposed development, the location of which shall be as jointly determined by the City PWD and the Developer, 6. If applicable, all existing concrete, pipe, building materials, structures, dear and grub materials, and other deleterious materials shall be removed from the site and either recycled or properly disposed of in accordance with the requirements of the DEQ. T. Easements for City infrastructure {i.e. sanitary sewer, water, and storm drain [if applicable]} should be a minimum of 1 ~-feet wide, and should not split lot lines. Easements for public storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and water lines should be dedicated to the City and notjust a P.U.E. Centerline of buried infrastructure shall be aligned a minimum of five {~} feet from the edge of the easement. if two or more City owned utilities are located within an easement, then a minimum 2g-foot width should be required. Easement dedications in final deeds or CC&Rs need a sfiatement, which should clearly indicate that easements must be maintained with suitable, all-weather, drivable vehicular access to City public infrastructure facilities, as determined by the City PWD. 8. Prior to the City PWD final approval of the construction plans for the proposed improvements, the following should be submitted: . _ ~ ~~ Jackson daks Phase 2,3 11J27J2t3f12 4 / A copy of written approval from Fire District #3 of the final street and driveway layout, site access, fire hydrant placement, and water system improvement plans for the proposed development. / The plans relating to the sanitary sewers should be approved in writing by BCVSA, and the appropriate signature blocks should be completed on the plans. / A copy of written approval from C7DQT regarding highway improvements {as applicable. 9. Field verify all existing infrastructure elevations and locations {i.e. pipe inverts, curb elevations, top of banks, ditch/channel inverts, street elevations, etc., to which the proposed development's infrastructure will connect into existing improvements, prior to final construction plan design and submittal for final approval. ~ 0. C.~verhead power Tines. if applicable, coordinate efforts with Pacific Power and Light, Qwest, and Charter Communications, to convert any overhead electrical power, telephone, or cable facilities within the proposed development to underground facilities, prior to the acceptance by the City PWD of fhe public improvements associated with the proposed development. All agreements and costs associated with the conversion of these facilities from overhead to underground facilities shall be by and between the utility owners and the Developer. 11. The accurate locations of any existing underground and above ground public infrastructure, and the location of the associated easements with these facilities, shall be accurately portrayed {both horizontally and vertically on the construction plans and as-built drawings. 12. The Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide to the Public Works Department a drawing of the recorded Final Plat map reproduced on Mylar®and in an acceptable electronic form in AutoCAD® format. The Final Plat shall be tied to a legal Government corner and the State Plane Coordinate System. The Final Plat shall either reflect or be later modified to reflect any applicable "red-line" changes noted in the construction "as-bunts", at the discretion of the City Administrator or his designee. Streets/Traffic o EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE ^ Tay#or Road ^ Grant Road ^ Sunland Avenue ^ Tulane Avenue Construction drawings for this Tentative Plan shall include a Streefi Lighting Plan/Driveway Lighting Plan in accordance with the requirements of the City PWD or .~ Jackson Qaks Phase 2,3 99127'!2002 5 as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee. The construction drawings shall include clear vision areas designed to meet the City's PWD Standards. ~. The Developer's engineer shall, at the cost of the Developer, evaluate the strength of the native soils and determine the drivewaylstreet section designs to accommodate the expected loads {including fire equipment} to be traveled on these driveways. If a public street, then the City will design the required street section. Storm Drainage, Irrigation Improvements ~ EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE ^ Jackson Oaks Phase 1 {currently in design & review phase} Developer's engineer shall develop a facility plan for the storm drain collection, retention, and conveyance system {SD System} which provides for storm water run-off from and run-on onto the proposed development {either surface run-on or culvert or creeklditch conveyance}, any existing or future development on adjacent properties, conveyed storm drainage, or surface water flow, and any areas deemed by the City that will need to connect-into the proposed development's SD System. 2. Roof drains and under drains shall not be directly connected to public storm drain lines, and shall drain to the street. 3. Any discharge points of the storm water facilities shall be designed to provide an aesthetically pleasing, useful, and low maintenance facility, that are designed to mitigate erosion, damage, or loss during a 100-year storm event; and that mitigate the "attractive nuisance" hazards associated with these types of facilities. 4. Prior to City PWD construction plan review, the Developer shall provide the City PWD with a complete set of hydrologic and hydraulic calculations and profile plats far sizing the SD system, which shall incorporate the use of the City PWD's rainfalllintensity curve, and City approved run-off coefficients, curve numbers, retardance, pipe roughness coefficients, etc., that are used in the engineering calculations. ~. Storm drainpipe materials shall be PVC, NAPE, or reinforced concrete, with watertight joints. Provide concrete orsand-cement slurry encasement where required in areas of minimum cover. Sanitary Sewer All sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system {SS System} design, construction and testing shall conform to the standards and guidelines of the Oregon DEQ, 1980 APWA Standards ~}regon Chapter, Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority {BCVSA}, and the City PWD Standards, where applicable. 2. The construction plans and the "as-built" drawings shall identify lateral stationing for construction of sewer laterals. ~, ~. f ~. Jackson Oaks Phase 2,3 11I27J2(J02 6 3. The City upon completion of initial construction plan review and preliminary approval, will forward the plans to BCVSA for completion of the review process. Upon completion of the review by BCVSA, completion of final revisions to the plans by the Developer's engineer, and following the final approval and signature on the construction plans by BCVSA, the Public Works Director will approve the plans in final form. 4. All testing and video inspection of lines and manholes shat[ be done in accordance with BCVSA requirements, at Developer's expense. The ^eveloper shall provide BCVSA and the City w'sth test reports, TV reports and certification of the sewer system construction prior to final acceptance. Wafter System D EX1ST11~1G INFRASTRUCTURE ^ 1~-inch Ductile lron {Taylor Road} ^ 1~-inch Ductile Iron {Tulare Ave & Sunland Ave {Jackson C}aks Phase ~ ~~ Developer shall comply with C}regon Health Division {C~HD} and City requirements for backflow prevention. 2. The Developer's engineer shall consult Fire District #3, and comply with any and all suggestions regarding fire protection. 3. Bach building shall be served by a separate water meter. 4. Construction drawings shall include the size, type, and location of all water mains, hydrants, air valves, service connections, and other appurtenance details in accordance with City PWD Standards and as required by the City PWD. 5. Water system shall be tested in accordance with City PWD Standards and requirements at Developer's expense and must be approved by the City. ~. Specifications for the design and construction of the water system shall be in accordance with City PWD standards. Site work, Grading, and Utility Plans Grading plans should have original/existing grades and final grades plotted on the plan. Typically, existing grade contour lines are dashed and screened back, and final grade contour lines are overlaid on top of the existing grades and are in a heavier line width and solid. Contour lines should be labeled with elevations. 2. All structures shall have roof drains, area drains, andlor crawl spaces with positive ~~ ~T Jackson t}aks Phases 2,3 11I27/2Q02 7 drainage away from the building or structure, 3. Provide City with a utility plan approved by each utility company, which reflects all utility line locations, crossings, transformer locations, valves, etc. 4, Utility locations must be accurately included on the as-built drawings, or as a separate set of drawings attached to the as-built drawings. Rights of WayslEasernents If applicable, Developer shall provide a Statement of Water Rights {on a City approved form}, for any affected properties. Por properties determined to have water rights, the developer will coordinate with the State Water master the reallocation of any waters attached to lands no longer irrigable as a result of the proposed development. ~~ ,R R s ~4 ATTACI~INIENT F PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECC}MMENDED C4NDITI4NS 4F AI"PI2QVAL 1. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall sul7zrzit to the City a copy of the proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions {CC&l~.s} for Units 2 and 3 of the .Jackson Oaks Subdivision. 2. The applicant shall corrzply with all requirements of affected public agencies and utilities as they pertain to the development of Units 2 and 3 of the Jackson Oaks Subdivision. Evidence ofsuch compliance shall be submitted to the City prior to final plat approval. 3. The applicant shall comply with all federal, state and local regulations, standards and requirements applicable to tl~e development and construction of Units ~ and 4 of the 3ackson Oaks Subdivision. ~. The applicant shall create a 1 foot wide "non-access strip" along the westerly periphery of the proposed subdivision so that access cannot be taken to this subdivision from adjoining properties. This access restriction will be lifted once the area to the west is developed in accordance with the T.O.I7. Master Plan previously approved by the City Council. ]~:iP] anrli t~~to2{}75. wpd ~~ f~.<a CLARIF~CATI4N C}F PUBLIC WaR~S STAFF REPORT FoR CENTT-AL POINT MASONIC LODGE PAGE 37 2. Driver~vav Desi~rz. The City will reimburse the developer for reasonable expenses incurred as a direct result of constructing the driveway access road to City Standards, minus costs that would have otherwise been incurred if a normal, paved driveway were to have been constructed. 3. Sidewalks; "Sidewalks, curb c~ gutter should continue along Moth sides of the driveway access road extending to .Don Jones Park ". should read, Public Works recommends that sidewalk, curb & gutter continue along both sides of the driveway access road extending to Don Jones Park. The City will reimburse the developer for the reasonable cost of the sidewalk along the north side of the driveway access road.