Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - September 3, 2002CITY OF CENTRAL POIN'P PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA September 3, 2002 - 7:00 p.m. @ Q Next Planning Commission Resolution No. 553 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Chuck Piland -Candy Fish, Don Foster, John LeGros, Paul Lunte, Rick Perry and Wayne Riggs III. CORRESPONDENCE IV. MINUTES A. Review and approval of August 6, 2002, Planning Commission Minutes V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES VI. BUSINESS A. Public hearing to review an application for a two lot partition at 458 West Pine Street. The subject property is located in the R-1-8, Residential Single-Family zoning district on Map 37 2W l OBD, Tax Lot 800. VII. MISCELLANEOUS VIII. ADJOURNMENT City of Central Point Planning Commission August 6, 2002 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 P.M. II. ROLL CALL: Chairman Chuck Piland, Rick Perry, Candy Fish, John LeGros, Paul Lunte, Wayne Riggs and Don Foster were present. Also in attendance were Ken Gerschler, Community Planner and Dave Arkens, Planning Technician. III. CORRESPONDENCE There was no correspondence. IV. MINUTES Commissioner Fish made a motion to approve the minutes from the July 2, 2002 meeting as presented. Commissioner Foster seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Perry; abstain, Fish, yes; LeGros, abstain; Lunte, abstain; Foster, yes and Riggs, yes. Motion passed. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances. VI. BUSINESS A. Public meeting to review a request by residents within the Parkwood Village Planned Unit Development to vary from the maximum fence height requirements that are identified in the Municipal Code. The subject property is located near the intersection of Meadowbrook Drive and Parkwood Village Drive in the R-2, Residential Two-Family District on Jackson County Assessment Plat 37 2W OlBD. Ken Gerschler, Community Planner, presented the Planning Department staff report. Mr. Gerschler explained to the Commission that the Parkwood Village PUD is being mostly developed as a zero lot line community with both attached and detached structures. He also explained the fence ordinance and that there have been a few fence variance requests in this general area. He stated that the homes are being built on a lot of fill dirt which provides proper drainage of storm water to the street. This fill has raised some of the structures and yards above the rest which has resulted in varying lot elevations. The applicants would like a 2' lattice extension on a 6' fence because of the changing lot elevations. This will allow additional privacy fortheseresidents. Mr.Gersch]eraskedthePlanningCommission to grant the Planning Staff the ability to review and approve or disapprove other fence variances in the Packwood Village PUD. He read the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and recommended that latitude be given for this particular development. Commission members asked if future development in this PUD and other developments be screened a little better to avoid such severe elevation changes in lots next to each other and that developers build the fences before the structure is finaled or sold. Mr. James Kontur, 2606 Packwood Village Drive, explained there is a drain in his backyard for storm water from the field in back of his lot. This drain has lowered the yard. The house being built next to him has been designed so that the duct work for the furnace system is under the finished floor level. This design has resulted in a 2' elevation difference of each home. His bedroom faces the new home and if a deck is placed off the back door it will look directly into his bedroom. Mr. Kontur stated that the variance would allow a 2' lattice addition on top of the 6' fence around the perimeter of his yard. Mr. Kontur also stated that there is already a lattice fence extension in the back yard of a Beebe Road resident and has been approved by the City. The statement from Mr. Kontur of extending the 2' extension around the perimeter of his yard brought about some confusion from the planning commission. Commissioner Riggs read the letter from Mr. George H. Gardener where he had stated that the lattice extension would be on the rear fence line only. Mr. Kontur had understood that Mr. Gardener meant that the variance would cover both rear yard and side yard fences. Cristie Cox, 2778 Packwood Village Drive, stated that she does not have any privacy from her bedroom and must keep the blinds shut at all times. The 2' lattice extension would allow her additional privacy. Commissioner Lunte stated that he would like to clarify if the applicants wanted the variance to include both side and reaz fences. Mr. Gerschler said he would draft a letter to the applicants asking them if they wanted a variance for rear and side fences and will include a final date to respond. Commissioner Lunte made a motion to adopt Resolution 552 approving the fence variance application based on findings of fact contained in the record and subject to the recommended conditions of approval. The recommendations include approval of a 2' (two-foot) high lattice on top of the permitted 6' (six-foot) fence on the rear portion of the fence only. Aside fence extension may constructed at 2606 Packwood Village Drive, Map Number 372WO1BC Taxlot 4700. All other applicants of this fence variance have the option, if reviewed and approved by a case by case basis by city staff, of side fence extensions. Commissioner Perry seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: The motion passed unanimously. VII. MISCELLANEOUS Mr. Gerschler invited members of the Planning Commission to the Oregon Planning Institute being held at the University of Oregon October 2-4, 2002. Copies of the schedule and registration forms will be available for each Planning Commission member. VIII. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Perry made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner Lunte seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Motion passed unanimously. Meeting was adjourned at 8:20 P.M. PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: September 3, 2002 TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: Ken Gerschler, Community Planner SUBJECT: Public Hearing - To consider a Tentative Plan fora 31ot land partition behind the home at 458 West Pine Street (372W10BD Tax Lot 800). A_nulicant/ Owner: James DeKorte Contracting 861 Annalee Drive Central Point, Oregon 97502 Agent: Neathamer Surveying 304 South Central Avenue Medford, Oregon 97501 Summary: The applicant has submitted a development proposal to subdivide 0.82 acres of land into 3 residential lots. This tentative plan is located within a R-1-8, Residential Single Family zone. Authority: CPMC 1.24.050 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a Tentative Plan. I3otice of the Public Hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060. Applicable Law: CPMC 16.10.010 et seq. Tentative Plans CPMC 16.36.010 et seq. Major and Minor Land Partitions CPMC 17.20.010 et seq. Residential Single Family District CPMC 17.60.010 et seq. Special Setback Requirements Discussion• The applicant, James DeKorte is requesting that a 0.82 acre parcel at 458 West Pine Street be partitioned into 3 separate pazcels(Attachment A). CPMC 17.24.050 requires that lots have a minimum area of 8,000 squaze feet. These area requirement's have been met by the applicant. Setback requirements for the pazcels will be 20 feet for front lot lines, five feet setback for interior side yards, and 15 feet for the reaz yard. Lot 3 has a special setback requirement of 70 feet measured from the centerline since Pine Street is a major arterial. In evaluating the actual need based upon future traffic loads, the City will only request a right of way dedication of ten ~~ feet. The width of the current right of way varies adjacent to this property and to determine the actual need, the width will be measured 40 feet from the centerline of Pine Street. Neighboring property owners were notified by mail (Attachment "B")and the Planning Department received a letter from Reverend Daniel Beteta of the First Presbyterian Church at 456 West Pine Street (Attachment "C "). Reverend Beteta has said that the congregation would like the existing fence to be replaced with similaz material and height if any of the structure is altered as a result of the development. The Planning and Public Works Departments reviewed the proposed minor land partition and concluded that they comply with city requirements and all conditions of approval pertaining to site development, minimum lot size, public works standards and specifications and access to public roadways (Attachments "D" and "E"). The Planning Department recommends that the proposed driveway location be adjusted to avoid the unnecessary removal of several large trees. The existing house at 458 West Pine Street is currently connected to well water and maybe subject to special requirements identified by the Public Works Department. A ten foot wide Public Utility Easement will be required along the street right of way for West Pine Street. Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority and 7ackson County Fire District Number Three have been notified of this land use action. BCVSA has submitted correspondence (Attachment "F ") indicating that there is an 8 inch sewer main located on West Pine Street. Although no comment has been received, Fire District 3 may require the installation of an additional hydrant to serve the newly created pazcels. Findines of Fact and Conclusions of Law Minor Partition CPMC 16.10.010 requires that applications for tentative plans be submitted with improvement plans and other supplementary information as may be needed to indicate the development plan. ^ The proposed minor partition satisfies the subdivision requirements listed in CPMC 16.36.030 and CPMC 16.36.040. CPMC 17.20.050 establishes minimum area, width and access requirements for the R-1, Residential Single-Family district. Parcels 1 and 2 of the proposed partition meet the area, width and access requirements for the R-1, Residential Single-Family District. H:\Plaruting\02051.wpd 02 Recommendation• Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take one of the following actions: 1. Adopt Resolution No._, approving the Tentative Minor Land Partition of 37 2W I OBD Tax Lot 800 subject to the recommended conditions of approval (Attachment C); or 2. Deny the proposed Tentative Minor Land Partition; or 3. Continue the review of the Tentative Minor Land Partition at the discretion of the Commission. Attachments: A. Tentative Plat B. Notice of Public Hearing C. Letter from Reverend Beteta D. Planning Department Recommended Conditions of Approval E. Public Works Staff Report F. Comments from BCVSA H:U'tanning\02051.wpd Oh /vJ/GV VL AJ~:JU 1 ~~~o ~~ ~~ ~~~ w w.+... . ...~ . .. ~g~ .-.1 Parcels nct 8 r ~Q~'~ ~ ~~ 1 ~ I i . 1 ao~'~ ~ ~ ~,, 1 /~,~ i,, :J4AfJLLJ6L Ititi1~~~U-11•1l:JC JIJISVGT II'M1a ("{~Ut b2 ' n _.:. x--, „ CSit9 of G'mtt a J ~ 851 Planning DepestY I ~ ~~ Para 1 r ~ { ....:. -.-, -~ .. ~ t eax~ ~ rt 8 aq ,t I _ yp P~' ~,~ ~ ~'°' ~° ~ op 1 ,~ , ~= 4 ~(aD 5Y. l \ ~ i r Par e 1 3 ~ • ~ ~,,~'' ~ ~t ~1 Ylc ~~ ^,/ 'r ~ ~t~ _ ~~ ,~ f~~ ,~ ,~ ~~ o~ g~ ~o~ ~~ %~~°~ \ ~~~ .~ o~ ./ / ~4 `' ~°" dt \. ~~~~ G.1 ty of Cen tz~al Poln t PLANNING DEPAPTMENT Notice of Meeting Date of Notice: August 13, 2002 Meeting Date: Time: Place: September 3, 2002 7:00 p.m. (Approximate) Central Point City Hall 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon NATURE OF MEETING Tom Humphrey, AICP Planning Director Ken Gerschler Community Planner Matt Samitore Community Planner Dave Arkens Planning Technician (sty t~f ~cut~;g ~H~~'` Planning Degartrn Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review a tentative land division application that would create 31ots on a 0.82 acre parcel behind the house at 458 West Pine Street. The parcel is located in the R-1-8, Residential Single Family zoning district and is identified in the records of the Jackson County Assessor as Map 37 2W I OBD, Tax Lot 800. CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for Tentative Partitions are set forth in Chapter 16 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Regulations, Off-street parking, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Works Standazds. PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Anyperson interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, September 3, 2002. 2. Written comments maybe sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall; 155 South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502. 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the 0~ 155 South Second Street • Central Point, OR 97502 O (541) 664-3321 • Fax: (541) 664-6384 expiration ofthe comment period noted above. Anytestimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents perpage. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Deparhnent at (541) 664- 3321 ext. 292. SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staffreports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of thereviewthePlanningCommissionmayapproveortentativepaztitionapplication. Cityregulations 06 l55 South Second Street O Central Point, OR 97502 • (541) 664-3321 O Fax: (541) 664-bsa4 FIIZST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 456 West Pine Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Phone (541) 664-1828 E-mait • f,~r~ ~=uno..com New a-mail: fpccpCa)ccountry.net August 20, 2002 -city of Central Point Dept. of Planning 155 South Second Street Central Point, OF2 97502 Re: Meeting of September 3, 2002 Dear Sirs, . Chip of Central mitt E~[IB~~'~ «C» ~ Planning Dq~arknm!t On behaff of the congregation, I would like to respond to your notice of meeting for September 3, 2002. We would like to raise the following concern in regards to the property at 458 West Pine Street. We would like_to have a fence between the property-and~the church's property similar to the current one. YVe don't want people wt~owill eventually move into the three lots to be using our parking lot for access. If the,6wners would like to remobe that fence, we are kindly requesting a replacemer~t~vith similar height to prevent any r; problems. ~.-- Most of the board members have a-cp~fl.'~,~t.with the date and time of your meeting and`' will not be able to attend. If you would lice more information, please contact me at the number mentioned above. ~ i" Sincerely --'fi`b ~.=:_ ~ i .; j (~ Y _:...~:_. ~Zev. am Bete#a-Jr:-~ -, ~;~: `°,:° i t ATTACHMENT D PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDED CONDPfIONS OF APPROVAL The approval of the Tentative Plan shall expire in one year on September 3, 2003 unless an application for final plat or extension has been received by the City. 2. THe project must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations. 3. The proposed roadway that serves lots 1 and 2 should be relocated to preserve several existing large trees. 4. The applicant shall dedicate to the public 10 feet of right of way to accommodate future road improvements and will be identified by the applicant's professional land surveyor who will determine the new right of way line by measuring 40 feet distant of the centerline of Pine Street. H:\Planning\02051.wpd V Q G~1t~ylt G Dekorte Partition 8/30/2002 1 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT' DEPARTMENT OFPUBLIC T~ORKS STAFFREPORT Purpose Provide infom~ation to the Panning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as `Developer") regarding City Public Works Department (PWD) standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed. Gather information from the DeveloperlEngineerngarding the proposed development. Special Requirements Existing Infrastructure: The Developer shall demonstrate that all connections to existing infrastructure (i.e. streets; water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems; nalural drainage systems; etc.,) will not interfere with or provide for the degradation of the existing effective level of service or operation of the infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have either adequate capacities to accommodate the flows andlor demands imposed on the existing infrastructure as the result of the connection of the proposed development's infrastructure, orwill be improved by and at the expense of the Developer to accommodate the additional flows andlor demands; while maintaining or improving the existing level of service of the affected facility, as approved by (as applicable), the regulatory agency, utility owner, andlor property owner involved. 2. Righf-of-Way Dedication: An approximate 10-foot section of Right-of-Way along the southem property line shall be dedicated for the widening of West Pine Street. Due to the non-uniform shape of the southem property boundary all properly measured 40-feet from the centerline shall be dedicated. 3. Deferred Improvement Agreement: The Developer's consent will be required for the creation of a deferred improvement agreement outlining the developer's responsibility for the cost of improvements including but not limited to: Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk bordering West Pine Street. 49 Dekorte Partition 8/30/2002 2 4. Landscape Pian/BuSer: A suitable landscape plan for the required landscape buffer along West Pine Street shall be prepared and submitted to the City for review and approval. Once approved, the landscape plan shall be implemented and maintained by the Developer at the Developer's expense. At a minimum, the landscape plan shall include provision for grass and street trees. The trees shall be selected from the City's draft street tree list, as approved by City's Planning Commission and City Planning Department and PWD staff. The street trees selected shall be compatible with the ovefiead power lines in this area and shall be of a minimum 1-1/2 inch caliper size. If the developer contends a suitable landscape area exists the City of Central Point Public Works Department will evaluate existing conditions. 5. Storm Dratnaae Infrastructure: The developer shall develop a facility plan for the storm drain collection and conveyance system which provides for run-off from andrun-on onto the proposed development, any future development on adjacent properties, and any areas deemed by the City that will need to tie-into the proposed development's storm water collection and conveyance system. It is our understanding that the storm drainage infrastructure will be a private system, operated and maintained by the property owners. 6. Driveway Lighting Plan: The Public Works Department does not recommend standard street lighting for the driveway access to the Dekorte Partition. However, the Public Works Department suggests each residence be provided with an individual driveway fighting system. 7. Re-Location of Driveway/Access: Due to the number of healthy trees that would be required to be removed if the driveway is constructed 'in its proposed location; It is the recommendation of the Public Works Department that the driveway access be constructed in the most`tree-conscious° manner possible. general All construction of public improvements shall conform to the City's PWD Standards, the conditions approved and stipulated by the Planning Commission, and other special specifications, details, standards, and/or upgrades as may be approved by the City Administrator or his designee prior to the approval of the construction plans for the proposed development. During construction, changes proposed by the Developer shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's engineer to the City PWD (and Building Department, as applicable) for approval prior to implementation. 2. Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals, and conditions as may be required by other agencies, including, but not limited to, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL), U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers (ACOE), affected irrigation districts, and ODOT. 3. Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. If feasible, the Developers engineer or surveyor should provide the drawings in both a "hard copy" form (produced on Mylar~) and in a "digital" format compatible with AutoCAl~', or other form as approved by the City PWD. i0 Dekorte Partition 8/30/2002 3 4. As-built drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line" changes to final approved construction plans that identify the locations and or elevations (as appropriate) of actual installed items, including, but not limited to, invert, inlet, and rim or lip elevations; spot elevations identified on drawings; road alignment; water lines, valves, and fire hydrants; water and sewer lateral stationing; modifications to street section; manhole and curb inlet locations; street tight locations; other below grade utility line locations and depths; etc. Provide a "red-line" hard copy (on Mylar~), or an approved alternative format, of construction drawings, and if feasible, an acceptable AutoCAD®compatible drawing electronic file to the Gity at completion of construction and prior to acceptance of public infrastructure facilities completed as part of the proposed development, or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee. 5. All elevations used on the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on the permanent benchmark shall be tied into an established City approved benchmark and be so noted on the plans. At least one permanent benchmark shall be provided for the proposed development, the location of which shall be as jointly determined by the City PWD and the Developer. 6. if applicable, all existing concrete, pipe, building materials, structures, clear and grub materials, and other deleterious materials shalt be removed from the site and either recycled or properly disposed of in accordance with the requirements of the DEQ. Easements for City infrastructure (i.e. sanitary sewer, water, and storm drain [if applicab{eJ) should be a minimum of 15-feet wide, and should not split lot lines. Easements for public storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and water lines should be dedicated to the City and not just a P.U.E. Centerline of buried infrastructure shall be aligned a minimum of five (5) feet from the edge of the easement. If two or more City owned utilities are located within an easement, then a minimum of 20-foot width should be required. Easement dedications in final deeds or CC&Rs need a statement, which should clearly indicate that easements must be maintained with suitable, ail-weather, drivable vehicu{ar access to City public infrastructure facilities, as determined by the City PWD. 8. Prior to the Gity PWD final approval of the construction plans for the proposed improvements, the following should be submitted: / A copy of written approval from Fire District 3 of the final street and driveway layout, site access, fire hydrant placement, and water system improvement plans for the proposed development. / The plans relating to the sanitary sewers should be approved in writing by BCVSA, and the appropriate signature blocks should be completed on the plans. / A copy of written approval from ODOT regarding Highway Improvements (as applicable). 9. Field verify all existing infrastructure elevations and locations (i.e, pipe inverts, curb elevations, top of banks, ditchkhannel inverts, street elevations, etc.), to which the proposed development's infrastructure will connect into existing improvements, prior to final construction plan design and submittal for final approval. 11 Dekorte partition 8/30/2002 4 10. Overhead power lines. If applicable, coordinate efforts with Pacific Power and Light, US West, and TCI Cable, to convert any overhead electrical power, telephone, or cable facilities within the proposed development to underground facilities, prior to the acceptance by the City PWD of the public improvements associated with the proposed development. All agreements and costs associated with the conversion of these facilities from overhead to underground facilities shall be by and between the utility owners and the Developer. 11. The accurate locations of any existing underground and above ground public infrastructure, and the location of the associated easements with these facilities, shall be accurately portrayed (Moth horizontally and vertically) on the constnuction plans and as-built drawings. 12. The Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide to the Public Works Department a drawing of the recorded Firia! Plat map reproduced on Mylai~ and in an acceptable electronic form in AutoCAD®format. The Final Plat shall be tied to a legal Government comer and the State Plane Coordinate System. The Final Plat shall either reflect or be later modified to reflect any applicable "red-line' changes noted in the construction °as-bunts", at the discretion of the City Administrator or his designee. Streets/Trafflc - IJCISTING INFRASTRUCTURE • West Pine Street (Minor Arterial} Construction drawings for this Tentative Plan shall include a Street Lighting Plan/Driveway Lighting Plan in accordance with the requirements of the City PWD or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee. The construction drawings shall include clear vision areas designed to meet the City's PWD Standards. 2. The Developers engineer shall, at the cost of the Developer, evaluate the strength of the native soils and determine the driveway/street section designs to accommodate the expected loads (including fire equipment) to be traveled on these driveways. 1f a public street, then the City wilt design the required street section. Storm Drainage, Irrigation Improvements - EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE • 12-inch RCP Storm Drain (West Pine Street) Developer's engineer shall develop a facility plan for the storm drain collection, retention, and conveyance system {SD System} which provides for storm water run-off from and run-on onto the proposed development (either surface run-on or culvert or creek/ditch conveyance}, any existing or future development on adjacent properties, conveyed storm drainage, or surface water flow, and any areas deemed by the City that will need to connect-into the proposed development's SD System. 12 Dekorfe Partition 8/30/2002 5 2. Roof drains and under drains shall not be directly connected to public storm drain lines, and shall drain to the street. 3. Any discharge points of the storm water facilities shall be designed to provide an aesthetically pleasing, useful, and low maintenance facility, that are designed to mitigate erosion, damage, or loss during a 100- year storm event; and that mitigate the "attractive nuisance" hazards associated with these types of facilities. 4. Prior to City PWD constnacfion plan review, the Developer shall provide the City PWD with a complete set of hydrologic and hydraulic calculations and profile plots for sizing the SD system, which shall incorporate the use of the City PWD's rainfal~ntensity curve, and City approved run-0ff coefficients, curve numbers, retardance, pipe roughness coefficients, etc., that are used in the engineering calculations. 5. Storm drainpipe materials shall be PVC, HDPE, or reinforced concrete, with watertight joints. Provide concrete orsand-cement slurry encasement where required in areas of minimum cover. Sanitary Sewer All sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system (SS System) design, construction and testing shall conform to the standards and guidelines of the Oregon DEQ, 1990 APWA Standards, Oregon Chapter, Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA), and the City PWD Standards, where applicable. 2. The construction plans and the as-built drawings shall identify lateral stationing for construction of sewer laterals. 3. The City upon completion of initial construction plan review and preliminary approval, will forward the plans to BCVSA for completion of the review process. Upon completion of the review by BCVSA, completion of final revisions to the plans by the Developer's engineer, and following the final approval and signature on the construction plans by BCVSA, the Public Works Director will approve the plans in final form. 4. All testing and video inspection of lines and manholes shall be done in accordance with BCVSA requirements, at Developer's expense. The Developer shall provide BCVSA and the City with test reports, TV reports and certification of the sewer system construction prior to final acceptance. Water System - EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE •:~ 12-inch Ductile Iron Waterline (West Pine Street) Developer shall comply with Oregon Health Division (OHD) and City requirements for backflow prevention. ., . ~ e3 Dekorte Partition 8/30/2002 6 2. The Developer's engineer shall consult Fire District #3, and comply with any and all suggestions regarding fire protection. Site work, Grading, and Utility Plans Grading plans should have original/existing grades and final grades plotted on the plan. Typically, existing grade contour lines are dashed and screened back, and final grade contour lines are overlaid on top of the existing grades and are iti a heavier line width and solid. Contour lines should be labeled with elevations. 2. All structures shall have roof drains, area drains, andlor crawl spaces with positive drainage away from the building or structure. 3. Provide City with a utility plan approved by each utility company, which reflects all utility line locations, crossings, transformer locations, valves, etc. Utility locations must be accurately included on the as-built drawings, or as a separate set of drawings attached to the as-built drawings. Rights of Ways/Easements If applicable, Developer shall provide a Statement of Water Rights (on a City approved fiorm), for any affected properties. For properties determined to have water rights, the developer will coordinate with the State Water master the re-allocation of any waters attached to lands no longer irrigable as a result of the proposed development. ~~ BEAR CREEK VALLEY SANITARY AUTHORITY 7915 SOU7N PACIFIC NYYI'. • MEDFORD, OREGON 97501-9099 • (541) 6355193 • (541) 7784144 FAX (341) 5755279 • www.bcvaw.wg August 16, 2002 Ken Gerschler City of Central Point Planning Department 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Re: DeKorte Partition, 372W10BD - 800 Dear Ken, City of.Ce7itral i'tiiri~E ~.~I~~BI'~' ttF_ t PlannSng Department The existing house is served by a connection to the 8 inch sewer main on Pine Street. The two new parcels will also be served by this main line either through extension of service laterals or a main line extension. In either case, the sewer construction must be done in accordance with $CVSA Standazds. Please have the applicant contact BCVSA for more information regarding sewer service requirements. Sincerely, C~/~s-- Cazl Tappert, P.E. District Engineer K:FDATA~AGENCIES\CENTPT\PLANNG~PARTITION~DEKORTE PARTITION.DOC ~D