HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 839 - Microdevices SPARPLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 839
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
APPLICATION FOR ROGUE VALLEY MICRODEVICES, INC.
(FILE NO. 1602 1)
WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a site plan and architectural review application to develop an
2.24 acre site within the C-5, Commercial Thoroughfare zone with a 43,000 square foot Rogue Valley
Microdevices corporate headquarters and light fabrication facility; and
WHEREAS, on December 6, 2016, the City of Central Point Planning Commission conducted a duly -
noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the Staff Report and heard
testimony and comments on the application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's consideration of the application is based on the standards
and criteria applicable to Site Plan and Architectural Review in accordance with Section 17.72, Design
and Development Standards in accordance with Section 17.75, and Off -Street Parking and Loading in
accordance with Section 17.64 of the Central Point Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, after duly considering the proposed use, it is the Planning Commission's determination
that, subject to compliance with conditions as set forth in the Revised Staff Report (Exhibit "A") dated
December 6, 2016, the application does comply with applicable standards and criteria for approval of
the site plan and architecture; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning Commission, by
this Resolution No. 839, does hereby approve the Site Plan and Architectural Review application for
Rogue Valley Microdevices, Inc.. This approval is based on the findings and conditions of approval as
set forth on Exhibit "A", the Planning Department Staff Report dated December 6, 2016 and the
Applicant's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as set forth in Exhibit "B, " including
attachments incorporated herein by reference.
PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 7`h day
of December, 2016.
Planning Commission Chair
ATTEST:
Jza
i IVYRWresentative
Planning Commission Resolution No. 839 (12/6/2016)
STAFF REPORT
December 6, 2016
AGENDA ITEM ffiile No. 15021)
Consideration of a Site Plan and Architectural Review application for the construction of a 43,000
square foot corporate headquarters and light fabrication facility for Rogue Valley Microdevices.
Rogue Valley Microdevices proposes to operate in the Thoroughfare Commercial (C-5) zoning
district. The project site is located at 4901 Biddle Rd., and is defined on the Jackson County
Assessor's map as 37S 2W 01C, Tax Lot 802.
Applicant: Rogue Valley Microdevices, Inc.; Agent: Jay Harland, CSA Planning.
Approval Criteria: CPMC 17.72, Site Plan & Architectural Review
SOURCE
Stephanie Holtey, Community Planner II
BACKGROUND
Rogue Valley Microdevices, Inc. ("Applicant") is a microelectronics manufacturing company that
intends to relocate its current operation in Medford to a 2.24 acre site un Biddle Rudd ("Property").
The proposed location is Lot 3 of a three (3) lot tentative partition (File No. 16005) approved in
April 2016 (Attachment "A' ).
The Property is currently planned and zoned for Tourist and Office Professional (C-4) uses; light
fabrication is not a permitted use in the C-4 district. The Property is in the process of both a land use
and zone change to Thoroughfare Commercial (C-5). Light fabrication is outright permitted in the
C-5 zone per CPMC 17.43.020(F). Due to the limited use of hazardous materials processes
associated with the fabrication of small electronic wafer boards, the Community Development
Director referred the application to the Planning Commission as a conditional use per CPMC
17.46.030 (File No. 16023). Pending approval of the above actions, the Applicant requests Site
Plan & Architectural Review approval for the site development.
Project Description:
The Applicant proposes to construct a 43,000 square foot light manufacturing building consisting of
24,000 square feet of production area on one level and 19,000 square feet of office area on two
levels (Attachment "B-1"). The offices are located in the front of the building nearest Biddle Road
and the light fabrication operations in the back nearest to USP Reddaway Trucking, an industrial
use (Attachment `B-3", and `134").
The Property has, frontage on Biddle Road and adjoins a pnivate retail street to the east and a private
access drive to the south. The primary fagade and main pedestrian. entry (North Elevation) front
Biddle Road and the main parking'area (35 spaces). Access at this location is from the private retail
street, which has limited access to Biddle Road (right-in/right-out). Secondary parking (11 spaces)
is behind the building (South Elevation) with two points of access from the private retail street and
92
access drive. The southerly private drive provides full access (right-in/left-in, right-out/left out)
onto Hamrick Road. A one-way loading drive parallels the west building elevation and provides
access to two loading bays.
Architecturally the structure has a modern design that provides variation in building materials to
distinguish the manufacturing (i.e. painted tip -up concrete) and office (i.e. stucco) uses. Elements
such as recessed windows, sun shades/canopies and inset panels mitigate building mass on the
North, East and West elevations (Attachment `B-2"). The color palette is off-white, dark blue/black
and matte stainless steel.
ISSUES
There are three (3) issues relative to the application as follows:
1. Legal Lot Status. At the time of this review, the 2.24 acre project site has been tentatively
approved but not legally created. Since the Southern Oregon Specialty Veterinary Center
occupies the parent parcel (Tentative Lot 1), construction activities may not commence until
the final plat is recorded.
Comment. The Applicant's findings state that the tentative plan improvements are
underway with completion of the final plat anticipated within the next couple of months.
Staff recommends the lot legality issue be resolved with a condition of approval requiring
final plat completion prior to building permit issuance.
2. Parking Adjustment. Per Table 17.64.02B, the required amount of parking for a
manufacturing facility is determined based on either the number of employees per shift or
the square footage of gross floor area, whichever is greater. In this case, 86 parking spaces
are required. The Applicant's parking plan proposes 46 spaces. To meet the off-street
parking interior landscape requirements (See Issue 3a), the applicant may lose one (1) space
in the secondary parking lot south of the building resulting in 45 spaces. Provision of 45-46
spaces does not meet the minimum/maximum parking requirement.
Comment: As part of the Conditional Use Permit (File No. 16023), the Applicant requested
a parking reduction on the basis that strict application of the code requirement would
significantly increase the number ofparking spaces needed for the proposed use. The
Applicant's Findings (Attachment "C') state that the a maximum of 35 people will occupy
the building at any time, including employees and visitors. Based on a Parking Demand
Analysis using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Manual, the manufacturing use will
generate 34-51 parking spaces (Attachment Y ", Exhibit 16). The parking plan with 45-46
spaces falls within the range generated by the ITE manual and the Central Point Municipal
Code, and is therefore considered acceptable,
3. Off -Street Parking Landscape Requirements. Proposed off-street parking lot landscaping
improvements are not consistent with the requirements for interior islands and tree planting
per CPMC 17.75.039(G)(2):
a. Interior Islands. CPMC 17.75.039(G)(2) requires landscape islands a minimum of
8 -ft wide be placed within parking rows that contain ten (10) or more spaces. Four
PN
(4) interior islands that are 4 -ft wide are dispersed throughout the front (North)
parking lot. The proposed islands do not meet the minimum width for interior
landscape islands. The south parking lot behind the building (South Elevation) has
an 11 space parking row and does not meet the interior landscaping requirement for
islands.
Comment. Based on staff's review, the interior landscape requirements can be met
with minor modifications to the parking lot configuration (i.e. adding and modifying
islands). The landscape islands within the north parking lot can be consolidated into
two (2) 8-f1 islands without losing any parking spaces. 116wever, the addition of an
interior island in the south parking lot appears to result in the loss of one (1) space.
As demonstrated in the Applicant's parking demand analysis (Attachment "D'), a
total of 45 parking spaces would remain within the acceptable range of parking
generated by the use.
Staff recommends a revised Site Plan be submitted at the time of building permit
application demonstrating compliance with the interior landscape requirements per
CPMC 17.75.039(G)(2).
b. Trees. CPMC 17.75.039(G)(2)(a-c) provides the tree planting requirements for off-
street parking lot interior landscape areas (i.e. terminals and islands). The number of
trees required is a function of the parking lot visibility from the public realm. Highly
visible parking lots require more trees than those that are located away from public
rights-of-way (i.e. behind buildings).
The north parking lot is between the primary building fagade and Biddle Road and
requires 1 tree for every four (4) spaces. There are 35 spaces requiring eight (8)
trees; however, only two (2) are shown on the landscape plan (Attachment "B-5).
The south parking lot is behind the building and requires one (1) tree for every eight
(8) spaces resulting in one (1) tree for the 10-11 space parking row. No trees are
shown on the landscape plan at this location. Table 1 shows the tree planting
requirements for each parking area.
Parking Lot No. T - .'Trees Dow
_ Location �_�pate� Re aired Prosed +t
North 35 8�� 2 -6
South 45-46 1 F 0 (-1
Comment: Staff recommends that a revised Landscape Plan be submitted at the time
of building permit application demonstrating compliance with the interior landscape
requirements for trees per CPMC I 7.75.039(G) (2) (a) and (c).
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Site Plan and Architectural Review application for the proposed Rogue Valley Microdevices
development has been evaluated for compliance with the Site Plan and Architectural Review criteria
94
set forth in Chapter 17.72 of the Central Point Municipal Code and found to comply, as evidenced
by the Applicant's Findings (Attachment "C").
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. Site Plan and Architectural Review approval is subject to designation of the project site (37S
2W O1C, TL 802) as Commercial Thoroughfare and C-5; and approval of a Conditional Use
Permit (File No. 16023). Failure to obtain any of the required land use approvals shall result
in the denial of this site plan and architectural review application.
2. At the time of building permit application, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan and
landscape plan demonstrating compliance with the off-street parking lot landscape
requirements in CPMC 17.75.039(G)(2). Modifications that alter the site layout may be
subject to CPMC 17.09, Modifications to Approved Plans.
3. Prior to building permit issuance, the final plat for the Tail Light Properties Minor Partition
(File No. 16005) shall be approved by the City of Central Point and recorded by the Jackson
County Assessor.
4. The Applicant shall comply with agency conditions as listed in the:
a. Rogue Valley Sewer Services letter dated November 16, 2016 (Attachment "E').
b. Jackson County Roads letter dated November 16, 2016 (Attachment "F").
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment "A" — Area Plan with Tentative Partition Plan
Attachment `B-1" — Site Plan
Attachment `B-2" — Architectural Elevations
Attachment `B-3" —1St Floor Plan
Attachment `134" — 2nd Floor Plan
Attachment `B-5" — Landscape & Irrigation Plan
Attachment "B-6" — Civil Site Grading & Utility Plan
Attachment "C" — Applicant's Findings, with Exhibits 1-16.
Attachment "D" — Application Clarification Memo from CSA Planning dated November 29, 2016
Attachment "E" — Rogue Valley Sewer Services letter dated November 16, 2016
Attachment "F" — Jackson County Roads letter dated November 16, 2016
Attachment "G" — Resolution No. 839
ACTION
Consider the Site Plan and Architectural Review application and 1) approve; 2) approve with
conditions; or 3) deny the application.
RECONEWENDATION
Approve the Rogue Valley Microdevices Site Plan & Architectural Review with conditions as
recommended in the Staff Report dated December 6, 2016, and contingent on the approvals of the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment (File No. 16025), the Zone Change Amendment (File No. 16024);
and Conditional Use Permit (File No. 16023).
95
HAMRICK ROAD
MENT fl -A ._"
E�
�y
t
r'7 '
r-____--r_-___-�/ L- i
� J
I
1
I � �
J
1
9
MEADC"ROOK DRNE
j r ROGUE VALLEY NNCROOEVICE!
96
A] IACHMENT-wl--1
i-- -- --- - - - - _ - T I
I 3=
--
.. 1
ppo�i 91PP!8
■
ROQUE VALLEY
MICRODEVICES
461 BIDOLE-TAX LOT eat
CENTRAL POINT, OREGON
m -moi
;gggg m
F`tl m
V ? (n
97
0
c
m
D
r
r
Mm
X?�
H
Fn 0
D m m
A fT1 m
z0G
CaI�Zz
9
_
Z
O
Elm
a
oo
m
j�
+g
mx
Xc n
mn m
n
i
A
M n-
ATTACHMENT "."
98
I
4
0
ATTACHMENT
99
F
�•,, PI
ROGUE VALLEY
y,
_
WCRODEVICE8
W S� ^�
r
4801 BIDDLE-TAX LOT 802
CENTRAL POINT, OREGON
.a`
R`-` m
LIN
(n
99
10
ATTACHMENT it
i
i'#
ai
ROQUE VALLEY"
MICRODEVI`ES
ABM BIDDLE-TAR LOT 802
CENTRAL POINT, ORrQQlN
3 m
e
L
i'#
I;.A's
0
64,
. s• ME
•` i
"Y •a ���t •i '
• -.4 1
r
-9 p Fal ROGUE VALLEY MICRODEVICES Madara Design Inc
II6 N s� � I€1,r I} 4601 FIIDOLE ROAD TAX LOT 803 2M Fb.�n caaxe.om �� 1
11I }fl CENPR L POINT. OREWN 97902 C-1 Pain a- WW2
{ ` Sal�&4ItTi5
FIVE
poob e1ppis
IF WA
ROGUE VALLEY
MICROCIEVICES
40 1 BIDDLE-TAX LOT 802
Dv �--- . "= POINT, OREGON
ey 1. 3 70-U
Pn3
70 C:
A --i
IF WA
ATTACHMENT
BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND
CITY COUNCIL
FOR THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
STATE OF OREGON
IN THE MATTER OF A REQUEST FOR A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, SITE PLAN
AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW FOR A
LIGHT FABRICATION FACILITY. THE
SUBJECT TRACT IS LOCATED AT 4901
BIDDLE ROAD WHICH IS ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF BIDDLE ROAD
BETWEEN HAMRICK AND TABLE ROCK
ROAD IMMEDIATELY EAST OF THE
SUPER 8 MOTEL. THE PROPERTY IS
LOCATED IN THE CITY OF CENTRAL
POINT AND IS MORE SPECIFICALLY
IDENTIFIED AS TAX LOT 802 IN
TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST
(WM), SECTION 01C.
Applicant/ Owners_
Rogue Valley Microdevices, Inc.
Tail Lite Properties, LLC
Agent; CSA Planning, Ltd.
PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT
AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
NATURE OF THE APPLICATION
Applicants' Exhibit 2
The Applicants request a Site Plan and Architectural Review for the building and site plan
for the proposed Rogue Valley Microdevices corporate headquarters building, In addition,
based upon information in the Pre -Application Conference Report, per staff's
recommendation the Applicant is also applying for a conditional use permit based on the
nature of the business and its parking needs.
Rogue Valley Microdevices corporate headquarters building is proposed to be located on Lot
3 of the tentative partition pian which is the western half of an approved land division. The
infrastructure for the partition plat is under construction now. It is possible, if not likely, that
the final plat will be completed contemporaneous with the review of this subject application.
The partition plat includes a retail street running from Biddle (toad to the southern private
access road. A new veterinary clinic was approved for Lot 1 at the southeast corner of the
property and is currently under construction, The approved tentative plat actually included
two alternate lot layouts, "A -l" and "A-2". Tail Lite Properties, Inc, is constructing "A-2"
consistent with the approved alternative that supports the proposed Rogue Valley
Microdevices headquarters use,
Frox
Page 1
Fndings of Foot and conclusions of Law
Applicant: Rogue Valley Microdevices, Inc, and Tail Lit® Properties, LLC
The request for fine CLIP is based on two things. First, the business uses small amounts of
hazardous materials for its fabrication of small electronic wafer boards. Second, the parking
calculations per the code are not allgmd with the actual .need for this building and use.
Therefore the Applicant requests a conditional use permit that allows for its small scale
handling of hazardous materials and for the proposed amount of parldng.
104
Rage 2
J Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
I Applicant: Rogue Valley Microdevices, Inc. and Tail Lite Properties, LLC
EVIDENCE SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATIONS
Applicant herewith submits the following evidence with its land use application:
Exhibit 1. Completed application forms and Duly Executed Limited Powers of Attorney
from Applicants and Owners authorizing CSA Planning, Ltd, to act on their
behalf.
j Exhibit 2. These proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, demonstrating how the
tt application complies with the applicable substantive criteria of Central Point' s
Ladd Development Ordinance
Exhibit 3. Applicants' Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development
Standards
Exhibit 4. Jackson County Assessor Plat Map 37-2W-01 C
Exhibit 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map
Exhibit 6. Proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map
Exhibit 7. Zoning Map on Aerial Photo
Exhibit S. Proposed Zoning Map
Exbibit 9. Area. Plan (depicting Approved In -Process Project and Proposed Development)
Exhibit 10. Letter Evaluating Transportation Impacts from Plan Amendment and Zone
Change, Southern Oregon Transportation. Engineering.
Exhibit 11. Survey of Existing Conditions; Pariani Land Surveying, February 9, 2015.
Exhibit 12. Site Photos and Site Photo Key Map
Exhibit 13. Proposed Site Development Plans:
■ Exterior Building Elevations
■ Site Plan
■ Floor Plan
■ C-1 Civil Plan
• L-1 Landscape Plan
Exhibit 14. Tentative Partition Plat Notice of Decision and Staff Report with Exhibit A-2
Exhibit 15. Development Transportation. Impact Analysis, Southern Oregon Transportation
Engineering
Exhibit 16. Parking Demand Analysis, Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering
Page 3
105
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Applicant: Rogue Valley Microdevices, Inc. and Tail Lite Properties, LLC
RELEVANT SUBSTANTIVE APPROVAL CRITERIA
The relevant substantive Central Point Zoning Ordinance (CPZO) criteria prerequisite to
approving a Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Architectural Review are recited in
relation to the proposed development on Parcel 3:
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT ZONING ORDINANCE (CPZO)
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW CRITERIA
1TA&M General requlremrernta.
A- Uses that are nor miafty perrMtted in the C-5 district but that are referred to the planning commission for
further review, per Section 97.48,0.30(26), will be processed according to application procedures for
conditional use permits. No use shall be permitted and no process, equipment or materials shatl be used
which are found by the planning commission to be harmful to persons I"sving or wortdng in the vicinity by
reason of odor, fumes, dust, smoke, enders, dirt, refuse, water -carried waste, noise, vibration, Illumination
or glare, or are found to involve any hazard of fire or explosion_
B. No use shall be permitted and no process, equipment or materials shall be used unless in compliance with
all applicable state and federal environmental, health and safety regulations.
D. Whenever feasible, buildings shad be located toward the rear of the lot with paddng toward the street in the
front yard area for easy access and to minimize traffic noise at the rear of the property, especially when the
rear property line abuts a residential (R) district. (Ord. 1884 §48, 1993; Ord. 1616 §44, 1989; Ord. 1436
§2(pe t), 1981).
17.46.010 Purpose.
The C-5 district is intended to provide for cainme(d&I and business uses that are most appropriately toe ated
along or near major highways or thoroughfares, and are largely dependent upon highway visibility and easy
vehicular access. (Ord, 1883 (part), 2008; Ord. 1436 §2(part),1981).
17A6.920 Per lftd ass_
The following uses are permitted in the C-5 district:
F. Light fabrication, such as:
1. Light fabrication, assembly, packaging, mail-order sales and wholesale sales of consumer goods, and
2. Light fabrication and repair shops such as blacksmith, cabinet, electric motor, heating, machine,
sheetmetal, signs, stone monuments, upholstery and welding;
17.46.030 Conditional uses.
The following uses are permitted in the G5 district when authorized In accordance with Chapter 17,76:
26. Permitted uses that are referred to the planning commission by city staff because they were found to
exhibit potentially adverse or hazardous characteristics not normally found in uses of a similar type or
size;
17.76.040 Findlapa and conditions.
The planning commission in granting a conditional use permit shall find as follows:
A. That the site for the proposed use Is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use and to meet all
other development and lot requirements of the subject zoning district and all other provisions of this code;
B. That the site has adequate access to a public street or highway and that the street or highway is adequate in
size and condition to effectively accommodate the traffic that is expected to be generated by the proposed
use;
C. That the proposed use will have no significant adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted use
thereof, In making this determination, the commission shall consider the proposed location of improvements
106
Page 4
Findings of t=act and Conclusions of Law
Applicant: Rogue Valley Microdevices, Inc. and Tail Lite Properties, LLC
on the site; vehicular ingress, egress and internal circulation; setbacks; height of buildings and structures;
walls and fences; landscaping; outdoor lighting; and signs;
D. That the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use applied for will comply with local, state and
federal health and safety regulations and therefore will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general
welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding neighborhoods and will not be detrimental or
Injurious to the property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the community
based on the review of those factors listed in subsection C of this section;
E. That any conditions required for approval of the permit are deemed necessary to protect the public health,
safety and general welfare and may include:
1, Adjustments to lot size or yard areas as needed to best accommodate the proposed use; provided the
lots or yard areas conform to the stated minimum dimensions for the subject zoning district, unless a
variance is also granted as provided for in Chapter 17.13,
2. Increasing street widths, modifications in street designs or addition of street signs or traffic signals to
accommodate the traffic generated by the proposed use,
3. Adjustments to off-street parking requirements in accordance with any unique characteristics of the
proposed use,
4_ Regulation of points of vehicular ingress and egress,
5. Requiring landscaping, irrigation systems, lighting and a property maintenance program,
6. Regulation of signs and their locations,
7. Requiring fences, berms, walls, landscaping or other devices of organic or artificial composition to
eliminate or reduce the effects of noise, vibrations, odors, visual incompatibility or other undesirable
effects on surrounding properties,
8. Regulation of time of operations for certain types of uses if their operations may adversely affect privacy
of sleep of persons residing nearby or otherwise conflict with other community or neighborhood
functions,
9. Establish a time period within which the subject land use must be developed,
10, Requirement of a bond or other adequate assurance within a specified period of time,
11. Such other conditions that are found to be necessary to protect the public health, safety and general
welfare
SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW CRITERIA
Chapter 17.72
SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
17.72.020 Applicability.
B. Major Projects. The following are "major projects" for file purposes of the site plan and
architectural review process and are subject to Type 2 procedural requirements as set forth in
Chapter t_7 U*, Applications and Types of Review Procedures.
1. New construction, including private and public projects, that:
a. Includes a new building or building addition of five thousand square feet or more;
b. Includes the construction of a parking lot of ten or more parking spaces;
17,72,040 Site pian and architectural standards.
In approving, conditionally approving, or denying any site plan and architectural review application,
the approving authority shall base its decision on compliance with the following standards:
A. Applicable site plan, landscaping, and architectural design standards asset forth in Chapter 17.75,
Design and Development Standards;
107
Page 5
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Appl!"nt: Rogue Valley Microdeuices. Inc. and Tail Lite Properties, LLC
8. City of Central Point Department of Public Marks Department Standard Specifications and Uniform
Standard Details for Public Works Construction;
C. Accessibility and SLrfhciency of fire fighting facilities to such a standard as to provide for the
reasonable safety of life, limb and property, including, but not limited to, suitable gales, access roads
and fire tars 3o tiat all buildings on the prerrOses are accessba to fire apparatus.
108
pqp 0
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Applicant: Rogue Valley Microdevices, Inc. and Tail Lite Properties, LLC
fU
FINDINGS OF FACT
The following facts are established and found to be true with respect to this matter:
1. Ownership/Applicant: Tax Lot 802 is owned in fee simple by Tail Lite Properties, LLC.
Rogue Valley Microdevices is in contract to purchase Lot 3 of the subject property. Agent
CSA Planning, Ltd_ is submitting this application on behalf of the property owner and
contract purchaser.
2. Location: The subject property is located on the south side of Biddle Road between
Hamrick Road and Table Rock Road, The property is identified as Tax Lot 802 in Township
37 South, Range 02 West (W.M.), Section 01C. The site address is 4901 Biddle Road,
Central Point, OR.
3. Parcel Size: Tax Lot 802 currently has 4.87 acres. See, Exhibit 4,
4. Comprehensive Plan Map Designation / Zoning: Designated Tourist and Office
Professional / Zoned C-4 Tourist and Office Professional. See, Exhibits 5 and 7.
5. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map Designation / Zoning: Designation proposed to be
amended to Thoroughfare Commercial and to change the zone to C-5. See, Exhibits 6 and 8.
6. Existing Frontage and Access: The subject property has frontage along its northern
boundary on Biddle Road. Biddle Road is classified in the TSP as an arterial. Tax Lot 802
also has access easements on the access drives that nun south from Biddle load along Tax
Lot 803 and along tLe southem boundaries of Tax Lots 801, 802 and 803 and intersecting
with Hamrick Road, These private commercial accesses were reviewed and approved by
Central Point at the time of land division that created the parent parcel. A private north -
south Retail Street has been approved to intersect with Siddle Road approximately mid -block
between existing accesses. The Retail Street will have right-inhight-out only access with a
median in Biddle Road and is currently under constuction.
7. Lot Legality: Tax Lot 802 was created through two partitions. Tax Lot 800 was divided
through partition P-03-2004 into three parcels in 2004, and in 2005 the resulting Parcel 2 was
subdivided into three lots, of which Tax Lot 802 was Lot 1. In 2007 a lot line adjustment
was made to the border between Tax Lots 802 and 803 creating its current configuration. In
April of 2016, the City of Central Point approved a tentative partition plat to divide Tax Lot
802 into three separate parcels. The proposed conditional use permit and site plan review are
directed at Parcel 3 of the approved tentative land division; it is passible, if not probable, that
the final plat will be recorded prior to completion of the subject land use review,
S. Previous Planning Permits:
File No. 16004 - Site Plan and Architectural Review which approved a veterinary clinic on
Parcel 1 of the land division and File No, 16005- Tentative Partition were approved April 14,
2016.
9. Existing Development, The property is currently vacant but construction of the Retail Street
and the veterinary clinic has begun.
109
Page 7
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Applicant: Rogue Valley Microdevices, Inc. and Tail Lite Properties, LLC
10. Land Uses on Abutting Properties and Surrounding Area:
Overview of arca: The stretch of Biddle Road/East Pine Street ("BR/EPS") that is east of the
Interstate -5 in Central Point is an employment area with a mix of commercial uses right
along BR/EPS on the south side with some industrial uses further to the south. Except for a
small portion of a larger residential area near Meadowbrook Drive and Orchard View
Avenue, the north side of BR/EPS is primarily undeveloped employment designated
property; further to the north is the Jackson County Expo (fairgrounds), the Central Point
Fast residential area, and some legacy County development patterns. There are a mix of
developed and undeveloped properties between the interstate and Table Rock Road.
East: To the east of the subject property is vacant laud owned by Les Schwab. Further
to the east is additional vacant employment land that is marketed for sale. This
land has a Comprehensive Plan Map of Thoroughfare Commercial and is zoned
C-5
North: Across Biddle Road is the Dulany property. This property has a single family
dwelling on it and is under developed in relation to its plan designation. The
property is planned Tourist and Professional Office and is zoned C-4. The land to
the northeast is planned and zoned for residential uses and has been developed
with single-family dwellings. Land to the northwest is a large vacant 21 acre site
planned Tourist and Office Professional and zoned C-4.
South: South of the subject property across the private commercial access drive is the
USF Reddaway warehouse logistics facility. This facility is planned General
industrial and coned M-2.
West: Immediately to the west is the Super 8 Motel. This site is planned Tourist and
Office Professional and is zoned C4. Further to the west is some vacant
commercial land across Hamrick Road and a road maintenance yard further to the
southwest.
11. Topography: The subject property is essentially level, sloping very gently to the north.
12. Water Facilities and Services: Underground water utilities exist at the west property line
and along the utility and access easement along the southern portion of the property. These
water facilities are available for connection.
13. Sanitary,Sewer Facilities and Services: Underground sanitary sewer utilities exists in the
utility easements along the south portion of the property and are available for connection.
14. Power aad Natural Gas: Underground power is available from Pacific Power and
underground gas is available from Avista Utilities and the sartae exist in the utility easements
along the south portion of the property and are available for connection.
15. Fire and Police .Protection: The subject properties are located within and are served by Fire
District No, 3. Police service is provided by the City of Central Point Police Department.
16. Wetlands, ,Streams and floodplain: The subject property does not contain any jurisdictional
wetlands per Jackson County GIS Services. The subject property does not contain any
streams or floodplain per Jackson County GIS Services,
17. Storm Drainage Facilities and Services: Underground storm drainage lines are located in
Biddle Road and in the private access easement and utility area on the south portion of the
property, These storm drain lines are available for connection. The approval of the prior
Page 8
110
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Applicant: Rogue Valley Microdevices, Inc. and Tail Lite Properties, LLC
land division necessitated construction of a stormwater detention facility on Lot 2 of the
partition which is planned to handle a significant portion of the Rogue Valley Microdevices'
storm drainage tweeds, see Exhibit 13, Sheet C -l.
18. Transportation and Access:
A. Access and Circulation: Access to the site is via a private retail street that is under
construction and was approved under Planning File No. 16005. The retail street
intersects with Biddle Road and is a right -in -right -out intersection allowing in -movement
from the west and out -movement to the east onto Biddle Road. A concrete median in
Biddle Road will be constructed in conjunction with the new retail street. Access coming
from the east will be from a Ieft turn onto the private street connection opposite
Meadowbrook and then right along the private access drive to the south and then a right
onto the private retail street. Access out of the site to the west will involve a right turn
onto the private retail street and then out the private access drive along the south property
line to a right turn on Hamrick then to the signal where a left can be made onto East Pine
Street
The office driveway is located on the private retail street_ It is somewhat close to the
intersection with Biddle Road but there is adequate room for at least two stacked vehicles
and it is a right into the site so no queuing at this location is expected. The other access
onto the site is via two large driveways to the south access drive; the wide driveways are
needed to get semi -trucks into the back parking Iot area and then out onto the private
access drive. These south driveways will be truck vehicle access points; smaller trucks
that use the west service drive will exit via the front office parking lot access point.
B. Transportation Impacts from Proposed Development: The Applicant's traffic
engineer also prepared a traffic impacts analysis that analyzes the proposed Rogue Valley
Microdevices project, see Exhibit 15. That analysis was an update to the Southern
Oregon Veterinary Specialty Center analysis done for that project which is now under
construction. In the prior analysis, Parcel 3 was assumed to be a future site for a 25,000
square foot specialty retail center, along with the veterinary clinic and an assumed sit
down restaurant on the remaining Parcel 2. The updated analysis continues to assume the
sit down restaurant on Parcel 2 and assumes the veterinary clinic use on Parcel 1 but
substitutes the Rogue Valley Microdevices use for Parcel 3. This results in a reduced trip
generation of the entire site of 53 P.M. peak hour trips.
The results of the analysis show that the transportation system can accommodate the
proposed use in conformance with all applicable performance standards.
19. Proposed Development Project:
The proposed Rogue Valley Microdevices corporate headquarters and light fabrication
facility has the following features:
A. Design Scheme: The approach to the building is to create a modern and attractive high-
tech light manufacturing building. The building is proposed to contain a 10,000 square
foot clean room within a 24,000 square foot production area and the building will have
approximately 19,000 square feet of accessory office space on two levels. Being a high-
tech
ightech facility, the interior is a purpose built design that reflects workflow needs and the
demands of the clean room.
Page 9
111
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Applicant Rogue Valley Microdevices, Inc. and Tail Lite Properties, LLC
The nature of the interior layout dictates the location of certain outdoor connections in
terms of entrance location, delivery doors and access to the accessory office uses.
Overall, the exterior is a modern, but relatively simple flat -roofed commercial building
with several attractive architectural elements on the main fagade and attractive materials
on all elevations. See, Exhibit 13.
B. Vehicle Parking and Loading: The project proposes 46 parking spaces. The
application is requesting an adjustment to the off-street parking standards as part of the
Conditional Use Permit approval (pursuant to special conditions of approval that may be
imposed under 17.76.040(E)(3)) because a strict application of the code would require
significantly more parking than is expected to be tteeded by the use. There is a wide
disparity between the two calculation methods for the parking requirements. The
employee calculation method for industrial uses yields a meed for approximately 1$
spaces. The gross floor area method would require 84 spaces, one for every 500 square
feet of gross floor area, which is difference of over 60 parking spaces. The proposed 46
spaces is between the two need calculation methods and is projected to be adequate for
the use. It is expected that this amount of parking will be adequate to allow for nearly
doubling of the size of rhe company within the new space:, which is the largest it can be
within the new facility. A parking demand analysis has been prepared by Southern
Oregon Transportation Engineering for this submittal and is located in Exhibit 16.
Industrial uses of 37,501 square feet to 50,000 square feet are required to Have four
loading berth; the actual fabrication area is 24,000 square feet which would require four
berths. The site plan and building elevations depict four overhead loading doors for the
facility. Two overhead doors are located on the west elevation along the service drive.
These will be accessed by forklift for semis from the main rear parking lot and by smaller
delivery vehicles such as FedEx and UPS. This entire circulation area on the west side of
the building could be considered a series of loading berths, in which case the site has the
equivalent of 8 loading berths just on this side. One overhead door loading location on
the east elevation, trucks could use this for delivery from the private retail street although
this would be expected to be a rare occurrence, primarily this would be accessed by
forklift on the occasion when equipment needed to loaded on the east side of the clean
room. The fourth overhead door is shown on the south elevation and this berth will
generally be used by a forklift off-loading from a semi -trailer truck parked in the rear lot.
C. Bike Parking: The code requires four bike parking spaces. The covered bike parking
spaces will be under a canopy area located at the outdoor break area.
D. Landscaping: This high-tech Iight manufacturing facility is proposed to be fully
landscaped at the time of development, see Exhibit 13, Sheet L-1. The proposed
landscaping is extensive for an industriat use and is proposed in a manner that will allow
it to blend well with commercial uses in the area. The 10 -foot sidewalk with tree wells
on the retail street will create an attractive streetscape for this private street. The planting
scheme includes a number of mass plantings that will create an attractive landscape
throughout the year.
20. Conditional Use Permit Findings: Even though the proposed use could properly be
approved as a permitted use wilder Use F -- Light Fabrication. The planning staff has the
authority to refer uses to the Planning Commission as a Conditional Use Permit, The Pre -
Application indicated the Staff s intent to refer the application to the Planning Commission
Ipagb 10
112
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Applicant: Rogue Valley Microdevices, Inc and Tail Lite Properties, LLC
for Conditional Use Permit approval. The City of Central Point has conditional use permit
criteria that require specific findings. Applicant's agent provides the below testimony as
evidence to address such required findings and this testimony may be relied upon as
substantial evidence; CSA Planning are experts in Oregon Land Use Planning and have
experience as a profess.ionaI planning firm for over 35 years.
A. Lot Size and Configuration: A site plan has been submitted concurrent with the
proposed use. The proposed design can be found to be in compliance with applicable
sections of the code and the site plan shows the use can be accommodated on the site.
The only aspects of the size of the lot and proposed development are relatively minor
issues relating to parking supply and the storm drainage. A portion of the storm drainage
detention for the building is being placed in the Swale on the northeast lot; this swale was
designed to accommodate drainage from the Rogue Valley Microdevices building in
accordance with private agreements between the parties. The other minor issue is
parking supply. The parking supply issue is largely a function of the code's methods for
calculating parking demand_ The two methods vary widely, but the code requires the
"higher" method to be used; applicant has requested the City approve an adjustment to
the off-street parking requirements, based upon the unique characteristics of the proposed
use pursuant to CPMC 17.76.040(E)(3). With approval of this parking supply
adjustment, the proposed development will satisfy all applicable City development
requirements on the subject lot.
.B. Traffic and Access. See transportation and access findings and related evidence
elsewhere in the application submittal.
C. Effects on Abutting Property: Analysis of abutting properties are analyzed by
direction:
li. North: Lands to the north are across Biddle Road, which is a major arterial
roadway_ The north building elevation is where the accessory office uses are
located and the design and appearance of this portion of the buildings is similar to
two-story office buildings permitted in the zone and serves to further buffer uses to
the north. Given the intensity of the Biddle Road use and the low -intensity office
use of the northern third of the building, no adverse effects on properties to the
north are expected. Signage, landscaping and outdoor lighting will be similar on
the north elevation to uses pemmitted in the zone and effect on lands to the north
will not be adverse.
ii. Northeast: Land to the northeast is a vacant lot that will be created by recording
the final plat for Planning File No. 16065_ The resulting lot will be across the
private retail street from Rogue Valley Microdevices. Also, there will be a
bioswale adjacent to the retail street that will further separate the uses as will the
large landscape area on the east side of the building. The northern two-thirds of
this lot will be adjacent to the office use of the building. The bioswale is required
to be a minimum length which moves the access to the vacant lot south in a location
where the driveways will be separated. Even though the driveways will be offset
they will be offset in the direction that still allows for smooth traffic flow because
the left -outs of each parking lot will not conflict with one another. The access
separation will be adequate for all movements to see one another in an appropriate
manner. Signage, landscaping and outdoor lighting will be similar when viewed
Page 11
113
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Applicant: Rogue Valley Microdevices, Inc. and Tail Lite Properties, LLC
from the northeast and compared to uses permitted in the zone and effect on the
parcel to the northeast will not be adverse.
hi. Soutbeast. Land to the southeast is under construction for a veterinary clinic. The
owner of the veterinary clinic is the owner of the subject development property.
The veterinary clinic's front entrance will face the east elevation where there are
high windows throughout and a single roll -up door; that particular roll -up door is
expected to be used on a limited basis but is necessary to provide forklift access to
the outside of the building on that side to the clean -room. There will be
approximately 115 feet of separation from the east wall to the veterinary clinic
entrance. The veterinary clinic provides emergency 24-hour animal care and the
lighting and development of the Rogue Malley Microdevices building is expected to
enhance lighting and safety in the area during night operations. The design of the
building includes a full height exterior wall on the back of the building to screen the
outdoor equipment area at the back of the building. Because Tail Lite LLC (a
limited liability company owned by the owners of Southern. Oregon Veterinary
Specialty Center) is the seller of the property to Rogue Valley Microdevices, they
have coordinated the designs of their respective buildings to assure compatibility
between the respective uses and designs. Signage, landscaping and outdoor lighting
wi1L be similar when viewed from the southeast and compared to uses permitted in
the cone and effect on the parcel to the southeast will not be adverse.
iv, South: Land to the south is a private access road and further to the south is the
USF Reddaway trucking facility. This is a warehousing, trucking and freight
handling facility. A h foot, high block fence with land. -A aping runs the entire lezegkh
of the parcel's southern boundary. The rogue 'Dalley Microdevices project is
designed so that the outdoor equipment and primary loading areas face this
industrial trucking use to the south. Industrial trucking uses are not aesthetically
sensitive uses and are noisy themselves with a considerable area devoted to outdoor
storage, Signage, landscaping and outdoor lighting will be similar to other
commercial outdoor storage and loading areas when viewed from the south and are
similar and typical of industrial uses to the south.
V. West: Land to the west is occupied by the Super 8 Motel. This is a 3 -story hotel
with internal access halls to the individual room. Each room appears to have its
own Packaged Terminal Air Conditioner unit (PTAQ below windows on its east
elevation. The proposed design includes a full height wall extension in the back of
the building to shield noise sources from the hotel and to visually screen this
equipment. All other Noise producing equipment is roof mounted behind parapet
walls on the roof and this HVAC equipment is similar from a noise and visual
perspective to other HVAC equipment that is typical of other commercial and light
manufacturing buildings in the area. The proposed building is 32 feet in height
which is tall enough to limit the number of rooms looking down on a roof structure
to only the top floor and evert that floor will primarily be looking across and not
down on the roof structure. Virtually all of the second and third stories would look
down on a roof structure to the east if the site were developed with a single -story
retail use. There is considerable separation between the two buildings,
app:toxirnately 100 feet. The project will be adding landscaping along the west
property line that will serve to screen and separate the two uses. The proposed
Page 12
114
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Applicant: Rogue Valley Microdevices, Inc. and Tail Lite Properties, LLC
service drive aisle is expected to be used infrequently and almost exclusively during
the day which should minimize the potential for conflicts with patrons at the Super
8. Lighting on the west elevation will consist of shielded sconce lighting aimed
downward that will serve to create a safe space without any direct lighting impacts
to the Super 8 motel. The Rogue Valley Microdevices project design has
thoughtfully considered the abutting Super 8 motel use and has been designed in a
manner that will minimize potential adverse impacts to a level that is equal or less
than what would otherwise be expected from development of uses outright
permitted .in the C-5 zone (or the C-4 zone for that matter if the site were not re-
designated).
D. Compliance with Local, State and Federal Health and Safety Regulations: Rogue
Valley Microdevices takes appropriate precautions to comply with applicable health and
safety requirements. DEQ conducts periodic unannounced inspections for regulation
compliance. In these inspections, no major corrections have been required. All gaseous
wastes are vented through a scrubber at their current site to remove particulate emissions
amording to industry best practices design. All gas process inputs are within an enclosed
system and the storage tanks will be located within a storage cabinet that also vents to the
scrubber in the event of any leak. The design of the building is such that a closed
catchment system exists in the floor so that any liquid spill drains to the catchment
system where it can be containerized and picked up for off-site disposal. From a sewage
standpoint, Medford's Regional. Wastewater Reclamation plant has an inspector on staff
and this person routinely conducts inspections to evaluate the quantity and type of
effluent released into the sanitary sewer to assure it is in compliance with applicable
discharge requirements. Rogue Valley Nlicrodevices self -reports to DEQ annually and
transmits a hazardous waste reduction plan that identifies ways for operation to reduce
the use of .hazardous waste for each unit of production.
Rogue Valley Microdevices las internal controls in place that involve weekly self-
inspections
elfinspections for items such as labelling, dates, seal connections, container conditions, etc.
From the standpoint of handling materials from the delivery trucks to the facility, this has
been taken into account with the design of the building with the external circulation and
roll -up doors to allow for direct forklift routes from delivery trucks to storage locations.
Roll -up door heights are specifically designed to assure adequate clearance when moving
materials, All materials are palletized and shipped in containers that are designed for the
particular material being handled, Rogue Valley Microdevices has an employee, Dan
Swanson, who is certified to provide forklift training so that all operators are properly
trained and he is also available in-house for ongoing supervision,
With respect to safety, the Medford Fire Department regularly conducts inspections at the
site. None of these Fire Department inspections have ever resulted in significant
corrections except in an instance where a new system was installed in accordance with
department directions and a later inspection determined that direction was incorrect. In
this circumstance, Rogue Valley Microdevices promptly implemented the correction at
their sole expense,
Page 13
115
Findings of Pact and Conclusions of Law
Applicant: Rogue Valley Microdevices, Inc. and Tall Lite Properties, LLC
N
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT ZONING ORDINANCE (CPZO)
The following conclusions of law and ultimate conclusions are reached under each of the
relevant substantive criteria which are recited verbatim and addressed below. The
conclusions of law are supported by Applicants' evidentiary exhibits at Section 11— including
Applicants' review of applicable development standards (Exhibit 3) and the findings of fact
as set forth in Section 1'V herein above.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW CRITERIA
17,46.060 General nquiremen ts.
A. Uses that are normally permitted In the C-5 district but that are referred to the nlanninu commission for
further revievv, per 5e tion 1 T.48.QLQ(26), will be processed according to appiivaRon procedures for
conditional use permits. No use snail be permitted and no process, equipment or materials shall be
used which are found by the planning commission to be harmful to pets ons living or working In the
vicinity by reason of odor, fumes, dust, smoke, cinders, dirt, refuse, water -carried waste, noise,
vibration, Illumination or glare, or are found to involve any hazard of fire or explosion.
Conclusions of Law: The City concludes that the proposed use has been referred to the
planning commission for Roher review per section I7.46.030(26). Tho City horowith
incorporates and adopts the below conclusions of law where complimce with each of tate
relevant conditional use permit criteria is demonstrated. Furthermore and based upon the
evidence in Section 11 and the findings of fact in Section 1V, the City concludes all processes,
equipment and materials will operate in a manner that will not be harmful to persons living
or working in the vicinity and specifically concludes as follows-
• With respect to odors and fumes, the release of any gasses from systems and
processes are vented through a scrubber that removes contaminants to levels
acceptable to DEQ and DEQ conducts periodic unannounced visits to verify proper
operation and compliance.
• With respect to dust, smoke, cinders and dirt, such matters are the baste of the
microelectronics industry and not only are there no such discharges the industry goes
to great lengths to remove any presence of such things in the air.
• With respect to refuse, solid waste is similar to waste from most any office or
commercial use and is simply placed in the dumpster for proper disposal by Rogue
Disposal and Recycling.
• With respect to liquid wastes, the processes are designed with great care to be a
closed system for hazardous wastes so that spend liquids end up in sealed drums and
are transported off-site for specialty processing and disposal. The closed system is
further designed with a liquid catchment system so that any spill that might occur
P8{m 14
116
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Applicant: Rogue Valley Nlicrodevices, Inc. and Tail Lite Properties, LLC
drains to the catchment system where it can be collected into sealed drums for
disposal. For water wastes that are allowed to go into the sanitary sewer system,
these wastes are carefully monitored and inspected by staff of the regional water
reclamation facility on a regular basis.
With respect to noise, most all of the noise generating machinery is located inside of
the building with exception of the standard HVAC to serve the office on the roof and
the chillers that are located in the back of the building. The full height wall
extensions on the back of the building are specifically designed to trap and direct any
chiller noise away from the potentially noise sensitive use of the Super 8 motel and
direct it toward the USF Reddaway site which is a trucking and warehousing facility
that is not especially noise sensitive and is a source of noise itself.
• Like dust, vibration is a major concern of the industry and not only will vibration not
be produced, every effort is made by the industry to eliminate any source of vibration
whatsoever.
0 With respect to illumination and glare, the proposed use does not represent any
significant source of illumination or glare that is different from any number of other
commercial uses that are outright permitted in the zone and compliance with the
City's design requirements for lighting will assure no such impact will occur.
• Ninth respect to Fire and explosion hazards, the City concludes this is not an absolute
standard because most all commercial and light industrial uses involve some degree
of fire hazard.. Rather, the City interprets this provision to require acceptable levels
of risk based upon the fire code requirements and any additional requirements of the
Fire District 3. The City concludes the use has operated in compliance with all such
requirements at its present location in the City of Medford and it can feasibly and will
comply with such requirements in Fire District 3 to assure the risk of firs or explosion
is minimized and is not substantially greater than is typically experienced for other
commercial and industrial rises in the area.
B. No use shall be permitted and no process, equipment or materials shall be used unless in compFance
with all applicable State and federal environmental, health and safety regulations.
Conclusions of Law: Based upon the findings of fact in Section IV demonstrating Rogue
Valley Kcrodevices has a track record of compliance and performs due diligence to assure
future and ongoing compliance, the City concludes the proposed use can feasibly and will
operate in compliance with all applicable state and federal environmental, health and safety
regulations.
D. Whenever feasible, buildings shall be located toward the rear of the lot with parking toward the street in
the front yard area for easy access and to minimize traffic noise ai the rear of the properly, especially
when the rear property line abuts a residential (R) district. <Ord. 1884 §48, 1893; Ord. 1615 §44,1989;
Ord. 1436 §2(part),1961j.
Page 15
117
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Applicant: Rogue Valley Microdevices, Inc. and Tail Lite Properties, LLC
Conclusions of Law. The City concludes the building is sited toward the rear of the lot to
allow for the main parking lot to be located in the front of the building, however the parking
and loading area near the rear of the building is also necessary for truck circulation.
Moreover, the City observes at this location that the rear of the lot is not the most noise
sensitive because the rear of the lot abuts an industrial zone and a lot developed with a
trucking and warehousing use.
17.46.010 Purpose,
The C-6 district is intended to provide for commercial and business uses that are most alppropri8teiy located
along or near major highways or thoroughfares, and are largely dependent upon highway visibility and easy
vehicular access. (Ord. 1883 (part), 2006; Ord. 1436 §2(part), 1981),
Conclusions of Law: The City concludes the Rogue Valley Microdevices use is consistent
with this purpose in significant part because the use is a highly specialized use that requires
easy vehicular access to the entire labor market in the region which the C -S in this location
will provide.
17.46.0211 Permitted uses.
The following uses are perrnii6ed in the C-5 Astrid:
F. Ughtfabricalion,such as:
1. tight fabrication. assembly, packaging, mart-ordersales and wholesale sales of consumer goods,
and
2. tight fabrication and repair shops such as blackanmith, cabinet, electric motor, heating, machine,
sheetmetal, signs. ateae monunwn6R, upholstery and welding!
Conclusions of Law: The City concludes the Rogge Valley Microdivices use is a light
fabrication use that involves low volumes of total materials and precision manufacturing to
produce custom microelectronics and such use can be a considered a permitted use in the C-5
zone, but due to some of the chemical processes associated with the fabrication activities the
staff referred the use a conditional use in the Pre -Application Conference summary.
17.46.030 Conditional uses.
The following uses are permitted in the G5 district when aWwrrized in accordance with Chapter 17.713:
26, Permitted uses that are referred to the planning commission by city staff because they were found
to exhibit potentiaAy adverse or hazardous drarracteristics not normally found in uses of a similar
tyl* or 41W,
Conclusions of Law: The City concludes that the staff referred the use as a conditional use
in the Pre -Application Conference summary based upon the chemical processes associated
with the use.
17.79.040 Findings and conditions.
The planning commission in granting a conditional use permit shall find as follows:
A. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use and to meet
all other development and lot requircm-pnts of the subject zoning district and all other provisions of this
code:
118
Wage 16
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Applicant: Rogue Valley Microdevices, Inc. and Tail Lite Properties, LLC
Conclusions of Law: Based upon the findings of fact in Section IV, the City concludes the
site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use. The City further concludes the
site size and shape is adequate because an adjustment to the off-street parking requirements
is warranted as may be conditioned under CPMC 17.76.040(E)(3) based on the analysis of
parking demand in Exhibit 16 prepared by Southern Oregon Traffic Engineering that
estimates parking demand for the proposed use to be between 29 and 50 spaces and the
proposed 46 spaces is adequate to handle the need.
B That the site has adequate access to a public street or highway and that the street or highway is
adequate in size and condition to effectively accommodate the traffic that is expected to be generated
by the proposed use;
Conclusions of Law: Based upon the traffic analysis in Exhibit 15, the City concludes the
site has adequate access to the public street system and the street is adequate in size and
condition to handle the traffic expected to be generated by the use.
C. That the proposed use wiil have no significant adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted use
thereof. In making this determination, the commission shall consider the proposed location of
improvements on the site; vehicular ingress, egress and internal circulation; setbacks; height of
buildings and structures; walls and fences; landscaping; outdoor lighting; and signs;
Conclusions of Law: Based upon the analysis of potential impacts on abutting properties
prepared by Applicant's professional land use planning consultant in Section IV Finding
21(C) herewith incorporated and adopted, the City concludes that the proposed use will have
no significant adverse effect on abutting property or permitted uses thereof.
D. That the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use applied for will comply with local, state and
federal health and safety regulations and therefore will not be detrimental to the health, safety or
general wellwe pl persons residing or working in the surrounding neighborhoods and will not be
detrimental or injurious to the property and Improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare
of the rommunity based on the review of those factors listed in subsection C of this section;
Conclusions of Law: Based upon the sununary of pet-nitting and compliance with
applicable local, state, and federal health and safety regulations and the analysis of effects on
abutting properties prepared by Applicant's professional land use planning consultant in
Section IV Finding 21(C)&(D) both herewith incorporated and adopted, the City concludes
that the proposed use can feasibly and will comply with all applicable regulations and that
compliance with such will regulations, together with the design of the building and layout of
the proposed use, will assure that the proposed microelectronics use will not be detrimental
or injurious to the property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of
the community will have no significant adverse effect on abutting property or permitted uses
thereof.
E. That any conditions required for approval of the permit are deemed necessaryto protect the public
health, safety and general welfare and may include:
1. Adjustments to lot size or yard areas as needed to best accommodate the proposed use; provided
the lots or yard areas conform to the stated minimum dimensions for the subject zoning district,
unless a variance is also granted as provided for in Chapter 17.13,
2. Increasing street widths, modifications in street designs or addition of street signs or traffic signals
to accommodate the traffic generated by the proposed use,
Page 17
119
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Applicant: Rogue Valley Microdevices, Inc. and Tail Lite Properties, LLC
3. Adjustments to off-street parking requirements in accordance with any unique characteristics of the
proposed use,
4. Regulation of points of vehicular ingress and egress,
5. Requiring landscaping, irrigation systems, lighting and a property maintenance program,
6. Regulation of signs and their locations,
7. Requiring fences, berms, walls, landscaping or other devices of organic or artificial composition to
eliminate or reduce the effects of noise, vibrations, odors, visual incompatibility or other undesirable
effects on surrounding properties,
8. Regulation of time of operations for certain types of uses if their operations may adversely affect
privacy o€Mee p of persons residing nearby or otherwise ccnflicl with other community or
neighborhood functions,
9. Establish a time period within which the subject land use must be developed,
10. Requirement of a bond or other adequate assurance within a specified period of lime,
11. Such other conditions that are found to be necessary to protect the public health, safety and
general welfare
i i Law:
With ct t o L F c.. 1 cic f
�': 71.E ti31 7�.9 9 L{wrr : i�Il i�S't)$. L 3tTEEt puriiiii�T ��i Clay LVSLCiILLLt that I`x 85 u ['
authority udder CPMC 17,76.040(E)(3) to adjust the parkirig requirements based upon the
unique requirements of the use. The City concludes the Applicant has provided a specific
parking demand analysis prepared by an Oregon Registered Professional Engineer with
expertise in transportation that demonstrates the base code requirement of 84 spaces wotidd
far exceed the number of spaces required to serve the 851h percentile demand estimated to be
50 parking spaces. Based upon this analysis in Exhibit 16, the City concludes the proposed
46ipace,5 is as aklegttdte Yrtimber sof puking spares that will appruptialwly serve the requtwted
conditional use.
With the exception of the adjustment to the parking requirements for the unique
characteristics of the proposed use, the Applicant believes the City can and should apply its
standard and customary conditions of approval for similar developments and that Stich
standard and customary conditions of approval will be adequate to protect the public health,
safety and general welfare.
# # # # # # # # # # # #
APPROVAL CRITERIA FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Chapter 17.72
SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
17.72-020 Applicability.
B. Major Projects_ The following are "major projects" for the purposes of the site plan and
architectural review process and are subject to Type 2 procedural requirements as set forth in
Chapter 17.Q5, Applications and Types of Review procedures:
1, New construction, including private and public projects, that:
a. Includes a new building or building addition of five thousand square feet or more;
b. Includes the construction of a parking lot of ten or more parking spaces;
120
Page 1 a
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Applicant: Rogue Valley Microdevices, Inc. and Tail Lite Properties, LLC
Conclusions of Law: The City concludes the proposed building is new and is approximately
43,000 square feet and therefore requires a site plan review.
17.72,040 Site plan and architectural standards.
In approving, conditionally approving, or denying any site plan and architectural review application,
the approving authority shall base its decision on compliance with the following standards:
A Applicable site pian, landscaping, and architectural design standards as set forth in Chapter 17.75,
Design and Development Standards;
Conclusions of Law. The City herewith incorporates and adopts Applicant's Exhibit 3
Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development standards, and based thereupon,
concludes the application is in compliance with all applicable site plan, landscaping and
architectural design standards in Chapter 17.75, except for the adjustment to the off-street
parking requirements imposed through a condition of approval under the Conditional Use
Permit standards at CPMC 17.76.040(EX3).
B. City of Central Point Department of Public Works Department Standard Specifications and Uniform
Standard Details for Public Works Construction;
Conclusions of Law: The City concludes Haat the proposed project is located on a discreet
parcel that is newly created with most all public improvements necessary for the
development already in place but that any additional new public improvements, such as
additional storm drainage facilities, can feasibly and will be constructed in accordance with
the Central Point Department of Public Works Standard and Specifications and the Uniform
Standard Details for Public Works Construction.
C. Accessibility and sufficiency of fire fighting facilities to such a standard as to provide for the
reasonable safety of life, limb and property, including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads
and fire lanes so that all buildings on the premises are accessible to fire apparatus.
Conclusions of Law. The City concludes that the design of the project provides for
adequate fire access. Most all of the entire building is within 150 feet of the private retail
street travel surface with the exception of the northwest corner of the building. The parking
drive aisle in the north parking lot is more than 20 -feet wide and provides 20 -feet of clear
space for access within 150 feet of the northwest corner of the building. Additional access is
available at the back of the building in the semi -truck loading area. And while less than 20 -
feet in width, the drive aisle along the west boundary is also adequate width for one-way fire
apparatus access.
Page 19
121
!-indings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Applicant: Rogue Valley Microdevices, Inc. and Tail Lite Properties, LLC
VI
SUMMARY OF APPLICANTS' STIPULATIONS
Applicants herewith agree to stipulate to the following, which they agree to observe if the
same are attached as conditions to approval of the subject site plan review application:
Stipulation l: [RESERVED- The applicant did not identify the need for specific stipulations
for the subject application but may supplement the initially submitted
findings with certain stipulations if the same erre found to be necessary
during the course of the review process]
Vli
ULTIMATE CONCLUSIONS; DECISION
Based upon the record and the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, it is
concluded that the applications for Site Development Platt approval and Conditional Else
Petmit approval are consistent with the requirements of all of the relevant substantive
approval criteria which have been addressed hereinabove.
Respectfully submitted on behalf of Applicant and Property Owner,
CSA PI a in Ltd.
Jay Harlaud
Principal
October 17, 2016
122
Pogo 20
APPLICANT'S EXHIBIT 3
DEMONSTRATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH
APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
The relevant approval standards applicable to the site development plan review are recited
verbatim below followed by findings to establish compliance with the same_
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT ZONING ORMNANCE (CPZO)
Title 17 Zoning
17.60,016 Paving of open areas.
In all commercial and industrial zones, all open areas utilized by vehicles, or used as sales or storage
areas, shall be surfaced with pavement or otherwise treated so Thal no dust is created by the uses. This
requirement shall be applicable to all development whenever a site plan is required or a change in use
occurs.
Compliance Discussion: Parking areas are proposed to be paved.
17.60.090 Special setback requirements.
To permit or afford better light, air and vision on more heavily traveled streets, to protect arterial streets and
to permit the eventual widening of streets, to preserve the natural beauty and distinctive character of creeks
and other water drainage channels (hereinafter referred to as "creeks") and to protect both public and
private property adjacent to creeks from flood damage, the following special setback lines are established
along all secondary and major arterial streets and highways, as identified in the comprehensive plan, and
along all creeks. No building, structure, or parking area shall be erected or maintained within such setback
areas, with the exception that fences may be erected and maintained within street setback areas in
accordance with Chapter 17.57.
D. In any C-4, C-5 and M•2 district the street setback line shall be:
1. Fifty feet distant from the centerline of any secondary arterial or highway;
2. Sixty feet distant from the centerline of any major arterial street or highway.
Compliance Discussion: The proposed parking lot is located approximately 72 feet from the
centerline of Biddle Road, a major arterial street. This exceeds the required street setback line For
a major arteirial street.
17,00.100 Projections from buildings.
Bay windows, cornices, eaves, canopies, sunshades, gutters, chimneys, flues, belt courses, leaders, sills,
pilasters, lintels, ornamental features and other similar architectural features may project not more than
twenty-four inches into a required yard or into a required open space as established by coverage standards.
(Ord. 1961 §3 (Exh. C) (part), 2014; Ord. 1486 §2(part), 1881),
Compliance Discussion: The proposed building is adequately setback such that no intrusions into
the required yards will occur that might be more than 24 inches.
17.60.110 Clear -vision areas -Establishment.
A clear -vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property at the intersection of two streets or a
street and a railroad. A clear -vision area shall contain no planting, fence, wall, structure or temporary or
permanent obstruction exceeding three and one-half feet In height, measured from the tap of the curb, or
123
APPLICANTS' EXHIBIT 3
Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards
Applicant; Rogue Valley Mfcrodevices, Inc and Tail Lite Properties LLC
where no curb exists, from the established street centerline grade, except that trees exceeding this height
may be located in this area, provided all branches and foliage are removed to a height of eight feet above
the grade.
Compliance Discussion: The proposed building is not within a clear vision area and no
landscaping is proposed that would affect a clear vision area.
17.60.130 Access.
Each lot shall abut a minimum frontage of forty feet upon a public street, other than an alley, with the
exception of padlots and lots fronting on a Cul-de-sac, which may be permitted a reduced frontage of not
less than thirty feet, provided all driveway and off-street parking requirements of Chapter 17.64 can be met.
This section is not intended to prohibit the creation or development of flag lots. (Ord. 1746 §1, 1996; Ord.
1584 §58, 1993; Ord. 1436 §2[part), 1981).
Compflance Discussion: Parcel has 134 feet of frontage on Biddle Road.
17.60.135 Landscaping requirements.
For all land use applications that require site plan approval, the Community ❑evelopment Director may, in
its discretion, attach as a condition of approval, reasonable landscaping requirements designed to beautify
the development. (Ord. 1684 §59, 1993).
Compliance Discussion: Applicant's plans depict proposed landscaping which will create an
attractive and desirable project.
RO®i1E VALLEY 114MMIEViCES LOAD11ii€iil PARKNO REGUNREMMYS
17.64.11311 Off-street loading.
A. In all districts for each rise for which a building is to be erected or structurally altered to the extent of
increasing the floor area to equal the minimum floor area required to provide loading space and which wilt
require the receipt or distribution of materials or merchandise by truck or similar vehicle, there shall be
provided off-street loading space in accordance with the standards set forth in Tame 17.64.01, Off -Street
Loading Requirements.
Use Categories
TABLE 17.64.01 OFF-STREET LOADING REQUIREMENTS
Off -Street Loading Berth Requirement (fractions rounded up
to the closest whole number)
INDUSTRX, WAREHOUSING AND WHOLESALING
Sq. Ft. of Floor Area
12,501-25,068
- I_._ ,4.
No. of Loading Berths Required
2
B. A loading berth shall not be less than ten feet wide, thirty-five feet long and have a height clearance of
twelve feet. Where the vehicles generally used for loading and unloading exceed these dimensions, the
required length of these berths shall be increased.
Compliance Discussion: The proposed use has no need for standard loading berths, as the goods
produced arc shipped out by delivery truck al irregular intervals rather than primarily semi -trailer
trucks. The business typically has delivery vans coming three times daily. To accommodate van
deliveries, the design includes a 350 foot long loading drive with two central loading doors on the
124
Page 2
APPLICANTS' EXHIBIT 3
Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards
Applicant: Rogue Vallev Microdevices, Inc and Tail Lfte Properties LLC
west side, so that delivery trucks can be staged and unloaded without blocking the surrounding
roads or access drives. This drive is 15 feet wide and is the length of eight of the standard loading
berths.
Occasional semi -trailer truck delivery unloading will be accommodated on the north side of the
south parking lot. Semis are unloaded by forklift. A gate in the fence provides access to a loading
door is located in the south wall of the building. This approach to loading will function well for the
business and meets the basic intention of the code, to ensure that unloading trucks are
accommodated on-site and will not block roadways. A fourth loading door is located on the east
side for occasional equipment deliveries. Forklifts will be used to bring materials from the south
parking lot to this door.
17.64.040 Off -strep# parking requirements.
All uses shall comply with the number of off-street parking requirements identified in Table 17.64.02A,
Residential Off -Street Parking Requirements, and Table 17,64.028, Non -Residential Off-street Parking
Requirements. For residential uses the off-street parking requirements are stated in terms of the minimum
off-street parking required. For non-residential uses the off-street parking requirements are presented in
terms of both minimum and maximum off-street parking required. The number of oil -street parking spaces
in Table 17-64.028, Non-Residentia€ Off-street Parking, may be reduced in accordance with subsection 8
of this section. Adjustments to Off -Street Vehicle Parking.
The requirement for any use not specifically listed shall be determined by the community development
director on the basis of requirements for similar uses, and on the basis of evidence of actual demand
created by similar uses in the city and elsewhere, and such other traffic engineering or planning data as
may be available and appropriate to the establishment of a minimum requirement,
TABLE 17.64.028
NON-RESIDENTIAL OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS
Minimum and Maximum Vehicle Parking Requirement (fractions rounded down to
Use Categories the closest whole number)
)NDUSTR€AL and MANUFACTURING w
Assembly and 2 spaces per each 3 employees on the 2 largest shifts`, or 1 space per each 500 square
Manufacturing
feet of gross floor area, whichever is greatest.
i;`1 space per employee if the business has only one shift).
Compliance Disc ion: This use has two approaches for calculating the number of required
parking spaces. The company has multiple overlapping shifts with a projected future maximum of
30 employees. This being the case, the 2 spaces per each 3 employees on the 2 largest shifts
applies. The maximum number of employees that would be present on a shift is projected to be
27, therefore this approach with two spaces per three employees would require 18 parking spaces.
Approach 2 -The proposed building is 43,000 gross floor area. At 1 space per each 500 square feet
of gross floor area, 86 spaces would be required.
Table 17.64.02B requires the greatest number of parking spaces for the two options be used, which
would be 86 spaces, 46 spaces are proposed, therefore the minimum requirement is not met. See
Section B for request for reduction of from the maximum requirement.
125
Page 3
APPLICANTS' EXHIBIT 3
Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards
Applicant: Rogue Valley Microdevices, Inc and Tail Ute Properties LLC
B. Adjustments to Non -Residential Off -Street Vehicle Parking. The off-street parking requirements in Table
17.64.028, Non -Residential Off -Street Parking Requirements, may be reduced, or Increased In any
commercial (C) or industrial (M) district as follows:
1. Reductions. The maximum off-street parking requirements may be reduced by no more than twenty
percent.
2. Increases, The off-street parking requirements may be increased based on a parking demand
analysis prepared by the applicant as part of the site plan and architectural review process. The parking
demand analysis shall demonstrate and documents justification for the proposed increase.
Compliance Discussion: The Applicant is requesting an adjustment in the number of parking
spaces required through the conditional use permit process, pursuant to CPMC 17.76-.040(E)(3).
See Exhibit 16. The project proposes 46 spaces, which is between the two extremes identified by
code, 18 and 86. It is a number that is more than one and a half tim the number of employees
that would be present at any one time. The Applicant requests that this alternative number of
spaces be approved as part of the CUP approval, see the main findirigs document where detailed
findings and conclusions of law addressing the requested adjustment are provided.
C. Accessible Parking Requirements. Where parking is provided accessory to a building, accessible panting
shalt be provided, constructed, striped, signed and maintained as required by ORS 447.233, and Section
1104 of the latest Oregon Structural Specialty Code as set forth in this section.
1. The minimum number of accessible parking spaces shall be provided for all uses in accordance with
the standards in Table 17,64.03, Minimum Number of Accessible Parking Spaces. Parking spaces used
to meet the standards in Table 17.64,43, Minimum Number of Accessible Parking Spaces, shall be
counted toward meeting off-street parking requirements in Tables 1 r'.64.02A and 1 7.64,022,
Residential and Non -Residential Off -Street Barking Requirements. The accessible parking
requirements set forth in Table 17.64.03, Minimum Number of Accessible Barking Spaces, are
minimum requirements and are not subject to reductions per subsection (B)(1) of this section;
2. Accessible parking shall be located in close proximity to building entrances and shall be designed to
permit occupants of vehicles to reach the entranee on an unobstructed path or walkway; and
3. Accessible spaces shall be grouped in pairs where possible.
Required accessible parking spaces shall be identified with signs and pavement markings identifying them
as reserved for persons with disabilities; signs shall be posted directly in front of the parking space at a
height of no less than forty-two inches and no more than seventy-two inches above pavement level. Van
spaces shall be specifically identified as such.
TA13LE 17-64.03
MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES
Total Minimum dumber
of Accessible parking
ASIS 447.233Total Spaces (with 60" access Van Accessible Parking Accessible Parking
Number of Parking aisle, or 96" aisle for Spaces with min. 96" Spaces with min. 60"
Spaces Provided (per lot) vans') wide access aisle wide access aisle
26 to 50
Compliance Discussion. The project proposes the required two accessible spaces and one of
which .is van accessible with a 96" wide aisle. Accessible parking is provided in the front parking
lot only, as it provides primary access to the building for staff and visitors.
126
Nage 4
APPLICANTS' EXHIBIT 3
Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards
Applicant: Rooue Vailev Microdevices, Inc and Tail Lite Properties LLC
G. Compact Car Adjustment.
1. Any parking lot or otherwise required public parking area containing ten or more parking spaces
shall be eligible for a compact car adjustment, provided all requirements of this chapter are
adequately met.
2. Up to, but not exceeding, twenty-five percent of the total number of required parking spaces may
be designed and provided for the parking of compact cars.
3. All compact parking spaces must be identified for compact parking only. Compact parking spaces
shall be designed in accordance with the minimum standards set forth in Section 17.75.039(B),
Parking Stall Minimum Dimensions.
Compliance Discussion: No compact spaces are proposed.
1. Bicycle Parking. Bicycle parking shall be provided in accordance with Table 17.54.04, Bicycle Parking
Requirements.
Land Use Minimum Required -- Minimum Covered
Manufacturing 2 spaces, or 0.15 space per 1.000 sq. it-, whichever is greater 1 GO%
Compliance Discussion: 6 bike parking spaces are provided of which all are covered.
Chapter 17.75
iDESM AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
G. Driveway and Property Access Standards. Vehicular access to properties shall be located and
constructed in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Central Point Department of Public
Warks Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Pubiic Works Construction, Section
320.10.35, Driveway and Property Access.
Compliance Discussion: The property proposes taking access from the abutting retail street to the
east and access drive to the south rather than taking access from its frontage on Biddle Road.
Driveway will be constructed to meet the City of Central Point Public Works specifications for
driveways.
D. Pedestrian Circulation. Attractive access routes for pedestrian travel shall be provided through the public
sidewalk system, and where necessary supplemented through the use of pedestrian accessways as
required to accomplish the following:
1. Reducing distances between destinations or activity areas such as public sidewalks and building
entrances;
2. Bridging across barriers and obstacles such as fragmented pathway systems, wide streets, heavy
vehicular traffic, and changes in level by connecting pedestrian pathways with clearly marked
crossings and inviting sidewalk design;
3. Integrating signage and lighting system which offers interest and safety for pedestrians;
4. Connecting parking areas and destinations with retail streets or pedestrian accessways identified
through use of distinctive paving materials, pavement Striping, grade separation, or landscaping.
Compliance Discussion: The parcel is on the west side of the Retail Street. A new ten foot wide
concrete sidewalk with tree grates per figure 17.75.02 will be installed, running from Biddle Road
to the southern access drive. Direct walkways connect from this sidewalk to the entrances of the
building and parking lots.
127
Page 5
APPLICANTS' EXHIBIT 3
Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards
Applicant: nogue ValleyMicrodevices, Inc and Tail lite Properties LLG
17.75,039 Off-street parking design and development standards.
All off-street vehicular parking spaces shall be improved to the following standards;
A. Connectivity. Parking lots for new development shall be designed to provide vehicular and pedestrian
connections to adjacent sites unless as a result of any of the following such connections are not
possible;
1. Topographic constraints;
2. Existing development patterns on abutting property which preclude a logical connection;
3. Traffic safety concerns; or
4. Protection of significant natural resources.
Compliance Discussion: All parking lots are connected by way of the retail street and southern
the private access road. Ultimately, the purpose of this criterion is to assure that higher order City
Streets are not used for access between adjacent commercial sites and nothing about the proposed
layout requires travel on higher order roads to access adjacent lots and the only adjacent lot is the
Super. 8 Motel and there is not anticipated to be any interaction between that use and the
microelectronics use at the subject site.
B_ Harking Stall Minimum ❑imensions. Standard parking spaces shall conform to the following standards
and the dimensions in Figure t 7.75.03 and Table 17.75.02; provided, that compact parking spaces
permitted in accordance with Section 17.64.040((3) shall have the following minimum dimensions -
1. Width --Shall be as provided in column B in Table 17.75.02;
2. Length --Shall reduce column C in Table 17.75.02 by no more than three feet.
Compliance Discussion: Proposed spaces meet the minimum dimensions.
C. Access. There shall be adequate provision for ingress and egress to ail parking spaces.
Compliance Discussion: The design includes 24 -foot drive aisles in both parking lots. Both lots
have direct access to access drives that connect to the local streets. In addition, a one-way drive
provides circulation from the rear lot to the front on the west side of the building.
D. Driveways. Driveway width shall be measured at the driveway's narrowest point, including the curb cut.
The design and construction of driveways shall be as set forth in the Standard Specifications and Public
Works Department Standards and Specifications.
Cmnpli3ance Discussion: Appropriate driveway widths are proposed. Proposed driveways can
and will meet Central Point's standard specifications.
E. Improvement of Parking Spaces.
1. When a concrete curb is used as a wheel stop, it may be placed within the parking space up to two
feet from the front of a space. In such cases, the area between the wheel stop and landscaping need
not be paved, provided It is maintained with appropriate ground cover, or walkway. In no event shall
the placement of wheel stops reduce the minimum landscape or walkway width requirements.
Compliance Discussion: Wheelstops are proposed and the area between the wheelstop and curb
will be paved; this area is not being counted toward the landscaping requirements [tor is it reducing
the 5 -foot sidewalk requirement.
128
Page 6
APPLICANTS' EXHIBIT 3
Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards
Applicant: Rogue Valley Microdevices, Inc and Tail Lite Properties LLC
F. Limitation on Use of Parking Areas. Required parking areas shall be used exclusively for vehicle parking
in conjunction with a permitted use and shall not be reduced or encroached upon in any manner. The
parking facilities shall be so designed and maintained as not to constitute a nuisance at any time, and
shall be used in such a manner that no hazard to persons or property, or unreasonable impediment to
traffic, will result.
Compliance Discussion: Parking space use will be used only for vehicle parking related to the
building's use.
G. Parking/Loading Facility Landscaping and Screening. Parking lot landscaping shall be used to reinforce
pedestrian and vehicular circulation, including parking lot entries, pedestrian accessways, and parking
aisles. To achieve this objective the following minimum standards shall apply; however, additional
Landscaping may be recommended during the site plan and architectural review process (Chapter
17.72). All parking lots shall be landscaped in accordance with the following standards:
1. Perimeter and Street Frontage Landscaping Requirements- The perimeter and street frontage for all
parking facilities shall be fandscaped according to the standards set forth in Table 17.75.03.
2. Terminal and Interior Islands. For parking lots in excess of ten spaces all rows of parking spaces must
provide terminal a minimum of six feet in width to protect parked vehicles, provide visibility, confine
traffic to aisles and driveways, and provide a minimum of five feet of space for landscaping. In
addition, when ten or more vehicles would be parked side-by-side in an abutting configuration, interior
landscaped islands a minimum of eight feet wide must be located within the parking row. For parking
lots greater than fifty parking spaces, the location of interior landscape island shall be allowed to be
consolidated for planting of large stands of trees to break up the scale of the parking lot.
The number of trees required in the interior landscape area shall be dependent upon the location of
the parking lot in relation to the building and pubfic right-of-way:
a. Where the parking lot is located between the building and the public right-of-way, one tree for
every four spaces;
b. Where the parking lot is located to the side of the building and partially abuts the public right-of-
way, one tree for every six spaces;
c. Where the parking lot is located behind the building and is not visible from the public right-of-way,
one tree for every eight spaces.
3. Bioswales. The >xe of bioswales within parking lots is encouraged and may be located within
landscape areas subject to site plan and architectural review. The tree planting standards may be
reduced in areas dedicated to bioswales subject to site plan and architectural review.
Compliance Discussion., Perimeter landscaping can and will meet standards. Required plantings
where the parking lots abut the Retail Street will be provided. The project proposes to use the bio-
swales on the adjacent parcel for a significant portion of the stormwater detention and management
and this has been agree to between the owners.
H. Bicycle Parking, The amount of bicycle parking shall be provided in accordance with Section 17.64.040
and constructed in accordance with the following standards:
1. Location of Bicycle Parking, Required bicycle parking facilities shall be located on-site in well lighted,
secure locations withln fifty feet of well -used entrances and not farther from the entrance than the
closest automobile parking space. Bicycle parking shall have direct access to both the public right-of-
way and to a main entrance of the principal use. Bicycle parking may also be provided inside a
building in suitable, secure and accessible locations. Bicycle parking for multiple uses (such as in a
commercial center) may be clustered in one or several locations.
2. Bicycle Parking Design Standards. All bicycle parking and maneuvering areas shall be constructed to
the following minimum design standards:
EW
Page 7
APPLICANTS' EXHIBIT 3
Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards
Applicant: Rogue Valley Microdevices, Inc and Tail Lite properties LLC
a. Surfacing. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced in the same manner as a motor
vehicle parking area or with a minimum of a three-inch thickness of hard surfacing (i.e., asphalt,
concrete, pavers or similar material). This surface wlfl be maintained in a smooth, durable and
well -drained condition.
b. Barking Space Dimension Standard. Bicycle parking spaces shall be at least six feet long and two
feet wide with minimum overhead clearance of seven feet.
c, Lighting. Lighting shall be provided in a bicycle parking area so that all facfiities are thoroughly
illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks or motor vehicle parking lots during all hours of
uN.
d. Aisles. A five-foot aisle for bicycle maneuvering shall be provided and maintained beside or
between each row of bicyde parking.
e. Signs. Where bicycle parking facilities are not directly visible from the public rights-of-way, entry
and directional signs shall be provided to direct bicycles from the public rights-of-way to the bicycle
parking facility.
3. Exceptions to Bicycle Parking. Tho rammuOy dnvalopment d cio for may allow exceptions to flee
bicycle parking standards in connection with temporary uses or uses that do not generate the need
for bicyclists parking such as Christmas tree sales and mini -storage units.
Compgoince Dfscatssiou: The project proposes 6 bike parking spaces. All spaces will be covered
and located immediately adjacent to the building entrance. Adequate aisles are provided and the
outdoor lighi-utg will nwce all bike parking areas adacmlely lit.
17.75A/2 Corrrmercial building demon standards.
The following design standards aro applicable to development in all commercial zoning districts, and are intended to
assure pedestrian scale commercial development that supports and enhances ft small town character or the
community. All publicly visible buildings shall comply with the standards set forth in this section.
A- Massing, Articulation, Transparency, and Entrances.
t. Building Massing. The top of the building shall emphasize a J11L distinct profile or outline with elements such as a projecting
parapet, cornice, upper level setback, or pitched roofiine.
2. Facade Articulation. Facades longer than forty feet and fronts
on a street, sidewalk, acressway or residential area shail be
divided Into smalt units through the use of articulation, which may
include offsets, recesses, staggered wails, stepped walls, pitched
or stepped roofllnes, overhangs, or other elements of the
buifdkng's mass.
For purposes of complying with the requirements in ft subsection "facade articulon" shah consist of a
combination of two of the following design featured:
a. Changes in plane with a depth of at least twenty-four inchae, either horizontally or vertically, at intervals
of not less than twenty feet and not more than forty feet; or
b. Changes of color, texture, or material, either horizontally or vertically, at intervals of not less than twenty
fest and not more than one hundred feet; or
e. A repeating pattern of wall recesses and projections, such as bays, offsets, raveals or projecting ribs,
that his.a relief of at least eight inches.
Compliance DjiscusAon: The proposed building incorporates a number of elentents to provide for
faGado articulation. The front office portion on the north side of the building has several window
bays on each side, which are then divided further through mullion patterns and projecting solar
shades. The long souther portion of the building fnclades several wirAow bays at the ground
level and more at the uppor level to bring daylight into the 2 -story fabrication area. These window
130
fie 8
APPLICANTS' EXHIBIT 3
Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards
Applicant: Rogue Valley Microdevices, Inc and Tail Lite Properties LLC
bays are also further articulated through mullion patterns and projecting solar shades. The final
bay at the south end is more of a vertically articulated bay, distinguishing it from the others
3. Pedestrian Entrances. For buildings facing a street, a primary pedestrian entrance shall be provided that is
easily visible, or easily accessible, from the street right-of-way, or a pedestrian accessway. To ensure that
building entrances are clearly visible and identifiable to pedestrians the principal entry to the building shall be
made prominent with canopies or overhangs.
To achieve the objectives of this subsection the design of a primary entrance should incorporate at least three of
the following design criteria:
a. For building facades over two hundred feet in length facing a street or accessway provide two or more
public building entrances off the street;
b_ Architectural details such as arches, freezes, the work, rnuraIs, or moldings;
c. integral planters or wing walls that incorporate landscape or seating;
d. Fnhanced exterior light fixtures such as wall sconces, light coves with concealed light sources, ground -
mounted accent lights, or decorative pedestal lights;
e. Prominent three-dimensional features, such as belfries, chimneys, clock towers, domes, spires,
steeples, towers, or turrets; and
f. A repeating pattern of pilasters projecting from the Facade wall by a minimum of eight inches or
architectural or decorative columns,
Compliance Discussion: The main pedestrian entry is located in the northeast corner in a distinct
tall building elentent that is composed mainly of glass. A flat canopy projects out near the Lop of
the element distinguishing it from the other building elements. Secondary building entrances are
Located on the east and west facades. Each has a steel and g€ass door, will have a wall sconce
4scent, and is entered from the abutting sidewalk or path.
4. Transparency_ Transparency (glazing) provides interest for the pedestrian, connects the building exterior and
interior, puts eyes on the street/parking, prornotes reusabrifity, and provides a human -scale elerne nt ort building
facades. The transparency standard applies to a building's principal facade. Projects subject to this section shall
meet the following glazing requirements:
a. A minimum of forty percent of a farads wall face area, the area from finished ground floor elevation to
twelve feet above finished floor elevation, shall be comprised of transparent glazing from windows or
doors. Ile Ilective or tinted glass or film is not permitted on ground floor facade windows. 'rhe forty percent
minimum transparency requirement may be reduced through the site plan and architectural review process
upon demonstration that a proposed all emative design achieves the transparency objectives. See
subsection (A)(4)(e) of this section for alternative design solutions.
,[
b. The second floor must provide a minimum of twenty-five percent glazing between three and eight feet,
as measured from that story's finished floor level, The twenty-five percent minimum transparency
requirement may be reduced through the site plan and architectural review process upon demonstration
that the proposed alternative design achieves the transparency objectives. See subsection (A)(4)(e) of this
section for alternative design solutions.
131
Page 9
APPLICANTS' EXHIBIT 3
Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards
Applicant: Rogue Valley Micradevices, Inc and Tail Lite Properties LLC `
c. If a single -story building has a facade taller than twenty feet, the facade area above fifteen feet is
subject to the same window requirement as the second floor requirement in subsection (A)(4)(b) of this
section.
d. Any building wall facade that is built up to an interior mid -block property line is not required to have
glazing on that facade If no prohibitions and no contractual or legal impediments exist that would prevent a
building being constructed on the adjacent property up to the wall of the facade.
e- Where transparent windows are not provided on at least forty percent of a building wall facade (Or
portions thereof) to meet the Intent of this section, at least three of the following elements shall be
incorporated:
i. Masonry (but not flat concrete block);
ii. Concrete or masonry plinth at wall base,-
iii,
ase;iii. Beit courses of a different texture and color;
iv. Projecting cornice;
v. Projecting awning/canopy (minimum four -foot overhang);
vi. Decorative tile work;
vii. Trellis containing planting;
viii. Artwork of a scale clearly visible from the associated right-ol-way;
ix. Vertical articulation;
x_ Lighting fixtures;
xi. Recesses or bays;
xii. Use of other architectural e;ements not listed that is demonstrated to meet the intent of this
secpon.
Compliance nisco.Won: The north -facing Riddle Road front Bade complies with the
transparency requirements. Its 840 square feet of glazing in a 1440 wall area provides 58.3%
transparency on the first floor. At the second floor within the band between 3 feet and 6 feet above
the finished floor there is 428 square feet of glazing in a 600 foot wall area, which provides 71.3%
transparency. The fagade meets and exceeds the standard_
5. Wall Faces. As used in this section there are three types of wall faces. To ensure that buildings do not display
unembellished walls visible from a public street or residential area the following standards are imposed:
a. Facade Wail Face. Facade wall faces greater than forty feet in length shall be divided into small units
through the use of articulation, which rnay include offsets, recesses, staggered walls, stepped walls,
pitched or stepped rvAines, overhangs, or other elements of the building's mass.
For purposes of complying with the requirements in this subsection facade wall faces shall consist of a
combination of two of the following design features:
I. Changes in plane with a depth of at least twenty-four Inches, either horizontally or vertically, at
intervals of not less than twenty feet and not more than forty feet; or
Ii. Changes of color, texture, or material, either
horizontally or vertically, at intervals of not less
than twenty feet and not more than one
hundred feet; or
ill. A repeating pattern of wall recesses and
projections, such as bays, offsets, reveals or
projecting ribs, that has a relief of at least eight
Inches at Intervals of not less than twenty feet
and not more than forty feet.
132
4.,
laege 1 O
APPLICANTS' EXHIBIT 3
Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards
Applicant: Rogue Valley Microdevices, Inc and Tail Lite ?ropenies LLC
Compliance Discussion: The facade wall face is the north elevation facing Biddle Road; this
fagade is extensively articulated and includes all of the required elements.
b. Building Wall Face_ As applicable each building wall face shall be given architectural treatment to meet
the intent of this section by using three or more of the following:
L Varying rooflines with one foot or greater changes of height at least every forty feet;
ii. Transparent windows that comprise at least forty percent of the visible facade;
in. Secondary entrances that include glazing and landscape treatment;
iv. Balconies;
v. Awnings/canopies;
vi. Planted trellises:
vii. Projecting cornices at least twelve inches In height;
viii. Variation in building form and materials demonstrated to meet the intent of this section.
c. Other Wall Faces. Other wall faces abutting residential areas shall comply with the requirements for
building wall faces. Other wall faces not abutting residentiaf areas are exempt from this section_
Compliance Discussion: The design of these faces provides a variety of architectural treatments
that enliven the long sidewalls of the building. Glass comprises 23.5% of the east building wall
face and 14.5% of the west building face is transpamrit. louvered solar shades project out over
each window. Both walls have variation in building form and height along the .length of the wall,
as well as secondary entrances that include glazing.
$_ Screening of Service Areas and Rooftop Equipment. Publicly visible service areas, loading zones, waste
disposal, storage areas, and rooftop equipmanI (mechanical and communications) shall be fully screened from
the ground level lot nearby streets and residential areas within two hundred feet; the following standards apply -
a. Service Areas.
i. A six-foot masonry enclosure, decorative metal fence enclosure, a wood enclosure, or other
approved rnatertals complementary to adjacent buildings; or
ii. A six-foot solid hedge or other plant material screening as approved.
Compliance Discussion: The south wall is actually an open equipment bay that runs the full
width to accommodate equipment supporting the fabrication work. it faces the access road and
abutting truck freight terminal, and does not face any public road or residential area. A six-foot
tall fence with aluminum slats is planned across the entire face to close off access to the equipment
from the parking area and screen any outdoor storage. Gates and a roll -up door are located on this
face to accommodate loading of equipment_ malls at the east and west ends of the equipment area
are full height to shield the view of the equipment from the public road. The proposed waste
disposal area is located adjacent to the southwest corner and will be screened with an enclosure
pursuant to "i" above.
t
133
Page 11
APPLICANTS' EXHIBIT 3
Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards
Applicant: Roue Valley Microdevices, Inc and Tall Lite Properties LLC
4�1 � nr.4• �! fh TM�
b. Rooftop Equipment.
i. Mechanical equipment shall be screened by extending parapet walls or other roof forms that are
integrated with the architecture of the buRding. Painting of rooftop equipment or erecting fences are
not acceptable methods of screening.
ii. Rooftop-mounlnrl voiml6va transmission equipment shall be integrated with the design of the
roof, rather than being simply attached to the roof -deck.
i
! I
Compliance Discussion:
The roof top HVAC equipment is set back from the roof edge to prevent visibility from the
ground. A full height mechanic4l equiptnent shield is also behig provided around the awits. The
site plan shows the location of the of the mechanical rooftop egviprnent screen.
- F --_ 1-1
134
Rage 12
we
_r
s
Z
X
W
V
3
6
aL szuavw;cis
S;;�
135 HM^.uWf WVSS:L9LL SLOZlZO 90
vivo sin
EXHIBIT
Subject Property
Tax Lots
Central Point Comp -ow Medium Density
Land Use Plan Res.
General Indusdrial M Thoroughfare
Commercial
Light Indusdrial Tourist and Office
Low Density Res. - Professional
Print Date: 3.15-2016; source: CSA Planning, Ltd;
Jackson County GIS; City of Central Point GIs
Proposed Comprehensive
Plan Map
Comprehensive Plan Amendment / Zone Change
Rogue Valley Microdevices & N
Tail Lite Properties LLC WE
37 -2W -01C-802 s
300 150 0 300 Feet
2012 Aerial
subject property
Tax Lots
Zoning Outline
300 150 0 300 Feet
NUM
Existing Zoning Map
On Aerial Photo
Comprehensive Plan Amendment / Zone Change
Rogue Valley Microdevices &
Tail Lite Properties LLC N
37 -2W -OIC -802
W+E
S
Print pate: 03-16-2016; $ourca: CSA Planning, ltd;
Jackson County GIS; City of Central Point 616
2012 Aerial
Subject_lDrop®fty
Tax Lots
Zoning Outline
300 150 0 300 Feet
Proposed Zoning Map
On Aerial Photo
Comprehensive Plan Amendment / Zone Change
Rogue Valley Microdevices &I
Tail Lite Properties LLC ra
37 -2W -OIC -802
w+E
S
Print Date: 03.15-2010; Source: CSA Planning, Lid;
Jackson County 615; City of Central Point GIS
GROIARG"ZM AWMrn ansoa 0, r
�` a
Memorandum
To: Matt Samitore, Central Point Public Works Director
Date: 05/16/2016
Subject: C4 to C5 Zone Change Traffic Findings and Conclusions
EXHIBIT 10
9 T-RTiHMATATiON
1w 11111-1 al31(A. t.i.t
S.O. Transportation
Engineering, LLC
112 Monterey Drive
Medford, OR 97504
Telephone 541 941 4148
Fax 541.535.8873
Kwlpi GQ cam
Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC evaluated impacts for a proposed zone change from C-4 to C-
5 on Township 37S Range 2W Section 02, tax lot 802 in Central Point, Oregon. The parcel is located along the
south side of Biddle Road west of Hamrick Road adjacent to Super 8.
Existing Site
Tax lot 802 is currently vacant and has tentative plat approval to be split into three parcels. There's a planned
veterinary center on the southeast comer (Parcel 1) that has land use approval and is currently under review for
building permits_ Access to the site is provided to Biddle Road and through an internal lane to Hamrick Road that
is expected to be constructed contemporaneously with the site work for the veterinary building_
w
4;
t
D Biddle Road
1 Parcel l ,
J'
i Paroel3
I
{
s
r
Zo a Ghanae from C-4 and C-5
The current C-4 zoning district is intended to provide for the development of concentrated tourist commercial and
entertainment facilities that will maximize ease of access and visibility from the Interstate 5 freeway and major
arterial streets, while the C-5 zoning district provides for commercial and business uses that are most
appropriately located along or near major highways or thoroughfares. Both zoning districts allow banks, offices,
convenience markets, drugstores, restaurants, supermarkets, sporting goods stores, retail stores, liquor stores,
veterinary clinics, and shopping centers to name some of the higher traffic generating uses. The C-5 zoning
district allows light fabrication, assembly, packaging, and wholesale sales of consumer goods that are not
permitted in the C4 zoning district. Other differences include art schools, pawnshops, gymnasiums, and
nurseries. The C-4 zoning district permits engineering services, legal services, art studios, and counselling
141
services, which are not permitted in the C-5 zone As can be seen, non -permitted uses in both zones are the
lower traffic generating uses_ A full list of permitted uses for each zoning district is attached
Conctusloans,-
Traffic generations for both C-4 and C-5 zoning districts were compared and determined to have comparable,
potential impacts to the transportation system. No change in the potential for additional traffic is estimated to
occur as a result of the proposed zone change from C4 to C-5.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me.
Respectfully,
IA. RI_. '. PYOJ
Kimbedy Parduccl, M_P T OE KR
Firm Principal i! • t. J G �.
Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC
Cc: Mlchael Wang, PE (ODOT) G`
Mike Kuntz, PE (Jackson County)+
PAg4
Attachments: C4 and C5 permitted us®s y s
Memorandum Page 2
FEN
P
Chapter 17.44
C-4, TOURIST AND OFFICE -PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT
17.44.010 Purpose.
The C-4 district is intended to provide for the development of concentrated tourist commercial and
entertainment facilities to serve both local residents and traveling public, and also for the development of
compatible professional office facilities. C-4 development should occur at locations that will maximize ease of
access and visibility from the Interstate 5 freeway and major arterial streets and to be convenient to the users
of Expo Park, the airport, and downtown. (Ord. 1946 (part), 2011; Ord. 1882 (part), 2006; Ord. 1436 §2(part),
1981).
17.44.020 Permitted uses.
The following uses are permitted in the C-4 district:
A. General professional and financial offices, including, but not limited to:
I. Banks and similar financial institutions;
2. Accounting and bookkeeping offices;
3. Real estate offices;
4. Insurance company offices;
5. Legal services;
6. Architectural and engineering services;
7. Professional photo or art studios;
8. Counseling services;
9. Corporate or government offices;
10. Medical/dental offices;
B. Tourist and entertainment -related facilities, including:
143
1. Convenience market, meat, poultry, fish and seafood sales; fruit and beverage stands;
2. Drugstores;
3. Automobile service station, automobile and recreational vehicle parts sales and repairs, and truck
rentals;
4, WWI and hotel;
5. Welk -in movie theater;
& Bowling allay;
7. Photo and art galleries;
8. Photo processing pickup station;
9. Travel agencies;
10_ Barber and beauty shops;
11. Sit-down restaurants or dinner houses (including alcohol);
12. Cocktail lounges and clubs serving alcoholic beverages;
13. Tavern with beer only;
14. Commercial parking lot;
15. Community shopping centers which may include any of the permitted uses in this section and may
also include the following uses:
a. Supermarkets;
b. Department stores;
c. Sporting goods;
d. Books and stationary;
144
e. Gifts, notions and variety;
f. Florists;
g. Leather goods and luggage;
h. Pet sales and related supplies;
i. Photographic supplies;
j. Health food;
k. Self-service laundry;
1. Antique shop;
m. Delicatessen;
n. Pastry and confectionery;
o. General apparel;
p. Shoes and boots;
q. Specialty apparel;
r. Jewelry;
s. Clocks and watches, sales and service;
t. Bakery, retail only;
u. Bicycle shop;
v. Audio, video, electronic sales and service;
w. Printing, lithography and publishing;
16. Mobile food vendors;
17. State -regulated package liquor stores;
145
18. Other uses not specified in this or any other district, if the planning commission finds them to be
similar to the uses listed above and compatible with other permitted uses and with the intent of the C-4
district as provided in Section 17.60.140, Authorization for similar uses;
19. Large retail establishments. (Ord. 1946 (part), 2011; Ord. 1900 §2(part), 2007; Ord. 1882 (part),
2006; Ord. 1835 P. 2003; Ord. 1823 §4(part), 2001; Ord. 1736 52, 19%, Ord. 1727 §2,1995; Ord. 1720
§1, 1995; Ord. 1684 §44, 1993; Ord. 1615 §37, 1989; Ord. 1511 §6, 1984; Ord, 1436 §2(part), 1981).
17.44.030 Conditional uses.
A. The following uses are permitted in the C-4 district when authorized in accordance with Chapter 17.76,
Conditional Use Permits:
1. Carrpgrounds and recreational vehicle overnight facilities;
2. Di+id-il1 iiiuuie iimaier.
3. Golf courseldriving range;
4, ice and rofter skating rinks;
5. aanoa hails;
6. Bil#iard/pool halls;
7. Miniature golf courses;
S. Amusement center (pinball, games, etc.);
9_ Nonindustrial business/vocational schools;
10. PhysicAl fitnessloonditioning center; mortis] arts schools;
11. Carwash;
12. Taxicab dispatch ofoe;
13. Ambulancelemergency services;
14. Day care center;
146
0
15. Drive-in fast food outlets;
16. Other specialty food outlets;
17. Television and radio broadcasting studio;
18. Accessory buildings and uses customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, such as incidental storage
facilities, may be permitted as conditional uses when not included within the primary building or
structure;
19, Permitted uses that are referred to the planning commission by city staff because they were found to
exhibit potentially adverse or hazardous characteristics not normally found in uses of a similar type and
size.
B. Uses other than those listed above may be permitted in a C-4 district when included as a component of a
commercial, tourist, or office -professional planned unit development that consists predominantly of uses
permitted in the zone and is planned and developed in accordance with Chapter 17.68, Planned Unit
Development (PUD). These uses shall include the following.
1, Department stores;
2. Sporting goods;
3. Books and stationery;
4. Gifts, notions and variety;
5. Florists;
6. Leather goods and luggage;
7. Pet sales and related supplies;
8. Photographic supplies;
9. Health food;
10. Self-service laundry;
147
11. Antique shop;
12. Delicatessen;
13. Pastry and confectionery;
14. General apparel;
15. Shoes and boots;
16. Specialty apparel;
17. Jewelry;
18. Clocks and watches, sales and service;
16. Bakery, retail only;
20. Bicycle shop;
21. Audio, video, electronic sales and service; and
22. Printing, lithography and publishing. (Ord. 1946 (part), 2011; Ord. 1900 §2(part), 2007; Ord. 1835 §2,
2003; Ord. 1823 §4(part), 2001; Ord. 1511 §7, 1984; Ord. 1436 §2(part), 1981).
41.44 x040 Site plan and architectural development standards.
Development within the C-4 district shall be subject to the site and architectural standards set forth in
Chapter 17.75, Design and Development Standards. (Ord. 1946 (part), 2011; Ord. 1823 §4(part), 2001; Ord,
1436 §2(part), 1981).
11.44.050 General use rect)uilrs"nts.
A. Uses that are normally permitted in the C-4 district but that are referred to the planning commission for
further review, per Section 17.44.030(A)(19), Conditional uses, will be processed according to application
procedures for conditional use permits. No -use shall be permitted and no process, equipment or materials shall
be used which are found by the planning commission to be harmful to persons living or working in the vicinity
by reason of odor, fumes, dust, smoke, cinders, dirt, refuse, water -carried waste, noise, vibration, Illumination
or glare, or are found to involve any hazard of fire or explosion.
148
B. All businesses, services and processes shall be conducted entirely within a completely enclosed structure,
with the exception of off-street parking and loading areas, outdoor eating areas, service stations, outdoor
recreational facilities, recreational vehicle overnight facilities, and other compatible activities, as approved by
the planning commission.
C. Open storage of materials related to a permitted use shall be permitted only within an area surrounded or
screened by a solid wall or fence having a height of six feet; provided that no materials or equipment shall be
stored to a height greater than that of the wall. (Ord. 1946 (part), 2011; Ord. 1436 §2(part), 1981. Formerly
17,44.060)-
17.44.060
7.44.060)_
17.44.060 Signage standards.
Signs in the C-4 district shall be permitted and designed according to provisions of Section 17.75.050, Signage
standards, and Chapter 15. 4, Sign Code. (Ord. 1946 (part), 2011; Ord. 1615 §16, 1989; Ord. 1436 §2(part),
1981. Formerly 17.44.070).
17.44.070 Off-street parking.
Off-street parking and loading spaces shall be provided as required in Chapter 17.64, Off -Street Parking and
Loading, and developed to the standards set forth in Section 17.75.039, Off-street parking design and
development standards. (Ord. 1946 (part), 2011; Ord. 1436 §2(part), 1981. Formerly 17.44.080),
149
Chapter 17.46
C-5, THOROUGHFARE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
Sections:
�.�
Purpose.
17.46.020
Permitted uses.
IZ.,§,,QQQ
Condrtionai uses.
17.46.1 N
l Wght regulations.
17 46,050
Area, width and yard requirements.
L7.16.GN
General requirements.
17_x+}
Signs and lighting of premises.
17.46 080
Off-street parking.
17.46.010 Purpcise.
The C-5 district is intended to provide for commercial and business uses that are most appropriately located
along or now major highways or thoroughfares, and are largely dependent upon hiShwa y visibility and easy
vehicular access. (Ord. 1883 (part), 2006; Ord. 1436 j2(part),1981).
17.48.020 permitted uses.
The foltowing uses are permitted in the C-5 district:
A. Professional and financial, including:
1. Banks and similar financial institutions,
2. Real estate, insurance, and similar offices,
3. Contractor's offices,
4. Medical services, clinics and laboratories;
B. Personal services, including,
1. Self-service laundry and laundry pickup stations,
2. Photo processing pickup stations,
3. Photo processing laboratories,
150
4. Small appliance service,
5. Printing, lithography and publishing,
6. Locksmith,
7. Taxicab dispatch office,
8. Ambulance/emergency services,
9. Art and music schools,
10. Businesslvocational schools,
11. Physical f►tness/conditioning center, martial arts schools,
12. Cauwash,
13. Automobile and truck service stations and repair shops,
14. Auto and furniture upholstery shops,
15. Veterinary clinics (within enclosed structure),
16. Barber shops,
17. Beauty salons,
18. Manicure salons;
C. Retail outlets, including:
1. Auto and truck sales (new and used),
2. Tire sales and service,
3. Glass and mirror sales and service,
4. Walicovering, floorcovering, curtains, etc.,
5. Major appliances sales and service,
151
6. Hardware sates,
7. Monument sales,
8. Supermarket,
9. Convenience market,
10. Drugstore,
11. Feed, seed and fuel (within enclosed structure),
12. Electrical and plumbing supplies,
13. Hewing and air-oonditioning equipment,
14. Stone, the and masonry supplies,
16. Nursery and gardening materials and supplies,
16. Antique shop,
17. Art and engineering supplies,
18. Pawnshop,
19. Sit-down restaurants, including service of beer, wine and liquor,
20. Drive-in fast food establishments,
21. Tavern, beer sales only,
22. Public/quasi-public utllMes and services,
23. Florist sales,
24. Pet sales,
26. General apparel,
26. Furniture sales, including used furniture,
152
27. Sporting goods sales, including firearms,
28. State -regulated package liquor stores,
29. Community shopping centers, which may include any of the permitted uses in this section and the C-
4 district,
30. Large retail establishment eighty thousand square feet or less as defined in Section 17.0 .010,
Retail establishment, large;
D. Tourist/recreational-oriented uses, including:
1. Hotel and motel,
2. Walk-in theater (fully enclosed),
3. Bowling alley,
4_ fee and roller skating rinks,
5. Dancehalls (nonalcoholic),
6. Billiard/pool hail,
7. Miniature golf,
8. Club and organizational meeting facilities;
E. Commercial parking lots:
1. Recreational vehicle storage lots;
R Light fabrication, including,
1. Light fabrication, assembly, packaging, mail-order sales and wholesale sales of consumer goods, and
2. Light fabrication and repair shops such as blacksmith, cabinet, electric motor, heating, machine,
sheetmetal, signs, stone monuments, upholstery and welding;
153
G. Other uses not specified in this or any other district, if the planning commission finds them to be similar to
the uses listed above and compatible with other permitted uses and within the intent of the C-5 district. (Ord.
1883 (part), 2006; Ord. 1736 §3, 1996; Ord. 1727 §3, 1995; Ord. 1721 §1, 1995; Ord. 1701 §1, 1994; Ord.
1698 §1, 1994; Ord. 1697 §1, 1994; Ord, 1895 §1, 1993; Ord. 1687 §1, 1993; Ord. 1684 §45,1993; Ord. 1511
§8, 1984; Ord. 1452 §1, 1982; Ord. 1436 §2(part), 1981).
17.46.030 Ccmd lonail uses.
The following uses are permitted in the C-5 district when authorized in accordance with Chapter 17.76:
1. Automobile and truck paint shops;
2. Recreational vehicle overnight facilities;
3. Drive-in movie theater;
4. Heavy equipment sales and service;
5. Mobile home and recreational vehicle sales;
6. Boats and marine equipment sales and service;
7. Motorcycle and snowmobile sales and service;
8. Dinner houses and restaurants serving alcoholic beverages;
9. Cocktail lounges and clubs;
10. Other specialty food outlets, mobile food vendors;
11. Meat, fish, poultry and seafood, light processing and sales;
12. Dairy products sales;
13. Paint and related equipment and supplies;
14. Cleaning and janitorial supplies;
15. Secondhand store or thrift shop;
154
16. Mortuary;
17. Amusement center (pinball, games, etc.);
18. Manufacturing for on -premises sales;
19. Taxidermist;
20. Auction house (excluding livestock);
21. Wholesaling of permitted use products;
22. Adult businesses, as defined in Chapter 5.24;
23. Small engine sales and service;
24. Vocational, technical and trade schools, including facilities related to industrial trades;
25_ Accessory uses and buildings customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, such as incidental storage
facilities, may be permitted as conditional uses when not included within the primary building or structure;
26. Permitted uses that are referred to the planning commission by city stuff because they were found to exhibit
potentially adverse or hazardous characteristics not normally found in uses of a similar type or size;
27_ Large retail establishments greater than eighty thousand square feet as defined in Section 17.08.0101
Retail establishment, large;
28. Regional shopping centers. (Ord. 1883 (part), 2006; Ord. 1701 §2, 1994; Ord. 1695 §2, 1993; Ord. 1511
§9, 1984; Ord. 1450 §1, 1982; Ord_ 1435 §2(part), 1981).
17.46.040 Height re_Uulations.
No building or structure shall exceed thirty-five feet in height in the C-5 district. (Ord. 1436 §2(part), 1981),
17.46.050 Area, width and yard requirements.
A. Lot Area. No requirements except as necessary to comply with applicable yard and parking and loading
requirements.
B. Lot Width. The minimum lot width shall be fifty feet.
155
C. Lot Depth. The minimum lot depth shall be one hundred feet.
D. Front Yard. The front yard shall be a minimum of ten feet and shalt be maintained as landscaped open
space. When off-street parking is located in the front yard area, the landscaped strip may be reduced to not
less than six feet with planning commission approval of the site plan.
E. Side Yard. The side yard shall be a minimum of five feet, except when abutting structures are proposed with
a common wall that complies with the Uniform Building Code.
F. Rear Yard. No rear yard shall be required in the C-5 district except when the rear lat line abuts property in a
residential (R) district and then the rear yard shall be a minimum of twenty feet. Where property in the C-5
district is separated from property in a residential (R) district by a public alley or street, no rear yard setback
shall be required.
G. Lot Coverage. No requirements except as necessary to comply with applicable yard, parking and loading
requirements. (Ord. 1436 §2(part), 1961).
17.46.060 G*rwrall requirements.
A. Uses that are normally permitted In the C -S district but that are referred to the planning commission for
further review, per Section 17.48.030(26), will bs processed a dcordirlg to application procedures for conditional
use permits. No use shall be permitted and no process, equipment or materials shall be used which are found
by the planning commission to be harmful to persons living or working in the vicinity by reason of odor, fumes,
dust, smoke, cinders, dirt, refuse, water -carried waste, noise, vibration, illumination or glare, or are found to
involve any hazard of fire or explosion.
B. No use shall be permitted and no process, equipment or materials shah be used unless in compliance with
all applicable state and federal environmental, health and safety regulations.
C. Wherever the side or rear property lines of a parcel In the C-5 district abut parcels in a residential (R) district,
a solid wall or fence, vine -covered open fence or compact evergreen hedge six feet in height shall be located
on that property line and continuously maintained to ensure effective buffering and visual screening between
the two land uses. Where a public alley or street separates the two properties, the barrier or screen shall be
placed on the C-5 property at the time of construction and may include driveway and pedestrian openings to
the alley or street, as approved by the planning commission.
r'bf-7
D. Whenever feasible, buildings shall be located toward the rear of the lot with parking toward the street in the
front yard area for easy access and to minimize traffic noise at the rear of the property, especially when the
rear property line abuts a residential (R) district. (Ord. 1684 §46, 1993; Ord. 1615 §44, 1989; Ord. 1436
§2(part), 1981).
17.46.070 Signs and Ughting of premises.
A. No illuminated sign or lighting standard used for the illumination of premises shall be so designed and
instaNed that its direct rays are toward or parallel to a public street or highway or directed toward any property
that lies within a residential (R) district.
B. No red, green or amber lights or illuminated signs may be placed in such a location or position that they
could be confused with, or may interfere with, any official traffic control device, traffic signal or directional guide
signs.
C. Signs in the C-5 district shall be permitted and designed in accordance with Chapter 1,5.24 and with
Section 17.60.110. (Ord. 1615 617, 1989; Ord. 1436 §2(pert). 1981).
17.46.080 Off-street parking.
Off-street parking and loading space shall be provided as required in Chapter 17.64. (Ord. 1436 §2(part),
1981).
157
Memorandum!
To: Matt Samitore, Central Point Public Works Director
Date: 10!4412016
Subject: C4 to C5 Zone Change Additional Traffic Findings
1'Agn1POPT ATION
i�n�tn�trllnG. ���
S.O. Transportation
Enginearfng, LLC
142 Manterey Drive
Medford, OR 97504
Telephone 544 941,4148
Fax 541 835.8873
Kwkp4@1Q com
Additional information was requ"ted by the City of Central Point regarding a proposed zone change
from C4 to C5 on Township 37S Range 2W Section 02, tax lot 302 in Central Point, Oregon. A
previous memorandum was prepared in May of 2016 that concluded the two zoning districts (C4 and
C5) had comparable, potential impacts to the transportation systtsm_ This memorandum explains this
in more detail and serves as an addendum to the first memorandum.
C4 and C5 Zoning Districts
The C4 and C5 zort'tng districts both allow development of concentrated commercial uses, but differ in
how they are located. Where C4 typically provides for maximized ease of access and visibility from
the Interstate 5 freeway and major arterial streets, C5 provides for uses most appropriately located
along or near major highways or thoroughfares. As stated in the previous memorandum, both zoning
districts allow banks, offices, convenience markets, drugstores, restaurants, supermarkets, sporting
goods stores, retail stores, liquor stores, veterinary clinics, and shopping centers to name some of the
higher traffic generating uses_ The highest permitted traffic generator in either zone is a convenience
market, which is shown in the ITE Trip Generation to generate 52.41 trips per 1000 square feet during
the p.m, peak hour, There are other uses that are outright permitted in one zone but a cor#ditional use
in the other. However, both zones are built out with these types of uses in a manner that balances out
potential trip generations. Overall, the highest and best uses in C5 are not shown to generate any
more traf'f'ic than C4.
Traffic Impact Analysis Applicability
The City of Central Point Public Works Standards and Specifications require a traffic impact analysis
for a land use application that involves one or more of the following actions in 320.10.03 (3)(a -g).
These include:
a) A change in zoning or plan amendment designation that generates 300 average daily trips (ADT)
more then the current zoning;
The proposed 70ne. ohangtr fmm G4 to C5 is shown to generate no additional traffic to the
transportation system
b) Any proposed development or land use action that a road authority, including the city, Jackson
County or ODOT, states may have operational or safety concerns along its facilities;
There are no known operational or safety concerns as a resell of the proposed zone change
c) An increase in site traffic volume generation by 250 average daily trips (ADT) or more, or 25 peak
hour trips;
Not applicable at the time of zone change., but is being addressed with the proposed development
application,
d) An increase in peak hour volume of a particular movement to and from the State highway by 20
percent or more;
An aucujy amilysis w oul appfic@blu at the thilu, of zone change, but is bring addressed with the
proposed development application However, the site does riot take access from a State highway and
158
the prolebtad tnp Voi"'_1o)e.-- aoy l liJVcli7@71(`,5 at rhe /-55Irltb'iC%)dr) r' i11ould be I., :s Ulai1 20% orme
total volume of any of those movements.
e) An increase in use of adjacent streets by vehicles exceeding twenty thousand pounds gross vehicle
weight by 10 vehicles or more per day;
Not applicable at the time of zone change, but is being addressed with the ,proposed development
application
f) The location of the access driveway does not meet minimum sight distance requirements, as
determined by the city engineer, or is located where vehicles entering or leaving the property are
restricted, or such vehicles queue or hesitate on the state highway, creating a safety hazard at the
discretion of the community development director; or
Not applicable at the time of zone change, but is being .addressed with the proposed development
application No new direct access to the public street system is requested or required to serve the
development on the land subject to the zone charge.
g) A change in internal traffic patterns that, at the discretion of the Public Works Director, may cause
safety problems, such as back-up onto a street or greater potential for traffic accidents.
Not applicable at the tiaie of zone change, but is being addressed with the proposed development
application Nothing pertaining to the zone change applicafion would be expected to aflov/
development that would cause changes to internal traffic pattens that would create or worsen any
safety problems on the public street system
Transt-ortetlon Planning Rule
The State Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) requires changes to land use plans and land use
regulations (i.e. Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments and Zoning Map Amendments) to be
consistent with the function and capacity of existing and planned transportation facilities. Oregon
Administrative Rule (OAR) 660-012-0060 subsection 1 states:
(1) if an amendment to a functional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive plan, or a land use
regulation (including a zoning map) would significantly affect an existing or planned transportation
facility, then the local government must put in place measures as provided in section (2) of this
rule, unless the amendment is allowed under section (3), (9) or (10) of this rale. A plan or land use
regulation amendment significantly affects a transportation facility if it would:
(a) Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility (exclusive
of correction of map errors in an adopted plan);
(b) Change standards implementing a functional classification system; or
(c) Result in any of the effects listed in paragraphs (A) through (C) of this subsection based on
projected conditions measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted TSP.
As park of evaluating projected conditions, the amount of traffic projected to be generated
within the area of the amendment may be reduced if the amendment includes an enforceable,
ongoing requirement that would demonstrably limit traffic generation, including, but not limited
to, transportation demand management. This reduction may diminish or completely eliminate
the significant effect of the amendment.
(A) Types or levels of travel or access that are inconsistent with the functional classification of
an existing or planned transportation facility;
(8) Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility such that it
would not meet the performance standards identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan;
or
(C) Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that is otherwise
projected to not meet the performance standards identified in the TSP or comprehensive
plan.
Memorandum Addendum Page 2
159
The proposed zone change and comprehensive plan map amendment from C4 to C5 on Township
37S Range 2W Section 02, tax tot 602 Is concluded to generate no increase in traffic to the
transportation system. The proposed plan amendment and zone change will, therefore, not
significantly affect any existing or planned transportation facility nor will it result in type; or levels of
travel or access that are inconsistent with the functional classification of any existing or planned
transportation facility such that it would not meet the performance standard identified in the City's
Transportation Sysftm Pian (TSP) or Comprehensive Plan. Additionally, the plan/zoning amendment
does not meet the Public Works TrAffic Impact Analysis (TA) Applicabilfty requirements as set forth in
section 320.10.03 (3)(a -g) of their Standards and SpeeifIcartions, and does not warrant any further
traffic analysis.
In conclusion, the application for plan and zoning amendment are found to be in compliance with the
City of Central Point Corhprehensive Plan pursuant to the Central Point lan# Development Code, and
are shown to be consistent with the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR). No further analysis is shown
to be required.
R*spacMAy,
I If 4t
Kimberly Parcluccl, PE PTOE
Firm Principal t
Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, I-t_C
Attachments: C4 and C5 permitted use comparisons
OAR 660-012-0060
Memorandum Addendum Page 3
160
Permitted C4
Use
C5
Highest and Best
Uses - ITE
Banks Yes
Yes
24.3 PM / 1000 SF
Accounting Offices Yes
No
Real Estate Offices Yes
Yes
Insurance Offices Yes
Yes
Legal Services Yes
No
Engineering Services Yes
No
Photo and Art Studio Yes
No
Counselling services Yes
No
Govt Offices Yes
No
Medical/Dental Offices Yes
No
Convenience Market Yes
Yes
52.41 PM / 1000 SF
Drugstore Yes
Yes
13.87 PM / Fuel Sta.
Auto/Truck Service Station Yes
Yes
Auto/Tire sales and repairs Yes
Yes
Motel/Hotel Yes
Yes
Walk-in Movie Theater Yes
Yes
Bowling alley Yes
Yes
Photo/Art Gallery Yes
No
Photo Processing Station Yes
Yes
Travel Agency Yes
I No
Barber/beauty shop Yes
Yes
Sit-down restaurant Yes
Yes
9.85 PM / 1000 SF
Cocktail Lounge Yes
CU
11.34 PM / 1000 SF
Tavern Yes
No
11.34 PM / 1000 SF
Commercial parking lot Yes
Yes
Community Shopping Center Yes
Yes
Supermarket Yes
Yes
9A8 PM / 1000 SF
Department store Yes
Yes
Sporting goods Yes
Yes
Bookstore Yes
Yes
Florist Yes
Yes
Leather Goods Yes
No
Pet Sales Yes
Yes
Photo supplies Yes
Yes
Health food Yes
Yes
Self-service Laundry Yes
Yes
Antique shop Yes
Yes
Delicatessen Yes
Yes
Pastry Yes
Yes
General Apparel Yes
Yes
Shoes and Boots Yes
Yes
Jewelry Yes
Yes
Clock sales Yes
Yes
Bakery Yes
Yes
161
Permitted
Use _
Bicycle shop
C4
CS
Highest and best
Uses - ITE
_ _
Yes
Yes
Audio/Video sales
Yes
Yes
Printing and publishing
Yes
Yes
Mobile food vendors
Yes
CU
Potentially high - varies
Liquor store
Yes
Yes
Ice/Skating Rink
CU
Yes
Dance Hall
CU
Yes
Silliard/pool Hall
CU
Yes
Miniature Golf
CU
Yes
Business Schools
Cu
Yes
Physical Fitness Center
CU
Yes
Carwash
Cil
Yes
Taxicab Office
Cu
Yes
Ambulance Services
CU
Yes
Drive-in Fast Food
Cu
Yes
32A15 FM / irnC S€
Contractors Office
No
Yes
Medical Clinic & Lab
No
Yes
Appliance Service
No
Yes
Locksmith
No
Yes
Art/Music/dusiness School
No
Yes
Upholstery Shop
No
Yes
Vatednary Clinic
'Yes
Yes
Tire Sales
Ne
Yes
Glass/Mirror Sales
No
Yes
Large Retail Establishments
No
Yes
RV Storage
No
Yes
Light Fabrication
NO
Yes
Hardware Sales
lib
Yes
Monument Sales
Mo
Yes
Feed, seed, fuel
Pio
Yes
Electrical/Plumbing Supplies
No
Yes
Heating & Air Equipment
No
Yes
.Stone/Tile Supplies
No
Yes
Nursery
No
Yes
Antique shop
No
Yes
Pawnshop
No
Yes
Public Utilities
No
Yes
Furniture Sales
No
Yes
162
(b) Affected cities and counties that do not have acknowledged plans and land use regulations as provided in
subsection (a) of this section, shall apply relevant sections of this rule to land use decisions and limited land use
decisions until land use regulations complying with this amended rule have been adopted.
(5) Cities and counties shall update their TSPs and implementing measures as necessary to comply with this division
at each periodic review subsequent to initial compliance with this division. Local governments within metropolitan
areas shall amend local transportation system plans to be consistent with an adopted regional transportation system
plan within one year of the adoption of an updated regional transportation system plan or by a date specified in the
adopted regional transportation system plan.
(6) The director may grant a whole or partial exemption from the requirements of this division to cities under 10,000
population and counties under 25,000 population, and for areas within a county within an urban growth boundary that
contains a population less than 10,000. Eligible jurisdictions may request that the director approve an exemption from
all or part of the requirements in this division. Exemptions shall be for a period determined by the director or until the
jurisdiction's next periodic review, whichever is shorter.
(a) The director's decision to approve an exemption shall be based upon the following factors:
(A) Whether the existing and committed transportation system is generally adequate to meet likely transportation
needs;
(B) Whether the new development or population growth is anticipated in the planning area over the next five years;
(C) Whether major new transportation facilities are proposed which would affect the planning areas;
(D) Whether deferral of planning requirements would conflict with accommodating state or regional transportation
needs; and
(E) Consultation with the Oregon Department of Transportation on the need for transportation planning in the area,
including measures needed to protect existing transportation facilities_
(b) The director's decision to grant an exemption under this section is appealable to the commission as provided in
OAR 660-002-0020 (Delegation of Authority Rule)
(7) Portions of TSPS and implementingmeasures adopted as part of comprehensive plans prior to the responsibie
jurisdiction's periodic review shall be reviewed pursuant to OAR chapter 660, division 18, Post Acknowledgment
Procedures_
Stat. Auth.: ORS 183, 197,040 & 197.245
Stats. Implemented: ORS 195.025, 197.040, 197.230, 197.245, 197.610 -197.625, 197.628 - 197.646, 197.712 &
197.717
Hist.: LCDC 1-1991, f. & cert. of 5-8-91; LCDC 1-1993, f. & cert. of 6-15-93; LCDC 4-1995, f. & cert ef. 5-8-95;
LCDD 6-1998, f. & cert. ef. 10-30-98; LCDb 2-2000, f. & cert. ef. 2-4-00; LCDD 3-2004, f. & cert of. 5-7-04; LCDD 6-
2006, f. 7-11-06, cert. of. 7-14-05
660-092-0000
Plan and Land Use Regulation Amendments
(1) If an amendment to a functional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive plan, or a land use regulation (including a
zoning map) would significantly affect an existing or planned transportation facility, then the local government must
put in place measures as provided in section (2) of this rule, unless the amendment is allowed under section (3), (9)
or (10) of this rule. A plan or land use regulation amendment significantly affects a transportation facility if it would:
(a) Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility (exclusive of correction of map
errors in an adopted plan);
163
(b) Change standards Impiementing a functional classification system; or
(c) Result in any of the effects listed in paragraphs (A) through (C) of this subsection based on projected conditions
measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted TSP. As part of evaluating projected conditions,
the amount of traffic pro}ecCed to be generated within the area of the amendment may be reduced if the amendment
includes an enfaroeable, ongolsV requirernent thaat would demonstrably limit traffic generation, including, but not
limited to, tronsportotion demand mora tgement. This seduction may diminish or completely eliminate the significant
effect of the amendment.
(A) Types or levels of travel or access that are inconsistent with the functional classification of an existing or planned
transpotilotion fWtV,
(S) Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility such that it would not meet the
performance standards identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan; or
(C) Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation tiltcifity that is otherwise projected to not meet
the performance standards identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan.
(2) If a local government determines that there would be a significant effect, then the local government must ensure
that allowed land us" are consistent wit the identified function, capacity, ana performance standards ofthe 11WHfty
measured at the and of the planning period identified in the adopted TSP through one or 8 combination of the
remedies fisted in (a)through (e) balani, unfe6s the amendment meats the balancing test in subsection (2)(e) of this
section or qualifies for partial mi igation in section (11) of this rule. A local government using subsection (2)(e).
section (3), section (10) or soctiQrr (11) to approve an amendment recognizes that additional motor vehicle traffic
congestion may result and that other facill providers would not be expected to provide additional capacity for motor
vehicles in response to this congestion.
(a) Adopting measures that demonstrate allowed land uses are consistent with the planned function, capacity, and
performance standards of the transportation Malty.
(b) Amending the TSP or comprehensive pian to provide transportation facififies, improvements or services adequate
to support the proposed land uses consistent with the requirements of this division; such amendments shall include a
funding plan or mechanism consistent with section (4) or include an amendment to the transportation finance plan so
that the fsacility, improvement, or service wilt be provided by the end of the planning period.
(c) Amending the TSP to modify the planned function, city or peftr mw*o *11an is rds of ttu;; transportaftm f aoHity.
(d) Providing other measures as a condition of development or through a development agreement or similar funding
method, including, but not limited to, transportation system management measures or minor transportation
Improvements. Local govemments shall, as part of the amendment, specify when measures or improvements
provided pursuant to this subsection will be provided.
(e) Provlift improvements that would benefit modes other than the significantly affected mode, improvements to
facilities other than the significantly affected facility, or improvements at other locations, if the provider of the
significantly affected facility provides a written statement that the system -wide benefits are sufficient to balance the
significant effect, even though the improvements would not result in consistency for oil performance standards.
(3) Notwithstanding sections (1) and (2) of this rule, a local government may approve on amendment that would
significantly affect an existing transportation facility without assuring that the allowed land uses are consistent with the
function, capacity and performance standards of the facility where:
(a) In the absence of the amendment, planned transportation facilities, improvements and services as sat" in
section (q) of this rule would not be adequate to achleve consistency with the identified function, capacity or
performance standard for that facility by the end of the planning period Ident1W In the adopted TSP;
(b) Development resulting thorn the amendment will, at a minimum, mhigste the Wripe is of the antertdlamt in a
manner that avoids further degradation to the performance of the facility by the time of the development through one
or a combination of transportation improvements or measures;
164
s
a� �a
7p$ aarrr���33 �J2
gar
,
1
IP
W-711
a � Iljl
1°
F
ys li� 1
�a: 1
165
J IT@ ri AaTA ii F.To
" J Looking South along Biddle Rd. across subject
property
01w _e _
Y
Looking Northeast along Biddle Rd. at area across
Biddle Rd.
{ 3� Looking Southwest along Biddle Rd. across adjoining
�" lot and subject property
Legend
Photo ID
Number
167
,1 Looking Northeast along southern property line across
subject property
Site Photos
Comprehensive Plan Amendment l
Zone Change
Rogue Valley Microdevices &
Tail Lite Properties LLC
37 -2W -01C-802
MCSA Planning, Ltd.
Page 1 of 2
5�Looking Northwest across adjoining [at and subject `� Lod" Southwest acrom adjoining let and
property subject property
T�Looking Southeast along Biddle Rd. across adjoining
property and subject property
�8 Looking Southwest along Siddle Rd. scross adjoining
property and subject property
Site Photos
Comprehensive Plan Amendment /
Zone Change
Legend Rogue Valley Microdevices &
Tail Lite Properties LLC
Photo ID 37 -2W -01C-802
Number ® CSA Planning, Ltd
Page 2 of 2
168
D
C
U)
PO
co
m
m
m
D
0
T
Zi
m
0
mz
X
m
D
� O
mZ
r �
< O
X
--� m
OO
0z°
X
0
m
r -
m
O
m
U)
169
m
i
w
p0o�] @ipp!e
ZY -
—7F
--T
oil
170
ROGUE VALLEY
MCRODEVICE3
w
m
4901 BIDDLE-TAX LOT 802
CENTRAL POINT. OREGON
UD
m
�o C:
m
4 0
170
x
G)
C
3
mz
t i
1T
c ��]
c o O
cv
D
m
l m C")
Zoms
UlZCl) z
171
i m
C0
rm-
t
9
w
y• ■
a
'
m o
p
'1 �
�
ro
D
Y
Z
f
m
r
Oi
�r
t
QQyg
w�
JpmJ
�v
c0
m
a
r
A
m
I�
{
o
171
i m
C0
rm-
t
9
w
172
ROGUE VALLEY ; cn cn
MICRODEVICES D
�� m
�7
4901 RIDDLE -TAX LOT 802
i X
OENIRALPOINI UREUUN
172
i
y
x
173
�'cZ. Lai
rfsG ao�
ROQUE VALLEY
NU
'
CJy
t75 Sp
1801 EIC®LE-TAX LCT 902h
m
CENTRAL POINT, OREGON
-a'I
173
24 �:j it s ES F t' C4.1
_!l,4 I
cif
911 t; I ROGUE VALLEY MICRODEVICES Madara Design Inc
u �, ��� asoiawosEROAD TAX LOT 60z ZMV*bo"m(aco wan
L�HTWAPCii FR, OpfyWIV 4f5pj CNbYPo70 0r4ryq .
j 541.36¢7SY%
174
— .' a
a ¢
e
� � J
00
®m.qm
10
STI
LU.
i
a
Mil
rsf ROQUE VALLEY cn cn
MICRODEVICES
�a 4801 BIDDLE-TAX LOT 802 1' viii m
`\ CENTRAL POINT, OREGON (n
City of Central Paint, Oregon
140 So. Third St., Central Point, Or 97502
541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384
www.ci.central-point.or.us
April 14, 2016
Jay Harland
CSA Planning, Ltd.
4497 Brownridge Ste. 101
Medford, OR 97504
CENTRAL
POINT
EXHIBIT 74
Planning Department
Tom Humphrey, AICP,
Community Development Director/
Assistant City Administrator
RE: Tail Lite Properties Site Plan & Architectural Review (File No. 16004)
Dear Mr, Harland:
This correspondence serves as a Notice of Decbion that on April 14, 2016 the Central Point
Cotmnuility Development Director approved.,
The Site Plan and Architectural Review appliealfion for construction of an 11,605 s.f.
veterinary clinic and site improvements subject to conditions of approval set Barth in
the staff report dated April 11, 2016.
A compile copy of the of the Community Development Director's decision can be obtained
at the City of Central Point Planning Department located at 140 South Third Street, Central
Point, OR 97502.
The final date for filing an appeal is ten (10) days f nm the date this letter was mailed. All
appeals must be in written form consistvat with the pro=dures set forth in Section
17.05.300(G) of the Central Point Municipal Code.
SLHm*my,
T AICP
Community Development Director
Fnnlosurc
176
FIVE,
APR 15 2016
BY
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ][TEM (File No.16004)
A%
CENTRAL
POINT
STAFF REPORT
April 11, 2016
Community Development
oT m Frump h rey, AICF,
Community Development Director
Consideration of a Site Plan and Architectural Review application for the construction of a 11,605 square
foot veterinary clinic, including 55 parking spaces and site landscape improvements. The 1,42 acre site is
Lot 1 of a proposed Tentative Partition application (File No. 16005) within the Tourist and. Office
Commercial (C4) zoning district. The project site is located on property identified on the Jackson
County Assessor's Map as 37S 2W 01C, Tax Lot 802. Applicant: Tail Lite Properties, LLC; Agent: Jay
Harland, CSA Planning, Ltd.
SOURCE
Stephanie Holtey, Community Planner 11
BACKGROUND
The applicant proposes to construct an 11,605 s.£ veterinary clinic on Biddle Road, just east of the Super
8 Motel (Attachment "A-1"). It is a single -story structure and includes a dog run (Attachment "A-2").
The proposed structure is to be the new location for Southern Oregon Specialty Veterinary Center, an
advanced care and emergency services clinic serving southern Ck egon and northern California.
The project is located at the southeast corner of 4901 Riddle Road. The: applicant is requesting 2pproval
of a three (3) lot partition, including construction of a new private retail street, (File No. 16005)
concurrent with this application. The proposed veterinary clinic will occupy proposed Lot 1 pending final
plat approval, which will take access from Hamrick Road via an existing private street and Biddle Road
by way of the proposed retail street.
The primary fagade frontage and main pedestrian entry (West Elevation) is along the proposed retail
street (Attachment "A-5"). The dog run is on the North Elevation, and parking is on the West and South
Elevations. Architecturally the building consists of painted stucco, ground level and stepped wall metal
panels with canopy overhangs. The colors will be red, off-white, bronze and metallic silver.
ISSUES
Four (4) issues were identified relative to this application as follows:
Parking Adjustment. The proposed parking plan provides for 55 parking spaces, which exceeds
the maximum 46 spaces allowed per CPMC 17.64,040. The applicant is requesting an increase to
the parking allowance per Section 17.64,040(B)(2).
Comment: The applicant's findings (Attachment "B') provide qualitative justification for the
proposed parking adjustment based on lack of nearby on -street parking availability and the
nature of the use (i. e. 2417 emergency and specialized care services). The applicant's findings
177
are.jurther supported by the ITE Parking Generation 3M Edition, which includes a study with an
observed parking demand ratio of 1.6 spaces per 1, 000 s.; of Gross Floor Area (GFA) and 1.4
spaces per employee. Based on the proposed building size and the typical number of employees
on any given shift, (i. e. 25-32 employees) the parking demand is expected to range between 48-58
parking spaces. Since the proposed parking plan is within the range for expected parking, staff
recommends that the parking adjustment is just fled.
2. Landscaping. The proposed landscape plan has been evaluated against the minimum landscape
requirements of Section 17.75A39(G). identified discrepancies are noW below:
a. Perimeter. The perimeter planting area 4aceta to the north proper line is 3 -ft in width,
which does not meet the minimum 10 -ft planting area required for conwwrcial land uses.
Resolution: As conditioned the proposal shall either demonstrate compliance with the
minimum planting area standard, or the applicant may record a cross access easement to
provide future vehicular and pedestrian access with the adjoining lot to the north.
Although the applicant's findings state that cross access is not deemed necessary,
providing for a connection at this location would be consistent with vehicular and
pedestrian connectivity requirement per CPMC 17.75,039(A), and provide for a
temporary non -conformity until such time development occurs north of the project site.
mei . The parldng plan proposes a pakicing row with eleven (11) contiguous spaces,
inconsistent with CPMC 17.75.434(G)(2). This section requires an bAetior huKkicaped
island within a pig row when ton (10) or more vehicles would be placed in an
abutting configuration.
,resolution: As conditioned, the parking layout shall be revised to comply with the
interior landscaping regtdrements. T his can be achieved by relocating the interior island
west of the proposed location.
3, Outdoor Dag Ran. The site plan illustrates an outdoor dog run and play area ("Dog Run") north
of the proposed structure (Attachment "Aa2"). The rode provides for limited outdoor activities in
the C-4 zoning district, and does not specifically include dog runs. The applicant requested a
code interpretation to determine the proposed Dog Run as a compatible use in the C4 zone. As
proposed, the Dog Run is for limited use (i.e. one dog at a time, tethered and supervised) to
provide for the safety of personnel and animals.
Comment. The Community Development Director considered the code interpretation request
and determined that the ".Dog Run " is a compatible activity as proposed. The favorable
interpretation was presented to the Planning Commission at the April 5, 2016 Planning
CommkYsion meeting and no issues were raised. Due to the location of tate proposed outdoor
activities in relation to other commercial properties, staff recommends visual screening of the
dog run and play area with a continuous evergreen hedge or other similar plantings.
178
4. Block Standard. The existing private street and block configuration permitted as Partition P-03-
2004 is legally non -conforming.
Comment. To meet the current block standards per CPMC 17.75.031(B), the existingprivate
street must be developed as a retail street per CPMC 17.75.031 (B) (3) and ]7.75.031(F). The
tentative plat approval (File No. 16005), per Condition No. 1, requires that the private street be
improved to retail street standards at the time of development for Lots I and 3. The proposed site
plan complies with the block standard and tentative plat as conditioned.
FINDINGS
The proposed veterinary clinic has been reviewed for compliance with the applicable standards and
criteria in Chapter 17.64, 17.72, and 17.75 and found to comply per the applicant's findings (Attachment
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall:
a. Demonstrate compliance with the parking lot perimeter landscape standards set forth in
CPMC 17.75.039(G)(1) by either:
i. Providing a copy of a recorded cross access easement with Lot 2; or,
ii. Submitting a revised site plan and landscape plan illustrating a nrinimum 10 -foot
planter width planted with at least 3 trees and 15 shrubs per 100 -feet.
b. Submit a revised site plan and landscape plan demonstrating compliance with:
i. The interior parking lot landscaping standard set forth in CPMC 17.75.039(G)(2);
ii. Tentative Partition (File No. 16005) Condition No. 1 requiring that the existing
private street be developed as a retail street per CPMC 17.75.031(F).
c. Submit a revised landscape plan to provide a landscape screen around the proposed dog
run and dog play area. The landscape screen shall be a continuous evergreen hedge or
other similar landscape materials.
d. Coordinate with the Rogue Valley Intemational-Medford Airport for compliance with the
requested noise easement (Attachment "G").
2. Prior to certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall receive Final plat approval for File No. 16005
and provide a copy of the recorded final plat to the Community Development Department.
3. Signage shall be subject to a separate review.
4. The applicant shall comply with conditions as listed in the Public Works Department Staff Report
dated March 29, 2016 (Attachment "C").
179
5. The applicant shall comply with condition as listed in the Jackson County Staff Report dated
April 5, 2016 (Attachment "D„).
6. The applicant shall comply with conditions as listed in the Rogue Valley Sewer Services Staff
Report dated March 29, 2016 (Attachment `T").
7. The applicant shall comply with conditions as listed in the $wilding Department Comments dated
April 5, 2016 (Attachment "F").
ATTACHMENTS
Attacbment "A-1" — Overall Site Plan
AttachTent "A-2” — Site Plan
Attachment "A-3" — Proposed Floor Plan
Attachment "A-4" — Roof Plan
tt?ichmemt "-A-5°" — Exterior BtAiding E1. -nations
Attachment "A-6" — Site Grading and Utility Plan
Attachment "A-7— Landscape Plan
Attachrent "W' — Applicant's Findings
Attachment "C" —Public Works Staff Report
Attachment "D" — Jackson Cody Roads Staff Resort
Attachment "E", • Ra rra Valley Serer Servieem Staff Report
Attachment "F"—13Wlding Department Coram is
Attachment "G" — Rogue Valley Internsttional-Medford Airport Comments
ACTION
Consider the proposed Site F%n & Architectural Review application and 1) approve; 2) approve with
revisions; or 3) deny the application.
RECOrAMNDAMN
Approve the Site Plaza & Architectural Review application for the Southern Oregon Specialty Veterinary
Center per the StatfReport dated April 11, 2016.
180
CH E T " "
A7 A M NT .�,. 2
rye
7 X
N
i
mm4
S
m v
f
f
it IN
r�r w`rw -J
LES Scl1 "
� � I
-
t 1
9
a�
fir
-
-
�
�
a Qesaoaa�aQ oo neo o �o�a neo aaoa�
Jul1' Itj1 11111 1 X1911111
No
0
r
SMEPLAN
",*,4i4L
,RVWpRfflw
g
PID HOLDER
EXHIBIT 15
Rogue Valley Microdevices
Site Development
Traffic Impact Analysis
September 9, 20116
Prepared By: T.aowpawNigh
,bfGlaiz,?iNc L L (
f OUT4/[,PM OicotI TutffPON-RTIOM I MOffC-C tIM6. [ C (
182
Chapter 17.64
OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING!
Sections:
17.64.010 Purvose.
17.64.020 Applicability.
17.64.030 Off-street loading.
47.64.040 Off-street pa_r_k�pg reuuir�mer�ts.
17.64.010 Purpose. a� SHARE
It is the purpose of this chapter, through the management of off-street parking, loading and
bicycle spaces, to manage auto dependence and encourage the use of alternative
transportation modes in accordance with the policies and strategies of the city's
transportation system plan.
The following regulations are established, in accordance with the transWation system
Plan, to provide for the: number of off-street parking, loading and bicycle spaces for new
uses and enlargement of existing uses in connection with the use of land permitted by this
zoning ordinance_ The requirements and standards set forth in this chapter are intended to
ensure the usefulness of parking, loading and bicycle facilities, protect the public safety, and
to mitigate potential adverse impacts on adjacent land uses. (Ord. 1946 (part), 2011; Ord.
1436 §2(part), 1951).
17.64.020 Applicability.0 sHRRE
In all districts, in connection with any use whatsoever, there shall be provided at the time
any building or structure is erected, enlarged or increased in capacity, or the use is changed
or increased in intensity, off-street parking spaces for automobiles, off-street loading, and
bicycle parking facilities for the enlarged or increased portion in the case of an addition or
for the building, structure or use in other cases, in accordance with the requirements herein.
All parking shall be developed and maintained to the standards set forth in
Section 17.75.Q39, Off-street parking design and development standards. (Ord. 1946 (part),
2011).
17.64.030 Off-street loading. 0 SHARK
A. In all districts for each use for which a building is to be erected or structurally altered to
the extent of increasing the floor area to equal the minimum floor area required to provide
loading space and which will require the receipt or distribution of materials or merchandise
183
by truck or similar vehicle, there shall be provided off-street loading space in accordance
with the standards set forth in Table 17.64.01, Off -Street Loading Requirements.
TABLE 17.64.01 OFF-STREET LOADING REQUIREMENTS
Off-street Loading Berth Requirement (inactions rounded up to the
Use Cafi ories cfaseat whole nunnher}
'INDVSTRIAL, WARE OUSfNG AND WHQLEAUNO
Sq. Ft. of Floor Area No, of Loading Berths R.equircd
Less than 12,500 1
12,501--25,000
2
3
25,001--37,500
37,501-50-,000
4
Over 50,000 5 plus 1 for each additional 50,000 sq. ft.
RETAt1.. RESi'AURANTS _ HOSPITALS. AND OTHER GOODS HANDLING
Sq. Ft. of Floor Area
No. of Loading Berft Required
Less than 12,500
0
12,301--60,000
1
60,001--100,000
2
3 plus 1 for each additional 80,000 sq_ fL
Over 100,000
Sq. Ft. of Floor Area
0--50,000
TABLE 17.64.01 OFF-STREET LOADING REQUIREMENTS (Continued)
Off -Street Loading Berth Requirement (fractions rounded up to the
184
closest whole number)
No. of Loading Berths Required
TABLE 17.64.01 OFF-STREET LOADING REQUIREMENTS (Continued)
Off -Street Loading Berth Requirement (fractions rounded up to the
closest whole number)
50,001--200,000
Over 200,040 M1 _ + 2 plus I for each 100,000 sq. ft.
B. A loading berth shall not be less than ten feet wide, thirty-five feet long and have a height
clearance of twelve feet. Where the vehicles generally used for loading and unloading
exceed these dimensions, the required length of these berths shall be increased.
C. If loading space has been provided in connection with an existing use or is added to an
existing use, the loading space shall not be eliminated if elimination would result in less
space than is required to adequately meet the needs of the use.
D. Off-street parking areas used to fulfill the requirements of this title shall not be counted
as required loading spaces and shall not be used for loading and unloading operations,
except during periods of the day when not required to meet parking needs.
E. in no case shalt any portion of a street or alley be counted as a part of the required
parking or loading space, and such spaces shall be designed and located as to avoid undue
interference uvith the public use of streets or alleys. (Ord. 1946 (part), 2011; Ord. 1436
§2(part), 1981. Formerly 17.64.020).
17.64.040 Off-street parking requirements. 0 SHRRE
All uses shalt comply with the number of off-street parking requirements identified in Table
17.64.02A, Residential Off -Street Parking Requirements, and Table 17.64.026, Non -
Residential Off -Street Parking Requirements. For residential uses the off-street parking
requirements are stated in terms of the minimum off-street parking required. For non-
residential uses the off-street parking requirements are presented in terms of both minimum
and maximum off-street parking required. The number of off-street parking spaces in Table
17.64.02B, Non -Residential Off -Street Parking, may be reduced in accordance with
subsection B of this section, Adjustments to Off -Street Vehicle Parking.
The requirement for any use not specifically listed shall be determined by the community
development director on the basis of requirements for similar uses, and on the basis of
evidence of actual demand created by similar uses in the city and elsewhere, and such
185
other traffic engineering or planning data as may be available and appropriate to the
establishment of a minimum requirement.
TABLE 17.64.02A
RESIDENTIAL OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS
Use Cat ries
Minimum Vehicle Parking Requirement (fractions rounded down to the closest
whole number)
RIIZSFI?i:V"AI.
Single -Family Residential
2 spaces per dwelling unit, both of which must be covered.
Accessory Dwelling Unit
1 space per accessory dwelling wit.
Two -Family
2 spaces per dwetIing unit, both of which must be covered.
Multiple -Family
1 space per studio or 1 -bedroom unity
1.5 spaces per 2 -bedroom unit; and
2 spaces per 3f -bedroom unit
plus 1 guest parking space for each 4 dwelling units or -fraction thereof.
Mobile Homs Parks
2 spaces per dwelling unit on the same Iot or pad as the mobile home (may be tandem);
plus 1 guest space for each 4 ❑eobi le homes.
2 spaces per dwelling unit, both of which must be covered.
Residential Home
Residential Facility
.75 spaces per bedroom.
Congrtsm (Senior) Housing
;.5 spsu s per dwelling WE.
Boarding douses, Bed and
Breakfast
I space per guest unit; plus I space per each 2 employees.
Use Cats ri®s
TABLE 17.64,028
NON-RESIDENTIAL OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS
Minimum and Maximum Vehicle Parking Requirement (fractions rounded
_ down to the closest whale number)
I E;lj
TABLE 17.54.02B
NON-RESIDENTIAL OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS
Minimum and Maximum Vehicle Parking Requirement (fractions rounded
down to the closest whole number)
CflWERCIAL LODGING
Rotel or Motel 3 space per guest unit; plus 1 space per each 2 employees. Uuits having kitchen
facilities shall provide 2 spaces per unit with kitchen.
Welfare or Correctional Institutions I l space per i beds for patients or km%ates.
Group Living such as Convalescent
Hospitals, Nursing Home
PUBLIC A$&9F,llrf$L Y
Churches, Chapels, Mortuaries
1 space per each 2 beds for patients or residents bedrooms.
3 spaces per each 2 beds, de,"Mined I}y the maximum design capacity of the
facility.
1 space per 75 sq. ft. of maize assembly area; or per Chapter] 7.72. Site Plan and
Architectural Review
Libraries, Museum, Art Gallery I space per 400 sq. ft. of net floor area; plus: i space per each 2 empioyew
5C'fl[st7t.S -
I space per employee; plus l space per 5 children the facility is designed or
Day Care Custer, Preschool intended to accommodate. No requirements for facilities caring for 5 or fewer
children simultaneously.
Elementary and Junior High Schools 3 spaces per classroom, or I sparse per 4 seats in the main auditorium, gymnasium,
(public and private/parochial } or other place available for public assembly, whichever is greater.
High Schools, Colleges, and Trade I space per each 5 students, based on the design capacity of the facility, or 1 space
Schools (public and private/parochial) per 4 seats in the main auditorium, gymnasium, or other place available for public
assembly, whichever is greater,
G�L1 '"SMENII' and FN—MRTA&ME '
Theaters, Amphitheaters, Stadiums [ I space per each 4 fixed seats or 8 feet of bench length.
187
TABLE 17.64.02B
NON-RESIDENTIAL OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS
188
Minimum and Maximum Vehicle Parking Requirement (fractions rounded
Use Categories
down W the closest whole number
S spaces per lane; plus I space per each 2 employees. Other uses in the building
Bowling Alley
shall be calculated separately per Section 17.64.040(F), Mixed Uses.
i space per each 100 square €eet of net floor (or ice) area or fraction thereof; plus 1
Banceha[i, Skating Rink
space per each 2 aWloy=.
Swimming Pool
I space per Bach 100 square fact of pool surface area.
GPR*AL CC1MM MC LLL
1 space per each 200 square feet of net Floor area (excluding storage and other cion -
Retail Stores, Personal Services
sales or non -display areas).
p'urnitwo, Appliarazs
1 slyace per mh jOU;gmre feet of'grns.4 floor alae.
Automobile, Boat, Manufactured
l space for eae;t employee on the major shift; plus 2 spaces for each service bay;
Home and Recreational Vehicle Sales,
,plus I space per each 300 square feet of showroom area; plus i space per each
Service, and Rental
2,000 square fee[ of used or new vehicle Was area, or other outdoor sales area.
I space for each employee on the major shift; plus 2 spaces for each seM ee bay;
Nurseries, Gardening and Building
plus I space per each 300 square feet of showroom area; plus I space per each
Materials
2,000 square feet of used or new vehicle sales area, or other outdoor sales area.
Service and Repair Shops
I space per each 300 square feet of gross floor area.
10 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area.
Eating and Drinking Establishments
1 space per 100 feet of gross floor area, plus 3 stacking spaces for drive-through
Restaurants, Fast Food
window.
eff[C.. - ii ,000 fM-;kL
1 space per 300 square feet of gross floor area. In no case shall there be fewer than
Banks and other Financial institutions
3 spaces provided.
I space per 250 square feet of gross floor area.
General and Professiorral Offices
Medical/Dental Offices
1 space per 250 square feet of gross floor area.
188
TABLE I7.64.02B
NON-RESIDENTIAL OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS
A. Calculation of Required Off -Street Parking_ Off-street panting facility requirements set
forth in Table 17.64.02A, Residential Off -Street Parking Requirements, and Table
17.64.020B, Non -Residential Off -Street Parking Requirements, shall be applied as follows:
1. Where the application of the schedule results in a fractional requirement it shall
be rounded down to the lowest whole number.
2. For purposes of this chapter, gross floor area shall not include enclosed or
covered areas used for off-street parking or loading, or bicycle facilities.
3. Where uses or activities subject to differing requirements are located in the
same structure or on the same site, or are intended to be served by a common
facility, the total parking requirement shall be the sum of the requirements for
each use or activity computed separately, except as adjusted through the site
plan and architectural review process under the provisions of subsection (B) of
this section. The community development director, when issuing a permit(s) for
multiple uses on a site, may restrict the hours of operation or place other
conditions on the multiple uses so that parking needs do not overlap and may
then modify the total parking requirement to be based on the most intense
combination of uses at any one time,
189
Minimum and Maximum Vehicle Parking Requirement (fractions rounded
Use Categories
down to the closest whole number)
i D13STRVIL and MANUFACF(rlZ'I'NG
2 spaces per each 3 employees on the 2 largest shifts*, or I space per each 500
Assembly and Manufacturing
sq We feet of gross floor ares, whichever is greatest.
(* 1 space per employee if the business has only one shift).
2 spaces per each 3 employees on the 2 largest adjacent shift*, or I space per each
War housing and Storage
1,000 square feet of gross floor arta, whichever is greater. (4'1 space per employee
if the business has only one shift).
Industrial Vehicles
I space for each vehicle kept or operated in connection with the use.
A. Calculation of Required Off -Street Parking_ Off-street panting facility requirements set
forth in Table 17.64.02A, Residential Off -Street Parking Requirements, and Table
17.64.020B, Non -Residential Off -Street Parking Requirements, shall be applied as follows:
1. Where the application of the schedule results in a fractional requirement it shall
be rounded down to the lowest whole number.
2. For purposes of this chapter, gross floor area shall not include enclosed or
covered areas used for off-street parking or loading, or bicycle facilities.
3. Where uses or activities subject to differing requirements are located in the
same structure or on the same site, or are intended to be served by a common
facility, the total parking requirement shall be the sum of the requirements for
each use or activity computed separately, except as adjusted through the site
plan and architectural review process under the provisions of subsection (B) of
this section. The community development director, when issuing a permit(s) for
multiple uses on a site, may restrict the hours of operation or place other
conditions on the multiple uses so that parking needs do not overlap and may
then modify the total parking requirement to be based on the most intense
combination of uses at any one time,
189
4. Where requirements are established on the basis of seats or person capacity,
the building regulations provisions applicable at the time of determination shall be
used to define capacity.
5. Where residential use is conducted together with or accessory to other
permitted uses, applicable residential requirements shall apply in addition to other
nonresidential requirements.
6_ The parking requirements outlined in Table 17.64.02A, Residential Off -Street
Parking Standards, and Table 17.64.020B, Non -Residential Off�Street Parking
Requirements, include parking for handicapped persons shall be provided
pursuant to the requirements of subsection C of this section, Accessible Parking
Requirements_
B. Adjustments to Non -Residential Off -Street Vehicle Parking. The off-street parking
requirements in Table 17.64.026, Nan -Residential Off -Street Parking Requirements, may
be reduced, or increased in any commercial (C) or industrial (M) district as follows:
1. Reductions. The maximum off-street parking requirements may be reduced by
no more then twenty percent.
2. Increases. The off-street parking requirements may be increased based on a
parking demand analysis prepared by the applicant as part of the site plan and
architectural review process. The parking demand analysis shall demonstrate and
documents justification for the proposed increase.
C. Accessible Parking Requirements. Where parking is provided accessory to a building,
accessible parking shall be provided, constructed, striped, signed and maintained as
required by ORS 44. 7.203, and Section 1106 of the latest Oregon Structural Specialty Code
as set forth in this section.
1. The minimum number of accessible parking spaces shall be provided for all
uses in accordance with the standards in Oregon Structural Specialty Code,
Minimum Number of Accessible Parking Spaces. Accessible parking spaces shall
be counted toward meeting off-street parking requirements in fables 17.64.02A
and 17,64.028, Residenti9l and Non -Residential Off -Street Parking
Requirements. The accessible parking requirements are minimum requirements
and are not subject to reductions per subsection (B)(1) of this section.
190
D. Shared Parking. Required parking facilities for two or more uses, structures, or parcels of
land in any commercial (C) or industrial (M) district may be satisfied by the same parking
facilities used jointly, to the extent that the owners or operators show that the need for
parking facilities does not materially overlap (e.g., uses primarily of a daytime versus
nighttime nature; weekday uses versus weekend uses); and provided, that prior to the
issuance of any building permit for the property that the right of joint use is evidenced by a
recorded deed, lease, contract, or similar written instrument establishing the joint use. The
city may approve owner requests for shared parking through the site plan and architectural
review process.
E_ Off -Site Parking. Except for single-family dwellings, the vehicle parking spaces required
by this chapter may be located on another parcel of land, provided the parcel is within three
hundred feet of the use it serves and the city has approved the off-site parking through the
site plan and architectural review process. The distance from the parking area to the use
shall be measured from the nearest parking space to a building entrance, following a
sidewalk or other pedestrian route. The right to use the off-site parking must be evidenced
by a recorded deed, lease, easement, or similar written instrument in the same manner as
set forth in subsection (A)(3) of this section.
F. Mixed Uses_ If more than one type of land use occupies a single structure or parcel of
land, the total requirements for off-street automobile parking shall be the sum of the
requirements for all uses, unless it can be shown that the peak parking demands are
actually less (see subsection D of this section, Shared Parking).
G. Compact Car Adjustment.
1. Any parking lot or otherwise required public parking area containing ten or
more parking spaces shall be eligible for a compact car adjustment, provided all
requirements of this chapter are adequately met.
2. Up to, but not exceeding, twenty-five percent of the total number of required
parking spaces may be designed and provided for the parking of compact cars.
3. All compact parking spaces must be identified for compact parking only.
Compact parking spaces shall be designed in accordance with the minimum
standards set forth in Section 17.75.039(6), Parking Stall Minimum Dimensions,
191
H. Change of Use. Prior to the change of use of a building or structure the applicant shall
demonstrate that adequets parking spaces are available to accommodate the new a"(s)
as required in this chapter,
I. Bicycle Parking. Bicycle parking shall be provided in accordance with Table 17.64.04,
Bicycle Parking Requirements,
Use
TABU 17.44.04IUCYCLE PARKING RAQUIREMENTS
— - ---- INlininium Required---.._--
Single-Family Residential
Multi -Family Residential, General
Multi -Family Residential, Congregate Housing, cc with
Physio d Disabill#es
Schools, Elementary
Schools, Junior HigI7/Midddle School
Schools, Senior High
College/Trade School
Transit CenterstPark and Ride bots
Religious Institutions
Hospitals
Medical/Dental Offices
Libraries/Museums, etc.
Cosnmcruw
NA
I space per unit
I space per 5 units
ini um
NA
100%
100%
:'V� - - 7
4 spaces per classroom
100%
4 spaces per classroom
100°/0
8 spaces per classroom
IW/o
I space per 4 students
(plus I space per student housing room/unit)
I
5% of &xtomobile parking spaces
100°!0
I space per 40 seat capacity
25%
1 space per 5 beds
75%
2 spaces, or I space per 1,000 sq, ft., whichever is
greater
25%
2 spaces, or I space per 1,000 sq. ft., whichever is
greater
25%
192
TABLE 17.64.04 BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS
Land Use 'Minimum Required
Minimums
Covered
Retail Sales
0.33 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.
501ye
Auto -Oriented Sales
2 spaces, or 0.33 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft,
whichever is greater
10%
Groceries/Supermarkets
0.33 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.
108/0
Office
2 spaces, or 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft., whichever is
greater
108/0
Restaurant
I space per 1,000 sq. ft.
25%
Drive -In .Restaurant
1 space per 1,000 sq. ft
25%
Shopping Center
0.33 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft
5wo
Financial Institutions
2 spaces, or 0.33 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.,
whichever is greater
10'%
Theaters/Auditoriums, etc_
1 space per 30 seats
101yo
hid"rial
Industrial Park
Warehouse
2 spaces, or 0.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft., whichever IWG/o
- - is greater
2 spaces, or 0.1 space per 1,000 sq. &, whichever 100%
is greater
Manufacturing, etc. _ — 2 spaces, or 0.15 space per 1,000 sq. ft., 100%
whichever is greater
(Ord. 2028 §3, 2016; Ord. 2002 §2 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 1948 (part), 2011).
1
Prior legislation: Ords. 1512, 1684 and 1912.
193
The Central Point Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2828, passed July 28, 2816.
Disclaimer: The City Recorders Office has the official version of the Central Paint Municipal Cade. Users sloutd
contact the City Recorder's Office for ardinancas passed subsequent to the ordinance cRed above.
Ptirsuant to the charter and Ordinance 1969, all references Woughout the code to "city administrator' have been
changed to "city manager!
City Website: htip Jlwww.centraipomtvrenonAovl
City Telephone: (541) 664-3321
194
Iii
�1
Hi Kim,
Here is an overview of the information you requested:
Employees: 20 at main location
Shifts: 5:00 a.m. — 2:00 P.M.
2 Employees
6:00 a.m. — 3:00 p.m.
1 Employee
7:00 a.m. — 4:00 p.m.
6 Employees
8:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m.
4 Employees
9:30 a.m. — 6:30 p.m.
3 Employees
11:00 a.m. — 8:00 p.m.
2 Employee
3.00 p.m. — Midnight
2 Employees
Of the 20 employees, 13 of them spend most of their day in the fabrication/manufacturing
area, but also
have desk space In the office. The remaining 7 work in the office area.
On average, half of the employees may leave the office on a daily basis for approximately 1 hour for
lunch, errands, etc. The time is dependent on the shift.
The daily deliveries are:
10:00-11:00 a.m. 3 Deliveries: FedEx, UPS, FedEx
Ground
2:30 p.m. 2 Pick-ups: FedEx and UPS
4:00 p.m, 1 Pick-up: FedEx Ground
Weekly deliveries are;
Average of 2 semis -truck deliveries per week
Our public/customer interaction, in person, is very minimal. We have meetings at our facility on average
twice per month.
Let me knew if you have any questions. I'm happy to elaborate further as needed,
Best regards,
JoAnn Martin
Rogue Valley Microdevices, Inc.
195
Hi Kim,
Laid out the probable increases by shift for Rogue V Micro, as follows;
5112E EtIIPIQYerc5
5am-2 pm
3
Gam-3pm
1
lam -4 pm
9
8 am -5 pm
a
9:30 am -6:30 pm
5
11 am - bpm
3
3 pm - Midnight
3
TOTAL 30 Maximum number of people there at any one tirne is: 27
Square footage:
Fabrication: 23,W not vq ft
1st Floor Office: 9,535 not sq ft
2nd Floor Office; 8175 mt eq ft
Total: 42,104 net sq ft
CSA Mone, LTD,
5--y T >3A/A
Ajw,ivmf%mnw
4497 8mwnridge Tanam 5101
Medkwd,OR 97504
Phone: 5411779.0589 F@7A 541!779-0114
l!'R
Land Use: 140
Manufacturing
DescHption
Manufacturing facilities are areas where the primary activity is the conversion of raw materials or parts
into finished products. Size and type of activity may vary substantially from one facility to another. In
addition to the actual production of goods, manufacturing facilities generally also have office, warehouse,
research and associated functions. General light industrial (Land Use 110) and industrial pari( (Land Use
130) are related uses.
Database Description
• Average par'ring supply ratios; 1.3 spaces per '1,000 square feet (sq. ft.) grass floor area (GFA) (three
study sites) and 1.3 spaces per employee (three study sites).
Average site employment density: 1.0 employee per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA (three study sites).
Parking demand counts were only submitted between 16;DO and 11:00 a.m. and between 2:00 and
3:00 p.m,
Study SitesNea,+rs
Bellevue. WA (11991); Kent, WA (19'91)
Institute of lraneporta;ion Engineers ( 36 I Parking Geaaraifdn, 41h Edifim
197
Land Uses 140
Manufacturing
Average Peak Period Parking Demand vs. 1,000 sq. ft. GFA
On a: Weekday
$#aetlsdc —
Pic Period Demand
Peak Period
2:�:�j ,m,
Numbw of §!Ydy SAA _
��
3
+
AvAr a Size of Sierriyr S1tas_
q��i� p A
E86. It, GFA
A_ v Peak Pedod Parking Demand
-
1.f}2 V8hides It D00 . ft. GFA
nderd Daviadon
0.23
Coefficient of Vadabon
230 -
0,82-1.27 vehickta ow 1 040 ft. C3FA
85th Fsroentile T
1.18yehic�;� M 1. -DW sg. ft. GFA
33F�f Psic�rst ______--
17.92 valici £ter 9 4Q t. GFA
Weekday Peak Period
Parking Demand
h1wNUAW W Transo:wfition 5:nrglne(ors
100 11,5.0
x = 1,000 sq, ft. CFA
o Actual Data Points
[ 371
198
201
Ptldnq Gawa(lon, 0) Uilion
260
1
5
200
.
1 �
150
100
o,
50
tt
1
Q 50
h1wNUAW W Transo:wfition 5:nrglne(ors
100 11,5.0
x = 1,000 sq, ft. CFA
o Actual Data Points
[ 371
198
201
Ptldnq Gawa(lon, 0) Uilion
Land Use: 140
Manufacturing
.Average Peak Period Parking [demand vs. Employees
On a: Weekday
Peak Period Demanc
Peak Period T _. 2.00--3:00
IMutr�ber of Stead Sites
�kvara e�5i�e of �tudy S�
Avert a Peak Period Pa
Standard Deviation
COefficlent of Variation
Fiance
$5th F.l
3
1�(1 ern to
r� vehicles r ern kr
0.24
24%
ercerrtr a -- _ __ 1.74
33rd Percentile
Weekday Peak Period
Parking Demand
250 — -
Z 200 _ _ •
> 150
.Y 100CL
- - -
50-
�' 0 f
0 50 100 150 200 250
x x Employees
• Actual Data Points
In-thadO of Transportation Engineera
[ 38 1
199
Parking Gen@,Ow, 0 Edfilon
EXHIBIT 16
f aurgam DP -inion Tp gnfP17-PT-PTION-fYQ)f,,CX-PItic L L �
319 Eastwood Drive - Medford, Or. 97504 — Phone (541) 606-9923 — Email: Kwkpl@Q.com
November 22, 2016
.iemica Gomez, Rogue Valley Microdevices, Inc.
943 Automation Way, Suite F
Medford, Oregon 97504
RE: Parking Demand for Rogue Valley Microdevices Headquarters
Dear 3essica,
i, you you request, Southern Drogv►Y Engiuizering, LLC evaluated the paridng demand
for the proposed Microdevices building located within the Hannick Business Park southeast of Hamrick
Road and Biddle Road in Central Point, Oregon. Information from the City of Central Point,
Microdevices, and the Institute of Tratnoportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation, 4"' edition
handbook was compared to determine the minieniam nwaber of parking spaces to meet the demand of
Microdevice's manufacturing use. The land use considered in the City of Central Point and ITE
requirements were 140 - Manufacturing.
Parking Requirements
Guy ofCeniral Point need calculation i�eg odsg.
Minimum number of required parking spaces for manufacturing land use in Table 17.64.02B:
Manufacturing - 1 space per 500 square feet = I x (43,000,'500) = 86 spaces
Or 2 space per 3 employees (largest shift) = 2 x (2713) = 18 spaces
Total range of spaces based on size and number of employees =1 8-84 spaces
Microdevices parking assessment:
Largest shift - 27 employees potentially overlapping between 5:00 am - Midnight
Deliveries estimated at 3 potentially overlapping during the day from Fed Ex and UPS
Normal trips from outside public is zero, but bi-monthly meetings are estimated to bring parking
demand up to 35 spaces with regular employees plus visitors.
Total estimated potential occapancy at one time = 35 spaces
ITE narking don a 10 -
Weekday Peak Period
Average Demand - Observed peak period demand expressed as a rate
851h % Demand = I he point at which 85 percent of the values fall at or below
200
I MAc I •- i VV Pmerkiag Ek;uand l errerstinas
A � r tst�r
LaNd Lir L nit Sire leak Period
Aaiu.�n J
W%
Demand
140 - Manufactwring 1,000 SF 43 1.02 1.19
Yeas. L'rrfv.s DMfied
Reniand I�KaI
{►pateq
Total Total
44 51
140 - Manufacturing Employees 30 0.97 1.14 -r�29 34
Total Range (spaces) 29-51
Nola' SF=Square Feet — ---
Parking Assessment
The information published by the ITE provides a guide to planners and designers regarding parking
demand. Average rates, $5`h percentile demands, and other measures are provided to help determine the
most reliable parking demand when local data is not available. In this case, local data is provided and
supports a parking demand within the range provided by the FTE. Rogue Valley Microdevice's local
data shows a potential need of 35 spaces when their facility is maximimd.
The goal with parking is to strike a balance between an oversupply of parking and an undersupply of
parking. Providing enough parking for a maximized situation ensures that drivers will seldom be
unsuccessful in finding a parking space, but it also creates waste when a facility isn't operating at
maxiimm. As more parking is provided, more care take advantage of it and fewer people use public
transportation. As the number of cars increase, so does read congestion. In response, Ica
governments then pay for increased wear and tear on the roads.
Failing to address the oversupply of parking creates many of the same problems that minimum parking
requirements were supposed to solve (e.g. sprawl, poor economic eavironment, loss of investment). A
Balance is struck when there are enough parking spaces to accommodate recurrent peak parking
demand, but additional spaces do not undercut current transit ridership, nor a city's financial ability to
meet other public needs and obligations.
Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering LLC I Microdevices Parking Demand I Nov. 22, 2016 1 2
201
Conclusion
The average parkin; demand in the ITE shows the need for 44 spaces for proposed development. The
85`s percentile parking demand shows 51 sees. Isocal data for Rogue Valley Microdevices shows a
potential gleed of 35 spaces when their facility is maximized. All of these parking demands are similar.
In contrast, Ilse City's parking requirement of 86 spaces would likely serve more than the maximum
need of the proposed facility which would result in an excess of parking spaces the majority of time.
The proposed site plan for Rogue Valley Microdevices proposes 46 spaces, which provides 31% more
than what local data shows is necessary when maximized. It is our conclusion that the proposed number
of spaces (46) is adequate to meet the demand of the proposed development without crca#ing an excess
number of under-utilized spaces.
Sincerely,
14L��e
P
Kimberly Parducei PE, PTOA NArt p
Soantail D"an TPAmspaazallan -1%G G6,lr mr, LL(
Attachments: City of Central Point Municipal Code
Microdeviceq Local Data L Y Pl��" 4
ITE Parking Generation data sheets t
Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC I Microdevices Parking Demand I Nov. 22, 2016 1 3
202
Memorandum
To: Stephanie Holtey/ Molly Bradley
City of Central Point
Community Development Department
Date: November 29, 2016
Subject; Request for Clarification
Rogue Valley Microdevices
File Nos. 16022-16024
ATTACHMENT "_..,"
CSA Planning, Ltd
4497 Brownrldge, Suite 101
Medford, OR 97504
Telephone 541.779.0569
Fax 541 .779.0114
eev@CSAplann ing. net
This memo is in response to your request for clarification on several items in our
submittal for Rogue Valley Microdevices,
1. Square Footage. Two different square footage numbers were unintentionally
included in our initial submittal due to a last minute change which did not get
reflected all the way through. The correct total is 43,000 square feet. This total is
divided as follows:
• Fabrication/Production area: 24,000 sf (includes the clean room)
• Related office space: 19,000 sf
43,000 sf total
The first and second floor plans are attached as requested.
2. Parking Analysis: The parking analysis and Exhibit 3 have been updated to show
the revised square footage. See attached.
3. Loading Requirements: Per the calculations sent to CSA on this matter, the City
appties loading based on the number of square feet in the Fabrication area.
OlfSbeet Loatfing Beeth Requirement (fractions
Use Categories rounded up to the closest whole number)
INDUSTRIAL, WAREHOUSING AND WHOLESALING T
Sq. Ft. of Floor Area No. of Loading Berths Required
12,501-25,000 ^y 2
Based on this, with a 24,000 square foot Fabrication area only 2 loading berths are
required. Two berths are located on the loading access drive and serve the
Shipping/Receiving area and the Fabrication area. All loading activities are coordinated
by the Shipping staff. Both meet the 10 foot by 35 foot dimension standards.
4. Architectural Elevations: Attached are revised elevations with additional notes
and dimensions as requested. As none of the light shelves over the loading doors
project out into the loading berth areas, therefore clearance is not issue,
5. Building Materials: Building materials are noted on the updated elevations. To
further expand the description of materials:
• The Office portion of the building is of standard construction with a stucco
finish, painted off-white.
• The Fabrication portion of the building will have tilt -up concrete walls with a
skim coat painted off-white to match the Office portion.
Memorandum Page t November 29, 2016
Rogue Valley Microdevices
203
I ri
• The aac*nt trim color where shown on the drawings will be a very dark blue.
This includes the parapet coping and the inset panels where shown above and
ba,low the windows.
• The base around the building is comprised of a concrete curb with a charcoal
gray band above it.
• Window and door frames are to be clear anodized aluminum,
• Exterior light shelves/shades are to be metal, powder -coated to look like matte
stainless steel.
6. Parking bot revisions. The perking lot laryouls have been revtoed to match the
standard requirements for parking islands. The parking lot to the south had I I
spaces, but due to the island requirements has been reduced by one space so that
no more than 10 spaces are contiguous. This removal reduces the total spaces to
455, The Applicant feels that the original layout for each lot is preferable to that
which is being submitted now to meat this code section.
Please let us know if you have any further questions on the project. Thank you for
your review.
Regards,
CSA Planning, Ltd.
6"rlt*
Beverly Thruston, AIA
Aeaaoiat•
CSA/bt M-Ger1(I®.0W 1'12218.dock
cc. File
Memorandum Page 2 November 29, 2013
Rogue Valley Mlcrodevices
204
A01 Si w&9�
November 16, 2016
ATTACHMENT ,,. .,."
ROGUE VALLEY SEWER SERVICES
Location: 138 West Vilus Road, Central Point, OR -Mailing Address: P.O. Box 3130, Central Point, OR 7502-0005
TeL (541) 664-6300, Fax (541) 664-7171 www.RVsS.us
Stephanie Holtey
City of Central Point Planning Department
155 South Second Street
Central Point, Oregon 97502
Re: File 16021 -SPR, Rogue Valley Mierodevices — Tax Lot 8€32, Map 372WOlC (REF: 16023 -
CUP)
Sewer service to the proposed development can be had by making a service connection to the
existing 8 inch sewer rain, which crosses the southerly portion of the subject property. The permit
for this connection will be issued by RVSS upon payment oErelated development fees.
The project is within the Phase 2 stormwater quality, area and must comply with stormwater quality
requirements outlined in the Regional Stortnwater Design Manual.
The proposed development appears to disturb more than 1 acre of land so will require an NPDES
1200 -CN permit prior to the start of any ground disturbing activities.
Rogue Valley Sewer Services requests that approval of this development be subject to the Following
conditions:
Prior to the start of construction:
1. Applicant must obtain a sewer permit from RVSS for the new connections. Sewer permits
will be issued upon payment of related development fees.
2. Applicant must obtain an NPDES 1200 -CN erosion and sediment control permit from
RVSS.
3. Applicant must have all erosion and sediment control measures in place prior to any ground -
disturbing activities.
4. Applicant must submit a stormwater management plan demonstrating compliance with the
regional Stormwater Design Manual for review and approval by RVSS.
During Construction
1. Applicant must sequence construction so that the permanent stormwater quality features are
installed first and will be operational when stormwater enters them.
2. Applicant must fence off and protect stormwater quality features from equipment traffic_
3. Applicant must comply with conditions of 1200 -CN and sewer connection permits.
K:\DATA\AGENCIES\CENTPT\PLANiNG\SITEPLANREVIEW\2016\16021—ROGUE
Wi CRODEVICES.DOC T
205
Prior to final acceptance of projects
1. Applicant must have new sewer laterals inspected and approved by RVSS.
2. Applicant must have all stormwater quality facilities, including vegetation when applicable,
inspected and approved by RVSS.
3. Applicant must record an operations and maintenance agreement nt for all tww stormwater
quality features.
At the conclusion of construction RVSS -mll issue a final acceptance letter indicating that all sanitary
sewer and stormwater requirements have been met.
Feet free to call rare if you have arty questions.
Call Tippert, m -
Manager
K;\DATA\AGED?CMS\CENTPWLANNG\SITEPLANREVM W\2016\16021 RO07 JR
NHCRODEVICES.DOC
206
ATTACHMENT
JACKSON COUNTY
Roads
November 16, 2016
Attention: Stephanie Holtey
City of Central Point Planning
140 south Third Street
Central Point, OR 9T502
RE: Site Plan and Architectural Review on Biddle Road -- a county -maintained road.
Planning File, 16021; 3T -2W -01C Tax Lot 802.
Dear Stephanie:
Roads
Engineering
Kevin CArietiansen
Cwumiclion Manager
200 Antelope Rosd
White Clly, OR 97503
Phone. (541) T74-5255
Fax (541) T74 -62M
chds*eQJwA9onccunty.orp
Mww.Jecksoncountyorg
-flank you for the opportunity to common( on this Site Plan and Architectural Review on a 4.87 acres site
In the C-4 — Tourist and Office Professional zoning district for a proposed 33,490 square foot light manufacturing
facility. The property is located at 4601 Biddle Road. Jackson County Roads offers the following comments:
1. Jackson County will allow a new private road with right Intright out access to Biddle Road as shown In the
applicant's submittal. J&*san County will require the right tnfright=out access be controlled by installation
of a median island in Biddle Road.
2. Utfilty Permits are required from Roads for any utility work within the County teed right-of-way.
3. Biddle Road is a County PAnor Arterial and is maintained by the County. The Average Dally Tratrc tot
was 7,528 for eastbound lames 450 east of Hamrick Road on August 20, 2912 old 7,430 on August 25,
20:'!4 450 feet east of Hamrick Road. As a comparison Of caPecity for &ddle R6K the capacity of a two
lane suburban read with ten foot lanes and no shoulder sB,832 ADT.
4. If county storm drain facRities are to be utilized, the aoplicarrt's registered Engineer shall provide a
hydrauDe report and plans for review and apprcwat by Jackson County Roads. Storm drainage runoff is
limited to that area currently draining to the County storm dratnege system. Upon completion of the
project the developer's Engineer shall certify that the construetdon of the drafroge system was
constructed per ft approved pian. A copy of the certification shall be sent to flavin Christiansen at
Jackson County Roads.
5. The applicant shall submit construction drawings to Jackson County Roads and obtain county permits if
required.
6. We would like to be notified of future development proposals, as county permits may be required.
-7.-- We concur with any right-of-way dedicated.
8. Roads recommend the removA of any existing driveways not being used on Biddle Road and replacing
the rn with new curb, gutter and sidewalk.
' 9. Ja+ kson County goads requests a TIS that addresses impacts at the site access, If mitigations are
recommended they shall be required.
10. ackson County's General Administration Policy #1-45 sets forth the County's position as it relates to the
management of County roads located within existing or proposed city limits or Urban Growth Boundaries
(UGB). The County has no current plans for Improvements to Biddle Road. Jackson County Roads
recommends that the city request road jurisdiction,
Ok SirOy.
KeVrt Chrlaiians8n
Construction Manager
i:lEnginceringlDevelopment%C ITIES1CNTR-LMI 6021. doc
207
ATTACHMENT "f;i."
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 839
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SITE PLAN AND ARCHITFr REVIEW
APPLICATION FOR ROGUE VALLEY MICRODP'
(FELE NO. 1602 1)
WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a site plan and arr' ^q� J z)p an
2.24 acre site within the C-5, Commercial Thoroughfare �� ���� : Valley
Microdevices corporate headquarters and light fabrication
WHEREAS, on December 6, 2016, the City of Central Point , zonducted a duly -
noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it review ,art and heard
testimony and comments on the application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's consideration of the application is based on the standards
and criteria applicable to Site Plan and Architectural Review in accordance with Section 17.72, D®sign
and Development Standards in accordance with Section 17.73, and Off -Street Parking and Loading in
accordance with Section 17,64 of the Central Pant Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, after duly considering the proposed use, it is the Planning Commission's determination
that, subject to eoinpliance with conditions as set forth in the Revised Staff Report (Exhibit "A") dated
December 6, 2016, the application does comply with applicable standard$ and criteria for approval of
the site plan and architecture; and
NOW, THERE, RE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning Commission, by
this Resolution No. 839, docs hereby aMove the Site Plan and Architectural Review application for
Rogue Valley Microdevices, Inc.. This approval is based on the futdings aid coadiUuns of Koval as
set forth on Exhibit "A", the Planning Det Staff Resort dated. De"mber 6, 2016 and the
Applicant's, Findings of Fact sW Conclusions of Law as set forth in Exhibit "I3, " including
attachments imorporated heat by refereme.
PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 6`s day
of December, 2016.
Planning Commission Chair
ATTEST;
City Representative
Planning Commission Resolution No. 839 (12/6/2016)
208