HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 837 - Microdevices zone changePLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 837
A RESOLUTION FORWARDING A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION TO THE
CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE REZONING OF THE PROPERTY
IDENTIFIED AS JACKSON COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP NO.37S2WO1C TAX LOT
802 FROM TOURIST AND OFFICE PROFESSIONAL (C-4) TO THROUGHFARE
COMMERCIAL (C-5)
FILE NO. 16024
Applicant: Rogue Valley Microdevices, Inc. and Tail Light Properties LLC;
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map is proposed to re -designate the property
identified by the Jackson County Assessor's Map as 37S2W OIC Tax Lot 802 as
Thoroughfare Commercial; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Thoroughfare Commercial (C-5) zoning is an urban Thoroughfare
Commercial zoning district consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and surrounding land
uses; and
WHEREAS, adequate public services and transportation networks are available to the site;
and
WHEREAS, the proposed zone change from C-4 to C-5 has been determined to be consistent
with the State Transportation Planning Rule.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning
Commission, by this Resolution No. 837, does recommend that the City Council approve the
change of zone on the property identified by the Jackson County Assessor's Map as 37S2W
O1 C Tax Lot 802. This decision is based on the Staff Report dated December 6, 2016 attached
hereto by reference and incorporated herein.
PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this
7th day of December, 2016.
Planning Commission Chair
ATTEST:
X#Jh4
Ci Represe to ive
Planning Commission Resolution No. 837 (12/06/2016)
City of Centra! Point, Oregon
140 S 3rd Street, Central Point, OR 47502
541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384
www_centralpointongM,POY
>W—'
A#"&k
CENTRAL
POINT
STAFF REPORT
December 6, 2016
Community Development
Tom Humphrey, AICP
Community Development Director
AGENDA ITEM: File No.16024
Consideration of a Zone (map) Change application from Tourist and Office Professional (C4) to
Thoroughfare Commercial (C-5) for a 4.87 acre parcel located at 4901 Biddle Road. The Project Site is
identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 0IC, Tax Lot 802. Applicant: Rogue Valley
Microdevices/Tail Light Properties, LLC. Agent: Jay Harland, CSA Planning.
STAFF SOURCE:
Tom Humphrey AICP, Community Development Director
BACKGROUND:
The applicant has requested a minor zone map amendment from C-4 to C-5 with the intent of
developing anew tax lot for a Corporate Headquarters and Light Fabrication Facility. As shown in
Table 1, the proposed zone change allows more permitted land uses and fewer conditional uses.
However, the nature of the expanded list of permitted uses will not have an appreciable difference on
traffic generation or impact and may even improve it (see Attachment B).
Table 1. Proposed Zone Chime
urr nq i17iN
Permitted Land Uses
ConditlonalftX Pwrr dd d
CUP HP
Current C-4
5(i
10 22
Pro osed C -S
69
2 11
ISSUES & NOTES:
There are 4 issues/Notes relative to this application as follows:
Zoning Map and Zoning Code Text Amendments, CPMC Chapter 17.10. This municipal
code section provides standards and procedures for major and minor amendments to the
Central Point zoning map. In this case the application was submitted with a Comprehensive
Plan Amendment and initiated jointly by the current and anticipated property owners (once it
is partitioned). The action is considered a `minor' amendment and is being processed using
Type III procedures. The amendment should be based on the following criteria; 1) its
consistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan, 2) findings demonstrating that adequate
public services and transportation networks will serve the property and 3) compliance with
the State's Transportation Planning Rule,
2. Comprehensive Plan Compliance. Approval of the proposed zone change must be found
consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan Map. The subject property has
a current Comprehensive Plan designation of Tourist and Office Professional but is proposed
for amendment to Thoroughfare Commercial concurrent with this zone change. If the Comp
Plan Amendment is approved, the zone change to C-5, Thoroughfare Commercial will be
consistent and compliant.
43
Compatibility with Surrounding Load Uses and Zoning. The subject property is
contiguous to lands zoned C -S, Thoroughfare Commorcial to the east, and is compatible with
M-2, General Industrial to the south and C-4, Tourist and Office Professional to the west.
Although the proposed zone change allows for the increase of permitted land uses versus
conditional uses, the overall character will remain consistent with the surrounding
commercial uses per CPMC 17.20.
4. Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) Compliance, OAR 660-012-0060. Criteria for TPR
compliance is addressed in the traffic findings (Attachment B) demonstrating adequate public
services and transportation networks.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL,:
A recommendation to approve a minor amendment may include conditions and, in this case, staff
advises that approval of the zone change be contingent upon approval of the Comprehensive Plan
(map) amendment.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment "X'— Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps
Attachment `B" — Traffic Findings, S. O. Transportation Engineering, LLC.
Attachment "C" — Planning Department's Findings
Attachment 'Tv'— Resolution No. 837
ACTION:
Open public hearing and consider the proposed amendment to the Zoning map, close public hearing and
1) recommend approval to the City Council; 2) recommend approval with revisions; or 3) deny the
application.
RECONn4i MATION:
Recommend approval of Resolution No. 837. Per the Staff Report dated December 6, 2016 and
supported by Findings of Fact.
44
OEM
Subject Property
Tax Lots
Central Point Comp
Lend Use Plan
General Indusdrial
} Light Indusdrial
Low Density Res,
Medium Density
Res,
-Thoroughfare
Commercial
Tourist and Office
Professional
Print pate: 3-1 rr2019; Source: CSA Planning, Ltd;
Jackson County r31S; City of Central Point GIS
Existing Comprehensive
Pian Map
Comprehensive Plan amendment / Zane Change
Rogue Valley Microdevices & N
Tail Lite Properties LLC verE
37-2111-01 C-802 s
300 150 0 300 Feet
n
WJSubject Property
Tax Lots
Central Point Comp
Mollorn DRnsity
Land Use Placa
Ras.
- general Indusdrial
- Thoroughfare
Commercial
W 7 Light Indusdrial
Tourist and Office
Low Density Res.
Professional
Print Date; 0-16-2016; Source; CSA Planning, Ltd;
Jeekson County GIS; City of CVIIMI Point GIS
Proposed Comprehensive
Plan Map
Comprehensive Plan Amendment / Zone Change
Rogue Valley Microdeviees & N
Tail Lite Properties LLC wE
37-2W-01 C-802 s
300 150 4 300 Feet
2012 Aerial
r Subject—Property
Tax Lots
r Zoning Outline
300 150 0 300 Feet
Proposed Zoning Map
On Aerial Photo
Comprehensive Plan Amendment / Zone Change
Rogue Valley Microdevices &
Tail Lite Properties LLC Nt
37 -2W -01C-802
W+E
S
Print Date: 03-15-2016; Source: CSA Planning, Ltd;
Jackson County GIS; City of Central Paint GI31
Memorandum
To: Matt Samitore, Central Point Public Works Director
Date: 05/16/2016
Subject: C4 to C5 Zone Change Traffic Findings and Conclusions
Atl4l-TACHMENT "
Iitllf4 S D4,Mfll] �!1
GItGi!lu13111c. I.LC
S.®. Transportation
Engineering, LLC
112 Manteray Dive
Med", Olt 97504
TW800ne 541.941 4148
Fax 541 535 5873
Kwkpl@Q.com
Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC evaluated impacts for a proposed zone change from C4 to C-
5 on Township 37S Range 2W Section 02, tax lot 802 in Central Point, Oregon. The parcel is located along the
south side of Biddle Road west of Hamrick Road adjacent to Super 8.
Existing Site
Tax lot 802 is currently vacant and has tentative plat approval to be split into three parcels. There's a planned
veterinary center on the southeast comer (Parcel 1) that has land use approval and is currently under review for
building permits. Access to the site is provided to Biddle Road and through an internal lane to Hamrick Road that
is expected to be constructed contemporaneously with the site work for the veterinary building.
.. Biddle Road
�II
i
e
3
Parcell
O
' Parcell
Zone Cfianue from C44nd C4
The current C-4 zoning district is intended to provide for the development of concentrated tourist commercial and
entertainment facilftles that will maximize ease of access and visibility from the Interstate 5 freeway and major
arterial streets, while the C-5 zoning district provides for commercial and business uses that are most
appropriatefy located along or near major highways or thoroughfares. Both zoning districts allow banks, offices,
convenience markets, drugstores, restaurants, supermarkets, sporting goods stores, retail stores, liquor stares,
veterinary clinics, and shopping centers to name some of the higher traffic generating uses. The C-5 zoning
district allows light fabrication, assembly, packaging, and wholesale sales of consumer goods that are not
permitted in the CA zoning district, Other differences include art schools, pawnshops, gymnasiums, and
nurseries. The C-4 zoning district permits engineering services, legal services, art studios, and counselling
49
r�
services, which are not permitted in the C-5 zone As can be seen, non -permitted uses in both zones are the
lower traffic generating uses. A full list of permitted uses for each zoning district is attached.
ConduajoiM
Traffic generations for both C-4 and C-5 zoning districts were compared and determined to have comparable,
potential impacts to the transportation system_ No change in the potential for additional traffic is estimated to
occur as a result of the proposed zone change from C-4 to C -5 -
If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me.
Respectfully.
Kimberly Parducci, P€ PTOE�
Firm Principal ] L �_._ t�•�t
Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC
cc Michael Wang, PE (ODOT)
Mike Kuntz, PE (Jackson County) r 1?
,ftachments: C4 and C5 permitted uses
I
Memorandum Page 2
50
ftl4lttipo Rf 01,11)"
�1141ri�C.Itli1G, t1.0
Memorandum S.O. Transportation
Engineering, LLC
112 Montemy odea
To: Matt Samitore, Central Point Public Works Director UWrd, OR 87504
Telephone 541.941.4148
Date: 10/04/2016 Fwc 541.536.5973
Subject: C4 to CS Zone Change Additional Traffic Findings KwR QQQ
Additional information was requested by the City of Central Point regarding a proposed zone change
from C4 to C5 on Township 37S Range 2W Section 02, tax lot 602 in Central Point; Oregon. A
previous memorandum was prepared in May of 2016 that concluded the two zoning districts (C4 and
CS) had comparable, potential impacts to the transportation system. This rnemorandum explains this
in more detail and serves as an addendum to the first memorandum.
C4 &W G3 Zoning Districts
The C4 and C5 zoning districts both allow development of concentrated conxrerciel uses, but differ in
how Latey are tacated. 4Yhere C4 typically provides for maxinmized as" of access and visibility from
the interstate 5 freeway and major arteHal streets, 05 provides for uses most appropriately tocated
along or near major highways or thoroughfares. As stated in the previous memorandum, both zoning
districts allow banks, offices, convenience markets, drugstores, restaurants, supermarkets, sporting
goods stores, retail stores, lienor stores, veterinary clinics, and shopping centers to name some of the
higher hwft generating uses. The highest permitted traffic generator in efitmarzone is a convenience
market, which is siiurrn in the ITE Trip Generation to generate 52.41 trips per 10th sclime, fleet during
the p.m. peak how_ There are other uses that are outright permitted in one zone but a owuMionsi use
in the other. However, both zones are built out with these types of uses in a manner that balances out
potential trip generations. Ovarall, the highest and bast uses in C5 ara not shuwn fa generate any
more traffic than C4.
Traffic -Impact Analysis. Apiplicabildy
The City of Central Point Public Works Standards and Spectffcations regtare a W&4ft lumped analysis
for a land use application that involves one or more of the following actions in 3211-10.03 (3)(0-g).
These include:
a) A change in zoning or plan amendment designation that generates 300 average daily trips (ADT)
more than the current zonirtg;
The proposed zone change from C4 to C5 is shown to generate no adz o0aal traffic to the
transportation sWem,
b) Any proposed development or land use action that a road authority, Including the city, Jackson
County or ODOT, states may have operational or safety concerns along its facilities;
There are no known operational or safety concerns as a result of the proposed zone change.
c) An increase in site traffic volume generation by 250 average daily trips (ADT) or more, or 25 peak
hour trips;
Not applkable at the time of zone change, but is being addressed with the proposed development
application,
d) An increase in peak hour volume of a particular movement to and from the State highway by 20
percent or more;
An across analysis is not applicable at the time of zone change, but is being addressed with the
proposed development application. However, the site does not take access from a State highway and
51
the projected trip volumes For any movements at the 1-5 interchange would be less than 20% of the
total volume of any of those movements.
e) An increase in use of adjacent streets by vehicles exceeding twenty thousand pounds gross vehicle
weight by 10 vehicles or more per day;
Not applicabla at the tirrie of zone change, but is tieing addressed with the proposed devetopment
applicalion.
f) The location of the access driveway does not meet minimum sight distance requirements, as
determined by the city engineer, or Is located where vehicles entering or leaving the property are
restricted, or such vehicles queue or hesitate on the state highway, creating a safety hazard at the
discmilon of ft community development director; or
th-d dpJ'01; ilue u: the 'It rw :,' e-1 I ,:hwnvlr3„ tWt ib i s prkw>r 3d develf4inwnr
appf(cahon No new drrerr arca ss to tit`s or&* ~ m * mpofW or rea,irred ro serve (lie
development an the land subject to the zone change.
g) A change in internal traffic patterns that, at the discretion of the Public Works Director, may cause
safety problems, such as back-up onto a street or greater potential for tru is acalcleft.
Not applILdble at the time of zone change. but is boing addrewed with the proposed development
appiicatian Nothing pertpining to the 7nnR chartgs& aprxmann wrp-#d be expected to allow
development that would cause changes to Wernat traffic patterns that would create or worsen any
safety problems on the public street system.
Tr2nVR2 bet Planning 1i�tl
The 9Mlt Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) requires changes to hwd use plans and land use
rogulalltrane (Le. Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments and Zoning Map Amendments) to be
consieCent with the function and capacity of existing geed planned banspwtatton facilities. Oregon
AdwnlsE "ve Rule (OAR) OG&OI Z t)OW auba"an 1 states:
(1) If an amendment to a functional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive plan, or a land use
regulation (including a zoning map) would significanlfy affect an existing or planned transportation
facility, then the local government must put in place measures as provided in section (2) of this
rule, unless the amendment is allowed under section (3). (9) or (10) of oris rule. A plan or land use
regulation amendment sigi iificaridy affeots a traewporbilim f tlr Nit would;
(a) Change the funclienel dassification of an existing or planned transportation facility (exclusive
of correction of reap errors in an adopted plan);
(b) Change standards implementing a funrpnnal cla W111cartion system; or
(c) Result in any of the effects iisted in paragraphs (A) through (C) of this subsection based on
projected conditions measured at the end of the planning period identfied in the adopled TSP.
As part of evaluating projected conditions, the amount of traffic projected to be generated
within the area of the amendment may be reduced if the amendment includes an enforceable,
ongoing requirement that would demonstrably limit traffic generation, including, but not limited
to, tranoporta*m demand management. This reduction may diminish or completely ailrriInatte
the significant effect of" amendment,
(A) Types or levels of travel or access that are inconsistent with the functional classification of
an existing or planned transportation facility;
(B) Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility such that It
would not meet the performance standards identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan;
or
(C) Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facillty that is otherwise
projected to not meet the performance standards identified in the TSP or comprehensive
p4an•
Mernorendurn Addendum Page 2
52
Conclusions
The proposed zone change and comprehensive plan map amendment from C4 to C5 on Township
37S Range 2W Section 02, tax lot 802 is concluded to generate no increase in traffic to the
transportation system. The proposed plan amendment and zone change will, therefore, not
significantly effect any existing or planned transportation facility nor will it result in types or levels of
travel or access that are inconsistent with the functional classification of any existing or planned
transportation facility such that it would not meet the performance standard identified In the City's
Transportation System Plan (TSP) or Comprehensive Plan. Additionally, the plan/zoning amendment
does not meet the Public Works Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Applicability requirements as get forth in
section 320,10.03 (3)(a -g) of their Standards and Specifications, and does not warrant any further
traffic analysis.
in conclusion, the application for plan and zoning amendment are found to be in compliance with the
City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the Central Point Land Development Code, and
are shown to be consistent with the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR). No further analysis is shown
to be required.
Respec9tilly,
Wunberly Parducd, PE PTOE
Fitter Prkmipel
Southam Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC
Attachments_ C4 and C5 permitted use comparisons
OAR $00-012-0060
Memorandum Addendum Page 3
53
Permitted
We
C4 I C5
84nks —
Yes
Yes
Acoeurrting Offices
Yes
NO
"asu t omom
Yes
Yes
fA lum Offt*
Yes
yes
Label sernises
YOM
Pio
Eroneertng Services
Yes
NO
Photo and An Studio
Yes
No
Counselling services
Yes
No
GoVt WK'ea
Yes
No
Mealtes unto( Offices
Yes
no
Cx►mr WWW Market
Yes
Yes
Oruwtore
V49
Yee
AmWTrud 3arvke Scion
'fes
Yes
AutoAWsales and repairs
Yes
Yes
MvtelJHottl
Yes
Yes
walk-irt Move Tt ver
Yes
Yes
8awlN alley
Yes
Yes
Pho",Wt t fifty
Yes
ft
Pf ftiKOfts
Yes
YIN
Travel Agency 9
Yes
tso
Sarberlbeaury shop i
Yae
yes
Sit-down restaurant i
Yes
yes
Cocktail Lounge
Yes
Cu
Tavern l
Yes
No
COMMMAI palift lot I
yes
Yes
Cvmrnunity shoppfttg �. •.Lnte
yes
Yes
Superowket
yes
Yes
ne�rartmen, stare
Yes
'leas
SRS BOB&i
Yea
Yes
Mokstore I
Yes
Yes
Florist k
Yes
Y+ss
Leather Rods
Yes
No
Pat sales
Yes
yes
Photo supplies
Yes
Yes
Wealth food
Yes
Yes
Seff-senke Laundry
Yes
Yes
AMlque shop
Yes
Yes
1lelltatamen
Yes
Yes
Pastry
Yes
Yes
General Apparel
Yes
Yes
Shoes and Boots
Yes
Yes
Invr*Y
Yea
yes
C sales
Yes
Yes
il""
VAS
Yes
54
Nlglsest and (test
Uses - ITE
24.3 Fht / 1dfl0 SF
OA1(MIR / 10 SP
13.57 PM / fuel Sta.
9.85 PM / 1OW SF
1.2.34 PM j WOR 8F
11.34 PM / IM SF
9.49 PM/10!16 SF
Pannitpd _v!
Use Il
Air "de snup
AwftAWmdft
Moklk food Vendors
lee/3Wmg RING
Dance Hall
iilAard/pool Hall i
IMinloture Golf
"new Schools
Physical FRnm Center
Cmimash
7axltab Office
Arnhulemar Services
Drire-m Fest Food
CatrUmmrs OfAce
oIhlikal Clinic a Lab
Appliance Service
LocksMith
>kj8us0ms School
tlpb)W"
Tke Sobs
GIM M,%NInw Sales
large ktO591wifthmants
Fkvswnw
Light Fabrfcatfon
Hodrvare 501"
Mmu n ent9eim
Feed, seed, fuel
VectricallPlumbing Suppiles
Ihatl i Air fr9041pmant
Stonw-nm Suppmeo
Nursoy
An"we g"
PawRowp
Public utflRlas
Furniture sv*
C4L—C5 HViest and Aw
uaae - I'm
Y%
Y*6
Yes
YVs
Ys!;
Cu
f.1;
Cil
cu
Cu
Cu
Cu
Cu
Cu
Cu
No
No
No
No
No
No
YeS
No
No
No
No
No
No
Ne
No
No
No
No
No
NC
No
No
Nei
Yqa
Cu
so
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yee
Yes
Yat
at
Yes
Yes
Yat
Yes
Yet
Yes
ret
Yes
Yat
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
55
pdImm*mVho`
3�c3P%,.'ICC43Sr
N Affected cities and counties that do not have admowiedged plans and land use regulations as provided in
subsection (a) of this section, shall apply relevant sections of this rule to land use decisions and limited land use
decisions until land use regulations complying with this amended rule have been adopted.
(5) Cities and counties shall update their TSPS and implementing measures as necessary to comply with this division
at each periodic review subsequent to initial compliance with this divislon. Local governments within metropolitan
areas shalt amend local transportation system plans to be consistent with an adopted regional transportation system
plan within one year of the adoption of an updated regional transportation system plan or by a date specified in the
adopted regional transportations system plan_
(6) The director may grant a whole or partial exemption from the requirements of this division to 66as under 10,000
population and counties under 25,000 population, and for areas within a county within an urban growth beundarytat
contains a population less than 10,000. Eligible jurisdictions rosy request that the director approve an exemption from
all or part of the requirements in this division. Exampffons shall be for a period determined by the director or m. 11 the
jurisdiction's next periodic review, whichever is shorter.
(a) The director's decision to approve an exemption shalt be based upon the Mowing factors:
(A) Whether the existing and cornrnii`eet fransportation system is generally adegtiste to meat likely transportation
needs;
(8) Whether the new development or population growth is anticipated in the planning area over the next five years;
(C) Whether major new transportation facilities are prop0sed which would of of Itie planning areas;
(D) Whether deferral of planning requirements would conflict with accommodOng state or regional transportation
needs; and
(E) Consultation with the Oregon Department of Transporta[icn on the deed for transportation planning in the area,
including measures needed to protect existing tranaportstlon feclilt€es.
(b) The director's decision to grant an exemption under ibis section is appealabte to the commission as provided in
OAR 660-002-0020 (Delegation of Augirxily Rute)
(7) Portions of TSPs and impfeme itdng measures adopted as part of comprehensive plans prlor to the responsible
jurisd'iction's periodic review shall be reviewed pursuant to OAR chapter 1580, division 18, Post Acknowledgment
Procedures.
Stat. Auth.: ORB 183, 197.040 & 197.245
Stats. implemented: ORS 195.025, 197.040, 197230,197.245, 197.610 -197.426,197.428-197.ff46,197.712 &
197,717
Hist.: LCDC 1-1991, f. & cert. ef. 5-8-91; LCDC 1-1993, f. & cert. a(. 0-18-93, LCDC 4-19M. f. & cert. of. 5-8-95;
LCDO 6-1998, f. & cart. at. 10-30-98; LCUI3 2-21JU0, t. & cerL ef. 2-4-01j; LCUO 3-2004, f. & cart. of. 5-7-04; LCDD 6-
2000, f, 7-13.06, cert. of. 7-14-06
OW -012-1106Q
Plan and Land Use Regulation Amendments
(1) tf an amendment to a functional pian, an acknowledged comprehensive plan, or a land use regulation (Including a
zoning map) would significantly affect an existing or planned transoonaticn fad lity, then the local government must
put in place measures as provided in section (2) of this rule, unless the amandment Is allowed under section (3), (9)
or (10) of this rule. A pian or land use regulatlon amendment significantly affects a transportation facility if it would:
(a) Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility (exclusive of correction of rep
errors in an adopted pian);
56
(b) Change standards implementing a functional classification system; or
(c) Result in any of the effects listed in paragraphs (A) through (C) of this subsection based on projected conditions
measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted TSP. As part of evaluating projected conditions,
the amount of traffic projected to be generated within the area of the amendment may be reduced if the amendment
includes an enforceable, ongoing requirement that would demonstrably limit traffic generation, including, but not
limited to, transportation demand management. This reduction may diminish or completely eliminate the significant
effect of the amendment.
(A) Types or levels of travel or access that are inconsistent with the functional classification of an existing or planned
transportation facility;
(B) Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility such that it would not meet the
performance standards identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan; or
(C) Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that is otherwise projected to not meet
the performance standards identified in the FSR or comprehensive plan.
(2) If a focal government determines that there would be a significant effect, then the local government must ensure
that allowed land uses are consistent with the Identified function, capacity, and performance standards of the facility
measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted TSP through one or a combination of the
remedies listed in (a) through (e) below, unless the amendment meats the balancing test in subsection (2)(e) of this
section or qualifies for partial mitigation In section (11) of Us rule_ A local government using subsection (2)(e),
section (3), section (10) or section (11) to approve an amendment recognizes that additional motor vehicle traffic
congestion may result and that other facility providers would not be expected to provide additional capacity for motor
vehicles in response to this congestion_
(a) Adopting measures that demonstrate allowed land ryes are consistent with the planned function, capacity, and
performance standards of the transportation facility_
(b) Amending the TSP or comprehensive plan to provide transportation facilities, improvements or services adequate
to support the proposed land uses consistent with the requirements of this division; such amendments shall include a
funding plan or mechanism consistent with section (4) or include an amendment to the transportation finance plan so
that the facility, improvement, or service will be provided by the end of the pfanning period.
(c) Amending the TSP to modify the planned function, capacity or performance standards of the transportation facility.
(d) Providing other measures as a condition of development or through a development agreement or similar funding
method, including, but not limited to, transportatlon system management measures or minor transportation
improvements. Local governments shall, as part of the amendment, specify when measures or improvements
provided pursuant to this subsection will be provided.
(e) Providing improvements that would benefit modes other than the significantly affected mode, improvements to
facilities other than the signifcantly affected facility, or improvements at other locations, if die provider of the
significantly affected facility provides a written statement that the systemwide benefits are sufficient to balance the
significant effect, even though the Improvements would not result In consistency for all performance standards,
(3) Notwithstanding sections (1) and (2) of this rule, a local government may approve an amendment that would
significantly affect an existing transportation facility without assuring that the allowed land uses are consistent with the
function, Capacity and performance standards of the facility where:
(a) In the absence of the amendment, planned transportation facilities, improvements and services as set forth in
section (4) of this rule mould not be adequate to achieve consistency with the Identified function, capacity or
performance standard for that facility by the end of the planning period identified in the adopted TSP;
(b) Development reautting from the amendment will, at a minimum, mitigate the impacts of the amendment in a
manner that avoids further degradatb3n to the perforrnanco of the facility by the time of the development through one
or a combination of transportation Improvements or measures;
57
ATTACHMENT " G
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
File No.: 16024
Before the City of Central Point Planning Commission
Consideration of a Zone (Map) Change Application on a 4.87 acre lot located at 4901 Biddle Road.
The property is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S2W 01C, Tax Lot 802.
Applicant:
Rogue Valley Microdevices Inc./
Tail Light Properties, LLC
Findings of Fact
and
Conclusion of Law
PART 1
INTRODUCTION
It is requested that the above referenced tax lot be rezoned from Tourist and Office Professional (C-4) to
Thoroughfare Commercial (C:-5). The applicant has already obtained City approval to partition the
subject property into three (3) parcels.
The zone change request is a quasi-judicial map amendment, which is processed using Type III
application procedures. Type III procedures set forth in Section 17.05.400 provide the basis for
decisions upon standards and criteria in the development code and the comprehensive plan, when
appropriate.
Applicable development code criteria for this Application include_
1. Comprehensive Plan
2. State Transportation Planning Rule
3. CPMC, Chapter 17.10
PART 2
FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS
Staff has reviewed the Findings (Attachment's A through E, File No. 16022) and the Findings from Staff
Report File No. 16024 and found that they address all of the applicable development code criteria for the
proposed zone (map) amendment. The Findings provided In the Staff Reports for File No. 16022 and
File No. 16024, dated December 6, 2016 are incorporated herein.
PART 3
SUMI MARY CONCLUSION
As evidenced in findings and conclusions provided in the Staff Reports (File Nos. 16022 & 16024), the
proposed zone change is consistent with applicable standards and criteria in the Central Point Municipal
Coyle, including the Statewide Planning Goals (where applicable), Comprehensive Plan, and Statewide
Transportation Planning Rule.
58
ATTACHMENT
PLANNING COMMISSION .RESOLUTION NO. 837
A RESOLUTION FORWARDING A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION TO THE
CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE REZONING OF FROM
TOURIST AND OFFICE PROFESSIONAL (C-4) TO THROUGHFARE
COMMERCIAL (C-5)
FILE NO. 16024
Applicant: Rogue Malley Microdevices, Inc. and Tail Light Properties LLC;
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map is proposed to re -designate 4901 Biddle
Road as Thoroughfare Commercial; and
WHEREAS, the proposed 'Thoroughfare Commercial (C-5) zoning is an urban Thoroughfare
Commercial zoning district consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and surrounding land
uses; and
WHEREAS, adequate public services and transportation networks are available to the site;
and
WHEREAS, the proposed zone change from C-4 to C-5 has been determined to be consistent
with the State Transportation Planning Rule.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE Td' RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning
Commission, by this Resolution No. 837, does recommend that the City Council approve the
change of zone on 4901 Biddle Road, also identified by the Jackson County Assessor's Mala
as37S2W 0 1 C Tax Lot 802.'Ois decision is based on the Staff Report dated December 6,
20 6 attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein.
PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this
bth day of December, 2016,
Planning Commission Chair~
ATTEST:
City Representative
Approved by me this 6th day of December, 2016.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 837 (12/06/2016)
59