HomeMy WebLinkAboutDCSM100316 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
Development Commission Study Session
October 3,2016
MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
Mayor Williams called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
II. ATTENDEES Mayor: Hank Williams
Council Members: Bruce Dingier, Allen Broderick, Brandon
Thueson, Taneea Browning, Michael Quilty, and Rick Samuelson
were present.
City Manager Chris Clayton; Parks and Public Works Director
Matt Samitore; Community Planner Molly Bradley; Planning
Manager Don Burt; and City Recorder Deanna Casey were also
present.
III. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. East Pine Streetscape Project
1. Object of Study Session—Review final streetscape design
a. On-Street Parking
b. Pedestrian Lights/Illumination Plan
c. Street Trees
d. Bulb-outs, Planters, and Pots
e. Streetscape Accessories (benches, trees grates, etc.)
f. Phasing Options
2. Next Steps
a. Preliminary Cost Estimate and Financing Options Oct/Nov.
b. Stakeholder Meeting(October/November)
c. Phasing (Nov.)
d. Final Design Fall 2017
e. Final Engineering, Phase I, Winter 2017
Planning Manager Don Burt presented the background and past consensus on the street
trees,parking, and street lights that have already been approved for the downtown.
• There will be three to four street trees per block, depending on private
driveways. The tree options are chanticleer pear or the hornbeam. The
prevailing preference is to use the chanticleer pear. Both are columnar in
shape and with appropriate grooming will not interfere with buildings,
parking, or awnings.
• There will be three single luminaire lights on 20-22 foot poles with the
capability to support hanging baskets and banners. Each intersection corner
will have 22 foot double luminaire lights. These options provide the best
lighting options.
• Signalized pedestrian crosswalk will be located at 6th Street due to the
existing pedestrian pattern of usage. This is also adjacent to where thee bus
stop will-beis located.
Council Study Session
October 3, 2016
Page 2
• Planter on NW Corner of Third Street has been reduced in size to save-money
for of er itemsadd one additional parking space.
The Development Commission agreed with the above design proposals as part of the
final design.
Adkins Consulting Engineer Jeremy Morris explained that the importance of coming to
a fmal design preference to avoid delaying the
• - • • •• - - - -- . _ • •- _ project bid dates—and—may
may
Landscape Architect Alan Pardee presented options for planters, pots and furniture. The
recommended options are a variety of pots, a few planter areas with a six inch high
boarder, and a few seat wall planters. It is best to have a variety of sizes and locations to
break up the sidewalk areas. There was concern about people walking between the
planters and the parking areas. All planters will be strategically located according to
parking spaces. Staff stated that we could provide a little more room between the planters
and the parking area, but that would require making the planter areas smaller. There
seemed to be agreement that more space should be provided for the planters.
There was discussion that the Commission did not necessarily like the 6 inch proposed
raised planters but understands the need for them. There was discussion about the size
and amount of the planter pots. The pots need to be in a series of three for design
elements. The seating planters can be stamped with a decorative design to be decided at a
later date.
There was a discussion that the variety of planters is important from a design element.
When the trees lose their leaves we will have the planters to break up the sidewalk and
provide a variety of things to look at. Some Commission Members were concerned that
there would be to many items and it would seem cluttered. Mr. Clayton stated this was
one of his concerns originally but after attending LOC he took notice of the planters and
design elements in Salem, there is plenty of sidewalk space and it did not look cluttered.
There is also concern about trash being tossed into the planters. This is a risk all cities
face, but if the planters are at ground level the plants do not survive because people walk
on them.
The Commission Members were reminded that we are looking to increase property value
and design is a major component of that value. We are also trying to keep the cost down
so that we can complete all the elements.
They were presented illustrations of what the cross walk sections would look like with
the planters/pots design elements. The crosswalk sections would be similar to the
sidewalk patterns, including the pedestrian signal crossing at 6th Street.
At this point staff needs a consensus to complete the drawings and proceed with
scheduling a stakeholders meeting and open house for October 17, 2016 at 6:00 pm.
CONCLUSION:
Council Study Session
October 3, 2016
Page 3
1. Current flower baskets that are attached to the buildings will be removed. Several
business owners have done a great job keeping them healthy and looking nice, but there
are a few locations where they do not look as good. As part of the project these planters
will be removed.
2. Mid-block street trees and street lights as discussed were accepted.
3. Proposed planter on west side of Third Street reduced in size to allow an
additional parking space.
4. Relocation of the signalized crosswalk to the eastside of Sixth Street was accepted.
5. Pl��t: No decision was made on the types of pots or color at this meeting. There
was a consensus that planters/pots would be part of the project in specific locations and
that final design, location, and size would be up to the landscape architect generally
per Option B.
6. Proceed: There was consensus to to complete the draft final design, complete
presentation drawings and : . - e : • e :. : . : schedule the open
house for October 17, 2016.
IV. ADJOURNMENT
The Study Session for October 3, 2016 was adjourned at 7:26 p.m.