Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - October 7, 2003CITY C3F CENTRAL POINT PLANNING C4JMMISSI4N AGENDA Clctaber '1, 2043 - ?.00 p.rn. ~~ hlext Planning Commission Resolut~On ~Io. 590 I. MEETING CALLED Td URDER II. ROLL CALL Chuck Piland -Candy Fish, Don Foster, Paul Lunte, Connie Moczygemba, Rick Percy and Wayne Rugs III. C4RRESPUNI:}ENCE IV. MINUTES A. Review and approval of September 2, 2003, Planning Commission Minutes V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES VI. BUSINESS Page 1 A. Public hearing to review Central Point Parks and Recreation Draft Master Plan. 2 - 13 B. Public hearing to review an application for a Conditional Use Permit, for the purpose of developing a church located within the proposed Snowy Butte Station subdivision. The subject parcel is situated near the center of the former Central Point Mill Site in an area that is proposed for "Civic" zoning and is identifed in the Jackson. County .Assessor Map as 3~ 2W l l C, Tax Lot 94{}0. l4 - 23 C, Public hearing to review an application for a four lot subdivision known as the Spruill Subdivision. The subject parcel is in a R-1-$, Residential Single Family District and is identified in the records of the Jackson County Assessor Map as 3'7 2W 11D, Tax Lot 1700, otherwise known as 3458 Burrell Road. Pc] 0£}720013 24 - 41 D. Public hearing to review a site plan application far tl~c development of a 53,000 square foot furniture stare in the Mountain View Plaza commercial develapn~ent. The subject parcel is in the C-4, Tourist and Qf~ce Professional District and is identified in the records of the Jackson County assessor as Map 37 2V~ 02D, Tax Lot 1300. VIL MI~CELLANE4US VIII. ADJ©URNMENT n~~ a~~~oa3 City of Central P©int Planning Connnission il~inutes September 2, ~Qfl3 ~. MEETING CALLER TC1 QRDER AT 7:00 P.M. II. RC3LL CALL: Chairman Chuek Piland, Rick Perry, Connie Moczygemba, Paul Lunte, Don Foster and Wayne Riggs were present. Also in attendance were Ken Gerscler, Community Planner; Chris Clayton, Deputy Public Works Director and Dave Arkens, GIS Technician, Candy Fish entered the meeting about five minutes late. III. CCIRRESPCINAENCE There was no correspondence. IV. MINUTES Commissioner Lunte made a motion to approve the minutes from the August 19, 2003 meeting. Commissioner Perry seconded the motion, ROLL CALL: Perry; yes, Fish, yes; Moczygemba, yes; Lunte, yes; Foster, yes; Riggs, abstain, Motion passed. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances VI. BUSINESS A. Public hearing to review a Tentative Plan application for snowy Bette Station Subdivision. The proposed development is located in the vicinity of Ash Street and Highway 99. This Master Plan would create 98 lots with TC?D-GC, TOD-MMR, R-3 and Civic zoning designations on Map 37 2W lOAD, Tax Lots 100, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 1140, 1200, 1300 and Map 37 2W 11BC, Tax Lots 4500 and 4600. Chairman Piland asked the Commissioners if there were any ex-pane communications or conflicts of interest; there were none. Ken Gerschler, Community Planner, presented the Punning Department stai'f report, I-le explained briefly the history of the area and how the mill area is now being cleaned up by sorting through the old concrete, rack, bark and other material. He shared the highlights of the Planning Planning Conantissic~n Minutes September 2, 2t1f13 Page 2 o~'S Staff report and explained that Cedar Street could be extended over the railroad tracks in the future and there will be a reserved area for this purpose. There will not be any buildings or other structures permitted in the reserved area for extending Cedar Street. Mr. Gerschler read through the Finding of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Snowy Butte Station will have a variety of zones including residential, commercial and light industrial. McLaughlin Court will have some kind of vehicle traffic blocking device, most likely bollards. This will allow pedestrian and bike traffic to flow from one subdivision to another, Commissioner Fish stated that there should not be traffic blocking devices and that vehicle traffic should be allowed to pass through. to Chicory Lane and to allow emergency vehicles better access. The applicant, Craig Stone, 1t}8 Cardley, explained the types of zoning and what types of development will be constructed in the subdivison. There will be a number of park areas and an area for a possible city welcome sign near Highway 99. Mr. Stone stated that there is not an opportunity for the widening of Chicory Lane and in his opinion no more traffic should be allowed to use the lane. The Civic area that will be used for a church could be used for a turn around for Chicory Lane. Chicory Lane property owners have been unwilling to cooperate to widen street because they would have to dedicate property for additional right of way and widening of the street. Commissioner Riggs asked if there is going to be a turn around on the south end of Haskell Street. Mr. Stone said that the proposed park area at the end of Haskell could be used as a temporary turn around until Haskell Street continues further south. Commissioner Fish stated that she would Tike to see Chicory Lane widened. Mr. Gerschler said that there are other options for access to Chicory Lane when other properties are developed in the future. Virginia Brown, a property owner on Chicory Lane, stated that she wanted to receive a tax refund from the City and Fire District because she feels that she is not receiving those services an Chicory Lane. She wants Chicory Lane to connect to McLaughlin Court or connect to Cherry Loop. Mr. Gerschler said that she needs to talk to her neighbors to see if they would be willing to give up property to widen the lane. We can also put that portion of Chicory Lane on a list for possible State funds to pave it some time in the future. Jim Stadtfeld, 50'~ Glenn Way, asked if this project would have any effect on Daisy Creek and some of the problems associated with flooding and will the new residential homes be elevated above the homes on Glenn Way. Lou Cosentino, 333 Glenn Way, asked if truck and rail traffic would increase due tea the commercial and light industrial uses and also if Daisy Creek would bs effected by this development. Planning Commission Minutes September .2, 2{~Q3 Page 3 of S Mr. Stone answered Mrs. Brown by stating that if Chicory Lane went through there would be an increase in traffic. There will be opportunity for Lindsey Court to go through to Haskell Street in the fixture allowing better access to Chicory Lane. This development should not change or have any negative effect on Daisy Creek and if anything it should improve the creek at flood stages because of the park area, All work done near the creek will be in accordance to City, State or Federal regulations. There will be truck traffic in the industrial and commercial area but it should not be as heavy as when the mill was in operation. All streets will be built to Public Works standards and can handle major truck traffic. Mr. Stone agreed to remove the birm along Chicory Lane. Commissioner Lunte made a motion to adopt Resolution 587, approving a Tentative Plan for Snowy Butte Station Subdivision that would create 98 Tots on Map 3'7 2W lOAD, Tax Lots 100, 300, 400, 500, 600, x'00, 800,1100, 1.200,1300 and Map 37 2W 11BC, Tax Lots 4500 and 4600 subject to the recommended conditions of approval and that the developer remove the birm at the end and on the east side of Chicory Lane nor#h of Lindsey Court. Commissioner Moczygemba seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: The motion passed unanimously. B, Public hearing to review a Tentative application for Coffin Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is located off of Beall Lane within an R-2, Residential Two Family Zoning District. This partition would divide two existing tax lots in to four separate tax lots and is located on Map 37 2W 11I3D, Tax Lots 16700 and 16800. There were no ex-parte communications or conflicts of interest, Ken Gerschler, Community Planner, presented the Planning Department staff report. He explained that Elk Creels is a limiting factor in developing this property, There needs to be a 25 foot top-of-stream-bank setback for any structure. DSL has been notified about the possible wetlands area on or near the property, The width of lot 4 should be 60' instead of 55'. p'ire District #3, Rogue Valley Sewer Services, and Rogue River Irrigation District have been notified. There is a possible need for additional right of way up to I S' on Beall Lane for future street improvements. The flag lot driveway, parcel 2, must be paved and 20' wide. There was a pond on parcel 2 that no longer exists. Mel and Carol Coffin, 520 Bead Lane, explained that the pond was a recreational f sh pond that had been filled in, Parcel 1 and 2 will use the same driveway to access Beall Lane and Parcel I and 4 will have separate access points to Beall. They will be building a covered parking area for Parcel 3 to meet City zoning codes. Mr. Coffin agreed to change the width of Parcel 4 to 60'. Ke also stated that the area of drainfield easement on Parcel 2 will be removed. The existing homes will be remodeled. Don Malloy, 1355 Circlewood Drive, is currently developing Mingus Creek Estates, the property Planning Commission Minutes September- 2, 2QC13 Page 4 of S next to the Coffin's partition, and is in favor of the improvements the Coffin's are making. Commissioner Fish made a :motion to adopt Resolution 588, approving the tentative partition that would divide t-~vo existing tax. Tots into four separate tax lots and is located on Map 37 2W 11DD, Tax Lots 16700 and 16800 subject to the recommended conditions of approval and on the findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the record. Commissioner Lunte seconded the motion. R{)LL GALL: The motion passed unanimously. C. Public hearing to review a Tentative Plan application far Hamrick Business Park. The proposed coxnrnercial and industrial subdivision is located south of Biddle Road and east of Hamrick Road. This parcel consists of 34.89 acres and would create seven lots and is located on 1VSap 37 2W 01C, Tax Lot 800. There were no ex-pane communications or conflicts of interest. I~en Greschler, Community Planner, presented the Planning Department Staff report. Mr. Gresclaier explained that lots 1, 2, and 3 axe in the C-4, "Tourist and Office zoning district, lots 4, 5 and 6 are in the G-5, Thoroughfare Commercial zoning district and lot 7, which is the current USF Reddaway truck. terminal, is in the Nl-2, Industrial General zoning district. 't'here will be a crass access easement through lets 1-fi with additional access between lots 4 and 5 to Biddle. These access streets must be wide enough to support trucks and be built to City standards. Dennis Hoffbuhr, 3155 Alameda, and Lamy Wilson, USF Reddaway, commented that the access streets will have curb, gutter and sidewalks and no on street parking. The access street through lots 1-6 could be continued to Table Rock Road when the Batter property is developed. Mr. Wilson stated that he would like to see the width of the birm reduced but the height would remain the same. This would provide snore area for the access street. Lots 1 and 2 would be developed first and they have a hotel and restaurant looking to buy these lots. The access street will be built and maintained by the property owner of each lot. fenny .tohnson will be building one or two hotels on lots l and 2 and stated that the hotels would be seeking two different cliental. Ray V~ilkerson, 2524 Beebe Road, stated that he vas aware that there was a commercial zone across from Central Point East Subdivision and his biggest concern is increased traffic on Biddle Road and East Pine Street. Becha Croft, 2535 Beebe Road, stated that she does not want to see a signal at Meadowbrook and Biddle but would like see a raised medium between Table Rock Road and Hamrick Road to keep people from turning left onto Biddle Road from the access street, Chris Clayton stated that if accidents occur at the intersection of Meadowbrook Drive and the access street between lots 4 and 5 that that will warrant traffic barriers, a signal or both. Planning Commission tl~inutes September ~, .2Q(?3 Page S of 5 Cornxnissioner Faster made a motion to adapt Resolution 589, approving the tentative subdivision located south of Biddle Road and east of Hamrick Road that consists of 34.89 acres and would create seven lots and is located on Map 3? 2W O1C, Tax Lot 800 and is subject to the recommended conditions of approval and based on the findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the record. Commissioner Perry seconded the motion. R{)LZ CALL: The motion passed unanimously. VII. MISCELLANE+DUS None. VIII. ADJCIURNMENT Commissioner Foster made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner Lunte seconded the motion. R.QLL CALL; Motion passed unanimously. Meeting was adjourned at 9:55 P.M. PARKS & F:EC~~]~ATION DEPARTMENT MEMCIRANDUM DATE: C}ctaber 1, ~a~3 TO: Punning Cammissian FROM: Nancy Hanson, Park Recreation Director SUBJECT: Central Paints Parks and Recreation Master Plan Summary City staff recruited 13 community members to serve on a ii~aster Plan Team. Team members consisted of sports representatives, city councilmen, business owners, school district and youth leaders. Members served far a six :month period meeting twice a month and serving an sub-caxnmittees. The guide used far master plan development was provided by the Oregon Parks & Recreation Dept. Discussion The planning consisted of, organization of the master plan team., agreement of the planning process and schedule, development of public participation, distributed survey, collected data & displayed basic information, The needs and Issues were addressed with a focus an the highest priority. Developed a vision and formulated goals and objectives, identified strategies and prioritized strategies, then developed an action program.. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend the drafted master plan far adoption by the City Council. TOD Corridor and so the applicant is pursuing the conditional use permit as a guarantee to develop this site for a new church. The parcel that the church will be located an is bounded an three sides by streets, one ofwhich is a collector. A collector is designed to handle higher volumes of traffic although this is not expected to become a problem particularly once Haskell Street is connected to the south. Church uses are typically compatible with the residential neighborhoods in which they are historically located, There activities are normally limited to weekends and for a few hours during weekday evenings. flff street parking is depicted in Attachment A and is designed to comply with City requirements far the use and square footage ofthe buildings. Sale access is shown being taken from Haskell Street but staffwauld like to see alternative ar secondary access provided from Cheny Loop Street as well. The City has received comments from the Rogue Valley Sewer Services and Fire District #3, both of whom will rely on the extension of sewer and water lines in Haskell Street as part of the overall development. Jackson County Roads and Parks have no comment on this project. Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law G"onditic~nal Use Permit The Planning Commission in granting a conditional use permit shall find as follows: That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use and to meet all other development and lot requirements afthe subject zoning district and all other provisions of the Cade; ^ The proposed church building (which is approximately 11,000 square feet in area) will fit easily on the two acre sight upon which it will be built. This includes the installation of landscaping and parking stalls. That the site has adequate access to a public street ar highway and that the street or highway is adequate in size and condition to effectively accommodate the trafFic that is expected to be generated by the proposed use; ^ This parcel will front on Haskell Street once it is extended. Staff recommends that the applicant provide an alternative point of access on Cheny Loop Street. The code in the T4D zone district requires 1 parking space for each 100 square feet of building space, for a fatal of approximately 110 spaces That the proposed use wi11 have na significant adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted use thereof: In making this determination, the commission shah consider the proposed location of improvements on the site; vehicular ingress, egress and internal circulation, setbacks; height of buildings; walls and fences; landscaping; outdoor lighting; and signs; .~ „ ~, ^ Churches are typically allor~ved in residential zoning districts and have proven to be compatible with residential uses. In this case the church use is being proposed as part of a master plan. and integrated into a larger project. Primary access will be taken from a collector street and other improvements such as landscaping and lighting will. be governed by the TOf3 corridor zoning standards. That the establishment, maintenance ar operation of the use applied far will comply with local, state and federal health and safety regulations and therefore will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing ar working in the surrounding neighborhood ar to the general welfare of the community. ^ The proposed facilities will need to meet any applicable local, Mate and Federal regulations. The Building and Fire Departments will review this proposal when it is submitted for building permits. That any conditions required for approval of the permit are deemed necessary to prated the health, safety and general welfare. ^ An approval of this project would be subject to any recommended conditions of approval assigned by the Planning Corxu~rrission (see Attachment C) and any additional recommendations introduced by the Public Works Department. Recommendation Staffrecammends that the Planning Commission take one of the fallowing actions: l . Adapt Resolution No. ,approving the Canditianal Use Permit subject to the recommended conditions of approval; ar 2. Deny the proposed Conditional Use Permit; or 3. Continue the review of the Canditianal Use Permit at the discretion of the Con~missian. Attachments A. Concept Development Plan and Church Site and Floor Plans B. Notice of Public Hearing C. Planning Department Recommended Conditions D. Correspondence ,~ ...~ - -----. Cra1g A, tans & Assaclates, t.Tp. Mantes & Associates,l»t.C Gaipin t.t_G (Applicant} 708 Cardiey Avenue, Medford, Ck. 9?504 802 htadia Way, Medford, Ck. 97544 P.Q. Box 8271, Medford, Or. 97504 {541}779-0569 {543}779-4771 {5di}779-5346 4200 ~,,~ R5ab 43nd e2nn a4aa ~>_G~ ~1~T{)WY 3~3iI"~"~'L'' ~Tt1'S`IOl+i 63bd .p_ asnn 94a 66ba U~ 46ba ~ 93aa s9nn .1A'S/ m~ 9zaa 5ood 64da 44aa 3"s',jp(y 9dnd ? /r '\ 2nn ,aa~ 4aa ~ `~ ~`\ .i ., _ ~~ "\ soo '. ~\~ tndastrfiaiE'\y/ ~~ `2Q33T SgfC !" ' MFR r ~`• aoo \ 95,2$4 Stt t=t \ '~ ,1../~ ~,.•" i Dan .\ ~ ~r ~f • .-w 1 idd \~ soa MFR {' 33,4$3 Sq Fi \•,t /%. srxncr avt7F xn. ~^- ..._..Y 3 4aa '#// -..__.._.-...~i„r. t MAFIi i i 5aa t~,445 Sg Ft~ i F66d j ' 59ad i~ ~~ ~: ieaa ~ \~\ #n i 4aa ,`,~• ~-, t~itc 2aoo ., ztoo ~~ 22na ..-. ~~~~ a5C iao aoao ~t, 4 PRELiIVIiNARY Piao P€AN ~1~5~1 ~ ~~ ~Z ,~~~'z \ ti ~ '\~`.r~~f e i ad *11 ,,. y ..n.. t ry `9t,398~5'g Ft ~ i ~ r~.l Zi~~ s;:7 Ff i C1VtG \ 5~\~\~ % aadb as ._.t...1...... ~ _t....~. 84~3i5SgFf \ \ ~`'+ ~Sd6 5a7 Sag 5b4 ..., ~~~ ~ 51 a i da •~~\ ~~', ~ f StMTjY 3At1F. O 51 S 1 ____ .~ ~~\.~4 <` aa0 r" ~`,~~1 ~~wJ 5a5 t~ ••-••itasetttcttCi2t (%x1NZ ~"~, SOa 57 Z ..~.. ,~........~.....-.,~.,..~ ~ 3da t ~'Mk~ 1 \,~5~ a ~ S14 8300 94da 5n2 4d8 y LIYif7SE't 'y ado C6URT s '8dd 519 519 l Sad 7dD 53B 57 .~. 3 4ab 12da 1 1 ab i aba Oda 9d0 caaca'sr use ` _~^,~_~~~ 1340 l4da ta0a add 156a Tlb{t771tY $!'RFF:I~ I6Q0 Exhibit Z^ 1 C{)N~EPT DEVEL.C}PMENT PLAN C7=NTRAL PU3NT. OREC£7N fi ' ~ ~ '\ 2a1 ~ ,. ado `~ \ •''~• `` ~ V'gMMMI'C~ ~ 34ba \ }; \VG3,fYf SgFt End 1t a R1a4 ~ ~ industrial ~ ~,. f ~\ {j, \ ~'\ 2G5,663 Sq Ft ~ y •\ , .r ~. .~ Craig A. Stave & Assac(ates, LTD, (Vlantero & AssacEat~es, C.t.G Galp9n t,C.C 708 Camfey Avenue, Medfcxd, Or. 97504 842 Nadia Way, Medford, C7r. 97544 P.O. Bax 8271, {541} 779.0}569 {541}779-CI771 {541}779-534& w x I3v~~~ ~~ctkxxorr ... w w w «. w w w r ....~.. w w .w...~.ri w .. t r l t «~ I f! t f ~~ns~lt 2.'t D PREI.iNiINARYPUDPLAt~f CHURN SITE PLAN & ELEVATI{JN c~~-i-~~ ~c~i~T, ai~~~or~ ... 3, i~~ ~~ - .CRSLir PTA ,-.. ~X~'i1~if fis^ i 1 ~~~~,~a~~Y~~~~~~ CHI~RCH FLOC~~. PLAN & E~EVATIC}N c~~v~ ~o~r~~-, a~~~c~r~ r~. ~.. v - - - - ~- PLANNI.N~ l~.F'P.~ ~~T.~.~'NT 'l'ozxz l~izzrrzl~hrey, ~ICP Planning Director I~en £~ersclrier Cornrrzzznity Planner Dave Arkens Plaz~zning `l'echniciaza Lisa Moran Planning Secretary Notice of Public Nearing Date of~Iotice: September ~6, 20U3 Meeting Date: October 7, 2003 Time: 7:00 p.m. (Approximate) Place: Central Point City 1rlall 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon NATURE flF MEETING Beginning at the above time and place, the Central PointPlanning Com~.nissionwill review an application for a conditional use permit that could allow the construction ofa church on a parcel ofproperiy located within the Snowy Butte Station Transit Oriented Development. The subject parcel is situated near the center ofthe former Central Point Mill Site in an area that is zoned "Civic" and is identified inthe records ofthe Jackson County Assessor as Map 37 2W 1OAD, Tax Lot 700 The Central. Point Planning Corrutussion will review the conditional use pernut application to determine if all of the requirements of the Central Point Municipal Code can be met. Ifthe Commission determines that the application meets the City's standards, an approval could be issued . CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for conditional use permit are set forth in Chapter 1? ofthe Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Information and conditions on the project approval. . PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, October 7, 2003. 2. Written comments maybe sent in advance ofthemeeting to Central Point CityHa11,155 South Second Street, Central Point, OR 9"7502. 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raisccl prior to the expiration of the conunent period noted above. Any testimony and written cornznents about the decisions described above wi11 need to he related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies ofa11 evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City I ial1,155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies ofthe same are available at I S cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Pla~~zning L`tepaz:tnzent at {541)664-3321 ext. 292. SUMMARY' Cl~' PR.+DCEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staffrepozts, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the conditional use permit as submitted. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. ~~~ ~~~~ ~ r,.- ; ~ r ~. ~ ,~- "~ ~'`' ~ ~` '~ ~ ~. ~~~, 155 South Second Street i Central Point, 4R 975{}2 • {541) 664-3321 +~ Fax: {541) 664-6384 ATTAC~IVIENT C COMMENDED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CfJNDITIONS Q~' APpRpVAL This Conditional Use Permit must comply with all applicable focal, state and federal regulations including, but not limited to, building and fire codes and Central Point°s Public Works Standards and Specifications. 2. ~'he applicant shall provide a alternative point of access onto Ceny Loop Street. 3. I~ew lighting, signs and landscaping will comply with the standards adopted for the TCtL} Corridor district. ~. This Conditional IJse Permit shall expire within one (1) year of the date of approval if not exercised. A written request for extension may be authorized by staff for a period of six months. ~~ Roads uric Nltmeyrr, ~."~ 7}~~is & b~4~toprnc'rs#,Enginr.~r ~{} p,~te~ FLoad ~~~ t4+}7'dC CRy. C}R 97503 r^~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ 776230 F~c: (~a41 y 7't4•s295 n€~meyel~~ncavcrty.br9 ~{ ~ varw.jacitsrss-cauitYyorB Septemhar 17, 2D{33 Attention: Tom Humphrey City of Central Point Planning 155 South Second Street Centrat Point, 4R 975g~ R'E: Qevetppment aff Hast~ell Street - a city-rnaintatned road. Planning t=ile: 43(336-GUP, Snowy butte Church. ©ear Mr. Humphrey: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this appticat'son for a Conditional Use Permit off Haskell Street. Roads and Partcs has no cc7mment. tf y©€~ have any questions or need further Information feet free to catl me at 774-6234, Sincerely, el --- Eric hliemeyer, PE T'raific & C~evetopmerit Engineer t.t~Agii~eeri[tg1F38YaloprneRkl'CI'~'1~StG~iTFtLF'T1030$~-C1~F'.Yipd J~ ,~~ck.sc~nj ~c~un~~r dire Dist-ric~ N~-. 3 83 3 3 Abate Road White C~t~y ~~. 3?5C~3~~.o7a ~5~~.~ s2~=~zaa ~vorce~ ~~~~.~ X26-~~ss ~fax~ 5epternber ~.8, 20fl3 Cit~r of Central Point Ken ~erschler~Planner F~.~~~[1CFD cr~~r c~~ ca~'w~. c~cH~ S~~ ~ /4 243 PI.AEJNtN~ Q BE3iWiNG C3 ~u~~.tc wo~zxs ~~. d Fire T~istrict #3 Comments f©r the ~vawing pro~ec~ prQpvsed in The City of Central Point. r McDonalds addition: * Flo additional water supply will be required, *Maintain access around the building. Wal Mart; ~- Complete set of plans will be required for our review. Access, water supply and suppression systems shall be the. major topic of our review. Duncan Development: Access looks pretty good 3o+D ~c~ot average Pine hydrants spacing, Try and place near intersection corners. David Spruill development 8urcell Road. Fire Hydrant locations need to be verified and approved by the fire district, ..~.....,~.~; Snowy Butte Station: Additional water supply and possible fire suppression and alarm systems may be rewired depending o construction issues. o3ob3 ~- spr project: Furniture Row building. Complete plans shall be submitted for our review. Possible fire suppression and alarm systems may be rewired for this type of building. ` r^~ Mark Moran deputy Fire Marshal ~,~ 'F~ ~~6 .~ ~~ ~. t~ G U ~ 'V~,1. L ~'1C` ~ ~'wV' ~ R ~ ~ RV l ~ ~ ~ Location: 13& West Vitas Road, Can#rai Paint -Mailing Address: P.C1. Box 3134, Ceu#ral Poisrt,6}R 97SQ2-(3D4}S Tel. {541}664-6304 or {541 } 779-4144 l:•'AX (541}664-71.71 ww-w.RV~S.us September 24, 2443 Ken Gerschler FAQ 664-6384 City of Central Point Planning Department 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 9'7542 Re: Sntiwy Butte Church, File # 43036-CUP Sewer service is not inunediately available to the proposed development, The closest available sewer is near the intersection of Lindsey Court anal Chicory Lane, though the topography may make this sewer unavailable for gravity service. Sewer is available on Haskell Street, approximately 3S4 fact North of Ash Street. This sewer will need to be extended to serve the planned Snowy Butte Station. The same extension will also provide access to the sewer for the proposed church. All future development must be done in accordance with RVS standards. Feel free to call me at 664-6344 ifyou have any further questions. Sincerely, > Y. Carl Tappert, P.E. District Engineer K:IDATAIAGENCIESICE~l~3`f"PT1Tr'LAS`ThICr~C~TP14303~-CUP_SI~{~WY BU`f`~l'EC~fURCH.DC.~C PLANNING DEPARTMEI~IT STAFF REPORT l~'IEETING HATE: October 7, 2003 TC}: Central Point Planning Commission FROIVI: Ren Cerschler, Community Planner S~IBJECT: Public Hearing - To consider a Tentative Plan fora 4 lot subdivision known as Spruill Subdivision, east of Bursell Road in the R-1-$ zoning district {Map 37 2~ 11 DB, Tax Lot 1']{74}, Ar~plicantt C7tivner: David Spruill 3458 Bursell Road Central Point, Oregon 9'7542 Agent: Same as above Summary: The applicant has submitted a development proposal to subdivide 0.99 acres of land into 4 residential lots. Anthc~rity: CPMC 1.24.050 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a Tentative Plan., Notice of the Public Hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.460 (Attachment "B"). Applicable Law: CPMC 16.10.(}14 et seq. -Tentative Plans CPMC 17.20 et seq. R-1, Residential Single Family District Discussion• The applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission approve a tentative plan. to subdivide a 0.99 acre parcel into four individual lots ranging in size from 6,702 to 13,007 square feet {refer to Attachment "A"}. Setbacks for the R-1-8 zone are 24 feet for the front lot line, 5 feet per story on the sides and 15 feet far rear lot lines. Two-story structures are proposed which will increase the side yaxd setback to 10 feet. The maximum allowable height is 35 feet. There is an existing two-story home and a detached garage on the parent tax lot. Access to the fats would be from a twenty feat wide private road connecting to Bursell Road. The Public V~orks Department will require that the roadway be built to standards that are typical of cluster development. The Planning Department requests that the private road have a name recorded on the plat since there is a limited address range on Bursell Road. The new street name will allow staff to assign addresses that will aid emergency services in locating the new homes. ~ ;t J v c. .s.. The Rogue River Valley Irrigation District, Jackson County Fire District I~;umber 3 and the Rogue Valley Sewer Services {RVSS} have been notified of the this tentative subdivision. RVSS will work with the applicant in the infrastructure design and tie the development into an existing 42 inch diameter sewer line in Burrell Road. Water service is shown on the tentative plan. Fire C3fficials will require that the applicant provide a copy ofmaps with hydrant location for review and approval by the district, Jackson County Roads and Parks will be involved in permitting new road approaches. F~ndin~s of Fact and Conclusions of Lawn Staff suggests the following findings of fact and conclusions of law as applicable to the project and necessary for its approval. CPMC 1'7.20.01{} establishes the minimum. area, width and access requirements for the R-1, Residential Single-Family District. 1. The project site is located in the R-1-8 (Low Mix Residential} zoning district and consists of a tentative plan application for the subdivision of approximately t}.99 acres into 4 separate Lots. CPMC 16.14.010 requires that applications for tentative plans be submitted with improvement plans and other supplementary information as may be needed to indicate the development plan. 2. The Planning and Public Works Departments have reviewed the tentative plan for the proposed subdivision and the findings of fact and determined that the project meets all City standards and requirements subject to the recommended conditions in Attachment C, Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following action: l .Adopt Resolution No., approving the tentative subdivision subject to the recommended conditions of approval; or 2. Deny the tentative subdivision; or 3. Continue the review of the tentative subdivision at the discretion of the Commission. 11CPCHSIICI'T'`~ WIL7~IF'LANNINCr~03060.WPD ~~ Attachmen#s: A. Copy of Tentative Plat B. Notice of Public Dearing C. Planning Department Recommended Conditions of Approval D. Correspondence from Agencies itCPCHS1ti~I`F'Y WIT}Eir'LANNIN~t0306~.Wr'D v ~~ I .. ~ ~ • '' ~``~• f ? ~~ ~~oo j,. W rx~ Ae.~rxx _ ... n_.. ~.. ,. rea::.:a r ..... r»".x ~cxn ... ~-^ it s ~ '"w""'""'erw'---+-~+.'T`rr*~ / ytu.t ur;~ rc:~ ",,,,, r rrt t'. . ~ ;.7 fl ~........ s; j_~..:~.r.'~'.".~~........ ._....... ... _.~...._....__._ct...,..,.._, ce __-_._..a-emu. .-. SCYiI~R F.IN~ as ..__... .a ~~ ... ~e - -.-.;:''~"-•..._.. ` J` 1 ~ ~ ~ ~i " ..:Y..~.. ~ _.....,,_._._._r~ as ucrae naw fcm 1~rr~vrrJ ___ ,,,..,,~_____ ti `"Kip"crervr~r Cz'n'.J r+aacir~ # ./fir tt w t 1, I~ M • .....~.....• .-.~.~.Y ~'~.Y ~.....w* ~....... ~'}'~ ~.~ ~• ~ ! t !t _ ~ ~ € ` ~ ~.. _. yam......., „ '..~._. `_' _.... W •° ~-~ ~ ~ .. ~ T Ynrmr.w +~+_t s:mmuy \ a.'•"nwi~~ ,y. tr \ .,..r j~••L. i ... ~,. .~.r.--- ^- .... ...--~^- r: % E.... ..-...- -.-"-s .. ""-"-"'~ ~ M'S ~{{o';~`,~r+„x:o7 a.~:: r, Ursa ~ ~ Y i ~ : C f .~y ~'~` '~" :..y ~ ?, it `~~ '1~ .. _ .... a.:n ", 'y a ~,X'~7T'Za.i'1 ~ t.~- ..-~.~E E - I ~" f ~ +4 .-~~-~ r ~ ~ ~ 1 !!1~.::~C. c.!.t ..~ 1 enax+oe~ 2-srcRY" r~ w ~^> a ~aer~ s-scorer r~xosaa ~st~a'r,r f' ~ „'~ r a+cerse +uvae Hwae f/ Cfro6Eih A~fUI't t t { t ~ tOs 15' 16' FOs I k7 f ~'~-'s F G. TQF ~ 7 / i . %n '`'^ . ~" ;n ss;' ~ .,, ,~ ---C__ :w^-u>>°. ~~~Y,. --- {~tn'rx `~. wry ~j ,t3 i ~ F ~~trw. ,~;~~ , ) ti ,~,_,_-_...-.-- slat ar. ------- "~, rrrr s.F..'' `..,.~a~no ar. 3 ~~ ~~ t 1-{'~`~" {%C?C? .r~,+--"'.--- uwsnoee: ~ ~- ~ aa~~? .,. _.. ......~..; c~~ { ~'„' •»~^'"-~ ~ UAT: NKN4~ 'a.~.~Cl wry---..~~. «.....G..~~.„:s.-.~~'i~~n...r.. .. ' PF1C lM1T~h1 I~}tARI Ct1f,.YHi1' ~ ~ x ~ s~xs TG NATi l.7t7'IRL LZNae7N elf f~71'~#[TY ( ~ ~ ~ ~j} r?• ~ 41tSfR •SIDIFLV.K. ('C1A7G1 L%tSTiNG I ~ ~ ~~~_ ~~~ :, , ~...:r_.~:<:~~r .~ ~u. i~ i~i ..~ I~N:i t~svvlslarts P1~ELIMiNA~FtY srrlw P~.Art i~`i ==~ -~`.s T}~. SURV EYC7R: ~>,rawrr P~tEL.INiCNAFtX SLJBI7IVISEON F'QR: ~pncw DATE sc,.4e: ;,,l~~~c,~,~> ~ ~ ~ DAVt~1 SPR[1IL.L CC?1~I5Tl~UCTEt7N AS NQTED ~~ , ~~~ ~ "' p o. ebx 84~ r,~1.~Nr, bR s754b a~v-z~ sPRU~a,I-LO-r `~~s SUBI~tV19IGiM onr~: ~~`~,~`~ ,, a~ ~ z~RAwrt ~x: PNONE 844--89# Fi#N• B&5-d9tB auRS~t ffon0 a/a3 .Z'°+.~^`.~~~-' ~w '""Kwxr°Mti..~. ClJY7RAL FGYNT, A4 f7T50Z nw.wtx~xo. rr..av`~ i~°ro CA[.L 4s 3lttt72S f C}F t «~ :x~e nxr cia ~ ,_ ;~ ~ ~. -,r~~--~-.. = . o ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; h$m ~}J~~GQC~ `l'orx~ Ilurrrpt~rey, t11CP ~'lanning I)irect,or 1Ccn Gerscl~ler Con~rnt.irrit,y P1Grnrler l~~xve Arkens Planning 'Teel~nician Lisa Morgan Planning ~ecrel,ary Notice of Public Dearing Date of Notice: September 16, 2aQ3 Meeting Date; October 7, 2003 Time: 7;00 p.m. (Approximate) Place; Central Paint City plan 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon NATURE OF MEETING Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Paint Planning Commissionwill review an application for a four lot subdivision lfnown as the Spruill Subdivision. The subject parcel is in a R-1-8, Residential Single-FamilyDistrict and is identified in therecords ofthe.lackson CountyAssessor as Map 37 2W 11D, Tax Lot 1700 The Central Point Planrriing Commission will review the tentative plan application to deteraa nine if all of the requirements ofthe Central Point Municipal Code can be met. If the Commission determines that the application meets the City's standards, an approval could be issued . CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for tentative subdivsions are set forth in Chapters 16 and 17 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Information and conditions on the project approval. PU$LIC COMMENTS 1. Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written coz~nments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, October 7, 2003. 2. 'Written comments maybe sent in advance ofthe meeting to Central Point City pIa11,155 South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502. ~. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Ha11,155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page. 5. For additional information, thepublicmaycon#actthePla~uYingDepartmentat(S41}~-331 ext. 2,92. SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staffreports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review tl~e Planning Commission may approve or deny the tentative subdivision application as submitted. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. ~. 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, C}R 97502 ~ X541} 664-3321 # Fax: {541} 664-6384 ATTAC~IIVIENT C PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOIVrMEI~DED CCll~DITIC}NS OF APPRpVAL l . The applicant shall comply with ail requirements of affected public agencies and utilities as they pertain to the development of the Spruill Subdivision. Evidence of such compliance shall be submitted to the City prior to final plat approval. 2. The Public Works Department has not included a staffreport for this land use application at this time. The applicant will be required to meet all public works details and standards for this project. 3. `The applicant shall comply with all federal, state aid local regulations, standards and requirements applicable to the development and construction of the Spruill Subdivision. 4. The applicant shall name the private roadway on the final subdivision plat. The ~'ackson County Suzveyor's Office should be consulted in naming the street to ensure that there are no conflicts with similar names in other parts of the County. 5. A final plat application shall be filed within one year of the Planning Commission approval or the tentative plan approval shall become null and void. The applicant miay request a six month extension with the Planning Department. ~tic~cxs~~c~~ wzn~~z,~N~t~~io~o~o.w~n ~~ y %3l X}~F LUCi.;3 ,L :3a LJ 1,J't1 [ 4 *t L)G .7J +J3-l4[\JV!• 4kJUFl[ t I~) J ! r-!ut». _U.M' Roads t«~~~ET71~BTy 7'r~c c~ Dcveloprnerr~ ~nginrer ~ T r 2R0AntelsypelZaaef 4YYi~ City. bR 97503 .~~ ~ ~~~~ i'it~Dt'3B: {545} 774-$23t~ li. L V ~; (~tt} rra~z~ nietnaye]~1acoun#y.prg {} J~„,~j( t`+ Cl ~ LL wl WtIW }2Ckf{)RL`ALRty+.SiP'~ OGtob~er ~, 2C1Q3 Attention: Tarn Humphrey City of Central Paint Planning 955 South Second Street +Centre~ Point, 4R 975112 RE: ~ Subdivision off Burrell Road .. a county-maintained road. Planning File D3450-TP; Spruill Subdivision. bear l~tlr. Humphrey: Thank you for the cr~ppartunity to comment tin this application far the tentat'rwe plan for the Spruill Subdivision, if approved,~the subdivision would create a residential development That would have four parcels. ~ aads and Parrs has the f©[lawing comments: 1. The applicant would need #o submit cons#ruction plans tca Roads Brad Parks, so we may determine if Co4~raty permits will be required. Road approaches Pram Burrell Road shall be cornple#ed under permits from Jackson County Reads, Additionally, any work within the county's fi0 foot right-af~-way shall be under a permit from this department, 2. Jackson County has a jua~isdictional transfer program applir.,able #o County reeds located within city limits, if Central Pont accepts jurisdiction of Burrell Road, Jackson County would provide funding equal to the cost of paving the roadway. if you have gray questions ar need further fee[ free tca call me at 774-fi23t}. Sincerely, ,,t 't..'''", Erie Niemeyer, PE Traffic & Development Pngineer 1:'~r~gineeringlC?eveac~prnentlGITIESiGt~ITRI.P``1103064-TP,~'aPd ~ ~r September .$, X4()3 City of Central Point den Cerschler-Planner ,j~Ck.sc~n° C~un~y Fire District ~o. 3 ~ 3 3 3 A~a~te Read White City ~R 975Q3~3,~7~ CS~x~ sz6=~~.0o CvQ~ce~ ~~~~.~ s2s-~~ss ~fax~ 4 ~~~~ ~~~~ Ci'TY Q~ C~N1'#~AE. PO{NT SEP 2 4 2003 ~c.~w~v~n-~ ~su~~.~~rv~ ~u~~.~c wo~xs ~~Pr. d Fire District #~ Ct~mments for the following project proposed in T'he City of Central Point. NtcUonalds additi©n: * tUo additional eater supply will be required. Maintain access around the building. Vllal Mari: Complete se-~ of plans will be required for our review. Access, water supply and suppression systems shall be the major topic cif our review. Duncan Development: Access looks pretty good 344 foot average Fire hydrants spacing. Try and place near intersection corners, -~---~-t~avid Spruill development Burrell R~aad. Fire~Kydrant locations need. to be verified and approved by the fire district. Snowy gu~te Station: Additional water supply and possible fire suppression and alarm systems may be required depending a construction issues. 03Ci63 -- spr project: Furniture Row building', Complete plans shall be submitted for our review. Possible fide suppression and alarm systems may be required for this type of building. ` Mark Moran Deputy Fire Marshal ~~ s~w,~~ _~~: ~~~~ ~ Rt~+GtJ~ VALLEY :3E1~1'FR ~FF~V'~~E ~.aegfinr~: 138 West Ylaa R~aad. Central Paint -Malting Address: T'.4.13crx 313D, Central Poit~ti71t. 975C}2-U44S 'Td. {541} -63t3t} ar (541 } 779-4Id4 SAX {541} 664~.7I71 vv~vw.RV55.us ~~~~~~~~ CITY OF t;EN`fE2Al. POINT selatez~.ber ~~> zt}03 SAP' ~ 4 2003 PtA~~,~~ a ~u~~.~~~ ca seta Gerschler ~,A.~ d6~4-b384 Pu~~.ICwol~I~s n~PT. d City t}~ Central Paint Pla~aning Department 155 South second Stxeet Gentxal Point, Oxegon 37502 ~.,~: Spx-uill Subdivision, 4306~•'~'k Deax T~,en, Thexe is a 42 inch diameter sewer main in ~ursell Road which. can pxovide sewer service to the pxoposed subdivision. Ali design az~d constxuction ofthe sewex service must be done in accordance with P.VS standards. Zf you need additional. irrforniatian, please call. 7ne at 7794144. Sincexely, Caxl "Z'appext, P.11. Distxict l/ngixaeer ~;IDATAI~,.GENCIE~ICENTPTIF'Lt~S~TGl5U~3DZV~~It3N1f~3064-TP S1?~ZUILL.Dt~C ~~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPCIRT MEETING HATE: October 7, 2003 TU: Central Point Planning Commission FRUM: Tam Humphrey AICP, Community Development Director SUBJECT. Site Plan Review and Findings of Zoning Compatibility for a Retail Furniture Store in Mountain View Plaza Applicant: Furniture Row USA, LLC 300 Union Blvd, Suite 350 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Owner; C A Galpin 744 Cardley Avenue #100 Medford, Oregon 97504 Property Descript~onrl 37 2W 02D, Tax Lot 1300 - 4.7 acres 2~onin~: C-4, Tourist and Office Professional Zoning District Summary The applicant, Furniture Raw, USA has requested a Site Plan Review far the construction of a 53,440 square foot retail furniture stare located in the Mountain View Plaza between I-5 and the Aibertsan's Grocery Stare {refer to Exhibit A). The single structure will house four separate furniture businesses under one roafi This application has been forwarded to the Planning Commission because of its size and because it will involve making findings of zoning compatibility far the C-~€ zone {Chapter 17.44,020 B.18). Authority CPMC 1.24.020 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hall a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a Site Plan Review. Itiiatice of the public hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060. {Exhibit B~. The Planning Commission also has the authority to rule that a use, not specifically named in the examples of allowed uses of a district shall be included among the allowed uses. r; A~piicable Law CPMC 17.72.010 et seq.- Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval CPMC 17.64.010 et seq.- tiff Street Parking and Loading CPMC 17.60.10 et seq.- Authorization far Similar Uses CPMC 17.44.010 et seq - C-~, Tourist and ~Jffice-Professional District Discussion The site plan and elevations depict a 42 foot tall building with a clerestory and gabled roof made ofinetal with standing seams. Four store fronts are proposed. with each serving as an entrance to a separate business. These businesses include Oak Express, Bedroom Expressions, Denver Mattress, and Sofa Mart. Each store will also have its own unique architecture and signage. Landscaping for the pro,~ect wi11 include planter areas along the periphery and at the northern entrance to the project. Specific vegetation and irrigation will be required as a condition to approval. There are approximately 11,004 square feet of area committed to trees and shrubs shown on the site plan. The landscaping plan should be more detailed and accompanied by an irrigation plan that will be installed to ensure a healthy growing environment. The Central Point Public Works Department will require a backflow prevention device for the irrigation system. A 30 foot wide driveway is proposed along the northerly property line that would provide access to the furniture complex. The municipal code requires that all areas used for off street parking, maneuvering be paved with durable materials for all-weather use and adequately drained. Furniture stores account for one of the lowest trip generators among commercial retail businesses and Furniture Row LISA is consistent with these statistics. Rogue 'tTalley Sewer Services and Jackson County Fire District 3 have been notified ofthis application and have provided their recommendations as follows see Exhibit D}. R"VSS has recommended the installation of a new pump station or extending a gravity main from an existing interceptor. The Fire District is requiring that a complete set of building plans be submitted for their review and suggested that fire suppression and alarm systems nay be required for this type of building. The Central Point Public Works Department will be distributing a staff report at the meeting. j v . ~~ Fntln~s of Fact & Conclusions of Law ~I~cthorization,fr~rSimilar Uses The Planning Commission in ruling upon similar uses shall find as follows; 1. That the use is closely related to listed uses and can be shown to exist compatibly with those uses. ^ The retail furniture complex being proposed is consistent with other retail uses iai the Mountain View Plaza. Consumers currently travel to the grocery store as a specific destination and this would also be the case with Furniture Row. The lower vehicle trips generated by this retail use are comparable, ifnot tower than those, projected for motels that were originally considered on this property, 2. That the use was not anticipated or known to exist on the effective date of the ordinance codified in this title, either because it involves products, services or activities not available in the community at that time or the use involves new products, services or activities that are nonetheless similar to permitted uses in size, traffic, impact, appearance and other attributes. ^ The Furniture Row, one buildinglmuItiple business concept was not known to exist at the time the City's ordinance was codified although there were other furniture retailers in operation. 3. That the use is treated under local, state or national codes or rules in the same manner as permitted uses. Except that these codes or rules shall not include land use and zoning regulations. ^ The proposed use will be permitted using the same code requirements that were used for other buildings in the Mountain View Plaza. ~, That the use is consistent with the purpose of the district and the comprehensive plan map and policies. ^ The Furniture Row retail furniture business fits into the Conunity shopping center concept given its size and scale. The rapidly growing residential community of Central Point demands a home furnishing retail business which this use readily provides. Site Plan in approving, conditionally approving or denying the plans submitted, the City bases it's decision on the following standards from Section 17.72.fl40: A. Landscaping and fencing and the construction of walls on the site in such a manner as to cause the same to not substantially interfere with the landscaping scheme of the neighborhood, and in such a manner to use the same to screen such activities and sights as rnig~it be heterogeneous to existing neighborhood uses. The Commission may require the maintenance of existing plants or the installation of new one for purposes of screening adjoining property. ^ The applicant has agreed to submit more detailed landscaping and irrigation plans to the City as a condition of approval, Trees will be included in the plans. B, Design, number and location of ingress and egress points so as to improve and to avoid interference with the traffic flow on public streets; ^ The project will access Mountain View Plaza Drive via a common 30 foot wide driveway which is acceptable to the City and affected service providers, C. To provide off~street parking and loading facilities and pedestrian and vehicle flow facilities in such a manner as is compatible with the use for which the site is proposed to be used. and capable ofuse, and in such a manner as to improve and avoid interference with the traffic flow on public streets; ^ The project meets the minimurr- parking requirements of CPMC 17.b5.050, Table 3 which stipulates 1 spaces for every 500 square feet. D, Signs and other outdoor advertising structures to ensure that they do not conflict with or deter from traffic control signs or devices and that they are compatible with the design of their buildings or uses and will not interfere with or detract from the appearance or visibility of nearby signs; ^ There is individual signage proposed far each store front and a common freeway oriented sign associated with this project. The CPMC will require that building permits be taken for the signs and staff will require an overall sign `package' from the developer to serve as a guide for installation. E, Accessibility and sufficiency of fire fighting facilities to such a standard as to provide for the reasonable safety of life, limb and property, including, fret not limited to, suitable gates, access roads and fire lanes so that all buildings on the premises are accessible to fire apparatus, `rW 1 ^ The project, if approved would need to meet any requirements of Jackson County Fire District 3. F. Compliance with all city ordinances and regulations; ^ The proposed construction meets the minimum setback requirements for the C-~ District. G. Compliance with such architocturo and design standards as to pravido aesthetic accoptability in relation to the noighborhood and the Central Point area and it's environs. ^ The proposed structure is similar in architecture to other buildings that have been constructed in Mountain View Pima. fn fact the unique architecture and building orientation will present an attractive facade along the freeway and will mask the backside of the Albertsons building. Recommendation Staffrocommends that tho Planning Commission take one ofthe fallowing actions: 1. Adapt Resolution No.~, approving the Site Plan application far the 53,440 square foot retail furniture complex, based on the Endings of fact contained in the retard and subject to the recammondod conditions of approval {Exhibits C); or 2, Deny the proposed Site Plan Review applicatian; or 3. Continuo the review of the Site Plan Review applicatian at the discretion of the Cammzss~an. Exhibits A. Site Plan, Landscaping Plan and Building Elevations B. 1'4Iotice of Public Roaring C, Rocommendod Conditions of Approval D. Carrospondenco ~~ xv"'nom+a~rz n cs ,..~~' ~.../ av~usT z, zoos as.~ MCG,.ICSB #~ Rgy153QN8 i5-~ StA>~ YAFCJ 8E'~~CK ~,.w ... P,U1LI) IN~i ~~ ppS's~ BUILCY EL2Utt~c~ PAF~KN4 P~{}~Il[1E ~vtr~~ Ph4tKIN~ y~p'Ctt3 Pk~ 70t~~ RELC~A p ULT RNi-~~~~. t~~~g~~'~c~N a~ ~ ~~t ll~i } 1~ ~~ ~~~TRAL. Qty G F~1'~ .~ p;ukvmy, Suva ~ $ Culacsdia g011't~~ ~~ ~ai~e~.~~ i .lip' _ -~ ,° e ~_ ~_ _ ee~ .~ _.. ~srr Bt~TT©M CHA{ R 40" ~3"x (trr ZH ,~Hx ~H `-V» ,y ee~~ C 1.4r'"~7 I f.J`VH SEAT' OF CHAIR ~Hx ,~H .OHO ALUMINUM ~II~ 4H 4$" V~" •MTOV~N(T•l~N~yGrt f y}}~ f 1.!'1i ~, YT/ fll`44Si1.fii 6H BELOW GRADE tCRETE FOOTING Td BE DETERMINED SPEC1FtCATIC~I'+]S; 8" FABRICATE (3), NEW, NON-ILCUMtNATED CHAIR SCULPTURE/MONUMENTSZGN. CHAIRS Td BE FABRICATED FRdM ALUMINUM AS PER SPECS ABOVE. CHAIRS TO BE SHOP-WELDE© PRIOR Td PRtMiNG ANC3 PAINTING. ALUMINUM WALL THICKNESS OF BdTTOM CHAIR Td BE .375", WITH MOUNTING PLATES dN EACH dF THE FOUR LEGS, WHICH WILL BE MOUNTED TO A 65Hx 66" CONCRETE PAD WITH ANCHOR BdLTS. CHAIRS Td BE PAINTED BENJAMIN MdORE #2088-20 COUNTRY LANE. STRUCTURE Td BE 25r OVERALL HEIGHT ,~ ~x gip; ;~ ~~,~ ~. ~~~` ~, ~ ~~ ,,~~,, ~ .; www.e.pltsts{gres.ea~u '"`~""' xzi il. isTM iF~#FT-~uc.nu,~a tKu ~~ ~'^ 't w:~ln'. ~, '..~.~ !y~ .:. .y~ t ~t ~ is's ~ 1'~q ~NEGfl~ Planning Director 1Cen Gerscl7ler Corr~rnunity Planner Dave Arkens Planning Technician Lisa Mangan Planning Secretary l~Totice of Public ~1~Ieet~ng mate of Notice: September 163 2043 Meeting Date; October'7, 2(}03 Time; ?;00 p.m. {Approximate} Place; Central Point City Hall 1.55 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon NATURE OF MEETING ,w. Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Paint Plaa:uw~~g Commission will review a site plan application fora 53,(104 square foot fixrniture store in the Mountain View Playa commercial development The subject parcel is inthe C-4,'I'ourist and Offic<: Professional District and. is identified in the records cif ~e Jackson County Assessor as Map 37 2W 42D, Tax Lot 1300 The Central Point Planning Commission will review the site plan application to determine ifall of the requirements of the Central Point Municipal Code can be met. If the Commission determines that the application meets the City's standards, an approval could be issued. CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for site plan review are set forth in Chapter 1'7 cif the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to Cseneral Information and conditions on the project approval. PUBLIC COMMENTS l . Any personinterested incommenting onthe above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, October '7, 2003. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance ofthe meeting to Central Paint City Hall, i 55 South Second Street, Central Point, OR 9'75{}2. ~ ~~ ATTACHMENT C RECOMMENDED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL l . The approval of the Site Plan shall expire in one year on f)ctober 8, 2~~4 unless an application for a building permit ar an application for extension has been received. by the City. 2. The project must carnpiy with all applicable local, state and federal regulations including those of RVSS and FI7#3, 3. The applicant shall submit a more detailed landscape and irrigation plan far City review and approval in conjunction with building permit inspection and site improvements. 4. The applicant shall prepare and submit a complete sign `package' far review and approval by city staff prior to the issuance of any building permits for store front or freeway signs. . ~ -~ i~ ~ ,tt~y~- ~V ~° J J~~r ~~ R~CI~E VALLEY ~r~WER. ERV~~~S ~.ocation: l38 West Vitas Road, Central Point -Mailing Address: P.O. I3ox 3134, Central Point,C}R 9'75{12-0405 Tet. {541 } 664-63f74 or {541 } 779-4144 IiAX {541} b6tt-7171 u+zvw.R~TSS.us September 24, 2fl03 Ken Gerschler FAX 664-0384 City oFCentral Point Planning Department 155 South Second Street Central Paint, Oregon 975012 Re: Furniture Row USA, .File # 43063-SPR Dear I~.en, The property immediately West oFthe subject property Mountain View Plaza} is served by a series off' privately maintained sewer pump stations. The same type aF system can be used to serve the proposed development. This would require installation of a new pump station and an easement across the adjoining property. Alternately, the proposed development could be served by extending a gravity main from the interceptor which Grasses the Freeway slightly South aF the property. This extension could be designed to eliminate the existing private pump stations at Mountain'tTiew Plaza. All sewer Ganstruction must be done in accordance with RVS standards, Feel free to call me iF you have any questions regarding sewer service to this project. Sincerely, -~_--- Carl Tappert, P.E. District Engineer K.:~DATAIAGENCIESiCENTPT1PLAl~1NG1SITEPLANREVIEW103463- SP12~FURNITURERO~TUSA.DC}C ;~ September ~.8~ 2Q~3 City of Central Point Ken Cerschler~Planner S ,~~c~.son Coun~;y Fire Dist~i~ ~a. ~ S3 3 3 Abate Road White City oR 97~03~~.07~ (5~~.~ 826=77~~© ~voice~ ~5~1~ 826-566 ~fax~ ~~~~~~~~ c~~r o~ r~~a~r~. ~o~~~ S~~ 2~ /4 203 PIAt~t~#IN 9d` Stttl.~34NG Pt1BE.lC wcx~xs DEPT d Fire District ~~ Comments for the fcrllbwing project proposed in T`he City of Central Point, McUonatds addition: * ~~ additional water supply will be required. *Maintain access around the building, Wad mart, - Complete se-~ v~ puns will be required for our review, • Access, water supply and suppression systems shall be the major topic of our review, Duncan Deveiopmenti - Access looks pretty g©od - 300 foot average Fire hydrants spacing, Try and place near intersection corners, David Spruill development B~urcell Raad. Fire Nydra~nt locations need to be verified and approved by the fire district, Snov~y Butte Station..; Additional water supply and possible dire suppression and alarm systems may be required depending o construction issues, o3of 3 ~ spr project: Furniture RQ~v building', Complete plans shall be submitted fvr our review. Possible dire suppression and alarm systems may be required for this type ©f building. ~~~ Mark Moran deputy Fire Ntarshal ~~ ~.~ads k:riC Niemc3'crr ~'~ 7'ra}J!C do 3~evEtapracnt Ertgin~x ~{i0 AntetaQe Fto~d Wfilte City. OR 97503 Phone: {5~~} 77a-ez~0 ~3~ {541 } 77d.fi295 ntemeyei®J~cic~~~~~tY•~9 ~. o ~ ~ s wYrw.jacksoncrnsn#y.or~8 September'#7, 2flt~3 Attet~#ion: Torn Humphrey City of Central Paint Planning 155 South Second Street Central Poin#, UR 975fl2 'i~E: Development off Freeman Road ~ a city-maintained portion of road. Planning File: 013463-SPR; Furniture Store. Dear iillr, Humphrey: Thank you for the op~rortunity to commen# on this application fora Site Plan Review off Freeman Rand. Roads and Parks has no comment. if yao have any questions or Head further information feel free #o call me at 774-fl230. Sinc rely, 1=ric Niemeyer, PE "Craftic & development Engineer ~~ ~:~a~n~~rin~t~~~,~crr~~c~re~.~no~~s~-s~~. August 28, 2(}(}3 Mr. Tam Humphrey Planning Director City of Central Point 155 South Second Central Paint, Oregon 9'752 Dear Mr. Humphrey; ~ri ~~~~~~~ ~' P`C7VV ctarnparlit3s ~utniture Raw U5A, ~I.C 13333 E. 37th Avenue Dtnvcr, CO 84239 t. 303. 371. 8564 f. 303. 371. 9420 It was nice meeting with you and other Central Point off°icials recently to discuss Furniture Row USA's proposed retail furniture store within the Mountain View Shopping Center. We are very excited about the prospect of coming to Central Paint, Attached you will find our "Site Plan Review Application" along with the required documents. Our intent is to acquire the 4.7 acre site (parcel 3} and to construct a 53,44(} square foot retail furniture stare. We would be bringing four of our retail furniture concepts to Central Point. They are Oak Express, Bedroom Expressions, Denver Mattress, and Sofa Mart. Each individual store would have its own entrance and signage. The building would be 53,44fl square feet and would be approximately 42' tall in the middle clerestory bay, The building design calls for architectural metal panels and an upgraded standing seam roof C~}ther materials utilized to construct the four store fronts include, metal, glass, EFIS, and wood. The landscaping plan calls for numerous areas of planted shrubs. The irrigation plan to accommodate the landscaping will be provided at a later date. While retail furniture sales is not specifically spelled out as a permitted use within the C- 4zoning district, the C-4 zoning ordinance states that, "other uses not specified in this or any other district {maybe allowed} if the planning commission finds them to be similar to the uses listed above and compatible with other permitted uses and compatible} with the intent of the C-4 district". We feel that our proposed use (retail furniture sales) is compatible with other C-4 uses in this area and would provide a compliment to other existing retailers. We feel that our low traffic pattern {2.2 parking spaces/1,(l(}{} square feet) is also beneficial for this area. We would be happy to answer any questions that you have regarding our submission package and are hopeful that we will be on the October 7`~ Planning and Zoning Commission agenda for consideration. Thank you, Richard D. Moreau Real Estate Furniture Row Companies c- ~U City of Central Point ~zt~ P~anni~~g {Jf~c~ Tom Humphrey, AICP Planning Director Ken Gerschler Community Planner Matt Samitore Community Planner Dave Arkens Planning Technician June 26, 2003 Mr. Chuck Martinez Commercial Property Advisors 744 Cardley Avenue, Suite 100 Medford, Oregon 97504 Dear Chuck: I arrz pleased to learn. that you are talking with a large commercial fiurnit~zre xetailer and that they are considering the City of Central Point as a candidate location far their business. It is my understanding that they are considering tl-e property behveen the local Albertsans store and Interstate-5, a site that is approximately four acres in area. The property is zoned C-4, Tourist and Office Professional,and as you have noted in our conversations, retail furniture sales is not specifically spelled out as a permitted use. The ordinance states that, other uses not specified in this or any other district {may be allowed) if the planning commission~nds them to be snnitar to the uses listed above and compatible with other permitted uses and {compatible) with the intent of the C 4 district. Retail furniture sales are a permitted use in the C-5 zoning district so it would be hard to make the case that the use is not specified elsewhere, However, the City is certainly willing to discuss the matter further with your clients to determine whether findings of similarity and compatibility can be made or whether a zone change would be snore appropriate. Traffic generation will also be another important consideration given the location of the property and other uses existing and proposed on site. I would be happy to schedule an appointment with your clients when they are in the Medford area and can be reached at (541) 664-3321 ext 230. AICP Planni'~g Director C, Phil Messina, Cit Administrator 155 ~. Secand Street ~ Central Paint, C}Pti 975(}2 « 541 664-3321 ~ FAX 541 664-0384