Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - September 2, 2003CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA September 2, 2003 - 7:00 p.m. ® @ Q Next Planning Commission Resolution No. 587 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Chuck Piland -Candy Fish, Don Foster, Paul Lunte, Connie Moczygemba, Rick Perry and Wayne Riggs III. CORRESPONDENCE IV. MINUTES A. Review and approval of August 19, 2003, Planning Commission Minutes VI. PUBLIC APPEARANCES VI. BUSINESS A. Public hearing to review a Tentative Plan application for Snowy Butte Station Subdivision. The proposed development is located in the vicinity of Ash Street and Highway 99. This Master Plan would create 891ots with TOD-GC, TOD-MMR , R-3 and Civic zoning designations. Pages 1-19 B. Public hearing to review a Tentative Plan application for Coffin Subdivision. The proposed subdivision is located off of Beall Lane within a R-2 ,Residential Two Family District. This partition would divide two existing tax lots into four separate tax lots. Pages 20-34 C. Public hearing to review a Tentative Plan application for Hamrick Business Park. The proposed commercial and industrial subdivision is located south of Biddle Road and east of Hamrick Road. This parcel consists of 34.89 acres and would create seven lots. Pages 35-48 Pc09022003 VII. MISCELLANEOUS VIII. ADJOURNMENT Pc09022003 City of Central Point Planning Commission Minutes August 19, 2003 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 P.M. II. ROLL CALL: Chairman Chuck Piland, Candy Fish, Don Foster, Paul Lunte, Connie Moczygemba, and Rick Perry were present. Wayne Riggs was absent. Also in attendance were Tom Humphrey, Planning Director; Ken Gerschler, Community Planner; and Lisa Morgan, Planning Secretary. III. CORRESPONDENCE There was no correspondence. IV. MINUTES Commissioner Lunte made a motion to approve the minutes from the August 5, 2003 meeting, with two corrections. 1) Paul Lunte had items stolen from his classroom, not his car. 2) Ou Resolution 586, Commissioner Foster made the first motion for approval, and Commissioner Moczygemba, seconded the motion. Commissioner Foster seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Foster, yes; Lunte, yes; Moczygemba, yes; and Perry, yes; Motion passed. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances. VI. BUSINESS A. Public hearing to review zone text amendments that would create new zone designations named Parks/Open Space, and Civic. Tom Humphrey, Planning Director; presented the staff report for introducing two new zoning designations. He explained that this has been discussed with the Citizens Advisory Committee, and that the CAC recommended creating another zone category for Parks and Open Space. By creating the Parks and Open Space category, it would limit the types of buildings and uses of land with this designation. There was discussion to clarify the differences between Civic zoning and Parks and Open Planning Convnissiar Miarues August 19, 2003 Page 2 Space zoning, and the purpose of each category. Mr. Humphrey stated that these new zones would become part of the text. The Planning Commission will be making recommendations to the Council with 2 readings before an ordinance is passed. The Planning Commission recommended that Fraternal Organizations and Non-Profit Organizations be included as Conditional Uses under Civic zoning, (should not be under Parks and Open Space zoning) and to remove the last sentence under the Purpose section in the Parks and Open Space zoning. Commissioner Fish made a motion to adopt Resolution 587, approving a recommendation to the City Council amending the Zone text to include Parks and Open Space zoning and Civic zoning with Fraternal Organizations and Non-Profit Organizations added as a Conditional Use under Civic zoning. Commissioner Lunte seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: The motion pass unanimously. B. Public hearing to review an application for Comprehensive Plan and zoning map amendments for residential and commercial properties in the vicinity of the North Tenth Street and Scenic Avenue intersection. The proposed modifications would change a number of residential parcels to Parks and Open Space or high density comprehensive map and zone map designations. The tax lots are identified in the records of Jackson County as Maps 372WOAA Tax Lot 4400, 372W03AB Tax Lots 4300 thru 5000, 372W03AC Tax Lot 100 & 9900, 372W03AD Tax Lot 100 and 372W03BA Tax Lot 100. Ken Gerschler, Community Planner; presented the Planning Department staff report. He asked that the audience keep in mind that this is only a recommendation to the City Council, and that there would be more opportunity to offer public input for the record at the Council meetings. Commissioner Piland opened the public portion of the meeting. Many residents in the vicinity of this proposed zone change spoke inopposition of re-zoning to a higher density. Most were in favor of the recommended re-designation of Scenic Middle School as Civic Zoning. There were two letters submitted for public record, and aninety-nine signature petition, both in opposition of the proposed R-3 higher density zoning in the area. Plaiiiiing Commission Minutes ~fugust 19, 2003 Page 3 A number of area residents provided insight regarding the issue of increased density that would come with the proposed changes. The most common concerns included the present poor condition of Scenic Avenue and the feeling that higher density was not necessarily compatible with the existing neighborhood. Residents pointed out that higher density development in this area would increase traffic, compromise the privacy of back yards and create a loss of open space between their homes and Scenic Middle School. Lee Brennan, of Agate Engineering spoke on behalf of the Housing Authority of Jackson County. The Housing Authority would like to develop the area with higher density affordable housing units. Mr. Brennan felt that a higher density would be a good fit in this area and asked the Planning Director if the adjoining roads were arterial roads. After confirming that the roads were arterial, Mr. Brennan and Planning Director Humphrey agreed that the arterial road location is ideal for a high density development since it provides increased transit opportunity. Mr. Brennan submitted a power point presentation of properties presently maintained by the Housing Authority to demonstrate how affordable housing can be designed to complement a neighborhood while meeting a housing need in the community. The presentation showed pictures of affordable housing developments throughout Oregon and California where the units included nice homes that are well cared for and architecturally pleasing. Additional comments were taken from area residents, all concurring with previously mentioned. Chairman Piland called a five minute break at 8:40 P.M. Greg Jones, a property owner located within 2e area, submitted illustrations of what he would like to do with his lot located on North Third. Mr. Jones stated that as a land owner, the C-N Commercial Neighborhood had not worked as well as he had liked. He explained that they just don't get enough traffic to be successful especially since the Upton Road/Interstate Five interchange never developed Mr. Jones feels that he and others would make better use of their land with a R-3 zone. Tom Szczesniak, property owner within the current C-N zone, stated that he would like to have the zone changed to R-3. Mr. Szczesniak stated that several businesses have tried in this area and didn't survive. He explained that in the event of a fire, the non-conforming zoning status would mean that he would not be able to replace an existing residence with anything less than a commercial building. Mr. Humphrey, Planning Director, would like to see more public input on this area by referring this item back to the Citizens Advisory Committee. He encouraged neighbors to attend the CAC meeting that would be scheduled as early as September. He would also like to take a look at street and infrastructure improvement costs. Planning Can»tissiar Minutes August 19, 2003 Page 5 Commissioner Fish showed concern that a rezone of the Ritter parcel would essentially reduce the value of her land when compared to the real market value that a developer might pay in the future. The Commission discussed the issue and decided to not recommend the zone change until a later date when some sort of assurance could be made on the Ritters behalf. Commissioner Fish made a motion to adopt Resolution 590, recommending that areas 4a and 4b be changed from R-1-8 to R-1-6, Residential Single Family zoning. Commissioner Moczygemba seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: The motion pass unanimously. D. Public hearing to review an application for Comprehensive Plan and zoning map amendments for residential properties in the vicinity of the Hamrick Road/West Vilas curve near the I.O.O.F. cemetery. The proposed modifications would change three residential parcels to Park and Open Space designations. The tax lots are identified in the records of Jackson County as Maps 372W11BA Tax Lot 1100, 372W11BB Tax Lots 1000 and 1100. Ken Gerschler, Community Planner, presented the Planning Department staff report. There were only a couple of comments for this item, which addressed concerns such as impact of the proposed changes on property values, and maintenance of the area which is occasionally littered with garbage. Mr. Chuck Root, of Rogue Valley Sewer Service, spoke earlier in the meeting and is in favor of the Civic zoning for their property which is located to the North of West Vilas Road. Commissioner Lunte made a motion to adopt Resolution 591, recommending the proposed zone changes for area 1, as indicated. Commissioner Mocygemba seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: The motion pass unanimously. E. Public hearing to review an application for Comprehensive Plan and zoning map amendments for the area known as Snowy Butte Station. The subject parcels are located near the intersection of Haskell Street and Highway 99. The proposed modifications would change five tax lots as part of a Master Plan for the vicinity. The tax lots are identified in the records of Jackson County as Maps 372W10AD Tax Lots 1200, 1300, 700, 800, and 9400. Tom Humphrey, Planning Director, presented the Planning Department Staff Report. He explained that east of Haskell will remain industrial, and the west side will be exclusive commercial. Plairning Commission Minutes August /9, 2003 Page 6 Craig Stone, of Stone & Associates, representing the applicants stated that this is a collection of various land uses. Most were in favor of this proposed development in that area, because it is a good use of land, and will help balance the City. There were questions about flooding for structures along Daisy Creek in the R-3 zoning area, additional access to Chicory Lane, access issues including an additional railroad crossing. Mr. Stone, spoke in response to the concerns mentioned as follows: A) Flooding -There will be technical studies completed regarding the impact of removing berms, and will speak with the McDowell's (property owners) regarding the location of the Parks and Open Space through the center of the R-3 zoning. B) There will not be access to Chicory Lane. Haskell Street will extend and the developers have designed their portion of the road in a manner that it will eventually go through to Beall Lane. C) Railroad crossings can not be forced by the developer and are often difficult to get and Mr. Stone stated that in his experience, you in most cases have to forfeit one crossing to gain another one. Mr. Humphrey asked Mr. Stone, if they had any objections in designating the proposed church site as Civic Zoning. Mr. Stone did not object to that. Commissioner Perry made a motion to adopt Resolution 592, recommending the proposed zone changes for Snowy Butte Station area, with the proposed Church site zoned as Civic. Commissioner Mocygemba seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: The motion pass unanimously. VII. MISCELLANEOUS Mr. Humphrey said that the City is currently taking landscaping bids for the area surrounding the Central Point Gateway sign. VIII. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Lunte made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner Moczygemba seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Motion passed unanimously. Meeting was adjourned at 11:30 P.M. PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: September 2, 2003 TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: Tom Humphrey AICP, Planning Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing - To consider a Tentative Plan fora 98-lot subdivision known as Snowy Butte Station, located west of Highway 99 and south of Pine Street on the site of the former Central Point Lumber Company. The property is proposed for rezoning to R-3, Residential Multiple-Family; TOD-LMR; TOD-MMR; TOD-OC; Civic and Parks/Open Space. Applicant/ Owner: Investors II, LLC P.O. Box 8271 Medford, Oregon 97504 Larry & Marilyn McDowell 5704 Adams Road Talent, Oregon 97540 Agent: Craig A. Stone & Associates, Ltd. 708 Cardley Avenue Medford, Oregon 97504 Summary: The applicants have submitted a development proposal to subdivide 35.8 acres of land into eighty three single family residential lots; four multi- familyresidential lots; three commercial lots; two light industrial lots; five park lots and one civic lot for a future church. The subdivision is part of a planned community, the master plan from which has been used to guide this subdivision request. This majority of this property is located in the Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Corridor District. However there are two parcels, owned by the McDowells, just outside the TOD Corridor boundary to the west. Authority: CPMC 1.24.050 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a Tentative Plan. Notice of the Public Hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060 (Attachment B). Applicable Law: CPMC 16.10.010 et seq. -Tentative Plans CPMC 17.65 et seq. -TOD Districts and Corridors ~~ Discussion: Snowy Butte Station is located in the area of the old Central Point lumber mill which is in the process of being cleaned up for redevelopment. The City Council recently annexed the McDowell property and also authorized the vacation unimproved right-of--way for portions of Ash Street, Amy Way and Chicory Lane. The Planning Commission considered Comprehensive Plan and zoning amendments at their last meeting, so any action taken on the tentative plan would need to be contingent upon Council approval of those plan and zoning amendments. The Planning and Public Works Departments have reviewed the tentative plan for compliance with the TOD Design Requirements and with the City's engineering standards and specifications. The area is designated for low and medium mix residential development, general commercial development (which allows both retail and light manufacturing uses), and more traditional multi- familyresidential uses. The subdivision meets the minimum and maximum lot allowance for the each of the zoning districts being proposed. The Department of Public Works has stated that, the street geometry indicated on the tentative plan does not necessarily represent the final design (refer to Attachment E). Therefore the applicant should expect to consult and coordinate with City staff during engineering design and prior to final plat approval. Parks and open space uses have been shown throughout the proposed development, however none of the areas have been assigned separate lot numbers. Even though the land will be dedicated to the City, the sites will become their own tax lots and should be designated as such. The TOD guidelines require that a given amount of land be reserved in parks and open space depending upon the land use. The applicant's plan dedicates 3.73 acres to open space made up of small pocket parks, landscaped buffers and one large park along Daisy Creek. The park land the applicants have assigned appears to meet the City's requirements. The Master Plan for the area (Attachment C) shows an overall circulation layout including future street connections, right-of--way reservations and various alley access and pedestrian accesses. Haskell Street is expected to extend through this site to the Cascade Meadows PUD. This will be dependent upon the development of the tax lots in between but the connection is part of the Central Point TSP. The Cedar Street right-of--way reservation relies on the prospect that there will be a new railroad crossing from Haskell to Front Street. This is uncertain but the reservation makes sense. The Cheney Loop will connect to Rochelle Court and Ash Street shows an alignment with Snowy Butte Road. McLaughlin Court abuts but will not connect to Chicory Lane. The construction of a bridge over Daisy Creek is not contemplated as part of this development but could become a City project at a later date. There are land locked parcels north of the Daisy Creek bridge that the applicant is willing to provide access to via a narrow street from Haskell to the property. Staff recommends that this be made a condition of approval and that the applicant and public works staff collaborate on this modification to the tentative plan. The Rogue River Valley Irrigation District, Jackson County Fire District Number 3, and Rogue Valley Sewer Services have been notified of the this tentative subdivision. Fire District #3 has asked for a complete set of plans showing proposed fire hydrant locations and access. a~~ The Public Works Department has provided their comments, reconunendations and requirements for this application which can be found in Attachment E. FindinES of Fact and Conclusions of Law Staff suggests the following findings of fact and conclusions of law as applicable to the project and necessary for its approval. 1. The project site is located in the TOD-Corridor and increases residential and mixed use land use efficiency in this area. The proposed tentative plan for low and medium mix residential development, general commercial, park and civic zoning is a permitted use in the TOD zoning district. The zoning in turn is consistent with the TOD Comprehensive Plan map designation. The Comprehensive Plan encourages innovative residential planning and development techniques that will help to increase land use efficiency and reduce costs of utilities and services (Comprehensive Plan, page XII-12). 2. The project consists of a tentative plan application for the subdivision of approximately 35.8 acres for the purpose of developing a mixed use development. The total number of lots proposed is 93 together with five other lots totaling 3.73 acres of Open Space. The proposed mixed use subdivision meets the density requirement for the TOD-LMR (Low Mix Residential) and TOD-MMR (Medium Mix Residential) Zoning District. Each lot within the subdivision meets the requirements of the TOD Design Requirements and Guidelines. The tentative plan includes all information required by CPMC 16.10.010 et. seq. 3. The Planning and Public Works Departments have reviewed both the tentative plan for the proposed subdivision and the findings of fact and determined that the project meets all City standards and requirements subject to the recommended conditions found in Attachments E and F. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following action: 1. Adopt Resolution No., approving the tentative subdivision subject to the recommended conditions of approval; or 2. Deny the tentative subdivision; or 3. Continue the review of the tentative subdivision at the discretion of the Commission. \\CPCHSt\CITY WIDE\PLANNING\03036TP.DOC . .. ~e Attachments: A. Copy of Tentative Plat B. Notice of Public Hearing C. Master Plan D. Correspondence Received from Affected Agencies E. Public Works Staff Report F. Planning Department Recommended Conditions of Approval \\CPCHSI\CITY WIDE\PLANNING\03036TP.DOC d :~ ATTACHMENT F PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall submit to the City a copy of the proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs) for Snowy Butte Station. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of affected public agencies and utilities as they pertain to the development of Snowy Butte Station. Evidence of such compliance shall be submitted to the City prior to final plat approval. 3. The applicant shall comply with all federal, state and local regulations, standards and requirements applicable to the development and construction of Snowy Butte Station. 4. The applicant shall collaborate with the Planning and Public Works Departments and then submit documents showing the dedication ofright-of--way for a new street into an adjoining land-locked multi-family property, prior to final plat approval. Said new street will not adversely affect the applicants plans to develop their multi-family parcel. A final plat application shall be filed within one year of the Planning Commission approval or the tentative plan approval shall become null and void. The applicant may request a twelve month extension with the Planning Department. \\CPCHSI\C[TY WIDEU'LANNING\03036TP.DOC ®e.~ /t l.elt e~esa~. ~~ Cify of Central Poinf ~~ Tom Humphrey, AICP Planning Director Ken Gerschler Community Planner Matt Samitore Community Planner Meeting Date: Time: Place: Lisa Morgan Planning Secretary NATURE OF MEETING Notice of Meeting Date of Notice: August 12, 2003 PLANNING September 2, 2003 7:00 p.m. (Approximate) Central Point City Hall 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review a tentative subdivision application that would create 86 residential lots and approximately 150 multiple family dwellings on 15.43 acres; 8.99 acres of Commercial lots; and 6.86 acres of Parks and Civic uses with the remaining balance of land devoted to streets, public facilities and utilities for a total of 35.79 acres. The location of this subdivision is west of South Front Street and east of Glenn Way. The parcel is located in the TOD-GC, General Commercial; TOD-LMR, Low Mix Residential (proposed); and TOD-MMR, Medium Mix Residential (proposed) zoning districts and is.identified in the records of the Jackson County Assessor as Map 37 2W l OAD, Tax Lots 100, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 1100, 1200, 1300; 37 2W 11C, Tax Lot 9400; 37 2W 11BC, Tax Lots 4500, 4600. CRTI'ERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for Tentative Subdivisions are set forth in Chapter 16 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Provisions, Tentative Plans, Improvements, and Design Standards. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Works Standards. PUBLIC COMMENTS Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, September 2, 2003. 2. Written comments maybe sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502. 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appear./l1 on the. matters shall be raised prior to the l v ~Ip expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Ha11,155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page. 5. -For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664- 3321 ext. 292. SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staff reports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the application. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. ~/ `~\~ r~~~ ~z~_ =5;:; ~. ~ ~ ,~' ~~"'~ ~" \<qtF `~c.~f~~. G. 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 ~ (541).664-3321 ~ Fax: (541) 664-6384 ~~ Craig A. Stone & Associates, Ll U. MOtlLBfO iG Assoc 708 Cartlley Avenue, Medfortl, Or. 97504 802 Nadia Way, Medf (541)779-0569 (541) 779-0771 6200 O~ ~oo 4s00 )r. 97504 P.O. Boz 8271, Med(artl, Or. 97504 {:-\ (541) 77&5346 4zo6 \~ sao aaoo 400 ~ !\/ SNOWY BUTTIS ST`p AG \ / o~ v </ 4600 ~ \ ~~~~ 5000 ~ ~\\\v//' boob ~~ \/ 1"=300 7 / \ % /zao ' roo ~-~ soo ' \ usm \, .oq\~~ .i\ a06 a \ 2oa~. \ •tYn043]bfiRl ~ ~<tJ• ~ \ '• MFR •, i ~~' '~\ .. z0a \ 95,2845q Ff \. '~ ~~t`~i' ~~'\•COmmarclal boa ~.~ ~ •\ / \~ \ ">' `\ .^'."~' MFR \•• i!~: ~~~, \~ Industrial ~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~ J ~ \ ' .:rx~..:: soo (' 33,483 Sq Fl \ %~ j! \~~\ 465,66359 F1 .::. :. ~. -----T- ~ ..:::::::..~- MFR I ^I MFR \~\ \ :::~~~iri~~;'+"' \ ~~~`- \/ ~' 50,405 Sq Ft~ i 141,6288q F1 \ ~.~~~' •\'s,,, '•\ 1500 ~ ~ ~ j / `\ '\'%., '•, 1900 J l V \ \.' ~ ~. l ~: \/~.. ..~ zoos \ ^ ^ ~ % /\ 52 ~, /~FF~~TTi', i ,.~ .-~ z ao'4 \:.. '\:" j 1.,~~~, is ~~~~ / SA`R? 1_R"1-IlT1T-1-;/~. t~~: ! l\ ra<~+a sate i l l l l l l l l l % zao0 •\ !~ ~Ra ~i'; j.~~-._.}J.11.]~L-11.11.1Jv,/ 5zaa zboo \ % \. ~' %sTllT'TTfi'1'fRT-1"Tr'fT~••~'; ~ i. < i~ `o„„i I I I I js,, ,~rii I i i V I '~ ' ~aaa0 GJ. zsoo ^~' j.~\ .J-.LILLILIJ.II-LL-l1J~ .a r~ ~y"WYL soo ~,. \.' \~. aaoa 'y,L z a0 191,398 Ft $FR -_ ~ r ~ ~ ~ : ~~: 21, 89 Ft l ~6 ~ -L-- - i ~..- - -~-t- .)... '. soo soe s6n slo i6a r snn~or uu6 o sl ~ zoo "f-'- 60s 2 s66 s1z --, sob y sla ao0 ~, : ~ k4;BPi Sq Ft I P+rk\, \. ~'~,\ 503 s01 y .L..-1-. ~. -I -.L ~. _\ ~~~ ~~~ O 514 aOB 8300 B40O s62 LNDSF,Y 10 COUpT : 6~0 5)8 517 ' sO0 'l~0 S16 515 1400 1200 IIOO ~o60 900 600 laoa i~bo6F loon i aoo 1s0a nnlaD+v srnrer i soo ~f ~- Exhibit 2. CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT PLAN OREGON d' I A. Stone & Associates, LTD. Mort ardley Avenue, Medford, Or. 97504 802 t` 7730569 (541) 1 ~~\ 4 `\ ~, ``. ~.~`~'.':~fir:: :?f:r t"=460 ~' ~ _ Metlfortl, Or. 97504 _~ \ ATION TONM HOUSE ,...`:. `.. ~~'~~~~~~~~~~~~ :~ \~'\~~.' \`~ \ ~ SINGLE FAMILY HOME =;; r°' ~ight o7Way Reservation ~~ '\ p r f~'/rYy ~ `y A.D,U. UNITS .- \. _c~~°I~' 1--r-1-- I I __L SANDY LANE O ~ V W OI a ~ .... ~I ~.., i~ ~ --L-== `~- -L- 0 x LINDSEY Exhibit 2.2A PRELIMINARY PUD PLAN CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT PLAN CENTRAL POINT. OREGON Associates, LTD. Montero & Associates, LLC Galpin LLC - (Applican Metlfwd, Or. 97504 802 Natlia Way, Medford, Or. 97504 P.O. Box 8271, Metlfwd, Or. (541)779-0777 (541)77}5346 t-170' Exhibit 2.L6 PRELIMINARY PUD PLAN CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT PLAN CENTRAL POINT. OREGON 0812?/2003 16:18 8264566 JCFD3 BUS OFC PAGE 02 s°9 ~ ~ ~ZRE DZST~ICT' No. 3 JACKSON COUNTY 8333 AGATE ROAD, WHITE CITY, OREGON 97503-1075 (541) 826-7100 FAK (541) 826-4566 www~icfd3.com August 27, 2003 Ken Gerschler, Fire D'sstrict ~3 will need compete sets o~ plans~to scale for these projects showing fire hydrant locations and access. Mark Moran Deputy Fire Marshal e~ ~y~~'`~' o~ .L~Av` August 27, 2003 o Cit - of Central Point - ? Public Works De artment a~ Robed Pierce +~ Public Works Director TO: Planning Commission FROM: Public Works Department SUBJECT: Public Hearing -Site Plan Review for 37 2W 10AD Tax Lots 1200 & 1300 Snowy Butte Station Apnlicant Investors II, LLC P.O. Box 8271 Medford, Oregon 97504 Owner Larry J. and Marilyn E. McDowell 5704 Adams Road Talent, Oregon 97544 Agent Craig A. Stone and Associates, Ltd. 708 Cardley Avenue Medford, Oregon 97504 Pronerty 37 2W l OAD Tax Lots 1200 & 1300 Description) zoning Purpose Rick Bartlett Supervisor Chris Clayton Deputy Director Mike Ono Technician Greg Graves Technician Karen Roeber Secretary II Alargari(a Munoz Secretory ] Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer") regarding City Public Works Department (PWD) standazds, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed. Gather information from the Developer/Engineer regarding the proposed development. ~~ - 2 September 2003 Snowy Butte Station A City of Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report is not intended to replace the City's Standards & Specifications. Staff Reports are written in coordination with the City's Standards & Specifications to form a useful guide. The City's Standards & Specifications should be consulted for any information not contained in a Public Works Staff Report. Snowy Butte Station Standard Specifications and Goals The Central Point Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction" shall govern how public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications from the Public Works Department. Central Point Public Works is committed to working with the Planning Department and developers to assure that all developments are adequately served by public facilities. Public facilities not owned or maintained by the City of Central Point include: Power (PP&L), Gas (Avista), Communications (Qwest), and Sanitary Sewer (BCVSA). In working together it is the Department's expectation that the developer will feel free to call on the Department whenever the standard specifications are not, in the developer's opinion, adequately meeting the needs of the development. The Department will listen to the developer's concerns and work with the developer to achieve the best outcome. However, the Department is not obligated to assure a profitable development and will not sacrifice quality for the sole purpose of reducing cost to the developer. It is always the developer's obligation to provide the public improvements necessary, as determined by the Public Works Department, to serve the development. The Department and the developer also have an obligation to assure that public facilities are constructed so that other properties are not adversely impacted by the development. Development Plans -Required Information Review of public improvement plans is initiated by the submittal of 3 sets of plans that are at least 95% complete. The plans shall include those of other agencies such as BCVSA or Jackson County Roads Department. Following plan review, the plans will be returned to the Developer's engineer including comments from Public Works Staff. In order to be entitled to further review, the Applicant's Engineer must respond to each comment of the prior review. All submittals and responses to comments must appear throughout the plans to be a realistic attempt to result in complete plan approval. Upon approval, the Applicant's Engineer shall submit (4) copies of the plans to the Department of Public Works. ~~ 2 September 2003 Snowy Butte Station _, In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, stone drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. Public Warks Permit A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued, except Public Works Inspection fees. After project completion during the final plat application process, the Public Works Inspector will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection time to assess the developer. Before the final plat application is processed the developer must pay the relevant inspections fees and bond for any uncompleted improvements (as determined by the Public Works Director). Snowy Butte Statio~z -Plans 1. Three sets of plans at 95% complete stage are to be submitted for review by the Public Works Department 2. Once approval is achieved the Developer shall submit four sets of plans to the Public Works Department for construction records and inspection, including a set of mylar drawings to be stamped, approved, and maintained by the City until final "As-built" drawing aze received. 3. The Developer's Engineer shall document changes to the approved drawings made in the field. A mylar and digital copy of the final "as-built" drawings will be required before the final plat application is processed. Snowy Butte Station -Protection of Existing Facilities The locations of existing facilities shall be shown on all applicable construction drawings for Public Works projects as follows: 1. The exact locations of underground facilities shall be verified in advance of any public works construction, in cooperation with the public or private utilities involved. 2. All existing underground and surface facilities shall be protected from damage during design and construction of public works projects. 3. Any existing facilities not specifically designated for alteration or removals, which are damaged during construction, shall be restored or replaced to a "same as" or better than condition, at the expense of the Developer. ~. J Z September 2003 Snowy Butte Station 4. Suitable notice shall be given to all public and private utility companies in advance of construction for the purpose of protecting or relocating existing facilities. Snowy Butte Station -Water Connection 1. Water system designs shall consider the existing water system, master plans; neighborhood plans and approved tentative plans. The Developer, Engineer and Contractor shall provide the necessary testing, exploration, survey and research to adequately design water system facilities, which will connect to and be a part of, or an extension of the City water system. 2. All requirements of the Oregon State Plumbing Specialty Code and the Oregon State Health Department, as they pertain to Public Water Systems, shall be strictly adhered to. 3. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of water system related components. Snowy Butte Station -Streets The Developer's engineer should be aware that certain alternate street standards for the Transit Oriented District and Transit Oriented Corridor might apply to the design and construction of streets in specific areas of the City. These alternate standards are fully described in the Central Point TOD Design Requirements and Guidelines. Street designs shall consider the needs of people with disabilities and the aged, such as visually impaired pedestrians and mobility-impaired pedestrians. Every effort should be made to locate street hardware away from pedestrian locations and provide a surface free of bumps and cracks, which create safety and mobility problems. Smooth access ramps shall be provided where required. All designs shall conform to the current American Disabilities Act (ADA) or as adopted by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The determination of the pavement width and total right-of--way shall be based on the operational needs for each street as determined by a technical analysis. The technical analysis shall use demand volumes that reflect the maximum number of pedestrians, bicyclists, parked vehicles and motorized vehicle traffic expected when the area using the street is fully developed. Technical analysis shall take into consideration, transportation elements of the Comprehensive Plan, TOD, neighborhood plans, approved tentative plans as well as existing commercial and residential developments. All street designs shall be coordinated with the design of other new or existing infrastructure. ~~ 2 September 2003 __.SnoviyButte Station 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of street related components. The Developer's engineer should be prepared to consult and coordinate the street design of the proposed development with City Public Works and Planning staff. The street geometry indicated on the tentative plan does not necessarily represent the final design. Final approval of improvement plans, including street design, geometry, and configuration shall be at the sole discretion of the City of Central Point. The Developer should also be aware their development may include improvements to existing City right- of-way adjacent to their proposed development, as determined by the City Administrator. Snowy Butte Station -Storm Drain 1. It shall be the responsibility of the Developer's Engineer to investigate the drainage area of the project, including the drainage areas of the channels or storm sewers entering and leaving the project area. If a contiguous annexed drainage area of given size exists, the engineer may use information that has formerly been established if it includes criteria for the drainage area at complete development under current zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations. If the City does not have such information, the engineer shall present satisfactory information to support his storm sewerage design. The engineer shall also be required to provide all hydrology and hydraulic computations to the Public Works Department that are necessary to substantiate the storm sewer design. The storm water sewer system design shall be in conformance with applicable provisions of Oregon DEQ, DSL and ODFW and United States COE and consistent with APWA Storm Water Phase II requirements. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of storm drain related components. Snowy Butte Station -Required Submittals All design, construction plans and specifications, and "as-built" drawings shall be prepared to acceptable professional standards as applicable, the Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals and conditions as may be required by other agencies, including, but not limited to Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL), Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) approval for storm drain connection and easement, landscape berms, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), affected irrigation districts, Rogue Valley Sanitary Service (RVSS), and Jackson County Road and Park Services Department (JC Roads), DSL and ACOE, as applicable (wetland mitigation). ~~ 2 September 2003 Snowy Butte Station_ 2. Fire District No. 3 must approve all streets and water improvement plans in writing prior to final review by City PWD. 3. During construction, any changes proposed by the Developer shall be subrnitted in writing by the Developer's Engineer to the City Public Works Department for approval prior to installation. PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: September 2, 2003 TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: Ken Gerschler, Community Planner SUBJECT: Public Hearing - To consider a Tentative Plan fora 4 lot subdivision known as the Coffin Partition, north of Beall Lane in the R-2 zoning district (Map 37 2W I IDD, Tax Lots16700 and 16800). Applicant/ Owner: Mel and Carol Coffin 520 Beall Lane Central Point, Oregon 97502 Agent: Timberline KKB Land Surveying P.O. Box 3064 Central Point, Oregon 97502 Summary: The applicant has submitted a development proposal to subdivide two existing tax lots into 4 residential lots. Authority: CPMC 1.24.050 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a Tentative Plan. Notice of the Public Hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060 ( Attachment "B"). Applicable Law: CPMC 16.10.010 et seq. -Tentative Plans CPMC 17.24 et seq. -R-2, Residential Two Family District CPMC 17.60.090 et seq. -Special Setback Requirements Discussion: The applicants, Mel and Carol Coffin are requesting that the Planning Commission approve a tentative plan to subdivide two existing lots with an aggregate total area of 1.32 acres into four individual parcels ranging in size from 7,700 to 17,607 square feet (Attachment "A"). Setbacks for the R-2 zone are 20 feet for front lot line, 5 feet per story on sides and 10 for rear lot lines. Iftwo-story structures are proposed, the side yard setback would increase to 10 feet. The maximum allowable height is 35 feet. Since Elk Creek traverses the parcel, a special setback will prohibit the conshuction of any structure within 25 feet of the top of the creek bank. The national wetlands inventory map has identified a large wetland in the vicinity which appears to overlay a portion of proposed parcel 2. The aerial photograph (Exhibit "F,") shows a swath of area in asemi-circular shape that may be classified as wetlands by the Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL). A small pond on the proposed parcel 2 that may also be considered as a part of the wetlands. The DSL has been notified of the proposed land partition and may request that development be limited on Parcel 2 or that any identified wetlands be mitigated on vacant land elsewhere in the Central Point area. There appears to be adequate area where a new house could be constructed away fi•om the wetlands area and the 100 year flood plain which is located adjacent to Elk Creek. The City is waiting for a final decision on revised flood map boundaries. Currently there are four buildings on tax lot 16700, a house, a shop and two storage sheds. One of the storage sheds will be removed and the shop will remain on the proposed parcel. number two. On tax lot 16800, there is a house, garage and an outbuilding. The outbuilding will be removed. The tentative plat map indicates that there is a 20 foot wide septic drainfield easement on the easterly boundary of parcel 2. The Planning Department recommends that the easement be extinguished and that all of the proposed parcels be connected to public sanitary sewer facilities. This has been made a condition of tentative approval (Attachment "D"). Access to proposed parcels 1 and 2 will occur via a twenty foot wide private driveway that connects onto Beall Lane. The code requires that the driveway serving parcel 2 be paved. Jackson County has jurisdiction of Beall Lane and may require mitigation and access management to reduce the total number of driveways onto Beall Lane. The Planning Department recommends that a cross access easement be recorded to benefit Parcels 1, 2 and 3. The easement would allow property owners to share the driveway for parcel 2 and provide access to off street parking facilities. The applicant will be required to pave the access road with a minimum weight capacity of 50,000 pounds to accommodate fire equipment. Parcel 4 would take its access directly from Beall Lane. Lot 4 will need to be adjusted in configuration in order to meet the 60 foot minimum lot requirement for the R-2 zone district. The Central Point Municipal Code requires that single family homes provide two off street covered parking spaces per dwelling unit. Parcel 1 will not meet the off-street parking requirement as a result of the partition since the existing shop at the rear of the property will be transferred to parcel 2. Although City staff will not require the construction of a garage or carport at this time, the applicant should be aware that any development application for the original house will "trigger" the garage to be built. It will be the responsibility of the property owner and the property owners' realtor to notify potential buyers of the off street covered parking requirements. The Rogue River Valley Inigation District, Jackson County Fire District Number 3 and the Rogue Valley Sewer services have been notified of the this tentative subdivision. Rogue Valley Sewer Services will work with the applicant in the design of infrastructure and tie the development into existing sewer facilities in Beall Lane. Fire Officials will require that the applicant provide a copy of maps with hydrant location for review by the district. The Public Works Department has indicated that there is water service available in the area and ., i~ ~. that a dedication of right of way will be necessary. Please refer to the Public Works Staff Report (Attachment "C") for details. Findines of Fact and Conclusions of Law Staff suggests the following findings of fact and conclusions of law as applicable to the project and necessary for its approval. CPMC 17.20.010 establishes minimum area, width and access requirements for the R-2, Residential Two-Family District. 1. The project site is located in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) and consists of a tentative plan application for the subdivision of approximately 1.32 acres into 4 separate lots. CPMC 16.10.010 requires that applications for tentative plans be submitted with improvement plans and other supplementary information as may be needed to indicate the development plan. 2. The Planning and Public Works Departments have reviewed both the tentative plan for the proposed subdivision and the findings of fact and determined that the project meets all City standards and requirements subject to the recommended conditions found in Attachments C and D. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following action: I. Adopt Resolution No._, approving the tentative partition subject to the recommended conditions of approval; or 2. Deny the tentative partition; or 3. Continue the review of the tentative partition at the discretion of the Commission. Attachments: A. Copy of Tentative Plat B. Notice of Public Hearing C. Public Works Staff Report D. Planning Department Recommended Conditions of Approval E. GIS Map/Photo showing potential wetlands F. Correspondence ~VCpchslACity WideVPlanningV03053 wpd C'~i5 :~+ €+/t _ -NTATIVE PARTITION PL ~1 CYty of CcttralPoint LOCATEp I1J Tt-IE 50UT1-iEAS7 I/A OF SECTI r-~T-,re-g~ri+ tt A tt T375, R2W, W.M. GITY OF CENTRAL POINT, L~S,_j'~,lL 1 ti COUNTY, OREGON JUNE 15, 2003 planning Department MAP PREPARED FOR f1EL AND CAROL CAfFIN 520 BEALL LANE CENTRAL POINT, ORE60N 97502 LEGEND -'-"'~ OJERHEAD LINES ------U9 WEST TELEPHONE 59 SANITARY SEWER wk WATERLINE D WATER ThETER ® SANITARY SEWER I'TANVkJLE FIRE HYDRANT }( PO.I£R POLE Oft LLTIiSTY PGLE ~ GATE VALVE ~ 7ELEFHONE PEDESTAL SCALE I°.30' SUBJECT PARCELS 372Wi1DD TAX LOTS 16700, 16800 f .. /G/~~`V1 KKB lil l~il l~ilN L4ND SURVEYING YERRY L RRaDENAP Le. 2Tl1 P.O. Box sob CSNtR.II, PoINT OREGON V(602 (bl)ab-4610 CBIL YH-66P2 Hwy ~P pvv P~E4 ~`V Q~ 3]2WIIDD TAX LOT 16200 ~2 WE9TRCPEWAY BROWN CENTRAL PoINT, OR, x]502 3T2WIIDD TAX LOT 16300 DENNIS LEE VAIL 1010 WESTROP WAY CENTRAL POINt, OR. 3T2WI2G TAX LOT 3401 DCN 1'IOLLOY P.O. BO( 5451 CENTRAL POINT, Oft. 9'FA2 ~y 115.0' V~ 1, ~~ ~ PARCEL i> 17607 SF ~~ I I PRF1, OF DRAINFIELD EABEfiENT V546 PG220 '~/ PARCEL 1 '-J W 16791 SF /~{" r n.d ~' `55.a TAZ e~DO Icc9o "~ .$ I za 9Q~ ERRCL PND LINDA ALGER ~ ,~ 556 BEALL LPNE a T LL CENTRAL POINT, LR. 9]501 Iwx " 1 ~o W N 6.a ~ FC `- ~~ PARCEL 4 7700 SF m ( d ~ hol,ae ~o ~ ^ o lav I bI ~` ~ ~ F Y ~ 1 ( ~ ~I d`''CJ''S~ ~ to be Ird~M W N -wM- _ ~ ~~ --wtr .. _ ~_ . fire ~.~~.L- _ . ~^'_""t^' ~7"'~'~~1 ~. _ ' V{ SS ~_ 55 ~_ } hydrmt 01st, E1~~2~Snn s IzEi.vc~ NOTEBi ELEVAilONS ARE BASED CN LITT C£ CENTRAL PoINT DATUhI (FEnA) BENCHttARK UBED IS BRA55 DISC LOX:ATED AT THE SW CORNER OF BRIDGE K ]01 ON BEALL LVIE CROSSING ELK CREEK (ELF 1293.1]) DIRECTION IS BASED ON FILED SURVEY 1464] WATERLINE SRES NOT NOTED LN THE GRCVND WITH LOCATES MEASURED INVERTS GN THE SANITARY SEWER INDICATE LINE HAS rylNlt'IAL FALL EABEI'1ENT5 LISTED IN THE SUBDIVISION GUARlWTEE (V544 PG22B, VII4 PG559, V351 PG2]e) GIVE ND SPECIFK LCLATION AND THUS ARE NOT SWJNN. 37 2W iiDD TAX LOTS 16700, 16800 TAX Lm 6300 PWL GROUT P.O. BOX 8219 f1EDFORD, CR. 97501 NOTE: THIS PARCEL IS CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTIGN AS A SUBDIVISION DEVELOPFiENT \ T- Cmtcline A4ipe ~.~ ~ ~ .-WIF- -1'v--Q-~- ~~ ~~ REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR LVrtGttI KERB K41fNA05XAW m. rt-ilbl t'& `B r:~t 2 E Metlfwd, Or ~r.. c~~ ~9 A Or. UNF p V O K ISNDSEY COURT 1"=260' ~\ 3.84 ACRES AMILY RESIDENTIAL e5G6q aESDUSTRIAI P eR CRESDPEN SPACE 40~W~ EOMES ® M~FRCRES TOTAL SITE AREA=35.79 ACRES (PER COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PLAT RECORDS) (EXCLUDING EXISTING RIGHT OF WAYS) COMMERCIAL 2.43 ACRES CIVIC 1.94 ACRES Exhibit 2 3 PRELIMINAR Y PUD PLAN . LAND USE PLAN CENTRAL POINT. OREGON 802 Nadia Way, (547) 77&0771 Y ~ a tm ' a: City of Central Point PLANNING DEPARTMENT Tom Humphrey, AICP '°'°L°~°~R Planning Director CYty Of CcnLral POint Ken Gerschler ~i ~j~~t~~'T ffB tf Community Planner .d.~ Planning Ilegarkttenl Matt Samitore Community Planner Lisa Morgan Planning Secretary Notice of Meeting Date of Notice: August 12, 2003 Meeting Date: Time: Place: NATURE OF MEETING September 2, 2003 7:00 p.m. (Approximate) Central Point City Hall 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will review a tentative land partition application that would create two lots from two existing parcels. Two lots would be created from a 0.90 acre parcel and Two lots would be created from a 0.42 acre parcel. The parcels are located in the R-2, Two-Family Residential zoning district and are identified in the records of the Jackson County Assessor as Map 37 2W 11DD, Tax Lots 16700 and 16800 CRITERIA FOR DECISION The requirements for Tentative Subdivisions are set forth in Chapter 16 of the Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Provisions, Tentative Plans, Improvements, and Design Standards. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Works Standards. PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Anyperson interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, September 2, 2003. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502. 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. ,~, e- . ~ w.~ 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Ha11,155South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies ofthe same are available at IS cents per page. 5. For additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664- 3321 ext. 292. SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staff reports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the application. City regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. PD Subject 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 ~ (541) 664-3321 ~ Fax: (541) 664-6384 EXN~¢!r "~~! °~ ~ ~~~'~'` A Cit of Central Point ,~ .-~~~~=. o _ ~,ro.., x_ - ~ ,__;; ;.~~ _ z Public Works De artment August 27, 2003 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Public Works Department SUBJECT: Public Hearing -Site Plan Review for 37 2W 11 DD Tax Lots 16,700 & 16,800 Coffin Subdivision Applicant Melvin & Carol Coffin 520 Beall Lane Central Point, Oregon 97502 Owner Melvin & Carol Coffin 520 Beall Lane Central Point, Oregon 97502 Agent Timberline Land Surveying P.O. Box 3064 Central Point, Oregon 97502 Property 37 2W 11 DD Tax Lots 16,700 & 16,800 Description/ Zonin Purpose Robert Pierce Public Works Director Rrck 73arllet! Supervisor CGris Cfayfa! Deputy Direemr Mike Ono Technician Greg craves Technician Karen Roeber Secretary II Margarita Munoz Secretory! Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer") regarding City Public Works Department (PWD) standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed. Gather information from the Developer/Engineer regarding the proposed development. E <r ~;? :~ ~, 2 September 2003 CofSn Subdivision A City of Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report is not intended to replace the City's Standards & Specifications. Staff Reports are written in coordination with the City's Standards & Specifications to form a useful guide. The City's Standards & Specifications should be consulted for any information not contained in a Public Works Staff Report. Coffin Subdivision Standard Specifications and Goals The Central Point Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction" shall govern how public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications from the Public Works Department. Central Point Public Works is committed to working with the Planning Department and developers to assure that all developments are adequately served by public facilities. Public facilities not owned or maintained by the City of Central Point include: Power (PP&L), Gas (Avista), Communications (Qwest), and Sanitary Sewer (BCVSA). In working together it is the Department's expectation that the developer will feel free to call on the Department whenever the standard specifications are not, in the developer's opinion, adequately meeting the needs of the development. The Deparhnent will listen to the developer's concerns and work with the developer to achieve the best outcome. However, the Department is not obligated to assure a profitable development and will not sacrifice quality for the sole purpose of reducing cost to the developer. It is always the developer's obligation to provide the public improvements necessary, as determined by the Public Works Department, to serve the development. The Department and the developer also have an obligation to assure that public facilities are constructed so that other properties are not adversely impacted by the development. Development Plans -Required Information Review of public improvement plans is initiated by the submittal of 3 sets of plans that are at least 95% complete. The plans shall include those of other agencies such as BCVSA or Jackson County Roads Department. Following plan review, the plans will be returned to the Developer's engineer including comments from Public Works Staff. In order to be entitled to further review, the Applicant's Engineer must respond to each comment of the prior review. All submittals and responses to comments must appear throughout the plans to be a realistic attempt to result in complete plan approval. Upon approval, the Applicant's Engineer shall submit (4) copies of the plans to the Department of Public Works. 2 September 2003 Coffin Subdivision In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. Public Works Permit A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued, except Public Works Inspection fees. After project completion during the final plat application process, the Public Works Inspector will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection time to assess the developer. Before the final plat application is processed the developer must pay the relevant inspections fees and bond for any uncompleted improvements (as determined by the Public Works Director). Coffin Subdivision -Plans 1. Three sets of plans at 95% complete stage are to be submitted for review by the Public Works Department 2. Once approval is achieved the Developer shall submit four sets of plans to the Public Works Department for construction records and inspection, including a set of mylar drawings to be stamped, approved, and maintained by the City until final "As-built" drawing are received. 3. The Developer's Engineer shall document changes to the approved drawings made in the field. A mylar and digital copy of the final "as-built" drawings will be required before the final plat application is processed. Coffin Subdivision -Protection of Existir:g Facilities The locations of existing facilities shall be shown on all applicable construction drawings for Public Works projects as follows: 1. The exact locations of underground facilities shall be verified in advance of any public works construction, in cooperation with the public or private utilities involved. 2. All existing underground and surface facilities shall be protected from damage during design and construction of public works projects. 3. Any existing facilities not specifically designated for alteration or removals, which are damaged during construction, shall be restored or replaced to a "same as" or better than condition, at the expense of the Developer. C'4 2 September 2003 Coffin Subdivision 4. Suitable notice shall be given to all public and private utility companies in advance of construction for the purpose of protecting or relocating existing facilities. Coffin Subdivision -Water Connection Water system designs shall consider the existing water system, master plans; neighborhood plans and approved tentative plans. The Developer, Engineer and Contractor shall provide the necessary testing, exploration, survey and research to adequately design water system facilities, which will connect to and be a part of, or an extension of the City water system. 2. All requirements of the Oregon State Plumbing Specialty Code and the Oregon State Health Department, as they pertain to Public Water Systems, shall be strictly adhered to. 3. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of water system related components. Coffin Subdivision: -Streets The Developer's engineer should be aware that certain alternate street standards for the Transit Oriented District and Transit Oriented Corridor might apply to the design and construction of streets in specific areas of the City. These alternate standards are fully described in the Central Point TOD Design Requirements and Guidelines. Street designs shall consider the needs of people with disabilities and the aged, such as visually impaired pedestrians and mobility-impaired pedestrians. Every effort should be made to locate street hardware away from pedestrian locations and provide a surface free of bumps and cracks, which create safety and mobility problems. Smooth access ramps shall be provided where required. All designs shall conform to the current American Disabilities Act (ADA) or as adopted by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The determination of the pavement width and total right-of--way shall be based on the operational needs for each street as determined by a technical analysis. The technical analysis shall use demand volumes that reflect the maximum number of pedestrians, bicyclists, parked vehicles and motorized vehicle traffic expected when the area using the street is fully developed. Technical analysis shall take into consideration, transportation elements of the Comprehensive Plan, TOD, neighborhood plans, approved tentative plans as well as existing commercial and residential developments. All street designs shall be coordinated with the design of other new or existing infrastructure. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of street related components. 2 September 2003 Coffin Subdivision The Developer of the Coffin Subdivision should be prepared to construct property frontage improvements along Beall Lane. Property frontage improvements may include but are not limited to: curb, gutter, sidewalk, right-of--way dedication, half-street improvements, and when applicable, participation in future regional traffic improvements. Coffin Subdivision -Storm Drain It shall be the responsibility of the Developer's Engineer to investigate the drainage area of the project, including the drainage areas of the channels or storm sewers entering and leaving the project area. If a contiguous annexed drainage area of given size exists, the engineer may use information that has formerly been established if it includes criteria for the drainage area at complete development under current zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations. If the City does not have such information, the engineer shall present satisfactory information to support his storm sewerage design. The engineer shall also be required to provide all hydrology and hydraulic computations to the Public Works Department that are necessary to substantiate the storm sewer design. The storm water sewer system design shall be in conformance with applicable provisions of Oregon DEQ, DSL and ODFW and United States COE and consistent with APWA Storm Water Phase II requirements. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of storm drain related components. Coffin Subdivision -Required Submittals All design, construction plans and specifications, and "as-built" drawings shall be prepared to acceptable professional standards as applicable, the Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals and conditions as may be required by other agencies, including, but not limited to Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL), Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) approval for storm drain connection and easement, landscape berms, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ALOE), affected irrigation districts, Rogue Valley Sanitary Service (RVSS), and Jackson County Road and Park Services Department (JC Roads), DSL and ALOE, as applicable (wetland mitigation). 2. Fire District No. 3 must approve all streets and water improvement plans in writing prior to final review by City PWD. 3. During construction, any changes proposed by the Developer shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's Engineer to the City Public Works Department for approval prior to installation. ~.~ EXHIBIT D PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The applicant shall comply with all requirements of affected public agencies and utilities as they pertain to the development of the Coffin Partition. Evidence of such compliance shall be submitted to the City prior to final plat approval. 2. The applicant shall comply with all federal, state and local regulations, standards and requirements applicable to the development and construction of the Coffin Partition. A final plat application shall be filed within one year of the Planning Commission approval or the tentative plan approval shall become null and void. The applicant may request a six month extension with the Planning Department. 8. The 20 foot wide easement shown on Parcel 2 should be extinguished and all parcels shall be connected to a public sewer system. VACpchslACity wideAPlenningV03053.wpd r"~ { ~ ~ ~ see 0 812 7/2 603 :16,;.18! - 82fi45fi6' JCFD3 EUS OFC ~" FAGE 02 SIRE D~STT~ICT No. 3 ,JACKSON COUNTY 8333 AGATE ROAD, WHII"E CITY, OREGON 97503-1075 (541) 826-7100 Ft1X (541) 826-4566 n~a jcfd3.com August 27, 20Q3 Ken Gerschler, Fire District #3 will need complete sets of. plans~to scale for these projects showing fire hydrant locations and access. Thanks, Mark Moran Deputy Fire Marshal ~ :, PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: September 2, 2003 TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: Ken Gerschler, Community Planner SUBJECT: Public Hearing - To consider a Tentative Plan fora 7 lot subdivision known as the Hamrick Business Park, south of Biddle Road in the C-4, C-5 and M-2 zoning districts (Map 37 2W O1C, Tax Lot 800). Applicant/ Owner: USF Reddaway, INC 16227 S.E. 130`h Avenue Clackamas, Oregon 97502 Agent: Hoflbuhr and Associates 3155 Alameda Street, Suite 201 Medford, Oregon 97504 Summary: The applicant has submitted a development proposal to subdivide an existing 34.89 acre parcel into 6 commercial lots and 1 industrial lot. Authority: CPMC 1.24.050 vests the Planning Commission with the authority to hold a public hearing and render a decision on any application for a Tentative Plan. Notice of the Public Hearing was given in accordance with CPMC 1.24.060 ( Attachment "B"). Applicable Law: CPMC 16.10.010 et seq. -Tentative Plans CPMC 17.44 et seq. -C-4, Tourist and Office Professional District CPMC 17.46 et seq. -C-S, Thoroughfare Commercial District CPMC 17.52 et seq. -M-2, Industrial General District Discussion• The applicant USF Reddaway, INC is requesting that the Planning Commission approve a tentative plan to subdivide the parcel containing the existing truck transfer facility into seven individual parcels ranging in size from 2 to 20 acres (Attachment "A"). The truck transfer will retain the largest parcel that is zoned M-2, Industrial General. The M-2 designation is an appropriate classification for the transfer facility. Proposed lots I, 2 and 3 are located within the C-4, Tourist and Office Professional designation. Proposed lots 4, 5 and 6 are zoned C-5, Thoroughfare Commercial. The C-4 and C-5 zoning permits a range of office and commercial activities that could include the construction of a motel and other similar large scale projects. ~' cd Setbacks for the C-4 zone are 10 feet for front lot line, 5 feet on sides plus one-half foot for each foot by which a building height exceeds 20 feet. The rear setback is 10 feet. For the C-5 zone, the front setback is 10 feet, however the area must be maintained as a landscaped strip. Side yards are generally a 5 foot minimum unless the Building Code facilitates the construction of a common wall at the property line. There is no rear yard setback for this application in the C-5 zone district. With the exception of the existing Reddaway truck transfer facility, the balance of the area under consideration is vacant. There is a large berm currently positioned at a point approxirnately 400 feet south of Biddle Road and serves as a noise buffer between the transfer facility and the Central Point East subdivision which is located on the north side of Biddle Road. The Planning Department recommends that the Planning Commission require the berm to remain as-is (unless a compatible alternative is proposed) and that the cross access easements serving lots 1 through 6 be positioned north of the berm. The applicant depicts cross access easements that provide the sole access for parcels I through 6 and connect the project area to Biddle Road (East Pine Street) and Hamrick Road. The Planning Department recommends a condition that encourages the applicant to work with adjoining land owners in establishing the connection of the cross access easements and private roads in a manner that all traffic circulates safely and efficiently. The Planning and Public Works Departments have discussed the access issue and determined that the most feasible solution in the area would include a cul de sac at the east terminus of this partition and a connection to Biddle Road that aligns with Meadowbrook Drive (Attachment "C ") A special traffic study may be required in the area at the request of the City or County prior to development of any roadway improvements that ties into public facilities. The County is currently planning and engineering the construction of large-scale capital improvements along Table Rock Road, some of which may include the installation of concrete meridians that could severely limit turning movements on all properties in this area. These changes emphasize the need for the City and property owners to work together in finding a solution. Please refer to the Public Works Staff Report (Attachment "D") for details and recommendations and requirements. The Rogue River Valley Irrigation District, Jackson County Fire District Number 3 and the Rogue Valley Sewer Services (RVSS) have been notified of this tentative subdivision. RVSS will work with the applicant in the design of infrastructure and tie the development into existing sewer facilities in the vicinity. Fire Officials will require that the applicant provide a copy of maps with hydrant location for review by the district. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Staff suggests the following findings of fact and conclusions of law as applicable to the project and necessary for its approval. ~l CPMC 17.20.010 establishes minimum area, width and access requirements for the C-4, Tourist and Office Professional, C-5, Thoroughfare Commercial and M-2, Industrial General Districts 1. The project site is located in the C-4, Tourist and Office Professional, C-5, Thoroughfare Commercial and M-2, Industrial General Districts and consists of a tentative plan application for the subdivision of approximately 34.89 acres into 7 separate lots, the boundaries of which coincide with the various zoning districts. CPMC 16.10.010 requires that applications for tentative plans be submitted with improvement plans and other supplementary information as may be needed to indicate the development plan. 2. The Planning and Public Works Departments have reviewed both the tentative plan for the proposed subdivision and the findings of fact and determined that the project meets all City standards and requirements subject to the recommended conditions found in Attachments "D" and "E". Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following action: 1. Adopt Resolution No., approving the tentative subdivision subject to the recommended conditions of approval; or 2. Deny the tentative subdivision; or 3. Continue the review of the tentative subdivision at the discretion of the Commission. Attachments: A. Copy of Tentative Plat B. Notice of Public Hearing C. Internal Traffic Circulation Map D. Public Works Staff Report E. Planning Department Recommended Conditions of Approval \\Cpchsl\City Wide\Pianning\03054.wpd ',A F" 1 C~' E ~~€~ ~~~;~~~ ~ ~ba ICI `"{ i e iii r;! ----! -,~ I;I it' I 1 I' I~,~ ICI ~: ~ I I~ :~ ~ ~ I i R pt' L 1 IJ. b ~s t~ ~~` ._. , ~-rr---~ I ii I I P~ I ~ I~ J I-i--- is t= rs ~,w ~0 IiY ~ io I<4 ~_~-~. i`' Y s: I ~. ~ a , ( I = ~ i ~ ~ j I 1 ', ~o I ' I ~ ` s s. 1 •i I . II I I I I I I I II . I . _ . i ( i ~ it~ I i _ t ' E~ I I ( I I i ~ I - - - ~ I L I L= _ I =1= _ =__-_- ~ _ ~ -1 -- - -~- --t.~ ~ .~, - ~~ or c~n,~ai Point. `SIT t~Att Planning Department' I ~~`~ ~__ . I rT-~ '` ' i I I '~I~I I I II I I I~iii~ ~ II I I ~ I I I I QI f I I ~ I ~~TI T u°. I ~~- -~- J I (-TTY ~-~s \o ~' ~ ~~ rev ~. I ~~ I ~~~ - I I i I I I ~ « .if~ I t ~ I L__ 5 4 -~ S s _ t '° m D 3 'i~~ ~ ~€°~ g ax ~ So~€ ~ a a e ~Q~~ 4 a~'E cQO ~ ~ 3 ~s rg [ S~dt' l m~ N Z . _- ~^ - - m o m --- -- _ .._ _._ -- ..... _._ F -- ._..__..__ P A = z _ _ _ ~N - _-. n0,'n _ _ .._ @__ G s Y .n. D - &9 Cz ty o~ Central Porn t PLANNING DE'PARTME'NT 'I'otn Humphrey, AICP Planning Director Ken Gerschler Community Planner Matt Samitore Community Planner Dave Arkens Planning Technician Notice of Public Meeting Date of Notice: August 12, 2003 Meeting Date: Time: Place: September 2, 2003 7:00 p.m. (Approximate) Central Point City Hall 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon NATURE OF MEETING GYty of Central Point E~HISI`I' ttBtf Planning Department Beginning atthe abovetime andplace, the Central Point Planning Commissionwill review an application for a seven lot commercial and industrial subdivision known as the Hamrick Business Pazk. The subject parcel is in C-4, Tourist and Office Professional, C-5, Thoroughfare Commercial, and M-2, Industrial General Districts and is identified intherecords ofthe Jackson CountyAssessor as Map 37 2W O1C, Tax Lot 800 The Central PointPlanning Commission will review thetentafiveplan applica6onto detemuneifall ofthe requirements of the Central Point Municipal Code can beinet. Ifthe Commission determines that the application meets the City's standazds, an approval could be issued . CRITERIA FOR DECISION Therequirements fortentativepartitions aresetforth inChapters 16 and 17 ofthe Central Point Municipal Code, relating to General Information and conditions on the project approval. PUBLIC COMMENTS Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, September 2, 2003. 2. Written comments maybe sent in advance ofthe meeting to Central Point CityHa11,155 South ay Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502. __ 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the - expiration ofthe commentperiod noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. CopiesofallevidencerelieduponbytheapplicantareavailableforpublicreviewatCityHa11,155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page. 5. For additional information, thepublicmaycontactthePlanningDepartmentat(541)664-3321 ext. 292. SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE Atthemeeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staffreports, heartestimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. Any testimonyor written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commissionmayapprove ordenythetentative application as submitted. Cityregulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. (~) 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 ~ (541)-664-3321 • Fax::(541) 664-6384 ~~~ne- ~~~~~ 1 1 ~- ~~~ 1~~ 1 ss f~ r` plann~~ Fsep hJ ~ 1 1'll ~~~t ,~- __ i'~ l a`' ~ ,, ~ li,` a ~ 11, 1 f(\ t Yf 1~'~ '{~} ~, ~_.,.--- ~ ,~~, ,1 1 {5 ~ ~' 11 11 11 ~ ~ I 5. ~ 1 t~ ~ 1 ~~ ~ ~ 1 1 a .. ' 1 1 1 1 rr w ~} Q 1 1 II l' ~ -~1-r iii ' _ i r~T s 1~ ; ~~ ~ -'r.m 1 l , p M ~~ ~~,,~ Y 11 ~ ~ t ~~~EEE J < t~ ~~~ ~a 1.; ~4 11! ` M ~ ~ `I !~ ~, 1 ~ E ~ ~ i 1111 s ~~ 11 ~ i ~ t 1 1 ._.J ~ `- . -- - v r ~ ~=~~ ~ ,~~~ ens, S°rcLD~ m ~ ~ ~Rb.~ ~ `a 76 ~i _`~"r _.. ~ GP 4"~2_ B6;• f 4. __. _" ~~ ~ ~ ~ m x ~""' 8°mx~~ s . n m ; ~ p ~~~~o ~ < fi x Q~~~ ~b u~ a~ ~ .. o~ y~ August 27, 2003 m~ ,~¢ pity of Central Point-- Public Works Department TO: Planning Commission FROM: Public Works Department CSity of Central ~'oitt ~X~~~gT' tt~ tt Planning Department Robert Pierce Public Works Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing -Site Plan Review for 37 2W Ol C Tax Lot 800 Hamrick Business Pazk Ap lip cant USF Reddaway 16277 S.E. 130'a Avenue Clackamas, Oregon 97015 Owner USF Reddaway 16277 S.E. 130a` Avenue Clackamas, Oregon 97015 Agent Hoflbuhr & Associates, INC. 3155 Alameda Street, Suite 201 Medford, Oregon 97504 Prouerty 37 2W Ol C Tax Lot 800 Description/ Zonine Purpose Rick Bar(!ea Supervisor Chrir Clayton Degrty Director Mike Ono Technician Creg Graves Technician Karen Roeber Secretary l7 Margarita Munoz Secretary I Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer") regarding City Public Works Department (PWD) standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed. Gather information from the DeveloperBngineer regarding the proposed development. A City of Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report is not intended to replace the City's Standards & Specifications. Staff Reports are written in coordination with the City's Standards & Specifications to form a useful guide. The ---- City's Standazds & Specifications should be consulted for any information not contained in a Public Works Staff Report. ~? 2 September 2003 -- Hamrick Business Park Hamrick Business Park Standard Specifccatioe:saad Goals The Central Point Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastructure, including streets, waterworks, and storm water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction" shall govern how public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications from the Public Works Department. Central Point Public Works is committed to working with the Planning Department and developers to assure that all developments are adequately served by public facilities. Public facilities not owned or maintained by the City of Central Point include: Power (PP&L), Gas (Avista), Communications (Qwest), and Sanitary Sewer (BCVSA). In working together it is the Department's expectation that the developer will feel free to call on the Department whenever the standard specifications are not, in the developer's opinion, adequately meeting the needs of the development. The Department will listen to the developer's concerns and work with the developer to achieve the best outcome. However, the Department is not obligated to assure a profitable development and will not sacrifice quality for the sole purpose of reducing cost to the developer. It is always the developer's obligation to provide the public improvements necessary, as determined by the Public Works Deparhnent, to serve the development. The Department and the developer also have an obligation to assure that public facilities are constructed so that other properties are not adversely impacted by the development. Development Places -Required Information Review of public improvement plans is initiated by the submittal of 3 sets of plans that are at least 95% complete. The plans shall include those of other agencies such as BCVSA or Jackson County Roads Department. Following plan review, the plans will be returned to the Developer's engineer including comments from Public Works Staff. In order to be entitled to further review, the Applicant's Engineer must respond to each comment of the prior review. All submittals and responses to comments must appeaz throughout the plans to be a realistic attempt to result in complete plan approval. Upon approval, the Applicant's Engineer shall submit (4) copies of the plans to the Department of Public Works. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. ~3 2 September 2003 Hamrick Business Park Public Works Permit A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works perniit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued, except Public Works Inspection fees. After project completion during the final plat application process, the Public Works Inspector will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection time to assess the developer. Before the final plat application is processed the developer must pay the relevant inspections fees and bond for any uncompleted improvements (as determined by the Public Works Director). Hamrick Business Park -Plans 1. Three sets of plans at 95% complete stage are to be submitted for review by the Public Works Department 2. Once approval is achieved the Developer shall submit four sets of plans to the Public Works Department for construction records and inspection, including a set of mylar drawings to be stamped, approved, and maintained by the City until final "As-built" drawing are received. 3. The Developer's Engineer shall document changes to the approved drawings made in the field. A mylar and digital copy of the final "as-built" drawings will be required before the final plat application is processed. Hamrick Business Park -Protection of Existing Facilities The locations of existing facilities shall be shown on all applicable construction drawings for Public Works projects as follows: 1. The exact locations of underground facilities shall be verified in advance of any public works construction, in cooperation with the public or private utilities involved. 2. All existing underground and surface facilities shall be protected from damage during design and construction of public works projects. Any existing facilities not specifically designated for alteration or removals, which are damaged during construction, shall be restored or replaced to a "same as" or better than condition, at the expense of the Developer. 4. Suitable notice shall be given to all public and private utility companies in advance of construction for the purpose of protecting or relocating existing facilities. ~~ 2 September 2003 - Hamrick Business Park Hamrick Business Park- Water Connection Water system designs shall consider the existing water system, master plans; neighborhood plans and approved tentative plans. The Developer, Engineer and Contractor shall provide the necessary testing, exploration, survey and research to adequately design water system facilities, which will connect to and be a part of, or an extension of the City water system. 2. All requirements of the Oregon State Plumbing Specialty Code and the Oregon State Health Department, as they pertain to Public Water Systems, shall be strictly adhered to. 3. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of water system related components. Hamrick Business Park -Streets 1. The Developer's engineer should be aware that certain alternate street standards for the Transit Oriented District and Transit Oriented Corridor might apply to the design and construction of streets in specific azeas of the City. These alternate standards are fully described in the Central Point TOD Design Requirements and Guidelines. Street designs shall consider the needs of people with disabilities and the aged, such as visually impaired pedestrians and mobility-impaired pedestrians. Every effort should be made to locate street hardware away from pedestrian locations and provide a surface free of bumps and cracks, which create safety and mobility problems. Smooth access ramps shall be provided where required. All designs shall conform to the current American Disabilities Act (ADA) or as adopted by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The determination of the pavement width and total right-of--way shall be based on the operational needs for each street as determined by a technical analysis. The technical analysis shall use demand volumes that reflect the maximum number of pedestrians, bicyclists, parked vehicles and motorized vehicle traffic expected when the azea using the street is fully developed. Technical analysis shall take into consideration, transportation elements of the Comprehensive Plan, TOD, neighborhood plans, approved tentative plans as well as existing commercial and residential developments. All street designs shall be coordinated with the design of other new or existing infrastructure. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regazding the design and construction of street related components. ~J 2 September 2003 Hamrick Business Park The Developer's engineer should be prepared to consult and coordinate the street design of the proposed development with City Public Works and Planning staff. The street geometry indicated on the tentative plan does not necessarily represent the final design. Final approval of improvement plans, including street design, geometry, and configuration shall be at the sole discretion of the City of Central Point. 4. The Developer of the Hamrick Business Park should be prepared to construct property frontage improvements along both Hamrick Road and Biddle Road. Property frontage improvements may include but are not limited to: curb, gutter, sidewalk, right-of--way dedication, half-street improvements, and when applicable, participation in future regional traffic improvements. Hmnrick Business Park -Storrs: Drain It shall be the responsibility of the Developer's Engineer to investigate the drainage area of the project, including the drainage azeas of the channels or storm sewers entering and leaving the project azea. If a contiguous annexed drainage area of given size exists, the engineer may use information that has formerly been established if it includes criteria for the drainage azea at complete development under current zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations. If the City does not have such information, the engineer shall present satisfactory information to support his storm sewerage design. The engineer shall also be required to provide all hydrology and hydraulic computations to the Public Works Department that are necessary to substantiate the storm sewer design. The storm water sewer system design shall be in conformance with applicable provisions of Oregon DEQ, DSL and ODFW and United States COE and consistent with APWA Storm Water Phase II requirements. 2. The City of Central Point Public Works Standards & Specifications should be consulted for specific information regarding the design and construction of storm drain related components. Hmreriek Business Park -Required Submittals All design, construction plans and specifications, and "as-built" drawings shall be prepared to acceptable professional standards as applicable, the Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals and conditions as may be required by other agencies, including, but not limited to Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL), Oregon Deparhnent of Transportation (ODOT) approval for storm drain connection and easement, landscape berms, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ALOE), affected irrigation districts, Rogue Valley Sanitary Service (RVSS), and Jackson County Road and Park Services Department (JC Roads), DSL and ACOE, as applicable (wetland mitigation). b~ 2-September 2003 Hamrick Business Park 2. Fire District No. 3 must approve all streets and water improvement plans in writing prior to final review by City PWD. 3. During construction, any changes proposed by the Developer shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's Engineer to the City Public Works Department for approval prior to installation. ~~ EXHIBIT E PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The applicant shall comply with all requirements of affected public agencies and utilities as they pertain to the development of the Hamrick Business Park. Evidence of such compliance shall be submitted to the City prior to final plat approval. 2. The applicant shall comply with all federal, state and local regulations, standards and requirements applicable to the development and construction of the Hamrick Business Park. 4. A final plat application shall be filed within one year of the Planning Commission approval or the tentative plan approval shall become null and void. The applicant may request a twelve month extension with the Planning Department. The existing earthen berm located north of the Reddaway transfer facility shall remain as-is unless a comparable alternative is found acceptable to the City. 6. The new road that will serve the proposed lots 1 through 6 will eventually be connected to Table Rock Road and therefore the applicant shall work adjoining parcel owners in planning the connection. \\Cpchsl\City Wide\Ptanning\03054.wpd